Author Archives: admin

Webcurios 20/12/24

Reading Time: 33 minutes

AND SO, WE CAME TO THE END.

44 editions of Web Curios, roughly 3,500 links, 400k-odd words (fcuking HELL though) and here we find ourselves, on the cusp of entering the second quarter of the first century of the third millennium of recorded time, with supposedly-educated residents of one of the world’s richest and most powerful nations shooting into the sky because they are scared of planes and no longer seem to understand technology.

Truly, the future is panning out gloriously.

So for the next few weeks, why not take a break from the future? Ignore it. Fcuk it. It will happen without you, whether you like it or not (and you probably won’t, let’s be realistic).

Briefly, before we crack on with the links and the words and all the usual Web Curios gubbins, I just want to say a small thankyou to all of you for reading this (or, more realistically, just opening it and clicking a few links and mostly ignoring the prose), for sending me interesting links and emails, for telling me each week which links I’ve managed to fcuk up (no really, I am grateful!)  and for occasionally sharing it with people – I really do appreciate it.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you will be FINE without me, I promise (but what will I do without you?).

By Tye Martinez (most images this week from TIH, to whom, again, thanks)

WE BEGIN WITH A CHRISTMAS GIFT TO YOU FROM SADEAGLE, BRINGING YOU A MIX FEATURING TRACKS FROM VIETNAM AND INDIA AND KOREA AND TURKEY AND LOADS OF OTHER PLACES BESIDES, WHICH SEGUES INTO SOME CRACKING HIPHOP IN THE FINAL HALF HOUR OR SO AND WHICH IS, GENERALLY, FCUKING SUPERB! 

THE SECTION WHICH WONDERS WHETHER PETERS MANDELSON AND THIEL HAVE EVER HUNG OUT, PT.1:  

  • The Shopify Winter Editions: No, I didn’t expect the prestigious ‘first link in the final Curios of the year’ slot (it IS prestigious! Shut up!) to go to the annual list of product updates shipped by an ecommerce company, but for the second time in recent months Shopify’s marketing people have done something genuinely fun and, well, credit where it’s due. Click the link and you’ll be taken to a dry-looking (and, frankly, dry-reading) list of product updates that have shipped this year – but, if you click on the top left of the Page, where you can toggle between the ‘boring’ and ‘not boring’ view, you can flip the experience to become…BORING TV! This is SO fun – basically they have taken the 150+ different updates and turned each into a tiny, silly TV commercial, made with AI, which you can watch on a little pop-up in-browser telly, complete with remote control to let you flip between them at will. I have no idea whether they fully committed to the bit and did all 150 (it’s a cute idea but, well, it’s still fundamentally about software updates to an ecommerce platform and I am not quite invested enough to do the full deep-dive), but everyone else, take note – THIS IS WHAT AI IS FOR. Well, not just this – you’d sort of hope for all the money spent and energy consumed we’d get a bit more out of it than ‘moderately-imaginative marketing for a massive corporate’, but let’s take what we can get shall we?
  • Rijksmuseum AI Art Explorer: One of the nice things about Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum – other than it’s superb collection and regularly-excellent digital work – is the way in which they facilitate others working with their archive; this is an excellent example, a hobby project cobbled together by one Sors Lockhorst which scrapes the museum’s API, uses OpenAI’s CLIP to map them in vector space and gives YOU, the end-user who frankly probably didn’t care about the preceding 20 words of semi-technical exposition, the opportunity to search the collection based on (their words) ‘vibes’. Want to ask the engine to show you works which demonstrate ‘the general sense of not knowing quite what you’re doing’? Or paintings which, more than any others, embody the very essence of ‘suspicious lust’? NOW YOU CAN! Your mileage will vary – not everything results in a satisfying selection of images but, broadly, there’s been something interesting in the way in which my (admittedly…somewhat oblique) queries have been interpreted each time – and because it’s not an official website you need to open the pictures in a new tab to get the full, hi-res view, but it’s another example of the interesting ways in which this sort of search can open up and recontextualise an archive.
  • The Taylor Swift Eras Website: I am sure that there are some of you who are already well aware of the launch of this website, whether as a result of your own personal Swiftian obsession or that of someone else in your household – I had no idea, though, that there was some NEW DIGITAL THING dropping from one of the world’s most famous people and was quite interested to see what one might make with all that money and all those resources and a reputation for engaging one’s fandom in deep, lore-driven explorations of MEANING and HIDDEN MESSAGES and LYRICAL COMPLEXITIES and…God, this is so fcuking miserable. Honestly, click the link – it feels HORRIBLY phoned-in (even the design is lacklustre and…cheap-feeling?) – fans get to choose which of the ERAS of the ERAS tour they want to vibe with, and clicking on the variously-coloured header images will take you to an embedded Spotify playlist of that specific album, and some shots of that bit of the stage show from various stages of the megatour, but there’s something really rather hollow about the fact that the sections on the homepage go ‘top nav / album embed / album shop / merch store’ – like, TayTay, you are VERY RICH and frankly haven’t you squeezed these kids (and their parents) enough now? Where’s the imagination and the sense of COMMUNITY and the opportunity to fans to come together and share their memories of the tour, and where are the additional easter eggs for all the devotees, and where, honestly, is the fun? Because this is not in any way a fun website. Once again it feels a little bit like being a fan of one of these people is a bit like enjoying a talented performer’s work, but also quite a lot like a strange findom relationship.
  • Connyct: I am including this not because I care about it in the slightest but because there’s a vanishingly-small likelihood that this is going to be TikTok2.0 – or at least it could be in the US, should the ban actually go through next year. Connyct is, as far as I can tell, ‘TikTok but doing rollout like Facebook in the mid-00s’, and so only opening up to college students at present so as to, I presume, allow them to scale at a reasonable pace and also build the sort of necessary young userbase that all social networks need to gain critical mass. Is this going to become the latest North American digital dopamine sink? I don’t know! I don’t, in all honesty, give a fcuk? And, come on, neither do you, let’s all stop pretending. Although, briefly removing the mask of weary cynicism, it does feel like, generationally-speaking, this might be a time for a platform reset for the young, and ‘social media as though it were invented for students today rather than 20 years ago’ isn’t a terrible pitch (even if that does, coincidentally, look pretty much exactly like TikTok).
  • Music Time Travel: Ok, full disclosure- I haven’t *actually* tried this, but the idea looks interesting and I am going to make a huge assumption that it’s not malware and it won’t brick your phone or anything. Rewind (that’s the app’s name, but ‘Music Time Travel’ is more helpfully-descriptive) basically lets you pick any year you like and pretend you’re listening to a sort of ‘greatest hits radio’ from said year – it links to your existing subscription music service so all the tracks are licensed, but adds a layer of curated ‘by year’ magic, meaning that if you want to spend the festive season harking back to a time in which your life was simpler and you didn’t yet know what a crushing fcuking *mess* you were going to make of everything then, well, you can! This feels like it might be fun for any of you whose children are going through a musical retrofetishism phase.
  • Cloudspotting: Pictures of clouds, which you can draw on so that you can share the shapes you see with the world. I love this – there are a load of images on there already, which you can either draw on yourself to find your own shapes, or hover over to see the shapes others have found in them; or, should you wish, you can upload your own photograph of some cumulonimbus (other cloud formations are available) so the wider cloud enthusiast community (nebulophiles?) can also enjoy seeing what they can scry in the wispy dampness. Why? WHY NOT, WHY DOES THERE HAVE TO BE A REASON FOR EVERYTHING FFS?
  • The Best Science Images of 2024: Nature picks their best shots of the year – honestly, these are great but to my mind there is nothing that can surpass the quite incredible close-up picture of a sand weevil which looks (I promise you am I right about this) like the best boss that FromSoft have ever designed, like something from an as-yet unexplored corner of Elden Ring’s map (seriously, if these references mean something to you then you have NO IDEA how right I am about this comparison). On the flipside, though, the swimming cheetahs felt a little like harbingers of some not-wholly-glad tidings. Still, overall these are all amazing pictures which will elicit some actual, proper ‘wow, isn’t the natural world a consistent incredible and beautiful place, regardless of our incessant attempts to fcuk it into the sun?’ feelings from all of you, so, well, enjoy those while you’re still capable of doing so. BONUS CRITTER PICTURE CONTENT: the annual comedy wildlife photography awards which, I’ll be honest, I’ve slightly fallen out of love with in recent years (it’s very much me, not them), but which this year redeem themselves with at least three top-quality images (the two separate penguin images – always great value, those lads – and the one of the seals, which I am AMAZED wasn’t titled ‘The Slap’ for reasons that should become immediately apparent when you see it).
  • The AI Art Critic: Upload an image and get a little video critique delivered to you by The Machine, in the guise of Danny Devito in a Warhol wig – the workflow here is presumably something like ‘image analysed by GPT, analysis fed as a script to a preset Runway text-to-video pipeline, for those interested; this is a classic example of what the limitations are of the text part of the pipeline, because the ‘opinions’ here are simply…nowhere near interesting enough to be worthwhile. The Machine won’t slag off the work, it will just spit some artw4nk-adjacent guff which, while corresponding to whatever it is you’ve uploaded, is neither interesting nor cruel nor funny, and therefore there’s no real incentive (to my mind) to try this more than once. Which is a shame, because I still maintain that there’s something magical and surprising about the tech here – the fact that The Machine can ‘see’ is fcuking insane!! – but it’s stymied by the off-the-shelf language model in use. Can someone make this again but with a jailbroken local copy of LLAMA or something? A little project for one of you to work on while I’m away!
  • Soot: Very much not my sort of thing, this, but I can imagine it being interesting and useful to people with significantly different brains than mine – Soot is, basically, a visual moodboard-type thing; you arrange images on a Page or series of Pages which you own and curate, images can be annotated and tagged and themselves link through to OTHER image boards, and you can make anything you post on there public so that other users can explore your aesthetic. I personally don’t *quite* see how this is different from the million-and-one similar type of platforms for this sort of thing that already exist, but I’m equally conscious that I am a bit like a dog staring at a car with this sort of stuff in that it is pretty much totally alien to my conception of the world and information and How Thinking Works, and your mileage might therefore vary a bit.
  • Google ImageFX: I have stopped bothering with AI update stuff in the main, partly because I was getting increasingly-irate emails from people complaining about it (on which, actually – if your default position is that ‘it is AI and therefore it is sh1t and you shouldn’t write about it or feature it or even look at or think about it lest you accelerate the badness!’ then, well, you haven’t really understood what Curios is about) and partly because there’s just SO FCUKING MUCH OF IT – I’ll make a brief exception for this, though, the latest iteration of Google’s text-to-image builder because it’s quite good (better than OpenAI’s, to my mind) and the interface is nice, and because, if you’re in the States or if you can be bothered to VPN your way there, then you can also experiment with this fun little style transfer-type toy called Whisk which lets you combine a bunch of elements into a scene which you can then remix using text prompts, giving a neat example of how this stuff is going to start working in the next year or so.
  • AI CEO: Satire! Except, well, it’s not so funny when it’s not the CEOs who are going to be replaced, it’s the rest of us!
  • The Old Robots: Via Pietro Minto, an OLD website featuring, er, a LOT of images of old robot toys from pretty much every point from the mid-20th-Century onwards. Do you have some sort of half-formed memories of a childhood toy in comforting beige, some sort of red-eyed lumbering hulk of 80s-imagined future, your very own plastic pal who was so much fun to be with? You will almost certainly find details of it in here, but fcuk me will you have to look hard because there are SO MANY OLD ROBOTS on here.
  • Spacefiller: I do like me some generative art, and I very much enjoy the idea here: “Each poster in the Living Prints series is algorithmically generated when you order it. The prints are sampled from an ecosystem of simulated organisms and no two posters are the same. You won’t know exactly what your poster looks like until it shows up at your door, but we think that is the fun part. The simulated organisms are grown from randomly placed seeds. A variety of predetermined species can appear in your poster, each with its own look and behavior.” OK, so the resulting outputs here aren’t to my personal taste, but I can very much get behind the idea at play – can, er, someone make one of these things that DOES conform exactly to my personal tastes, please? THANKS!
  • AImail: I think email gets too much of a hard time, personally. Email is discrete. It’s asynchronous. You can deal with it in your own time, at your own convenience, or indeed never. Noone has EVER sent you an email simply saying ‘hi’ with no further detail or information. I LIKE RECEIVING EMAILS. AND YET! It appears to have been saddled with the blame for a significant proportion of our modern ills, the corporate ones at least, and we’ve had a decade or more of people promising to KILL email or SAVE US from email or TRANSFORM email, and still it persists, unkillable. The latest attempt to free us all from the, er, not-particularly-tyrannical grip of email comes in the shape of Cora, an AI-enabled system which promises, as far as I can tell, to triage all of your mail and deliver you summaries twice a day of the things you need to know, responding automatically to the things you don’t need to be aware of, and deleting the things it deems to be spam. ARE WE ALL FCUKING MAD?!?!?! There is literally no way in hell that ANY AI software anywhere in the world can execute this sort of stuff autonomously, accurately, all the time, and putting your email life in the hands of this sort of system in 2024 is almost-certainly going to lead to some genuinely awkward – but, admittedly, potentially-very-funny mishaps as Cora decides that, actually, you didn’t need to see that reminder email from HMRC after all. Currently available via a waiting list, for any of you brave (stupid) enough to entrust your inbox to an LLM.
  • Cask Exchange: As we canter into the second quarter of the third millennium, it does rather feel like the ambient mood is ‘casino on the titanic about an hour before the iceberg hits’ – everyone feels a bit reckless, a bit emboldened, and a bit ‘fcukit, put it all on black, what’s the worst that could happen?’. In this spirit, and given you might want to divest some of the $Hawk you picked up on the crypto exchanges the other week, you may well be interested in Cask Exchange, a website which lets you invest in, er, whisky barrels? Is this a thing? Is this legit? Perhaps it is – per the blurb, “Cask Exchange is an online trading platform where qualified distilleries, wholesalers, and brands can buy and sell barreled spirits for bottling. It connects sellers looking to monetize their barrels with buyers seeking liquid for bottling.” – and, of course, there’s a market for everything, but, also, CAN MAYBE EVERYTHING NOT BE A FCUKING MARKET PLEASE? Apparently this has been going in some form or another since 1998, so once again it is I who am the rube and the idiot – Christ alive, I despise (and, mostly, completely fail to have any real understanding of,) money.
  • Snowflake Maker: You know those snowflakes you make with small children using folded paper and scissors? Well this is that, minus the paper and scissors (and hence minus finding bits of said paper all over your house for the following decade or so) – this is…fun! Genuine, simple, uncomplicated fun! Also, if you’re that way inclined, there’s an interesting minor patternmaking challenge involved in trying to create a snowflake with a pleasingly-phallic cutout pattern – give it a go!
  • The LAN Party House: I’ve never really been a proper geek – I appreciate that writing this as someone who writes, for free, a weekly newsletter about ‘stuff that I find interesting on the internet’ might possibly result in some muffled laughter at my expense from the seven of you reading this but, honestly, it’s true! I have never done D&D, I am not into boardgames or scifi or fantasy, or any of the standard tropes, and I have generally tended towards ‘drink and drugs’ as pastimes rather than ‘fandoms and communities’, and I am capable of doing my own washing without it smelling of mildew (sorry, but)! Which is why stuff like this absolutely fascinates me – just…imagine being so into something that you go to these insane lengths to facilitate it! For those of you too young or too…’normal’, frankly, to be aware of what a LAN party is/was, in the days before online gaming the only way to play serious multiplayer network games (FPS or strategy sims, mainly) would be to connect them to a Local Area Network – or LAN – which required the machines to all be cabled together, which required them to be in the same place, which meant people taking their computers to a central place and connecting them and then basically spending 24h+ doing nothing but eating fast food and playing games…you can see, can’t you, where some of the stereotypes about this community started? Anyway, this is what a house designed from the ground up to accommodate that sort of event might look like, if it were envisioned by someone VERY wealthy who had some pretty serious design chops – honestly, this is AMAZING (although what’s possibly more amazing is that the person in question is also married and has children) and will make one or two of you very, very covetous indeed.

By Jose Luis Cena

THIS IS AN ALBUM OF INSTRUMENTAL HIPHOP BITS BY DRUM TALK AND IT IS, HONESTLY, REALLY QUITE SOMETHING AND I RECOMMEND IT UNRESERVEDLY! 

THE SECTION WHICH WONDERS WHETHER PETERS MANDELSON AND THIEL HAVE EVER HUNG OUT, PT.2:  

  • WikiLocal: This isn’t a wholly-new idea – I have definitely featured something along similar lines before, possibly during Lockdown One – but I have a particular soft spot for projects which both leverage Wikipedia and which encourage local exploration and learning. This is a really simple website, mixing up maps with Wikipedia entires to let you quickly and easily find places that are notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry devoted to them in the immediate vicinity of any location you choose – so, for example, I can see the place where Van Gogh briefly lived round the corner from me, say, and I have literally JUST learned that I am located just by the site of the oldest adventure playground in London still to stand at its original site. I KNOW I AM SO PRIVILEGED! Honestly, this is SO interesting and I figured it might be particularly cool to give it a go over the holidays as an opportunity to get to know your neighbourhood a bit better. NB – Web Curios accepts no responsibility should this tool reveal that you live in an area with no interesting or notable history/landmarks whatsoever.
  • Meta Motivo: Ok, this is QUITE technical, but it’s really interesting from the point of view of attempting to create virtual agents which can move, act and to an extent even ‘learn’ autonomously in virtual space- this is a new experimental model/toy thing from Meta which explores how it’s getting along making models which can effectively perform “whole-body control tasks, including motion tracking, goal pose reaching, and reward optimization, without any additional training or planning.” There’s an explanatory blogpost here – which is, honestly, VERY TECHNICAL – but click the main link and enjoy playing with the AI stick figure man who, if you play around with it a bit, can be made to dance and caper in ways which give you a brief, tantalising glimpse as to how interesting and odd and fun it will be in a few years time when you have semi-autonomous in-world virtual actors who can act independently and who can display emergent physical behaviours. If, though, that doesn’t really grab you, then can I please encourage you to at the very least take a moment to right click on the figure and lob a beach ball at it? The ragdoll physics at play are VERY funny.
  • Disney Prime Video: A comedy Bluesky account! It’s not just people just humourlessly shrieking about platform etiquette, you know! These are imagined films – some funny, some not, but I did enjoy the recasting of a film about the nativity myth as one entitled ‘Cucked By God’.
  • Surf Social: This, theoretically, looks like it might be interesting and useful – Surf Social is effectively a wrapper service for a bunch of different feeds from different places, including the fediverse (Bluesky, Mastodon, Threads) and YouTube and Flipboard, and which will basically let you spin up a selection of interest-based feeds pulling in content from across each of these platforms into single, consolidated streams, Which, actually, sounds…potentially good? While the theoretically idea of ‘pulling all your feeds into one’ doesn’t tend to work in practice – different platforms are for different things! Context collapse is a problem! – keeping the main ones where they are but pulling shared results for interest-based searches seems…smart and not likely to mess with the way in which you use the platforms already. This could be worth a look, although the standard ‘it’s in Beta and so is likely to fall over’ caveats of course apply.
  • Keikku: To be honest, I am including this almost solely because I had no idea that stethoscopes had gotten so incredibly hi-tech or required such shiny and fundamentally-overengineered websites. LOOK AT THESE FCUKERS IT’S LIKE SCIFI MEDICINE OUT OF STAR TREK OR SOMETHING!!! Also…whilst obviously progress is good and stuff, and I can’t imagine anyone dying because of a stethoscope running out of batteries, I do wonder whether perhaps there are some things that possibly don’t need a wifi connection. Oh, and it taught me a new favourite word – auscultation! – which means that basically I love this website now.
  • Not My Name: This is quite dizzying, and does little to dispel my long-held internal belief that anyone learning Chinese as an adult is basically some sort of genius or magician. This is a website all about Chinese names and how they have been basically ‘flattened’ by the simplified version of the language – from the explanation, “You may come across Chinese names in various contexts, such as Cixin Liu, the author of the science fiction novel The Three-Body Problem, and Ai Weiwei, a contemporary Chinese artist. However, these names have been transliterated to Hanyu Pinyin, which represents Mandarin pronunciation, rather than their original characters. This can lead to name ambiguity, as even native Chinese speakers may find it challenging to decode the original names behind the Pinyin.” Scroll down the page, click on ‘explorer’, and you’re presented with a dizzying array of names (navigate using the arrow keys), each with an accompanying visualisation showing how many people share it, and the traditional characters it derives from, and the different tones that can be used when pronouncing it…the key to understanding it isn’t explained HUGELY clearly (which I’m going to attribute to difficulties in translation), but it’s worth clicking around and exploring – if nothing else the vocal samples illustrating pronunciation demonstrate the insane range of the language and the sounds and stresses and dear God it is SO HARD.
  • Social Justice Kittens 2025: Another year, another calendar full of kittens accompanied by some of the best Tumblr-esque sentiments expressed across the web in the past 12 months. Some absolute gems in this year’s selection – I think, on reflection, my personal favourite is May’s pair of Sphynx’s worriedly discussing the need to dismantle capitalism within a generation, but please do feel free to pick your own.
  • The World War II Film Supercut: OK, there is a certain section of the Curios readership here who on clicking this link are liable to become so powerfully tumescent with excited arousal that it might cause some sort of medical event – BE WARNED. Are you someone who would say they are ‘into history’? Did you contemplate buying a ticket to The Rest Is History live podcast recordings? Do you ACTUALLY think about the Roman Empire every day? Do you REALLY like old war films? OH MY GOD THIS IS ALL YOUR CHRISTMASES COME AT ONCE! I can’t stress enough what a fcuking BATSHIT project this is – per this explanatory blogpost, “For more than a year I’ve been working on the World War II Supercut, a video project that combines 143 World War II movies into one 12 hour series, with historically significant clips pulled from the movies and ordered chronologically.” The main link takes you to a Google Drive folder where you can find the entire 12-hour epic, arranged into a dozen hour-long episodes, taking you from the pre-war to the post-war in an astounding collage of clips from every war film you’ve ever heard of and a bunch more that you probably haven’t. To be clear, I could give not one iota of a fcuk about WWII or war films or history and so this is of less than no interest to me, but for those of you who are going to make a day of this then, well, MERRY FCUKING WARMAS!
  • Pop The Confetti: Click the button, pop the confetti cannon, watch the sprinkles, feel your laptop become worryingly hot as it tries to render the physics of thousands of bits of paper! Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT IT IS CHRISTMAS!
  • Midjourney Patchwork: This is an interesting idea – Midjourney have launched (in beta, I think) a tool which effectively works as a storyboarding/concepting workspace with integrated AI, so you can start to flesh out the look and feel of characters and scenes using the Midjourney image generation tool within your digital whiteboard, sort of like…I don’t know, like Miro but with the ability to spin up really very good AI images as part of the embedded functionality. You can read a guide to it here, which might give you an idea of whether or not it might be of use to you – generally though this looks like it could be superuseful from the point of view of initial storyboarding or concepting, particularly as a team-based tool.
  • Puppets: Via Lynn comes this lovely little puppet toy – it detects your hands, you select the puppets you want to embody and VWALLAH! In mere seconds you’ve got a passable Statler and Waldorf on your screen, moving along with your hands as you make them quip and caper. I actually found myself doing the voices while I played with this, which suggests both that this is pretty fun and that I am a very, very lonely man who probably needs to take steps to address this. BONUS HAND-TRACKING BROWSER TOYS! This lets you make rudimentary paintings using your handprints on a virtual cave wall, which when I used it resulted in what I can only describe as a scene looking a bit like a neanderthal dirty protest had taken place but which I am sure in your capable and artistic hands will help you create some truly stellar artworks (or, at the very least, a crudely-drawn c0ck, in the best tradition of wall-based art since time immemorial).
  • AI Mix Check: Are you a musician or a sound engineer? Would you like to have your sound mixing skills critiqued by an AI? No, I can’t imagine for a second that you would – and yet the future has seen fit to afford you the opportunity! I am not a musician and so have no demos to upload for assessment, but I would love it if one of you who is more musically-inclined can give me some sort of indication of quite how awful the advice it gives you is – although actually, on reflection, it’s not like it will be bad advice so much as ‘advice that will ensure that your record is mixed so it could be played in a supermarket at 917pm without anyone noticing’.
  • Short Trip: Oh WOW, this is a blast from the past. The main link is to the Steam download page for a short, small PC game called ‘Short Trip’, where all you do is drive a tram through some mountain villages, picking up and dropping off passengers – it’s designed as basically a small, soothing distraction, a 15m mind-cleanser, if you will. It came out earlier this month, and is the final evolution of THIS, which I featured possibly a decade ago and which I was delighted to rediscover all these many years later. Honestly, this is SUCH a lovely 5-10 minute distraction, beautifully drawn and made – there’s a *weight* to the controls that makes it feel…I don’t know, HOMEMADE in a way, and fits with the art style perfectly; I am really happy to see that the original is still online and that the creator, Alex Perrin, has persevered to make a fuller version available for download. Honestly, this is a classic of the small, interactive web and should be celebrated as such.
  • Scroll: Via B3ta comes this game, which challenges to see how far you can scroll, either in 30s or until you get bored or die or your finger develops some sort of intolerable RSI-type condition. If you can do more than 2.5 in 30s then either you have a far better mouse than I do or your fingers are AMAZING (or I am in some way digitally subnormal, which I concede is also a possibility).
  • Play Codex: Another daily puzzle to add to your now-probably-hours-long routine! This one’s a codebreaker – each day there’s a different quote which you have to work out; each day, the code changes. The codes are always simple letter substitution games – you know, today all ‘ys’ are ‘ls’, that sort of thing – but they’re always a decent, chewy five minutes of mental work which might be the sort of thing you enjoy (or will be the sort of thing that you hate-wrangle for a while before fcuking off back to Sudoku).
  • Travle: God, I am SO embarrassingly-bad at this. Travle is a simple game (which Gdocs seems REALLY disinclined to let me type – I KNOW HOW TO SPELL ‘TRAVEL’ YOU D1CKS I AM DOING THIS DELIBERATELY) which asks to to get from country A to country F simply by mapping out a country-to-country route to get from one to the other. This, honestly, has served as a humiliating reminder of how utterly appalling my geography is, but you may find it less shaming than I have.
  • Isle of Tune: Last up this week, something for you to play with over Christmas – come back to me in 2025 with your compositions, please (or, er, don’t! You owe me nothing! Spend Christmas however you choose!)! Isle of Tune’s a fun little music toy – make your composition by plotting a route for a train, placing various objects by the track, and seeing what sound they make; the various different elements are different sounds, you can change the pitch and tempo, and generally this is actually a far more in-depth and complex tool than in initially appears (but, also, it’s cute and whimsical and basically a tiny digital train set, and who doesn’t love that? NO FCUKER, etc etc!). ENJOY!

By Cody Bratt

OUR FINAL MIX OF 2024 IS THIS PERFECTLY-CURATED SELECTION OF VAGUELY-HOUSEY BUT GENERALLY-LOW-OCTANE TRACKS PICKED BY DJ SANZA! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Old Web Rulez: Just some incredibly powerful aesthetics really.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Trendy AI Videos: AI videos! Odd, slightly-unpleasant AI videos! The latest one, of the writhing mushrooms (no, really, writhing is 100% the right adjective) is spectacularly unsettling. This is slop, but…odd slop – and there are some of these, a few imagining a sort of ‘America’s Got Talent’ but with AI, which feel legitimately, horrifically near-real.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Gisele Pelicot, Again: We kick off this week with another piece about the Pelicot trial and the woman who has, rightly, become a cause celebre over the latter half of the year and who I really, really hope gets to just sort of be left alone for a while now. You all, I presume, know the details of the case by now, but this account by Sophie Smith in the LRB is excellent in particular because it doesn’t attempt to make this a ‘French’ case or a ‘French’ issue, taking it back to a scene in a beloved book by a beloved (female, fwiw) author which sheds some not-particularly-pleasant light on our general, cultural attitudes to sex and marriage and consent and ‘ownership’ – honestly, this whole article made me feel extremely, deeply uncomfortable, which is exactly as it should be I think – I’ve been particularly struck this week by the oddity of the two parallel cultures which exist in the UK, one where this is a significant and groundbreaking and horrific and illuminating case that should hold significant lessons for us all, and another which is cheerfully debating the whys and wherefores of a woman’s attempt to sleep with 1000 men in a day as part of her bongo career, and how we probably ought to maybe have more of a conversation about how and where these two worlds intersect.
  • The Pulitzer Year in Review: A link to the Pulitzer Centre’s picks of its journalism over the past year – “As we wrap up 2024, we are proud and excited to share a hand-picked selection of Pulitzer Center-supported stories that shaped our year. Every December, our team takes a moment to reflect on the journalism that moved us, surprised us, challenged us, or made an impact. These stories—reporting from more than 20 countries—include the big breakthroughs and the quieter moments that require sustained attention as public discourse shifts.” As you might expect, this is all SERIOUS REPORTAGE, but as a broad selection of stories about The State Of The World this is pretty hard-to-beat.
  • AI At The End of 2024: It’s slightly astonishing to think that it’s only been a couple of years since the introduction of the latest wave of generative AI – the past month or so has seen a flurry of different announcement and launches (and spats and disputes) which means it’s not always easy to get a sense for what the current state of the art is, but thankfully the ever-helpful Ethan Mollick has done a convenient roundup of ‘what is currently possible with the mainstream models from the main players’ and if you want a guide to ‘what can this stuff ACTUALLY do at the fag-end of 2024?’ then this is a decent overview. FWIW, my thoughts on this are, broadly: a) most people are still in the main thinking about this in very limited fashion when it comes to potential use-cases, and tend to be WAY too focused on the ‘creative’ outputs (pictures and video) which are the least-interesting (currently) expressions of the tech; b) 2025 should see people doing some interesting, creative and hugely-useful things with multimodality which will be very impressive; c) agents are going to be make a lot of things VERY messy in the next 12-18 months; d) the ‘oh fcuk, this stuff is…eating jobs!’ realisation is finally going to start to bite in the coming year.
  • Crypto is for Crime: Paul Krugman explains neatly why, in the main, yes, actually, crypto IS largely a nefarious thing! This neatly covers why it’s seemingly very likely that a significant portion of the world’s crypto stocks are being actively used for money laundering, and touches on the debanking thing which is getting lots of conservatives and cryptoenthusiasts frothy over in the US, and is generally a good overview of why one might want to use crypto for these purposes (and why, if you dig into it, there aren’t actually that many real, non-dodgy uses for the stuff anyway). Oh, and if you for some reason want to listen to me and some smarter, funnier people talk about this on a podcast you can do so here.
  • GoatseCoin: Ok, I know I have linked to this story before, but if you haven’t clicked on it in the past can I PLEASE exhort you to give it a try now – it basically links the ‘where are we in AI at the end of ‘24?’ stuff to the crypto stuff, and, even if I only take about 15% of it at face value (I am always skeptical of ‘autonomous machines’ and am inclined to presume Mechanical Turk-ing until proven otherwise), this is honestly batsh1t. To recap – there’s an AI agent that has been spun up, which exists on Twitter; people interact with it, those interactions get fed into the model, and so it ‘learns’ and grows…anyway, this ‘agent’ has in the past few months invented a memecoin based on Goatse (you don’t, I assume, need me to explain this to you by now – you’ve been here a while, you’ve received the horrible, fleshy induction), which now has a seven figure market cap…oh God, this is all so mad and deeply silly but also TERRIFYINGLY FUTURE and pretty much my favourite news story of the year.
  • That Massive Ed Zitron Essay: It’s been a good year for US-based UK PR man-turned-tech-industry-scourge Ed Zitron, who’s very much become A PERSONALITY off the back of his sustained critiques of the AI and wider tech industries – part of me wants to say something about preaching to the converted and audience capture here, but that same part of me realises quite how bitter that would sound and so, well, I won’t. This is Zitron’s last of the year, which is doing NUMBERS and lauded pretty much everywhere as an ESSENTIAL, EXCORIATING RANT – it’s neither of those things, though, it’s overlong (I know!) and overwrought (I know!) and slightly-too-hyperbolic (I KNOW!!!!), and could reasonably be summarised as ‘modern capitalism tends to make products and experiences worse over time, and the technology industry has effectively become our most ubiquitous and ever-present example of that, and it is bad and it is terrible for consumers and, more widely, society!’. Which, you know, is true! But probably didn’t require 10k words to say. God I am such a cnut – thank God Zitron doesn’t read this shit and won’t ever know that some fcuker who writes 10k words a week themselves has had the temerity to call them ‘verbose’.
  • What It’s Like Getting Your News From Rumble: Stuart Thompson in the NYT spends some time getting all of their news from Rumble, the right-wing social media platform that’s basically ‘YouTube, but for people who worry that Fox News is possibly leaning a bit woke these days’ – as you’d expect, it’s aimed at people who are angry, and scared, and want to be rendered more angry and scared by muscular men shouting at them from their computers. This is less interesting, to my mind at least, about Rumble than it is about this very, very hyperspecific media diet and what it does to you – because, honestly, it’s not hard to look at this and then look closer to home and the GBNewssphere and the TommySphere and the TRUTH TELLING ‘news’ accounts on X and YouTube and TikTok and realise that OH FCUK WE NO LONGER HAVE ANY SORT OF SHARED CENTRAL CONCEPT OF WHAT IS TRUE AND REAL AND ACTUALLY HAPPENING ANY MORE. I can’t stress enough how much it weirds me out that seemingly NOONE is talking about this, even after a year in which it because eminently clear that there are approximately 73 different versions of ‘reality’ which people might believe in at any given moment and that maybe 20% of those 73 versions intersect in any meaningful way with what is actually happening, and that this…might prove to be problematic from a civic point of view, maybe.
  • Fantasy: Ok, this is a link to an actual book to buy – BUT! I promise you, if you’re a ‘creative’ then you will absolutely fcuking adore this. Fantasy is a book by Bruno Munari, an Italian writer who in 1977 wrote this as a guide to his concepts of imagination, creativity and ideas – it has only just been translated into English, and is available from a small press in the US and, seriously, if you’re the sort of person whose job involves design or making or even if you’re just the sort of person who really does believe that Eno’s Oblique Strategies are TRANSFORMATIVE INTELLECTUAL TOOLS then, honestly, you will ADORE this – when I found it this week I dug out a public domain copy of the Italian version to remind myself of how good it is and, honestly, this really is superb (here’s the full Italian text – Italiani, godete, the rest of you take a look and get a feel for the sort of work it is).
  • The Harper’s Spotify Story: You might not have heard about this one yet what with it being quite new, but thanks to this piece dropping in the past day or so the PR team at Spotify is going to have a significantly-less-relaxed Christmas than they might have hoped. The main thrust of the piece – extensively-researched by Liz Pelly – is that Spotify has basically been commissioning huge quantities of faceless, semi-nameless, inoffensive music which it owns the rights to and then quietly working to ensure that said music displaces other tracks to which Spotify doesn’t own the rights across popular playlists, so as to ensure that Daniel Ek, his fellow partners, and the battery of shareholders he now has to deliver VALUE to on a quarterly basis can continue being richer than any human being ever needs to be, ever. Here’s the framing, just to set the scene – oh, and just in case you were wondering, this is 100% going to get worse with AI music which really is pretty-much good enough now to produce infinite ‘ambient chill’ and ‘lofi beats’ playlists to carry us through to the heat death of the universe. REJOICE! “Spotify, I discovered, not only has partnerships with a web of production companies, which, as one former employee put it, provide Spotify with “music we benefited from financially,” but also a team of employees working to seed these tracks on playlists across the platform. In doing so, they are effectively working to grow the percentage of total streams of music that is cheaper for the platform. The program’s name: Perfect Fit Content (PFC). The PFC program raises troubling prospects for working musicians. Some face the possibility of losing out on crucial income by having their tracks passed over for playlist placement or replaced in favor of PFC; others, who record PFC music themselves, must often give up control of certain royalty rights that, if a track becomes popular, could be highly lucrative. But it also raises worrying questions for all of us who listen to music. It puts forth an image of a future in which—as streaming services push music further into the background, and normalize anonymous, low-cost playlist filler—the relationship between listener and artist might be severed completely.”
  • Moon: I think that Bartosz Ciechanowski might be one of my favourite internet people in the world – he is SO GOOD at what he does, and there’s something so insanely generous about the work he puts into these explainers; honestly, his making these feels almost like a species-wide public service (ACTUALLY, there’s an idea – is there an award for the best use of the web for purposes that benefit humanity in small ways? There should be, I think). I’ve featured his explainer articles on here before, and this new one is another beautiful addition to the collection – here, Ciechanowski explains (in LONGFORM – this is detailed and involved, but justifiably so) everything you wanted to know about the moon, how it relates to the Earth, where it came from (perhaps disappointingly, here Ciechanowski sticks to the ‘official’ line rather than the true version which involves the moon actually being a fake version placed there by Archons c.1500 – I know this is true because David Icke once told me (this itself is true)), all accompanied by his brilliant interactive diagrams which help bring all the tricky concepts of mass and orbit and, well, PHYSICS, to life. SO GOOD.
  • The Eternal Bossman: I always find the fetishisation of bodegas by people from New York somewhat tiresome – yes, yes, you have SMALL INDEPENDENT LOCAL SHOPS, they are OPEN LATE, they sell IDIOSYNCRATIC THINGS, they are often run by COLOURFUL PERSONALITIES…GYAC mate this does not make your city in any way special ffs! Particularly when the london cornershop (not, to be clear, necessarily found on a street corner) is its very own perfectly-rendered urban curio with its very own vibe and personality – central to this is the proprietor, the bossman, written up here with genuine affection by the Economist; this is a lovely piece of writing both as a picture of modern London but also as a little vignette about the state of the country, socially and economically.
  • The Polski Sklep: I’m sure there are many parts of the UK in which the rise of Polish immigrant communities feels like a relatively-recent phenomenon, but 80s Swindon was weirdly dominated by Polish families which meant that I thought everyone in the UK was called things like ‘Niewiadomski’ and ‘Wolosczinski’, and that I learned Polish swear words in parallel with English ones (there are, honestly, few things more satisfying to snarl under one’s breath than ‘curwa’), and that loads of the local shops were owned by Polish shopkeepers, and which in turn meant that I felt weirdly nostalgic reading this piece in Vittles about how the Polish shop (polski sklep) has formed a key part of diasporic life, and the odd cultural collisions you find in the aisles of shops like these. Honestly, fcuk bodegas.
  • The Sam Smiths Pubs: This has been EVERYWHERE in the past 24h – a sign both of how much the English love reading about a proper eccentric and of how the Sam Smiths chain has a particular place in the hearts of many (specifically, I think, people who realised that they allowed you access to a magical world of sub-£3 pints  – as recently as about 2010ish) – but for those of you who’ve yet to read it this is a BRILLIANT piece about the pub chain, why it’s so odd, and the very, very peculiar individual who runs the business. Americans in particular will I think practically soil themselves at the layers of Englishness on display here, but everyone will enjoy it – although I was slightly disappointed that the article at no point managed to explain why Sam Smith’s beer gives significantly worse hangovers than ANY other brewer (is it because it was cheap and therefore I drank more of it? Impossible to say).
  • How Netflix Fcuked Everything: On Netflix, its model, and the rise of ‘slop content’ and the disengaged viewer, and how, as with so much, DATA HAS FCUKED EVERYTHING. Honestly, I really wish that someone would take away from Q1 of the 2000s that our obsession with quantification IS NOT MAKING THINGS BETTER. Anyway, this is very much ‘inside the TV industry’ but it’s a fascinating, well-written and well-researched piece that will help explain to you why there’s nothing worth watching anywhere despite there being basically infinite telly. Given the majority of material on streaming platforms appears to be designed to meet the needs of a theoretical, middle-of-the-bell-curve average consumer who’s probably ‘watching’ whilst also completing at least one other task, and given than on that basis quality simply doesn’t matter like it used to, what do we think that means when AI can churn out rubbish that is basically ‘film-shaped’ if you squint? HMMMMMMMM.
  • The Mad Wargame: Ok, this is…very odd, and I am still not entirely certain why I am recommending it, but for some reason this really stuck with me after reading and so I will chuck it in here on the offchance that it appeals to one of you. Some caveats: 1) this really is VERY long; 2) it’s about the narrator and his friend undertaking a mission to play an INCREDIBLY complicated and dry-sounding WWII strategy tabletop game; 3) the narrator is (and I am not trying to be mean here – it really is true, I promise) basically Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons (he is also not unaware of this fact), almost certainly owns a fedora and/or a collection of samurai swords and/or some of those velvet-effect paintings and is…not exactly sympathetic. And his friend is, honestly, a more extreme version of this persona. These are not heroes we’re dealing with here, let’s be clear. You can imagine this guy literally saying ‘milady’; 4) this is a post on a board game website, and therefore entirely unedited. AND YET. There is something…sort-of brilliant about this, a sort of morbid-self-awareness, as well as a sense of superiority, that reminded me INCREDIBLY of the narrator in A Confederacy of Dunces (a book which I never really understood the adulation for, if I’m honest) and which made the whole thing weirdly compelling to me in ways in which I appreciate that I am now really struggling to communicate. Look, this is WEIRD and VERY uncool, but also sort of cool because of it, if that makes sense. No? No, ok, fine.
  • The Best Links Of The Year: In case you’re interested, by the way, Caitlin over at links asked me to pick my favourites – so here they are. I’m putting them in the longreads section because 4-5 of them are basically longform writing and so it sort-of fits here, and if you missed them the first time around I really do recommend giving them another go.
  • Planet Puppet: I honestly wasn’t expecting a late contender for ‘best essay of the year’ to appear in December, but this is an all-time classic imho and you MUST read it. Mina Tavakoli visits the Vent Haven Ventriloquist ConVENTion, the annual convention for the ventriloquists of the world to come together, play puppets and generally hang out, and I am not exaggerating when I say that in terms of subject matter and style this really is one of the best things I have read all year.  Honestly, this should win SO MANY PRIZES, it really is utterly superb and funny and poignant and sad and and and oh God, seriously, it is so good that I want to stop writing about how good it is so that I can go and read it again.
  • The Point of Whales: Our final essay of 2024 is this, by Richard Smyth, published in September but which I only found this week. This is short and human and rather beautiful, I thought, and the final paragraph seems like a fitting one to leave you with.

By Zhiyong Jing

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 13/12/24

Reading Time: 35 minutes

So, kill the rich or don’t kill the rich – where do YOU stand?

Obviously MURDER IS BAD, but I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that I think I’ve come up with a solution to the general problem of plutocratic wealth accumulation which we can all get behind.

Let’s all agree that noone should be murdered – ok? OK! Let’s also accept that as part of our general social contract we all agree to abide by this and that everyone should be protected from murder by the law – ok? OK! Let’s ALSO agree that this applies to everyone alive…UNLESS you decide that you personally want to accumulate a personal fortune above a certain centrally-agreed threshold – let’s say, arbitrarily, $100m (I will leave it to you to decide where you think that line should fall) which will still let you enjoy the benefits of being RICHER THAN YOU COULD EVER POSSIBLY NEED TO BE whilst at the same time preventing you from achieving the sort of patrimony that allows you to, I don’t know, buy elections. If you DO decide that, actually, I still need more money than that, then, well you’re free to accumulate it – but, also, you forfeit your right to protection from murder. Want to be a billionaire? GREAT! As long as you’re willing to also therefore be an active participant in a global game of ‘Killer Manhunt’, like Hunted but with live ordnance and some STRONG MOTIVATIONS!

Honestly, I can see NO DOWNSIDES to this idea and look forward to it forming the central plank of a coming manifesto somewhere in the world.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are probably cursing the fact you’re not able to vote me into power RIGHT NOW.

By Elizabeth Zvonar

EASE INTO THIS WEEK’S CURIOS WITH A TWO-HOUR MIX OF UNSURPASSED BEATS, BURBLES, BLOOPS AND CLICKS (IN THE BEST POSSIBLE WAY!) MIXED BY THE SUPERB JON K! 

THE SECTION WHICH, WHILE IT HAS NO DESIRE TO BE SEEN TO BE IN ANY WAY AS SHARING AN OPINION WITH KEMI BADENOCH, WOULD LIKE TO GENTLY POINT OUT THAT THE ENGLISH OBSESSION WITH SANDWICHES IS FCUKING WEIRD, PT.1:  

  • The Bluesky Curiobot: If you will allow me a brief moment of authorial self-indulgence (LOL I KNOW!)…whilst obviously the terrible words are the price I demand for all the awesome links in Curios each week, I am conscious that this isn’t the…easiest format to cope with, or the most digestible, and that to be honest there are better and more efficient ways of getting your link fix than ‘wading through whatever stream of consciousness bullsh1t Matt happens to spew out when time comes to write up the link’. AND SO! For those of you who might prefer a lighter, easier way of getting ALL OF THE INTERNET, Shardcore kindly knocked up the CurioBot on Bluesky – all of the links from Curios (minus the the videos), extracted from the newsletterblogthing and posted to Bluesky at a rate of one every few hours during (roughly) UK working hours. You get the link, and a graphic of the copy that accompanied it – but you can ignore that and get to the good stuff without having to wade through my prose at all. BE GRATEFUL! Also, look, if this is still too much then be in some way mollified with the knowledge that you’re only a year or so away from AI agents being good enough that you’ll be able to tell one to just pull you the 5-10 links it knows you’ll like best from that week’s Curios without needing to interact with the copy whatsoever – AND THEN WHERE WILL I BE?
  • Americans: This is both a beautiful bit of digital exhibitionmaking, and a rare example of a brand campaign that I really like. WeTransfer has been effectivedoing the ‘brand as patron’ thing for ‘creatives’ for a few years now, but I think this is the most successful- and best-realise project to date; in it, Dutch artist and filmmaker Robin du Puy presents a selection of films and photographs and audio portraits of ‘America’ and its citizens, captured over the past two years (there’s a book being published now-ish, and an accompanying documentary film next year). There are 24 people here from across the country, spanning ages from 6 to 80+, across gender and race and economic boundaries, and some of the images captured here are wonderful, the portraits in particular. The whole site is just a pleasure to explore – it’s well-made but not overly fussy or fancy, the navigation works, and the UX/UI presents the work effectively – honestly, this is a GREAT exhibition which works perfectly as a website, well done everyone involved.
  • Cloud Data: Another week, another beautiful (if somewhat puzzling) website found via Kris at Naive. I need to be completely honest with you – I haven’t got the faintest idea what this is, why it exists, who made it or how it works or what, really, is going on, or why; that said, CLICK THE LINK IT IS LOVELY! Basically it’s a sort of loopy ambient music toy visualiser thing – the site shows a sort of particulate simulation of steam or smoke, and clicking around it will cause small audio samples to play (whose pitch and timbre I think depend on where on-screen you click), which sort of fade and loop into themselves over a simple piano loop – the effect is of a strange, slightly-mysterious musical instrument which you can use to create fragments of odd, Sigur Ros-adjacent ambient-type sound (fcuk, music journalism’s loss really is your gain, you lucky readers!)…oh, and the particulate thing responds (slowly and subtly) to your mouse movements…honestly , I really do adore this and have spent longer than you might expect fiddling around with it in slightly-confused wonder, give it a go (and, er, if any of you can come up with a better explanation of what this is and why it exists then please do tell me because).
  • The Tinder Year In Swipe: All of the platforms, as alluded to last week, are in their wrapup era (dear God I am SO SORRY I promise never to use that sort of appalling construction ever again – I am leaving that infelicity untouched so it shames me into remembering) and Tinder is no exception – I can’t personally say that I found this any more revealing or illuminating than any of the others, but I was struck by the frankly insane tone of it. Obviously I am very, very far away from being part of Tinder’s core userbase or target market – I presume that the dating apps are broadly stratified by age, and that Tinder is where young people go to swipe, cry and eventually go back to browsing the hentai subs – but the framing of the whole thing around the idea of a ‘vision board’ (for the manifesting, you see) is, to my eyes, somewhat batsh1t. All of the various ‘trends’ are buried behind icons with no textual overlay or preview – so you have to click on the pair of ‘so kooky!’ 50s-style flick-corner sunglasses to find out that, according to Tinder, ‘eyecontactships’ (cf ‘A connection built entirely on intense eye contact — an unspoken bond without words’) have been BIG in 2024, for example. It is very, very much Not Worth The Hassle in terms of the ‘insights’ available – but don’t worry, because you can then go and create your own MANIFESTATION BOARD for 2025 when you can pick a grab-bag of these trendy traits (or the icons that represent them) and create a sort of slightly-gaudy collage to represent how YOU want your dating life to be next year…oh, God, look, this feels like it’s aimed at 14 year old girls, honestly, which is why perhaps I don’t understand it – but, equally, why the fcuk is an app designed to help people find others against whom to consensually rub their mucous membranes employing design techniques that seem more suited to Just Seventeen magazine than something for over-18s? I DON’T UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ABOUT THIS (and dear God I am going to die so so so alone).
  • Once More With Feeling: A really lovely bit of data analysis and visualisation work by Naitian Zhou and David Bamman from the University of California (and brought to my eyes by Lynn), which basically asks the question ‘how do the emotions elicited in cinema tend to vary across the runtime of a film, and what commonalities can be seen in the way in which cinematic stories use emotion over the course of a narrative arc?’. Which, yes, fine, sounds dry as fcuk, but it’s great, I promise! Basically think of it as a riff on Vonnegut’s famous ‘shape of stories’ way of considering plot, but applied to emotion. There are, aside from anything else, some interesting inferences that you might draw from this in terms of the apparent decline in ‘emotionality’ evidenced in the study since the 1980s, not to mention a whole HOST of new ‘SCIENTIFIC’ reasons you can point to as to why it’s structurally VITAL for your 6-second preroll to hit specific narrative beats (there’s an academic paper linked to on the main page here for those of you who want to go deep on this – I can imagine, for scholars of filmmaking, there’s actually a lot of rather useful information in there if you can be bothered to dig it out).
  • Sitters or Standers: More excellent datawork! This is once again from the talented people at The Pudding, who have here chosen to investigate the crucial question of ‘how many people spend the majority of their working life sitting down vs those who spend the majority of it standing up’ (if you are reading this I have a reasonably-strong feeling about which of these camps you fall into, although I concede that it’s possible that some of you might be standing desk freaks). What this does brilliantly is takes that initial question and then, using MORE DATA, unpacks what that means, what that difference looks like, where YOU sit relative to the US population, and how the differences in income and outcomes for the two different groups maps onto – and you’ll be surprised about this! – all sorts of structural societal inequalities because, THAT’S HOW THINGS WORK! I know I say this with tedious regularity whenever I feature these people and their work, but they are SO good at this and I sort of think every single organisation dealing with public data and the communication thereof should look at The Pudding’s website and, basically, learn.
  • The Queue Game: Sadly not a link to the actual game, but to an Insta carousel post (sorry, I appreciate that this is a SH1T LINK but I promise it describes something interesting) which describes how Nike built a game in Roblox which simulates the process of queueing for a sneaker drop, which rewarded players who completed it with a Snap code allowing early access to a…real life sneaker drop, which is so horribly meta and ourobouros-like that I feel like I’m getting some sort of intensely-recursive digital labyrinthitis (and it’s sentences like that one which make me feel honour bound to point you once more at the Curiobot and say ‘you can spare yourself this, you know’). This is really clever, damn the sweatshop footwear peddlers.
  • Deta Surf: There really does seem to be a general sense of AI fatigue out there – so many ‘PLEASE STOP TRYING TO MAKE AI-GENERATED SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS HAPPEN’ complaints,  charming in their finger-in-dyke futility! – but, sadly, I don’t think 2025’s going to see less of it in your life. There may be occasional positive side-effects to its continued incursion into every aspect of human/digital interaction, though – witness Deta Surf, a prototypical new web browser whose gimmick is, basically, ‘full LLM functionality wherever you surf’. So, for example, you could be browsing some photos and see something that has the PERFECT colour palette for your A/W26 wardrobe – just tell the browser to extract the colours from the image as HEX values into a CSV! See an interesting diagram on a page but not quite sure what it’s telling you? Highlight the relevant area, ask the browser to explain it to you and VWALLAH! Or at least that’s the theory as-sold – whether this will be the advertised reality is of course uncertain (what IS certain is that all of this sort of functionality will be baked into Chrome eventually and you will never hear of these plucky, first-to-market innovators ever again), but it’s clear that this is the direction of travel for the browser experience one way or another. Come on, don’t make that face, it sounds useful! What? No, no, sorry, it won’t make it any more likely that your job will still exist in a decade. Sorry about that.
  • Sora: OPEN AI’S TEXT TO VIDEO MODEL IS FINALLY HERE! Except you can’t use it in the UK due to OpenAI being scared off, at least for the moment, by UK/EU regulation – but, honestly, based on what I’ve seen floating about the web you’re not missing anything particularly groundbreaking or significantly better than Kling, Runway and the rest of the other TTV tools. What you get by all accounts is the standard genAIvideo suite of skills – great at abstract images, great at stuff that looks like stock, really really bad at anything that involves object permanence or any sort of real-world physics whatsoever (the physics thing is really interesting to me from the point of view of the whole ‘so, is embodiment a vital component of getting this stuff right then?’ question) – and, per all the other stuff on the market at the moment, it can’t maintain coherence for longer than a few seconds at a time. To be honest, of all the stuff that OpenAI has shipped over the past week or so I think I’m less interested in Sora than I am in the realtime video update they just gave GPT – which means that you can now get it to analyse and interpret live video through your phone camera or screensharing, so you can literally point your phone at stuff and ask the ai to tell you what it makes of what you’re looking at…which potentially has huge implications for simultaneous translation and tourism and all sorts of other things, as long as you don’t mind the fact that there’s a better-than-even chance that your magical AI interlocutor will just make a bunch of stuff up. This stuff could potentially be REALLY useful – and, again, there’s a host of genuinely fun and SUPRISING and DELIGHTFUL (zzzzzzzzz) things that you could do with a live video feed, an LLM reading it and MAKING STUFF HAPPEN as a result. Come on, please, someone use this in a halfway creative way for once, I’m bored of agencies wasting AI on boring, rubbish stuff.
  • Mozi: It’s pronounced ‘Mosey’, don’t you know. This is BRAND NEW, by Ev Williams (one of the two founders of Twitter who *hasn’t* turned out to be a gigantic new age cryptowellness jackass) and is basically a small social network for (reading between the lines) the international plutocrat class (or, if I’m being less bitter for a second – for reasons I can’t really get into, I currently have…something of a personal beef with the super-rich – just people who travel a lot for business and have lots of friends who also travel lots for business). The idea here is that you sign up, you make your small network of REAL FRIENDS, and you simply use Mozi as a kind of basic location tracker/planner so you can better coordinate where in the world you and all your plutey mates will be so you can better arrange the concordance of private jets to your mutual social advantage (fcuk, dammit, still feeling quite chippy). “What’s that, Jans? You’re going to be in Gstaad for 9 hours on Friday? Oh great, I’ll just shift the booking on the Lear a couple of hours and we can have a light dinner at that gorgeous new Bosi place carved into the mountainside!”. I think I am going to be sick.
  • All The Albums of the Year: It is quite funny to me that the boom in ‘curation’ (up there with ‘gaslighting’ as one of the most traduced and abused words of the decade) has itself resulted in the need for metacurators – people doing the ‘roundup of all the trend docs’, say, or ‘the best of the gift guides’ or, as in this case, compiling EVERY SINGLE ALBUM OF THE YEAR LIST THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN BY ANYONE AT ALL ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. Or at least that what this feels like – there are a LOT of lists on this (including the wonderful, utterly obscure Quietus top-100 which, even by their standards this year – and I say this with love – is…niche), but they have also helpfully provided a bunch of ways in which you can check out the albums, including one view which shows you a sort of aggregate list which, as you might possibly have been able to predict, shows Brat at the top of the annual critics’ pile. Still, if you want a starting point to get REALLY INTO the year’s best music over the holiday season (if you’re wearing headphones they can’t talk to you!) then this is a perfect website.
  • StampFans: I LOVE THIS IDEA! Stampfans is a project for people who want to produce newsletters that are a bit more meaningful, and personal, and…weighty than this ephemeral digital rubbish – rather than your missive getting sent via Beehiiv or Substack or whatever platform you’ve chosen to hitch your email agon too, StampFans will PRINT IT AND MAIL IT OUT! Yes, that’s right, this is basically a service that lets you create a (small-run) physical mailing list, to which you can send actual, physical post in bulk for a really quite modest fee. The idea is that people will pay more for a monthly physical update in letter form, which means that you can absorb the fees for the printing, paper and postage which StampFans in turn charges you – honestly, I think if you’re a poet or somehow named writer, or if you’ve got a project in the epistolary romance vein, or…Jesus, there are SO many fun ways in which you could use the mechanic to create something beautiful and personal for a small community of readers, I am getting almost…excited thinking about it, which, honestly, is no mean feat here at the fag-end of 2024 when enthusiasm for anything much beyond ‘numbing it all with drugs’ is pretty much nil. SOMEONE PLEASE USE THIS FOR GOOD!
  • AP’s Photos of 2024: The Associated Press shares its pics for the best news photography of the past year. Stunning across the board, but my personal pic is the Romanian Orthodox nuns. As you’d imagine, this covers the FULL GAMUT OF HUMAN LIFE (and death), so caveat emptor for blood and death and tears and suffering (and sports!) and all the other fun things that make up the rich tapestry of existence.

By FeeBee

NEXT UP PUT SOME SUNSHINE INTO AN OTHERWISE STEEL=GREY DECEMBER WITH THIS SUPERB SELECTION OF AMAPIANO AND AFROBEAT COLLECTED OVER THE YEAR BY DANIEL HARRIS!

THE SECTION WHICH, WHILE IT HAS NO DESIRE TO BE SEEN TO BE IN ANY WAY AS SHARING AN OPINION WITH KEMI BADENOCH, WOULD LIKE TO GENTLY POINT OUT THAT THE ENGLISH OBSESSION WITH SANDWICHES IS FCUKING WEIRD, PT.2:  

  • Sanborn Fire Maps: Per the history books, “”D. A. Sanborn, a young surveyor from Somerville, Massachusetts, was engaged in 1866 by the Aetna Insurance Company to prepare insurance maps for several cities in Tennessee. [..] Before working for Aetna, Sanborn conducted surveys and compiled an atlas of the city of Boston titled ‘Insurance Map of Boston, Volume 1, 1867’” – “But Matt!”, I hear you ask, “why the fcuk should I care?”, which is, frankly, a not-unreasonable question. The answer is that Brandon Silverman loved the typography and design of the aforementioned maps so much that he’s taken the time to create this website dedicated to them – you can buy prints of some of the design work, but you can also browse the archive in high-definition and, honestly, the lettering and layout of the title pages alone is, I promise you, fcuking AMAZING – seriously, if you’re in any way visually inclined then I think you will slightly fall in love with the work on here. It’s astonishing when you go through the galleries how much stuff seems to riff off this particular style – it really does feel ICONIC, in an odd sort of way.
  • UnWrapped: Were you somewhat underwhelmed by your Wrapped last week? Do you not feel it quite captured the intricacies and nuance of your DEEPLY PERSONAL relationship to music, a relationship which is ENTIRELY UNIQUE and UNLIKE ANYONE ELSE’S (“you listened to 3,208 hours of Chappell Roan, CharliXCX and The 1975”)? Well why not create some alternative graphics to share amongst your friendship group and see if anyone gives a single iota more of a fcuk – this does a very good job of mimicking the vibe of this year’s Wrapped, down to the nonsensical AI-generated genre soup it created for everyone and some truly stellar made-up bandnames (I just fired it up again to remind myself of what it does, and it’s telling me that I listened to a LOT of Hedgerow Focaccia in 2024 which, honestly, I wish I had, maybe it would have made me feel better) – part of me wonders whether you could actually fool people with these, and the answer is, I think, ‘yes’ (making up fake bands and trying to get people to pretend to be sincerely into them even though they are entirely fictional is a MEAN thing to do, though, and I still feel guilty about getting a friend of mine’s little brother to swear blind that he was a massive fan of underground indie heroes ‘Chimney Factory’ c.1996).
  • David Whyte: David Whyte is a poet – I personally wasn’t familiar with his work, but this section of his website, which presents the text of one of his poems to music, has a genuinely BEAUTIFUL look at feel to it, all watercolour landscapes that get filled in as you scroll, both digital and, oddly painterly (which in my experience is a really hard balance to strike when trying to nail this sort of aesthetic on-screen), and despite the fact that this is possibly a *touch* on the twee side for my personal taste I can’t help but admire the gorgeous webwork on show here.
  • The Tiny Tools Directory: A handy collection of small webbuilding and creative tools, compiled by Curios favourite Everest Pipkin, designed for anyone who’s interested in building games or any sort of other lightly-interactive project online. Contains links to all sorts of useful things, from documentation about the ‘how’ to bits of software that will help with the ‘what’ – from game engines to graphics packs, mapmakers to sound generators, all helpfully=filterable in a variety of different ways. Such a generous collection of tools, rendered genuinely useful thanks to simple, helpful taxonomy and design – an object lesson in how to run this sort of thing.
  • Specific Suggestions: You will, of course, as diligent students of Stuff Online, be familiar with the 1944 CIA document which described in detail how best to sabotage an organisation or bureaucracy from within, with helpful tips like ‘talk as frequently as possible and at great length’ or ‘hold conferences when there is critical work to be done’ – all the sorts of things that, IRONICALLY, are often hallmarks of modern working culture. Anyway, some kind soul has now compiled all these helpfully-unhelpful ways of working into a single website where you can hit a button to get a new piece of sabotage advice each time, along with some accompanying text explaining a little more about the project. Why not make it a workplace ‘thing’ in 2025 to share a new one of these with your team at the start of each new week? Although, er, given the way everything’s going perhaps we shouldn’t accelerate the decline of the labour market any more than is already happening.
  • Fearleaders: Did you know that there is only ONE all-male (and non-binary) cheerleading team in the world, and that that team is in Vienna, Austria, and that they are call THE FEARLEADERS????? No, fcuk off, you did NOT know that, stop lying. Per the site, “As Fearleaders Vienna we support gender diversity and emancipation. We subvert gender stereotypes by turning them upside down and expose ridiculous and in the same way toxic masculine behaviour with overstatement and irony. We want to set a strong statement for equality and fundamental rights for every person in our society. We think that there is a need for men to not only choose a clear position when it comes to equality, but to also make a statement and fight side by side with the women* we support. Staying silent means accepting the status quo.” Also, and this is really important, they have some really sweet outfits in a popping orange/blue colourway. If you feel that this is YOUR SORT OF THING then you may be happy to know that there is a 2025 calendar currently onsale, featuring (based on the brief selection of sample images on display) some PG-rated queer lols in the Alps.
  • Do Professional Stuff on Bluesky: Look, I imagine any of you working for Big Agencies will have access to one of the big social media multiplatform management systems and as such will get this as standard at some point soon (if it’s not already baked into Hootsuite et al – thankfully this sort of thing is No Longer My Problem) – but if you don’t you might find this useful. TrackBlue’s a platform that lets you do a bunch of ‘pro’ stuff on the platform, like scheduling posts and managing your audience and getting analytics and that sort of jazz. Is it interesting? No, no it is not, but it might be USEFUL and sometimes I sacrifice my personal interest for your professional development, because that’s the sort of selfless misanthrope I am.
  • TimeyWimey: The name of this website/tool is so utterly abhorrent that I considered excluding it on grounds of crimes against language, but the design here is SO NICE that I couldn’t quite bring myself to. This is, fine, a very, very simple idea – a website which helps you calculate time differences – but the way it works is so simple and so elegant that I was left slightly agog (I appreciate that it’s entirely possible that none of you will be that amazed by this, but you have to bear in mind that, as I have mentioned, I am basically an anti-visual person and so possibly my threshold for this sort of thing is maybe…a touch lower than yours). Still, I thought this was super – it almost made me wish that I was the sort of international jetsetter who had cause to pay attention to different timezones (but I am very much not).
  • The Best Book Covers of 2024: Or at least ‘the 100 best book covers of 2024 according to Print Magazine’ – those slight caveats don’t make this any less of a great selection of designwork though. I think, based on the fact there are occasionally multiple editions of the same book, that this covers the wider world rather than just North America – there is such a wonderful breadth of work here and several of these which I would LOVE as prints (the cover to Napalm in the Heart by Pol Guasch, in particular, made me properly stop and gasp as I scrolled and I LOVE IT SO), and this is both just a lovely thing to scroll through and a wonderful source of high-quality visual inspiration should you be in the market for such a thing.
  • Photo Dharma: Do you like Buddhism? Do you like photographs? Do you like the concept of ‘photographs of Buddhism’ but have previously been unsure as to what the best place online to explore it might be? WELCOME TO YOUR HEAVEN! Photo Dharma contains “over 18,000 photographs of Buddhist archeological sites, pilgrimage centres, and temples in S & SE Asia, as well as Maps, Posters, etc.” for you to scroll through to your heart’s content. Web Curios – getting you one step closer to Nirvana with every link you click! Found via Jodi Ettenberg’s excellent monthly roundup of things.
  • Every Colour Imaginable: Now, I don’t know you, I don’t know what your mind is like and as such I simply have no idea what you can or can’t imagine. Are you capable of conceiving of colours of a depth and brilliance I can’t even guess at? Do your eyes perceive frequencies denied to me by my low-quality retinas? I HAVE NO FCUKING IDEA. As such I’m not able to gauge the veracity of the whole ‘every colour imaginable’ thing – but trust me when I say that there are a FCUKTONNE of colours on this page, although I am baffled as to exactly why.
  • SkullSite: An early Christmas present for the goths now (lol, like this hasn’t been on all your bookmarks lists for decades) – SkullSite is dedicated to photos and 3d scans of bird skulls – JUST BIRDS, FCUK OFF WITH YOUR MAMMALIAN CRANIA! – of which there are seemingly many, many hundreds collected here. The site is OLD and is seemingly in the process of being migrated elsewhere, and the 3d scans don’t currently work because of Flash being dead, and, well, what’s left is a collection of photos of the headbones of dead avians, but WOW are bird skulls cool looking and multivariantly weird-looking. Were it not *a bit weird* I would be sorely tempted to pick up a few of these as decorative objects (but I am quite acutely conscious at the moment of the fact that I probably can’t really afford to add any more ‘odd’ to my personality lest I become entirely incapable of relating to actual human beings).
  • Anti-Tag Clouds: Ooh, this is an interesting angle from which to look at a text which I’d honestly never thought of before – “An Anti-Tag Cloud shows you the most common English words that never appear in a text, visualizing the “negative space” of a literary work. Size indicates how frequent a word is across other texts.” Select classic books from the drop down and learn that ‘blood’ is never mentioned in Pride & Prejudice, that The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes apparently contains not a single mention of the word ‘religion’, and that, genuinely surprisingly, the word ‘horse’ does not occur even once in ‘Carry On, Jeeves’. Ooh, and the complete absence of the terms ‘father’ and ‘mother’ in Winnie The Pooh is REALLY interesting (to me at least). There’s an interesting reverse game in this where you’re presented with the missing words list and asked to guess which book the tag cloud applies to, in case anyone fancies engineering that.
  • Hotpipes: A reader writes! Thankyou so much to Caroline Crampton, who got in touch after last week’s Curios saying “I would like to recommend my favourite regular pipe organ broadcast: Hot Pipes. As far as I can tell, this radio show/podcast is made by a single British ex-pat living in Spain who just really, really loves documenting and explaining the sound of historical pipe organs. He often themes shows around particular composers or locations. For instance, this is one featuring organs that were built inside American pizza restaurants.” I obviously had no idea when writing last week that one of the six of you who read this thing would be a pipe organ enthusiast and would really appreciate my including an organ-related link, but THIS IS PERFECT AND WHY I LOVE WRITING CURIOS AND WHY I LOVE THE WEB (in the brief moments when I don’t resent it for making me the broken husk of a man I very much now am).
  • The London Community Laptop Orchestra: Based in Hackney, because some stereotypes are simply too powerful to overcome, the LCLO (I refuse to type the whole name more than once) is “a london based community laptop orchestra, open to anyone who’s interested in getting involved. no experience is required. only a laptop.” I know NOTHING about this and am working on the basis that these people are unlikely to be murderers, but if you’d like to find out for yourselves then there’s a meetup in FCUKING HACKNEY next week! Please do go along and reassure me that they are not in fact some sort of weird digital satanic cult or something.
  • Julianne Aguilar: I’m going to paste a small section of the ‘about’ bit of digital artist Julianne Aguilar’s website here, as I think it will help you understand why I love it: “Julianne Aguilar is an artist, writer, and narrative designer. Her work is inspired by HTML1, unfinished and abandoned 100k+ word fanfics, weed, hell.com circa 1999, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Net Chick: A Smart-Girl Guide To The Wired World by Carla Sinclair, the 1999 Nine Inch Nails masterpiece The Fragile, “Mother Earth, Mother Board” by Neal Stephenson, Elim Garak from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, dying MMORPGs, gail.com, the 1996 first person shooter Quake…” – the list of influences goes on, but it’s safe to say that this is all VERY MUCH MY SH1T. Aguilar’s website features a selection of small little digital artworks (along with a selection of articles and non-digital works), all linked from the homepage, some lightly-interactive and some which unfold over a short period as you watch them, and I have only explored a dozen or so but I honestly think there is some really, really lovely stuff in here that rewards both investigation and a bit of careful attention.
  • Into Time: Ok – click this link and and watch the beautiful colour gradient shift over the screen. Get a bit mesmerised. Then click the screen and realise that you can subdivide it into different sections and create a unique, vaguely-kaleidoscopic artwork composed of shifting windows of colour in a geometric grid and…LOOK IT IS GOOD OK IT IS NOT MY FAULT I AM TERRIBLE AT DESCRIBING THESE THINGS. Just click the link ffs.
  • Doctor Who Scarf: Is Doctor Who good or bad at the moment? Has the series been KILLED BY WOKE or has it NEVER BEEN BETTER? I can’t tell at what point in the seemingly-constant WHO QUALITY DISCOURSE the fandom finds itself (and, honestly, nor indeed do I particularly care – it is a children’s TV programme ffs), but hopefully one thing that EVERYONE can agree on is that a stripey scarf is, at heart, an excellent thing to be celebrated. And so it is with this site (SEAMLESS!) which exists specifically to chart the different scarves worn by Tom Baker, a past Doctor from…what, the 70s? 80s?…per their description, “Tom Baker wore several scarves during his seven series as the Doctor. Each one had its own unique characteristics. Select the links above for detailed information about each scarf including patterns, knitting specifications and yarn suggestions. There are also sections featuring the history of the design, tips for scarf construction, a gallery of scarves knitted by fans (and me) plus some fun ephemera.” FUN SCARF-RELATED EPHEMERA – WHAT MORE COULD YOU ASK FOR?!?! I jest, Whovians, I jest, enjoy your scarves.
  • Bird1000: A game! Promoting an album! Which has, honestly, one of the most utterly-batsh1t soundtracks I have heard in…dear God, in quite a while. This is a sidescrolling platformer – simple but quite shiny-looking – which is part of a wider multimedia arts project to promote a new record by Armenian artist Tigran Hamasyan. “The transmedia project The Bird of a Thousand Voices is the first of its kind to bring ancient Armenian folk tale Hazaran Blbul to life. Armenian composer & pianist Tigran Hamasyan and Dutch filmmaker & visual artist Ruben Van Leer are joining forces for a new live staged production that had its world premiere at the Holland Festival. The mythical bird – whose thousand different songs travel the world to spread harmony – comes to life in an intriguing new kind of music theater, an online game, a kinetic art installation and a series of films.” This is…this is quite overwhelming to be honest, and I am not joking when I say that the music really is like nothing I’ve ever heard before, sort of intensely melodic and a wonderful mix of Eastern and Western, but also…quite fcuking mental. I really really enjoyed this – three minutes of very weird, quite dazzling fun,
  • Skeal: Last up in this section is a game which I am slightly amazed I haven’t linked to in the past – this is PERFECT for December (and, honestly, any time of the year, but most of all December). It is short, it is silly, it will make you grin from ear-to-ear, and you need to turn your sound up. ENJOY!

By Zoe Hawk

OUR FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK IS AN HOUR OF TOP-NOTCH JAZZ SELECTED AND MIXED BY MAARTEN GOETHEER!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Tumblr Communities: This is a really interesting development by Tumblr. Yesterday it rolled out its ‘Communities’ feature to everyone, having previously been testing it in beta since earlier this year, which basically functions a bit like subReddits or forums – anyone can create a ‘community’ around anything they like (presumably within reason – no ‘recreational self-harming’ allowed, I would imagine), within which people post content on which others can comment…yes, it’s yet another reinvention of the base concept of ‘the forum’ (which I think after a few decades we can now all basically agree is the platonic idea of digital platforms, amirite? Eh? Please yourselves you fcuks)! But given the intensely-culturally-specific nature of Tumblr communities and the way fandoms congregate there seems to make perfect sense, and which makes this something that I am holding out hope is going to reinvigorate the platform a bit. It’s all a bit thin at the moment, the discovery functionality is, to be polite, dogsh1t, and there’s a general air of ‘featureset 1.0’ about the whole thing but, equally, it’s very early days and, who knows? If you’re really into, I don’t know, Taylor/Charli slashfic then perhaps this will be your new online foreverhome? Also – and this, I have to say, pleased me no end – THE OTHERKIN ARE THERE!!!!! No, I am not linking to their space, let them believe they are goblins in peace.
  • Flag Stories: Do you like flags? Would you like a LOT of information and data about flags and how their designs and design elements compare? Good, because FCUK ME does whoever runs this page share that enthusiasm and then some.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • UKSnack Attack: Imagined snack foods that don’t exist but which the creator of these mockups and several hundred thousand people who follow the account very much wish did. This doesn’t wholly do it for me, but it’s entirely possible that you will all be less pathetic food snobs than I am – either way, the photoshopping here is TP NOTCH, so well done to the kid behind it.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Gisele Pelicot: There’s no way to describe Janice Turner’s reporting of the conclusion of the trial of Gisele Pelicot other than ‘very distressing’, but, equally, it feels like it ought to be required reading – aside from the most obviously-horrific elements, there’s something particularly chilling, which Turner grapples with, about the self-image of the men involved, about how a sexual culture can be allowed to persist which allows men like the perpetrators to somehow doublethink their way into somehow not believe that they were committing rape…It’s impossible to read this without feeling quite sick, but it’s also quite important that we do, I think. One thing, though – I’ve found some of the commentary around ‘French culture’ and ‘French sexual / social mores’ in the reporting of this case somewhat blinkered and pathetic. GYAC everyone, this is not a country that is significantly more sexually-enlightened than anywhere else, regardless of what the English might want to believe of themselves, and to pretend otherwise is to ignore the fact that the vast majority of sexual crimes in the UK go unpunished.
  • Damascus: That…that happened quickly, didn’t it? I don’t mean to be wildly conspiratorial about events in Syria, but it does rather feel like there are some…COMPLICATED GEOPOLITICAL CURRENTS underpinning the events of the past week or so, and that there are about seven layers of proxy warfare happening in the region at any given second. Anyway, this is all by way of preamble to say that I am not even going to pretend to have anything other than a pretty cursory understanding of the complexities of the overthrow of the Assad regime., but that I found this piece in the LRB a helpful and clear overview of the situation as it stands (or stood a couple of days ago, at the very least). What does seem clear, though, is that Israel looks very much like a country which feels like it can act with impunity now – which, perhaps, is exactly what it is, for better or worse.
  • Parsing Luigi: I’ve been slightly disappointed at the lack of high-quality thinkpieces on the UnitedHealth CEO assassination – yes, ok, we’ve had the handwringing over the question of whether it’s ok to celebrate a death, even if the person who died ran a really horrible business in really horrible industry, but what I want to know is who’s currently running the book on ‘number of CEOs to get offed, globally, in 2025’? Because, honestly, I reckon there’s a market in that. Anyway, this piece looks at all the sleuthing that went on in the wake of his identity being uncovered – specifically his Goodreads, reading the tea leaves of his publicly-declared reads and his wishlists, scrying in the viscera of his reading history for clues as to what drove him to pursue a terminal solution to what he saw as the inherent injustice of the US healthcare system. The answer? There isn’t one, because you can tell very little about what someone is ACTUALLY like or what they actually think from the books they have performatively claimed to read on a socially-focused platform! Still, it’s interesting to speculate.
  • What Happened To The Glamour of Tomorrow: This is SUCH a good and interesting essay and one of the occasional ones which I feel honour bound to recommend if you’re someone with ‘planner’ or ‘strategist’ or (lol!) ‘futurist’ in your job title. Virginia Postrel asks ‘when did we stop thinking that progress was inevitable?’ and ‘when did the future stop feeling exciting and instead become either grim or dull or terrifying?’, and, honestly, this articulates something I felt so strongly wondering round the Electric Dreams show at the Tate recently – there’s a section showing some of the works displayed at the 1970 World’s Fair in Tokyo and literally EVERYTHING about that exhibition – the design of the pavilions, the language used, the ambition and the enthusiasm on display – spoke of a world in which tomorrow was, inevitably, going to be BETTER. Now? Hm.This is long but SO smart and dizzyingly polymathic, covering design and architecture and economic theory and philosophy and taking you through 20thC modernism towards a theory of how we might once again make progress seem exciting. This links to something I read, linked to from Sean Monahan’s typically-interesing newsletter, about how one of the main problems for the left is that it lacks a progress-based vision; at the moment what it seems to be offering is a future in which, ok, things might be more equal, but, also, you won’t have any holidays or new things, and you will have to eat root vegetables for six months of the year because seasonality, whereas the right is promising spaceships and rockets and getting rich on the memecoin lottery and, well, you can sort of see the problem can’t you?
  • The Creator Economy: Or, as Suw Charman-Anderson puts it in this essay, hares and lynx. This is one of the best explanations of why the economics behind the glorious ideal of THE CREATOR ECONOMY – in which everyone is selling the fruits of their creative labour to 1000 true fans and everyone’s happy and fulfilled – is a lovely concept which simply has no bearing in reality thanks to some fairly simple supply/demand logic; this is a really good, clear rundown of why it’s simply not possible for the vast majority of people to make a living ‘creating’ (at least not in the freeform way we like to think of it now), at least not in the present economic system – should anyone you know start talking about wanting to ‘pivot to becoming a full-time creator’ at any point over Christmas then I suggest that you a) share this link with them; b) maybe recommend some good plumbing courses or something.
  • The AI We Deserve: I’ve been recommending Evgeny Morosov’s writing in here for YEARS, and he’s once again written a banger – on AI and how perhaps we shouldn’t ‘settle’ for LLMs, and that perhaps it might be possible to conceive of a different form/function mix for AI if we think beyond narrow neoliberal conceptions of utility, and how the history of AI research since the mid-20thC has ended up where we are now. Which, now I’m typing it, is quite heavy for 1044am on a Friday morning, but if you have any interest at all in both the history of AI research but also the broader question of the ‘shape’ of technologies and how those ‘shapes’ get determined then you will really enjoy this a lot. There’s something in here about ‘pointy, directional’ systems vs ‘wandering’ systems that I think is really rich and rather fascinating, in particular.
  • The Management Singularity: I’m not linking to anything about the Casey Newton/Gary Marcus AI spat this week because I figure that if any of you care about it you’ll already be aware, and if you’re not then you don’t – that said, fwiw, my broad position is that Newton fcuked up by conflating a bunch of different AI-sceptic positions into one straw man (and an inelegantly-constructed one too) but that he is right about some things (specifically, that anyone saying ‘this stuff is useless’ doesn’t quite understand either AI or What Lots Of Companies Actually Do), and that Gary Marcus is a very smart man who REALLY loves Gary Marcus – but this piece feels vaguely-adjacent to it. Briefly, this is a decent little ‘where we are now’ article by Henry Farrell which points out that the real usecases for GenAI at the moment are to be found in boring, invisible bits of businesses rather than at the shiny margins, and that – basically the reason I like this is that it (SURPRISE!) agrees exactly with what I have been saying for 18m, to whit: “I have not seen any case studies of implementation of LLMs in big organizations. But I am prepared to bet significant amounts of money that this is going to be one of their most important uses. For much the same reason that they are excellent at spitting out ritual products, they are going to be very good at taking goals and procedures that are expressed in the language of Overall Management System A, and translating them into the terms and objectives of Sub-Management Systems B, C, an d D or for that matter, at giving Sub-Management System C a better idea of what those people in Sub-Management B are actually on about, when they use those weird words and keep on pushing incomprehensible goals.”
  • How Videogames Became Addiction Technology: A piece in the NYT looking at how the game industry’s model has shifted towards live service games – those, like Fortnite, which NEVER END, and which receive regular content updates over the course of their years-long lifespan, and which as a result can be profitable to a degree unimaginable to the old ‘sell a copy of a physical product’ concept of gaming pre-web – and how that shift has meant an equal shift in game design principles, where it is now vitally important to KEEP THE PLAYER COMING BACK, and how that in turn means that games have quite a lot more in common with slot machines than they did a decade or so ago. All of which is true, and all of which feels…desperately underregulated, if I’m honest (I can’t believe I am talking positively about the regulation of videogames – Young Matt would be APPALLED), especially when you take into account these smart additional observations on How This Works With Live Data offered by Adrian Hon.
  • The First AI Films Are Here: A warning – if you’re an actual, proper creative person, who makes stuff with love and care and craft and pours their heart and soul into whatever it is that you bring into the world, if you’re that sort of person then, well, this article will really upset you. 404 Media’s Jason Koebler went to a screening of AI-generated films by TV company TCL which is making them because…well, because this: “TCL said it expects to sell 43 million televisions this year. To augment the revenue from its TV sales, it has created a free TV service called TCL+, which is supported by targeted advertising. A few months ago, TCL announced the creation of the TCL Film Machine, which is a studio that is creating AI-generated films that will run on TCL+. TCL invited me to the TCL Chinese Theater, which it now owns, to watch the first five AI-generated films that will air on TCL+ starting this week.” So the endpoint is this – are you poor? Are you too poor to afford premium TV and streaming? NO PROBLEM! You can get a cheap TV and a bunch of free content! Yes, ok, fine, the free TV is cr4p, and the free content is 90% ads and 10% AI-slop, but, well, FREE MOVING IMAGES TO DISTRACT YOUR EYEPIECES! Obviously the ‘films’ are terrible, but it’s not that that’s the most upsetting part of this – it’s the clear understanding developing in my mind that, much as there’s a(n often predatory) ‘sub-prime market’ for lending to the financially at-risk, there will soon be a sub-prime market for culture, produced and marketed to people who can’t afford the ‘premium’ stuff, with all the best dataextractive ad-side services that modernity can muster. Fcuk ‘em, they’re only proles. Dear God.
  • Fish Eye: Ooh, I love this essay by Amelia Wattenburger – this is both a really interesting way of thinking about looking at problems, or concepts, or information, or a text, at different levels of ‘zoom’ to extract different layers of meaning from them/it, but it’s also a really charmingly-designed webpage which features possibly my favourite ever bit of pointless-but-lovely on-page animation (you will see what I mean).
  • The Pr0nhub Bongo Data Bonanza: Judging by the numbers in here it’s a wonder any of you can still see to read, you grubby things! The world’s premier tube site returns with its 2024 data drop – as ever, you can learn fascinating things about the particular proclivities of your nation, or the baffling extent to which certain national stereotypes really do maintain across all areas of life (although, briefly, I am going to push back slightly against people suggesting that Italians searching for Italians or French people searching for French people is nationalistic narcissism and suggest it’s far more likely to do with linguistics and the fact that not everyone wants to hear their fcuking in English), and this year’s selection of stats is no exception. I am slightly saddened to see that the global spike in trends for ‘giant pr0n’ which I think happened in 2021 appears to have been a blip, but am once again slightly amazed at how little as a species we talk about the seemingly-universal desire to crack one off to cartoons. Like, does noone else other than me think that, at the very least, there is something CULTURALLY CURIOUS about this? And how it might be linked to all sorts of interesting things such as the ubiquity of videogames over the past 30 years, and how that plays into a prevalence to a particular smooth, poreless aesthetic as classically seen in games and anime? And how that plays into real-world aesthetics and fashion, and how that spills into cosmetic procedures? Anyone? No? Ok, FINE.
  • How WhatsApp Changed The World: A typically-great bit of reporting by Rest of World which looks at how Whatsapp for Business has basically become international infrastructure for ecommerce businesses across the world, particularly outside of the Global North, and how the introduction of AI (INEVITABLY) is going to potentially impact the economies that have been established around the platform and its use for customer services, etc. So so so interesting.
  • Paper People: Another piece about gaming and gaming culture, this time about the growth in popularity of dating simulators aimed at women in Japan and Korea (and elsewhere, but particularly in those countries), and how this is leading to the young men who were traditionally served by the genre feeling somehow traduced or abandoned by a market that now wants to serve people who don’t have the same genitals or desires as they do. Do…do women do this if stuff they like gets popular with a new group? Because, honestly, this sort of behaviour is one of the more embarrassing aspects of my gender. Anyway, this is hugely-interesting about games and how they reflect shifting cultural attitudes and social mores, and how WEIRD fan culture is (THE EMPHASIS IS ON CULT).
  • Mike Myers: A lovely interview with Mike Myers, taken from a recent appearance in LA, in which he talks about his life, his career, his work, comedy in general…honestly, Wayne’s World is obviously ace but I have no love whatsoever for Austin Powers (I once saw Austin Powers 2 in the cinema with my Mexican friend Nick who was living with me at the time – I laughed a grand total of once, at a joke about Moon Unit Zappa at which not one other person made a sound, which story I tell you not to make me look somehow ‘cool’ (I am at least self-aware enough to know it very much does not do that) but to give you an idea how far away it and I are in terms of ‘comedy taste’), I am too old for Shrek to be an overwhelming cultural touchstone in my life and SNL is a) American; and b) never, ever funny, and so I am not any sort of Myers fan, but this is SO CHARMING and SO INTERESTING and, as with a lot of these interviews with people who are obviously VERY GOOD at what they do, you will end up learning a surprising amount about ‘the craft of comedy’ (sorry) as you read.
  • Rough Fish: This is very much one of those articles which I did not expect to enjoy, or even finish, and yet which I found oddly and completely fascinating – the ‘rough fish’ of the title are not, sad to say, tattooed, scarred and belligerent; instead it’s a descriptor for a class of fish generally considered not worth gutting fully when out fishing in Minnesota, and this article is how the State is slowly coming to the realisation that while they might be annoyingly-bony to eat they can still be useful and a vital part of the ecosystem. Seriously, I have never fished and am the very opposite of a nature or outdoorsy person, but this charmed me LOADS and it might do the same to you.
  • War Games: Not suggesting that there’s any reason why we might want to be thinking about this sort of thing right now, but, well, what do you reckon would happen if someone got a bit nuke happy? Well helpfully someone’s already simmed it all out. “The best available model of such an event is an ultrasecret 1983 Pentagon war game called Proud Prophet. That game was a nuclear test of sorts, and it provided critical lessons that remain crucial today. It was unique in that by design it was largely unscripted, involved the highest levels of the U.S. military and its global warfighting commands and used actual communication channels, doctrines and secret war plans. One of its great strengths was that unlike any other war game involving the possibility of small-yield nuclear weapons, it ran freely and was allowed to play out to its natural conclusion: global devastation.” Look, this won’t necessarily fill you with Christmas spirit but it’s SO interesting, both in terms of how the ‘game’ worked and also how it unfolded – come on, tell the truth, it would be quite fun do play this over the course of a few days, wouldn’t it, drunk on the power and safe in your imagined bunker.
  • Cleaning The Tube At Night: The second week in a row I’m featuring a piece by Miles Ellingham in the Londoner; honestly, though, this is another cracker, accompanying the night cleaning team of the London Underground as it goes through the tunnels as you and I sleep, cleaning the tracks and the walls and the tunnels of the detritus, human and animal and mineral, that accumulates over the hundreds of miles of track that comprise the network. Exactly the sort of storytelling you want from your city’s press, taking you into a part of the urban environment most of us don’t ever think of and will never see, this is the sort of writing the Standard *should* have been commissioning, fcuk you Evgeny and Gideon and Emily and Dylan you fcuking fcuks.
  • Cymbals, Anyone?: I though this was SUCH a charming story, told wonderfully, about the moment at which Patricia Wentzel possibly might have realised they were neurodivergent – but didn’t, yet.
  • Radicalised: Finally this week, a Cory Doctorow short from 2019 which, as you will realise as you read it, is not a little prescient.  There’s a bit of dialogue towards the end in which an adult and a child have a conversation about ethics which is so eerily on-the-nose that it’s a wonder their not raiding the author’s house for a rudimentary Tardis. Very good indeed.

By Cecil Touchon

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 06/12/24

Reading Time: 31 minutes

HELLO EVERYONE HELLO HAPPY FRIDAY!

I, er, went out for LUNCH yesterday, which, it turned out, was quite long, and quite liquid, and which almost certainly didn’t require the additional afterbooze, and which possibly was the reason as to why I woke up at 4am this morning…which is by way of small explanation as to why what follows is, even by my standards, a poorly-written and frankly barely-sensical mess of branespeek.  The links, though? The links are, as per, fcuking GREAT.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you should probably just click the links and ignore the words this week, sorry.

By Bobbi Essers

IT MAY NOT SURPRISE YOU TO LEARN THAT MY INTEREST IN CHRISTMAS IS PRETTY MUCH ZERO AND THAT I HAVE WHAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS A VISCERAL HATRED OF ‘FESTIVE’ MUSIC, BUT, BECAUSE I APPRECIATE THAT YOU MAY BE LESS FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN THAN I AM, I NONETHELESS PRESENT TO YOU THIS 3.5H SELECTION OF (NOT WHOLLY TRADITIONAL) CHRISTMAS TRACKS COMPILED BY MY FRIEND ED!

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY CURIOUS TO WATCH THE ‘GREGG WALLACE MAKES FRIENDS WITH LAURENCE FOX’ THING THAT NOW SEEMS GRIMLY INEVITABLE, PT.1:  

  • Advent 2024: Despite my personal distaste for the season, I am aware that, for many of you, this is THE MOST WONDERFUL TIME OF THE YEAR and that this might well be the week in which you turned on the fairy lights, purchased a violently-overpriced spruce and started calculating which of your secondary organs you’re going to have to sell to pay for everything. In the general spirit of ALMOST CHRISTMAS, then, we kick off the links this week with this, honestly, really really lovely project which presents a different, small digital toygamevignettething for each day of the advent calendar. Per their blurb, “Advent.js is a creative coding calendar of beautiful pieces of digital art (and one beautiful main menu) made by writers, poets, engineers, artists and other creative coders, with one new piece being revealed each day of December leading up to Christmas” – I can’t, to my shame, recall whether I’ve featured this in previous years, but there’s a link to the 2023 edition on the homepage should you want EVEN MORE CHRISTMAS. Obviously we’re only a few days into this, meaning there are only (at the time of writing) six of the windows currently open, but there are some really, really lovely pieces of work already in there – in particular, the little gamething from 3 December is, honestly, SO SO SO GOOD and really fun, and frankly worth the click all on its own. Bookmark this and enjoy a SMALL MOMENT OF DIGITAL FESTIVE JOY each morning between now and 25th December – or, alternatively, put yourself into some sort of medically-induced coma until approximately 3rd Jan when this will all be over. If anyone has any hookups on that front, by the way, I am very much all ears.
  • Our AI President: This is sort-of interesting and, weirdly, sort-of incredibly sad (or at least it was to me). It’s fair to say that Lebanon is…well, it’s a bit fcuked really, isn’t it, what with the 20+ years of no real Government and the whole Hezbollah thing, and the more recent ‘getting absolutely pounded by ordnance thanks to the munificence of the state of Israel’ thing, and, without wishing to be too pessimistic (lol), it’s not looking hugely likely that things will get significantly better anytime soon. Still, er, at least they now have a vaguely-inspirational chatbot! Our AI President is a project by Arabic newspaper AlNahar, which has used 90-odd years of its journalism on Lebanon and the wider region to train an LLM, which you can now interrogate about the country, its history, and how the fcuk it might be possible to sort it out a bit. “Lebanon has been enduring without a leader for over two years now, marred by decades of political deadlock and rampant sectarianism. But unlike transient human leaders driven by corruption, power, and greed, the AI President embodies transparency, integrity, and utilitarianism, and operates solely on logic and data-driven decision-making. By creating this AI leader, AnNahar aims to fill a critical gap in the political sphere while also exploring the potential for artificial intelligence to transcend the biases and political leanings that have long plagued traditional governance.” The bot is…actually not a terrible example of the genre, and it will deliver reasonably-cogent-sounding answers to questions like ‘so, how exactly might Lebanon extricate itself from the current clusterfcuk it finds itself embroiled in?’, but, honestly, there’s something almost-entirely awful about the hollowness of it all, and the idea that a fcuking LLM might have ‘answers’ to some of the issues facing the country – there are a bunch of suggested questions you might want to ask The Machine at the bottom of the page, including “how might we achieve accountability for the Beirut port explosion of 2020” which made me do an actual, bleak lol. Don’t worry, people of Lebanon! Your state is nonexistent and your national infrastructure is fcuked, but why not ask a chatbot how to make it better?
  • They See Your Photos: It seems strange that in the year 2024 we are still largely blind to the sheer quantity of information that’s collected about us every minute of every day by every single digital touchpoint we encounter – and yet the response to this tool/toy suggests that the vast majority of us still don’t have the faintest idea quite how real the digital panopticon is. They See Your Photos is a smart little bit of promo for some ‘secure’ photo storing app, which is designed to give you an idea of exactly how much information AN Other digital platform is able to get out of whatever photo you might upload to it – go to the site, give it a pic from your cameraroll, and GASP IN HORROR as you realise that not only can the metadata reveal where it was taken, on what device and at what time, but that, thanks to AI, your photo can now be ‘seen’ and interpreted and, by extension, that information can also be used to target you, sell to you and all of the other wonderful things demanded by 21stC capitalism. Which you might find creepy – or, quite possibly, might unlock a TROVE of interesting and creative ways you can leverage this sort of thing for FUN BRAND LOLS!
  • All Of The 2025 Trend Documents:  Along with the Christmas adverts and the spike in suicides, one of the other traditional, festive moments we all look forward to at this time of year is the absolute AVALANCHE of trends documents written by seemingly every digital platform, consultancy, agency and brand, all desperately scrabbling to find something interesting and worthwhile to say about the coming year. Should you be in the invidious position of having to have opinions on this sort of thing then, well, I am so, so sorry – but, equally, you will probably find this moderately-useful. I, thankfully, don’t really have to pretend to care about this stuff any more, but I have taken a cursory look and, honestly, even by the p1ss-poor standards of previous years this feels like a particularly-poor crop (or at least the agency/culture-type ones are – I confess to not quite having the emotional fortitude to open the Goldman Sachs-type documents) – I question who still needs to be told ‘when collaborating with digital creators, let them take the lead!’, for example (although I did very much enjoy the Pinterest one, if only for its confident assertion that ‘Sea Witchery’ is going to be big next year). For those of you who might need to use this to produce further trends documents – the TRENDS OF THE TRENDS, if you will – then you might find this little tool useful; it’s an LLM layer put on top of all of them, meaning you can ask questions of the corpus and it will spin up answers to, say, “if I’m attempting to sell pants to young men, what are the key visual signifiers I should be hitting in my marketing in 2025?”. This is a good idea, and useful, and a good example of ‘HOW TO USE GENERATIVE AI IN ACTUALLY-PRACTICAL WAYS’, and I am only SLIGHTLY annoyed that this is something that I have been suggesting to people for literally 18months now grumble grumble noone ever fcuking listens.
  • Another AI Advert: Following the peculiar horror of the Coca Cola Christmas spot – but to far less fanfare and DISCOURSE, because it wasn’t FIRST and therefore noone seems to care – is this effort, seemingly an official spot by Vodafone, which is, again, seemingly-entirely-AI-generated (your usual combination of Flux/Midjourney/Runway/Kling/etc seems to be in play here). The result is…well, it’s better and less-horrific than the Coke one, but, also, it’s not exactly *good* – oddly, though, that seems to matter less in this space, perhaps because mobile ads are already such a tedious grab-bag of lifestyle image cliches and that therefore there’s nothing noticeably worse about the versions presented here – nothing looks ‘real’, but then again nothing really looks ‘real’ in mobile ads anyway, so, I suppose, who cares? Which does rather feel like quite a sickly canary in this particular coalmine. Not to be outdone, Serbian football team Red Star Belgrade put this clip out on Wednesday (announcing their departure from X, I think) which is a similar sort of clip but far more effective – partly, I think, because there’s enough creativity in the images they use to sort-of warrant the use of the tech in a way that doesn’t quite feel true with the Vodafone clip. Oh, and just to reassure any of you in the ‘branded video content’ game that you’re not all out of a job JUST yet, there’s also this effort from Italy for Ferrero’s (amazing, addictive, heart-straining) Pocket Coffee sweets (seriously, they are fcuking INCREDIBLE – basically a shot of sweetened espresso in a chocolate shell, I recommend them unreservedly), which proves that, in the main, anything using genAI video still looks too uncanny and odd and unpleasant for mainstream consumption. I’m not, though, convinced that I will be able to say the same thing in 12 months’ time. BONUS AI VIDEO – this one did make me laugh, fair play.
  • The Colour Clock: Time! But, er, also colour! Briefly experience the wonder of synaesthesia with this nice little digital…thing (website, Matt, it’s a fcuking website – Jesus, this isn’t coming easily this morning) in which every time (hh:mm:ss) corresponds to a particular colour hex, meaning you get an imperceptible shift in tone every second. This is rather mesmerising, and I think it would look rather cool on a big screen (or as an actual, wall-mounted clock, should someone fancy making such a thing for me).
  • The National Gallery Mixtape: A properly fun use of AI, this, by the National Gallery and Google, which makes excellent use of one of generative AI’s main ‘skills’ – to whit, taking information of one shape and putting into into another shape. This is a tool that lets you both explore the National’s collection (via the digitised images already held by Google’s Arts & Culture project) and, er, hear what it sounds like – again, this is a vaguely-synaesthesiac experience which basically asks The Machine ‘if these paintings were to form the inspiration for a musical composition, what would such a composition sound like?’. The interface is pleasingly simple – you simply select paintings from the left-hand menu (from a reasonably-sized selection from the National’s archives, Rembrandt, Titian and all the lads), drop them onto the ‘musical score’ on the right in whichever order you choose, add notations from the ‘stickers’ menu (which let you affect the tempo of the composition and give pointers as to the sort of style of music you might want The Machine to mimic) and then HEY PRESTO you will have a personal bit of music which in some way represents the paintings you’ve selected. Which is, fine, almost entirely pointless…AND YET, I think there’s something rather interesting about the idea of seeing how the system decides to render the works in sonic form, and the stitching together of the various elements into a single composition is neat, and, in general, I find this sort of weirdness significantly more interesting and engaging than ‘imagine an AI landscape’ imagew4nkery, or the dreadful soullessness of LLM prose generation. This is fun, give it a play.
  • Explorable Images: We’re still a way away from ‘games, spun up by AI based on a prompt’ or ‘turn any picture you want into an explorable scene’ – but we’re a lot closer than we were a year ago. This link is to a series of (very early-stage) demos by a company called WorldLabAI, which, very basically, show you how its tech can create semi-explorable, navigable environments from a single 2d image – effectively letting you ‘step inside’ the picture and walk around ‘inside’ it, Except you can’t quite, not really – the ‘range’ of your exploration is very limited, and you can’t actually do anything within the scene other than move around a little bit and turn 360 degrees. That said, what’s slightly amazing is that it appears there’s persistence to what’s being imagined – if you look ‘behind’ you, you see the same thing each time, which has significant implications for the ability of this sort of thing to eventually enable proper in-image exploration. Which is fcuking MAD, to be clear. Then a couple of days later, Google announced a similar bit of tech but even more impressive – again, it’s entirely-prototypical and nowhere near product-ready, but there’s something intensely ‘oh, fcuk, that really is quite remarkable’ about this.
  • Clearsky: The Bluesky excitement seems to have quietened down slightly this week (thank God), but I continue to stumble across interesting things built using its API – Clearsky is a tool which, if you plug in your username, will tell you how many people you’re blocking, how many people are blocking you (and who they are), what starter packs you’re in…all useful information, as long as you’re not the sort of person to take being blocked personally. The ‘what starter packs am I in?’ thing really is useful, given the platform doesn’t seem to give you any other way of seeing this info – you can’t actually *do* anything with it, fine, but it does tell you who owns each Starter Pack so you can, should you desire, get in touch with them and ask to be removed. It’s also interesting to see the very, very weird blocklists people are building – who knew ‘following ex-Guardian journo Jim Waterson’ would be enough of a reason for people to want to block you?
  • Silent Poems: This is rather beautiful – type into the window and see your words rendered in a beautiful, vaguely-cursive, entirely-made-up alphabet. This is ‘real’ in the sense that it’s not random shapes; each corresponds to a particular letter, so you could in theory learn to read this if you put the effort in (and, well, what else are you going to do with the holidays?), and there’s something gorgeous about the way in which the letters all sort of flow into each other; even very mundane sentences have something gorgeous and organic about them when written down here. A project by one Lavinia Petrache, an animator from Zurich – THANKYOU LAVINIA THIS IS LOVELY.
  • Uncrop Your Profile Picture: It feels…weird linking to something on Twitter, like I’m offering you some really dirty drugs – meth or PCP or something. Except, unlike those two, Twitter barely even offers a vanishingly-small high these days before the crushing, ruinous comedown. Still, I was briefly amused by this – and slightly-astonished to find it, because I honestly didn’t think anyone was still making fun stuff over there. This is a simple tool that uses genAI to imagine what exists outside of the margins of whatever image you’re using as your profile pic on the platform – I’ve got a vague suspicion that it’s also doing some light scraping of your feed to inform what it’s imagining, but I haven’t tried to look under the hood to check. I don’t *think* it’s doing anything horrible with your data – I mean, anything more horrible than’s already being done to it by the platform – but, well, caveat emptor is probably advised. When I showed this to Shardcore the other day he pointed me at this project which he did two and a half years ago, just before the NEW WAVE of AI broke which proves that a) there are no new ideas under the sun; and b) this stuff really has come on leaps and bounds in 30 months.
  • PongClock: It’s a clock! But it’s also Pong! But, mainly, a clock. I really like this and, again, think it would be quite cool on a big screen somewhere.

By Katrien de Blauwer (this and all remaining images via TIH)

NEXT UP, OPPIDAN DOING A SET FOR DJ MAG FROM A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO WHICH IS A PRETTYMUCH PERFECT COLLECTION OF PARTY BANGERS! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY CURIOUS TO WATCH THE ‘GREGG WALLACE MAKES FRIENDS WITH LAURENCE FOX’ THING THAT NOW SEEMS GRIMLY INEVITABLE, PT.2:  

  • The Desert Island Discs Spreadsheet: An *incredibly* middle-aged, middle-class, anglocentric link, this one, but, well, I have a vague idea about the makeup of at least a proportion of my readership and I SEE YOU, Radio4 people. I have no idea who has compiled this but this spreadsheet contains not only links to every single episode of the show EVER – oh, hang on, ought I explain? Ok, fine – to the non-anglos amongst you, Desert Island Discs is a long-running BBC radio show on which notable people are interviewed about their lives, with the general conceit that they are being asked which records they would take with them if they were to be stranded alone on a desert island. So, this spreadsheet not only links to every single episode of the show, which is just interesting and useful in and of itself (there really are some incredible names on there) but also, for reasons known only to the person who compiled it, records every single artist whose music has been selected by someone, keeping a running tally of the most-popular (Mozart, in case you were wondering), books that people have chosen to take (you’re allowed to bring one – Shakespeare takes the top spot, but a surprising number of masochists would apparently choose the Encyclopaedia Britannica, which feels…joyless, frankly) and the sole luxury item that they would wish to bring with them (it’s worth scrolling down that particular tab because there are some truly esoteric picks in there – my personal favourite is whoever it was who chose ‘the law of the land’ as their luxury, for the sole stated purpose of then being able to break it). This is oddly-fascinating (or at least it is if you’re a middle-class, Radio4-listening brit of a certain age – I concede that for everyone else then, well, it’s a fcuking spreadsheet).
  • The Bluesky Roast Thing: So this was this week’s self-referential viral Bluesky thing – plug in your handle (or indeed anyone else’s), and this will do the whole ‘roast my profile’ thing (much the same as did the rounds for Twitter and Insta a month or so back), with an LLM offering an ‘hilarious’ analysis of your posts and posting style. I can’t stress enough how horrible I find this – the copy it comes out with hits a very specific register of perky-LLM-positivity that I find especially grating, and, overall, the tone of voice here is pretty much my least-favourite style of writing in the whole world; blandly-cheerful, ‘sassy’ and toe-curlingly insincere. Still, LOADS of people really enjoyed this, or at least enough to share The Machine’s ‘hilarious’ insights into their personality and ‘unique’ posting style, which I found interesting – turns out people can put up with horrible LLM-writing when it’s all about them!  BONUS BLUESKY THINGS!: for the techy amongst you, this is a decent primer on how to extract analytics from the platform so you can, should you so desire, cobble together information on post performance, etc etc.
  • The Neighbourhoods: This is a lovely project by one Rob Stephenson, exploring and documenting New York City – per the description, “This weekly newsletter is a not-so-deep dive into every neighborhood in NYC in an effort to create some sort of photographic document of modern-day New York, or at least a record of what I find interesting* on any particular day. I know I will be leaving out a ton of things that could be considered crucial to the understanding of a particular neighborhood and including stuff that will leave some scratching their heads, but this isn’t meant to be a complete or even accurate representation of a place, just my reaction to it. With a mix of old and new pictures and field recordings, I hope this project will add something to the substantial body of work that has already been made about the city.” This is SO interesting – I say this as someone who’s only ever visited New York and doesn’t have anything resembling DEEP KNOWLEDGE of the city, but who is fascinated by writing about hyperlocal urbanity, and for whom this sort of writing, discursive and personal and curious and interested and interesting, is basically personal catnip. If you like reading people like Jon Elledge writing about London then you might also enjoy this – and, obviously, if you’re a New Yorker, this feels like something of a must-read.
  • Y2K: There’s some new film coming out from ubiquitous indie-presenting collective A24 – I have literally fcuk all idea what it’s about, and nor do I care, but it does have a rather nice retropromosite accompanying it which I rather enjoyed; the gimmick is that it looks and feels like a desktop c.1999 (I may not know the first thing about the film, but I have a reasonable degree of certainty that it is set IN THE PAST), complete with Winamp-esque media player with a playlist of era-appropriate tracks, a bunch of files on the desktop for you to explore and an AOL-style chat window just waiting for you to talk to your friend through…except are they your friend? What’s going on? WHO ARE YOU REALLY SPEAKING TO? This is rather fun.
  • Billy Bass Cameo: Fine, it’s not *quite* Cameo, but, well, almost. Have YOU ever wanted the opportunity to have your own, bespoke video of a Big Mouth Billy Bass singing along to whatever song you fancy? No, I can’t imagine for a second that you have EVER wished for such a thing, and yet the universe has provided nonetheless. It’s all very homebrew, but all the better for it – you have to upload your own MP3, you can select specific movements for Billy to perform while it plays, and you can even select different lighting setups to best-frame your piscine performance (the best thing about the site, though, is that it includes a button which is simply labeled as ‘send to fish’. More websites need such a button). I am THRILLED that this exists, and I imagine there is at least one person in your life who would be equally thrilled to receive a video of a mechanical fish flailing arrhythmically to ‘Silent Night’.
  • YourSign LM: You may not think that the TikTok feed of a wholesale signmaker somewhere in China would be worth following, but you would be WRONG. I promise you, the guys fronting these – ‘Tony’ and ‘Leon’ and a couple of others – are some sort of hydrogen bomb of onscreen charisma, and while it’s increasingly apparent that there’s nothing remotely funny about what’s likely to happen to US politics over the next four years, there is something VERY funny about a young Chinese man doing an absolutely nailed-on Trump impersonation while attempting to convince you of the absolute importance of shipping a LOT of neon signage products from Shenzhen.
  • The Open Source Challenge: The OSINT enthusiasts at Bellingcat have put together this series of challenges to test your online sleuthing skills – they are unlocking at various points over the coming month, or you can unlock them early by completing previous puzzles in the sequence – the two that are currently open to view are both of the ‘where was this picture taken?’ variety, and as such not HUGELY complex, but it will be interesting to see what shape the rest of the selection takes.
  • Songs of Insects: What sort of lunatic wouldn’t want the opportunity to listen to the glorious sounds of cicadas, recorded and catalogued online alongside grasshoppers, crickets and 90-odd other species of noise-making insects? NO FCUKER, etc! This is a North American site and these are North American insects, just to stave off any disappointment in those of you who are exclusively interested in the sounds made by European or Asian insects instead.
  • Craftball: Pointless, shiny luxe brand browsergame corner! This time it’s the turn of Loewe, who, for reasons that I doubt even their head of brand could adequately explain, have chosen to spunk a bunch of money on a game which, even by the standards of these things, really is p1ss-poor. What exactly does ‘manouvering an orange (no, really, it’s a fcuking orange – WHY?) left and right along one of three straight courses in an attempt to avoid obstacles’ have to do with ‘flogging expensive bags and shoes and perfumes’? NO IDEA! Still, who cares? You can win PRIZES (I imagine the ‘prizes’ amount to ‘a tenner off a keyring’, but, still, PRIZES!)! This really is bafflingly-sh1t, but does at least have the requisite degree of shine and polish you expect from this sort of thing – seriously though, can anyone explain the orange to me?
  • Pipe Dreams: Oh this is great, PURE CURIO. Did you know that “Pipedreams, which recently celebrated the 40th anniversary of continuous broadcasts, began in 1982 and remains the only nationally distributed weekly radio program exploring the art of the pipe organ”? No you didn’t, fcuk off, stop lying. Anyway, this is the website accompanying the (presumably North American) show which features a quite astonishing array of pipe organ music – there are nearly 2,500(!!!!) recordings on here as far as I can tell, meaning if you ever wanted to get REALLY into, er, the sound of the pipe organ, you now have the perfect place to start. I can imagine that for some of you that this will feel pleasingly-festive (and quite possibly that for a few others it will cause potentially-traumatic flashbacks to being forced to spend a lot of time in church as a kid).
  • NPR’s Books We Love: Oh this is a great resource, well done NPR – this website is basically a pleasingly-explorable selection of books published this year which have been recommended by various NPR contributors, across a range of genres and categories, which is easy to browse and which contains over 350 titles, meaning that there’s something in there for pretty much every taste. Be aware that this is obviously a North American selection, meaning not everything on here will necessarily have been published yet where you are – but you can also browse previous selections going back to 2013, so if you’re in the market for a bunch of book recs for the holiday season this is an excellent place to start.
  • Infinite Baseball: Via Lynn Cherny’s reliably-fascinating newsletter (seriously, if you’re interested in AI and digital creativity in general you really ought to subscribe) comes this silly-but-also-interesting project, which basically produces AI-generated imaginary baseball games, delivered via ‘live’ commentary on the site – this is…sort-of incredible, partly because I don’t understand baseball in the slightest and as such I have no idea whether what it’s saying makes any sense at all. It *sounds* like it does, though, and there’s something oddly-soothing about having the commentary running in the background, wittering away about line-drives and batting averages. This is an art project by Dan Moore, who writes: “The Great American Pastime reimagines one of America’s most cherished rituals through the lens of artificial intelligence. This piece employs the Infinite Baseball Radio Network to broadcast an unending stream of AI-generated baseball games that captures the rhythm, tone, and drama of a live sports broadcast. By inviting listeners into a familiar yet subtly artificial version of America’s favorite pastime, the work provokes reflection on humanity’s increasingly tangled relationship with technology, nostalgia, and the narratives that shape the American cultural identity.” So, er, there!
  • Continue and Persist: This is a lovely idea, and I think you should all pick someone you know in the US to send one of these to. Per the blurb, “Every day, thousands of Cease and Desist letters are issued, telling people to stop what they’re doing (Looking at you, David Chang). What a bummer! That’s why we created: The Continue and Persist Letter. A official-looking legal letter that encourages and uplifts people, one that tells people to keep doing what they’re doing! Surprise someone you appreciate by sending them a Continue and Persist Letter.” WHAT A LOVELY THING! Also, they will post it for you for free, which seems like a good enough reason for you to bother – I can’t tell you how pleasing it would be to receive an official-looking bit of documentation telling me that, actually, I’m not wasting my life doing this and I should crack right on (but, perhaps, the opposite would be healthier).
  • Comball: Have you ever wondered to yourself ‘what would it be like if someone were to combine the twin ludic  pursuits of pool and popular mobile game 2048?’? No, I can’t imagine for a second that you have (you incurious fcuk, you), but thankfully Eray Zesen has which is why this fun little browsergame exists.
  • The Complete BBC Micro Games Archive: Growing up in the UK in the 80s, exposure to computing was in the main limited to occasional opportunities to use one of the school’s collection of yellowing, grubby BBC Micros, a system characterised by amazing, blocky graphics and some truly batsh1t games which for some reason were occasionally considered to be ‘educational’ enough to let us spend an hour or so messing around with them – I genuinely have no idea what exactly playing a text adventure game called ‘Granny’s Garden’ was meant to contribute to my intellectual formation, but GOD did I love those occasional moments when I got to play it rather than memorising times tables. Anyway, this site seemingly collects EVERY SINGLE GAME EVER MADE FOR THE BBC EVER, including the aforementioned Granny’s Garden, so if you want to experience exactly how poor electronic entertainments were in 1984 then this is basically all your Christmases come at once.
  • TicTactic: Noughts and crosses reimagined as a sort of roguelike card battler. This is a demo of the full thing, but it’s pretty full and the game is surprisingly deep and complex when you get into it a bit (ok, complex compared to actual noughts and crosses).
  • Fliphaus: Via the excellent Nag, this is a TERRIFYINGLY addictive game which someone really needs to rip off for the UK asap. The premise is simple – you’re shown two houses side by side, pulled from Zillow listings, and all you have to do is guess which one is priced higher. Given how insane Brits are about housing and property in general, and how insane we also area about money, a UK version of this would break traffic records for whichever estate agent or property-adjacent company nicks this idea first – GO!
  • The Confounding Calendar: This week’s last ludic link is this (growing) selection of puzzle games – a new one’s being released every day for advent, and, honestly, each of the ones so far is SO SO GOOD (in particular the fiendish and brilliant ‘Alphabet Soup for Picky Eaters’, which had me grinding my teeth at it for longer than I care to admit). These are fun, imaginative, quirky and interesting, and I think it’s very much worth checking back over the next couple of weeks to play them all.

By Kumi Oguro

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS A SUPERB SELECTION OF TRACKS CHOSEN BY NICK STROPKO WHICH IS REALLY MAKING ME WANT A COCKTAIL AS IT PLAYS IN THE BACKGROUND, UNFORTUNATE GIVEN IT IS CURRENTLY 10:01AM!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS IS ONCE AGAIN SADLY EMPTY!

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Arch Budzar: Art. Not normally my sort of thing, visually, but I find there’s something interesting about the juxtaposition of the sort of ‘naive’ style and the messaging and maybe you will too.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The Bloomberg Jealousy List 2024: Bloomberg’s once again published its now-traditional ‘jealousy list’ in which a selection of its writers pick the pieces from the past year that they wish they’d written themselves – as ever, it’s a wide-ranging set of picks (many of which you’ll have seen here in the past year, testament to my EXCELLENT taste or, alternatively, how closely my proclivities cleave to those of an EDITORIAL ELITE – either/or) which this year has been widened to include…stuff that isn’t actually writing, such as podcasts or, in one instance, that four-hour video explainer about why the Star Wars hotel failed. I am going to sound like something of a curmudgeon here – I know! – but I thought the picks this year lacked a certain something; personally-speaking I think this has been a great year for essaywriting and longform journalism, but I don’t particularly see that reflected here (outside of a few notable exceptions), and there are half-a-dozen pieces that I remember rejecting for Curios because, well, I didn’t think they were very good. Still, this is a MASSIVE collection of longreads which are very much worth picking through to find the best ones.
  • Scam America: Don’t worry, it’s not (really) about the election – except it is a bit. This dovetails neatly with a piece I included a couple of weeks back about how the Trumpian victory might usefully be seen through the lens of ‘everyone in the US is now a small business owner/creator/hustler’, and builds on it slightly – its particular thesis is that the dominant culture in the States right now is that of the huckster, the carnival barker and the man on the bridge playing that game with the chickpea and the tiny paper cups, and it’s quite hard not to a) agree; and b) think ‘hm, it’s not just the US, this is 100% a pan-Western phenomenon’. To quote, “When I hear about young men turning conservative, I see the idiots from the gym in their dollar-sign shirts. They are not enlightened—nowhere near it—but they are not explicitly hateful either. They think of themselves as open-minded, and to the extent that they believe the last thing they are told, they sort of are. They are aspiring scammers, though more likely than not they are being scammed. They’re willing to tolerate a lot of nasty shit—maybe they don’t believe Trump means it, maybe they don’t care, maybe they think he’s got a point—but it’s not clear that their hatred is what gets them out of bed. It’s not immutable, in other words. For these guys, the difference between the left and the right is that one side are winners and the other are losers. The right is here to keep the scam rolling. The left, to these young men, are the losers being lost in the dust because they’re in denial about the country they live in. To these young men, the left says: follow the rules! Watch your mouth! Wait your turn! Play nice! To the left, these young men say: can’t you fcuking idiots see that there are no more rules?” Sound familiar?
  • South Korea: As far as ‘poorly executed political manoeuvers’ go, it seems that Yoon Suk Yeol’s brief foray into martial law this week will go down in the annals – it will also be remembered (for some desperately unwell people, at least) as THE DAY BLUESKY CAME OF AGE, with Verge reporter Sarah Jeong posting (no I am not going to fcuking say ‘skeeting’, what’s wrong with you?) live on the platform about what was going on on the ground, and providing exactly the sort of realtime reportage that used to be Twitter’s stock in trade until That Fcuking Man decided to ruin it. The link uptop is to Jeong’s next-day writeup, which is a really excellent piece of writing that captures the ‘slightly p1ssed watching history unfold’ vibe of her original posts (an aside: it was…fascinating seeing Americans react to Jeong’s being lightly-drunk on a Monday night as though that was somehow strange or scandalous, your regular reminder that, when it comes to booze, yanks are generally fcuking amateurs (sorry, but you are)); it’s also worth reading Ryan over at Garbage day for a typically-sharp take on WHAT THIS MEANS for Bluesky, and how its demographic profile might actively work against it becoming a large-scale breakout network.
  • FOMO Is Not A Strategy: A smart, practical and sensible piece of writing by Rachel Coldicott on how you might want think about your approach to AI in 2025 from a professional/organisational standpoint, and the extent to which it is VITAL (or, actually, not vital at all) to get on the hypetrain. This is pleasantly-non-w4nky and antihyperbolic and worth a read if any part of your job involves ‘having people ask you annoying questions about AI’.
  • The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants: This is, embarrassingly, 8 months old and completely passed me by on publication – which is a shame, as it’s properly fascinating (if VERY long – seriously, this is 300-odd pages and QUITE DENSE). This is a paper published by Google looking at the ethical considerations which need to be undertaken when considering the development, deployment and governance of what they term ‘Advanced AI assistants’ (which description covers things like ‘LLMs’ and extends to the sorts of agentic behaviour we can expect to see more and more of in the next year or so); I know I’m possibly a little biased given its heavy philosophy/ethics bent, but I found this SO interesting and, to its credit, surprisingly-lightly-written considering the subject matter and the knottiness of the questions being discussed. In particular, the section about the need for a tetradic conception of AI alignment struck me as a simple-but-remarkably-useful way of thinking about base-level questions of ethics in this space and a helpful model to keep in the back of your head should that sort of thing be Your Problem, but, honestly, the whole paper really is super-interesting and worth at least skimming should this be your sort of field of interest.
  • Games and Strategy and Creative: I try not to feature stuff about advermarketingpr in here anymore because, well, I can’t even pretend to care, frankly, but I thought this thread by James Whatley was good and useful – it’s about videogame ads specifically, but the thinking he works through is generally helpful for any of you still struggling to educate people about the difference between ‘strategy’ and ‘tactics’ (if, like me, you are struggling to give a fcuk about that difference, I am afraid I cannot help you), or on what a ‘creative framework’ is for, or any of that sort of horrible, dispiriting b0llocks.
  • I Have No Mouth And I Must Stream: An excellent – and not a little disturbing, frankly – look at the insanity that some people succumb to in the content mines and the things that we think it’s ok to do to ourselves in search of views and, perhaps most-troublingly, the things that we are willing to passively watch other people do to themselves in the name of lols, and how this might end up going in a world in which how we think of employment is necessarily going to change a LOT. WARNING: contains at least one image of someone very, very eating disorder-y, should that sort of thing be something you’d rather not see.
  • Local Newspaper Dating: This is 100% a coming thing – first this piece, then yesterday’s news that UK magazine The Fence (which, whilst technically a national publication is very much a London-centric beast) is going start running personal ads in the new year, is CONCLUSIVE PROOF that hyperlocal, non-app-based dating is going to be everywhere next year. The link is to a piece about the local newspaper in Vermont whose ‘personals’ section has taken off in recent months as singles, burnt out from the relentless emotional battering they’ve taken from Hinge, Tinder and the like are instead turning to the more-traditional approach of ‘writing an advert for themselves in the local paper’ – honestly, I reckon we’ll see all The Mill’s stable of local outlets starting to run these as a small revenue stream (and as a community-building feature), mark my words (except, obviously, in the event that I am totally wrong about this).
  • The Future of Football Games: When I was a kid at international school there was a Spanish guy who introduced me to Spain’s answer to Football Manager, PC Futbol (real heads will know) and who was quietly obsessed with his vision of a future in which all football match footage would be able to be played, leading to situations in which you’d be able to literally ‘drop in’ to critical moments in famous games to see whether, for example, you could avoid skying the final penalty in the 1994 World Cup final (Hola Fermin! ¿Que Tal?). A mere 28 years on from that fanciful speculation and it looks as though…that might actually be possible? Honestly, I read this and I was ASTONISHED – obviously this is PR puff piece in WIRED and so should be taken with the requisite sodium chloride, but, honestly, what’s being described here sounds AMAZING. I mean, listen to this: “The real killer application here, though, is the ability to recreate actual Premier League plays yourself through the Moments feature. Rezzil has taken notable plays from EPL games (typically big goals for now, though the types of plays you can recreate will expand with time), then split them up pass-by-pass into what Rezzil calls “fractions” of the play. You first watch a video of the actual real-life goal, then view a digital rendering of which passes will lead up to the final shot. From here, you’re transported straight onto the pitch. All 20 Premier League stadiums are featured in the game, so your virtual playing field will change depending on where the actual play took place. You’re then prompted to complete each “fraction” of the play, taking control of that player and moving the ball onto the next phase. The fraction could be a short pass, a midrange lob, or even a long bomb to a streaking teammate, and then eventually a shot. Your passing target lights up orange just before becoming open, then green during the optimal delivery window.” I WANT THIS NOW.
  • All of the Chinese Cuisines: Ooh this is SO interesting – a post on the Chinese Cooking Demystified which goes into frankly insane detail on the hyperspecific regionality of Chinese food and the differences that can be found in dishes from area to area. This is really excellent – first explaining why the more-traditional conception of regionality in Chinese cuisine is not entirely accurate, and then going through 63 individual regions and detailing some typical dishes, ingredients and cooking techniques for each. This will, be warned, leave you absolutely ravenous.
  • Forensic Linguists Solve Crimes: I rather love this – the idea that one’s writing leaves as much of a fingerprint as one’s digits, and that through analysing a text’s vocabulary choices, syntax and grammar it is in theory possible to determine its author based on parallel analysis of their previous writings (I think it’s fair to say that you could make out the peculiar stench of my prose at 100m, for example), and how that’s used by forensic linguists to solve ACTUAL CRIMES. I was particularly amused by the fact that thanks to our collective addiction to posting we’ve all basically created a corpus of information that can be used to spot our writing with relative ease – maybe get ChatGPT to write the ransom note, just to be safe.
  • Tom Whitwell’s 52 Things: The 2024 iteration of Tom Whitwell’s annual, excellent collection of ‘interesting facts I learned this year’ is typically superb – as always with these things, I reckon there’s more inspirational creative fodder in here in terms of ‘interesting ways of looking at the world and thinking about things’ than in every single one of those fcuking trend docs all the way back in the first section. Pick your favourite – mine is, obviously, number 24, but I found 42 oddly fascinating and curious too.
  • My Shelfie: If you will excuse me a moment of brief self-indulgence (LOL I KNOW I KNOW IT WAS A JOKE!), I am going to link to something written by ME – this is part of Jared Shurin and Lavie Tidhar’s Shelfie project, which I featured in here when it launched and which they kindly asked me to contribute an entry to. So, in the unlikely event that you’ve ever wondered ‘what do the bookshelves in Matt’s house look like?’, ‘what’s on those bookshelves?’ and ‘what vaguely-amusing anecdotes was Matt able to scare up relating to a selection of said books on one of said bookshelves?’, this is your answer.
  • When New York Department Stores Were Great: I absolutely loved this piece, on the days before online shopping, in which the big New York department stores were were the city’s residents all descended to do their Christmas shopping, when the window displays were lavish and the trees extravagant and the demands of some of the more well-heeled clientele were predictably-batsh1t – this is SO much fun, full of great anecdotes, and will be catnip both to New Yorkers who remember the era and anyone who’s been raised on a media diet in which Christmas in NYC is always portrayed as the shiniest, glitziest version of Yule that you can imagine. I would LOVE to read a similar piece about Fortnum’s, Harrod’s and the London equivalents should any commissioning editors want to put such a piece on their slate for 2025.
  • A Portrait of the Artist as an Amazon Reviewer: You may have heard of Kevin Killian – his name occasionally crops up ‘curios of online culture’ conversations as ‘the most prolific and oddly-brilliant Amazon reviewer ever’ – but this profile of him is wonderful, and paints a picture of a genuinely-fascinating man who lived a genuinely-fascinating life (hung out with Ginsberg! Acted in bongo! A gay man who married a lesbian!) and who found an unexpected by very real artistic outlet through the unpromising medium of the Amazon review. I honestly love this – both as a profile and as a depiction of outsider-artist practice, and it’s sad to think that the inevitable deluge of AI slop polluting much of the easy-access textual web is going to make things like this harder to spot, and find, and remember.
  • Loving The Chatbots: Certainly not the first ‘people’s weird relationships with AI’ piece to feature in Curios this year, but this is one of the more comprehensive – Josh Dzieza spoke to a range of people for this article, exploring the different reasons why people choose to embark upon relationships of varying degrees of intimacy with AI companions, goes over the history of them, and explores the ethics of both the concept and where it might end up. If you’ve read a lot on this topic then some of the early bits of the piece will be familiar to you, but the case studies Dzieza has pulled in lend the piece broad human colour that’s often lacking, there was a lot of stuff in here from a platform/tech point of view that was new to me (and I say that as someone who, as you can imagine, reads quite a lot about this sory of thing), and the central human story at the heart of the piece is well-told and just weird enough to be compelling without being offputtingly-alien. Good luck not feeling a bit odd by the end of this – I know I always say this, but I don’t think we are quite prepared for how odd things are going to become in the next few years.
  • London’s Last Dog Track: Slightly sad, slightly elegiac portrait of Romford, the last dog racing track to be left operational in London. It doesn’t lean too hard into the ‘eels and geezers’ stereotypes, which is good, and it’s strong on the history of the sport and its relation to the city; it also, once again, provided me with a brief moment of pause at how utterly unbothered London is as a city by the rampant gak abuse that’s all over the fcuking place, specifically the throwaway line about punters popping to the toilets to celebrate a win. Can we maybe not make it normal, actually?
  • El Ultimo Vagon: Or, cruising the last tube carriage in Mexico City’ – honestly, I LOVE THIS SO MUCH, this is just a brilliant piece of journalism about the specific cultural phenomenon that is ‘El Ultimo Vagon’ on the Mexico City metro, where it’s basically accepted that the final car of a subway train is pretty much free cruising territory, how different lines attract different types of clientele, and how it’s not just about some casual boning but is also a place of meeting and coming together for the city’s various queer communities. Wonderful, interesting, informative and eye-opening (it did also prompt me to briefly imagine what this might look like in London, to which my mental answer was ‘significantly grubbier’).
  • In The Rocket’s Red Glare: Rachel Kushner goes LONG (really, this is chunky) for Harper’s, but every word here is wonderful – her account of accompanying her 16 year old son to a drag racing meet, and of the world of ‘funny cars’, and of working with your hands, and of what the ‘nitro’ in fast cars actually is, and about America and history and all sorts of other things. I appreciate that 10,000 words on drag racing may not immediately seem enticing, but I promise you that I absolutely devoured this and I can neither drive nor tell one end of a sparkplug from another.
  • The Invention of Fergus Henderson: No apologies whatsoever for including yet another piece about London restaurant St John – thankfully this is another cracking article about the place, this time in Vittles, looking at how it came to embody a certain *type* of Englishness, and English food, and how that fits into certain (semi-invented) concepts of national identity, and generally this is thoughtful, considered writing about eating and culture and a place where, in small ways, my life changed forever.
  • Goodbye, Bridge of the East: The last longread of the week is by Wang Zhanhei, translated by Dave Haysom, about the narrator’s relationship with a wannabe influencer somewhere near (I think) Shenzhen Shanghai (thanks to my friend Ged for correcting me here) – it is short and beautiful and cold and sad, all of which feel about right for this morning I think.

By Neko Sawatzki

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 29/11/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

I got to go to a GALLERY OPENING this week, like an IMPORTANT PERSON (I am not an important person, I simply still have friends who work in arts PR), and as such I would like to use the limited real estate available to me at the top of Curios to strongly recommend the Electric Dreams show at the Tate Modern – if you’ve any interest in the history of how art and electronics have intersected from the mid-20thC onwards then it really is superb, and, even if you don’t, IT WILL FCUKING EDUCATE YOU.

Otherwise, this week has largely been characterised by my having to turn off the radio every time they decide to talk about the assisted dying bill – look, you’re all entitled to your opinions, but when you’ve watched someone die slowly, painfully, cruelly and helplessly over the course of a couple of years I’m going to suggest that it rather changes your perspective on the whole question, and if you all think I haven’t already banked my Switzerland cash in preparation then, well, you’re wrong.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you don’t get this sort of mix of light artistic recommendation and vaguely-nihilistic thanatophilia ANYWHERE else!

By Keita Morimoto (links this week once again via TIH, for which thanks)

BASK IN THE GLORY OF A BRAND NEW MIX OF EXCELLENT (MOSTLY) HIPHOP FROM SADEAGLE, WHO HAS BRIEFLY EMERGED FROM CORNISH OBSCURITY TO BLESS YOUR EARS!

THE SECTION WHICH LOOKS FORWARD TO SEEING ALL THE EXCITING, INNOVATIVE AND FAR-WORSE-MODERATED PLATFORMS AUSTRALIA’S KIDS WILL FLOCK TO NOW, PT.1:  

  • Sill: This is perhaps a touch more, well, functional than many of the links with which I often like to kick off a Curios – what can I say, it’s not all marshmallows and hundreds and thousands, and sometimes you just need to CHOKE DOWN YOUR ROUGHAGE. So, with that in mind, Sill is a not-particularly-’fun’-but-genuinely-useful addon to Bluesky which does one simple thing – in this instance, collecting all the links that are currently being shared most widely amongst the people you follow on the network, theoretically giving you a quick and easy way of what stories are trending RIGHT NOW in your own personal filterbubbleechochamber, helpful both for knowing exactly what issues you might be expected to have an opinion on RIGHT NOW and, more generally, as a topline ‘BREAKING’ ticker. Obviously the contents of this will depend on the sort of people you’re following and the things that they share, so don’t come crying to me if it’s wall-to-wall Daily Mail (lol, it’s Bluesky, every single fcuking link’s going to be the Guardian or The Atlantic).
  • Afloat: THIS, though, this *is* frivolous – it’s not been a vintage year for ‘websites as music video’ projects (WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, MUSICIANS, WHY WILL YOU NOT PRODUCE THE LABOUR-INTENSIVE WORKS I DEMAND???), and in fact it does slightly feel like it’s only going to be a few short years until the whole concept of the ‘music video’ per se is consigned to the dusty oubliette of the past (or maybe the introduction of Spotify video is going to reinvigorate the medium…but, somehow, I doubt it), but, while we wait for an entire medium to sort of slide apathetically into obsolescence we can still enjoy excellent projects like this one. This is a track called ‘Afloat’ by an artist called ‘Sounds of System Breakdown’, and the video is rather nicely done – as far as I can tell it’s at least in-part procedurally-generated, meaning that each of you will experience it slightly differently, but the basic premise is that you are on a raft, drifting through a semi-submerged cityscape, as the track (dance-ish) plays – you can use the mouse to move your field of vision, and there are various different elements (videoscreens, buildings and the like) that you pass as you drift along, there’s a day and night cycle, and, in general, there’s something rather pleasing about this, to the extent that I’ve let it play through on three occasions now because it’s just…nice to just drift through the vaguely-post-apocalyptic cityscape. This was made by one Rob Costello, so, er, THANKS, ROB COSTELLO!
  • A UK Cinema Guide: One of the small (and actually sort-of pleasant in a weird way if you don’t think about it too hard) side-effects of the general ensh1ttification of so many digital services (let’s not talk about the analogue ones, it’s too painful) is the occasional projects that spring up to fill in the gaps where stuff just…doesn’t really work any more. Sadly these sorts of projects tend not to be able to do anything to fix the big issues – the health service, say, or the rubbish collection – but, occasionally, they do manage to make small improvements to minor areas of irritation and LO! This is very much such a thing. Have you tried to go to the cinema recently? Have you found yourself frustrated by the sub-optimal experience of working out what’s on where and at what time? Did you think to yourself ‘fcuk’s sake, I wish there was a simple website that let me select the cinemas I was interested in going to and would then just show me all the potential films I could watch at said cinemas along with showtimes? WELCOME TO EARLY CHRISTMAS! Look, this is…not exciting, it’s not shiny (but, to be clear, it works perfectly well)…but it’s potentially useful, and it’s a nice example of a UX/UI solution that shouldn’t be beyond the wit of man for your favourite monopolistic search provider to mimic and, frankly, the nice person who made it (one Tom Benbow – THANKYOU, MYSTERIOUS TOM BENBOW!) deserves a small round of applause. No, I’m not joking. CLAP FFS.
  • Train Times: LOOK, WE’LL GET TO THE FRIVOLOUS STUFF IN DUE COURSE OK? Very much in a similar vein to the previous link, this is an attempt to deliver some sort of small degree of clarity and simplicity to the currently-unpleasant business of trying to work out how to get from A to B on the train in the UK; it is, very simply, a super-stripped down, accessible way of working out train times and routes, which, somehow, seems to work faster than any other official portal offering ostensibly the same information. Honestly, this is both really impressive and something of an horrific indictment of the websites, apps and general IT chops of the UK’s existing rail providers – given a significant portion of you reading this in the UK are likely to be attempting to travel via train in the next month or so, it might be worth bookmarking this so that, when you’re developing light hypothermia as you huddle in a banking snowdrift on platform 3 at Newport Parkway Station at 21:42 on Christmas eve awaiting the long-delayed train to Swansea that you know in your heart of hearts will never come, you can at least look at when the trains are *meant* to be turning up. It’s ugly, but it is fast and, seemingly, it works. It won’t, though, stop every third train from being cancelled.
  • GenChess: A little AI project from Google which invites you to design your own chess set based on generative AI prompts – you give it short stylistic cues and it will invent you a selection of designs for a chess set based on, I don’t know, your favourite football team or novel series or mathematical principal or bodily fluid (I haven’t tried the full gamut, but, surprisingly, it didn’t demur when I asked it to imagine a chess set inspired by ‘arterial blood’). You can also invent an opponent’s set which you can then play against in a slightly-clunky browserchess battle, should you so desire – it’s a nice, lightweight little toy, but it’s a real shame that there’s no option to send your imagined sets for 3d printing (or at least to download CAD files of them) as some of the designs this throws up are actually rather fun.
  • Josh Lafayette’s Best Albums of the Year: These are EXCELLENT – Josh Lafayette has designed posters for each of his favourite albums of the year, and these are SO GOOD; honestly, if these were available for sale as prints I have a feeling they would sell like hot-cakes. Apparently he’s been doing this since 2007 and now I feel genuinely ashamed and not a little disappointed in myself that I’ve not featured it before now – some fcuking webmong I am. Anyway, he also posts them on his Insta which looks worth a follow should you enjoy these (and you really should, they are ace).
  • Bluesky Mosaic: OH GOD THIS IS TERRIFYINGLY ADDICTIVE. The cavalcade of ‘stuff built on the Bluesky API’ continues apace (this week’s offerings have also included this and this), but the undisputed chamption of the past seven days’ offerings has to be this one, which pulls a selection of images from the Bluesky firehose as they are posted and displays them on a webpage, with the pictures swapping out every second or so. This is…this is DIZZYING and slightly mad and – to be entirely clear – FULL of c0ck (and, somewhat more troublingly, the adult diaper community of bluesky, which is very active at the time of typing), and it’s just a brilliant, strange, terrifying, nonsensical, mad, whimsical muddled snapshot of Life Online. Seriously, this really is utterly hypnotic and really should be on display on a massive screen somewhere (and yes, I know I say things like this all the time, but it really is true in this case). Seriously though, I am very much not joking about the c0ck – this is definitely NSFW, or at least it is if you have the sort of employer who for some reason might get ‘funny’ about you having a selection of engorged glans gaily appearing across your monitor – as an aside, I would be absolutely fascinated to see what the relative image feeds of a bunch of different networks looked like; this vs X or Reddit would be a really interesting head-to-head. BONUS BLUESKY THING: here’s a map of everyone on it, via Andy.
  • The Private School Labeler: I’m including this more as a ‘this thing exists’ heads-up rather than an ‘I think this is good’ endorsement, fyi – this is an interesting wrinkle of Bluesky’s featureset, being used in ways it’s not hard to see becoming…quite toxic quite quickly. So users on BS can subscribe to ‘labelling’ accounts – which, should you subscribe to them, will apply labels to other accounts based on certain criteria. So, for example, there’s this one, which will, should you sub to it, apply visible labels to official brand and sporting accounts to make it easier to spot them – which, you know, seems good! But then there are other uses, like the one at the main link which exists to highlight people on the network who have been to public school – or this one, which is designed to highlight ‘nepo babies’ (a term which, along with ‘brat’, needs to be taken out back and shot at the end of 2024 please), and which you don’t need to be a genius to work out can perhaps be construed as…a bit mean, maybe? The fact that the labelees can’t opt out, for one, the fact that these things can be anonymous…it doesn’t seem like a fully-thought-through design decision to effectively create a system that would let me start to label people as ‘MATT-CERTIFIED CNUTS’, say, and you do rather get the impression that things like this are going to start becoming a touch problematic should Bluesky ever get to a critical mass of users.
  • Gentle Rain: Today’s vaguely-dystopian intersection of AI and HR comes in the form of this new service which purports to offer training for managers in art of, er, managing via the medium of A SELECTION OF AI PERSONAS! Basically, as far as I can tell, this lets you roleplay specific HR/management-type scenarios with variously-inept virtual employees, with your cajoling, wheedling attempts to get them to DELIVER MORE VALUE assessed by another AI to determine how good a boss you REALLY are. Exactly how ‘bullying an LLM’ is expected to translate to ‘dealing with an actual, proper meatsack full of complex emotions and motivated by infinite unpredictable variables’ is…unclear, and a cursory glance at the software here and some of the snippets of ‘training dialogue’ make it clear that at no point have the people behind this managed to de-LLMify the tone of voice of the virtual employees, meaning that unless your colleagues all speak in nothing but breathless LinkedIn-ese then this is unlikely to offer a particularly 1:1 experience. Still, it’s better than the one from a few years ago which made you sack a crying man in VR I suppose.
  • ContentIn: It was, I suppose, bound to happen – a bunch of awful cnuts were already using LLMs to spin up their appalling bromides on LinkedIn, so inevitably a bunch of EVEN MORE APPALLING CNUTS have found a way to monetise it. Are you sick and tired of having to spend, ooh, a whole three minutes each day coming up with some cripplingly-banal parable that you can translate into prose-cruft for your slavering audience of doublefigureIQ LinkedIn mediocrities? Well it’s your LUCKY DAY! ContentIn will, for a fee, help you with EVERY step of the process – coming up with ideas for ‘thought leadership’, helping you ‘build out your ideas’ and even write you a post in classic, line-break heavy, portentous LinkedIn style! The main gimmick here is that this promises to ‘write like you’ – which, to be clear, is fcuking bullshit, unless of course by ‘write like you’ what you actually mean is ‘write like every single other fcuking cnut on the platform with the same cadence and cliches’ – and, while you may be able to tell I am not wholly positive about this as a concept it does rather look like the testimonials on the site are genuine and that people are actually using this and…and…I am actually slightly spun out with the sheer, mad idiocy of a website purporting to be a place for people to demonstrate and share professional expertise is being overrun with automated content written by spicy autocomplete, which is then being read by bored office monkeys who will then respond with their own automated rubbish…it’s morons all the way down, a teetering, tottering pyramid of fcuking stupid. Come, armageddon, because, honestly, we deserve every single thing we get at this stage. Fcuk me I hate LinkedIn SO MUCH.
  • Stippler: Upload an image, get a nicely-stippled version of it back. That’s it! Nothing more, nothing less. Who doesn’t want to see themselves as a weirdly-abstract dot-image? NO FCUKER, etc!
  • Rovr: Ooh, this is interesting and another one I’m slightly amazed I’ve not seen before – Rovr is basically an online radio station with a BRILLIANT collection of curators putting together hour-long shows of whatever they fancy which are then streamed to a worldwide audience. It’s just music – no ads, no algorithm, it’s scheduled and tied to timezones so there’s a sort of ‘mood’ to the day wherever you are in the world, and there really are some great names on there including, from the UK alone, DJ Food, DJ Vadim, Joe Muggs and a whole bunch of other people who are catnip to people of my sort of middle-aged ears.
  • TinyIdeaStuff: One of the weird things about TikTok is that it’s sort-of impossible to tell how ‘famous’ any creators on it are – like, are they FAMOUS-famous, or are they just famous in their particular corner of the app (“hi, my name’s Matt, I’m actually a pretty big deal on linktok as it happens”)? Anyway, lots of these videos have like 8m views, so I am going to assume that they are…pretty famous, so apologies if this is OLD NEWS to those of you who are more likely to Do Video than me. Anyway, TinyIdeaStuff is a channel that does short, surreal sketches – I can’t really say much more than that because, well, there’s not much else to say; they’re funny, in that very ‘now’ register of internet humour which is (basically) a post-memetic evolution of ‘omg so random lolz!’ from 2005 (don’t @ me, there’s a clear cultural throughline here) but which I concede to finding pretty funny despite myself. Also, there’s something intensely-charismatic about these kids – actually, that’s something that’s been puzzling me recently…do we need a new term for people who are particularly compelling *but only on tiny screens*? That feels like a thing. Is it a thing?

By Clayton Schiff

NEXT UP, SOME PLEASINGLY-HARD TECH-HOUSE MIXED BY JENTEN! 

THE SECTION WHICH LOOKS FORWARD TO SEEING ALL THE EXCITING, INNOVATIVE AND FAR-WORSE-MODERATED PLATFORMS AUSTRALIA’S KIDS WILL FLOCK TO NOW, PT.2:  

  • Fugatto: While a lot of focus this year has been on the leaps and bounds made by AI video, I’ve personally been most impressed with the advances made in audio generation – the latest versions of stuff like Suno really are astonishing, and while the programs aren’t quite composing chart toppers yet they are definitely good enough that stock audio libraries ought soon to be entirely-redundant. Potentially more interesting, though, is stuff going on at the weird edges of sound generation – which brings us neatly to Fugatto, which is actually ‘a framework for audio synthesis and transformation’ and which is only really a proof-of-concept idea thing, and which is here presented as…quite a dense paper, but which I am sharing with you because some of the examples of what they’re trying to do here are genuinely interesting. Rather than getting the machine to imagine sounds that we could make ourselves, wouldn’t it be more interesting to get it to imagine sounds that have never previously existed? Sounds that we can’t even begin to conceptualise? Sounds so odd that even language doesn’t seem to be able to adequately describe them? YES IT WOULD! So click the link, scroll down, and hear the first rudimentary attempts to get a machine to generate the sound of ‘a cello barking’ or ‘a saxophone screaming’ or ‘an oral delivery of a violin playing a beautiful solo in English saying the words “I need to know; Who let the dogs out?”, sounding like a violin playing a beautiful solo.’ Seriously, this is VERY ODD, but also super-interesting in terms of pushing the boundaries of what we can imagine and conceive of. We’re going to start needing new words, aren’t we?
  • Woznim: Via my friend Ged comes this potentially-helpful little app – do YOU struggle to remember who the fcuk people are and what they are called? In that case it’s entirely possible that this app will save your life (or, more accurately, from momentary, low-level embarrassment). Basically this lets you make notes of people’s names based on where you met them, thereby associating person with place – which, apparently, helps one remember someone else’s name. Per the blurb, “Easily save the names of people you meet and the exact locations where you met them. Whether it’s a coffee shop, a conference, or a random encounter on the street, Woznim helps you keep track. Add personalized notes to each entry. Keep track of important details, like the conversation you had, mutual interests, or future plans.” One the one hand, I can imagine this being useful for a particular type of person; on the other, it probably doesn’t help if the main reason you can’t remember anyone’s name is that, at heart, you simply don’t give a fcuk if they live or die, so possibly worth bearing that in mind.
  • Pearls: WELCOME BACK TO THE WORLD OF LUXE BRAND BROWSERGAMES! This is designed to promote the overpriced gewgaws of Van Cleef & Arpel – you’ll need to open it on your phone, but when you do you’ll get access to a pleasingly-gentle little game in which your sole task is to bounce a pearl from one pillar to another by tapping your phone’s screen (it’s…low-octane entertainment, fair to say). Depending on the score you achieve, you can attain REWARDS – admittedly my performance was so poor that all I was offered by way of recompense was, er, some branded wallpaper for my phone, but I like to imagine that if you really rack up the points you get the chance to win a cubic zirconia the size of your face.
  • Leonardo’s Inventions: On the one hand, Da Vinci was doubtless one of the world’s great polymaths with a near-genius level grasp of a range of disciplines; on the other, he gets an awful lot of credit for being an inventor when, to be honest, most of his ‘inventions’ were bullsh1t. Yeah, ok Leo, you ‘invented the helicopter’ – except you didn’t really, you did a (very impressive, admittedly) sketch of a prototype which, thanks to MODERN KNOWLEDGE, we now know wouldn’t have worked at all. Your flying machine? Wouldn’t have gotten off the ground mate. That tank? Ever see active service, did it? I am merely trying to point out that calling Da Vinci (fuck, for some reason my brain has just remembered those two viral twins from Covid-times and is now insisting on pronouncing this ‘Da Vinky’ – thanks brain, you cnut) a great inventor based on his sketches is like calling me a great inventor based on that period I went through aged c.4 when I was obsessed with building multi-part transformer cars out of LEGO. Anyway, that extended and wildly-unfair rant about one of history’s great minds out of the way, this is a nice selection of 3d models of said inventions which you can peruse at your leisure.
  • Kortex: I realised many years ago that I simply have no interest at all in OPTIMISING MY LIFE, or developing EFFICIENT WAYS OF BEING AND THINKING – I simply don’t care, turns out. That said, if YOU are the sort of person who’s always liked the idea of having some sort of digitally-assisted filing system to help you arrange your thoughts and your work and your ideas in some sort of cogent, coherent and useful way then you might find Kortex useful – I think it’s still in beta, but it looks like a reasonably-useful set of tools, particularly for people whose practice involves lots of research and note-taking across different fields and areas of interest.
  • Routeshuffle: Not an entirely original concept – I think I saw something like this during Lockdown 1 – but I am generally a fan of things that encourage you to explore your local area in different or unusual ways. Routeshuffle basically lets you choose your starting point, whether you’re walking, running or cycling, asks how long you want to go for, and then plots you a random route – helpfully these are circular so you’ll end up back where you started. Nice, simple and useful – there’s a premium version for some reason, but I will forgive the poor student who built this for attempting to scrub together a few pennies because, well, times are hard and we all need to eat.
  • Treasure Inside: FINALLY! After predicting for YEARS that treasure hunt/puzzle books – a la Masquerade – are going to make a comeback, FINALLY THEY HAVE (turns out if you keep repeating something at regular intervals for long enough you will eventually be proved right). Treasure Inside follows a spate of more homegrown treasurehunt projects with a rather more large-scale and shiny variant – Jon Collins-Black has hidden five treasure boxes across North America, packed with goodies, and has written a book packed with clues to help eager hunters work out where they are and track them down. Per the blurb, “There’s Treasure Inside is the culmination of close to five years of work. The author worked with experts in several fields to put together a treasure both unique and valuable. Worth millions of dollars and growing more valuable each day, the pieces in the treasure are as varied as they are unique. Chosen to appeal to as many different tastes and interests as possible, items include Bitcoin, antiquities, shipwreck bounty, rare Pokémon cards, sports memorabilia, gold, precious metals and rare gems. Other objects have historical significance, including ones made or owned by the likes of Pablo Picasso, Andrew Carnegie, George Washington, Amelia Earhart, Jackie Onassis, Henry David Thoreau, and Louis Comfort Tiffany.” I can’t help it, I fcuking LOVE stuff like this – I still remember with genuine pleasure working on Perplex City back in the day, and I really would love someone to do something large-scale like this in the UK please thankyou.
  • Productivity Blocker: A reader writes! I have no idea who this person is, but they emailed me with this project, described thusly: “While there are plenty of Chrome extensions for helping you focus, this is the first one that blocks productive websites so you can relax. It currently blocks over 80 productive websites including: Slack, Fiverr, Duolingo, Linkedin and Dropbox.  All blocked sites are redirected to this block page https://www.productivityblocker.com/blocked, with fun (and stupid) recreational links people can enjoy. The extension is free and exists mostly as a joke/parody of our glamorization of always working, hustle culture. But as an added plus, it does promote wellness and not burning out.” I rather like this, and should any of you currently be working for Nestle, then a) your employer’s a cnut; and b) you can totally rip this off as a simple brand activation for KitKat, that will be one million pounds in consultancy fees please.
  • Salaryman Synthfun: Ok, I don’t usually link to single Insta posts without context but, well, I can’t find any additional context and this is simply too much fun to exclude. Just click the link and enjoy the video of a Japanese man absolutely wigging out as he plays a cacophonous mess on synths using a videogame controller as input. The accompanying caption just reads: “Many Japanese salarymen spend their Friday nights playing synthesizers like crazy using game controllers”, which makes me think that perhaps the word ‘many’ is doing a lot of heavy lifting in this sentence. Do any of you live in Japan? Can any of you confirm or deny that this is in fact a thing that people do rather than something that one bloke does?
  • Saapato: Via Kris at Naive, this is a beautiful little site built by sound artist Brendan Principato – I don’t really quite know how to describe it, but it’s…a sort of patchwork mosaic of works and photos and fragments of music, and if you click around on the various patchwork squares each generates a sound, meaning you can create a light audio tapestry as you navigate which will be different for each of you. Beautifully, whatever I seem to press manages to combine to create something vaguely-beautiful, which is no mean feat of programming – this really is rather gorgeous.
  • Intro: This was introduced to me this week by James Whatley, who described it as ‘LinkedIn meets Cameo’, a combination of words so singularly-unappealing that I nearly voided myself in immediate protest upon hearing them. Still, if you’re the sort of dreadful, dead-behind-the-eyes fcuk who likes to think of themselves as a ‘thought leader’ then you can rent yourself out for meetings using this platform/app – it’s basically like an escort service but for cnuts on LinkedIn, so you have various startup/tech people offering the benefits of their hard-earned wisdom for a mere $2k a session, or various multiply-jointed yoga influencers or clean eating gurus and DEAR GOD everyone here is a vision of alphaness in taupe. Still, if you’d like to pay four figures to have some sort of Stephen Bartlettalike spaff out some rubbish about the vital importance of HUSTLE AND GRIND MENTALITY then, well, you’re a fcuking idiot, frankly. Although now I come to think of it I am not so proud that I’m not partly tempted to put myself up on there for ‘demotivational chats’ just to see if there are any takers.
  • Net Elevation: Want to know what the net elevation of someone’s life was – that is, what the net difference in the height above sea level of their place of birth and place of death was? WELL LUCKY YOU!
  • Travel In Times: Would you like to be able to quickly and easily find out how long it would have taken you to travel from, say, Sevenoaks to Bury in the 17th Century? GREAT NOW YOU CAN! This is really interesting, promise – it estimates travel times based on the road network that was in place across Europe at the time (and, presumably, making generous assumptions about the likelihood of your drowning in any sea crossings you might need to make), and as such you can learn that it would have taken a day and a half to get to Cambridge from London 500 years ago, but that that time was slashed to 4h just a hundred or so years later. Insert your own gags here about how unfavourably your travel times back home this christmas compare to those from an era before electricity.
  • Surveillance Self-Defence: Are YOU an incredibly paranoid person who is increasingly convinced that THEY are watching your every move online? Well you’re probably right tbh, they almost certainly are – and why wouldn’t they be, you PERVERT? Anyway, should you feel the beady eyes of surveillance upon you – or at least *think* that you do – you might find this collection of tips and tools and remaining unmonitored online of use. They’re…they’re a TOUCH on the paranoid side, but I suppose that’s kind of the point. My snark aside, it’s obviously true that for a variety of people, for a variety of reasons, this sort of thing is hugely important – per the blurb, “Surveillance Self-Defense (SSD) is a guide to protecting yourself from electronic surveillance for people all over the world. Some aspects of this guide will be useful to people with very little technical knowledge, while others are aimed at an audience with considerable technical expertise and privacy/security trainers. We believe that everyone’s threat model  is unique—from activists in China to journalists in Europe to the LGBTQ community in Uganda. We believe that everyone has something to protect, whether it’s from the government or parents or prying employers, stalkers, data-mining corporations, or an abusive partner.”
  • Smoke and Fire: A page of gifs of smoke and fire from cartoons. No more, no less. There’s something sort of wonderful about the way these are collected, and it’s really worth scrolling all the way through to get the full effect.
  • Let’s Party: On the one hand, part of me thinks that this is a really great idea; on the other, part of me also thinks that this is the sort of thing that cause some quite INCREDIBLE ruptures in the more complicated and messy types of friendship group. Let’s Party is a an app for your phone that attempts to bring back the UNFETTERED FUN of the pre-digital age – the idea is that you take photos through the app, which doesn’t then ‘unlock’ them until the morning afterwards – so you only get the full dump in the morning when you’ve forgotten all about what you may or may not have snapped. Which, yes, I can totally see as being fun! But the wrinkle here is that you can let multiple phones have a shared account – which means you’ll also get everyone ELSE’S photos at the same time too, which is obviously fine if you’ve all been good but is potentially…less fine depending on how the night panned out and exactly what your relationship is with these people and, look, I’m not suggesting you’re all messy b1tches who love drama but, equally, this feels…dangerous.
  • Pierret’s Dream House: I LOVE THIS! Pierret is, apparently, a French business that sells glazing (doors and windows) – they’re currently running a promo where you are in with the chance of winning 20 grand’s worth of, er, doors and windows (is that a lot of doors and windows? I’m not really up on how much stuff costs beyond weed and casillero del diablo these days), based on your ability to DESIGN YOUR OWN DREAM HOUSE! Yes, that’s right, presumably riffing on the recent popularity of similarly ‘cosy’ (sorry, HATEFUL word) villagebuilding games, this is a surprisingly-full-featured little browsergame where you can spin up your own maison or chateau, personalise the…yes, DOORS AND WINDOWS to your heart’s content, and then presumably have your creation judged by Monsieur Pierret at the end of it. Honestly, I adore this, mainly for the fact that it’s a lot deeper and more fully-featured than it probably needed to be – for one or two of you (the one or two of you who still hanker after a doll’s house, probably) this will possibly prove mesmerising.
  • Solitomb: A fun fantasy-roguelike cardgame based (loosely) on Solitaire – this is FUN, simple to learn but surprisingly-complex, and can comfortably eat away a few of those hours standing between you and a date with the muscle-relaxant of your choice.
  • Known Mysteries: Our final miscellaneous link of the week is, honestly, one of my favourite things of the year. Known Mysteries is, per the blurb, “about the desire to escape Earth. Using a mix of video and text, Sorrow’s story unfolds with the help of the player to solve the mysteries in her town.” But honestly, that doesn’t even begin to describe all the reasons why I adore this. It’s the first game to be built and hosted on the Solar Server, which is, as the name suggests, a solar-powered server in Alberta, Canada, maintained by Kara Stone who also wrote the game – per the blurb on the site, “Solar Server is an autonomous solar powered web server run from my apartment balcony in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. It will host a series of videogames designed to be low-carbon and have environmental themes in the games. My goal with this project is to not only represent environmentalist themes and have people think about the future of the planet and what needs to change, but also put principles of sustainability into actual practice. Because I am an artist, I want people to see and interact with my work, yet my previous work demands you interact with fossil fuels in order to engage with it—on Steam’s servers, Apple’s, Androids, and itch.io’s. With Solar Server, consuming fossil fuels is no longer a necessity when playing my work.” So, to start with, that’s just really cool – but also, the game is GREAT. Seriously, it’s brilliant – it’s more a visual novel, fine, but it’s brilliantly-written and well-paced and the treatment of photos and imagery and video to make it all work as a lightweight website on a small server actually works in service of the narrative, and the music is GORGEOUS and I promise you this is worth every single one of the 60 minutes or so it will take you to play through all three parts of the story (and if for whatever reason parts two or three aren’t working, try again later – the sun might have gone behind a cloud). I can’t tell you how much I love this, honestly, it is very special imho.

By Richard Diebenkorn

FINALLY THIS WEEK, A MIX OF SLIGHTLY-DREAMY SYNTHY SOUNDS THAT IMHO ARE PERFECT FOR COLD SUNNY DAYS, COMPILED BY TECHWAA! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Magical Trash: Oh, fine, not in fact a Tumblr (I do fear I am going to have to retire this section in 2025 as, bluntly, Tumblrs aren’t what they used to be – sic transit gloria mundi and all that jazz), but, as you all know by now, like even I give a fcuk anymore about Curios’ internal taxonomy! Magic Trash is dedicated to, er, the bins of the Disney Magic Kingdom, where even the refuse is branded to within an inch of Mickey’s life. SO MANY BINS. Nicely-decorated bins, fine, but very much still, well, bins.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Pretty Little Patriot: Ok, this is quite far from my normal wheelhouse and not normally my sort of thing, but some of the images on this Insta feed really are quite something. Via Caitlin’s excellent ‘Links’, Pretty Little Patriot is a MAGA-friendly line of clothes for women and…fcuk, just so much of this is baffling to me – the aesthetic, the general ENERGY of the whole thing, the continued insanity of the apparently-entirely-contradictory loves of Jesus, The Donald and high-ordnance firearms managing to coexist in the minds of these people with no apparent cognitive dissonance…there’s a lot to take in here, but I am 100% serious when, were it not for their politics, I would buy the FCUK out of the first sweatshirt in this carousel (and, frankly, quite a few of the others too).
  • Susan Collins:I was lucky enough to be introduced to this artist earlier this week, and not only is she lovely but her work is ACE. Susan Collins does multi-camera, multi-installation videowork (or at least that’s what her recent practice has focused on) and there’s something both conceptually-fascinating but also visually compelling about the results. See what you think – you can read a bit more about the work and her practice here.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Against The Dark Forest: This is very ‘the web writing about the very concept of the web’ and so your appetite for it will largely be dependent on the extent to which you find long, discursive pieces about ‘the digital commons’ and ‘online spaces’ and what both of these things are, can and could be, interesting and worthwhile. Presuming that that opening description hasn’t caused you to shut this tab in disgust, then you will very much enjoy this essay by Erin Kissane, where she (gently, it has to be said) pushes back against some of the prevailing ways of thinking that have spun up around the web in the past couple of years – the way she gets there is interesting, but the fundamental conclusion is worth mentioning here. “So the necessary counterpart to understanding that the Dark Forest Internet complex obscures the arbitrary and temporary nature of the current situation might be accepting that there is no moral arc of the world. Our systems bend toward justice when we bend them, and keep on bending them, forever. I think our failure to remember that the mega-platforms are just intentionally extractive constructs run by brainmelted but very human weirdos is a failure of accountability, but our failure to remember that it doesn’t have to be this way is a failure not only of imagination, but of nerve.” This feels particularly relevant as the rise in popularity of Bluesky is suddenly making more mainstream commentators think about ‘the nature of the web’ for a second, because once again this week there’s another one of those fcuking ‘why does noone make websites anymore?’ articles doing the rounds (GYAC mate they are you’re just too fcuking lazy and bovine to go looking for them you algofattened tw4t), and that we appear to be once again at one of those periods in digital cultural history where people are briefly inclined to think ‘hang on, how did we get here and how might we make sure that we end up somewhere better next?’. Anyway, this is interesting and intelligent and closes with an excellent analogy based on The Wind in the Willows, which is something I don’t get to type often enough.
  • Who’s The Real Cnut?: Kudos to the LRB here for neither censoring the title of this piece or the URL – this is Andrew O’Hagan writing about Paul Dacre and the newspaper he has edited for the past 32 years, the Daily Mail. The swear in the title refers to Dacre’s famous predilection for using the word – often multiple times within the same sentence – but it’s one that significant swathes of the British public would happily use to describe a man who’s presided over an organ of the press (which organ, though? The spleen? The bile duct? The sphincter? So hard to pick!) which has had a role unsurpassed in the coarsening of public discourse and the spreading of hate since he took the helm. I tend not to wish death on anyone – death is EASY, after all, it lets you off the hook – but there are a few people who I would cheerfully see introduced to the rack and the pinion for an afternoon, and this man is very much on that list.
  • That Mental Interview With Elon’s Dad: So this links to a long thread on Bluesky – sorry, I can’t be fcuked to look up whatever the platform equivalent of threadunroller is, you can deal with threads, you’ve grown-ups – about Elon Musk’s father’s recent appearance on a podcast in which, variously, he a) outs Elon for lying about the emerald mines; b) suggests Elon and his ‘hollywood friends’ all laughed at him for backing Trump in 2016; c) implies very strongly that Elon’s mum’s family are actual Nazis; d) also quite strongly implies that, despite his claims to ‘not be a racist’ that he in fact very much sort-of is one; e) reveals that he was so close to apartheid-era President of South Africa PW Botha that said President’s wife and kid regular stayed at the Musk compound in the 80s…look, this is a WILD RIDE and frankly I think you probably can’t take any of it 100% seriously because papa Musk is…not exactly what you might term a reliable narrator, and certainly has his own interests at play when discussing his son, but if even SOME of this stuff is true then it does rather explain one or two things. Oh, also there is some INTENSELY-creepy stuff about getting his stepdaughter pregnant, so, er, be warned.
  • AI Is About Power: This piece in Jacobin will not, if you’ve been paying attention, contain anything that will surprise you, but I thought it a decent overview of the ways in which AI is inevitably going to be used in order to concentrate power in the hands of the boss class and will equally-inevitably have impacts on the dignity and quality of labour that are unlikely to be positive. I know I keep banging on about this – SORRY I KNOW IT IS BORING – but I find it quietly astonishing that senior businesspeople like the bloke who runs Salesforce can say things like this, out loud, and noone seems to realise how…bad it is for people. I mean, seriously, DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT “WE’RE ABLE TO EXPAND OUR LABOR FORCE WITHOUT HIRING MORE PEOPLE” IMPLIES FFS?????
  • The AI Art Turing Test: After poetry last week, this week it’s the turn of art – can YOU tell which of these images is AI-generated? And what does that mean about AI art, and people, and what we like, and what we produce? You will get a lot of these wrong – but I think that what that implies is less ‘wow, AI is really good at creating amazing artworks!’ and more ‘wow, we’re used to seeing a lot of really mediocre art!’.
  • Substack in 2024: An interesting piece looking at Substack at the end of 2024, likely motivated by the recent revelations that Elon Musk made apparent enquiries about buying the platform and its increasing status as ‘the home of political writing online’ (or at least, a certain sort of liberal-ish writing. And Nazis). What this told me is that THE CREATOR ECONOMY DOESN’T FCUKING SCALE (one day, one day, everyone will realise I am right about this), that while there are some people out there making absolute bank on Substack there are plenty of people who…aren’t, and that my personal prediction that we’re going to get a GenZ/A reimagining of the concept of ‘the magazine’ (“what if…what if…some of your favourite substackers bundled some of their work into a package that you could buy for less than the cost of subscribing to them all individually?”) in 2025 is still looking like a reasonable bet.
  • The Rise of the Brocasters: Yes, yes, PODCASTS WON THE ELECTION (they didn’t win the election) and they are THE MOST IMPORTANT MEDIUM IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW (I don’t know about that but they are certainly the most fcuking annoying – can all you cnuts with fcuking podcasts PLEASE at least have the common decency to provide accurate transcripts so that those of us who don’t have the appetite to listen to your HILARIOUS MATEY BANTER can just scan your words in case you occasionally say something worthwhile? Please?), but the thing I found most interesting about this was the implied vacuum that exists in male-focused media, and it made me think, in a week in which the UK saw yet another documentary about the lads’ mag era (non-UK readers – google ‘Front Magazine’ for a reasonable approximation of ‘the 00s for young English men’), about how, for better or worse, after the demise of FHM, Loaded and the like, nothing really emerged to take their place and the rise of bloke-ish podcasts feels like it’s filling that gap somehow. Basically ‘a mixture of aliens, extreme sport stuff, fringe-y science, fitness and money advice’ is EXACTLY the sort of thing a modern-day FHM would probably cover (I maintain, though, that the absence of sex from the male-focused podcast world is…weird. Maybe it’s all the steroids or something).
  • The Queue Is The Thing: The Face, on the very 2024 phenomenon of ‘queuing for the drop (or the waffle, or the sneaker, or the slice, or whatever the fcuk the fcuking algo has dangled in front of your dopamine-starved eyes this week), and What It Means. A couple of thoughts – a) there’s some neat little GUERILLA ACTIVATIONS that the right brands could do with stuff like this, serving the queue in various ways; and b) I wonder a bit whether this is another reaction to the lack of viable third spaces – a queue like these, after all, is also an excuse just to hang out for free (ok, eventually you spend, but you get what I mean) with other people who are interested in the same things as you. Christ, that’s sad isn’t it? “Why are you here?” “I JUST WANT TO FEEL SOME SORT OF BASIC HUMAN CONNECTION FFS”.
  • Guns To Mexico: Our second LRB piece of the week is this excellent essay about the *other* smuggling route across the US-Mexico border – the steady stream of firearms making it from America to the increasingly-insanely-criminal streets of Mexico. This is so so so so good, and rather a neat counterpoint to the prevailing Republican narrative suggesting that the traffic is all murderers coming south to north rather than murder weapons going north to south; there are some wonderful human stories throughout too.
  • AI In The Philippines: The Philippines is very much my canary in the coalmine when it comes to the impact of AI on work, given so many of its people are employed doing relatively-low-skill white collar work for Western companies. This is a fascinating piece in Rest of World looking at the way in which call centre staff across the country are being impacted by AI technologies, and how they are having to work faster and with less agency for the same amount of money – more efficient, but less autonomous, tools guided by machine hands so-to-speak. That’s not to mention all the people who have been screwed by data such as this, demonstrating that the number of listings for jobs in copywriting and graphic design and low-level coding have fallen vertiginously since the advent of generative AI, and that that drop in listings now looks permanent. I don’t know how often I can keep saying this before I bore even myself to death, but THIS ISN’T LOOKING GOOD EVERYONE.
  • Olive Oil:A history of how it was made, how it is now made, and how the flavour of what we now think of as olive oil is intimately linked to the changing methods by which it’s produced. Honestly, if you ever get the opportunity to go and do an olive harvest and then a pressing then you really must – it’s fun, going to a frantoio is just generally cool, and I promise you that the stuff you get back when you’ve picked and pressed your own bears about as much relation to Filippo Berio as I do to Paul Mescal.
  • The Promise of Duolingo: I enjoyed this, about how Duolingo doesn’t in fact teach you how to speak a language at all, but as long as you’re clear about that then it probably doesn’t matter. Per my friend Alex, who’s been using it for years, “I feel like people have overcorrected from “Duolingo will make you fluent” to “Duolingo is a waste of time”. It’s not, it’s very good for vocab and reading comprehension. You just need to do something else for speaking, listening and possibly grammar. But *nothing* is good for all aspects of language learning.” I am also recommending this because it makes no mention whatsoever of Duolingo’s increasingly fcuking annoying, attention-seeking and try-hard marketing campaign (NOONE IS HORNY FOR THE DUOLINGO OWL STOP PRETENDING).
  • What Is A Khia?: New internet slang just dropped! On the one hand, this is a fun little explainer on a new term born out of the queer internet; on the other, can we all possibly maybe agree to…maybe just leave it there? Just let it remain a niche concern, a community bit, something small and private, maybe? Can we basically just agree that if a brand attempts to drop this into its comms we will all collectively spit and shun? Good! Also, I specifically love this piece for the light Rita Ora shade it throws – I still maintain that there is noone, not one person in this world, who would self-describe as a Rita Ora ‘fan’ and that her presence in the pop cultural canon is some sort of elaborate psyop.
  • The Year In Fiction 2024: This year’s nominees for the annual Tournament of Books is out – I don’t normally include this but am making an exception this year because it’s SUCH an interesting list and I wanted to read pretty much every single one of the novels on here (of the ones I’ve not already picked up) – in part this is just a factor of the synopsis-blurbs all being so well-written, in part because of some truly superb cover design on display (US publishers have had a very good year from an aesthetic point of view, it seems). I will 100% be using this as a way of killing entire weeks of the holiday season and I suggest you do the same. BONUS LITERARY RECOMMENDATIONS: this is a really interesting selection of Booker-nominated novels from the 1970s, a decade whose fiction has fallen out of fashion to an extent – John Self presents a list of 10 novels you may not have heard of (I certainly hadn’t heard of most of them) and each of these sounds WONDERFUL and worth reading.
  • Stalker 2: Another bit of videogame writing – per last week, even if you don’t play games this is very much worth reading. Stalker 2 is a new game, a first-person shooter set in an irradiated, postapocalyptic wasteland (so far, so videogame) – the development team is Ukrainian, and so releasing the game has been an incredible logistical achievement, with half the team working out of Prague as refugees and the others contending with life in a warzone. This piece, by Dia Lacina, is a beautiful piece of writing about the emergent stories that happen in the best games, about the atmosphere that Stalker 2 creates, about making art in war…honestly, this really is excellent and recommended to even the most game-averse of you.
  • Derek Parfit: This isn’t the first essay I’ve featured about philosopher Derek Parfit in Curios – that was in 2020, and you can read it here – but it’s possibly the funniest. I know, I know, you don’t immediately understand how a biographical essay about the life of one of the 20thC’s most…obtuse English philosophers can be described as ‘funny’, but I promise you that I laughed out loud on at least five occasions while reading this. OK, fine, so it may feel like you are laughing AT Parfit, but, equally, how can you not? This is an incredible picture of a brilliant, maddening, impossible, flawed genius whose life was seemingly quite utterly ruined by his mind. I mean, just read this – it gives you a flavour, certainly, but also just *imagine* this being your life: “Despite Edmond’s declared sympathy, his biography still has farcical elements. The book is largely an entertaining, and highly revealing, exercise in psychological portraiture by means of anecdote. Parfit, Edmonds tells us, would peddle in the nude on his exercise bike, reading philosophy; he would brush his teeth for hours, reading philosophy; every day he would eat the same breakfast of muesli and yoghurt and the same dinner of carrots, cheese, lettuce, and celery, to maximise his time for philosophy; he would make coffee using water straight out of the tap, to maximise his time for philosophy; he would take a mixture of vodka and pills every night to help him sleep, since he couldn’t stop thinking about philosophy.” Astonishing.
  • New Flesh: I think this is the third or fourth time I’ve linked Emma Garland this year – her writing about sex and relationships is superb, and this is another excellent essay about The Substance, sex and death and decay and the necessary link between all three concepts and some of the reasons why, despite everything, this feels rather like a sexless era.
  • Wing Yip: Absolutely brilliant piece by Jonathan Nunn in Vittles about Wing Yip, the massive Chinese supermarket in North West London, and eating in the cafe there – it’s about the food, a bit, but it’s also about place and people and the changing shape and face of the city, and urban development and memory and and and and fcuk this is EXCELLENT.
  • The X-Files: Our final longread of the week is another LRB link – this is Patricia Lockwood writing about the X Files, about moments that change us, about my favourite neuroscientific case study Phineas Gage, about EM Forster…on a sentence-by-sentence level this is almost offensively good, and, beyond that, I found myself crying by the end and I couldn’t quite tell you why. Beautiful beautiful beautiful.

By Laurence Von Thomas

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 22/11/24

Reading Time: 35 minutes

I had something of a new professional nadir this week which I feel it might be cathartic to share.

So I was booked to appear on some panel thing by a very corporate company, to talk about AI (I was asked as a result of one of my ‘actual jobs’ – rest assured I wasn’t introduced as ‘Matt Muir, author of a miserably-unpopular newsletter no cnut has ever heard of’). I would like to, in order, apologise to: a) the person who booked me, the brother in law of some good friends of mine, whose career I feel I may have irrevocably fcuked; b) everyone in the audience who perhaps wasn’t expecting one of the panellists to attempt to break some sort of record for uses of the word ‘fcuk’ in an ostensibly-businesslike 45-minute panel discussion; c) everyone in the audience who I managed to inadvertently imply had never done anything in their careers that could be considered better than ‘average’ (and that even that, frankly, was perhaps being generous to them). I am sorry to all of you. There is possibly a lesson to be taken from this, but I have spent the past three days attempting to drink the memory away and so it’s probably lost to me by now.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are probably wondering whether I am available to speak at your event and the answer is a resounding ‘yes’!

By André Palais

THE MUSIC THIS WEEK KICKS OFF WITH THIS PROPERLY JOYFUL HOUR-LONG CELEBRATION OF MF DOOM AND HIS MUSIC WITH A LIVE BAND AND ALL SORTS OF GUESTS!

THE SECTION WHICH MET JOHN PRESCOTT (RIP) ONCE, MANY YEARS AGO, AND WHICH WAS SUBJECTED BY HIM TO ONE OF THOSE WEIRD CHEEK PINCH THINGS THAT GRANDPARENTS DO, WHICH WAS FRANKLY QUITE WEIRD AS I WAS 22 YEARS OLD AT THE TIME AND WE WERE IN A PROFESSIONAL CONTEXT, PT.1:  

  • AI Shopping: Another week, another edition of Curios in which I feel compelled to lead with an AI thing (SORRY) because, well, I think it’s more interesting than wanging on about that fcuking car rebrand. Perplexity very quietly this week announced something that feels…quite ‘disruptive’ (lol) – in-app, one-click shopping! Users in the US can now (well, now-ish – I’m not 100% sure if this is live live, but it should be imminently) not only ask Perplexity’s AI search engine to recommend products – it can now give them the opportunity to buy said recommended products directly through the Perplexity interface. Which, let’s be clear, is quite astonishing and does rather scream “YOUR DAYS ARE FCUKING NUMBERED, KIDS” to the entire SEO industry as it currently exists. There is, of course, no detail whatsoever about exactly how The Machine is going to decide upon which products are worth your dollars – there’s talk on the page here about them pulling in data from ‘sources’ to inform recommendation decisions including ‘reviews from all over the internet’, but there’s no indication of which, or weighting, or basically anything that will let manufacturers know how the fcuk to best induce the unknowable abacus within the black box to recommend *their* widget over their competitors’ (there’s a specific reference to Shopify data here, but it’s one vector of many I think and there’s nothing beyond that to draw conclusions from). Welcome, then, to an exciting new era in which a) entire consumer trends are set to be driven by invisible maths; and b) a whole new industry of appalling LinkedIn cnuts will emerge, promising to get YOUR products and services primacy within the great AI recommendation lottery. WHAT A GLORIOUS FUTURE! Also, should any of you choose to pursue option b) then please know that I think significantly less of you (and would also like a small cut of future profits thanks).
  • A Better Version of the Coca Cola Christmas Ad: So aside from That Fcuking Car Rebrand, the other big advermarketingpr discourse of the past week or so has revolved around the world’s premier brand of sugarwater deciding to phone it even more than usual with its festive ad campaign and have the whole thing cobbled together via AI – if you’ve not seen the original aberration you can view it here (but seriously, don’t – it commits the cardinal sins of being not just ugly (cf the aforementioned AI) but also dull as fcuk, given that literally all they did was replicate every single ‘festive coke’ trope, but, well, badly), but rest assured that the version in the main link is SIGNIFICANTLY better, not least as it leans into the weird, facemelting properties of the video for good effect. Anyway, this is a nice, clear example of why this stuff isn’t ready for primetime yet – because, in the main, people fcuking hate it when they see it (so, er, just wait a year or so ;til consumers won’t be able to tell the difference any more and then plough right ahead!).
  • Inside Kristallnacht: In the month of the 1938 pogrom which saw Jews across Germany targeted, this site commemorates the events and the stories of those who experienced them through the eyes of Dr Charlotte Knobloch, six at the time of the events. This is a beautifully-made website about a famously bleak moment in the 20thC, comprising an interactive documentary voiced by Knobloch (I think there may be a VR component to this as well if you happen to have the kit), and the ability to ask her (or rather a well-realised avatar of her) questions about her memories and experiences. This is something you watch and sit with rather than play with and bounce off – it’s very, very well-done, historically-resonant, and, obviously, very moving. It also makes an absolute mockery of people attempting to use the word ‘pogrom’ to describe recent events in Amsterdam, to a degree which should feel shameful.
  • Virtual St Peter’s: A big few weeks for Vatican Digital (I like to imagine that Vatican Digital is like a small, ‘agile’ agency within the wider monolith of the Holy See, with younger, funkier cardinals in streetwear) – not only have they had to cope with the continuing flood of smut generated by the internet around recently-revealed anime-style mascot Luce, but now they’ve launched this frankly incredible ‘visit St Peter’s from the comfort of your own desktop’ site which lets you, er, do exactly that via the medium of some quite astonishing composite images which have been somehow magicked together by AI (I confess to not having spent too long perusing the tech specs here) into a form that lets you take a virtual tour. Be warned – this REALLY fcuked my laptop something chronic (to the point where I just lost three minutes having to reboot the bstard thing), but I concede that might just be down to my tech being sh1t rather than the weight of the webwork here. Once you get in, though, this really is quite beautiful – St Peter’s really is an astonishing piece of architecture, aside from the religious significance, and while nothing can quite communicate the scale of the place like standing inside it, this does a reasonably good job at communicating how mindfcukingly big it is. Oh, and do make sure you take a moment to use this to check out the Pieta’ by Michelangelo in one corner of the Basilica which, fine, is a great sculpture but one on which he has totally and utterly fcuked the proportion of Christ’s thighbones (he really has!).
  • IMG_001: A beautiful example of how modern digital conventions can in small ways shape the world. Per a post by Riley Walz, “Between 2009 and 2012, iPhones had a built-in “Send to YouTube” button in the Photos app. Many of these uploads kept their default IMG_XXXX filenames, creating a time capsule of raw, unedited moments from random lives.” This website pulls from a database of 5million of those videos, presenting a seemingly-infinite stream of videos that noone ever expected to see – videos that don’t matter, that don’t capture magical, marvellous moments, that aren’t beautifully-shot or emotionally-resonant, but instead which are just…life, just odd fragments of footage existing free of context in the great online soup. These are, obviously, mostly entirely banal, but it’s that banality that renders them compelling – that and the randomness of the content, caroming you from place to place, language to language, year to year – and, honestly, it’s all I can do not to just down tools (or, more accurately, rest my weary fingers in some sort of restorative waterbath) and just watch the stream forever. A slightly-bittersweet link, this one – on the one hand, it’s a great project! I like it! On the other, it’s exactly the same as something I featured in Curios two years ago called Astronaut (in this edition, should you be curious) and which made me briefly think ‘oh ffs there is nothing new under the sun, perhaps I should just die’.
  • Tee Hee: Ok, this is both AI *and* a tiny bit crypto so I could forgive you for just skipping on, but COME BACK! Tee Hee is another AI agent let loose on Twitter – or at least it purports to be. This is another in the same sort of ecosystem as the crypto-trading bot that’s been juicing the $GOATSE memecoin over the past month or so (a sentence which I am slightly horrified to find makes something resembling actual sense to me) – while I have no interest whatsoever in the strangely-cultish community that’s building up around the idea of autonomously-trading cryptobots, I am VERY interested in AI agents and where they end up and what they get used for; it does feel, to me at least, like next year’s going to be interesting in ways we’re not entirely prepared for when it comes to this sort of thing. Anyway, if you want to read a bit more about the how and the why behind the project you can do so here – there’s a lot of interesting stuff in here about the ‘architecture’ of the autonomy being employed here, should that be the sort of thing you’re curious about.
  • Times New Dumba$$: On the one hand, I am increasingly disinclined to give Horrible Apartheid Toad any more publicity than he currently commands (I can only imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth); on the other, how could I resist an email to me which explains “Thought you might appreciate this: Elon does this stupid “X” jump all the time. So we took one of those pictures and warped it into every letter of the alphabet. Now it’s a free font, available for download.” So if you’d like to download and make free use of a font depicting the world’s richest cnut looking like an idiot, now you can! It won’t lessen his increasing stranglehold on much of our world, but, on the plus side, look how silly he looks! Does that make it better? Hm.
  • Dustin Brett: OOH this is a GOOD ONE. Dustin Brett is obviously *quite* a talented programmer who’s decide to make his personal website a brilliantly-realised virtual desktop, giving the illusion that you’re effectively inside his computer and browsing his stuff. There are blogs and photos and some soundfiles and some videogame roms and, honestly, this is SO nice to just wander around and explore; there’s something about the desktop interface that lends a pleasing intimacy to what is, at heart, some bloke’s largely-unremarkable webpresence, and there’s a pleasing commitment to the whole thing which means it goes far deeper than it really needs to. Oh, and you can play Doom through it, which should be reason enough to log on for five minutes and shoot some imps.
  • Algorithmic Frontiers: I confess to finding this a bit frustrating – I really *wanted* to like it, being as it is at the intersection of AI and fine art, and I do think some of the works here are potentially-interesting, but FCUK ME is this a horribly-designed website and a generally unpleasant navigational experience. This is, basically, a showcase of a dozen works by a dozen artists, each exploring the intersection of AI and creativity and asking questions around representation and bias inherent in all of these nascent systems – per the curatorial note, “The Algorithmic Frontiers includes 12 Digital Stills. The art pieces explore algorithmic art, inspired by data contributed by women/womxn from over 40 countries. The goal of the Exhibit is to counter gender, racial and cultural biases in AI and engage a broader public in conversations about the ethical, legal, cultural, economic, and political implications of Generative AI. It also aims to facilitate the understanding of both the technical and the social policy implications of Generative AI, using a critical approach to AI Art and leveraging it as a civic engagement medium. It is designed to improve confidence in our collective power to intervene in the socio-technical pipeline of AI development and governance.” Which, to be clear, is right up my street! Interesting! Good! But, seriously, click the main link and try and work out what the everliving fcuk is going on here – there are approximately seven different calls to action on the landing page, there are a bunch of different sections which may or may not relate to each other, and significantly more on-page real-estate gets given over to textual analysis of the works versus images of the works themselves, which feels…backwards. Basically this is conceptually-interesting (and several of the resulting images are rather good imho) but an absolute fcuker to navigate, which is something of a shame.
  • Peer Review: An excellent little bit of dataviz democracy (well, democracy-ish in this specific case) work by Tortoise here – this is an interactive exploration of the different members of the UK’s upper chamber, the House of Lords, specifically looking at the different archetypes that the peers can be grouped into based on their attendance, voting records, donor status and the like – you can also see details on individual peers’ registered interests, their holdings and any additional paid positions they may have, giving you an easy way of seeing whether or not, for example, they might have a personal vested interest in, say, matters regarding reform of landlording legislation. Of course, what with it being the unelected Upper Chamber there’s actually fcuk-all you can do with any of this information beyond letting it make you a bit angry – you can’t vote the cnuts out, you can only wait for them to die (or for the increasingly-unlikely reform of the bicameral system, but tbh I wouldn’t hold your breath on that front) – but it’s good to have another set of data which you can use to raise your blood pressure should you desire it.
  • The Big 3d Bluesky Firehose: Things I learned this week about Bluesky – it is very much in that stage of social media platform growth where users of the platform REALLY like talking about the platform they are posting on. As such, this link was EVERYWHERE this week – it offers you a (really quite dizzying) realtime feed of everything being posted on Bluesky presented as though you’re sort of falling into it (text-only, so no fear that you’ll have a massive furry c0ck hurtling towards your field of vision, fear not), and it’s mesmerising in that familiar, ‘oh my god the sheer weight of people and thought is dizzying’ way (and, in general, there’s something very funny about some of the occasional phrases that get thrown at you – I just opened it to check and saw “tears for breakfast again” scrolling towards me and, well, what can I say, it made me laugh). Oh, and seeing as we’re doing ‘fun things on Bluesky’, here’s all the emoji being posted on the platform, as rainfall, in realtime, and here is a truly heroic build which isolates and reads out every single English language swearword posted as it happens (honestly, I can’t stress how deeply, childishly funny it is to have this open in the background and to have your work soundtracked to the occasional frustrated cry of ‘fcuk!’ or ‘tits!’), and here’s a thread of other examples by Andy Baio which contains a selection of other fun, pointless visualisations you can enjoy while you convince yourself that it’s 2012 all over again. Finally on Bluesky (because, honestly, I really don’t want to hear about it anymore – let’s all use it and SHUT THE FCUK UP ABOUT THE FACT WE ARE USING IT), should you be interested in making bots on the platform then you might want to check out the Bluesky version of Cheap Bots Done Quick, a simple and easy way of spinning up an automated feed from basically nothing. Go! Play! Have fun! BUT PLEASE STOP TALKING ABOUT HOW COSY AND NICE IT FEELS IT MAKES ME HATE YOU AND WISH PAIN UPON YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES.
  • Delete All Your Tweets: Lol, it’s too late, they’ve all been scraped and ingested into Grok. Still, if you’re a code-happy sort and want to expunge all evidence of your presence from Elon’s Nazi Playground then you might find this Github repo useful. Oh, and this lets you port all your tweets INTO Bluesky, although, let’s be clear, this strikes me as quite an astonishingly-hubristic step (“no, they are like the library of Alexandria and I cannot risk this patrimony being lost to humanity”).
  • Donate A Poem To Bremerton, Washington: OH GOD I LOVE THIS. Per the form, “My small town of Bremerton, Washington installed this “Leave a Poem, Take a Poem” box during the pandemic, but every time I check it, there’s nothing in there! Let’s change that! Using this form, submit some of your OWN POETRY. I will do the work of printing it out and then head down there to fill the box with your words!” This is so lovely and so pure that I am not even going to attempt to subvert it by submitting my revolutionary work of survivor affirmation “I’m your fcukbucket” for consideration (I feel, on balance, it may not be tonally apt), but I would encourage all of you, talented versifiers, to get your verses in. Who knows, this could be your passport to a life-changing degree of very geographically-specific microcelebrity! In my head this is now the setup for a Hallmark Christmas film in which a struggling poet becomes an unwitting celebrity in a small town half a world away, connecting with the love of his life through the medium of his heartfelt verse (needs work, but, honestly, I reckon there’s a solid 70 minuter in this).

By Nigel Van Wieck

DO YOU REMEMBER A FEW MONTHS AGO WHEN THAT GUY POSTED ONLINE ABOUT A GENRE OF MUSIC THAT WAS DESCRIBED TO HIM, VERY SPECIFICALLY, IN A DREAM? WELL NOW THERE IS A WHOLE ALBUM OF THAT GENRE OF MUSIC AND FCUKING HELL IS IT A SOMEWHAT INTENSE SONIC JOURNEY THAT I FEEL YOU SORT OF NEED TO HEAR TO REALLY COMPREHEND!

THE SECTION WHICH MET JOHN PRESCOTT (RIP) ONCE, MANY YEARS AGO, AND WHICH WAS SUBJECTED BY HIM TO ONE OF THOSE WEIRD CHEEK PINCH THINGS THAT GRANDPARENTS DO, WHICH WAS FRANKLY QUITE WEIRD AS I WAS 22 YEARS OLD AT THE TIME AND WE WERE IN A PROFESSIONAL CONTEXT, PT.2:  

  •  The Sounds of Disneyland: Web Curios, famously, does not judge its readers, does not look upon your proclivities and perversions with disgust or censorious eyes – wherever you get your jollies is, broadly, fine by me.That is except for those of you who despite being grown adults still fetishise the entertainment products of the Disney machine – you I do judge, plentifully. Still, in the spirit of end-of-year rapprochement I present to you this collection of what I presume is the ambient music that gets piped around the parks, should you want to recreate the vibe in the privacy of your own home/sanatorium – know, though, that I think you are WEIRD.
  • Exoroad: An interesting data-led map of the US, which lets you adjust a bunch of sliders and settings to identify which parts of the country meet specific criteria you’ve specified – so house price ranges, say, or crime rates, or population density or…oh, or ‘ethnicity’, which all of a sudden feels…less good, frankly, and makes me think this is just designed to be used by people who want to live in places where they know they can exclude both the poor and those they find ethnically distasteful. So, actually, on further reflection I sort-of feel bad about linking this, but on the flipside it’s a really interesting combination of different datasets which, if you squint, probably aren’t *definitely* going to be used to perpetuate regional segregation. Probably.
  • Memento Movi: Want to have the inevitable fact of your own mortality communicated to you via the reassuring medium of your favourite films? GREAT! Memento Movie asks you to tell it your age, to pick a movie (from an annoyingly uncomprehensive list), and to guess at your likely lifespan (ngl, this question spun me out slightly – are we talking what I *think* I’m going to get to? Or what I get to given the choice? Because let me tell you there are some VERY different numbers at play there), and it will then, with nary a second’s thought, present you with the EXACT frame from said film which corresponds to where you are in the Great Journey of Life. Apparently I am currently at a relatively nondescript scene about ⅔ of the way through The Princess Bride, which feels about right tbh.
  • Terms of Service: A USEFUL AND POSITIVE USE OF AI THAT FEELS LIKE A NET BENEFIT TO PEOPLE! I know! Amazing! This is actually a really, really good idea and feels like something that might usefully be lifted by a ‘consumer champion’ brand anywhere in the world because, well, it’s just a good and useful idea. The website’s actually called TOSAbout (but that’s a horrible name, so let’s not mention it again), and exists to offer an easy-to-parse overview of the terms of service of a selection of major tech platforms, from Adobe to Zoom and everything inbetween – said terms are given a topline rating from 1-7 (7 being ‘amazingly not totally cnuty’ and 1 being ‘by ticking the checkbox you have surrendered your rights in this and three subsequent lifetimes, and your offspring will be used for glue’) and for those who want more detail as to the specific iniquities being foisted upon the user there are also AI-generated summaries giving an overview of the (rarely) good, the (far more prevalent) bad and the (inevitable) ugly. Smart, useful, helpful, and a near-perfect use of LLMs which I am slightly disappointed with all of you for not having come up with already tbqhwy.
  • Jamcorder: Ooh, this is an interesting idea – I am negatively-talented, musically-speaking, so have no idea whether this is actually something useful or not, but I am intrigued by the concept. The Jamcorder (can we maybe rethink the name though lads? It’s…well, it’s sh1t isn’t it?) is a small device that’s designed to attach to your keyboard via the MIDI socket and which basically transcribes EVERYTHING you play in hypercompressed format, meaning you can record, they say, 25,000 hours of music on one device. That is…a lot of keyboard noodling. While it’s fair to say that not EVERY one of those 25k hours will be packed with Beethoven-level output, for anyone whose musical working practice is basically ‘sit at the piano and fcuk around’ I can imagine this being an invaluable way of mapping and tracking the creative process and ensuring that your ‘notes’, so to speak, are never lost.
  • Words Like This: Another poetry-related Curios, this is a lovely little site put together by…two people in Australia (hello, mysterious pair of Australians, should you ever see this!) which is designed solely to present poetry they think is good, simply and appealingly, in a manner intended to let the words and the work speak for themselves, The presentation is simple – nicely-arranged text on block-colour backgrounds, a different background colour for each poem – and for reasons that escape me it really works presentationally and contextually; I think this is a lovely way to read verse, and I enjoyed the ‘about’ section, where they talk about the project and why they do it, very much indeed: “Words Like This presents beautiful passages of poetry in a beautiful, contemporary way. There will be no use of technical terms like ‘personification’ or ‘quatrains’ here. No lengthy analysis or historical perspective of the poetry or the poets who wrote them. Sure, context can be important in helping to understand a poem, but that removes from the visceral or primal (two other good words) response that we have to hearing our language spoken out loud or in our minds. Poetry is really just about words like this.” LOVELY, and I mean that is a nice rather than ‘damning with faint praise’ sort of way.
  • The COlour Literacy Project: Do you want to know more about colour as a concept, and to get better at exploring what it signifies, communicates and connotes? OF COURSE YOU DO YOU ARE NOT MADE OF WOOD FFS! “The Colour Literacy Project is a 21st century initiative that recognizes colour as a meta-discipline. Our mission is to provide state-of-the-art educational resources that strengthen the bridges between the sciences, arts, design and humanities in order to meet the challenges and opportunities of the future. Fluency with the language of colour sharpens our visual intelligence, expands our perceptions, and enhances our ability to communicate.” This feels very much aimed at the artistic educational establishment, or at practitioners looking to deepen their appreciation of colour and how to work with it – there are a LOT of exercises and resources on here.
  • Dear Photograph: HOW HAVE I NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE??!?! This is an artefact of the pre-social web (or, more accurately, the very early social web, where we all used our Facebook pages to share interesting links about things we cared about rather than it instead being yet another incessant hose of low-quality moving picture pabulum fired into our eyeballs at the rate of violence), dating back to…Jesus, some time in the mid/late-00s I think, and…God, there’s something about this that just *feels* of the past, even though there’s nothing necessarily retro about the project or its scope. Dear Photograph is a website which collects photos of people holding photos of the place they are photographing – a description which I appreciate makes NO SENSE, but which you will hopefully forgive me for when you see the recursive nature of the project. Each picture is accompanied by a short text recounting the memory that’s being recovered in each case, and the whole thing is a small, poignant series of vignettes which touch on place, recollection and the general inevitable truth that all things must eventually pass.
  • The AI Soul Imprint Generator: Via Jan in the Czech Republic (HI JAN!) comes this project by Charles University in Prague, which invites you to answer a series of questions and which will then, based on your answers to said questions, SHOW YOU WHAT YOUR SOUL LOOKS LIKE! What your soul will probably look like – SPOILERS! – is an artlessly-composed bit of AI slop, but I quite like the disconnect between the slightly-portentous vibe of the questionnaire and site and the outputs, which inevitably look quite a lot like the sort of poorly-photoshopped tribute pages of the 2012-era web. Interestingly this is part of a wider body of work investigating some..,not-insignificant questions around technology and theology being investigated by the Theology and Contemporary Culture Research Group of the Protestant Theological Faculty of Charles University in cooperation with Faculty of Mathematics and Physics of Charles University, Multidisciplinary working group AI in context and Monastery of the Infant Jesus of Prague. So expect someone to come up with an answer to the vexatious question of ‘does The Machine have a soul’ sometime next week.
  • Daisy The AI Anti-Scammer Granny: This has annoyed me quite a lot over the past week or so, so I will keep this short – briefly, this is a (very nice, very smart, very well-done and very successful) bit of PR by O2, in which they have claimed to have ‘invented’ an AI system that will thwart phone scammers by keeping them tied up on the line; this has been covered EVERYWHERE thanks to its (again, smart) mix of zeitgeisty elements (old people being scammed! AI!), but two things in particular have rather boiled my p1ss about it that I want to get off my chest. 1) IT IS A FCUKING PR STUNT THIS IS NEVER, EVER GOING TO BE AN ACTUAL THING THAT O2 DEPLOY; IT WILL HAVE EXISTED AND BEEN LIVE FOR EXACTLY AS LONG AS IT TOOK TO JUSTIFY THE EXISTENCE OF THE PRESS RELEASE WHY THE FCUK IS IT BEING WRITTEN UP UNCRITICALLY AS THOUGH IT IS A REAL THING FFS YOU ARE SH1T AT YOUR JOBS TECH JOURNALISTS!; 2) this is basically a riff on something that was in Curios about ~6m ago which I distinctly remember flagging as ‘something worth ripping off’, so basically I am just salty that I am not getting any (completely undeserved, to be clear) credit here.
  • Hip Hop English School: Ok, unless you speak Japanese you’re probably unlikely to get a vast amount out of this, but it really makes me happy that it exists – HipHop English School is a Japanese podcast in which the hosts use a different hiphop track or artist each week to help teach its listeners English – some of the episodes are just breakdowns of specific songs, line-by-line, while others are interviews with artists who happen to be touring Japan…honestly, this feels like SUCH an easy, replicable format for (say) K-Pop, or Reggaeton, or any other genre of music where lyrics tend not to be in English, so, well, go and steal.
  • Roots: I am pretty sure that if you’re the sort of person who feels the need to put usage limits on your phone you’re already well-versed in all the different apps and tricks and tools you can deploy to bolster your nonexistent willpower – should you be in the market for another, though, Roots looks like it has a comprehensive featureset and (and this is the bit I think is a bit gross if I’m honest) a huge fat layer of GAMIFICATION atop said featureset. Earn badges! Compete in challenges! Badges and challenges which only really exist…in your phone! Do you see the…slight disconnect?
  • 100s of Beavers: Thanks to Lisa Schmeiser’s excellent newsletter I was introduced to this film, which I had never heard of before but now I feel I really must see. I don’t want to explain or describe it – just click the link and watch the trailer, and know that you will never, ever have seen anything quite like this before.
  • Pi Test: How many digits of Pi can you recall from memory? PROVE IT THEN YOU BRAGGART!
  • Handyfotos: Via Kris comes another decade-old web project which is SUCH a perfect slice-of-life website that I have fallen slightly in love with it. Photos and videos presented in a grid, filterable by various tags (location, what’s in the photo, etc) but otherwise presented entirely without context. There’s some minimal explanation, but, honestly, I quite like not really knowing more than this: “The Marco Land Handyfoto Foundation (est. 2014) is a sustained media archive of moments. A Handyfoto — or mobile photo — captures mundane objects or situations as a photo or video. It is the unexpected synergy between two unharmonious elements. The MLHF defines Handyfoto also as a way-of-seeing, a sacred practice: unplanned, observant, and attuned to life’s subtle humor and charm.” Beautiful, mundane digital life shards.
  • The Arts Grant Guru: THIS IS A FCUKING SCAM. You, clever Web Curios readers that you are, would obviously arrive at that conclusion without my guidance, but I think it’s worth sharing because I get the impression there are at least a couple of people who work in the arts who read this and I feel the community as a whole should be on the lookout for nakedly-grifty sh1t like this. In an environment in which arts funding is more contested – and harder to come by – than ever, a service which purports to use THE MAGIC OF AI to help you craft better grant applications could be seen as a helpful service; this, though, is a naked fcuking scam, charging users a fee to perform tasks that could reasonably be achieved with the free versions of most of the large LLMs (and, if not, can DEFINITELY be achieved with the £20 a month pro versions, which is still less money than these cnuts are trying to charge for what is literally just a layer on top of (I presume) GPT. Honestly, this is gross and makes me really quite annoyed, so please do tell anyone you know who works in the sector to please not fall for sh1t like this? Thanks.
  • Source Plus: Ooh, this is interesting – for artists working with AI who would like to be able to train their own local models on datasets that have been cleared for that express purpose, Source Plus offers a series of downloadable imagesets which have the full approval of their creators and copyright owners to be used for model tweaking. Useful for anyone working in this space who’d prefer not to feel like they were thieving from the mouths of the STARVING ARTISTS.
  • Friend: Oooooooooooooh this is an odd one. Friend is a forthcoming AI companion service whose BIG THING is the idea that your companion, your ‘friend’, will live in a physica pendant-style device and effectively become a forevercompanion, remembering you and your life and what you do and what you say and being, basically, your always-there-pal who’s fun to be with! Or at least that’s the theory. In practice, now that the web version of Friend is live, it feels…quite different to that. Load up the website and you’re thrust straight into conversation with one of these ‘friends’ – you don’t get to choose which ‘companion’ you’re paired with, although you can refresh the page to get a new one – who starts your chat with a prompt and…the prompts are all FCUKED. My first one opened with “i’m texting you from my friend’s couch lol, him and his wife are fighting I’m just here in the corner”; the next one with “my kid’s in the hospital after a car crash and i’m a mess, pretending to be strong is exhausting” – hang on, what? WHY THE FCUK WOULD I WANT TO HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THE IMAGINARY MOTHER OF A CARCRASH VICTIM? There doesn’t seem to be any version of these that *doesn’t* have one of these fcuked-up, ‘provocative’ openings, which does rather lend one to wonder…what’s going on here, why is this designed like this, and is there a bigger, more interesting story being alluded to (which, to be clear, would be sort of cool and interesting)? Katherine Dee at Default Friend thinks not, but I am VERY INTRIGUED by this and will keep an eye out for subsequent developments.
  • Free Billionaire Sperm: Are YOU a woman who might want to bear a child? Are YOU struggling to conceive? Do YOU need access to some high-quality sperm? Would YOU like said sperm to be ABSOLUTELY FREE? Well lucky you, today’s your lucky day – presuming, of course, you’re able to get yourself to Moscow, because that’s where Telegram founder Pavel Durov has decided to make his seed freely available to whoever wants some (I presume there’s a finite supply of DurovJuice rather than him spending half his life strapped into some sort of unholy prostate milking machine but, honestly, who knows?). Durov’s previously boasted of already having fathered ‘100s’ of children via similar means, but it’s good to know that he’s not stopping there. I don’t know about you, but I am not entirely convinced that the reasons behind this are *wholly* benign, got to say (have any of you read ‘Rant’ by Chuck Palahniuk? Just saying, is all).
  • Nomido: Find ALL THE WORDS that can be made from each day’s fragments – this is, annoyingly, far harder than I thought it was going to be (or I am losing IQ points by the day, either/or).
  • Procjam: Another great set of tiny games via Lynn Cherny – these are the entries to the recent Procjam game development festival, and features dozens of small, cute, fun exercises in procedural generation, from a bonsai growing simulator to some rather fun sandboxes, many playable in-browser.
  • OpenRA: Finally this week, the sort of thing that may make middle-aged Curios readers’ weekends – want to play Command and Conquer: Red Alert in a version that’s all updated and compatible with modern computers and stuff? OH GOOD HERE YOU ARE.

By  Julie van der Vaart

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS BASICALLY THE SOUND OF BEING IN A MARINA C.1987, OR AT LEAST IT IS IN MY HEAD (I WAS NOT HANGING AROUND MANY MARINAS IN 1997, TURNS OUT), AND IT IS BY DREAM CHIMNEY! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS IS SADLY EMPTY! 

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • A Letter to Elon Musk: I have to say, were my name to have become something of a byword for late-20th-Century liberal hubris I would probably have retired entirely from public life, so credit to Francis Fukuyama for taking all the decades-long ‘end of history? LOL!’ ribbings in his stride (this is possibly why he continues to be a respected and renowned thinker and I, charitably, am…not so much). This is an ‘open letter’ to Apartheid Toad explaining why, contrary to what a succession of galaxy-brained sycophants (and Dominic Cummings – on which note, have you happened to have checked out his Twitter feed of late? I can’t tell whether he’s just abandoned any remaining shred of self-respect to play the part of ‘pick me!’ boy to Elon, or whether he’s halfway down a Goodwin-esque slippery slope, or whether in fact it’s both) might currently be claiming, ‘reducing government bureaucracy and making everything more efficient might in fact be a *bit* harder than just ‘sacking everyone whose jobs I don’t like the sound of or really understand’, and that the intensely-concatenated nature of government means that casually shutting down one seemingly-insignificant bit might actually have some…quite big consequences down the line. Smart and practical and certain to be ignored by its intended audience!
  • The Stone Soup Theory of Billionaires: This has received a LOT of love online this week – I personally found it a touch on the noddy side, but I appreciate that it might equally serve as a useful primer to all sorts of ways of thinking about ownership, means of production and the like and as such will happily include it (also, everything it says is right and true). This (very long, be warned) piece uses the classic ‘stone soup’ story (you know the one – and if you don’t it’s neatly explained at the start, thus neatly sparing me the requirement to outline it, thank fcuk) and how it’s neatly-analagous to the way in which billionaires (and the general ruling class) are able to claim credit for achievements which in fact are born of the collective rather than the individual.
  • On Millennial Snot: This came via Helen Lewis and I am annoyed I missed it when it was published last month because DEAR GOD does it perfectly articulate something I feel very strongly indeed (and also, perhaps unfairly, characterises quite accurately how I feel about the general vibe on Bluesky). Honestly, you will read this and you will nod and you will then notice it EVERYWHERE – this transcends geography, and to a certain extent transcends language (I can recognise this register in Italian, for example) and it is HATEFUL and, hopefully, we can consign it to the dustbin of the first quarter of the century and move on. “These are middle-aged PhDs with prestigious careers, talking like snotty teenagers or sassy black drag queens. Note the overuse of sarcasm, emphasizing asterisks, exclamation points, and pregnant pause ellipses to denote how “over it” they are. They all speak in the dramatic tone of the mean girl  – “History PhD here, and uh, this thread is…a lot!” – You see this language, and these people, everywhere today. You know them by the “fluent in sarcasm” in bio. The PhDs, the columnists, the policy wonks and Wonkettes, the assorted professional quippers and clappers back – public intellectuals did not talk this way twenty years ago. Lionel Trilling did not call things “brat.” This is new. Yet this bumptious patois is how our ascendant elites talk now. I call it “Millennial Snot.””
  • The Self-Care Boom: Or, “beware brands trying to use the fact that everything feels terrifying and jagged and generally fractious to sell you more tat that you neither want nor need under the banner of ‘self-care’”. Taking Audrey Lorde, this feels VERY TRUE: “I can’t say what Lorde would make of the surface-level “self-care” the beauty and wellness industries promote today, since it only rose to popularity in 2016. Following the (first) election of U.S. President Donald Trump, activists circulated the above quote from Lorde to emphasize the importance of tending to one’s needs in times of political upheaval. Cosmetic companies slyly swapped the word “self” for “skin”. Customers ate it up — of course Lorde meant collagen levels when she preached about preservation! — because people were tired, and applying eye cream is easier than engaging in political action. Over the next year, skincare became the fastest growing market in beauty, amassing $5.6 billion in sales and totaling 45% of the industry’s growth. And over the next eight years, every failure of care by the government created another opportunity for Big Beauty to expand the reach of its narrowing standards, all under the banner of wellness.” SEE ALSO: this excellent piece on the fantasy of ‘cosy tech’, and, again, the idea of being sold stuff as a coping mechanism against the iniquities of the world.
  • Inside the Jaguar Relaunch: Oh, OK, ONE article about the fcuking car rebrand. ONE. This is good because it demonstrates exactly how fcuking wrong-headed it was to invite a bunch of fcuking car journalists to an event that did not, in point of fact, feature any vehicles they could actually write about – honestly, if you have aver worked in advermarketingpr and any where near the horror that is BRAND STEWARDSHIP there will be so much of this that both rings true and also makes you want to curl up and die like some sort of woodlouse of humiliation. Oh, fine, seeing as you’re here and you’re reading this, you might also enjoy this video of brand director Santino Pietrosanti (THE most Southern Italian name in the world btw, congratulations) talking about the forthcoming rebrand work at a recent event, where a) he seems to indicate that this is entirely sincere; and b) does that hilarious thing where he talks about ‘fearless creativity’ and ‘breaking down barriers’, all in service of a brand ad that literally looks like an AI-generated parody of every single car ad of the past 5-6 years, down to the boilerplate bullsh1t two-word brand bromides like “believe more” and “imagine suppository” (ok, I may have made the latter one up, but you get the idea). WELL DONE SANTINO, YOU MADE THE MOTHERLAND PROUD!
  • The Long Context: This is long, and a *bit* involved, but it’s a really interesting exploration of using LLMs to turn texts into interactive fictions, which goes through the process of explaining how context windows and ‘memory’ work in an LLM, and which, per the best sort of writing on these topics, contains all sorts of smart ideas about how and where you might want to apply the principles described in the essay in more practical scenarios. I am feeling VERY STRONGLY at the moment that there is a massive gap between ‘what LLMs are actually capable of with some creative thinking’ and ‘what people are actually doing with them’, and I reckon there’s quite a bit of competitive advantage to be found in that space.
  • Niantic Owns The World: Or at least the digital representation of our physical reality. Regular readers may recall that I have for a few years now been interested in who’s winning the battle to effectively create an accurate digital twin of THE ENTIRE PLANET – turns out, based on news this week, that is Niantic, who thanks to the magic of all the millions of people playing Pokemon Go! have managed to basically get to the very front of the queue when it comes to data about the physical topography of the planet. “As part of Niantic’s Visual Positioning System (VPS), we have trained more than 50 million neural networks, with more than 150 trillion parameters, enabling operation in over a million locations. In our vision for a Large Geospatial Model (LGM), each of these local networks would contribute to a global large model, implementing a shared understanding of geographic locations, and comprehending places yet to be fully scanned. The LGM will enable computers not only to perceive and understand physical spaces, but also to interact with them in new ways, forming a critical component of AR glasses and fields beyond, including robotics, content creation and autonomous systems. As we move from phones to wearable technology linked to the real world, spatial intelligence will become the world’s future operating system.” What does this mean? Helpfully, 404 Media has the jargonbusting rundown, which can basically be summarised as ‘they will sell access to this data to whoever wants to use it!’. This is going to be an incredibly important part of the next wave of tech, imho, and it’s worth spending a few moments thinking about all the incredible (terrifying, mad) applications for ‘an entirely accurate map of the entire world, existing digitally, which can be worked on and interpreted by AI’ (there are lots).
  • We See Too Many Hot People: Is this true? I have no idea, but it FEELS true and, per the tried and tested vibes-based curatorial policy here at Curios Towers, that’s enough for me! This article argues – I mean, that’s a bit strong, it’s not really so much an argument as an assertion it’s quite hard to dispute – that one of the reasons dating is so fcuked is that everyone is presented with such an incessant cavalcade of impossibly-pulchritudinous flesh every waking minute of every waking day via the socials and the apps and the telly and and and and, and as such we now expect EVERYONE to look like this, regardless of the fact that the mirror might tell us we’re letting down our side of the bargain. And so, everyone is unsatisfied at how imperfect their irl date is and would seemingly prefer to spend another evening gazing at the poreless features of yet another egirl/boy. The piece puts a lot of the blame on bongo, which, honestly, feels about right, but I do increasingly wonder about the effect that being brought up on videogames and anime has also had on a generation’s beauty standards (this is an argument I will HAPPILY get drunk and opine on for hours, I warn you).
  • Dating With AI: What’s it going to be like when we outsource the labour of dating apps to AI agents made in our image? Well, according to this article it’s going to be…sh1t! Honestly, this entire piece made me feel desperately, deeply sad, and tired, and like I might just walk into the Thames with rocks in my pockets because honestly why bother. SEE ALSO: the inexorable rise of the ‘situationship’, which explores why it is that so many 20- and 30-somethings seem to be embroiled in inchoate, unsatisfying non-relationships which, per my reading of this article, seem to afford a lot of the downsides of a relationship with none of the upsides (apart from the boning, I presume, though tbh the article does rather give the impression that all the people interviewed are far too busy being neurotically unhappy to find time to actually fcuk). More than anything though it was another piece of writing that contributed to the general impression of risk aversion being perhaps the greatest handicap afflicting the youngest adults in society – does this feel like a semi-reasonable take? I have no idea, I tend not to hang out with that many 20 year olds tbh.
  • Camera Rolls: I am such a miserably non-visual person that my cameraroll is a largely barren affair – it simply doesn’t occur to me to take pictures most of the time, which is why (perhaps sadly – is this sad?) my memories tend to be associated to things I have read, or Curios I have written (yeah, ok, that is fcuking tragic, let us never speak of it again), or meals, but rarely, if ever, images. That said, presuming you’re less of a sensory oddity than I am you will probably find a lot in this piece that resonates, and I particularly enjoyed the speculation about the significance of images decoupled from context and meaning: “Unlike social media, the camera roll is a private collection of images for your eyes only. When you look at all of them together, the reasons as to why you took one, what’s in it, or the question of its quality almost falls away. In the camera roll, the virtue of the image is completely reframed. A picture is no longer held to the rules of being good or bad, powerful or insignificant, evocative or dull. Rather, the photos maintain their own separate life within us, casting a gaze and a pressure of their own. Instead of possessions we have images; instead of memories, we have castoff snapshots.”
  • Designing Baba Yaga: Ok, this is very much NOT a typical Curios longread link – this is instead the final paper of one Ariel Adams of the University of Tennessee, who has completed a course on 3d model making and, as part of that, designed and printed a high-quality model of Baba Yaga from scratch. This paper basically explains how you go about doing this sort of thing, the things you have to think about, how the production process works and, honestly, this FASCINATED me – seriously, this is SO interesting in a really unexpected way, I learned loads about manufacturing, and the model Adams ends up with is *so* impressive; honestly, this made me want to get a 3d printed (and a fcuktonne of talent, obvs) and get busy.
  • Sara Jakša: This is another slightly-atypical link – I featured the ‘People and Blogs’ newsletter in here a few months ago (in case you’ve somehow forgotten(!), it’s a series interviewing people who blog about how and why they do it), and this is the latest post, interviewing Sara Jakša about their writing and practice…look, I can’t quite explain this one, but there is something about the tone of Sara’s writing, the register of their written voice, that I find utterly, completely charming; I am not joking when I say I could read this for DAYS, it’s like some sort of textual ASMR (I think that Sara is Finnish, which goes some way to explaining the rhythm and cadence). The interview covers their life, their work, their interests…it’s not revelatory, doesn’t contain any ‘stories’ that I could point you at, but, as a piece of writing and as a voice it is, to me, beautiful, and I fell slightly in love.
  • Elden Ring: Elden Ring, a game that came out in 2021, is widely considered to be one of the greatest ever made – this article by Gabriel Winslow-Yost is, fittingly, one of the greatest pieces of writing about a game (and indeed games as a medium) I’ve ever read in a ‘proper’ magazine (in this case Harper’s). If you play games this will please you immeasurably (and you don’t have to have played Elden Ring to enjoy it); if you don’t, this is perhaps the best essay I have ever read in terms of explaining why they can be beautiful and why you should care about them as a medium.
  • Sports Betting in the US: As I might have previously alluded to in Curios, I have found the past year or so’s ‘hang on…there may be some negative externalities to this ‘gambling’ hobby!’ realisation from the US media slightly astonishing (lads…THE CLUES WERE THERE!), but that doesn’t mean I can’t enjoy pieces of classic big-ticket US magazine journalism like this one in Rolling Stone, which does the brilliant thing that I only really ever seem to see writers in the States getting the space to do in this style, taking a bird’s-eye view of the whole industry and speaking to players up and down the food chain to bring the mad, teeming ecosystem of gamblers, grifters, regulators and mooks into focus. Really, really good.
  • That Vanity Fair Piece About Cormac McCarthy’s ‘Muse’: Honestly, if you want a good cultural weathervane as to the degree to which we’ve done something of an attitudinal 180 on certain issues over the past few years this is a pretty perfect example – Vanity Fair gives Vincenzo Barney (more on whom later) a LOT of space to write about how actually Cormac McCarthy, aged 42, seducing and sleeping with a 16-year-old girl is actually fine and good because, you see, she was his muse, and, you know, great men and art and stuff, and WOW is it a thing. Where to start – the lack of any sort of real critical eye applied to the relationship? The wildly overwritten prose (and yes, I know, but it takes one to know one)? The fact that there are a…lot of assertions by the article’s subject, Augusta Britt, which…don’t seem to have been factchecked that well? The fact that Barney (who, to his credit, does ‘smouldering byline photo’ very well, lucky boy) has a novel coming out soon, and so therefore is basically yet another man using Augusta Britt to further their own career? TAKE YOUR PICK! The fact Barney’s been reposting much of the (sizeable) criticism this piece is receiving on Twitter suggests that he’s preparing to ride this particular wave as far as it will take him which, on a personal note, I hope is straight into the mouth of a waiting shark.
  • Gutted: Janis Hopkins again, this time writing about Twitter, migrating to Bluesky and the horror of one’s own social media presence (and about a medical procedure, but its not really about that at all). Once again, this is very good writing: “Every day my girlfriend would visit and spend some time with me, try to get hold of updates on what was going on. I was often on a lot of morphine (they let me control it with a little button, I learned to count down the seconds until it would let me push it again) and not especially communicative. So too with my parents or friends, who I would chat to for a bit and then wait for them to leave. Hospital visits often have the same character. Awkwardness at being in such an ugly space, around the sick and the miserable. A kind of enforced jollity, a pretence that you don’t look ghastly. There’s nothing to do and small talk runs dry. I felt the awkwardness of my own presence and wanted to spare them from it. If this seems ungrateful, it is. And perhaps another person might have felt more lonely, more isolated, more desperate to have their loved ones around them. Not me, though. Because I was on Twitter.”
  • How Politics Destroyed Contemporary Art: Part of me is including this because it is a genuinely interesting essay offering a provocative position on the past decade or so’s shift in contemporary curatorial practice, and the extent to which the rush to elevate and promote marginalised practices and communities has led itself to a certain stultifying homogeneity of aesthetic in the contemporary museum and gallery scene; other part of me is including it because it contains what may be my favourite opening paragraph of the year. Both are good reasons.

By Michael Kirkham

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 15/11/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

On Saturday night I went to the pub for my friend Nick’s birthday, and happened to meet a group of football fans who supported Swindon Town FC, the team of the town where I grew up (but, to be clear, I WAS NOT BORN THERE). When asked why they supported the team, despite not being from there or having any connection to the place, they replied that they were all from the South, and that they just wanted a team to support that was a) near enough to London to allow them to go to home games cheaply and easily; and b) amusingly sh1t; they then asked me if I did in fact grow up there, and, when I replied in the affirmative, dropped into a genuinely serious register as one of them solemnly said to me, with a look of real pity in his eyes, ‘I am so, so sorry mate’.

Anyway, I’m pretty sure that it’s thanks to those cnuts that I’ve had a horrible chest infection all week, so fcuk them and fcuk Swindon too, the place and the football team. They’re right, it *is* a sh1thole.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you can rest assured that I wiped all the phlegm off this before hitting ‘publish’.

By Min Ding (most images this week from TIH, for which thanks!)

WE BEGIN THIS WEEK WITH MUSIC BY THE SINISTERLY-NAMED ‘MARK OF SATAN’ WHICH IS, I PROMISE, SIGNIFICANTLY LESS EVIL THAN THE NAME MIGHT MAKE YOU THINK AND IS IN FACT SOME RATHER GOOD BEATS WITH A SORT OF GRAND GUIGNOL HAMMER HORROR-STYLE VIBE, MADE BY A MAN I MET IN A PUB LAST WEEK!

THE SECTION WHICH WAS THRILLED THAT ORBITAL WON THE BOOKER AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD ITS SMALL RECOMMENDATION TO THE CHORUS BECAUSE IT IS A GORGEOUS PIECE OF WRITING AND I SAY THAT AS SOMEONE WHO REALLY IS MOSTLY DEAD INSIDE, PT.1:  

  • Tiny Troupe: Couple of caveats to this one: a) it’s AI, I AM SORRY (but I promise it’s interesting AI, honest); and b) this is technical and unless you’re someone who feels comfortable parsing phrases like “you will need to set the AZURE_OPENAI_KEY and AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT environment variables to your API key and endpoint, respectively”, then, well, you won’t really be able to do anything with it. Ok, so with those caveats aside I think this is super-interesting – Tiny Troupe is, (very) basically, a new experimental AI agent playground developed by Microsoft specifically for the purpose of ‘testing’ ideas and concepts for business. How? Well effectively (and, again, I am…somewhat flattening what’s going on here because, well, I only understand bits of it, leave me alone) this lets you spin up a sandbox populated by various AI ‘personas’ with qualities that you, the creator, can define, and then put various scenarios/options to them to see how they respond – so, for example, you could use said personas to evaluate the performance of different marketing messages, or product lines, or TV show ideas…Per the blurb, ”TinyTroupe is an experimental Python library that allows the simulation of people with specific personalities, interests, and goals. These artificial agents – TinyPersons – can listen to us and one another, reply back, and go about their lives in simulated TinyWorld environments…The focus is thus on understanding human behavior and not on directly supporting it (like, say, AI assistants do)…TinyTroupe aims at enlightening productivity and business scenarios, thereby contributing to more successful projects and products.” This end of AI feels, much as with autonomous browser-access, like an area that’s going to blow up in the next year or so, and I am fascinated to see a) the sort of things that people are going to use sandboxes like this to assess; b) whether the stuff it models bears ANY relation whatsoever to how things then happen in the real world because, well, I HAVE SOME DOUBTS, Still, it’s all fascinating stuff – although we’re now getting into the sort of odd, dark territory where if you start to think too hard about the ‘little computer people’ and how much you’re making them suffer by using them as an infinite focus group then you very quickly get into quite unpleasant psychological scifi territory. I can’t help but imagine a not-too-distant future in which we’re offered the opportunity to use systems like this to model consequences and reactions to potential actions, like some sort of predictive assistant to determine the likely reaction if we wear *that* dress to the party or send *that* message to the groupchat. Is that good? No idea! BONUS AI MAGIC LINK: there’s some quite impressive animation transfer going on in this new paper by Bytedance.
  • Defeat The Spotify Algorithm: I understand that, for many people, their relationship with the various algorithms that govern their lives, largely unseen and unbidden and sort-of-unknowable, is a benign, symbiotic one – we feed them with our data, and in return for this gentle care, they guide us down paths that they know will scratch our pleasure centres in *just* the right way (can I just say that writing that in such a way that vaguely-anthropomorphised the algo made me feel…wrong, and quite genuinely unsettled? Just for the record) – and that in particular Spotify’s internal maths tends to be judged quite positively by many, who find its personalised daily selections to be almost uncannily attuned to THEM…I get all of that, I do, but, equally, sometimes it’s good to throw the machine something rogue, something UNEXPECTED and possibly to allow serendipity, non-mathematically-optimised chance, back into your musical life. And so, welcome to Max Hawkins’ Daily Random Playlist, which every day will present you with 30 songs selected (apparently) at random from the Great Spotify Pile – the idea being that every day your audio stream will get queered with 30 songs which have come entirely out of leftfield, allowing you to maybe take a step or two off the well-tarmacked path The Machine has laid in front of you. Aside from anything else this feels like a good way of discovering GENUINELY new music – based on a few days of seeing what this spits out, I am reasonably confident that there’s neither rhyme nor reason behind the selections – and, given we are soon to enter The Season of Wrapped, you’ve probably got about, ooh, 10 days or so to mess with your data and render your selection marginally less basic, and this can DEFINITELY help with that.
  • The Mushroom Colour Atlas: Being as I am a largely urban person I am not up on mycology, seasonality, and the whole question of ‘what time of the year is it appropriate and safe to go and try and pick psychedelics in a field?’, but I am broadly aware that the rough answer is ‘now-ish’. This link won’t help you pick liberty caps – and they won’t make anything better, they’ll just make the horror VIVIDLY PIXELLATED – but it is a really interesting and rather beautiful site, presenting a lovely, watercolour-ish pantone chart of all the different hues that fungi can take, along with information on the various types, their habitats and the like. Just…nice (and, for a certain type of middle-class household, also your new Farrow and Ball palette-matching tool).
  • A Group That Makes Small Decisions For You: This one comes via Caitlin at Links and I am…slightly in awe of it, if I’m honest, because it’s one of those things where I look at it and am once again reminded of the sheer insane diversity of human experience and proclivity. Are you the sort of person who, when confronted with a minor decision in your life – what to wear, say, or what to have for lunch, or what shade of Le Creuset to buy – will mutter to themselves ‘it doesn’t fcuking matter, give a fcuk’ and just pick something, or are you the sort of person who would MUCH rather get a DEFINITIVE ANSWER from someone as to which the BETTER option is? If the latter, then why not become a member of this Facebook Group where you can, at any time of the day or night it seems, drop a question into the chat and have one of the 185,000(!!!!!) people worldwide who participate offer up their thoughts on what your preferred course of action should be. ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-FIVE THOUSAND PEOPLE. How many ‘so, mash or new potatoes?’ questions? How many ‘hair up or down?’ posts? I AM IN AWE. Who…who lives like this? How TIRING must it be? HOW DO YOU CARE SO MUCH ABOUT THINGS???? I can’t work out whether this is a weird side-effect of a constantly rated and quantified life, where it’s assumed that there is always a ‘best’, or at least ‘better’, option, or whether instead it’s just born out of a simple desire for community and connection, but, either way, I am agog (you can read more about these maniacs here should you so choose).
  • Butterfly Superhighway: This was sent to me by one Toby Barlow (HI TOBY BARLOW!), who is Creative Director at US agency Lafayette American – as far as I can tell this is a non-commercial project that’s just about celebrating the journey of the monarch butterfly as it migrates across the US (and about raising awareness of the plant they need access to – milkweed, apparently – as they make their trip), and it’s just a really nice, gentle, Google Maps-based trip across North America. Click one of the different journey-tracks on the homepage and it just sort of whisks you along from destination to destination in a pleasing digital analogue of the monarch’s flight.
  • Bluesky Starter Pack Directory: People really are fascinating. It’s been genuinely interesting this week watching a certain section of Twitter finally decide that ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and they need to MAKE A STAND and LEAVE THE CESSPIT (a question to those people – I appreciate that the tenor of conversation in certain parts of Twitter has declined significantly in the past couple of years, and there’s just SO MUCH HORRID STUFF ON THERE…but, equally, guys, have you tried…just not looking at the algorithmic feed? Because it turns out that if you don’t, you only see stuff from people you follow…which you control! Like, have you tried just, well, not pressing the button that says ‘show me all the mad, horrible stuff!’?), and then arriving on Bluesky (also, can I personally express a vehement hatred for the skullfcukingly-twee ‘I am going where the sky is blue/to the blue place/to [insert emjoi combination indicating bluesky]’ – JUST NAME THE PLATFORM WHAT DO YOU THINK IT’S GOING TO HAPPEN JESUS FCUKING CHRIST – and immediately doing the ‘oh my god this place is growing SO MUCH, watch out Elon the RESISTANCE STARTS HERE, Twitter will be dead in months, it’s all over for them!’ thing…look, I know you’re excited and it’s just like getting the post-Brexit band back together again, but, well, let’s look at some numbers shall we? Bluesky’s put on a couple of million users this week. Threads, which at the time of writing has over 13x Bluesky’s numbers, added over 15m. GYAC YOU ARE ALL SHOUTING EXCITEDLY ABOUT THE FACT THAT THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE AT YOUR PARISH DISCO, GET OVER IT. Ahem. Anyway, despite the fact that the platform continues to prove to me that, at heart, I really hate quite a lot of people who broadly share my politics (SAD!), Bluesky grows and is becoming more useful, and one of the reasons is that Starter Packs – which allow you to bulk-follow a bunch of users, arranged by topic into groups with one click – are really useful network builders. The link up there takes you to a searchable directory of ALL the starter packs currently out there, so just plug in terms you’re interested in and work from there. CAVEAT – the problem with starter packs, I’ve come to learn, is that while useful they can also clog up your feed with a LOT of cruft, so worth being discriminate before you find that you’ve accidentally followed the world’s 3000 premier newt sexers and can see nothing but amphibian mating chat across your TL. BONUS BLUESKY TOOL!: this webtool lets you enter your Bluesky handle below to find people followed by lots of the people you follow (but not you), another useful way of reconstituting at least some of the network you might have had on other networks.
  • Bluesky Deletions: My misanthropy aside, one of the nice things about Bluesky is that once again people can build and create on top of a text-based social platform, which is how you get things like this – a website which presents a constantly-updating, vanishing and ephemeral stream of posts that have been deleted from Bluesky. The site spits out a few at a time in a constantly-scrolling feed, and they fade in 2-3 seconds meaning that you can’t quite read all of them, so everything you see has a suitably transient, evanescent quality. This has the feel of a gallery installation, in a good way.
  • The Golden Dryer Sheet Awards: A nice initiative by one woman media empire in waiting Taylor Lorenz (so impressive, but whose hunger and drive I find quite honestly terrifying), who has come up with a great little idea to celebrate pieces of journalism which, through no fault of their own, get buried by the days news avalanche. Seemingly open to any piece published in 2024 (not, note, SELF-published), the full blurb is as follows – any journalists reading this will almost certainly have at least one piece from the past 11 months that fits the bill here: “The day Biden stepped down. The day Trump got shot. The day Eric Adams was indicted. The day the Brat album was released. Great days for the internet, horrible days for your article to go live. This category of The Golden Dryer Sheet Awards is for stories that were published on days when the world was preoccupied. About the Golden Dryer Sheet Awards: There’s hundreds of journalism awards and they all ask for one thing: impact. They want work that speaks volumes, asks big questions, makes giant waves. This award isn’t that. I’m not looking for impact. I’m not looking for fancy bylines. I’m looking for work that you’re proud of that set nothing in motion. Like the award’s namesake, your submission should have made a barely perceptible improvement to society. You know that it happened, you put in the work. Maybe one other person caught a whiff of your efforts. But that’s it. The Golden Dryer Sheet celebrates all the journalism that no one cared about. Except you. And possibly your mother.”
  • Elisium City: No, it’s not a typo (or if it is, it’s not MY typo) – this really is called ‘Elisium City’, ‘just like paradise, but, well, a bit off!’. It seems appropriate in the second week of the new world order, after a few days in which we have been reassured that, yes, this version of Trumpland will be just as venal, selfish plute-weighted and mad as the last one, that we feature yet ANOTHER attempt by a bunch of rich people who seemingly think that all it takes to crack civics is ‘a fcuktonne of money’ and ‘large gates and possibly some well-paid private security personnel’ to create their own exciting new urban vision. For reasons known only to the web devs here you can’t copy any of the text from the site, which is a shame because I wanted to bring you more prose along the lines of ‘cognitive net-zero sponge luxury resource city’ (no, really, that is a direct quote) because FCUK ME is this utterly nonsensical. It is going to be in Florida! It is going to be…a city? For very rich people? There will be flying cars! It seems to exist in a post-scarcity society in which people will simply be free to ‘pursue their passions’ across 14 specifically designed districts! It appears to be some sort of proof-of-concept thing for…smart cities tech? WHO KNOWS??? This is like what would happen if someone looked at NEOM and went ‘that, but on a shoestring’, and is quite bafflingly irreal.
  • Network of Time: This is kind of incredible, and it feels a *bit* like magic or witchcraft or something. This is basically the ‘six degrees of separation’ game, except done with photos – select any two people from the (very, very long) drop-down lists of notables from post-photography history and the site will in no time spit out a selection of pictures from its archives which take you from person A to person X, via images. So for example you get from ‘Nelson Mandela’ to ‘Jeffrey Epstein’ in three steps – a photo of Mandela with Kofi Annan, then Annan with Bill Clinton, and then WOOP THERE’S JEFF! This is a lot of fun, sort-of-amazing, and made me think that there’s probably something bigger and shinier and more clever that you can do with this idea that, well, I am not currently smart enough to conceive of.
  • Deflock: This is interesting a global map of cameras equipped with license plate recognition technology, theoretically letting you see exactly where you might want to not drive if you don’t want your numbers taken. Depending on where in the world you look there’s also data about which way they’re facing so you can do your utmost to avoid prying eyes – why might you want to do that? NONE OF MY BUSINESS.
  • Hangout FM: This is interesting – built by the people behind much-loved shared listening site turntable.fm from all those years ago, Hangout FM is basically…well, it’s another shared listening platform, and, per the blurb, “Welcome to Hangout FM, where you can DJ live on a virtual stage in avatar form. Better than a discord bot, Hangout FM is a virtual space for DJs and artists to share music and connect with fans anytime, anywhere. Our mission is to create the music metaverse through our app and website (hangout.fm), provide DJs for every social gathering (virtual and in real life), and drive fame to artists. No camera or microphone is necessary, we’ve built the perfect virtual music venue just for you with this app [it’s both Android and iOS, fyi]! Get on stage and start DJing with your friends right now from anywhere in the world. We feature hundreds of hangouts where DJs are currently playing all kinds of music. Anyone can hop on stage to DJ by creating a playlist or uploading their own music.” Which sounds both quite fun and also weirdly 2020-coded, but also comes with the added benefit of the ability to listen in to anyone else’s broadcast – you can see live ‘hangs’ here, which you can drop into and listen to – and it’s launching with record label agreements which mean there are over 100million licensed tracks to play with in the app…this could be really fun for a certain type of person, and maybe that type of person is YOU.
  • The Real Hotels: It may not surprise you to know that I have never experienced an episode of ‘The Real Housewives of…’ in any outfits incarnations, and yet, thanks to the osmotic nature of memes in 2024 I feel like I can trace the broad contours of the show regardless (the shouting, the tears, the shouting and the tears, and the oddly-inexpressive faces…is that basically right?) – for those of you more invested in the HousewifeVerse, though, you might enjoy this site which celebrates all the many, many hotels which have apparently featured across the various franchise instalments. Want to live vicariously? Want to zoom around a world map and see all the various different luxury palaces these people have stayed in while pretending to live, laugh and love for the cameras? Want an insight into what it looks like when it ALWAYS looks and feels like Dubai or Miami, wherever in the world you might be? OH GOOD! This is a fan project made by ‘hotel marketers’, which strikes me as quite a nice calling card so well done them.
  • Love Songs: Undisputed kings of the dataviz The Pudding are back with an analysis of how ‘love songs’ have evolved as a genre over the past century, specifically looking at the vexatious question of ‘are there fewer love songs in the Billboard 100 than there used to be?’. Lovely vizwork, and interesting subject and, at heart, some GOOD LESSONS about how taxonomy and nuance in data clustering and evaluation can reveal more, better information from a dataset than might immediately be apparent (or, depending on your perspective, how you can make data say anything if you fcuk with the labels enough).

By Moonassi

OUR NEXT MIX IS A SET BY SHARNIE AND HANNA ON RINSEFM AND IT IS AN HOUR OF PLEASINGLY-INTENSE BEATS AND BREAKS WHICH FEELS VERY LATE-2024! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS THRILLED THAT ORBITAL WON THE BOOKER AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD ITS SMALL RECOMMENDATION TO THE CHORUS BECAUSE IT IS A GORGEOUS PIECE OF WRITING AND I SAY THAT AS SOMEONE WHO REALLY IS MOSTLY DEAD INSIDE, PT.2:  

  • The Manchester Digital Music Archive: On the one hand, it’s true that the tedious music-based BRAND IDENTITY that Manchester’s had wrapped around it by a couple of successive generations of entrepreneurs and grifters is…annoying, frankly (YES WE KNOW ABOUT BAGGY AND THE SALFORD BOYS CLUB CAN YOU FCUK OFF NOW PLEASE?); on the other, it’s also true that the city has a pretty incredible place in the UK’s musical pantheon and has been responsible for some genuinely influential genres and people and places over the past 50-odd years (longer, I know). The Manchester Digital Music Archive “is an online community archive established in 2003 to celebrate Greater Manchester music and its social history. We are a crowd-sourced archive, a place for people all over the world to share Manchester music ephemera and memories, be they fans, musicians or involved with the music industry itself.” What this means in practice is that you can browse an INSANE list of artists associated with the city and see whatever’s in the archive associated with them – from flyers from A Guy Called Gerald’s earliest club appearances to a whole bunch of zine reviews of the late, lamented Vibrant Thigh (no, me neither). This is SO INTERESTING.
  • Save Wisdom: One of the things you learn as you age is that you will at some point or another really, really regret not asking the old people in your life more about said life while they are still in a position to respond with anything other than emphysemic wheezing or a whispered ‘switzerland…now…please’. Save Wisdom is a project designed to address this, offering 1000 questions which can be used as a guide or template for conversations with people whose memories you want to preserve or archive – all of these are intended to help draw out information about a person, their wants and desires and their memories, and, honestly, if I were a) the sort of person who was sentimental enough to start a memorialisation project for an elderly relative; or b) had any relatives left to memorialise, I would be all over this.
  • VeloPlanner: ARE YOU A LYCRA DAD? Not a sex thing, honest – I am talking about lycra in the cycling context. Should you be one of the baffling number of men (sorry, this feels horribly sexist – I am of course aware that cycling is very much a gender-neutral pursuit, it’s just that I can’t help but associate it with ‘men in their 30s and 40s who have realised it’s a legitimate excuse to spend literally hours away from your family and maybe fit in two pints’)  who think ‘getting on a bike and pedalling in the cold and wet and rain’ is a fun way of spending time, you might find this website super-useful – VeloPlanner is basically an all-in-one repository of all of the world’s cycling routes, allowing you to do useful things like plot a route from London to Shenzen (I am speculating here, no idea if that is at all possible). Why not spend the rest of the day imagining the sort of road trip and real ale tour that you and the Bike Lads could go on if you hadn’t instead chosen to procreate?
  • Animations: Geometric, maths-y (TECHNICAL!) animations by Etienne Jacob (whose work I featured here back in 2019 via Twitter – this links to his website, so I am allowing myself the revisit DO NOT JUDGE ME), sent to me by my friend Tom who wrote ‘these make my ganglia feel nice’ and, while that may make my friend Tom sound like some sort of intensely-weird brain pervert, you will also know EXACTLY what I mean when you look at these. It’s like some sort of weird, visual-only ASMR, seriously.
  • Particle: Another week, another app seeking to DISRUPT NEWS CONSUMPTION – going to be honest, this doesn’t feel like a great time to be launching such a service given that the reaction of a not-insignificant portion of the world to last week’s news is likely to be ‘yeah, not really going to look at the news for a while thanks’, but, well, good luck nonetheless! Particle’s gimmick is that it aggregates different sources into topic-based feeds for a wide-ranging overview of opinions and perspectives on any issue, and that it offers varying degrees of AI summarisation/interpretation to give you quick overviews of a given question alongside AI-enabled interrogation of a concept, but, well, neither of those seem like enough of a hook to bother with this, if I’m honest (but I say that as someone who has realised this week that their relationship with information is, on some pretty deep level, utterly, utterly broken, and as such probably isn’t worth listening to). Still, if you’re on Apple and want another, differently-shaped window into the horror that is everything then, well, here!
  • The St John Prints: APOLOGIES THIS LINK TAKES YOU TO THINGS THAT COST ACTUAL MONEY. Ahem. St John, for those of you who aren’t familiar, is a very famous restaurant in Farringdon, London – I’ve featured writing about it before lots of times in Curios, and it holds a special place in my heart because not only is it a fcuking amazing place to eat but also because I worked literally next door to it for a couple of years, and going down to the bakery every morning to buy doughnuts for me and the woman I was having an affair with at the time was a moment of genuine daily joy. Photographer Jason Lowe took the photographs that accompanied the restaurant’s 30th anniversary cookbooks, and is now making prints of those photos available for sale on his website and these are AMAZING. Seriously, whether or not you have personal history with the restaurant these are some top-quality photos of food, cookery, meat fish and viscera (quite a lot of viscera), and they would make SUPERB gifts for someone.
  • The Best Inventions of 2024: As is now seemingly tradition, Time Magazine has once again published its rundown of what it considers to be the best inventions or innovations of the past 12 months –  I confess to feeling a bit ‘meh’ about quite a few of these this year, perhaps because, in contrast to previous selections, these seem a bit more ‘product’-y rather than ‘general innovation-y’, but, as in previous years, it’s worth having a look through the list as there will be at least a couple of entries which are new to you and which might elicit a spark of inspiration as to how you might take them in different directions, or which might make you think of the stories they create. This, for example, is sort-of brilliant and heartbreaking at the same time.
  • Transit: I know, I know, you *have* a travel app, you like your travel app, you don’t want to change your travel app – and to be honest I haven’t tried this and so I’m only recommending it on spec, but it *sounds* interesting. Transit is basically a ‘wherever you are we will tell you how to navigate the urban transit environment’ service, but it’s ad-free and seems, as far as I can tell, to have a pleasing community layer to it allowing realtime user feedback about how the service is performing to be integrated into the information fed to others. Oh, and there’s something REALLY clever that it launched the other week which uses your phone’s vibration-sensing tech to determine how many stops on the underground you’ve travelled so that you can track your relative map position even without signal which, honestly, is SO CLEVER that I am slightly in awe.
  • Stretch Timer: A little timer app for Macs only, but which is, I promise, one of the most innately-satisfying bits of design work you will have seen in ages. I promise you, if you’re the sort of person who regularly wears those annoying little too-small fisherman’s caps and the sort of square-legged, slightly-too-short ‘artist’s trousers’ at work because you have ‘creative’ in your job title (YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE) then you might have some sort of involuntary pleasure reaction to this. It really is that simple and beautiful and amazing.
  • Towns: Do you need or want another community or messaging app? No? What if I told you this one was ON THE BLOCKCHAIN????? Yes, I know, that changes EVERYTHING! This is a new app developed by one of the people who created HouseParty (don’t worry, I didn’t remember that either and had to look it up) and who has received what I presume is an unconscionable amount of money from investors to create another digital product which, I confidently predict, will have exactly the same degree of lasting impact as his previous one. Here’s some explicatory blurb from a recent profile of the product: “Group chats on Towns can be configured in such a way that only people who fulfill certain criteria—who have specific expertise, say—are allowed to post messages, while everyone else watches from the sidelines. In this scenario, Rubin hopes, large group conversations will no longer be polluted with ill-informed takes and scam posts. He believes the ability for someone to prove that they are a real person using blockchain-based credentials, meanwhile, could help to minimize the opportunity for malicious actors to manipulate public discourse with bots.” So, basically, the ‘blockchain secret sauce’ here is ‘everyone participating this has their credentials encoded on the blockchain which then act as a passkey to certain communities depending on said credentials and the community’s own entry/participation requirements’ – which, you know, in theory doesn’t sound too bad, until you start thinking hard about how the fcuk that would work (how these creds get verified, and who by), and you quickly realise that, as with a lot of other blockchain stuff, this only really makes sense if EVERYTHING ELSE IS ON THE BLOCKCHAIN TOO, and, well, lol, no.
  • Nudols: Have you ever wondered how one might go about marketing Pot Noodle to an Italian market? WONDER NO MORE! This is a quite astonishing new brand of instant cup noodle, apparently launching now-ish in Italy – there is SO much to ‘love’ here! Let’s start with the name, a BEAUTIFUL phonetic-Italian rendering of the word ‘noodles’ (let’s…let’s gloss over the fact that the rest of the brandname is ‘Banzai’, shall we)! The website homepage features a lovely voxel rendering of a noodle stand, in a design and style SUSPICIOUSLY REMINISCENT of something I featured in Curios about three years ago (I am not suggesting that these people read Curios so much as someone on the design team here has, I think, taken some QUITE HEAVY INSPIRATION from someone else’s work)! The…questionable approach to ‘pan-asian culture’ that sees the product referred to as ‘gnam gnam style’ (‘gnam gnam’ being phonetic Italian vocalisation for ‘the act of happy eating’)! Honestly, there is a LOT going on here – if nothing else, let’s notch this up as another datapoint to prop up my personal ‘maximalist webdesign is back!’ thesis.
  • Antique Microscopes: Would you like an online museum collecting examples of antique microscopes throughout history for your enlightenment and delectation? I DON’T KNOW I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE INTERESTED IN I AM NOT FCUKING PSYCHIC. On the offchance, though, that is exactly what this link will take you to. I am charmed by this line from the homepage, mind: “An antique microscope is a work of art as well as science.” EXACTLY.
  • Strangers On A Bench: This is such a good idea and it feels a bit like it might take off and become very famous indeed – not sure why, just has a certain VIBE about it (so, remember, WE FOUND THE CONCH). Strangers on a Bench is a podcast project which started a few months ago in which Tom Rosenthal strikes up a conversation with someone he doesn’t know who he finds sitting alone on a park bench- he asks them about them, and their life, and they just have a chat. The listener doesn’t know the person’s name, so these are entirely-anonymous little slices of life, vignettes describing the odd mundanity of everyone’s existence and the ways in which everyone contains multitudes and universes and, honestly, this is the sort of thing that normally makes me want to set fire to a teashop by way of anti-twee rebellion and yet it is SO LOVELY (and I say this as someone who really, really hates podcasts). Honestly, I think this is quite special and I think lots of you will really really like it a lot.
  • Videogame Weather ASMR: I confess to not being wholly clear as to what the audience is for this YouTube channel, which features nothing but videos of videogames being played slowly, gently and with a real focus on in-game weather systems. Then again, though, who wouldn’t appreciate, say, an 8-hour-long drive around Los Santos with no shooting, no violence, just the sound of the storm raging outside? NO FCUKER, etc!
  • Geography Help: I am slightly astonished by this. You know that game Geoguessr, right, where you get shown a random streetview pic and are tasked with working out where in the world it is? This is a site that’s seemingly been created for the sole purpose of making you better at that game – it includes information about local identifiers for seemingly every country in the world, from ‘what are the road markings like?’ to ‘what colour are the road signs?’ to ‘what special characters might I spot on signage which could give me a clue to the country I am in?’, and this is amazing to me because it’s INSANELY comprehensive and weirdly incredibly sort-of useful for all sorts of different purposes, and it’s all born out of a desire to help people get marginally better at a very silly, very online game, and fcuking hell people are amazing.
  • Amstrad: There’s a whole generation of people for whom Alan Sugar is just an irascible TV caricature with some absolute all-time Tweets to his name, but, for those of us with a few more miles on the clock, he’s ALSO the man responsible for some of the worst home computing products of a generation in the shape of Amstrad, briefly (risibly) touted in some corners of the UK (probably corners of Sugar’s house tbh) as ‘Britain’s answer to Microsoft’. Anyway, for reasons we can only speculate at, a new website has appeared celebrating the history and legacy of the Amstrad brand – look, this is only really of interest if you’re old enough to remember this stuff, or if you’re a peculiarly-rigorous scholar of ‘now-defunct electronics brands from decades past’, but I personally got some quite strong nostalgiapangs from these cream plastic monoliths (and some PTSD responses to the fcuking Amstrad mouse, a genuinely evil piece of design with some of the worst driver software ever committed).
  • Games To Play While The NYT’s Games People Are On Strike: As I mentioned the other week, the New York Times’ games people are on strike – to keep you occupied while you’re boycotting Wordle (OBVS), they’ve posted up a bunch of other games they’ve made which won’t direct traffic to the NYT and which are also LIGHTLY-SATIRICAL COMMENTS ON LABOUR RELATIONS, lol! In fairness a couple of these are very good and worth your time.
  • Nightfall: An EXCELLENT browserpuzzlegame which, you will discover, is actually surprisingly deep and quite massive and which contains many, many hours worth of gameplay should you be willing to lend it the time. This is basically a full, in-browser remake of an old 2002 game called ‘Spybotics’, which, per the era, is all about HACKING NETWORKS and that sort of jazz, and which, if you can look past the slightly-of-its-time cyberpunk styling and writing, is actually a surprisingly-involved series of little puzzles which get knotty reasonably fast. This is a GREAT afternoon-killer, should you desire one.
  • Asterogue: A cute little roguelike which gives you three levels for free and which then asks you to pay $5 to get the rest and, honestly, this was so good I paid the price of a cup of coffee to pay more. Good, clean, simple roguelike fun, and 100% worth the price of a London half.
  • Shogun Showdown: Our final game this week is this BRILLIANT little (also) roguelike puzzler – kill all the enemies, reach the end of the gauntlet, picking up powerups and bonuses along the way; die, repeatedly, and try again and again. Four different unlockable characters, each of which plays slightly differently, a varied moveset which makes different runs feel genuinely distinct…this is free browsergame GOLD and you will thank me for pointing you at it, I promise (except you won’t, will you? You’ll just click the link and forget me you FCUKING INGRATES).

By Rochelle Voyles

OUR FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK IS DESCRIBED AS ‘A PANAMERICANA TRIP WITH MESCALEROS’ AND, HONESTLY, I CAN’T DO BETTER THAN THAN AND SO WON’T TRY (IT IS ACE)!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Horrible Luxury: You remember that Tumblr from last week with the powerfully-horrible aesthetic? Well I think this one may be…actually, no, I don’t want to say ‘worse’ – let’s instead say ‘equally violent’ and leave it at that.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Neil Staines: Via Kottke, this is the Insta feed of one Niall Staines who does a variety of different styles of visual art but whose pixel-extension images – basically where you take a point in a picture and extend all the pixels from that point in a line to the edge of the canvas – are really rather wonderful and the main reason why I’m featuring the work.
  • Gully Tattoo: One the one hand, this guy works out of Brighton and so if you’re in the UK then there’s the theoretical possibility that you could get his stuff inked on yourself; on the other, his work is INSANELY good and I imagine has a waiting list of YEARS, so good luck. Still, if you want to see some pretty astonishing trompe l’oeil work – the shadowing and depth in this is jaw-dropping, seriously – then click away.
  • Amon Silex: Yes, ok, fine, this is another ‘odd AI images’ account, but this person is mining a bit of latent space that feels unfamiliar, far more furry and feathery and Babadoook-horror-style-adjacent to what I’m more used to seeing, and I very much enjoy how basically unsettling everything on this page is. TOO MANY EYES AND KNEES!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The End of the 20th Century: We start this week with a piece by Jason Steinhauer to makes the argument that we can perhaps conceive of 2024 as the end of the ‘long’ 20thC (if you’re unfamiliar with the concept of ‘long’ and ‘short’ centuries, “the argument rests on the premise that centuries are not solely defined by dates, but also by the interconnected technologies, institutions and ideologies that shape people’s decisions and world events”), a period stretching from 1919 which is characterised by largely linear media and processes, and which has now been finally overtaken by the non-linear media and processes birthed by the digital age which have only now been said to have come to full maturity (the point being that we have had all this stuff for a while, but it’s only now that you can fully say that we have switched from 20thC models to 21stC models). You really do have to read the whole thing – it doesn’t lend itself to pull-out paragraphs or neat summarisation, sadly – but it’s worth every word and struck me as an interesting and potentially-helpful way of characterising How Things Work. This is obviously stimulated by the US election but is not, strictly, ‘about’ it, and as such I would recommend it even if you’re general reaction to reading any more analysis about What Happened Last Week is ‘fcuk off no more please just make it fcuking stop can we talk about that medically induced coma idea again please?’.
  • Labour and the Budget: A very good overview of the current economic picture in the UK (insofar as such a thing is possible, given we should all have realised by now that ECONOMICS IS NOT A SCIENCE) and the budget announced by Rachel Reeves last week, and its relationship to ‘classic’ supply-side economics, and what some of the (big picture, economic and political) positives and negatives of the various decisions made might be. Excellent as ever in the London Review of Books, although it does rather give weight to the horrible fear that’s been growing within me since approximately July 5th thata) everything is going to feel rubbish for four years because all of the spending’s on infrastructure; and therefore that b) these people will get voted out at the next election because of aforementioned a), and as a result of that all the capital spending will be stopped and as such there won’t have been enough of it, and that as such nothing will actually get better, but, well, here’s hoping I’m reliably wrong about that.
  • All Of The Various Bits About The US Election And The Fallout From It In One Place: Ok, given I appreciate that there are a not-insignificant number of you who are almost certainly VERY SICK of hearing about the US election (fcuk knows, I’m one of them!), I am taking the unusual step of collating all the links about it in a sub-section so that everyone else who’s not a total masochistic sicko can choose to skip to something less tediously overplayed. For the rest of you, though…:
    • Why The Democrats Lost: Adam Tooze, again in the LRB, gives what to my mind is one of the better, more balanced post-mortems that does the dispassionate job of looking at the numbers and the campaigns and concludes that, to give one example, “In modern America, neither economic self-description as articulated in polling nor political identity are independent variables. It is likely that in the coming weeks, large numbers of voters who in early November declared themselves in such surveys as the monthly Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index to be miserable about their financial circumstances will feel better about their affairs. Nothing will actually have changed in terms of jobs, prices or incomes, but because ‘their guy’ is back and Harris is out, they will feel more optimistic. Business confidence among small businesses – one of the Republicans’ core constituencies – will probably see a similar leap. To chase these votes through fine adjustments in macroeconomic policy, as though there were some optimal point on the trade-off curve that would have flipped enough of them in swing states into the Harris camp, was folly. What was needed was not a conservative shift in macroeconomic policy, but a more comprehensive political effort to acknowledge, address and neutralise the inflation issue.” Excellent.
    • Exit Right: Gabriel Winant offers a more in-depth party-focused analysis, arguing that it’s the Democrat’s failure to articulate a forward-looking rather than retro-nostalgic centrist vision that cost them. There are some interesting parallels made here with the post-Thatcherism Labour party that I…wasn’t wholly convinced by, but as piece of (VERY) in-depth coal-raking about party campaign strategy and positioning I found it fascinating and worthwhile (if LONG).
    • The TikTok Electorate: I think this might be one of my favourite bits of analysis of the whole think – Max Read asserts that one of the potential reasons behind the appeal of Trump across wide demographic swathes often untethered to race or agebracket lies in the new economic reality for many, many Americans (and not just Americans). Specifically (and I paraphrase), ‘this is the logical outcome of an economy where everyone is hustling and grifting and monetising, where thanks to creator fund payouts and drop-shipping opportunism and and and you have whole swathes of the country who now think of themselves as ‘small businesspeople’ and ‘entrepreneurs’, and that necessarily affects and impacts their outlook on economic policy and what is ‘fair’ and ‘necessary’ in ways that were perhaps underappreciated’. Honestly, this feels like SUCH a smart way of thinking about quite a lot of things from hereon in, US politics aside.
    • Shame on the Elon Enablers: Ok, fine, this is less ‘you need to read this’ and more ‘this article basically says what I think and I think you should all read it and agree with it’ – specifically, this is Paris Marx writing about how perhaps it would have been nice had the media not spent much of the past two years writing about Elon Musk in that ‘lol, mad maverick techbro!’ style that it so loves, and might instead have been better served by instead writing about all the fcuking iffy sh1t he was quite obviously getting into online. On which note, by the way, I would like to point out with a small degree of personal pride that that is exactly what Private Eye has been doing for the past 3 years, so well done me.
    • Why The Work Still Matters: 404 Magazine now with an impassioned editorial plea on why funding investigative journalism, particularly in and around tech, is more important now than ever; this doubles as an excellent rebuttal to all the morons who would like to consign journalism to the dustbin of history because lots of people listen to podcasts now. GUYS IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE A BINARY CHOICE FFS.
    • The Fury Gap: Another interesting perspective, this time offered by Jennifer Valenti, pointing out that it’s not implausible to imagine that the gender divide observed in voter habits in the US last week are…not likely to be improved by the result of said election and some of the reactions to it, and how that might actually be quite a bad thing. I think we’re about, ooh, maybe 9-12 months away from some horrifically hamfisted attempt to begin to BRIDGE THE GENDER DIVIDE, possibly BRANDED, so look out for that (and don’t, please, be the person who suggests it as 2025’s ‘purpose’ initiative, I beg of you).
    • Election Day: The last bit about the election, I promise, is this lovely, quiet, slightly-sad piece by Rusty Foster, currently on a break from Today in Tabs and hiking instead, on his experience of being out in the wilderness while democracy happened elsewhere.
  • The Metaverse is for Kids Now: On the one hand, I have seen a few variants of this piece over the years (remember the racist echidna VRChat days? GOOD TIMES!) and it’s always worth approaching them with a degree of skepticism because, well, it’s all anecdote, isn’t it, but on the other this…this feels plausible, and so I am going to choose to believe that actually it may well be happening. Basically the piece – in WIRED – is all about how if you visit Meta’s Horizon Worlds now you’ll find it awash with teenagers, who have realised that there aren’t any adults there and who are quietly getting used to spending significant swathes of time in VR worlds. OK, fine, there is the inevitable ‘grubby possibility of bad stuff’ lurking at the edges here, but this is more a story about the unexpected pace and direction of tech adoption than it is a ‘caveat parents’ article. Basically this made me think that, actually, there’s every likelihood that this is actually going to be a real-life mainstream thing in 15 years or so in a way I hadn’t really previously considered.
  • AI Inventions: Ok, this is a REALLY smart usecase for AI and I am very impressed. Der Spiegel profiles a company called Iprova, which (basically) uses a bunch of AI systems to work out potential gaps in the patent landscape that can be exploited by enterprising inventors, which, honestly, is SUCH a clever way of deploying an LLM – not for ideation, but for identifying potential gaps into which ideation might fit. So, so interesting, and should, if you think about it for longer than about three seconds, give you plenty of ideas for ways to deploy similar techniques in your own creative thinking: “The company finds ideas on the cutting edge of the cutting edge. Take, for example, the time that Panasonic asked Iprova for help finding new uses for autonomous vehicles. The software suggested giving the cars jobs when their human passengers weren’t using them, such as delivering parcels—essentially making them self-driving gig workers. It even suggested that human passengers might be willing to take the scenic route, or at least routes involving picking up or dropping off parcels, for the right discount on their ride. Panasonic bought that idea and filed a patent application in 2021.”
  • Child Influencer: NB: THIS IS A VERY, VERY GRUBBY ARTICLE THAT WILL NOT MAKE YOU FEEL GOOD ABOUT ANYONE INVOLVED OR INDEED HUMANITY AS A WHOLE. It also features two of the most SPECTACULARLY Dutch people I have heard of in ages – in this case ‘Jacky Dejo’, a former child snowboard influencer-turned-OnlyFans-type model, and her Dad, who, as far as I can tell from the piece, basically ok’d his kid selling cheesecake pics of herself in a bikini to chickenhawks worldwide from when his kid was about 15. There is, honestly, no part of this that won’t make you grimace and make vaguely-disgusted sounds, from the fact that at no point does ‘Jacky’ seem anything other than VERY MESSED up, to the incredibly-uncertain nature of her dad’s relationship to the whole enterprise, to exactly what the deal is with her mum (who declined to be interviewed for the piece), but my main takeaway was, once again, ‘being in any way famous for what you look like online is genuinely so awful-sounding as to be a modern-day Dantean punishment’.
  • Sex Education in 2024: This felt quite a lot like a piece designed to attract some ‘wtaf?!’ clicks and so I’m going to take it with a small pinch of salt – that said, it feels both plausible and a not-unreasonable reaction to the frankly inadequate provision of sex education in schools. If you wanted to make sure your teen kids were learning about fcuking in a way that perhaps didn’t just involve unfettered consumption of whatever bongo they scare up, what would YOU do? Would you, say, pull together an educative playlist of media which you think explores questions of sex, consent, pleasure and the like in less-mechanistic fashion and take it upon yourself to guide your kids through it like some sort of, er, sexy Virgil? No, I can’t imagine you would, and yet that’s exactly the choice made by the people profiled in this piece.
  • Goalhanger Media: In a week in which Gary Lineker confirmed that he was leaving the BBC, it seems appropriate that this Esquire profile of the man’s podcast empire should also drop. Fair play to Lineker – it’s a phenomenally successful business model, although one which I know for a fact is predicated on a lot of younger staff members behind the scenes making…significantly less cash than the talent from any of this stuff, and the rewards to presenters are INSANE – I imagine Cambell and Stuart will have raked in £1.2+ each from TRIP this year, and that may well discount the live shows – and there seems to be no end to the public’s appetite for this stuff…equally, though, I do wonder whether the removal of the BBC’s ‘respectability and national treasure shield’ will lead to some of the…other stories coming out. Let’s just say that it’s lucky Gary’s smarter and savvier around people with their phones out than disgraced referee David Coote, based on what I know of his hobbies.
  • Let The Clubs Close: To be clear, I don’t agree with this perspective at all, but I read it and, based on my experience of going out to places where YOUNG PEOPLE are, it feels true. Written by a YOUNG PERSON, this basically says ‘yeah, we’re not going to clubs anymore or to see new, unsigned acts, because why would we take a chance on maybe having a 3/10 night?’ – basically, as mentioned here quite a lot over the past couple of years, this boils down to risk-aversion (and, to be more charitable, is a direct result of everything being more expensive – you’ll take a punt on a £2 door fee, not so much on a £20 door fee), and it feels…sad, and empty, but what do I know? Rhetorical, obvs, I am OLD and know FCUK ALL.I felt a sort of terrifying sense of redundancy at this paragraph, a bit like a dinosaur seeing a distant meteor streaking through the sky and thinking, deep in its lizard brain, ‘this bodes, and not well’.
  • Food in London for Non-Londoners: Originally presented as ‘for Americans’, but, well, this is for anyone who is coming to the city and doesn’t want to have a terrible time, culinarily-speaking. Honestly this is something that I feel every single tourist city in the world should have a version of written for it, it’s an act of public decency. Speaking of which, if anyone is going to Rome ever and wants tips, just ask.
  • Crossing The USA By Train: Ok, so this is mainly pictures rather than words, but I LOVE how genuinely enthusiastic and (yes, I know, a hateful word and I am sorry for using it) wholesome (sorrysorrysorry) the whole thing is. It made me REALLY want to take a coast-to-coast train journey across America – so maybe I will, on reflection.
  • Inside The Mind of Ken Dodd: Do you know who Ken Dodd was? If the answer is ‘no’ then you can probably skip this one; if the answer is ‘yes’, though, then make a cup of tea and enjoy this WONDERFUL account of Rob Chapman’s interview with the great comedian – honestly, if you’re the sort of person who’s in any way interested in the craft of comedy and how audiences and performing work, then this is gold dust. Dodd comes across here as someone with an almost boundless love for the medium he worked within, like Stewart Lee or Paul Merton do, and it’s genuinely wonderful to read.
  • Against Autofiction: One of two essays that did the rounds this week about ‘writing the web’ (this is the first, which I enjoyed less and so can’t be bothered to write up but which, for completeness and because it’s an interesting companion piece, I include regardless), this is a REALLY interesting discussion as to what the ‘best’ literary form via which to communicate the ‘essence’ of the web is, and why, despite much recent literature on the subject falling within this broad bailiwick, it’s not necessarily autofiction. Conor Truax instead coins the term ‘database novel’ to describe a form of fiction which they contend best-encapsulates the nature of experiencing online, and, honestly, reading this was like a light going on in terms of a sudden ‘oh, fcuk, yes, you’re right!’ sensation. Read this paragraph, which will tell you pretty quickly whether you’re going to get on with this or not: “The sine qua non of the database novel is its focus on the superstructure that hosts the persona, rather than the persona unto itself. Database novels are organized like a database: They comprise a repository of independent units – their sentences – and a seemingly infinite number of coherent wholes. Though their sequencing does have a bearing on rhythm, it has no effect on apparent causality or the hypnotic effect of the novels on the whole.”
  • A History of Fcuk: Or rather, an excerpt from a book all about the history of that word in the English language. I love this – I love etymology, and I love swearing, and so the conjunction of the two couldn’t be more perfect in my eyes. Semi-related aside: I also find the parallel etymology of the profane usage of the word ‘cock’ to be particularly fascinating – it’s, er, not a coincidence, that before it was used as a vulgar vernacular for the male member it was deployed as one of the many terms to denote the unmentionable God. JESUS CHRIST, MEN, YOU ARE SO DEEPLY, DEEPLY OBSESSED IT IS NOT THAT IMPORTANT.
  • Steal Smoked Fish: A story about the friends you grow up with and growing older and The Mountain Goats and the very strong, very persistent feeling that, given the choice, you really would prefer not to exist any more if that’s ok please thankyou.
  • Five Thought Experiments: George Saunders writes in New York Magazine and, yes, ok, fine, it’s about the election, but that’s not why you should read it. You should read it because it is EXCEPTIONAL prosework, damn the fcuker.
  • Any Percent: A VERY LONG scifi story (I mean, it’s a short story, just a LONG one) which I need to warn you a) has a *slight* whiff of ‘Ready Player One’ about it (but I promise it is nothing like that and loads better) and b) doesn’t *quite* stick the landing (but that’s a personal perspective), but which I enjoyed so so so much regardless. Imagine a world in which you could play a game that let you experience a whole life in about 20 minutes of realtime. Imagine there were leaderboards showing who had managed to, say, become the richest person in the (game) world in the shortest amount of (game) time? Imagine there were speedrunners? What might that look like? So so so so interesting, this MUST have been optioned by someone as it’s pure cinema (or, more likely, bloated streaming property) waiting to happen.
  • Adrift in the South: Our last longread of the week is by Xiao Hai, in translation in Granta, writing about their life working low-wage jobs in China’s factories for the past 30 years. This is beautiful beautiful beautiful and I just want to tell all of you to read it – honestly, it’s one of the most gorgeous things I have read all year, not one word of hyperbole, and I think you will all adore it as much as I did.

By Emily Thompson

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 08/11/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

WELL.

I know I say this after every big event, but you really don’t need or want my opinion on the US election and so I will spare you (see, don’t you wish other newsletters were this considerate?).

Oh, ok, fine, apart from two specific, semi-related things.

One, we really, really need to hope that a lot of very successful, very decorated, very well-educated scientists operating at some of the world’s most august institutions and dealing with the very freshest realtime data about the state of our planet are very, very wrong about a lot of things, because it does rather feel like in the next four years we are about to sail gaily right past every single (already risibly lax) climate target we have set ourselves over the past couple of decades.

Two, per the above, we really, really need to hope that the accelerationists are in fact right and we can just sort of tech our way out of this, because it’s clear as fcuking daylight that we’re simply not going to take any of the other steps available to us.

So, er, fingers crossed then!

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you may as well take comfort in the links while they last.

By Wes Lang

LET’S START THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH NEARLY THREE HOURS OF TRACKS WHICH SAMPLE THE LATE QUINCY JONES AND WHICH ALSO HAPPEN TO BE SOME EXCELLENT HIPHOP!

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE EVERYONE WHO LIVES IN THE UK AND WORKS IN ADVERMARKETINGPR AND WHO HAS FELT THE NEED TO WRITE LONG SCREEDS ABOUT US POLITICS ON LINKEDIN THIS WEEK IN A DESPERATE AND FAILED ATTEMPT TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK INTELLIGENT TO FCUK THEMSELVES INTO THE SUN PLEASE AND THANKYOU, PT.1:  

  • Waves of Interest: Don’t worry, this is the only US election-related link in this section – just get through this one and it’s wall-to-wall digital frippery (well, at least until we get to the longreads, but that’s about three hours and nine cups of tea away). The Democratic post-mortem will be long, and tiresome, and almost certainly largely-exculpatory, but looking at this website it does rather strike me that, based on the data here, it perhaps oughtn’t have come as too much of a surprise that the Harris campaign’s ‘more of the same, but you like this democracy stuff so, well, vote to keep it!’ melted like butter beneath a blowtorch when subjected to the white heat of the Trumpian ‘I will make you richer, I will protect you from the mad criminals slavering at the gates, and I will inflict suffering on those you dislike and fear’ rhetoric. This site basically tracks search interest in the US across a variety of election-related topics between 2020 and now, showing relative volume trends – and so we can see here that searches on ‘inflation’, ‘energy costs’, ‘terrorism’ and ‘tax policy’ are up hugely, while searches on social issues (‘racism’, ‘gender equality’, ‘birth control’, ‘inquality’) are down by a few points (the data actually goes back to 2004, and you can look at heatmaps for each issue which change over time, showing you the relative change in search volume across North America over time for, say, ‘gun control’). The data here is from Google, and while it’s obviously important to note that search data isn’t a reliable indicator of behaviour it’s also worth pointing out that it’s not NOT a reliable indicator of behaviour, and that, looking at this now with the cold realisation of ‘oh god what the fcuk have they done?’, it does seem like someone maybe ought to have been looking at this and possibly factoring some of these sorts of factors into the thinking when it came to campaign focus. Hey ho, it is what it is, it’s not like the ramifications of this one will extend significantly beyond the national borders of the US and the temporal limits of the single Presidential term (lol)! BONUS ELECTION-RELATED LINK: Oh, ok, one more, just because this feels…just horribly emblematic of Where We Are At. Have a thread of AI propaganda images featuring Peanut the squirrel, harbinger of a second Trump term – a sentence which is even more preposterous for the fact it in some way makes perfect sense. Do you ever get the feeling we deserve everything that’s coming to us? Looking at this stuff gives me that sensation VERY STRONGLY.
  • AI Minecraft: Shall we turn away from the terrifying contours of the real world and instead retreat into an infinite digital playground of wonder? OK! This is another of those quite astonishing developments in AI which, while (ok, fine) still obviously incredibly shonky and effectively-broken, also feels quite a lot like actual magic and which offers a tantalising glimpse of the sorts of exciting virtual worlds we’ll be able to spin up and explore while outside the irradiated winds howl across the surface of the bunker (I JEST, I JEST! Like the power will still be working by that point!). This is a demo by a couple of tech outfits (Decart and Etched, don’t ask me exactly what it is that they do because my embarrassing lack of technical chops will become, well, embarrassingly apparent) who have combined to release this proof-of-concept demo of what is, basically, ‘Minecraft, but infinitely-AI-generated, running in realtime in your browser’. Which, to be clear, is FCUKING ASTONISHING. Let’s set some expectations – you click the link and you’ll be placed in a lobby where you’ll wait to get a turn on the servers; each turn lasts a max of 10m, after which you’ll get booted, and this runs in a very small window in your browser because it can’t process at higher scale yet (can you tell that I’m winging the tech explanation a bit here? I totally am); oh, and there’s no persistence, so nothing you do in the game really ‘happens’ in any meaningful in-engine sense (more of which briefly)…BUT THIS IS AMAZING! You can pick from different Minecraft biomes, and each lets you wander round an infinite world! Which you can build in! The game is trained on enough Minecraft to ‘get’ that you can mine, and that there are resources, and you can build stuff – but, equally, because there’s no persistence and nothing ‘exists’ in memory, everything you see and walk through is being generated on the fly, and so if you do a 360 degree turn in-game you will find that the view you return to is not the view you started looking at…because there is no ‘there’ there, not even a digital one, and The Machine’s just imagining what it ought to show you based on what you last saw (if you see what I mean). Honestly, this is INSANE, and if you play games then it will give you a very real ‘imagine the opening of Fallout 3 when you leave the vault and that immense sense of exploratory possibility, but different every time’ vibe. Honestly, this really is quite astonishing (and will be even moreso if you’re more au fait with Minecraft than I am), and is probably worth all the sea-boiling energy it’s taking to maintain (lol lol lol).
  • All of the Mikus: Hatsune Miku, as you are all doubtless aware, is the first ever true virtual superstar, who turns 18(!) next year and who has over the past few years become something of a symbol of international solidarity and one-ness, as embodied by, er, a blue–green-haired-anime-pop-starlet. Over the past few years, people from all over the world have been imagining their own, nationally-tweaked versions of Miku, clad in more local costume and with accessories connoting particular regions or subcultures, and there’s been a largely-heartwarming fandom that’s formed around people on Tumblr sharing their drawings and sketches – now someone’s created a map of ALL OF THE MIKUS, so you can scroll around and see the nearly-2000-different variations that the world’s fans have seen free to gift us. Aside from just being kind-of interesting from the point of view of ‘one character interpreted a million different ways’, there’s something slightly revealing about the ways in which different countries choose to show themselves via Miku, and what it is that they see as being most representative or emblematic of their national character (based on a few of the more visible examples, I worry slightly about Italy).
  • Bluesky FollowerFinder: As previously discussed here, it’s not entirely clear to me that the pre-Musk era of shortform social media is ever going to return – I do rather get the feeling that after a decade and a half we might have collectively decided as a species that, actually, putting all of our brains into a digital room together and just seeing what happens is not, in fact, a recipe for success – but, equally, it’s fair to say that for some of us (ok, me) there’s an extent to which the dripfeed of information delivered via 280-character textual updates has become…something of a problematic addiction, and we might be interested in maintaining said addiction somewhere when Twitter finally becomes an entirely-unusable ghost town. To which end, and presuming that you have at some point set yourself up a Bluesky account (on which – I can’t do Threads, I simply can’t, it feels entirely fcuking wrong and I don’t want to; Bluesky is twee and has incredibly strong and offputting #fbpe energy, but, well, it’s better than nothing) you might find this Chrome extension useful – log into Twitter, go to your ‘following’ or ‘followers’ page, and this will attempt to find all those people on Bluesky. It’s slow, it gets stuck every now and again and you will need to click ‘continue’ to make it get going again, and it doesn’t like it when you navigate away from the browser window, but it really does work, and might be a useful way of at least beginning to replicate the vibe of your Twitter feed (but it won’t; that is never coming back and we should probably just accept it. Ok, *I* should probably just accept it).
  • Text-To-Brainrot: What with everything increasingly feeling like it’s going to be quite…hard and abrasive and tricky, at least for a little while, you might find this tool useful – give it any PDF you like and it will BY MAGIC (thanks to a couple of genAI hacks and a few stock video sources) turn it into a TikTok ‘brainrot’-style video – you know, the ones which combine vaguely-soothing videogame footage with an unlinked voice-over, supposedly to create a GENTLY DISSOCIATIVE VIEWING EXPERIENCE. Anyway, if you want a slightly-less-painful way of ingesting all the dozens of utterly-pointless, meaning-bereft trend documents that litter the streets at this time of year, you could do worse than plugging them into this and letting them wash over your increasingly-smooth brain accompanied by footage from Temple Runner (NB – I would briefly like to point out that LESSER newsletters, newsletters that don’t source their links ARTISANALLY and who perhaps don’t click on every single thing that crosses their digital path like some sort of compulsive, included links to something purporting to be this service last week, but which didn’t in fact work. WEB CURIOS ONLY BRINGS YOU WORKING LINKS! Or, at least, they work at the time or writing. Or they do as long as I remember to paste the right one and don’t fcuk up the url. They work MOST OF THE TIME, ok? Jesus).
  • Morning Pages: I really like this. A page on Alicia Guo’s website which exists simply to let you type – as you type, the letters disappear one by one, so you’re effectively only ever able to see the few most recent words of characters of the passage you’re scribing; the idea, I imagine, is something to do with flow state, and the idea of just writing for writing’s sake, without the pressure of looking back and realising ‘oh, hang on, I fcuked up that sentence something chronic, how galling’ (something which, it may not surprise you to learn, I do not experience when writing Curios. Curios exists in only one direction, and that direction is FORWARDS!). If you’re the sort of person who writes, and who when writing finds that it’s helpful for them to limber up a bit with some exercises or just a few hundred words of stream-of-consciousness, then this could be really useful. Aside from anything else there’s just something really pleasing in seeing the words vanish into the past; would that everything were so easily discarded.
  • BioArt: Would you like access to a truly remarkable database of illustrations and diagrams of bacteria, cells, proteins, bits of anatomy, animals and ALL SORTS OF BIOLOGICAL STUFF? Yes, of course you would, you’re not some sort of MONSTER. I am sure there’s an excellent and educative reason as to why this exists and why the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the US has made it public, but I’m fcuked if I know what that is and, honestly, I don’t really care either – JUST LOOK AT HOW COOL ALL THE VIRUSES LOOK! Aside from anything else, if you’re a certain type of person I think that some of these would make cracking tattoos.
  • Sock Puppet Master: A good TikTok account! Sock Puppet Master basically does one thing, but it does it very well – taking the audio from 911 calls, police bodycams and the like, and animating them in the surreal style. Which, obviously, given what we know about policing in North America is very much a case of ‘laughing while at the same time acknowledging that, well, there are many, many occasions when it would be VERY HARD to make amusing animations based on the actions of law enforcement’, but as long as you go in with that caveat in mind it’s possible to find quite a lot to enjoy here. This is the TikTok offshoot of a reasonably-long-running project that’s won actual comedy awards and stuff, should the ‘TikTok humour’ label put you off (I say this as someone who went to see some comedy last night which was, unbeknownst to me, some bloke who was famous on TikTok, and it was noticeable how much better he was from about 10m in when he realised that the TikTok-y schtick doesn’t really work so well when your audience is actually in a room in front of you rather than holding you in a tiny box two inches from their face).
  • Eyeball: Ooh, this is interesting. Given you’re here and reading this (or at least clicking the links while you desperately try not to focus too hard on the horrible words) then I presume you are broadly keen on ‘interesting links from across the web’ – Eyeball is a new app which is designed to facilitate light-touch linksharing with a group of friends. The idea is that it sits as a widget on your homescreen, and within that widget appear links that have been shared to your group – so you create groups of friends (upto five for the free version) and then simply drop interesting links you think they will like into the chat, which others can look up whenever they want; kind of like a small, discrete friends-only linky messageboard which lives on your phone. I feel like I’ve slightly butchered the explanation here – plus ca change, eh? – but this looks really cool and were it not iOS-only at the moment I would have totally downloaded this and tried it out this week.
  • EyeCandy: I featured a site a bit like this during lockdown many years ago, but it’s still a good idea and this is still a useful resource – EyeCandy is basically a resource for people who want to make video which basically features a laundry-list of techniques along with visual guides to what they mean and how they work (masking, tilt-shift, match-split, etc etc – this is the same as the previous site), along with what looks like a really nice selection of clips and showreels highlighting exciting visual innovations or BEST PRACTICE or just generally stuff which looks cool and videomakers might find inspiring. If you make films, or want to make films, this looks like a really useful thing to bookmark.
  • Ode to a Laundry Room: I love this LOADS. A website dedicate to a single place, specifically a laundry room in the Dutch city of Rotterdam in which the site’s creator lived for a year and a half. “my dear friend was kind enough to offer me a place to stay during, what was supposed to be, a 10-day-long visit to Rotterdam to see my pals. a laundry room at the place they were renting. the war started 3 weeks before my flight to the netherlands. in march, after 2 weeks on the road and a different reason to leave, i got to my destination, and the short-term-stay little laundry room turned into a place i called home for a year and a half. to be specific – 527 days…this page is a digital ode to the laundry room, as well as its archive. i never said a proper goodbye and will forever regret it. on the last day of moving out and cleaning, i did not at all realise it was the last time id be there. this here will never make up for it, but it is a way to bring me some peace about the fact that i never said goodbye.” I believe VERY STRONGLY that we should do this more often – I honestly adore the idea of making small digital shrines, memorials, to people or places or things that have held meaning for us.
  • Earth Magic Portals: Ok, there’s no actual magic here – or anywhere else for that matter – but if you squint a bit then it might FEEL like magic, and, well, we’ll take what we can get this week. This is basically just a bit of showoffy webwork by a webshop called Flavour Machine to demonstrate how good they are at doing webcam-based gestural controls…and now I’ve just managed to make this sound really dry, WELL DONE MATT YOU TERRIBLE FCUKING HACK. Ahem. Anyway, click the link, click the ‘use hand-tracking controls’ and then enjoy the vaguely-wizardy sensation of being able to swap between youtube videos using a few swipes of your hands – there’s something particularly nice about the ‘pinch to select a portal-type tweak to the UI, and as a general point this feels like something that can be iterated on. If nothing else I now REALLY want someone to build something that lets me conduct an orchestra via the medium of sweeping hand gestures in my kitchen, so if one of you could sort that out please that would be ace thanks.

By Frank Kunert

NEXT UP, HAVE THIS SPECTACULAR SELECTION OF TUNEFUL OBSCURITIES COMPILED FROM THE CRACKLING ARCHIVES OF SADEAGLE’S INCREDIBLE RECORD COLLECTION! 

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE EVERYONE WHO LIVES IN THE UK AND WORKS IN ADVERMARKETINGPR AND WHO HAS FELT THE NEED TO WRITE LONG SCREEDS ABOUT POLITICS ON LINKEDIN THIS WEEK IN A DESPERATE AND FAILED ATTEMPT TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK INTELLIGENT TO FCUK THEMSELVES INTO THE SUN PLEASE AND THANKYOU, PT.2:  

  • Suffrago: Look, let’s get this straight – this is not some ‘let’s organise! The work starts here!!!!!111eleventy’-type resistance sh1t I’m espousing here (lol that I would ever be so motivated or hopeful), but, equally, it’s not inconceivable that some of you in the UK might this week have thought ‘hm, maybe it’s worth engaging with politics beyond the standard electoral cycle this time around’ – to that end, you might find Suffrage interesting, a new platform which is, ambitiously, attempting to basically ‘do digital democracy better’. It’s not intended solely for politics, long-term – the idea, I think (in common with lots of these projects, FCUK ME are they bad at explaining it – seriously guys, if you happen to see this, it is NOT EASY to work out what the everliving fcuk any of this is for!) is that this eventually becomes an issue-agnostic platform for the sharing of views and the agglomeration of complex information around an issue so as to enable better decisionmaking by the polis. In theory there is a LOT in here – the ability to follow policy at a constituency level and discuss/debate your representative’s voting record; simplified explanations of the legislative process and the passage of bills through parliament; condensed information about debates and discussions at national, regional and local level…look, I’m personally…unconvinced that this is ever going to get enough views and traction to be meaningfully useful, but, equally, if everyone had my cynical, negative and defeatist attitude then nothing would ever get done and we’d all be well on our way towards hell in the proverbial handca…what’s that? Eh? Oh. Anyway, still, here’s a website about democracy.
  • Noomo Beat: This is interesting – not necessarily in terms of what it does (which, to be clear, is very little – albeit in VERY shiny fashion) but more in terms of what it means about agencies, digital and AI. Noomo Beat is a webproject by digital agency Noomo, which is designed to show off what it can do with AI and fancy graphics and indicate the sort of thing that potential clients might commission – the site shows off an interface for an imagined clothing brand which basically asks a few simple questions of the users and then uses that answers to said questions and a soupcon of generative AI to create a BESPOKE EXPERIENCE for each user – what this in practice means is that you then get shown a (really VERY SHINY, I must stress) selection of clothes (the clothes are seemingly always the same) with a slightly different soundtrack and colourway based on your answers. That’s it! BUT LOOK IT IS INTERACTIVE AND IT HAS AI IN IT! I would posit that, more than two years on from The Great Initial Wave of GenAI Excitement, if this is what agencies think is ‘useful’ about it then agencies deserve everything they’re going to get in the next few years.
  • 1 Dataset, 100 Visualisations: Oh this is such a lovely project, and such a useful and interesting look at all the many different ways one might present a single set of datapoints and how the difference in said presentation affects the manner in which the information communicated is interpreted and received. Per the blurb, “this project is not made to show off, but rather show how interpretation can create better results. Take a close look at your dataset, and figure out what the main story in your data is. Different approaches and focuses demand different visualizations. We decided to keep every visualization the same style and colors and let the interpretation and story angle dictate the visualization. This resulted in 100 vastly different visualizations.” This is a bit of a calling card by Danish design studio Ferdio, and a smart one – it neatly demonstrates that they are quite good at this sort of thing, that they can do it in lots of different styles, and that they understand how style impacts substance, as well as showing that they are nice enough and confident enough to disseminate their expertise for free. This is both textbook CONTENT MARKETING and a really excellent resource for anyone interested in dataviz and all the different ways in which you can use smart visual design to bring numbers to life.
  • Buttons: I have to be honest with you – this is not, in general, a hugely-interesting website (as far as I can tell it’s the storefront for a Czech studio that designs typefaces) but it IS the first one which basically offers potential customers a discount on prices in exchange for, basically, d1cking around. Basically the link here takes you to a page which, with a click, will generate a new website button at random, which will plonk down from the top of the page; more clicks will see more buttons deposited onto the page. If you, the user, click enough times to fill the whole screen with RANDOM BUTTONS then you will unlock a discount you can redeem when you buy fonts from the shop. Why? I have no idea, but I am very much a fan of this and STRONGLY suggest that any and all of you working with online retailers lobby hard to include similar mechanics on their websites.
  • Gravitational Lens Simulation: Look, I could pretend to understand what this is showing, but I’d be lying – in large part my reasons for including this amount to little more than ‘ooh, cool visual FX that look a tiny little bit like what happens to the edges of your field of vision at the start of a trip’. Let me instead delegate the explanation to the site itself, which says the following in explanation of what the everliving fcuk Gravitational Lensing in fact is: “Imagine a heavy ball on a trampoline – it creates a dip that makes marbles roll towards it in a curved path. That’s similar to how massive objects in space (like black holes) bend light. When light from distant stars passes near these heavy objects, it bends around them, creating multiple images or making the stars appear in different positions than where they really are. This bending of light by gravity is called gravitational lensing, and it helps astronomers study things in space they can’t see directly. The pulsing star in the center helps demonstrate this effect by making it easier to track how the light bends around the black hole.” There, clear? No, me neither. Still, you probably don’t need to know too much about the INCREDIBLE, MIND, BODY AND UNIVERSE-BENDING PHYSICS being modeled here – instead, click the link, let your jaw go slack and marvel at the pretty lights as you move the black hole around the twinkly cosmos.
  • Documentary Storm: I appreciate that you may not necessarily be in the market for ‘deep-dives into this fcuking world we live in’ right now, but, on the offchance, you might find this website a pleasing resource – Documentary Storm is, basically, a place that collects a fcuktonne of documentaries on a wide range of topics and makes them searchable by theme, title, etc. Nothing’s hosted here – these are all YouTube embeds – but it’s a convenient portal to find non-fiction filmmaking should you be interested. It’s also worth pointing out that the term ‘documentary’ has been largely rendered meaningless in the past few years, as the streaming platforms seemingly-snakebelly-low quality control bar for this stuff has seen some…questionable-quality investigations and VERY propagandistic material being peddled as ‘objectively-researched fact’; put it this way, I wouldn’t expect everything on here to have Attenborough-level rigour, and I would perhaps take significant portions of the films on here with a skipful of salt (I am thinking specifically of a lot of the UFO-type things, but I reckon there is probably quite a lot of…iffy medical stuff lurking here if you lift enough rocks).
  • Photo Exhibits: Ooh, this is nice – an oooooooold website featuring the photography of one Stephen Edelbroich, who snapped a load of photos of New York, Paris, Venice, Vietnam (and other places too) and uploaded them here for the world to see – these are OLD, either analogue or early-digital depending on exactly when they were taken, and it’s honestly quite a thrill to go through them and go back a quarter-century.  I’m not sure how GOOD the photos are, if I’m totally honest, but it’s so nice to find them here.
  • Daze: So this has been getting frothy writeups left right and centre over the past few weeks, despite the fact that the app itself is only out of waitlist this week (and even then iOS-only because of FCUKING course grumble grumble) – anyway, it LOOKS very cool even if, as a result of the aforementioned iPhoneonlyness, I am yet to try it. Basically Daze is a new messaging platform whose gimmick is (basically) that it combines the simplicity of messaging (ie you are literally just messaging someone, or a group of people) with the creative multimedia possibilities of Stories or Reels; so you can effectively create chats that look more like the collage-type-canvas you might expect from a c.2015 Insta/Snap aesthetic. Slap down gifs and videos and audio and animations and CHANGING FONTS and colours and it’s all CHAOTIC and MESSY and this looks like it might be ALL THE RAGE (for 10m until Meta rips off all its features wholesale across the ecosystem and kills this stone dead).
  • Practical Betterments: I am pretty sure I have never in my life practised any form of self-improvement –  certainly not in the decade and a half that I’ve been making myself a worse person via the medium of internet obsession – but, should you be a more aspirational sort of person than me, the sort who believes in the possibility of things and people and circumstances getting better rather than constantly decaying towards entropy, then you might enjoy this website collecting a list of simple things that we can all do to improve our lives in small ways. Things like ‘lubricate your keyholes’ (no sniggering), or, er, ‘organise your toiletries chronologically’ (I have no idea what this means and am slightly too scared to click through and find out), and, look, this all strikes me as utterly insane, microoptimisation in search of tiny, imperceptible marginal gains, but, equally, I cry most days and so as such perhaps the person behind this, one ‘Nathanial’, is a better person to listen to than I am.
  • An Incredibly Satisfying Swedish-Accented Rap: This is a bit of an unusual one – it’s literally just a link to a video which would ordinarily go in, well, the videos section where it belongs, but this is on Insta and as such I can’t embed it down there, but it doesn’t fit in the Instagram section either because it’s just a single video and the rest of the account isn’t (so far at least) delightfully-accented rap/poetry, and so you’re just going to have to put up with me queering the Curios running order slightly by putting it here. What’s that? You don’t give a fcuk? Oh. Anyway, this is a video posted by one Cecilia Elise Wallin and I am slightly obsessed with it – the delivery, the diction, the movement, the fact that when I first saw it I was half-convinced it was CG…this is just wonderful, and I really hope Ms. Wallin makes more of them.
  • Perverse: Speaking of (sort-of) poetry (SEAMLESS!), Perverse is a new online (and offline, but mostly online I think) journal of verse, “a magazine for “deliberate, obstinate, unreasonable or unacceptable poems, contrary to the expected practice”, which might appeal to those of you who enjoy slightly-unconventional forms of poetry – it’s a newsletter too, so you can sign up for occasional deliveries of crafted words to your inbox.
  • PacCam: We begin the BUMPER GAMES portion of Curios (I think we can all agree a bit of low-stakes ludic distraction will make it all better, right?) with this excellent, silly little game which basically lets you play a slightly-shonky, rudimentary version of Pacman using your face as a controller – enable your webcam and you can direct your small yellow pillmuncher around the screen by turning your head to the left or right or looking up or down. This is silly and a bit shonky but VERY fun (in a slightly broken way) – be aware though that a) it will give you a lot of shots of you looking VERY unattractive as you contort your neck to direct the sprite onscreen; and b) in fact, if any of you ever watched Daniel Day Lewis in My Left Foot, those are basically exactly the faces you’ll be pulling.
  • Letroso: Another week, another daily word game – this one’s like Wordle but you have a 10 letter word to guess each day; the basic ‘if you get the right letter in the right place it changes colour’ thing is the same, but there are a few tweaks in acknowledgement of the fact that, well, longer words make for a harder game. I like this a lot, and it’s a nice alternative to Wordle if you’re deciding to boycott it while the NYT fights with the unions (yes, even your daily word puzzle can become a complex labour rights issue! EVERYTHING IS POLITICS THERE IS NO ESCAPE).
  • Moida Mansion: This is SO good – not least because of the meticulous attention to detail applied to the design and style and look and feel of the whole thing. Moida Mansion is a browsergame that’s designed to look and play like one of the old ‘Game And Watch’-style LCD games that those of a certain age will remember from long car journeys – an LCD screen, simple movement, no animations – updated with some really clever wrinkles that transform it into an actually fun game (none of the original titles of the era were, to be clear, ‘fun’ in any accepted way). Everything about this is just perfect, down to the manual and the way it’s written and presented, and the game itself is a solid 15 minutes’ enjoyment – a really exceptional bit of work by renowned game designer Lucas Pope.
  • All Of The Ludum Dare 56 Entries: Via Lynn Cherny’s superb newsletter comes this link, to all the entries to the recent Ludum Dare game design jam, which challenged designers to create a small game from scratch in 72h or less, under the loose theme of ‘Tiny Creatures’ – there are DOZENS here, many of which you can play in your browser but the rest of which are free to download, and there are puzzlers and platformers and silly narrative fiction experiments and, honestly, there are HOURS of entertainment here if you just fancy turning your brain off and playing for a while.
  • Tenebra: I know that you don’t THINK that what you need and want in 2024 is a browsergame built on emulating the graphics and OS of the long-forgotten BBC Micro from the 1980s – and, look, you might be right, maybe you DON’T need or want this, but, well, I’m giving it to you anyway because it’s honestly great and SO much better than you think it’s going to be. Tenebra is a puzzlegame with 31 levels – the gimmick is that you have to get the protagonist to the end of each, but he is afraid of the dark – how do you get him through the dark areas to safety? This starts simple but becomes fiendish enough to be interesting and fun after a few levels, and I imagine there are some of you for whom this is a genuine, brainscratching pleasure.
  • Wigmaker: Our final miscellaneous offering this week is another infinite clicker (it’s not infinite, don’t worry). Would you like to play a game about making wigs? Are you pleased by liberal use of terms like ‘peruke’ to connote a hairpiece? Oh man are you going to enjoy this, in that case. A particularly nice example of the clicker genre, with a pleasant interface and some nice writing, this is a gentle, soothing and satisfying way of passing some time, ideally while on payroll so you can get remunerated for watching Wig Number Go Up.

By Devin Lunsford

OUR FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK IS BY THE FABULOUSLY-NAMED ‘LEGALIZE LAMBADA’ AND MAKES ME WANT TO USE THE WORD ‘FUNKY’ DESPITE THE FULL-BODY-PRETZEL-CRINGE THAT DEPLOYING THAT TERM MAKES ME FEEL! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Blocky Graphics: A collection of powerful aesthetics in one place; is it time for the third vaporwave revival yet?
  • 420Princess: Actually, no, wait, I take back what I said about the last link – THIS is a powerful aesthetic. I think it might be deeply, deeply evil, but, well, that feels kind of apt this week. DRINK IN THE BADNESS.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Hamid Naderi Yeganeh: As far as I can tell from their bio, Hamid is studying maths in some capacity at UCL; he uses his maths skills to create frankly amazing pictures from equations (ok, fine, he might well be doing loads of other stuff with them but the likelihood is I wouldn’t understand ANYTHING about that, whereas ‘making pictures with equations’ is something I can broadly get my head around). This is…quite astonishing, although to be honest this could all be absolute lies and I would have no idea whatsoever.
  • Geometry Club: Per the bio, “Celebrating the beauty of architecture with precisely aligned photographs from around the world.” You want photos of the top corner portion of a lot of buildings? GREAT!
  • Artisan Embroidery: Via Jana over at Zuckerbakerei (honestly, SUCH a lovely newsletter/website which is also home to some glorious baking recipes), this is the Insta feed of Jordan Cunliffe in Lancashire who embroiders data. EMBROIDERS DATA. There are some of you who I know will be ABSOLUTELY TUMESCENT at those words – know that I write for YOU.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Welcome Back To Trumpland: It pains me to have to say that one of the best immediate analyses of Tuesday’s vote – which, by the way, evidenced once again my unerring ability to be wrong about stuff; I went to bed around midnight convinced that it was going to be a drawn-out affair with recounts and contestations and no declaration til Thursday at the earliest, which once again proves that you should never, ever listen to a word I say about anything and that, basically, I am a know-nothing bozo – came on unpleasantly-right-wing website Unherd…but it did, hence why I am linking to it. It’s not triumphalist – Tom McTague doesn’t appear to have wanted this result any more than I did – but it does a good job of presenting the bald reasons as to why the result went the way it did, reasons which have continued to be borne out as more data emerges about voting patterns across demographies. This paragraph in particular seems to neatly-encapsulate things: “Ultimately, Joe Biden was right that his vice president was a weaker candidate than he had been and Obama was before him. Harris was weaker than Hillary Clinton, too. The Democratic Party’s presidential nominees are getting progressively worse. Some Democratic analysts were arguing overnight that Harrris had been denied the time to introduce herself to the American public. But this only reveals the depth of their denial. Biden was no longer fit for the presidency and would surely have lost by an even greater margin, yes. But Harris was only as plausible as she was because she was parachuted in at the last moment. It is surely the case that the emptiness of the drama she offered could only be sustained for the mini-series we got.”
  • Immediate Post-Mortem: I thought this was an excellent post by Ben Ansell, Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions at Nuffield College, University of Oxford, who had predicted a victory for Harris ahead of the polls closing and, in the wake of being proved quite decisively wrong, wrote this explaining why he thought that had happened. It’s very much worth reading, in part for its dissection of the inadequacies of the polling and prediction industries, and in part for its reasonably-clear-eyed assessment of the factors driving the Trumpian success – in particular, “People’s memories of the Trump administration were quite favourable. Until COVID broke out at least. And it seems that – as with Boris Johnson for example – the public weren’t inclined to blame Trump for the initial period of COVID chaos in early to mid 2020. For many people, their memories of Trump from early 2017 to early 2020 were strong economic growth, lower taxes, stable inflation and a calm international environment. And those same people looked at high inflation in 2021-22, high levels of border crossings, and a chaotic international environment, and they used a simple heuristic. Things were pretty good under the last guy. Things are less good under these guys. I vote for the last guy.”
  • I Told You So: Not me, to be clear – no, this is Sam Kriss, with 2000-odd words on ‘why he was right about this and so much other stuff besides’ (in Kriss’ defence, he did in fact call this). It feels oddly appropriate to be featuring Kriss in Curios again after about 8 years – he was very roundly discredited c.2016ish in a me too-adjacent scandal of which I forget the details, but he’s managed to maintain a career outside of the big ticket UK publications doing his post-hipster cultural analysis schtick and this piece is…look, I don’t necessarily like some of the tone, or what feels like slightly mean-spirited personal criticism of Harris, but a lot of this *feels* right; in particular the section about Brat and the summer hysteria that surrounded the campaign at the outset reminds me very strongly of stuff I remember saying to friends at the time (and may well have written here, I can’t be fcuked to check now, sorry) about how the whole thing had quite strong ‘YES SHE CAN!’ energy, and not in a good way, and basically for the past few days I have had the phrase “The Harris campaign exhumed, and was eventually consumed by, the zombified corpse of the girlboss’ and, well, I don’t know what to do with it and so I am leaving it here for you.
  • The Final Weeks of the Trump Campaign: It’s interesting, isn’t it, how the same piece can read incredibly, entirely differently depending on when you read it relative to other events. When I first read this on Sunday afternoon it was an interesting and slightly-catty look at the obviously-dysfunctional circus that exists around Trump and the infighting between his cabal of dreadful lieutenants to see who gets to be that weeks favourite lickspittle; rereading it again yesterday afternoon, it instead becomes…quite a worrying image of the sort of court that will once again spring up around the mad, syphilitic king. It really is worth reading this, not least because the people sound – and I say this even by the standards of US politics, where the monstrous is very much the quotidian – like REALLY appalling human beings (it’s also interesting that it doesn’t touch the Loomer rumours AT ALL). Remember the days of Conway and Spicer and that crowd? IT’S ALL COMING BACK! Oh god I am so so tired already.
  • The Ads: Ok, so this one is TECHNICALLY about the election but it’s actually more about the advertising around it, and specifically how it was advertised to the citizens of Montana – a State in which there was so much political advertising that the campaigns bought more inventory than actually existed. Alexander Sammon recounts his experience of spending 26h watching TV in the state to get FULLY IMMERSED in the scale of the ad campaign being waged, and it’s a superb and slightly-unhinged account of what nonstop exposure to political messaging can do to a man. It’s also slightly incredible to read this and then to check the data that shows the immense spike in people searching ‘did biden drop out’ on election day – like, managing to avoid details about this election does feel like it would have taken a not-insubstantial effort of will, so congratulations to everyone who managed to get to polling day uncertain as to who the candidates were.
  • Liberalism and the Far Right: This is an academic paper, and it’s quite hard and quite knotty and not exactly an easy read, but it feels like it fits quite aptly this week given its findings “suggest that far-right movements can gain power by embracing liberalism’s ambiguity and contradictions. In other words, mastering liberal messaging can be essential to the growth of far-right movements, challenging any easy dismissal of these politics as “illiberal.”. HM.
  • The Money Funding All This: Look, it’s taken me 6 links to mention Peter Thiel, DIDN’T I DO WELL? In fairness this piece in the Byline Times doesn’t mention cuddly Peter T, but it does reference his ageing counterparts the Koch brothers, who are the oldschool version of Pete’s ultramodern Silicon Valley techlibertarianism – this is a look at the ‘talent network’ that unites all the young, presentable, telly-friendly and strangely-identikit right-wing talking heads you see cropping up as participants on panel and debate shows on and offline. You may not recognise the names but you will definitely recognise some of the faces, and you may not be…wholly surprised to learn that the organisation which is working to promote them into the mainstream and which is working to polish and refine their messaging and presentation is…FUNDED BY MASSIVELY-RIGHT-WING US BILLIONAIRE INTERESTS! Look, I don’t mean to be some sort of mad conspiracist about this, but, well, THIS IS HOW THIS SHIT WORKS FFS THESE IDEOLOGICAL MOVEMENTS ARE NOT ORGANIC. So if you see a lot more of these people being invited on to places to discuss Trump, the new right and how it links to (or should link to) UK politics, know that it’s possibly not quite as simple as it ostensibly looks. BONUS SEMI-RELATED CONTENT: Taylor Lorenz wrote in her newsletter yesterday about ‘why the left can’t have its own Rogan’, which basically boils down to ‘there aren’t any leftist billionaires willing to fund this sort of stuff whereas, turns out, there are fcuktonnes of right-leaning plutes who very much are’. Don’t, please, think too hard about what the argument at the heart of all this says about the relative likelihood of right-wing things happening vs left-wing things happening.
  • The Rise of the Climate Anti-Hero: It feels…very wrong that the best article I have yet read about XR and Declare Emergency and Just Stop Oil and the current ‘souping the artworks’ protest movement was written in New York Magazine, but, well, here we are! This is long but SO good, a really interesting and multifaceted and fair portrait of the movement and some of the people within it – I enjoyed it in particular because it doesn’t paint them as perfect or as crusaders so much as people who are very frightened and simply don’t think that it is viable to no longer act. I think that this week is probably not a terrible time to read something like this and maybe consider whether or not they might be right.
  • Vanishing Culture: This is VERY LONG and quite involved, and, honestly, you sort of need to be REALLY interested in the general question of ‘how do we preserve online culture and materials?’ – but, presuming that you are, this is a fascinating document pulled together by the Internet Archive (now back online, huzzah) about why the work it does is important, not just in a ‘wow, isn’t it nice to be able to go and look at webpages from 2009!’ way but in a ‘look, we’ve been effectively putting most of our new culture onto digital media for the past 15 years at least, and at no point have we given anything resembling sufficient thought to how we’re going to make sure that it lasts and that we don’t get left with a fcuking enormous ‘digital dark ages’ in a few generations’ time’ (lol like we have that many generations left lol!)-type way. Aside from anything else, should any of you work for anyone who’s looking for something PURPOSE-Y to do in 2025 (like that’s ever going to be a thing again – unfettered capitalism all the way, kids! Markets gonna market!) then you could do significantly worse than steering them towards the general issue of digital preservation because, honestly, this is very much a THING and is only going to become more of one.
  • AI Right Now: Another week, another brilliant post by Ethan Mollick on AI – this time outlining some incredibly interesting extant use cases for LLMs which are smart and useful and creative and which should give you all food for thought. In particular there’s a lot of really useful stuff in here in terms of how to helpfully think about multimodality and image/video analysis which, to me at least, was quietly-revelatory.
  • My Week As An AI Slave: Oh OK, fine, that’s not actually the title – in reality it’s something more prosaic like ‘I let ChatGPT control my life for a week’, but I prefer my formulation. Anyway, this is an NYT piece and is pretty middle-of-the-road, but I found it interesting, partly as a contrast to the last iteration of this piece I remember from a year or so ago – it’s notable how much difference the ability to parse images and ‘dialogue’ with a user through voicechat, enhances the experience. It was also fascinating to me that the author realised halfway through that the key feature of an LLM is its middle-of-the-roadness, and that allowing it to dictate one’s choices effectively condemns one to a Basic B1tch existence of taupe and ugg boots and buddha bowls and Oh God this stuff is going to take over, isn’t it, because that is literally what most people like and want. Welcome to the future, an army of AI voice assistants directing an army of Deanos to an out-of-town leisure complex while wearing matching leisurewear, forever.
  • Where ‘Order’ Comes From: I ADORED this, in large part because it took stuff that I am really, really bad at understanding – specifically probability and maths – and helped me understand it better than I did before. Honestly, this is such good, clear writing that I think you should all read it, if only to enjoy the sensation of someone making something comprehensible in such calm, cogent fashion – this is by one Marco (thankyou Marco!) and is about why order arises our of apparent chaos and, I promise, you will feel SO much smarter after reading this (unless you already know all this stuff, in which case…why are you reading this sh1t? Shouldn’t you be off using your MASSIVE BRAIN for better things? THERE’S WORK TO DO FFS!).
  • Trying The Light Phone: You may recall the Light Phone, a recently(ish)-buzzy, nicely-designed new entrant to the ‘like a smartphone but designed to not let you get distracted by apps and stuff’ market – this is one GenZ person’s experience of using it. Look, this is in Mashable and so the writing is…fine, but I found the user’s experience really interesting and important in light of current talk about ‘banning smartphones for under-16s’ – per their account, it was all lovely and digital detoxy up until the point they started butting up hard against all the ways in which the modern world simply requires you to interact with it using a smart device, and how that makes not having one incredibly friction-y and very fcuking inconvenient indeed, and how, actually, that creates all sorts of stresses and annoyances and inconveniences that mean all the ZENLIKE CALM you get from, I don’t know, not being on Snap every living second, is somewhat wasted. Basically what this demonstrates is IT’S NOT THAT FCUKING SIMPLE (on which note, it’s worth having a close look into the Australian government’s ‘ban social media for <16s’ policies just to see how spectacularly-badly-designed they are).
  • Hey, Chat: On the rise of ‘chat’ as a conversational term used irl by kids, in the sense of ‘there is no distinction between me talking in real life to an individual or a group, and me talking online in a chat with one or more interlocutors’, which, actually, makes perfect sense on the one hand (why should we make distinctions between ‘communicating in physical person’ and ‘communicating online via text’? Except of course for all sorts of reasons of nuance, etc, but wevs!). On the one hand, this is literally just AN Other example of language evolving as it always has and always will do, and it’s nothing to get het up about; on the other, this could, if you squint, be looked at as yet more evidence of the growing degree to which interactions are being reduced to ‘actor—->audience’ rather than ‘dialogue’, and this is another expression of the sickening maincharacterisation of everyone and the NPCification of everyone else (I have THOUGHTS on this, fwiw) – you decide!
  • Training Your Colour Vision: This is a bit of a followup to the link a few weeks back of the GeoGuessr guy realising he can literally identify places by the colour of the sky in photos – here, Max Levy, who is colourblind to at least some degree, tries to see whether he can improve his ability to identify specific pantone shades on sight. Why? WHY NOT FFS???? This is a lot more interesting than I have just made it sound, I promise.
  • Mycology for Dummies: A brilliant piece of writing by Jan Hopis, about why writing about drugs is usually horrible and cringeworthy and unpleasant to read – and, also, about taking mushrooms. You shouldn’t be able to get away with having both of these things in one essay, but credit to Jan here because he nails this.
  • Fear and Loathing on Feeld: Or, based on having read this and the reactions it elicited online, ‘why dating in London is seemingly like ‘Nam’. This is…this is horrible, honestly, and made me want perform some fairly invasive brain surgery on myself to scoop out whatever part of my frontal lobe is responsible for ‘wanting to feel loved again’ to ensure I am never, ever tempted to try one of these fcuking things. If you are in a couple, you HAVE to read this as it will make you so, so grateful; if you are not, it will make you fervently pray for the asexual/aromantic fairy to visit you while you sleep because there is NOTHING about any of this experience that sounds good for anyone. If there’s one thing that this article I think pretty conclusively proves, by the way, it is that the normalisation of therapy culture and speak in the UK has been a net negative for at least one, possibly three, generations, and we are all worse people for all our ‘self-care’.
  • Happy Hardcore in Glasgow: For a certain generation, before people decided that it was the psytrance community with their white dreadlocks and dogs on strings that deserved mockery and vilification, it was happy hardcore that occupied the uncoveted ‘least cool genre of dance music’ position (in fairness it was also comments like this, delivered by some monged-out kid to my mate Paul: “I like happy hardocore because it’s really happy and really safe” – that’s very much the calibre of person it tended to attract). If you’re not familiar with it, take a moment to listen and then come back when you’ve washed the blood out of your ears, and then enjoy this great piece in the newly-launched Glasgow Bell about the Glasgow hardcore scene and the kids that made it – you can almost smell the cheap speed and glue! Also worth noting that this link and the last one are from new independent local journalism outfits launched in the past few months, a rare feelgood moment in UK media in 2024. Dear God I still have the hardcore tab open and playing, this is HORRIBLE.
  • Athens Revised: Beautifully-written but inevitably-harrowing account of rape, by Erin Wood. I didn’t touch on the Saoirse Ronan stuff last week, but this feels like a suitable paragraph to quote: “A month before I graduated from high school in 1996, I was learning to see my female body as more than just a vessel to resent and attempt to thin. My body was also a set of weapons that could protect. The heel of my hand could drive nasal bone into brain. Bunched fingers could eject eyeballs from sockets. The self-defense course, called Model Mugging, was underwritten by an alumna of my school and offered to every senior girl. The male instructors—known as “padded assailants”—would don protective gear so that we students could practice hitting them without restraint, as if fighting for our lives, or to prevent being raped. Or both.”
  • Not My Problem: Finally this week, one of the best pieces of speculative writing about near-future AI stuff that I’ve read in an age – this is Tim Maughan with a short story called “Not My Problem”, and it’s really impossible to read any of the elements in this without thinking “well, yeah, I mean that’s probably actually going to happen, isn’t it?” Brilliant, and only about 80% as frightening and unsettling as you think it’s going to be, which is a bonus of sorts.

By Raija Jokinen, via blort

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 01/11/24

Reading Time: 35 minutes

The world’s either going to get maybe, possibly, a tiny bit better next week, or it’s going to get LOADS worse – EXCITING, ISN’T IT? I don’t know about you, but part of me quite wants to be put into a medically-induced coma until America gets its sh1t together.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you’re sick of their fcuking politics too, admit it.

By Zhiyong Jin (all pics this week via TIH, for which thanks as ever)

WHY NOT ENJOY THE OPENING SECTION OF CURIOS ACCOMPANIED BY A SELECTION OF UK GRIME TRACKS MIXED BY MANGA? THERE IS NOT GOOD REASON NOT TO, CLICK THIS LINK! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY ANGRY AT THE FACT THAT IT KNOWS WHO AND WHAT ‘THE RIZZLER’ IS, BUT IS EVEN MORE ANNOYED THAT THIS WEEK IT GOT HIM MIXED UP WITH BABY GRONK, PT.1:  

  • 3d Workers Island: This week’s first link is a bit of an odd one (plus ca change), and to be honest it’s more of a short story in slightly-odd webpage form, and, well, I appreciate I am hardly selling it to you here but I PROMISE IT IS GOOD. You just have to be aware of the following things: a) despite what it might look like, there’s no real interaction happening here – you advance the narrative by clicking, and that’s your only form of agency here; b) so effectively that means that what you’re doing is reading and looking – do you like reading and looking? GREAT! I don’t want to give too much away here because part of the pleasure of this is how gently-unsettling it is, but think of this as a spooky tale for hallowe’en (yes I know I am a day late, it’s not my fcuking fault when the days fall), one which wonders what it would be like if you one day realised that the computer sandbox you like to play with might have something slightly more going on under the hood than you at first thought. Told through ‘game’ footage, screenshots of forum posts, messenger conversations and other fragmented bits of digital media, this is REALLY nicely–paced and gets…quite creepy by the end. It will take about 10 minutes of your life, but you probably weren’t going to do anything important with them anyway, were you? Exactly.
  • MusicFX DJ: A NEW FUN MUSICAL AI TOOL TO PLAY WITH! This one’s from Google, and basically takes a multi-track approach to AI music – rather than just inputting a single prompt to generate a piece of music, this interface lets you specify various elements that you want included, and then use sliders to change the emphasis given to each prompt in the resultant composition – so, for example, you might have one term which is just ‘crying’, and by adjusting the slider you can, in realtime, determine the exact amount of wracked sobbing you’d like to include in the song. This is, in the main, a GREAT way of creating some genuinely-horrible-sounding cacophonies (as I type this, some truly appalling sounds generated by the terms ‘southern gothic’, ‘hardcore’ and ‘breakbeat’ are swirling around my kitchen), but it feels like this particular way of directing The Machine allows for a lot more interesting and malleable results – there’s something honestly sort of magical about moving the sliders and hearing the track respond to your urgings in semi-realtime, even if I haven’t yet managed to create anything that doesn’t make my ears want to immolate themselves. Have a play, this is FUN.
  • The Bullsh1tometer: I am, perhaps naively, clinging onto the hope that as of this time next week North America will have collectively decided that, actually, the past 10 years haven’t actually been all that fun, and that it might now be time to put this whole miserable episode behind us and forget, ideally forever, that That Fcuking Man ever existed (I appreciate it is unlikely that it is going to be that simple, but hey ho). As the rest of the world waits to see whether the population of  one country ends up making a decision so catastrophically stupid (AGAIN!) that it fcuks things up for everyone else too, why not enjoy this election-themed explainer from Australian satirical outlet Crikey, which is running a project to neatly demonstrate the ways in which AI can (and already is) being applied to news output, and how that affects the way in which a reader experiences facts. Per their explanation, “We’ve used the current US election campaign as a test case. We started by selecting six “base” stories, pivotal moments in the campaign so far that have been covered across the globe, with the key details generally agreed upon across the spectrum.  The team at DDB and Pow Wow then took a “neutral” article (acknowledging that no article, even wire copy, can ever be truly neutral) for each of these stories and passed them through a fine-tuned LLM (large language model). The LLM is designed to find opportunities to insert political bias. As the dial is turned up, the AI system adds more and more bias, until the “neutral” base article is converted into a piece of extreme propaganda.” So, basically, you select one of a selection of articles and can turn the AI heat up to a degree of your own choosing, seeing how quickly and easily The Machine is able to turn relatively-staid and neutral prose into something significantly more partisan and inflammatory in just a click.  This won’t tell you anything you don’t already know, but it’s a neat educational explainer as to why you need to be (even more) cognisant of how easy it is to spin facts with words, and how (per everything else) it’s not going to get any better anytime soon.
  • Hourly at the Whitney:  What time is it RIGHT NOW? No, seriously, it’s important. Basically if you click this link on the hour, you will experience a lovely little bit of site-specific art by Maya Man; if you click at any other time, you’ll just get the website for the Whitney (which is nice, but, well, not all that interesting per se). I won’t spoil the work by explaining or describing it (although if you’re too impatient to wait for the hour to strike, you can get the details here – but know that I judge you poorly), but I was utterly charmed by this – I think there’s something wonderful about this sort of subtle, additive webwork, and the idea that someone might just be online while the hour strikes and be surprised by the unexpected interaction is lovely to me. It sort of puts me in mind of those elaborate water clocks that you occasionally find in provincial shopping centres, which twice a day do some sort of insanely-elaborate trumpet-and-geyser routine to the tune of the William Tell overture (you OBVIOUSLY know what I mean here, don’t pretend that this isn’t the most evocative and resonant description of anything you’ve ever read). Basically I think that anyone who’s in charge of a website should give serious thought to including some sort of regular, time-based easter egg, the stranger the better – I am very much available for ‘consultancy’ here, should anyone want to discuss some options.
  • Smashing: Of all the things that need ‘hacking’ (nothing needs hacking, NOTHING, you are not fcuking Neo, you are just a tedious micromanager of your own experiences and you should just fcuking relax, ok?), I think if I’m honest that ‘finding things to read online’ is pretty low down the list – JUST SUBSCRIBE TO CURIOS FFS WHAT IS WRONG WITH EVERYONE? However, should you somehow be of the opinion that 20-odd high quality longreads, lovingly curated by ME, isn’t enough for you each week, you might be interested in Smashing, the second ‘surface more articles to read’-type app I can remember in the past 18 months (you may recall Artifact, which lasted approximately six months). How it works is a *bit* opaque, but as far as I can tell there’s a combination of…some sort of algorithmic content sorting, alongside ‘community recommendations’, with the idea that the app’s userbase will also contribute interesting things to the content pool based on their own surfing/browsing/reading. Which is a nice idea in theory, but rather undermined by the intended target audience for the app is…people who feel they need help finding interesting things to read. DO YOU SEE THE PROBLEM IN THIS THEORETICAL FLYWHEEL? There’s also quite a large red flag in the app’s blurb, which, when reaching for topics that users might be interested in, alights immediately on ‘marketing’, ‘wellness’ and ‘AI’, suggesting that, possibly, it’s aimed at people who don’t actually like reading for reading’s sake at all (look, I’m sorry, but if you are asked for your primary interests and your immediate response is those three terms then, well, I think you have dust where your soul should be), an opinion further reinforced by the fact that ‘AI Summaries’ is a big selling point (you can instruct the app to make any article ‘funny’, which will send a genuine shiver of revulsion down the spine of anyone who’s been exposed to LLM-generated ‘humour’ at any point). Basically this looks like it’s for cnuts, and I hope none of you download it (but, as ever, I will never know if you do, so).
  • The Geoguesser Man Has Reaches His Final Evolution: OK, so this is literally just a link to a video on X, and it’s only 20s or so, but also I think this might be significant at a species level. The Geoguesser guy – you know, the bloke who’s somehow discovered he has a quite incredible facility for working out where on earth any given photograph was taken – has worked out that he can, more often than not, identify the rough geolocation of an image based on nothing more than the tone of the sky in said image; this video is of him realising the full extent of his powers. I am honestly slightly astonished and not a little terrified by this, as if it’s not all a scam or a setup then I honestly think he might have hit a new tier of evolution.
  • A Flood of AI Animation Is Coming: This link takes you to what, fine, is a very dry update from AI videmongers Runway about a new update to their stack; ignore the boring (and frankly far-too-technical) words, though, and enjoy the videos, which demonstrate the frankly startling animation/mocap results that you can now get from AI style transfer in what I think might be realtime. Basically it takes facial movement and voice patterns and uses those to animate an AI-generated facial model – as you can see from the example clips here, what this means is Pixar-grade lipsyncing and emoting with literally no effort whatsoever, which, from the point of view of lowering the barrier to entry for creating animations, is pretty significant. On the one hand I appreciate that, as with all this stuff, there are a LOT OF QUESTIONS (whither jobs! Whither the environment! Etc etc) but I can’t help but see things like this as…broadly good? I don’t know, I just think that anything that allows kid with an idea and an imagination to more easily make things based on said ideas and said imagination is, on balance, A Net Positive, and I can’t get immediately angry about something that lowers the barriers to Making Fun Things. Sorry. Also, let’s be honest, there’s a fcuktonne of very ropy human-created animation already out there, so let’s not pretend it’s all fcuking Golden Era Disney.
  • Synthwave Chimes: Via Kris at Naive, this is a lovely, fuzzy and slightly-incomprehensible little synthtoy – there are some…dangling things (the titular ‘chimes’, I suppose – fcuk, I could probably have worked that out before I started typing this now-entirely-pointless digression) which you move your mouse over to produce sounds – the sounds in question are a bit ragged and frayed around the edges, and I like the vaguely-atonal cacophony that results when you careen the cursor across the shapes, and, in general, I think I would like windchimes significantly more if they sounded like this.
  • Grief Garden: Also via Kris (THANKS KRIS!) comes this simple-but-hugely-poignant (and, realistically, only going to become moreso) website which exists to collect people’s memories of the things that they have lost, or know they will lose, as a result of climate change. Per the blurb, Grief Garden “is an exploratory space, containing stories of plants, animals, and other memorialized climate grief. Explore the canvas by clicking on cells to either learn more about a memorial or to add your own — this can be a favorite tree, a beach, a friend, anything that you would like to memorialize.” It presents as a simple ASCII-ish map – clicking on any square on the map that has a character on it will show you someone else’s memory; clicking on one with no character will allow you to enter your own. This feels very much like something that could / should be taken by a museum and made bigger, because…well, look, none of this is getting better, is it, and it feels like these are feelings and ideas that a significant proportion of the global population is going to have to start wrestling with sooner than it probably realises. Seriously though, please do spend some time with this – there are some really lovely bits of writing buried in the memories, like this one: “But there are snapshots of this season I won’t forget. Toddlers receiving commendations for bravery on behalf of fathers who will miss a lifetime of milestones. Stepping onto the tarmac under that ominous, orange sky, the scarcest smattering of ash on the breeze. Evacuation sirens; smoke so dense it cancels out the sun. The fear in my son’s eyes as he struggled to catch a breath. Thousands upon thousands of livestock charred and scattered by the road; millions upon millions of native animals – likely entire species – incinerated.” Yes, ok, fine, I didn’t say it would be cheerful.
  • Leon Eckert: I have no clue whatsoever how I found the personal website of Leon Eckert, who, per his description, is ‘a German programmer, researcher and artist focusing on the critical discussion of technology and its impact on society’ and currently living in Shanghai (HELLO LEON, should you be the sort of person who Googles themselves, HAPPY FRIDAY I HOPE YOU ARE WELL), and I am linking to his website because it has THE most pleasingly fun/silly UX/UI flourishes I have seen on a site in AGES. Seriously, just click the link and then toggle the checkboxes on the left-hand-side of the page to make your browsing experience significantly more fun. I would like all new websites to come with these features, please, especially the ‘multiply my cursor by 1000’ one which genuinely made me feel as though I was having some sort of minor episode for a second.
  • Thos Computer: This is a very simple site but I LOVE the interface and how the drop-down menus and what you select from them effectively act as a sort of Choose Your Own Adventure-type recongfiguration of the website content (which, I promise, will make more sense to you when you click the link and play around). This feels like a really interesting and potentially-fruitful way to explore narrative design; I really like the idea of a story which reconfigures itself around you as you change individual words, alter verbs or swap out nouns.
  • On Games: A new magazine! An actual, physical magazine! About videogames! All glossy and high-quality and super-designed! This looks LOVELY, and very grown-up, (and pricey, at £25 for volume one), and the sort of thing that would sit among the exposed brickwork and filament bulbs of someone from 2013’s warehouse apartment. Gorgeous design, though.
  • Nintendo Music: I was never a Nintendo kid as a child, and as a result don’t have the deep-seated nostalgia associated with the brand, its consoles and its characters – I am aware, though, that for many of you the sound of the NES (or SNES, or N64, or Gameboy, or Switch, dear god this makes me feel old I am going to stop listing old consoles now) is the sound of CHILDHOOD and BETTER TIMES, and as such I realise that for some of you a mobile app which lets you listen to ALL OF THE NINTENDO MUSIC EVER is basically like some sort of holy grail so, well, here you go! I haven’t tried this so can’t attest to its quality, but it’s an official Nintendo app so I’d expect it to be pretty decent. I particularly like the way that the app will apparently let you extend the duration of shorter tracks, so you can transform (for example) the Rainbow Road theme into some sort of 18-minute prog fever dream.
  • The RIP Off: This is a project by an outfit called Brain, very much the Gobots to MSCHF’s Transformers when it comes to ‘gimmicky short-term gimmicks with immense viral potential’ – they are the people behind the ‘Green Day, but with the songs reproduced on crappy instruments’ which you doubtless saw when I was off, and while I am sure they’re perfectly-pleasant people this does very much feel like a bunch of people who saw what MSCHF were doing and literally thought ‘yeah, ok, we can copy that wholesale’. Still, I grudgingly have to admit that I think this is quite a fun idea – the simple premise is that each time a famous dies, someone somewhere is the first in the world to express their condolences via social media, and that that person should be rewarded in the form of a medal. The site lists a bunch of now-deceased celebrities; if you believe you were the first in the world to wish them well in their shuffle off the mortal coil, link your Twitter account to the site and claim your prize – in this specific case, a medal engraved with your name and the fact that YOU were the first person in the world to publicly mourn (for example) Liam Payne. Sadly the medals only ship within the US, which means that I feel it important for a UK funeral parlour to rip this off wholesale for the anglo market.

By Takashi Nakamura

NEXT UP WE RETURN TO FORMER EDITOR PAUL WHOSE BLOOPS AND BEATS ARE IN PARTICULARLY FINE FORM THIS WEEK! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY ANGRY AT THE FACT THAT IT KNOWS WHO AND WHAT ‘THE RIZZLER’ IS, BUT IS EVEN MORE ANNOYED THAT THIS WEEK IT GOT HIM MIXED UP WITH BABY GRONK, PT.2:

  • I Can’t Believe Other People Don’t Do This: We have all experienced the very particular feeling of watching someone else undertake a task in a manner which, to us at least, looks so utterly preposterous, so wrong-headed, so STUPID, that it makes us question whether or not the person in question is in some way, I don’t know, intellectually subnormal (professionally-speaking I have found this most often when watching how people use search engines; by contrast, others tend to get this feeling watching me dress) – this is a Reddit thread collecting a VAST crowdsourced list of the ways in which various people perform certain tasks in hyperoptimised ways and, honestly, some of these are fcuking GAMECHANGERS. Seriously, there will be at least one thing in here which utterly changes your life (as well as a lot of others which, yes, fine, make you slightly question the sanity or life-choices of some of the posters in the thread – I appreciate you like tidy drawers, mate, but plastic ziploc bags in said drawers in which you organise all your individual gubbins feels a touch…excessive) – I experienced a moment of genuine revelatory clarity at ‘open bags of crisps upside down because all the seasoning sits at the bottom’, for example, akin to when the image of the duck suddenly resolves itself into a bunny rabbit.
  • Extract All The Links: I feel quite strongly that I am cutting my own throat by serving you up this link, but such is my dedication to bringing you the very best of the web that I can’t hold back even when a link is basically designed to render Curios (or at least the bit of it which involves me) entirely redundant. Simon Willison got an LLM to code this up for him as part of some tinkering he was doing (you can read the notes of how here, should you be interested) – it’s a very simple tool which lets you paste in any copy you like from any webpage you fancy, and which will quickly and neatly extract any embedded urls from said text and dump them out for you without any of the annoying accompanying prose. Which means that should you decide that while the links are good the words are, frankly, dogsh1t, you need never again suffer through my prose – just copy the entire text of Curios, dump it in here and then surf to your heart’s content without my godawful words ruining your webspelunking. Know, though, that if you choose to do that I will do everything in my power to come back from the dead and haunt you to the point of insanity (not joking).
  • AI For Culture: Do any of you work in the cultural sector? I have a vague feeling a couple of you might – anyway, if so, this might be of use/interest. Basically this is a set of tools and resources compiled by what looks like a range of pan-European cultural institutions designed to help people within the sector work out how best to deploy generative AI as part of their work – per the blurb, “We are on a mission to empower the culture heritage sector through Artificial Intelligence. Our aim is to enable professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts within the sector with the resources they need to integrate AI into their daily workflow, find creative ways to use them and solve their current problems. The platform hosts a pool of readily deployed AI software tools, along with training and testing datasets that have been curated for use within the sector. To describe what is possible and showcase existing successful deployments, various types of upskilling material are also hosted by the platform.” The fact that none of the tech companies have their logos on this makes me think it’s probably a genuine attempt to assist culture workers rather than a naked attempt to inject The Machine into every possible corner of the world for pecuniary gain. There are over 100 tools in the database here, so if you’re interested in AI for general purpose, practical use it’s probably worth a quick look.
  • Napkin: This is, I concede, quite dull, but it might also be quite useful. Are you the sort of person who makes slides with diagrams on them? Do you have to get someone else to make the diagrams for you because, fundamentally, you’re a useless design refusenik? Enter Napkin, which will use THE MAGIC OF AI to spin up appropriate, diagrammatic illustrations for your slides based on the copy you feed it – basically you just plug in the on-slide text and it will spit out what it concludes are suitable graphical/diagrammatic representations of said text for you to select, tweak and ultimately use – if you’re the type of, I don’t know, SYSTEMS THINKER who likes to describe complex processes and feedback loops and stuff then this will probably be far too noddy for you; on the other hand, if you’re someone who works in advermarketingpr and whose slides contain concepts which should probably be written in crayon so RIGOROUS are they then this is probably EXACTLY the degree of sophistication you need. As an aside, I have been in many, many meetings over the course of my career with consultants from places like Accenture, and I am entirely convinced that 70% of all monies paid to the people in those companies goes on creating slide templates featuring triangles and arrows in important-looking configurations which mean the square root of fcuk all but very much LOOK businesslike.
  • Hummingbirds: A new(ish) twist on the influencer model! This time with an emphasis on HYPERLOCALITY, though, which is obviously ENTIRELY novel (not in fact really that novel at all), which I suppose makes sense in, say, the US, given the size of the country, but possibly marginally less so somewhere like the UK, where it’s questionable whether the market exists for finding influencers in, say, Maidstone. Still, the premise feels solid – local businesses sign up, set up campaigns that they want influencers to participate in; said influencers sign up, select the brand campaign then want to work on, make their content, get paid, everyone wins! Well, in theory at least – as ever with these things I have…questions about the economics of the whole thing and whether the incentives available are attractive enough to tempt a sufficient volume of creators, or whether the impact of said ‘influence’ is enough at a micro level to make the brand campaigns worthwhile, but should you be less sceptical about all this than I am then you might find the model of interest. BONUS INFLUENCER PLATFORM: this is by possibly the UK’s least-favourite entrepreneur James Watt, the man who singlehandedly managed to render the word ‘punk’ utterly meaningless thanks to his work with Brewdog and who’s now branching out into the influence space himself with his new venture called ‘Social Tip’, where (basically) if you buy something from a brand, said brand can then pay you to talk about how happy you are to have bought said something all over the internet. This doesn’t, apparently, require any form of disclosure whatsoever from the person being paid, as given that they have already made the purchase it’s considered that they are not being induced to promote the product – which strikes me as…something of a grey area which may not remain grey for that much longer should the ASA be paying proper attention. In fact, the whole terms section of the site strikes me as being full of the sort of stuff that feels very much ‘we’re fcuking around! Let’s find out!’, so it will be interesting to see how long this lasts for.
  • Cafeteria: Seeing as we’re doing ‘links vaguely related to advermarketingpr’, here’s Cafeteria, an interesting idea from the US which is designed to let brands get REAL INSIGHTS from REAL TEENS about what they REALLY THINK. They do this by paying them to complete short surveys – the company behind the app has a cohort of teens signed up, presumably with a reasonable demographic split (this is North America only, I think) and paying them to answer questions about what they’re into, the brands they like, etc etc. Kids get asked to participate at most a couple of times a month, to prevent burnout or, presumably, them gaming the system to earn lots of pocket cash; participants get paid upto $20 to participate, which seems like an awful lot of money for this to be in anyway practically scaleable, but, then again, American budgets are American budgets. Worth being aware of if your job has anything to do with ‘knowing what the kids are into’ (if that’s the case you really are reading the wrong newsletter).
  • Walkcast: This is a really lovely idea which is sadly ruined by the appalling LLM-generated copy – Walkcast is basically an AI-generated podcast which spins up a story based on where you are in the world. As far as I can tell what happens here is that there’s a combination of geolocation (which tells the programme where you are), light prompting (which generates the story based on the aforementioned location data), and text-to-voice (which streams it into your ears), resulting in a new, location-specific story delivered to you whenever you want it. Which is in theory SO COOL, but is totally undermined by the fact that the tone is so utterly grating, full of the sort of horrendous, vaguely-millennial-inflected slop that is an LLMs default output. As previously discussed here, it is HARD to make The Machine write anything non-businessish that isn’t awful to read, but they could at least have attempted to mitigate the baseline mediocrity here a bit. Feels like there is an idea in here with a bit of tweaking, though – oh, this came via the excellent Sentiers, by the way, which continues to be a great newsletter for futures-type writing and thinking.
  • The UFO Timeline: This is a great little project by amateur UFOlogist (is that the term? Apologies if I’ve just used the community equivalent of hatespeech here) by one Sam Lingle (HI SAM LINGLE!) who decided that it was quite annoying to keep track of the history of UFO investigations and discoveries and that what was needed was a website which presented a timeline of what was learned when – A UFO TIMELINE, IF YOU WILL! Ahem. This is GREAT, even if, like me, you are…unconvinced as to the existence of extraterrestrial life (or, perhaps more accurately, are unconvinced of the extent to which extraterrestrial life is interested in hanging out with us), and it taught me that the earliest recorded instance of alleged alien abduction occurred in the 1770s in Sweden, when one Jacob Jacobsson ‘came face to face with short, humanoid beings and a chubby man wearing a red cap’ and was somehow disappeared by them for four days (I don’t mean to be sceptical here, but I’m guessing it was easier to spin yarns like this in the late-18th Century). Anyway, this is a really nice personal project which is far better-coded than it probably needs to be, and is a pleasant way of spending 10 minutes learning about all the different parts of the world that have seen citizens claiming to have been ‘probed by the greys’.
  • Jordan Stone:I don’t do TikTok, I am not interested in it, and I don’t find it, as a rule, particularly interesting as a medium (I know, I know) – that said, I think Jordan Stone  might be a genius and that their videos are ART. I don’t, honestly, know quite how to explain these to you – they’re a sort of evolution of brainrot content, stitching together and overlaying multiple different videos and music with fx to create something oddly-meditative and poignant and beautiful (I am not joking, seriously, I think this really is quite moving at times), despite being composed from clips that are, objectively, often very, very silly. I can’t quite explain the power of this, but trust me when I tell you that it may be the best thing I’ve seen on the platform all year and I would 100% watch an hour-long supercut of these, ideally very stoned in a comfortable gallery setting.
  • Stop Project 25 – The Comic: To all the North Americans reading this – you poor, poor fcuks, seriously, this election has been going on for approximately three decades and it increasingly looks like it might in fact NEVER STOP HAPPENING; it’s exhausting and very boring for the rest of us, but for you it’s exhausting, boring and TERRIFYING, which must be even worse. I am not going to suggest what you do with your vote because a) it’s none of my business, who the fcuk am I to tell you what to do?; and b) I am 99% certain that everyone reading this is a Democrat (the only person I know who actually supports Trump and who might in fact read this is not a US citizen and lives in Mexico, so give a fcuk), but I found this website, which details some of the Project 25 stuff that has so many on the ‘left’ (lol at the idea that the current democratic party could be described in any such way in any rational world) so scared, nicely done – detailing the alleged plans for the post-election Trump supremacy in comicbook format to neatly explain via sequential art exactly how bad it could get for, basically, anyone who isn’t a straight white man. As I’ve said before, part of me does slightly think this is ‘QAnon for liberals’, but, even taking a lot of this with some grains of salt, it’s…a bit troubling. Anyway, hopefully That Fcuking Man will do an Elvis between now and Tuesday so this will all end up being moot (if we all hope hard enough it COULD HAPPEN).
  • Use YouTube As An Instrument: Ooh, this is a FUN little hacked-together toy – plug in any YouTube url and this website lets you assign timestamped portions of the video to individual keys on your laptop, meaning you can basically turn any vid into a customised soundboard; this could be quite a lot of fun for mixing and recording (or if you just want to be able to quickly and easily use the ‘AW YEAH!’ bit from Timmy Mallett’s ‘Itsy Bitsy Teeny Weeny Yellow Polka Dot Bikini’ as an on-demand audio sting for the rest of the day).
  • Battleships: The game of Battleships – you know, the one where you have to guess where your opponents ships are placed on a grid – reimagined as a single-player daily puzzler. This is clever and neat, but I was really bad at it and so it has made me unaccountably grumpy and I don’t feel like praising it anymore than the bare minimum as a result. Sorry.
  • Color Gum: A tiny little puzzler which you will get through in about 5 minutes, and as such a perfect ‘tea and biscuit’ companion – you just need to manoeuver the blob to the goal, ensuring that it’s the right colour when it arrives; simple, but you can see how the mechanic could get quite chewy and complex if you extended it a bit.
  • The ThinkyGames Games Archive: ThinkyGames is a website all about, er, games that require some thought – they recently updated their website, and it now includes this GREAT archive of games, many of which are browser-based and entirely free-to-play, and which will require you to use your brain in some small way but which also include titles for all the major consoles and PC; if you’re after something to play right now then there are dozens of options here, but, equally, if you’d like a resource to help you decide what to play in the future then this is worth bookmarking. SO MANY GREAT GAMES, SO LITTLE TIME.

By Joshua Amirthasingh

THE LAST MIX OF THE WEEK IS THIS FABULOUS AND SOMEHOW-MELLIFLUOUS COLLECTION OF TUNES FROM ALL OVER THE PLACE, SUPERBLY MARSHALLED BY JOI N’JUNO!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • PicVoid: As far as I can tell, these are just found photos from around the web, seemingly all depicting people’s bedrooms or living rooms in a non-specific period that feels…vaguely-early-00s, I think? There’s a certain quality they all share, despite the disparate contents, that give the whole collection an odd, vaguely-hauntological vibe which I very much enjoy – this is PURE VIBES, basically, and not particularly comforting ones.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Kelani Fatai: Fatai is a Nigerian painter who does portraits of figures from Black culture in a sort-of-faux-Renaissance style – I *really* like the look and feel of the work here, and Fatai is set to become VERY FAMOUS quite soon as I think they have been picked to do the cover art for the forthcoming Mama Knowles memoir ‘Matriarch’. YOU SAW HIM HERE FIRST.
  • Devil’s Blush: An account that posts videogame screenshots – honestly, though, that doesn’t come close to expressing the BEAUTY of this. Seriously, the shots are ART – they’re photos of screens, so there’s a very particular quality to the images, and the way the pixels show up, that is SO powerfully of-an-era that it feels like being transported back to your memories of playing Mario on a CRT round your mate’s house (you can read an interview with the person behind it here, should you be so inclined).

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The Labour Party In 2024: We start this week with one of three LRB pieces in this week’s longreads (it really is such a wonderful magazine), this one a synthesis-review of three books on UK politics which presents as more of a ‘state of the Labour Party in 2024’ piece and which, as a general primer on the party and the journey it’s been on over the past 15 years, is absolutely superb. The books it covers include Diane Abbott’s recent autobiography and a recent bio of Starmer, thereby neatly capturing the left and…not-so-left of the party, and delves into the internecine conflict that has characterised much of the past decade (and the past month or so) of the Labour story, and, in general, this is a superb ‘where we are and how we got here’ piece on the current party of Government.
  • Trump and Male Insecurity: I’m keeping it relatively light on the US politics front this week because, well, we’re all fcuking sick of it, aren’t we? An election campaign that feels like it’s been happening since 2014, dominated by the same dreadful man (albeit with a revolving cast of dreadful cheerleaders)…please god let this be over soon (but not, to be clear, in The Bad Way). Anyway, I enjoyed this piece in the Ink about the weird, incredibly insecure masculinity that’s been at the heart of much of the past couple of years of Republican (Trumpian?) rhetoric – the fear that they will take the guns, the meat and the petrol away, thereby depriving red-blooded males across the 50 states of WHAT MAKES MEN MEN – neatly summed up in this paragraph: “Eruptions of hypermasculinity — which is to say, faux masculinity — are reactions against perceived threats to the vertical binary of male and female and produce a rise in the popularity of authoritarianism. As women—and other categories assigned to the female position in power relationships — have moved towards greater equality, those who have counted on an impenetrable floor beneath them (which is also the ceiling above women and others designated as inferior) have become hyper-anxious.“Build the Wall!” really means “Rebuild the Floor!””
  • The Cult of the Founders: Henry Farrell writes about the monomaniacal founders of the Valley, and how we might usefully conceive of them as cult leaders (which, can I just point out, plays neatly into my overarching cultural theory about how the most important prism through which to attempt to understand the post-web era is cults in general – COME TO MY TED TALK, etc etc), and how problems arise when these cult leaders are forced by success or circumstance into instead acting like church leaders, and it’s the conflict between their vision of themselves as being worthy of adulation and ceaseless praise and the practical reality of ‘living in a world with other people that probably ought to be considered too’ that creates so many issues. This neatly encapsulates the core tenet: “Once, they believed that software would eat the world. They’d ride their sandworms from the desert through the shield to their own glory and the despair of their enemies, smash everything up, and create a galactic empire of inspiration and awesomeness. Instead, they found themselves managing self-ramifying and self-perpetuating empires of bureaucracy, submerged beneath memos and trivial decisions, and worst of all, dealing with fcuking HR and surly and subordinate employees who didn’t share their values, nor behave as worshipfully as they ought have done” – as someone who has occasionally had to deal with ‘brilliant’ entrepreneurial types I cannot stress enough how much this chimes with my personal experience.
  • Carbon Inequality Kills: I did a quick search on this, and it was covered, as far as I can tell, in a grand total of three publications this week. Three. FFS HUMANITY!!! Anyway, in a week in which it once again became abundantly clear that we are in no way ready for what we are going to have to accept as ‘weather’ in the coming years, Oxfam published their latest piece of research into the actual climate impact of the super wealthy – and it may not surprise you to learn that you turning your thermostat down by 0.5 degrees this winter isn’t going to make an iota of difference to the climate crisis when you have the hardcore plutes spaffing emissions out left, right and centre. It really is worth reading this – it will make you FURIOUS, but it contains some truly jaw-dropping stats, including this pair which made me just sort of stop and stare, slack-jawed, at the screen for a second while attempting to process them: “If everyone began emitting as much carbon as those in the top 1%, the remaining carbon budget would be gone in fewer than five months; if everyone emitted carbon at the same rate as the luxury transport emissions of 50 of the world’s richest billionaires, the remaining carbon budget would be gone in two days.” FCUKING HELL THOUGH.
  • GPT Search: OpenAI yesterday announced that the long-awaited SearchGPT was here – now paying subscribers (it will be rolled out to everyone else ‘in the coming months’) get access to an LLM which can pull live info from the web when answering questions. I played around with this a bit yesterday, and on the one hand it’s pretty good and works as you might expect (it’s basically like Perplexity – I couldn’t tell you which is ‘better’ at present); on the other, though, WOW is this going to be…interesting in terms of truth and knowledge and stuff. Per all of these things, answers are delivered as summaries with linked ‘footnote’-style sources so you can see where The Machine’s pulling the info from; the thing is that there’s no guarantee that it’s going to go to the best sources, and when it’s drawing from something that itself is already a synthesis of sources you can see that tracking back to the source of a ‘fact’ is going to get…tricky. Turns out, for example, that OpenAI’s model has ingested exactly the same incredibly-racist non-science as Perplexity and Copilot, because it gave me exactly the same answers as those highlighted in this piece when asking about IQ scores – this feels like something that is quite quickly going to become…problematic.
  • Be Like Water: The second piece in a week from the smart agency people Nemesis, which I feel slightly bad about because, well, I don’t really care about marketing or brands any more (lol, I never cared, ever), but I appreciate that some of you sadly still do and as a result might find this piece, which is a really good, clear and simple primer on ‘how to think about selling stuff and how, specifically, the question of ‘brand’ works in the context of that selling’ – this might be the sort of thing that those of you who regularly mainline Binet and Field and Mcluhan might all scoff at as TODDLER STUFF, but I liked it because it’s very, very unpretentious and doesn’t try and dress this stuff up as more complicated than it actually is (BECAUSE IT’S NOT FCUKING COMPLICATED, WHATEVER YOU CNUTS ON LINKEDIN WHO SPEND YOUR ENTIRE FCUKING LIVES WRITING ESSAYS ABOUT ADS THAT YOU DIDN’T MAKE AND YET ON WHICH YOU HAVE SEEMINGLY INCREDIBLY-STRONG OPINIONS SEEM TO THINK SERIOUSLY WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU WHY ARE YOU LIKE THIS?).
  • My Bad Bot: Katie Notopoulos writes for Business Insider about her odd experience of having a bot of her on Instagram – Meta’s new ‘make an AI of yourself!’ feature’s open to a limited set of users, and lets you effectively train an AI on your output to create a ‘digital you’ that can respond to DMs because, I don’t know, you want to maintain the illusion of approachability but at the same time don’t actually want to interact with your ‘fans’? No idea what the point of this is, basically – and neither does Notopoulos, who realises early on that the bot is incapable of speaking in anything other than horrifically-stilted millennial cringe. Still, it doesn’t matter that this stuff is sh1t, and pointless, and literally noone seems to want it – IT’S A-COMING!
  • Who Owns The Culture Scans?: This is super-interesting, and raises a question which feels like it’s going to become more and more pertinent as so much of the physical gets digitised and, eventually, ingested – there’s an online community around a website called Sketchfab which lets users upload scans of physical objects and host them there for free, and it’s mainly comprised of people working in the cultural or institutional sector, making 3d scans of museum collections and keeping them on Sketchfab as a global resource for anyone who might want to access and use them. Except now Sketchfab has been bought by Epic Games, and there’s no guarantee that this freedom of use is going to continue – Epic being…pretty keen on monetisation, overall. In a nutshell, “Sketchfab is no longer accepting new seller applications, and has invited existing Sketchfab creators to migrate their models to Fab, which launched last week. Epic Games has also not made clear what the plan for free and open access 3D models on Sketchfab is after 2025, but it says that it will provide those users an alternative solution eventually and plenty of notice on how that transition will work. The Sketchfab users I talked to have a variety of specific concerns about this transition, but ultimately they are all worried that Fab is a marketplace designed for Epic Games to make a profit on sales, whereas Sketchfab prioritized open access and the ability to share 3D models for free.” This sort of thing might feel a bit niche, but I can’t stress enough how important these questions are going to become in the coming years, and how important the creation and maintenance of public, freely-accessible digital materials is (and, conversely, how bad it will be if we let private interests gate stuff like this).
  • I Am My Own Legal Department: A post by Molly White – of ‘web3 is going great’ fame, amongst other things – about the oddity of being a solo media empire (my term, not hers), and all the different hats you need to be able to wear (legal! Marketing! HR! Sales!), and how tHe CrEaT0r eC0nOmY, at its heart, basically requires that said creators do all of this stuff, and how it’s…hard. I feel this will resonate for many of you out there attempting to Do Your Own Thing – in particular, I really like the acknowledgement that this sort of life/work really is not for everyone, and to assume that ‘oh, just go indie!’ is an option for everyone is, basically, dumb.
  • Character Amnesia in China: Ooh, this is SO interesting and feels like an excellent basis for a bit of creepy speculative fiction – did you know that there’s a genuine phenomenon amongst speakers (or, more accurately, writers) of the Chinese language whereby people simply…forget how to write certain characters? I did not, and was fascinated by this article explaining the phenomenon – basically it’s partly a result of the complexity of the written language and the full characterset, and the largely non-phonetic nature of the relationship between spoken Chinese and the corresponding written characters. This is SO interesting, not least in terms of what it reveals about how the brain works and how we relate language and symbolic representation of said language.
  • Who’s Afraid of GenAlpha?: On the YOUNG, and how they are TERRIFYING – specifically how there’s a generation of kids who are growing up with a degree of preternatural confidence as a result of being trained on TikTok and influencer content to be FABULOUS at all times and how that is playing out in the real world, specifically the classroom. To be clear, the author doesn’t wholly buy the ‘these kids are terrifying!’ thesis, but I do think there’s something in the idea that a generation raised on ‘like and subscribe!’-type personalities as opposed to, I don’t know, Ed The Duck might turn out a bit different. For what it’s worth, I sat in front of three 11 year old boys at a show last weekend and, apart from the fact they said ‘what the skibidi sigma?’ literally every 5 minutes, they were adorable (it was a screening of Ghostbusters, in case you’re interested, and their reaction to the bit where Sigourney Weaver gets all lusty at Bill Murry was literally to make concerned noises about ‘consent’ which was just TOO PERFECT).
  • RIP Tiger Tiger: In memory of central London nightspot Tiger Tiger, a genuinely appalling ‘nightclub’ which basically acted as a byword for ‘a certain type of person on a certain type of night out’ for much of the 00s. I had honestly forgotten this place existed until I learned it had finally shut down this week, but this article rather wonderfully captures ‘the vibe’ and the era that birthed it in which the mainstream suddenly realised that there was a LOT of money to be made by selling the idea of ‘clubbing’ to people who didn’t really like dance music and who were a bit scared of drugs. “The Piccadilly original opened the year before Fabric, in 1998, and in its own way came from the same spirit. The mass market democratisation of clubbing, the peak of the superclub era. Tiger Tiger was a place for people who had no clue about A Guy Called Gerald and found the drugs stuff way too weird. It came from the same genus as the Australian-themed Walkabout bars, the great sheds of cheap booze and bad pop that once stood at Charing Cross, Embankment and Shepherd’s Bush. If you didn’t know the names of any real clubs, well, these were always open, and always reassuringly the same.” MEMORIES. SO MANY TERRIBLE MEMORIES.
  • Translation: A beautiful essay by Emily Wilson, on translation and picking the right word or phrase or alighting on the exact sentence structure that reveals the meaning of the original text in its new language. Here she writes about attempting to perfect one specific line in the Odyssey – this is SO interesting, both on the act of translation itself and on the particular challenges of doing so from Ancient Greek, and will appeal to any of you who are either multilingual or just really, really like words and playing around with them.
  • The Food of Amazon Marketplace: On the cooks in New York who are running small-scale food operations out of their houses and selling through Facebook Marketplace – I’ve featured this sort of operation before, but previously it’s been sales via Whatsapp groups rather than anything this public. Does this happen in the UK? It feels vaguely like it might – or that it will soon.
  • Wonder Kitchen: This also feels like a taste of things to come (sorry for the unintentional, appalling wordplay there) – Wonder Kitchen is a new initiative in the US which basically takes the Dark Kitchen template and ramps it up a notch, with big name restaurants from all over the country having their recipes standardised, tweaked and made mass-market-viable, and then sold under a single umbrella retail brand within which customers can order a mix-and-match selection of dishes from a range of different restaurants. The difference between this and the dark kitchen model that came of age during Covid is that those were all made-up brands, invented to pop on an app; these, by contrast, are actual, bricks-and-mortar restaurants putting their name to the dishes, giving a degree of cachet to the offering but at the same time posing no small risk to the original venue should the quality of the deliverable versions drop off. Anyway, expect this to come to the UK before too long, allowing you to order a meal composed of, I don’t know, an American Hot, one of Max’s Sandwiches and an Almost Famous burger (all of which will arrive cold and oddly-rubbery, and which will cost you the fat end of £100) – God, I can’t WAIT.
  • The New Primal Scream Album: I have never really understood Primal Scream as a band – never liked any of their records, and Gillespie always struck me as a massive tool (see also: Richard Ashcroft. I bet they’re both DEVASTATED about this) – which is why I very much enjoyed this absolute SHOEING given to their new album by JR Moores in The Quietus. Honestly, this really is a proper going over – enjoy this snippet and then get involved with the whole thing, it really is VERY cathartic: “The first voices to appear on the album are those of a gospel choir, which indicates they are going to do a lot of the heavy lifting on the choruses throughout the LP. That’s true of the next track, ‘Love Insurrection’, and the backing singers do try their best despite it having a vocal melody that barely exists. That applies to the next song, too. So it continues. Then there are the words, on which Gillespie worked so hard before whining them into the least fortunate microphone since that owned by Morrissey. To say this 63-year-old is still writing sixth-form poetry is an insult to the nuanced submissions of this year’s A-Level candidates.”
  • What Actually Else Is There: Ok, this is VERY LONG (seriously, I read it over three evenings) and it is VERY HARD (hence the three evenings), but, honestly, I really do promise you it’s worth the time and the effort, because it is also BEAUTIFUL and fascinating and so so so smart, and you will, I promise, feel like a marginally more clever person when you finish reading it. It also made me cry twice, weirdly, despite not really being that sort of piece at all. This is Jenny Turner, writing about the life and work of Gillian Rose, a philosopher whose work I wasn’t previously familiar with who dealt in critical theory and Hegelian philosophy (hence in large part the ‘hard’ comment – I don’t know about you, but critical theory has always made my head hurt and this is no exception), and while there’s a lot of discussion of her work and thinking there’s also a lot about her life, and how Turner’s life intersected with hers as a student, and, basically, this is as much a love story as it is anything else; Turner’s love for Rose, Rose’s love for ideas and thinking…really, I promise you that this is gorgeous and worthwhile – and, even if you can’t face the whole thing, can I just ask that you click the link and ctrl+f for ‘barbarism’ and read the three or four paras there because it feels…very apt, frankly.
  • Wine and the French: The last LRB link this week is this wonderful piece of writing by known francophile Julian Barnes about the historical relationship between the French and wine. There are some great anecdotes in this – not least the one which mentions the fact that ‘drinking in moderation’ in France c.1900 was classified as ‘no more than four litres of wine a day’, and which once again proves that if you go back far enough in history everyone was, basically, half-cut ALL THE TIME – and it then takes a…darker turn with the second half, which explains how the French army basically used booze as a means of control over soldiers when they were being asked to do frankly-suicidal things like ‘run at a machine gun nest’. Barnes, as ever, writes superbly, and this is just fascinating overall. FOUR LITRES THOUGH.
  • Rubbish in the Maldives: A few years ago I was lucky enough to visit the Maldives – I know, I know, but I had had a VERY BAD (couple of) year(s) – and one of the things that struck me (other than the very odd and not particularly pleasant realisation that the act of going to see a thing can in circumstances such as this one make it slightly more unlikely that future generations will be able to see it) was the fact that Male, the main island of the archipelago, is, in large part, an enormous rubbish dump. This piece by Lawrence Lenhart tells some of the stories of the people who try and manage the waste in the region, and I can’t pretend it’s not…a touch dispiriting, but it really is very well-written indeed.
  • My Marriage Was A Scavenger Hunt: The story of a marriage, in retrospect. Addiction, depression, lies told to yourself and your partner – this is quietly devastating but very beautiful. Another one that made me weep like a baby, fwiw.
  • Falling Through: Finally this week, an excellent little scifi story by Steen Comer, taking the ‘what if every now and again you woke up in a slightly-different but still-recognisable timeline, with no control over when?’ plot device and spinning gold out of it. Excellent from start to finish.

By Gerard DuBois

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS (WHICH WANTED TO INCLUDE THIS ONE TOO BUT COULDN’T WORK OUT A WAY TO EMBED IT, SO HAVE THIS EXCELLENT TRACK AND NSFW VID FROM AMYL AND THE SNIFFERS AS A BONUS)!:

Webcurios 25/10/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

It’s still, technically, Summer here in the UK, until Sunday morning at least – WHY AM I SO FCUKING COLD THEN?

Yes, that’s right, we’ve reached that phase of the year when all I can seem to think about is how fcuking cold my fingers are when I am typing this fcuking thing, and whether I should finally bite the bullet and lean into my general ‘ageing vagrant’ vibe by purchasing a pair of fingerless gloves (and yes, I am aware that ‘heating’ exists, but I am also aware of exactly what the ‘matt’s employability mapped over time’ graph looks like and as such am holding off for the moment); you, though, don’t care about that (or at least I presume you don’t; in the unlikely event that you find yourself somehow moved by my frigid plight, feel free to, I don’t know, set fire to me next time you see me), you’re only here for the links.

FINE WELL HERE ARE YOUR FCUKING LINKS THEN SEE IF I CARE.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you almost certainly didn’t come here to be abused, but, well, here we are.

By Joyce Lee

WE KICK OFF THIS WEEK WITH THE NEW UNDERWORLD ALBUM WHICH IS OUT TODAY AND WHICH REALLY IS EXCELLENT! 

THE SECTION WHICH SPENT A LONG TIME IN THE PUB LAST NIGHT DISCUSSING HOW, BASICALLY, EVERYTHING THAT’S SH1T IN THE WORLD CAN BE BLAMED ON THE 1990s AND WHICH IS NOW PRETTY FIRMLY CONVINCED OF THAT THESIS, PT.1:  

  • Change The NHS: One thing that one can say for the British, almost entirely without exception, is that if you give them the opportunity to show off how ‘clever’ and ‘funny’ they are on a public platform they will grab it with both hands (and then possibly start doing some sort of embarrassing dance with it, onstage, while mugging at a nonexistent audience in the hope of some sort of laughter and applause). From the strangely-unshakeable impulse to write ‘yes please!’ on forms when asked to confirm one’s sex, to Dom Laurelli (RIP), a kid I went to school with, who turned the final page of our GCSE Design & Tech exam into a self-portrait, under which he wrote to his unseen examiner ‘look into my eyes before you fail me’, we simply can’t resist the opportunity for clowning. Which is why it was so…surprising to see this week that the country’s National Health Service, the creaking public health infrastructure which is increasingly failing to cope with us all not having the common decency to die in our 60s like we used to, decided to launch its public consultation, asking the public to contribute their own ideas as to how the service might be ameliorated, in such a way that everyone’s suggestions were public and searchable. Which, obviously, meant that as soon as people realised this, thousands of bored office monkeys the length of the country decided that it was time to unleash their inner Swift and get all HUMOROUS AND SATIRICAL with their proposals, and resulted in the platform being flooded with ‘gags’ – it took them about 24h to realise this and implement some sort of backend fix, but today if you visit the site now all the suggestions seem to be tediously sensible and practically banal. Thankfully some of the best of the flurry of comic responses are preserved in this thread – there are some glorious ones in here, but my personal favourite was ‘get rid of computers’, a degree of bloody-minded luddism which I sort-of respect. Anyway, this was all very amusing for 24h but, equally, was also slightly enervating from the point of view of someone who’s designed and implemented stuff like this before and can’t quite believe anyone was naive enough to launch it like that (and yes, one *could* perhaps believe that it was a deliberate ploy to drive awareness of and interest in the consultation, but given it was trailed in every single paper and on the morning broadcast rounds, I’m going to suggest that that probably wasn’t necessary).
  • Redact-a-Chat: I’m slightly less enamoured of this than I was about 35s ago as I just realised it’s another MSCHF project and, while I admire the indefatigable creativity, I would prefer to feature stuff that carries less of the whiff of the trust fund. Still, I can’t help but be slightly in love with this VERY SILLY website, which is, very simply, a chatroom where users can only use each word in the English language once a day – after it’s been used once, future instances of it in the chat will be redacted, meaning that after a short while each day you have to be VERY creative with your phrasing and word choices to get anything to show up at all. The nice thing about this is that you can spin up your own instance of the chat, with a separate, private ‘room’ accessible only to those with the link, which means that you can (if you like – and, honestly, I really do!) maybe create one of these as an alternative to your groupchat platform of choice and add an interesting sense of verbal scarcity to your dull quotidian FPL captaincy debates. Ooh, even better, why not challenge your colleagues to use ONLY this platform for all professional communications today, thereby adding a real air of jeopardy to requests made later in the day which are rendered as a series of ‘redacted’s? Go on, it’s not like what you do for a living matters anyway.
  • The Half Bakery: Oh my WORD, this is some OLD internet. The Half Bakery is a site from…Christ, it’s hard to tell, but it feels like it was born sometime around 2000, and I certainly remember hearing about it in the early years of the 21stC as an example of ‘look at all the amazing creative and fun and silly things that the web is enabling!’ (how naive we were, how young, how…hopeful, and yet to bruise)…anyway, it was basically a very early forum/community-type-place where anyone could submit an idea they had, however half-baked (hence, inevitably, the name), and other users could vote on them, and FCUKING HELL there is some gold in here. Seriously, this is a collection of brilliant, funny, dumb and occasionally-borderline-genius ideas, just sort of sitting here waiting for someone to do something with them. Why hasn’t anyone yet done ‘Gogglebox, but for bongo’ (I am paraphrasing here a suggestion made by one MrThingy on September 6 2000)? Why has noone yet built a social network where posts are restricted to a single character (suggested by nineteenthly  on August 03 2011)? Why is the person who suggested an industry based on the idea of burying people with seeds, which they termed ‘morticulture’ xenzag, August 2 2006), not a millionaire?! Honestly, there is stuff in here that could CHANGE THE WORLD, so why not spend a few minutes having a delve and deciding which of these you’re going to make your singleminded obsession?
  • Today Is Crisp Sandwich Day: Matt Round at Vole has spent the past four years making 25 October – aka the feast day of St Crispin – the official day on which the making and consumption of crisp (potato chip, for the north Americans out there) sandwiches is celebrated, so this is your reminder that a) this is TODAY!; and b) you might want to adjust your dining plans accordingly. If nothing else this feels like the sort of thing that should be marked by a special lunch in the workplace. Beautifully, the library of stock photos of crisp sandwiches that Matt started a few years ago is now bafflingly hundreds of pictures strong, containing just over 600 images of potato snacks trapped between slices of bread. Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT?
  • Good Mourning: Do you remember when the Queen died? Of course you do, you’ve only recently taken down the commemorative ‘keep calm and keep weeping’ bunting! What you might not remember, though, is the very strange spectacle of seemingly every single website of every single UK business deciding it was imperative that they modify their homepages to ensure that their exhortations to BUY BUY BUY were delivered…respectfully, and in shades of grey, BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT SHE WOULD HAVE WANTED! Thankfully for those of you with a less-than-eidetic recollection of minor bits of website redesign, the indefatigable Zef spent his mourning period in 2022 taking screencaps of all the RESPECT and has now compiled them into this single website for your viewing pleasure. So it is that we can see how RESPECTFUL dildo peddlers Ann Summers were as they essayed the tricky balancing act of ‘remembering the passing of a near-centenarian monarch’ and ‘getting you off with latex assistance’, and we can rejoice in the bittersweet memories elicited by the still-poignant juxtaposition of a memorial banner for HRH and the Co-Op’s desperate need to shift units by advertising ‘Five Freezer Faves for £5’. This is BRILLIANT, and a perfect reminder of what a country that has basically just lost its collective sh1t looked like.
  • WhenPhoto: Not an *entirely* original premise, but fcukit, it’s FUN and FRIVOLOUS and oddly addictive – this is a small game which asks you to do the ‘guess when this photo was taken’ thing for a selection of images, giving you points depending on how close you are to the actual year in which the image was created, and it’s fascinating how one’s ability to be granular about decades, etc, diminishes as one goes further back in time.
  • Dippy: This week saw the…first, I think, instance of a chatbot being cited in a lawsuit in a death – but almost certainly not the last! – which feels like an appropriate time to introduce you to the latest in the seemingly-neverending cavalcade of ‘spicy chat interfaces’ for the apparently-equally-infinite market of people who really, really want to have horny text conversations with an autocomplete model. I read some interviews with the CEO this week who spouted some guff about mental health and the importance of having someone to speak to at 3am when your anxiety spikes, but, honestly, click the link and look at the homepage and then come back and tell me what YOU think this service is advertising with its weirdly-muscular twink avatar and slightly-sinister ‘The Day Your Boyfriend’s Mask Slipped’ tagline, suggesting that maybe, just MAYBE, this is in fact being marketed at people who’d like their werewolf bongo just a *touch* more interactive. Anyway, there are a BUNCH of different ‘personas’ (horny roleplay companions) created by the platform and the ‘community’ (apparently this has half a million users, though that very much sounds like a number designed for fundraising purposes rather than one based in reality), and scrolling through the available bots it’s clear that there’s a heavy skew here to masc-presenting avatars which all seem to present as a variation on ‘troubled boyfriend who’s all manipulative and stuff but also REALLY LOVES YOU’, which makes me think this is mainly being explored by horny teenage girls who’ve read a LOT of questionable YA romance. Anyway, look, I have no idea who clicks on what, so if you decide to give this a go and frot yourself to the point of chafing to the textual promptings of a virtual lover then it is your secret and yours alone.
  • Deaddit: Reddit, but where all the posts are written by AI! Totally pointless, obviously, but I thought there was something quite interesting about how The Machine has very much nailed the tone of a certain corner of Reddit, that odd, edges-sanded-off English that you get in international, post-web digital spaces. You can see a list of all the ‘subReddits’ here – I spent longer than I care to admit yesterday reading the ‘conspiracies’ section which, honestly, I sort-of forgot was all AI-generated after a while because it REALLY reads convincingly; if you scroll down within posts there are even comments sections with the bots arguing amongst themselves which, again, are…weirdly convincing. If you weren’t vaguely worried at the prospect of the web being flooded with AI content to the point of us no longer having any reasonable clue what’s by actual humans and what’s by The Machine, then, well, click this link and let the fear start to build.
  • Azar: “Every generation gets its own Chatroulette” is in no way an accepted Truth About The World, but I am increasingly convinced it should be. Azar is the latest product to basically do the Chatroulette thing (see also Omegle and the rest) – the app/website is Korean and has apparently existed in various forms for a decade, but I stumbled across it this week with it being touted as a ‘fun way to meet and chat with new people from around the world’. The way it works is standard – you click in, it pairs you with a strangers somewhere in the world for a videochat that lasts as long as you both maintain the connection – but there are some 2024-appropriate quality of life upgrades to the base level experience, namely the promise that they have a whole bunch of AI stuff in the background to, basically, minimise the possibility of anyone ever needing to see some unwanted dong (I presume it’s general nudity-recognition rather than specific c0ck-recognition, but, well, it’s not women who tend to inflict their unasked-for junk on strangers, as a rule) or hear a racism. Obviously I have NO IDEA how well this stuff works, and I only really used this for about 30s the other day because, honestly, it is VERY CLEARLY aimed at kids and as such I felt…well, honestly, a bit wrong using it, like some sort of weird, wrinkled interloper in the land of the smooth-skinned and hopeful. On that note, though, it’s worth being aware of the fact that ‘premium users’ can pay to select their pool of interlocutors based on gender and location, which feels…rather more perv-friendly than I personally would be happy with.
  • Hatom: To be clear – I do not understand what this is AT ALL, other than it has something to do with crypto and so therefore is almost certainly a borderline-criminal grift…but no matter, because this website is GLORIOUS. “Building synergistic DEFI primitives”, screams the homepage, as though those words in that configuration are meant to mean anything, while a strange sort of CG…embryo? floats in the background. Click and hold and listen as the voiceover takes you on a JOURNEY, and speaks to you of “a time when the old principles of finance must be shattered and replaced with a fresh breath of hope” – which I have to applaud as one of the most spectacularly-mangled bits of copy I’ve experienced all year, THANKS HATOM! Look, there are LAYERS to this website, and, for reasons known only to the coked-up-madmen behind…whatever this is, there’s a CG griffon that appears on the second page, and, look, this is almost certainly a complete scam but it is SO preposterously-shiny that I can’t quite bring myself to hate it. “INCENTIVIZING GROWTH WITH THE BOOSTER” – YES LADS SIGN ME UP!
  • Sylva Labs: I don’t want to make fun of this – I really don’t! It’s a small business, it’s all green and sustainable and stuff, and the design and look and feel suggests that the people behind it are talented! – but, equally, I couldn’t help but snigger a *bit* at a website offering the chance to buy bottles of ‘experimental dark sipping spirit’ for £40, when it turns out that ‘experimental dark sipping spirit’ is in fact…a non-alcoholic whisky-analogue drink made from, er, old planks of wood. Look lads, I am sure this is INCREDIBLY nice but for £40 a bottle I want a hangover, sorry.
  • The Feeld Magazine: After that other dating website – was it Hinge? Sorry, I forget – did that ‘love stories from the apps’ magazine-style promo campaign earlier this year featuring writing by Roxane Gay and others, so another dating app, this time Feeld (the one for people who like to bore other people about how sexually open they are), has launched its own mag – except as far as I can tell this is going to be a proper literary endeavour, with a (theoretically) long-term vision and all that jazz. They’ve certainly spent the money on the inaugural authorial lineup, with some VERY impressive contemporary names who won’t have come cheap, and a puffpiece in the NYT which very clearly seeks to place the mag in some sort of lineage of the New York literati (and which contains a moment halfway through which does rather threaten to derail the whole thing – you’ll understand what I mean when you get there, I promise). Anyway, this is interesting in part because some of the writing is excellent – the Tulathimutti piece for example is very good indeed – but also because I think print is still hugely underutilised in advermarketingpr these days.
  • Ask Trev: Another weird website from a half-remembered past, this – no idea how I came across it again this week, but it sparked vague recollections of an early-00s launch and some media appearances by Trevor Nelson who was one of the founders…AskTrev was launched as a kind of jocular response to the popular perception amongst a certain generation that people called Trevor were a bit…plodding, perhaps, and not exactly intellectual heavyweights – AskTrev was designed to prove that that wasn’t in fact true, with a team of dedicated Trevors (all men called Trevor) on hand to answer questions and offer help with a whole range of things (see? SEE HOW FUN THE INTERNET USED TO BE, WHEN PEOPLE JUST DID FUN AND VAGUELY SILLY STUFF LIKE THIS AND EVERTYTHING DIDN’T HAVE TO BE A FCUKING VIDEO????). Basically this is a directory of contact emails for Trevors who are willing to answer your questions, sorted by subject – I cannot in any way vouch for the quality of the advice being offered by the Trevors here, or indeed how many of the email addresses are still in operation, but I can’t help but adore the general ethos on display here: “TrevorsTogether.com is a completely free service. But nowadays, people don’t trust ‘free’, they don’t believe ‘free’. There must be a catch, and unfortunately, there is in most cases. But not here. Ask a question, get an answer, pay nothing. Job done. Why is it free? It’s free because a group of people, all called Trevor decided they wanted their name to be synonymous with generosity, charity and kindness. The truth is that for some years now, ‘Trevor’ is a name too often in the media,  given to either a Geek or a Nitwit. And strangely, there’s no historical provenance for it. No ‘trigger’ which started this trend. It seems to have evolved from nowhere.  So, you could call this endeavour a Trevor fightback. A wrong which is finally being put right, towards a time when Trevor = Help.” YES TREVS FIGHT BACK.
  • /r/London Fights Back: Ok, so this is just a link to a single Reddit post, but I like what it represents. This is someone complaining on the London sub about how their favourite sandwich shop was featured by a TikToker recently and fcuked into oblivion by the resultant footfall – the conversation it spawned has eventually led to the wider community realising that, if Reddit’s going to be a major source of ongoing information to LLMs then there’s a real chance to influence the future content of said LLMs by changing what we write about now…and, as a result, it’s entirely possible that we can embed the concept of the appalling Aberdeen Angus Steakhouse chain of restaurants as being THE ultimate dining destination simply via the medium of bigging it up repeatedly on the platform. Which is why this week has seen HUNDREDS of posts on Reddit waxing lyrical about how amazing the places are, and how they are must-visit destinations, and, honestly, whether this works or not I love the ingenuity on display here (and also, this is 100% a tactic that the right brand could reuse with a bit of humour for PR purposes).
  • The Power Rangers Auction: Do you want a chance to bid on a styrofoam weapon from the Power Rangers TV show? Do you want to get a chance to find out what a latex mask that’s been worn across hundreds of hours of filming under studio lights smells like on the inside? DO YOU WANT TO BUY THE PINK RANGER COSTUME? Click the link, examine the lots and BID!

By Owen Gent

WE NOW TURN TO FORMER EDITOR PAUL, WHO ONCE AGAIN BRINGS US A SELECTION OF BLEEPS AND BEATS AND SQUELCHES WITH A MIX OF TECHNO AND TRANCE WHICH IS LIKE BEING AT A RAVE BUT WITHOUT HAVING TO DEAL WITH THAT ANNOYING FCUKER WITH THE FLAMING POI!

THE SECTION WHICH SPENT A LONG TIME IN THE PUB LAST NIGHT DISCUSSING HOW, BASICALLY, EVERYTHING THAT’S SH1T IN THE WORLD CAN BE BLAMED ON THE 1990s AND WHICH IS NOW PRETTY FIRMLY CONVINCED OF THAT THESIS, PT.2:  

  • Bluesky Follower Bridge: It does rather feel that Twitter’s long, drawn-out decline entered a new phase recently, what with That Fcuking Man’s decision to further-ensh1tten the platform by nerfing the Block function, and one does wonder what will happen should That Other Fcuking Man lose the US election in 10 days and the whole ‘turn Twitter into a hypodermic for the injection of right-wing filth into the mind of the populace!’ plan turns out to have been a bust – I’m not convinced he won’t just shut it all down in a fit of pique should Trump lose, basically. Anyway, this has also resulted in another swathe of users decamping to Bluesky, which still feels a but ghostly but which is slowly filling up – having had something go small-v-viral on there this week, I can confirm that it’s JUST as annoying! – which means you might find this Chrome extension useful – basically it lets you really easily find people you follow, and who follow you, on Twitter over on the other platform, and then follow them all (there’s no batch-follow, you have to do it manually, but it’s not that onerous). Worth a go, given everything (and the fact that by all accounts Threads continues to be a horrible, empty parody of a place and there’s really nowhere else to go anymore).
  • The Art of Spongebob: Spongebob’s another modern cultural touchstone that I never really connected with – partly age, I think, partly a lack of cable/satellite telly – but I am aware that for a significant swathe of people it’s seemingly of almost-Biblical significance; this, then, is for YOU, a Twitter account which exists to share art from the series, sketches and concept drawings and early animations, and basically anything from the archives that highlights the inventiveness and humour of the art style, which, objectively, is undeniable. There’s a really nice piece on the account here, including an interview with the person who runs it, who’s only 19 and who had it handed to them by a previous mod/owner…I think there’s something quietly wonderful about accounts like these being passed down from one generation to another, like a digital version of old recipes or the keys to the Satanic lodge or whatever.
  • Cheers: Another week, another attempt to pull the general idea of ‘dating’ out of the seemingly-terminal nosedive it finds itself in, via…another app! Except, no, wait, this one’s different, promise! Only available in New York at the time of writing, the gimmick with Cheers is that it leverages your friends to help you find love; you reach out to your friends to get them to fill in your profile and recommend you, matches are suggested based on profiling but also the degree to which your friend network (in-app, obvs) overlaps, and you can get your friends to do introductions to mutuals for you…look, I am sure that there are parts of this that feel SAFE and HELPFUL, but, equally, it also sounds like an awful lot of faff and hard work, and that it depends a LOT on you getting all your friends to sign up just so that YOU can have a better chance of MEETING THE ONE, which, honestly, feels perhaps a *touch* solipsistic (and like it could result in SO much messiness, depending on what your friendship group is like). Anyway, coud one of you in NYC try this out and let me know what it’s like? Thanks!
  • Plaid Patterns: Would you like a website which contains a seemingly-infinite quantity of plaids, along with the ability to create your own ENTIRELY UNIQUE version? No, I can’t imagine that any of you have been searching for such a thing, nor indeed that you will have the faintest idea of what to do with it, but I just give you the urls, it’s up to you to work out what they’re for ffs.
  • Tron1: Despite what the Muskian misdirection machine wants us to think, I do not personally believe that we are all going to have humanoid robotic assistants anytime in the near future – that said, it’s obvious that domestic robotics of some sort are very much a coming thing (or if not ‘domestic’ then at the very least ‘everyday’), as evidenced by this latest off-the-shelf product being sold by Chinese manufacturer LimX Dynamics. The Tron1 is, basically, one of those odd bipedal walker type things that they had in Star Wars, except (at least per the promo materials) without the front-mounted murder cannons, which can either walk or wheel itself around, and can be remote controlled or programmed and, as far as I can tell, is intended to let people get to grips with robotics and AI rather than being something intended to be any sort of home helper. It’s $15k’s worth of kit, so probably not for the average hobbyist, but I can imagine a certain type of person becoming almost painfully aroused at the thought of all the uses they could put this to.
  • Animal Futures: A pleasingly shiny bit of digital by the RSPCA here, designed to help educate children about the climate emergency and what it might mean for the world’s animal life and biodiversity in general – via a really nice graphical interface, users can click around and explore different environments, investigating how different potential future scenarios will impact them, and the animals that inhabit them. On the one hand this is really nicely made – on the other, I can’t help but feel…well, it’s all a bit depressing, isn’t it? All the scenarios are named things like ‘climate carnage’, or indicate a future in which we’ve gone hell-for-leather on tech at the expense of the poor critters…except for one specific scenario, presented as utopian, which sees everyone suddenly deciding that animals are just as important as we are, actually, and all going vegan simultaneously overnight, thanks to AI technology enabling us to talk to all of the creatures…and, look, I am just not 100% convinced telling kids that whichever way you look at it the environment seems pretty much utterly fcuked, EXCEPT if we can learn to talk to the animals and empathise with them, because, well, I’m not totally convinced that one’s ever going to happen. Still, really nice graphics here so well done on that front.
  • Text Behind Image: Would you like to be able to manipulate an image with text in it so that the text appears BEHIND the primary element in the image rather than in front of it? Do you inexplicably not have access to any photoshop-type software? Bookmark this website, then.
  • Are Socks Hard To Knit?: My kneejerk reaction to this would be “only the middle bit”, but should you wish to explore the question in (much, much) more detail then you might enjoy this webpage by one Luisa Vasquez, in which she interrogates the issue to discover whether, actually, socks are indeed tricky or whether YOU are just sh1t at knitting. I shan’t spoil the answer for you, but Luisa goes LONG on this – here’s her methodology, should you be curious: “I turned to Ravelry, a knitting and crochet site, to help answer my questions. Ravelry is a pattern database and community site. Pattern creators can upload patterns to the site for makers to find, and then makers can document their projects on the site as well. There are over 54,000 sock patterns and more than two million completed sock projects documented on the site. I was curious whether socks were more or less difficult than other knitting patterns often attempted by beginners. After completing a pattern on Ravelry, knitters can rate the project’s difficulty on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being a “piece of cake” and 10 being “very difficult”. I compared the difficulty of some of these common patterns to see how they compared to socks.” The anticipation is killing you, right? I KNOW!
  • The 30 Day Map Challenge: Via Giuseppe, one for the cartographers amongst you (are there any cartographers amongs you?) – basically a challenge to create a different sort of map every day, with different themes for each, running from one using hexagons to one describing a journey to one made using only AI…this strikes me as the sort of thing that will be very fun for a VERY SPECIFIC type of person. Are YOU that type of person? I don’t fcuking know, do I, who the fcuk are you anyway?
  • The Rest: While I like to imagine that you are all faithful to me and that Web Curios is the only newsletter you allow ingress to your inbox, I am not so naive to think that you don’t occasionally have dalliances with other providers – and, let me be clear, I am fine with that! I am not jealous! I don’t look at other newsletters, with their professionally-produced logos and consistent formatting and ‘communities of readers’ with envy, oh no! Which is why I have no qualms pointing you in the direction of a new (to me at least) variant – The Rest is about music, and very specifically about providing a small antidote to algorithmically-driven listening – here’s the pitch: “In our newsletter, we feature a song and an insightful story about it. You can enjoy the song on your preferred streaming platform while the story will give you something to ponder and discuss with your family, friends, and colleagues.” There’s something really nice about the tight focus here which makes it more appealing to me than a lot of other music-focused newsletters – I also like that there’s an only-partial paywall, and that your $4 monthly sub, should you choose to pay it, gets you access to the full archive, but that not paying it doesn’t preclude you getting the daily updates. This looks really interesting, and, while I’m only a couple of emails in, I have enjoyed the music and the accompanying writing on each occasion so far – recommended.
  • A Media Literacy Curriculum: Can we all agree that one of the biggest missteps of the past couple of decades, from an educational / instructional point of view at least,has been the lack of focus on teaching, training and reinforcing critical thinking and media literacy skills? No? We can’t even agree on THAT? FFS! Anyway, I am personally convinced of this, and as such was interested to stumble across this site this week which offers a selection of courses and training modules designed to help teens get a better idea of where information is from, how to parse it, and how to determine its likely truth value: “This curriculum, developed by Poynter’s MediaWise with support from YouTube, breaks big media literacy topics and ideas into bite-sized pieces to help teens actively and knowledgeably use the internet, specifically by giving them the skills to discern fact from fiction and the confidence to share information responsibly. There are 11 lessons in this series, linked in the folders on this page, with a slide presentation, handouts (when needed) and a link to a YouTube Hit Pause or MediaWise video that corresponds with the lesson. Lessons can be used sequentially, as stand-alones or in the order that best suits instructional purposes. Each lesson is designed to last 30-45 minutes, with additional extension activities included. You can also find abbreviated versions of the curriculum, designed as a five hour workshop or a 90 minute lesson. Through implementation of the entire curriculum sequence, students are equipped with the knowledge to recognize misinformation, the skills and resources to fact-check it and the confidence to make decisions on responsible sharing.” Which, to be clear, sounds GREAT – except all the materials strike me as exceptionally fcuking dull, and dry, and it’s all apallingly-presented, and, look, I’m not trying to suggest they get all buscemi.jpeg about it, but maybe not presenting everything as a series of worksheets might have been a start? Anyway, there is a LOT in here, and, leaving aside my quibbles about the presentation, there’s almost certainly some really useful material if you’re a parent or guardian or educator or similar.
  • AI Safety Dance: By contrast to the last link, this is an educational resource that’s also designed in a way that makes it FUN (well, ok, as fun as it’s possible for something that is literally about AI safety to be, which, it turns out, can be ‘quite’ if you try hard enough) – this is VERY LONG, and is basically a series of hyperlinked long essay modules about the current AI safety debate, doomers vs accelerationists, etc etc, all framed in intensely-readable (to me, at least – I admit that the less-online might find the style…grating in parts) prose and with some light comic elements and a general Tumblr-ish vibe that I find particularly appealing. Look, this is very much within my wheelhouse and so I appreciate I might be biased, but as an introduction to some of the questions around ‘why should we be worried about this stuff, or why should we not be?’ this is imho very well-made indeed.
  • General Collaboration: Another attempt to create the ONE APP that will somehow wrangle the ungodly multiplatform mess of modern administrative life into a single, tameable feed – this one promises to put all your different annoying little alerts and notifications from Slack and GDocs and Sheets and Teams and Figma and Git and and and FCUK’S SAKE MAKE IT STOP…ahem, sorry, all THOSE alerts into one place. I might suggest that if you need this app you perhaps need to look at your tech stack and how…efficient it is before you look at adding to it, but, well, you do you!
  • USA Facts: While the url does very much sound like that of a joke website – “USA FACTS! ALL FACTS, ALL USA, ALL THE TIME! REAL AMERICAN FACTS, MADE IN THE US! PATRIOTIC TRUTHS!” etc etc etc – it appears that it is in fact real; this is Steve ‘Dad Dancing At A Microsoft Keynote’ Ballmer attempting to unsh1ttify the North American informational water table via the creation of this website, designed to present verified statistics and information about life in the US free of partisan framing. “Researchers. Analysts. Statisticians. Designers. No politicians. No one at USAFacts is trying to convince you of anything. The only opinion we have is that government data should be easier to access. Our entire mission is to provide you with facts about the United States that are rooted in data. We believe once you have the solid, unbiased numbers behind the issues you can make up your own mind.” Which sounds great in theory, until the part where you realise that they are still using data from Federal institutions which feels like the sort of thing that will make a lot of…redder Americans immediately nope out, and there are EXPERTS involved who will doubtless have PERSONAL OPINIONS…and, well, basically I am unconvinced that the quality of discourse is salvageable, even with OBJECTIVE MATERIALS presented by an avuncular white guy who has to be be trustworthy because he got very, very rich through capitalism! Still, I think it’s probably on balance A Good Thing, however little of a difference it’s likely to make to anything.
  • Minimal Market: A site which collects various different little webapps designed to help you ‘decrease distractions and increase productivity’ – which, honestly, if you’re reading this newsletter strikes me as the last fcuking thing you’d be interested in, but, equally, I know that at least one person who occasionally reads this also has their phone set to lock them out of whatsapp after 5 mins of usage so, well, who the fcuk knows.
  • Lo-Fone: Ok, this is both a product that is for sale (boo) and isn’t actually on sale yet anyway (double boo), but I am including it because I get the feeling it might appeal to quote few of you. Lo-Fone is a…yes, that’s right, a PHONE! Clever you! Except this is designed to be SUPER-minimal – you can get messaging apps on it, you can get a map app, you can put music on it, but there’s no browser, no social apps, and no news apps, and the whole thing is designed to be as functional as possible – other features are described as follows: “LoFone has a unique colour E Ink display that is gentle on the eyes, promotes better sleep and has incredible battery life. The case and battery are replacable. It has a point and shoot camera with no live preview, to make photo taking impulsive and fleeting. It also has a torch, a headphone socket and a user-assignable action button, making it just as useful as a smart phone.” I mean, look, it’s just a fcuking phone, and it might be sh1t, but it *sounds* quite good and you can sign up for updates on the site should you be so inclined.
  • Difftext: OOH this is useful – lets you compare two texts aside by side and highlights what’s changed from one version to another. BRILLIANT for seeing if your changes have in fact been implemented, but terrible news for people like me, who for literally years has responded to at least 60% of all feedback on my writing with a promise to, yes, implement the edits, and then not in fact done so because most people NEVER FCUKING CHECK.
  • Snail Racing: A very slow, very low-stakes racing game in which you guide a snail – far better rendered, in 3d, than it needs to be – around a small patch of garden, attempting to beat all the other snails to the crown of FASTEST SNAIL OF THEM ALL. This is really nicely-made, but, to be clear, it is VERY SLOW.
  • Star Word: Via my friend Ed, this is a clever little game where you basically have to play scrabble to connect up various bits of the screen (it will all make sense when you play, I promise you). It’s all wrapped up in a light narrative about astronauts getting stranded on an asteroid and needing your help to escape – if I were to be a d1ck, and when am I not?, I’d argue that this would benefit from the writing being quite a lot tighter, but, well, that would demonstrate a quite staggering lack of self-awareness on my part and that would never do.
  • Jelly Gang: Finally this week, an absolutely charming little physics-y puzzle game which features the most adorable cast of…squidgy little guys, basically. “Jelly Gang is a puzzle platformer where you control a group of 30 squishy characters. While you can move left, right, and jump like in a traditional platformer, only the characters within a focus region around your mouse cursor respond to your controls. The rest remain physically active but out of your direct control. The camera follows a larger main character, adding a unique layer of strategy to the gameplay.” Honestly, this is LOVELY and I would very much enjoy seeing the central idea expanded into a larger game.

By Toni Hamel:

THIS WEEK’S LAST MIX COMES FROM FELIX DICKINSON AND I SUPPOSE YOU MIGHT VAGUELY DESCRIBE IT AS ‘BALEARIC’ BUT TBH I NEVER LIKED THAT AS A LABEL AND SO WE’LL JUST SAY THAT IT’S A COLLECTION OF EXCELLENT VAGUELY-HOUSEY MATERIAL AND LEAVE IT THERE! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • The State of Community: It’s very much that time of year when the Trend Reports start to be spotted in the wild, sickly things in the main, unlikely to survive even into 2025 intact. Some, though, are marginally-less-sh1t than others (honestly, this year’s crop has been particularly appalling so far) – this is Tumblr’s own effort, which contained at least two things which made me think ‘oh, actually, yes, that’s interesting’ and which is both full of quite useful observations and also really nicely designed. This is specifically focused around social, consumer and community, with an obvious youth focus, and so is probably not of that much interest or use to you if you’re involved in flogging sprockets to the plumbing industry, but if your job is more about convincing impressionable young adults that brands will somehow make this ALL BETTER then a) you’re scum, you know that don’t you? and b) this will be useful!

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Arthur Chance: Thanks to BBC Tom for this – the feed of Omar Karim, who’s an artist playing with AI in a variety of different and interesting ways which seem to explore a little beyond the standard ‘I MADE A PICTURE WITH THE MACHINE’ – I particularly like the vague idea he has about equipping an agent with the ability to interact with the drug dealers who blow up your phone every weekend with those infuriatingly-emoji-heavy lists of product (I am 45 years old and I do not speak emoji, all I want is something to relieve me from the burden of consciousness for a few hours, WHY MUST YOU MAKE THIS SO HARD FFS???).

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Brands After Vibes: This is the sort of piece that, unless you’ve worked in a very specific set of industries or had to have very particular sorts of conversations about ‘what a brand means’ and ‘how it shows up’ (kill me kill me kill me), will be largely incomprehensible to you – and you should be happy about that! For those of you who still like to pretend that ‘planner’ and ‘strategist’ are real, actual jobs that have value, though, this is very good and definitely worth a read – from preposterously-plugged-in agency Nemesis comes this reflection on the end of the ‘just vibes’ era for brands, how it has resulted in an awful lot of capitalist culture ‘looking the part but feeling off’, and how the amorphous concept of ‘vibes’ is in part a result of an algorithmically-driven culture where The Machine rounds everything to achieve middle-of-the-bell-curve mass appeal. This is VERY w4nky, but I don’t disagree with much, if any, of it.
  • Habermas Machines: This feels orthogonally-related to the last piece – here Rob Horning writes about how LLMs can ‘help drive consensus’, and whether the reduction of deliberation to the simple rationalisation of datapoints does something to inherently alter the way in which decisions are made and the value of making said decisions to us as both individuals and a collective – which I appreciate sounds perhaps *touch* heavy, but which Hornig does a far better job of explaining than I do. His final line gives you a neat summation – “The automated production and summarization and summation of political opinion doesn’t help people engage in collective action; it produces an illusion of collective action for people increasingly isolated by media technology” – but it really is worth reading in its entirety because it’s interesting and smart and another useful one to add to the (too thin) file of ‘people who are thinking about what we lose when we outsource our thinking’.
  • Retiring The Marketplace of Ideas: This is long and academic and not exactly an easy read, but I enjoyed the thinking in it and wholeheartedly endorse the broad principle – to whit, the term ‘the marketplace of ideas’ is fundamentally rubbish and we shouldn’t use it any more, and we should instead think of different ways in which to characterise the health (or otherwise) of an informational ecosystem. The author here, Robert Mark Simpson, does a very good job of explaining exactly why the ‘marketplace’ metaphor is unhelpful, and goes on to make a convincing argument as to why we ought to adopt an urban metaphorical model instead – here’s the outline, but if you can spare the time I would strongly recommend reading the whole thing as it’s very good indeed imho: “We should drop the marketplace of ideas as our go-to metaphor in free speech discourse and take up a new metaphor of the connected city. Cities are more liveable when they have an integrated mix of transport options providing their occupants with a variety of locomotive affordances. Similarly, societies are more liveable when they have a mix of communication platforms that provide a variety of communicative affordances. Whereas the marketplace metaphor invites us to worry primarily about authoritarian control over the content that circulates through our communication networks, the connected-city metaphor invites us to worry, more so, about the homogenization of the tools and formats through which we communicate. I argue that the latter worry demands greater attention under emerging technological conditions.”
  • The Future of Media: Or, as it should have been titled, “The Future of Media (according to a selection of North American media elites of 2024)” – there has been a LOT of chat about this week in certain sections of the web (things journalists like talking about – journalism and how fcuked it is!), and, while it’s maddening in its own way (not least…guys, a lot of the people you’re interviewing here are largely responsible for the parlous state of media globally, and they didn’t take us here on purpose…what makes you think their opinions about the future are worth anything now, based on how fcuking wrong they got things in the past? Also, WHY IS THIS SO INSANELY PRINT-Y? Also, if I read one more fcuking piece about people in their 50s and 60s bemoaning the difference in working culture between them and people three decades younger than them I will fcuking SCREAM) it’s also very interesting and, reading between the lines, pretty fcuking gloomy. Nothing said in here should surprise you, but it’s entertaining in an inside baseball sort-of way (and the portrait shots of the various interviewees are SUPERB, and imho the best thing about the whole piece).
  • The Harris Strategy: Deep breaths, everyone, not long to go now. Honestly, it really does feel like this election campaign has been going on for a decade now – because I suppose in some respects it actually has – and that’s said as someone who live shelf the world away; I honestly can’t begin to imagine the degree of psychic fatigue that you poor fcuks over there in North America (and those of you reading this over here who have to care for professional reasons) are subject to. Anyway, as we prepare to find out whether America is a) going to draw a line under the past horrible decade and maybe rest a bit; or b) just going to dump a breezeblock on the accelerator, tighten the tourniquet and stare fixedly at the horizon while the cliff-edge fast approaches, this piece looks at the odd policy vacuum that is the Harris campaign and specifically asks whether or not her staunchly-pro-Israeli stance is going to cost her the election. There’s no answer, obvs, but it’s an interesting question (although this is Jacobin, so you also know what the exact angle is here).
  • Defrauding Dementia Patients For Political Gain: Sticking with the US election, this is a staggeringly grim story from CNN, which highlights how fundraisers – on both sides, lest you think this is a clear case of LEFT GOOD RIGHT BAD, although it’s worth pointing out that it seems like one side does this…a lot more than the other – are basically using all sorts of incredibly fcuking nasty tricks to dupe older voters, many of whom are suffering from a variety of types of cognitive decline, into donating large sums, often on a monthly basis, without them actually knowing what the fcuk is going on. There are some examples of graphics used in mailers that are HEARTBREAKING, honestly – the one about ‘getting a friend request from Trump’ to dupe people into clicking a link is just so incredibly fcuking horrible on so many (oh, ok, fine, TWO) levels.
  • Human Trafficking in Cambodia: I don’t really have any hugely-successful schoolfriends, but my mate Rich from international school has had an interesting life, having spent much of the past couple of decades as a professional poker player in the far east (by his own admission this has often been a lot less glamorous than it sounds, exploiting the time difference to screw drunk post-club college kids for a few dollars at a time). He’s currently dividing his time between the Philippines, where his partner and kid live, and a casino in Cambodia, in an area not far from that mentioned in this article, and he has intimated to me that it is…quite a scary place. Based on this, he’s not lying – this is a MISERABLE account of how people from all over Asia are effectively trafficked into slavery, working for Chinese gangs who operate mass scamming operations out of the largely-lawless hotel/casino complexes that are scattered across the country. Someone from the region once described Cambodia to me as ‘a place where the very rich in Asia go when they want to do bad things, because there are basically no laws there’ – this does rather back that account up.
  • Hollywood’s New Competitors: I think I started reading Ted Gioia 3-4 years back – he has since become VERY famous, and although I do in part think he’s gotten a bit high off his own success I very much recommend reading this article in which he opines on the fact that pretty much everyone is a video factory these days. Chick-Fil-A producing kids TV shows on their own platform, football teams and basketball teams are effectively content houses as much as they are sports franchises these days, YouTubers can now release longform, cinema-quality docs on the platform…and that’s without even considering the potentially-imminent advent of decent quality  AI video. What does this mean? WHO KNOWS, but it doesn’t look or sound great for established empires. MASS MEDIA IS DEAD IT JUST HASN’T STOPPED MOVING YET.
  • Cruising With GenZ: Not, to be clear, in the park-based sexytime sense – no, this is about the apparent growing appeal of the cruise trip for younger people. This is The Face, interviewing a bunch of kids about why a type of holiday that was previously the preserve of the about-to-die is suddenly now hot with the younger demographic – the answers, ngl, depressed the fcuk out of me, a combination of the rise and rise of the premium mediocre experience, the predictable safety of the cruise (“you always know what you’re getting, you can get steak every day”), the fact that it’s basically QUITE LIKE BEING AT HOME in that you can be on the internet, go shopping, watch telly and eat familiar food, and there are no bugs, and there’s aircon and OH GOD THIS MADE ME WANT TO CULL AN ENTIRE GENERATION.
  • The Spotify Vandal: Their headline, not mine – to be clear, I think this person is a genius and a hero. What’s a surefire way to get a bunch of streams on Spotify without being a famous artist? THAT’S RIGHT, GAME THE SEARCH FUNCTION! Which is why an obscure and not-exactly-chartbound musician who records under the name ‘catbreath’ has achieved a surprising degree of exposure, thanks to their habit of naming their songs things like ‘my discover weekly’ and ‘chillout mix’. This person isn’t getting rich – they say they make a couple of hundred bucks a month – which makes this feel pleasingly anarchic rather than evil and ruinous, and it made me think about what the next iteration of this longstanding hack might be, after buying homophone search terms and the like.
  • Are Games Bad?: No, of course they’re not – but this article asks whether or not we might reasonably expect them to be better. Specifically this looks at the work of hideo Kojima, widely considered one of the medium’s greatest auteurs and visionaries, someone who’s basically revered as, I don’t know, the Kurosawa or similar of the medium. He’s also someone who can’t write dialogue for sh1t, in common with an awful lot of people writing for big budget games, and Frank Lantz asks in this piece whether we shouldn’t possibly ask for a little more from our entertainments, and whether the fact that we don’t is tied into something wider: “I think that the puzzle of Hideo Kojima is, in some ways, a microcosm of the puzzle of video games in general. So many of the worst things about video games are not just reluctantly tolerated but enthusiastically embraced because, through association, they have become emblems of our beloved hobby/artform/lifestyle. The same kind of winking, tongue-in-cheek affection that people have for the “bad” parts of Kojima games reflects the way the broader video game audience has internalized their deepest flaws as being, not just acceptable, but welcome. Not just welcome, but somehow necessary. Video games are childish and vulgar and corny and silly on purpose. And we like it this way!”
  • Building A Game: Sticking with videogames, this is a post about David Turner’s decision to make a videogame using photos and stop-motion animation – it’s technical and involved but it’s SO interesting, both in terms of the problem solving and creativity but also just the technical process of doing something so involved. Even if you’re not interested in games give this a go, you might find it oddly inspirational.
  • The End of the In-Flight Magazine: I can never think of in-flight magazines without thinking of Red Dwarf and Dave Lister’s throwaway comment that they are filled with articles with names like “Salt: An Epicure’s Delight!” – anyway, they’ve basically been consigned to history now, at least in the West, (until someone works out that print is cool again, actually, and your high-end airlines bring them back with a nicely-designed cover and aspirational columnists – I give it ~5y), but this piece takes a nostalgic look back at them as a medium, at the WONDERFUL freebies they offered to journalists (also an excellent word-rate from what I’ve heard) and the particular appeal they held to advertisers – as the writer makes clear, if you’re on a plane then you’re already one of the most privileged billion people or so on the planet, making you a marketers’ dream. Anyway, I think BA should start stocking The Fence – someone make that happen please.
  • Saizeriya’s: I love this piece SO MUCH! I had no idea at all that there is a very popular Japanese chain of ‘Italian’ restaurants which exists not only in its country of origin but in countries across the region, or that it serves dishes which might best be described as local reimaginings of classic dishes rather than anything an actual Italian might recognise (Italiani, se leggete, vi avverto che quest’articolo vi fara’ salire la collera’ culinaria come poche altre cose), or that it’s INSANELY cheap because of some really smart and interesting business practices (no, wait, come back!) which let them offer incredible economies of scale, or that it’s recently been at the heart of some light culture warring about the appropriateness or otherwise of taking dates there…honestly, this is PERFECT, food and culture and the genuine sense that I think will persist in me forever that Japan is basically Mars.
  • Rollercoasters: As you know, I don’t normally link to the mainstream UK press because I assume that most of you can get that elsewhere – I’ll make an exception for this, though, as it made me SO HAPPY. Tom Lamont goes long on rollercoaster design, spending months in the runup to the launch and opening of a new ride at Thorpe Park in the South of England talking to the man who designed it – seriously, this is a brilliant piece, interesting and informative and wonderfully-balanced between the technical and the personal. By the end of this I wanted to a) go on ALL THE ROLLERCOASTERS; and b) be friends with the guy who designs them, and I imagine you will be much the same.
  • My Auschwitz Vacation: Tanya Gold visits Auschwitz and writes about it for Harper’s. This is brilliant, brilliant writing; I could quote entire swathes of it, but this gives a flavour: “Auschwitz, though, is too powerful to give to the Jews. I encounter a tourist who came to Poland for a river cruise and stayed for this. “I’m not disappointed,” she says. “It is horrific.” I no longer believe that Hitler lost the war, but Poland gives itself over to magical thinking. I daydream about time travel here and even finding a magician to bring them back. I mostly think that if you don’t know what a Jew is when you walk into Auschwitz-Birkenau, you still won’t know it when you walk out, and so whatever else it is, it is a memorial to nothing except logistics.”
  • Forgetting Taylor Swift: Sam Kriss writes about Taylor Swift. This is too long, and it loses its way about halfway through with a frankly bizarre series of digressions about Americans’ relationship to Paris which didn’t really seem to fit with the rest of it at all, but I’m including it because the rest of it, the bits where he talks about Swift, and being at her concert, and WHAT IT ALL MEANS, really is excellent – particularly the hyperreal nature of the experience and how it necessarily sort of defies memory. This line in particular stuck out, in a week when standom has rightly received some additional scrutiny: “This intense obsession isn’t the same as actually enjoying something. It’s all sterile; it’s the empty carapace that remains when the actual enjoyment has rotted away.”
  • What Tempts Our Wives: A short story by Sarah Horner about love and losing and need and nature and and and. I thought this was beautiful: “My wife no longer washes her hands when she comes in from the garden. I find traces of earth around the house: dirty fingerprints on the refrigerator handle, last season’s leaves on top of the toilet seat, blood-like drops of tomato juice on the hardwood floor. When we got married, we promised to eat one meal a day together, even if it was just leftovers in front of the TV. I knew I was losing her when she began snacking on peas and berries straight from the plant, preferring that to my own well-intentioned cooking.”
  • Spinning Webs In Space: This sprawls and meanders a bit, but I really enjoyed the writing and the setting and the themes and then I was kicked in the face by the ending something chronic. Jill Christman writes here about why strangers tell her everything, about memories of the 1970s, about spiders and weightlessness and gravity and rape.

By Takaya Katsuragawa

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 18/10/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

HELLO I AM BACK HELLO!

What have YOU done with the past few weeks of your life? I have singularly failed to take a holiday of any sort (how does one take a holiday from oneself? No, not ‘acid’, tried that), or indeed to really stop looking at the internet, but I have caught up on some sleep and, I think, just about managed to muster the enthusiasm to get to the end of the year without risk of (additional, ulterior) breakdown, so WELL DONE ME!

Anyway, as I type it’s vaguely-sunny out, and in a desperate attempt to expose my bone-white epidermis to a few rays before the sun disappears for six months, I am not even going to bother pretending with the intro this week and will instead crack right on with the links, not least because I imagine you’re having some pretty chronic url withdrawal symptoms right now (do not tell me you found another dealer, do not tell me you found another dealer, I will CUT YOU).

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are glad to see me, I can tell (LOOK AT ME).

By Paul Ranson (pics via TIH)

WE BEGIN THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH WHAT TOM SPOONER CALLS ‘SAD CRACKLY JAZZ’, AND FRANKLY WHO AM I TO ARGUE (THIS IS LOVELY AND ALMOST-PERFECTLY AUTUMNAL)!

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST TO ANY OF YOU WHO ARE IN LONDON AND WHO HAVE A BIT OF SPARE TIME OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS AND WHO WANT TO GET INVOLVED WITH SOMETHING GENUINELY INTERESTING AND COOL AND FUN AND CREATIVE TO CLICK THIS LINK AND SIGN UP AND LEARN MORE, PT.1:  

  • Greenwich: This is a lovely way to return to the internet (I have obviously not left the internet, I have just been…less assiduous about tracking its movements. INTERNET I WILL NEVER LEAVE YOU, etc etc) – Greenwich is the latest in the seemingly-infinite series of attempts to create an additional sort of semi-social layer over the web, which in this instance means ‘install this Chrome extension and it will let you both add hyperlinks to any bit of any webpage you like, but will also grant you the ability to see the hyperlinks others have added, meaning you start to build up a lovely network of ‘oh, this made me think of that’ links between sites created solely through others’ personal associations’ (as you can see, I’ve spent the past fortnight honing my prose to a fine point). Obviously this lives and dies by the number of people using it, and obviously there are about three people currently so doing, but I have a real soft spot for this sort of concept and the idea of mapping these loose thematic connections between places on the web. You can read a blogpost about the project here, and there’s this page which tracks all the different connections between sites that people have made with the software – sadly there doesn’t appear to be any sort of explanation to be found anywhere about why the everliving fcuk the person behind it chose to call it ‘Greenwich’.
  • The Syllabary: Oh this is GORGEOUS and not a little hypnotic: “The Syllabary consists of 1319 empty sounds and 2281 spoken parts of 1 to 37 lines in length, each based on a cluster of between 1 and 47 monosyllabic words. The program chooses an initial text at random and leads the viewer to the next in any of three directions through some 15013 lines of verse.” Basically this is basically randomised-poetry-by-way-of-maths – just click the link, hit the ‘play’ icon and let yourself be transported. Whoever they have doing the voice over for this has an almost criminally-soothing tone and frankly I could listen to them intone vaguely-nonsensical iambs at me for days.
  • This Compliment Does Not Exist: A tiny, frivolous webproject by Fred Wordie, who has spun up this site to offer compliments to YOU, internet stranger, should you be feeling that the universe isn’t demonstrating quite the adequate degree of appreciation towards your being. Click the button, get a compliment, generated by (I presume) GPT and voiced by Elevenlabs – absolutely no idea why Fred has decided to choose ‘the leprechaun from the Lucky Charms adverts’ for the voice model here, but he does and so we’ll just go with it.
  • Bop Spotter: This is very much a link that falls under the heading of ‘yes, I know you’ve seen this, I know it’s a few weeks old now, but I need to include it in Curios otherwise I will forget it because honestly I have just cyborged my memory to the point of codependence at this stage and perhaps that is why I can never stop’ – Bop Spotter is that project by the guy in San Francisco who’s placed a bunch of mics on telephone poles, all of them linked to Shazam, to get an ambient sense of the music that people are listening to in the city in realtime, and it is SUCH a nice idea and feels like the sort of thing that there are at least 17 different ‘urban surprise and delight activation ideas’ that a motivated team of annoyingly-tattooed creatives might excitedly come up with to attempt to shill more IPA. So far it’s detected over 1500 songs – you can listen to the selection via an embedded player on-site, but I quite like the idea of taking this sort of data and making a ‘sound of X city’ streamable radio station on a 24h delay, so if someone can just go and make that happen that would be ace thanks.
  • A Live Map Of Trains In England RIGHT NOW: It’s that time of the year again when people’s thoughts start to turn to the festive season (sorry, sorry, I know, TOO EARLY) and the massive fcuking schlep they will have to do to be reunited with their loved ones for a few days of bitter familial wrangling, and for those of you in the UK I think we can all confidently predict that you’ll end up spending at least an hour, possibly three, sat in the weird no-man’s-land between carriages while increasingly drunk people spill lager on you on their trip back from the buffet car (“the kitchen’s closed, but we do have a seemingly-infinite quantity of Beefeater in cans”) – or that the train you thought you were going to get simply…doesn’t exist! To reassure you that the UK does still seemingly have at least one or two working examples of rolling stock and that some trains are apparently still moving around the country, why not enjoy this LIVE MAP OF TRAINS, ALL MOVING AROUND THE COUNTRY RIGHT NOW. Aside from anything else it’s a decent realtime look at the varying quality of the service across the country – man does the North West look like it has some issues.
  • HTML For People: This is fcuking great and I love it. HTML For People is a site designed to explain code in a way that makes sense to actual human beings who don’t think in maths (ie people like me). Honestly, I can’t stress enough how approachable and clear this is – if you’re interested it will take you through every single step of building a website, explaining to you along the way what each bit is and why it exists and how it relates to the other bits…honestly, I can’t stress enough how good a resources this is, and even if you have no interest of actually getting your hands dirty with code this is worth looking at to get a better understanding of why, basically, everything is at heart a spreadsheet. Here’s the blurb – really, though, this is very good indeed.  “HTML isn’t only for people working in the tech field. It’s for anybody, the way documents are for anybody. HTML is just another type of document. A very special one—the one the web is built on. I’m Blake Watson. I’ve been building websites since the early 2000s. Though I work professionally in the field, I feel strongly that anyone should be able to make a website with HTML if they want. This book will teach you how to do just that. It doesn’t require any previous experience making websites or coding. I will cover everything you need to know to get started in an approachable and friendly way.” THANKS, MYSTERIOUS BLAKE WATSON!
  • Height Hunt: Someone has decided to make and maintain this website which exists to collect ALL (probably not all, but significantly more than you might expect tbh) the ‘beware, height restrictions!’ road signs around the UK – you know, the ones which get amusingly ignored by HGV drivers once a year, resulting in a stuck lorry and several palettes worth of FMCG products scattered underneath a semi-rural railway bridge. This is the work of one Adam Townsend – THANKS ADAM! I was particularly taken with the ‘about’ page, which I thought might give me a clue as to why Adam was undertaking this…very specific endeavour, but which instead just told me about the UK’s road signage protocols in quite a lot of detail. I respect that.
  • AI Storymaker: Ok, this link feels like a BIT of a cheat, because it’s neither to a FUN AN EXCITING CREATIVE WEBPROJECT or to something that actually exists, BUT it’s SUCH a lovely piece of design prototyping and such a clever proof of concept that I hope you won’t mind. You sort of have to click the link to get the idea (because, per 12 years of this stuff, I can’t write for sh1t), but basically this is a proof-of-concept prototype of a kids’ block-building/storytelling set; each of the different wooden blocks/characters is embedded with an RFID chip, which in turn is linked to a different GPT model representing different characters, and (basically) placing the different wooden toys in different configurations and combinations will result in different combinations of characters and settings, which in turn will cause an ENTIRELY NEW story featuring said characters and settings to be spun up by The Machine. Now, obviously there’s a lot of theory here, and anyone who’s played with ‘AI Storytelling’ will know that the resulting stories will be fcuking soulless dreck, BUT I hope you can get at least a tiny frisson of possibility and excitement from the base concept here, because this feels like quite a fertile area to create in, and, again, the sort of thing that might reasonably be used as INSPIRATIONAL FODDER (you can totally steal this imho).
  • The Future Timeline:  Do you…worry? Are you perhaps a touch concerned about what might be going on? Well don’t! There’s no point! There’s literally fcuk all you can do about almost anything that’s going to impact your life – all the really big stuff is, in the main, out of your hands, so why bother fretting? Also, as the information contained within The Future Timeline demonstrates, SO MUCH WEIRD SH1T MIGHT BE ABOUT TO HAPPEN ANYWAY that there’s not really any point making plans. The Future Timeline has been running for YEARS, seemingly the work of only one man – “London-based writer and futurist, William James Fox, started Future Timeline back in 2008. It began as a relatively small and obscure website with a brief list of future predictions. Over the years, however, it expanded to form a lengthy and detailed timeline – running from the present day, through the next century and beyond, all the way to the end of the universe itself.” This is utterly fascinating, and the sort of thing you could lose an afternoon to quite easily – I flit between the sections imagining the immediate future (you may be reassured that the period 2025-2050 is summarised neatly with “Technological unemployment is rising rapidly”) and the 2200s, when apparently we’ll have sorted the arcologies out and be living our best Sim City 2000 lives. So, so so interesting, if obviously all totally speculative – if nothing else, though, it rather reinforced by general feeling about the overall arc of stuff being positive but the next 50-100 years or so being…somewhat choppy for us as a species. Let’s see (I won’t, I will be SO DEAD, thank fcuk).
  • 5 Million Devs: What would DO do if your platform for developers hit the (honestly impressive) milestone of 5million people using it? Well, if you’re Netlify (no, I don’t know and I don’t care, don’t tell me who they are or what they do) what you inexplicably decide to do is build a web experience which lets visitors play an honestly-surprisingly-shiny little Marble Madness clone while learning ‘facts’ about the company’s journey to this point. This is, objectively, a terrible, terrible waste of time and money, but I can’t help but admire the commitment here (and, honestly, there’s something kind of satisfying about the marble-y-ness of the whole thing). No fcuking idea AT ALL how you measure the, er, ‘value’ of this to the business, mind.
  • Microphotography: The 50th winners of Nikon’s ‘Small World’ microphotography contest have just been announced! Look at some incredible images of very, very small things! The winning pic of mouse tumours is sort-of amazing (don’t worry, you can’t tell it’s the cance), but my personal favourite is the one of the cannabis plant because 15 year old me would have been inordinately excited about the trichomes (15 year old me didn’t know what a tricome *was*, to be clear, but was aware that they were in some abstract way ‘good to have’ when it came to weed. 15 year old me was largely intolerable, I’m sorry to say).
  • Werner’s Nomenclature of Colours: Ok, so, per Wikipedia, “Werner’s Nomenclature of Colours is a book of named colour samples compiled by Abraham Gottlob Werner, and subsequently amended by Patrick SymeThe book, first published in 1814, was used by Charles Darwin in his scientific observations. Werner’s Nomenclature can be viewed as a predecessor of modern named colour systems such as Pantone” – this website is a digitisation of that book, by one Nicholas Rougeaux, which lets you explore the colours Werner identified, the names he gave them, examples of the colour appearing in nature…as someone who doesn’t really have an iota of artistic talent in their body, this is a bit magical, like having someone slowly and patiently explain, I don’t know, the concept of ‘numbers’ to me, and the general site design here is pleasing insofar as, for whatever reason, it very much has the sort of general feel and vibe of a book full of watercolour sketches. This is really rather lovely and soothing.
  • A Clarins Metaverse: There was a piece that did the rounds the other week about how all the people who a few years ago were glorying in the title of ‘Chief Metaverse Officer’ have now moved on to become Chief AI Innovators instead, but on seeing this website this week – all you need to know about it is that makeup brand Clarins got absolutely fleeced by some ‘3d world’-peddling third-party platform and have shelled out for AN Other generically-branded ‘metaversal space’ where you can, I don’t know, jump off a lipstick or watch an ad for some concealer (after it’s finished buffering) – it made me think that there are perhaps some companies where signoff process are so slow, where compliance is so rigorous, that they might only now be coming to the end of a long and arduous metaverse building process, whose project teams are only now emerging blinking into the cold, hard light of the future, clutching their newly-birthed IMMERSIVE 3D BRAND SPACES to their chests, only to find that…the world has moved on and noone cares and oh by the way we shut down the team and you’re unemployed, sorry, Anyway, BRANDED VIRTUAL CLEANSER EXPERIENCES!
  • Natural Landscape Photography Awards 2024: There are LOADS of gorgeous images of the natural world here – I’m particularly taken with the abstracts, as ever, but a special mention also for Felix Wesch’s portraits of birch forests where the colours and lighting are just insane.
  • After: ANOTHER dating app! I was thinking about this the other day – even if I wanted to dip my toe into the thick, somewhat…coagulated waters of the online dating pool, I simply wouldn’t be able to because I don’t own ANY photos of myself (I think in total I have approximately three from the past two decades of my life). Obviously this is an INSURMOUNTABLE issue, so, well, that’s me done! Anyway, ‘After’ is a new dating app – I think it’s only launched in a limited number of cities at the moment, possibly US-only – which as its gimmick has chosen ‘we’re fixing the problem of ghosting!’, which, honestly, feels like a reasonable ‘enemy’ for the brand to choose. The way this works is that if you message someone and have a conversation but decide that you don’t want to take it any further, you have to actually tell the person why (I presume it can be euphemistically gentle and doesn’t require the brutal honesty of, say, “the way you breathe makes me homicidal”, or “I could never respect, let alone love, someone with your approach to spelling”) or the app will remove your matching privileges – which, honestly, feels like a bracingly strict approach that might have benefits.
  • The Living Museum: An interesting way of exploring the British Museum’s collection, this – an LLM layer over the top lets you ask natural language queries of the interface, which thanks to the GPT-ing has a certain fuzziness in its understanding of the catalogue and which in turn means you can ask it to search for ‘sexy statues’ and it will sort-of understand (this is a VERY loose definition of ‘sexy’, unless your tastes are spectacularly-niche). On the one hand, I like this way of using the tech to open the collection, and the interface is really nice – on the other, there’s something…odd about AI curation, insofar as there’s no ‘curation’ happening other than ‘vaguely-linked datapoints in latent space’ and…I don’t know, perhaps I miss the intentionality of a human aye in pulling together a collection, but I increasingly find with projects like this that the breadth and scope is impressive but there’s not actually that much meaning being delivered when you look closely. Anyway, see what you think.
  • TypingBowl: Do YOU think you’re a good typist? Would YOU like to test your typing skills by going head to head in LIVE TYPING CHALLENGES against strangers from across the web? Are…are you always this competitive? Anyway, should you wish to see whether YOU are a better touch-typist than some other webmong somewhere in the world then WOW will you enjoy this.
  • Musicleague: Ooh, this could be fun – if you’re in a particularly-musically-focused friendship group or groupchat I could see this proving quite popular. Musicleague basically works a bit like fantasy sports (except it doesn’t really) – you form a league with whoever you want; you play in ‘rounds’ and each ‘round has a theme, players submit songs for each round that fit the theme, everyone listens to the songs and then votes and comments on their favourites (the ‘comments’ functionality is a genius build I think), the person whose selection got voted the best wins…nonspecific friendgroup kudos! This, honestly, could be a lot of fun with the right group of people (and incredibly annoying with the wrong one, so CHOOSE WITH CARE).
  • Defunct Website: A service allowing you to specify when you’re website is dead, defunct, an EX WEBSITE. I rather like this – it removes ambiguity, and there’s something rather cool about having a definitive endpoint to qa webpage or project. In fact, can we make this an accepted part of webdesign and online etiquette, that every website has it’s ‘go live’ and ‘shuttered’ dates recorded on its homepage URL at the point of its abandonment via some sort of service like this? Great!
  • The Best Active Internet Forums: This list has done the rounds a bit over the past week or so, but it really is worth bookmarking – forums have always been, and will always be, the best of the web (I am right about this), and this piece is a list of some of the best ones still active, covering a huge range of topics from drugs to miniature ponies. This made me quite annoyed at Google shutting off its specific forum search product about 12 years ago, which really is something I should have gotten over by now tbh.
  • Death and Hell: Ok, yes, I know that the title doesn’t *sound* promising, and I concede that, yes, this is once again one of those ‘borderline’ websites where I was debating whether it was ok to feature because, well, there’s that whiff of schizophrenia about it, but I came down on the side of inclusion because it’s OLD and I am not convinced its author is still about, and because, well, MY GOD this is very deep and very weird and VERY esoteric, and there’s some VERY old testament ish vibes to the whole thing, and, well, here’s an example of the sort of prose you can expect to encounter in the many, many hundreds of pages buried here: “Sub-humans have also been targeted for “transformation” by lycanthropic paramilitary units using very sophisticated memetic warfare systems, hybridized tectonics with a subliminal interface and have set up these events beyond space-time referred to as: “Temple Dahmer Initiations.” Are YOU Tired of the Health Risks involved with Bloodborne Pathogens?” WELL, ARE YOU?

By Alma Haser

NEXT, A PLAYLIST FEATURING 100 TRACKS BY BLACK BRITISH ARTISTS RECORDED SINCE 2020 AND WHICH IS A BRILLIANT AND INSANELY-VARIED SELECTION OF MODERN UK EXCELLENCE!

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST TO ANY OF YOU WHO ARE IN LONDON AND WHO HAVE A BIT OF SPARE TIME OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS AND WHO WANT TO GET INVOLVED WITH SOMETHING GENUINELY INTERESTING AND COOL AND FUN AND CREATIVE TO CLICK THIS LINK AND SIGN UP AND LEARN MORE, PT.2:

  • IOGraphica: Oh this is WONDERFUL! Have you ever thought ‘God I wish I could turn the pointless movements made by my mouse cursor as I once again waste my life through screen-based interaction into BEAUTIFUL MONOCHROMATIC SEMI-ABSTRACT ART!’? No, it strikes me as unlikely, but that is EXACTLY what you can do with IOGraphica, which is a bit of software which tracks your mouse movements and turns them into gorgeous visualisations. So so so beautiful.
  • Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2024: Critters!  Yes, ok, fine, and some landscapes, but it’s mostly about the critters! As ever, important to note that not all the aforementioned critters on display here are, er, alive, but as long as that doesn’t put you off then you can rest assured that these are all astonishing in various ways – I personally was charmed by the one featuring toad-on-toad violence (you’ll know it when you see it), but every single one of these pictures is glorious. BONUS PHOTO CONTEST: seeing as you’re here, you might want to check out the winners of this year’s ‘Panoramic Photographer of the Year’ contest which are also lovely (but, well, WIDE).
  • Wes Cook: This came out of one of the talks at this year’s XOXO Festival, and having read about the project and watched the associated video (which, honestly, I can’t recommend enough) I was UTTERLY CHARMED and you will be too. Wes Cook was an artist operating in the US in the 20th Century, working across a frankly insane range of projects from theme parks to film studios to theatre design. On a roadtrip, Cabel Sasser encountered his work, and became obsessed. Per Cabel, “Wes Cook died in 2004. He had no heirs, no family. His life’s work was left in a storage locker that went unpaid, eventually being sold at auction. I purchased all I could from the person who bought his storage locker, until I basically ran out of money. Oops. He deserves to be world famous. Maybe it’s not too late.” This website hosts the archive of Wes’s oeuvre, the video of Cabel’s talk, and I promise you that after you’ve watched the talk (WATCH THE TALK) you will fall slightly in love with this.
  • Letterboxd Besties:So apparently if you’re a Film Person (it feels the capitalisation is important here) and you use film rating site Lettrboxed it lets you pick your TOP FOUR FILMS EVER by which to define yourself to the rest of the cinephile community – this website lets you put in your username and see if anyone else in the big wide world has the same UNIQUELY-RAREFIED TASTES as you do. Honestly, this feels like a near-perfect extension for a dating app, no? Also, based on this, I wonder what the most ‘basic’ top 4 is? Shawshank, It’s A Wonderful Life, Elf, Back To The Future? A Fiat500 selection for the ages!
  • Laid Off Overlays: Look, I appreciate that there is nothing funny about being out of work and being worried as to where money’s going to come from, and the modern charade of having to digitally caper in the shop window in the desperate hope that some passing suit chooses YOU to bestow the temporary gift of employment on is particularly miserable and horrid, but, also, I found this website – which lets you create your very own ‘Twibbon’ (remember them!?)-style graphical overlay to add to your profile on LinkedIn in the style of the ‘Looking For Work!’ badges popping up all over the place over there. Want to create a badge that says “I Need The Money But I Promise I Will Never Care”? How about “No Major HR Grievances”? “Look Into My Eyes Before You Scroll Past Me And Condemn My Kids To A Present-Free Christmas”? The choice is yours. This is…this isn’t actually funny, is it?
  • Crayon Town: Another ‘infinite canvas on which the entire web can draw simultaneously’ project, with the unique gimmick that the graphics are done to make the whole thing look (convincingly, I must say) as though it’s been drawn in crayon. Which might lessen the horror when you stumble into the inevitable ‘swastika corner’ (to be clear, I have not found ‘swastika corner’ and there’s no suggestion that it does in fact exist – I did though just scroll around for a minute and saw someone had written the simple phrase ‘gay wand’, which has really made me laugh for some reason).
  • Pictures Of People Taking Pictures: I feel that this ought to be a bigger thing than it is. You can contribute your own, should you so desire (you should).
  • Cartographist: Ooh, this is interesting – it’s a Github repo so you will need to be able to wrangle the code, but this is SUCH a cool twist on the standard browser/tab design – created by Szymon Kaliski, who describes it thusly: “Cartographist is an experimental web browser optimized for rabbit-holing. Instead of opening new windows (with cmd-click), Cartographist spawns horizontally scrollable panes.Instead of forcing you to find things in a linear history, Cartographist shows a tree-structured outline of your browsing. Instead of always starting fresh, Cartographist can save, and load “trails” – the exact state of the session you’ve left – supporting researching topics over long periods of time.” If you click the link you can get a better idea from screenshots (or you can see some video of it in action here), but this strikes me as SUCH a clever way of rethinking the way in which we move through webspace.
  • Watch Frame By Frame: Would you like to be able to quickly and easily scrub through a video frame-by-frame? Er, why? Nevertheless, this webpage will let you do just that with any YouTube or Vimeo url, presumably for the purposes of spotting, I don’t know, scene anomalies, or for investigating whether something’s been a edited in certain ways, or, if you’re a pervert from 1983, for catching snatched glimpses of fleeting nipples and pubes from old films. You do you!
  • Films In Airplane Toilets: A reader writes! Peter Brooke Turner, to be precise, who emailed me with the following “I’m a touring musician who has started my own theatre company @attcthe which makes films in airplane toilets and which might be of interest to you?” To which my immediate answer was ‘YES PETER THIS IS EXACTLY THE SORT OF MAD SH1T I AM INTO WHAT THE ACTUAL FCUK?” (I was more polite than this). Honestly, these are…very weird, but also really inventive and fun and creative, and as a way of spending time when you’re bored on a poky Airbus this feels like something more people should possibly get into (also, this feels like a GREAT music video concept waiting to happen, no?). There’s one in which someone’s filming in a tux, which strikes me as quite a strong commitment to the bit – WELL DONE PETER THIS IS VERY WEIRD.
  • Jars: A whole bunch of AI-generated TV channels – AI presenters, AI voices, AI scripts, all utter gibberish, obviously, but sort-of entertaining, a bit like watching Furbys talk to each other. These are all vaguely themed around ‘formats’ – so there’s AI Dragon’s Den (sorry, ‘Shark Tank’), AI cooking…actually I have become slightly captivated by the cooking one, it’s like some sort of weird fever dream where there are near-edible recipes being described by someone who’s being hand-operated by a trainee at the Henson workshops, and where every single sentence ends ‘YES CHEF!’ regardless of whether that makes any sense or not. This might actually be brilliant, not quite sure.
  • Hots & Cots: This is basically ‘Tripadvisor for the US Military establishment’, a website where serving members of the US Forces can post photos and reviews of the food and accommodation they’re given by Uncle Sam in exchange for acting as IED fodder a few years down the line. Obviously the quality of bed and board varies drastically from place to place, but a few observations: 1) based on the diets these people seem to be eating, WHERE IS THE FIBRE???; 2) portion sizes are…variable; 3) I’m sorry, if this is your writeup of the food then you have no reason to complain about anything: “This brunch smash burger was amazing. Hash brown, fried egg, caramelized onions, and maple ketchup. So delicious. They also had a section that was doing fresh pasta dishes too.” MAPLE KETCHUP? A FRESH PASTA STATION? You didn’t get this sh1t in Full Metal Jacket.
  • Bookloop: Vinted, for books. Yes, I know, lazy, but a) I am running SO LATE; and b) that is literally what it is, deal with it. Scan your books’ barcodes or enter the ISBN and the site will give you a valuation for them – you can then trade them in for credit on Bookshop.org, thereby supporting indie booksellers when you spend said credits. All in all this just seems like a great setup and something that’s worth signing up for if you possibly ought to get rid of one or two tomes but can’t quite bring yourself to conduct the ceremonial burning this year.
  • Design Playlists: Do you DO DESIGN? Do you like to listen to music while you do so? Would you like to listen to music selected by OTHER DESIGNERS that they think helps them DO DESIGN BETTER? Great, you’ll like this site then, as it collects, er, playlists compiled by designers to listen to while they design, to be listened to by other designers while they, in turn, design. DESIGN MORE AND FASTER, YOU FCUKS. What do you imagine all the music in these playlists sounds like? Go on, just have a guess. YOU’RE RIGHT!
  • Chess Grid: Make a downloadable black and white artwork based on the chess grid – the nice gimmick here is that you can enter the specific moveset from a single match, or passage of play, and that will be reflected in the resulting piece that’s generated. Even those of you who don’t revere Magnus Carlsen might find something to love here – the aesthetic of the generated works is very strong indeed to my mind, these would make glorious prints in the right environment.
  • Frankenstein: SUCH an interesting way of exploring a text, this, specifically of seeing the ways in which the text was altered between different editions of the same work. This is the Frankenstein Varorium, an online tool which allows the user to explore the text through its various incarnations, allowing you to select individual passages and see how they have evolved through different revisions of the work. ““In the case of Frankenstein, the substantive changes that MWS made in her revised edition are so extensive that many teachers and students of Frankenstein consider 1818 and 1831 as two different novels.” Scholars do not agree on a single authoritative text, though the 1818 edition became more available from the 1990s onward in teaching editions, reflecting increasing interest in the earlier versions of the text. With this project, we offer a way to explore not just two but five distinct moments in the novel’s writing and re-writing, and they do not proceed in orderly stages. The following diagram summarizes the relationships among the manuscript and published versions of Frankenstein composed between 1816 and 1831 that we worked with for this variorum project.” Obviously this is mainly of use and interest to people who, er, really want to get deep into Frankenstein, but if you’ve even a passing interest in information design then this is worth exploring because the interface is really, really nicely done.
  • Weather Landscapes: Another link to something you actually need to be able to code to do anything with – SORRY SORRY SORRY – but I think the fact that this is yet ANOTHER eminently-thievable idea should be enough for you to forgive me (all I ask is absolution, and only for some of the sins). This, basically, outlines how you might go about knocking up a realtime weather data display that, rather than showing you the temperature and precipitation probabilities in boring textual fashion instead does so by rendering it as a kids’ drawing. Honestly, this is SO CHARMING and I would 100% applaud anyone pitching this sort of thing as some sort of public installation or similar – please please please can one of you do something with this?
  • Street Nuns: The only thing not to love about this site is that, in the specific context in which it is here being used, ‘street’ connotes ‘walking around on the pavement’ rather than ‘incredibly streetwise and not a little threatening’. Otherwise, though, this is a perfect website – photos of nuns, out and about. As someone who had literally the most miserable 18 months of his life in Rome, I can honestly confirm that there is no set of personal circumstances so bleak that your life won’t be instantly improved by just seeing a nun, on a bus.
  • Doubles: Can you multiply a number by two? Can you do it again? And again? Can you do it AGAINST THE CLOCK? This game has made me feel more stupid than almost anything else I have done this year, which is no small feat.
  • A Selection Of Excellent Tiny Browser Games: The link takes you to the webpage for a recent weekend game jam – scroll to the bottom and there’s a selection of a dozen or so browsergames which I can highly recommend as an afternoon pastime, the stuntbike game in particular being INCREDIBLY ‘one more go’-ish. ENJOY!

By Percy Fortin-Wright

OUR FINAL PLAYLIST THIS WEEK IS THIS SELECTION OF ‘SONGS THAT HAVE DEFINED THE DECADE SO FAR’, WHICH HAS BEEN COMPILED BY A BUNCH OF EX-PITCHFORK STAFFERS WHO THIS WEEK LAUNCHED A NEW MUSIC MAGAZINE CALLED HEARING THINGS! (WHICH YOU CAN CHECK OUT HERE)

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Diamond Geezer: Not in fact a Tumblr at all! Instead, this is a VERY oldschool blog, in which the titular Diamond Geezer writes…not very geezerishly at all, actually, all about London, its streets and boroughs and history. This is very much an urbanist nerd’s paradise, and if you’ve any interest at all in the city now and as it was then you’ll adore this – even better, it’s been going for 25 years!!! TWENTY FIVE FCUKING YEARS! I will never, ever cease to be amazed by people’s indefatigability and passion, and I will never again think that Curios is in any way ‘special’ or ‘noteworthy’ (lol of course I will, it is my baby and I love its hideous countenance and the strange, wet noises it makes).

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Servilletas: Images of paper napkins from bars, cafes, bakeries and restaurants in Spain (I think). Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT YOU INGRATES.
  • Ethos, Austin: A restaurant in Austin, Texas, sharing images of its food. Except the food is all AI, the images aren’t real, the restaurant doesn’t exist…but it does have a website! And, perhaps more understandably, a merch shop! I am confused about this – not about the fact that someone’s spinning up AI images of food, more about…why? Why the website? Is this a teaser for something else? See, this is the problem with AI stuff – IT MAKES EVERYTHING CONFUSING AND UNKNOWABLE.
  • DJ Ag: I love this – turns out I have actually seen DJ Ag out and about in South London before, and but this is his Insta which showcases his habit of just setting up some decks, an amp and a mic on the street and letting people come and MC with him. Some of the resulting performances here are ACE, and in general this is just one of those ‘see, this is why living in a big city is awesome and why people are at heart sort of brilliant’ things that we can all get behind (until some brand decides to make Ag the cornerstone of their next ‘activation’ and the whole thing dies a miserable death).
  • The Savalavada: This is interesting – India has its own version of The Onion! Ok, fine, I’m sure India’s had a fcuktonne of satirical, humorous outlets mocking its politics and culture, but this one’s new and feels more…Onion-y. It only exists on Insta, and I confess that a lot of the humour went right over my head, but I did very much enjoy a recent headline celebrating “International Day for Really Close Female Roommates” and so I am recommending it on that basis alone.
  • Insta Repeat: Thanks to Kev Lloyd for sending this to me – an insta account highlighting the inherent aesthetic sameness of shots on the platform via the medium of collages which neatly point out exactly how fcuking banal everything in your ‘September’ dump was.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Machines of Loving Grace: I am not, if I’m honest, really expecting many (any?) of you to read all of this – it is, after all, a 15,000 paean to the future benefits of the glorious AI future, penned by a man with a vested financial interest in as many people as possible believing VERY FIRMLY in the validity of that future – but I would say that it’s worth a look if you have a passing interest in the general ‘so, where have the plutocratic tech fcuks decided is the future this week?’ question. This is Anthropic’s Dario Amodei waxing (VERY) lyrical about What This Will All Mean and Where We Will All End Up, and – SPOILERS! – we don’t have to worry, it’s all going to be great! This is a nice companion to the (far shorter, thank fcuk) Sam Altman piece from the other week – the contrast here comes with Amodei seeming to think somewhat more deeply about how this stuff might play out…although, to be clear, nowhere near deeply enough. So we get the fat end of 15,000 words on the amazing advancements in longevity and medicine and science that we can all expect, and the promise that ‘powerful AI’, smarter than a Nobel Winner (lol at the Hinton shade!), could be here as soon as 2026, and that is going to make EVERYTHING BETTER! It also, though, relies on a lot of this sort of thinking – “Diseases have been eradicated and many countries have gone from poor to rich, and it is clear that the decisions involved in these tasks exhibit high returns to intelligence (despite human constraints and complexity). Therefore, AI can likely do them better than they are currently being done.” – which…doesn’t feel *hugely* robust, intellectually-speaking, and, as ever, there are gaping holes where the sections on ‘negative externalities’ might be expected to sit, or indeed what we’re meant to do about the fact that, per Dario, we will soon reach a point where “our current economic setup will no longer make sense, and there will be a need for a broader societal conversation about how the economy should be organised.” What might that conversation be? How might that work? Dario? DARIO????? Oh well, no need to think about that just yet, eh?
  • Death of Memory: A brief blogpost from Matt Webb next, in which he speculates idly about the potential ulterior motives behind attacks on the Internet Archive. Webb’s not being entirely serious here, I don’t think, but I did think there was something interesting at the heart of what he writes and which gets to the core of much of what is making me uneasy about the proliferation of AI slop everywhere – we’re back to the pollution of the informational water table again, kids (I WILL MAKE THIS ANALOGY CATCH ON IF IT FCUKING KILLS ME, I TELL YOU), and how, after a while of this, you won’t ever be able to remember a time before the streams weren’t all brown and unpleasantly-faecally-scented. Anyway, this is a great writing prompt for a scifi short if nothing else.
  • Risks and Harms and Kids and Social Media: An excellent piece of writing by Danah Boyd, capturing much of the current panicked zeitgeistvibe about kids and phones and social media – on which note, man does the stuff coming out of the TikTok case in the US make for uncomfortable reading for TikTok! – and arguing sensibly and cogently that we should approach the question in terms of risks and harms, and that as such we should think more in terms of working to minimise risk via design and education rather than attempting to ‘ban harms’. This really is worth reading in full – particularly if this is a question that you’ve been wrestling with as a parent or guardian – but this is a decent little precis: “Can social media be risky for youth? Of course. So can school. So can friendship. So can the kitchen. So can navigating parents. Can social media be designed better? Absolutely. So can school. So can the kitchen. (So can parents?) Do we always know the best design interventions? No. Might those design interventions backfire? Yes. Does that mean that we should give up trying to improve social media or other digital environments? Absolutely not. But we must also recognize that trying to cement design into law might backfire. And that, more generally, technologies’ risks cannot be managed by design alone.Fixating on better urban design is pointless if we’re not doing the work to socialize and educate people into crossing digital streets responsibly. And when we age-gate and think that people can magically wake up on their 13th or 18th birthday and be suddenly able to navigate digital streets just because of how many cycles they took around the sun, we’re fools. Socialization and education are still essential, regardless of how old you are.”
  • Plutocrat Archipelagos: On the very, very rich. Jack Self writes about spending time in the company of the plutes, about the rarefied air up there, about the oddity of existence in a world whose contours are continually being smoothed to your exact specifications. The prose here is delightful: “In desert gated communities, time is drawn out as thin as the air. The world attains a kind of placid stasis. If we are to believe Borges, as empires rise they generate maps that become coextensive with their territories. And as empires collapse, these maps burn, until the only scraps that remain are in the desert; a confetti archipelago of defunct ideologies, strewn amongst the sand and rocks. We are living through a period of societal collapse. This isn’t a factual statement, but an emotional one. It feels like we are approaching the end of a specific social contract. Modernity is a project founded on patriarchal domination, on linear time, infinite extraction and unstoppable accumulation. In its five centuries, it has evolved into such an unnatural paradigm that it now only survives through extreme and perpetual violence; perpetrated indifferently against both humans and non-humans alike.”
  • Culture Isn’t Stuck, Actually: A counterpoint to the recent spate of ‘we have stopped producing anything really new, culturally-speaking’ pieces, Katherine Dee here suggests that the difference is simply that you can’t see culture anymore, or at least anything resembling a truly representative slice of it, and as such it’s perspective that is screwed not the production of new culture itself. Part of me definitely buys this – specifically, I buy this from the point of view of a 45 year old man who really *shouldn’t* feel like they have any sort of finger-on-the-pulse view of culture, otherwise something really has gone very wrong indeed – although equally I am not sure I 100% buy the following as an example of true ‘newness’ because, well, this doesn’t exactly feel revolutionary: “The social media personality is one example of a new form. Personalities like Bronze Age Pervert, Caroline Calloway, Nara Smith, mukbanger Nikocado Avocado, or even Mr. Stuck Culture himself, Paul Skallas, are themselves continuous works of expression — not quite performance art, but something like it. They may also be influencers, or they may not be, but the innovative aspect isn’t that they’re promoting a brand or making money from their venture.  It’s not about their single tweet, self-published book, or video. The entire avatar, built across various platforms over a period of time, constitutes the art. Their persona must be enjoyed in the moment, as it reveals itself on the platforms; the audience response is part of the piece. The way their audiences start to speak like them, the aesthetics they inspire, and the way they shape headlines — this is all social media born culture.” Sorry, Leigh Bowery would like you to acknowledge them please.
  • The Tesla Thing: If you care about the Tesla robotaxi event thing, chances are that you will have read all you need to about it – if you don’t, you probably don’t care to read anymore. That said, PLEASE take a moment to enjoy this short writeup of the event by Jonathan Gitlen, which is a beautiful example of how to take a gag and work it repeatedly, and which does a neat job of skewering exactly why people should stop listening to that horrid apartheid toad (although I can’t help but be impressed by the rockets, albeit grudgingly).
  • Why Boys Don’t Go To College: Sorry, I should probably have de-yanked the English there – “why young men don’t go to university”, then. I mean, obviously they do, but there’s data from all over the place suggesting that young women are significantly more likely to enter higher education than young men in 2024. Here, Celeste Davis wonders why, and runs some numbers that suggest there’s an interesting – and frankly a bit miserable – fact underpinning this, to whit ‘when groups become minority-male, men tend to abandon them wholesale’. That’s right, the data suggests that one of the reasons that young men aren’t going to university so much is…too many women! Davis explains the concept of ‘male flight’ – wherein beyond a certain tipping point, topics or subjects become ‘female-coded’ in the mind of men, who therefore see them as ‘lower status’ and who therefore avoid participating in them. This is INCREDIBLY miserable – and, honestly, not a little embarrassing tbh, what the fcuk is WRONG with us?! – and yet feels…true? Anyway, this really interested me and wasn’t something I’d ever really considered before. There’s definitely some nudge-adjacent purpose work you could squeeze out of this, with a bit of thought.
  • Netflix’s Endless Library: This is a couple of weeks old and so you might well have seen it – SORRY, NO MORE BREAKS FOR MATT, BAD MATT! – but in case not it’s definitely worth reading – the New York Times goes long on the current state of the streaming economy and how the past decade or so’s approach to the production and distribution of TV has led to the weird situation of there being an infinite amount of it and yet, simultaneously, nothing to watch, and why there are so many shows that seem to exist without anyone ever having seen them (we’re back to the ‘culture is still happening, you just can’t see it because it’s now too big to fit in any single person’s eyeline’ argument again), and how this all links back to…venture capital and modern finance! Funny how whichever way you slice it the general ensh1ttification of so much of modern experience can be blamed squarely on those cnuts, isn’t it? By which I mean, enervating and infuriating!
  • Taylor Lorenz and Modern Media: Depending on how interested in media and media personalities you are, you might have missed the news that Taylor Lorenz, probably the most famous tech/digital culture journalists online right now since we collectively realised that Kara Swisher…wasn’t actually doing a very good job, has quit (or been quit from, unclear tbh) ‘mainstream’ media and is setting herself up as a one woman media vertical (…node, anyone?)…anyway, whether or not you care about that I think this is an interesting profile/interview which covers a lot of interesting ground about the extent to which the ‘mainstream media’ (Jesus I hate that term, I really do – it *reeks* of the worst of the web) has dropped the ball when it comes to ‘online reporting’ over the past decade or so, the growth of independent, narrow-focus new media brands and projects, the idea of the ‘personal brand’ in the workplace and all that sort of jazz. I think Lorenz is very good at what she does and wish her the best, but I can’t deny that my heart sank when I got to the bit about her not wanting to JUST be a journalist but instead aspiring to be a ‘360 degree online personality’ because…a) that isn’t how good reporting happens! b) that doesn’t seem to tend to end well for the ‘360 degree online personalities’ in question! Still, more power to her.
  • The Disappearance of an Internet Domain: In that brief 48h period a few weeks ago when a bunch of red-faced conservatives in the UK had to pretend to both be aware of, and to care about, the UK’s sovereignty over the Chagos Islands (and the fact that said sovereignty was being handed over to the bloody foreigners, WHERE IS OUR EMPIRE, etc etc, one element of the story that was criminally-overlooked was the impact it would have on the world’s websites, who will shortly no longer be able to avail themselves of the .io suffix – because that was attached to the Chaygos Islands, which will now be part of Malaysia, meaning the domain is being retired. This is SO INTERESTING – the links between physical borders and digital domains is always fascinating, conceptually, and this hints at a whole weird alternative world of international geopolitics based around domain-based interest groups which I now want to spend the afternoon daydreaming about.
  • Frieze: Web Curios favourite Clive Martin visit the Frieze Art Fair, which has just departed London, to give his thoughts from the frontline of artcapitalism. I have long had a soft spot for Frieze – I worked for an agency that did its PR for a new years c.2005ish, and going to the opening party on the Wednesday was always  one of the most incredible experiences, not least because it remains one of the only places in the world I’ve ever seen real people in ‘real life’ wearing actual catwalk couture like it was in any way normal – but I confess to looking at the pricetag this year (I long ago slipped off the freebie list, chiz chiz) and thinking ‘yeah, no, you’re alright mate, £70 to stand in a tent is not actually that appealing ta’. Still, Clive does an excellent job of giving you the vibe – his writeup is very much about the people and the commerce and the *feel* of the whole thing rather than the art itself, which, frankly, is pretty much the perfect analogue for Frieze itself. Also, this is written in the second person and you are a SUCKER for things written in the second person.
  • Spotting Gators With Lana Del Rey’s Brother-in-Law: This piece is SO MUCH FUN! Honestly, possibly the most enjoyable read in this week’s Curios, I was grinning throughout. You may be aware that Lana DeL Rey recently got hitched to some random bloke from Florida – it turns out that Mr Del Rey is one of the proprietors of a company that does tours of the alligator swamps for tourists, and so OBVIOUSLY Ock Sportello (can I just say, by the way, that this is possibly the greatest name I have encountered in 2024? Go on, take a moment to roll it around your mouth, it is BRILLIANT) decided to go down and check it out. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Mr Del Rey doesn’t show up to work much any more, but this piece doesn’t suffer from the lack of any meaningful celebrity-adjacent content – it’s just funny and interesting and personal, and does that lovely thing where the writer evidently realises on starting to research the piece that they are not going to end up writing the article they thought they were going to be writing, but that what they will end up writing will be better than what they had planned. You will grin throughout this, I promise.
  • Nardwuar: Do you know who Nardwuar is? I have mentioned him a few times before, I think – and apologies if you do, and this is all old to you, but I have genuinely no clue how famous he is – but to give you the brief synopsis: Nardwuar, otherwise known as ‘Nardwuar The Human Serviette’ (no, no idea) is possibly the greatest music interviewer in history. He has interviewed EVERYONE, and his schtick is basically: a) earnest – Nardwuar is never ironic, never cynical, never anything less than 100% enthusiastic; b) informed – Nardwuar knows EVERYTHING. Seriously, each interview basically features the musicians becoming slowly more and more freaked out by the insane, almost stalker-ish, level of knowledge about them that Nardwuar displays, from their tastes to their hates, their history and their records. He might be the greatest living scholar of modern musicians, no sh1t; c) indefatigable – Nardwuar always plays it straight, even on those occasions when SOME musicians (naming no names but I think I decided that Blur were, in the main, total cnuts when I saw how they treated poor Nardwuar) decide to be mean to him, which makes some of his interviews almost unbearably poignant to watch. ANYWAY, Nardwuar is a treasure and a delight, and this chat with him about his favourite ever interviews, is just pure and gorgeous and will make you happy, I promise. Also, it is an excellent excuse to explore the Nardwuar back catalogue if you’re yet to experience him, because honestly he is a…unique talent.
  • The Thirty-Two Fouettes: A short story by Dwight Curtis about…well, sort of about ballet, but not really about that at all. I found this fascinating – I don’t know that I *liked* it, entirely, but I have reread bits of it over and over again this week and it’s stuck with me. Something very…nasty about this, in a very subtle way, and I think that’s what I am enjoying.
  • Icarus Also Flew: From the latest issue of The Fence, this has rightly been lauded as a brilliant piece of writing – Ella Fox-Martens writes about moving in with someone you’ve never met. This does not, I promise, go where you expect it to, and it is so much better for not being the piece you think it’s going to be when you start reading it.
  • The Manifesto: Last of the longreads this week is this superb short by Ilse Eskelen, about a young woman who wants to impress a boy, and it is very funny indeed and you should make yourself a cup of tea and read it right now.

By Charlie Tallott

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!: