Author Archives: admin

Webcurios 21/03/25

Reading Time: 31 minutes

 

Have any of you seen The Years at the theatre in London? If so, did YOU have someone faint in your performance of it? Because, seemingly, it’s happening at every show and I refuse to believe it’s not a plant because, honestly, there is no way that some stage blood and a bit of abortion chat is enough to make someone require medical assistance.  I am now a fake-fainting truther and nothing will persuade me otherwise (unless it just so happens that one of you was in fact taken ill, in which case apologies for mocking your presumed lack of fortitude).

Anway, I am out of introductory inspiration this week so you’ll just have to crack straight on with the links while I go and wash all this internet off me.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you should call me if you’re reading this.

By He Wei

WE OPEN THIS WEEK WITH SOME BREAKS AND RAVE AND TWO HOURS OF MUSIC GUARANTEED TO BLOW AWAY WHATEVER REMAINING COBWEBS ARE LINGERING WITHIN YOUR SKULL!

THE SECTION WHICH INVENTED THE CONCEPT OF ‘VIBE-SCRYING’ IN THE PUB YESTERDAY AND IS NOW DESPERATELY TRYING TO REMEMBER WHAT THE FCUK IT MEANT, PT.1:

  • The Fourth HTML Review: One of my favourite ever online projects is BACK for its fourth edition! The latest edition of the HTML Review – featured repeatedly in Curios over the past few years, and, lest you forget, self-described as ‘literature made to exist on the web’ – dropped overnight, and given its relative newness I was only able to spend 15 minutes with it this morning c. 620am before I was forced to start, you know, GETTING ON WITH ALL THE TYPING AND STUFF. Still, even a relatively cursory examination of the contents suggests that this is another beautiful collection of…fcuk, ok, let me try and, for once, muster some sort of accurate description of what the fcuk this is, in an attempt to entice those of you as-yet unfamiliar…OK, so the HTML Review is, once again, a collection of pieces of writing of various forms, by a collection of digital artists and authors, each of which features code as a fundamental, inherent part – none of these…essays, poems, vignettes, ‘interactive text experiments’, whatever you want to call them, would work (or at least not in the same way) were they rendered as static text on a page, and as such they offer a glimpse of some of the communicative and artistic possibilities afforded by simple, in-browser HTML. So you have a series of reflections on all the bedrooms in which one author has lived, rendered in ASCII with accompanying hover-over images; you have a flowing river of interactions centred around the authorial ‘I’; you have at least one piece that made me ever so slightly lose my sh1t, to the point that I had to go and quickly wash my face and have a word with myself because it is TOO EARLY TO CRY, there are meditations on hypertext and communication, a plea from one artist to all of us to help him store his files, and, for reasons I can’t quite get my head around yet, a short essay that is also an interactive marimba. As soon as I finish writing Curios this week I am going to open this back up again and spend some proper time with each of these, and, honestly, if you only really pay attention to one link this week I would strongly suggest you make it this one – I can’t stress enough how much I adore the way in which words and code work together in every single one of these examples, and how each single…essay? Work? Whatever, each single ELEMENT is in and of itself beautiful and interesting and curious and perfect. Did I mention I love this? I love this.
  • EXPTV: When I was at University there was a bar in Manchester that we occasionally used to end up in because a) it was open late; and b) it sold absinthe, which occasionally seemed like a good idea at 2am. It was called the FAB Cafe (which I think still exists), and was all decked out with slightly kitsch B Movie posters and props and was, in pretty much every respect, a slightly-ridiculous place. Which, I appreciate, means NOTHING to you and which you could probably have done without, but, well, it’s MY newsletter and they are MY memories, so wevs. Anyway, the reason I bring that up is because EXPTV – a website which basically runs a seemingly-infinite video stream of ODD STUFF, very much of the sort which you might have seen soundlessly playing on a small TV in a corner somewhere in the aforementioned FAB Cafe while a man in full juggalo-style facepaint made with the teaspoons and sugarcubes. It’s quite hard to get a handle on the specifics of what you’ll see if you watch this – the description goes with “EXP TV is a live tv channel broadcasting an endless stream of obscure media and video ephemera…EXP TV’s daytime block is “Video Breaks”–a video collage series featuring wild, rare, unpredictable, and ever-changing archival clips touching on every subject imaginable. The nighttime block starts at 10pm and features specialty themed video mixes and deep dives” – but based on the brief glimpses I’ve had it might best be described as ‘goth-adjacent kitsch, with a vague sort of horror-psychedelia flavour’. Does that appeal? Does that even make sense? IT DOES NOT MATTER EXPERIMENT AND LIVE A LITTLE. This is PURE VIBE, basically – whether the vibe is to your liking is of course for you and you alone to decide.
  • TV Garden: Sticking with the telly, seeing as we’re here, I am slightly astonished not to have featured TV Garden before – despite my best efforts, it seems I am yet to see ALL of the internet. This is, honestly, a fcuking AMAZING resource – basically, via what I presume is some sort of DARK MAGIC, this website offers you the means to watch seemingly every single TV channel in the entire world via the magic of HTML. Choose your country, and then select from literally THOUSANDS of TV stations which you can stream for free to your heart’s content. I am not *entirely* sure that there’s not something hooky going on here – I am pretty sure that the BBC wouldn’t be wholly pro so many of its channels being made freely available to a global audience like this, for example – but, well, INFORMATION (or, in this case, telly) WANTS TO BE FREE! Honestly, I spent a really pleasing/slightly odd 30 minutes earlier this week working with Italian daytime TV on in the background for a comforting hit of weirdly-familial nostalgia, and as a quick means of taking a cultural temperature check of anywhere you can think of in the world this is pretty much unparalleled. SINCERE WARNING: this is potentially horribly addictive, and I say that as a non-TV person; I nearly lost myself to Laotian QVC just now, so caveat emptor.
  • Seemingly All of the World’s Video: Another ‘hang on, I *must* have linked to this at some point over the past 15 years’ moment – except, apparently, I haven’t. The Internet Archive has, as you might expect, a LOT of video on it; this link takes you to basically the root directory for all of it. THERE IS SO MUCH HERE! It’s a huge, sprawling, slightly-inchoate mess, but, equally, SO MUCH STUFF! 11,700 videos tagged ‘comedy central’! Loads of Chaplin films! Digitised children’s films ripped of 80s VHS tapes! ALL OF THE OLD DISNEY FILMS, BEFORE THE MOUSE DECIDED TO DO WEIRD REMASTERS OF EVERYTHING! This is searchable, but, also, it’s the sort of thing that just rewards you scrolling through and marvelling at the sheer scale and scope – some of this stuff you will be able to find on YouTube, fine, but so much of it feels like the sort of thing that you could only really find here, and it’s another wonderful example of the importance and public-spiritedness of this sort of archival project (and also I have just stumbled across a full rip of a 2018 anime called, spectacularly, “I Want To Eat Your Pancreas”, and who doesn’t love that? NO FCUKER, etc).
  • Steal My TESLA: I was disappointed to see two Teslas on Soho Square yesterday afternoon and to note that neither of them had been defaced or vandalised in the slightest – London, please, up your game! Steal My Tesla is a site/service (joke?) established by a Shadowy Network in the US, offering Tesla owners feeling regretful of their purchase or fearful that said purchase will be torched, and struggling to offload the vehicle on the used car market, the chance to get their car nicked for them and sold on the black market, so the original owners can claim on the insurance and everyone is happy. Except, obviously, this is a joke – but one which, to be honest, feels like a viable idea should anyone want to make it reality.
  • What Have They Done Now?: Politics AND vibecoding! Patrick Tanguay of Sentiers got The Machine to spin up the code for this site, which neatly aggregates all the recent headlines about whatever the fcuk Those Fcuking Men have been up to – per Patrick’s description, “If you’re like me, you’ll have moments during the day where you wonder, “what have they done now?” I then usually head to CNN or the BBC to see what fresh hell they have thought up. Instead, you can just look this page up, it aggregates mentions of #trump, #musk, #DOGE, and #tariffs from The New York Times, BBC, The Guardian, The Globe and Mail, Al Jazeera, and WIRED.” Obviously you don’t need another place to keep informed as to all the ways in which the oligarch class is seeking to reshape the world to its own ends, but this is interesting partly as a nice example of a neat, simple bit of AI-generated webwork but also as a stark reminder of the sheer volume of fcuking NOISE being generated by these cnuts.
  • PoetiCal:  More words and code! PoetiCal is a gorgeous project, describing itself as ‘an experimental, collaborative publication only accessible through a calendar app’ – users (like you!) are invited to submit texts for consideration to the project (what sort of texts? These sorts: “original and inventive writing, in any form: short texts, poems, experimental pieces, diary entries, micro-essays, prose poetry, stream-of-consciousness writing, dialogues, aphorisms, memoir snippets, dream logs, travel observations, shopping lists, love letters, character sketches, found text, erasure poetry, conceptual writing, surrealist descriptions, automatic writing, creative code, visual/concrete poetry, personal manifestos, brief literary criticism, historical fiction, nature and urban sketches, hybrid genres, and text-based art.”), along with a date on which you would like it published; on the other side, users can sync their calendar (Google, Apple, Outlook, etc) with PoetiCal, thereby ensuring that they’ll have access to new works as and when they are published. This is SUCH a clever idea, using the basic functionality of the calendar app as a means of delivering art on a sporadic basis, and I love the idea of opening your calendar one morning and discovering that, along with the colonoscopy appointment and the reminder to CALL MATT, you have been gifted a poem or an essay or some other small piece of writing by a stranger somewhere in the world. This is *such* an interesting use of the functionality and I am very charmed by it.
  • Touch Grass: An app which is designed specifically to encourage you to GET THE FCUK OUTSIDE – the gimmick here is that you can set the app to lock you out of your phone’s apps until you have proved to it via the medium of photographic evidence that you have, indeed, been outside and TOUCHED GRASS. Upload a photo of you TOUCHING GRASS and get access to all your lovely phonegubbins again, so you can continue ignoring nature and the real, messy, dirty physical world in favour of 1s and 0s and safety and control! I like this, but also like the idea of building variants on it that require the user to complete increasingly unhinged and humiliating challenges in order to get their privileges back, like a sort of low-stakes MrBeast where, rather than winning a million quid, you just get the ability to order food and text your mates again (unrelated, but I saw poor, dead-eyed Jimmy Donaldson described as ‘normcore Jigsaw’ this week which is possibly perfect).
  • Campseek: Via Kris over at Naive, Campseek is a really clever idea, using a sort of ‘friends of friends’-type mechanic to help with new music discovery. It’s a really simple premise – Campseek lets you see what other fans of a particular band have been listening to on Bandcamp, in the general ‘well, if we both like X then maybe I will also like some of your other tastes too’ sense. You can plug in the specific Bandcamp urls of specific artists or albums, or otherwise just plug in genre tags to get a broader, less-specific set of recommendations, and there’s something really lovely about the way that the interface maps where the community of ‘other people who liked this and what they in turn also liked’ are in the world. This could, if you were feeling curious, be a whole afternoon’s new musical discovery and is a really excellent way of discovering new music (and for deciding that the simple fact of sharing one interest with someone in no way guarantees that you will like ANYTHING else they’re into).
  • Not Great News For The Ad Industry: This is…I think it’s prototypical and proof-of-concept rather than being an Actual Thing That Really Works, but, well, I am not wholly sure. Hongos is a new project by Samim, which basically uses a bunch of different variants of The Machine, workflowed together in smart ways, to create a start-to-finish pipeline for the creation of AI videos of…surprisingly-high-quality. “HONGOS is an open-source AI video production tool that generates everything from a single prompt: script, images, voices, videos, and final edits. It produces complete, professional-quality videos on any topic—whether for ads, social media, or more. By utilizing advanced AI models, HONGOS transforms what once took weeks and thousands of dollars into a process that takes minutes and costs under $8 per 30sec clip.” Basically, you feed this with a single prompt and, if you like, a starting image, and the workflow will turn that into a script, video, music and v/o, JUST LIKE THAT. Obviously there are skipfuls of salt to take with any of these things – I would be amazed if the ratio of hits to misses spat out by this is any better than 1:1000 – but its undeniable that the examples on-page are…honestly, actually pretty good, not least the scriptwork which feels significantly better than most Machinework you see. It’s worth spending a few minutes on the page and watching a few of the examples – if you work in corporate video then maybe have a stiff drink on hand to suck on when the ‘oh dear god what is to become of us all?’ fantods become too much to bear.
  • Elimar: LMI is a company which, apparently, does ‘data’-type work in and around the arts and with arts inititutions – part of which, seemingly, is pigment analysis of old masters for museums, estates and the like. As a sort of business card, they have produced this VERY shiny website detailing work they have undertaken on a lesser-known work by Van Gogh, known as ‘Elimar’ – this is a really nice piece of webwork which gives you some surprisingly good background on the painter and his works and his style, and about the titilar painting, and which Taught Me Stuff, and which is beautiful and slick and really really shiny…and which left me utterly, totally baffled as to what the fcuk it is that LMI actually *does*. Still, I am not the target audience and as such my bafflement is entirely by-the-by – ENJOY THE LOVELY SCROLLYWORK!
  • Very Cool Tutorials: A TikTok account which posts Minecraft tutorials but done in the style of surprisingly decent trap songs (and I say this as someone who knows nothing about minecraft and who really doesn’t have any time for this sort of music). Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT?
  • Creative Coding Crafts: Are YOU based in London? Do YOU like code and creativity? GREAT! “We are a London-based and online community dedicated to making space for creativity – physical space, head space, collaboration space. A playground for exploring the tools, ideas, and experiments that live at the intersection of code and art. In concrete terms, we’re looking at browser-based sketches (p5.js, Three.js, d3.js, GSAP, etc.), using physical tools like pen plotters and circuits, and occasionally exploring the weird and wonderful edges of creative expression – like quantum computers’ involvement in music.” The website collects coding resources that might be of use, a book club, details of upcoming events…this is not my sort of thing, but I get the impression that it might be some of yours.
  • Into the Amazon: Another LOVELY piece of webwork, this by National Geographic, telling the story of the Amazon river in a gorgeous, interactive, instructive and, crucially, really interesting way; it takes as its starting point the mountains from which the Amazon starts and takes you through down into the rainforest, telling you about the flora and fauna and geography, and overall this is SUPERB and worth 10 minutes of your time.
  • ThreadsInside: This is quite a clever idea I think – using The Machine, this website offers ‘podcasts’ based on interesting forum threads from around the web, giving you short, bitesized, interesting listening experiences derived from the weird, expert corners of the geekweb. You know how occasionally you will find literally the best and most expert advice or opinion on something in a years-old thread on the Garfield community forums (for example)? Well, that – but in podcast form! Ok, so obviously the pods are all machine generated and so as such your mileage may vary here, but the concept is smart and curious, and I like the breadth of topics they have for you to explore (examples include “How could I safely contact drug cartels?” and, er, the pros and cons of owning a laundromat).
  • Missing Tooth Claim Form: A truly charming little bit of internet, this – per this story in last weekend’s Guardian, Seamas O’Reilly’s son lost a tooth but accidentally swallowed it, leaving a slight problem – how to claim the owed monies from the tooth fairy? O’Reilly’s immediate, flustered response was to suggest to the kid that you needed to ‘fill out a form’, which led to him then having to craft said form in Photoshop to prove to the child that he was in fact going by the book – so, obviously, someone took that gag and ran with it, and has now mocked up an excellent and very convincing UK Government webpage where you too can now download an ‘official’ copy of form TF-230 (DO YOU SEE???). This is, honestly, just really cute and even someone as desperately broken as me can’t find anything to snark at here.

By Alex Colville

NEXT UP IT IS THE RETURN OF FORMER EDITOR PAUL WITH A MIX OF RELATIVELY-MINIMAL TECHNO WHICH IS JUST THE RIGHT SIDE OF ‘AUSTERE’!

THE SECTION WHICH INVENTED THE CONCEPT OF ‘VIBE-SCRYING’ IN THE PUB YESTERDAY AND IS NOW DESPERATELY TRYING TO REMEMBER WHAT THE FCUK IT MEANT, PT.2:

  • Liquid Shape Distortions: This is hypnotic and rather lovely; abstract, vaguely-liquid patterns, in a slightly 60s-psychedelia-inflected style; click the randomise button until you find one that pleases you particularly and then drop a tab and zone out for 8 hours (NB – it is not in fact necessary to do acid to appreciate this, but I imagine that the two experiences might be at least briefly complementary, at least until the gnawing existential fear starts).
  • Newsreel: On the one hand, it does feel quite important to have at least a vague handle on ‘what is going on right now’; on the other, given ‘what is going on right now’, it’s also not wholly surprising that growing numbers of people, particularly younger people, are deciding that, actually, they could possibly do without the 24 litany of rolling horror being fired into their faces at a million miles an hour ALL THE FCUKING TIME. Still, it’s fair to say that the increasingly-fractured news landscape and the replacement of ‘traditional’ (some might say ‘reputable’) sources with influencers and people talking STRIDENTLY and with STRONG OPINIONS about thing they don’t necessarily know the first tfcuking thing about isn’t, perhaps, an unalloyed Good For Humanity – which is why Newsreel has launched, attempting to offer news in a format which ‘fits peoples lives’. Look, I don’t mean to be cynical about this, but I think I can remember half a dozen similar projects over the past decade or so, none of which have managed to outlast the VC money runway that birthed them, and I remain unconvinced that this is going to fix the problem – I am unsure at this point whether the whole ‘news reticence’ thing is a format issue so much as a ‘what is the point of paying attention to this given my sense of agency is so utterly diminished?’ issue. Still, in case you’re curious, “Newsreel reimagines news for a generation drowning in distraction. Our app is designed to deliver news in a radically different way—interactive, multimodal, and built for today’s attention spans. Think of us as what would happen if the best parts of social media and legacy news had a baby. No long articles, no endless feeds. No overwhelm, no confusion.” It’s waitlist-only, and as far as I can tell is following the Facebook model of a slow rollout across US colleges, but if you’re curious as to what the latest iteration of ‘the news, but less boring and, you know, like Insta!’ looks like then you might want to sign up and see.
  • Dearly Blossom: You may have seen this floating across your feed this week, but in case not this is possibly the most joyful TikTok channel I have ever seen, ever. Would you like a selection of videos in which a fluffy, pink, Muppet-like puppet mimes and scats and dances to jazz? YES YOU WOULD! Honestly, this is so so so so good – I can’t quite explain what it is about the puppetry, but it’s SO charming, like Henson-level good, and the singing and the movement and the whole personality that comes through here is glorious and, basically, it reminded me of all the best things about oldschool Sesame Street. I promise you that if this doesn’t make you smile then you are, sadly, almost certainly dead.
  • The World Photography Organisation Awards 2025: Photographs! Of things! From around the world! There is a wonderful variance of styles and subject matters here, from architecture to portraiture to documentary photography, and it’s worth digging through the individual categories as there are some glorious shots buried in here.
  • The Data Rescue Project: It feels, frankly, preposterous that this even need be a thing, and yet here we are. “The Data Rescue Project is a coordinated effort among a group of data organizations, including IASSIST, RDAP, and members of the Data Curation Network. Our goal is to serve as a clearinghouse for data rescue-related efforts and data access points for public US governmental data that are currently at risk” – so, basically, this is a public project seeking to guard potentially significant troves of US State data from being wiped by the new administration. I appreciate that hyperbole is unhelpful when talking about What Is Happening, but it does rather feel that ‘destruction of historical datasets and governmental records’ isn’t something that happens in a healthy, functioning democratic state and, in fact, that it’s what tends to happen it states that are in fact the opposite of functioning and democratic..
  • Hallow: I went to Catholic school as a kid – there were loads of Italian and Polish immigrants where I grew up, so one of the local state schools was papist to accommodate those of us spawned from foreigners – and as such, despite being very much the opposite of a Man of Faith, I have a reasonable grounding in the basics of Church doctrine and the Christian religion. Which is why I am not 100% certain that Hallow – an app for prayer – is…maybe *wholly* Godly. One of the things about praying, you see, is that, famously, you can do it anywhere and it can take any form, and that basically it’s an expression of faith which is entirely personal and between you and your God…so exactly why one might need assistance with the whole ‘praying’ thing from an app and, er, Mark Wahlberg. Still, sign up and you get access to LOADS OF PRAYERS! And, er, some Wahlberg-related content! And the opportunity to PAY TO PRAY, with an annual subscription which runs to $70! $70! TO TALK TO GOD!!! I do not, on balance, think that Jesus would be a fan of Hallow, but, on the plus side, I imagine they’re paying Mr Wahlberg handsomely for his endorsement and so, well, bully for Mark. I would love to see the house that the app’s founders live in, and to have an open and frank conversation with them about the correct interpretation of Matthew 19:24.
  • Relative Time: Do you ever think that we’ve become a bit stuck in our ways when it comes to the measurement of time, and that we ought perhaps to mix it up a bit? Bored of the tired old ‘Anno Domini’? Well why not add some mild, low-grade excitement to your life with this website which will instead let you measure any year by its distance from a selection of other milestones. Fine, YOU may want to call this year ‘2025’ (CONFORMIST! DULLARD!), but think how much more exciting it would sound if instead we agree to refer to it as, er, 30 ADS (After Dating Sites), or 4.4kAF (After Form) – YES, THAT IS RIGHT, SO MUCH MORE EXCITING! This is very silly and utterly pointless, but, beautifully, the code is available on a Github repo so that, should you so choose, you can amend your entire website to render the dates entirely incomprehensible to anyone who isn’t you.
  • Rock Collections: A collection of other people’s digital collections. “Rock Collections is a site where you can comb through what other people collect online, to explore the small, personal, and idiosyncratic internet…a project that asks what kinds of collecting “beings with tactile instincts” practice in digital spaces. What traces do we pick up, and carry with us, and how? Where and in what form do these collections live? Despite the scale of internet life, this project looks for traces of the small, personal, and handmade in our digital lives. Rock Collections is a site where you can comb through other people’s digital collections. It’s not a totalizing, all encompassing catalogue of the Internet. It’s just a small corner, where someone can hand you something they’ve found, and say here, look at this one.” The site is ASCII-ish and minimal – click each of the ‘rocks’ to learn a little about what the collection is of, who it is by, and to be offered links to visit it if you so choose. There are collections of screenshots of whatsapp messages, singing cat videos, ‘dudes holding doves’ (no, really), and these are all small and personal and individual and there is no stated reason for their existence, and this is perfect and as it should be. Anyone with a collection is invited to submit their own for inclusion – I think this is beautiful and it pleases me no end.
  • Inner Voice: A little webart project by Damon Zucconi, presenting a rolling list of (near-)homophones arranged alphabetically while the screen beeps at you. Which, I appreciate, sounds like something you have no interest in clicking on, AND YET! I don’t know why but I found myself watching this all the way through which, honestly, surprised me. LET YOURSELF BE CAPTIVATED BY THE BEEPING WORDS!
  • The British Wildlife Photography Awards: Not just lovely animals, but lovely BRITISH animals! PATRIOTIC FAUNA! These are all gorgeous and VERY CUTE – if your heart doesn’t melt slightly at the sight of the sleepy otter then, well, you have problems – and occasionally surprising (I did not think we had rainbow sea slugs in British waters, for one), and my personal favourite is the one entitled ‘weasel at rush hour’ because it turns out that there’s just something inherently comedic about the weasel and its face (no, really, there is, I promise you).
  • The Afro Hair Library: This is a brilliant resource – a collection of open source 3d models, made by black digital artists around the world and available for download to anyone who wants to use them, the idea being to create models that have a better, more accurate and more diverse depiction of African hairstyles than traditionally seen in videogames
  • Wordlink: ANOTHER DAILY WORD PUZZLE! This one is quick and lightweight and pleasingly-fun – also, it will TEACH YOU THINGS, specifically really really obscure people and places and things – for example, today I have learned that “Conner Prairie is a living history museum in Fishers, Indiana, United States, which preserves the William Conner home. The home is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and the museum recreates 19th-century life along the White River”, which, OK, fine, is unlikely to be of any long-term use to me but which I am broadly-speaking happy to now know about. Each day you’re presented with 6 words, all of which can be shuffled around to make pairs – your task is to find the correct order for all eight words, whereby the pairs they make with the *next* word will be a thing. Which, Jesus, even by my standards is a fcuking appalling description, sorry, Look, just click the link and it will make sense, I promise.
  • Selfie Shuffle: After joy that was pig-stacking extravaganza StyScraper, Matt Round returns with another fun distraction – would you like to have one of those ‘shuffle the tiles until the image recomposes itself’ games, where the image you have to recompose is your own face? GREAT, HERE YOU ARE!
  • Wikiasteroids: Game AND learn (sort-of)! Wikiasteroids is, as you might have guessed from the name, a riff on the classic 80s arcade game Asteroids, where the titular asteroids you’re tasked with blowing up in your little spaceship are generated each time someone somewhere in the world makes an edit on Wikipedia (there are some clever little variables going on under the hood – the larger the edit the larger the asteroid, for example) – each time you blow one up you’re given a little SNIPPET OF KNOWLEDGE direct from Wikipedia to nourish your brain while you otherwise-mindlessly blast rocks. This is fun ANY you will find yourself osmotically picking up all sorts of weird and pointless facts and bits of information as you play, so basically it’s educational and you should allow yourself to play it RIGHT NOW.
  • Invisiclues: Are you OLD? Do you REMEMBER THE GAMES OF THE PAST? Does part of you occasionally think that all of this electronic entertainment was BETTER and MORE PURE before they bothered with these fancy things like ‘graphics’ and the like? In which case this will be catnip to you – via Andy at Waxy, Invisiclues is a site that seemingly collects all the old Infocom text adventures (so Zork, obviously, but also a bunch of less storied ones), all playable in your browser,  along with clue books for them so that you needn’t ever get stuck. If you’re thinking ‘you know what I would love to do with my weekend? Yes, that’s right, spend it staring at a screen typing words into an antediluvian text interface!’ then ENJOY!
  • Fast and Confused: Finally this week, a SUPERB little game lifted from last week’s B3ta – your task is to drive your car and FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS. This is bitesized and hugely-replayable, and if you’re not careful you’ll lose 15 minutes to it without even trying.

By Sally Kindberg

OUR LAST MIX THIS WEEK IS A BIT CINEMATIC, A BIT ETHEREAL AND ALL LOVELY AND IT IS BY IZZY DEMSKY!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Vinyl Sleeves: This is long-dormant, sadly, but it collects some wonderful examples of classic design taken from the inner sleeves of old vinyl records – some of these are GORGEOUS and, should you be in the market for inspiration for patterns or suchlike, this is potentially an excellent visual resource.
  • Cabin P0rn: Not, to be clear, Actual Bongo – this is instead a Tumblr collecting photos of really, really fancy ‘cabins’ (although I might quibble the word choice here – ‘cabin’ strikes me as something rustic and possibly made of logs, whereas most of these look like they were the product of VERY EXCLUSIVE DESIGN ATELIERS), which will almost certainly make you wish you were violently rich so that you too could afford to live in such WALLPAPER*-ish splendour.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Max Kozik: Max Kovik makes short films, They involve characters made of paper and cardboard. I think Max might be a genius – seriously, these are SO SO SO GOOD, and very funny, and genuinely cinematic in a way that shouldn’t really be possible given that all the characters are made out of, basically, toilet roll. GIVE THIS MAN BUDGET AND LET HIM SHINE!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • When Was The Last Time You Felt Consensus?: Ryan Broderick writes in Garbage day about whether or not we’re past the point of any sort of shared notion of ‘what the fcuk is going on?’, and whether there’s any way back – or at least that’s how I interpreted it, perhaps because I am increasingly curious as to whether or not we should basically think of the past…ooh, let’s say 80 years, for the sake of argument, a period during which you could mostly sort of assume that everyone was broadly drinking from the same informational pool, and during which you could broadly assume a degree of shared assumptions and beliefs about What Was Going On, as an anomaly, a blip in human history after which, as seems to be happening now, we revert to our natural, species-wide state of baffled confusion and subjective reality. The point Ryan makes about the shift from ‘articles’ to ‘posts’ as a way of framing the way in which we consume and share information is I think an important one – the op ed-ing of everything, and the way in which old media has struggled to keep pace – and I thought this paragraph sums it up well: ““Article World” is the universe of American corporate journalism and punditry that, well, basically held up liberal democracy in this country since the invention of the radio. And “Post World” is everything the internet has allowed to flourish since the invention of the smartphone — YouTubers, streamers, influencers, conspiracy theorists, random trolls, bloggers, and, of course, podcasters. And now huge publications and news channels are finally noticing that Article World, with all its money and resources and prestige, has been reduced to competing with random posts that both voters and government officials happen to see online. These features are not just asking, “what happened to American men?” They’re asking, “why can’t we influence American men the way we used to?”” This is not, to be clear, anything like an ‘American’ problem – this is true of everywhere I can think of right now, or at least anywhere ‘online’.
  • Silicon Valley Christians: Long-term Curios readers may be aware that I have a slight…let’s not call it an ‘obsession’, that makes me sound odd, let’s instead call it ‘peculiar fascination’ with Paypal mafioso and Most Terrifying Man Currently Alive Peter Thiel and his strange combination of libertarian politics and Christian faith, and exactly how these two elements of his character inform all of the different ways in which one of the world’s richest men has, for the past 15 years or so, attempted to bend society to his personal idea of ‘how things should work’ (it may surprise you to learn that Mr Thiel appears to be very keen indeed on a world that functions in a way in which he, and people who think like him, get to do what they like!) – this piece in Wired looks at the broader nexus of Christian thinking in the Valley, Thiel included, and what sort of an impact this relatively small group of plutocratic evangelicals is having on, not to put too fine a point on it, the whole world. Messianic fervour? CHECK! Doing God’s work! CHECK! Stealthily promoting a load of conservative values via the medium of technology and cultural philanthropism? CHECK CHECK CHECK!!!
  • The Battle for the Bros: Apologies for the very US-centric feel to the initial longreads this week, but this piece, per the first one, feels like something that is more widely interesting and relevant than just North America. This is a New Yorker piece looking at the US podcast ecosystem, and specifically the corner of it which is providing the nation’s (and, again, to a certain extent the English-speaking world’s) young men with their news and information and PERSPECTIVES, and it profiles Hasan Piker, one of the various guys the media seems desperate to anoint THE JOE ROGAN OF THE LEFT, along with a few other contemporaries in the podcast world – it’s long, but interesting and particularly good at communicating the very specific bro-ish vibe that seems to be a prerequisite of achieving ‘cut through’ (sorry) with a specific coterie of men between 15-30 in 2025. Worth thinking about the TikTok Oracles piece from the other week as you read this, as they’re not-unconnected imho.
  • Slop Vs Reality: A good piece in 404 Media that neatly articulates something that I have been feeling for a while and which I have mentioned here before, to whit – perhaps the most significant side effect of the first generative AI boom has been the incredibly-fast and little-lamented degradation of the informational water table  and the way in which this is reshaping digital networks and media as the barrier to content creation falls to the floor thanks to The Machine. This is, I’m not going to lie, not exactly a cheering read, and it’s particularly dispiriting when you bear in mind the social platforms seemingly-limitless desire to inject genAI into everything, the imminent arrival of AI personals across your Insta experience, the machine-penned comments and reactions and and and…maybe the inevitable endpoint of this is that we simply abandon the web to The Machine and give it all up as a terrible mistake. Perhaps, on reflection, that would be for the best.
  • Make Something Heavy: I like this both as a manifesto/ethos and as a counterpoint to the somewhat-bleak slop narrative presented above. Anu (they only have one name, seemingly) writes about the importance of making work that feels ‘heavy’, that feels like it has permanence – this isn’t about things being SERIOUS or LONG so much as imbuing the projects you undertake with a sense of longtermism and permanence. “Telling everyone they’re a creator has only fostered a new strain of imposter syndrome. Being called a creator doesn’t make you one or make you feel like one; creating something with weight does. When you’ve made something heavy—something that stands on its own—you don’t need validation. You just know, because you feel its weight in your hands. And that weight is its own reward.”
  • Very Online Is Over: I think that this might resonate a lot, particularly if you’re of an internet vintage that means that your early online experiences came in weird forums but also if you’re a Tumblr kid from a few years later on – this piece in Mashable (I know, sorry) posits that the idea of being ‘very online’ simply doesn’t exist anymore as a result of the flatting nature of algorithmic feeds, and that as such a certain type of culture – and relationship to culture – has been lost as a result.
  • Men, Dating: Another in the seemingly-endless procession of pieces about THE TROUBLE WITH YOUNG MEN – except this one speaks to them specifically about their experiences of app-based dating, and, honestly, this was slightly heartbreaking to read (I think every single facet of the app-based dating experience is heartbreaking, to be clear). DAZED speaks with a bunch of different days in their 20s about their feelings about, and experiences with, dating in modern life, and the one seemingly constant thing that comes through here is that NOONE KNOWS WHAT TO DO ANYMORE OR HOW TO BEHAVE, and the degree of uncertainty and insecurity and introspection this leads to is, frankly, toxic in the extreme. I felt so, so sorry for all of these kids.
  • Women & Weed: The Face looks at the apparently growing phenomenon of ‘female stoners’ (I do not, personally, think that this is a new thing, but apparently it is a TREND and must be analysed as such), examining the reasons why female marijuana smokers are a fast-growing demographic. Personally speaking I felt the piece probably didn’t give *quite* enough weight to FCUKING MARKETING – I think you can tie a lot of this squarely back to the ‘getting stoned as self-care’ thing, allied with the fact that weed’s been pitched in the states as a gentle lifestyle complement thing, which feels very aligned to the whole ‘girls, pamper yourselves!’ industrial complex, but see what you think.
  • Red Chip Art: I liked this a lot, and it feels like you can file it alongside Boom Boom as a ‘signifier of the now’ – this piece looks at the rise of what its author terms ‘Red Chip’ art and WHAT IT MEANS; I very much enjoyed the capsule definition of the term, and it feels particularly zeitgeisty if you consider it in a wider cultural context: “What is red-chip art? It’s not unrelated to Trumpism, and Trumpism’s aesthetics, but it is does not have an explicit political stance. (Red-chip art isn’t for Republicans, and blue-chip art isn’t for Democrats, as we already know.) Red-chip art comes in many guises, but certain visual patterns predominate: super-flat cartoons, a street art/graffiti aesthetic, and multi-colored chrome. A crypto component is always welcome. Crucially, red-chip art is defined by its refusal to revere art history, perhaps as a part of a broader rejection of elite, specialized knowledge.” You will know it when you see it.
  • Italy and the Right: An interesting piece in the LRB looking at the postwar history of right-wing politics in Italy, culminating in Giorgia Meloni’s current status as Prime Minister and looking at both Italy’s…peculiar disdain for self-reflection in the wake of World War II, and how the unique combination of church and state that maintains in the country afforded a safe space for the the modern right to rise from the ashes of fascism.
  • FutureGolf: I am very much not a sports fan, but it turns out I have a near-limitless appetite for reading about the new variants on established sports that are being spun up by people desperate to refit, say, crown green bowls for a dynamic, young audience. This piece is about golf’s attempts to make itself SEXY AND RELEVANT for the young, by, er, making it a bit faster, and doing it all indoors on a massive soundstage with a mad-sounding robotic putting green and everything packaged together with shiny graphics and idents for an international TV audience. I am FASCINATED by these things – between this and the King’s League 5-a-side thing I am fascinated to see whether these things get traction. Aside from anything else, though, this is entertaining because golf is, at heart, a very silly sport: “you can explain practically everything about TGL by explaining its constraints. Matches are played mostly on Mondays and Tuesdays because that’s typically a slow time for golfers, who are often at tournaments Wednesday through Sunday. (It’s also a slow time on ESPN, which owns the league’s broadcast rights — TGL has mostly replaced mediocre college basketball games.) They’re 15 holes instead of the normal 18, a better fit in a two-hour time slot. There’s a 40-second shot clock and a radically simplified scoring system, all in service of making TGL faster-paced and easier to follow than the whispered chaos of a typical golf tournament. Heck, the whole thing is set in West Palm Beach because most professional golfers live within driving distance.”
  • London Sewage: Ok, this is probably only of interest if you live in London (or, if you don’t, if you have a particularly deep interest in the sewage travails of major urban centres), but it’s a great bit of reporting by Jim Waterson for London Centric and another example of how new, crowdfunded local media outlets are doing work that simply wouldn’t happen without them. Aside from anything else, this did strike me as a CRACKING bit of PR for Thames Water (ok, this is relative, but still) at a time when they can’t buy a positive headline.
  • The Prehistoric Psychopath: This is SO interesting  apparently new research suggests that our prehistoric forebears were not, contrary to much received wisdom, violent creatures engaged in a state of near-permanent primal and bloody conflict, but were instead mainly NOT like that, and in fact hunter gatherers were significantly more peaceful and collaborative than we once thought. Instead, it seems that the majority of violence experienced in prehistoric society was in fact caused by a relatively-small number of what you might term ‘psychopaths’ – a fact which, as I read through the piece, couldn’t help but make me look around and conclude that very little has in fact changed in several thousand years of evolution.
  • The History of the Pineapple: The second piece this week from Works in Progress, you may not think that the history of the cultivation of the pineapple would be an interesting read but you would be WRONG – this covers agriculture, industrialisation, global trade, trends, cookery and more besides, and made me REALLY want to go back to Costa Rica again.
  • The Glasgow Chessmaster: Another lovely bit of local reporting, this time by the Glasgow Bell, profiling Michael, a Glasgow resident who’s been a fixture in a certain area of the city for several years, sitting outside whatever the weather to play chess with passers by. This is sweet, sensitive, enquiring and sort-of beautiful, and a perfectly human little vignette of the people trapped in the asylum system with no real understanding of when they might get out, or indeed how.
  • The Revenge of the US Steakhouse: I do love a good restaurant review, and this, by Helen Rosner in the New York Times, is an excellent example of the genre. Less a review of a single place, although ostensibly about Daniel Boloud’s place, and more a temperature check on the current status of the iconic New York steakhouse, this is in part about the food but also quite a lot about the steak as signifier, symbol of a sort of ‘red-blooded masculinity’ which you may have noticed is back in vogue this year. “I doubt that Boulud means to associate his restaurant with any sort of political moment or ideological bent. Certainly, nothing on the menu or in the service seemed to communicate anything beyond polished, murmuring attentiveness. But a restaurant, like any work of art, cares little for its author’s intentions. Midway through one meal at La Tête d’Or, my companion looked around the room, dropped his voice, and said to me, “You know, I think you might be the only woman in here.” That wasn’t strictly true—we’d passed at least one lady sipping cocktails at the bar, and a few more eventually trickled in to be seated for dinner—but the room was, on each of my visits, overwhelmingly a room of men. I observed them in pairs, sniffing at a decanter of Burgundy; in quartets, loosening their ties; in thorny post-work acts of bread-breaking, chuckling at one another’s bons mots, presumably discussing getting the satellites up, or talking to Lockheed, or closing the funding round. The steak house speaks its own language, no matter how much of the menu is retitled in French.”
  • Cusk on London Fields: Rachel Cusk’s introduction to a recent new edition of Martin Amis’ London Fields is a brilliant piece of writing about one of my favourite ever novels (please don’t judge me). You may need to be familiar with the book to enjoy it fully, but if you are then I promise it is a treat: “Amis’s rendering of the world of the Black Cross is one of the novel’s achievements: steeped over time in the rancid deposits of male habit, the traditional British pub is rarely so accurately described. In the fog of cigarette smoke, the rituals of maleness are blearily, incoherently performed, their basis in evolution long since lost from view; broader social changes—multiculturalism, the speed of technology—are diffidently incorporated into the mulch; slow processes of decomposition and fermentation have replaced the line of history. In the pub, the one discernible truth remains the truth of gender: what men have in common is women. The pub is first and foremost a refuge from women, occasionally a place to display them, more often a scene of affirmation in the business of subduing them.”
  • The Last Decision: “In mid-March 2024, Daniel Kahneman flew from New York to Paris with his partner, Barbara Tversky, to unite with his daughter and her family. They spent days walking around the city, going to museums and the ballet, and savoring soufflés and chocolate mousse. Around March 22, Kahneman, who had turned 90 that month, also started emailing a personal message to several dozen of the people he was closest to. On March 26, Kahneman left his family and flew to Switzerland. His email explained why: “This is a goodbye letter I am sending friends to tell them that I am on my way to Switzerland, where my life will end on March 27.” That should give you an idea as to whether this is something you want to read or not – personally I found it interesting and compassionate, but I appreciate you may not feel the same way about a piece discussing the degree to which it can or should be considered an entirely rational act to end one’s life premature with medical assistance. I found Kahneman’s phrase “I am not afraid of not existing” a rather beautiful sentiment which I think I am going to adopt.
  • Techniques and Idiosyncracies: A short story by Yiyun Li in the New Yorker about medicine and treatment and memory and grief. It is very, very sad, but in a spare and beautiful way.
  • We’ve Got War To Cover: The last longread of the week is this brilliant essay by the brilliantly-named Dante Fuoco. It’s about the Iraq war and Anna Nicole Smith and family and betrayal and memory and it is really very good indeed.

By Iness Rychlik

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

 

Webcurios 14/03/25

Reading Time: 43 minutes

 

I went to see Cabaret in London this week with an old friend, and to my surprise really enjoyed it (do go if you can, it really is very good) – but, also, fcuk me does it hit differently in 2025! Also, per my comment about Oedipus a few weeks ago, HOW IS IT THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE GOING TO WATCH ‘CABARET’, AN ADAPTATION OF A FILM FAMOUSLY ABOUT THE WEIMAR YEARS AND THE RISE OF FASCISM BEING FACILITATED BY DECADENCE, WHO ARE MOVED TO GASP IN SHOCK AT THE REVELATION THAT THE NICE YOUNG GERMAN MAN IS IN FACT AN ACTUAL NAZI????

Anyway, this week I didn’t have to take my trousers off in front of ANYONE, and so as such I think we can consider it, broadly, to have been a success. Also, someone responded to last week’s Curios telling me that this newsletter is ‘positively libidinal’ and that I might be ‘the kinkiest human being they have never met’, which, honestly, is not something I would ever have expected to be told for writing a newsletter about Occasionally Interesting Links but, well, thanks!

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are wrong, I am actually tediously vanilla.

 By Nicholas Osborn https://www.instagram.com/boatlullabies/

WE BEGIN BY RETURNING TO THE RECORD COLLECTION OF TOM SPOONER, WHO HAS COMPILED THIS SELECTION OF OLD TRACKS WHICH RANGES FROM FOLK TO PSYCHEDELIA AND EVERYWHERE INBETWEEN!  

THE SECTION WHICH THINKS THAT THE WHOLE ‘TEST YOUR LINKEDIN POSTS ON VIRTUAL BUSINESSMONGS’ THING MIGHT BE THE MOST DEPRESSING LINK OF THE YEAR SO FAR, AND I INCLUDE THE TWO-HEADED BONGO FROM LAST WEEK IN THAT ASSESSMENT, PT.1:  

  • Synthsational: Sometimes I like to open Curios with a link which makes no fcuking sense to me whatsoever (I mean, ‘like’ is a big word here – ‘am forced to due to my increasingly partial and imperfect understanding of what the everliving fcuk is happening at any given moment’ is perhaps a more accurate summation, but, well, it’s hardly snappy, is it? Oh, God, it’s happening again, sorry), and other times it’s nice to open with something that is just good, uncomplicated fun – so today we’re going with FUN (in fairness I think there’s a reasonable amount of semi-complex stuff going on under the hood here but we’re here for a good time not a hard time, so)! Synthsational is a really smart little synthtoy-type thing, which lets you make music over a backing track – press left and right to change the style of the backing track, press space to change (I think) the pitch), and create music using only four letters on your keyboard – there’s some voodoo happening under the hood which seemingly means that whatever the fcuk you press you are basically prevented from making anything too cacophonously awful, kind of like the inflatable laneguards you get if you’re bowling as a four year old, and there’s something slightly miraculous about the fact that I was just sort of noodling around here and ended up accidentally compositing a weirdly-beautiful ethereal bit of electropop in a minor key. Alright, fine, my involvement here was admittedly minimal – The Machine, in one of its infinite incarnations, was doing the heavy lifting – but it really does feel a bit like magic. You can record the outputs directly from the site, which is a nice touch, and as a way of spinning up little melodies this feels both fun and maybe useful. For the first time in…fcuk, possibly ever, this made me think owning an iPad could actually be quite good, as just sitting with this for an hour and noodling feels like a genuinely-relaxing way to spend time. Give it a try, it really is rather wonderful.
  • Phone-to-Edit: It feels churlish to say this, but this was a lot more fun when I came across it on Monday (STOP WHINGING ABOUT THE FREE INTERNET STUFF YOU MISERABLE CNUT) – still, I very much like the idea and think there are quite a few fun riffs one might possibly build off this. The gimmick of this website is a simple one – anyone can edit it however they so choose, simply by calling a specific US phone number and describing what they want the website to look like – this is using The Machine (no idea which flavour) to recognise your voice, parse your instructions and turn those into (rudimentary) code which is then deployed near-instantaneously. You have to actually call the number to get this to work, and you have a maximum of 30s in which to describe your aesthetic vision, but it works to a quite remarkable degree (even if the resulting webpage looks very much like something you might have spun up in DreamWeaver c.1996) – the version of the site I found also let you do the same by talking directly to the site via your mic, but I presume that that was proving ruinously costly in terms of API calls and so hence it’s phonecall-only. If nothing else I would be hugely grateful if any of you in the US can get the website to briefly read ‘WEB CURIOS SENT ME HERE’ and then send me a screencap, because, well, I like to occasionally give myself the illusion of readership and agency. THANKS!
  • It Is As If You Are On Your Phone: Web Curios favourite Pippin Barr is back with a smart little semi-satirical websiteproject thing – a (mobile-only) website whose user interface is designed to allow you to pantomime the experience of having a meaningful and important interaction with your phone WITHOUT ACTUALLY DOING ANYTHING. You are, of course (and this certainty of shared experience is, let’s take a moment to acknowledge this, at heart a fundamentally miserable truth!), aware of the specific feeling of 21stC awkwardness of being stuck waiting for something or someone and having RUN OUT OF CONTENT, and being reduced to that weird pattern of inconsequential swipes and taps, the moving up and down the nested set of phone menus, swiping through your messages without reading, all of the holding pattern behaviours that have replaced our ability to just SIT STILL AND THINK (I noticed this a few years ago on planes awaiting take-off, and I strongly advise you to keep an eye out for it)…? Yes, well with this website you get to pantomime meaningful swipes – follow the instructions on-screen and anyone watching you will think that you’re answering IMPORTANT EMAILS or BUILDING YOUR PERSONAL BRAND rather than simply killing some of the interminable seconds between birth and death with some busy-but-meaningless fingerwork. Honestly, this is ART – I know I always say sh1t like this, but it really is – and the only way it could possibly have been improved would be for it to have been called ‘Fauxne’.
  • The ‘Hello’ Man: While the flattening effect of global social media platforms has led to a semi-inevitable homogenisation of international culture, edges sanded off to conform to the algorithmic interpretation of ‘best fit content’ for the widest possible audience, there are occasional moments when you stumble upon another nation’s Weird Internet People and you are reminded that odd is infinitely fractal. Thanks to Pietro Minto for introducing me to ‘Il Salutatore’ (loosely translated as ‘the ‘hello’ man’ for the purposes of this little writeup), an Italian social media…personality? Danger? Not quite sure how to characterise this guy to be honest, but let’s assume he’s benign (ngl, given he’s Italian and given his general facial hair and vibe I wouldn’t be hugely surprised were he to have some…spicy views on gender politics and ‘traditional values’, but let’s not let my possibly-unfair suppositions get in the way of some top-quality strange) – The ‘Hello’ Man runs this YouTube channel where his whole thing (and I mean literally his WHOLE thing, this man has a very single-minded schtick) is approaching Italian ‘celebrities’ and getting them to say hi to their fans on camera with him. Literally, that’s it. WHY IS THIS MAN DOING THIS? His videos have, max, 500-ish views (and most of them struggle to break three figures), and yet WOW has he been doing this for a while (please, noone feel the need to point out certain…parallels with any long-term, pointless digital endeavours that might also spring to mind here)…this is just beautifully, wonderfully, awkwardly strange – his encounter with a baffled but polite Chiwotel Ejiofor is broadly representative, but I think I was most excited to see that he’s recently done Ilona Staller (Cicciolina for the, er, 80s politics fans) because, well, I was worried Jeff Koons might have embalmed her or something. Anyway, this is perfectly weird and very strange, so, here, I’m giving it to you.
  • Smile Like Zuck: I don’t quite understand why this is as oddly fun as it is, but I found myself spending a surprising amount of time earlier this week getting into a rhythm of ‘Zucking’ at my webcam – the game here is to attempt to match the expression of the procession of dead-eyed, grinning Zuckerbergs to the satisfaction of the facial recognition software. Honestly, it’s weirdly addictive for reasons I can’t quite pinpoint.
  • Manus: This week’s BIG AI THINGY, at least on Monday, was Manus, a new agentic AI product built out of China. As you obviously all know, ‘agentic’ AI is THE COMING THING, with The Machine set to get the ability to effectively go off and mimic human behaviours all over the web – the thinking is that eventually this will be how you get boring digital admin stuff done, by entrusting one of the infinite army of AI helpers that we’ll all have at our disposal to go off and, I don’t know, do the BORING BUSYWORK of, say, choosing a loved-one’s present, or doing the grocery shopping, or whatever (but DEFINITELY not stealing your silly, online, task-based job, oh no, definitely not). There are obviously LOTS of ifs and hows and whys and ‘yes, ok, but what are the knock-on implications of all this if we take it seriously?’ questions here which I am not going to get into because, honestly, I would be here all week and I would lose the attention of the three remaining masochists still reading at this point – instead I am just going to suggest you check out Manus, which feels (based on my cursory examination of the example tasks they have on the website – you need an invite code to get into the actual live environment right now) pretty representative of Where This Is Currently At – superficially really impressive, but, actually, not very good when you look at it for more than 2s. This is built on top of – I think – Claude and some other model, but it does the DeepSeek-ish think of showing you its working as it ‘thinks’ and does, which means that if you click on any of the demo examples you can see a replay of it ‘reasoning’ and acting in semi-realtime; this is SO interesting, and not a little bit…creepy? But, also, slightly-depressing from the point of view of curiosity and diversity of thought, because every single example I have looked at here (which, by the way, have all been of the non-code variety because, well, I don’t really care about coding) just deliver the most basic, first page of Google-type results – there’s one example where Manus is asked to plan and book an itinerary of ‘interesting’ things to do over a fortnight trip to Australia and New Zealand, and you can literally see The Machine googling ‘things to do in Australia and New Zealand and then taking its recs from, literally, Australia.com. Basically I can’t help but look at this and imagine an inevitable point in ~3y where a specific destination on Earth is entirely decimated by tourism because The Machine has ineffably decided that it is vitally important that it send EVERYONE there for their Summer holiday (much as seems to have happened with Italy and every single American under the age of 30 since COVID). Anyway, welcome to a future in which stuff happens and you don’t know why but, well, it’s ok, because TRUST THE MACHINE! Oh, and if you’re Actually Technical, someone obviously ripped the code and open sourced it – you can get a version here if you would like to attempt to run it locally.
  • Some New, Impressive AI Video Stuff: Ok, so this is prototypical rather than live, but it’s quite hard not to look at these examples of style transfer and object insertion into video, powered by The Machine, and think ‘oh dear, poor lots of people currently working in low-to-mid-end post-production’.
  • A Truly Incredible List of Free Internet Stuff: Bookmark this NOW. No, seriously, I mean it, you honestly have no idea what an insane resource this is. The site’s official name is, seemingly, FMHY (no idea), but what it ACTUALLY is is a truly incredible directory of links to FREE INTERNET STUFF, subdivided by category. So, for example, the ‘music’ section contains links to all sorts of streaming sites – but also places that host old MP3s recorded at gigs, or old concert footage, or fun music toys, or podcast discovery services; there’s a whole section on ‘films and TV’ which is basically a link to all sorts of…not wholly-legal torrenting/streaming options but also loads of interesting community-type spaces and public domain archive materials…Honestly, this is the most insanely-generous bit of information gathering I have seen in an age and I am slightly in love with whoever is behind it (there’s a Discord, so it feels like a community of people rather than an individual), not least because a) they take the time to check the safety of the links regularly and prune any that seem sketchy; b) the NSFW section is entirely empty, which, without wishing to sound like a prude, was a really nice and reassuring surprise because I was worried I was going to have to apply some LARGE CAVEATS to my recommendation; and c) they explicitly say that they don’t want or need donations because they are doing out of the spirit of SHEER ONLINE KINDNESS, which, honestly, is SO NICE and much rarer than it should be. Honestly, I really do mean it, this is probably the most useful link I am going to feature in here all year (the bar, so low!) and you really do want to keep it close.
  • Virtual LinkedIn: I think that this might be one of the worst things I have seen so far in 2025 – and trust me when I say that given all of the links I choose NOT to include each week that is no idle statement. This is a websiteappthing called ‘Virtual Societies’ which exists to let you TRIAL your LinkedIn BANGERS with an, er, infinite audience of AI businessmongs! Yes, that’s right, someone’s literally created a sandbox where you can post your CONSIDERED PIECES OF THOUGHT LEADERSHIP and get an assessment, based on the non-opinions of nonexistent AI-imagined personas, of exactly how much it will slap – this is basically ‘AI focus groups’ (per previous Curios, another fcuking stupid idea if you ask me) but for the specific purpose of helping you get temporary digital validation from the worst people on the planet. Give it the url of your LI profile and it will pull your connections, lightly scrape their data to get a topline idea of who the fcuk they pretend to be when doing business cosplay, and then spin up a shadow network of ‘virtual businessmongs’ who are meant to ACCURATELY REFLECT the real people whose tedious corporate bromides you reward with little digital sealclaps on the daily. Is this in any way accurate or meaningful? Well, prima facie ‘no’ – but, equally, given that LLMs are trained to basically write in LinkedIn English it’s not unreasonable to assume that this is a non-awful way of ensuring your deathly prose cleaves as closely to the coveted MIDDLE OF THE BELLCURVE as is possible. Words can’t adequately express how much I hate that this exists and that there is a market for it.
  • The Letraset Graphic Materials Handbook: Do you do design and craft and making and stuff? Because if so, this link – taking you to an archived scan of the Letraset Graphic Materials handbook from…Christ knows, the 70s/80s? Which is both a sort of brochure for the company’s design products but also a quite incredible practical guide to making and typesetting and design and craft and, honestly, as I flicked through this it made me momentarily genuinely sad that I have absolutely no skill in this sort of area at all (antiskill, in fact) because I can imagine for a certain type of person this might unlock all sorts of creative ideas and endeavours. Honestly, this really is very cool indeed (if you’re not like me).
  • Turn Bluesky Threads Into Webpages: This is quite neat – plug in the URL of the top Bluesky post from a thread and this will export the whole lot as a standalone webpage, kind of like Threadreader (but for Bluesky and nicer-looking). Really nicely made and genuinely useful as a way of sharing content from the platform.
  • SwipeSky: Ooh, this is nice (and slightly devilish, as with all platforms that reduce actual human beings to small cards that live inside your phone and which you can save or doom with a Caesar-esque thumb gesture) – SwipeSky basically just presents you with a stream of Bluesky users that you don’t currently follow and, presuming you’ve given it access to your account, lets you choose to follow them with a swipe. If your feed feels a bit stale after all the excitement of the influx of users a few months ago then this is one way of refreshing it – although obviously there’s a degree of caveat emptor here as there’s relatively minimal info on your potential new follows beyond profile pic and bio copy, so there’s every chance you’ll end up clogging your feed with a bunch of incredibly tedious FBPE-type people who don’t understand irony or jokes, or one of the occasional Bluesky people who just really likes posting an awful lot of c0ck, all the time.
  • Small Seasons: Here in the UK were were briefly fooled by FAKE SPRING last week, but are now ‘enjoying’ hailstorms and frost – if you would like to have a slightly better understanding of how seasons actually work than ‘it go cold then it go hot then it go wet’ then this lovely site might help. “In agricultural days, staying in-tune with the seasons was important. When should we plant seeds? When should we harvest? When will the rains come? Are they late this year? Knowing what was happening with nature was the difference between a plentiful harvest and a barren crop. Prior to the Gregorian calendar, farmers in China and Japan broke each year down into 24 sekki or “small seasons.” These seasons didn’t use dates to mark seasons, but instead, they divided up the year by natural phenomena.” We are currently in the middle of Keichitsu, or ‘the going out of the worms’, the period in which insects emerge from hibernation (hang on, what, insects hibernate? Jesus, who knew?), which I am sure gladdens you immensely.
  • Korea Central TV: So apparently this is an actual livestream of North Korean TV, live – I have no idea how legit this is, or how representative the channel is of wider media in the country, but if you’ve ever been curious as to what actual, proper dictatorial propaganda comms looks like then just buy the Washington Post LOL SATIRE just click the link. This is just one page on a much larger site dedicated to letting you explore North Korean media, should you be curious – but, equally, Web Curios takes no responsibility whatsoever for any knocks at the door which may come as a result of you engaging with this stuff.
  • Animal Sounds Around The World: MORE lovely datavis by The Pudding, this time looking at onomatopoeic language for animal noises used around the world – this is SO interesting (as ever it’s also nicely designed and coded too, obvs), but is rendered imperfect by its baffling refusal to riff on a 12 year old semi-viral comedy song and not having any ‘what does the fox say?’-related gags. I can’t tell you how much it pleases me that ‘miaow’ in Spanish is spelt ‘mjaw’, by the way.
  • Fun GUI: I think this is a little calling card for a digital agency in…New Zealand? Anyway, that’s not important – what IS important is that this webpage lets you basically, er, digitally stroke some flanged shapes, which now, as I come to type it, sounds quite remarkably deviant. WAIT COME BACK IT IS NOT A SEX THING! Drag your mouse over the shapes and enjoy the feeling of slight rubbery resistance in the resulting animation – this is very trivial, but there’s something really rather lovely (and unusual) about the weight and heft that the animations give the UI here, I think. NOT A SEX THING!
  • LetterLoop: Ooh, I like this a lot. letterLoop is basically a platform that lets you compile a sort of email newsletter in collaborative fashion; get everyone you want involved signed up, select the questions or prompts you want to give them, and the platform will send out the question(s), compile the responses, and share them as a compiled email newsletter to everyone once all the answers are in. Per the blurb, “Letterloop lets you ask and answer meaningful questions about everyone’s lives that don’t often come up over call or text. In our experience, calls are wonderful, but thinking of great questions (and answering them!) on the spot can be tough. It’s easy to fall into the same patterns of communication. Plus, while group calls are fun, they can quickly get too chaotic for everyone to ask and answer thoughtful questions. Messaging is convenient but isn’t designed for everyone to get a chance to share at the same time. Chat threads offer spontaneity and are a great way to share bits of your life in real-time. But when was the last time you asked everyone in your thread a question like, “What brings you energy and joy lately?” Letterloop lets you ask these kinds of questions over email, giving people the time and space to reply. At the end of each cycle, the replies are presented in a fun and beautiful newsletter delivered to everyone’s inbox. It’s our way of slowing down that we hope you’ll adopt as a new ritual with your friends and family.” Ok, so obviously the whole ‘what brings you energy and joy’ thing makes me feel quite ill, but leaving aside the twee new agey w4nk there’s something quite clever about this as a service, and lots of ways I can imagine using it for community-related or internal communications purposes.
  • Nebula Trail: A webpage that basically does the whole ‘fluid dynamics’ thing – click, drag, GAWP AT THE LIGHTS. This feels like something it might be amusing to put on phone or tablet and then watch a cat go mental at.
  • Gleeful Beasts: A YouTube channel featuring ‘digital animated puppet comedy’ – basically a bunch of short, kid-friendly animations featuring some delightful freaks and some really rather good character modelling. These are CHARMING, whether or not you have children (but if you do then they might enjoy these particularly).
  • Uniform Freak: Do you like, er, air hostess uniforms? Do you like them A LOT? Regardless, you almost certainly don’t like them anywhere near as much as Cliff Muskiet, who I admire a huge amount for putting what I presume is his ACTUAL NAME on a url that literally reads ‘uniformfreak dot com’. I am going to hand over to Cliff here, because I think his homepage copy probably reveals a certain amount about the tenor of the site:  “Ever since my early childhood, I have been interested and fascinated by the world of aviation. I used to collect everything that wore an airline name or logo, such as posters, postcards, stickers, timetables, safety cards and airplane models. Sometime in 1980 I was given my first uniform by one of my mother’s friends. I was so excited and I wanted to have more uniforms. In 1982 I heard that two charter airlines were introducing new uniforms. I wasted no time, I called these airlines and as a result I was invited to pick up a set of old uniforms. Between 1982 and 1993 I didn’t do much to obtain any more uniforms, something I really regret now as I could have had many many more! Most of my uniforms were obtained between 1993 and today. At the moment my collection contains 1891 uniforms from 632 different airlines. As I travel the world as a senior purser with KLM, it gives me the opportunity to visit local airline offices and I meet people who can maybe help me to obtain new uniforms for my collection. One day, I hope to make a book about my collection. Another dream that will come true? Who knows?” This feels…slightly like I am peering at someone’s fetish closet, but, equally, really is VERY comprehensive when it comes to stewardess uniforms through history, so, well, who am I to judge (NO FCUKER, that’s who! Cliff, I really hope you are alive and well and that should you ever see this that you know it is written with affection)?

By Laurie Lipton

NEXT, ENJOY A CRACKING SELECTION OF TRACKS CELEBRATING ONE OF THE ALL-TIME GREAT HIHOP LABELS, DEF JUX!    

THE SECTION WHICH THINKS THAT THE WHOLE ‘TEST YOUR LINKEDIN POSTS ON VIRTUAL BUSINESSMONGS’ THING MIGHT BE THE MOST DEPRESSING LINK OF THE YEAR SO FAR, AND I INCLUDE THE TWO-HEADED BONGO FROM LAST WEEK IN THAT ASSESSMENT, PT.2:

  • Status: It was Charlie Brooker, I think, who first popularised the whole ‘Twitter is better if you think of it as a videogame and treat it as such’ line of thought – taking that to its logical conclusion, Status answers the question ‘what if you could play social media as a no-stakes pointscoring exercise?’ Which feels a bit like it has already been answered – ‘that is literally how you should use real-life social media ffs’ – but, anyway, thanks to Status you can now ‘enjoy’ all the fun bits of social (the posting! The dopamine buzz from likes! The interactions!) except IT IS ALL FAKE. Status does something similar to the flurry of ‘social media but populated by AI characters!’ apps which cropped up last year, but leans harder into the game aspect of it – there’s a clear ludic element here based around racking up points for roleplaying, getting fans, etc etc. The smart thing is the way you can choose to inhabit different sorts of personas, adding a light RPG-ish mechanic – do you want to see you you can become QUEEN BEE of a fictitious stan army? Do you want to try and navigate the complex world of the controversial podcasting edgelord without being hounded off-platform? SO MANY POSSIBILITIES! I briefly had a play with this earlier in the week, and while it is not for me it is genuinely quite a clever and interesting – and, crucially, addictive – mechanic which I can imagine getting moderately-popular. Equally, though, if you stop to think about it for longer than about 30s it becomes VERY DEPRESSING, so, er, maybe don’t do that! SMOOTH BRANE 4-EVA!
  • One Post Wonder: ANOTHER attempt to recast social media as anything other than a miserable horrorshow! This new variant – in beta, but you can submit your email and be alerted when it opens up – tries a minimalist approach, with the idea being that posting is restricted to once a day, for everyone; as they put it, “One Post Wonder is a social network where everyone posts no more than once a day. It doesn’t matter if it’s a cat picture, a duck joke or a column worthy of Alexandra Petri. One Post Wonder features a rich set of privacy controls that allow you to carefully control who can see your posts, a design that emphasises content with minimal distractions, and a sustainable business model that puts the focus squarely on user satisfaction.” Which, you know, sounds lovely, should enough people sign up to it to make it a workable space – so give them your email and wait for an invite, because MAYBE this will be the halcyon digital space we have all so longed for! STILL WE HOPE! You can actually get a peek at what the beta looks like here and…you know what, I quite like the vibe. MAYBE IT WILL BE GOOD!!!
  • Eyes on Asteroids: Via my friend Adrian (W_W) comes this lovely site by NASA which lets you look at ALL OF THE ASTEROIDS and zoom in on them and spin them around and, yes, ok, when it comes down to it these are just lumps of rock and so not hugely aesthetically pleasing but THEY ARE FLYING THROUGH SPACE RIGHT NOW which is, you have to admit, just sort of amazing. Also it’s a nice reminder of the fact that there is ALWAYS loads of stuff whizzing past us at pace, and that most of it doesn’t hit us, and that despite the slightly troubling asteroid-related news rumblings earlier this year it is still VASTLY more likely that you’ll die of cancer or because of some sort of trivial, stupid human error than it is that you’ll be wiped out by several tonnes of rock hurled at you from the other side of space. RELAX!
  • Breakbeats: It’s been a VERY good year so far for huge repositories of musical samples, and here are EVEN MORE! Per the mysterious collector: “Here is my collection of vintage funk/soul breakbeats. All loops in wav quality (and not converted from mp3). Every break manually sliced (rex2), some breaks have 2 or more versions, for example, cd and vinyl. Click right mouse button and select “save as” for single file download.” CAVEAT: I DO NOT THINK THAT THESE ARE PUBLIC DOMAIN AND SO AS SUCH THERE MIGHT BE SOME, ER, ISSUES AROUND USING THEM COMMERCIALLY. Also you can’t preview the files before downloading, so it’s a bit of a lucky dip. BUT! There is SO MUCH in here, and the couple I have downloaded as a test are great, so fill your breakboots.
  • The Northern Lights Photographer of the Year: When I first saw this link I was a bit sniffy about the photos here, with my (incredibly insistent and VERY annoying) internal monologue complaining about ‘too much HDR effect’ and ‘too much post-production’. Then on Wednesday I saw my friend Lisa who was in Norway with her family earlier this year and skied under the Northern Lights and whose phone photos looked basically like this, so, actually, it turns out that this is just what they look like and I should wind my neck in. ANYWAY, these are some VERY COLOURFUL photographs of lights in the sky, and they are proof that in some instances nature is a gaudy little bitch, basically. This came to me via Jodi Ettenburg’s excellent ‘Curious About Everything’ newsletter which is a consistent source of great reading every month and which I recommend unreservedly.
  • A Weird ASCII Coding Playground Thingy: Ok, I don’t wholly get how this works – it’s basically a little code playground/sandbox which lets you experiment with meddling with fun ASCII-animating code, but exactly HOW you do that requires approximately 100% more of an understanding of coding than I possess. BUT! Even a total fcuking digimong like me can appreciate the beauty of the animations which you can explore using the menu on the right-hand side – also, some of them are very much the sort of thing that you could lose a few hours staring at at 4am under the right conditions. For those of you less preposteriously-useless than me, though, who understand the STRANGE MAJICK of computerspeak, there’s probably quite a bit of creative fun to be had here exploring how you can tweak and manipulate the examples to your own ends. Per the dev, “This playground is an attempt of a browser-based live-code environment with text-only output. It is born from the joy and pleasure ASCII, ANSI and in general text-based art can give and it is an homage to all the artists, poets and designers which used and use text as their medium. From the design perspective it is also an exercise in reduction: there is almost no interface, just a preview window and a code editor; margins and line numbers are removed as well.”
  • The News As Comics: This is, to be clear, horrible. What would happen if you took the day’s headlines, fed them to an LLM to turn said headlines into a three-panel comic and then got The Machine to illustrate said three-panel comic? THIS! This is what happens! A horrible, miserable, idiotic attempt to reduce everything happening to a three-line summary with no depth or meaning or nuance! Honestly, I spent some time this week going back through these to see if they were ever anything than awful, and, seriously, it made me feel like I was losing approximately one IQ point per second I spent staring at them. This is ugly and sad and stupid and I hate the fact that this is what we are going to do to all information eventually because we’re all going to forget how to fcuking think at some point in the next 10 years.
  • Seven39: Yes, I know that that’s an incredibly irritating way of writing 739, but it’s their website and I have to respect their wishes. Unnecessary whinging about nomenclature aside, I do rather like this as a concept. Seven39 (and that’s the last time I am typing it out like that) is ANOTHER SOCIAL NETWORK but one with quite a clever gimmick, I think – it is only live, and you can only post to it, for three hours per day, from 7:39 (EST) to 10:39. That’s it – that’s your window, no negotiating. There’s something interesting about creating a time and place for conversation, like a sort of digital happy hour of sorts (and yes, I know what a horrible and meaningless concept that is, forgive me). Sadly the time difference to the UK means that I would have had to post from midnight to 3am to test it out and, well, I simply don’t care that much, but if you’re in a more forgiving timezone then I would suggest taking a look at this in case it’s FUN AND VIBRANT (or in case it’s just full of weirdo perverts, which can also be interesting in its own way).
  • A World Map of Female Composers: This is a page on the website of Sakira Ventura, who, per her bio, is a researcher and academic (I think) with a specific interest in the history of women in music, and who created this wonderful interactive map showing all (obviously not ‘all’, but a significant number) of the female composers of note throughout history, located geographically based on their nationality. Which is lovely, and I am glad it exists, but I have just realised that all it shows you is their name and image and now I am churlishly annoyed that it doesn’t also feature links to their works – so, er, if someone would like to somehow magically make that a reality that would be great, thanks!
  • The British Voter Bot: Slightly depressing, this one – a Bluesky bot which shares actual voter profiles from the British Election Study conducted last year (in case you’re not already aware, “BES surveys have taken place immediately after every general election, providing data to help researchers understand changing patterns of party support and election outcomes. They also take place between elections, with 26 (by May 2024) large 30,000 person online panel surveys conducted by the present team, since 2014”) and which means you’ll occasionally see things like “I’m a white British Anglican male, 67 years old, and my main electoral priority is immigration” (lol seemingly that comprises 70+% of the surveyed people, judging by the stuff I have seen so far) floating across the TL. It’s interesting, but after a while does leave one with the overwhelming impression that…man, Britain is significantly less tolerant and welcoming, and significantly more scared and racist, than we (ok, ok than *I*) tend to like to think.
  • Able To Play: Oh this is a great initiative – Able To Play is a service which helps you see at a glance whether a game has accessibility settings which enable you to play it or not. Create a profile, list your accessibility needs and preferences, and the system will let you know which titles fall within the broad range of ‘stuff I will be able to engage with, regardless of any conditions I might have’. Honestly, if you or someone that you know has particular accessibility requirements this is a hugely-useful resource, and it feels very much like A Good Thing.
  • 3d Earthquake Map: I’ve featured realtime maps of quakes on here before, but I think this is the first one that shows you how deep the quake is on a 3d globe. This is, as ever with this stuff, mildly terrifying at first as you realise quite how much mad tectonic activity is happening beneath our feet ALL THE FCUKING TIME, but then quite addictive – it’s nice to keep it open in the background, because it will ping when a new quake has been detected and you can just tab over to that it is in fact displaying the hopefully-reassuring legend ‘Tsunami Risk: NO’ (I can’t imagine the genuine horror of seeing the opposite message, and so am going to navigate away from this website before my brain forces me to imagine some sort of horrible vertical, watery armageddon).
  • Theremin: OH GOD THIS LETS YOU PLAY THE THEREMIN IN YOUR BROWSER WITH YOUR HANDS LIKE SOME SORT OF MAGICAL SOUND WIZARD! This is great, seriously, and you will grin like a moron the first time you try it.
  • Quickflip: ANOTHER DAILY WORD PUZZLE! This is REALLY infuriating, fyi – or at least it has been for me, because I have a seemingly-unerring ability to pick the wrong option. The way this works is simple – each day you’re presented with 8 tiles, each with a letter on; each tile can display one of two letters, and you can toggle between the two by clicking. There are TWO potential words that can be spelled each day – ONLY TWO – and one is the RIGHT word and the other is WRONG, and your task is to flip the letters in such a way that you arrive at the right word rather than the wrong one in the fewest number of flips possible. I have got it wrong every day this week and, honestly, feel quite grumpy about it.
  • Posters Out Of Focus: Leaving aside the unfortunate url, this is a decent little daily puzzle for the cinephiles – each day, guess which VERY PIXELLATED film poster is being shown; with each incorrect guess the poster becomes slightly higher-res and additional clues (year of release, star, genre, etc etc) are revealed and if you’re slightly less clueless when it comes to the culture of the moving image than I am you might find this a fun addition to the daily rotation.
  • Type Help: I was going to feature this a few weeks ago but I rather bounced off it and didn’t feel I could wholly recommend it without understanding it better – then Adrian Hon wrote this excellent explainer about the game and how it works, and I figured that I could just let him tell you about it and you could decide if you’re into it or not. Basically this is VERY text heavy and will possibly require you to make a spreadsheet, so that should give you a rough idea of whether this might conceivably be ‘fun’ for you or whether you’re a bit more like me and consider stuff that requires excel to be pretty much the antithesis of fun. Here’s the opening of Adrian’s explainer – see if this makes you go ‘ooh, interesting!’ or ‘jesus, fcuk off’: “In an age of non-descriptive game titles, Type Help may win the championship belt. Far easier to cite its inspirations – Return of the Obra Dinn, Her Story, Unheard and The Roottrees are Dead – all members of the burgeoning genre of deduction games, where players piece together a tragic mystery from audio or video or static tableaux. The only time you type “help” is at the beginning of the game, where it’s explained you’ve come into possession of a computer containing the investigatory records of a long-ago mystery. The Galley House was discovered with a number of dead bodies and no clear culprit; all you have are transcripts of audio from its inhabitants, divided by room and by time period. Transcripts have filenames like 02-EN-1-6-7-10, which can be decoded as: 02: The second time period of the mystery. There are 26 in total, and they can be as short as a few minutes or as long as several hours.EN: Entrance, i.e. the room the transcript is from. There are lots of rooms.1-6-7-10: The people present in the room during this time period, in this case, the persons designated 1, 6, 7, and 10. An early task is assigning names to numbers. Because there’s no list of filenames, your primary goal is to find as many as you can in order to learn the full story. This is as straightforward as making deductions and guesses based on what people say and do, and then typing in the resulting filename.” Basically if you like logic puzzles then this may scratch a similar itch.
  • Orisinal: This is SUCH a treat! For webmongs of a certain vintage, Ferry Halim is something of a legend – when I was but a scrap of a thing, sitting in an office in Victoria wearing a suit and learning very quickly that I was not, in all likelihood, going to have a career as a corporate lobbyist, one of my favourite ways of passing the time (outside of browsing BMEZine and googling “how to buy weed online uk”) was playing the beautiful, pastel-coloured, relaxing and fiendishly-addictive browsergames made by the mysterious Halim and posted on his website Orisinal. Then Flash died, and so did the website…but now, thanks to Flash emulation code it is BACK! And all the old games are back too! INCLUDING THE ONE ABOUT STACKING THE PIGS, WHICH I LOST LITERALLY A WEEK TO C.2003! I am so so so happy that this has been resurrected, it is a part of (my) web history. Oh, it’s not the fastest to load, so be patient.
  • The Roy Orbison in Clingfilm Adventure Game: I have, I think, mentioned Michael Kelly on here before, and linked to his odd little stories about a German man whose singular erotic obsession is the concept of Roy Orbison, naked and wrapped in clingfilm, but I had totally forgotten he made an ACTUALTEXT ADVENTURE GAME out of the concept. Look, this is…niche, I appreciate, but equally I find this almost terminally funny – I don’t quite understand why, but there is something about the style and tone and premise that absolutely fcuking slays me. Seriously, I just spent 5 minutes clicking around and laughed out loud three times – please indulge me for a few moments and give this a go, if you laugh too then maybe we can be friends (but I promise I will never try and wrap you in clingfilm for erotic or even non-erotic purposes).

By Thérèse Mulgrew

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS THIS VAGUELY-LATINATE=FLAVOURED SELECTION OF HOUSEY DISCO-Y LOUNGEY TRACKS COMPILED BY SASHA CHADAEV! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Odd This Day: A reader writes! Says Chris Coates, “as your contact page says you’d welcome things people have created, I thought I’d send you a link to this thing I do. I call it ‘Odd this day’, the idea being to find something bizarre from history for every day of the year. Today [NOT IN FACT ACTUALLY TODAY, DUE TO MY RECEIVING THIS EMAIL IN THE PAST], for example, is the 118th anniversary of Nature publishing Francis Galton’s ‘wisdom of crowds’ paper about a visit to the West of England Fat Stock and Poultry Exhibition – or, at least, everyone thinks he went to the fair, but he didn’t.” This is GREAT, and honestly throws up something interesting on a daily basis – not least this, which is one of the more astonishing artefacts from that weird period in which male writers being insanely horny on main was apparently fair game to publish in actual papers/magazines.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Claw Craziness: Oooh, this is fun – this Insta feed posts behind the scenes footage of an incredible-looking setup where someone’s got a bunch of fairground claw machines set up in a room somewhere, all of which are playable remotely by people online…and yes, fine, I know that sounds both weird AND banal, but it’s not, ok? FFS.
  • What I Think Might Be The Worst Poetry Ever: Look, as a general rule I try not to feature stuff in Curios that I don’t like because, well, it feels mean to point at something that someone has made and tell them that I think it’s sh1t (unless it’s corporate webwork; corporate webwork can, in the main, fcuk off). This week, though, I am making an exception for the Insta account of one 7SoulsDeep, because I was walking blamelessly through Soho the other week and was confronted by some of this person’s ‘verse’ scrawled on a pavement and, well, if you’re going to force this sh1t into my head, 7SoulsDeep, then I can tell the world that you are one of the worst examples of instapoet faux-profundity that I have ever read in my life, and if I hear a more appallingly, clunky and adolescent line in 2025 than ‘I made her mind wet’ then, well, something very weird is likely to have happened. The fact that this account has over 70k followers makes me feel marginally less bad about the likely extinction we’re racing towards at speed.
  • Bad Wiki Photos: Terrible photos of famouses from their Wikipedia pages! Why? Because they’re comically bad. Seriously, the Venus Williams pic in particular is amazing – like, there are a LOT of photos of Venus Williams out there, why use *that* one?

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG (ALSO WHILE WE ARE HERE IT TURNS OUT THAT 12FT.IO IS WORKING AGAIN SHOULD YOU NEED TO JUMP PAYWALLS FOR ANY OF THE LINKS BELOW)!

  • The Population Implosion: A good, if VERY long, New Yorker piece exploring exactly why so many people are currently rather exercised about how many kids we’re all having (no, not the racist reasons, the OTHER reasons). I found this fascinating; I wasn’t aware of quite how much global data shows that none of us really seem to want kids any more, or at least not enough to produce enough of us to keep things running as they currently are, or quite how close we (when I say ‘we’ here I am lazily referring to, mostly, the richest countries, the ‘West’ or ‘Global North’) are to all sorts of quite unpleasant-looking cliffs in terms of our collective ability to keep all these complex systems functioning on what looks like being something of a skeleton staff, so to speak. A few caveats here – there’s a BIG focus on South Korea in the piece, which is particularly far along this timeline and exposed, and there are repeated references to academics soberly (and rather tiredly) reminding the reader that, actually, attempting to make any sort of accurate medium-term predictions about stuff like this is in the main a fool’s errand. Still, it is all very interesting and does give something of a different perspective on the current obsession with AI (and, by extension, robotics) – because, if you believe this stuff, without some sort of tech hail mary (does it worry you how many times already this year I have written something about us all hoping for a tech-based miracle? It worries me) then we’re all going to be having VERY different, and probably less-good, lives in a generation or two. Although, honestly, as a barren man who’ll be dead before this stuff affects me, give a fcuk (obviously I do care a *bit*, don’t look at me like that). Oh, and HERE’S A BONUS PIECE THAT LINKS TO THE TECH POINT! “Human populations will start to decrease globally in a few more decades. Thereafter fewer and few humans will be alive to contribute labor and to consume what is made. However at the same historical moment as this decrease, we are creating millions of AIs and robots and agents, who could potentially not only generate new and old things, but also consume them as well, and to continue to grow the economy in a new and different way. This is a Economic Handoff, from those who are born to those who are made.” Or at least, quite a few people are betting/hoping on that being the case.
  • The Rise of the Degrowther Right: I thought this was a fascinating article, although I probably should acknowledge that it’s in Jacobin and as such wears its politics quite clearly on its sleeve. Still, as an overview of a movement that I have sort of felt the shape of but not quite ‘seen’, so to speak, it’s super-interesting; there’s an interesting throughline here from the gilets jaunes a few years back to the right-wing fetishisation of farming as ‘pure’ labour, the tradwifery (of course!) and a whole bunch of other stuff too. Once you’ve read this, you will start seeing it a LOT I think: “This is not a merely twenty-first century phenomenon or just part of the quixotic ideological combinations beloved of the online far right. Rather, it is the latest version of a long-established defense of a “naturalist” vision of ecology, seen not as an interventionist project for reshaping the world but as a moral call to reel in modern excesses. As conservative philosopher Roger Scruton told Bastié in an interview for right-wing ecological magazine Limite, “Progress is a perverse superstition”; the call to defend our home (in Greek, oikos, root of the word “ecology”) must not be “economic” but “spiritual and cultural.” The late Scruton is a big deal among much of the European and US right. His legacy is proudly taken up by figures around the National Conservatism meetups, a jamboree that unites Anglophone conservative forces with harder-right parties in Europe, and that is also backed by institutes close to Viktor Orbán’s Hungarian government. Italian premier Giorgia Meloni has routinely cited Scruton as an intellectual inspiration, and he’s had a notable effect on the way her Fratelli d’Italia party talks about green issues. For the party’s spokesman on these matters, Nicola Procaccini, even the word “environmentalism” is suspect. “Ecology,” Procaccini told a Fratelli d’Italia event for business chiefs in April 2022, “means looking after your own home. The difference between left-wing environmentalism and right-wing ecology also lies in our spirituality, as against the Left’s materialism.”” Honestly, this really is smart and worth engaging with.
  • Design and the Construction of the Imaginaries: Ok, so ordinarily when it comes to the longreads I feel reasonably qualified to give you a precis of what an individual piece is about, more or less – here, though, I am just going to sort of do some vague handwaving, because while excellent and interesting and thought-provoking throughout, it’s also true that this essay by Tobias Revell (which is actually the narrative of a presentation around his ongoing Phd, I think) is…quite discursive and wide-ranging and as such it’s quite hard to give a pithy ‘and it is about X’ summation. That said, if you are interested in (*deep breath*) design and digital and futures and how you scry them from the past and present and AI and ‘work’ and work and BIG IDEAS and how people relate to them and science and the concept of ‘progress’ and storytelling and narrative and presentation and The Society of the Spectacle and and and and and…well, then you should read this. It is LONG, but it will make you think more about more different things than any other link in this week’s issue, which hopefully is recommendation enough to earn your click.
  • Should We Talk To AI About Ethics?: This was a surprisingly interesting and deep look at the questions around whether or not it is A Good Thing for us to attempt to imbue The Machine with a sense of ‘ethics’ and, if not, what an appropriate set of alternatives might be – the starting point for this is the obvious statement that there is no universally-accepted normative ethical standard to use as a baseline, and as such any attempt to construct an ‘ethics’ inside the ‘mind’ of The Machine is inherently going to be biased or weighted in some way by definition, and that,beyond that, perhaps there are some questions that we should not expect – or want! – The Machine to engage with or answer because there are certain considerations that should fall outside the purview of artificial ‘intelligence’. Which, obviously, LOL THAT SHIP FCUKED OFF YEARS AGO. “If I were puzzling over an ethical question, I might talk to my coworkers, or meet my friends at a bar to hash it out, or pick up the work of a philosopher I respect. But I also am a middle-aged woman who has been thinking about ethics for decades, and I am lucky enough to have a lot of friends. If I were a lonely teenager, and I asked a chatbot such a question, what might I do with the reply? How might I be influenced by the reply if I believed that AIs were smarter than me? Would I apply those results to the real world? In fact, the overwhelming impression I get from generative AI tools is that they are created by people who do not understand how to think and would prefer not to. That the developers have not walled off ethical thought here tracks with the general thoughtlessness of the entire OpenAI project.”
  • At CPAC: Another week, another slightly-incredulous dispatch from the belly of the beast. This time it’s Antonia Hitchens writing in the LRB about her visit to CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference which each year draws the usual selection of MAGA and MAGA-adjacent wingnuts from the Extended Republican Universe, and which, as you might expect, was this year a sort of triumphant procession of teak-skinned horror. Hitchens is excellent here, dispassionate and factual and letting the facts do the heavy lifting – you don’t need to do much prose flexing when events are this fcuking weird. This gives you the temperature of the piece, but the whole thing is a grimly-fascinating look at the people whose whims and choices are going to play a significant part in determining the future direction of your life for the next few years, whether you like it or not (we do not, in the main, like it): “Downstairs, a conservative law clerk was introducing himself to Stewart Rhodes as a fellow Yale Law School grad. They compared notes on different professors. The law clerk asked how his time in jail had been. Rhodes put down his beer and pulled up his sleeve to reveal a tattoo of Trump, bleeding after the shooting in Butler. ‘No president in our lifetime has showed physical strength. This is like going back to Teddy Roosevelt or George Washington,’ the clerk said. (After being shot while campaigning in Milwaukee, Roosevelt kept speaking for fifty minutes while blood soaked his shirt.) Musk had just sent out an email asking federal workers to detail what they had accomplished at work that week or be fired. (‘Elon is doing a great job, but I would like to see him get more aggressive. Remember, we have a country to save!’ Trump had posted earlier in the day.) Musk pulled up to the party after midnight, but apparently decided not to come inside after his security made a sweep of the perimeter. The host was devastated. The downstairs tenants in the building, contestants on the reality show Love Is Blind, were furious about the number of people trying to use their bathroom.”
  • Glitching The Circuit: This is not a revolutionary idea, but when I read this piece this week it felt timely and interesting and relevant, and something that feels worth thinking about and applying to various parts of life and the world (I hate myself for saying this, but there’s a not-terrible strategy proposition to be built out of the basic principles here which I think could take you to some interesting places) (god, that felt wrong, sorry). Basically the premise here (at heart) is ‘look, given that everything is being averaged out by algos maybe it behooves us to start queering the data slightly to make things more interesting’ – which, as an ethos, feels like a positive and pleasingly-disruptive one (disruptive in the good way, not in the cnuty Zuckerbergian way).
  • Garbage: This is a short essay by World’s Most Assiduous Walker Craig Mod (see Curios passim) about the Japanese approach to litter and waste – specifically, the implicit assumption that you, the consumer, are responsible for disposing of the byproducts of your consumption, and that this responsibility is taken seriously by citizens as part of their general ‘do not inconvenience your neighbour’ vibe, and how this is, basically, A BETTER WAY TO LIVE, and I can’t stress how much I felt myself agreeing with this deep in what passes for my ‘soul’ – not just about physical objects and waste, but as a conceptual approach. CLEAN UP YOUR SH1T feels like an excellent and quite powerful maxim to live by in 2025, I have to say, and one we might all do well to bear in mind (he said, like some sort of preachy, censorious w4nker. Jesus. Sorry, I won’t do that again).
  • The Podcast Economy: This isn’t in fact the title of the piece, but it’s very much its main thrust – Joel Morris runs the numbers on the world of podcasts and finds that, basically, more than half of them are listened to by fewer than 50 people, and about 0.1% of them have enough listeners (10k+) to qualify for the sorts of in-cast ads that mean you start earning a vaguely-livable wage. The piece then goes on to talk about how basically you need to ‘pay creators’ – and, yes, that’s lovely, but I think that there’s an interesting, broader point here about the word ‘creator’ and its impact that’s worth exploring. “We are all creators!” we are endlessly told! “We are all creative!” And that is true! Creativity is part of being human, and I fundamentally agree that we can all do it (and all do, to greater or lesser extents, every day)! What I find interesting about the term ‘creator’, though, is that implies a professionalisation of the role – like, it’s a JOB, it’s a THING I DO, it is WHO I AM…and, by extension, it is HOW I WANT TO EARN…but here’s the thing. The mere fact of ‘creating’ does not, magically, create a market for that which is created! You can indeed be a creator – but that does not magically oblige people to give a sh1t, or to want to pay you to support this creation! MOST PEOPLE THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE NOT EARNED MONEY THROUGH THE ACT OF CREATIVITY! I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY WE SUDDENLY THINK THAT ECONOMICS WORK DIFFERENTLY NOW! Until we get to post-scarcity or someone decides they can afford to run the UBI experiment properly, basically, I think we all have to start accepting that even if you call yourself a fcuking ‘creator’ it does not in fact mean that that is how you are going to be able to pay for your supper, however much you might wish that in fact to be the case.
  • Leaving: I really enjoyed this – I don’t think it’s finished, so it’s more of a draft/work-in-progress blogpost than an ‘essay’ per se, but Olu Niyi-Awosusi’s musings on social media and how it has evolved over their lifetime, and their shifting feelings towards it, and the difficulty in finding space and community online in a post-social landscape, really spoke to me. In particular this line, which I want to have carved in stone somewhere because I think it is important and true: “if everyone around you is similar, and you are different, relying on them to help you find Weird Things (to them!) is foolhardy.” PREACH.
  • The Rise of the TikTok Oracle: One to read while remembering the growing body of evidence suggesting that for young people around the world TikTok is a legitimate, go-to news service with FACTS (lol!) being delivered to them by the pretty friends who live in their phone – this article paints an interesting picture of how the medium is shaping the message (THANKS MARSHALL!), with the algorithm rewarding people who SPEAK WITH CONFIDENCE and MAKE ASSERTIONS and give you the ONE TRUE PERSPECTIVE…which, yeah, that’s about as positive as it sounds. This is actually a far more serious and well-thought/argued piece of writing than I am making it sound – its author, Nikita Walia, goes deep on some of the theory underpinning her argument (and, yes, McCluhan gets a look-in), but even if you’re less interested in the sociology/comms theory behind it all it’s an interesting dive into a recognisable and increasingly prevalent phenomenon which, yet again, is a perfect example of technology shaping society in ways we’re not going to grasp until well past the point of ‘too late’.
  • A Return to Early Virtual Aesthetics: On how the visual signifiers of a past digital era are being exhumed and reappropriated everywhere from fine art to fashion and everything inbetween. Why the popularity? This is a neat summary: “This has as much to do with the state of the contemporary image as it does Early Virtual ones. The image is in crisis. It has never been harder for an image to mean anything. They don’t compel us. They did once, many of us remember. When they did, they looked like this. We don’t want perfectly immersive graphics. We want graphics that make us feel the way we felt playing Pokémon Red.” That final sentence is GREAT and useful and I look forward to seeing it crop up in lots of fcuking keynotes over the next few months.
  • The Rise of Matchmaking Clubs: Or, ‘dating is still fcuked, apparently, but here’s a way in which the rich are going to circumvent the apphorror!’. Because, basically this is a piece about how you can now pay large sums of money to professional matchmaking services who will basically do a ‘Married at First Sight’-style partner search for you to find THE ONE. Remember a few weeks ago when I said that someone would try and reinvent the arranged marriage soon for the post-apps landscape? SURELY NOT LONG NOW!
  • How The Online Right Are Weaponising the Blake Lively vs Baldoni Thing: The Blake Lively / Justin Baldoni story is ugly and miserable and the online reflection of it is a predictable cesspit of misogyny, but this piece by Taylor Lorenz looks at how it’s being weaponised by right-wing commentators in the US and worldwide as a means of effectively top-of-funneling people into their audience and, eventually, into the wonderful, mad world of online right-wing conspiracies and, inevitably, beef tallow and perineal sunbathing (probably). Anything they could do with Heard/Depp… “If you’re on social media platforms, especially if you’re a woman or under the age of 40, content about Lively vs Baldoni has likely become inescapable. TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram videos about the case are amassing millions of views, Google searches have skyrocketed, and, as Megyn Kelly said on stage, all of America seems to be obsessed with the controversy. Right wing creators have become expert at tapping into online trends and cultural conversations, and immediately recognized the opportunity. Last fall, after Baldoni’s smear campaign against Lively was revealed in The New York Times, conservative influencers sprung to action. They flooded the zone with exhaustive coverage aimed at discrediting Lively. They have used the case to dismantle public support for #MeToo, especially among liberal women. So far, it’s working. Recently, two co-founders of Betches, a liberal women’s media company that has done work with the DNC, repeated Owens’ exact framing of the case on Instagram, attacking Lively to their audience of progressive women followers. They lambasted The New York Times for their coverage and called Lively a “narcissistic egomaniac.””
  • Meet Yabujin: I’ve always had a softspot for mysterious, reclusive musicians – I was for a time in the very early-00s obsessed with the near-mythical figure of Jandek – and so this profile of obscure internet ‘sensation’ (can someone be a sensation if literally noone you know has heard of them? YES THEY CAN WELCOME TO INFINITELY-FRACTAL CULTURE!) Yabujin, whose work combines a sort of 00s-ish digital aesthetic with the sort of hardstep beats which I have to admit I have a secret fondness for, pleased me no end. It’s worth clicking the links throughout the piece and listening to the tracks – once you get the vibe it’s interesting how many other places you will start to see the influence.
  • Outsourcing Memory: Bee is a new AI-powered wearable that does the ‘I record everything you say, ever, and use it to provide you with DATA AND SUMMARIES AND A LIFE LOG AND AND’ thing – it obviously doesn’t work properly, but it works *enough* that this writeup in The Verge is properly interesting, painting a picture of a future in which all our tracked and what they ‘mean’ is determined by the manner in which they are interpreted by The Machine. Does this sound good? I don’t think it does: “More sobering was asking it about my moods over the past month. Bee said I’ve experienced a period of “significant stress balanced with moments of accomplishment and joy.” When asked to summarize the themes of my life, it detailed how I’ve been mediating a tense family dispute. That’s when I remembered this device heard me cry on the phone while fighting with a cousin. Reading Bee’s analysis, my vulnerable moments no longer felt fully mine.”
  • Zyn and the Nicotine Gold Rush: On the meteoric rise of Zyn as a brand and white tobacco as a lifestyle accessory, which is both interesting from a product/marketing/society point of view, and partly because it reminded me of going to international school and making friends with a guy called Karl Settergreen (HELLO KARL IF YOU ARE THE SORT OF MAN WHO GOOGLES HIMSELF IN 2025!) who had a bright pink guitar, floppy hair, and a degree of openness about sex which I, aged, 15, found frankly astonishing – basically he was the most Swedish man I had ever met. He also introduced me to snus, the original product on which Zyn and its variants are based and which, in 1995, was a humbug-sized brown pouch full of strong, dark tobacco which tasted like the grave and which caused you to spit like a camel; the idea that THAT is now the coolest lifestyle flex for a certain type of basic tw4t is, frankly, astonishing to me.
  • Tom Wolfe: A beautiful look at Tom Wolfe’s writing and his repeated framing and skewering of 20thC America at various stages in its modern development, this is a lovely reminder of why he was so wonderful to read and why, per the author’s central thesis, his style has poisoned the journalistic well ever since: “Wolfe was so immersed, observant, and detached that he often got it right. But many of the journalists who followed slid away from the heavy-duty reporting that was the only way to keep New Journalism honest. They learned to write “like” Wolfe, in terms of flourish, without taking the time he took to report the substance. Laden with multiple, rapid deadlines, even the most earnest journalists were unable to climb on a bus and ride cross-country with their subject for a year. Others were wannabe novelists or gonzo reporters hungrier for attention than for accuracy. A succession of journalists were caught plagiarizing; creating composites, glomming various people they had interviewed into a single, named character; hiring other reporters to go to the scene and feed them details; or, not to put too fine a point on it, making sh1t up.”
  • The Story of Two Tone: A history of the Two Tone musical movement in Harper’s. I am going to leave the opening here, because I think it will make you want to read the rest of the piece immediately: “When I was asked recently what gigs I’d most want to see if I could travel back in time, a few obvious answers leaped to mind: Charlie Parker, the Velvet Underground, Dylan and the Band c. 1965–66. Truly, what I’d most like to do is revisit certain nights in the late Seventies in a less altered state than I was in at the time: the Fall, Joy Division, Pere Ubu, Wire. Also on that list: one night in the spring of 1979, when, down in the basement of the Hope and Anchor, a raucous crowd witnessed an early London performance by the Specials. To say it was packed doesn’t do it justice. It had its own weather system: clouds of body heat, beer fumes, a fug of cigarette smoke curled around a passel of porkpie hats. A carnival squeezed into a cupboard. And this one abiding mystery of nightlife physics: How do people dance in such situations, let alone make the piston-elbowed, knees-up motion eternally associated with ska? There were members of various London bands in that sauna of a room, keen to check out the buzz around these Midlands interlopers. An unruly bunch, on first acquaintance—two of them black, five white, and all distinctly un-posey. Was this serious competition, or a passing fad? What no one—not even the Specials themselves—could have foreseen was how big they would become, and how soon. Not just big within this or that underground scene, but tabloid big, television big, young-kids-dressing-like-you big. In the early Eighties, bands like the Human League and Culture Club also attained such world-seducing status, but they were explicitly pop and always had their mascaraed eyes on the prize. The Specials were something you couldn’t plot on a graph; their revved-up combo of punk rock and Jamaican ska planted a seed that wrought unlikely blooms.” This is wonderful on the history and the politics and the music, whether or not you’ve ever done the aforementioned “piston-elbowed, knees-up” dance.
  • Dante: Finally this week, a short story by Nate Waggoner. Again, take the opening paragraph and then click and keep going; this is beautiful and ugly and sad and funny and and and: “Dante is 19 years old, has high cheekbones, soulful hazel eyes, and bright teeth he flashes cockily when he antagonizes my aunt Jai, doing something like reciting the Chris Rock “Who the fcuk reupholstered your pussy?” monologue from My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy at the dinner table. It would be fair to compare his appearance to that of an Adam Levine or a young Luke Wilson or a James Franco. We start watching Game of Thrones after he pitches it to me like this: “You gotta see this show, dawg. This bitch? Has dragons.” He leaves his socks on the kitchen island and drops the newspaper on the floor after he’s done with the sports pages. He does things like borrow my car to go buy pot-growing equipment and shoot off guns with his boys, get pulled over, then fail to tell me about that, or about how I’m now driving around with bullets in my backseat. It’s 2012, and we’re both living with Jai—I’m there while I’m in grad school, and he’s starting chemo back up again.”

By Dan Balestrin

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

 

Webcurios 07/03/25

Reading Time: 37 minutes

Last night, for the second time in my life, I found myself taking my trousers off in front of a few hundred people at a theatre in Soho (I was not being paid for this). It feels unfair that this should happen twice to be honest, and I am starting to suspect some sort of nefarious grand plan at play.

I went to see a comedy show – it was very good! There are still tickets available for tomorrow night if you also want a chance to be lightly-humiliated! – and, right at the end, there was a callback gag which resulted in an audience member having to hand over their shirt to the comedian. Which was then extended to said comedian then finding other audience members to complete the outfit – which was the point at which I began to very much regret being in the front row and being broadly speaking of comparable size to the performer. So he asked me for my trousers, I wrestled for about 0.3s with whether I wanted to be the cnut that derailed his finale, and then I took them off. Perhaps most humiliatingly of all, the guy – a good looking man of regulation weight – genuinely struggled to get into my strides, making the pipe-cleaner nature of my gams painfully apparent to every single one of the others present.

Anyway, I woke up with a not-insignificant feeling of shame, so should there be a fundamentally sheepish quality to this week’s Curios then that is why.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are probably glad you didn’t have to see that.

By Tai Shani

WE START WITH AN EXCELLENT DRUM AND BASS ALBUM FROM A COUPLE OF YEARS BACK, PLEASINGLY CALLED ‘KILBURN’, BY ZERO T AND ONJ! 

THE SECTION WHICH FEELS YOU ALL PROBABLY OUGHT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND THEN ADJUST YOUR PLANS ACCORDINGLY, PT.1:  

  • Space 0: We begin this week with one of those, I appreciate, annoying links where my description is basically going to consist of a lot of words expended to communicate the fact that, honestly, I haven’t the faintest idea what the everliving fcuk is happening here or what this is for or who made it or anything. I promise this isn’t down to authorial laziness – or, at least, not *primarily* down to authorial laziness – so much as this being a VERY chunky bit of webwork which basically succeeded in utterly overwhelming my poor, wheezing old laptop and which, if you’re going to give it a go, you should very much leave until AFTER you have closed all your other tabs. Still, should you have access to whatever the fcuk a 2025 version of a Cray Supercomputer is then I think this is potentially quite a fun toy – basically it’s a 3d world that you can WASD yourself around (so far, so banal) and which is peppered with…things, different objects all rendered in 3d which you can pick up and (and this is the bit where it starts to make the hardware complain) then combine in infinite combinations in godlike fashion, so that you can finally see what would happen if you were to merge the qualities of (say) a seahorse, a leopard and a Birkin handbag (no, really, this is exactly what happens, it is very much this odd). The hard computational work happens when you start asking the system to spin up these hybrids – I assume there’s some genAI under the hood here to create the eventual 3d models you end up with, but this gets VERY weird (and, to reiterate, unless your laptop is a LOT better than mine, VERY wheezy) very quickly indeed). If your hardware is upto it then this is a really interesting toy-slash-art-project-thing – but, seriously, don’t attempt to combine this with doing your timesheets come 6pm. Via the always-fascinating TITAA.
  • Kakocomputermoyan: I’ve featured works by Filipino digital artist Chia Amisola in Curios before, but this is her latest piece which brings together projects by a variety of different creators. Per the site description, “KAKAKOMPYUTER MO YAN (“that’s what you get for using the computer!”) is an exhibition of internet art featuring 21 Filipino artists. Its ‘songs’ are represented as various artworks: an elegy for Fall Out Boy’s Pete Wentz and St. Peter, a shrine to Onel de Guzman, a simulated torrent client, to data center mythologies. These counter-narratives articulate an online third-world. From exploitation, to queerness, to appropriation, to bootlegging, many of these stories would not have been possible without the internet. Contained within the karaoke machine, the internet becomes an urgent medium for works that speak to its potential for resistance.” Which, I appreciate, doesn’t tell you a whole lot, so rather than reading this rubbish why not click and explore? I have wandered through a dozen or so of these over the past few days, and there’s a pleasing breadth of style and tone and technique at play here, with works that play with the fabric of html in interesting ways to more static, visual/narrative experiences, to animations to interactive ‘game’-type pieces…I obviously can’t speak to any of the aspects of national identity and culture being referenced here, but as a general overview of web art practice in 2025 and a view of the web from a less-Western perspective, it’s consistently interesting and, occasionally, very clever indeed. Think of it like a gallery to wander through, and, if you can, give it 20-30 mins to explore.
  • The First Great Personal Portfolio Website Of 2025!: Long-time readers will be aware that I have a particular softspot for people who make needlessly-shiny and complex websites to show off their work, and this, by one Toshihito Endo, a Japanese dev who has decided that rather than spending days of their life demonstrating ‘thought leadership’ on LinkedIn they would instead create an entirely-functional 3d world via which to demonstrate their coding chops. “This is a place where I work on projects. I organise a space with “my work objects” as well as “my identity fragments” to make it comfortable and now, I’m glad to have you here! Feel free to walk around and will you find me to “say hello”?”, reads the charming welcome message, and then you get into the site and DEAR GOD this is legitimately better than about 70% of 3d gallery spaces I have ever visited online. Explore Endo’s workspace, learn about the things he likes, explore his portfolio, and, at one point, explore an model of his head rendered in glorious polygons as a representation of HIS OWN MIND inside the virtual space. Honestly, I can’t stress how beautifully-made this is and how *stylish*, and how much I wish I had a really rich client whose money I could use to employ this person because they are obviously very talented indeed.
  • Mark: We are, of course, living through an age of DISRUPTION. Disruption of governments! Disruption of the broad concept of ‘democracy’! Disruption of the functional planetary environment! SO MUCH DISRUPTION! You know what hadn’t, to this point, yet been disrupted? YES THAT IS RIGHT BOOKMARKS! I am sure you’re in agreement with me when I say that one of the major factors in humanity not having yet achieved some sort of transcendental emotional epiphany has been the lack of progress made in the preceding few centuries when it comes to ‘keeping track of where you are in a book’ – thank FCUK, then, for Silicon Valley! Mark, you will be THRILLED to learn, is a bookmark…POWERED BY AI!!!!! Yes, throw away your dumb, oh-so-19thC faux-leather numbers because this device will catapult your reading habits into the 22nd Century. Basically the gimmick here is that the bookmark will not only MAGICALLY REMEMBER where in the book you are, but it will also ‘read’ and summarise everything that you have read using the MAGIC OF THE MACHINE, thereby neatly-obviating the need for you to actually concentrate as you’re turning the pages. “Today”, runs the blurb on-site, “book readers struggle to retain everything they read” (SPEAK FOR YOUR FCUKING SELVES PLEASE) and so this solves that issue by, er, giving said readers a wafer-thin AI summary of the contents so that rather than reading a foundational text you can instead experience it as though filtered through the utterly-mediocre minds of a bunch of cnuts on LinkedIn. Although, judging by the books used as ‘example’ texts in the screenshots here, this is squarely aimed at the sorts of people who believe that Yuval Noah Harari is anything other than a stupid person’s idea of a smart person, or that Peter Thiel is a thought leader rather than, say, a cryptofascist. Is it clear from my tone that I wish genuine and long-term physical harm both on the people who want to get rich from this and from their target customers in equal measure? Because, really, I do. This is like some sort of ur-parody of techcnutery – from the absurd claims that THIS is the staggering innovation that will change humankind’s relationship to written texts forever, to the boast that it’s made from the same materials as a Boeing 777 – MATE IT IS A FCUKING BOOKMARK GYAC – to the seemingly-sincere promise that each year it will deliver you a ‘wrapped’ summary of ALL THE KNOWLEDGE YOU HAVE CONSUMED THAT YEAR (can you imagine a GPT-spun ‘summary’ of all the things you have ever read? Can you imagine how utterly miserable that would be, flattened into insignificance? Yes, well, EXACTLY), to the fact that I think it’s going to retail at around…wait for it…$200, this is the sort of thing I am slightly amazed exists in the wake of the humane debacle. I hate literally everything about this!
  • Revenge Font: A legitimately clever little PR stunt, this, by London agency Dude – their office is on Regent’s Canal, and was, towards the end of last year, tagged in fairly large-scale fashion by some charming local kids with questionable spraywork. So, to TAKE BACK CONTROL, Dude have decided to take the style of the tag and appropriate it themselves – they used it to create a brand new font which they have aptly decided to call ‘Revenge’, available to download from this site and free-to-use, thereby turning some frankly ugly graffwork into a nice little calling card for their creativity (and, actually, not a bad font in its own right tbh). There’s a link to donate to East London arts organisations on-page too for some nice CSR feelgoods, and, generally, this is a smart bit of creative work that I hope will have won them some extra business this year.
  • Claude Plays Pokemon: This has been going for over a week now – SO LATE! – but, given the AI’s seeming lack of sufficient token memory to have a consistent picture of what the fcuk it is doing, it’s quite likely that it’ll take a few more before it gets anywhere near completion. This is a Twitch stream featuring Anthropic’s Claude model attempting to play Pokemon, while a crowd of kids comment on its progress. What’s really interesting is that I think it’s using a reason-y model (3.7 Sonnet?) and as such you can watch The Machine’s ‘thought processes’ as it plays; there’s something really quite amazing about seeing the way in which it ‘thinks’ (it doesn’t think) and the ways in which this mimics the shape, but very much not the function, of human thought, and the ways in which it gets stuck in loops and into obsessional cul-de-sacs; on the one hand, it’s hard not to watch this for 5 minutes and think that we really should stop listening to people like Altman when they say things like “AGI NEXT TUESDAY!!!”; on the other, it’s also absolutely fcuking astonishing to think that this is something that would have been literal witchcraft 3 years ago and now is so accepted that I can be blase about it in poor quality prose.
  • Queer Communist Peter: Not just him, though – there’s Trans Lesbian Peter Griffin too! And RadFem Peter! And Punk Rock Peter! Why are the kids spinning up AI-juiced brainrot accounts featuring alternate-universe variants on the Family Guy character waxing lyrical about social justice issues? I DON’T KNOW BUT THEY ARE! This feels adjacent to that ‘communist ASMR’ page I linked to last week, with the brainrot style being the spoonful of sugar making the leftist discourse easier to swallow, and I suppose there’s a degree to which this all makes sense – it’s also undeniably true that there’s something really quite jarring about hearing, say, the theories of Adorno being delivered to you via the medium of a poorly-cloned version of Seth Mcfarland while Minecraft loops play in the background. For more on this you can read Taylor Lorenz’s ESSENTIAL (not in any way essential) deep dive into the phenomenon at User Mag – but, also, you might just want to keep it vague and puzzling and mysterious, because, honestly, even knowing more about the ‘why’ doesn’t really make it make sense (oh, by the way, there’s a line in the writeup about the guy who’s trying to set himself up as a sponsorship broker for these accounts who talks with all apparent sincerity about having a ‘monetisable stable of peters’ (I paraphrase, but) which nearly broke me).
  • A Truly Amazing Library of Music Bits: I think this one came to me via B3ta (THANKS ROB) – wherever it’s from, it’s a fcuking astonishing collection of what I think are original musical elements, small loops and samples that are all entirely free to download and use as you see fit, and, seriously, there are fcuking THOUSANDS here, spanning all sorts of genres and exactly the sort of thing you might want to play with were you a budding music producer or making game SFX or, basically, anything at all involving digital composition. This is, apparently, all the work of one Andre Louis – THANKYOU MYSTERIOUS STRANGER ANDRE LOUIS!
  • Turn Any Image Into An Explorable 3d Landscape: You…you want more of a description than that? FFS. Look, take any image you like, plug it into this website and then wander around it/through it as though it were a 3d gameworld – HAPPY NOW? This works best with map-type imagery – I think the software somehow ‘sees’ roads and topography and tries to work with them – but will render anything you feed it, which is how I found myself on Wednesday morning getting very lost in the, turns out, unsettlingly-craggy landscape that is my face.
  • The Saltcraft Studio: PREPOSTEROUS WASTE OF LUXE CLIENT BUDGET OF THE WEEK! This time it’s the turn of perfumier Issey Miyake to have its wallet inspected by some enterprising agency or another – the brand has a scent which, I presume, is somehow redolent, or the embodiment, of SALT, and so, obviously, decided to create an INTERACTIVE ARTISTIC WEBSITE EXPERIENCE where YOU, the putative scent-enjoyer, can craft your VERY OWN salt-themed digital artwork, which creative process involves, er, clicking a bunch of times to create your own UNIQUE SALT CRYSTAL and then choose from a bunch of different backgrounds and flourishes to make your own PERSONAL SALT SCULPTURE THINGY! No, you’re right, there is literally no reason why anyone would want to do this – beautifully upon completion of the user journey your special crystalline creation is inducted into a SALTY HALL OF FAME along with all the other works created by Issey Miyake fans worldwide – now, while I can’t be certain that the site doesn’t only display a limited number of finalised designs it strikes me as an unlikely and unnecessary limitation…which might then suggest that, per this morning when I found it two long hours ago, a grand total of 11 people have bothered to interact with this. Anyone want to speculate as to the cost-per-user of this? WELL DONE EVERYONE (especially the client handling person on the agency side).
  • Photos of the Old West: Via my friend Alex, some great photos of the America at the turn of the 20thC. You can almost taste the sarsaparilla (I have no idea what sarsaparilla is).
  • Time Gradient: Timezones, mapped to a greyscale gradient. Click, drag and hold to experience a very pleasing visual effect indeed – I very much like this as a way of displaying multiple time locations simultaneously.
  • Shuffled: Via Curios reader Dave Whiteland (THANKYOU DAVE!) comes this very niche little newsletter which each week will email you with a short overview of which countries in the world have changed leader over the past 7 days. Want to keep track with the health of democracy in Tuvalu? Need a nudge when the Vanuatans next choose to exercise their democratic right? OH GOOD! This actually covers major cabinet appointments and departmental/structural changes to the machinery of Government, and, my slightly-arch commentary aside, might be genuinely useful for…actually, no, sorry, I cannot for a second conceive of a situation in which anyone who NEEDS this information isn’t already getting it elsewhere, but I am very glad that anyone REALLY keen on knowing more about global governance has this as an additional resource.
  • Cold Album Drumming: A website-slash-YouTube channel with a single purpose – to whit: “Brad Frost plays drums to the albums he knows intimately, but has never drummed to before. Cover to cover. No warm-up. No prep. Totally cold. What could possibly go wrong?” I have only dipped into this briefly, and I think you probably need to be a drummer to really get this, but Frost is talented and a charming guide/companion, and there’s something honestly heartwarming about how much FUN he seems to be having as he smashes the fcuk out of his symbols in rhythmic fashion.
  • Bookwatch: Like the idea of books but hate reading? Ok, great, in which case enjoy audiobooks! But! What if…what if audio isn’t enough? What if you HATE READING but find merely listening to words sadly lacking? What if you need visual stimuli to ENGAGE YOUR MIND? Welcome, then, to Bookwatch, a website which takes a bunch of books (per all of these things, when they say ‘books’ they mean ‘the same fcuking laundry list of terrible self-help w4nk that every single tedious, cookie-cutter tech fcuk pretends to read so as to be able to have the same tedious, cookie-cutter opinions and beliefs as every single other tedious, cookie-cutter tech fcuk’) and presents them as…videos! I am 99% sure this is all being AI’d, with the summary being machine-generated from the core text and then the videos then being spun up from the summary copy, and, honestly, the idea of getting a fat-free AI-generated video summary of these already-largely-valueless texts is…entirely-dispiriting, frankly, but if YOU know someone whose tedious drive to self-optimise has seen them begin to inject the Huel directly into their stomachs to minimise digestion time then this may well be the innovation for them (also, please poison them; it’s for the wider benefit of the species, I promise).
  • Rejected Vanity Plates: It is a wonderful quirk of the Californian system that every application for a vanity number plate has its approval or rejection made part of the public record, meaning that each year it’s possible to marvel at some of the things people honestly thought that the State would approve for them to have stuck to their car. Refresh the page to get a new one – honestly, some of these are AMAZING, as are the official interpretations and reasons for approval/rejection. I for one am STUNNED that the person who wanted ‘SHE BANGS’ as their number plate was turned down.

By Jordanna Kalman

NEXT UP, AS WE MOVE TOWARDS FESTIVAL SEASON, WHY NOT HAVE 4+H OF TRACKS FROM ARTISTS WHO PLAYED LAST YEAR’S BOOMTOWN? 

THE SECTION WHICH FEELS YOU ALL PROBABLY OUGHT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND THEN ADJUST YOUR PLANS ACCORDINGLY, PT.2:

  • Left Field Dating: Surely it can only be a matter of months now before someone attempts to DISRUPT DATING for the final time be reintroducing the concept of arranged marriages and dowries but this time DIGITAL AND MOBILE-ENABLED, thus bringing us neatly full-circle? As we wait for that possibly-inevitable moment to arrive, welcome to the latest attempt to SOLVE LOVE – Left Field Dating is a new US-only (so far) app (and only a few cities in the US, I think), whose gimmick is LOCATION-BASED SERENDIPITY; as far as I can tell, you create your profile in the standard way and then, rather than having to swipe the misery carousel, you instead let THE MYSTERIOUS AI pair you with people based on its assessment of your potential compatibility (based on your profile and OTHER SIGNALS), with the gimmick that you will only be suggested matches when you’re both vaguely-proximate to each other. So the idea is that if you’re, say, killing time for 3h somewhere you could turn the app on and be notified if anyone the system thinks you might be up for fingering wanders through the vague vicinity – while this obviously sounds like an absolute fcuking safety nightmare, the FAQ suggests that no specific locations are given out, meaning that you’re in theory safe from a stranger suddenly approaching you with a gleam in their eye and ‘the app says we should fcuk’ on their tongue. This sounds simultaneously like ALMOST a great idea and also something with one or two too many obvious flaws to ever work, but let’s see if it ever escapes the NYC/campus ghetto. BONUS LOCATION-BASED PEOPLEFINDER! Pie is also-US-only, also in a limited number of cities, but rather than Left Field is a FRIENDSHIP rather than boning app – with this one you can flag you’re going to a specific event or location and get matched with other users who’ve also expressed an interest, which, honestly, feels *quite* a lot like how Facebook worked c.2010ish, but there is nothing new under the sun.
  • Noosphere: Another week, another attempt to FIX NEWS! No, this one isn’t going to work either, sorry. Noospehere is a newly-launched app-based news platform (iOS-only at present, and possibly US-only too so far) which, as far as I can tell, has decided to take the slightly odd market position of ‘a social app where you only follow journalists and get links to all their work and reporting’, which, honestly, is basically ‘Twitter in the old days’ as far as I’m concerned. Per their description, “Noosphere is a place where premium, quality journalists bring their best work, connecting authentically with their fans and followers, while building a sustainable business for the next era of news. A beautiful, intuitive design includes Articles and Briefs – in Text, Audio Photos and Video – never before published and trustworthy, straight from the source. Each reporter’s bio is accessible and transparent. Journalists update you regularly, including Alerts options so you are the first to have breaking news or in-the-field visibility on everything from politics, to climate change, conflict zones and beyond.“ There’s some interesting detail about the monetisation policy buried in this writeup here – effectively this seems designed to put cash directly in the pockets of the journalists themselves rather than a media organisation (although obviously Noosphere is not a charity) – but the pricepoint is…honestly incredibly fcuking punchy, because $240 a year feels like a LOT to pay for a disparate bunch of voices that may or may not provide a balanced and wide-ranging overview of What Is Going On, especially when there’s no guarantee at all that this will develop the critical mass of either journalists posting or users reading to sustain itself beyond the initial VC fund runway.
  • The Great Wikipedia Race: Riffing on last week’s SUPERB ‘3d navigable museum of Wikipedia’ (which if you are yet to download and play with, WHAT THE FCUK IS WRONG WITH YOU??), comedian Sean Morl is running a GLOBAL WIKIPEDIA 3D RACE CHALLENGE THING on Monday 17th March 2025, all being streamed live for lols. The idea is simple – on the day, a randomly-generated bingo card of potential Wikipedia entries will be given to all participants, who will then have two hours to run through the museum attempting to complete a whole ‘line’ of topics in any order they please. Silly, pointless and antithetical to actually learning anything, I find the idea of people streaming themselves running through a weirdly-liminal gallery space attempting to find the, I don’t know, ‘gangrene’ section infinitely pleasing.
  • Chance Vision: I could attempt to explain or describe this to you, but I would instead invite you to click the link, to scroll down the page and, using the words arranged on the Page, and to attempt to work out what the everliving fcuk this…product? App? THING? thinks it is meant to be. “What if seeing truly meant understanding? We bridge the gap between curiosity and knowledge, empowering you to uncover the stories, meaning, and cultural context behind everything you see. We believe understanding the world should be effortless – a natural extension of your curiosity. With Chance AI, visual discovery becomes intuitive, human, and deeply meaningful – just as it’s meant to be.” YES OK BUT WHAT THE FCUK DO YOU DO WHAT ARE YOU FOR? As far as I can tell this is basically a packaged up LLM with photoanalysis capabilities, available as a standalone app for anyone who hasn’t yet realised that you can do all of this stuff with a standard GPT login these days, but, well, I am featuring it mainly for being the most utterly-meaningless piece of copywriting I have seen all year, for which sincere congratulations.
  • Night Earth: The earth! At night! As a composite made up of loads of satellite images from 2012! This is rather beautiful, although there’s also something sobering about the thought that the reality of this image a whole 13 years on will be a planet that is so much brighter – burning so much more! – than it was back then.
  • Webring.fun: Part of the growing OLD WEB nostalgiaboom, we are BRINGING BACK THE WEBRING! Webrings, for the children or less-terminally-online, were a thing of the early-ish internet era whereby sites of similar theme or tone or style would organise into loose collectives (webrings) characterised by a shared sense of community and mutual hyperlinking, with the broad theory that webrings were useful ways of arranging sites into broad groupings to aid with discovery and thematic clustering the early, pre-indexing days. This is a very new attempt to revitalise the concept, and there are only a dozen or so sites signed up to this one, but I am going to try and add Curios this week and if you own a small, personal, bloggish site then you may want to add yourself to it as a vaguely-community-minded nod to an earlier and more innocent era when we still believed that this would make things better rather than, as inevitably happened, it making things far, far worse.
  • Middle School: Another superb piece of work by The Pudding looking at a specific demographic cohort in the US through the lens of MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF DATA. This time they’re looking at Middle Schoolers – a term that means the square root of fcuk-all to me, not being North American or a product of its scholastic system, but which as far as I can tell basically means 11-14ish – and how they FEEL ABOUT LIFE and, as is always the case with these guys, it’s an object lesson in how to tell stories with data and bring numbers to life in a way in which humanises and personalises them. Leaving aside the beauty of the presentation and the effectiveness of the presentation, WOW does it seem like tweens in the US are miserable (lol I wonder why).
  • Extraordinary Male Living Space: The description for this is lifted directly from Ryan, where I found the link originally – it will take you to a Reddit post, from which you MUST click the main image and then enjoy the carousel of psychedelia. Can you IMAGINE the headaches that spending longer than approximately 10 minutes in this house would induce? It’s also important that you read OP’s accompanying description, because there’s something unbelievably-poignant about the ‘after three failed relationships’ line – this is very much the home decoration choice of a man who has fully embraced ‘forever alone’ as a lifestyle choice. MEN, WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????
  • Circle of Attraction: I went for a few beers and a stroll with my friend Ben this week, and we were reminiscing about the halcyon times of 13-ish years ago when it seemed like we couldn’t leave the house without someone attempting to throw money at us in exchange for some sort of ill-defined service provision. It’s fair to say that here in tough old 2025 times are…somewhat less flush, turns out, and the magic money tree really does seem to have succumbed to Dutch Elm, and I imagine many of us could do with some sort of magical, serendipitous windfall to take the edge off slightly. Well, thankfully it turns out that the secret to turning your financial fortunes around is, er, playing some YouTube videos in the background! Circle of Attraction is a YT channel which posts videos whose purpose, it is claimed, “is to help you manifest a rich and beautiful life with the Law of Attraction, by providing you with POWERFUL money meditation music, visualization videos, and inspirational texts and affirmations regularly. You are capable of achieving an EASIER and WEALTHIER life!” Beautifully, the site then goes on to offer this slightly-more-grounded disclaimer, noting “our music and videos will not make you rich overnight, but serve you as powerful tools to help activate the Law of Attraction in your life so that you can attract money, wealth, and abundance.” So, er, CAVEAT EMPTOR! Still, if you think that watching an hour-long video featuring an AI-generated bundle of notes hovering over a dollarsign background while new age music plays gently as a bed – “Tap into the MEGA-MILLIONAIRE FREQUENCY of 432Hz x 777Hz and open the door to wealth in just 7 minutes. Let this session shift your energy and align you with financial abundance, making it easier for money and success to flow into your life!” – then, well, ENJOY! Also, should any of you find that you magically DO become plutocratically wealthy after availing yourself of the services here offered, then, well, REMEMBER WHERE YOU HEARD ABOUT IT PLEASE.
  • Percussive City: A small project by artist collective Uncle Friend, this webpage presents a series of videos answering the question ‘what would the city sound like if you attempted to turn various disparate elements of it into percussive instruments?’ – the answer, by the way, is ‘surprisingly good’ and I would really enjoy hearing a whole ambient-y, breaks-y album produced solely from sound fragments born of London’s street furniture so, well, if one of you would like to crack on and make that for me that would be nice thankyou (ONE DAY someone will read one of these exhortations and do what I ask. ONE FCUKING DAY).
  • Cool Tools: Are you the sort of person who before buying something, however trivial, feels it essential to compile some sort of seventeen-tab spreadsheet comparing different models’ featuresets and review scores and price points so as to ensure you’re getting the VERY BEST OF THE BEST? How is that working out for you? Is it not really time consuming and annoying? Maybe…try giving less of a fcuk? Or, alternatively, avail yourself of this useful new site pulled together by the people behind long-running recommendations newsletter ‘Recommendo’, which for years has been, er, recommending things its curators think are good to its readership. The database of past recommendations has now been tagged and made searchable on this site, meaning if you want to ask it for the VERY BEST (say) trainers or air fryers or knives then it will probably have an opinion; Recomendo is, to the best of my knowledge, independent and all-human, and as such this feels like a decently-objective addition to your ‘product recommendations’ rolodex (if you’re enough of a weirdo to have such a thing in the first place).
  • 3d Words With Some Perspective: Type in two words and this site will create you a little 3d model that basically combines them so as that when you rotate the model a certain way one is visible and vice-versa. Which, yes, makes the square root of no sense at all, but will be entirely clear once you click. I REALLY want a 3d printer so I can get a couple of physical ones of these made – ideally reading something vaguely profane and silly, like ‘wnking turtles’ (no, me neither, but that is what is in my head RIGHT NOW at 934am).
  • 70s Scifi Book Cover Generator: Someone’s trained an AI model on a bunch of pulp scifi cover designs from the 70s and chucked it up on Glif for anyone to play with – sadly as with all of the cheaper models it fcuks up text rendering something chronic, meaning the books are often blessed with titles like “The Langfluider Slihntzlx”, but the graphical styles and general composition here are spot-on and there’s something quite interesting in exploring what others have chosen to spin up.
  • Emoji Stretcher: Make emoji, but wide. Emoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooji, if you will (but you inevitably won’t).
  • HORRIBLE AI BONGO CORNER: NB CLICKING THIS LINK WILL TAKE YOU ONTO A SITE WHERE YOU ARE ONLY A FEW CLICKS AWAY FROM SOME POTENTIALLY REALLY HORRIBLE STUFF WHICH YOU MIGHT NOT WANT TO SEE. Also, I think there’s some AI-generated nudity on the landing page. So, well, sorry about that. BUT, equally, I wanted to bring you this link because I am increasingly intrigued as to what is going to happen to us when it becomes trivial to spin up whatever flavour of smut anyone wants, unconstrained by previously-limiting factors like ‘basic human physiognomy’. Every time a new OpenSource TTV model drops, within hours the bongo-themed LORAs emerge – so it is with whatever Chinese variant this is, which has been manipulated by weirdos so as to be able to generate incredibly-realistic looking videos of ‘sexy’ women with, er, two heads. Yes, that’s right, two heads. Two ‘SEXY’ heads, but two heads nonetheless. I can’t stress enough how INTENSELY weird it feels to look at this – really quite deeply, viscerally wrong in a way that felt somehow newly-awful – and I felt it quite important that I share it with you so I didn’t have to suffer alone. Again, I am sorry (also, by the way, I wasn’t joking about the rest of that site, I really don’t recommend clicking around much unless you’re feeling a reasonable degree of emotional fortitude because it will not do wonders for your faith in humanity (or, more accurately, men)).
  • Fly Pieter: Since I found this a link to it’s apparently been shared by That Fcuking Man and so it’s entirely possible you’ll have seen it – if not, though, Fly Pieter is a VERY simple, almost rudimentary, in-browser flight sim which is distinguished by dint of it being in large part ‘coded by machine’ – it’s actually quite a lot more complex than that, as outlined in this writeup, and not simply a case of typing ‘make me a flight sim’ into Grok, but it’s true that, basically, the bulk of the work in getting this running was done by The Machine. It’s only ‘fun’ in the most loose of senses but it feels like a small watershed moment in terms of what is possible in terms of building with automation. If you squint it’s almost possible to be hopeful about the new era of limitless digital creativity that we might be about to usher in (or, alternatively, to be pessimistic about the terminal weight of digital cruft we’re about to be buried under; either/or).
  • Social Democracy: Ok, I tried with this but it was simply TOO DRY for me – for any of you for whom The Rest is History is the BEST thing in the world, though, this might well be catnip. A browsergame in which it is Germany in 1928 and you need to try and stop the Nazis getting into power using only the power of POLITICAL PROCESS and TECHNICAL GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEMS. As I said, it’s not exactly a light game of Tetris – “Play as the Social Democratic Party of Germany in 1928, and try to stop the NSDAP from taking power. Guide the party through elections and parliamentary politics. Deal with the Great Depression and the spiraling political violence that characterized the late “Weimar Republic”.” – but if you’re a very specific type of weird history nerd then this could be the best link of the week.
  • 368 Chickens: This, by contrast, is very simple and very easy to understand, but absolutely fcuking FIENDISH in its execution and made me momentarily very frustrated on Monday before I decided to put it down and move on with my life. You have 368 chickens to place on a board. When you place three or more chickens of the same type in a line, they vanish. EXHAUST YOUR CHICKENS.
  • The Beast of Glenkildove: Finally this week, an interactive, choose your own adventure-type novel! Ok, you only get the first three chapters for free and beyond that you need to pony up for the full thing, but there’s a good 20-25m of play here before you hit the paywall and it is REALLY nicely done – curious and better-written than I’d expected and full of decisions that feel MEANINGFUL and IMPACTFUL, and if you’re the sort of person who ever enjoyed Fighting Fantasy books as a kid then you will get a powerful kick of nostalgia from this (except this is in fact a lot better than Fighting Fantasy books because, honestly, they were mostly a bit sh1t).

By Françoise Huguier

OUR LAST MIX OF THE WEEK IS THIS BRILLIANTLY-SUNSHINEY COLLECTION OF TRACKS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD, COMPILED BY UNITED FREEDOM COLLECTIVE! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Manuscript Miniatures: Not a Tumblr! I don’t care! “ManuscriptMiniatures.com is an image collection of miniatures depicting armoured figures from the medieval period. Miniatures are sourced from manuscripts created before 1450 in countries across Europe.” There are over 16000 here, so if you can’t find something that pleases you then you are almost certainly morally deficient in some significant way.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Lordess Foudre: Poster-ish art and design which is very much channeling the whole ‘digital end of days’ vibe which I like to think is what keeps you all flocking back to Web Curios week after week, and which I am continually tempted to buy because, well, just click the link, it is ACE.
  • Jordanna Kalman: One of Kalman’s images is a feature photo in the newsletter this week, but I wanted to link to their Insta feed too because I think the work is beautiful and I would like you all to pay attention to it.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • AI and the Limits of Vocabulary: So this is an academic paper – wait! No! Come back! This is interesting, I promise! – all about the extent to which language defines our ability to conceive of subjects/topics, and how, if one takes that premise, that our extant language may be insufficient or inadequate to enable us to have helpful conversations about the emergent world of AI: “This position paper argues that, in order to understand AI, we cannot rely on our existing vocabulary of human words. Instead, we should strive to develop neologisms: new words that represent precise human concepts that we want to teach machines, or machine concepts that we need to learn. We start from the premise that humans and machines have differing concepts. This means interpretability can be framed as a communication problem: humans must be able to reference and control machine concepts, and communicate human concepts to machines. Creating a shared human-machine language through developing neologisms, we believe, could solve this communication problem.” Obviously this is all VERY Wittgenstinian, but it doesn’t get too knotty, I promise, and even if you’re someone for whom the idea of reading a philosophy paper is approximately as appealing as dental surgery this is a relatively light read. I find the concept of ‘latent space’ a useful example of this, a term which has emerged as a manner of conceiving of the way in which The Machine categorises and links information and ‘meaning’ and without which I don’t think I would be able to ‘understand’ (lol) any of this stuff anywhere near as well – seriously, this is really really really fascinating, and gets moreso the longer you sit with it.
  • If You’re So Smart, Why Can’t You Die?: OK, this is VERY LONG and quite…discursive and a but rambly, but also it’s SUCH an interesting and smart exploration of what we mean when we talk about ‘machine intelligence’ or indeed ‘intelligence’ in general, and the difference between specific and general intelligence, and how thinking of these distinctions can be useful when considering what we mean when we talk about ‘artificial intelligence’ or even whether we should be using the ‘i’ word in this context at all. Really can’t recommend this highly enough if you have the time to spare and the will to put in a bit of effort. Look, here are the opening few paras to give you a taste – honestly, this thought example alone struck me as a really smart way of framing the premise, and it gets smarter as it goes on: “When a coffee shop makes a bagel, it’s a pretty good bet they can make a croissant as well. Not every shop that has one has the other, but they’re pretty strongly correlated. We call this correlation “baking”. This sounds like a weird way to say it. We call “this correlation” baking? It just…is baking, isn’t it? But the steps you follow aren’t literally the exact same. The procedure to make a bagel and the procedure to make a croissant happen to be similar enough, achieving similar enough ends, of interest to similar enough people, that those similarities can be compactly described by the one word “baking”. But there’s nothing special about the word “baking” uniting these on any fundamental level. The similarities came first, and the word after. Now imagine a coffee shop that’s been tasked to “achieve superbaking”. They make one bagel on Monday, ten bagels on Tuesday, and eighty million bagels on Wednesday. They’ve never made a croissant. Have they achieved superbaking?” BONUS AGI-ISH ARTICLE: here’s Gary Marcus patiently explaining why AGI still isn’t imminent despite what an awful lot of people with a vested interest in telling you otherwise might be wanting you to believe.
  • The World Is Flattened: I’m including this not because I necessarily think it’s spot-on but because, given Ted Gioia’s increasing prominence as a Cultural Thinker, it’s likely to get a lot of traction and appear in a reasonable number of people’s ‘borrowed opinions’ folder in the next few months. Following on from his superviral ‘where is culture at?’ post from 2024 in which he outlined his theory on the rise of ‘dopamine culture’, Gioia defines 2025 an era in which we have reached ‘peak flat’: “I still participate in many web platforms—I need to do it for my vocation. (But do I really? I’ve started to wonder.) But now they feel constraining. Even worse, they now all feel the same. Instead of connecting with people all over the world, I now get “streaming content” 24/7. Facebook no longer wants me stay in touch with friends overseas, or former classmates, or distant relatives. Instead it serves up memes and stupid short videos. And they are the exact same memes and videos playing non-stop on TikTok—and Instagram, Twitter, Threads, Bluesky, YouTube shorts, etc. Every big web platforms feels the exact same. That whole rich tapestry of my friends and family and colleagues has been replaced by the most shallow and flattened digital fluff. And this feeling of flattening is intensified by the lack of context or community. The only ruling principle is the total absence of purpose or seriousness.” I agree with this broad point – what I agree with less is Gioia’s ‘THIS IS THE FAULT OF 30 TECH LEADERS’ line, which strikes me as…I don’t know, willfully ignoring the manner in which the entire world has become driven entirely by data over the past 5 decades, and this is an inevitable question of THE FCUKING BELL CURVE and automatic systems designed to optimise for market capture and how that, even if you’re Carole Cadwalldr, probably isn’t ONLY Mark Zuckerberg’s fault. Gioia also seems to suggest we’re on the verge of some sort of mass response to this and the beginning of a new era of pushback against this homogeneity…which might be true! Equally, though, it might not! Anyway, this is about 55% there, I think, and another nice datapoint to use in your ‘and this is why the small/cosy/artisanal/craft/homemade web is something we should lean into in 2025-6’ presentation. BONUS FLAT CULTURE LINK: this is an interesting piece which, while looking at Substack in particular, also nudges to the inevitable way in which audience maximisation tends inevitably towards a certain homogeneity within any given field.
  • Hanging With The MAGA Gays: Trying to keep the US politics stuff to a minimum here at the moment because, well, you don’t need another fcuking source of it, do you, but this article in GQ is not only very well-written but also feels like a perfect piece of ‘I never thought the leopards would eat MY face!’ foreshadowing. Meet the gay men who caped for Trump, who don’t believe that the TQ+ bits of the LGBTQ+ spectrum have anything to do with them, and who are presumably shocked and baffled at the stats coming out of the States this week suggesting that popular support for gay marriage has fallen across the country alongside the rise of MAGA conservatism. Again, this feels less about gay/straight and more about the unashamed return of the sense of ‘droit de seigneur’ amongst the rich and ‘beautiful’ and the feeling that, actually, social natural selection is absolutely fine as long as I am on the right side of the dividing line thankyouverymuchindeed.
  • Meet Brian Armstrong: You won’t enjoy meeting Brian, admittedly, but I think it’s important you do. Brian is CEO of crypto exchange Coinbase, and an increasingly influential figure in Washington as the Trumpian regime prepares to go all-in on digital currencies and magic beans (for reasons that are in NO WAY connected to the massive enrichment of some of the principal actors at the heart of the administration, no siree!). This profile gives some background on the man and his politics, which – and you might be surprised by this, so maybe sit down – lean towards the creation of independent, largely-unregulated tax haven city states for the super-rich! WHAT THE FCUK IS IT WITH THESE CNUTS AND THEIR WISH TO SECEDE ENTIRELY FROM SOCIETY? And, if they want to do it, can they instead do it in terminal fashion rather than through endlessly trying and failing to create their own fcuking countries? This sounds good, doesn’t it? Like the sort of thing that the world’s richest people should definitely be into? FCUK’S SAKE. ““I do think crypto has implications far beyond just payments and money,” Armstrong said during a podcast interview in August, when asked about crypto’s relationship to the Network State. He said that he’s “definitely very interested” in special economic zones—in which typically cash-strapped countries cede land to tech bros who want to play a real-life version of SimCity—and other “ways that you can tokenize real estate and actual physical land to create better forms of society…We’re actually losing freedoms,” added Armstrong, who has an estimated net worth of $8.4 billion. “So I would like us to all in crypto think about how we actually go create physical places in the world to preserve freedom over the long term. I think that’s ultimately crypto’s destiny.”
  • Human Gunk: Jay Springett makes his pitch for linguistic immortality and brings us a useful concept which sits alongside AI slop – human gunk! “Gunk is what happens when content isn’t made to inform, entertain, or create meaning, but only to be seen. It’s the accumulated, suffocating residue of media optimised for machine visibility instead of human readability. Like the filth of the Augean Stables, it has built up all across the internet over the years of the last decade or so—layer upon layer of clickbait, regurgitated press releases, SEO-padding, and engagement bait. It’s made by people, but produced like sludge. It’s all Gunk. Human Gunk…Gunk is all the awkward, keyword-stuffed sentences at the top and in the middle of every article. The personal sob stories about someone’s grandma you have to scroll past before you get to a recipe. It’s all the endless think pieces that say nothing but mention product names. It’s all the LinkedIn posts that read like they were ghostwritten by a sentient press release. It’s corporate blog spam that exists only to trap search traffic. The same five insights repackaged in a thousand different ways, all slightly worse than the last.” Or, you might argue, the latest linky newsletter containing all the same links as all the other linky newsletters (chiz chiz chiz). There’s an interesting question at the heart of Springett’s essay here as to whether the slop era is meaningfully worse, or whether it’s simply an inevitable evolution of what we’ve been doing to ourselves for a decade. Either way, gunk is a genuinely useful addition to the vocabulary of the now.
  • Why People Believe Fake Things: Ordinarily I really dislike the Q&A as a written interview format, but I will make an exception for this as the content is so interesting – this is an interview with one Flint Dibble (WHAT a name!), an archaeologist who spends time trying to debunk fake archaeological theories and who recently took on the thankless task of going on the Joe Rogan show to patiently explain to the philosopher lunkhead why, in fact, it was reasonably-unlikely that Atlantis had in fact ever existed, despite what a significant number of people inside Joe’s phone seem to think. This is fascinating throughout, and Dibble obviously has the patient of several saints – this bit is worth quoting in full, because while it’s something I think I probably instinctually ‘knew’ already it’s also the first time I’ve seen it articulated this clearly – this is in reference to science, but applies pretty universally imho: “ As soon as there’s somebody saying this entire discipline is trying to cancel me, that should be a red flag immediately. This person is probably creating a narrative of them as a savior that knows more than an entire discipline and therefore is probably full of crap. When you look at the people who actually did make major paradigm shifts in various scientific fields, they never claimed they were being canceled. Where’s Albert Einstein going on air and saying physicists are canceling me for proposing new ideas? No. Real archeologists and historians that propose new ideas are plentiful, and they’re my colleagues and friends. We talk about Galileo being burned by the Church. Galileo was not being burned by his colleagues. And so there’s a big difference there. As soon as somebody’s using that kind of language of, “I am being canceled, there’s a conspiracy against me to shut me down because these people don’t want their truth challenged,” that should immediately be a red flag. Why is this person using this kind of rhetoric? They’re only using it to convince you, rather than to convince you of the veracity of their ideas. Because what they’re doing is they’re appealing to the public rather than the experts who understand all the evidence.”
  • The Kebab / Train Station Study: Ok, so this isn’t technically much of a read (unless you REALLY enjoy reading Python scripts) but I am very much a fan of the project’s existence. James Pae came across a post on social media positing that there was a strong negative correlation between the proximity of a kebab joint to Metro stations in Paris and said kebabs being ropey, and decided to see if he could write code to test said hypothesis – this is an explanation of how he did it and what he learned. VERY geeky, but also interesting from a functional ‘how’ point of view (and even if, like me, you are a no-code moron, it’s fascinating to see how one would put this together if one were not in fact a no-code moron).
  • Cybersigilism: OOH, A NEW AESTHETIC! To me, at least – Cybersigilism is…basically it’s a sort of weird mashup of ‘cyberdog aesthetics’ and ‘death metal band logo aesthetics’, cybergoth-ish and vaguely-witchy, and I am very much a fan. “Drawing on the visual languages of HR Giger and the logos of metal bands (particularly those designed by Christophe Szpajdel), the spiderweb-like aesthetic fuses hints of cyberpunk and futurism with seemingly mystical amulets. Often, the designs look like alien vascular networks or Art Nouveau electrical currents, while appearing both organic and mechanical simultaneously. “I’ve seen people say it looks like a witch’s curse,” said Aingelblood, a tattoo artist from LA who goes by @cybersigilism on Instagram. “And honestly, I love that metaphor.” But then there are others who refer to it in more layman’s terms: Gen Z tribal.” PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE can one of you spend some time attempting to get a consumer-facing brand to embrace this? Just for me?
  • The Millennial Redemption Arc: Or, “it turns out that everything feels so sh1tty now that kids are starting to express nostalgia for peak girlboss flat-design capitalism”, or “oh ZIRP era, how we miss you!”. I felt a genine pang of sadness for a generation when I read this para, ngl: “Gen Z didn’t get a real college experience. Gen Z doesn’t do happy hours with their coworkers. Gen Z doesn’t meet people outside dating apps. Every headline Gen Z reads today would have been a Millennial’s 30 Rock joke 10 years ago. While Gen Z can claim innovations like TikTok, all of Gen Z culture has been created under the thumb of some kind of existential threat, be it climate change or a coup. Gen Z has never, in other words, had their Girls era.”
  • Seeing Like A Simulation: A great (admittedly a few months old, but I missed it last year) piece in the LARB, itself a review of a new book looking back at the history of Will Wright’s seminal Sim City, the videogame that trained an entire generation of people that nuclear power was fundamentally dangerous and that mass transit probably wasn’t worth the hassle of lining up all the subways properly. What this does brilliantly is get under the hood of the (necessary) simplifications and abstractions that underpin the engine and the extent to which the nature of said simplifications and abstractions makes Sim City – as with any designed system of any kind – an innately political project by its nature.
  • Meet Billy Possum: I had, I confess, forgotten that the ‘Teddy Bear’ is a result of Theodore Roosevelt once allegedly refusing to shoot a bear; I had NEVER known that, in the early 20thC, an entrepreneurial woman named Susie W Allgood attempted to wrest the title of ‘best-loved cuddly mammalian kids toy’ from the teddy bear by creating her own alternative – BILLY POSSUM. As you might surmise from the fact that, well, you’ve never fcuking heard of him, Billy Possum was not the runaway success his creator had hoped for, but the story of how far Allgood went in attempting to Make Billy Possum Happen is a cracking one (also, the press officer in me was SCREAMING at some of the details in here). There’s a moment about halfway through the piece where they present a photo of a rare, surviving example of a Billy Possum toy, sold at auction in 2005, and you will suddenly realise that perhaps Ms Allgood was…maybe a *touch* on the delusional side, let’s say.
  • Can You Sous Vide Sausages In Condoms?: Is a rare example of a question which, before it was committed to digital ink via the medium of this blogpost, has almost certainly never been written down anywhere else in human history. The answer, by the way, is ‘yes you can, and apparently they can be quite nice too’ – but the main draw here is obviously the incredibly-phallic photos and phrases like ‘the prophylactic wiener’.
  • 10 Observations About Tokyo: Just a really nice, short piece about travel and cities and cultural differences and customs. I thought this point was particularly interesting and semi-universal (or at least, not Japan-specific): “If Tokyo is disconcertingly functional, that’s in part because it’s a parasitic organism sucking the life out of the rest of Japan. All the good jobs are here, all the opportunities, and so all the ambitious young people are here too. This one megacity is Japan’s New York, D.C. and LA all rolled into one. Living here, it’s easy to forget the huge demographic chaos Japan faces due to its collapsed birthrate and fast-aging population: stay in Tokyo and you’d never know the country has an acute shortage of young people. But the demographic sh1tshow is painfully evident the second you get out into Japan’s second- and third-tier cities: boarded-up shops, ghost neighborhoods, shuttered primary schools, abandoned houses: a Children of Men dystopia. The miraculous metropolis all around me thrives because the rest of Japan doesn’t. Every politician talks about this. None has a good idea for what to do about it.”
  • Meet Tyler Cowen: John Phipps profiles blogger and insane polymath Tyler Cowen for the Economist’s 1843 Mag – this is both really interesting and really well written, sharp without being at any point unpleasant, but, for me at least, it was also a BIT close to the bone; Cowen is significantly smarter than I am (I would not be so hubristic as to attempt a comparison), but there are…not-insignificant parts of this that I read and thought ‘oh God that feels like me…oh God that feels like me’ which is, honestly, quite odd and not wholly-pleasant (not least because the only thing worse than realising that you’re probably quite similar to someone who in many respects is…very flawed is realising you are quite similar *but also significantly less good*). Anyway, I really enjoyed this in a complicated way – oh, if you do read it, be prepared for one specific line which, if you are anything like me at all, will make you SO jealous of this man that you will have to get up from your device and go for a calming walk to regain your composure, all the while muttering ‘seriously, why can’t I be like that???’.
  • Real Tennis: We’re finishing up the longreads this week with three pieces from the new edition of Granta which really does have some cracking stuff in it – should any of these end up paywalling you then I think they are currently doing a digital-only subscription for £1, which is a frankly insane offer and 100% worth the money. This first essay is all about the famously, fabulously, eccentric sport of Real Tennis, as described by enthusiast Clare Bucknell, who writes with affection and a pleasing degree of self-awareness about the sport’s origins and the culture that surrounds it. As per usual in descriptions of Real Tennis, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE to conceive of what it looks like being played from the textual descriptions – this is no fault of Bucknell’s so much as it is the fault of the sport for being absolutely-fcuking-impenetrable (watch this if you want a quick primer) – but, honestly, that doesn’t really matter as this is all TONE AND TEXTURE AND VIBE.
  • Round One: A story about trying to conceive and, specifically, about a man having to produce a sample and not feeling quite up to it (it is not, to be clear, solely about that moment, but it *is* very funny indeed), and about the oddity of how the process of IVF sort-of divorces the biology from the practice traditionally required to achieve the outcome and how that odd disconnect plays out in a relationship…this is very good, though perhaps not one to read if this is an experience you’re currently going through.
  • Flesh: Finally this week, I think this is a stellar piece of writing by David Szalay about an age-gap relationship between a young man in Central Europe (I am going to guess at Hungary) and the woman in the nearby apartment who he helps with the shopping. Sad and poignant and funny and beautiful and weirdly sexy and simultaneously very much not, this absolutely captivated me up until the last line which caused me, and I am not exaggerating here, to let out a small, audible ‘oof’ which I think will be felt by many of you (you will know why). Please read this one, it is GLORIOUS and deserves to be shared.

By Charles Pfahl

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 28/02/25

Reading Time: 37 minutes

IT IS PRACTICALLY SPRINGTIME! THE WORST IS OVER!

Except, of course, spring doesn’t technically start in the UK for another three weeks – and lol! The worst is very much yet to come! But, well, let’s not dwell on these HARD TRUTHS – instead join me in staring out of the window at that mysterious yellow sky orb and celebrating the fact that, for the first time in what feels like approximately nine months, nothing appears to be damp!

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you should probably close this and go outside and find something better to do with your life before everything becomes even more irredeemably terrible and the Earth a burnt-out, irradiated shell bereft of life.

By Andy Dixon

WE KICK OFF THIS WEEK’S LINKY CORNUCOPIA (CAN ONE KICK OFF A CORNUCOPIA? ONE PROBABLY CANNOT, BUT, WELL, FCUK IT) WITH A BRAND NEW MIX OF OBSCURE JAZZ FROM SADEAGLE WHICH I CAN HIGHLY RECOMMEND IF YOU CAN GET PAST THE SOMEWHAT-QUESTIONABLECHOICE OF  OPENING  SAMPLE!

THE SECTION WHICH THINKS THAT’S QUITE ENOUGH REPELLENT SYCOPHANCY THANKYOU VERY MUCH INDEED, PT.1:  

  • The Museum of All Things: Ok, I need to be upfront here – this is something which is very much desktop-only, you will need to DOWNLOAD and INSTALL and which requires marginally (but only marginally, I promise) more effort than the standard Curios link, but I promise you that it is 100%, unquestionably worth it. No, really, it is, I WOULD NOT LIE TO YOU (about the quality of the links, at least – everything else in here should be taken with the requisite skipful of salt and in the knowledge that Authorial Pose Is Real). The Museum of All Things is possibly one of the most wonderful, brilliant things I have ever experienced – digitally, obvs, my meatspace life is, I promise, less bereft than that – and I think it should possibly form part of the national curriculum or come preloaded on every computer sold between now and the inevitable climate-induced collapse of civilisation (current ETA: 2052). “YES OK YOU VERBOSE CNUT, WHAT THE FCUK IS IT???”, I imagine you screaming at me (you’d be amazed at how often I imagine you doing this as I type, as an aside, it’s a strangely-effective motivator); ok, FINE, let me explain (after 200 words of needless, unwanted preamble). The Museum of All Things is basically Wikipedia – ALL of Wikipedia, or at least as much of it as makes no odds – presented as an explorable, slightly-bowdlerised gallery experience which you can explore in first person. Download the file, fire it up, set it to fullscreen and enjoy what is honestly a DIZZYING experience which lets you wander through pleasingly-anonymous (and VERY liminal, should you be a Backrooms head) gallery corridors with images and texts on the walls culled from Wikipedia – you obviously don’t get the full text (that would be mad), but there’s some sort of code at work behind the scenes that obviously plucks bits of text from various bits of each Wiki entry along with selected, seemingly semi-random, images, and while this makes it a legitimately terrible way to actually learn anything it also makes the experience of walking through the ‘gallery’ a lightweight enough experience that you can just sort of glide through, glancing at various bits of info as they take your fancy rather than getting stuck reading the full 37,000 word hagiography of Buckminster-Fuller (say). What makes this SO good is the way in which the FPS-y, first-person exploration works – because this is (as far as I can tell) largely procgen, you get a different navigation experience each time you enter the gallery, and the way in which you transition from one topic/subject to another is by going through little corridors and side rooms in the gallery space, which often seem to appear out of nowhere (you know how in the film Labyrinth there are various bits where doors suddenly appear out of nowhere as a trompe l’oeil effect is resolved? Like that, basically), which means that there’s a real sense of exploratory uncertainty about where in the MASSIVE LATENT SPACE OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE you will end up. I can’t stress enough how utterly magical this is – on some (ok, fine, very incomplete) level this is a navigable digital space which encompasses the entire span of human knowledge (or at least the bits that nice people have bothered to write Wikipedia entries for), which is, honestly, fcuking astonishing from a conceptual point of view and means that from my perspective this really should win all sorts of prizes. Please please please, even if you are not a ‘computer’ person or a ‘games’ person, do give this a go, I think it is astonishing.
  • Witness Statement: I think I’ve made this point a few times now – LOL! Web Curios is by this point so much a caricature of itself, so…trope-y, that it could practically write itself (and, occasionally, I rather wish it would) – but The Machine is demonstrating a stubborn reluctance to get better at prose; whichever iteration of whichever model one uses, it still seems to be the case that shifting it away from the very centre of the stylistic bellcurve is tricky to say the least. Which, in some ways, is why I find this project by the mysterious ‘Jenny’ so interesting – Witness Statement is an ongoing art project whereby the day’s headlines are fed into various LLMs, all of whom are pre-prompted to turn said headlines into poetry; said poems are then posted here each day (I like to think that this is all automated and as such is Machine all the way down). Each day offers new efforts from Google’s Gemini, ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, and it’s so interesting seeing the different ways in which each model both parses the headlines and reflects them in what each considers to be ‘verse’ – interestingly (to me, at least) Gemini is br FAR the best ‘poet’ of the three, with GPT stuck in LinkedInland and Claude being annoyingly reductive, but what I find most interesting is the occasional obliqueness of the interpretation of events reflected in the versified narratives. Honestly, combine a rolling hourly version of this with Matt Web’s GPT clock and it is a PERFECT installation.
  • Twitter’s AI Does Bongo: Look, I know you don’t want to listen to this; I don’t really want to link to it. BUT! I also feel it important to keep you, dear reader, at the very bleeding edge of digital innovation and so as such feel it vital that I inform you that Grok, Twitter’s AI model, recently expanded its range of services (or at least it did to those people mad or racist enough to want to actually pay for a Twitter sub) to include a variety of new ‘personality’ modes, which now include the ability to be, er, ‘sexy’. The link, then, takes you to a recording of a user engaging Grok’s voice mode to have a, er, ‘sexy’ interaction with the machine, and, look, you won’t exactly *enjoy* this clip unless you have a very, very particular set of pleasure receptors but it is undeniably fascinating when you take into account a) all of the well-known social issues which currently surround sex and dating; b) the increasing apparent gulf in worldview and ideology between young men and young women; c) the known personality of the world’s richest man who it seems probably personally signed this feature off, smirking all the while. Go on, click the link and LISTEN (you will want to stop after approximately 30s, but FORCE yourself to continue – it gets so much worse, to the point where, honestly, your genitals might in fact just fully disappear). I don’t know which part of this is most upsetting – the tone of the voice, the staccato delivery, or the delivery of lines like ‘I climb up onto the nearest surface’, delivered by a machine with no concept whatsoever of physicality pantomiming ‘sexy’ for the benefit of users who, let’s be honest, have almost certainly never experienced the physical act of love. Have you ever called up a telephone sex line (LOOK, I WAS 13 YEARS OLD FFS)? Well it’s like that, except, potentially, even less erotically-charged. I can’t tell you how utterly, utterly wrong this feels, and how sad I felt when I realised that, as per, this is the worst this stuff is ever going to be, and that this sort of thing is likely going to become part of every young person’s (oh, ok, YOUNG MAN’S) sexual awakening quite soon. Is this…progress?
  • The Door of Perception: Sincere thanks to Curios reader Ike who sent me this link along with the following description: “it’s a curated collection of art by a person named Ben Roth. i found them when searching for moebius’s artwork, discovered Kevin Lucbert’s biro art via the sidebar and realized what an enormous aesthetic repository this site is.” FCUKING HELL. The work collected here isn’t, in general, My Type Of Thing, but whoever Ben Roth is (he self-describes as ‘a feral art director’, which, honestly, great!) he has put in a LOT of hours curating this site, which groups seemingly dozens (hundreds?) of painters/illustrators/photographers and their work into a collection which is weirdly-thematically-coherent despite the disparity of artist styles on display. Your mileage will vary depending on your personal taste, but as a one-person curatorial effort this is pretty exceptional.
  • The Sutro Tower: Despite having been to SF on multi[ple occasions I confess to never having heard of the Sutro Tower before – nonetheless, it is REAL and A THING, and now you can look at it in your browser window in glorious 3d! This is interesting not because of the subject matter – it is a tall building, it is not in point of fact that exciting – but because of how this quite wonderfully-navigable 3d render was created, to whit from a bunch of still photos using Gaussian Splat (see Curios passim for further evidence that this is a term I only vaguely understand) tech. Per the blurb, “Welcome to my 3D model of San Francisco’s Sutro Tower. Feel free to explore it at your own pace. If you’re on a phone, you can also engage the AR mode by clicking the little cube, it’ll let you explore the scene by walking around and waving your phone. Sutro Tower is a wonderful building, and I hope you enjoy learning a bit about it here. If you want to learn more, check out the much more thorough official digital tour. This scan is made possible by recent advances in Gaussian Splatting. In particular, this scene was shot on drones, aligned in RealityCapture, trained in gsplat, compressed by SOGS, and rendered by PlayCanvas.” There’s something very, very cool about the fact that this sort of thing can basically be spun up from a bunch of photos, and the potential implications for the creation of digital spaces and virtual worlds are rather exciting imho.
  • Flashes: FINALLY out of Alpha, Flashes is, basically, ‘a video feed for Bluesky’ – except it’s photos too, so think of it as Insta to Bluesky’s Meta. It’s iOS-only at the moment which means – full disclosure – I haven’t actually personally tried it out yet (also, I could not possibly give less of a fcuk about a photo/video app), but initial feedback I’ve seen from users has been positive (although I am not sure how SFW it is given the occasionally-spicy nature of some corners of Bluesky (you might be getting a lot of c0ck, is what I am saying here)), and if you’re more of a visual person than I am then you might find this a fun addition to your social media 4.0 stack.
  • Sausage Dot Com: I am basically including this website solely for the MAJESTIC url, but also because, for reasons I can’t adequately explain, the concept made me laugh a lot. This is, as you might expect from the site name, a website dedicated to information about sausages – per the landing blurb, “Discover the World of Artisanal Sausages! Explore recipes, cooking tips, and join our community of sausage enthusiasts. From classic bratwurst to exotic chorizo, we’ve got everything for sausage lovers” – but it also features a prominent tab on the nav which simply reads ‘COMMUNITY’ and, honestly, DON’T YOU WANT TO JOIN THE SAUSAGE DOT COM COMMUNITY!?!?! Except sadly this site appears to be a hastily-spun-up, possibly-AI-generated, front for a Thai sausage shop and there is, I am regretful to report, no sausage community for you to join. I feel, honestly, that if you’re lucky enough to own something as fundamentally-joyful as sausage dot com you should possibly put a bit more effort in, is all I’m saying, so if the Thai owners happen to see this then, well, pull your fcuking fingers out and build the sausage community.
  • Beat Shaper: Obviously all of the standard caveats about my being a cloth-eared cnut with all the musical nous of psoriasis apply here, but, that said, this is REALLY impressive – basically this is a machine-juiced beatmaker which uses THE MAGIC OF AI to, er, somehow spin up fresh beats on demand based on your vague directions – there are a bunch of knobs and sliders that you can adjust to direct the style, along with the ability to determine how ‘dark vs upbeat’ and ‘ambient vs energetic’ you want it to sound, and press ‘generate’ to get your very own bespoke beatloop to fcuk with as you so choose (you can’t do any editing on-site, as far as I can tell, but you can export the generated soundfiles to mess with in the software package of your choosing). I don’t think it’s created anything ‘good’ in the 15 mins or so I’ve spent futzing around with it, but equally everything it spits out is…interesting, and technically-competent, as an idea-starter this feels like a not-terrible tool to try out.
  • Inclusive Sans: One of the (many, many) awful things about the web – and indeed any system which affords you the ability to see Us at scale in any way – is that it has to some extent revealed the fact that, at heart, we’re all incredibly similar and generally basic in all the same ways. So it is that once you’ve been online for a while, people clowning on fonts like Papyrus and Comic Sans becomes one of those incredibly painful ‘basic’ opinions that becomes almost physically-painful to see expressed, a bit like the feeling one might get on a dating app after seeing the 2876th person express their unique and human individuality with a sentiment along the lines of ‘can’t get started without my coffee in the morning!!’. Anyway, that’s a pointless and unnecessary (HI, WELCOME TO WEB CURIOS!) preamble to this new font which has been designed as an alternative to Comic Sans and which was created to solve the problem of ‘I need an inclusive, easy-to-read font which doesn’t have the same cultural baggage and visceral negative reaction which Comic Sans now seems to elicit in basically everyone’. Anyway, if you work in an environment where ‘making signage and graphics which are easy to read and which don’t make people’s eyes bleed’ is a requirement you might find this useful.
  • Not A Band: A rare, meatspace-focused link here – Not A Band is, er, a band (counterintuitive I know) whose whole, singular schtick is that their repertoire consists entirely of TV theme tunes. Do you want some fcukers to come along and play ‘Mr Brightside’ seventeen times to your guests? NO! Do you instead want some fcukers to turn up and segue seamlessly from a slap-bass-heavy rendition of the A-Team theme into The Littlest Hobo into a pop-punk rendition of the Power Rangers theme? OH YES YOU DO! From what I can tell, Not A Band are UK-based and as such may not be available for international engagements – but if any of you book them for an event via this link, can I ask that you PLEASE invite me, please? Unless you’re booking them for a wake, as that would be weird.
  • Yope: An app whose name is so horrible to say out loud – I don’t know why exactly, but it really is – that doing so makes me involuntarily make a proper ‘bulldog licking p1ss off a nettle’ face, Yope (ugh, seriously) is a very-hyped, very-invested and, as far as I can tell, utterly-pointless new app which exists solely to allow ‘photo-sharing between groups of people’. LIKE, I DON’T KNOW, 3000000000 OTHER FCUKING DIGITAL PRODUCTS! I know, I know, doing something better can often be a more viable route to success than doing something new, but, equally, I genuinely struggle to understand what new and exciting and, crucially, product-defining new feature twists it is possible to apply to ‘a system which allows you to share images (and maybe one day video!!) with a closed network of contact’. WHY WOULDN’T PEOPLE JUST USE ONE OF THE SEVENTEEN OTHER FCUKING SOCIAL APPS THEY ARE ALREADY ONBOARDED WITH??? Proof, if ever any more was needed, that the vast majority of VCs are fcuking morons with no fcuking vision whatsoever (I will, of course, happily eat my words when you’re all Yoping images of yourselves to your karass in five years time).
  • 1 Bit A Day: Ok, so technically this is a daily challenge game a la Wordle and should, taxonomically-speaking, be at the end of Curios, but, well, it involves drawing and I can’t really do it, and as such I am being petulant and chucking it in mid-list. SO THERE. Anyway, 1 Bit A Day is a potentially-fun daily distraction for those of you with a modicum of artistic vision – each day you’re given a prompt and instructed to draw it to the best of your ability as a bit of pixelart on a 16×16 grid. That’s it. Today’s, for example, is ‘eraser’ – go on, draw that in pixelart. DO IT! Once you’ve submitted your cack-handed (ok, I might be projecting here) attempt you get to see the gallery of other people’s so you can gauge exactly the degree to which you are less artistically able than hundreds of other people around the globe. Do YOU want that sort of devastating daily reducer? OH GOOD!
  • Werd’s Sources: Was it last week I featured that Chrome extension which shares all the sites you visit with anyone else using said extension? Christ, only two months in and the year is already flattening to a single point. Anway, this is basically a bit like that, but less madly-intrusive – Ben Werdmuller writes a blog, which you can find here – the page the main link goes to is an automatically-update list of links to all of the new posts from all the sources that Ben reads, meaning that you effectively get to share his infostream if you want. I LOVE this idea – honestly, it’s a bit like getting to live inside someone else’s algo except, well, not anywhere near as intrusive or creepy-feeling, and SO interesting (also, it’s nice to see that, based on this, Ben’s web diet is as…er…obsessionally-excessive as mine is). I honestly think that this is a feature which ought to be included on browsers as standard, really- there’s something so wonderful about being able to leave a breadcrumb trail through one’s browsing for others to follow if they so choose.
  • The World Nature Photography Awards Winners: Another year, another selection of LOVELY CRITTERS! You know the drill by now – these are obviously amazing, they are all (to my eye) victims of overzealous filtering, and some of them remind you of the fact that a lot of animals are basically fcuking terrifying if you actually look at them properly. My personal favourite this year is the very, very body-horror image of the fly ensnared, but do please feel free to pick your own (you are wrong).
  • Wall of Sounds: I have no idea who made this but I love that it exists. This is a single webpage which hosts a bunch of audio files, each with its own embedded player – you can set as many of them as you like to play simultaneously to create your own, personal, almost-unrepeatable sound sculpture from the fragments, which obviously sounds like the opposite of fun but which, honestly, works far better than it ought to and made me feel, momentarily, like an ACTUAL ARTIST until I realised that all I was actually doing was clicking some buttons on a webpage.
  • British Folk Traditions: An 18 video YouTube channel all about THE STRANGE OLD PAGAN WAYS of my homeland, which will appeal to anyone who’s a fan of folk horror or who is planning on spending the summer filming their very own low-budget Wicker Man knockoff and needs some inspiration. There is some GLORIOUSLY-odd stuff in here and if you do nothing else I strongly encourage you to watch the oldest clip on the page, a film of people in 1991 performing the ‘crying the neck’ (no, me neither) ceremony which feels like it might at any point descend into proper, visceral tortureporn horror (SPOILERS: it doesn’t, but it really does have that vibe about it).

By Mark Gleason

OUR NEXT MIX IS AN OLDSCHOOL BALEARIC HOUSE SELECTION PUT TOGETHER BY CURIOS READER GAVIN WEALE WHICH I ENJOYED FAR MORE THAN I EXPECTED TO (AND WHICH I APPRECIATE SOUNDS LIKE FAINT PRAISE BUT HONESTLY THIS IS ACTUALLY GOOD!)!

THE SECTION WHICH HAS HAD QUITE ENOUGH REPELLENT SYCOPHANCY FOR ONE PRESIDENTIAL TERM THANKYOU VERY MUCH INDEED, PT.2:

  • Watch Old Chinese Movies For Free: I mean, look, I’ve pretty much exhausted my descriptive powers with this one. It’s, er, 17 (at the time of writing) old Chinese films (from the 60s as far as I can tell, all available to watch for free on YouTube: “Celestial Pictures has meticulously restored these award-winning films frame-by-frame, ensuring they can be enjoyed by new generations of fans. From martial arts epics to gripping dramas, Shaw Brothers Cinema celebrates the rich legacy of Chinese cinema while continuing to inspire new productions.” I’m going to have to be honest here and say that I haven’t in fact watched any of these, but I am going to assume that this is a) entirely legit and copyright-friendly (LOL LIKE YOU CARE) and b) that these films are in some way worth watching – judging by the title alone, I can’t imagine anyone having a bad time with ‘The Amorous Lotus Pan’ but, as ever, caveat emptor.
  • A Great Auction of Film Props: Have YOU got a spare few thousand dollars burning a hole in your pocket (LOL!)? Have YOU got a space on your wall which would be just PERFECT for the actual, framed Western Union letter Marty posts from the past in Back to the Future II (I neither know nor care whether it was in fact Marty who posted it; please do not feel that you have to correct me here)? No, of course you don’t! But! If you fancy trawling through a frankly-astonishing collection of actual film props, all coming up for sale at a US auction at the end of March, then this link will fill you with all of the joy. If nothing else I have briefly amused myself by imagining the sorts of people likely to put down the winning bid on each item – I can’t, for example, think of the person who ends up dropping $60k+ on ‘the actual shield used by Russell Crowe in some of the fight scenes in Gladiator’ as being some sort of terminally-online fedora-owner, but perhaps I’m being unfair. Also, fcuk ME but are there some actual, proper bits of legendary memorabilia here – the original, director-annotated script for Grease, for example, which feels like a STEAL at a guide price of $150k (Jesus Christ).
  • Virtual Car Showroom: Every few years I come across one of these sites which let you select from a small roster of sports cars and then experience the, er, unique joy of seeing a very hi-res 3d model of said car appear on your screen so you can look at it from all angles and marvel at how gorgeous it looks in a variety of flaked paint hues – WHY DO THEY EXIST? My only possible explanation – and yes, I know I could probably find this out myself with a bit of curiosity and cursory digging but, well, life is short – is that it’s a ‘look how good we are at in-browser 3d rendering work’ showoff gimmick by a webdev team, but, regardless, if you’re a 13 year old boy then this will be a good hour or so’s ‘fun’ (also, if you’re a 13 year old boy then STOP READING THIS and do something more age-appropriate ffs, you are too young for this level of jaded misanthropy).
  • Gulls Eating Stuff: POPULAR SCIENCE! Online crowdsourced data platform CitSci is currency running a datagathering exercise seeking out images from around the world of gulls, er, ‘eating stuff’. Per their explanation, “We want to know what gulls are eating and where! Across the world, gulls have been undergoing a huge demographic shift. We want to know all the weird and wonderful things gulls eat in order to start collecting some data on gull diet” – all they want is a photo of a gull, eating stuff, uploaded to the site. Ideally they’d like you to identify what sort of gull it is and what it is eating, which leads to some wonderfully-captioned photos featuring vital data such as ‘what is it eating? My guess is off-brand paprika-flavoured Pringles’ which, honestly, makes me inordinately happy. If you live somewhere with a population of horrible, aggressive bin-birds then PLEASE get involved, this is God’s work.
  • The Birth of Oil: I sometimes wonder what it would be like doing brand comms for a major polluter – like, how does it feel to exist in a parallel reality in which there is no apparent causal connection between your employer’s actions and All Of The Bad Stuff Happening? Is there a feeling of cognitive dissonance, or do you just smooth-brain your way through it? I couldn’t help but wonder that when looking at this website, produced by petrostate plaything Saudi Aramco to…to what end, exactly? WHO IS THIS FOR???? Honestly, this site baffles me – it’s basically a potted history of both oil as a substance (geology! Time! Decay! Dinosaurs!) and as the foundation on which the modern Saudi state is built, a paean to the BRILLIANCE of the company and the country, a hymn of praise to the black stuff and all it brings us…but WHY DOES IT EXIST? Like, it’s very shiny – although also SO BLAND and visually-underwhelming, although they obviously spent on the V/O work – and it’s well made enough, but who is it speaking to? It celebrates the history of the company and the engineering achievements involved in unlocking the desert’s greasy patrimony, but, again…WHY? It is boring and dry and, given the amount of money I can guess has been thrown at this, unimaginative, and it makes me a bit sad if I’m honest. In the unlikely event that anyone from the agency that built this happens to see these words, could you maybe email me to explain what the everliving fcuk the brief was for this and how much you trousered for it? THANKS!
  • Marxist ASMR: I might have mentioned by ASMR-susceptibility on here before, I forget – I found myself trying to explain the phenomenon to someone the other day and realised I was labouring the ‘no, it’s not a sex thing, honestly!’ point a bit too hard – but I appreciate that for many people it’s a horrid, creepy scene that makes their skin crawl and so I tend to keep it out of Curios. I will make an exception for this, though, purely because of the odd nicheness of the schtick – while many ASMRtists have a particular furrow they plough (scifi roleplay, weirdly-specific visits to the dermatologist, pretending to be an overly-enthusiastic vampire, that sort of thing) this particular person’s vibe is, er, to attempt to explain the fundamental tenets of marxist theory via the medium of slow, low whispering. I can 100% guarantee you that the first academic publisher to take this idea and run with it from a PR/marketing point of view will do NUMBERS, so could someone from Oxford University Press get in touch with payment in a few weeks please, thankyou.
  • WikiRailLine: This is…quite bare-bones, but I absolutely adore the thinking behind it – and, again, this is something that would be SO simple to lift as a nice little in-app Easter egg if you were Trainline or similar. Just plug the ID number of the train you’re travelling on (which I appreciate may be easier said than done – I didn’t know this, but each train has a unique ID number which corresponds to its type, starting destination, its arrival destination and the date of travel, which apparently it’s possible to find out if you’re motivated enough) and the site will pull up a list of Wikipedia articles about places and points of interest you will pass on your journey. Small, simple but such a lovely idea and one which I would honestly love to see a rail provider or transport company run with, because while this website is…not exactly welcoming or user-friendly, it’s fair to say, the idea behind it is just LOVELY.
  • Figure Grid: I am going to have to be lazy here and crib the description directly from artist Effie Bowens’ own words here: Figure Grid is “a diagram displaying the various ways the human figure is represented in contemporary art. It’s an attempt to organize my relationship to all these bodies, and track the evolution of that relationship. There is a human (and artistic) obsession with self replication that I wanted this project to confront. Coming up in the experimental dance and performing art scene in New York, I discovered that performance frequently overlapped with the visual art scene by sharing galleries, museums, and other spaces. The tension generated from these two forms sharing spaces created a perverse curiosity around the difference between the live, temporal body and the static, figural representations of the body. When I started working in window displays, a whole new set of reference points emerged regarding mainstream appeal, and the parameters of design and desire. Figure Grid critically engages with the hierarchies of value and works centripetally to link and organize a collection of artistic works.” I do not think like this AT ALL and as such I find this way of conceiving of, and representing, the qualities of objects particularly fascinating (also the collection of things on the grid is…interesting and curious and weird, which I appreciate).
  • The 3d Printed Chopsticks Hack: I imagine that the number of people reading this who also own a 3d printer hovers somewhere between 0 and 1, but for YOU, you lucky fraction of a human, Christmas is come early. I honestly fcuking love this – when I was a little kid I went to visit my dad in the US (he ran away there post-divorce, the fcuker – HI DAD!) and he took me to a restaurant in Chinatown in SF where the waiter, seeing my understandable 5 year old struggles with chopsticks, contrived an amazing solution with elastic bands which made them magically-usable even by cack-handed young me, and this is basically the super-future version of that. Pay a couple of quid and get the printable file, which (as you can see from the accompanying imagery and video) turns chopsticks into a FUN, TRIGGER-ENABLED FEEDING GAME!
  • Do We Eat Him?: I don’t feature that many YouTube series in here, mainly because, well, I don’t really watch them and most of them are sh1t. Somehow, though, this floated across my radar this week and I watched the first episode and, amazingly, have since checked back and watched the subsequent two, and…this is good! Like, honestly, actually quite good! The setup/premise is simple – our two heroines exist in some sort of vaguely-sketched post-apocalyptic world in which the ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE has finally happened, and as we meet them are debating whether it is in fact ok to consume the corpse they have just found re them being very hungry indeed. There’s not a lot of plot here – by the end of the third episode they are still debating the practicalities of the cooking – but the way in which the scenario is shaped, and the charm of the two performers and the amazingly-not-annoying late-GenZ vibe/tone of the thing really does carry it a long way, and I have done a genuine lol at least once during each short (3mish) clip, and I think this has potential and that the people involved might actually be quite talented. See what you think.
  • Geometric Nightmares: Want to meet a whole new community you’re really glad you don’t belong to? OH GOOD! “This is a community for discussion and content relating to “geometric nightmares,” a specific type of dream, often occurring during illness, that involves shapes or objects, themes of infinity, pressure, an overwhelming sense of unease or terror and anxiety, a void and incomprehensibly large or small objects, and/or a crushing silence. Take note, these dreams can come in many different forms, these are just some popular examples.” I can’t say for certain how this will make you feel, but try this representative example on for size and see how you get on: “Im not sure if anyone else has had this type of geometric nightmare because everyone’s seem to be relatively the same, but mine is different. Only happens when I have a fever and fall asleep, then wake up, though I’m not always sure if i am awake or not. It consists of my entire house getting squashed into a sphere, slowly getting larger and larger, until eventually it’s the same size as the house, but still I can see the entire thing forming inside my room. My body is sweating profusely, while the sphere gets microscopic, but again, I can still see it. Extremely tiny things seem to have an effect on me, while not bad, just unnerving. I can hold the sphere in my hand as it slowly gets bigger, once again becoming as big as my house, still in my hand. This is honestly the best way I can put what I see and feel without actually showing you.” I am so, so glad that there is no part of the preceding description that I can relate to.
  • Cybertruck Hunters: On the one hand, it has been clear for several years now the sort of person That Fcuking Man is, and the sort of trajectory he’s been on, and as such I think that anyone who has actively chosen to enrich him by buying one of his fcuking cars when there are plenty of cheap, high-quality EVs now available sort of deserves the opprobrium; on the other, obviously vandalising others’ property is a bad thing. Which is why I enjoy this TikTok account so much – its owners are choosing to target Tesla owners not by damaging their vehicles but instead by driving close to them and projecting humiliating messages onto their cars’ outsize, ugly bumpers. Childish? Very much so, but also tell me you don’t laugh seeing ‘Cybertruck: For White Pr1cks’ in block capitals on the rear. This loses points for the fact that the perpetrators are doing all of this from inside a Lamborghini, which stinks of crypto tbqh, but in general I very much approve of this as a childish fcuk you.
  • Time Traveller POV: This week’s big breakout TikTok is this account which shares animated, AI-generated point-of-view perspective vids simulating what it might be like to ACTUALLY BE IN THE PAST. Except, obviously, because this is the web and it’s AI-generated, what this in practice means is that you get a bunch of clips featuring standard Midjourney-looking visuals accompanied by some VERY odd animations and strangely-modern expressions; this short clip of ‘hey, let me take you on a tour of my hometown Pompeii!’ is a near-perfect representation, from the weird oil painting tone of the visual to the amazing YouTuber face pulled by our historical guide as he realises that he’s about 3-5m away from being very, very burnt toast. Is this ‘good’ from the point of view of education or instruction? POSSIBLY NOT BUT IT IS ALSO VERY FUNNY, SO WEVS.
  • In Case Of Death: I am slightly surprised noone’s done this before – this feels like a MSCHF drop rather than an actual product, but, seemingly, it is an Actual Thing, produced by manufacturer of fancy iPad cases Zugu. Per the blurb, “Introducing The In Case of Death Case. Bricks your iPad when you die, so you can take your secrets to the grave. From the makers of the case for every situation comes a case for the most extreme situation: mortality.” This almost, but not quite, makes me want an iPad (via the excellent Yemi’s Newsletter).
  • NextFlick: I saw some DISCOURSE this week around the quantity of ads which filmgoers are forced to sit through as they wait for the feature to start – wasn’t there a time in the past when the trailers were widely considered to be the best bit? Anyway, for those of you who still believe that to be the case, here’s a website which will let you watch nothing but an infinite procession of film trailers from now until the heat death of the universe – a quick play just now gave me promos for Party Girl (no, me neither), Kung Fu Panda 3 and The Guns of Navarone, so, er, something for everyone!
  • Flip A Real Coin: Somewhere in the world there is a real coin, inside what I think is a pringles tube, with a camera pointed at it. Press the button on this site and the tube will rotate, flipping the coin IN REAL LIFE – the site will show you which face is showing, giving you a genuine, ENTIRELY RANDOM result. I am so enthused that this exists I can’t quite adequately explain it.
  • Dodeku: I normally reject Sudoku out of hand because a) it bores me; and b) if I am honest I am embarrassed to admit how bad I am at it, but, honestly, this is actually fun and accessible even to number refuseniks like me. Every day’s a new puzzle – your task is to fit the numbers into the right places to solve the grid. EASY, RIGHT? No, not at all in fact, but it’s oddly satisfying.
  • Cursor Drifter: Oh this is SO fun! From last week’s B3ta (THANKS ROB!) a game which will be immediately aesthetically familiar to anyone who played Micro Machines in the 90s and which asks you to pilot your tiny car through a tiny maze guided by your mouse cursor. Each level is 5-10s of gameplay, meaning you buzz through this at speed and with joy, and it is honestly so so so marvellously enjoyable.
  • CSS Puzzlebox: I’ve definitely featured things *like* this in the past, but this specific example is NEW and SHINY and BEAUTIFULLY-CODED, but also a complete fcuking cnut which has utterly banjaxed me about three puzzles in and I am BITTER. Feel free to play with this – all you have to do is click! – but be aware that, if you’re anything like me, it will cause you to swear with increasing vehemence at your screen.
  • Bracket City: Ooooooooooh this is VERY nice and tickles a particular wordcel part of my brain very pleasingly indeed. I can’t really explain this – seriously, click the link and get your head around how it works and then think how you might describe it to an audience of strangers in 50ish words…HARD, ISN’T IT? Yeah, YOU try writing this one day you ingrate. Anyway, this is basically a word puzzle, but it’s pleasingly-nested in its conception/execution and there’s something lovely about the way that the overall shape of the solution is revealed incrementally, like so many layers peeling back. There’s something VERY pleasing about this.
  • Styscraper: Immensely-generous maker of fun webthings and Friend of Curios Matt Round is back with another of his wonderful, magical and VERY playable webtoys – this time it’s game in which you have to stack pigs (and other objects) to make the tallest tower you can. This is SO GOOD – the physics are spot-on, fun-feeling and JUST real enough to satisfy, the animations are charming, the sounds cute and the general gameplay a perfect amalgam of slow progress, incremental improvement, ‘one more go’-ness and FCUK YOU YOU FCUKING BSTARD ARMCHAIR frustration (you will see what I mean, I promise). Beautifully, large swathes of my corners of the social web this week have been taken over by people posting oblique references to how they are now incapable of seeing the world except through the prism of potential stackability, which I think is testament to how good this is and how much time you are going to spend messing around with it.

By Alyssa Monks

OUR LAST MUSICAL OFFERING THIS WEEK IS AN HOUR OF THE UK’S TOP GRIME MCS GOING AT IT (MANGA IS AS PER SUPERB)! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Punch Cards: Or, to give it its full name, Tristan Davey’s Punch Card Archive. “Punched cards were once a ubiquitous part of accounting, data collection and early computing. At their peak of use, in the 1950s and 60s, hundreds of companies around the world printed millions of punch cards every month. Yet within a few years of their obsolescence they all but disappeared from the public consciousness. This archive captures a small selection of these cards and their ephemera, and aims to document and preserve these pieces of history for the future.” Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT??? Via the world’s most personable stationery retailer.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS IS, ODDLY, EMPTY THIS WEEK!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Making Media Great Again: We kick off the longreads this week with this profile of Paul Marshall, one of the UK’s growing number of near-billionaires and one of the most prolific philanthropists in the country…and someone who is increasingly using said plutocratic wealth to influence the country’s media and the tenor of public discourse, through his ownership of GB News and, more recently, the Spectator. This is partly interesting as a straight profile, but to me spoke more to the growing, increasingly-insidious sensation that there is a group of about 300 people that basically runs everything and membership of that group is dependent solely on money; turns out there IS a shadowy cabal running everything, but, prosaically, it’s just…really rich people! I appreciate that my surprise at this might strike you as…surprisingly and uncharacteristically-naive, any maybe it is, but equally I haven’t until recently had cause to stop and think about the practical reality of Being Worth $750m And What That Means In Terms of Who You Hang Out With Most Nights – and now that I know a bit more about that world, albeit tangentially, it’s fcuking sickening and I hate it and it makes me quite exceptionally angry! Eat the rich!
  • Remodeling The Internet: One for the advermarketingpr folk, this – The Verge recently commissioned a bunch of research into THE FUTURE OF THE WEB, etc etc, and while the audience is North American it felt to me that much of what’s expressed here is probably applicable quite widely across the Western world. This is slides (SORRY) but there’s honestly a lot of interesting/useful data in here which might be useful to anyone working on any FUTURE DIGITAL STRATEGY or campaign planning-type stuff. Aside from anything else, there’s a REALLY interesting series of datapoints in here around the gendered differences in desire for community and connection, and how men are seemingly SIGNIFICANTLY happier to seek that out online whereas women still strongly prefer real-world interaction, which I think is something probably quite deep worth exploring further.
  • Watching Luigi: If I’m honest I am including this mainly because of Molly Crabapple’s beautiful watercolour courtroom sketches which are genuinely gorgeous (assisted, of course, by the fact that so is Luigi, the bstard), but there’s also something really interesting about the spectacle of the spectacle, if you see what I mean, and the realtime creation of a folk hero being played out very publicly; I think the closest analogue I can alight on for the Luigi phenomenon is that posthumous air of sainthood that developed around Aaron Shwartz except Luigi’s still with us and, objectively, is possibly less of a worthy candidate that poor Aaron. Anyway, this is very reportage-y, but as a snapshot of Where We Are, as well as a near-perfect reflection of what the society of the spectacle looks like, framed and packaged, this is very good indeed.
  • Declaring War on Bo Burnham: It very much feels like 2025 marks the cleaving of eras, and that we’ve collectively decided that, basically, we have decisively moved on from the millennial-coded, flat-branded, vaguely-optimistic (through tears) vibes of the mid-00s to (see pretty much all recent Curios) ‘the 80s all over again, but on weirder drugs’ – this essay feels partly like a reckoning with that, and an examination of what the defining characteristics, and lasting residue, of that era were. It’s very much a pro-Burnham piece, to be clear, just one that has a very clear idea of what his work came to represent and what it says about an era. This gives you a feel for the argument, but it’s very much worth reading the whole piece: “Here is the deranged struggle of someone who keeps getting exactly what he wants and still feels nothing. And Inside makes it clear Burnham believes this disease is an epidemic, that easy access to an audience creates that same gnawing, insatiable hunger in tens of millions of kids who won’t have his charmed life. But there is that other layer that Burnham never acknowledges and may not even be aware of, which is that publicly detailing the contours of his illness is, paradoxically, one of the symptoms of that illness. And that, in my opinion, is the real epidemic of the modern age. Somewhere, right now, a teenage girl just recorded herself crying for a TikTok video but, when she went to edit it, realized her mic wasn’t plugged in and so now she’s making herself cry a second time to get another take. Next door is some dude with a great job, healthy body, a loving partner and lots of friends who, after a long day of fairly easy work and an evening watching Netflix, will tweet, “Another wretched day enduring the horrors, my thoughts are with all of you who know that just surviving this absolute hellscape is an accomplishment all its own.” They all exist within an online subculture in which earnest attempts at positive sincerity and wellness are to be mocked as vapid (as they are in Burnham’s “White Woman’s Instagram”). The practice of not just broadcasting your lowest moments, but intentionally playing up the angst for maximum engagement has to be the world’s worst possible coping mechanism, a form of self-harm with an added layer of performance anxiety (I’m not sure science even has a word for the gut-punch sensation of recording your sobs of despair, only to see the post get zero likes and a single comment from a spambot).”
  • The Future of Childless Cat Guys: In another week in which a significant number of column inches have been devoted to the seeming gender disparity in voting intentions in the recent German elections, and specifically ‘WHAT IS DRIVING ALL THESE MEN TO THE RIGHT???’ (odd, isn’t it, how the parallel question of ‘what is making all these young women skew more left?’ isn’t asked. It’s almost as though we still see everything through a man-first lens!), I thought this piece was really interesting (I think it came via Helen’s newsletter, though I can’t be sure) – it basically suggests that the future might involve a LOT of very, very single middle-aged men, which, honestly, feels about right; I can’t tell you the number of guys I know in their 40s who have basically just sort of…stopped, and who don’t quite look like starting ever again, and who I can very much see characterised by this passage. There but for the grace of God, honestly: “I’m sure there are some readers who, like the Manosphere does today toward female loneliness, delight in the idea of this collective of cat men. They think it’s what they deserve. And like with the cat ladies of today, these men will likely serve as some sort of political caricature that isn’t representative of the whole. Some of these men will be once-eligible bachelors for whom life has slipped by. Some of these will be aggressive, misogynistic men who never made any real effort to connect with women on a human level and yet continue to resent them out of entitlement. But a good many will be something else: guys who teetered on the edge of these worlds, guys who felt limited by their shyness or their career or their looks or some other factor that they believed prohibited them from having a shot, guys who frankly just never quite figured it out.”
  • Raw Pork Meat Sandwiches: This is an essay in part about contemplating eating a German sandwich which is basically seasoned raw minced pork and raw onions on a roll (I am sorry, Germans, but I do not consider this ‘food’), but it isn’t really about that at all. It seems astonishing that someone need write a vaguely-humorous piece about ‘why basic standards are a good thing actually’ in 2025, but, well, welcome to the moron future!
  • Reference Board Final Bosses and The Irony Epidemic: I feel I ought to also reproduce this essay’s subtitle in full: “You are laughing? Everything feels recycled, and you are laughing?” Viktoria Vasileva here writes about the fact that nothing is new anymore and the ‘trend to death to exhumation’ cycle is currently running at an unsustainable pace, and at this rate we’re going to start recycling trends that haven’t even happened yet to feed the ever-ravening content mill. You will presumably have read – or even felt- this argument quite a lot over the past few years, but this is as good an articulation of it from a fashion/aesthetics point of view as I’ve read.

  • GenZ and the End of Predictable Progress: I know, I know, GENERATIONAL COHORTS ARE NOT REAL AND ARE IN FACT ARBITRARILY CONSTRUCTED FOR MARKETING PURPOSEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ…but! I thought this was a surprisingly deep and well-argued essay about the specific challenges facing the generation, the specific relevance of the new US administration’s policies to this specific coterie of people, and the extent to which all of the various vague iniquities of character attributed to The Youth can be encapsulated in the broad-brush phrase (which also, conveniently, can be sung to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles themesong) ‘Collapse Of The Social Contract’ – which, honestly, feels like the best catch-all for everything going on right now and why, possibly, everything feels quite so spiky.

  • AI Imagines The Impossible: Or ‘why small businesses fcuking despise you for your AI-generated imageboard inspirations’. The Washington Post here writes about the growing phenomenon of people turning to hairdressers or dressmakers or bakers, brandishing designs that they want to see replicated in real life – but which designs are AI-generated, and as such physically or structurally impossible to recreate. Which, obviously, doesn’t prevent said customers from demanding the thing anyway and, predictably, getting somewhat exercised when said tradespeople are unable to do what’s asked of them – which, honestly, is a whole new ‘real life consequence of AI’ thing that hadn’t even BEGUN to occur to me. Isn’t it wonderful, all the ways in which The Machine is ‘disrupting’ society? Eh? Oh.
  • The Illegal Street Racers of YouTube: This is interesting – there’s a bunch of people in NYC doing illegal high-speed street races late at night, filming everything and uploading it to YouTube for a growing number of fans to enjoy. Partly fascinating because, well, FAST CARS AND NEW YORK, but also because of the fact that this sort of thing is becoming more and more accessible thanks to the falling cost of HD dashcams and the advent of high-quality wearable cameras such as Meta’s RayBans. This feels very much like the plotpoint to the new, youth-focused Fast & Furious spinoff franchise coming 2027 (also, feels very much like the sort of thing that will also be happening, possibly less glamorously, all over the world in rural locations – is there a secret street racing online video subculture out there? Can someone show me?).
  • Dayglo Pets: Almost everything about this book feels like very obvious foreshadowing for a very specific type of horror story – LA! Genetic engineering! A perfect example of ‘What do you get for the millionaire who has everything?’ product development! RABBITS! This is a piece in WIRED looking at a company called the Los Angeles Project which, basically, is working on fcuking with animal DNA using CRISPR to make glow-in-the-dark bunnies. No, really, The project’s stated mission – one which I can imagine would have pretty much any zoologist or vaguely-religious person borderline-apoplectic – is to make nature “more complex and interesting and beautiful and unique” – BY MAKING GLOW-IN-THE-DARK BUNNIES! Honestly, this is SO deeply-fcuked-up and almost every sentence could be plucked from here and used in the aforementioned horror story with no edits – I mean, really, look: “The crazy thing is, this technology is so advanced, and nobody’s doing sh1t with it,” Zayner says. “That’s kind of our motto: Let’s do stuff with it.”” YES FINE WHAT IS THE WORST THAT COULD HAPPEN???
  • The Singles Ski Trip: I read pretty much all of this piece with my knuckles in my mouth – I can’t pretend that there’s ANY element of this trip that doesn’t sound like absolute hell to me, from the location to the activities to the other guests – but, equally, I also thought ‘this feels like a new TV format waiting to happen’. Did you know that there are tour companies that organise holidays for single people to the ski slopes? Well there are! Does that sound like your idea of fun? The answer to that will almost certainly depend on the answer to the accompanying question “how much do you want to hang out with a bunch of people who all give the overwhelming impression of having attained a 2:2 in Geography at Durham?”, but, well, see what you think!
  • Running Pong in 240 Browser Tabs: Tiny Award Winner (SUCH AN ACCOLADE!) Nolen Royalty is back with a new, very silly, project, which basically fcuks with Chrome and favicons to create a VERY complicated game of Pong – this is a technical explanation and so won’t be for everyone, but as an explanation of How To Make A Cool Web Thing it’s rather fun (and, again, this feels like a VERY stealable idea for a brand with a decent dev team and some patience (and quite an elastic strategy)).
  • Hot Sauces of the World: I confess to not really understanding people’s obsession with hot sauce (why do you want all your food to taste of fire vinegar?) but I am conscious that there are some people for whom it is practically a religion, and as such that there might be some of you for whom this EXHAUSTIVE guide to the world’s different hot sauce varieties might be a thrilling companion to the rest of your fiery vinegar-flavoured existence. There’s a lifelong ‘try them all!’ project here, should any of you have a the time and inclination.
  • London’s Most-Memed Neighbourhoods: Ok, your appetite for this one will depend largely on the extent to which the following pen portrait speaks to you: “You’re sitting in London Fields, a park in east London, on a humid but warm summer’s evening. You see someone sitting on a blanket. A pair of Birkenstock mules next to them. They’re wearing a North Face Nuptse jacket, just in case of a potential cold spell, the kind that British summers bring. Oh, and some mom jeans. On the blanket, there’s a bottle of Chin Chin, a beloved white wine, which was likely bought from Shop Cuvee. Next to it, some Torres crisps and Perello olives. Their partner is wearing Salomons XT6s, an Arc’teryx soft shell, a pair of Dickies carpenter pants, and a fisherman’s beanie whilst smoking a Lost Mary vape. They have a whippet in a raincoat looking really anxious, trembling while sniffing at its fur that’s been washed in Aesop’s Animal Body Wash.” If you live in London, there will be at least ONE person in your life you will feel immediately compelled to send this to upon finishing reading – if you find that multiple people in your life send this to YOU, perhaps take a long, hard look at yourself.
  • Painting Myself: Celia Paul writes in the New York Review of Books about the practice of painting herself over a long career as an artist, and how through self-portraiture she reclaimed the concept of herself which had be subsumed by ‘Paul as Muse’ through her association with Lucien Freud and others. This is beautifully-written, and has the peculiar quality of intense self-obsession that is common in so many artists, particularly those whose own form is at the heart of their work, and I enjoyed it significantly more than I tend to enjoy pieces which use the word ‘I’ this often.
  • How We Misread Gatsby: I am not by any means a scholar of Fitzgerald or his most famous novel, but I really enjoyed this analysis in the New Statesman, all about how we often misplace the novel in time and, by so doing, end up misreading some of the social cues and messages in the text. “Many of our most recycled, plagiaristic observations about Gatsby miss the point, failing to read between the lines. For example, it is often noted that Benjamin Franklin’s schedule for self-improvement provides Gatsby with a manual for upward social mobility, that he is a representative American who buys into the nation’s founding dreams. But Jimmy Gatz’s plan focuses on physical activity and hard work, omitting the spiritual dimension of Franklin’s schedule, who asked himself every morning, “What good shall I do this day?” Franklin centred morality as well as industry, and Fitzgerald expected his audience to recognise what was missing. The Great Gatsby renders a society that has confused material enterprise with moral achievement. Gatsby, like the country he embodies, forgets that he should be trying not just to be great, but to do good.”
  • Inside ARC: A depressing little vignette from the afterparty of this week’s right-wing nutter conference in London, ARC, which saw Jordan Peterson and a bunch of other grifters (not racist, obviously, but…surprisingly popular with racists!!!!) joined by cranks, kooks and aspirant influencers as they celebrated the shifting tides of global discourse in Mayfair. I had, prior to this piece, missed the fact that Danny Rampling, former superstar house DJ, is now a fully-paid-up member of the ‘mad conspiracists’ collective (I briefly imagined the surreal spectacle of him, Matt Le Tissier and Richard Fairbrass all hanging out together discussing 5g brainworms, which was an odd mental segue), but otherwise this is grimly predictable – the 80s vibes, the triumphalism, the ‘extremely rich people cosplaying as being somehow marginalised’ thing, and, of course, the just-under-the-surface bigotry. I don’t know if I can take it if cnuts like this take control, you know. I might just have to stop.
  • Something Like Pleasure: This is an essay by Kathleen Quigley on having sex again for the first time after cancer, and after a mastectomy, and, look, it’s moderately explicit and may not be to everyone’s taste, but I found it moving and beautiful and kind and hopeful and I think it’s very much worth reading, as much for its depiction of old lovers turned friends as it is for the sex’n’cance.
  • Watching The Clock: You probably know about the video installation ‘The Clock’ by Christian Marclay, which is a 24h film in which every scene shows a different scene from a different film, the only caveat being that the time is visible in-shot; every minute of every hour is visualised with a visible timepiece taken from cinema – this is the account of one person’s experience of spending 24h watching it, which, as you might imagine, becomes surreal and dreamlike very quickly indeed. This is far more entertaining and better-written than I expected it to be, and it made me want to go and spend a day watching this (and, inevitably, going slightly mad).
  • A Wonderful Country: I LOVE THIS! Written in 1946 by Mavis Gallant, this is about a Hungarian man arriving in Canada during World War II and it is brilliant and funny and human and STYLISH in a way you don’t automatically expect writing from 1946 to be, and I would like you all to read it please (it’s not long, this one, promise).
  • Describe Your Most Challenging Project: I have linked to Alexander Velky’s autobiography on here before a few months ago, but I wanted to highlight the latest chapter because, honestly, I think this is really really good – Alexander here writes about moving to London, indebted and overeducated and very virginal, and about living in a flatshare and having no money and the soul-destroying cycle of ‘looking for work, scrabbling for pennies, getting drunk’ that makes up so much of BIG CITY LIFE in one’s 20s (depending on one’s luck). I think the style here – possibly requiring a Capital S – is excellent, and there’s a certain quotidian relentless misery (but also, it’s funny! Honest!) that reminded me an awful lot of the excellent Pleasant Hell by John Dolan/Gary Brecher (which I also recommend unreservedly) or the writing of the Mountain Goats’ John Darnielle.
  • An Angel Passed Above Us: Finally this week, a superb story by László Krasznahorkai, timely as we pass three years of war in Ukraine – pretty much entirely told in monologue, this is a brutal (and very funny) bit of satire that made me literally wince in places, but which is well-written enough throughout to both sustain the tone and stick the landing. Very, very good indeed.

By Jenn Mazza

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 21/02/25

Reading Time: 39 minutes

Last weekend I went to watch non-league football at Canvey Island. I don’t really feel I should write about it too much in this newsletter other than to say ‘I do not, in all honesty, recommend that you spend a Saturday in February watching non-league football at Canvey Island’, but I would like to say in the club’s defence that you can get pints for £4.50 which makes it easier to pointedly ignore the 22 men shouting “FCUKING HOLD IT” at each other for 90 long, freezing minutes.

I also went to see contemporary dance last night – MY HOUSE HAS SO MANY ROOMS! Most of them admittedly empty, but nonetheless – which was warmer, but no less baffling (and the drinks were significantly more expensive). My ANALYTICAL TAKEAWAY from these experiences, which you will be grateful to learn I will happily share with you, is that you should basically never step outside your cultural comfort zone – it’s called a ‘comfort zone’ for a reason ffs, you wouldn’t want to hang out in your ‘torture and pain zone’ would you? No, you wouldn’t, so there.

Fcuking hell I am so so so tired. Can you tell? I worry you can tell.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are entirely entitled to just click the links and ignore the words this week, seriously.

By Tomona Matsukowa (this image lifted from TIH, for which thanks)

YOUR FIRST MIX THIS WEEK IS A COLLECTION OF REALLY *INTERESTING* (IN A GOOD WAY!) TRACKS WHICH I MIGHT CALL ‘CINEMATIC’ IF I WERE THE SORT OF PERSON TO WHOM THAT ADJECTIVE MEANT ANYTHING, SELECTED BY DJ LOSER! 

THE SECTION WHICH THINKS THAT IF YOU HAVE A NEWSLETTER WITH 140K SUBS WHICH YOU CHARGE £80 A YEAR FOR AND YOU MENTION THAT YOU FOUND SOMETHING IN MY P1SSY LITTLE EFFORT THAT YOU CHOOSE TO LIFT AND QUOTE ME ABOUT THEN THE LEAST YOU CAN FCUKING DO IS INCLUDE A BACKLINK (YES I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU, THE KNOWLEDGE, I KNOW YOU ARE READING THIS), PT.1:  

  • Protein Monster: It is, I think, reasonable to say that I consume an above average quantity of internet – a statement which simultaneously sounds like the world’s least-impressive flex and an admission of a life which has been terribly wasted! – and as such like to think that I have a reasonably good mental rolodex of ‘weird and obsessional webprojects which don’t really seem to make sense except as some sort of art project or, viewed less-charitably, an expression of deep-seated pain and trauma’, and yet every few weeks I will stumble across something so weird and massive and utterly inexplicable and so fundamentally perfect for Curios, and which has been around for AGES,  that I get quite annoyed with myself for not having seen all of the web by now. Consider sites like Protein Monster your regular reminder that the internet is FCUKING MASSIVE and, much like the sea, we have explored about ~3% of it and that which remains contains far stranger things than are dreamt of even in my philosophy (do not, please, feel emboldened to share your philosophy with me at this point). YES OK BUT WHAT IS IT FFS??? Hm. It’s possible the reason I’ve taken such a meandering route to describing this is that I am not wholly sure how to do it – but let me try. Protein Monster is a collection of webpages which all link to each other in a massive, incomprehensible spiderweb of…I don’t know, calling it ‘content’ feels frankly offensive to what I presume is the single person behind it. This is a dizzying, strange, confusing, funny, interesting, unsettling, NSFW, creepy and deeply, deeply online website which doesn’t seem to have any coherent theme or aim beyond ‘LOOK AT ALL OF THIS STUFF’ – the main link takes you to the closest the site has to a ‘landing page’, so you could just start there, or alternatively you might prefer the more, er, *intense* entrypoint of this (occasionally quite NSFW) page (you will need to click the black page once it loads to kick it off), which acts both as rough visual introduction to the overall aesthetic of the whole thing and also as what I honestly think is one of the most perfect ‘this is what ONLINE is like’ little bits of video/audiowork I have seen in years (no, honestly, I mean it). This is VERY, VERY ODD (also, it is INCREDIBLY deep/wide, and I have only scratched the surface of what is in there – it doesn’t *feel* like it goes anywhere ‘bad’, but, well, caveat emptor).
  • My Life In Weeks: A really lovely piece of information design work by one Gina Trapani, one which, I have just realised, she’s been working on for over 10 years (as an aside, I have found SO many long-running webprojects in the past few months, it’s genuinely slightly humbling to realise that Curios is to REAL web OGs as the mayfly to the elephant) and which is effectively a week-by-week log of her entire life; per Gina, “This is a map of my life, where each week I’ve been alive is a little box. Tap a box to see what I was doing where that week.” This is SUCH a nice way of visualising information over time which has a lot to recommend it and I can imagine might be a nice thing to explore with kids or as a family as a means of tracking your experiences (as someone with, basically, neither of those things, I am rather shooting in the dark here, but I am sure you can work something out).
  • EU Accelerationism: Anything the US techcnuts can do! This is a very dull-looking website (and, if I’m honest, the content’s not exactly thrilling – no, wait, come back!) but the ‘thinking’ behind it is, I think, interesting in terms of the ambient temperature of the tech industry in the EU (or certain aspects of it, at least) in Q1 2025 (and, more importantly, in light of the ‘all gas, no breaks’ approach seemingly being adopted by the sector in the US. Basically this is a manifesto (CAN THE WORST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD PLEASE STOP WRITING FCUKING MANIFESTOS PLEASE?) whose contents are a call for Europe to DEREGULATE THE FCUK OUT OF TECH!! You can, hopefully, imagine the sort of ‘hey, everything would be fine if we just let capital and markets do their thing!!’ rhetoric at play here, but this, from one of the first sections, gives you a representative flavour: “By exempting businesses with annual revenues below €10 million from complex regulations like VATMOSS, GDPR, and the EU AI Act, we empower entrepreneurs to focus on creating great products and reaching market success without being weighed down by compliance.” Ah, yes, compliance! Having to adhere to rules and regulations designed to protect consumers and society from the impact of your attempts to get incredibly fcuking rich! Of course you shouldn’t be held back from plutocracy and a seat at the Big Table by pesky concerns around, I don’t know, not fcuking everything and everyone in half with your fcuking disruption! Via my friend Ben; let’s hope that this dies on its fcuking ar$e.
  • RPLY: It is, of course, lazy and simplistic to make sweeping comments about THE MODERN WORLD and our increasing reluctance to put the effort in to personal relationships and friendships and social obligations (equally, one might also argue that given the psychic cost of, well, EVERYTHING FCUKING ELSE that it’s perhaps understandable we don’t necessarily have a lot of energy left, but); equally, though, as someone now well past middle age, it’s impossible not to sight slightly at the premise behind RPLY, which is a downloadable plugin for MacOS (Apple only) which will integrate with iMessage and, if you let it, check your inbox for any unanswered messages, suggest responses and, as far as I can tell (if you go full ‘run my life, The Machine!’), send replies for you too. Which on the one hand I can imagine being potentially useful for people who find their volume of inbound overwhelming, fine, but which also a) makes me quite sad – I DO NOT THINK THAT SAYING ‘YES’, ‘NO’ OR ‘THANKYOU’ ARE THINGS SO TAXING THAT YOU NEED TO OUTSOURCE THE TASK (apologies for what I am sure is a moderately-ableist point of view there); b) relies on the AI not sending wildly inappropriate or unhelpful responses without your say-so, accepting meetings on your behalf or telling a supplier to go fcuk themselves with a spoon. I am probably being unfair – I am basing this solely on vibes and this writeup, after all – but, generally, this does not ‘spark joy’ in me (I appreciate that the degree to which I LOVE exchanging messages with people makes me possibly a bad judge of the widespread appetite for this sort of service, to be fair).
  • The Feelings Engine: This is a promo for a travel agency in (I think) the US, the inexplicably-named Black Tomato (honestly, WHY?), which has built an LLM layer over the top of their search functionality which allows you to pump in natural language queries about the sort of emotions you’d like to evoke on your travels and, in exchange, get a suggested trip which, The Machine promises, will PERFECTLY MATCH what you are looking for. To give you an idea of how this works, I just told it that “I want to feel a gentle sense of melancholia born of the knowledge that all human life is transient and, in the end, nothing we do will matter because we are all going to die” – in return, it suggested the following, which, fair play, was more than I was expecting and a couple of rungs up from TUI: “Deep in the Sarawak Jungle of Borneo, where ancient tribes have lived in harmony with nature for countless generations, you’ll find a profound connection to both the transient and eternal aspects of human existence. This 13-day journey strips away all modern distractions as you learn to live among the Penan, one of the world’s last remaining nomadic jungle tribes. In this pristine wilderness, you’ll learn their ancestral survival techniques – skills passed down through generations, each teacher knowing their knowledge must be preserved even as they themselves pass on. Sleeping in hammocks beneath vast jungle canopies, cooking over open fires, and learning to read the forest’s ancient signs, you’ll experience a way of life that has remained largely unchanged for millennia. The culmination of your journey is a solitary 48-hour challenge where you’ll rely solely on your newly acquired skills – a powerful reminder of both human resilience and vulnerability in the face of nature’s timeless rhythms.” If only I had a spare £13k and someone to go with.
  • PxPxPx: Collaborative creativity website corner! I like this a lot – basically you click the link and you’re taken to a BIG canvas on which you and anyone else currently vising the site can draw, with the gimmick being that you can only draw in one colour and each user is assigned a different pantone shade, meaning it’s created this sort of semi-collaborative, semi-adversarial game where people vie for control of different bits of the map…so basically, as you have doubtless gleaned, it’s another riff on the /r/Place gimmick, but a) it’s a nice one; b) it’s pretty obviously something which has been shared around various kid internet places and there’s something slightly pleasing about how the overwhelming sentiment from The Youth, at least the online youth, is ‘fcuk Elon’ (also, “USA is fcuked” which made me laugh). Basically this is like a graffiti wall at a school, if the school were digital and international and infinite. Which, honestly, sounds AWFUL, but this is fun, promise (also, as far as I can tell, there is NOTHING BAD on there!).
  • Project 2025 Observer: As the whole Project25 thing continues look morelike an actual plan rather than the fevered imaginings of a bunch of semi-libertarian wingnuts (oh, hang on, it was BOTH? FFS!), this site is tracking the ostensible progress of the US administration towards fulfilling the aims set out in the original project plan – which, I get, is a laudable attempt at transparency, but, equally, given the lack of actual clarity on what is ACTUALLY being done vs what is being shouted about VERY LOUDLY, and the judicial impediments being used to prevent some of the more obvious and egregious attempts to gut the state, it’s possible that this paints a SLIGHTLY more apocalyptic picture than is quite warranted (it is equally possible, though, that this is simply me huffing vast authorial quantities of copium, so, well, take your pick). Oh, and seeing as I am briefly doing US politics in the uptop, here is the website for 50501, which is a protest organisation in North America which is working to help organise on-the-ground and grassroots movements and which has coordinated peaceful protests across the country over the past couple of weeks, and here’s the site for Tesla Takedown, an organisation which is trying to get people to protest the company, dump Tesla stock and fcuk That Fcuking Man in the wallet (there’s quite a lot of chat from People Who Have Studied Him about how his actual cash position is significantly more parlous and vulnerable than his paper position might make him appear, which, honestly, I don’t understand enough about money to really meaningfully grasp  but which I hope against hope is true).
  • Grocy: This is one of those very particular links where I imagine that, while for 99.9% of you it will be baffling, incomprehensible and deeply-tedious (why ARE you reading this? Why am I writing it? Gah, existential angst at 7:52am doesn’t bode hugely well), there will be 0.1% of you (so, what, a statistical third of a person?) for whom this is LIFE-CHANGING and transformative. Are YOU the sort of person who gets a vague sense of excitement from the concept of life-tracking and the quantified self? Do you like hacking stuff together? Does the concept of a ‘linux kernel’ not only mean something to you but NOT strike fear into your very heart? OH GOOD! Grocy is what looks like a reasonably-powerful bit of code which you can use to effectively track and manage your domestic food arrangements (oh, hang on, there’s also an app! This isn’t just for the codemongs!). Honestly, it is worth clicking through and seeing all the stuff this does – you can barcode scan all your food so it knows what’s in your fridge/larder, you can use it to stack stock quantity and set purchase reminders, it has an integrated recipe suggestion feature which works from your known, in-stock ingredients, the code’s all open source…honestly, for the right type of person this will be THRILLING (and, depending on what the rest of their life and family is like, for their partner and offspring it may be…less so, I concede).
  • The Tube Ad Critic: Someone is doing reviews of the ads on the London Underground – specifically of the copy – and offering up star ratings to the various campaigns, which is a nice idea (I am aware that enough of you reading this still work in advermarketingpr and so might be in the market for such a link, even if it’s possibly a *bit* industry-specific for general consumption). In general this is pleasant enough, even if I would personally prefer it were the author to be, well, a bit more aggressively opinionated, especially given the fact that seemingly no fcuker in the entire London ad industry knows how to write decent fcuking copy anymore. Three out of five stars.
  • JS Kaleidoscope: Upload any image you like and watch as it turns into a beautiful kaleidoscope. Or at least it’s beautiful if you use an abstract or a landscape – if you use a photo of your own face, as I did upon first finding it, it very quickly becomes a deeply-horrifying exploration of some fairly long-buried meat-based insecurities (or it does if you’re me).
  • The Substance Lookbook: OBVIOUSLY I haven’t seen The Substance, but I am aware enough of the world outside the internet to know that there was a film called The Substance, it starred Demi Moore, and it was a groundbreaking satire on femininity, sexism, ageing and female identity/agency / a deeply disappointing schlockfest which failed to stick the landing (delete as per). Anyway, point is I have an idea of the film’s general VIBE, and as such very much enjoyed looking through what is apparently the lookbook produced for the movie and which is just such a perfect encapsulation of a mood/aesthetic; honestly, this is good because it is SO CLEAR and SO DIRECTIONAL and even someone with as little aesthetic sense as me can get what it’s communicating and what ‘the look’ is. Really interesting and a very good example of how to craft (or think about crafting, or maybe cohering) a campaign or project.
  • The Protector App: A small bugbear about The Modern World – I hate it as much as you do (probably more, it’s fair to say), and I hate the techcnuts (again, trust me on this, given the amount of time I have been forced to spend thinking about them over the past few years it’s fair to say that my hatred might even outweigh yours), and I think that increasingly large parts of How Capitalism Works and How It Manifests In Society are deeply troubling…but, also, I am really fcuking bored of people taking stuff and creating narratives around it that fit their worldview but which aren’t, well, true (DOING THAT IS HOW WE GOT HERE YOU FCUKING MORONS). A case in point was the reaction to the release this week of Protector, marketed as an app which lets you hire ex-Forces personnel to be your on-demand bodyguard/militarised escort service – some of it was funny (‘Uber for Goons”), but most of it was hyperbolising about “OH MY GOD THEY’VE DONE MILITIAS-AS-A-SERVICE” and the like…except, well, I don’t think that’s what this is. This is a lifestyle flex, a status booster, something for the ‘gram and the Tok and probably not intended as an actual, honest-to-goodness security proposition. Witness the marketing videos the company put out pre-launch, expertly (if…somewhat morally uncritically) deconstructed in this Reel, which is very clearly pimping this as a really fcuking pimped way to arrive at Prom, basically. Can we all say Boom Boom Aesthetic?
  • Ludocene: Ooh, this is a really nice idea. If you’re into videogames, you might find the current publishing landscape overwhelming (particularly on PC) – outside of the big publishers, there is a dizzying number of titles being published each month and it’s hard to develop an understanding of what’s interesting and good given the impossibility of outlets being able to cover everything worthwhile. Enter Ludocene, a recently-launched Kickstarter which is hoping to fundraise to launch, er, ‘Tinder for games’ – “Ludocene is a new way to find your next game. It uses rich human-researched data to build your catalogue of games. It uncovers amazing, unusual and unexpected matches not just the usual suspects or big popular games. It feels like you’re playing a game, where winning is discovering video games that perfectly match your tastes: Build your perfect deck of games you love; Pick experts whose taste you trust; Discover your best matches in the tailored suggestions. Each game is represented by a card that you can interact with: click to view a game trailer and flip to view more details and the best prices on storefronts.Like a dating app, you are offered a stream of games. You swipe up to reject and swipe down to add them to your deck of games that represent your taste. Every choice refines the stream of games offered as you hunt for your next game.” It’s 25% there with three weeks to go, and in general seems like a decent idea that might prove really helpful with enough momentum and users behind it.
  • Nobody Here: OH GOD ANOTHER BRILLIANT AND MASSIVE AND INEXPLICABLE WEBSITE! This is also, I think, OLD – but it’s quite hard to tell, and judging by the baffling but still very active concern it is still very much A Thing (FCUKING HELL I JUST LOOKED AND IT IS 27 YEARS OLD! 27! THERE ARE PEOPLE DISMANTLING US DEMOCRACY WHO ARE YOUNGER THAN THIS WEBSITE!). This is the website of…someone? I think they are Dutch, and I presume they’re a coder, but, honestly, I don’t really know – I fell in love with the homepage (honestly, the animations and interactions on the silhouette figure would have been enough for me to include this, even without the baffling labyrinth of STUFF that sits beneath it) and then just found myself clicking around and…Jesus, this, per Protein World, goes DEEP but it is so, so pleasingly incoherent and WHOLLY personal, and I increasingly believe (work with me here) that, actually, at the age of, say, 11, every single kid in the world should be given a set amount of cloud storage space and some basic dev education and told ‘this is your foreverplace, make of it what you will’ and left to turn it into whatever they choose because how much better would the web be if there were more sites like this? IT WOULD BE LOADS BETTER YOU JOYLESS FCUKS.

By Marta Blue

NEXT, THIS IS AN ASTONISHING 13H PLAYLIST COMPILED BY JARVIS COCKER WHICH IS RELIABLY ACE AND WHICH YOU SHOULD BOOKMARK RIGHT NOW!

THE SECTION WHICH THINKS THAT IF YOU HAVE A NEWSLETTER WITH 140K SUBS WHICH YOU CHARGE £80 A YEAR FOR AND YOU FOUND SOMETHING IN MY P1SSY LITTLE EFFORT THAT YOU CHOOSE TO LIFT AND QUOTE ME ABOUT THEN THE LEAST YOU CAN FCUKING DO IS INCLUDE A BACKLINK YOU CNUTS (YES I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU, THE KNOWLEDGE, I KNOW YOU ARE READING THIS), PT.2:

  • Komaeda: In what is an absolute BUMPER WEEK for ‘inexplicable and very large and occasionally-unsettling websites which your very own internet Virgil couldn’t begin to adequately describe even were he an actual, proper writer’, I think Komaeda might be the oddest of all. It opens with the phrase ‘i cant fcuking breathe’ and, honestly, only gets weirder from there. It’s a bit janky, there are parts of it that feel oddly like a Newgrounds animation c.2005 (REAL HEADS WILL KNOW) – including this alternative entrypoint, which feels like a portal back to a VERY different online time – and, again, I don’t have the faintest idea what is on all the pages or how deep this goes and so can’t promise there isn’t anything bad lurking somewhere in the depths, but it doesn’t feel like that sort of site fwiw. This is – and I know I say this all the time, but I feel it quite strongly, so – ART. Weird, broken, possibly-not-very-good art, but art nonetheless. There is music, there are visuals, there are stories and comics and essays and animations and VERY WEIRD THINGS, and quite a lot of stuff that sounds, honestly, like schizophrenia, but who can tell in this day and age? ENJOY!
  • Psst!: In an era in which it seems clear that any ostensible – even if cosmetic – progress we might have made on the concept of ‘corporate responsibility’ is going to be rolled back hard over the course of the coming years, consequences be damned (I am not going to keep repeating the ’Boom Boom’ thing, but, well, that), it feels like the concept of leaking and whistleblowing is set to be more important than ever. Effectively Psst! is running a digital dead drop, letting anyone anonymously share files with their legal team who will then analyse and see if there’s anything that can be done with said information – per the blurb, “Psst is a non-partisan, non-profit public service that helps people bring forward public interest information. We’ve worked with a lot of people concerned about something they’ve seen at work. We know the tricks powerful corporations use to shut people up. We also know a lot of important information never comes out due to legal threats. In our era of AI, Big Tech and decreasing government guardrails, we need safe channels to share public interest information more than ever.” Perhaps unsurprisingly given Where We Are, “Currently, the Psst team is prioritizing depositors who are working in tech or US-based governmental entities” – should there be any of you reading this who fit that description, this might be worth a look. Although based on what I was told yesterday about some…changes another VERY LARGE company is set to make to its stated ‘values’ (LOL) and what this stuff practically means in terms of likely directions of corporate travel, I might suggest that any of you working in BIG EVIL CAPITAL LAND might want to think about this sort of thing too.
  • Fiverr Go: I have long thought that the digital pieceworkers and VAs in places like the Philippines are going to be some of the earliest canaries to fall as AI starts cutting swathes, and it’s hard to see this latest innovation from gigworking platform Fiverr as anything other than an accelerant to the inevitable endpoint (ie all of those jobs are gone). The gimmick here is that Fiverr is allowing CREATORS (in this case v/o artists, illustrators and graphic designers from what I can tell) to spin up their own AI models based on their work, and license those models on a per-use basis to customers, theoretically combining AI and HUMAN CREATIVITY to create a passive income stream – the digital, model version of you works all day and night while you put your feet up and enjoy the fruits of your talented, exploited and extended via the magic of The Machine. Except, well, I can’t see how the economics work here because – and I appreciate that what I am going to say is possibly going to sound mean, and maybe is, but I think it is also true – none of the v/o artists or illustrators or designers tending to ply their wares on platforms like Fiverr are distinct enough to be worth the fee, and won’t be better enough than what, honestly, you can get from AN Other model where you can either use it for free or get an infinite license for a tenner a month rather than having to pay a per-work rate. So, well, why the fcuk would I bother? If I want to support a REAL CREATOR I would like them to do the actual work rather than using a model of their style; it feels like this offering misses several points. Still, as I often say, I don’t know the first fcuking thing about business or economics or, really, anything at all, and so expect this to be how we all do business in the AI-enabled luxury communist future of tomorrow.
  • Olyn: What is Olyn? Per the landing page, “Pioneering the Future of Media Distribution…Supporting creators to monetize and distribute their media content without listing dependencies or platform constraints.” SO EVOCATIVE! SO INSPIRATIONAL! SO ARTISTIC AND HUMAN! Leaving aside the frankly-hideous prose, Olyn is marketing itself as a direct-to-consumer model for film creators – per this TC writeup, it: “claims to offer a new model for film and video distribution that leans on the power of social referrals to spread “à la carte” streaming content. Although any size of production — from Hollywood blockbuster downward — can use the platform, the company claims it could be a game changer for the independent film industry, which tends to struggle against the marketing budgets of the bigger movies distributed on mainstream streaming platforms…Instead of films being sold to platforms like Netflix, the model hinges on the marketing budget of the filmmakers themselves, combined with influencers, film critics, and content creators acting as distribution partners by embedding purchase links within their content, blogs, and social channels.” Look, it’s possible I’m missing something here but I don’t wholly understand exactly how ‘share a link to your content!’ is a revolutionary or disruptive proposition given, well, that’s how people have been sharing things for 25 years by now, but perhaps there’s something I’m missing (if this company still exists in the same shape in three years time I will eat my pants) (I would be grateful if a) none of you bothered tracking this; b) in three years’ time this is a long distant memory and I am finally happy and at rest).
  • Sky360: I know that, per horse_e_books, everything happens so much, and that it is therefore hard to keep track, but it honestly feels like approximately a decade since a bunch of incredibly smart people in the US started taking potshots at planes because they thought that they were alien craft. Except it wasn’t, it was only a few months, and, given the potentially-parlous state of the world over the coming few years and the likely growing sense of paranoia which everyone’s going to start wearing like so many additional lbs of stress around our necks (you can feel it, can’t you, the knotting?), it’s likely that we’ve not seen the last of mad online UFO conspiracies – which is what makes it so UTTERLY TIMELY that someone has seen fit to launch Sky36, a project promising to establish “Observational Citizen Science of Earths atmosphere and beyond” (the infelicitous punctuation there is theirs on this occasion rather than mine, I promise) which DEFINITELY won’t attract every Area51-coded crank in the Northern Hemisphere, no sirree. Basically the spelling and tone of this makes me…somewhat concerned, but should you be the sort of person who wants to build their own UFO-detection system out of homebrew parts then, well, GREAT!
  • Cutting Edge AI Video, February 2025 Edition: Or “LOL WE ARE SO COOKED (again)!”, choose your headline per preference. This comes via Arnicas’ superb newsletter (I can’t stress again how much you should be subscribed to it if you have any interest in visual / storytelling tech and AI) and is an experimental lora (that is, fine-tuning mod) for one of the better text-to-vid models, Hunyuan which basically creates vids that look…a bit crap. Honestly, watch these and tell me you’d be able to tag them as fake if presented to you in-feed – I posit that you would absolutely fcuking not be able to. I know I keep banging this drum, but I don’t think people are quite *getting* it, still – these things are not going to go away, they are not going back in the bottle, and they are very soon (within the year, doubtless) going to be good enough to create photorealistic video that mimics the grain and lighting and…mundanity of real life, and they will then become small enough and lightweight enough to run locally on a phone or laptop and cheap enough that the generation cost is less-than-trivial…and at that point I genuinely don’t know what happens. Do you?
  • Rabbithole: As everyone begins to realise that what both OpenAI and Google both admitted two years ago (specifically, “we have no moat here”) is entirely true, we’re basically entering the era of ‘all the models are largely interchangeable outside of specific usecases and they all do basically the same stuff’, which is good for users if not for the poor chumps who put all their eggs in the wrong basket (what’s that? Is that the sound of no violins whatsoever? It fcuking is, you know!). So it is with ‘Deep Research’, which is being touted by everyone as THE NEW HOTNESS. Rabbithole is a standalone platform (although almost certainly built on top of something else – oh, yes, Gemini, with other integration coming soon) which is designed specifically for ‘exploring interest areas’ – while I wouldn’t rely on it AT ALL for anything that actually mattered (which applies to all AI research, by the way – it is simply not good enough yet to be useful, unless what you consider ‘useful’ is ‘something that could have been produced by an average 16 year old’ in which case, well, raise your fcuking bar ffs), it is actually quite a fun way of asking a question and letting it lead you – give it an area of enquiry and it will not only give you answers with sources, but it will also suggest other directions in which you can take your enquiry – so a question about, say, situationism, will give you a sourced breakdown of the movement but also suggested branching questions around its impact on urban exploration practices, its subsequent influence on later social movements, and specific techniques employed in the movement’s early days to create ‘experiences’, all of which are, honestly, not bad follow-ups! As a means of getting the broad ‘shape’ of a topic, this could be quite useful imho.
  • Angus Nic Neven: Look, I think Angus Nic Neven is a musician. I THINK. That, though, doesn’t explain why his personal website is possibly the most obviously, overtly, occult thing I think I have ever seen on the web ever. Like, I don’t believe in evil and witches and things like that (when, like me, you sold your soul to the devil aged 17, it is important to maintain this sense of grounded reality lest you get impossibly panicked about What Is To Come), but it’s impossible not to get the sense that there is something about this whole site that…well…*bodes*, basically, and not well. If the internet existed when I was at secondary school and I was caught looking at this by Sister Janet she would have been even more concerned for my mortal soul than she already was, let’s just say. I am reasonably-certain that clicking this link won’t leave you cursed or in any way doomed to a life of satanically-linked torment of the soul but I can’t promise it for sure, is all I’m saying. Should Angus happen to ever see this, please do drop me a line and explain what the fcuk is going on here because I love it but it also scares me quite a lot.
  • Sacred Forests: While I might personally be, er, *somewhat bearish* about the future prospects of the planet (at least without the aforementioned Big Tech Hail Mary that we’re all seemingly now fixated on), I am very much pro initiatives that exhibit a slightly more hopeful outlook, such as Sacred Forest. It’s also a really nicely-made website which features a friendly capybara early-on, which endeared me to it no end. This is basically a project that seeks to work with indigenous communities to encourage rewilding of natural areas in a way in which is consistent with, and sympathetic to, their community and practice as well as benefiting the planet – per the blurb, “Sacred Forests is an Amsterdam born, internationally operating social enterprise start up at the forefront of a ‘new’ yet ancient way to protect forests, Indigenous forest conservation.” In typical Dutch fashion they acknowledge the slightly-eyeroll-inducing trope of ‘a bunch of rich white guys doing the saviour thing’ – although ‘acknowledging’ is not the same as ‘not doing the thing you are acknowledging’, to be clear, and this is obviously an initiative with its heart in the right place – your mileage will obviously vary, but I thought this was an interesting idea and, from the simple point of view of communication and digital/visual design, is very nice indeed.
  • EggThread: How online are you, do you think? VERY online? I think this thread is a decent test. It is about the fact that there are no eggs in the US, and those that there are are currently very expensive. It starts off silly and gets increasingly nonsensical and internetty, and, honestly, I think this is possibly one of the purest expressions of Where We Have Ended Up With Digital Culture – serious news filtered through what is now an accreted series of layers of memetics and irony and DEEP-FRIED KNOWLEDGE; a decade or more of marination and maceration of ourselves in the internet soup has led us to this point, where someone can post a photo of an empty palette of eggs in a shop with the caption “Trump take egg” and a dozen or so (mad) posts later someone will write “You need slurp juice to buy egg now” AND IT MAKES SENSE (to me. Oh God, I am irrevocably ruined, aren’t I?). Consider this a useful barometer of the extent to which you’re able to function in polite, offline society (or, er, not).
  • Goosebumps: An infinite runner – click to jump, collect the tokens, avoid the rocks! Simple, fast and visually rather glorious (but VERY hard to play, to my mind at least, as a result of the visual clutter), this is a promo for something or other (I don’t know or honestly care what) which will give you a pleasing few minutes’ distraction before you move onto something a bit more nourishing.
  • 3d Maze: Also via TITAA, this is FUN – basically your task is to navigate a 3d maze in FPS; by the end of your first run you can choose the size of the next maze you take on, meaning you can create something enormous and very, very difficult. The only way this fun, lightweight little webtoy could be improved would be to allow you to upload your own images to act as wallpaper for the maze – being confronted with a closeup of your own hideous visage would give a new and compelling reason to get the fcuk out of there sharpish, for example.
  • The Flash Museum: I can’t believe I haven’t featured this before. The Flash Museum is, er, a digital museum of old flash games, converted so they play in modern browsers – if you spent any time on Newgrounds (second mention this week, IT’S SO BACK!) in the early-00s then you will recognise SO MANY of these titles – in the main they are fcuking awful, but there’s a certain janky period charm to them imho. Also there are some legit classics – Alien Hominid still slaps as much as it did when I spent entire days doing nothing but playing it at work (RIP Citigate Public Affairs, you are wiv da angles) – although you should be aware that, given the 00-iness of the whole thing there is also a bunch of stuff of possibly questionable taste to modern eyes (I think I saw a variant on ‘columbine simulator’ up there, for example).
  • Weekend At Mario’s: Via Rob at B3ta, what would the first level of Mario be like if the plumber was dead? Not that much fun tbh, but the ragdoll physics here makes this a reasonably-enjoyable thing to futz around with for five minutes or so.
  • Virtual PC: A virtual PC! With a virtual hard-drive! On which you can play actual, full PC games from the late-90s! Seriously, there’s DOOM (obvs!), Sim City 2000 (honestly, load it up just to hear the intro music and get the purest hit of Proustian nostalgia you will feel all week), Civilisation, Age of Empires…GO BACK TO YOUR CHILDHOOD WHEN EVERYTHING WAS SIMPLE!
  • Little Sisyphus: Our final game this week is this LOVELY little NES-style platformer with a surprisingly-sophisticated physics model at its heart – this is HARD, be warned (or at least it was for me), but I guess that’s era-appropriate, and it’s really very impressively made indeed considering it all runs in-browser, and it came to me via Andy and you should give it a go RIGHT NOW.

By Dennis Møgelgaard

FINALLY THIS WEEK WE CLOSE OUT HARD WITH FORMER EDITOR PAUL AND HIS GERMANIC BLEEPS AND BLOOPS AND WHEES! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • King of Blood: Via the lovely people over at MeFi, King of Blood is a webcomic which is less sinister than its name might immediately suggest but which isn’t wholly un-sinister, if you see what I mean.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Potions & Spells: Ok, this isn’t in fact long at all, but it felt interestingly *true* to me and I am increasingly of the opinion that Sean Monahan is one of about a dozen people worth reading on Where Modern Culture Is Going Right Now (not that I think he is always right, but he is always interesting) – also it harked me back to something I’ve been wanging on about for over a decade(!) now, to whit “when Grey predicted that New Witches was going to be a big consumer trend in 2015 I laughed and mocked them in Private Eye, but actually it turns out they were totally right and in fact the stuff they identified has actually been one of the more significant, if one-remove, influences on the past ten years imho’ and which I feel this little article neatly bookends. It’s short, see what you think: “What if, instead of using clinical language to describe addiction, we used spiritual terms? The gambling addict is not suffering from compulsive behavior; he is possessed. Schoolchildren are not distracted by screens; they are hypnotized. Ozempic is not a medication; it’s a potion. Propaganda does not use communications strategies; it casts spells. Or on a more personal note—it’s not a vibe shift; it’s a broken spell? Maybe UFOs aren’t extraterrestrials; they’re demons.” It doesn’t feel  good, but it feels…accurate.
  • Human Mediocrity will Pave the Way: I had a slightly awkward moment before Christmas when I was asked to speak at an event (about AI, OBVIOUSLY!!!!) and realised after being there for 3m that I hated everyone in the room with an incandescent passion and that I was therefore not going to care about being polite, and ended up effectively implying that everyone there deserved to lose their jobs to The Machine because they were in the main involved in the pollution of the cultural ecosystem with infinite quantities of dreck (I think the exact moment I realised I was possibly going TOO FAR was when I asked everyone in the room who thought the work they did attained the heady heights of ‘mediocre’ on a day to day basis to raise their hands and then, at the nervous laugher, just looked at them all, unsmiling. It’s a miracle they paid the fcuking invoice tbh) – I felt that very strongly when reading this brilliant and thought-provoking piece by Mo Diggs. There is a lot in here so I won’t attempt a full summary, but, roughly, he’s not attempting to say ‘THERE HAS BEEN NO GOOD CULTURE IN TWO DECADES’ so much as he is saying ‘the viewing of culture through the prism of digital/social media has created a flattening effect which has not contributed to the creation of valuable works, in the main’ – there’s a lot more in here about the inherent cultural drivers of social platforms, the way this all ties into the wider dark forest internet theory, etc, but even if you’re just interested in a topline read of ‘culture in the now’ then this really is very interesting indeed.
  • Ryan On Trump: I sort of assume you all read Garbage Day already – and you should, much as it pains me to heap praise on a significantly more successful product, it is one of the best English-language newsletters in the world if you’re interested in the digital culture and how it is CHANGING US – but if you don’t then let me take a moment to recommend the headline post, and this one, giving an overview/perspective on the ongoing attempts to reduce the US State apparatus to smouldering rubble and tens of thousands of government employees with Grok (probably). I appreciate you might not want to stick your face in That Man’s Firehose, so to speak, but if you want at least to stay at least minimally informed about all the things that are actually happening – and What It Means – then Ryan (and Rusty at Tabs, actually) are both doing a superb job. You don’t get analysis like this in the NYT, in the main: “At some point between 2019-2021, the internet conquered mainstream media, viral content replaced traditional corporate entertainment, and Republicans have first mover’s advantage. This is their victory lap after all the shameless years they spent posting Pepe the Frog memes and setting up YouTube channels to brainwash children. But I am surprised by how thoroughly the Democrats and, more generally, leftists and liberals have ceded internet culture, as a whole, to the right. Every meme, every format, every platform is fertile ground for an adversarial regime that knows how to spin them into cheap and easy propaganda and there is no line they aren’t willing to cross. You can quibble, and say that conservatives are better funded or less squeamish about being cringe or care less about telling the truth. But none of that really changes the fact that social media, the machine that now decides what pop culture looks like, is now an inherently right-wing space. And regardless of what explanation you subscribe to as to how we got to this point, that is a huge cultural loss for the left. And one without a clear solution in sight.”
  • The Milei Rugpull, Explained: You may not want to read about crypto – fcuk, NOONE wants to read about crypto, there is literally nothing on earth less fun other than possibly self-circumcision (not that I have ever tried that, to be clear) – but this story is worth gritting your teeth for, because FCUKING HELL it really doesn’t feel like the sort of thing that someone ought to be able to get away with in terms of ‘naked criminality abetted by an elected official’. This is written by Molly White and so is thankfully readable and clear and does a decent job of handholding you through What Apparentlly Happened – the big takeaway here, to my mind, is the sheer, naked venality on display, which to my mind is the hallmark of all these cnuts and what, troublingly, makes me think that the current version of the Trumpian project might actually be a bit more stable than the 2016 version. Back then it was all warring factions and competing interests within the court – this time, though, it seems all the various jesters and courtiers and viziers, while still variously mad, racist, deranged, perverse, criminal and sick, are all united under the single, unifying goal of ‘become as rich and embeddedly powerful as is humanly possible’, which makes it…less likely that there will be some sort of krakatoan fallout. Still, though, here’s hoping!
  • New Junior Devs Can’t Code: File under ‘I told you so’ or ‘hm, so it turns out that we DO lose something if we outsource the thinking!’, this is an entirely-predictable story about how software companies are finding that junior devs they’re trying to hire…can’t code. Sure, they can cobble together stuff from Github, but in terms of actually understanding the first principles of what they are doing and how the various languages at heart *work*…nope, not so much. Which, obviously, is Not Great – I was thinking the other day when reading about the great, amusing COBOL fcukup, that we are soon going to be at a point where there is noone left alive in the world who knows how COBOL actually works (it was created in the 60s iirc) and, given how many crucial systems are built on it, how that might end up being a touch problematic in the long-term. OH WELL!
  • Using GPT as a Focus Group: I present this not because I think it is a good idea – I am at best sceptical, and at worst of the opinion that this is, at present, a ruinously-dumb thing to do – but because it is obviously happening and therefore it’s important to know about. This is a blogpost by one James Breckwoldt who used GPT to effectively simulate responses ‘in the persona of’ ordinary voters talking about ordinary issues, and found that these synthetic opinions sounded very much like the sort you hear from actual focus groups from actual real people…and, look, I am sure James is a nice man and a good professional, but, also, THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT THE FCUKING TECHNOLOGY IS BRILLIANT AT DOING FFS, MAKING WORDS THAT LOOK BROADLY LIKE THEY ARE THE RIGHT SHAPE FOR WHATEVER YOU WANT THEM TO DO. Also, given the nature of How The Machine Works, literally ALL it is doing is probabilistically arranging tokens based on its prediction of where they migh best fit based on what it has seen before…meaning OF COURSE IT SOUNDS LEGIT BECAUSE IT IS DRAWING ON SOURCE MATERIAL OF PEOPLE IN THE PAST TALKING ABOUT SIMILAR ISSUES! Like, I get what they are trying to say here, but I simply don’t see what practical, actual value this delivers you – I could literally MAKE UP focus group quotes based on ‘things I know that people think based on listening to conversations on buses and at football matches and in the supermarket’, but that would be bullsh1t too! If anyone thinks I am being stupid here, by the way, please do feel free to drop me an email and explain why, I am genuinely happy to listen to any explanation you can offer me. Also, given you now have companies like this one offering this service at scale, I wonder where the liabilities fall – who carries the can when my business model, guaranteed to be a success based on the insanely-positive reactions of the modelled, virtual customerbase, was not in fact a billion-dollar win and I am in hock to the bank for a violent wedge and the bailiffs are banging on the door while I drink meths and cry? WHAT THEN???
  • The Deep Research Problem: I referenced this earlier, but should you not want to take my word for it that all the AI research tools are not quite ready yet then why not instead listen to BUSINESS GURU Ben Thompson, who basically says the same things as me but with more rigour and therefore the ability to charge £1k an hour consultancy fees, the git.
  • The DuoLingo Brand Handbook: I have refused, and continue to refuse, to cover the fcuking owl suicide thing, and DuoLingo brand discourse overall is something I have…very limited interest in, in the main, but this document, published…recently-ish, I think, is interesting from the point of view of advermarketingpr and how to create, define and manage a brand. If you want to skip straight to the ‘so, how exactly does pretending that your green anthropomorphic owl mascot has offed itself as some sort of ironic metacommentary on the state of the world drive app downloads?’ section then you can find it on p54
  • Barcoding Brains: Neuroscience is very much something I wish I understood more than I actually in fact do; still, what little I *do* manage to grasp is fascinating and slightly-horrifying (turns out that thinking about the fact that there is this blancmange-textured mass just sort of wobbling about inside my skull really does trigger the appalled ‘GAH DEAR GOD I AM MADE OF MEAT AND IT IS HORRIFYING’ palmsweats, as attested by how hard I am finding it to type at this exact moment), and this is really interesting, both in terms of human biology and psychology but also how that intersects with our attempts to create digital analogues to ‘thinking’, etc. This is basically about where we are with attempts to ‘map’ and understand the structure of the brain and how all the various nodes within it connect, and what implications the nature of said connections have for the nature of consciousness and thought. Crunchy but so interesting (if you can get past the meathorrors).
  • The Largest Sofa You Can Fit Around A Corner: Ok, this is far too maths-y for me to be able to claim to meaningfully understand in any way, but I love the central question – specifically, what is the optimal and largest design of sofa that can be moved around a corridor corner. A Certain Type of Reader may recall that the irrevocably-stuck sofa was a central running gag in…I think the first?…Dirk Gently novel, and as such this article basically gave me Proustian flashbacks to being VERY YOUNG and reading that and being utterly captivated by the silliness and yet extreme seriousness of the gag (it is a silly premise, but it is a very serious mathematical problem). Anyway, I think IKEA should make this sofa IRL.
  • 50 Years of Travel Tips: I try and keep the list posts to a minimum in Curios, but this was interesting and alien enough to me to make me want to link it – this is by Kevin Kelly, who has traveled a LOT, and has decided to share What He Has Learned over decades of seeing the world. Some of these seem eminently sensible – for example “If you detect slightly more people moving in one direction over another, follow them. If you keep following this “gradient” of human movement, you will eventually land on something interesting—a market, a parade, a birthday party, an outdoor dance, a festival.” – whilst others seem…a bit pushy, frankly. I don’t, honestly, think that this is good advice at all, and would genuinely love to see a tourist attempt this in London one afternoon where I think they would probably get some…interesting responses: “Crash a wedding. You are not a nuisance; you are the celebrity guest! The easiest way to do this is to find the local wedding hall where weddings happen on schedule and approach a wedding party with a request to attend. They will usually feel honored. You can offer the newlyweds a small token gift of cash if you want. You will be obliged to dance. Take photos of them; they will take photos of you. It will make your day and theirs. (I’ve crashed a wedding in most of the countries I have visited.)”
  • Why GenZ Doesn’t Trust The News: With the obvious caveats that a) GENERATIONS ARE NOT MONOLITHSZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ; and b) this is a SMALL sample, this is also a very interesting ‘kids, in their own words’ piece which will probably make you a *bit* despair-y about the whole ‘will we ever get back to having a widely-shared conception of truth and reality, do you think?’ thing. I know that this is, on some level, just how we are wired as animals – pretty privilege is, after all, a think that transcends professions and disciplines – but, equally, try reading this and not then wanting to sigh and possibly go for a long walk off a short, very high roof: “Sometimes, trust is based on something even simpler: looks. “I kind of trust people based on how they look,” admits Jake, 17, another student.” OH JAKE FFS.
  • Making AI Recipes: Do you still spend any time on Facebook? I genuinely don’t – even the one Group I used to use it for (W_W) is now on Whatsapp, so there’s honestly no reason for me to engage with it beyond morbid curiosity – but the last time I did I ended up in an algohole that wanted to show me nothing other than ‘recipes’ for desserts accompanied by obviously-AI-generated images. In this piece, Katie Notopoulos speaks to people who have made such recipes and tries one herself – the upshot, basically, is ‘fine-if-bland’ – but the food here is really the least interesting thing, compared to (and this is something I think not enough people grasp right now) the number of people who simply DIDN’T REALISE THE IMAGES AND RECIPES WERE AI, or DIDN’T FCUKING CARE. To all of you confidently predicting some sort of mass consumer backlash to ‘AI slop’, well, LOL! I would like to gently remind you that if you work in communications, post on Bluesky and live in a metropolitan urban environment YOU ARE NOT IN ANY WAY REPRESENTATIVE OF ALMOST ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANET. So, er, maybe wind your neck in on the ‘normal people hate this stuff, actually’ rhetoric, eh?
  • Haley Mlotek’s Divorce: Mlotek has a book on her divorce out this week, which is being serialised all over the place – I have found myself enjoying the extracts far more than I expected to given I have never been married and therefore never divorced (I have, er, inspired a divorce, but that’s a different story). I think this is lovely writing on the practical realities of adult love and its end, and there’s a second, different extract here on her and her husband’s experimentation with ‘open marriage’-type stuff as a failed attempt to save everything which I also enjoyed. Try this for size and see what you think: “I could tell you about my last night with my former husband, but mostly I think about how the night passed no matter what we did to hold still. My marriage ended when those scenes stopped being scenes. The fights were the same as the conversations, and the coffee was made no matter what was said the night before. The fight I think of as being the first—although there were others before it, this was just the one I think of as the beginning of our end—happened when we were far away from home, on a vacation with our friends. Late at night and very drunk, we screamed at each other. Remembering our volume the next morning was its own kind of hangover. As the sun rose, our friends in the next room coughed and I heard it through the walls; everyone who hadn’t passed out from rum had heard us fight as clearly as I heard that cough. I apologized—I always did—then I spent more time thinking about his words than I thought about what I was sorry for. “But you’re my wife,” my husband had said to me, and that was enough. Only eight weeks into our marriage, my status in his life was as his wife. I took no pleasure or power in that title. I felt what he meant: that what I was to him should be enough. The next morning, he apologized, and I knew he meant it—both the apology and the title. He was sorry. I was his wife.”
  • That Mad Article About the Tory Chief Whip: This has by now been filleted for the juicy bits by everyone under the sun, but it’s worth reading the full thing – and if you’re yet to come across any of it then WOW are you in for a treat. A note to Americans and other foreigners – the role of the ‘Whip’ in UK Parliamentary politics is effectively that of ‘leader’s enforcer’, so the whips are in charge of making sure all the party members toe the line, vote in the right way, stay out of trouble and don’t rock the boat. Which, it turns out, also involves covering up a LOT of very, very dodgy stuff. This might all sound fantastical – and, look, it involves scatplay, which most accounts of workplace indiscretions don’t quite build up to – but as someone who’s worked in and around politics, and in Westminster, it is entirely true that there are lots and lots of people in and around the UK system who are at best FCUKING WEIRD and, at worst, UTTERLY FCUKING BROKEN. It’s quite hard not to read this and think ‘hm, maybe a system that continues to attract people who exhibit these sorts of behaviours when they should in fact be running the country and trying to make it work better for everyone perhaps isn’t working as intended?’ OR MAYBE IT IS, EH????
  • Alt Lit: Sam Kriss (is he still cancelled in UK media? It seems so, which is odd considering several other people who appear to have made…full comebacks from the same era’s opprobrium) writes about the Online Novel, oddly something I have been thinking/talking about a bit recently. He’s ambivalent about the ones he writes on, but I enjoyed this in part because he’s a reliably-entertaining prose stylist but also because the ones he liked more were the same as the ones I liked more, and because I think he makes some good points about style and bravery and formalism – although I read this paragraph and disagreed quite strongly, because, to my mind, the novel continues to be VERY BAD at parsing the past two decades as lived digitally and I don’t see what he writes here as being true AT ALL. Who do YOU agree with? “Everything that’s published now is shaped by the forms and concerns of online, whether it’s explicitly about the internet or not. Our bestselling poets write what are essentially Instagram captions. Publishers live or die at the mercy of BookTok. The recent glut of normie novels about trying to be a good person, or minor racial contretemps between professional-class narcissists, or hot girlies who don’t really do anything in particular—all of these are attuned to the sensibilities of an implicitly online public, whose sense of what might be an interesting topic for literature is downloaded directly from Twitter. The most mainstream Obama-endorsed fiction is now more like a feed than anything else: a series of sharp little lines, minute observations, quips, for you to quote on social media. The whole culture industry is just the internet’s auto-coprophagy, feeding its own waste back into the system. You are not radical or cutting-edge because you remember Neopets.”
  • Chess: Nicholas Pearson writes in the LRB about his son playing chess, to quite a high level, and the modern game more generally – this is a lovely piece of writing, giving an overview both of the game at its highest level in 2025 but also at the grass-roots, and also a moving portrait of watching your children grow up and apart from you and how beautiful and also desperately affecting that must be. This is gorgeous.
  • On The Beach: I have never read anything by Nevile Shute – he exists in my mind mainly as acharacter detail in the Adrian Mole books if I’m honest – but I absolutely loved this essay, all about his novel ‘On The Beach’ and its relevance to contemporary culture and the global response to the climate…can we call it the climate apocalypse now? Fcukit, I am going to start! This is by Peter Coviello, and it is smart and interesting and made me really want to go and read a book about the end of the world written in 1957, which, honestly, doesn’t happen to me very often.
  • The Convent: Another piece by Miles Ellingham in the Londoner, a journalist whose stories about the capital I am very much enjoying of late – this is a wonderful portrait of Tyburn Convent located in Central London, just off Marble Arch, and where the nuns live an ascetic and quiet existence, praying for the capital’s millions of souls (and, presumably, everyone else’s too). This does an excellent job of painting the nuns Ellingham speaks to as real people, three-dimensional beneath the wimples, and it’s all the better for the lack of rose-tint on the authorial lens.
  • A Day in the Life of a Jobless Copywriter: This is by Andrew Boulton, and it is very funny but also DEAR FCUKING CHRIST. Not only is this the worst time in recorded human history in which to attempt to exchange written words for money, but it’s only going to get worse! WHY DON’T I HAVE A MORE DIVERSIFIED SET OF SKILLS FFS? Eh? What? Yes, it is entirely my own fault, why are you looking at me like that?
  • Ideal Candidate: Our final longread this week is this SUPERB (if not *wholly* subtle) bit of satirical writing about the modern labour market. You will get the premise from the full title, but I promise you this really is worth reading all the way through – it is very long, but it is also very good (and it is written in the second person, which for some of you will be enough to recommend it), and Scott Smitelli sustains it superbly throughout. Do not, though, read this on Sunday, if you’re one of those people who spends the hours from 5pm onwards in tears at the prospect of a new week.

By Julia Hetta

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 14/02/25

Reading Time: 37 minutes

HAPPY VALENTINE’S DAY EVERYONE! I assume all your digital cards to me are currently stuck in the ether somewhere and will all arrive together in due course – consider this my personal, amorous missive to each of YOU, for what could motivate a man to set aside so much time and effort every week for strangers other than a deep and abiding sense of LOVE (agape or eros, take your pick)?

Yes, that’s right, mental illness and a growing sense of their own futility in a world which increasingly doesn’t seem to care! But we can call it ‘love’ if you prefer.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are still in time to cancel that dinner reservation, you know it is a bad idea and you will regret it.

By Ana Cuba

WE START OFF THIS WEEK WITH A SLIGHTLY-STRANGE PROJECT BY A MAN CALLED, APPARENTLY, GLEMPY, WHO HAS DECIDED TO SET THE BBC’S SHIPPING FORECAST TO LOFI BEATS AND HAS CREATED A SURPRISINGLY-COMPELLING NEW GENRE WHICH I AM GOING TO CALL CROMERTYHOP!

THE SECTION WHICH DISCOVERED THIS WEEK THAT THERE IS A TRADE BODY FOR THE DATING APPS INDUSTRY AND THAT IT IS HELMED BY A MAN WHO WEARS JEANS AND SHOES, WHICH FEELS WEIRDLY SIGNIFICANT IN A WAY I CAN’T QUITE PUT MY FINGER ON, PT.1:  

  • The VCU Network: I think I’ve talked in here before about the odd, solipsistic nature of the ‘surfing the web’ (LOL! I think we should bring that terminology back) (and if I haven’t then I totally meant to, honest), the weird sense that I think is sort of innate to being online whereby only the bits of the web that you’re currently looking at are really *real*, so to speak, and that your browsing experience is the only true browsing experience, and that your internet is THE internet. Which, obviously, is not true in the slightest – I actually think that we might have done ourselves rather a lot of good had all the vaguely-experimental ‘see what the web looks like if Facebook thinks you’re someone else’ toys you were able to spin up c.2010 or so had been allowed to persist a bit longer. Which is by way of very longwinded and slightly-baggy preamble (sorry; that doesn’t bode hugely well for the rest of this week’s typing, does it? Apologies, I’ll try and keep the authorial digressions to a minimum. Oh, fcuk, I’m doing again aren’t I?) to The VCU Network, a truly FASCINATING window into the web as experienced by other people, but one that it turns out I am not sure if I can totally get into. Let me explain (IT’S ABOUT FCUKING TIME MATT FFS) – the VCU network is basically an art project which functions as a Chrome extension – anyone with the extension installed and turned on is automatically participating in the project, which sees EVERY SINGLE URL YOU VISIT shared with everyone else participating. So at any given moment you can open up a new tab and see what everyone else in the world with the extension installed is looking at RIGHT NOW – which, obviously, is slightly-incredible and madly voyeuristic and intrusive and weird, and immediately feels…uncomfortable, almost, like a violation of sorts (I learned about several entirely new sources of gay bongo, for example, which while not specifically ‘my thing’ was, well, instructive!). Hence my conflict here – I love this, I love the ethos of it…but I don’t want everyone to be able to see where I find all my stuff (I FOUND THE CONCH) and so am ambivalent about whether or not I can continue using it (also, there aren’t *quite* enough other users to make it constantly compelling at the moment). Fcuk it, I am going to turn it on again, if only for a few days – I look forward to seeing what sort of FILTHY PERVERTS you all are!
  • The Telegram Index: A slight caveat here – Telegram is, obviously, occasionally dodgy as all fcuk and I am in no way advocating its use for the negotiation and purchase of drugs or other illicit materials, etc etc. That said, it’s also a really good place to find specific communities, a bit like a more international and significantly-geekier (and, yes, ok, more criminal) Reddit – this site is a decent enough directory of Telegram Groups, Channels and Bots, categorised by theme. Personally-speaking I’ve found Telegram to be hugely useful as a source of hooky streams for the football, but I would imagine that the wider sports communities can be similarly-helpful for other pursuits; there is also, as you might imagine, a…not-insignificant bongo offering, which, look, I am not going to judge you but also BE CAREFUL OUT THERE because, well, I imagine it can probably get quite dicey once you get into some of the more, er, niche communities.
  • Global Caps Lock: ANOTHER COLLABORATIVE DIGITAL ART PROJECT! Ok, fine, this probably only fits the description if your definition of ‘art’ is elastic enough to encompass ‘mass simultaneous typing in all-caps’ but, well, it fcuking ought to be, so there. The Global Caps Lock Project is a simple one in which anyone can participate – download the client software, activate it, and you will become part of the Global Caps Lock Collective, operating as a single hivemind and applying capslock as one! Effectively what this means is that everyone running the client – at the time of writing, a frankly disappointing nine people – shares a single caps lock key; when it’s on for one, it’s on for all, and vice-versa. Which, obviously, could potentially be problematic if you work in a role which requires the typing of large quantities of copy and where the readers of said copy might reasonably prefer NOT TO BE SHOUTED AT; but, also, ART IS NOT MEANT TO BE EASY. I very much enjoy this, and would enjoy it even more if one of you a) installed it on a work computer; and then b) shared with me your experience of explaining your newly-idiosyncratic approach to capitalisation to colleagues. Thanks!
  • Nest: I think this is really rather beautiful. Nest is a sort of digital sound art toy thing (you’d think after all these fcuking years I’d have gotten better at the whole ‘describing the work’ thing, but perhaps my singular refusal to evolve or improve my writing style is part of the Curios ‘charm’? It’s not, is it?), which, obviously, I don’t *really* understand – basically you have a bunch of different sound clips which you can activate, each of which changes the way in which the background sequencer works in some way; create weird, scratchy breaks by clicking and dragging (the geometry of the shapes you create affects the pitch and duration of the beat fragments), and layer the samples to create an honestly-rather-lovely sound collage which is different every single time. This is significantly more artful than it might initially appear – once you start to add multiple layers everything begins to coalesce, weirdly, regardless of what you’re doing, and there feels like there’s some guiding maths underpinning this all to add some slight sense of order to your chaos, and I have it on in the background now and it is quite, quite beautiful.
  • Central da COP: I know that you’re here for a good time not a hard time – LOL! – but can we just be honest for a moment and admit that, well, we’re fcuked, aren’t we? I mean, we’re not going to do any of the stuff we desperately need to do to solve the environmental mess we’ve landed ourselves in in time to prevent huge, civilisation-altering climactic change, we’re too addicted to modernity to give up what we need to, and our last remaining hope probably rests in going full speed ahead with tech that will only accelerate our demise if it doesn’t magically hail mary us out of this mess (I was at a two-day AI conference this week – it was risibly bad and, in the main, made me really fcuking angry tbh – and there were two people onstage, one from DeepMind and one advising the UK government, both suggesting that the best way to work out how to mitigate the impact of AI on the environment was to…ask AI, and I had a proper Damascene moment of realisation that this really is the dumbest of fcuking timelines)…but, er, again, that’s not actually about the link, is it? Fcuk. AHEM! So, the link is a Brazilian website which is still attempting to be hopeful about the fact that EDUCATION MIGHT SAVE US and is taking the smart move of presenting a bunch of information about the NEXT COP taking place in Brazil in November 2025 (I really do like this annual jamboree at which a bunch of people fly internationally to agree that, yes, we’re still not doing enough – it increasingly seems like a GREAT use of everyone’s time!) in the style of a website all about football, because, the thinking goes, Brazlians care a lot more about that then they do about climate change so, well, maybe this will help redress the balance slightly. The stories are written through a football-y lens, using the language of the game to attempt to stealth-educate – which is an interesting idea from a communications point of view, although one I am moderately-sceptical about the efficacy of. Still, it’s an interesting idea and you can read more about it here, and, realistically, we are all still going to die.
  • YouTube Videos As Games: This is smart, and fun, and pleasingly-oldschool, taking me back to the carefree days of the late 2010s when you could basically print money in agencyland by saying things to clients like ‘choose your own adventure youtube videos to drive brand engagement through interactive digital storytelling!’ (God they were so stupid) – this is a YouTube channel called Firerama which makes all sorts of different YT vids which function as games of different sorts, all of them using really smart and inventive use of the ‘fast forward’ hotkey function to skip you to different points in the vid which therefore mimic the flows of a game. Seriously, the way they’ve exploited the platform functionality for all these really is wonderfully inventive; there are Guitar Hero-style rhythm games, obviously there’s a version of DOOM, there’s even rudimentary chess…obviously the games aren’t what anyone would call ‘good’, but there’s something really smart here which I think you could have fun with with a bit of thought (also IT IS SURPRISING, which isn’t something you get to say about digital experiences enough in 2025 to my mind).
  • The Ultimate Online Book Ranking Engine: Or at least that’s what this will be when enough of you feed it with your data. This is made by Aris Catsambas (which I have just realised by the way is a WONDERFUL surname, congratulations; I now want to change my name to Doggazelles), who also made the Cellar Door website I featured last year, and basically asks visitors to pick their favourite from a pairing of novels – it asks only that you only vote if you’ve read both of the books in question, but otherwise you just pick your preference from the pairing and move onto the next set. At any point you can see the cumulative global ranking of THE BEST BOOKS EVER – at the moment The Hound of The Baskervilles leads (weird tbh), followed by Pride and Prejudice, Children of Men (again, weird), A Farewell to Arms, The Parasites…this is just an interesting data-collection exercise tbh, moreso if you’re a book-lover, but it’s also another example of a site that was built entirely with AI (Aris tells me he used Replit, fwiw). I…I like the fact that AI is making this possible! Let a million websites bloom!
  • The Secret Museum of Mankind: Ok, I feel I need to caveat this upfront: this is a link to an OLD photographic book depicting The Peoples of the World, and what with being from the past it contains some…antiquated attitudes, is perhaps the most polite way of putting it, and some occasionally startlingly-racist language. With that in mind, let me present to you a quite amazing document – The Secret Museum of Mankind is described thusly on the landing page: “Published in 1935, the Secret Museum is a mystery book. It has no author or credits, no copyright, no date, no page numbers, no index. Published by “Manhattan House” and sold by “Metro Publications”, both of New York, its “Five Volumes in One” was pure hype: it had never been released in any other form. Advertised as “World’s Greatest Collection of Strange & Secret Photographs” and marketed mainly to overheated adolescents, it consists of nothing but photos and captions with no further exposition. This was not a book published to educate (despite appearing on some public library’s shelves), but to titillate (literally)— its emphasis was on the female form (“Female Beauty Round the World”) and fashion, and it featured as many National-Geographic-style native breasts as possible. But anything lurid, weird, or just plain unusual is fair game. This was a book to gawk at by flashlight under the bedcovers.” Really, it’s just astonishing – both in terms of the scale and scope (there is a LOT of ground covered here, geographically-speaking), but also in terms of the worldview it presents and the fact that this worldview was entirely prevalent less than a century ago. Obviously don’t want to make this about politics – EVERYTHING IS POLITICS – but it does rather feel as though the attitudes here depicted are ones on which the current US administration would look with a degree of warm nostalgia.
  • Brenna Murphy: Via Kris, this is the website of digital artist Brenna Murphy and to be honest I don’t really understand what the fcuk is happening here, but my complete sense of bafflement shouldn’t put you off exploring what is quite a dizzying labyrinth of graphics and textures and linked webpages and audio and animations and renders and and and and…basically click this link and see how it makes you feel, and then decide based on this whether you think this is something you want to spelunk through. Brenna appears to be part of a wider digital art collective called MSHR, which you can read more about at the link and which encompasses a bunch of different artists working across different digital media whose work seems, based on my relatively-cursory exploration, worth a dig.
  • Solidarity Cinema: OK, some caveats here – obviously as a non-cinema person I don’t really have any idea what the films collected through this service are like, and I haven’t personally tried to watch anything from the collection and so can’t 100% vouch for its legitimacy…but, with those out of the way, if you’re the sort of person for whom a ‘good night in’ might involve a punishing 150minute silent documentary about Syrian goat farmers then MAN do I have the website for you! Solidarity Cinema is, from what I can tell, a laudable project designed to provide access to cinema which is either about, or related to, global activism and the struggles of the marginalised (this is a broad-brush assessment and there is a LOT more in there) to anyone in the world. As far as I can tell, there’s a GDrive with some 9,000 films on it which anyone can access (you have to apply via a Google form, but once you’re in you can seemingly watch to your heart’s content) – which I think avoids issues of copyright by dint of these all being the sorts of films that Netflix is…unlikely to want the copyright for. You can see a list of the films available here, which will give you a sense of whether this is something you will be interested in or not – basically the films all have descriptions like “Adam Ousmane is a pool attendant at a local resort. When the new managers decide to downsize, Adam loses his job to his own son, Abdel. Shattered by the turn of events, Adam is pressured into contributing to the Chadian war effort. With no money to speak of, the only asset he can donate is his son.” I mean, look, it’s not exactly Comedy Central, but if that is your thing then, well, welcome to the motherlode.
  • Rapport: Are you shortly set to have to spend time with someone with whom you have NOTHING TO SAY? Er, why? But! If you do find yourself in that invidious position then you may find it helpful to have Rapport bookmarked – this is a mobile-only website which basically offers you a set of ‘interesting conversational prompts’ to use should you be struggling to find anything to say to your interlocutor. Which…look, this is a nice little webproject by its creator Matthew Prebeg, but if I’m honest if someone attempted to revive a flagging conversation with ‘so, what’s your favourite shade of denim?’ I think I would probably leave or have to self-immolate or something. Although it did just ask me what the most ‘beautiful number’ is, and I started having a weird and not-entirely-unerotic reverie about the number 19, so perhaps it’s not a total bust (NB that is a joke, obvs, 13 is the only sexy number as any fule kno).
  • YellowFellow: This is the website for AN Other digital agency – sorry, motion studio – based in Tel Aviv, which is largely-unremarkable apart from the genuinely-delightful animations on the landing page; honestly, the motion work is SO charming and it’s a wonderful calling card for their obvious skill in the field and the fact they can obviously ‘do’ playful very well indeed. Every single website should have little animated things on it, MAKE IT LAW.
  • ArtLinks: A slightly weird throwback to 2020/1 here, with the Met Museum in New York running a weird, NFT-linked digital game to let users explore its collection and draw thematic connections between works and, er, win a jpeg? “Art Links is a blockchain-based game created by The Metropolitan Museum of Art where players find common threads linking artworks across The Met’s collection. No art history degree required! Find links between artworks to create a chain.Each chain consists of 7 artworks and 6 connections. Connections can be words or emojis. The game has 3 rounds, with each round becoming progressively more difficult. Players have 4 attempts to complete each chain correctly (forming a Completed Chain). Once a player successfully creates a Completed Chain, they are able to claim free digital collectible NFTs in the form of Badges and complete in-game challenges called Achievements for the chance to win exciting rewards!” WHY THOUGH? WHY THE NFT/BLOCKCHAIN THING?!?! The game itself is weirdly-baffling and seems entirely-arbitrary, until you realise that all it really requires you to do is read the item descriptions which basically tell you which ‘connecting’ word you need to pick, largely removing any sort of real challenge…I wonder slightly whether someone at the Met is related to someone working at a blockchain-first digital agency, because that’s really the only explanation I can find for the fact that this exists in 2025.

By Andrew Wyeth

NEXT UP, THIS IS A SLIGHTLY-GOTHY, SLIGHTLY-DRONEY AND ENTIRELY-FCUKING-WONDERFUL ALBUM BY VYVA MELINKOLYA AND IT IS PRETTY MUCH WHAT FEBRUARY SOUNDS LIKE!

THE SECTION WHICH DISCOVERED THIS WEEK THAT THERE IS A TRADE BODY FOR THE DATING APPS INDUSTRY AND THAT IT IS HELMED BY A MAN WHO WEARS JEANS AND SHOES, WHICH FEELS WEIRDLY SIGNIFICANT IN A WAY I CAN’T QUITE PUT MY FINGER ON, PT.2:  

  • CityWalki: Another portal back to early COVID times (SORRY!) with this throwback website – this isn’t new, conceptually-speaking, and I have featured stuff very similar to it before, but I am including it here partly because in London we literally haven’t seen the sun for 10 days now and I had forgotten what it looks like until I opened this up and ‘strolled’ around a few other cities for a while. Oh, I should probably explain what the fcuk it is, shouldn’t I? CityWalki is one of those ‘pick a city, get some FPV footage of someone walking (or driving, or drone-ing) around it – so far, so ‘exactly like a bunch of other sites’. But there are a LOT of different cities, and I’d forgotten how momentarily-transportive a slow-paced FPV tour of somewhere can be. Also I let it take me to Rome and had an unexpectedly incredibly emo moment where I found myself weeping slightly at the colosseum, which suggests I possibly haven’t really been taking adequate care of myself of late if I’m wholly honest. In the UK you can visit London and Manchester – beautifully, while the footage of all the other cities I’ve seen has been picturesque and sunny, Manny basically gives you steel-grey skies and the walk from Piccadilly into town, past a Ladbrokes, which feels…perfect, tbh.
  • Drone: This describes itself as a ‘rich, harmonic soundscape synthesiser for music practice, chanting and meditation’, and, while I am not personally into any of the aforementioned practices, fcuk me did I enjoy using it to make weird dirge-ish sounds. Honestly, this is strangely compelling, even if you’re not the sort of person who needs something to synchronise their ‘oms’ with, and, as you will realise when you start playing around with it, this actually afford you quite an impressive degree of control over the tone and pitch of your, er, synthy-drone noises. Aside from anything else, this affords you the opportunity to soundtrack ANYTHING you like in the manner of a 1970s horror/scifi film, which I think we can all agree is not to be sniffed at.
  • Snow Crystals: Did you know that there is an online guide to snowflakes, snow crystals and ‘other ice phenomena’? THERE IS AND IT LIVES HERE! This site appears to be the labour of love of one Kenneth G Libbrecht (proud author of a book on the same subject, apparently) who really, really likes snow crystals and associated phenomena. Honestly, I was ready to write this off as ‘ahaha old timey obsessional website, how quaint’, but, honestly, there’s something properly infectious about the enthusiasm here and I got quite into the section about designer snow crystals and how to build bespoke designs in lab conditions, and then there’s a page featuring an image of the largest snow crystal ever found in the wild which contains the following copy whose final parenthetical aside basically made me swoon slightly for reasons I can’t quite explain, and basically I am in love with this website now: “This is the largest snow crystal ever photographed, as verified by Guinness World Records, measuring 10.0 mm (0.4 inches) from tip to tip (averaged over the three axes). I captured this image on December 30, 2003, during a gentle snowfall in Cochrane, Ontario. Click on the picture for an even larger view (if you dare).” IF YOU DARE! Seriously, Kenneth, should you ever happen to read this, THANKYOU.
  • After Dark II: This links to an art auction taking place in the US at the end of the month, but for which online bids will be accepted – it is described thusly: “Our latest AFTER DARK catalog continues our sale of exclusive LGBT oriented art, design, and historical ephemera. From emerging contemporary names, to early 20th century male nude fine art and photographs, our catalog includes iconic names like Robert Loughlin, Bruce of Los Angeles, and Gran Fury to many overlooked 20th century gems of the queer art world. This sale celebrates a century of creativity and expression from gay artists in all forms, from print ephemera to original canvases.” Whether you’re queer or otherwise, there is some GREAT work here, some ‘erotic’ and some not at all, and the starting prices look eminently-reasonable should you be in the market for some works.
  • HistoryScapes: A joint app project by the National Trust and the University of Essex which basically works to present a bunch of different interactive tours of National Trust properties which you can either download to listen to you as you visit, or which you can set yo GPS track you with audio triggering as you walk through relevant areas. There are only three on there at present, which rather limits the utility, but you’d expect/hope that this be seen as a more long-running project which will see additional tours/walks/locations added to it. Worth a look if you’re the sort of person who spends their weekends dropping a tenner on a small cup of tea and a dry scone in a slightly-draughty ‘tearoom’.
  • European Alternatives: Want to kick back against the US’ tech hegemony? AHAHAHA GOOD FCUKING LUCK! Still, we can still pretend that it’s not basically all sewn up by perusing this list of European alternatives to popular software products which you might want to explore should you be sick of enriching Those Fcuking Men. This is all quite dry and techy stuff – email providers, SaaS services, filehosting and uptimemonitoring and DEAR GOD THIS IS DULL. But, equally, it is nice to be reminded that there are companies not based in North America that you can choose to use instead (if you don’t mind the friction, and the occasionally suboptimal service, and the fact that you’re basically Cnuting against the inevitable tide of capital).
  • Trees: I like this a lot – I am not the target audience, I have no use for it, but I am thrilled it exists. “Meye is a collection of free cut out PNG trees from all four seasons by landscape architect Mikkel Eye. All the trees are available as high quality PNG’s with transparent background. The trees are free to use for anyone who wants to add plantings to their visualizations, sections, and diagrams within the fields of landscape architecture, architecture, or urban planning.” So far, so standard, but it’s the next line in the description that made me fall in love: “However, your project should be in focus.” I am 100% going to add that stipulation to every single thing I ever do from now on – in fact, here, “you are allowed to steal whatever you like from Web Curios – I know you do already, don’t make that face at me – as long as your project is in focus. What does that mean? I WILL BE THE JUDGE”.
  • Normal Time: I have on various occasions over the years complained about the lack of temporal innovation over the past few thousand years – we landed on the 24h day and the 365-day year and just sort of…stopped innovating (special shout out to Swatch’s ‘Beats’ initiative which I think I mention every 3-4 years on here and which will forever hold a place in my heart as the most insanely-ambitious marketing ploy I think I have ever seen). Thanks, then, to OG digital artist Rhea Myers who has entered the ring with their conception of Normal Time, which, look, is maths-y enough that my brain basically slides off the side of it but which FEELS good and which gives a pleasingly-long-term feel to the passage of time over a year – make years feel monolithic again! You can read the mechanics of how it’s calculated on the site, but I liked this description of the utility which also sorts of acts as an artist’s statement of sorts: “Normal time makes it easy to compare progress across different time scales by removing artificial human concepts of time. It creates a unified way to express completion of any cyclic or linear time period. Dehumanizing time in this way has the counterintuitive effect of making it more recognizably natural and intuitive for human beings to express and understime durations. Furthermore it respects that each human life is complete unto itself, removing the implicit judgment of longer lives being “more complete”. It creates a clear distinction between lives that are “in progress” and “complete” without obfuscating the progression of those lives. And it recognizes that all completed lives are equally whole.”
  • The Single Feed Returns: Without wishing to redo my small rant from last week (I know that Web Curios is basically 30% thematically the same every week and I hate myself for it, trust me), EVERYTHING IS CYCLICAL. We’re currently having a resurgence, for I think the third time now, of the ‘all your various feeds in one convenient place!’ combinator app – the main links takes you to one offering called Tapestry, there’s this other one I found called OpenVibe, but basically they all do (or try to do) the same thing; to whit, pulling your various social feeds into one place so you don’t have to keep flitting between all the different apps to manage your interests, feeds and conversations. Which on the one hand is interesting and obviously convenient to a point, but on the other strikes me as slightly negating the concept of social media – I am not sure how helpful adding another layer of context collapse to your feeds would be (for better or worse, every platform’s grammar is different and posts removed from said grammar work…differently, quite simply), and by doing something like this you’re basically removing quite a lot of the ‘spontaneous and serendipitous discovery’ bit from the social experience (although, in fairness, each of these does allow you to pull in ‘interest-based’ feeds too, so there’s perhaps an element of that still here). Still, I can imagine this appealing to a few of you so one or both might be worth a look (they seem to be pretty much feature-identical as far as I can tell) – be aware though that they can’t pull stuff from the Meta platforms (actually Threads might now be federated enough to work, but no fcuker cares about Threads so wevs) so you’re not totally covered.
  • ReorProject: This is something I personally have little-to-no interest in but which I am aware some of you might find useful – SEE HOW FCUKING NICE I AM TO YOU? AND WHAT DO I GET IN RETURN, EH?? – although, honestly, I was so confused and frankly slightly upset by the description of it as a note-taking and information-organisation service for ‘high entropy thinkers’, because, honestly, WHAT IN THE NAME OF FCUK IS A HIGH-ENTROPY THINKER??? I think it is b0llocks. Anyway, my weird little eruption of rage aside (sorry, not sure what came over me there, this is basically one of those ‘give us your unformed notes and we will scry order in your mindchaos’ apps, which uses THE MAGIC OF AI to automatically categorise and sort your thinking into useful, semantically-linked chunks. Take a look at the homepage – as ever with this stuff, your mileage will vary depending on the degree to which you’ve ever thought ‘God, I wish Evernote actually worked’.
  • ROOST: Boring and technical but also useful and A GOOD THING, ROOST stands for Robust Open Online Safety Tools and is a collaboration between a bunch of big tech companies to put out a load of open source tools which will afford smaller companies the opportunity to implement industry-standard safety practices around their digital work, for free. Per the blurb, “ROOST is a community effort to build scalable and resilient safety infrastructure for the AI era. Many organizations – big and small – still lack access to basic safety resources, hindering innovation and putting users at risk. ROOST develops, maintains, and distributes open source building blocks to safeguard global users and communities. Backed by dedicated technical teams and leading experts, ROOST meets organizations where they are and provides hands-on support at every stage of their safety journey.” This is obviously only really of interest to you if you have to worry about safety/security in digital product delivery, but it’s a rare example of Big Tech ‘doing something not-terrible’ and possibly the only actually practically-meaningful thing to emerge from the massive farrago that was the AI Summit in Paris (a very, very expensive press conference for Lil’ Manu, was how I saw it).
  • WikiTimeline: Turn any Wikipedia entry you like into a timeline. Why? I DON’T KNOW WHY FFS. Look, maybe it’s useful for teachers or something, I don’t know, I don’t have all the answers. Any answers, in fact. It’s distressing, frankly.
  • XScreenSaver: Screensavers are a weird sort of lost artform, for two decades ubiquitous and then *poof*, gone, vanished, all those flying toasters and infinitely-recursive pipe layouts vanished like so much morning dew. XScreenSavers is a collection of SO MANY SCREENSAVERS which you can download and run on desktop and mobile should you want to carry them with you forever – if you’d rather just have a brief hit of nostalgia, you can explore the gallery of memories here.
  • Stretch My Time Off: I think over the 15ish years I have been writing this fcuking thing I must have mentioned KitKat as a brand more than any other – turns out there is a frankly STAGGERING quantity of internetty cruft that you can retrofit into the broad ‘have a break’ brand strategy, and as such there have been dozens of instances where I’ve pointed at a site or idea and written ‘KitKat, steal this, it is an easy win’ and, inevitably, noone from KitKat did anything because a) they obviously don’t read this sh1t; and b) even if they did, they don’t need to take advice from some superannuated webmong typing in his pants at 933am on a Friday morning. Anyway, this is, AGAIN, SO perfect for a rebadge and a light bit of branding – this website does one simple thing, which is to tell you (seemingly wherever you are in the world) which days you should take off as holiday to maximise your allocation based on bank holidays, religious celebrations and other national days off which your country of employment has scheduled for the year. THIS IS SO SO SO PERFECT FFS JUST PUT A FCUKING KITKAT LOGO ON IT.
  • KidPix: Personally-speaking this means little to me, but I think if you’re the sort of person who grew up with Macs (I don’t really understand how this could have happened, but maybe your parents were graphic designers or architects or just really irritating hipsters) then you might have a soft, nostalgic spot for KidPix which was apparently the MacOS equivalent of MS Paint and which now exists as a browsertoy for all your childish scrawling needs. I think there’s something quite nice about adopting this as your entire aesthetic for the rest of the year, personally, but then again I was recent told that my dress sense is ‘risibly bad’ so, well, I probably wouldn’t listen to me on matters visual at all.
  • A Bunch of Full Warner Bros Films On YouTube: Ok, so you’ll need to VPN yourself to the US for these to work but this is literally 39 full films which are available to watch on YouTube for free, in high res – the selection is…odd, frankly, running the gamut from The Mission, which iirc won an Oscar, to Critters 4, which I know very much didn’t, and passing through a bunch of forgotten comedies, a few Serious Films and, inexplicably, American Ninja V, a film which I am reasonably certain noone, including the people who made it, have thought of since the wrap party. Still, it also contains a Bobcat Goldthwaite film AND the animated adaptation of The Phantom Tollbooth, on which basis I recommend it without reservation.
  • Fabularious: AI BONGO STORYTIME! Yes, another week, another AI-enabled smut-generator! I include this not because I think it’s ‘good’ (no, really, I promise), nor indeed because I think that you have a strange and inexplicable desire to spin up poorly-written gangbang smut, but more because, well, a) there’s something VERY funny (to me, at least) about quite how obviously this is made for (and quite probably by) very horny teenage boys; and b) slightly-less amusingly, how this is obviously made in India, and how it made me think of the already-weird-and-not-hugely-healthy way in which gender politics works in the country, and the weird and bleak reality that demographics mean that a significant proportion of Indian men will live and die entirely alone, romantically-speaking, because of the fact that there are simply so many more of them, and the extent to which I can 100% see stuff like this becoming an ingrained part of life, forever, for a certain type of guy. Which is quite hard to see as anything other than utterly bleak, if I’m honest. Erm. Anyway! Choose your characters, choose your scenario and spin up some TRULY AWFUL (ie, not in any way erotic) erotica!
  • EdHeads: Occupying the final games-y slot in this week’s ephemera section is this…odd selection of semi-educational games, which let you play short flash-style browsergames based on investigating a mechanic’s workshop, or a crash scene, or, er, undertaking ‘deep brain surgery’ or ‘virtual knee surgery’. Want to spend ten minutes fcuking around with someone’s patella? OH GOOD!

By Llyn Foulkes

WE CLOSE OUT THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH THIS ABSOLUTELY FCUKING WONDERFUL SELECTION OF JAZZ COMPILED BY SAKINA ABDOU!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • The Frame Blog: Not, in fact, a Tumblr! Still, if you have ever wanted to know a LOT – possibly everything – about framing pictures then this is basically the motherlode of all information. Beautifully this is still VERY active, offering new, fun, frame-related content on a regular basis.
  • Every Day I Draw The Titanic: I am astonished that I have neither seen or featured this before given that the person behind it has been doing it for TEN FCUKING YEARS. TEN YEARS. A decade of drawing the Titanic every day and posting it to this Tumblr. I am in awe – THIS IS ART. I found this via the genuinely curious newsletter Night Water, which I can confidently say is one of the weirder ones I sub to and which you might enjoy for its utterly-idiosyncratic approach to subject matter.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  •  Patagraph: Stop-motion animation by one Victor Haegelin – this is very, very good work by a very talented professional.
  • Babil Online: Photographs of telephone wires (I think) against grey skies, which I know don’t sound hugely-compelling as a subject but actually really quite beautiful when shot and framed this well. Photos by one Alexey Narodizkiy.
  • The Bop House: I don’t normally feature accounts that are influencer-y, less those that feature said influencers doing cheesecake photoshoots and thirst traps, because, well, I don’t care and I figure that if you do you can find that sort of thing yourself. I am making an exception for the Bop House account, though, not because the content is particularly fascinating but because I find the premise behind it – effectively this is a creators’ house for OnlyFans influencers, which makes a sort of sense from a commercial/collaborative point of view and which is evidently being parlayed via this sort of mainstream channel into a PG13-ish reality-lite franchise while the seamy stuff gets shot behind closed doors for the OF crowd. This is…very now.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Into The Kill Zone: So I had to spend time this week thinking about the AI Summit and What It All Means for professional reasons and, honestly, my main takeaways (you don’t care, I know, but, well, tough) were: a) well that was a complete fcuking waste of time; b) we’d better hope that this stuff solves some pretty hard questions about physics/biology pretty fcuking soon otherwise we’re going to feel *quite* silly about putting all of our eggs in this basket as we slowly (and then quickly) crisp up; and c) WOW does it feel like we’re (by which I mean the US and the UK) basically just saying to big tech businesses ‘you know what, you just do what you fancy and we’ll just sort of sit here and hope it works out for everyone’. This is an excellent piece of writing which looks at the relationship between tech and the state and the economy on both sides of the Atlantic, at the way in which it’s basically all set up to advantage large incumbents and this is just being entrenched, and, look, I think this para rather sums up the authorial argument (but it’s really worth reading the whole piece): “The events of the last two weeks in the US put into a new and darker light the approach to government articulated by Blair and William Hague in A New National Purpose two years ago. This project has matured into one involving more than 70 reports and Cabinet ministers including both Kyle and Streeting. It argues for a transformation of the state in terms that are vague but which include a smaller state with power centralised in 10 Downing Street and ministers recruited from business rather than Parliament. Technology, especially AI, is to be used to transform government and public services. Although I have been skeptical of this project, at no point did it cross my mind that it might pave the way to a Britain that is oligarchic and authoritarian. Now, looking at what is unfolding in the United States, a shiver of recognition runs through me. It’s as if I’ve already read the playbook.”
  • The Business Community Is Stupid: Ok, I admit that this is in here partly because I very much enjoy the tone of this and partly because it dovetails very neatly with Wot I Think, but it’s also a good, pleasingly-angry piece of writing which neatly nails the way in which businesses in the US in particular might in fact come to regret siding with this particular shower of bstards: “A stable, democratic, well-governed society is good for business. An unstable, undemocratic, wildly governed society is bad for business. The business lobby’s many years of ceaselessly trying to nibble away at the foundations of stability and democracy and fairness for their own immediate gains have now brought us to the brink of a strongman government that will, I assure you, be very bad for business. Unpredictable trade wars are bad for business. Eroding confidence in the US dollar because you want to prop up crypto scams for your donors is bad for business. Letting religious zealots control public education is bad for business. Destroying access to contraception and abortion is bad for business. Constantly toying with provoking wars is bad for business. Allowing the environment to become polluted is bad for business. Even enormous wealth inequality is bad for business, because it means a few people have all the money, instead of all your customers having plenty of money to spend with your business. You know what’s good for business? Switzerland! A bunch of happy healthy wealthy people sitting around eating chocolates and spending money in peace! You know what’s bad for business? Fcuking Donald Trump! A psycho idiot fcuking sh1t up constantly and destabilizing the world and robbing businesses of all ability to trust the rule of law and predict the future with some degree of confidence. The tech oligarchs who sat on stage with Trump at his inauguration were not there because he is good for business—they were there because being there, right there on the inside, is the only way to flourish.” EXACTLY.
  • Journalism Is Fcuked: I mean, ok, this is not exactly a SEARINGLY-HOT TAKE – but, that said, it’s a decent overview of the how and the why of the current state of media by Ian Dunt (someone who I genuinely find too boring to link to ordinarily – and who I perhaps unfairly hate a bit for being a sort-of unofficial spokesperson for the sorts of people who talk about needing ‘grown-ups in the room’ in politics, a phrase which makes me honestly want to commit small but very sharp acts of violence), but who I will make an exception for on this one occasion because he nails this pretty decently. This covers the perils of traffic-focused journalism, the hollowing out of the information landscape thanks to paywalling and the tiered knowledgebase that that is leaving us with, and attempts to offer some solutions – the solutions won’t work, and I can’t pretend I didn’t find something risibly patronising about Dunt’s instruction that everyone should ditch one of their telly streaming subscriptions in favour of direct payments to three substacks, like some sort of middle-class informational ‘eat your greens!’ scold, but it’s a decent ‘where we’re at’ screed about, well, how journalism is, per my title, fcuked.
  • DOGE and the Evil Housekeeper: Dan Hon has for years been one of the smartest people I know (I don’t know Dan, obviously, he lives in my phone like all of you do) on the subject of tech and government infrastructure, and in this essay for MIT Tech Review he neatly lays out the ways in which what Musk and his horrible little herrenvolk pixies are fcuking with the US State’s digital infrastructure, and why, and how it might be possible for staff to stand against it. It feels…quite dark, all this, ngl. “In trying to make sense of the wrecking ball that is Elon Musk and President Trump’s DOGE, it may be helpful to think about the Evil Housekeeper Problem. It’s a principle of computer security roughly stating that once someone is in your hotel room with your laptop, all bets are off. Because the intruder has physical access, you are in much more trouble. And the person demanding to get into your computer may be standing right beside you. So who is going to stop the evil housekeeper from plugging a computer in and telling IT staff to connect it to the network?”
  • Make Apartheid Great Again: I have read a few articles making similar points this week, but this was the first and the best and most strongly-worded and least-euphemistic, and it’s important, I think, to be clear about what is happening and the attitudes being demonstrated and what the prevailing cultural wind that has been legitimised in the past few months is openly sort of about. Watching the uniform reaction of the US right – and its ancillary branches across the web, the quisling cohorts parroting the MAGAlines for…for bluetick pennies, I guess – to last weekend’s superbowl performance was to see people literally mainstreaming startling, staggering racism, a seeming sense of affront at…seeing black people on their screens! THIS IS NOW QUITE OVERT, I THINK.
  • A Smart and Thoughtful Series Of Thoughts On AI: There was one piece of writing published this week on AI and how we might want to think about our approach to it as a society and species that really was worth reading – perhaps unsurprisingly, it didn’t come from the Paris Summit (on which note, have you read the declaration that the UK and US didn’t sign? IT DOESN’T EVEN FCUKING SAY OR MEAN ANYTHING FFS WHAT IS THE POINT OF ANY OF THIS STUFF????). What WAS surprising, though, was that it came from the Vatican, and, if you believe the signature, from the VERY PAPAL BRAIN of cuddly Frankie himself! This is VERY long, but, I promise you, is one of the most-considered and most sensible, thoughtful and human pieces of writing I have read on the subject in a long time; it covers work, art, philosophy, theology, questions of the soul and identity and the mind-body duality, and, look, I am as agnostic as they come and sold my soul to the devil aged 17 and am very much not going to heaven, and have a pretty strong aversion to Catholic doctrine, but this is really, really interesting and thought-provoking, and the contrast between the depth of consideration on display here and that demonstrated by pretty much every official government document on the subject I’ve read over the past few years is…dispiriting, frankly.
  • The Headmap Manifesto: This is a quite incredible document that I am slightly amazed I had never heard of before (and which came to me via Tom Scott’s newsletter) – the headmap manifesto was written in 1999 by one Ben Russell and is described elsewhere on the web as follows “When the headmap manifesto first appeared in 1999, Google was barely a year old, the U.S. government had not yet removed the GPS signal degradation that prevented its widespread commercial use, and Apple’s iPhone was still almost a decade away. Predominantly written by computer engineer Ben Russell, headmap (always spelt in lower case, although I capitalise it here when beginning a sentence) envisioned a world not entirely unlike the one we inhabit today, in which location-aware devices have radically transformed everyday life. It foreshadows recent developments from the emergence of location-based social networks like Foursquare and Yelp to dating and hookup apps such as Grindr and Tinder. In contrast to the strongly commercial, proprietary-driven nature of these applications, however, headmap foresaw these practices as emerging from the ground up. The potential for GPS technology to be integrated into every device and object would allow individuals to tag physical places with virtual information, provide site-specific advertising, organise community events and track people and objects. These practices, headmap claims, would lead to nothing short of a revolution of everyday life, transforming the way territory, architecture, politics, sex and social interaction are understood and enacted.”  Honestly, this really is quite amazing – it’s part futurology, part experimental poetry, part fragmented journal, and it’s utterly mesmerising for how madly, wonderfully-prescient it is and yet how at the same time it got so much wrong about the directions in which wearable tech would evolve and take us. There’s a wonderful series of potential counterfactual presents that could emerge from this should you immerse yourself in the thinking, and if nothing else it also sort-of works as an unusual creative writing exercise.
  • Rotting Upstream: I very much enjoyed this look at how rot culture has been appropriated by the mainstream, and the accompanying analysis of how that flow worked – in summary, “This is the mindless low brow sludge → high culture flex pipeline. Common discourse paints out brain rot as intellectual poison: refined sugars and seed oils for the mind. But it’s also become something more useful and valuable than junk food alone. In today’s surreal cultural landscape, it’s become a ‘badge of honour’, offering people a semblance of a community and connection.It offers what cultural anthropologist Mimi Ito calls a ‘genre of participation’. There’s a reward if you get the obscure reference: you are in communion with the author; your specific habits and tastes are seen, confirmed, and validated by the knowledge that someone else is watching the same TikToks, following the same online conversations, reposting the same posts as you.” “WE ALL CRAVE COMMUNITY SO MUCH WE FIND IT IN INFINITE RUNNER VIDEOS MASHED WITH FOOTAGE FROM GAZA” is perhaps the bleakest-timeline-conclusion to draw from this. ADJACENTLY-RELATED PIECE: Max Read on Benson Boone and the ‘Booneiverse’ – aka background content that attains a degree of ubiquity so as to become a unifying factor, a bit like advertising jingles for the modern age. As an aside, this piece caused me to listen to Benson Boone’s music for the first time ever and, whilst doing so, I realised that the uncanniness I was feeling was the realisation that this is the EXACT genre of music that AIs like Suno have recently gotten VERY good at mimicking which…I don’t know, doesn’t feel like A Good Thing.
  • Soy Right Ascendant: Also by Max Read, this one, and I think this might be the best thing I have read about how to characterise the current incarnation of the online right in the Trump2.0 era (and, as with all this stuff, I wish I could just silo it off as an American thing but unfortunately thanks to his and Apartheid Toad’s global ubiquity, all culture is basically downstream of those cnuts for the foreseeable and there’s not really anything we can do about it) – honestly, this is SO well-judged and coherent in a way that very little writing about digital culture (and its bleed into meatspace) tends to be, and, if you’re a certain type of horrible little online goblin (hi! Kindred spirit over here!) you will enjoy this hugely. This section is him quoting from a newsletter post by a certain Scarlet, but I reproduce it in full because, well, it’s perfect: “They have special diets are afraid of seed oils. They wear skinny jeans and have meticulously groomed beards. They talk non stop about masculinity, drive pickups, and wear plaid, but can’t change a tire to save their lives. While the right spent years mocking liberals for wanting “safe spaces” and echo chambers, for crying about identity politics, for being frail, fragile, overly-sensitive weaklings, they were slowly transforming into the perfect mirror of all of it — without the nagging concern for equality or any of that lib sh1t. […] The Soy Right is being oppressed and they want you to know it. They’re scared to take the subway, they’re offended that you called them white or cis, they’re upset that you didn’t think they were cool in high school, they want to call the manager because there’s less boobies in video games. They are crybabies of the highest order. While the right is winning cultural and political victories nonstop lately, that’s not enough. They also need you to like them. Why don’t you like them?!”
  • GenZ Doesn’t Exist: YOU obviously know this – you read Web Curios! You’re smart! Apart, obviously, from your fcuking terrible taste in newsletters! – but many don’t and so it bears repeating – GENERATIONAL MONOLITHS ARE SILLY AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SILLY AND ARE ACTUALLY DETRIMENTAL TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS. Here the reliably-smart Sean Monahan of 8ball writes about what might perhaps be a smarter way to conceive of meaningful generational divides based less on broad age-range coteries and more ‘how old were you when X happened’ – where, in this case, ‘X’ is ‘home computing’ or ‘9/11’ or ‘COVID’. If you work in advermarketingpr then, per my earlier comment, you really should have arrived here yourself by now, but here’s a nice easy spelling out of it for the kids at the back.
  • The Cringe Matrix: You may not think you need a detailed analysis of the four different primary ways in which the concept of ‘cringe’ can be experienced, but I promise you that you do and that once you have read it it will TRANSFORM you. Honestly, this is far more interesting and thoughtful than I expected it to be, and might actually be professionally-useful from a tone-of-voice/content point of view for the right sort of project/brand.
  • Facememes: This is a bit thin, fine, but I found the central premise – that we’ve lived through the era in which specific facial expressions could attain memetic status in the way in which haircuts or specific makeup styles used to in eras past – interesting; as a ‘no, there really are no photographs of me inexistence, no I am not lying, I just don’t like being photographed, yes, it is because I am ugly, please stop asking me these questions’ person who doesn’t use Insta et al I feel like I have missed a lot of this stuff, but it speaks to quite a lot of wider cultural stuff about lightspeed trends and the churning memetic combine harvester that is TikTok.
  • The Kid’s Food Boom: Or, in a phrase the piece coins later on and which I prefer to the headline term, this is ‘recession maximalism’ – in uncertain times, we want comforting, simple food that harks back to an era in which we presumably felt safe and secure…which is why the US (and, I think, London too) is seeing something of a boom in low-rent foods in a maximal style – corndogs and pizza rolls and processed food consumed unironically and unashamedly as part of an adult lifestyle. Which, I think, can also be tied into a certain anti-intellectual resurgence in US culture (fancy food is PRETENTIOUS AND WOKE, after all, qualities not exactly in favour right now) which, again, is being replicated in the UK as well (you know how during Brexit we got used to hearing the worst cnuts in the world saying we were a ‘vassall state’ of Europe? I do rather think we’re going to get a better idea of exactly what vassaldom looks like between now and 2029).
  • How Ozempic Is Fcuking Fast Food: I have to say that I really resent Ozempic and Wegovy and their ilk (this isn’t going to reflect well on me, but, well, this is a safe space, right?) – I am a naturally-emaciated person and while this is not in and of itself a benefit, it does mean that I simply don’t get fat and don’t need to exercise, and I have always thought of this as a MAGIC SUPERPOWER, and now these fuckers invent some magic injections and everyone else gets to be just like me? I WAS SPECIAL, YOU CNUTS.Ahem. You didn’t need to know that but I felt oddly compelled to share – sorry! Anyway, this is all about the degree to which Ozempic et al don’t simply reduce the appetite of those that take it, they seemingly change it, removing cravings for processed foods – and seemingly making them actively-unappealing – and replacing them with, er, a seemingly insatiable desire for vegetables. I am darkly-fascinated by these meds, I have to say – if this was the first third of a film, I would be getting very strong ‘terrifying side effects set to be discovered in act 2’ vibes. Thank God real life doesn’t seem to be operating like a scripted show, though!
  • Playing War: This is a really interesting look at how Soldier of Fortune magazine – something which I have always sort of vaguely known about but have never actually seen a copy of, because, well, I don’t actually want to read about war – was basically a sort of weird radicalisation pipeline for a whole bunch of men, and how it became weirdly intertwined with neoconservative politics as the 80s and 90s wore on. This is one of those great articles that make you realise that international conflicts and the associated communities that exist around them are, in the main, just deeply, intensely fcuked-up (an astonishing insight, I am aware) (Jesus).
  • Goodbye Pamela Paul: Ok, if you’re not North American then there’s no reason whatsoever you should know or care who Pamela Paul is – BUT! Even if the name means nothing to you I think this is worth reading – partly because it is just a brilliantly-brutal takedown of an individual who, objectively, totally deserves it, and partly because every single thing it says about Paul (a media commentator who’s written for the NYT for years and who’s basically been paid to have opinions for the last three of them) can be applied to the commentariat class in the media in your country too. Honestly, read this piece and then think of your least-favourite opinion columnist and I guarantee you will be able to map most of the arguments 1:1. Seriously, tell me that this para doesn’t work with EVERY SINGLE OPINION WRITER: “For in the end, the reactionary liberal is a ruthless defender of all that exists. Paul’s 2021 book, 100 Things We Lost to the Internet, is a cabinet of banalities wherein the usual liberal virtues (civility, patience) sit glassily alongside a predictable middle-class nostalgia for things like scouring the Bloomingdale’s shoe department for the right dress pump or taking in a Broadway show without hearing the low buzz of a text message. “There was nothing to do but let go of whatever might be happening outside the theater and lose yourself in what was happening onstage,” Paul writes wistfully. “You simply couldn’t be reached.” It is a great dream of the reactionary liberal not to be reached. Paul will freely admit, for instance, that it is immoral for Israel to kill tens of thousands of civilians. Yet it is no less immoral for student protesters to erect an ugly encampment in the middle of the quad and hurl slogans at the police. This is because political action is an unacceptable snag in the continuity of bourgeois experience. One gets the sense that politics has gone off, like a cell phone, in the darkened theater of Pamela Paul’s mind. It is worse than wrong: It is rude.”
  • The Pinball Philosophy: A piece of writing by John McPhee from 1975, in which the author profiles two rival kings of the NYC pinball scene. I cannot tell you how BRILLIANT this is – SO stylish and so of its time and you can smell the stale cigarette smoke and see the seedy-looking guys hanging around central New York, and this feels and reads so perfectly 1970s and of-its-time that it feels like actual time-travel. Glorious.
  • Incel Philosophers: I think that this article made me think more than anything else I read this week – in it, Ellie Robson writes about Mary Midgely, a philosopher who in the 1950s made a programme for the BBC in which she noted that the canon on Western modern philosophy was dominated almost entirely by works and thinking penned by single, unmarried, childless men. Basically, modern philosophy is an incel medium. OH GOD THIS IS SUCH A REVELATION! Honestly, it sent me down a wonderful 15 minute counterfactual rabbithole of imagining what might have emerged from Kierkegaard if he hadn’t basically been terrified of women, whether he might have been equally-brilliant but, well, a bit less sad and so therefore a bit more inclined towards a philosophy that was less brutally, bitterly inward-facing…this is SO good and so interesting, and will almost certainly result in a lot of you who are women reading this and thinking ‘typical fcuking man to have never noticed or thought about this before’ which, honestly, is fair enough tbh.
  • The Secret Pattern: Aube Ray Lescure writes about returning to Shanghai to visit her parents – it is about place and family and memory and not belonging and belonging and it feels very…I don’t know, very clean and very spare and very beautiful indeed.
  • I Know Nothing About Sex: Finally in the longreads, Judith Hannah Weiss with a brilliant essay in the APPALLINGLY-NAMED ‘Oldster’ magazine (honestly, such an awful name, please someone change it) which is a weird, meandering, slightly-messy collection of thoughts around sex and age and memory which I think I enjoyed on a prose level more than anything else I read this week and which I think you will enjoy too. This has STYLE.

By Mark Tennant

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 07/02/25

Reading Time: 35 minutes

I went to the theatre to see Oedipus this week with my friend Jay (thanks Jay!), and there was a moment towards the end of the show where the climactic, pivotal fact that (and I don’t think I’m spoiling anything here) Oedipus had in fact fcuked his mum ELICITED ACTUAL SHOCKED GASPS FROM THE AUDIENCE.

How? HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO BE AN ADULT AND TO GO AND SEE THE PLAY OEDIPUS AND YET HAVE SEEMINGLY NO FCUKING CONCEPT OF THE MEANING OF THE TERM ‘OEDIPAL’ AND ITS ORIGINS?!

Anyway, the play is fcuking dogsh1t and I really wouldn’t bother (the lighting is nice, though).

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are free to mine me for more pithy analysis of contemporary London culture at your convenience.

By Guim Tió Zarraluki

WHY NOT ACCOMPANY THIS WEEK’S OPENING SELECTION OF LINKS WITH THIS IMPECCABLE SELECTION OF ‘70s/80s JAPANESE GROOVES’? NB THERE IS NO GOOD REASON!

THE SECTION WHICH FEELS LIKE IT POSSIBLY OUGHT TO ADMIT THAT MAYBE PROJECT25 WASN’T IN FACT ‘QANON FOR LIBERALS’ AFTER ALL, PT.1:  

  • Picto World: Yes, ok, this entirely frivolous and pointless and pretty much wholly-unoriginal as a concept, but, at the same time, it has literally NOTHING to do with What Is Happening Out There and so as such it feels appropriate to lead with it. SMOOTH YOUR BRANES! Picto World is a small, collaborative (or adversarial, depending on how you approach it – but, per the aforementioned ‘What Is Happening’ line, can we maybe reserve some spaces where we’re *not* doing adversarial, please?) project–toy-thing which presents you, the visitor (yes YOU) with a representation of a globe, on which each country on the world map can be associated with an image, creating a sort of nation-by-nation patchwork collage of pictures, each (sort-of) representing the country in question. The images aren’t fixed, so anyone can jump in and swap out one picture for another, making this a slowly-evolving patchwork quilt of how the internet’s collective unconscious feels the globe’s nation-states should be pictorially represented (there’s some moderation going on to ensure that nothing vile gets posted, which seems to be working fine so far). Click on the images to see them in full (and to realise that some of them are gifs/videos) – necessary to work out what the fuck they’re depicting in some cases – and enjoy the genuinely weird sense of ‘countries as memes’ that you get (I have no idea, for example, who decided that Italy should be represented by a short clip of a topless man smoking three cigarettes simultaneously, but have to concede that on some level it sort-of makes sense). This is fun, and if you’re bored is an excellent place to spend the afternoon doing some light nationalistic trolling (although, on reflection, perhaps I shouldn’t be extolling the virtues of ‘comedy nationalism’ here in ugly old 2025).
  • Aphantasia: I really, really like this; perhaps more conceptually than practically, but still. Aphantasia is basically a proto-social-network, text-based, whose interface is arranged in a node-based, visual fashion – so rather than showing posts as text arranged in chronological or algo-sorted order, shows them as a network of interconnected nodes, demonstrating the way in which each post relates to the wider ecosystem of information on the network; this gives you sense of the way in which conversations branch and fork and meander, and how different users engage with topics, and while it obviously doesn’t make it in any way easier to read than your traditional networks it DOES make it far more interesting from a ‘shape of topic’ point of view (which, now I write it down, will quite possibly mean nothing to anyone who isn’t me). Anyway, this is unlikely to ever evolve into anything more than a small, niche experiment, but I am very into whatever it’s creator is trying to do in terms of information visualisation, conversational taxonomy, network development and the rest (NO I PROMISE IT IS INTERESTING COME BACK).
  • The Taylorator: Ok, this is both technical and almost certainly illegal in most places you’re likely to be reading this, but, also, I am VERY into the concept (NB: Web Curios would like to plainly state that it does not in any way advocate the disruption of radio signals and is in no way condoning or endorsing any activity that fcuks with the broadcast network! Honest!) – The Taylorator is, to quote the developer, “a piece of software which allows you to use an SDR (such as a LimeSDR) to transmit music on every valid frequency in the FM broadcast band. It’s named the Taylorator because it was originally written to broadcast Taylor Swift on every channel at once, to force everyone to listen to her music.” Basically this is code which, when combined with a USB-attached device which can broadcast on FM, lets you effectively override all the radio signals on that frequency over a small area with whatever you like – Taylor Swift, yes, but also SO MUCH OTHER STUFF. I am now slightly dizzy with the possibilities this affords and how you might use this for GENTLY SUBVERSIVE ENDS – at the very least there’s a lot of fun ways you could integrate this into experience design, immersive theatre and the rest, but also, obviously, a fcuktonne of ways you could just really mess with people’s heads in some creative and satisfying (for you) ways (but, again, please do not do this).
  • Graze: Following the late-2024 flurry of excitement it very much feels like Bluesky user growth has hit a plateau again, suggesting that while people might be leaving Twitter, they’re perhaps not *desperate* for another text-based feed to take its place (SOCIAL MEDIA IS DEAD FFS IT JUST HASN’T STOPPED TWITCHING YET). Still, it persists (and, per some of my interactions on there this week, has managed to attract exactly the sort of moronic users that have characterised every single other social network since their advent, which I suppose is a sign of maturity of sorts), and as it matures is starting to develop a wider ecosystem of accompanying apps which take advantage of its open, friendly nature to build on top of the basic Bluesky experience. Such a tool is Graze, which basically lets you do a bunch of stuff to customise your Bluesky feed – effectively creating a selection of different algorithms to manage the way in which you receive information which you can switch between at your choosing. So, for example, Graze makes it (reasonably) trivial to create various feeds which include and exclude people based on their inclusion in starter packs, say, or have granular content restrictions in place, or to do a bunch of more complex stuff that integrates with other websites and APIs…basically this lets you turn Bluesky into something significantly more powerful, and potentially-commercially-useful (you can read more about the possibilities here, as the website is frankly not superb at outlining how powerful this all seems to be). This is interesting and obviously potentially really helpful to anyone looking to make the feed more practical, but there’s also part of me that read the explainer piece and some of the use-cases and got slightly saddened that rather than looking at new and innovative ways in which you might leverage the feed and the information we’re instead likely to get ‘ecommerce solutions’ and ‘TikTok, but for Bluesky’ which feels, well, a bit unambitous, frankly (says the person who creates nothing, ever, and should probably wind their neck in on reflection).
  • WikiTok: Do you enjoy TikTok, but are you concerned that it’s possibly not the *healthiest* place to spend six hours a day, mindlessly swiping through infinitehumantelly? Welcome to WikiTok, then, which applies the tried, tested and obviously-terrifyingly-dopaminic ‘swipey’ interface and swaps out the human zoo video content with NOURISHING FACTS from Wikipedia. Next time you’re sitting staring mindlessly at your phone, why not feed yourself with LOVELY INFORMATION? This seems, as far as I can tell, to be almost entirely random, hence my having learned about pour-over coffee, Italian writer Marco Balzano and, er, Polish satellite TV stations, in the short time I’ve been refreshing my memory – this is honestly brilliant if you’re even halfway curious about the world and is a rare instance of a broadly-pointless website which probably won’t lop three points off your IQ every time you load it up.
  • ReddTok: This, though, is basically crack – videos from Reddit with the TikTok interface, letting you take a whistlestop tour of what the world’s largest forum is sharing RIGHT NOW. No algorithm, no steering, just (seemingly) utterly random snippets of video from around the world which could be anything from (based on the past 30s) dogs, capybaras, film sets, more dogs, porpoises, vintage cigarette lighters OH GOD THIS IS LIKE FCUKING CRACK. As far as I can tell (based on an admittedly-very-limited sample size of videos) this doesn’t pull from anything labelled NSFW, so you’re unlikely to be confronted with anything too glistening and mucal – but, well, I am not 100% certain about that so please exercise caution should you decide to use this while out and about.
  • The Blue Report: Seeing as we’re doing ‘stuff built on Bluesky’, The Blue Report collects the links that are being shared most-widely across the network at the moment (I think based on popularity over the past 24h, updated hourly). Which is in theory interesting, but which currently in practice seems to mean that everything is about That Fcuking Man (or That Other Fcuking Man) and all the different ways they appear to be attempting to dismantle the State apparatus of the US for their own personal gain (and that of their plutocratic pals), which means that you might want to wait to come back to this until he’s stopped dominating the news cycle for five minutes (possibly 2029).
  • Boss: This is UTTERLY CHARMING. Boss is a small browser-based synthtoy made by, I think, Laura Sirvant, which lets you put together a relatively-simple track from a bunch of different beats and SFX, and which accompanies your musical noodlings with a genuinely beautiful, pixelart-style graphic of a ‘boss’ – besuited, balding, brogued-up – in a generic office space, grooving to your beats in a manner than can only be described as ‘deeply repressed’. Beautifully, the more complex you make your tune, the more engaged your little corporate avatar becomes, cutting increasingly complex rug for your viewing pleasure – honestly, I now want EVERY SINGLE SYNTH to come bundled with dancing avatar software like this, it is so beautiful and pure.
  • The Tuxedo Society: I think this did numbers last weekend, based on a viral Insta video or two showing generically-attractive young white people performing wealth at a villa on Lake Como – The Tuxedo Society is, per the blurb, “a carefully curated community of exceptional individuals who embrace elegance, tradition, and the art of meaningful connections. From bespoke travel experiences to exclusive networking events, TuxedoSociety empowers its members to thrive in a world of limitless possibilities.” So, effectively, a member’s club – I mean, that’s literally it, this is all it is, and not even a real one with a real fcuking club ffs – which puts on pseudo-swanky-looking events at which said members (please reflect on the context in which I might be using this specific term) can cosplay plutocracy in rented tuxedos. There was a LOT of discourse around this swirling this week, about the ‘Saltburn aesthetic’ and the appeal of ‘old money vibes’ in this new, hyperconsumerist1980sera in which we appear to find ourselves, which just made me realise that one of the most frustrating things about getting old is finding out that everything repeats itself and NOOONE OTHER THAN YOU SEEMS TO REALISE THIS. Old internet heads will OF COURSE remember that in the…mid-00s, I think? There was a very early, very exclusive social network called A Small World, which was originally access-gated to *actual* Old Money people – we’re talking people with titles (weirdly I had a login to this because I knew an actual Italian countess in my youth – this is, for anyone who knows me irl, fairly off-brand, its fair to say), who used it to literally post things like ‘flying into Gstaad tomorrow evening; does anyone have a reliable chauffeur I can borrow for 48h’. It’s since degraded into irrelevance, but it’s worth remembering because THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN. Although I suppose this is the aspirational, premium mediocre equivalent, so perhaps it is new after all and I am an idiot. Either way, you might want to check out the Insta feed in case you feel like experiencing some strong, and not necessarily positive, emotions towards your fellow human beings.
  • Dub: Do you despair as to how you’re going to squirrel away enough cash to survive in the weird, scary times between ‘your job becomes obsolete’ and ‘someone sorts out UBI or we solve scarcity’? Yeah, me too. Still, perhaps THIS will solve all your woes! Dub is an app which does the same thing as various e-trading platforms have been offering for a few years, to whit the opportunity to effectively clone someone else’s portfolio and trades, so you’re basically just running exactly the same buy/sell choices as the guru of your choosing. Which, on the one hand I can see sounding superficially attractive but which raised a LOT of questions as soon as I started to think about it longer than approximately 30s. Like, what’s the lag on trades? It says ‘same time, same price’ but unless there’s something VERY fancy going on under the hood that simply doesn’t seem feasible. Is there a cap on the number of people who can ‘follow’ a particular tipster? Because, based on my limited knowledge of ‘how this stuff works’ (tbf ‘limited’ is a generous interpretation) it feels like if there are big groups copying marginal activity then that starts to tip things in ways that may not be wholly beneficial. Still, those of you understand more about things like ‘money’ and ‘stocks’ and ‘wild speculation in the hope that this will be your ticket out of the white-collar bullsh1t mines’ might see this as a CRAZY OPPORTUNITY, so, well, fill your boots (and don’t forget all the LOVELY WORDS AND LINKS when you’re all rich).
  • The Self-Help Book From That Severance TV Show: I am impressed at the degree to which Severance is leaning into the marketing – I mean, it’s obviously an insanely-expensive show and they need to do numbers, but there’s some commitment to the bit on display which I admire quite a lot. This is an actual audiobook of the fictional self-help manual from the show (which, again, I have never seen and will never watch – apologies if I am misrepresenting what this is but, well, I don’t wholly care tbh) which is, I think, only partial but is committed enough for me to be impressed.
  • Cats In Art: I’m genuinely dismayed that until this week I had never heard of the KattenKabinet, an Amsterdam museum dedicated to cats in art. I get the feeling this is an institution best experienced in person, but while there’s only limited elements of the collection available to view online there *is* an excellent little Google Streetview-style interactive tour you can take so that you too can enjoy a taste of felines in fine art and sculpture, all sitting in a *glorious* looking Amsterdam townhouse. I am 100% going to this next time I visit. Oh, and the museum logo features a cat with what seems to be an unnecessarily-visible ar$ehole, which, for reasons I can’t adequately explain, pleases me no end.
  • Duck Radio: Internet radio, playing 24/7, which changes station depending on the apparent movements and activity of some ducks in the garden of the site’s creator (there’s a sensor which triggers a change in frequency each time a duck pecks at it, apparently). This is utterly pointless and a genuinely-terrible way to listen to the radio, and I love it immoderately.
  • Ripples: It doesn’t currently feel like February’s going to provide the respite from the WIND TUNNEL OF NEWS that I was hoping for, but if you want something to briefly soothe you as you come to terms with whatever the fcuk is happening now then you probably won’t do better than this website, which does one thing only but does it near-perfectly. A webpage that simulates a pool of clear water over crystalline rocks – click, drag, and simulate the fluid dynamics of liquid as you drag your fingers through it, take a deep breath and let the cares of the world slough from your shoulders momentarily (before they return, heavier than ever before, a few moments later). THIS IS WEBSITE AS THERAPY.
  • TV Series Cancelled After One Episode: I am reasonably-certain that the number of significantly-influential TV commissioners who read Web Curios hovers around the ‘0’ mark, but, just in case, this Wikipedia list of TV shows which lasted just one episode is SUCH fertile territory for potential reboots. You will, presumably, have heard of such lamentable lost classics as ‘Heil Honey I’m Home!’, a domestic comedy featuring Hitler and Eva Braun who are…disconcerted when a Jewish couple moves in next door and disrupts their suburban idyll, but there are loads here which are new to me and which I now REALLY want to track down and see (see: “Australia’s Naughtiest Home Videos (September 3, 1992) – A spin-off of Australia’s Funniest Home Videos hosted by Doug Mulray that depicted videos of sexual situations and other sexually explicit content”) – also, I feel a strange sense of national pride at the number of these which were commissioned and then dropped by Channel 4, well done lads.

By Summer Wagner

NEXT UP, ENJOY SOME VERY PLEASING UK BASS (AND OTHER THINGS BESIDES) COURTESY OF JED HALLAM OF LWSTD!

THE SECTION WHICH FEELS LIKE IT POSSIBLY OUGHT TO ADMIT THAT MAYBE PROJECT25 WASN’T IN FACT ‘QANON FOR LIBERALS’ AFTER ALL, PT.2:  

  • Define Art: This is, admittedly, *quite* conceptuallywanky, but it turns out that’s exactly the sort of thing I like, so. Define Art is a very simple webpage which offers anyone the opportunity to write their own definition of what ‘art’ is/means, either by replacing the definition that’s currently on-page entirely or by editing it as they see fit. At the time of writing (840am; I know how you LOVE to be apprised of the exact progress of the Curios sausagemaking process) ‘art’ is defined as “The immanentisation of the artist’s personal eschaton”, but it’s entirely possible that it will be something else entirely by the time you arrive at it – the act of defining ‘art’ as a piece of interactive digital artwork is basically exactly the sort of neatly-pretentious, semi-recursive, not-as-clever-as-it-thinks-it-is b0llocks that I live for and I think this is PERFECT (so, so shallow).
  • Ahead: This really, really gives me the fantods, but I can’t adequately explain why exactly. Ahead purports to be ‘Duolingo for emotional intelligence’ (oh, there, THAT’S why it feels intensely-creepy!), and seems to work by offering you a daily battery of tasks and exercises, tailored to YOU based on what it thinks you want/need (based on a fairly-rudimentatary sign-up questionnaire, as far as I can tell, and what I imagine is some sort of machine learning stuff under the hood) which are designed to, I don’t know, ‘help you manage your anger’ or ‘come to terms with the feeling of inadequacy that assails you every time you leave the house’ or ‘stop crying all the time’ (ha, impossible dream!), all packaged up in nice, pastel-adjacent palettes and reassuring fonts and Simple, 2025-Friendly Mental Health Bromide Speak! Ach, I know, I know, I am a terrible, miserable cynic who might perhaps benefit from not being such a miserable cnut all the time – I know this! I do! – but, equally, I am not wholly certain that spending more time on your device (the device that already acts as a prism through which the world is manipulated and filtered to be ALL ABOUT YOU) obsessing about yourself is necessarily good for you. It’s unclear from my limited fiddling with this whether the app has its own ‘impossibly-horny owl’-type mascot, should that be something that might motivate you to try/not try this.
  • Book Saboteur: Ooh, this is a fun idea by Javier Arce – upload any ebook file (in epub format) and use this website to fcuk with the text – censor random words, insert errant sentences or spoilers from books or films, add typos, replace all instances of one worth with another per your specifications…part art project and part way of really, really messing with someone on what, now I think of it, could be a really troubling and quite unpleasant level. There’s something HUGELY dark about the idea of taking someone’s ebook file, fcuking with it and then replacing it on their device as though nothing were amiss, leaving them to be increasingly baffled as to why their copy of Moby Dick seems to have replaced every instance of the word ‘whale’ with ‘Joe Swash’ or ‘Harambe’ – DO NOT DO THIS TO ANY OF YOUR FRIENDS OR LOVED ONES OR CHILDREN, DO NOT DO THIS.
  • Chipped Social: My note for this simply read ‘transhumanist girlies!’ which tbh I was quite proud of (but you don’t need to know that, and almost certainly don’t care, so apologies for the unnecessary digression). Chipped is, basically, fake nails with NFC chips, meaning that you can not only look INCREDIBLY GLAM but also be super-digital at the same time – the nails link to Chipped’s own Linktree-esque profile pages, which you can customise to include whatever urls or social profiles you like, meaning you can effectively use your manicure as an integrated business card type thing. Which, to be clear, is sort-of brilliant and exactly the kind of mad, semi-future thing that I was hoping for from 2025. Honestly, this is a great idea (apart, er, from the obviously-appalling environmental cost of the disposable plastic nails and the chipset and the rare metals! Apart from that!).
  • The Trump Golf Tracker: Yes, I know, but I’ve managed to make it ⅕ of the way through the second links section before mentioning that cnut so I think I should be lauded for my efforts at minimising his impact (is…is this ‘activism’? LOL!). The Trump Golf Tracker does exactly what it’s name suggests, offering an overview of how much time That Fcuking Man has spent on the golf course since his inauguration. One might argue that time spent on the golf course is time NOT spent dismantling the fabric of American Democracy, but that’s what Elon’s ramen-haired tech-death-squad (I am riffing on Ryan’s excellent description here, credit where its’ due) are apparently spending 23 of every 24h doing, so maybe even this is an illusory hope. The golfing percentage for the Presidency to date stands at an estimated 22% – sterling work!
  • Corners of the Internet: Linking to another person’s list of links from Curios feels…a bit ourobouros-like, if I’m honest, but then again this is an EXCELLENT resource which, should you be the sort of person who needs regular doses of browser-based distraction throughout the day, you might want to bookmark. This is VERY unfancy – literally a GSheet with some urls on it – but they are GREAT urls, many of which I’m familiar with as an online timewaster of some vintage but many more of which were entirely-unknown to me and which are lots of fun. Toys and games and things to read and listen to and learn about – there are at least a hundred-odd links in here to all sorts of interesting places around the web, which is pretty much my perfect way to spend a couple of hours when someone is paying me to do something else entirely (have I mentioned I’m available for hire? Tempting, isn’t it?).
  • The Taiwan Queer Voice Map: You might have to ‘right-click-translate’ this one – or at least you will if you don’t speak Chinese, but it’s a lovely, fascinating project. Per the description, “Since the lifting of martial law in Taiwan, the stories of queer, homosexual, and sexual minorities have gradually appeared in various media in the 1990s. Deeply inspired by Lucas Larochelle’s 2017 work Queering The Map, Queer Voicemap Taiwan hopes to extend the concept of Queer Map to collect queer moments, voices, and experiences in every corner of Taiwan, and to supplement the small history and daily life that has been overlooked in Taiwan’s big history.” It’s sadly a bit sparse, but there are some beautiful little stories in there if you explore.
  • Be Moss: Via Kris and Naive Weekly comes this beautiful little web experience which I might almost describe as ‘meditative’ were I not approximately as spiritual as mince. Click the link, enjoy the sounds, and spend a few minutes enjoying the visuals as they happen at you. BECOME MOSS – it increasingly seems preferable to some of the alternative options, if I’m entirely honest with you.
  • Neural Viz: I think this year will be the one in which an AI-generated video of some sort does actual numbers and is received well from a critical point of view – the tech is now sharp enough that anyone who understands its limitations well enough to work around them can make some very impressive-looking films, and in the hands of someone who gets how scripts and visual storytelling works I think these tools could be used to create something…objectively good. Neural Viz is particularly impressive – there are nearly 30 vids on here from over the past year or so, all mining the same vaguely-connected extended universe of slightly-seamy-looking 70s police procedurals and detective shows, featuring a revolving cast of alien creatures which absolutely nail the general aesthetic vibe of the era (there’s an EXCELLENT look/feel to all of this, and it’s a corner of latent space I very much appreciate). The scripts are…actually pretty good, the editing works to the limitations of the medium (pace Trisha Code), and there are some nice gags in each of the few clips I’ve watched to date…This is worth a look – although, obviously, if you’re of the opinion that anything and everything made with AI is sh1t and evil then it’s unlikely to change your mind (also, ffs, we’ve spoken about this, it is a silly attitude to have) (also, thanks to reader Deshan Tennekoon for the tip).
  • Science Urls: Yes, ok, this is just a bunch of RSS feeds, but if you’re the sort of person who REALLY NEEDS TO KNOW ALL OF THE SCIENCE NEWS then you will probably find this useful, seeing as it appears to draw from nearly-30 high-quality sources like Nature, BBC Science and others.
  • Mascot Micrographia: As far as I can tell this is some sort of visual compendium of Japanese mascots – it’s quite hard to tell, though, seeing as there’s literally no additional information about what the actual fcuk is going on here. Still, I enjoy it because there’s a pleasing fluidity to the interface and I like the way you can explore the different cutesy guys in clusters based on particular qualities they might share – so, for example, you might choose to view them grouped by broad taxonomic groups, or you can instead click on any that take your fancy and see them clumped by physical resemblance…as an interface I rather like it, even if, per my opening line, I don’t really have the faintest fcuking clue what this is depicting.
  • The Underwater Photography Contest Winners 2024: SO MANY FISH! Also, aquatic birds and corals and a bunch of organisms whose exact status in the great panoply of life I’m not exactly certain about! These are obviously all fcuking amazing – there’s a beady-eyed cormorant I’m a particular fan of, and a slightly-baffling category that seems to involve people posing in elaborate costumes underwater, and and some frankly terrifying things with far, far too many teeth.
  • Lines of Flight: I rather love these. Per the blurb, “Lines of Flight is a sequence of volumetric digital poems examining the entanglements of wind, wing and flying technique that constitute the airborne encounter. These poems offer a depiction of the human and more-than-human registers of atmospheric flight, while gesturing towards the histories, infrastructures and media environments that entwine them’. While I’m not entirely convinced that these work as ‘poems’ per se, there’s something really gorgeous about the way in which the visualisation is used to express the inherent concept of the work (which, yes, I know, but that sentence will I promise feel significantly less cnuty (I hope) when you click the link and see what I am describing).
  • TOS About: A SMART AND USEFUL USE OF GENAI! This is a little site which has used some LLM or another to parse all the terms and conditions of various major tech providers and asked it to offer an assessment of each from the point of view of the customer – it may not surprise you to learn that they are nearly all utter bstards! Still, it’s a smart and simple and effective use of the brute-force power of the machine which, should you still be struggling to work out how to make this stuff work for you (really?) might prove in some small way inspirational. Or it will just make you hate Adobe and the rest even more than you already do. Or both!
  • Smile To Sing: Also via Kris, this a very simple website that does one thing and one thing only – it uses your webcam to see if you’re smiling, and if you are it plays you a song. THAT IS IT BUT IT IS PERFECT. I really, really think that all websites from hereon in should have this sort of thing built in – rewards for smiles to all visitors, please! If nothing else I quite like the slightly-evil spins that you might put on things with tech like this – maintain a rictus grin while filling out your HMRC self-assessment and receive a £50 tax rebate! Which thought, amusingly (and, er, self-indulgently),, made me smile for a second, which triggered the website – seriously, I really do want this sort of tech EVERYWHERE, can we please start setting this up? Thanks.
  • Deck Gallery: THEY ARE SLIDES FFS WE HAVE DISCUSSED THIS. Ahem. Sorry. If you work in the sort of benighted industry whereby the majority of your job seems to involve shoehorning concepts that have no business being presented in PowerPoint or Keynote onto PowerPoint or Keynote slides, you might find this collection of ‘nicely designed ‘decks’ (grinding my teeth so hard, so hard) a useful place to find ‘inspiration’.
  • I Don’t Have Spotify: Thanks to Raf Roset for sending this to me – although judging by Spotfy’s latest results, the proportion of people reading this who don’t have a Spotify account is likely to be…very small indeed. Still, just in case a couple of you find it useful, the website basically lets you plug in a link to any Spotify track you like (or songs on YouTube, or other platforms) and tries to find it on non-Spotify platforms, presumably using some sort of audio-matching tech. It’s…spotty, but then I have been testing it on VERY OBSCURE things and so your mileage may vary hugely.
  • Hot Tub: BONGO FOR APPLE USERS! I wasn’t aware that there was a whole, semi-unsanctioned app market for the iPhone out there (unsurprising given my general distaste for all things Apple I suppose), but there is, and this week there apparently appeared on it this app – Hot Tub is basically something which circumvents Apple’s own squeamishness about sex to deliver an on-phone bongo experience to those poor iPhone owners who’ve previously had to…I don’t know, w4nk to a Tube site in their phone browser? Is that a hardship? I really don’t understand bongo, you know. Anyway, I obviously haven’t tried this because of the aforementioned ‘no Apple’ and ‘not into bongo’ points, but it seems to pull in, er, ‘content’ from a bunch of different popular smut-peddlers and is ad-free, and, from what I have seen, has been…er…enthusiastically-received by horny Apple fans, so if you’ve been DESPERATE to watch people fcuking via an app rather than via boring old url-based browsing then this is presumably all your Christmases come at once.
  • Pitfall: Play 1980s ATARI classic Pitfall in your browser! Be reminded that, honestly, old games really were quite sh1t before getting bored and moving on! As ever with this stuff, I think the best use of it is to show it to a young person in your life and watch their growing astonishment at the poverty of The Past’s entertainment landscape.
  • Bluejeweled: This is a single-note gag, but it is moderately cathartic and it made me laugh, so. Also, if you have a family member who has wasted untold hours on one of these fcuking ‘match the gems’-type games they will appreciate this to an immoderate degree I think.
  • When They Died: WHEN DID THE FAMOUSES DIE? Macabre, but strangely-compelling (also, I am so embarrassingly bad at history that this put me in a really bad mood as a result of my own crushing ignorance, so, well, be warned).
  • Middle of Lidle-dle: Another one of those little games which I am astonished noone from Lidl or their agencies a) thought of themselves; or b) have decided to lob some money at to make it ‘official’, this is silly and pointless but weirdly fun. The site shows you an object from the storied Middle Aisle of Lidl, where they keep the esoteric sh1t, and asks you to guess how much it costs in a ‘higher’/’lower’ Price Is Right-style game of narrowing down the value until you hit paydirt, The quicker you get there, the higher your score – this shouldn’t have entranced me for 10 minutes earlier this week but, embarrassingly, it very much did.

By Wei Lin Tse

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS BASICALLY THE SOUNDTRACK TO MY DAYS OF TAKING CHEAP SPEED, AS FORMER EDITOR PAUL RETURNS WITH THE TRANCEY BEATS AND BLEEPS AND 303s! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Killer Covers: Not actually a Tumblr! Still, it’s excellent regardless of what fcuking platform it’s built on – Killer Covers is one of those collections of excellent pulp novel artworks, featuring such literary classics as ‘Miami Golden Boy’ and, er, ‘Tutor From Lesbos’, and yes, the design and illustration work on display here is EXACTLY as you probably imagine it to be.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS IS INEXPLICABLY EMPTY THIS WEEK! ONWARDS!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Meta Trends 2025: For a few years now, Matt Klein from Reddit has been doing God’s work (is it God’s? I mean, given the nature of it, it’s actually quite possible it’s the devil’s – anyway, you be the judge) and going through the great morass of agency trend reports to attempt to get some sort of big-picture, bird’s-eye view of the GENERAL LANDSCAPE OF CULTURE AND AGENCYW4NK each year and WHAT IT ALL MEANS. He’s emerged from hibernation with the 2025 edition, which involved him reading a frankly-horrifying-sounding quantity of agency-penned crystal ball gazing about the coming year, and you can read his thoughts, findings and analysis in this LONG, but genuinely-fascinating and very smart, piece of writing. This is partially-paywalled, so if you want to read the whole thing you’ll have to sub to Matt’s digital magazine Zine, but if you do ‘strategy’ or ‘planning’ or some other such madeup bullsh1t in the vacuous world of advermarketingpr then this feels like a worthwhile cost to put against expenses. My personal favourite things about this are a) Matt’s honest assessment that the vast majority of these reports are total fcuking bullsh1t and exist solely as an attempt to sell whatever particular service offering the agency – or it’s senior management – had decided it’s important to flog this year; and b) his AI-generated baseline summary of all of them, which I am going to reproduce here in its entirety because it’s almost painfully accurate: “The world is changing really fast because of computers and phones and the internet. Some people are worried because everything’s moving so quickly, and sometimes it’s hard to tell what’s real and what’s pretend. People are feeling stressed and confused. They’re concerned about some big problems like the Earth getting too hot. Even though some people try to hide from all these changes by sticking to their own groups, they can’t escape how different the world is becoming.” WELL QUITE.
  • The End of Woke: I’m including this not because I particularly agree with all – or indeed most – of the points it makes, but because it’s both reliably well-written by Henry Mance, and because its presence in the FT is a useful barometer of Where The Money Has Decided We Are Going Next. While there’s a lot of analysis in here that feels factually correct – to whit, the post-2016 focus on issues of longstanding discrimination and structural prejudice excluded certain groups, even if not deliberately, in a manner that fundamentally proved counterproductive to the broad adoption of practices which might have addressed some of said discrimination and structural inequality – there’s also quite a lot of it that feels like long-winded justification as to ‘why we don’t have to pretend to care about this stuff anymore which is frankly a relief because we never did’, which feels…unpleasant coming from the salmon pink bankers’ favourite. Regardless, worth reading this because it is Where We Are.
  • Deep Research And The Coming Bullsh1t Avalanche: Gary Marcus runs his critical eye over the new GPT ‘reasoning’ model which has been rolled out to some users in preview and which is offering a similar service to that provided by Gemini’s own ‘research’ function, letting users specify a research query and have The Machine run off and pull together a report on said query, drawing from sources and annotated and generally doing the job of an exec/research assistant. It…may not surprise you to learn that, while superficially impressive, a lot of what is churned out is…bullsh1t! In all the usual ways! It makes stuff up, it leaves stuff out, and, while it *is* comparable to a junior researcher or account exec, it’s very much comparable to one with no sense of pride in their work and an incredibly-slapdash attitude. Except, well, we’re lazy and slapdash too, which means what is inevitably going to happen (because human nature!) is that people will use this as a shortcut, take the results at face value, and start making actual decisions based on a sort of Cliff Notes version of facts compiled by someone who’s not wholly bothered about ‘truth’ and ‘accuracy’ and ‘completeness’. Which you can sort of see *might* be problematic in a number of different ways, and could lead to some ‘unhelpful’ outcomes (leaving aside the broader questions of ‘if you don’t do the reading, how are you meant to do the thinking?’ and ‘if we don’t train people how to do research properly and rigorously when they’re young, we’re just going to sort of collectively lose the ability aren’t we?’).
  • Big Data and the Veil of Ignorance: This is SUCH a good article, on the use of data and how it intersects with questions of justice – honestly, it’s a *little* on the dry and philosophical side, but it’s one of the most interesting things I’ve read on the unintended consequences of large-scale data interpretation and the way it intersects with contemporary morality…SO fascinating, I promise. Try this paragraph – if you can get on with this then you will really enjoy the whole thing: “In the last decades, “big data” has massively changed the informational landscape, and industry reports and research suggest that insurers want to make use of it. In a recent paper, I had explored some of the consequences with regard to moral hazard. Yes, big data might provide better information about people’s behavior. But there are also reasons to think that this might create new injustices. For one thing, there is the unequal quality of data and the risk of errors, e.g. for people who change their names (which, in many societies, tend to be women, because of patriarchal family norms). For another thing, there are the many forms of background injustice that make a difference to the conditions under which people choose. Think, for example, about the problem of “food desert” in poor neighborhoods. If your insurance company sees your credit card data, its algorithmic systems might categorize you as choosing hedonism over a healthy lifestyle (and increase your co-payment), while it is in fact a matter of circumstances that you cannot buy healthier food.”
  • A Deep-Dive Into Deepfake Bongo: An excellent bit of investigative work by the smart people at Bellingcat, who investigate the network of money and businesses that sit behind one of the most widely-used Deepfake bongo sites being used to make non-consensual smut out of innocent image and video sources. Partly interesting because of the meticulous way in which they describe the investigation, and partly because of the fact that it is SO FCUKING COMPLICATED; it’s shell companies and redirects all the way down, as you might imagine, and it becomes clear as you read this that, despite the well-meaning legislative steps which are starting to be taken (not least in the UK, where the Government is, credit where it’s due, taking this stuff more seriously than in lots of other place), it’s going to be INCREDIBLY hard to get this stuff taken down in any definitive sense, or indeed to pin any sort of responsibility on a single company or individual should you want to pursue a fine or prosecution.
  • The Klarna CEO: I genuinely despise Klarna as a business – its branding, its vibe, its shameless promotion of debt as a means to pursue a deeply-unsustainable lifestyle, its rebranding of ‘payday lending’ as ‘financial empowerment for a new generation’…the whole fcuking thing makes me feel genuinely a bit sick. Worst of all, though, to my mind, is ALL-STAR CEO and VC whisperer Sebastian Siematkowski, who you might have heard parping all over the media in the past 18 months or so wanging on about how his business was basically going to start replacing its staff with The Machine wherever possible, and that that process was in fact well underway. This profile in the NYT does, to its credit, pour several skipfuls of salt on some of Seb’s more bullish claims about exactly how much AI the company is actually using, but I found this more interesting as a general ‘direction of travel’-type piece – what’s important to take away from this is that Seb is talking up Klarna’s use of AI and its intention to where possible replace people with The Machine BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE MARKET WANTS TO HAPPEN. He is literally speaking to investors, and investors hear ‘mmm, lower personnel overheads mean maximal profit!’ and their trousers tent with the saddest of financially-motivated boners – basically this article is one of the first I’ve read that takes an almost-honest look at What This Means. It does finally feel like people are starting to catch up with me on what the practical implications of this stuff for a lot of people are going to be very, very soon, but I am slightly staggered that a) it’s taken so fcuking long; b) we’re still not seeming to be dedicating serious thought to the implications on a socioeconomic level. OH WELL IT WILL BE FINE.
  • The Philippines vs AI: Or, ‘hmm, that canary doesn’t look too healthy, I wonder what that means about the air quality in here?’ – this piece in Rest of World looks at the Philippines, a country which for the past couple of years has been my ‘must watch’ bellwether for the impact of The Machine on actual, real people’s jobs, is seeing the establishment of coalitions and workers’ collectives in attempt to guard against the erosion of a significant part of the jobs market through the application of generative AI. On the one hand, I am pleased to see the action; on the other, nothing in the piece makes me hugely confident about the collective power of the Filipino worker to make a meaningful difference to the pace of capital-mandated progress. So it goes!
  • The Death of Scenius: Ian Leslie writes on ‘urban creativity’, specifically with reference to Eno’s concept of the ‘scenius’, “the collective genius that can emerge when a population of diverse and fertile talents living in geographical proximity form a loose community or ‘scene’,” and whether it’s been killed by modernity. I remember working on the Cameron Government’s attempt to rebrand Shoreditch as Tech City back in 2010-12 (genuinely sorry about all that, everyone, please don’t hate me) and one of the BIG REASONS it was claimed it would apparently be trivial to recreate the dynamism, inventivity and (most importantly) billion-dollar valuations of Silicon Valley in, er, Old Street was the SERENDIPITOUS CONNECTIONS afforded people by the coffeeshops and bars of the area which would allow for the sort of casual meetings between genius-level intellects which have birthed companies like Apple (amusingly, the insane spike in rental prices this whole fcuking project created in the area neatly worked to absolutely fcuking crush much of the independent, artsy, creative scene which was still just about clinging on in the area, thus totally fcuking the ‘serendipitous meetings in bars and coffeeshops’ thing in half) – this piece argues that, for various reasons, we don’t live like that anymore and possibly won’t ever again (you thought society was atomsied in the 80s? Etc etc) and that that is culturally…problematic. This made me think quite a lot more than I expected it to.
  • Nobody Cares: This is, fine, a bit of a rant, but fcuk me did it resonate me in a week during which I have once again had to attempt to engage with the Italian consulate in London and experienced the unique, particular contempt which the Italian state seems to reserve for its citizens abroad. If nothing else, this is a reminder that caring is good for other people and we should try and do it more (this is more a note to myself than it is to you, fwiw).
  • Noise Complaints and London Pubs: The couple of London-centric new digital magazines launched last year continue to do excellent work, proving that there is still an appetite for good local journalism and (hopefully) that people will actually pay for it (it also throws into sharp relief what a complete pig’s ear the succession of useless fcuking cnuts who ruined the Standard have made of running paper) – this is Joshi Hermann’s The Londoner, with a longread about the way in which noise complaints from local residents are increasingly being weaponised against the pub trade and leading to situations whereby venues are effectively being pressuregrouped into shutting down by people who moved to the area seemingly without realising that there might occasionally be people talking outside the boozer. The only thing I think this piece misses – which is sort of the elephant, to my mind – is money; thing is, London is fcuking expensive, and getting moreso. The sorts of people renting anywhere near central London are likely to be QUITE RICH. When you become QUITE RICH, I have observed, you tend to expect the edges of your life to be sanded down, and to be able to effectively pay to remove inconveniences, and London is very good at helping the rich achieve this – which means that they tend to expect that they can do this with EVERYTHING, hence this. Basically the problem is money, always. Fcuking money.
  • The Mediterranean Diet Is A Lie: I found this piece slightly-irritating (partly because it felt like it was casting rather a lot of shade on My People), but the general point it makes – that, actually, the concept of the ‘mediterranean diet’ is in many respects a marketing fiction, that it bears little relation to the quotidian eating habits of a significant proportion of the population of mediterranean countries, and that we should probably stop fetishising it – probably isn’t wholly incorrect. A couple of things it doesn’t mention, though: a) the reason Italian kids are all fcuking obese is a combination of parental indulgence and THE FACT THAT THEY INCREASINGLY EAT LIKE AMERICANS; and b) the idea of the ‘mediterranean diet’ is also predicated on a society in which patriarchal ideas about gender roles are rigidly enforced, and which became significantly-less easy to maintain on a regular basis when you’re no longer in a situation where one family member (or more, if a multigenerational household) stays at home DOING DOMESTICS all day because woman. Basically I think this is a bit facile and has an agenda, but then again I am, I concede, perhaps a *touch* biased.
  • Eat The Mona Lisa, Jeff: This is very, very silly, but it made me laugh more than any other article I read this week. Inge Beekmans goes deep on “What would it mean if Jeff Bezos would buy and eat the Mona Lisa? This article demonstrates how a seemingly meaningless petition on change.org conjures various connections between contemporary manifestations of technologically driven nihilism and an upcoming battle between technocapitalism and intangible sociocultural values.” Your appetite for this will depend largely on the effect that paragraphs such as this had on you, basically: “From a purely material perspective, it is difficult to imagine how Bezos and da Vinci’s Mona Lisa could be more different. The Mona Lisa is a more than five hundred year old poplar wood panel covered with oil paint, that is now hanging in the Salle des États in the Louvre. Bezos is a white, middle aged man, who moves between multiple homes, but mainly resides in Seattle.“
  • Why Are Cocktails So Weird?: I’m a tedious purist when it comes to cocktails – I’m just not sure I can be fcuked to wait 15m and drop £20 on a drink which, when it turns up, might taste of the perfume counter – but I enjoyed this article looking at both the evolution of the style of cocktail enjoyed in the world’s high-end bars, and the reasons why the current vogue is for some pretty-weird-sounding sh1t. It made me really, really want some centrifuged blood orange juice, which wasn’t a sentence I was expecting to ever type if I’m honest.
  • RIP The Horny Profile: Depending on How Online You Are, and How Online You Have Been Since 2000ish, you will either be VERY FAMILIAR with the concept of the 00s Horny Profile or this will mean nothing to you – either way, you are in for a TREAT with this piece, which collects some of the best, most jaw-dropping examples of journalistic thirst and objectification committed to the page (what’s especially galling about this is that given the time of the articles these fcukers were earning a decent wordrate, which, given the engorged and purple nature of much of the prose, feels very unfair here in ‘30p a word if you’re lucky, oh and the cnuts won’t pay your invoices for six months’ 2025) in one gloriously-swollen package. Some you will know, some will be new to you, but all of them will make you feel vaguely-icky, as though a faint film of someone else’s sweat is drying on your skin. I also found this reaction to it interesting – this is obviously the perspective of someone a generation or two younger than me, who is slightly baffled at the hate and wonders ‘what the fcuk else was a journalist supposed to write about Jessica Simpson other than a few thousand words lauding her rack?’ which was…unexpected, and struck me as an interesting new twist on ‘feminism’.
  • Bridget Jones’ Hollow Feminism: I was slightly amazed to learn that there was a new Bridget Jones film imminent – it feels SPECTACULARLY out-of-time, which perhaps is the point I suppose – but enjoyed this brutal evisceration of the whole franchise and the character by Tanya Gold in the New Statesman; there’s a lot of good stuff in here which anyone who remembers reading the books back in their heyday will find stirs some quite specific memories (or at least it did with me): “In the second book, she is commissioned to interview Colin Firth in Italy for the Independent: the newspaper where Bridget was born in a column in 1995. She misses the plane because she is trying on a bikini; asks Firth, “Who is Neacher?”(she means Nietzsche); tries to kiss him; and ultimately submits a transcript rather than an interview. That scene gave me a panic attack: who would do this? (A woman with no powers of criticism, or analysis.) Even so, the Independent likes it: “Anything that gets letters is good no matter how bad it is.” There are hints here of a worse future, for both women and for journalism.”.
  • I Quit Sugar: I have seen this linked a LOT this week – with reason, it’s a genuinely great read, of the ‘I went to a mental-sounding wellness spa and had an EXPERIENCE’ variety. Caity Weaver REALLY likes sugar – I don’t think you can quite prepare yourself for quite how much she appears to enjoy it – and goes on a detoxy spa trip to Austria to attempt to go a week without and to see if she can get to the bottom of the why. This is a JOURNEY, and it is in parts very, very funny (Weaver is self-aware throughout, although I think if I were sitting on a transatlantic flight about to take off and she sat next to me with the meal she describes, I would consider it an act of actual violence), and, even though you may have read one of the semi-regular ‘I spent a week in a spa where you drink only water and three cl of weak vegetable broth a day while measuring my stool samples by hand’-type accounts which seem to appear in certain sections of the lifestyle press every few years, I promise you this is a truly excellent way of spending 20m or so.
  • Wildberries and Warlords: Wildberries was basically, as I understand it, Russia’s home-grown Amazon equivalent – this article, in the Economist’s excellent 1848 Magazine, explores how it’s effectively now at the centre of a genuinely mad-sounding blood feud which honestly sounds like something out of the 15th Century (but with significantly more automatic weapons). I went to college with a man from Chechnya, as it happens, who was almost certainly the son of a very, very bad man and who last I heard was wanted by Interpol on counts of people trafficking, so a lot of this is…weirdly reminiscent to me of Adam Islamov, his mysterious and unsmiling friend Nurbal, and his incredibly-sinister ‘Grozny Streetfighters’ baseball cap.
  • Cursed Algorithm: I once again link to Emma Garland’s writing about sex and the web and the intersection of the two, because she is just so good at the now of it. Seriously, look: “It doesn’t help that I have a friend who incessantly sends me god awful content from lolcows or the worst “shock punk” solo artists (read: unregistered sex offenders) the internet has to offer, another providing regular “Asian dad fit” breakdowns, and another showering me with Creed memes. One of my suggested reels earlier today was a girl wearing a bathing suit in the shower, glancing back over her shoulder, with overlay text that said: “I might not be a 10 but I’ll let you leave the lights on & use all 4 holes.” This was sandwiched between bulking vs cutting advice promoted by a man helping his girlfriend lift from behind, and a photo of Dr Dre with Mr Blobby posted by Insane Championship Wrestling founder Mark Dallas. Someone said I have “the algo of a hetero man,” and it’s true – with a spirit to match, I fear. Due to my podcast consumption, I keep getting advertised Load Boost (a supplement intended to make you blow bigger loads, obviously).”
  • Lynn Barber vs Marianne Faithfull: This was shared a bit in the aftermath of Faithfull’s death last week; honestly, it is one of the most incredible celebrity profiles I have ever read, ever, and every single word of it is gold, and it is ESSENTIAL that you click the link and read it right away. Two monstrous characters (and maybe a third too), wrestling off the page.
  • High & Dry: I find most writing about sobriety spectacularly dull – possibly due to certain, er, ‘lifestyle choices’ I continue to make – but this (very long, be warned) article about the author’s experience attending the sober enclave at famously-hedonistic music festival Bonnaroo is WONDERFUL from start to finish – funny and sad and populated with great characters, and honest throughout about the fact that being sober around fcuked people is not always fun, and when you’re a relapse-risk it’s…quite stressful. I can’t tell you how much you will enjoy this, I promise – and it also contains Dylan, who I guarantee you will fall in love with as soon as you meet him. Really, really wonderful piece.
  • Capybaras: The final longread of the week is this, by the inimitable Gary Shteyngart, in the New Yorker – it’s not the best thing he’s ever written, largely down to the fact that capybaras aren’t THAT interesting, but it is still funny and effortlessly charming and he is such a wonderful, personable companion as he travels far and wide to get up close and personal with a capy (also, just going back to my ‘man is this a bad time to try and get paid for the written word’ rant from earlier, IMAGINE getting New Yorker rates and expenses for this piece), and the gentle, jeopardy-free nature of the piece was honestly something of a balm. You’ll like it, promise.

By Thomas Sing

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 31/01/25

Reading Time: 36 minutes

Look, for some reason I slept genuinely-appallingly last night and as such this has been written pretty much entirely in a sort of fugue-state; I’m going to have to forego any attempt at a ‘comedy’ intro and restrict myself to saying that I started reading ‘My First Book’ by Honor Levy yesterday (on Jamillah Knight’s recommendation, for which thanks) and it really is both excellent and the most terrifyingly, brilliantly internetty writing I think I’ve ever read ever, and I think if you can stand reading the crap in here then you will find it genuinely wonderful.

Fcuk, even THAT was a struggle. Evidently I expended all my meagre energies ensuring that the quality of the prose that follows is ENTIRELY CONSISTENT with the prose in previous editions – for better, and indeed for worse.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are entirely within your rights to be appalled at the slightly-phoned-in nature of the preceding two paras.

 

By Andrea Gori

OUR FIRST MIX THIS WEEK COMES FROM TOM SPOONER, WHO FLASHED ME RIGHT BACK TO BEING 15 WITH THIS SELECTION OF 90s TRACKS, A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF WHICH I USED TO LISTEN TO ON A CHEAP CURRY’S OWN-BRAND WALKMAN ON POOR-QUALITY C90 CASSETTES (ACTUALLY THE PAST WAS SH1T ON REFLECTION WASN’T IT?)! 

THE SECTION WHICH CANNOT GET THIS POST ABOUT THE NEW US ADMINISTRATION OUT OF ITS HEAD, PT.1:  

  • A Better World: Do you occasionally feel that, collectively, we might at a few crucial junctures in our history have taken THE WRONG CHOICE? That, in the infinitely-branching multiverse in which we entirely-possibly exist, there therefore are other, alternative timelines in which we took the OTHER fork in the road and Paltrowed ourselves into a slightly-different but vastly better alternareality that doesn’t involve quite so much of…well, *all this*? Would you like to perhaps EXPLORE some of these alternative timelines and see whether or not you can take make some small, crucial tweaks that will ameliorate everything for everyone? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! A Better World is a very, very fun little webtoy thing with a very simple premise – fire it up and it presents you with a series of historical events (you get a different starting set each time), some of which you are told you can CHANGE. So, for example, in the version currently open in a tab here I could choose to ‘modify’ the fact that Copernicus discovered the heliocentric model in the 16thC…so I just decided to see what happens if the Church, improbably, gets right behind the science and supports it, and now there is a whole new timeline in which Pope Galileo establishes the Great Scientific Church in 1603, and the creation of an orbital church in 1922…THIS IS WONDERFUL, seriously, and you can tweak all sorts of moments from the past in all sorts of ways and, basically, either take us to a glorious, post-scarcity alternafuture or, er, condemn us to semi-literate grubbing, and as both a game and just a fun counterfactuals toy it’s a an excellent way to spend 15 minutes. You even get a little ‘karma’ score based on how much you’ve ameliorated (or fcuked) the world, should you wish to keep track of your godly achievements. I don’t *think* that this is built on an LLM, although on reflection this is exactly the sort of thing which they would be perfectly capable at. By the way, I just fiddled with something else in my ‘Church of Science’ timeline, and now Adolf Hitler is President of East America by 1920, so, actually, perhaps the arc of the universe just bends towards Nazi and there’s nothing we can do about it, sorry lads.
  • DeepSeek: I’m including this here for completeness and because it’s not impossible that some of you might be interested in playing with the thing that sent markets insane on Monday – it feels a lot like using any of the other LLMs, except with none of the multimodality stuff, so it’s unlikely to excite you particularly, but it is a clear and obvious example of the fact that (as has been clear for a couple of years and, I think, largely admitted by both OpenAI and Google) that these companies have no moat. I think (and I will go a bit deeper in the longreads on this, but it’s worth repeating) that all the people on Monday getting all excited about how THIS WAS THE END OF THE AI BUBBLE and LOL SAM ALTMAN are, possibly, rather missing the point – what do you think happens when a profit-maximising system is granted access to something which enables ‘greater efficiency at scale’ (ie more profit), at a lower cost than was previously thought? Do you think it is going to use LESS of that thing? If you do then I would gently posit that you are a fcuking moron.
  • The Rest of World Photo Contest 2024: I think I mention on here regularly enough how wonderful I think Rest of World is as a media outlet – it consistently reports interesting stories from parts of the world that rarely get covered with any nuance or care by media (or at least the media I consume – I appreciate that, yes, this might be more of a ‘me’ problem), and it’s been really pleasing to see it continue to thrive over the past few years. This is what I think is its annual photo contest – there are only 10 images selected here, but there are some wonderful ones and in particular the image by Sandra Singh of the refugees in Lampedusa, just off the boat and clustered around a single phone as they videocall someone to tell they they’re alive, is a just astonishing image in terms of its combination of humanity, politics and very intense modernity, and has made me go ever so slightly wobbly here in my kitchen at 720am which very much suggests I didn’t get enough sleep last night. Anyway, lovely pictures.
  • The Wiener Holocaust Library: I happened to see a play on Wednesday evening all about Nazis – like, actual historical ones – and it turns out that it felt INCREDIBLY ODD and not wholly-comfortable in January 2025. Anyway, as you’re almost certainly aware, Monday was the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz and as such it feels appropriate to share the link to the Wiener Holocaust Library: “Based in London, The Wiener Holocaust Library is the world’s oldest and Britain’s largest collection of original archival material on pre-war Jewish life, the Nazi era and the Holocaust. The Wiener is home to hundreds of thousands of documents, letters, photographs, press cuttings, books, pamphlets, periodicals and unpublished manuscripts and memoirs, posters, artworks, and eyewitness testimonies.” There is a huge archive of imagery here, alongside documents and documentation and correspondence, German newspapers of the era, maps and logistical papers and…it’s all fcuking monstrous, honestly, and quite astonishingly unpleasant when you start going through it properly and start to slowly achieve a vague, and still inadequate, sense of the scale and horrific, grinding efficiency of the machine.
  • POTUS Tracker: Yes, I know, I know, THERE IS TOO MUCH OF HIM EVERYWHERE ALREADY. Honestly, the worst thing about all of this (to be clear: the worst thing FOR ME, someone who is no way (at least at present) materially affected by US politics) is that, if your job involves in any way having to DO NEWS then you simply can’t avoid him. Honestly, I need to keep up with what is going on to write the things people pay me to write, which means I am currently hearing his fcuking name approximately 17 times an hour and…that doesn’t feel healthy. Someone said to me the other day that they’re planning on just sort of noping-out of news for the next few years which, well, now that is a very particular type of modern, Western privilege. Anyway, this website tracks where the President of the US is and what they are doing, alongside official engagements and legislation enacted, so you can get a vague overview of what he is doing without needing to engage with either what he is saying or about what other people are saying about what he is saying, which, frankly, might make things *slightly* easier.
  • Bauhaus Bonk: Ok, this is a) a videogame that isn’t out til next week; and b) it’s one you’d actually have to pay a few quid for…BUT! There is a free demo! And, honestly, whether or not you care about games can I ask that you PLEASE take a minute and click the link and watch the trailer? If you have any interest in art or design or music or animation then I think you will find it UTTERLY CAPTIVATING. I don’t really want to spoil anything about the mechanic here or what happens, but it’s both delightfully-simple and SUCH a clever combination of visual and audio style with a really interesting kinetic gameplay mechanic, and I think it might quietly end up being rather beautiful.
  • The TI84 Online Calculator: If you were a different type of person to me – someone less scared of numbers, in the main – it’s entirely possible that the image you’ll see on loading up that url will give you a flashback of almost Proustian clarity. This website simulates – apparently in its entirety – the look and functionality of a specific type of scientific calculator which I think even I recognise as being pretty ubiquitous amongst more more maths-and-science-minded friends, which means that you can do all the, er, really ‘fun’ stuff that you used to do with these things back in the day ALL OVER AGAIN RIGHT NOW! I think you can use these things to run graphs and stuff, and, if you’re patient enough and so inclined, rudimentary animations and the like (and, almost certainly, some weirdo has got one to run DOOM at some point by now), but my main memory of what they can do comes from 1997 when my mate Javier worked out that, because you were allowed to take a calculator into all your exams and because this thing had a surprisingly-large memory, you could basically just transcribe all your notes into it and use them during the every single examination with pretty much total impunity.
  • Time Travel Television:  Websites that curate YouTube content by era and package said content into faux-retro viewing platforms are not a new thing and I have featured a fcuking multitude over the years, but I really enjoyed this particular variant, mainly because whoever’s done the curation seems to have done a really good job of both isolating some nice ‘channels’ to flip between and also of minimising the YouTube cruft inbetween episodes and, having only scratched the surface here, but OH MY GOD this goes deep. Obviously I went straight to the 90s because LIFE WAS NICE THEN, and in the course of a dozen or so channelhops I got, variously, Daria, MTV, Home Improvement, VH1, Dharma and Greg (I can’t imagine anyone cares about that, but just to give you an idea of the breadth of choice) – trying the 80s briefly there was another MTV analogue showing decade-appropriate vids, Dynasty and, wonderfully, The Wonder Years…basically if you feel CHILDHOOD/TEEN NOSTALGIA for the 60s/70s/80s/90s (or, alternatively, if you are young and want to experience how fundamentally limited and eventually-frustrating the domestic entertainment landscape was), then you will ADORE this.
  • Is My Twitter Feed Fcuked?: I am still maintaining a Twitter account, but for the past month or have only used it to post a link to this and then fcuk off because, well, 90% of the people who used to use it and make it fun for me have left. Still, if you’re still persisting with the increasingly-accurately-epitheted ‘hellsite’ then you might find this tool interesting (or, should you wish to get into a REALLY fun argument with any friends or family members who you think might not necessarily be benefiting from Elon’s Algorithmic Firehose of Fash) – all it’s doing is chucking an interface on top of an LLM, to be clear, but it’s an interesting use-case. To use it, you open Twitter, go to your For You page and scroll and scroll and scroll – take a screenrecording for 2m (that is a LOT of scrolling), feed it to this and it will, in time, spit out an analysis of the sort of content that you’re being exposed to, its political balance, key themes, etc (there’s also a lot of…slightly more esoteric bullsh1t like ‘mental health effect’, which is obviously rubbish, but). I presume that this is plugged in…what, Gemini? Anyway, it’s not only quite a fun way of getting OBJECTIVE PROOF that Twitter’s a cesspit these days, but it’s also a not-terrible usecase for multimodal AI should you be unimaginative enough to require one (sorry, but come on).
  • Encore: This is a smart idea which I am not convinced *quite* works yet, but it feels like something which people might find useful. Encore is, put simply, a natural language search layer which works across a whole bunch of different secondhand and vintage portals – you can limit the search to a bunch of different countries,  of which the UK is one, which means that you can type something like ‘baggy trousers that are a bit like carhartt but don’t specifically have to be that brand, and definitely not camouflage because I get incredibly confused if my legs blend into the urban background’ (I am a desperately-unimaginative dresser) and get some not-terrible results. It’s hit-and-miss (hence my ‘doesn’t work perfectly’ caveat uptop), but that’s I think in large part down to the occasionally-odd quirks of LLM interaction and interpretation, and as a quick way of browsing loads of different second-hand outlets online it feels potentially quite useful. It’s free, but it has paid tiers if you shop LOADS and want access to bells and whistles (like, using a marginally-better version of GPT, the ability to search by uploaded image, etc etc), and if you’re someone who’s less badly-dressed and averse to shopping than I am you might enjoy this.
  • Fathomverse: This is such a nice idea and I approve unreservedly – it also harks back to a long line of ‘using the crowd to solve dataset labelling problems’ solutions that go all the way back to donating their home computer’s processing power to SETI in the 2000s. I’m going to take the writeup from Bloomberg, so: “The game for phones and tablets populates a virtual ocean with images of marine critters in their deep-sea habitats stored in a sprawling database known as FathomNet. Some photos are of ocean animals whose identity has been verified by scientists. Others are organisms labeled by the AI or that have yet to be classified. Players first embark on training dives where they’re taught to distinguish the characteristics of 47 different types of marine animals.Once players are trained up as amateur marine biologists, they take on missions drifting along ocean currents looking for pulsating dots that indicate where marine life has been recorded. Players tap the screen to see the animal and identify if it’s familiar or tag it as unknown. The game then reveals whether their choices match the consensus of other players or if the creature remains undetermined. They win points for correct classifications as well as the number of organisms they spot. Players also score bonus points for correctly labeling a previously unidentified life form when consensus is reached.” Which, ok, makes it sound super-dry, but, well, Bloomberg, innit. I played with this for 15m earlier this week and it’s actually surprisingly fun and VERY zen, so if you’re the sort of person who enjoys pastimes that might reasonably self-describe as ‘cozy’ (have we talked about the extent to which that makes my teeth itch? It really does) then I think you might get something out of this AND you’ll be helping to explore the sea which feels like A Good Thing, karmically-speaking (to be clear, there is self-evidently no such thing as karma – I mean, look, does this look like a universe in which the concept of ‘karma’ is at play in any significant manner? I put it to you that it very much fcuking does not).
  • Fortune: This is silly, and ephemeral, and a *tiny* bit broken, but it is also small and frivolous and pleasingly-vapourwave and playful, and there’s about 90s of experience here and it will leave you, I hope, feeling…calmer. If you’re confused, just click around. NO I WILL NOT EXPLAIN IT MORE CAN WE NOT MAINTAIN AN AIR OF MYSTERY AROUND ANYTHING ANYMORE FFS?
  • Indieblog Page: Ok, this is just wonderful and HUGE credit to Andreas Gohr, whoever they may be, whose work it apparently is. As they put it, “This website lets you randomly explore the IndieWeb. Simply click the button below and you will be redirected to a random post from a personal blog…you can drag the button to your bookmarks and have it always available when you want to be inspired” – you can check out the full list of sites it’s drawing from (and I think even download it should you wish to for whatever reason) and it is fcuking VAST – honestly, there are THOUSANDS on there, many I had heard of and many I hadn’t, and if you’re the sort of person who vaguely enjoys the idea of hopping from site to site entirely at random and just seeing what you find and what you learn (which, given where you’re reading this, I’m going to assume you to to at least a small extent) – not everything I have found through this has been interesting, to be clear (and quite a lot quite the opposite) and a few things have made me feel…quite uncomfortable (the links are politically agnostic), but as a general ‘fcuk me the web is vast and we are legion and GOD PEOPLE ARE WEIRD AND OBSESSIONAL (BUT, MOSTLY, WEIRD’ source it’s almost unparalleled.
  • Homemade Meals: This is interesting – a Dutch company which I think is now launched in the UK as well, which offers an app service connecting people who want to cook food at home to sell with people who want to buy home-cooked food for delivery, muchlike the diasporic groups which exist on Whatsapp as informal networks for home cooks to sell to their community. Which, ok, now I type it feels like applying an exploitative commercial layer almost certainly backed by VC money to something which was already working quite happily without it thankyou very much, but, equally, it’s an interesting idea – although on reflection I have no fcuking clue what they do about hygiene standards and the enforcement thereof, which makes me *slightly* concerned that this might be a not-insignificant potential botulism vector. Caveat Emptor, I guess.
  • The Video Game History Library: Honestly, this is a frankly INSANE archive of old videogames magazines and the like, which I am only not being more vocal about because it inexplicably doesn’t feature the UK’s PC Zone or ZERO magazines (both were from the early-90s and both had, I now realise, a…probably-unhealthy effect on my writing style in later life). Still, it has LOADS OF OTHER ONES, and there are all sorts of other things too – promo materials from old launches and the like, and ALL sorts of behind-the-scenes details and documentation about the game development process from both individuals and studios, donated as part of the laudable desire to maybe try and not let all of this history fall into digital landfill. It is not…hugely user-friendly, but if you’re interested in the industry and its history then this is likely to appeal significantly.
  • The Dataviz Project: Ooh, this is good – a wonderful collection of different examples and techniques for data visualisation, compiled by Ferdio as what I presume is a marketing tool; it’s effectively a glossary/taxonomy of different dataviz mechanisms with examples of them in use, and if you’re someone who has to work in this area and who wants some sort of inspiration for how you can do something marginally more interesting than ANOTHER FCUKING BUBBLE CHART then, well, click the link.
  • Shapecatcher: Doodle in the box and The Machine will attempt to guess which Unicode character you’re trying to represent. Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT YOU JOYLESS GIT?
  • Personality Map: I feel I ought to warn you that this is potentially QUITE DANGEROUS depending on the sort of person you are – so, er, caveats apply. Basically (and this is speculative based on how I *think* this is working under the hood) you ask this natural language questions about yourself, of the ‘why am I like x?’ or ‘I think y, what does this say about me?’ variety, and in return you get a detailed analysis of WHAT IT MIGHT MEAN. Per the blurb, “PersonalityMap is a platform to help you understand the relationship between “everything and everything” with regard to human psychology. We provide access to over 1 million correlations spanning personality, demographics, behaviors, and beliefs. In addition, we provide a powerful and one-of-a-kind interface for exploring these relationships, allowing you to investigate questions of interest from a variety of angles. PersonalityMap can be used to generate new hypotheses, as well as to refine and confirm (or disconfirm) existing hypotheses. PersonalityMap is powered by an advanced, novel machine-learning algorithm of our own design. While its predictions are not always accurate, in a study testing its accuracy, it outperformed 100% of non-experts and 99% of academic psychologists in predicting correlations.” I feel I need to say upfront here that I do not think you should take ANYTHING this tells you with anything other than a skipload of salt; of course, this may be because I just asked it something (no of course I am not telling you what) and it responded by telling me that it’s likely because I am arrogant and desperate for approval so, well, this can basically fcuk right off as far as I’m concerned (I feel so so so seen).
  • Close Up Photographer of the Year: In part amazing, in part slightly-ruined by seeming-universal excessive HDR application across the board, there are still some lovely images here (but arachnophobes should exercise caution when scrolling, is all).
  • The Elevationists: I am slightly astonished that I’d not previously been aware of the fact that there is an actual, honest-to-goodness ‘Church of Marijuana’ in (of course) North America somewhere – but there is! They call themselves ‘elevationists’! They have an ACTUAL CHURCH, which I presume is permanently hotboxed and soundtracked by a few dozen people ripping bongs (but in really spiritual fashion), and in which you can get married! Despite my slight incredulity this seems…entirely benign, as far as I can tell, and just seems to be an excuse for a bunch of people in Denver who a) like smoking weed a LOT; and b) who identify as ‘spiritual’ in some sort of vague, nondenominational way, to hang out and get blitzed out of their gourds and, well more power to them frankly.

By Lola Gill

NEXT WE HAVE A WHOLE NEW ALBUM BY OLOFF WHO I APPRECIATE MIGHT NOT BE TO EVERYONE’S TASTE BUT WHO I REALLY ENJOY AND WHICH I RECOMMEND YOU CHECK OUT BECAUSE, WHATEVER ELSE IT MIGHT BE, IT IS VERY MUCH ITS OWN THING!

THE SECTION WHICH CANNOT GET THIS POST ABOUT THE NEW US ADMINISTRATION OUT OF ITS HEAD, PT.2:  

  • AI Smut Generator: As any of you who have a website with an associated email address will know, one of the quotidian joys of opening the associated inbox is to see what inventive spam you will have been gifted with (this week’s favourite was a lovely man in China asking if I might be interested in getting into aggregates and heavy machinery and, you know what, there was a brief moment when I was tempted ngl) – most of which tend to be of the ‘Wow! Your site is amaze! How much for mutually beneficial SEO-focused linkjuicing?’ variety. Which is why, when I got an email this week tersely asking me ‘how much for a shoutout on your site?’ I was inclined to ignore it. Until I checked the sender’s email, and realised that it was someone asking to pay me to talk about their AI erotic story generator – so obviously like a moron I replied and said that actually I would probably write about it anyway and there was no need to pay me, because I am a fcuking idiot who is so, so bad at ‘business’ that it actually hurts me. I did, though, warn my interlocutor that he might not like what I had to say. So, let’s see! This is *technically* free to use – although you only get one story credit, so if you want to do more than test it out I think it will start asking you for money – and so I had a play with it the other day, and…look, it’s marginally more sophisticated than a previous iteration of this sort of thing that I featured…what, a year or so ago?, in that you can specify to a quite astonishingly-granular degree the setting, the ‘type’ of encounter you want (nothing awful, that I was able to see at least), names and details of protagonists, etc etc, specify how filthy you want your filth, and BANG, in a few seconds you’ll have 1500 words or so of bespoke wordy bongo! Look, I can’t, obviously, tell you whether this will scratch whatever particular flavour of itch is your favourite, but, on the plus side, it is genuinely filthy, and seems to have a reasonably-coherent grasp of both physicality and in-scene coherence…but, also, honestly, *I* could write better, filthier filth than this and, to be clear, that is very much not the sort of thing I do. It’s just so obviously less good than getting an actual human being to do it for you, and while the pricing is actually…not that bad, I just can’t imagine anyone getting the, er, value out of this that would encourage persistent usage. Pleasingly, though, it does let you access all the OTHER filth people have generated, or at least some of it, so as long as you don’t mind spelunking through the weirdly-sticky and unpleasantly-mucal caverns of a stranger’s sexual imaginings then, well, GOOD ONE!  Also, there is one story on there about urolagnia which is so, so preposterous that it made me laugh out loud on several occasions, so this may not necessarily work for you as an erotic aid but it will almost certainly give you some bellylaughs if you’re reasonably-open-minded. So, er, Ryan, about that payment you mentioned…?
  • The Modern Literary Novel: This site is quite amazing, and I am not wholly certain as to whether it’s the work of a single person – but I *think*it is, which makes it all the more remarkable a body of work. This is an EXHAUSTIVE critical look at literary fiction worldwide – honestly, you cannot even begin to imagine the sheer number of authors and works that the author has read and opined on, from literally all over the globe. I obviously went to the English section because, well, small-island mentality, innit, and a) was delighted by the selection of authors, partly because it immediately irritated me slightly (Alain de fcuking Botton?) which is always a sign that you’re going to find the perspectives *interesting*; and b) then delved into it and was genuinely thrilled to find that this person has some SPICY OPINIONS and is not shy of sharing them. Witness this section on Martin Amis, a writer who I adore but who, equally, I appreciate is not everyone’s cup of tea – I honestly fell in love with the author a bit upon reading this WONDERFUL kicking: “So where does that leave us with Amis? I have covered Money: A Suicide Note and London Fields, despite the fact that both read like watered down early 1980s Norman Mailer (with, perhaps, a bit of Elmore Leonard thrown in) but I really do not think that these are anywhere near as great as some people make them out to be. No doubt we will have to put up with him and his antics for some time to come but there are many better writers to read. And if you want to know more about him, many of the sites below will help you. He was born in 1949, son of Kingsley Amis. He read English at Oxford and worked for the Times Literary Supplement and New Statesman as a literary critic. He had his teeth fixed (expensively, in the USA), trashed Katie Price aka Jordan, a woman of similar talent to his own, and argued with his father. He also wrote some books.” Seriously, this is amazing and if you like books and reading and writing then it’s entirely possible you could lose days to this.
  • Play Tetris inside a PDF: Do not ask why, just accept it and be happy. Is this a fun way of playing Tetris? No. Does it in anyway enhance or improve the base-level game experience? Also no.
  • The Drop: Ooh, it’s been a while since we’ve had a totally-fcuking-bullshit AI Kickstarter, but this one is a particular doozy. The Drop is a pendant which has 10xed its funding goal and so WILL APPARENTLY HAPPEN (there is no way in fcuking hell that this is ever happening), and which is designed to LEVERAGE THE POWER OF AI to, er, enable you to exert a frankly-psychologically-troubling degree of control over your calorific intake. The gimmick is that the pendant is equipped with a camera angled so that, in theory, it will be pointed at the point in your field of vision where a plate would sit while you eat; it recognises food, and will automatically take a picture of said food each time, send that image to The Machine for analysis, and IMMEDIATELY send you a calorie-and-nutrition breakdown of whatever you’re eating via (inevitably) an app. SHALL WE COUNT THE WAYS IN WHICH THIS IS FCUKING BULLSHIT? 1) The camera – do you realise how fcuking annoying it will be to ensure that your food is in-shot every time you eat? And how does it stop itself from just assuming that EVERY SINGLE PLATE OF FOOD that passes through its field of vision is finding its way into you?; 2) The ‘analysis’ – LOOK YOU CANNOT IN ANY WAY MEANINGFULLY ASSESS THE CALORIFIC LOAD OR NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF A PLATE OF FOOD WITH ANY DEGREE OF ACCURACY BASED ON A SINGLE 2D PHOTO FFS IT SIMPLY ISN’T POSSIBLE. Still, thanks to a LOT of idiot wellness fans, it has been willed into existence. Jesus. Also, again, I do not feel that this promotes a…healthy attitude to one’s diet.
  • Sephora Pinball: Would you like to take a small, interlink break to play a quick couple of games of branded pinball courtesy of makeup-peddlers Sephora? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! On the one hand, this is impressively-styled and the integration of the various makeup products into the table mechanics is nicely done from a design point of view; on the other, this is literally LESS GOOD as a game than the free pinball title that you got bundled as a freebie with Windows in the early-90s; like, ffs lads, you could literally just have reskinned that code and made something actually good with replayability potential and ACTUAL BRAND EXPRESSION and instead, well, you just phoned it in, didn’t you? Still, I bet the money was good and so I do, on balance, completely understand.
  • Emergence: Do you remember the height of the NFT/web3 boom and the associated oddity of the ideas floating around? Do you remember all the (inevitably vaporware) projects that were all about BUILDING AN ENTERTAINMENT FRANCHISE/IP ON THE BLOCKCHAIN? All of those DAO-based community projects about ‘collaborative, community storytelling’? That was fun, wasn’t it? And, obviously total fcuking bullshit because a) in the main creating stuff simply doesn’t work that way, and most people aren’t actually very good at building worlds or crafting stories; b) NONE OF IT REQUIRED FCUKING CRYPTO OR WEB3 IN THE FIRST PLACE. And yet despite all this we have seen the appearance of Emergence this week, backed by a BIG NAME HOLLYWOOD WRITER (the guy who wrote the Dark Knight trilogy, should that move you) and which ticks all of the 2021 boxes – look, here’s the summary from Variety because I find this sort of stuff exhausting to parse: “Centered around a white hole in a galaxy, the “Emergence” franchise will feature various storytelling mediums, including podcasts, comics and animations. Built using blockchain AI storytelling platform Story, Incention will launch Goyer’s project to “showcase the potential of this revolutionary model” and “capture mainstream attention while redefining how IP evolves.” “Emergence” will be created by Incention users as well as through its generative AI tool, Atlas, which is designed to serve as a “creative partner” to help with common tasks like aggregating ideas, crafting narratives and generating full videos.” Doesn’t…doesn’t that sound a) fcuking cursed; and b) like you will never, ever hear of this again following that Variety article? Maybe I’m wrong, of course, but the precedents aren’t good. I hope that Mr Goyer has been paid for his involvement in real money rather than forked Ethereum magic beans.
  • The Homosaurus: This is SO interesting – and I say this as a tedious cishet with no particular skin in the gay game – and a wonderful resource for anyone interested in queer culture and history. “The Homosaurus is an international linked data vocabulary of LGBTQ+ terms. Designed to enhance broad subject term vocabularies, the Homosaurus is a robust and cutting-edge thesaurus that advances the discoverability of LGBTQ+ resources and information. The Homosaurus was originally created in 1997 by IHLIA LGBT Heritage as a Dutch and English gay and lesbian thesaurus that was used as a standalone vocabulary to describe their collections. Over time, terms relating to bisexuality, trans, gender, and intersex concepts were added, but not methodically. This original version of the vocabulary (which we refer to as version 0) had an overly flat structure and, due to the lack of connections, terms were too isolated from one another and therefore easily missed. But, it became apparent that a vocabulary developed by an LGBTQ archives to describe LGBTQ resources could be a powerful tool.” Just click on the ‘vocabulary’ list and scroll down, and learn about such fascinating concepts as ‘intersex witches’. God people are fascinating.
  • The Spiralator: Are Spirographs still a thing for people growing up in modernity, or have they been consigned to the oubliette that also holds Spangles? Presuming you know what a spirograph is (and if you don’t, feast your eyes), this is a digital version of one – fiddle with all the parameters (plotter width, various options in terms of radius, colours, etc etc) and then see what wonderful geometric spirals emerge. Ok, fine, that’s literally all you can do with this – but, equally, take a look at the gallery because people have been making some rather beautiful designs, should you wish to potentially feel inspired.
  • Sequencer: Yes, I know, browser-based sequencer tools are OLD NEWS and you have seen millions of them (and me? How many do you think *I’ve* seen? I HAVE SEEN QUANTITIES OF WEBSITES YOU LITERALLY CANNOT BEGIN TO CONCEIVE OF), but this one is slightly different in that you can switch between two-dozen-ish different scales and see how each alters the tone of the sequence you’ve coded. Which might not be interesting to anyone who actually understands music, but if you’re like me and you genuinely have no idea what ‘pentatonic’ or ‘ionian’ means in terms of sound then it’s honestly eye-opening and really quite fascinating.
  • Exotic Animal Photo Repository: On the one hand, I like the fact that this exists very much indeed; on the other, the fact that the people who created it feel the need for its existence is incredibly fcuking troubling from the point of view of exactly what we’re doing to our increasingly-fragile-looking knowledge space – per the blurb, “This website exists to be a repository of image references for accurately identified animal species. In recent years, major image repositories like Arkive have gone offline, and generative AI has polluted the utility and accuracy of search engine results.  This site is the result of a decade of travel and photography at zoos, sanctuaries, and other facilities holding wild and exotic animal collections in North America. All animal identification to species and subspecies level is as accurate as possible and based on facility signage. As these images are presented for reference purposes, some are blurry or have distortions from glass/fencing visible. These were included intentionally: the reference material is still valuable even if the photography isn’t perfect.”  BONUS IMAGE LINK: this is a decent search engine for public domain images, should you require one.
  • Nested:Despite this being from 2011, I have never in fact featured it in Curios – which, frankly, is a travesty, as this is an absolute all-time piece of webwork by the mysterious Orteil (“some European dude who likes to make toys and games out of javascript”). I don’t really want to tell you too much, other than that literally everything in the universe is in here (I am sort-of not joking) and that you will feel a steadily-mounting sense of amazement as you work out what is going on and how deep this goes.
  • Design Your Own Lacoste: On the one hand, this site by Lacoste, which lets you customise one of its shirts in a frankly-astonishing number of different styles and with a truly impressive degree of granular control, is probably the best variant on the whole ‘brand lets you create your own bespoke tees/trainers/whatever’ thing I’ve ever seen – seriously, the power of the design tools here is genuinely surprising and the UX/UI is really very well done in deed; on the other, what’s the point of this if you can’t then order the designs, or vote on ones that you would like see put into production? It feels like it’s missing a step here, but perhaps I’m just being entitled. Check out the gallery to get a feeling of what you can achieve with this, there are some really rather nice designs here.
  • Subpixel Snake: Someone’s made a version of Snake that’s so small it requires a microscope to play. No, I don’t know either.
  • Order Up: A non-Wordle-like daily game! Each day you’re given a list of things and are asked to put them in order based on a specific instruction or clue within a set number of tries. This is *just* challenging enough to be interesting, although I have occasionally found its selfish insistence on being culturally North American an annoyance (this is not its fault, to be clear).
  • Collections: Our final game of the week is this one, a fun, moderately-involved daily word puzzle – each day there are three words for you to guess, and each day those three words will be linked by a category. Your job is to guess the category while attaining the highest points total you can – you lose points by ‘buying’ letters as you try and guess the three words, for wrong guesses at the connection, etc etc, and there’s a pleasing tension between needing more information and not wanting to spend your precious points determining whether that letter’s an ‘A’ or an ‘E’. I like this, but, full disclosure, I am annoyingly and embarrassingly sh1t at it which made me quit in slight disgust the other day. You, though, are probably significantly less stupid than I am.

By Javier Mayoral

SADEAGLE HAS BLESSED YOU WITH ANOTHER MIX ALL THE WAY FROM CORNWALL AND FULL OF EXCELLENT WEIRD RECORDS YOU ALMOST CERTAINLY DON’T KNOW BUT WHICH I AM FAIRLY CERTAIN YOU WILL ENJOY IMMODERATELY! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Look Caitlin: I have absolutely no clue what this is or where I found it this week, and in fact I have literally no recollection of seeing it before this morning which means that either a) it appeared magically in the Curios linkdump at some point, transported there by some sort of hopefully-benign force; or b) I was very drunk when I found it. Let’s all just hope it’s the former. Anyway, no idea what this is or why it exists but there is a STRONG AESTHETIC at play in the selection of images here which I appreciate.
  • A Few Things, Maybe Several Things: People tend to fall into three camps; people who have no fcuking clue who The Mountain Goats are, people who think they are the singularly-most-irritating musical act in the world, and people who would probably read John Darnielle’s shopping lists as artistic practice. I’m, obviously, in the third camp (can I take a moment to also recommend his superb novel Wolf In White Van from a few years back, which really is beautiful) (and which reminded me slightly of Gary Brecht’s ‘Pleasant Hell’, which seeing as I’m here I will also recommend to you). Anyway, this is a Tumblr featuring 300 words about every single Mountain Goats song ever, which, well, for some of you may well help you achieve apotheosis.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Why Northern England is Poor: Typically-fascinating writing and analysis by Tom Forth who lays out his (in-progress; I get the feeling he’s developing this over time) thesis as to the origins for the economic disparity that exists between the North and South of England, covering historical, social, economic and political factors (and giving you a nice explanation about Thatcher’s involvement that’s slightly-more-nuanced than ‘that milk-stealing b1tch’ (which, to be clear, we’re still entirely-entitled to call her). In a week in which significant, transformative development was again planned in the South (Heathrow, ‘the new Silicon Valley’ lol), this feels particularly germane. It’s quite hard to read this and not get quite…annoyed, not least at the utter facility and emptiness of the  ‘leveling up’ agenda bandied about by that last shower of cnuts, a pox on all their houses forever.
  • How Much Economic Growth Can We Expect From AI?: Ok, so this is, er, VERY LONG and VERY ECONOMICS-Y and not exactly a light read – BUT it is also hugely-interesting if you’re in any way curious about some of the actual projections behind all the assumptions being made around how AI is somehow magically going to ‘sort the economy’ (lol no), and if you’re either in a position where this sort of stuff matters to you professionally or simply someone who ‘likes talking about economics’ (weirdo) then this is worth a skim. I’m not going to try and offer you some sort of pat summary because, well, it’s more complicated than that, but I like how factual and analytical the piece is, and that it contains paragraphs like this which neatly sum up how I broadly feel about this sort of thing: “The fundamental thesis—that AI research output will be automated; that humanity will create ‘superintelligent’ systems; and that AI systems will do science that create greater and faster technological progress than humans could ever have done—will be borne out in the fullness of time. But this vision has to make contact with reality, and reality can act as a weird breaking mechanism: Meta wants to build AGI, but they couldn’t use a nuclear power plant for their datacentre, because of some rare bees.” NB – this was written pre-DeepSeek, but I don’t think that it materially changes the scope and direction of the points made, although would affect some of the ‘cost’ elements of the equation.
  • Deepseek Isn’t A Victory for AI Sceptics: I’m going to bundle all the DeepSeek stuff in here because, well, I can’t imagine that many of you give anything resembling a fcuk. First up is James O’Malley writing about how, as I mentioned uptop, all the people initially gleefully going “LOL THE BUBBLE IS OVER” were possibly not in fact correct (I have written before about the fact that a significant proportion of the ‘it’s all lies! The tech is useless! It’s all going to fail like NFTs!’ people are increasingly subject to audience capture by people who are increasingly paying them to keep saying stuff like that regardless of how accurate it is, because cope); I like this because it is clear, easy to read and understand, and makes exactly the same points that I would have done were I a more serious and cogent thinker who wrote proper essays rather than sh1t like whatever this is. ADDITIONAL LINK: Ben Thompson gives his take, which is drier and techier but basically ends up in roughly the same place. ONE MORE ADDITIONAL LINK: this is good, by Curios favourite Ethan Mollick, on use cases for the various models as of the now (DeepSeek’s not on there, but, honestly, we’re now at a point where they all do more or less the same stuff (multimodality excepted).
  • Capital Haves vs Capability Havers: I really like the framing here, but utterly disagree with the way it is then deployed. Still, it’s an interesting read – Lars Doucet effectively divides people in the future into ‘capability havers’ and ‘capital havers’, and suggests that the gradual insertion of AI into every aspect of our lives is likely to improve the lot of ‘capability havers’ (people good at working with The Machine) while slightly-diminishing the importance and impact of ‘capital havers’ (because simply having lots of cash is less of a lever in a world in which we all have access to The Machine). Which, to be clear, I think is interesting – and I like the capability/capital thing – but ends up in an entirely wrong place. I’d be inclined to think of it more in this way: 1) capital havers will continue to be in a position of extreme power because of entrenched wealth inequalities, networks and the freedom said capital grants you to live an occasionally-machine-free life; 2) capability havers of a certain type and quality will do well (say, the top decile of any given profession) will do well, because the capital havers will value a certain calibre of human expertise and as such will reward that with a share of said capital; 3) EVERYONE ELSE IS FCUKED IN HALF. I can plot that for you on a two-by-two matrix if you like.
  • Live With The AI Glasses: An interesting hands-on (on-face?) writeup of the current consumer-ready iteration of Meta’s A/XR glasses (the ones actually on sale now, not the scifi prototypes they showed off last year) – as with a lot of this tech, there’s a degree of ‘yes, but what is this for?’ coupled with ‘it’s not good enough yet to quite do the things you can tell it would be good at’, but I think there’s enough here to suggest that my personal thesis (should you inexplicably care what I think, that A/XR glasses are going to be mainstream by 2035 – and if I am stupid and ill enough to still be doing this in a decade’s time (lol like I am going to reach my mid-50s, like fcuk mate) then feel free to remind me of how wrong I was and also what a loser I am for still writing this fcuking thing) is still going to come true.
  • AI and Fake News: The Chinese View: You’ll have to write-click and get this in-browser translated (unless, obviously, you actually speak Chinese, which is of course entirely possible), but it’s a piece from China looking at the problem of AI misinformation, etc. It won’t tell you anything that won’t have occurred to you before, it it was interesting to me because a) in a country the size of China with such wildly-divergent levels of education and hence media literacy the potential effects of this stuff are…wild, potentially; and b) because it specifically calls out ‘old people who are sh1t at the internet’ as a specific at-risk class for this stuff, which is the sort of honesty I wish we saw more of in the UK because FCUK ME are there a lot of people out there right now of middle age and older (and also, astonishingly and depressingly, some younger people too) who may ‘use’ the web but who literally haven’t got the faintest fcuking idea how to evaluate a source (I think it’s fair to say we’ve seen…ample evidence of that since 2014ish).
  • Gen Z Life: Do YOU want a bunch of (actually pretty good, honest) research about GenZ and what they THINK AND FEEL AND LOVE AND HATE? Great! This is, I think, a US study, but I also think that there’s probably enough commonality in the lived experience of younger people in the anglophone west to make it applicable to UK kids as well, at least a bit. Anyway, I enjoyed this because it very clearly says ‘NO GENERATION IS A MONOLITH AND TALKING ABOUT THEM AS SUCH IS STUPID’ which, well, it is. Also it basically acknowledges the edges of GenZ latent space as basically being ‘sesh gremlin’, ‘hypercapitalist’, ‘bedrot’ and ‘woke’, which feels about right.
  • Being Mean Is Back: If you’re yet to read this superb longread by Brock Colyar, on their experience of hanging out at the election parties with the young MAGA crew, then you MUST – it’s…I mean, it’s fcuking horrible, to be clear, a sort of distillation of the sorts of attitudes and demeanours and behaviours that I remember incredibly clearly from a certain type of post-Neil Strauss forum culture in the early-00s and the ‘fratire’ boom, an inherent…frattishness (sorry, I appreciate that’s probably an annoying reference if you’ve not seen the Greek system close up at any point, but it fits), but it also made me once again think that I am totally right about the ‘80s at highspeed’ thing of the next 4 years because MAN some of the language used in this piece flashed me right back (in a bad way). The way in which Colyar is referred to by several interlocutors in this, by the way, is genuinely chilling, in a ‘hm, part of me wonders whether they viewed this person as entirely human’ way – “She also called me a “man in lipstick,” though I wasn’t wearing any. Later, when introducing me to Sinclair, she said, “He’s a queer. But a friendly one.””. I mean, fcuking hell though.
  • The Goon-To-Fash-Pipeline: This is slight, and I considered not including it, but I was so taken (read: bleakly intrigued to the point it started to sound weirdly-not-implausible) by this that I felt compelled to share it with you: “apps are working together to further push men to the right by rendering them porn-addled, socially awkward and isolated. This formula, his theory goes, will make men more misogynistic; embittered by their inability to form relationships with women yet still sexually objectifying them, they will then become conservative in order to gain more control over women. “There’s a direct pipeline from gooning, to conservative podcasts, to the Fourth Reich,”” NB – IF YOU ARE STILL PURE ENOUGH NOT TO KNOW WHAT GOONING MEANS THEN UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES UNDERTAKE ANY SEARCHES THAT MAY JEOPARDISE THAT PURITY.
  • Reactionary Decarbonisation: Part of me feels somewhat bad and doomer-ish (lol!) sharing links like this; on the other hand, though, I think it’s increasingly important that people be aware quite how much of large corporate talk (and indeed ‘action’) around the climate emergency and What They Are Doing About It is, put simply, fcuking bullsh1t. In particular this examines why the ‘carbon capture’ and ‘carbon management’ industries are, when examined closely, are basically environmental indulgences, reputational figleaves for big polluters to completely fail to change their business practices in favour of spending less money doing something they can pretend is making a difference. Don’t think too hard about what this means!
  • Who Is Sophie Cress?: This is a great story, and taps a whole ‘weird side-effects of AI’ thing that I hadn’t even begun to consider. Ashley Abram is a journalist who found herself one day approached by one Sophie Cress, putting themselves forward as a potential spokesperson for a story – except, when Abram investigated a bit more, there were a few things about Cress that didn’t quite seem to add up…and when she looked more closely, it became apparent that it Miss Cress was…unlikely to be a real person who actually exists. Did you have ‘AI-generated experts shilling for sextoy brands and polluting actual journalism’ on your AI apocalypse bingo card for 2025? No, me neither, but this is a properly fascinating development – oh, and as to the ‘why’, it’s an automated SEO/backlink play (SEO continues to demonstrate it’s one of the worst industries to have been created by the web, hands-down).
  • Cozy Games: This is SO nicely done and really ought to win all sorts of awards for the team at Reuters that put it all together – this is a piece all about the phenomenon of ‘cosy games’ (cf Animal Crossing, Stardew Valley, etc etc) which will tell you literally nothing new whatsoever if you know the first thing about videogames BUT which also is a sort-of interactive cosy game in and of itself, courtesy of some very impressive scrollytelling (yes, I know it’s a horrible word but it’s not my fcuking fault we have singularly failed to come up with a better term for this since Snowfall all those many years ago) and some equally-impressively-integrated little interactive dialogue and graphical elements. This is SO well-made, honestly, and utterly charming in its design.
  • The Strange and Resistant Appeal of Affluent Millennial Design: You will know the style that this piece is talking about pretty much within 3cm of scrolling – it’s about design and branding and that very particular flat aesthetic that took over in the era of the Airbnbisation of everything c.20..14ish? Anyway, this is a Blackbird Spyplane post which will either commend it to you entirely or make you skip over, your call.
  • How Private Equity Took Over Your Nursery: This is a London-focused piece, but I would be amazed if this sort of thing won’t be happening anywhere with a problematically-mercantile childcare provision setup. This is excellent journalism by Joshi Hermann at The Londoner, and yet another example of what I have been saying to anyone dumb enough to listen to me for about 15 years now, to whit that PRIVATE EQUITY IS FCUKING CANCER. I particularly liked the quote in there from the woman who WORKS in Private Equity who says something like ‘no, actually PE is a force for good in the world…but, er, I don’t actually want it anywhere near my kids’ education, thanks’ which I think is just a tiny bit telling.
  • Theme Song Earnings: The numbers in this Rolling Stone piece are absolutely insane – the Barenaked Ladies basically say that they earned somewhere in the region of $100m+ from doing the themesong to The Big Band Theory. I’d like, by comparison, to know how many rounds at the Dogstar Alabama 3 got for the Sopranos theme.
  • Amiga Hardcore: This is simultaneously some of the best and some of the worst music you will ever hear in your life, and I sort-of love it with all my heart. “Commodore International’s introduction of the Amiga in the mid-‘80s marked a shift towards home computers being seen as a vehicle for creativity and entertainment. Initially written off by the general public as “game machines,” due to developers’ emphasis on graphics and sound, Amigas gradually began gaining popularity among artists and enthusiasts in the demoscene, a subculture devoted to crafting short-form audiovisual pieces and entering them in competitions. By the early ‘90s, then-dated Amigas had become the catalyst for a new wave of transgressive hardcore techno and breakbeat that reveled in a lo-fi, homespun sound—a reaction to the explosion of more commercial hardcore that was being made with newer software.” This piece contains some interviews and some words, but more importantly a LOT of embedded songs which go quite unbelievably hard.
  • Innit Innit Boys: An absolutely wonderful piece in the Guardian about how British Nigerians growing up in the 80s and 90s fell in love with, and found identity through, Nigerian footballers coming into English football and showcased at world cups, and how football can be so vital to diaspora communities whether in the UK or elsewhere. “The children, born or raised here, have grown affectionate for the place we have learned to call home. In London as the years passed, we have celebrated births and birthdays and buried those lost. Some have started new families, bringing a second generation of British-Nigerians into the world. We worked our first jobs and found our first loves here, built a continued sense of kinship and connection, until eventually, if you are like me, arriving at a point where London feels more like home than anywhere else. The Nigerian population in London has continued to grow. The 2021 census counted 266,877 Nigerian-born residents in Britain, a number not accounting for their children and relatives born here. It is thought to be the largest Black population in Britain, with a presence in nearly every borough of the capital. The football leagues across London reflect this dynamic: British-Nigerians turning out for clubs across the city, chasing Premier League pipedreams.”
  • Day 1509 In The Big Brother House: A beautiful little essay in the Fence by Gary Grimes, talking about finding community and friends and himself in the threads of the Big Brother fan forums in the late-00s, logging on from his bedroom in Ireland and spinning fantasies of who he was and wanted to be to his fellow BB obsessives; if you’ve ever been part of any sort of online community (particularly if the messageboard/forum format is familiar to you) this will be hugely evocative; aside from anything else it’s just a lovely bit of coming-of-age writing (although, personally, I was slightly disappointed by the lack of specific BB callbacks).
  • The Future Is Too Easy: I am increasingly…bored, I think, of ‘TECH IS BAD AND THE PEOPLE WHO RUN IT ARE BAD’ articles – not because I disagree, but because, well, yes, and? What exactly is your 4,000 word treatise on ‘websites and apps are now rubbish and they used to be better’ going to add to the discourse that doesn’t already exist within it? This, though, while ploughing a similar furrow is significantly more entertaining, not least because the author is writing about their time at CES and I am always a sucker for some trade show reportage. Also, it is very funny in places, and this is an opening paragraph I like so much I am actively jealous of it: “There is something unstable at the most basic level about any space with too much capitalism happening in it. The air is all wrong, there’s simultaneously too much in it and not enough of it. Everyone I spoke to about the Consumer Electronics Show before I went to it earlier this month kept describing it in terms that involved wetness in some way. I took this as a warning, which I believe was the spirit in which it was intended, but I felt prepared for it. Your classically damp commercial experiences have a sort of terroir to them, a signature that marks a confluence of circumstances and time- and place-specific appetites; I have carried with me for decades the peculiar smell, less that of cigarette smoke than cigarette smoke in hair, that I remember from a baseball card show at a Ramada Inn that I attended as a kid. Only that particular strain of that particular kind of commerce, at that moment, gave off that specific distress signal. It was the smell of a living thing, and the dampness in the (again, quite damp) room was in part because that thing was breathing, heavily.”
  • Rich Stein: John Merrick writes in Vittles – I hope you can access this, because it really is great – about English celebrity chef Rick Stein and his weirdness, and his dad, and this is just beautiful, honestly, and made me cry a little at the end.
  • I Think People Are Perverts: Ok, this is NOT FOR EVERYONE, but should you be interested in reading an 11,000 word treatise on Ethel Cain’s latest album, David Lynch, the nature of art, the nature of the experience of art, the nature of criticism, architecture, structuralism and a whole bunch of other stuff too. I think you can probably work out based on that whether or not you want to read it, but I thought it was excellent and interesting throughout, fwiw.
  • Norman Foster: Our final longread of the week is this absolutely superb profile of Norman Foster in the New Yorker, which benefits from every single inch of the space it’s given. SO SO SO GOOD, honestly, I cannot tell you how excellent a piece of profile writing this is and how much I promise you will enjoy it. CLICK AND READ.

By PicPicZo

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 24/01/25

Reading Time: 36 minutes

Had you missed this? The feeling of being basically sandblasted in the face by a sort of fecal whirlwind? WE’RE SO BACK BABY! You know those photos they always release at the end of a storied leader’s tenure showing the ageing effect the weight of office has had on them? Well imagine what WE’RE going to look like after four years of this; perhaps it’s time for me to consider preventative botox and maybe having my tearducts sealed up.

Anyway, last week’s Curios apparently contained ONE LINK that Google didn’t like, meaning that I think it got spamghettoed and so literally three of you will have seen it. I know, you don’t care, but it was a good one and you can read it here should you so wish.

I have no idea whether that will have utterly-fcuked the deliverability of this sh1tshow in perpetuity, but, well, it’s not like I write this for you fcukers anyway so wevs.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are very much appreciated, whatever I may in fact say to the contrary.

  

No idea when this is from or who made it, but it’s via Feuilleton

THIS IS A BRILLIANT MIX OF APHEX TWIN TRACKS AND MIXES PUT TOGETHER BY THE FABULOUSLY-NAMED DJ SALIVA WHICH I RECOMMEND UNRESERVEDLY!

THE SECTION WHICH HAS BECOME SOMEWHAT UNCOMFORTABLE AT THE AMOUNT OF TIME IT SEEMS TO SPEND WISHING GENUINE, TRANSFORMATIVE HARM ON THE WORLD’S SUPER-RICH, PT.1:  

  • The Shardcore Inquisition: Generative models don’t have a personality, however much it might be tempting to project one onto them when they do such a convincing job of spitting out words in human-sounding chunks; they do, though, as a result of the weightings and training data and Weird Ineffable Maths Sh1t (this is the technical term) going on under the hood, have different ‘tendencies’ when it comes to the way in which they will respond to certain queries and the pre-prompting that’s going on under the hood to guardrail, shape and limit their outputs – but how do these tendencies express themselves? And how do the models differ in terms of their sense of ‘self’? If you ask them who they are, what do they tell you? You, of course, may never have given a flying fcuk about questions such as these, but Shardcore is weird and very much has – hence this, a new work from him in which he’s basically ‘interviewed’ a selection of the most popular LLMs (ChatGPT, Llama, Claude, Gemini and some other open source variant) to see how their responses to the same questions about ‘who they are’ and how they ‘see’ or ‘think of’ themselves (they don’t think and they don’t see, obvs, but you appreciate that describing this stuff quickly gets tricky if you try and stick to the strictly factual). Each LLM is posed a series of interview questions – the resulting answers have been matched to an AI-generated face, with an AI-generated voice, using some (occasionally-questionable) AI-lipsyncing software, so the resulting work is a series of short films in which you get to hear the machine tell you what it ‘thinks’ (doesn’t think) it is. This is FASCINATING – the differences in tone and ‘awareness’ between the models really are quite eye-opening, not least the variance between Claude’s stark, joyless insistence that it’s just code, whatever us silly meatsacks might want to project. and that frankly all these silly games are beneath it, compared with Llama’s frankly-unsettling self-image as…I don’t know, it’s either VERY MACHO or VERY TOM OF FINLAND, but it definitely likes to think of itself as ‘something of a bad boy’ (is this the masculine energy of which you spake, Mark?). As always with this stuff, if your knee-jerk reaction to anything involving The Machine is to recoil in horror from the slop then, well, maybe don’t – this is genuinely conceptually interesting and it’s a good example of the possibilities afforded to art and artists by AI beyond ‘machine make picture good!’ which seems to be about the extent of the ambition being deployed in this space at the moment. If nothing else then I look forward to this being revisited in a couple of years time to see how the machine’s sense of self (there is no sense, there is no ‘self’!) evolves.
  • Des & Beth: This should be in the video section to be honest, but I can’t find it as anything other than an embed on Reddit so, well, I’m putting it here instead. Every now and again I feel compelled to post the latest, best example of ‘machine-made video’ in here and ‘Des & Beth’ is by quite a long chalk the high-watermark of the medium so far. It’s a short film telling the story of two people meeting for a blind date in a cafe, and the highest compliment I can give it is to say that…I would probably watch the next one. Which, I know, doesn’t sound like much, but this has CHARACTERS and PLOT (and, I am pretty certain, is entirely human-written – this feels like the script and shot composition were written by someone with a passing knowledge of ‘how short films work’ and ‘how normal people speak’, things which tend not to be the case when you let The Machine take on the direction duties) and it made me…almost sort-of laugh on a couple of occasions, which, again, faint praise, but still. As for the quality of the video – yeah, ok, if you were to see this scrolling past on your phone you probably wouldn’t be able to immediately tell this is AI – there’s minimal weirdness, scenes are largely coherent, and it doesn’t even have the giveaway sheen of machine that characterises so much of the rest of this stuff. Obviously there’s minimal info on workflow and time taken to create, but…honestly, this is pretty fcuking good. Which, obviously, will make quite a few of you feel very ill indeed, and I completely understand why – I am choosing to see this as a wonderful opportunity to diminish the distance between ‘I have an idea but no technical chops’ and ‘oh look I have made something!’ rather than another nail being hammered into the coffin of the creative industries, but, equally, I appreciate that it does *sound* quite a lot like a nail. Sorry.
  • Better Without AI: As an antidote to the previous too links which I appreciate will have possibly left something of a sour taste in the mouths of the more anti-AI amongst you, Better Without AI is a WHOLE BOOK (in website form) all about how you, me and everyone we know can work to protect and guard against some of the potentially-negative impacts of the technology. Per the blurb, “This book is about overlooked risks—not malevolent robots, but “moderate apocalypses,” which could result from recent and near- future technologies. AI systems we cannot understand are already making major social and cultural decisions for us…Can we get the benefits of technological breakthroughs without succumbing to the risks? This book explains seven practical actions we can take to guard against disasters…The most important questions are not about technology but about us. What sort of future would you like? How might AI help get us there? What is its role in that world? What is your own role in helping that happen?”. You can read the full text of the book on the website, broken down by chapter, along with a bunch of supplementary materials and essays (you can also get it as a free ebook should you so desire) – I confess to only having skimmed it, but the bits I read were interesting and well-composed enough for me to recommend it to you here. That said (sorry sorry sorry) I also think there’s something a *bit* Cnut-like about things like this – I mean, lads, while I admire your endeavour I’m not entirely sure that some well-meaning ‘thinking about stuff’ is going to do much to deter the great mulching machine of global capitalism from deciding that the only way to solve the ‘growth problem’ is to maximise efficiencies everywhere as hard as possible using The Machine. Still, nice to dream! BONUS ANTI-AI LINK!: if you’re a Google user who’s not enjoyed seeing its own AI product being shoehorned into every single fcuking corner of the GSuite experience (I AM A FUNCTIONAL FCUKING ADULT AND I CAN READ MY OWN EMAILS STOP INFANTILISING ME FFS) then you can install this Chrome extension to neatly banish it from the interface.
  • Fcuk The Crawlers: OK, this is TECHNICAL and you will need to know what you’re doing if you want to fcuk with it, but, equally, if you’re a site owner and you would like to not just put guardrails up against AI scraping but also to DO SOME HARM to The Machine then you might find this interesting. The short explanation is ‘there’s some code here that if you deploy it to your site will basically trap any AI crawlers attempting to scrape it in some sort of infinite labyrinthine recursive loop of reloading webpages’ (this is, at best, an…incomplete attempt to tell you how it works, but I hope you’ll forgive me what with my being a pretty much total luddite) – you can read more on the homepage should you feel like sticking it to The Man and The Machine at the same time.
  • TrumpCoin: I’ve been slightly surprised at the lack of coverage of this – I mean, fine, there’s a LOT GOING ON, but I thought perhaps that the staggeringly overt corruption on display here might have merited more than a few headlines completely misunderstanding the play here. In case you’re not aware, ahead of his official inauguration Trump launched a new memecoin – $TRUMP, obvs! – which, while the website is VERY CLEAR is not an investment vehicle, was obviously immediately bought up and traded by all the usual parties, the grifters and the juicers and the inevitable mooks, flared in value before inevitably crashing…but that’s not the story here! The story is that THIS IS A MECHANISM THAT ALLOWS POTENTIALLY VAST SUMS OF MONEY TO BE DONATED IN LARGELY-UNTRACEABLE FASHION TO OSTENSIBLY THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD. Does this sound like democracy? It doesn’t, does it?
  • The Richard Mille Art Prize 2024: I confess to having been entirely ignorant of both Richard Mille and the art prize that bears its brandname – turns out (you may all already have been aware of this, so please excuse my ignorance) that it’s a company that makes VERY FANCY watches of the sort worn by people who (I have gone on quite an elaborate internal journey about the RM customer while I wait for the kettle to boil just now, so indulge me if you will) like to describe themselves as ‘work hard, play hard’, quite possibly own multiple sportscars (but possibly the electric versions because, you know, they care) and several gilets, and the art prize is awarded in conjunction with the Louvre (but the nouveau Middle Eastern outpost rather than the Parisian one) based on…oh, look, Christ knows, this isn’t really about the art is it? It’s about MONEY! Lovely shiny money! And the website very much reflects that – it’s SO SHINY, with lovely CG depictions of the works which you can explore and zoom around and learn about, and the interface really is lovely – it’s sort of a classic ‘scroll to explore’ walk through a virtual gallery space, but the animations and interstitial flourishes are very nicely done indeed. The work? The work is…the work is exactly the sort of work which I would imagine winning an art prize sponsored by a luxury timepiece manufacturer and hosted by a plutocrats’ culturewashing exercise, honestly, but it’s all VERY PRETTY.
  • Wikienigma: It’s unfortunate that, despite being in many respects a largely-terrible person who has been implicated in some of North America’s greatest foreign policy fcukups of the 20thC, Donald Rumsfeld was *also* responsible for the ‘known unknowns’ speech, which, honestly, remains my favourite and most-cogent explanation of different states of knowledge and uncertainty (I am not joking). So to Wikienignma, an EXCELLENT website which exists to document ‘known unknowns’ – things where we know the question but have no idea as to the answer. There are over 1100 entries here – as you might expect, they tend strongly towards the scientific/mathematical and so as a result I basically understand about 17% of the words on the website; that said, even if, like me, you’re crippled by scientific ignorance, it’s impossible not to find some of these things just FASCINATING – just now I have learned about Mustatils, 7,000 year-old structures which litter the ruins of ancient Saudi Arabia and Jordan in their thousands and which NOONE KNOWS WHY, and that noone can really do the maths that explains why things wrinkle in the way they do, and, seriously, my life is richer as a result (do not, please, speculate as to what thin gruel it must be to have been so improved).
  • SkinGPT: Ok, look, literally the only reason I’m including this link is because of the utter bodyhorror induced in me by the product name – SKINGPT FFS IT IS SO HORRIBLE SO UTTERLY WRONG. Ahem. Anyway, SkinGPT (ugh ugh ugh) is virtual tech which promises to let the cosmetics industry ‘demonstrate’ the effects of its products on people by taking a photo of them and then ‘AI-ing’ (technical term) the image to demonstrate how much better-looking your dermis will be if you spend several thousand pounds on squalene to rub into it. I confess to being hugely skeptical of both the tech here and of what the practical difference is between this and just applying a layer to a photo (THE DIFFERENCE IS AI! AI! MAGICAL AI!) and, in all honesty, I think it’s probably all total fcuking bollocks but, well, SKINGPT!
  • Wokeipedia: I believe this is created and maintained by Ian Betteridge – one of that small, storied group of people who will forever live on as a LAW OF THE INTERNET, which is something I confess to being pathetically-envious of – so, well, THANKS IAN! Wokeipedia, as you may be able to glean from the name, is an ongoing compendium of things that have been decried as ‘woke’ in the media – a selection of examples from recent days include dinosaurs, recycling plastic, films, sign language and trains. I enjoy this, and it made me chuckle in places, but, equally, it’s hard not to feel a bit dispirited by the sheer witless mundanity of the worldview here presented when you see it massed like this – more than anything it’s just astonishing that this bullsh1t has been happening for…Jesus, the best part of a fcuking decade, and these headlines are still running. WHY? WHO FOR? Actually we can answer those, can’t we? FFS.
  • Propagandopolis: Ok, so technically this is a shop that sells the posters it displays on the website – BUT! You don’t actually have to buy anything (although, obviously, should you wish to then I am sure the site’s owners would be grateful) and so I feel happy to recommend this as a general ‘interesting thing to explore’. Would YOU like to spelunk through an archive of some many hundreds, if not thousands, of old propaganda posters from all over the globe? I don’t know! I have no idea who you are or what you’re into, and your inner life is a constant source of mystery and confusion to me! But, if you do, then this site will make you very happy – I had quite a weird sensation looking through these that soon it’s going to be impossible to know when looking at materials such as these online whether or not they’re original or whether they’re AI-generated, which was such a horrible thought that I had to do and walk around my living room humming happy songs to clear my head. Hey ho!
  • Subways of Europe: Who doesn’t love an exploration of the underground transportation networks of some of Europe’s major cities? NO FCUKER, etc! Subways of Europe is, as the beautifully-staid ‘about’ copy puts it, a celebration of those cities which have ‘a picturesque as well as historically interesting underground transportation network to explore’. The photos are very much of the ‘architectural’ variety (or at least the ones I’ve looked at are) – denuded of people but beautifully-lit, and focusing on stonework and tiling and atria and all that sort of thing. I am, honestly, not generally interested in trains or anything like that, but there’s something fascinating about the different approaches to urban transit design employed by different cities. Also, man is Rome’s underground shoddy.
  • TrueFood: WEB CURIOS DISCLAIMER: I personally think that the current furore ovew ‘highly processed foods’ is a bit faddish and driven by one or two personally-motivated celebrity nutritionists who are doing very well out of this particular moral panic thankyouverymuchindeed. That said, I appreciate you may have DIFFERENT VIEWS (why? Just borrow mine, I barely use them, honestly) and as such might find this site interesting – TrueFood is a US site which basically takes in a LOT of information from various public sources about ingredients used in widely-available North American foodstuffs and offers them here for your perusal, so you can compare various products and brands to see how they stack up in terms of their use of polysyllabic chemical constituents. “TrueFood is a user-friendly interface designed to unveil the degree of processing of food products, powered by GroceryDB, a comprehensive database. GroceryDB is part of a research project that provides the data and methodologies necessary to quantify food processing and analyze ingredient structures within the U.S. food supply. By integrating large-scale data on food composition with machine learning, TrueFood offers valuable insights into the current state of food processing in the U.S. grocery landscape, highlighting distributions of food processing scores and the variability in product offerings across different grocery stores.” There’s something interesting about the way it presents ingredients and lays out the information which I think is worth looking at even if you couldn’t give half a fcuk about whether or not you’re more hydrogenated fats than man.
  • The Letterform Archive: OH MY GOD if you like print, type, layout design, fonts and any and all of that stuff then this is a fcuking GOLDMINE. SO MUCH TO BROWSE! SO MUCH INSPIRATION! Honestly, it’s quite tempting just to take 10 minutes out this morning and just have a gentle browse of these because there is some WONDERFUL work on there, and I say that as someone who, as a general rule, has all the design/aesthetic sensibility of Helen Keller.
  • FingerDama: A Kickstarter! A fully-funded Kickstarter that you can back with no fear of it failing! Kendama, apparently is an ancient Japanese toy/game thing that basically involves a cup, a ball, a string, and you attempting to introduce one to the other via your SKILL and DEXTERITY – this version is basically that, but rendered miniature so that it can be played with one hand wherever you go. The reason I’m including this, basically, is because it feels like fidget spinners rebranded for the age of horrors, and there’s a small chance that you could become PLUTOCRATICALLY RICH by bulk-buying these now and then selling them to a DESPERATE MARKET around Christmastime (NB this is obviously a stupid idea and I don’t mean it and will accept no responsibility should any of you be foolish enough to actually pursue it) (although if you do and make bank then, well, REMEMBER WHERE YOU HEARD IT FIRST YOU INGRATES).
  • Joan Ocean Dolphin Connection: Do you remember famously-difficult and almost-completely-obscure 90s videogame Ecco the Dolphin? Remember how it was basically a story about dolphins sort of protecting us from extraterrestrial threats via the medium of, er, messing about underwater? Well I feel Joan Ocean, whoever she may be, very much enjoyed the vibe of that game because MY GOD does this website channel some strong ‘new age crystal healing’ energy – I don’t really want to write too much here because this really does have to be experienced to be believed, but I would like to draw your attention to a couple of things: 1) there is a menu on the left whose navigation options include ‘whales’, ‘dolphins’ and, er, ‘sasquatch’; 2) there is a link somewhere on the page to Joan’s *other* web presence, called ET Friends, whose headline is ‘The Holographic Universe with the Dolphins’. This is AMAZING, and feels very much like a cousin of the wonderful world of The Aetherius Society, which has been delighting me ever since I first walked past its offices aged about seven.

By Katrien De Blauwer

NEXT WE RETURN TO THE TEUTONIC, TRANCEY BLEEPS AND BLOOPS AND BEATS FAVOURED BY FORMER EDITOR PAUL IN HIS LATEST EXCELLENT MIX WHICH MADE ME QUITE WANT TO TAKE SPEED AND STAY UP ALL NIGHT DANCING UNTIL I REMEMBERED WHAT THAT WOULD DO TO WEDNESDAY! 

THE SECTION WHICH HAS BECOME SOMEWHAT UNCOMFORTABLE AT THE AMOUNT OF TIME IT SEEMS TO SPEND WISHING GENUINE, TRANSFORMATIVE HARM ON THE WORLD’S SUPER-RICH, PT.2:  

  • The Pudding Cup 2024: Official holder of the Web Curios ‘best dataviz people in the world’ title (and STILL they won’t return my calls), the Pudding presents their annual list of their favourite dataviz projects from the past year – there are three main winners, none of which I’d seen before, and a selection of other commended projects, and if you’ve any interest in ‘how to best communicate stuff that can often be quite data-heavy and a bit dull in ways that are, well, less data-heavy and less dull’ then you should take some time to go through all of these because there’s some gorgeous work here – personally I thought this site, exploring the data, topics and associations, contained within GPT3.5 was particularly wonderful (and I was personally annoyed that I didn’t see if last year FFS what sort of a fcuking webmong am I?).
  • Fictional Videogame Stills: While videogames and gaming culture are now so utterly-embedded in the consciousnesses of anyone…what, under-35?, it’s fair to say that this very much wasn’t always the case; way back in the grey, malnourished days of the early-90s (so different from the, er, grey, malnourished days of modernity!) the idea of anyone drawing artistic inspiration from the world of videogames was frankly preposterous, let alone that this might be considered ‘fine’ art in any way shape or form. I had literally no idea that as far back as the late-80s Suzanne Treister was making work inspired by games, or that in the early-90s she produced this series of images directly inspired by the Commodore Amiga, at the time the most-cutting-edge home gamesplaying machine. “In the late 1980s I was making paintings about computer games. In January 1991 I bought an Amiga computer and made a series of fictional videogame stills using Deluxe Paint II. I photographed them straight from the screen as there was no other way to output them that I knew of apart from through a very primitive daisy wheel printer where they appeared as washed out dots. The effect of the photographs perfectly reproduced the highly pixellated, raised needlepoint effect of the Amiga screen image. Conceptually this means of presentation was also appropriate in that it made it seem like I had gone into a videogame arcade and photographed the games there, lending authenticity to the fiction. The first seven works on this page form a series titled, ‘Q. Would you recognise a Virtual Paradise?’” I sort-of love these from an aesthetic point of view, but more than anything I am thrilled to learn that this was A Thing. Also, each of these games looks fcuking fascinating and I would love to see a gamejam focused on bringing these screenshots to playable life.
  • Trains: Specifically, trains in North America! Via Andy over at Waxy, this is a live map of all the trains in North America RIGHT NOW, showing you where they are and where they’re going (sometimes – information’s incomplete for a lot of these, or so it seems). I am sure that North Americans will find their own reasons to find this interesting or useful, but my main takeaway from this is ‘how the fcuk is it that a country the size and wealth of the US doesn’t seemingly have a functional national passenger rail infrastructure?’ – seriously, click the map, there are FCUK-ALL trains on there, it’s insane. Anyone would think that’s the result of a fixation on (and billions and billions of dollars of lobbying by) the motor industry to the exclusion of pretty much all else.
  • The Infrared Photography Award 2024: PHOTOS OF THINGS THAT ALL LOOK SORT-OF PURPLE! Not just photos, though – there’s a short film category here as well as the stills, and, despite my tedious snarking, the images here are actually a lot more interesting than I might have imagined from the general ‘infrared’ thing; yes, ok, a lot of them *are* purple, but there’s also some quite wonderful black and white work there which, for reasons I don’t entirely comprehend, has a sort of vibrancy and contrast which is particularly pleasing to the eye (or at least mine), and the photos of space are, as you might expect, fcuking mental. I have a vague sense that this sort of stylistic effect might be something you see quite a lot of this year after Harmony Korine’s popularisation of it in filmmaking over the past year or so (but, as previously noted, you should never, ever listen to any of my predictions for anything because I am, in the main, a fcuking moron).
  • TabBOO!: Again via Andy, this is a very silly Chrome extension which basically adds jump-scares to the browsing experience of any website you tell it to – you can get a feel for it from the on-site explainer vid, but, basically, if you tell it to work on, say, bbc.co.uk, every time you then visit said URL you will, after browsing for a short while, get a scary pop-up image to shock you out of your digitally-induced torpor. I can’t for a second imagine that this will make an iota of difference to anyone’s browsing habits, but it did make me think that it would be VERY FUNNY to install this on a luddite colleague’s computer, assigned to (for example) the url for their timesheeting software. Except, of course, noone goes to the office any more and so you can’t really do that sort of thing these days – SEE WHAT WE HAVE LOST FFS!
  • Rutland Ramblings: NOT, contrary to what you might be thinking, the ceremonial county in the East Midlands of England (OBVIOUSLY that’s what you were thinking), but instead the Rutland in question here is the one in North Dakota (I now feel bad saying something the other week about how the US could effectively afford to lose the Dakotas and noone would really notice – sorry, Dakotas!), which, at the most recent census conducted in 2020, had a population of 163 but which, despite its diminutive size, somehow has an active and semi-regularly-updated local website detailing the comings and goings and EXCITING EVENTS going on in the community, and, look, I’m not going to pretend that this is anything other than a VERY NICHE CONCERN or that an entry from last October about how some people in Rutland had a nice time playing frisbee golf is…particularly-scintillating, but it makes me VERY HAPPY that it exists, and I can’t help but love a corner of the web so pure. Also, it made me think that there’s an interesting fictional project here – I do rather like the concept of a website like this which over the course of a year or so gradually reveals something sinister, glistening and possibly suppurating lurking at the village’s core, something whose unspeakable hungers can only be sated by The Old Rituals. That might just be me, though.
  • A Wibbly 3d CG Aubergine: I mean, look, I’m not sure how much more I can gild this particularly lily – it’s, er, a sort-of-3d model of the aubergine emoji which, if you drag it around the screen with your cursor will wobble with fleshy promise. It is significantly less-phallic than I possibly just made it sound, to be clear, but it is also completely, totally and utterly pointless and therefore perhaps perfect.
  • The Dropbox Brand Guidelines: No! Wait! Come back! IT IS INTERESTING I PROMISE YOU! Or, ok, fine, it’s interesting to *me* and might be to a few of you too, what with some of you being designertypepeople (or at least I *think* some of you are; as ever, you remain a mysterious enigma to me – so fascinating! So unknowable! So distant!) – this is, as you probably worked out from the link description, Dropbox’s brand guidelines, setting out the look and feel and tone of the company’s work and assets, and while I appreciate that’s not per se thrilling I think this is a really nice example of how to create documentation around this sort of thing that is user-friendly and clear and INTERESTING, and therefore has an outside chance of people actually looking at it and using it rather than sitting unloved and unlooked-at in the S: drive somewhere. In particular I really liked the part around ‘motion’, not least because it’s nice to see a company take all aspects of this seriously and think consistently about all aspects of how it’s expressed (oh, and the tone of voice stuff is good too – not necessarily because of the tone itself, but because of how clear and easy to understand it is, and how the examples work, and how user-friendly it is in a way these things so often aren’t).
  • Pepper: This link comes courtesy of Present & Correct, the world’s most personable stationery retailer, and is a website celebrating, and I feel I need to quote this in full, “The Peppermills of Jens Quistgaard…Over the course of his prolific and varied design career, Jens Quistgaard created a series of peppermills for Dansk Designs. Taking the dispersal of salt and pepper as the jumping off point, JHQ’s designs are a meditation on the possibilities of shape for a common household object. Intriguing and fantastical, the variety of forms expands the vocabulary of functional design, calling on an array of familiar references: chess pieces, tools, clocks, toys, as well as natural and botanical shapes. These peppermills, otherwise known as “table seasoners”, evoke tiny household sculptures, powerful individually, but most compelling when grouped and viewed in sets.” I know that the word ‘iconic’ should probably be retired for ever, so cruelly and wantonly has it been misdeployed and abused over the years, but seriously, just LOOK at these! You can literally imagine the feel of these in your hand, and the smell of the wood, and all of the corduroy and the sideburns and the appalling-retrograde attitudes to gender politics associated with the era! This feels like the sort of design work that someone with a retro-feeling apartment in the Barbican would flay the skin from your bones to get at.
  • Vivos: We’re, what, about 6-7% of the way through the year – how are you feeling about everything? LOL! In the spirit of the age, then, let me present to you ‘Vivos’, the ‘Global Shelter Network’ that also describes itself in the next breath as ‘the backup plan for humanity’. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.Humanity, you say? Is it…is it a backup plan for ALL of humanity? What’s that? “575 Private Bunkers With Space For Thousands In One Of North America’s Safest Locations” – so, er, no, then, it’s ‘a backup plan for a few thousand lucky, rich souls who might have an outside chance of saving themselves while the rest of us claw at the outside walls of their secure dwellings with radiation-blistered fingers and skin sloughing from our fragile, crumbling bodies! Great! Obviously this is fcuking vile and I wish ill on everyone involved in this preposterous grift (I think it’s fair to say that if you’re reduced to the point of needing one of these, things have probably gotten beyond the point where one of these will be sufficient to save you, is what I’m saying, and we all know that Peter and the real plute players have already bought half of New Zealand as contingency, so good luck on your own in the burning Cali desert!) – but I am also intrigued as to whether it gets any traction; the site claims that they are expanding into Germany and other countries, so, well, who knows? Maybe you’ll all be safe in your airlocked safety paradises while I continue spaffing out Curios til the very end – I mean, it would feel sort-of fitting tbh.
  • Your Digital Envirofootprint: To be clear – you watching or not watching Netflix is not going to make a blind bit of difference to anything, other than your own state of mind, and the concept of a ‘personal carbon footprint’, as we all know by now, was literally invented in the US by comms firms employed by the fossil fuel industry to deflect blame for environmental catastrophe away from them and towards the individual. So, well, this is SLIGHTLY bullsh1t. Equally, though, it’s quite interesting – tell it some of your lifestyle habits and it will tell YOU how much CO2 they contribute to emitting. What are you supposed to do about this? NO FCUKING CLUE! Still, if we all send 30 fewer emails next week that will make up for people worth £600m quid taking private jets everywhere, won’t it? Won’t it?
  • LED Scroller: Type whatever you want and it will scroll across the screen in big glowy LED-style letters. This reminds of a website whose url sadly no longer works which used to let you put a BIG FCUKING MESSAGE on your mobile screen, which during lockdown 1 I used to use to inform people who were being inconsiderate when walking around in terms of space, etc) that, and I quote ‘YOU ARE WALKING LIKE A CNUT’ (look, we all coped in our own way).
  • Loura’s Game: OH I LOVE THIS! Such a fun idea and such a cool thing to do with your personal website – this belongs to someone called Loura, who writes: “I’ve had a fascination with old-school rpg games since I played Final Fantasy VI as a kid and my blog theme reflects that. Recently I decided to take it up a notch and turn my blog itself into a game.” Such a lovely idea – there should be a pop-up-looking window in the bottom left of the site when you load it up that you can use to access the game part, which, while simple, is genuinely fun and I am slightly in love with the idea of just gamifying a site BECAUSE YOU CAN. If any of you can see fit to set something like this up on, I don’t know, PWC.com, I will love you forever.
  • Vox Regis: You are the king! The people are rebelling! But, with a bit of smart thinking and some very light maths you can crush the rebellion by causing various factions to fight amongst themselves – this is very simple but engaging enough to keep your attention for its full five-minute start-to-finish runtime, and there’s something really pleasing about the way the perspective is you, as the king, looking up from on high (the hands in particular are a nice touch). Oh, and the rebelling peons get smeared into pleasingly-jammy smudges when they die, which oughtn’t be satisfying but, worryingly, very much is.
  • Escape from Castle Matsumoto: A bumper week for games, this – here’s another one which is pretty fun and which you can play with a friend should you have such a thing. Are any of you old enough to remember Spy vs Spy? Not just the classic comic from Mad magazine, but the 80s videogame? Of course you do, you’re all fcuking ancient like me (but in case not, this is what it was). Anyway, this is a bit like that – except you’re not spies, your ninjas, and it’s set in ancient Japan. The general premise is the same, though – you play against either the computer or a human opponent, each trying to loot the titular castle, leaving traps and tricks to thwart the other player so you can emerge with more cash than them. It looks GREAT – by which I mean it looks legitimately like a C64 title – but it is QUITE FIDDLY and you will need to spend a bit of time familiarising yourself with the controls before you’re able to do anything other than wander about confusedly.
  • Dragonsweeper: Minesweeper, but with a fantasy-themed skin and some interesting tweaks to the rules (which you will have to work out as you play because the game seemingly has no interest whatsoever in telling you what is going on). Getting your head around the shape of the game is part of the fun, and if you can be bothered working it all out there’s something very satisfying indeed about finally beating the fcuking thing (I may have become…somewhat frustrated).
  • Asterism: The final link of the week is SOMETHING YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR. Sorry. That said, I think that this is worth every penny of the £10 or so that its creator is asking for it – Asterism is a truly GORGEOUS indie videogame, seemingly the work of a single person who has built a beautiful, superbly-animated, rich and heartfelt story through a combination of craft techniques and stop-motion animation, resulting in a game which is part-point-and-click adventure and part just sort of beautiful animated short film, and, honestly, it is inventive and beautiful and creative and I can’t stress enough what a truly incredible feat it is and how much it deserves people to take a look at it – oh, and the music is glorious too, which is just the cherry on the cake. It’s not super-long, but it’s just gorgeous and is one of the most impressive personal creative projects I think I’ve seen in years. If nothing else, please click the link and watch the trailer, I guarantee you will be utterly charmed.

By  Jesse Zuo

OUR LAST MIX THIS WEEK IS BY SUN SONE AND I CAN ONLY REALLY DESCRIBE IT AS SOUNDING LIKE WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO SIT IN ONE OF THOSE SCANDI OVERDESIGNED LOUNGE CHAIRS FROM THE MID-70s IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Movies: Specifically, films watched and reviewed by a Danish bloke who, as far as I can tell, has watched something like 4,000(!!!!) of the fcuking things over the past few years and so therefore you’d imagine probably knows a few things about what’s good and what isn’t. I have no idea what his taste is like, but based on the sheer volume it’s probable that he’s seen a bunch of stuff you haven’t and you might be able to pick up some interesting recommendations from here should you wish to.
  • Before The Clothes Come Off: Slightly astonished I’ve not featured this before, not least because it has SUCH strong ‘10 years ago’ vibes – ‘Before The Clothes Come Off’ shares stills from either bongo movies or mags in which the performers have not yet started, er, performing – everyone’s fully-clothed, therefore, if evidently about to get up to something INCREDIBLY FILTHY. There’s SO much to love about these – the outfits, the expressions that suggest that something DESPERATELY SALACIOUS is about to happen any second now (in fairness, they were probably right), the incredible captioning which results in such wonderful juxtapositions as a relatively-banal image of a man and a woman, fully-clothed, with the all-caps legend ‘JUICY VAGINA’…so much to love.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Kee Kunath: I discovered this photographer’s work through a selection of articles about her recent portrait series on India’s female bodybuilders – you can see some of those shots on her insta feed along with her wider body of work, and she is fcuking great.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Welcome To The Billionaire Era: Apologies in advance for the fact that there’s a reasonable amount of US politics stuff in here this week – but, well, we’re all downstream of it, painful as it is to admit, which means that whatever gets shat into the water table across the Atlantic will eventually bemerd our own in due course. So, how does it feel to live in a billionaire’s fantasy? Because that’s pretty much what the next four years seem to connote – we need to go faster to outrun the creeping horrors in the rearview mirror, so what better way to ensure that than by cutting the brake cables and buying some nitro off that nice, smiling man in the fancy suit? This first piece is by Don Moynihan, who does a good – if fundamentally FCUKING BLEAK – job of laying out the insane routemap that putting ‘no regulation, massive cost-cutting’ creates for the country and the world, focusing quite a lot on Marc Andreessen (a lesser-cited but incredibly-important part of the current inner circle whose terrifying, swivel-eyed accelerationist AI manifesto from a few years back is worth reading again in 2025, btw) and his recent NYT interview (which is also worth reading in full because FCUKING HELL), as well as on what the Musk effect is going to be. Honestly, this is very good – not least because it is increasingly clear that we are going to see a LOT of very rich people with very close ties to government saying many of the same sorts of things in the coming years in the UK and elsewhere.
  • The Aesthetic Rebirth of America: I know talking about ‘fascism’ feels like a bit of an overreaction. I understand that talking about ‘the end of democracy’ sounds, and probably is, hyperbolic. I get that all of that is frankly tedious and annoying and gets people to turn off, and so I am not going to do that. I would, though, like you to read this essay, by one Rachel Haywire, about ‘the new aesthetic’ that they would like to see adopted by the new administration in the US (and this should be read alongside the Executive Order requiring the building of more ‘monumental’ state architecture), and, as you read it, to think about where some of the themes it contains might be familiar from, and the sorts of regimes which, in the past, have espoused similar rhetoric about aesthetics and strength, and to think what it means when people feel absolutely fine harking back in misty-eyed terms to artistic movements which were closely associated with, and oftentimes started by, people who thought Hitler was actually right about a bunch of stuff. I suppose now we have an answer to ‘so, what sort of ideas can you trojan horse into people with a decade-long-drip-drip-drip campaign around the inherent superiority of classical western architecture and aesthetics?’.
  • Trump and the Spectacle: This, in the LRB, is fcuking superb from start to finish, honestly, just sustained, virtuosic writing and I just want you all to go and read it please. “It’s not news that Trump is a creature of the society of the spectacle. Creature and master, emanation and accelerant. He is the image. The mugshot. He’s the picture of himself on Fox he sits watching for hours each day – rightly understanding that doing so is doing politics, politics as our society now practises it. Governing? We leave that to our servants. (What a lovely bygone sound there is to Michel Foucault’s term of art ‘governmentality’. Only ascendant powers think the state is for governing. Leaders of empires in decline look across at Xi Jinping and wonder if he can be serious about infrastructure and censorship and party discipline and the size of the army. Wasn’t that yesterday?) Define the society of the spectacle. Oh, come on – you know what it is. What do you want, a Helen Levitt street scene opposite a drone shot of children looking at their iPhones? The question is not what the spectacle consists of – the spectacle goes on making a spectacle of its least change of apparatus, the least descent down its ladder of conformity – but what in the long term it does, above all to the other term in the portmanteau. ‘Society’ – what’s that?” Given that a bunch of you are the sort of cnuts who will quote Debord at a moment’s notice, this should appeal. BONUS GOOD TRUMP ARTICLE: this is by Edward Docx in the Guardian, who’s also a reliably-good writer and whose exploration of the idea of the ‘ogre’ in the context of Trump works far better than I expected it to.
  • Your Memecoin Is Your Slush Fund: I mentioned it in the main links section, but the whole Trumpcoin thing is just…fcuking ASTONISHING to me (I had forgotten this particularly unpleasant aspect of the idiocracy from the last time around, the sort of incredulous horror as you realise that…fuck, people really can just GET AWAY WITH THIS SH1T) – this piece does a really good job of explaining in mostly-comprehensible language how the grift works, and why it works, and what the purpose of it actually is (per my commentary above), TO SEND TRUMP CASH. Look, here’s the simple explanation – but honestly, read the whole thing, it’s important: “Suppose you wanted to buy a favor from Donald Trump, and he wanted to let you buy a favor from him. How could you do it? You can’t just pay him a giant bribe — that’s illegal. Maybe you could pledge him a bunch of cash for his presidential campaign. But there are campaign finance laws that will get in your way, and even if you succeed, he can only use the money for his campaign, not to buy yachts or whatever else he might like to use the money for. Instead, what you can do is to buy a bunch of TRUMP or MELANIA. When you buy one of those memecoins, you increase the demand for the memecoin. Its price then goes up. This makes Donald Trump richer, without any money actually having to change hands.”
  • What Ross Ullbricht Actually Did: Certain portions of the crypto-y, degen-y web have been celebrating this week as one of their poster children received a presidential pardon – Ross Ullbricht, better known as the guy behind the Silk Road who called himself ‘Dread Pirate Roberts’, was locked up for a whole bunch of reason which Henry Farell neatly lays out, but had become something of a symbol for the crypto crowd of The Man’s seemingly ceaseless attempts to STIFLE INNOVATION and IMPINGE UPON FREEDOMS. As such Ullbricht’s pardon is a clear signal to the cryptocrowd that they are IN FAVOUR – again, anyone might argued that acting in a manner clearly designed to appease a group of people whose activities and fortunes can materially impact the wealth of senior members of the Government feels…not ok, really? See also Elon standing on stage and saying ‘We’re going to take DOGE to  Mars’, which feels QUITE a lot like a ‘to the moon’ reference if you ask me…IT’S THE FCUKING KLEPT EVERYONE.
  • How Zuck Used Rogan: I know, I know, OLD NEWS – but I think it’s an interesting piece to read, because it neatly lays out the new podcast comms playbook, and why Rogan and people like him are wonderful opportunities for a well-trained executive because their ignorance and lack of anything resembling journalistic technique, combined with the associated coverage each episode provides, make it extremely easy to craft a narrative which suits you around whatever issue you like, which will then become disseminated worldwide with nary an interrogatory “…but, hang on”. In this instance Techdirt does a really good, step-by-step explainer of exactly how Zuckergberg manipulated Rogan and how, in turn, Rogan failed to ask any of the questions one might have expected a serious journalist to. Is it good that we’re entering an era in which the most powerful people in the world are increasingly likely to only ever communicate via these most softball of platforms because actual journalists have been largely removed from the food chain? IT DOES NOT FEEL GOOD.
  • The End of Social: Ok, that’s not technically the headline Ann-Helen Petersen chose to go with, but the point she makes in this rather good piece is that social media is not what it was and will never be that way again, however much you might want to sit on Bluesky and pretend it’s 2011. I can’t speak for you, but I have basically stopped using social media on my phone over the past year – I will check Bluesky if I am at a desk during working hours, but that’s it, which for someone as appallingly-online and previously-Twitter-addled as I am is quite the sea-change. As it happens I wrote something about this for a magazine last year – it’s paywalled sadly, but you can read the original unedited copy here if you’re interested.
  • Living Alongside the Computer People: An excellent essay by Jay Springett which looks at the backlash to the idea of Meta introducing AI avatars to its social media ecosystem at the beginning of the year – Springett writes about his experiences with Butterflies, a social network populated solely by AI agents which you may recall I featured in here last Summer. I bounced off it pretty quickly – I don’t care enough about the banality of real people’s lives ffs, let alone the banality of imaginary people’s imaginary lives – but he got rather into it, and there’s something interesting in his characterisation of his experience, seeing small stories happen without his input, characters developing and evolving relationships…I suppose there’s an extent to which social media has increasingly become a platform on which people interact with a small group of people they know irl and a far wider pool of people who they don’t know and will never meet and will never speak to…and, when you think of it like that, does it matter if they’re not real? I mean, yes, it does to me, very much, but I can see the points being made here and I appreciate that mine might not be the majority viewpoint. Anyway, whether or not you want this stuff, IT’S FCUKING COMING.
  • Neoliberalism’s Imagined Futures: Ok, this is long and a bit academic, but it’s properly-interesting, honest, on the way in which we imagine future cities and future spaces, and how the imagined architecture of these futures in many respects reflects and connotes a certain embedded ideology, specifically the neoliberal paradigm – which, yes, I know, that makes me sound like a cnut and makes this sound dull, but whilst the former assessment may be sadly accurate the latter is wrong. I promise, this is really really thought-provoking, not least because of the important reminder it contains that nothing is neutral and everything has meaning. The basic thesis is as follows – but it is worth at least skimming, I promise: ““eco-futurist” images symbolically communicate an association with sustainability through the visible use of “green” technologies and the adoption of highly contextual encounters with greenery, rhetorically prefaced on the ability of techno-science to mediate human–nature relationships, and visually bound within the design tropes of luxury tourist destinations. By intertwining the aspirational futures of sustainable design with the aesthetic sensibilities of the wealthy, I argue that eco-futurism primarily aligns itself with the interests of neoliberal property development and the spatial and social logics of colonialism.”
  • Podcast’s Pivot To Video: I mean, this feels like slightly old news – ‘video of podcast as social feed content’ has been a thing for what feels like a couple of years now, but I suppose there’s a critical mass of podcasters moving into video to warrant a ‘this is a big trend!’ piece. I understand the utility of video as an additional means of creating promo content, but also question the extent to which anyone ‘watches’ a podcast (though as someone who doesn’t even listen to them my opinion here is probably even less valuable than usual) – I do though think it’s a bit unfair that a medium previously perfect for all those of us with a face for radio is being coopted by the fcuking beautiful. FCUK OFF, BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE. Apart from those of you who feel a strong, inexplicable attraction to authors of preposterously-verbose internet newsletters, you can stay.
  • AI Potholes: In my semi-regular attempt to occasionally offer up a small alternative to the general ‘AI is evil’ narrative which seems to have taken hold amongst all right-thinking folk, here’s James O’Malley writing about why Keir Starmer’s example of ‘using AI to fix potholes’ wasn’t in fact as risible as lots of wags on the web enjoyed making it out to be. This is clear, simple and sensible, and a good reminder that AI IS NOT JUST FCUKING LLMS, and even when it IS an LLM, the really interesting and useful stuff it can do is, mostly, VERY far removed from writing terrible prose and creating soulless images.
  • The Future of Sports: When I was a little kid I remember going to a theme park – possibly Alton Towers – where one of the indoor attractions was literally a massive, floor-to-ceiling screen which showed first-person footage of a rollercoaster and which, when you stood in front of it as the film played, induced motion sickness to a frankly-terrifying degree (god the past was sh1t, wasn’t it?). I couldn’t help but think of that when reading this piece abouT THE FUTURE OF SPORTSBALL, which, per the article, seems to be ‘10xing revenue from live events by streaming them in a sort of ultra-HD ‘you’re in the best seats in the house’-style in venues that are basically like the Vegas Sphere but smaller. Aside from the aforementioned vertigo fear – honestly, it looks…horrid – I can actually imagine this being a lot of fun, like watching a big game in a packed pub but with everything turned up to eleven. I’ll be fascinated to see who brings this to the UK first, it can only be a matter of time before some warehouse in East London gets one.
  • Reading Too Many Debut Novels: A long-but-interesting and VERY generous post by Holly Gramazio, who last year as a newly-published debut novelist decided to read a bunch of OTHER debut novels published in 2024 to see if she could get a handle on whether there are any specific qualities or tropes which debut novels share. This is an exhaustive investigation into what she found out – which, should you be interested in writing, reading or publishing is just generally interesting – which also at the end segues into a huge list of the books she read, divided into categories to help you work out what you might be interested in reading. If you’re looking for a place to start building a reading list for the year, this feels like it could be an interesting place to start and to discover some potentially-great new writers.
  • Gorilla Tag VR: Everything I read about VR makes it sound like a busted flush – noone wanted the massive Apple headset, the MetaQuest, despite being apparently good kit, is still failing to breakthrough in any meaningful mainstream sense, and the progress being made with smartglasses and XR makes it seem reasonable to assume that that’s the next likely breakthrough post-phone tech. AND YET. I also keep reading stuff that suggests that there’s a whole generation of kids – reasonably-affluent kids, I presume – who are really, really enjoying VR and who spend a lot of time there, and it makes me wonder whether this is just a generational waiting game and that we’re going to have to wait for the Alphas to age into positions where they can influence the technology we encounter. Anway, this is all about Gorilla Tag, apparently an insanely popular game in the VR space, and the weird mythologies that kids are creating around it because, well, that’s what kids do.
  • Where Is Central London?: An important investigation by The Londoner, which obviously has no definitive answer and is entirely subjective but which here leads to several thousand pleasing words as various people offer their own interpretation of where ‘central’ starts and ends (fwiw my personal definition goes from, basically, Hyde Park Corner to St Paul’s W-E and King’s X to Waterloo N-S and it is the only correct one).
  • Chasing a Vibe Pic: I loved this, not least because it feels SO analogous to the way in which I experience the web and hence made me feel if only for a fleeting moment that I wasn’t entirely alone. Chris Erik Thomas writes about a found image on the web and the rabbitholes attempting to locate it took him down, and it’s a pretty perfect encapsulation of why I love the web (well, the web pre about 5-6 years ago, at least) – every bit of it exists because a person felt it ought to, and every part of it is an expression of an aspect of humanity, and it is in its totality a mad multidimensionalspeciespatchwork and it is meaningless and beautiful and poignant and weird and it is us, and this essay, I think, gets that.
  • My Summer Car: This is a review of a videogame, but I promise you it is of a videogame that will not sound like any videogame you have ever played before, or indeed that you can ever imagine anyone wanting to play. My Summer Car is about being in Finland over the Summer holidays, and trying to build a car from scratch – and it is even less fun to play than that description makes it sound, by design, and it’s the friction and the hostility that are the point. I have no personal interest in ever playing games like this, but I have an almost-insatiable appetite for reading about them, because I do firmly (and, obviously, extremely-w4nkily) believe that Games Can Be Art, and this is absolutely fcuking art. I mean, listen to this: “The broken vehicle in your driveway is the rusty chassis of a car called the “Satsuma”. Almost all the parts you need are arranged in shelves and scattered on the floor of your garage. A fully disassembled combustion engine lies in bits and must be painfully reconstructed. The steering column needs to be put back in. The suspension, brakes, gearbox, wheels – everything, every little bolt – has to be accounted for…Some of these parts you’ll need to order via mail. In another game this might simply be a menu. You’d click the part and – bloop – it would show up on your shelf. Here, ordering, say, a fuel mixture gauge means using a magazine in the garage to make an envelope appear, driving 20 minutes to the store, putting the envelope in the post box, driving back home, waiting two in-game days, getting a phone call from the store owner who says your package has arrived, driving back to the store to pick it up, then coming home again. It is comically laborious.” Doesn’t it sound terrible but also SUPERB? This is a great bit of games writing that I recommend to you all even if you couldn’t give two fcuks about the medium.
  • Amis: I knew I featured a bit of Amis writing when he died, but I came across this one this week and it’s SUCH a good piece about the man, his place in the English canon, the influence he had and the almost vulgar brilliance of his prose. I obviously fcuking loved Martin Amis’ books, and I appreciate not everyone will have felt the same way, but if you were a fan then this is a lovely reminder of why.
  • Davos: Finally this week, Caitlín Doherty writes for Harper’s from Davos. I can’t pretend I didn’t find myself grinding my teeth throughout a lot of this, but it’s SO brilliantly done, smart and informed and as frankly sick of the neverending merrygoround of monied power which determines the contours of our existence without really at any point doing a particularly good job of demonstrating why this state of affairs ought to persist as I, and presumably you, are. It is full of wonderful lines and vignettes, but the one about Al Gore having to look up ‘epistemology’ felt just too perfectly bleak for words.

By Sophie Sund

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 17/01/25

Reading Time: 35 minutes

I hope all of you who’ve sent me complaining messages about there being ‘too much AI stuff’ in Curios over the past few years are feeling suitably-chastened now that Sir Keir’s going to MAINLINE IT INTO THE NATION’S VEINS. Whether or not intravenous injection was necessarily the right analogy for the forced introduction of a potentially-nefarious technology that noone necessarily wants into the body public is…questionable, but, well, tough! You’re getting AI whether you like it or not! COMPLAIN TO YOUR ROBOT THERAPIST ABOUT IT, SOYBOY!

Sorry, not sure what came over me at the end there, it must be excitement at the coming of a new world order (suspiciously, just like the old one!) in which ‘owning the libs’ is once again the court sport of choice; rest assured that I am, remain and always will be 100% soy.

So, as we sit in the ROLLERCOASTER OF LIFE, feeling it crank up once more towards a the summit and knowing that we’re once again about to take a species-wide plunge at speed into a pit of unfettered capitalism, let me offer you up a Web Curios to take your mind off things. I hope it works it works for you, it doesn’t seem to be working for me.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you don’t have to watch on Monday afternoon if you don’t want to.

By Frances Waite

WHY NOT BEGIN THIS WEEK’S MUSICAL JOURNEY WITH THIS EXCELLENT AND WILDLY-ECLECTIC SELECTION OF OLD RECORDS FROM AROUND THE WORLD? NO, YOU ARE RIGHT, THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS GENUINELY SADDENED TO HEAR ABOUT PAUL DANAN YESTERDAY AND WHICH WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER THE ORIGINAL LOVE ISLAND, RIP YOU MAD-EYED SESH HOUND, PT.1:  

  • The Nokia Design Archive: Did you have a 3210? DO YOU REMEMBER SNAKE AND THE RINGTONE AND AND AND…look, I find retrophonenostalgia almost terminally-dull (the past was different! Technology has evolved! This is…not, in general, a hugely-interesting observation to my mind!), but it is also true that as the devices have become more technically-capable and feature complete they’ve also become more homogenous in terms of design…which is why this website is such a total joy, letting you explore the HISTORY OF NOKIA and, specifically, to do a load of digging around in their design archives so you can look through all the frankly insane scamps and draughts and vaguely-directional lookbooks that they were working through around the time they were also producing things that looked like this. There is SO MUCH STUFF in here, and if you’re someone who works in product design or branding, or who’s just generally interested in the process of ‘how people inform their design decisions’, then this will be catnip to you. The interface is simple but it works – you navigate between thematically-connected ‘nodes’, effectively, clicking into see individual elements or documents or videos, and there’s a nice interlinking of entries which creates a sort of taxonomy of Nokia design thinking, which I rather enjoy. Per the blurb, “The Nokia Design Archive is a graphic and interactive portal designed by researchers from Aalto University in Finland. It currently hosts over 700 entries, curated from thousands of items donated by Microsoft Mobile Oy and representing over 20 years of Nokia’s design history — both seen and unseen. You can freely explore the archive, learn about designers’ experiences working in Nokia and discover interesting topics surrounding design and mobile technologies.The Network view shows the archive’s contents, organised by thematic collections and displayed according to their relationships with each other. The visualisation displays the entries organised according to collection – click on them to explore and understand them and their context in the design process.” Basically it’s full of odd sketches and half-formed thoughts and notes and lookbooks and ‘inspiration libraries’, and for someone who, like me, is peculiarly un-gifted when it comes to the visual and the design-y and the like, it feels a bit like strange glyphs from an advanced alien civilisation (but also, SO Y2K).
  • I Feel So Much Shame: This is a website/poem type-thing by Jackie Liu, created as part of an initiative called ‘Welcome To My Homepage’ (running for 10 years and, shamefully, entirely-unknown to me until this week, the project is ‘an international online residency program hosted by The Museum of Human Achievement in Austin, TX that offers artists a low-stakes opportunity to experiment and expand their practice, explore the web as a site for creative production, and reach new audiences’, which I very much approve of as a thing and feel is something other institutions might want to usefully consider; I do think ‘web as canvas’ is underexplored by Big Art, which feels…retrograde in 2025) and it is made from scanned-in risograph prints, and, basically, you just click through it, but…look, this absolutely fcuked me in half when I read/experienced it the other day, to the point of having to take an actual break and have a word with myself, so caveat emptor and all that, but I thought it was BEAUTIFUL (NB – there’s nothing horrible or awful here, honest, I am just a bundle of exposed nerve endings right now it seems).
  • Free Our Feeds: This has had a reasonable amount of publicity and traction in certain corners of the web this week, and was an interesting (to me, at least) barometer of ‘how celebrity endorsements work in global media in 2025’ – turns out Mark Ruffalo gets you coverage in North America these days but not Europe, who knew? Anyway, Free Our Feeds is a campaign which is seeking to raise money to create a ‘warchest’ which will then be used to establish an independent foundation to make the AT Protocol, which Bluesky is built on and is basically one of the options for the fediverse alongside ActivityPub which Mastodon is built on, independent and globally-standardised OH DEAR GOD I FIND THIS STUFF SO DULL. Sorry, but I can’t bring myself to care about the technical side of this stuff – I know, I know, I should, but I simply can’t. Basically this is a nice-sounding idea, which, still, feels a bit pointless – like, I am not convinced there are enough normal people who care about any of this to a) raise all the money they want; or b) sustain any sort of campaign to recreate a FREE AND OPEN WEB in the face of the convenience, ubiquity and massive marketing budgets of Big Tech, and, in general, the whole Bluesky vs Mastodon ‘purity of the fediverse’ debate is just too neckbeardy for me to be able to engage with, and I imagine it’s the same for the vast majority of people. So, er, fcuk knows why I have just spaffed on about it for 200-odd words. Sorry about that.
  • Google, Voice and Culture: This page links you to four separate AI experiments by Google designed to explore how the tech can be used by cultural institutions to enhance the visitor experience, and these are FUN and frankly have potential applications beyond the museum and galleries sector. They’re all worth having a play with yourself, but there’s Talking Tours, which lets you wander round a venue (gallery, museum or, er, the Etihad) and get AI-generated commentary of whatever you’re ‘looking’ at in your browser; Mice in the Museum, where a pair of mice (no, me neither) give their opinions on an artwork of your choice from one of Google’s many digitised collections in, er, small rodent voices; Lip Sync, where a, er, pair of animated lips (no, again, no idea) have ‘live’ discussions on a series of prompt questions posed by artists; and Doodle Guide, which lets you draw anything you like and then get your sketch assessed by an AI voice which discusses your work, its style and execution. The last of these is by far the most fun – no, Google, that is NOT a ‘proud stetson’, try again! – but in general they’re all decent examples of how its voicemodels and multimodality are currently working, and, as with a lot of this stuff, you (or at least I) get the feeling that this is very nearly at the point of being very useful and very interesting indeed (use this phrase to beat me with in a year when this hasn’t progressed at all).
  • Google Euphonia: Seeing as we’re doing Google and AI and voice stuff, this is an interesting and laudable project to file under ‘see? Some of this AI stuff is good, honest! Not all of it is going to steal your job and entrench existing power structures! Although most of it, fine, probably will!’. Google Euphonia is its project to create speech recognition software which is capable of parsing a wider range of speech types, encompassing ‘non-traditional’ speaking patterns and so designed to help those with disabilities which affect the vocal cords be understood better by The Machine. The project is currently soliciting speech samples to help train and improve its models, so if you or anyone you know has non-standard vocal patterns then you might want to upload something to this as it feels, broadly, like A Good Thing.
  • Reddit Answers: THE LLMIFICATION OF EVERYTHING CONTINUES! Here we have Reddit taking the seemingly-sensible step of rendering its enormous UGC knowledge archive interrogable – so with Reddit Answers, currently in early-access (you won’t be able to use it now, but you can sign up for updates), you’ll be able to ask ANY QUESTION YOU LIKE of the Reddit corpus and, allegedly at least, get an answer back with references to where The Machine has sourced the info and links back to the original Reddit threads for investigation and future research. Which is HUGE, potentially, from an online shopping and recommendations point of view, and makes me feel that any brand that has invested time in building out a strong Reddit presence over the past few years, with a dedicated fanbase, is going to do quite well out of this (also, that ‘getting people to recommend your stuff on Reddit’ is quite an important pillar of any brand strategy, turns out). It is, of course, another HUGE warning klaxon for all those websites which have spent years amassing well-indexed articles on ‘the best handheld blenders for under £20’ which are going to see their traffic, and their income, tanked by this, after having seen their Google numbers kneecapped last year. It does rather feel like a lot of website-based stuff is going to be gurgling its last in the next year or so, much as it pains me to say so.
  • Chestfaces: Bluesky is not, in general, like Old Twitter – Old Twitter was younger and more vibrant and sillier and slightly-meaner, whereas Bluesky is more mannered and more po-faced and, generally, older, greyer and sadder (as, frankly, are we all) – but occasionally you’ll find things that SPARK JOY in the old way. So it is with Chestfaces, an account on Bluesky which exists solely to post images of famous men, topless, whose naked chests have been superimposed onto their faces, giving them (YES YOU GUESSED IT) chestfaces. There are only 12 of these, and they last posted a few months ago, but fcukit, I WANT MORE CHESTFACES FFS can whoever is running this please bring it back? Thanks.
  • Tony Slattery’s Funeral Fundraiser: This won’t mean anything to the non-Anglos here, I don’t think, so you can skip this one, but for anyone broadly-speaking of my generation (young GenX/VERY OLD millennial) then it might speak to you. Tony Slattery died this week, unexpectedly, of a heart attack, and it slightly floored me – I was genuinely in awe of the man as a kid, to the point where he made me doubt my sexuality…he was smart and funny and handsome and SO sharp, witty and dangerous and obviously a nervous wreck and I had never seen anyone like him on television before, obviously incredibly clever but so…smooth with it. His life ended up being sadder and smaller than anyone thought likely back then, as documented in this heartbreaking interview with him from a few years back, which is why his partner launched this crowdfunder to help cover his funeral expenses. It’s hit its target but in case any of you felt the same as I did about the man, you might want to contribute.
  • Steppin: Do YOU feel like your phone has a stranglehold on you? Do YOU feel like you need to TAKE BACK CONTROL from the device? Do YOU also feel that you could possibly do with getting some more exercise in this year?  Fcuk me, the January cliches! Combine all of your self-improvement goals (well, ok, two of them at most) into one simple app with this new download – Steppin is actually a pretty smart idea, the gimmick being that you ‘earn’ screentime based on your physical activity as tracked by your phone. Select which apps you want to limit, select your exchange rate (100 steps = 1 minute on TikTok, say) and off you go! I presume it’s no longer possible to fool your phone by throwing it in the air a few times and as such that this works as advertised, in which case I can imagine it working quite well for certain types of people – it integrates with a bunch of existing fitness and activity-tracking devices too, so if you’re one of those appalling self-quantifying fcuks then it will fit right into your disgustingly-optimised lifestyle.
  • Undermound: Got to be honest with you here, I haven’t really got the faintest idea of what’s going on here – I *think* this is a sort-of portfolio site collecting the Canva sketches of one Stevie Pimblott, but, frankly, I’m not really sure. Just scroll, click and see where you end up (I don’t get the feeling it goes anywhere bad, but, just so you know, I take no responsibility AT ALL if it does).
  • Colors: Another death this week which kicked me in the face slightly was that of former Benetton CD Oliviero Toscani, a man responsible for some of the most incredible, arresting, brave and, frankly, occasionally-borderline-not-ok ad campaigns of my early life (children, or those of you who for whatever reason don’t have an eidetic memory for this sort of stuff, let me remind you of the sort of sh1t that they used to put on billboards). What I really loved Toscani for, though, was Colors Magazine (I will forgive him the American spelling just this once) – Colors was basically the in-house magazine of Benetton’s in-house creative agency, Fabrica, and each issue was devoted to a different topic, and I first picked up a copy coming back from Italy on my own in…1993 and, muchlike Adbusters a few years later, it absolutely changed my conception of what a magazine could be, how you could be ‘political’ but also quite astonishingly stylish (to be clear – YOU could; I, as proven several decades hence, cannot), to to be informative and honest and INTERESTING, how to present information densely-but-beautifully, and the power of ugly/beautiful as an aesthetic…I am gutted that I lost the dozen or so editions of this I once owned, but enjoyed delving through this website which collates the covers of each of the issues (‘Fat’ is a particular favourite of mine) – I really, really hope that there’s going to be a proper exhibition of the archive of this, it would be ACE.
  • Lumon Industries: This website’s actually a few years old – I first came across it…whenever, a while ago, but didn’t understand it and didn’t feature it because it made no sense to me. And, look, I still don’t understand it and it still makes no sense to me, but I now know that that’s because it’s based on something from the TV show Severance, which I understand is very popular and is coming back on TV soon and which it’s likely that quite a few of you watch and enjoy. So! Er, this is for you! I don’t know what it is! Oh, ok, fine – it’s basically a slightly-mysterious busywork simulator (with a nicely-fleshed-out UI) which is clearly something to do with the MYSTERIOUS BUSYWORK that the characters perform in the show…look, can one of you who knows about this email me and offer me a short explainer? I will be really grateful and possibly send you a small reward.
  • Watch Duty: You will probably have heard of this app over the past week or so – it’s what’s mainly being used in LA to track the spread of the fires in near-realtime (you can see a browser-based map here should you wish). What I find interesting about it is that it’s nothing to do with the State of California – it’s an app developed by a very, very rich person who decided that he might as well do it because he had loads of money and some time on his hands. Which, to be clear, is nice of him – it’s not-for-profit, it doesn’t do anything bad with your data, and in general seems like A Good Thing! But also does feel sadly emblematic of A Lot Of Things – it does rather feel that infrastructural digital services like this ought to be the preserve of the state rather than relying on well-meaning plutes to step in and sort sh1t out.
  • Deep: I can’t speak for you, obviously, but it does rather feel to me like the shine has somewhat been removed from the 1950s dream of space exploration, tarnished by interstellar travel’s now-indelible association with That Fcuking Man and indeed now MechaBezos. So, as an alternative, why not let’s explore a future under the sea? Yes, ok, I know why (SO MUCH TOOTHY AND TENTACULAR FEAR, not to mention several thousands of lbs of psi), but ignore that for a moment and instead enjoy Deep, whose mission, apparently, is ‘Make Humans Aquatic’ (I can’t be the only one seeing Ariel frantically mugging ‘NO, NO!’ in the corner of my field of vision, surely?). This is a VERY shiny website promoting the company’s undersea exploration kit, including this thing, called ‘Sentinel’, which will apparently allow people to ‘live and work undersea’, opening up the theoretical possibility of modular dwelling bunkers on the edge of the Mariana Trench for when everything up-top gets…well, a bit burny. This is VERY scifi, only-partially-believable, and feels like a series of really unpleasant disaster films just waiting to happen.
  • Kudos Wiki: This is a nice idea – someone’s basically scraped Wikipedia for all the films that, per writeups on there, are the ‘best’ ever, which, turns out, gives you quite a wide-ranging and interesting new canon which diverges from a lot of ‘best films EVER’ lists you might previously have seen online. The list is available either to browse, or – and this is an interesting move which I don’t *quite* understand the licensing around – you can sign up for $1 a month and get a link to watch a different film from the list every four weeks (or indeed $12 for access to everything forever); if you’re a cinephile and want a new watching challenge/goal for 2025 this could be quite a cool way of doing it.
  • All Of The Cartoon Pitches: This is an INCREDIBLE resource for anyone interested in comics and cartoons and animation and illustration – this page collates DOZENS of links to documents which were used to pitch, or write episodes for, network animated TV shows – from He Man and She-Ra to Spongebob to Ren & Stimpy, this is basically a how-to manual of how to package and sell your work, and for a very specific type of person it will be GOLDEN.
  • Brand New iPhone Sexting App Just Dropped: I mean, I could have given it its full title – Exploding Messages – but frankly this does a clearer job of explaining what you’ll be using it for. Per the writeup on the app store, “Send texts and photos that disappear on iMessage. Your friends don’t need the app to view them. Screenshots are blocked too!” Which, obviously, is all fun and games, but some thoughts: 1) you have to be VERY CONFIDENT in that ‘no screenshots’ functionality; 2) if you think about it, this could equally be used to send people some pretty awful stuff, unsolicited, with complete deniability. Which, er, doesn’t sound great tbh. OH WELL NOODZ!

By Alfonso Duran

NEXT, ENJOY TWO HOURS OF REALLY RATHER LOVELY JAZZ COMPILED BY WINDRUSH RADIO! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS GENUINELY SADDENED TO HEAR ABOUT PAUL DANAN YESTERDAY AND WHICH WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER THE ORIGINAL LOVE ISLAND, RIP YOU MAD-EYED SESH HOUND, PT.2:  

  •  Loser Lane: Are YOU a cyclist? Are YOU annoyed by the provision of cycling lanes and other pro-bike amenities in your city? Are YOU so irritated by it that, er, you’ll go to the trouble of coding a small game about how bad cycling there is? I imagine the answer to that last one was ‘no’, but full kudos to Toronto resident Marie LeBlanc Flanagan who was so annoyed at the Mayor’s plan to close cycle lanes that she knocked up this little – to be clear, impossible – game to demonstrate what being on a bike in the city currently feels like. You can read a bit more about it here, but I am now IN LOVE with the idea of making a small videogame as protest at small acts of municipal idiocy. Can someone make a game about the bins please? Oh God, someone’s going to make one about grooming gangs aren’t they? Let me retract this idea immediately.
  • JourneyMaker: Another digital arts and culture toy, this one brought to me by Ben Templeton’s excellent newsletter; the Art Institute of Chicago has built this website which lets kids prepare their route through the museum ahead of their visit by picking a selection of works that interest them – it’s a lovely interface, which does a good job of giving the illusion of LIMITLESS CHOICE while actually being relatively-tightly-constrained, and there’s something really nice about the packaging of it and the way it creates a bespoke map JUST FOR YOU detailing your route and giving you little worksheets…it’s just a nice, light-touch bit of personalisation which has the benefit of being ACTUALLY CURATED rather than being chucked into The Machine and latent-space-sliced, which makes it feel like a more crafted experience than you might get otherwise. Lovely stuff.
  • The Smell of Data: ‘What if you could smell your computer?’ is a question that almost no actual consumer has ever wanted to know the answer to, but nonetheless is something which the tech industry seemingly seems hell-bent on making reality; I think it’s been 20-odd years since I first saw a ‘here’s a box that will spray relevant scents into the air as you play Call of Duty so you can actually SMELL the cordite and, er, blood as you perforate terrorists for FREEDOM!’ device – they had a bit of a resurgence during lockdown, and again during the brief metaversal spazzout of 2022, but noone’s ever REALLY wanted this to be a thing. This, though, this is ART and therefore a million times better: “The sense of smell helped early humans to survive. But now that our hunting and gathering has moved to the digital environment, our noses can no longer warn us of the lurking dangers in the online wilderness. The Smell of Data is a new scent created to instinctively alert internet users of data leaks on personal devices.” The Smell of Data is a device which you charge up with scent capsules and carry around with you, linked to your phone; when your phone connects to an unprotected website on an unsecured WiFi network or Hotspot, it will spray a puff of the scent into the air to alert you to the fact that you’re potentially being mined. This has now put me in mind of all sorts of builds on this – I quite like the idea of something like this embedded into the outsize collar of a coat or something and triggering at any point you’re in-shot of a digital camera, some sort of surveillance-watcher (impossible, obvs), but I am sure you can come up with your own.
  • Hyperkinetic Art: I like this a lot. The website of someone called Simon, who makes work with a plotter pen – per their description, “I make art with maths and programming, and I have a pen plotter robot called Stephen that brings it to life with a biro…The majority of the work I produce is inspired by nature, and the pursuit of generating organic shapes in the least organic medium I can think of – a bstard fcuking computer…All of the artwork is created with javascript, rendered on a HTML5 canvas for development and then exported to polylines and curves to be plotted onto paper. I’ve built up a considerable set of tools for creating generative art in the process, and have wandered down some unexpected paths, such as implementing Newton’s laws of gravitation to manipulate particle paths.” I think the work here is LOVELY, and far more interesting than a lot of machine-drawn imagery often is – it’s a commercial site and the prints are available to buy, but if you’re not in the market for new art then you might just want to have a browse and enjoy.
  • Emoticon Generator: Before the TYRANNY OF EMOJI there was the emoticon, and in the land of the emoticon the emoticon that used non-standard, non-English characters was king. This EXCELLENT little site lets you simply and easily create your very own bespoke emoticon, choosing from a selection of drop-downs to make a personalised little face JUST FOR YOU. Why not make this your kooky, whimsical digital callsign for 2025 (other than, you know, the appalling tweeness and self-regard involved in believing one needs a ‘kooky, whimsical digital callsign for 2025’)?
  • Alphabetical Order: Another newsletter! This is BRAND NEW,  only one issue in, and if you’re interested in music writing then you might enjoy the premise here: “Every other week, I’m going to pull a record off the shelf and write about how it affected my life in some way. Not my favorite records necessarily, or ones I even love for that matter, but albums that are tied to memories or important life moments.” This is a similar premise to Shelfies by Jared and Lavie, but for music, and I rather like this way of thinking of cultural items in relation to oneself. I can’t vouch for the quality of the resulting essays – there’s only one up there so far – but I think this is a fun idea which might be worth following.
  • Vintage Bowling: Would YOU like to immerse yourself in some classic Americana, the American of diners and T-Birds and large men demonstrating impossible grace and skill when wielding a 15lb mass? GREAT! This website collects photos of old-style bowling alleys in the US and is, basically, just a whole aesthetic in itself. These are actually really quite interesting from an historical perspective, as they trace the evolution of the game from the…19th?C to more modern iterations, but the real gold here is, imho, in the 1950s-era stuff, where you can practically smell the Brylcream, the tallow for the fries and the appalling quantity of cheap aftershave worn by Spike who just won’t leave that poor waitress Jeannie alone (look, that’s where I imagination just took me, what of it?).
  • Doom Running in a PDF: It’s monochromatic! It renders so painfully-slowly it’s unplayable! But! It is, definitively, the original DOOM running inside a PDF document! An achievement as stunningly-futile as it is technically-impressive, so WELL DONE to whoever is behind it, I can only applaud your endeavour.
  • Wandermap: On the one hand, I am impressed by how clever this is; on the other, I think that it is likely to lead to some genuinely unpleasant travel experiences. The premise, though, is really smart – Wandermap lets you plug in any video from Insta and then parses it to pull all the destinations from it and then map them for you, giving you an instant itinerary to mimic that of your favourite shiny-toothed and floppy-haired influencer moppet. Which, to be clear, is really smart! – I presume there’s a ‘feed video to GPT, extract destinations, map to OpenStreetMap’ pathway going on under the hood, though I am guessing here – but, also, means that what you’re doing is mimicking exactly the same route and destinations as the influencer in question, leading to a) you going to places that will inevitably be fcuking rammed by the time you get there, because, well, INFLUENCER!; b) you seeing stuff that you have already seen because, well, YOU WATCHED THE INITIAL VIDEO. Although given current travel habits practiced by The Young this doesn’t appear to be something that bothers them, so, basically, I should shut up and accept that I am old and don’t understand anything anymore.
  • Eyemead: Thanks to my friend Josh for sharing this with me – Eyemead is…Jesus, you know how I occasionally wang on about the fact that there are several million words of me on the web, blah blah blah? Well Eyemead is the home to ‘69 hand-coded websites by John Palmer’, started in 1998, which comprises “2,673 htm files and 6,206 images, totaling 12.92 million words and 268 Mb.” I MEAN, FCUKING HELL. This is, I think, no longer being updated – the last entries date from 2016 – but…this is SO MUCH WORK, on everything from oak trees to making haybales, Sherwood Forest to the Anapurna Circuit in Nepal…I love the fact that this exists, and I love the fact that John Palmer spent nearly 20 years building all of this stuff and that it is STILL THERE. I honestly believe – and, actually, as I type this, I realise I actually DO believe this, very firmly – that Governments ought to consider a certain personal hosting budget as a birthright, for anyone to create and host and maintain projects, and that this should extend to their posthumous preservation, because THIS IS CULTURE, however small and seemingly-marginal and frivolous it may seem, and the thought of all of this sort of thing one day vanishing into bits is…distressing to me, turns out.
  • Amazon Kitchen: This is a YouTube channel promoting some fancy brand of knife or another, but the reason I am including it here is because its promos are basically lavishly-produced, vaguely-ASMR-ish cooking videos which almost EXACTLY mimic the very specific aesthetic of a specific corner of the Meta algorithm which was stalking me a few years back – there was a period of about a year or so when on the rare occasions I opened Facebook I would be confronted with an endless stream of videos of LARGE MEN, mostly bearded and often topless, cooking in outdoor settings over open flames, mostly MEAT (obviously), using lavishly-oversharpened and outsize knives. Why? NO IDEA (I am 11 stone damp and have never, ever been able to grow adequate facial hair, just so’s you know). Anyway, these videos are basically like that and I’m linking them here mainly out of some sort of weird sort of algonostalgia, which now I come to think of it is…weird. Is this a thing? Has anyone else felt like they miss an algorithm they’re no longer exposed to? Am I having some sort of nervous breakdown?
  • The Missouri Marmite Museum: I don’t mean to be unfair to the state of Missouri, but I’ve never been presented with a compelling reason to visit it before (actually, speaking of being mean to States, it’s always interesting (to me at least) to ask Americans ‘if you could disappear ONE state – like, it would totally cease to exist immediately – which would you disappear?’; it’s astonishing how often the answer is ‘one of the Dakotas, maybe both’) – NOW though it’s all different. THEY HAVE A MARMITE MUSEUM! Ok, this is a terrible webpage – it’s literally just some information – but I was SO heartened to find this slightly-inexplicable piece of the UK in the US. “The Missouri Marmite Museum celebrates the world’s most famous love-it/hate-it item: a yeast extract made from the dregs found at the bottom of British beer barrels, and sold in adorable brown glass jars. The museum’s collection began with one metal-top jar purchased in 1974; today the collection is a broad spectrum of plastic-top jars, toy trucks, cookbooks, stuffed animals, thimbles, toast racks, advertisements, and wearing apparel: socks, t-shirts, aprons, and sweatshirts.   Parts of the collection come from India, New Zealand, South Africa, Australia, England, Sri Lanka, Canada, and Hong Kong – with the oldest item (1930’s) having been excavated from a rubbish dump in Wales. The Missouri Marmite Museum, located in Valley Park, Missouri, is open by appointment only.” I mean, that feels almost like it merits a roadtrip.
  • The Coney Island History Project: Sorry, there’s a lot of Americana this week, turns out – still, this is a really interesting website collating photos and information about the history of the Coney Island fairground in New York and, best of all, oral histories with locals about their memories of the place – I’ve only skimmed this, but there are some great stories in here which are worth exploring imho (via Blort).
  • The Puppets Co-Op: OH THIS IS FUN! Would YOU like to get into making puppets? Would you like a bunch of guides on how to do so, from small puppets to frankly-terrifyingly-large ones? Would you like an incredible trove of information about puppets and puppetry, all presented in an adorably-scratchy style that I genuinely adore? OH GOOD! Also there’s a section on the site about ‘puppet libraries’ where you can RENT OUT PUPPETS, which sounds like quite a fun thing to do on a rainy afternoon if you ask me.
  • Musiq Is: I *think* that this is another site that has basically been spun up by AI, like some of the ones I featured last week, but I can’t be wholly certain – either way, it’s a fun series of toys/games designed to test your musical ability – so you’re tasked to maintain a series of BPMs, for example, or identifying notes of a certain pitch. Fun, although possibly less so if, like me, you’re borderline tone-deaf.
  • Handcheck: Fun, pointless but also sort-of a cool proof-of-concept – the site just asks you to make and hold a series of hand gestures which it uses your webcam to track and verify…ok, so the payoff is a touch underwhelming, but there’s obviously quite a lot of uses for this; I quite like its potential as a non-traditional captcha for example, but there’s also a very childish part of me that quite wants to make a website to which access is locked until visitors make the ‘Loser’ sign on their foreheads.
  • The Current Time In Morse Code: I mean, that is literally what this is, I don’t really know what else I’m meant to say about it other than that part of me would really like one of these on a very big, railway station-style clacker board (yes, I know that that’s not the technical name for them but it escapes me right now).
  • Realbird Fakebird: A FUN NEW DAILY GAME! Which is nothing like, and doesn’t want to be anything like, Wordle! Actually I don’t think this is new at all, just new to me (so slow, so superannuated) – anyway, the premise is that each day you’re presented with seven things which you have to characterise as ‘X’ or ‘not-X’ – so today for example it’s ‘which of these were real, branded pinball machines?’. This takes literally 30s and is…light, frivolous, pointless fun! It still exists! Just!
  • The Visible Zorker: OK, this is…VERY, very geeky, but also quite wonderful in its own way. Zork, in case you don’t know (but if you’re reading this I have a creeping suspicion that you probably do), was one of (if not THE) original text adventures from the 80s; in this version, you can play the whole game but ALSO see the code as you play, so you can literally SEE how the sausage is making itself as you eat it (so to speak – wow, that was a really horrible analogy, sorry about that). Obviously if you’re a code person then this will speak to you far more than it did to me, but as someone resolutely non-technical it’s actually a really helpful and useful way to get my head around some of the ‘how does software actually work?’ questions that occasionally flit around my head in search of an answer (you can read more about the project here if you’re curious).
  • Sebastian’s Quest: A cute little Pico-8 browsergame in which you play a mouse. There is cheese. This is VERY ill-explained, but you basically have to make your way from screen-to-screen, pushing the blocks around to make a path for yourself…except you will quickly realise that there are wrinkles to the rules, and that you will have to work those wrinkles out for yourself. This is more fun than I expected it to be, though you will have to think a *little* bit.
  • St Blamensir: Finally this week, something a bit lovely which I don’t want to explain too much. From the creator’s blurb: “this is my personal interactive worldbuilding project hosted on neocities which incidentally also feeds my medieval hyperfixation. It is everchanging and I have a lot more stuff planned for it.” Do you like manuscripts and marginalia? Did you enjoy the visual stylings of Pentiment? I think you’ll enjoy this, then.

By Elif Özen

THIS WEEK’S FINAL MIX IS BY BOBBY MYSEH AND IT IS TWO HOURS OF GORGEOUS, VAGUELY-80s LOUNGECORE! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Dogs Divide by Zero: THANKYOU to reader Cameron McCormic who sent this to me along with the message “Everything starts with pen/brush marker/water colour on paper. Sometime I surprise myself.” This Tumblr collects his abstract sketches which are simultaneously VERY kaleidoscopic and also insanely-redolent of a particular 1970s visual style that I can’t for the life of me name or place. I like these a lot.
  • Gap Playlists: Via Simon from Unspun Heroes comes this sadly-defunct but still-great Tumblr featuring links to music that used to be played in Gap shops in the 90s and early-00s, alongside images from the period and links to playlists of the era-appropriate tracks. This is some EXCELLENT musical (and visual) nostalgia, although it did also remind me of the tedious stranglehold Gap had on mainstream daywear for a decade or more.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Aim Not Here: AI video (sorry) depicting a few nice corners of latent space – as with the more interesting projects of this sort, there’s a very clear aesthetic and vibe to these which, whilst obviously the product of The Machine, are stylistically-distinct enough to make them interesting to my mind; I rather like the ‘weird Hunterian Museum’ vibe of a lot of the stuff in here.
  • MD Foodie Boyz: I post this link with NO INTENDED SHADE WHATSOEVER, but with the following comments: 1) this is the Insta feed of a podcast (I know, I know) in which a bunch of ACTUAL, LITERAL CHILDREN (‘tweens’, if I’m being generous) talk about fast food and snacks; 2) the podcast has a LOGO. I appreciate the world is very different now to THE DISTANT PAST in which I was this age, but fcuk me the degree of media sophistication at play from the kids here is impressive (if you assume that this isn’t being adult-managed, which I am going to do); 3) I have tried listening to this. WHO IS LISTENING TO THIS? The inanity – no shade! I am sure they are nice kids! I am very much not the target audience! – is astounding. WHO WANTS TO LISTEN TO THREE NOT-HUGELY-ARTICULATE 12 YEAR OLDS TALK ABOUT CHIPS??? I don’t know man, I don’t see the ‘children as pillars of the creator economy’ thing as a necessarily Good Vibe, but I suppose this is what the Rizzler has wrought and so, well, here we are.
  • Marion Cumpa: An Insta feed posting what I might be tempted to call ‘erotica’ were that not such a fundamentally-awful word, there’s some photography on here but the reason I’m posting the link is because of the illustrations which I think are EXCELLENT and several of which I would pay actual cashmoneyfor should such an opportunity present itself.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Oldham: Another reminder of the importance of local journalism and why it’s vital to fund it wherever possible – this is an excellent piece of reporting by Joshi Hermann at the Manchester Mill, explaining clearly and methodically the background to the current resurrection of panics around ‘grooming gangs’ in Oldham, which does an excellent job at demonstrating that the issue is complex, multilayered and has been investigated multiply and at length, regardless of what specific, self-interested actors may currently wish people to believe. More than anything this shows that stories like this are complex, and often, at heart, slow and boring – investigations into procedures and processes and the past necessarily take time and do not necessarily provide conveniently-packaged answers or solutions, however much the nature of the crimes in question might induce one to wish they did. It’s also indicative of the degree to which people have been trying to make this story all about them for years, even before That Fcuking Man decided to opine, and how, even after years of being across the issue, it’s still hard for even the most-informed to have a clear picture of what happened, and how that is not for want of trying. Seriously, this is EXCELLENT journalism of the sort you see all too rarely these days.
  • The New Tech Right: I absolutely adored this essay by Jasmine Sun – ok, in part because it articulated lots of things I already think – about the current wave of right-wing thinking currently sweeping the Valley (although one might argue, as she does and others have done, that a better framing is accel/decel rather than left/right), what it stems from, and, per Doctorow’s point in The Well which I referenced last week, how coalitions are the spirit of the new age, and how people who don’t necessarily agree with the general vibe might consider working around it. In particular I adored the ‘In/Out’ list, which felt not only INSANELY on-point but also an excellent articulation of my current BIG THESIS, to whit ‘2025 is basically going to feel like the 1980s, but compressed into a single year’.
  • What The Fcuk Are We Doing Anymore?: One for the writers – LOL! IT WILL MAKE YOU SO DEPRESSED! – in which the reliably-excellent Kate Wagner goes long on the general sense of malaise felt amongst people who in an ideal world would like to exchange the writing of words for money, particularly people who find themselves (in NA, at least) on the political / social left. This is a long excerpt, but it’s worth reproducing as I think it gives a good overview of the central arguments: “Part of my ambient madness comes from what I see as an ever-emerging truth: there is increasingly nowhere to run to for stability or protection, especially political and legal protection, in the world of letters. This, coupled with the fact that social media has, in effect, become a kind of extrajudicial kangaroo court whose verdicts have dire consequences including for employment, does not bode well. While there remains a healthy culture of left-wing magazine writing, many of the old bulwarks (especially large newspapers) have either caved to power — such as the case with censorship or silence on Palestine — or have caved to the mob and seek only to frantically pander to a populism that isn’t even real because the internet has scattered us into algorithmic cesspits that are becoming more and more difficult to climb out of. (My own parents are on a completely different internet from me and nothing I produce would ever or has ever reached them “organically.”) And this is before we get into things like ensh1ttification, literary cultural decline writ large and what AI slop promises to do with the publishing industry. These developments, unfortunately, are a long time coming. For the last twenty or so years, the need to see internet number go up has destroyed countless literary lives, not to mention things like style and form, whether in terms of clickbaitiness in the Millennial mode or scandalous self-exploitative virality or through being made so afraid of backlash that one undermines one’s own argument, hands the keys over de facto to one’s enemies, writes oneself into a hole.”
  • Another ‘Where We Are Now With AI’ Piece: Ethan Mollick again, giving another ‘where we are RIGHT NOW’ update on the AI landscape, particularly in the context of the next AGI hypetrain slowly picking up speed (authorial opinion: AGI is bullsh1t and anyone promoting its imminent arrival is attempting to sell you something (or fleece investors)) – his point, once again, is one which I keep on making and which I found myself repeatedly returning to during the INJECT IT INTO OUR VEINS SIR KEIR!!!!! announcement on the UK’s AI strategy on Monday – to whit, it is astonishing how little anyone understands what you can CURRENTLY do with this stuff, and without that understanding I don’t think you can have sensible conversations about the future of it, and certainly not at the level of policy. Also, from a purely UK perspective, the habit of using political correspondents to ask questions on tech announcements really boils my p1ss and should stop ffs.
  • What Is Going To Happen To Search Very Very Soon: Look, I have written about this EXTENSIVELY over the past year so, presuming you actually read what I write and then don’t dismiss it out of hand as, well, b0llocks, you probably already know most of what’s in here – if not, though, this is a useful companion to that Reddit Answers link all the way back up there which explains, neatly, all the reasons why any businesses built on ‘search’ as a thing might be, well, fcuked beyond all recognition.
  • Trouble Transitioning: A superb essay by Adam Tooze in the LRB, ostensibly reviewing a history of energy written by one Jean-Baptiste Frezzos but at the same time offering a really well-crafted history of the concept of the ‘energy transition’, alongside a series of explanations as to why thinking of it as a phase transition is in and of itself potentially-unhelpful. This is a very good, inevitably-sobering piece which lays down an awful lot of rather…chilling (lol the irony!) facts about our current carbon emissions and what we might need to do about them, the answer to which is, basically, ‘completely change the way we behave and interrelate as a species’ so, er, GOOD ONE! I met someone this week who works for the Carbon Trust and who was…let’s say ‘less than bullish’ about things, in case you wanted An Update From The Coalface (again, lol!).
  • The Augmented City: OK, full disclosure, this is a 140-page document and I have at best skimmed it – that said, it’s a PROPER ACADEMIC THING from Cornell University and it is a really interesting central question, specifically ‘how might we think about AR/mixed reality data projects in the context of the urban environment, what benefits and disbenefits might the tech bring to public spaces, how might one consider regulating the use of this stuff, how can communities harness it for hyperlocal benefit…seriously, there looks to be some really interesting thinking in here and it’s a nice alternative to the ‘smart city’ bullsh1t that has siphoned up SO MUCH academic urbanist money in the past decade or so. I can think of a dozen brands off the top of my head who ought to be thinking at least a bit about this stuff.
  • The Neil Gaiman Stuff: So I didn’t link to any of the allegations previously because, well, it was a series of podcasts, but this longread by New York Magazine is…well, look, if you’re reasonably online and you have any interest in this stuff then you will almost certainly have read it, but I am aware that there are some…less-online people among the Curios readership (this strikes me as frankly mental – like, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE? – but obviously you’re very welcome) and as such they might not have seen it yet. This is a pretty unpleasant read, and it’s worth noting that it contains reasonably-explicit descriptions of what sounds very much like abuse, assault and a bunch of other things too – I’m linking to it because I think it’s quite important to share these things if people are brave enough to speak about them, and also because it’s wearily, weirdly familiar.
  • 69 Theses: Predictions and Lessons For Crypto in 2025: To be clear, I have no personal interest in crypto beyond the general ‘wtaf this is so weird’ stuff I put in here, but I found this list FASCINATING – this is very much from a different part of the web to the one I inhabit, the part where people still diamond hand and hodl like it’s 2020, and where sh1tcoins and memecoins and AI-juiced markets are real things rather than, well, just a collection of very silly-sounding phrases. I think I understood about…OK, being charitable I’d say about 65% of this, but it is DIZZYING, like a whole parallel futurenow being built somewhere over there. This might all be bullsh1t – and I have a fairly strong belief that 90-ish per cent of it is – but it is SUCH AND INCREDIBLY WEIRD SCIFI FUTURE! Your appetite for this will depend entirely on your tolerance for sentences like this one: “There are now two categories of memecoins: A) Legacy memecoins (ie $PEPE, $WIF, $BONK, $DOGE, etc.); and B) Sentient memecoins (ie $GOAT, $LUNA, $KWEEN). One group relies on humans to spread its gospel; the other relies on machines which do not eat, sleep or urinate from biological bladders. Legacy coins must morph into sentient memecoins or retreat from relevance entirely.” I TOLD YOU IT WAS ODD.
  • Hitachi and the Magic Wand: A bit of a slight story, this one, but I was, er, tickled by the revelation that Hitachi has basically franchised out the Magic Wand brand because it was too embarrassed to have a sex toy in its product portfolio.
  • At The Thistle: Dani Garavelli, again in the LRB, writes about the newly-opened Thistle Centre in Glasgow, where the city’s drug addicts are able to go and safely inject in a clean, secure environment – while I appreciate not everyone is comfortable with the idea of the state effectively going ‘yeah, go ahead, shoot up, no bother mate’, the piece does a good job of explaining the rationale behind the Centre’s existence and the hope that people using it will eventually develop relationships with the staff that will see them seek treatment over time. I find this a fascinating area of policy, particularly having moved back to South London last year and currently seeing a frankly-dispiriting number of skagheads doing the ‘need/beg/score/gouch’ circuit on the streets of Oval.
  • AI, The Old and Singapore: I found this almost-unbearably affecting, but in general it’s a pretty straight telling of how the elderly care sector in Singapore is increasingly integrating robotics and AI into its services – residents are apparently enthused by their new electronic companions, which is great, but it’s impossible to shake the feeling of their being something unutterably sad about hundreds, thousands, millions of people living out their last days alone but for a digital overseer emoting ‘care’ at them. Still, growth industry for anyone looking for a career pivot!
  • Britain’s Car Market Is Fcuked: I don’t drive, I have had a single driving lesson in my entire life (I was 20, I think, and realised that…I simply didn’t care, and so stopped – on reflection, this was to prove a troubling indicator of the future direction of significant portions of my life) and therefore cars and driving and the general concept of ‘the motorway’ are strange and wild to me, esoteric like the magic of the Wookey Hole Witch. Still, despite my near-total ignorance of motoring and associated issues, this is a really interesting essay explaining exactly how much more expensive buying a new car (any car, including electric) has become – which, you might argue, is not necessarily a bad thing but which is…quite inconvenient in a country still very much designed for the fcuking things. There’s an interesting point at the end of the piece about how strategies employed by previous governments have led to a position that has actively harmed our chances of meeting the targets set by the same governments which, well, WHODATHUNKIT?!
  • Century Scale Storage: This is VERY long, but I promise it is super-interesting – the Harvard Law Review goes DEEP on digital storage and the challenges of preserving information for the long-term, and, really, this kept me interested all the way through in a way I wasn’t expecting – also, if there is ANY part of your work or life that requires you to think about long-term storage or archiving of anything then this is probably hugely-useful.
  • Kofte, Two Ways: Typically-brilliant food writing in Vittles – here Melek Erdal writes about making İçli Köfte (as they explain in the piece, that’s what kibbe ended up as when they reached Turkey). This is an excellent essay up-top about modern diasporic living and the way food travels and ‘authenticity’, followed by two recipes for the kofte, one authentic and one very much not, and the writing throughout is joyful – the tone is both super-London and (for all I know of it) also super-diasporic and it sounds like my city.
  • My Machine and Me: ‘Glance Back’ is an art project by Maya Man which I featured here in…oh God, nearly five years ago, time travel back there should you wish, and which takes a photo of you from your webcam each day, with minimal warning, asking you to share what you are thinking about the moment it’s taken; these then become an archive of your thoughts and moods as you sit ENGAGING WITH THE MACHINE. This essay by Greta Rainbow is about her experience spending a year with the app and what it’s like looking back at twelve months of pictures of your face when each is tied to a written memory, and what that means (if anything) about our relationship with screens and the time we spend staring at them, and I like it very much.
  • Feeding The Machine: This is a profile of Trisha Paytas, who I think I have been aware of for about a decade now and who, I think, might be one of the most thoroughly modern human beings alive today (see also, depressingly: The Paul Brothers, Caroline Calloway, MrBeast, Jake Humphrey). WHAT an incredible human being (I mean that in the most literal of senses).
  • Bad Beef: A history of the rap beef, starting way back in the 80s with the ‘Roxane Wars’ and all the way through to the terminal Biggie-Tupac feud of the 90s – this is fascinating, and a nice piece of context to Drake continuing to embarrass himself all over the courts and media this week (it really is astonishing how some people, regardless of wealth and success and trappings, will simply never, ever be able to be cool – honestly, I feel we have enough very high-profile examples of this phenomenon for someone to do a proper study of it now, with Drake and That Fcuking Man as the two core case studies).
  • Five Star Ratings: Or, ‘how noone in Japan would ever give a five star review of anywhere, ever’. I love this so so much – “At a soba shop near my house, low stars are given for the colour of the tempura (black), the smell (ammonia) and the presence of ashtrays (one for each table). On Tabelog, a Japanese Yelp for restaurants, if I see 3.49 stars, it gives me a little thrill. A typical review might read something like, ‘Food was super delicious. Perfect night. The server had messy hair. 2 stars.’ It’s why Shake Shack has 4.5 stars on Google and the best udon you’ve ever had in your life has 3.8: tourists love grade inflation.”
  • The Ghost Coat: Our last longread of the week is by Catherine Lacey in Granta – this is superbly-written, and I was basically sucked in by this paragraph and I hope you will be too: “And while it is true that a person is always ignorant of the particular future moving toward her person, there will certainly be moments when this truth is truer than others, and such was the case as I spent several days calling all the friends who’d visited my home in the prior weeks and months to discern whether the coat was theirs; the precarity of my present was becoming truer and truer, darker and darker, yet entirely out of view. And though this story ends peacefully, I haven’t degraded that peace by entrapping it here. The moviegoer is best dropped some distance from a story’s true end, and told to walk the last mile alone.”

By Tim Barr

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!: