Author Archives: admin

Webcurios 21/02/25

Reading Time: 39 minutes

Last weekend I went to watch non-league football at Canvey Island. I don’t really feel I should write about it too much in this newsletter other than to say ‘I do not, in all honesty, recommend that you spend a Saturday in February watching non-league football at Canvey Island’, but I would like to say in the club’s defence that you can get pints for £4.50 which makes it easier to pointedly ignore the 22 men shouting “FCUKING HOLD IT” at each other for 90 long, freezing minutes.

I also went to see contemporary dance last night – MY HOUSE HAS SO MANY ROOMS! Most of them admittedly empty, but nonetheless – which was warmer, but no less baffling (and the drinks were significantly more expensive). My ANALYTICAL TAKEAWAY from these experiences, which you will be grateful to learn I will happily share with you, is that you should basically never step outside your cultural comfort zone – it’s called a ‘comfort zone’ for a reason ffs, you wouldn’t want to hang out in your ‘torture and pain zone’ would you? No, you wouldn’t, so there.

Fcuking hell I am so so so tired. Can you tell? I worry you can tell.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are entirely entitled to just click the links and ignore the words this week, seriously.

By Tomona Matsukowa (this image lifted from TIH, for which thanks)

YOUR FIRST MIX THIS WEEK IS A COLLECTION OF REALLY *INTERESTING* (IN A GOOD WAY!) TRACKS WHICH I MIGHT CALL ‘CINEMATIC’ IF I WERE THE SORT OF PERSON TO WHOM THAT ADJECTIVE MEANT ANYTHING, SELECTED BY DJ LOSER! 

THE SECTION WHICH THINKS THAT IF YOU HAVE A NEWSLETTER WITH 140K SUBS WHICH YOU CHARGE £80 A YEAR FOR AND YOU MENTION THAT YOU FOUND SOMETHING IN MY P1SSY LITTLE EFFORT THAT YOU CHOOSE TO LIFT AND QUOTE ME ABOUT THEN THE LEAST YOU CAN FCUKING DO IS INCLUDE A BACKLINK (YES I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU, THE KNOWLEDGE, I KNOW YOU ARE READING THIS), PT.1:  

  • Protein Monster: It is, I think, reasonable to say that I consume an above average quantity of internet – a statement which simultaneously sounds like the world’s least-impressive flex and an admission of a life which has been terribly wasted! – and as such like to think that I have a reasonably good mental rolodex of ‘weird and obsessional webprojects which don’t really seem to make sense except as some sort of art project or, viewed less-charitably, an expression of deep-seated pain and trauma’, and yet every few weeks I will stumble across something so weird and massive and utterly inexplicable and so fundamentally perfect for Curios, and which has been around for AGES,  that I get quite annoyed with myself for not having seen all of the web by now. Consider sites like Protein Monster your regular reminder that the internet is FCUKING MASSIVE and, much like the sea, we have explored about ~3% of it and that which remains contains far stranger things than are dreamt of even in my philosophy (do not, please, feel emboldened to share your philosophy with me at this point). YES OK BUT WHAT IS IT FFS??? Hm. It’s possible the reason I’ve taken such a meandering route to describing this is that I am not wholly sure how to do it – but let me try. Protein Monster is a collection of webpages which all link to each other in a massive, incomprehensible spiderweb of…I don’t know, calling it ‘content’ feels frankly offensive to what I presume is the single person behind it. This is a dizzying, strange, confusing, funny, interesting, unsettling, NSFW, creepy and deeply, deeply online website which doesn’t seem to have any coherent theme or aim beyond ‘LOOK AT ALL OF THIS STUFF’ – the main link takes you to the closest the site has to a ‘landing page’, so you could just start there, or alternatively you might prefer the more, er, *intense* entrypoint of this (occasionally quite NSFW) page (you will need to click the black page once it loads to kick it off), which acts both as rough visual introduction to the overall aesthetic of the whole thing and also as what I honestly think is one of the most perfect ‘this is what ONLINE is like’ little bits of video/audiowork I have seen in years (no, honestly, I mean it). This is VERY, VERY ODD (also, it is INCREDIBLY deep/wide, and I have only scratched the surface of what is in there – it doesn’t *feel* like it goes anywhere ‘bad’, but, well, caveat emptor).
  • My Life In Weeks: A really lovely piece of information design work by one Gina Trapani, one which, I have just realised, she’s been working on for over 10 years (as an aside, I have found SO many long-running webprojects in the past few months, it’s genuinely slightly humbling to realise that Curios is to REAL web OGs as the mayfly to the elephant) and which is effectively a week-by-week log of her entire life; per Gina, “This is a map of my life, where each week I’ve been alive is a little box. Tap a box to see what I was doing where that week.” This is SUCH a nice way of visualising information over time which has a lot to recommend it and I can imagine might be a nice thing to explore with kids or as a family as a means of tracking your experiences (as someone with, basically, neither of those things, I am rather shooting in the dark here, but I am sure you can work something out).
  • EU Accelerationism: Anything the US techcnuts can do! This is a very dull-looking website (and, if I’m honest, the content’s not exactly thrilling – no, wait, come back!) but the ‘thinking’ behind it is, I think, interesting in terms of the ambient temperature of the tech industry in the EU (or certain aspects of it, at least) in Q1 2025 (and, more importantly, in light of the ‘all gas, no breaks’ approach seemingly being adopted by the sector in the US. Basically this is a manifesto (CAN THE WORST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD PLEASE STOP WRITING FCUKING MANIFESTOS PLEASE?) whose contents are a call for Europe to DEREGULATE THE FCUK OUT OF TECH!! You can, hopefully, imagine the sort of ‘hey, everything would be fine if we just let capital and markets do their thing!!’ rhetoric at play here, but this, from one of the first sections, gives you a representative flavour: “By exempting businesses with annual revenues below €10 million from complex regulations like VATMOSS, GDPR, and the EU AI Act, we empower entrepreneurs to focus on creating great products and reaching market success without being weighed down by compliance.” Ah, yes, compliance! Having to adhere to rules and regulations designed to protect consumers and society from the impact of your attempts to get incredibly fcuking rich! Of course you shouldn’t be held back from plutocracy and a seat at the Big Table by pesky concerns around, I don’t know, not fcuking everything and everyone in half with your fcuking disruption! Via my friend Ben; let’s hope that this dies on its fcuking ar$e.
  • RPLY: It is, of course, lazy and simplistic to make sweeping comments about THE MODERN WORLD and our increasing reluctance to put the effort in to personal relationships and friendships and social obligations (equally, one might also argue that given the psychic cost of, well, EVERYTHING FCUKING ELSE that it’s perhaps understandable we don’t necessarily have a lot of energy left, but); equally, though, as someone now well past middle age, it’s impossible not to sight slightly at the premise behind RPLY, which is a downloadable plugin for MacOS (Apple only) which will integrate with iMessage and, if you let it, check your inbox for any unanswered messages, suggest responses and, as far as I can tell (if you go full ‘run my life, The Machine!’), send replies for you too. Which on the one hand I can imagine being potentially useful for people who find their volume of inbound overwhelming, fine, but which also a) makes me quite sad – I DO NOT THINK THAT SAYING ‘YES’, ‘NO’ OR ‘THANKYOU’ ARE THINGS SO TAXING THAT YOU NEED TO OUTSOURCE THE TASK (apologies for what I am sure is a moderately-ableist point of view there); b) relies on the AI not sending wildly inappropriate or unhelpful responses without your say-so, accepting meetings on your behalf or telling a supplier to go fcuk themselves with a spoon. I am probably being unfair – I am basing this solely on vibes and this writeup, after all – but, generally, this does not ‘spark joy’ in me (I appreciate that the degree to which I LOVE exchanging messages with people makes me possibly a bad judge of the widespread appetite for this sort of service, to be fair).
  • The Feelings Engine: This is a promo for a travel agency in (I think) the US, the inexplicably-named Black Tomato (honestly, WHY?), which has built an LLM layer over the top of their search functionality which allows you to pump in natural language queries about the sort of emotions you’d like to evoke on your travels and, in exchange, get a suggested trip which, The Machine promises, will PERFECTLY MATCH what you are looking for. To give you an idea of how this works, I just told it that “I want to feel a gentle sense of melancholia born of the knowledge that all human life is transient and, in the end, nothing we do will matter because we are all going to die” – in return, it suggested the following, which, fair play, was more than I was expecting and a couple of rungs up from TUI: “Deep in the Sarawak Jungle of Borneo, where ancient tribes have lived in harmony with nature for countless generations, you’ll find a profound connection to both the transient and eternal aspects of human existence. This 13-day journey strips away all modern distractions as you learn to live among the Penan, one of the world’s last remaining nomadic jungle tribes. In this pristine wilderness, you’ll learn their ancestral survival techniques – skills passed down through generations, each teacher knowing their knowledge must be preserved even as they themselves pass on. Sleeping in hammocks beneath vast jungle canopies, cooking over open fires, and learning to read the forest’s ancient signs, you’ll experience a way of life that has remained largely unchanged for millennia. The culmination of your journey is a solitary 48-hour challenge where you’ll rely solely on your newly acquired skills – a powerful reminder of both human resilience and vulnerability in the face of nature’s timeless rhythms.” If only I had a spare £13k and someone to go with.
  • PxPxPx: Collaborative creativity website corner! I like this a lot – basically you click the link and you’re taken to a BIG canvas on which you and anyone else currently vising the site can draw, with the gimmick being that you can only draw in one colour and each user is assigned a different pantone shade, meaning it’s created this sort of semi-collaborative, semi-adversarial game where people vie for control of different bits of the map…so basically, as you have doubtless gleaned, it’s another riff on the /r/Place gimmick, but a) it’s a nice one; b) it’s pretty obviously something which has been shared around various kid internet places and there’s something slightly pleasing about how the overwhelming sentiment from The Youth, at least the online youth, is ‘fcuk Elon’ (also, “USA is fcuked” which made me laugh). Basically this is like a graffiti wall at a school, if the school were digital and international and infinite. Which, honestly, sounds AWFUL, but this is fun, promise (also, as far as I can tell, there is NOTHING BAD on there!).
  • Project 2025 Observer: As the whole Project25 thing continues look morelike an actual plan rather than the fevered imaginings of a bunch of semi-libertarian wingnuts (oh, hang on, it was BOTH? FFS!), this site is tracking the ostensible progress of the US administration towards fulfilling the aims set out in the original project plan – which, I get, is a laudable attempt at transparency, but, equally, given the lack of actual clarity on what is ACTUALLY being done vs what is being shouted about VERY LOUDLY, and the judicial impediments being used to prevent some of the more obvious and egregious attempts to gut the state, it’s possible that this paints a SLIGHTLY more apocalyptic picture than is quite warranted (it is equally possible, though, that this is simply me huffing vast authorial quantities of copium, so, well, take your pick). Oh, and seeing as I am briefly doing US politics in the uptop, here is the website for 50501, which is a protest organisation in North America which is working to help organise on-the-ground and grassroots movements and which has coordinated peaceful protests across the country over the past couple of weeks, and here’s the site for Tesla Takedown, an organisation which is trying to get people to protest the company, dump Tesla stock and fcuk That Fcuking Man in the wallet (there’s quite a lot of chat from People Who Have Studied Him about how his actual cash position is significantly more parlous and vulnerable than his paper position might make him appear, which, honestly, I don’t understand enough about money to really meaningfully grasp  but which I hope against hope is true).
  • Grocy: This is one of those very particular links where I imagine that, while for 99.9% of you it will be baffling, incomprehensible and deeply-tedious (why ARE you reading this? Why am I writing it? Gah, existential angst at 7:52am doesn’t bode hugely well), there will be 0.1% of you (so, what, a statistical third of a person?) for whom this is LIFE-CHANGING and transformative. Are YOU the sort of person who gets a vague sense of excitement from the concept of life-tracking and the quantified self? Do you like hacking stuff together? Does the concept of a ‘linux kernel’ not only mean something to you but NOT strike fear into your very heart? OH GOOD! Grocy is what looks like a reasonably-powerful bit of code which you can use to effectively track and manage your domestic food arrangements (oh, hang on, there’s also an app! This isn’t just for the codemongs!). Honestly, it is worth clicking through and seeing all the stuff this does – you can barcode scan all your food so it knows what’s in your fridge/larder, you can use it to stack stock quantity and set purchase reminders, it has an integrated recipe suggestion feature which works from your known, in-stock ingredients, the code’s all open source…honestly, for the right type of person this will be THRILLING (and, depending on what the rest of their life and family is like, for their partner and offspring it may be…less so, I concede).
  • The Tube Ad Critic: Someone is doing reviews of the ads on the London Underground – specifically of the copy – and offering up star ratings to the various campaigns, which is a nice idea (I am aware that enough of you reading this still work in advermarketingpr and so might be in the market for such a link, even if it’s possibly a *bit* industry-specific for general consumption). In general this is pleasant enough, even if I would personally prefer it were the author to be, well, a bit more aggressively opinionated, especially given the fact that seemingly no fcuker in the entire London ad industry knows how to write decent fcuking copy anymore. Three out of five stars.
  • JS Kaleidoscope: Upload any image you like and watch as it turns into a beautiful kaleidoscope. Or at least it’s beautiful if you use an abstract or a landscape – if you use a photo of your own face, as I did upon first finding it, it very quickly becomes a deeply-horrifying exploration of some fairly long-buried meat-based insecurities (or it does if you’re me).
  • The Substance Lookbook: OBVIOUSLY I haven’t seen The Substance, but I am aware enough of the world outside the internet to know that there was a film called The Substance, it starred Demi Moore, and it was a groundbreaking satire on femininity, sexism, ageing and female identity/agency / a deeply disappointing schlockfest which failed to stick the landing (delete as per). Anyway, point is I have an idea of the film’s general VIBE, and as such very much enjoyed looking through what is apparently the lookbook produced for the movie and which is just such a perfect encapsulation of a mood/aesthetic; honestly, this is good because it is SO CLEAR and SO DIRECTIONAL and even someone with as little aesthetic sense as me can get what it’s communicating and what ‘the look’ is. Really interesting and a very good example of how to craft (or think about crafting, or maybe cohering) a campaign or project.
  • The Protector App: A small bugbear about The Modern World – I hate it as much as you do (probably more, it’s fair to say), and I hate the techcnuts (again, trust me on this, given the amount of time I have been forced to spend thinking about them over the past few years it’s fair to say that my hatred might even outweigh yours), and I think that increasingly large parts of How Capitalism Works and How It Manifests In Society are deeply troubling…but, also, I am really fcuking bored of people taking stuff and creating narratives around it that fit their worldview but which aren’t, well, true (DOING THAT IS HOW WE GOT HERE YOU FCUKING MORONS). A case in point was the reaction to the release this week of Protector, marketed as an app which lets you hire ex-Forces personnel to be your on-demand bodyguard/militarised escort service – some of it was funny (‘Uber for Goons”), but most of it was hyperbolising about “OH MY GOD THEY’VE DONE MILITIAS-AS-A-SERVICE” and the like…except, well, I don’t think that’s what this is. This is a lifestyle flex, a status booster, something for the ‘gram and the Tok and probably not intended as an actual, honest-to-goodness security proposition. Witness the marketing videos the company put out pre-launch, expertly (if…somewhat morally uncritically) deconstructed in this Reel, which is very clearly pimping this as a really fcuking pimped way to arrive at Prom, basically. Can we all say Boom Boom Aesthetic?
  • Ludocene: Ooh, this is a really nice idea. If you’re into videogames, you might find the current publishing landscape overwhelming (particularly on PC) – outside of the big publishers, there is a dizzying number of titles being published each month and it’s hard to develop an understanding of what’s interesting and good given the impossibility of outlets being able to cover everything worthwhile. Enter Ludocene, a recently-launched Kickstarter which is hoping to fundraise to launch, er, ‘Tinder for games’ – “Ludocene is a new way to find your next game. It uses rich human-researched data to build your catalogue of games. It uncovers amazing, unusual and unexpected matches not just the usual suspects or big popular games. It feels like you’re playing a game, where winning is discovering video games that perfectly match your tastes: Build your perfect deck of games you love; Pick experts whose taste you trust; Discover your best matches in the tailored suggestions. Each game is represented by a card that you can interact with: click to view a game trailer and flip to view more details and the best prices on storefronts.Like a dating app, you are offered a stream of games. You swipe up to reject and swipe down to add them to your deck of games that represent your taste. Every choice refines the stream of games offered as you hunt for your next game.” It’s 25% there with three weeks to go, and in general seems like a decent idea that might prove really helpful with enough momentum and users behind it.
  • Nobody Here: OH GOD ANOTHER BRILLIANT AND MASSIVE AND INEXPLICABLE WEBSITE! This is also, I think, OLD – but it’s quite hard to tell, and judging by the baffling but still very active concern it is still very much A Thing (FCUKING HELL I JUST LOOKED AND IT IS 27 YEARS OLD! 27! THERE ARE PEOPLE DISMANTLING US DEMOCRACY WHO ARE YOUNGER THAN THIS WEBSITE!). This is the website of…someone? I think they are Dutch, and I presume they’re a coder, but, honestly, I don’t really know – I fell in love with the homepage (honestly, the animations and interactions on the silhouette figure would have been enough for me to include this, even without the baffling labyrinth of STUFF that sits beneath it) and then just found myself clicking around and…Jesus, this, per Protein World, goes DEEP but it is so, so pleasingly incoherent and WHOLLY personal, and I increasingly believe (work with me here) that, actually, at the age of, say, 11, every single kid in the world should be given a set amount of cloud storage space and some basic dev education and told ‘this is your foreverplace, make of it what you will’ and left to turn it into whatever they choose because how much better would the web be if there were more sites like this? IT WOULD BE LOADS BETTER YOU JOYLESS FCUKS.

By Marta Blue

NEXT, THIS IS AN ASTONISHING 13H PLAYLIST COMPILED BY JARVIS COCKER WHICH IS RELIABLY ACE AND WHICH YOU SHOULD BOOKMARK RIGHT NOW!

THE SECTION WHICH THINKS THAT IF YOU HAVE A NEWSLETTER WITH 140K SUBS WHICH YOU CHARGE £80 A YEAR FOR AND YOU FOUND SOMETHING IN MY P1SSY LITTLE EFFORT THAT YOU CHOOSE TO LIFT AND QUOTE ME ABOUT THEN THE LEAST YOU CAN FCUKING DO IS INCLUDE A BACKLINK YOU CNUTS (YES I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU, THE KNOWLEDGE, I KNOW YOU ARE READING THIS), PT.2:

  • Komaeda: In what is an absolute BUMPER WEEK for ‘inexplicable and very large and occasionally-unsettling websites which your very own internet Virgil couldn’t begin to adequately describe even were he an actual, proper writer’, I think Komaeda might be the oddest of all. It opens with the phrase ‘i cant fcuking breathe’ and, honestly, only gets weirder from there. It’s a bit janky, there are parts of it that feel oddly like a Newgrounds animation c.2005 (REAL HEADS WILL KNOW) – including this alternative entrypoint, which feels like a portal back to a VERY different online time – and, again, I don’t have the faintest idea what is on all the pages or how deep this goes and so can’t promise there isn’t anything bad lurking somewhere in the depths, but it doesn’t feel like that sort of site fwiw. This is – and I know I say this all the time, but I feel it quite strongly, so – ART. Weird, broken, possibly-not-very-good art, but art nonetheless. There is music, there are visuals, there are stories and comics and essays and animations and VERY WEIRD THINGS, and quite a lot of stuff that sounds, honestly, like schizophrenia, but who can tell in this day and age? ENJOY!
  • Psst!: In an era in which it seems clear that any ostensible – even if cosmetic – progress we might have made on the concept of ‘corporate responsibility’ is going to be rolled back hard over the course of the coming years, consequences be damned (I am not going to keep repeating the ’Boom Boom’ thing, but, well, that), it feels like the concept of leaking and whistleblowing is set to be more important than ever. Effectively Psst! is running a digital dead drop, letting anyone anonymously share files with their legal team who will then analyse and see if there’s anything that can be done with said information – per the blurb, “Psst is a non-partisan, non-profit public service that helps people bring forward public interest information. We’ve worked with a lot of people concerned about something they’ve seen at work. We know the tricks powerful corporations use to shut people up. We also know a lot of important information never comes out due to legal threats. In our era of AI, Big Tech and decreasing government guardrails, we need safe channels to share public interest information more than ever.” Perhaps unsurprisingly given Where We Are, “Currently, the Psst team is prioritizing depositors who are working in tech or US-based governmental entities” – should there be any of you reading this who fit that description, this might be worth a look. Although based on what I was told yesterday about some…changes another VERY LARGE company is set to make to its stated ‘values’ (LOL) and what this stuff practically means in terms of likely directions of corporate travel, I might suggest that any of you working in BIG EVIL CAPITAL LAND might want to think about this sort of thing too.
  • Fiverr Go: I have long thought that the digital pieceworkers and VAs in places like the Philippines are going to be some of the earliest canaries to fall as AI starts cutting swathes, and it’s hard to see this latest innovation from gigworking platform Fiverr as anything other than an accelerant to the inevitable endpoint (ie all of those jobs are gone). The gimmick here is that Fiverr is allowing CREATORS (in this case v/o artists, illustrators and graphic designers from what I can tell) to spin up their own AI models based on their work, and license those models on a per-use basis to customers, theoretically combining AI and HUMAN CREATIVITY to create a passive income stream – the digital, model version of you works all day and night while you put your feet up and enjoy the fruits of your talented, exploited and extended via the magic of The Machine. Except, well, I can’t see how the economics work here because – and I appreciate that what I am going to say is possibly going to sound mean, and maybe is, but I think it is also true – none of the v/o artists or illustrators or designers tending to ply their wares on platforms like Fiverr are distinct enough to be worth the fee, and won’t be better enough than what, honestly, you can get from AN Other model where you can either use it for free or get an infinite license for a tenner a month rather than having to pay a per-work rate. So, well, why the fcuk would I bother? If I want to support a REAL CREATOR I would like them to do the actual work rather than using a model of their style; it feels like this offering misses several points. Still, as I often say, I don’t know the first fcuking thing about business or economics or, really, anything at all, and so expect this to be how we all do business in the AI-enabled luxury communist future of tomorrow.
  • Olyn: What is Olyn? Per the landing page, “Pioneering the Future of Media Distribution…Supporting creators to monetize and distribute their media content without listing dependencies or platform constraints.” SO EVOCATIVE! SO INSPIRATIONAL! SO ARTISTIC AND HUMAN! Leaving aside the frankly-hideous prose, Olyn is marketing itself as a direct-to-consumer model for film creators – per this TC writeup, it: “claims to offer a new model for film and video distribution that leans on the power of social referrals to spread “à la carte” streaming content. Although any size of production — from Hollywood blockbuster downward — can use the platform, the company claims it could be a game changer for the independent film industry, which tends to struggle against the marketing budgets of the bigger movies distributed on mainstream streaming platforms…Instead of films being sold to platforms like Netflix, the model hinges on the marketing budget of the filmmakers themselves, combined with influencers, film critics, and content creators acting as distribution partners by embedding purchase links within their content, blogs, and social channels.” Look, it’s possible I’m missing something here but I don’t wholly understand exactly how ‘share a link to your content!’ is a revolutionary or disruptive proposition given, well, that’s how people have been sharing things for 25 years by now, but perhaps there’s something I’m missing (if this company still exists in the same shape in three years time I will eat my pants) (I would be grateful if a) none of you bothered tracking this; b) in three years’ time this is a long distant memory and I am finally happy and at rest).
  • Sky360: I know that, per horse_e_books, everything happens so much, and that it is therefore hard to keep track, but it honestly feels like approximately a decade since a bunch of incredibly smart people in the US started taking potshots at planes because they thought that they were alien craft. Except it wasn’t, it was only a few months, and, given the potentially-parlous state of the world over the coming few years and the likely growing sense of paranoia which everyone’s going to start wearing like so many additional lbs of stress around our necks (you can feel it, can’t you, the knotting?), it’s likely that we’ve not seen the last of mad online UFO conspiracies – which is what makes it so UTTERLY TIMELY that someone has seen fit to launch Sky36, a project promising to establish “Observational Citizen Science of Earths atmosphere and beyond” (the infelicitous punctuation there is theirs on this occasion rather than mine, I promise) which DEFINITELY won’t attract every Area51-coded crank in the Northern Hemisphere, no sirree. Basically the spelling and tone of this makes me…somewhat concerned, but should you be the sort of person who wants to build their own UFO-detection system out of homebrew parts then, well, GREAT!
  • Cutting Edge AI Video, February 2025 Edition: Or “LOL WE ARE SO COOKED (again)!”, choose your headline per preference. This comes via Arnicas’ superb newsletter (I can’t stress again how much you should be subscribed to it if you have any interest in visual / storytelling tech and AI) and is an experimental lora (that is, fine-tuning mod) for one of the better text-to-vid models, Hunyuan which basically creates vids that look…a bit crap. Honestly, watch these and tell me you’d be able to tag them as fake if presented to you in-feed – I posit that you would absolutely fcuking not be able to. I know I keep banging this drum, but I don’t think people are quite *getting* it, still – these things are not going to go away, they are not going back in the bottle, and they are very soon (within the year, doubtless) going to be good enough to create photorealistic video that mimics the grain and lighting and…mundanity of real life, and they will then become small enough and lightweight enough to run locally on a phone or laptop and cheap enough that the generation cost is less-than-trivial…and at that point I genuinely don’t know what happens. Do you?
  • Rabbithole: As everyone begins to realise that what both OpenAI and Google both admitted two years ago (specifically, “we have no moat here”) is entirely true, we’re basically entering the era of ‘all the models are largely interchangeable outside of specific usecases and they all do basically the same stuff’, which is good for users if not for the poor chumps who put all their eggs in the wrong basket (what’s that? Is that the sound of no violins whatsoever? It fcuking is, you know!). So it is with ‘Deep Research’, which is being touted by everyone as THE NEW HOTNESS. Rabbithole is a standalone platform (although almost certainly built on top of something else – oh, yes, Gemini, with other integration coming soon) which is designed specifically for ‘exploring interest areas’ – while I wouldn’t rely on it AT ALL for anything that actually mattered (which applies to all AI research, by the way – it is simply not good enough yet to be useful, unless what you consider ‘useful’ is ‘something that could have been produced by an average 16 year old’ in which case, well, raise your fcuking bar ffs), it is actually quite a fun way of asking a question and letting it lead you – give it an area of enquiry and it will not only give you answers with sources, but it will also suggest other directions in which you can take your enquiry – so a question about, say, situationism, will give you a sourced breakdown of the movement but also suggested branching questions around its impact on urban exploration practices, its subsequent influence on later social movements, and specific techniques employed in the movement’s early days to create ‘experiences’, all of which are, honestly, not bad follow-ups! As a means of getting the broad ‘shape’ of a topic, this could be quite useful imho.
  • Angus Nic Neven: Look, I think Angus Nic Neven is a musician. I THINK. That, though, doesn’t explain why his personal website is possibly the most obviously, overtly, occult thing I think I have ever seen on the web ever. Like, I don’t believe in evil and witches and things like that (when, like me, you sold your soul to the devil aged 17, it is important to maintain this sense of grounded reality lest you get impossibly panicked about What Is To Come), but it’s impossible not to get the sense that there is something about this whole site that…well…*bodes*, basically, and not well. If the internet existed when I was at secondary school and I was caught looking at this by Sister Janet she would have been even more concerned for my mortal soul than she already was, let’s just say. I am reasonably-certain that clicking this link won’t leave you cursed or in any way doomed to a life of satanically-linked torment of the soul but I can’t promise it for sure, is all I’m saying. Should Angus happen to ever see this, please do drop me a line and explain what the fcuk is going on here because I love it but it also scares me quite a lot.
  • Sacred Forests: While I might personally be, er, *somewhat bearish* about the future prospects of the planet (at least without the aforementioned Big Tech Hail Mary that we’re all seemingly now fixated on), I am very much pro initiatives that exhibit a slightly more hopeful outlook, such as Sacred Forest. It’s also a really nicely-made website which features a friendly capybara early-on, which endeared me to it no end. This is basically a project that seeks to work with indigenous communities to encourage rewilding of natural areas in a way in which is consistent with, and sympathetic to, their community and practice as well as benefiting the planet – per the blurb, “Sacred Forests is an Amsterdam born, internationally operating social enterprise start up at the forefront of a ‘new’ yet ancient way to protect forests, Indigenous forest conservation.” In typical Dutch fashion they acknowledge the slightly-eyeroll-inducing trope of ‘a bunch of rich white guys doing the saviour thing’ – although ‘acknowledging’ is not the same as ‘not doing the thing you are acknowledging’, to be clear, and this is obviously an initiative with its heart in the right place – your mileage will obviously vary, but I thought this was an interesting idea and, from the simple point of view of communication and digital/visual design, is very nice indeed.
  • EggThread: How online are you, do you think? VERY online? I think this thread is a decent test. It is about the fact that there are no eggs in the US, and those that there are are currently very expensive. It starts off silly and gets increasingly nonsensical and internetty, and, honestly, I think this is possibly one of the purest expressions of Where We Have Ended Up With Digital Culture – serious news filtered through what is now an accreted series of layers of memetics and irony and DEEP-FRIED KNOWLEDGE; a decade or more of marination and maceration of ourselves in the internet soup has led us to this point, where someone can post a photo of an empty palette of eggs in a shop with the caption “Trump take egg” and a dozen or so (mad) posts later someone will write “You need slurp juice to buy egg now” AND IT MAKES SENSE (to me. Oh God, I am irrevocably ruined, aren’t I?). Consider this a useful barometer of the extent to which you’re able to function in polite, offline society (or, er, not).
  • Goosebumps: An infinite runner – click to jump, collect the tokens, avoid the rocks! Simple, fast and visually rather glorious (but VERY hard to play, to my mind at least, as a result of the visual clutter), this is a promo for something or other (I don’t know or honestly care what) which will give you a pleasing few minutes’ distraction before you move onto something a bit more nourishing.
  • 3d Maze: Also via TITAA, this is FUN – basically your task is to navigate a 3d maze in FPS; by the end of your first run you can choose the size of the next maze you take on, meaning you can create something enormous and very, very difficult. The only way this fun, lightweight little webtoy could be improved would be to allow you to upload your own images to act as wallpaper for the maze – being confronted with a closeup of your own hideous visage would give a new and compelling reason to get the fcuk out of there sharpish, for example.
  • The Flash Museum: I can’t believe I haven’t featured this before. The Flash Museum is, er, a digital museum of old flash games, converted so they play in modern browsers – if you spent any time on Newgrounds (second mention this week, IT’S SO BACK!) in the early-00s then you will recognise SO MANY of these titles – in the main they are fcuking awful, but there’s a certain janky period charm to them imho. Also there are some legit classics – Alien Hominid still slaps as much as it did when I spent entire days doing nothing but playing it at work (RIP Citigate Public Affairs, you are wiv da angles) – although you should be aware that, given the 00-iness of the whole thing there is also a bunch of stuff of possibly questionable taste to modern eyes (I think I saw a variant on ‘columbine simulator’ up there, for example).
  • Weekend At Mario’s: Via Rob at B3ta, what would the first level of Mario be like if the plumber was dead? Not that much fun tbh, but the ragdoll physics here makes this a reasonably-enjoyable thing to futz around with for five minutes or so.
  • Virtual PC: A virtual PC! With a virtual hard-drive! On which you can play actual, full PC games from the late-90s! Seriously, there’s DOOM (obvs!), Sim City 2000 (honestly, load it up just to hear the intro music and get the purest hit of Proustian nostalgia you will feel all week), Civilisation, Age of Empires…GO BACK TO YOUR CHILDHOOD WHEN EVERYTHING WAS SIMPLE!
  • Little Sisyphus: Our final game this week is this LOVELY little NES-style platformer with a surprisingly-sophisticated physics model at its heart – this is HARD, be warned (or at least it was for me), but I guess that’s era-appropriate, and it’s really very impressively made indeed considering it all runs in-browser, and it came to me via Andy and you should give it a go RIGHT NOW.

By Dennis Møgelgaard

FINALLY THIS WEEK WE CLOSE OUT HARD WITH FORMER EDITOR PAUL AND HIS GERMANIC BLEEPS AND BLOOPS AND WHEES! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • King of Blood: Via the lovely people over at MeFi, King of Blood is a webcomic which is less sinister than its name might immediately suggest but which isn’t wholly un-sinister, if you see what I mean.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Potions & Spells: Ok, this isn’t in fact long at all, but it felt interestingly *true* to me and I am increasingly of the opinion that Sean Monahan is one of about a dozen people worth reading on Where Modern Culture Is Going Right Now (not that I think he is always right, but he is always interesting) – also it harked me back to something I’ve been wanging on about for over a decade(!) now, to whit “when Grey predicted that New Witches was going to be a big consumer trend in 2015 I laughed and mocked them in Private Eye, but actually it turns out they were totally right and in fact the stuff they identified has actually been one of the more significant, if one-remove, influences on the past ten years imho’ and which I feel this little article neatly bookends. It’s short, see what you think: “What if, instead of using clinical language to describe addiction, we used spiritual terms? The gambling addict is not suffering from compulsive behavior; he is possessed. Schoolchildren are not distracted by screens; they are hypnotized. Ozempic is not a medication; it’s a potion. Propaganda does not use communications strategies; it casts spells. Or on a more personal note—it’s not a vibe shift; it’s a broken spell? Maybe UFOs aren’t extraterrestrials; they’re demons.” It doesn’t feel  good, but it feels…accurate.
  • Human Mediocrity will Pave the Way: I had a slightly awkward moment before Christmas when I was asked to speak at an event (about AI, OBVIOUSLY!!!!) and realised after being there for 3m that I hated everyone in the room with an incandescent passion and that I was therefore not going to care about being polite, and ended up effectively implying that everyone there deserved to lose their jobs to The Machine because they were in the main involved in the pollution of the cultural ecosystem with infinite quantities of dreck (I think the exact moment I realised I was possibly going TOO FAR was when I asked everyone in the room who thought the work they did attained the heady heights of ‘mediocre’ on a day to day basis to raise their hands and then, at the nervous laugher, just looked at them all, unsmiling. It’s a miracle they paid the fcuking invoice tbh) – I felt that very strongly when reading this brilliant and thought-provoking piece by Mo Diggs. There is a lot in here so I won’t attempt a full summary, but, roughly, he’s not attempting to say ‘THERE HAS BEEN NO GOOD CULTURE IN TWO DECADES’ so much as he is saying ‘the viewing of culture through the prism of digital/social media has created a flattening effect which has not contributed to the creation of valuable works, in the main’ – there’s a lot more in here about the inherent cultural drivers of social platforms, the way this all ties into the wider dark forest internet theory, etc, but even if you’re just interested in a topline read of ‘culture in the now’ then this really is very interesting indeed.
  • Ryan On Trump: I sort of assume you all read Garbage Day already – and you should, much as it pains me to heap praise on a significantly more successful product, it is one of the best English-language newsletters in the world if you’re interested in the digital culture and how it is CHANGING US – but if you don’t then let me take a moment to recommend the headline post, and this one, giving an overview/perspective on the ongoing attempts to reduce the US State apparatus to smouldering rubble and tens of thousands of government employees with Grok (probably). I appreciate you might not want to stick your face in That Man’s Firehose, so to speak, but if you want at least to stay at least minimally informed about all the things that are actually happening – and What It Means – then Ryan (and Rusty at Tabs, actually) are both doing a superb job. You don’t get analysis like this in the NYT, in the main: “At some point between 2019-2021, the internet conquered mainstream media, viral content replaced traditional corporate entertainment, and Republicans have first mover’s advantage. This is their victory lap after all the shameless years they spent posting Pepe the Frog memes and setting up YouTube channels to brainwash children. But I am surprised by how thoroughly the Democrats and, more generally, leftists and liberals have ceded internet culture, as a whole, to the right. Every meme, every format, every platform is fertile ground for an adversarial regime that knows how to spin them into cheap and easy propaganda and there is no line they aren’t willing to cross. You can quibble, and say that conservatives are better funded or less squeamish about being cringe or care less about telling the truth. But none of that really changes the fact that social media, the machine that now decides what pop culture looks like, is now an inherently right-wing space. And regardless of what explanation you subscribe to as to how we got to this point, that is a huge cultural loss for the left. And one without a clear solution in sight.”
  • The Milei Rugpull, Explained: You may not want to read about crypto – fcuk, NOONE wants to read about crypto, there is literally nothing on earth less fun other than possibly self-circumcision (not that I have ever tried that, to be clear) – but this story is worth gritting your teeth for, because FCUKING HELL it really doesn’t feel like the sort of thing that someone ought to be able to get away with in terms of ‘naked criminality abetted by an elected official’. This is written by Molly White and so is thankfully readable and clear and does a decent job of handholding you through What Apparentlly Happened – the big takeaway here, to my mind, is the sheer, naked venality on display, which to my mind is the hallmark of all these cnuts and what, troublingly, makes me think that the current version of the Trumpian project might actually be a bit more stable than the 2016 version. Back then it was all warring factions and competing interests within the court – this time, though, it seems all the various jesters and courtiers and viziers, while still variously mad, racist, deranged, perverse, criminal and sick, are all united under the single, unifying goal of ‘become as rich and embeddedly powerful as is humanly possible’, which makes it…less likely that there will be some sort of krakatoan fallout. Still, though, here’s hoping!
  • New Junior Devs Can’t Code: File under ‘I told you so’ or ‘hm, so it turns out that we DO lose something if we outsource the thinking!’, this is an entirely-predictable story about how software companies are finding that junior devs they’re trying to hire…can’t code. Sure, they can cobble together stuff from Github, but in terms of actually understanding the first principles of what they are doing and how the various languages at heart *work*…nope, not so much. Which, obviously, is Not Great – I was thinking the other day when reading about the great, amusing COBOL fcukup, that we are soon going to be at a point where there is noone left alive in the world who knows how COBOL actually works (it was created in the 60s iirc) and, given how many crucial systems are built on it, how that might end up being a touch problematic in the long-term. OH WELL!
  • Using GPT as a Focus Group: I present this not because I think it is a good idea – I am at best sceptical, and at worst of the opinion that this is, at present, a ruinously-dumb thing to do – but because it is obviously happening and therefore it’s important to know about. This is a blogpost by one James Breckwoldt who used GPT to effectively simulate responses ‘in the persona of’ ordinary voters talking about ordinary issues, and found that these synthetic opinions sounded very much like the sort you hear from actual focus groups from actual real people…and, look, I am sure James is a nice man and a good professional, but, also, THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT THE FCUKING TECHNOLOGY IS BRILLIANT AT DOING FFS, MAKING WORDS THAT LOOK BROADLY LIKE THEY ARE THE RIGHT SHAPE FOR WHATEVER YOU WANT THEM TO DO. Also, given the nature of How The Machine Works, literally ALL it is doing is probabilistically arranging tokens based on its prediction of where they migh best fit based on what it has seen before…meaning OF COURSE IT SOUNDS LEGIT BECAUSE IT IS DRAWING ON SOURCE MATERIAL OF PEOPLE IN THE PAST TALKING ABOUT SIMILAR ISSUES! Like, I get what they are trying to say here, but I simply don’t see what practical, actual value this delivers you – I could literally MAKE UP focus group quotes based on ‘things I know that people think based on listening to conversations on buses and at football matches and in the supermarket’, but that would be bullsh1t too! If anyone thinks I am being stupid here, by the way, please do feel free to drop me an email and explain why, I am genuinely happy to listen to any explanation you can offer me. Also, given you now have companies like this one offering this service at scale, I wonder where the liabilities fall – who carries the can when my business model, guaranteed to be a success based on the insanely-positive reactions of the modelled, virtual customerbase, was not in fact a billion-dollar win and I am in hock to the bank for a violent wedge and the bailiffs are banging on the door while I drink meths and cry? WHAT THEN???
  • The Deep Research Problem: I referenced this earlier, but should you not want to take my word for it that all the AI research tools are not quite ready yet then why not instead listen to BUSINESS GURU Ben Thompson, who basically says the same things as me but with more rigour and therefore the ability to charge £1k an hour consultancy fees, the git.
  • The DuoLingo Brand Handbook: I have refused, and continue to refuse, to cover the fcuking owl suicide thing, and DuoLingo brand discourse overall is something I have…very limited interest in, in the main, but this document, published…recently-ish, I think, is interesting from the point of view of advermarketingpr and how to create, define and manage a brand. If you want to skip straight to the ‘so, how exactly does pretending that your green anthropomorphic owl mascot has offed itself as some sort of ironic metacommentary on the state of the world drive app downloads?’ section then you can find it on p54
  • Barcoding Brains: Neuroscience is very much something I wish I understood more than I actually in fact do; still, what little I *do* manage to grasp is fascinating and slightly-horrifying (turns out that thinking about the fact that there is this blancmange-textured mass just sort of wobbling about inside my skull really does trigger the appalled ‘GAH DEAR GOD I AM MADE OF MEAT AND IT IS HORRIFYING’ palmsweats, as attested by how hard I am finding it to type at this exact moment), and this is really interesting, both in terms of human biology and psychology but also how that intersects with our attempts to create digital analogues to ‘thinking’, etc. This is basically about where we are with attempts to ‘map’ and understand the structure of the brain and how all the various nodes within it connect, and what implications the nature of said connections have for the nature of consciousness and thought. Crunchy but so interesting (if you can get past the meathorrors).
  • The Largest Sofa You Can Fit Around A Corner: Ok, this is far too maths-y for me to be able to claim to meaningfully understand in any way, but I love the central question – specifically, what is the optimal and largest design of sofa that can be moved around a corridor corner. A Certain Type of Reader may recall that the irrevocably-stuck sofa was a central running gag in…I think the first?…Dirk Gently novel, and as such this article basically gave me Proustian flashbacks to being VERY YOUNG and reading that and being utterly captivated by the silliness and yet extreme seriousness of the gag (it is a silly premise, but it is a very serious mathematical problem). Anyway, I think IKEA should make this sofa IRL.
  • 50 Years of Travel Tips: I try and keep the list posts to a minimum in Curios, but this was interesting and alien enough to me to make me want to link it – this is by Kevin Kelly, who has traveled a LOT, and has decided to share What He Has Learned over decades of seeing the world. Some of these seem eminently sensible – for example “If you detect slightly more people moving in one direction over another, follow them. If you keep following this “gradient” of human movement, you will eventually land on something interesting—a market, a parade, a birthday party, an outdoor dance, a festival.” – whilst others seem…a bit pushy, frankly. I don’t, honestly, think that this is good advice at all, and would genuinely love to see a tourist attempt this in London one afternoon where I think they would probably get some…interesting responses: “Crash a wedding. You are not a nuisance; you are the celebrity guest! The easiest way to do this is to find the local wedding hall where weddings happen on schedule and approach a wedding party with a request to attend. They will usually feel honored. You can offer the newlyweds a small token gift of cash if you want. You will be obliged to dance. Take photos of them; they will take photos of you. It will make your day and theirs. (I’ve crashed a wedding in most of the countries I have visited.)”
  • Why GenZ Doesn’t Trust The News: With the obvious caveats that a) GENERATIONS ARE NOT MONOLITHSZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ; and b) this is a SMALL sample, this is also a very interesting ‘kids, in their own words’ piece which will probably make you a *bit* despair-y about the whole ‘will we ever get back to having a widely-shared conception of truth and reality, do you think?’ thing. I know that this is, on some level, just how we are wired as animals – pretty privilege is, after all, a think that transcends professions and disciplines – but, equally, try reading this and not then wanting to sigh and possibly go for a long walk off a short, very high roof: “Sometimes, trust is based on something even simpler: looks. “I kind of trust people based on how they look,” admits Jake, 17, another student.” OH JAKE FFS.
  • Making AI Recipes: Do you still spend any time on Facebook? I genuinely don’t – even the one Group I used to use it for (W_W) is now on Whatsapp, so there’s honestly no reason for me to engage with it beyond morbid curiosity – but the last time I did I ended up in an algohole that wanted to show me nothing other than ‘recipes’ for desserts accompanied by obviously-AI-generated images. In this piece, Katie Notopoulos speaks to people who have made such recipes and tries one herself – the upshot, basically, is ‘fine-if-bland’ – but the food here is really the least interesting thing, compared to (and this is something I think not enough people grasp right now) the number of people who simply DIDN’T REALISE THE IMAGES AND RECIPES WERE AI, or DIDN’T FCUKING CARE. To all of you confidently predicting some sort of mass consumer backlash to ‘AI slop’, well, LOL! I would like to gently remind you that if you work in communications, post on Bluesky and live in a metropolitan urban environment YOU ARE NOT IN ANY WAY REPRESENTATIVE OF ALMOST ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANET. So, er, maybe wind your neck in on the ‘normal people hate this stuff, actually’ rhetoric, eh?
  • Haley Mlotek’s Divorce: Mlotek has a book on her divorce out this week, which is being serialised all over the place – I have found myself enjoying the extracts far more than I expected to given I have never been married and therefore never divorced (I have, er, inspired a divorce, but that’s a different story). I think this is lovely writing on the practical realities of adult love and its end, and there’s a second, different extract here on her and her husband’s experimentation with ‘open marriage’-type stuff as a failed attempt to save everything which I also enjoyed. Try this for size and see what you think: “I could tell you about my last night with my former husband, but mostly I think about how the night passed no matter what we did to hold still. My marriage ended when those scenes stopped being scenes. The fights were the same as the conversations, and the coffee was made no matter what was said the night before. The fight I think of as being the first—although there were others before it, this was just the one I think of as the beginning of our end—happened when we were far away from home, on a vacation with our friends. Late at night and very drunk, we screamed at each other. Remembering our volume the next morning was its own kind of hangover. As the sun rose, our friends in the next room coughed and I heard it through the walls; everyone who hadn’t passed out from rum had heard us fight as clearly as I heard that cough. I apologized—I always did—then I spent more time thinking about his words than I thought about what I was sorry for. “But you’re my wife,” my husband had said to me, and that was enough. Only eight weeks into our marriage, my status in his life was as his wife. I took no pleasure or power in that title. I felt what he meant: that what I was to him should be enough. The next morning, he apologized, and I knew he meant it—both the apology and the title. He was sorry. I was his wife.”
  • That Mad Article About the Tory Chief Whip: This has by now been filleted for the juicy bits by everyone under the sun, but it’s worth reading the full thing – and if you’re yet to come across any of it then WOW are you in for a treat. A note to Americans and other foreigners – the role of the ‘Whip’ in UK Parliamentary politics is effectively that of ‘leader’s enforcer’, so the whips are in charge of making sure all the party members toe the line, vote in the right way, stay out of trouble and don’t rock the boat. Which, it turns out, also involves covering up a LOT of very, very dodgy stuff. This might all sound fantastical – and, look, it involves scatplay, which most accounts of workplace indiscretions don’t quite build up to – but as someone who’s worked in and around politics, and in Westminster, it is entirely true that there are lots and lots of people in and around the UK system who are at best FCUKING WEIRD and, at worst, UTTERLY FCUKING BROKEN. It’s quite hard not to read this and think ‘hm, maybe a system that continues to attract people who exhibit these sorts of behaviours when they should in fact be running the country and trying to make it work better for everyone perhaps isn’t working as intended?’ OR MAYBE IT IS, EH????
  • Alt Lit: Sam Kriss (is he still cancelled in UK media? It seems so, which is odd considering several other people who appear to have made…full comebacks from the same era’s opprobrium) writes about the Online Novel, oddly something I have been thinking/talking about a bit recently. He’s ambivalent about the ones he writes on, but I enjoyed this in part because he’s a reliably-entertaining prose stylist but also because the ones he liked more were the same as the ones I liked more, and because I think he makes some good points about style and bravery and formalism – although I read this paragraph and disagreed quite strongly, because, to my mind, the novel continues to be VERY BAD at parsing the past two decades as lived digitally and I don’t see what he writes here as being true AT ALL. Who do YOU agree with? “Everything that’s published now is shaped by the forms and concerns of online, whether it’s explicitly about the internet or not. Our bestselling poets write what are essentially Instagram captions. Publishers live or die at the mercy of BookTok. The recent glut of normie novels about trying to be a good person, or minor racial contretemps between professional-class narcissists, or hot girlies who don’t really do anything in particular—all of these are attuned to the sensibilities of an implicitly online public, whose sense of what might be an interesting topic for literature is downloaded directly from Twitter. The most mainstream Obama-endorsed fiction is now more like a feed than anything else: a series of sharp little lines, minute observations, quips, for you to quote on social media. The whole culture industry is just the internet’s auto-coprophagy, feeding its own waste back into the system. You are not radical or cutting-edge because you remember Neopets.”
  • Chess: Nicholas Pearson writes in the LRB about his son playing chess, to quite a high level, and the modern game more generally – this is a lovely piece of writing, giving an overview both of the game at its highest level in 2025 but also at the grass-roots, and also a moving portrait of watching your children grow up and apart from you and how beautiful and also desperately affecting that must be. This is gorgeous.
  • On The Beach: I have never read anything by Nevile Shute – he exists in my mind mainly as acharacter detail in the Adrian Mole books if I’m honest – but I absolutely loved this essay, all about his novel ‘On The Beach’ and its relevance to contemporary culture and the global response to the climate…can we call it the climate apocalypse now? Fcukit, I am going to start! This is by Peter Coviello, and it is smart and interesting and made me really want to go and read a book about the end of the world written in 1957, which, honestly, doesn’t happen to me very often.
  • The Convent: Another piece by Miles Ellingham in the Londoner, a journalist whose stories about the capital I am very much enjoying of late – this is a wonderful portrait of Tyburn Convent located in Central London, just off Marble Arch, and where the nuns live an ascetic and quiet existence, praying for the capital’s millions of souls (and, presumably, everyone else’s too). This does an excellent job of painting the nuns Ellingham speaks to as real people, three-dimensional beneath the wimples, and it’s all the better for the lack of rose-tint on the authorial lens.
  • A Day in the Life of a Jobless Copywriter: This is by Andrew Boulton, and it is very funny but also DEAR FCUKING CHRIST. Not only is this the worst time in recorded human history in which to attempt to exchange written words for money, but it’s only going to get worse! WHY DON’T I HAVE A MORE DIVERSIFIED SET OF SKILLS FFS? Eh? What? Yes, it is entirely my own fault, why are you looking at me like that?
  • Ideal Candidate: Our final longread this week is this SUPERB (if not *wholly* subtle) bit of satirical writing about the modern labour market. You will get the premise from the full title, but I promise you this really is worth reading all the way through – it is very long, but it is also very good (and it is written in the second person, which for some of you will be enough to recommend it), and Scott Smitelli sustains it superbly throughout. Do not, though, read this on Sunday, if you’re one of those people who spends the hours from 5pm onwards in tears at the prospect of a new week.

By Julia Hetta

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 14/02/25

Reading Time: 37 minutes

HAPPY VALENTINE’S DAY EVERYONE! I assume all your digital cards to me are currently stuck in the ether somewhere and will all arrive together in due course – consider this my personal, amorous missive to each of YOU, for what could motivate a man to set aside so much time and effort every week for strangers other than a deep and abiding sense of LOVE (agape or eros, take your pick)?

Yes, that’s right, mental illness and a growing sense of their own futility in a world which increasingly doesn’t seem to care! But we can call it ‘love’ if you prefer.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are still in time to cancel that dinner reservation, you know it is a bad idea and you will regret it.

By Ana Cuba

WE START OFF THIS WEEK WITH A SLIGHTLY-STRANGE PROJECT BY A MAN CALLED, APPARENTLY, GLEMPY, WHO HAS DECIDED TO SET THE BBC’S SHIPPING FORECAST TO LOFI BEATS AND HAS CREATED A SURPRISINGLY-COMPELLING NEW GENRE WHICH I AM GOING TO CALL CROMERTYHOP!

THE SECTION WHICH DISCOVERED THIS WEEK THAT THERE IS A TRADE BODY FOR THE DATING APPS INDUSTRY AND THAT IT IS HELMED BY A MAN WHO WEARS JEANS AND SHOES, WHICH FEELS WEIRDLY SIGNIFICANT IN A WAY I CAN’T QUITE PUT MY FINGER ON, PT.1:  

  • The VCU Network: I think I’ve talked in here before about the odd, solipsistic nature of the ‘surfing the web’ (LOL! I think we should bring that terminology back) (and if I haven’t then I totally meant to, honest), the weird sense that I think is sort of innate to being online whereby only the bits of the web that you’re currently looking at are really *real*, so to speak, and that your browsing experience is the only true browsing experience, and that your internet is THE internet. Which, obviously, is not true in the slightest – I actually think that we might have done ourselves rather a lot of good had all the vaguely-experimental ‘see what the web looks like if Facebook thinks you’re someone else’ toys you were able to spin up c.2010 or so had been allowed to persist a bit longer. Which is by way of very longwinded and slightly-baggy preamble (sorry; that doesn’t bode hugely well for the rest of this week’s typing, does it? Apologies, I’ll try and keep the authorial digressions to a minimum. Oh, fcuk, I’m doing again aren’t I?) to The VCU Network, a truly FASCINATING window into the web as experienced by other people, but one that it turns out I am not sure if I can totally get into. Let me explain (IT’S ABOUT FCUKING TIME MATT FFS) – the VCU network is basically an art project which functions as a Chrome extension – anyone with the extension installed and turned on is automatically participating in the project, which sees EVERY SINGLE URL YOU VISIT shared with everyone else participating. So at any given moment you can open up a new tab and see what everyone else in the world with the extension installed is looking at RIGHT NOW – which, obviously, is slightly-incredible and madly voyeuristic and intrusive and weird, and immediately feels…uncomfortable, almost, like a violation of sorts (I learned about several entirely new sources of gay bongo, for example, which while not specifically ‘my thing’ was, well, instructive!). Hence my conflict here – I love this, I love the ethos of it…but I don’t want everyone to be able to see where I find all my stuff (I FOUND THE CONCH) and so am ambivalent about whether or not I can continue using it (also, there aren’t *quite* enough other users to make it constantly compelling at the moment). Fcuk it, I am going to turn it on again, if only for a few days – I look forward to seeing what sort of FILTHY PERVERTS you all are!
  • The Telegram Index: A slight caveat here – Telegram is, obviously, occasionally dodgy as all fcuk and I am in no way advocating its use for the negotiation and purchase of drugs or other illicit materials, etc etc. That said, it’s also a really good place to find specific communities, a bit like a more international and significantly-geekier (and, yes, ok, more criminal) Reddit – this site is a decent enough directory of Telegram Groups, Channels and Bots, categorised by theme. Personally-speaking I’ve found Telegram to be hugely useful as a source of hooky streams for the football, but I would imagine that the wider sports communities can be similarly-helpful for other pursuits; there is also, as you might imagine, a…not-insignificant bongo offering, which, look, I am not going to judge you but also BE CAREFUL OUT THERE because, well, I imagine it can probably get quite dicey once you get into some of the more, er, niche communities.
  • Global Caps Lock: ANOTHER COLLABORATIVE DIGITAL ART PROJECT! Ok, fine, this probably only fits the description if your definition of ‘art’ is elastic enough to encompass ‘mass simultaneous typing in all-caps’ but, well, it fcuking ought to be, so there. The Global Caps Lock Project is a simple one in which anyone can participate – download the client software, activate it, and you will become part of the Global Caps Lock Collective, operating as a single hivemind and applying capslock as one! Effectively what this means is that everyone running the client – at the time of writing, a frankly disappointing nine people – shares a single caps lock key; when it’s on for one, it’s on for all, and vice-versa. Which, obviously, could potentially be problematic if you work in a role which requires the typing of large quantities of copy and where the readers of said copy might reasonably prefer NOT TO BE SHOUTED AT; but, also, ART IS NOT MEANT TO BE EASY. I very much enjoy this, and would enjoy it even more if one of you a) installed it on a work computer; and then b) shared with me your experience of explaining your newly-idiosyncratic approach to capitalisation to colleagues. Thanks!
  • Nest: I think this is really rather beautiful. Nest is a sort of digital sound art toy thing (you’d think after all these fcuking years I’d have gotten better at the whole ‘describing the work’ thing, but perhaps my singular refusal to evolve or improve my writing style is part of the Curios ‘charm’? It’s not, is it?), which, obviously, I don’t *really* understand – basically you have a bunch of different sound clips which you can activate, each of which changes the way in which the background sequencer works in some way; create weird, scratchy breaks by clicking and dragging (the geometry of the shapes you create affects the pitch and duration of the beat fragments), and layer the samples to create an honestly-rather-lovely sound collage which is different every single time. This is significantly more artful than it might initially appear – once you start to add multiple layers everything begins to coalesce, weirdly, regardless of what you’re doing, and there feels like there’s some guiding maths underpinning this all to add some slight sense of order to your chaos, and I have it on in the background now and it is quite, quite beautiful.
  • Central da COP: I know that you’re here for a good time not a hard time – LOL! – but can we just be honest for a moment and admit that, well, we’re fcuked, aren’t we? I mean, we’re not going to do any of the stuff we desperately need to do to solve the environmental mess we’ve landed ourselves in in time to prevent huge, civilisation-altering climactic change, we’re too addicted to modernity to give up what we need to, and our last remaining hope probably rests in going full speed ahead with tech that will only accelerate our demise if it doesn’t magically hail mary us out of this mess (I was at a two-day AI conference this week – it was risibly bad and, in the main, made me really fcuking angry tbh – and there were two people onstage, one from DeepMind and one advising the UK government, both suggesting that the best way to work out how to mitigate the impact of AI on the environment was to…ask AI, and I had a proper Damascene moment of realisation that this really is the dumbest of fcuking timelines)…but, er, again, that’s not actually about the link, is it? Fcuk. AHEM! So, the link is a Brazilian website which is still attempting to be hopeful about the fact that EDUCATION MIGHT SAVE US and is taking the smart move of presenting a bunch of information about the NEXT COP taking place in Brazil in November 2025 (I really do like this annual jamboree at which a bunch of people fly internationally to agree that, yes, we’re still not doing enough – it increasingly seems like a GREAT use of everyone’s time!) in the style of a website all about football, because, the thinking goes, Brazlians care a lot more about that then they do about climate change so, well, maybe this will help redress the balance slightly. The stories are written through a football-y lens, using the language of the game to attempt to stealth-educate – which is an interesting idea from a communications point of view, although one I am moderately-sceptical about the efficacy of. Still, it’s an interesting idea and you can read more about it here, and, realistically, we are all still going to die.
  • YouTube Videos As Games: This is smart, and fun, and pleasingly-oldschool, taking me back to the carefree days of the late 2010s when you could basically print money in agencyland by saying things to clients like ‘choose your own adventure youtube videos to drive brand engagement through interactive digital storytelling!’ (God they were so stupid) – this is a YouTube channel called Firerama which makes all sorts of different YT vids which function as games of different sorts, all of them using really smart and inventive use of the ‘fast forward’ hotkey function to skip you to different points in the vid which therefore mimic the flows of a game. Seriously, the way they’ve exploited the platform functionality for all these really is wonderfully inventive; there are Guitar Hero-style rhythm games, obviously there’s a version of DOOM, there’s even rudimentary chess…obviously the games aren’t what anyone would call ‘good’, but there’s something really smart here which I think you could have fun with with a bit of thought (also IT IS SURPRISING, which isn’t something you get to say about digital experiences enough in 2025 to my mind).
  • The Ultimate Online Book Ranking Engine: Or at least that’s what this will be when enough of you feed it with your data. This is made by Aris Catsambas (which I have just realised by the way is a WONDERFUL surname, congratulations; I now want to change my name to Doggazelles), who also made the Cellar Door website I featured last year, and basically asks visitors to pick their favourite from a pairing of novels – it asks only that you only vote if you’ve read both of the books in question, but otherwise you just pick your preference from the pairing and move onto the next set. At any point you can see the cumulative global ranking of THE BEST BOOKS EVER – at the moment The Hound of The Baskervilles leads (weird tbh), followed by Pride and Prejudice, Children of Men (again, weird), A Farewell to Arms, The Parasites…this is just an interesting data-collection exercise tbh, moreso if you’re a book-lover, but it’s also another example of a site that was built entirely with AI (Aris tells me he used Replit, fwiw). I…I like the fact that AI is making this possible! Let a million websites bloom!
  • The Secret Museum of Mankind: Ok, I feel I need to caveat this upfront: this is a link to an OLD photographic book depicting The Peoples of the World, and what with being from the past it contains some…antiquated attitudes, is perhaps the most polite way of putting it, and some occasionally startlingly-racist language. With that in mind, let me present to you a quite amazing document – The Secret Museum of Mankind is described thusly on the landing page: “Published in 1935, the Secret Museum is a mystery book. It has no author or credits, no copyright, no date, no page numbers, no index. Published by “Manhattan House” and sold by “Metro Publications”, both of New York, its “Five Volumes in One” was pure hype: it had never been released in any other form. Advertised as “World’s Greatest Collection of Strange & Secret Photographs” and marketed mainly to overheated adolescents, it consists of nothing but photos and captions with no further exposition. This was not a book published to educate (despite appearing on some public library’s shelves), but to titillate (literally)— its emphasis was on the female form (“Female Beauty Round the World”) and fashion, and it featured as many National-Geographic-style native breasts as possible. But anything lurid, weird, or just plain unusual is fair game. This was a book to gawk at by flashlight under the bedcovers.” Really, it’s just astonishing – both in terms of the scale and scope (there is a LOT of ground covered here, geographically-speaking), but also in terms of the worldview it presents and the fact that this worldview was entirely prevalent less than a century ago. Obviously don’t want to make this about politics – EVERYTHING IS POLITICS – but it does rather feel as though the attitudes here depicted are ones on which the current US administration would look with a degree of warm nostalgia.
  • Brenna Murphy: Via Kris, this is the website of digital artist Brenna Murphy and to be honest I don’t really understand what the fcuk is happening here, but my complete sense of bafflement shouldn’t put you off exploring what is quite a dizzying labyrinth of graphics and textures and linked webpages and audio and animations and renders and and and and…basically click this link and see how it makes you feel, and then decide based on this whether you think this is something you want to spelunk through. Brenna appears to be part of a wider digital art collective called MSHR, which you can read more about at the link and which encompasses a bunch of different artists working across different digital media whose work seems, based on my relatively-cursory exploration, worth a dig.
  • Solidarity Cinema: OK, some caveats here – obviously as a non-cinema person I don’t really have any idea what the films collected through this service are like, and I haven’t personally tried to watch anything from the collection and so can’t 100% vouch for its legitimacy…but, with those out of the way, if you’re the sort of person for whom a ‘good night in’ might involve a punishing 150minute silent documentary about Syrian goat farmers then MAN do I have the website for you! Solidarity Cinema is, from what I can tell, a laudable project designed to provide access to cinema which is either about, or related to, global activism and the struggles of the marginalised (this is a broad-brush assessment and there is a LOT more in there) to anyone in the world. As far as I can tell, there’s a GDrive with some 9,000 films on it which anyone can access (you have to apply via a Google form, but once you’re in you can seemingly watch to your heart’s content) – which I think avoids issues of copyright by dint of these all being the sorts of films that Netflix is…unlikely to want the copyright for. You can see a list of the films available here, which will give you a sense of whether this is something you will be interested in or not – basically the films all have descriptions like “Adam Ousmane is a pool attendant at a local resort. When the new managers decide to downsize, Adam loses his job to his own son, Abdel. Shattered by the turn of events, Adam is pressured into contributing to the Chadian war effort. With no money to speak of, the only asset he can donate is his son.” I mean, look, it’s not exactly Comedy Central, but if that is your thing then, well, welcome to the motherlode.
  • Rapport: Are you shortly set to have to spend time with someone with whom you have NOTHING TO SAY? Er, why? But! If you do find yourself in that invidious position then you may find it helpful to have Rapport bookmarked – this is a mobile-only website which basically offers you a set of ‘interesting conversational prompts’ to use should you be struggling to find anything to say to your interlocutor. Which…look, this is a nice little webproject by its creator Matthew Prebeg, but if I’m honest if someone attempted to revive a flagging conversation with ‘so, what’s your favourite shade of denim?’ I think I would probably leave or have to self-immolate or something. Although it did just ask me what the most ‘beautiful number’ is, and I started having a weird and not-entirely-unerotic reverie about the number 19, so perhaps it’s not a total bust (NB that is a joke, obvs, 13 is the only sexy number as any fule kno).
  • YellowFellow: This is the website for AN Other digital agency – sorry, motion studio – based in Tel Aviv, which is largely-unremarkable apart from the genuinely-delightful animations on the landing page; honestly, the motion work is SO charming and it’s a wonderful calling card for their obvious skill in the field and the fact they can obviously ‘do’ playful very well indeed. Every single website should have little animated things on it, MAKE IT LAW.
  • ArtLinks: A slightly weird throwback to 2020/1 here, with the Met Museum in New York running a weird, NFT-linked digital game to let users explore its collection and draw thematic connections between works and, er, win a jpeg? “Art Links is a blockchain-based game created by The Metropolitan Museum of Art where players find common threads linking artworks across The Met’s collection. No art history degree required! Find links between artworks to create a chain.Each chain consists of 7 artworks and 6 connections. Connections can be words or emojis. The game has 3 rounds, with each round becoming progressively more difficult. Players have 4 attempts to complete each chain correctly (forming a Completed Chain). Once a player successfully creates a Completed Chain, they are able to claim free digital collectible NFTs in the form of Badges and complete in-game challenges called Achievements for the chance to win exciting rewards!” WHY THOUGH? WHY THE NFT/BLOCKCHAIN THING?!?! The game itself is weirdly-baffling and seems entirely-arbitrary, until you realise that all it really requires you to do is read the item descriptions which basically tell you which ‘connecting’ word you need to pick, largely removing any sort of real challenge…I wonder slightly whether someone at the Met is related to someone working at a blockchain-first digital agency, because that’s really the only explanation I can find for the fact that this exists in 2025.

By Andrew Wyeth

NEXT UP, THIS IS A SLIGHTLY-GOTHY, SLIGHTLY-DRONEY AND ENTIRELY-FCUKING-WONDERFUL ALBUM BY VYVA MELINKOLYA AND IT IS PRETTY MUCH WHAT FEBRUARY SOUNDS LIKE!

THE SECTION WHICH DISCOVERED THIS WEEK THAT THERE IS A TRADE BODY FOR THE DATING APPS INDUSTRY AND THAT IT IS HELMED BY A MAN WHO WEARS JEANS AND SHOES, WHICH FEELS WEIRDLY SIGNIFICANT IN A WAY I CAN’T QUITE PUT MY FINGER ON, PT.2:  

  • CityWalki: Another portal back to early COVID times (SORRY!) with this throwback website – this isn’t new, conceptually-speaking, and I have featured stuff very similar to it before, but I am including it here partly because in London we literally haven’t seen the sun for 10 days now and I had forgotten what it looks like until I opened this up and ‘strolled’ around a few other cities for a while. Oh, I should probably explain what the fcuk it is, shouldn’t I? CityWalki is one of those ‘pick a city, get some FPV footage of someone walking (or driving, or drone-ing) around it – so far, so ‘exactly like a bunch of other sites’. But there are a LOT of different cities, and I’d forgotten how momentarily-transportive a slow-paced FPV tour of somewhere can be. Also I let it take me to Rome and had an unexpectedly incredibly emo moment where I found myself weeping slightly at the colosseum, which suggests I possibly haven’t really been taking adequate care of myself of late if I’m wholly honest. In the UK you can visit London and Manchester – beautifully, while the footage of all the other cities I’ve seen has been picturesque and sunny, Manny basically gives you steel-grey skies and the walk from Piccadilly into town, past a Ladbrokes, which feels…perfect, tbh.
  • Drone: This describes itself as a ‘rich, harmonic soundscape synthesiser for music practice, chanting and meditation’, and, while I am not personally into any of the aforementioned practices, fcuk me did I enjoy using it to make weird dirge-ish sounds. Honestly, this is strangely compelling, even if you’re not the sort of person who needs something to synchronise their ‘oms’ with, and, as you will realise when you start playing around with it, this actually afford you quite an impressive degree of control over the tone and pitch of your, er, synthy-drone noises. Aside from anything else, this affords you the opportunity to soundtrack ANYTHING you like in the manner of a 1970s horror/scifi film, which I think we can all agree is not to be sniffed at.
  • Snow Crystals: Did you know that there is an online guide to snowflakes, snow crystals and ‘other ice phenomena’? THERE IS AND IT LIVES HERE! This site appears to be the labour of love of one Kenneth G Libbrecht (proud author of a book on the same subject, apparently) who really, really likes snow crystals and associated phenomena. Honestly, I was ready to write this off as ‘ahaha old timey obsessional website, how quaint’, but, honestly, there’s something properly infectious about the enthusiasm here and I got quite into the section about designer snow crystals and how to build bespoke designs in lab conditions, and then there’s a page featuring an image of the largest snow crystal ever found in the wild which contains the following copy whose final parenthetical aside basically made me swoon slightly for reasons I can’t quite explain, and basically I am in love with this website now: “This is the largest snow crystal ever photographed, as verified by Guinness World Records, measuring 10.0 mm (0.4 inches) from tip to tip (averaged over the three axes). I captured this image on December 30, 2003, during a gentle snowfall in Cochrane, Ontario. Click on the picture for an even larger view (if you dare).” IF YOU DARE! Seriously, Kenneth, should you ever happen to read this, THANKYOU.
  • After Dark II: This links to an art auction taking place in the US at the end of the month, but for which online bids will be accepted – it is described thusly: “Our latest AFTER DARK catalog continues our sale of exclusive LGBT oriented art, design, and historical ephemera. From emerging contemporary names, to early 20th century male nude fine art and photographs, our catalog includes iconic names like Robert Loughlin, Bruce of Los Angeles, and Gran Fury to many overlooked 20th century gems of the queer art world. This sale celebrates a century of creativity and expression from gay artists in all forms, from print ephemera to original canvases.” Whether you’re queer or otherwise, there is some GREAT work here, some ‘erotic’ and some not at all, and the starting prices look eminently-reasonable should you be in the market for some works.
  • HistoryScapes: A joint app project by the National Trust and the University of Essex which basically works to present a bunch of different interactive tours of National Trust properties which you can either download to listen to you as you visit, or which you can set yo GPS track you with audio triggering as you walk through relevant areas. There are only three on there at present, which rather limits the utility, but you’d expect/hope that this be seen as a more long-running project which will see additional tours/walks/locations added to it. Worth a look if you’re the sort of person who spends their weekends dropping a tenner on a small cup of tea and a dry scone in a slightly-draughty ‘tearoom’.
  • European Alternatives: Want to kick back against the US’ tech hegemony? AHAHAHA GOOD FCUKING LUCK! Still, we can still pretend that it’s not basically all sewn up by perusing this list of European alternatives to popular software products which you might want to explore should you be sick of enriching Those Fcuking Men. This is all quite dry and techy stuff – email providers, SaaS services, filehosting and uptimemonitoring and DEAR GOD THIS IS DULL. But, equally, it is nice to be reminded that there are companies not based in North America that you can choose to use instead (if you don’t mind the friction, and the occasionally suboptimal service, and the fact that you’re basically Cnuting against the inevitable tide of capital).
  • Trees: I like this a lot – I am not the target audience, I have no use for it, but I am thrilled it exists. “Meye is a collection of free cut out PNG trees from all four seasons by landscape architect Mikkel Eye. All the trees are available as high quality PNG’s with transparent background. The trees are free to use for anyone who wants to add plantings to their visualizations, sections, and diagrams within the fields of landscape architecture, architecture, or urban planning.” So far, so standard, but it’s the next line in the description that made me fall in love: “However, your project should be in focus.” I am 100% going to add that stipulation to every single thing I ever do from now on – in fact, here, “you are allowed to steal whatever you like from Web Curios – I know you do already, don’t make that face at me – as long as your project is in focus. What does that mean? I WILL BE THE JUDGE”.
  • Normal Time: I have on various occasions over the years complained about the lack of temporal innovation over the past few thousand years – we landed on the 24h day and the 365-day year and just sort of…stopped innovating (special shout out to Swatch’s ‘Beats’ initiative which I think I mention every 3-4 years on here and which will forever hold a place in my heart as the most insanely-ambitious marketing ploy I think I have ever seen). Thanks, then, to OG digital artist Rhea Myers who has entered the ring with their conception of Normal Time, which, look, is maths-y enough that my brain basically slides off the side of it but which FEELS good and which gives a pleasingly-long-term feel to the passage of time over a year – make years feel monolithic again! You can read the mechanics of how it’s calculated on the site, but I liked this description of the utility which also sorts of acts as an artist’s statement of sorts: “Normal time makes it easy to compare progress across different time scales by removing artificial human concepts of time. It creates a unified way to express completion of any cyclic or linear time period. Dehumanizing time in this way has the counterintuitive effect of making it more recognizably natural and intuitive for human beings to express and understime durations. Furthermore it respects that each human life is complete unto itself, removing the implicit judgment of longer lives being “more complete”. It creates a clear distinction between lives that are “in progress” and “complete” without obfuscating the progression of those lives. And it recognizes that all completed lives are equally whole.”
  • The Single Feed Returns: Without wishing to redo my small rant from last week (I know that Web Curios is basically 30% thematically the same every week and I hate myself for it, trust me), EVERYTHING IS CYCLICAL. We’re currently having a resurgence, for I think the third time now, of the ‘all your various feeds in one convenient place!’ combinator app – the main links takes you to one offering called Tapestry, there’s this other one I found called OpenVibe, but basically they all do (or try to do) the same thing; to whit, pulling your various social feeds into one place so you don’t have to keep flitting between all the different apps to manage your interests, feeds and conversations. Which on the one hand is interesting and obviously convenient to a point, but on the other strikes me as slightly negating the concept of social media – I am not sure how helpful adding another layer of context collapse to your feeds would be (for better or worse, every platform’s grammar is different and posts removed from said grammar work…differently, quite simply), and by doing something like this you’re basically removing quite a lot of the ‘spontaneous and serendipitous discovery’ bit from the social experience (although, in fairness, each of these does allow you to pull in ‘interest-based’ feeds too, so there’s perhaps an element of that still here). Still, I can imagine this appealing to a few of you so one or both might be worth a look (they seem to be pretty much feature-identical as far as I can tell) – be aware though that they can’t pull stuff from the Meta platforms (actually Threads might now be federated enough to work, but no fcuker cares about Threads so wevs) so you’re not totally covered.
  • ReorProject: This is something I personally have little-to-no interest in but which I am aware some of you might find useful – SEE HOW FCUKING NICE I AM TO YOU? AND WHAT DO I GET IN RETURN, EH?? – although, honestly, I was so confused and frankly slightly upset by the description of it as a note-taking and information-organisation service for ‘high entropy thinkers’, because, honestly, WHAT IN THE NAME OF FCUK IS A HIGH-ENTROPY THINKER??? I think it is b0llocks. Anyway, my weird little eruption of rage aside (sorry, not sure what came over me there, this is basically one of those ‘give us your unformed notes and we will scry order in your mindchaos’ apps, which uses THE MAGIC OF AI to automatically categorise and sort your thinking into useful, semantically-linked chunks. Take a look at the homepage – as ever with this stuff, your mileage will vary depending on the degree to which you’ve ever thought ‘God, I wish Evernote actually worked’.
  • ROOST: Boring and technical but also useful and A GOOD THING, ROOST stands for Robust Open Online Safety Tools and is a collaboration between a bunch of big tech companies to put out a load of open source tools which will afford smaller companies the opportunity to implement industry-standard safety practices around their digital work, for free. Per the blurb, “ROOST is a community effort to build scalable and resilient safety infrastructure for the AI era. Many organizations – big and small – still lack access to basic safety resources, hindering innovation and putting users at risk. ROOST develops, maintains, and distributes open source building blocks to safeguard global users and communities. Backed by dedicated technical teams and leading experts, ROOST meets organizations where they are and provides hands-on support at every stage of their safety journey.” This is obviously only really of interest to you if you have to worry about safety/security in digital product delivery, but it’s a rare example of Big Tech ‘doing something not-terrible’ and possibly the only actually practically-meaningful thing to emerge from the massive farrago that was the AI Summit in Paris (a very, very expensive press conference for Lil’ Manu, was how I saw it).
  • WikiTimeline: Turn any Wikipedia entry you like into a timeline. Why? I DON’T KNOW WHY FFS. Look, maybe it’s useful for teachers or something, I don’t know, I don’t have all the answers. Any answers, in fact. It’s distressing, frankly.
  • XScreenSaver: Screensavers are a weird sort of lost artform, for two decades ubiquitous and then *poof*, gone, vanished, all those flying toasters and infinitely-recursive pipe layouts vanished like so much morning dew. XScreenSavers is a collection of SO MANY SCREENSAVERS which you can download and run on desktop and mobile should you want to carry them with you forever – if you’d rather just have a brief hit of nostalgia, you can explore the gallery of memories here.
  • Stretch My Time Off: I think over the 15ish years I have been writing this fcuking thing I must have mentioned KitKat as a brand more than any other – turns out there is a frankly STAGGERING quantity of internetty cruft that you can retrofit into the broad ‘have a break’ brand strategy, and as such there have been dozens of instances where I’ve pointed at a site or idea and written ‘KitKat, steal this, it is an easy win’ and, inevitably, noone from KitKat did anything because a) they obviously don’t read this sh1t; and b) even if they did, they don’t need to take advice from some superannuated webmong typing in his pants at 933am on a Friday morning. Anyway, this is, AGAIN, SO perfect for a rebadge and a light bit of branding – this website does one simple thing, which is to tell you (seemingly wherever you are in the world) which days you should take off as holiday to maximise your allocation based on bank holidays, religious celebrations and other national days off which your country of employment has scheduled for the year. THIS IS SO SO SO PERFECT FFS JUST PUT A FCUKING KITKAT LOGO ON IT.
  • KidPix: Personally-speaking this means little to me, but I think if you’re the sort of person who grew up with Macs (I don’t really understand how this could have happened, but maybe your parents were graphic designers or architects or just really irritating hipsters) then you might have a soft, nostalgic spot for KidPix which was apparently the MacOS equivalent of MS Paint and which now exists as a browsertoy for all your childish scrawling needs. I think there’s something quite nice about adopting this as your entire aesthetic for the rest of the year, personally, but then again I was recent told that my dress sense is ‘risibly bad’ so, well, I probably wouldn’t listen to me on matters visual at all.
  • A Bunch of Full Warner Bros Films On YouTube: Ok, so you’ll need to VPN yourself to the US for these to work but this is literally 39 full films which are available to watch on YouTube for free, in high res – the selection is…odd, frankly, running the gamut from The Mission, which iirc won an Oscar, to Critters 4, which I know very much didn’t, and passing through a bunch of forgotten comedies, a few Serious Films and, inexplicably, American Ninja V, a film which I am reasonably certain noone, including the people who made it, have thought of since the wrap party. Still, it also contains a Bobcat Goldthwaite film AND the animated adaptation of The Phantom Tollbooth, on which basis I recommend it without reservation.
  • Fabularious: AI BONGO STORYTIME! Yes, another week, another AI-enabled smut-generator! I include this not because I think it’s ‘good’ (no, really, I promise), nor indeed because I think that you have a strange and inexplicable desire to spin up poorly-written gangbang smut, but more because, well, a) there’s something VERY funny (to me, at least) about quite how obviously this is made for (and quite probably by) very horny teenage boys; and b) slightly-less amusingly, how this is obviously made in India, and how it made me think of the already-weird-and-not-hugely-healthy way in which gender politics works in the country, and the weird and bleak reality that demographics mean that a significant proportion of Indian men will live and die entirely alone, romantically-speaking, because of the fact that there are simply so many more of them, and the extent to which I can 100% see stuff like this becoming an ingrained part of life, forever, for a certain type of guy. Which is quite hard to see as anything other than utterly bleak, if I’m honest. Erm. Anyway! Choose your characters, choose your scenario and spin up some TRULY AWFUL (ie, not in any way erotic) erotica!
  • EdHeads: Occupying the final games-y slot in this week’s ephemera section is this…odd selection of semi-educational games, which let you play short flash-style browsergames based on investigating a mechanic’s workshop, or a crash scene, or, er, undertaking ‘deep brain surgery’ or ‘virtual knee surgery’. Want to spend ten minutes fcuking around with someone’s patella? OH GOOD!

By Llyn Foulkes

WE CLOSE OUT THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH THIS ABSOLUTELY FCUKING WONDERFUL SELECTION OF JAZZ COMPILED BY SAKINA ABDOU!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • The Frame Blog: Not, in fact, a Tumblr! Still, if you have ever wanted to know a LOT – possibly everything – about framing pictures then this is basically the motherlode of all information. Beautifully this is still VERY active, offering new, fun, frame-related content on a regular basis.
  • Every Day I Draw The Titanic: I am astonished that I have neither seen or featured this before given that the person behind it has been doing it for TEN FCUKING YEARS. TEN YEARS. A decade of drawing the Titanic every day and posting it to this Tumblr. I am in awe – THIS IS ART. I found this via the genuinely curious newsletter Night Water, which I can confidently say is one of the weirder ones I sub to and which you might enjoy for its utterly-idiosyncratic approach to subject matter.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  •  Patagraph: Stop-motion animation by one Victor Haegelin – this is very, very good work by a very talented professional.
  • Babil Online: Photographs of telephone wires (I think) against grey skies, which I know don’t sound hugely-compelling as a subject but actually really quite beautiful when shot and framed this well. Photos by one Alexey Narodizkiy.
  • The Bop House: I don’t normally feature accounts that are influencer-y, less those that feature said influencers doing cheesecake photoshoots and thirst traps, because, well, I don’t care and I figure that if you do you can find that sort of thing yourself. I am making an exception for the Bop House account, though, not because the content is particularly fascinating but because I find the premise behind it – effectively this is a creators’ house for OnlyFans influencers, which makes a sort of sense from a commercial/collaborative point of view and which is evidently being parlayed via this sort of mainstream channel into a PG13-ish reality-lite franchise while the seamy stuff gets shot behind closed doors for the OF crowd. This is…very now.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Into The Kill Zone: So I had to spend time this week thinking about the AI Summit and What It All Means for professional reasons and, honestly, my main takeaways (you don’t care, I know, but, well, tough) were: a) well that was a complete fcuking waste of time; b) we’d better hope that this stuff solves some pretty hard questions about physics/biology pretty fcuking soon otherwise we’re going to feel *quite* silly about putting all of our eggs in this basket as we slowly (and then quickly) crisp up; and c) WOW does it feel like we’re (by which I mean the US and the UK) basically just saying to big tech businesses ‘you know what, you just do what you fancy and we’ll just sort of sit here and hope it works out for everyone’. This is an excellent piece of writing which looks at the relationship between tech and the state and the economy on both sides of the Atlantic, at the way in which it’s basically all set up to advantage large incumbents and this is just being entrenched, and, look, I think this para rather sums up the authorial argument (but it’s really worth reading the whole piece): “The events of the last two weeks in the US put into a new and darker light the approach to government articulated by Blair and William Hague in A New National Purpose two years ago. This project has matured into one involving more than 70 reports and Cabinet ministers including both Kyle and Streeting. It argues for a transformation of the state in terms that are vague but which include a smaller state with power centralised in 10 Downing Street and ministers recruited from business rather than Parliament. Technology, especially AI, is to be used to transform government and public services. Although I have been skeptical of this project, at no point did it cross my mind that it might pave the way to a Britain that is oligarchic and authoritarian. Now, looking at what is unfolding in the United States, a shiver of recognition runs through me. It’s as if I’ve already read the playbook.”
  • The Business Community Is Stupid: Ok, I admit that this is in here partly because I very much enjoy the tone of this and partly because it dovetails very neatly with Wot I Think, but it’s also a good, pleasingly-angry piece of writing which neatly nails the way in which businesses in the US in particular might in fact come to regret siding with this particular shower of bstards: “A stable, democratic, well-governed society is good for business. An unstable, undemocratic, wildly governed society is bad for business. The business lobby’s many years of ceaselessly trying to nibble away at the foundations of stability and democracy and fairness for their own immediate gains have now brought us to the brink of a strongman government that will, I assure you, be very bad for business. Unpredictable trade wars are bad for business. Eroding confidence in the US dollar because you want to prop up crypto scams for your donors is bad for business. Letting religious zealots control public education is bad for business. Destroying access to contraception and abortion is bad for business. Constantly toying with provoking wars is bad for business. Allowing the environment to become polluted is bad for business. Even enormous wealth inequality is bad for business, because it means a few people have all the money, instead of all your customers having plenty of money to spend with your business. You know what’s good for business? Switzerland! A bunch of happy healthy wealthy people sitting around eating chocolates and spending money in peace! You know what’s bad for business? Fcuking Donald Trump! A psycho idiot fcuking sh1t up constantly and destabilizing the world and robbing businesses of all ability to trust the rule of law and predict the future with some degree of confidence. The tech oligarchs who sat on stage with Trump at his inauguration were not there because he is good for business—they were there because being there, right there on the inside, is the only way to flourish.” EXACTLY.
  • Journalism Is Fcuked: I mean, ok, this is not exactly a SEARINGLY-HOT TAKE – but, that said, it’s a decent overview of the how and the why of the current state of media by Ian Dunt (someone who I genuinely find too boring to link to ordinarily – and who I perhaps unfairly hate a bit for being a sort-of unofficial spokesperson for the sorts of people who talk about needing ‘grown-ups in the room’ in politics, a phrase which makes me honestly want to commit small but very sharp acts of violence), but who I will make an exception for on this one occasion because he nails this pretty decently. This covers the perils of traffic-focused journalism, the hollowing out of the information landscape thanks to paywalling and the tiered knowledgebase that that is leaving us with, and attempts to offer some solutions – the solutions won’t work, and I can’t pretend I didn’t find something risibly patronising about Dunt’s instruction that everyone should ditch one of their telly streaming subscriptions in favour of direct payments to three substacks, like some sort of middle-class informational ‘eat your greens!’ scold, but it’s a decent ‘where we’re at’ screed about, well, how journalism is, per my title, fcuked.
  • DOGE and the Evil Housekeeper: Dan Hon has for years been one of the smartest people I know (I don’t know Dan, obviously, he lives in my phone like all of you do) on the subject of tech and government infrastructure, and in this essay for MIT Tech Review he neatly lays out the ways in which what Musk and his horrible little herrenvolk pixies are fcuking with the US State’s digital infrastructure, and why, and how it might be possible for staff to stand against it. It feels…quite dark, all this, ngl. “In trying to make sense of the wrecking ball that is Elon Musk and President Trump’s DOGE, it may be helpful to think about the Evil Housekeeper Problem. It’s a principle of computer security roughly stating that once someone is in your hotel room with your laptop, all bets are off. Because the intruder has physical access, you are in much more trouble. And the person demanding to get into your computer may be standing right beside you. So who is going to stop the evil housekeeper from plugging a computer in and telling IT staff to connect it to the network?”
  • Make Apartheid Great Again: I have read a few articles making similar points this week, but this was the first and the best and most strongly-worded and least-euphemistic, and it’s important, I think, to be clear about what is happening and the attitudes being demonstrated and what the prevailing cultural wind that has been legitimised in the past few months is openly sort of about. Watching the uniform reaction of the US right – and its ancillary branches across the web, the quisling cohorts parroting the MAGAlines for…for bluetick pennies, I guess – to last weekend’s superbowl performance was to see people literally mainstreaming startling, staggering racism, a seeming sense of affront at…seeing black people on their screens! THIS IS NOW QUITE OVERT, I THINK.
  • A Smart and Thoughtful Series Of Thoughts On AI: There was one piece of writing published this week on AI and how we might want to think about our approach to it as a society and species that really was worth reading – perhaps unsurprisingly, it didn’t come from the Paris Summit (on which note, have you read the declaration that the UK and US didn’t sign? IT DOESN’T EVEN FCUKING SAY OR MEAN ANYTHING FFS WHAT IS THE POINT OF ANY OF THIS STUFF????). What WAS surprising, though, was that it came from the Vatican, and, if you believe the signature, from the VERY PAPAL BRAIN of cuddly Frankie himself! This is VERY long, but, I promise you, is one of the most-considered and most sensible, thoughtful and human pieces of writing I have read on the subject in a long time; it covers work, art, philosophy, theology, questions of the soul and identity and the mind-body duality, and, look, I am as agnostic as they come and sold my soul to the devil aged 17 and am very much not going to heaven, and have a pretty strong aversion to Catholic doctrine, but this is really, really interesting and thought-provoking, and the contrast between the depth of consideration on display here and that demonstrated by pretty much every official government document on the subject I’ve read over the past few years is…dispiriting, frankly.
  • The Headmap Manifesto: This is a quite incredible document that I am slightly amazed I had never heard of before (and which came to me via Tom Scott’s newsletter) – the headmap manifesto was written in 1999 by one Ben Russell and is described elsewhere on the web as follows “When the headmap manifesto first appeared in 1999, Google was barely a year old, the U.S. government had not yet removed the GPS signal degradation that prevented its widespread commercial use, and Apple’s iPhone was still almost a decade away. Predominantly written by computer engineer Ben Russell, headmap (always spelt in lower case, although I capitalise it here when beginning a sentence) envisioned a world not entirely unlike the one we inhabit today, in which location-aware devices have radically transformed everyday life. It foreshadows recent developments from the emergence of location-based social networks like Foursquare and Yelp to dating and hookup apps such as Grindr and Tinder. In contrast to the strongly commercial, proprietary-driven nature of these applications, however, headmap foresaw these practices as emerging from the ground up. The potential for GPS technology to be integrated into every device and object would allow individuals to tag physical places with virtual information, provide site-specific advertising, organise community events and track people and objects. These practices, headmap claims, would lead to nothing short of a revolution of everyday life, transforming the way territory, architecture, politics, sex and social interaction are understood and enacted.”  Honestly, this really is quite amazing – it’s part futurology, part experimental poetry, part fragmented journal, and it’s utterly mesmerising for how madly, wonderfully-prescient it is and yet how at the same time it got so much wrong about the directions in which wearable tech would evolve and take us. There’s a wonderful series of potential counterfactual presents that could emerge from this should you immerse yourself in the thinking, and if nothing else it also sort-of works as an unusual creative writing exercise.
  • Rotting Upstream: I very much enjoyed this look at how rot culture has been appropriated by the mainstream, and the accompanying analysis of how that flow worked – in summary, “This is the mindless low brow sludge → high culture flex pipeline. Common discourse paints out brain rot as intellectual poison: refined sugars and seed oils for the mind. But it’s also become something more useful and valuable than junk food alone. In today’s surreal cultural landscape, it’s become a ‘badge of honour’, offering people a semblance of a community and connection.It offers what cultural anthropologist Mimi Ito calls a ‘genre of participation’. There’s a reward if you get the obscure reference: you are in communion with the author; your specific habits and tastes are seen, confirmed, and validated by the knowledge that someone else is watching the same TikToks, following the same online conversations, reposting the same posts as you.” “WE ALL CRAVE COMMUNITY SO MUCH WE FIND IT IN INFINITE RUNNER VIDEOS MASHED WITH FOOTAGE FROM GAZA” is perhaps the bleakest-timeline-conclusion to draw from this. ADJACENTLY-RELATED PIECE: Max Read on Benson Boone and the ‘Booneiverse’ – aka background content that attains a degree of ubiquity so as to become a unifying factor, a bit like advertising jingles for the modern age. As an aside, this piece caused me to listen to Benson Boone’s music for the first time ever and, whilst doing so, I realised that the uncanniness I was feeling was the realisation that this is the EXACT genre of music that AIs like Suno have recently gotten VERY good at mimicking which…I don’t know, doesn’t feel like A Good Thing.
  • Soy Right Ascendant: Also by Max Read, this one, and I think this might be the best thing I have read about how to characterise the current incarnation of the online right in the Trump2.0 era (and, as with all this stuff, I wish I could just silo it off as an American thing but unfortunately thanks to his and Apartheid Toad’s global ubiquity, all culture is basically downstream of those cnuts for the foreseeable and there’s not really anything we can do about it) – honestly, this is SO well-judged and coherent in a way that very little writing about digital culture (and its bleed into meatspace) tends to be, and, if you’re a certain type of horrible little online goblin (hi! Kindred spirit over here!) you will enjoy this hugely. This section is him quoting from a newsletter post by a certain Scarlet, but I reproduce it in full because, well, it’s perfect: “They have special diets are afraid of seed oils. They wear skinny jeans and have meticulously groomed beards. They talk non stop about masculinity, drive pickups, and wear plaid, but can’t change a tire to save their lives. While the right spent years mocking liberals for wanting “safe spaces” and echo chambers, for crying about identity politics, for being frail, fragile, overly-sensitive weaklings, they were slowly transforming into the perfect mirror of all of it — without the nagging concern for equality or any of that lib sh1t. […] The Soy Right is being oppressed and they want you to know it. They’re scared to take the subway, they’re offended that you called them white or cis, they’re upset that you didn’t think they were cool in high school, they want to call the manager because there’s less boobies in video games. They are crybabies of the highest order. While the right is winning cultural and political victories nonstop lately, that’s not enough. They also need you to like them. Why don’t you like them?!”
  • GenZ Doesn’t Exist: YOU obviously know this – you read Web Curios! You’re smart! Apart, obviously, from your fcuking terrible taste in newsletters! – but many don’t and so it bears repeating – GENERATIONAL MONOLITHS ARE SILLY AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SILLY AND ARE ACTUALLY DETRIMENTAL TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS. Here the reliably-smart Sean Monahan of 8ball writes about what might perhaps be a smarter way to conceive of meaningful generational divides based less on broad age-range coteries and more ‘how old were you when X happened’ – where, in this case, ‘X’ is ‘home computing’ or ‘9/11’ or ‘COVID’. If you work in advermarketingpr then, per my earlier comment, you really should have arrived here yourself by now, but here’s a nice easy spelling out of it for the kids at the back.
  • The Cringe Matrix: You may not think you need a detailed analysis of the four different primary ways in which the concept of ‘cringe’ can be experienced, but I promise you that you do and that once you have read it it will TRANSFORM you. Honestly, this is far more interesting and thoughtful than I expected it to be, and might actually be professionally-useful from a tone-of-voice/content point of view for the right sort of project/brand.
  • Facememes: This is a bit thin, fine, but I found the central premise – that we’ve lived through the era in which specific facial expressions could attain memetic status in the way in which haircuts or specific makeup styles used to in eras past – interesting; as a ‘no, there really are no photographs of me inexistence, no I am not lying, I just don’t like being photographed, yes, it is because I am ugly, please stop asking me these questions’ person who doesn’t use Insta et al I feel like I have missed a lot of this stuff, but it speaks to quite a lot of wider cultural stuff about lightspeed trends and the churning memetic combine harvester that is TikTok.
  • The Kid’s Food Boom: Or, in a phrase the piece coins later on and which I prefer to the headline term, this is ‘recession maximalism’ – in uncertain times, we want comforting, simple food that harks back to an era in which we presumably felt safe and secure…which is why the US (and, I think, London too) is seeing something of a boom in low-rent foods in a maximal style – corndogs and pizza rolls and processed food consumed unironically and unashamedly as part of an adult lifestyle. Which, I think, can also be tied into a certain anti-intellectual resurgence in US culture (fancy food is PRETENTIOUS AND WOKE, after all, qualities not exactly in favour right now) which, again, is being replicated in the UK as well (you know how during Brexit we got used to hearing the worst cnuts in the world saying we were a ‘vassall state’ of Europe? I do rather think we’re going to get a better idea of exactly what vassaldom looks like between now and 2029).
  • How Ozempic Is Fcuking Fast Food: I have to say that I really resent Ozempic and Wegovy and their ilk (this isn’t going to reflect well on me, but, well, this is a safe space, right?) – I am a naturally-emaciated person and while this is not in and of itself a benefit, it does mean that I simply don’t get fat and don’t need to exercise, and I have always thought of this as a MAGIC SUPERPOWER, and now these fuckers invent some magic injections and everyone else gets to be just like me? I WAS SPECIAL, YOU CNUTS.Ahem. You didn’t need to know that but I felt oddly compelled to share – sorry! Anyway, this is all about the degree to which Ozempic et al don’t simply reduce the appetite of those that take it, they seemingly change it, removing cravings for processed foods – and seemingly making them actively-unappealing – and replacing them with, er, a seemingly insatiable desire for vegetables. I am darkly-fascinated by these meds, I have to say – if this was the first third of a film, I would be getting very strong ‘terrifying side effects set to be discovered in act 2’ vibes. Thank God real life doesn’t seem to be operating like a scripted show, though!
  • Playing War: This is a really interesting look at how Soldier of Fortune magazine – something which I have always sort of vaguely known about but have never actually seen a copy of, because, well, I don’t actually want to read about war – was basically a sort of weird radicalisation pipeline for a whole bunch of men, and how it became weirdly intertwined with neoconservative politics as the 80s and 90s wore on. This is one of those great articles that make you realise that international conflicts and the associated communities that exist around them are, in the main, just deeply, intensely fcuked-up (an astonishing insight, I am aware) (Jesus).
  • Goodbye Pamela Paul: Ok, if you’re not North American then there’s no reason whatsoever you should know or care who Pamela Paul is – BUT! Even if the name means nothing to you I think this is worth reading – partly because it is just a brilliantly-brutal takedown of an individual who, objectively, totally deserves it, and partly because every single thing it says about Paul (a media commentator who’s written for the NYT for years and who’s basically been paid to have opinions for the last three of them) can be applied to the commentariat class in the media in your country too. Honestly, read this piece and then think of your least-favourite opinion columnist and I guarantee you will be able to map most of the arguments 1:1. Seriously, tell me that this para doesn’t work with EVERY SINGLE OPINION WRITER: “For in the end, the reactionary liberal is a ruthless defender of all that exists. Paul’s 2021 book, 100 Things We Lost to the Internet, is a cabinet of banalities wherein the usual liberal virtues (civility, patience) sit glassily alongside a predictable middle-class nostalgia for things like scouring the Bloomingdale’s shoe department for the right dress pump or taking in a Broadway show without hearing the low buzz of a text message. “There was nothing to do but let go of whatever might be happening outside the theater and lose yourself in what was happening onstage,” Paul writes wistfully. “You simply couldn’t be reached.” It is a great dream of the reactionary liberal not to be reached. Paul will freely admit, for instance, that it is immoral for Israel to kill tens of thousands of civilians. Yet it is no less immoral for student protesters to erect an ugly encampment in the middle of the quad and hurl slogans at the police. This is because political action is an unacceptable snag in the continuity of bourgeois experience. One gets the sense that politics has gone off, like a cell phone, in the darkened theater of Pamela Paul’s mind. It is worse than wrong: It is rude.”
  • The Pinball Philosophy: A piece of writing by John McPhee from 1975, in which the author profiles two rival kings of the NYC pinball scene. I cannot tell you how BRILLIANT this is – SO stylish and so of its time and you can smell the stale cigarette smoke and see the seedy-looking guys hanging around central New York, and this feels and reads so perfectly 1970s and of-its-time that it feels like actual time-travel. Glorious.
  • Incel Philosophers: I think that this article made me think more than anything else I read this week – in it, Ellie Robson writes about Mary Midgely, a philosopher who in the 1950s made a programme for the BBC in which she noted that the canon on Western modern philosophy was dominated almost entirely by works and thinking penned by single, unmarried, childless men. Basically, modern philosophy is an incel medium. OH GOD THIS IS SUCH A REVELATION! Honestly, it sent me down a wonderful 15 minute counterfactual rabbithole of imagining what might have emerged from Kierkegaard if he hadn’t basically been terrified of women, whether he might have been equally-brilliant but, well, a bit less sad and so therefore a bit more inclined towards a philosophy that was less brutally, bitterly inward-facing…this is SO good and so interesting, and will almost certainly result in a lot of you who are women reading this and thinking ‘typical fcuking man to have never noticed or thought about this before’ which, honestly, is fair enough tbh.
  • The Secret Pattern: Aube Ray Lescure writes about returning to Shanghai to visit her parents – it is about place and family and memory and not belonging and belonging and it feels very…I don’t know, very clean and very spare and very beautiful indeed.
  • I Know Nothing About Sex: Finally in the longreads, Judith Hannah Weiss with a brilliant essay in the APPALLINGLY-NAMED ‘Oldster’ magazine (honestly, such an awful name, please someone change it) which is a weird, meandering, slightly-messy collection of thoughts around sex and age and memory which I think I enjoyed on a prose level more than anything else I read this week and which I think you will enjoy too. This has STYLE.

By Mark Tennant

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 07/02/25

Reading Time: 35 minutes

I went to the theatre to see Oedipus this week with my friend Jay (thanks Jay!), and there was a moment towards the end of the show where the climactic, pivotal fact that (and I don’t think I’m spoiling anything here) Oedipus had in fact fcuked his mum ELICITED ACTUAL SHOCKED GASPS FROM THE AUDIENCE.

How? HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO BE AN ADULT AND TO GO AND SEE THE PLAY OEDIPUS AND YET HAVE SEEMINGLY NO FCUKING CONCEPT OF THE MEANING OF THE TERM ‘OEDIPAL’ AND ITS ORIGINS?!

Anyway, the play is fcuking dogsh1t and I really wouldn’t bother (the lighting is nice, though).

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are free to mine me for more pithy analysis of contemporary London culture at your convenience.

By Guim Tió Zarraluki

WHY NOT ACCOMPANY THIS WEEK’S OPENING SELECTION OF LINKS WITH THIS IMPECCABLE SELECTION OF ‘70s/80s JAPANESE GROOVES’? NB THERE IS NO GOOD REASON!

THE SECTION WHICH FEELS LIKE IT POSSIBLY OUGHT TO ADMIT THAT MAYBE PROJECT25 WASN’T IN FACT ‘QANON FOR LIBERALS’ AFTER ALL, PT.1:  

  • Picto World: Yes, ok, this entirely frivolous and pointless and pretty much wholly-unoriginal as a concept, but, at the same time, it has literally NOTHING to do with What Is Happening Out There and so as such it feels appropriate to lead with it. SMOOTH YOUR BRANES! Picto World is a small, collaborative (or adversarial, depending on how you approach it – but, per the aforementioned ‘What Is Happening’ line, can we maybe reserve some spaces where we’re *not* doing adversarial, please?) project–toy-thing which presents you, the visitor (yes YOU) with a representation of a globe, on which each country on the world map can be associated with an image, creating a sort of nation-by-nation patchwork collage of pictures, each (sort-of) representing the country in question. The images aren’t fixed, so anyone can jump in and swap out one picture for another, making this a slowly-evolving patchwork quilt of how the internet’s collective unconscious feels the globe’s nation-states should be pictorially represented (there’s some moderation going on to ensure that nothing vile gets posted, which seems to be working fine so far). Click on the images to see them in full (and to realise that some of them are gifs/videos) – necessary to work out what the fuck they’re depicting in some cases – and enjoy the genuinely weird sense of ‘countries as memes’ that you get (I have no idea, for example, who decided that Italy should be represented by a short clip of a topless man smoking three cigarettes simultaneously, but have to concede that on some level it sort-of makes sense). This is fun, and if you’re bored is an excellent place to spend the afternoon doing some light nationalistic trolling (although, on reflection, perhaps I shouldn’t be extolling the virtues of ‘comedy nationalism’ here in ugly old 2025).
  • Aphantasia: I really, really like this; perhaps more conceptually than practically, but still. Aphantasia is basically a proto-social-network, text-based, whose interface is arranged in a node-based, visual fashion – so rather than showing posts as text arranged in chronological or algo-sorted order, shows them as a network of interconnected nodes, demonstrating the way in which each post relates to the wider ecosystem of information on the network; this gives you sense of the way in which conversations branch and fork and meander, and how different users engage with topics, and while it obviously doesn’t make it in any way easier to read than your traditional networks it DOES make it far more interesting from a ‘shape of topic’ point of view (which, now I write it down, will quite possibly mean nothing to anyone who isn’t me). Anyway, this is unlikely to ever evolve into anything more than a small, niche experiment, but I am very into whatever it’s creator is trying to do in terms of information visualisation, conversational taxonomy, network development and the rest (NO I PROMISE IT IS INTERESTING COME BACK).
  • The Taylorator: Ok, this is both technical and almost certainly illegal in most places you’re likely to be reading this, but, also, I am VERY into the concept (NB: Web Curios would like to plainly state that it does not in any way advocate the disruption of radio signals and is in no way condoning or endorsing any activity that fcuks with the broadcast network! Honest!) – The Taylorator is, to quote the developer, “a piece of software which allows you to use an SDR (such as a LimeSDR) to transmit music on every valid frequency in the FM broadcast band. It’s named the Taylorator because it was originally written to broadcast Taylor Swift on every channel at once, to force everyone to listen to her music.” Basically this is code which, when combined with a USB-attached device which can broadcast on FM, lets you effectively override all the radio signals on that frequency over a small area with whatever you like – Taylor Swift, yes, but also SO MUCH OTHER STUFF. I am now slightly dizzy with the possibilities this affords and how you might use this for GENTLY SUBVERSIVE ENDS – at the very least there’s a lot of fun ways you could integrate this into experience design, immersive theatre and the rest, but also, obviously, a fcuktonne of ways you could just really mess with people’s heads in some creative and satisfying (for you) ways (but, again, please do not do this).
  • Graze: Following the late-2024 flurry of excitement it very much feels like Bluesky user growth has hit a plateau again, suggesting that while people might be leaving Twitter, they’re perhaps not *desperate* for another text-based feed to take its place (SOCIAL MEDIA IS DEAD FFS IT JUST HASN’T STOPPED TWITCHING YET). Still, it persists (and, per some of my interactions on there this week, has managed to attract exactly the sort of moronic users that have characterised every single other social network since their advent, which I suppose is a sign of maturity of sorts), and as it matures is starting to develop a wider ecosystem of accompanying apps which take advantage of its open, friendly nature to build on top of the basic Bluesky experience. Such a tool is Graze, which basically lets you do a bunch of stuff to customise your Bluesky feed – effectively creating a selection of different algorithms to manage the way in which you receive information which you can switch between at your choosing. So, for example, Graze makes it (reasonably) trivial to create various feeds which include and exclude people based on their inclusion in starter packs, say, or have granular content restrictions in place, or to do a bunch of more complex stuff that integrates with other websites and APIs…basically this lets you turn Bluesky into something significantly more powerful, and potentially-commercially-useful (you can read more about the possibilities here, as the website is frankly not superb at outlining how powerful this all seems to be). This is interesting and obviously potentially really helpful to anyone looking to make the feed more practical, but there’s also part of me that read the explainer piece and some of the use-cases and got slightly saddened that rather than looking at new and innovative ways in which you might leverage the feed and the information we’re instead likely to get ‘ecommerce solutions’ and ‘TikTok, but for Bluesky’ which feels, well, a bit unambitous, frankly (says the person who creates nothing, ever, and should probably wind their neck in on reflection).
  • WikiTok: Do you enjoy TikTok, but are you concerned that it’s possibly not the *healthiest* place to spend six hours a day, mindlessly swiping through infinitehumantelly? Welcome to WikiTok, then, which applies the tried, tested and obviously-terrifyingly-dopaminic ‘swipey’ interface and swaps out the human zoo video content with NOURISHING FACTS from Wikipedia. Next time you’re sitting staring mindlessly at your phone, why not feed yourself with LOVELY INFORMATION? This seems, as far as I can tell, to be almost entirely random, hence my having learned about pour-over coffee, Italian writer Marco Balzano and, er, Polish satellite TV stations, in the short time I’ve been refreshing my memory – this is honestly brilliant if you’re even halfway curious about the world and is a rare instance of a broadly-pointless website which probably won’t lop three points off your IQ every time you load it up.
  • ReddTok: This, though, is basically crack – videos from Reddit with the TikTok interface, letting you take a whistlestop tour of what the world’s largest forum is sharing RIGHT NOW. No algorithm, no steering, just (seemingly) utterly random snippets of video from around the world which could be anything from (based on the past 30s) dogs, capybaras, film sets, more dogs, porpoises, vintage cigarette lighters OH GOD THIS IS LIKE FCUKING CRACK. As far as I can tell (based on an admittedly-very-limited sample size of videos) this doesn’t pull from anything labelled NSFW, so you’re unlikely to be confronted with anything too glistening and mucal – but, well, I am not 100% certain about that so please exercise caution should you decide to use this while out and about.
  • The Blue Report: Seeing as we’re doing ‘stuff built on Bluesky’, The Blue Report collects the links that are being shared most-widely across the network at the moment (I think based on popularity over the past 24h, updated hourly). Which is in theory interesting, but which currently in practice seems to mean that everything is about That Fcuking Man (or That Other Fcuking Man) and all the different ways they appear to be attempting to dismantle the State apparatus of the US for their own personal gain (and that of their plutocratic pals), which means that you might want to wait to come back to this until he’s stopped dominating the news cycle for five minutes (possibly 2029).
  • Boss: This is UTTERLY CHARMING. Boss is a small browser-based synthtoy made by, I think, Laura Sirvant, which lets you put together a relatively-simple track from a bunch of different beats and SFX, and which accompanies your musical noodlings with a genuinely beautiful, pixelart-style graphic of a ‘boss’ – besuited, balding, brogued-up – in a generic office space, grooving to your beats in a manner than can only be described as ‘deeply repressed’. Beautifully, the more complex you make your tune, the more engaged your little corporate avatar becomes, cutting increasingly complex rug for your viewing pleasure – honestly, I now want EVERY SINGLE SYNTH to come bundled with dancing avatar software like this, it is so beautiful and pure.
  • The Tuxedo Society: I think this did numbers last weekend, based on a viral Insta video or two showing generically-attractive young white people performing wealth at a villa on Lake Como – The Tuxedo Society is, per the blurb, “a carefully curated community of exceptional individuals who embrace elegance, tradition, and the art of meaningful connections. From bespoke travel experiences to exclusive networking events, TuxedoSociety empowers its members to thrive in a world of limitless possibilities.” So, effectively, a member’s club – I mean, that’s literally it, this is all it is, and not even a real one with a real fcuking club ffs – which puts on pseudo-swanky-looking events at which said members (please reflect on the context in which I might be using this specific term) can cosplay plutocracy in rented tuxedos. There was a LOT of discourse around this swirling this week, about the ‘Saltburn aesthetic’ and the appeal of ‘old money vibes’ in this new, hyperconsumerist1980sera in which we appear to find ourselves, which just made me realise that one of the most frustrating things about getting old is finding out that everything repeats itself and NOOONE OTHER THAN YOU SEEMS TO REALISE THIS. Old internet heads will OF COURSE remember that in the…mid-00s, I think? There was a very early, very exclusive social network called A Small World, which was originally access-gated to *actual* Old Money people – we’re talking people with titles (weirdly I had a login to this because I knew an actual Italian countess in my youth – this is, for anyone who knows me irl, fairly off-brand, its fair to say), who used it to literally post things like ‘flying into Gstaad tomorrow evening; does anyone have a reliable chauffeur I can borrow for 48h’. It’s since degraded into irrelevance, but it’s worth remembering because THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN. Although I suppose this is the aspirational, premium mediocre equivalent, so perhaps it is new after all and I am an idiot. Either way, you might want to check out the Insta feed in case you feel like experiencing some strong, and not necessarily positive, emotions towards your fellow human beings.
  • Dub: Do you despair as to how you’re going to squirrel away enough cash to survive in the weird, scary times between ‘your job becomes obsolete’ and ‘someone sorts out UBI or we solve scarcity’? Yeah, me too. Still, perhaps THIS will solve all your woes! Dub is an app which does the same thing as various e-trading platforms have been offering for a few years, to whit the opportunity to effectively clone someone else’s portfolio and trades, so you’re basically just running exactly the same buy/sell choices as the guru of your choosing. Which, on the one hand I can see sounding superficially attractive but which raised a LOT of questions as soon as I started to think about it longer than approximately 30s. Like, what’s the lag on trades? It says ‘same time, same price’ but unless there’s something VERY fancy going on under the hood that simply doesn’t seem feasible. Is there a cap on the number of people who can ‘follow’ a particular tipster? Because, based on my limited knowledge of ‘how this stuff works’ (tbf ‘limited’ is a generous interpretation) it feels like if there are big groups copying marginal activity then that starts to tip things in ways that may not be wholly beneficial. Still, those of you understand more about things like ‘money’ and ‘stocks’ and ‘wild speculation in the hope that this will be your ticket out of the white-collar bullsh1t mines’ might see this as a CRAZY OPPORTUNITY, so, well, fill your boots (and don’t forget all the LOVELY WORDS AND LINKS when you’re all rich).
  • The Self-Help Book From That Severance TV Show: I am impressed at the degree to which Severance is leaning into the marketing – I mean, it’s obviously an insanely-expensive show and they need to do numbers, but there’s some commitment to the bit on display which I admire quite a lot. This is an actual audiobook of the fictional self-help manual from the show (which, again, I have never seen and will never watch – apologies if I am misrepresenting what this is but, well, I don’t wholly care tbh) which is, I think, only partial but is committed enough for me to be impressed.
  • Cats In Art: I’m genuinely dismayed that until this week I had never heard of the KattenKabinet, an Amsterdam museum dedicated to cats in art. I get the feeling this is an institution best experienced in person, but while there’s only limited elements of the collection available to view online there *is* an excellent little Google Streetview-style interactive tour you can take so that you too can enjoy a taste of felines in fine art and sculpture, all sitting in a *glorious* looking Amsterdam townhouse. I am 100% going to this next time I visit. Oh, and the museum logo features a cat with what seems to be an unnecessarily-visible ar$ehole, which, for reasons I can’t adequately explain, pleases me no end.
  • Duck Radio: Internet radio, playing 24/7, which changes station depending on the apparent movements and activity of some ducks in the garden of the site’s creator (there’s a sensor which triggers a change in frequency each time a duck pecks at it, apparently). This is utterly pointless and a genuinely-terrible way to listen to the radio, and I love it immoderately.
  • Ripples: It doesn’t currently feel like February’s going to provide the respite from the WIND TUNNEL OF NEWS that I was hoping for, but if you want something to briefly soothe you as you come to terms with whatever the fcuk is happening now then you probably won’t do better than this website, which does one thing only but does it near-perfectly. A webpage that simulates a pool of clear water over crystalline rocks – click, drag, and simulate the fluid dynamics of liquid as you drag your fingers through it, take a deep breath and let the cares of the world slough from your shoulders momentarily (before they return, heavier than ever before, a few moments later). THIS IS WEBSITE AS THERAPY.
  • TV Series Cancelled After One Episode: I am reasonably-certain that the number of significantly-influential TV commissioners who read Web Curios hovers around the ‘0’ mark, but, just in case, this Wikipedia list of TV shows which lasted just one episode is SUCH fertile territory for potential reboots. You will, presumably, have heard of such lamentable lost classics as ‘Heil Honey I’m Home!’, a domestic comedy featuring Hitler and Eva Braun who are…disconcerted when a Jewish couple moves in next door and disrupts their suburban idyll, but there are loads here which are new to me and which I now REALLY want to track down and see (see: “Australia’s Naughtiest Home Videos (September 3, 1992) – A spin-off of Australia’s Funniest Home Videos hosted by Doug Mulray that depicted videos of sexual situations and other sexually explicit content”) – also, I feel a strange sense of national pride at the number of these which were commissioned and then dropped by Channel 4, well done lads.

By Summer Wagner

NEXT UP, ENJOY SOME VERY PLEASING UK BASS (AND OTHER THINGS BESIDES) COURTESY OF JED HALLAM OF LWSTD!

THE SECTION WHICH FEELS LIKE IT POSSIBLY OUGHT TO ADMIT THAT MAYBE PROJECT25 WASN’T IN FACT ‘QANON FOR LIBERALS’ AFTER ALL, PT.2:  

  • Define Art: This is, admittedly, *quite* conceptuallywanky, but it turns out that’s exactly the sort of thing I like, so. Define Art is a very simple webpage which offers anyone the opportunity to write their own definition of what ‘art’ is/means, either by replacing the definition that’s currently on-page entirely or by editing it as they see fit. At the time of writing (840am; I know how you LOVE to be apprised of the exact progress of the Curios sausagemaking process) ‘art’ is defined as “The immanentisation of the artist’s personal eschaton”, but it’s entirely possible that it will be something else entirely by the time you arrive at it – the act of defining ‘art’ as a piece of interactive digital artwork is basically exactly the sort of neatly-pretentious, semi-recursive, not-as-clever-as-it-thinks-it-is b0llocks that I live for and I think this is PERFECT (so, so shallow).
  • Ahead: This really, really gives me the fantods, but I can’t adequately explain why exactly. Ahead purports to be ‘Duolingo for emotional intelligence’ (oh, there, THAT’S why it feels intensely-creepy!), and seems to work by offering you a daily battery of tasks and exercises, tailored to YOU based on what it thinks you want/need (based on a fairly-rudimentatary sign-up questionnaire, as far as I can tell, and what I imagine is some sort of machine learning stuff under the hood) which are designed to, I don’t know, ‘help you manage your anger’ or ‘come to terms with the feeling of inadequacy that assails you every time you leave the house’ or ‘stop crying all the time’ (ha, impossible dream!), all packaged up in nice, pastel-adjacent palettes and reassuring fonts and Simple, 2025-Friendly Mental Health Bromide Speak! Ach, I know, I know, I am a terrible, miserable cynic who might perhaps benefit from not being such a miserable cnut all the time – I know this! I do! – but, equally, I am not wholly certain that spending more time on your device (the device that already acts as a prism through which the world is manipulated and filtered to be ALL ABOUT YOU) obsessing about yourself is necessarily good for you. It’s unclear from my limited fiddling with this whether the app has its own ‘impossibly-horny owl’-type mascot, should that be something that might motivate you to try/not try this.
  • Book Saboteur: Ooh, this is a fun idea by Javier Arce – upload any ebook file (in epub format) and use this website to fcuk with the text – censor random words, insert errant sentences or spoilers from books or films, add typos, replace all instances of one worth with another per your specifications…part art project and part way of really, really messing with someone on what, now I think of it, could be a really troubling and quite unpleasant level. There’s something HUGELY dark about the idea of taking someone’s ebook file, fcuking with it and then replacing it on their device as though nothing were amiss, leaving them to be increasingly baffled as to why their copy of Moby Dick seems to have replaced every instance of the word ‘whale’ with ‘Joe Swash’ or ‘Harambe’ – DO NOT DO THIS TO ANY OF YOUR FRIENDS OR LOVED ONES OR CHILDREN, DO NOT DO THIS.
  • Chipped Social: My note for this simply read ‘transhumanist girlies!’ which tbh I was quite proud of (but you don’t need to know that, and almost certainly don’t care, so apologies for the unnecessary digression). Chipped is, basically, fake nails with NFC chips, meaning that you can not only look INCREDIBLY GLAM but also be super-digital at the same time – the nails link to Chipped’s own Linktree-esque profile pages, which you can customise to include whatever urls or social profiles you like, meaning you can effectively use your manicure as an integrated business card type thing. Which, to be clear, is sort-of brilliant and exactly the kind of mad, semi-future thing that I was hoping for from 2025. Honestly, this is a great idea (apart, er, from the obviously-appalling environmental cost of the disposable plastic nails and the chipset and the rare metals! Apart from that!).
  • The Trump Golf Tracker: Yes, I know, but I’ve managed to make it ⅕ of the way through the second links section before mentioning that cnut so I think I should be lauded for my efforts at minimising his impact (is…is this ‘activism’? LOL!). The Trump Golf Tracker does exactly what it’s name suggests, offering an overview of how much time That Fcuking Man has spent on the golf course since his inauguration. One might argue that time spent on the golf course is time NOT spent dismantling the fabric of American Democracy, but that’s what Elon’s ramen-haired tech-death-squad (I am riffing on Ryan’s excellent description here, credit where its’ due) are apparently spending 23 of every 24h doing, so maybe even this is an illusory hope. The golfing percentage for the Presidency to date stands at an estimated 22% – sterling work!
  • Corners of the Internet: Linking to another person’s list of links from Curios feels…a bit ourobouros-like, if I’m honest, but then again this is an EXCELLENT resource which, should you be the sort of person who needs regular doses of browser-based distraction throughout the day, you might want to bookmark. This is VERY unfancy – literally a GSheet with some urls on it – but they are GREAT urls, many of which I’m familiar with as an online timewaster of some vintage but many more of which were entirely-unknown to me and which are lots of fun. Toys and games and things to read and listen to and learn about – there are at least a hundred-odd links in here to all sorts of interesting places around the web, which is pretty much my perfect way to spend a couple of hours when someone is paying me to do something else entirely (have I mentioned I’m available for hire? Tempting, isn’t it?).
  • The Taiwan Queer Voice Map: You might have to ‘right-click-translate’ this one – or at least you will if you don’t speak Chinese, but it’s a lovely, fascinating project. Per the description, “Since the lifting of martial law in Taiwan, the stories of queer, homosexual, and sexual minorities have gradually appeared in various media in the 1990s. Deeply inspired by Lucas Larochelle’s 2017 work Queering The Map, Queer Voicemap Taiwan hopes to extend the concept of Queer Map to collect queer moments, voices, and experiences in every corner of Taiwan, and to supplement the small history and daily life that has been overlooked in Taiwan’s big history.” It’s sadly a bit sparse, but there are some beautiful little stories in there if you explore.
  • Be Moss: Via Kris and Naive Weekly comes this beautiful little web experience which I might almost describe as ‘meditative’ were I not approximately as spiritual as mince. Click the link, enjoy the sounds, and spend a few minutes enjoying the visuals as they happen at you. BECOME MOSS – it increasingly seems preferable to some of the alternative options, if I’m entirely honest with you.
  • Neural Viz: I think this year will be the one in which an AI-generated video of some sort does actual numbers and is received well from a critical point of view – the tech is now sharp enough that anyone who understands its limitations well enough to work around them can make some very impressive-looking films, and in the hands of someone who gets how scripts and visual storytelling works I think these tools could be used to create something…objectively good. Neural Viz is particularly impressive – there are nearly 30 vids on here from over the past year or so, all mining the same vaguely-connected extended universe of slightly-seamy-looking 70s police procedurals and detective shows, featuring a revolving cast of alien creatures which absolutely nail the general aesthetic vibe of the era (there’s an EXCELLENT look/feel to all of this, and it’s a corner of latent space I very much appreciate). The scripts are…actually pretty good, the editing works to the limitations of the medium (pace Trisha Code), and there are some nice gags in each of the few clips I’ve watched to date…This is worth a look – although, obviously, if you’re of the opinion that anything and everything made with AI is sh1t and evil then it’s unlikely to change your mind (also, ffs, we’ve spoken about this, it is a silly attitude to have) (also, thanks to reader Deshan Tennekoon for the tip).
  • Science Urls: Yes, ok, this is just a bunch of RSS feeds, but if you’re the sort of person who REALLY NEEDS TO KNOW ALL OF THE SCIENCE NEWS then you will probably find this useful, seeing as it appears to draw from nearly-30 high-quality sources like Nature, BBC Science and others.
  • Mascot Micrographia: As far as I can tell this is some sort of visual compendium of Japanese mascots – it’s quite hard to tell, though, seeing as there’s literally no additional information about what the actual fcuk is going on here. Still, I enjoy it because there’s a pleasing fluidity to the interface and I like the way you can explore the different cutesy guys in clusters based on particular qualities they might share – so, for example, you might choose to view them grouped by broad taxonomic groups, or you can instead click on any that take your fancy and see them clumped by physical resemblance…as an interface I rather like it, even if, per my opening line, I don’t really have the faintest fcuking clue what this is depicting.
  • The Underwater Photography Contest Winners 2024: SO MANY FISH! Also, aquatic birds and corals and a bunch of organisms whose exact status in the great panoply of life I’m not exactly certain about! These are obviously all fcuking amazing – there’s a beady-eyed cormorant I’m a particular fan of, and a slightly-baffling category that seems to involve people posing in elaborate costumes underwater, and and some frankly terrifying things with far, far too many teeth.
  • Lines of Flight: I rather love these. Per the blurb, “Lines of Flight is a sequence of volumetric digital poems examining the entanglements of wind, wing and flying technique that constitute the airborne encounter. These poems offer a depiction of the human and more-than-human registers of atmospheric flight, while gesturing towards the histories, infrastructures and media environments that entwine them’. While I’m not entirely convinced that these work as ‘poems’ per se, there’s something really gorgeous about the way in which the visualisation is used to express the inherent concept of the work (which, yes, I know, but that sentence will I promise feel significantly less cnuty (I hope) when you click the link and see what I am describing).
  • TOS About: A SMART AND USEFUL USE OF GENAI! This is a little site which has used some LLM or another to parse all the terms and conditions of various major tech providers and asked it to offer an assessment of each from the point of view of the customer – it may not surprise you to learn that they are nearly all utter bstards! Still, it’s a smart and simple and effective use of the brute-force power of the machine which, should you still be struggling to work out how to make this stuff work for you (really?) might prove in some small way inspirational. Or it will just make you hate Adobe and the rest even more than you already do. Or both!
  • Smile To Sing: Also via Kris, this a very simple website that does one thing and one thing only – it uses your webcam to see if you’re smiling, and if you are it plays you a song. THAT IS IT BUT IT IS PERFECT. I really, really think that all websites from hereon in should have this sort of thing built in – rewards for smiles to all visitors, please! If nothing else I quite like the slightly-evil spins that you might put on things with tech like this – maintain a rictus grin while filling out your HMRC self-assessment and receive a £50 tax rebate! Which thought, amusingly (and, er, self-indulgently),, made me smile for a second, which triggered the website – seriously, I really do want this sort of tech EVERYWHERE, can we please start setting this up? Thanks.
  • Deck Gallery: THEY ARE SLIDES FFS WE HAVE DISCUSSED THIS. Ahem. Sorry. If you work in the sort of benighted industry whereby the majority of your job seems to involve shoehorning concepts that have no business being presented in PowerPoint or Keynote onto PowerPoint or Keynote slides, you might find this collection of ‘nicely designed ‘decks’ (grinding my teeth so hard, so hard) a useful place to find ‘inspiration’.
  • I Don’t Have Spotify: Thanks to Raf Roset for sending this to me – although judging by Spotfy’s latest results, the proportion of people reading this who don’t have a Spotify account is likely to be…very small indeed. Still, just in case a couple of you find it useful, the website basically lets you plug in a link to any Spotify track you like (or songs on YouTube, or other platforms) and tries to find it on non-Spotify platforms, presumably using some sort of audio-matching tech. It’s…spotty, but then I have been testing it on VERY OBSCURE things and so your mileage may vary hugely.
  • Hot Tub: BONGO FOR APPLE USERS! I wasn’t aware that there was a whole, semi-unsanctioned app market for the iPhone out there (unsurprising given my general distaste for all things Apple I suppose), but there is, and this week there apparently appeared on it this app – Hot Tub is basically something which circumvents Apple’s own squeamishness about sex to deliver an on-phone bongo experience to those poor iPhone owners who’ve previously had to…I don’t know, w4nk to a Tube site in their phone browser? Is that a hardship? I really don’t understand bongo, you know. Anyway, I obviously haven’t tried this because of the aforementioned ‘no Apple’ and ‘not into bongo’ points, but it seems to pull in, er, ‘content’ from a bunch of different popular smut-peddlers and is ad-free, and, from what I have seen, has been…er…enthusiastically-received by horny Apple fans, so if you’ve been DESPERATE to watch people fcuking via an app rather than via boring old url-based browsing then this is presumably all your Christmases come at once.
  • Pitfall: Play 1980s ATARI classic Pitfall in your browser! Be reminded that, honestly, old games really were quite sh1t before getting bored and moving on! As ever with this stuff, I think the best use of it is to show it to a young person in your life and watch their growing astonishment at the poverty of The Past’s entertainment landscape.
  • Bluejeweled: This is a single-note gag, but it is moderately cathartic and it made me laugh, so. Also, if you have a family member who has wasted untold hours on one of these fcuking ‘match the gems’-type games they will appreciate this to an immoderate degree I think.
  • When They Died: WHEN DID THE FAMOUSES DIE? Macabre, but strangely-compelling (also, I am so embarrassingly bad at history that this put me in a really bad mood as a result of my own crushing ignorance, so, well, be warned).
  • Middle of Lidle-dle: Another one of those little games which I am astonished noone from Lidl or their agencies a) thought of themselves; or b) have decided to lob some money at to make it ‘official’, this is silly and pointless but weirdly fun. The site shows you an object from the storied Middle Aisle of Lidl, where they keep the esoteric sh1t, and asks you to guess how much it costs in a ‘higher’/’lower’ Price Is Right-style game of narrowing down the value until you hit paydirt, The quicker you get there, the higher your score – this shouldn’t have entranced me for 10 minutes earlier this week but, embarrassingly, it very much did.

By Wei Lin Tse

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS BASICALLY THE SOUNDTRACK TO MY DAYS OF TAKING CHEAP SPEED, AS FORMER EDITOR PAUL RETURNS WITH THE TRANCEY BEATS AND BLEEPS AND 303s! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Killer Covers: Not actually a Tumblr! Still, it’s excellent regardless of what fcuking platform it’s built on – Killer Covers is one of those collections of excellent pulp novel artworks, featuring such literary classics as ‘Miami Golden Boy’ and, er, ‘Tutor From Lesbos’, and yes, the design and illustration work on display here is EXACTLY as you probably imagine it to be.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS IS INEXPLICABLY EMPTY THIS WEEK! ONWARDS!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Meta Trends 2025: For a few years now, Matt Klein from Reddit has been doing God’s work (is it God’s? I mean, given the nature of it, it’s actually quite possible it’s the devil’s – anyway, you be the judge) and going through the great morass of agency trend reports to attempt to get some sort of big-picture, bird’s-eye view of the GENERAL LANDSCAPE OF CULTURE AND AGENCYW4NK each year and WHAT IT ALL MEANS. He’s emerged from hibernation with the 2025 edition, which involved him reading a frankly-horrifying-sounding quantity of agency-penned crystal ball gazing about the coming year, and you can read his thoughts, findings and analysis in this LONG, but genuinely-fascinating and very smart, piece of writing. This is partially-paywalled, so if you want to read the whole thing you’ll have to sub to Matt’s digital magazine Zine, but if you do ‘strategy’ or ‘planning’ or some other such madeup bullsh1t in the vacuous world of advermarketingpr then this feels like a worthwhile cost to put against expenses. My personal favourite things about this are a) Matt’s honest assessment that the vast majority of these reports are total fcuking bullsh1t and exist solely as an attempt to sell whatever particular service offering the agency – or it’s senior management – had decided it’s important to flog this year; and b) his AI-generated baseline summary of all of them, which I am going to reproduce here in its entirety because it’s almost painfully accurate: “The world is changing really fast because of computers and phones and the internet. Some people are worried because everything’s moving so quickly, and sometimes it’s hard to tell what’s real and what’s pretend. People are feeling stressed and confused. They’re concerned about some big problems like the Earth getting too hot. Even though some people try to hide from all these changes by sticking to their own groups, they can’t escape how different the world is becoming.” WELL QUITE.
  • The End of Woke: I’m including this not because I particularly agree with all – or indeed most – of the points it makes, but because it’s both reliably well-written by Henry Mance, and because its presence in the FT is a useful barometer of Where The Money Has Decided We Are Going Next. While there’s a lot of analysis in here that feels factually correct – to whit, the post-2016 focus on issues of longstanding discrimination and structural prejudice excluded certain groups, even if not deliberately, in a manner that fundamentally proved counterproductive to the broad adoption of practices which might have addressed some of said discrimination and structural inequality – there’s also quite a lot of it that feels like long-winded justification as to ‘why we don’t have to pretend to care about this stuff anymore which is frankly a relief because we never did’, which feels…unpleasant coming from the salmon pink bankers’ favourite. Regardless, worth reading this because it is Where We Are.
  • Deep Research And The Coming Bullsh1t Avalanche: Gary Marcus runs his critical eye over the new GPT ‘reasoning’ model which has been rolled out to some users in preview and which is offering a similar service to that provided by Gemini’s own ‘research’ function, letting users specify a research query and have The Machine run off and pull together a report on said query, drawing from sources and annotated and generally doing the job of an exec/research assistant. It…may not surprise you to learn that, while superficially impressive, a lot of what is churned out is…bullsh1t! In all the usual ways! It makes stuff up, it leaves stuff out, and, while it *is* comparable to a junior researcher or account exec, it’s very much comparable to one with no sense of pride in their work and an incredibly-slapdash attitude. Except, well, we’re lazy and slapdash too, which means what is inevitably going to happen (because human nature!) is that people will use this as a shortcut, take the results at face value, and start making actual decisions based on a sort of Cliff Notes version of facts compiled by someone who’s not wholly bothered about ‘truth’ and ‘accuracy’ and ‘completeness’. Which you can sort of see *might* be problematic in a number of different ways, and could lead to some ‘unhelpful’ outcomes (leaving aside the broader questions of ‘if you don’t do the reading, how are you meant to do the thinking?’ and ‘if we don’t train people how to do research properly and rigorously when they’re young, we’re just going to sort of collectively lose the ability aren’t we?’).
  • Big Data and the Veil of Ignorance: This is SUCH a good article, on the use of data and how it intersects with questions of justice – honestly, it’s a *little* on the dry and philosophical side, but it’s one of the most interesting things I’ve read on the unintended consequences of large-scale data interpretation and the way it intersects with contemporary morality…SO fascinating, I promise. Try this paragraph – if you can get on with this then you will really enjoy the whole thing: “In the last decades, “big data” has massively changed the informational landscape, and industry reports and research suggest that insurers want to make use of it. In a recent paper, I had explored some of the consequences with regard to moral hazard. Yes, big data might provide better information about people’s behavior. But there are also reasons to think that this might create new injustices. For one thing, there is the unequal quality of data and the risk of errors, e.g. for people who change their names (which, in many societies, tend to be women, because of patriarchal family norms). For another thing, there are the many forms of background injustice that make a difference to the conditions under which people choose. Think, for example, about the problem of “food desert” in poor neighborhoods. If your insurance company sees your credit card data, its algorithmic systems might categorize you as choosing hedonism over a healthy lifestyle (and increase your co-payment), while it is in fact a matter of circumstances that you cannot buy healthier food.”
  • A Deep-Dive Into Deepfake Bongo: An excellent bit of investigative work by the smart people at Bellingcat, who investigate the network of money and businesses that sit behind one of the most widely-used Deepfake bongo sites being used to make non-consensual smut out of innocent image and video sources. Partly interesting because of the meticulous way in which they describe the investigation, and partly because of the fact that it is SO FCUKING COMPLICATED; it’s shell companies and redirects all the way down, as you might imagine, and it becomes clear as you read this that, despite the well-meaning legislative steps which are starting to be taken (not least in the UK, where the Government is, credit where it’s due, taking this stuff more seriously than in lots of other place), it’s going to be INCREDIBLY hard to get this stuff taken down in any definitive sense, or indeed to pin any sort of responsibility on a single company or individual should you want to pursue a fine or prosecution.
  • The Klarna CEO: I genuinely despise Klarna as a business – its branding, its vibe, its shameless promotion of debt as a means to pursue a deeply-unsustainable lifestyle, its rebranding of ‘payday lending’ as ‘financial empowerment for a new generation’…the whole fcuking thing makes me feel genuinely a bit sick. Worst of all, though, to my mind, is ALL-STAR CEO and VC whisperer Sebastian Siematkowski, who you might have heard parping all over the media in the past 18 months or so wanging on about how his business was basically going to start replacing its staff with The Machine wherever possible, and that that process was in fact well underway. This profile in the NYT does, to its credit, pour several skipfuls of salt on some of Seb’s more bullish claims about exactly how much AI the company is actually using, but I found this more interesting as a general ‘direction of travel’-type piece – what’s important to take away from this is that Seb is talking up Klarna’s use of AI and its intention to where possible replace people with The Machine BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE MARKET WANTS TO HAPPEN. He is literally speaking to investors, and investors hear ‘mmm, lower personnel overheads mean maximal profit!’ and their trousers tent with the saddest of financially-motivated boners – basically this article is one of the first I’ve read that takes an almost-honest look at What This Means. It does finally feel like people are starting to catch up with me on what the practical implications of this stuff for a lot of people are going to be very, very soon, but I am slightly staggered that a) it’s taken so fcuking long; b) we’re still not seeming to be dedicating serious thought to the implications on a socioeconomic level. OH WELL IT WILL BE FINE.
  • The Philippines vs AI: Or, ‘hmm, that canary doesn’t look too healthy, I wonder what that means about the air quality in here?’ – this piece in Rest of World looks at the Philippines, a country which for the past couple of years has been my ‘must watch’ bellwether for the impact of The Machine on actual, real people’s jobs, is seeing the establishment of coalitions and workers’ collectives in attempt to guard against the erosion of a significant part of the jobs market through the application of generative AI. On the one hand, I am pleased to see the action; on the other, nothing in the piece makes me hugely confident about the collective power of the Filipino worker to make a meaningful difference to the pace of capital-mandated progress. So it goes!
  • The Death of Scenius: Ian Leslie writes on ‘urban creativity’, specifically with reference to Eno’s concept of the ‘scenius’, “the collective genius that can emerge when a population of diverse and fertile talents living in geographical proximity form a loose community or ‘scene’,” and whether it’s been killed by modernity. I remember working on the Cameron Government’s attempt to rebrand Shoreditch as Tech City back in 2010-12 (genuinely sorry about all that, everyone, please don’t hate me) and one of the BIG REASONS it was claimed it would apparently be trivial to recreate the dynamism, inventivity and (most importantly) billion-dollar valuations of Silicon Valley in, er, Old Street was the SERENDIPITOUS CONNECTIONS afforded people by the coffeeshops and bars of the area which would allow for the sort of casual meetings between genius-level intellects which have birthed companies like Apple (amusingly, the insane spike in rental prices this whole fcuking project created in the area neatly worked to absolutely fcuking crush much of the independent, artsy, creative scene which was still just about clinging on in the area, thus totally fcuking the ‘serendipitous meetings in bars and coffeeshops’ thing in half) – this piece argues that, for various reasons, we don’t live like that anymore and possibly won’t ever again (you thought society was atomsied in the 80s? Etc etc) and that that is culturally…problematic. This made me think quite a lot more than I expected it to.
  • Nobody Cares: This is, fine, a bit of a rant, but fcuk me did it resonate me in a week during which I have once again had to attempt to engage with the Italian consulate in London and experienced the unique, particular contempt which the Italian state seems to reserve for its citizens abroad. If nothing else, this is a reminder that caring is good for other people and we should try and do it more (this is more a note to myself than it is to you, fwiw).
  • Noise Complaints and London Pubs: The couple of London-centric new digital magazines launched last year continue to do excellent work, proving that there is still an appetite for good local journalism and (hopefully) that people will actually pay for it (it also throws into sharp relief what a complete pig’s ear the succession of useless fcuking cnuts who ruined the Standard have made of running paper) – this is Joshi Hermann’s The Londoner, with a longread about the way in which noise complaints from local residents are increasingly being weaponised against the pub trade and leading to situations whereby venues are effectively being pressuregrouped into shutting down by people who moved to the area seemingly without realising that there might occasionally be people talking outside the boozer. The only thing I think this piece misses – which is sort of the elephant, to my mind – is money; thing is, London is fcuking expensive, and getting moreso. The sorts of people renting anywhere near central London are likely to be QUITE RICH. When you become QUITE RICH, I have observed, you tend to expect the edges of your life to be sanded down, and to be able to effectively pay to remove inconveniences, and London is very good at helping the rich achieve this – which means that they tend to expect that they can do this with EVERYTHING, hence this. Basically the problem is money, always. Fcuking money.
  • The Mediterranean Diet Is A Lie: I found this piece slightly-irritating (partly because it felt like it was casting rather a lot of shade on My People), but the general point it makes – that, actually, the concept of the ‘mediterranean diet’ is in many respects a marketing fiction, that it bears little relation to the quotidian eating habits of a significant proportion of the population of mediterranean countries, and that we should probably stop fetishising it – probably isn’t wholly incorrect. A couple of things it doesn’t mention, though: a) the reason Italian kids are all fcuking obese is a combination of parental indulgence and THE FACT THAT THEY INCREASINGLY EAT LIKE AMERICANS; and b) the idea of the ‘mediterranean diet’ is also predicated on a society in which patriarchal ideas about gender roles are rigidly enforced, and which became significantly-less easy to maintain on a regular basis when you’re no longer in a situation where one family member (or more, if a multigenerational household) stays at home DOING DOMESTICS all day because woman. Basically I think this is a bit facile and has an agenda, but then again I am, I concede, perhaps a *touch* biased.
  • Eat The Mona Lisa, Jeff: This is very, very silly, but it made me laugh more than any other article I read this week. Inge Beekmans goes deep on “What would it mean if Jeff Bezos would buy and eat the Mona Lisa? This article demonstrates how a seemingly meaningless petition on change.org conjures various connections between contemporary manifestations of technologically driven nihilism and an upcoming battle between technocapitalism and intangible sociocultural values.” Your appetite for this will depend largely on the effect that paragraphs such as this had on you, basically: “From a purely material perspective, it is difficult to imagine how Bezos and da Vinci’s Mona Lisa could be more different. The Mona Lisa is a more than five hundred year old poplar wood panel covered with oil paint, that is now hanging in the Salle des États in the Louvre. Bezos is a white, middle aged man, who moves between multiple homes, but mainly resides in Seattle.“
  • Why Are Cocktails So Weird?: I’m a tedious purist when it comes to cocktails – I’m just not sure I can be fcuked to wait 15m and drop £20 on a drink which, when it turns up, might taste of the perfume counter – but I enjoyed this article looking at both the evolution of the style of cocktail enjoyed in the world’s high-end bars, and the reasons why the current vogue is for some pretty-weird-sounding sh1t. It made me really, really want some centrifuged blood orange juice, which wasn’t a sentence I was expecting to ever type if I’m honest.
  • RIP The Horny Profile: Depending on How Online You Are, and How Online You Have Been Since 2000ish, you will either be VERY FAMILIAR with the concept of the 00s Horny Profile or this will mean nothing to you – either way, you are in for a TREAT with this piece, which collects some of the best, most jaw-dropping examples of journalistic thirst and objectification committed to the page (what’s especially galling about this is that given the time of the articles these fcukers were earning a decent wordrate, which, given the engorged and purple nature of much of the prose, feels very unfair here in ‘30p a word if you’re lucky, oh and the cnuts won’t pay your invoices for six months’ 2025) in one gloriously-swollen package. Some you will know, some will be new to you, but all of them will make you feel vaguely-icky, as though a faint film of someone else’s sweat is drying on your skin. I also found this reaction to it interesting – this is obviously the perspective of someone a generation or two younger than me, who is slightly baffled at the hate and wonders ‘what the fcuk else was a journalist supposed to write about Jessica Simpson other than a few thousand words lauding her rack?’ which was…unexpected, and struck me as an interesting new twist on ‘feminism’.
  • Bridget Jones’ Hollow Feminism: I was slightly amazed to learn that there was a new Bridget Jones film imminent – it feels SPECTACULARLY out-of-time, which perhaps is the point I suppose – but enjoyed this brutal evisceration of the whole franchise and the character by Tanya Gold in the New Statesman; there’s a lot of good stuff in here which anyone who remembers reading the books back in their heyday will find stirs some quite specific memories (or at least it did with me): “In the second book, she is commissioned to interview Colin Firth in Italy for the Independent: the newspaper where Bridget was born in a column in 1995. She misses the plane because she is trying on a bikini; asks Firth, “Who is Neacher?”(she means Nietzsche); tries to kiss him; and ultimately submits a transcript rather than an interview. That scene gave me a panic attack: who would do this? (A woman with no powers of criticism, or analysis.) Even so, the Independent likes it: “Anything that gets letters is good no matter how bad it is.” There are hints here of a worse future, for both women and for journalism.”.
  • I Quit Sugar: I have seen this linked a LOT this week – with reason, it’s a genuinely great read, of the ‘I went to a mental-sounding wellness spa and had an EXPERIENCE’ variety. Caity Weaver REALLY likes sugar – I don’t think you can quite prepare yourself for quite how much she appears to enjoy it – and goes on a detoxy spa trip to Austria to attempt to go a week without and to see if she can get to the bottom of the why. This is a JOURNEY, and it is in parts very, very funny (Weaver is self-aware throughout, although I think if I were sitting on a transatlantic flight about to take off and she sat next to me with the meal she describes, I would consider it an act of actual violence), and, even though you may have read one of the semi-regular ‘I spent a week in a spa where you drink only water and three cl of weak vegetable broth a day while measuring my stool samples by hand’-type accounts which seem to appear in certain sections of the lifestyle press every few years, I promise you this is a truly excellent way of spending 20m or so.
  • Wildberries and Warlords: Wildberries was basically, as I understand it, Russia’s home-grown Amazon equivalent – this article, in the Economist’s excellent 1848 Magazine, explores how it’s effectively now at the centre of a genuinely mad-sounding blood feud which honestly sounds like something out of the 15th Century (but with significantly more automatic weapons). I went to college with a man from Chechnya, as it happens, who was almost certainly the son of a very, very bad man and who last I heard was wanted by Interpol on counts of people trafficking, so a lot of this is…weirdly reminiscent to me of Adam Islamov, his mysterious and unsmiling friend Nurbal, and his incredibly-sinister ‘Grozny Streetfighters’ baseball cap.
  • Cursed Algorithm: I once again link to Emma Garland’s writing about sex and the web and the intersection of the two, because she is just so good at the now of it. Seriously, look: “It doesn’t help that I have a friend who incessantly sends me god awful content from lolcows or the worst “shock punk” solo artists (read: unregistered sex offenders) the internet has to offer, another providing regular “Asian dad fit” breakdowns, and another showering me with Creed memes. One of my suggested reels earlier today was a girl wearing a bathing suit in the shower, glancing back over her shoulder, with overlay text that said: “I might not be a 10 but I’ll let you leave the lights on & use all 4 holes.” This was sandwiched between bulking vs cutting advice promoted by a man helping his girlfriend lift from behind, and a photo of Dr Dre with Mr Blobby posted by Insane Championship Wrestling founder Mark Dallas. Someone said I have “the algo of a hetero man,” and it’s true – with a spirit to match, I fear. Due to my podcast consumption, I keep getting advertised Load Boost (a supplement intended to make you blow bigger loads, obviously).”
  • Lynn Barber vs Marianne Faithfull: This was shared a bit in the aftermath of Faithfull’s death last week; honestly, it is one of the most incredible celebrity profiles I have ever read, ever, and every single word of it is gold, and it is ESSENTIAL that you click the link and read it right away. Two monstrous characters (and maybe a third too), wrestling off the page.
  • High & Dry: I find most writing about sobriety spectacularly dull – possibly due to certain, er, ‘lifestyle choices’ I continue to make – but this (very long, be warned) article about the author’s experience attending the sober enclave at famously-hedonistic music festival Bonnaroo is WONDERFUL from start to finish – funny and sad and populated with great characters, and honest throughout about the fact that being sober around fcuked people is not always fun, and when you’re a relapse-risk it’s…quite stressful. I can’t tell you how much you will enjoy this, I promise – and it also contains Dylan, who I guarantee you will fall in love with as soon as you meet him. Really, really wonderful piece.
  • Capybaras: The final longread of the week is this, by the inimitable Gary Shteyngart, in the New Yorker – it’s not the best thing he’s ever written, largely down to the fact that capybaras aren’t THAT interesting, but it is still funny and effortlessly charming and he is such a wonderful, personable companion as he travels far and wide to get up close and personal with a capy (also, just going back to my ‘man is this a bad time to try and get paid for the written word’ rant from earlier, IMAGINE getting New Yorker rates and expenses for this piece), and the gentle, jeopardy-free nature of the piece was honestly something of a balm. You’ll like it, promise.

By Thomas Sing

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 31/01/25

Reading Time: 36 minutes

Look, for some reason I slept genuinely-appallingly last night and as such this has been written pretty much entirely in a sort of fugue-state; I’m going to have to forego any attempt at a ‘comedy’ intro and restrict myself to saying that I started reading ‘My First Book’ by Honor Levy yesterday (on Jamillah Knight’s recommendation, for which thanks) and it really is both excellent and the most terrifyingly, brilliantly internetty writing I think I’ve ever read ever, and I think if you can stand reading the crap in here then you will find it genuinely wonderful.

Fcuk, even THAT was a struggle. Evidently I expended all my meagre energies ensuring that the quality of the prose that follows is ENTIRELY CONSISTENT with the prose in previous editions – for better, and indeed for worse.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are entirely within your rights to be appalled at the slightly-phoned-in nature of the preceding two paras.

 

By Andrea Gori

OUR FIRST MIX THIS WEEK COMES FROM TOM SPOONER, WHO FLASHED ME RIGHT BACK TO BEING 15 WITH THIS SELECTION OF 90s TRACKS, A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF WHICH I USED TO LISTEN TO ON A CHEAP CURRY’S OWN-BRAND WALKMAN ON POOR-QUALITY C90 CASSETTES (ACTUALLY THE PAST WAS SH1T ON REFLECTION WASN’T IT?)! 

THE SECTION WHICH CANNOT GET THIS POST ABOUT THE NEW US ADMINISTRATION OUT OF ITS HEAD, PT.1:  

  • A Better World: Do you occasionally feel that, collectively, we might at a few crucial junctures in our history have taken THE WRONG CHOICE? That, in the infinitely-branching multiverse in which we entirely-possibly exist, there therefore are other, alternative timelines in which we took the OTHER fork in the road and Paltrowed ourselves into a slightly-different but vastly better alternareality that doesn’t involve quite so much of…well, *all this*? Would you like to perhaps EXPLORE some of these alternative timelines and see whether or not you can take make some small, crucial tweaks that will ameliorate everything for everyone? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! A Better World is a very, very fun little webtoy thing with a very simple premise – fire it up and it presents you with a series of historical events (you get a different starting set each time), some of which you are told you can CHANGE. So, for example, in the version currently open in a tab here I could choose to ‘modify’ the fact that Copernicus discovered the heliocentric model in the 16thC…so I just decided to see what happens if the Church, improbably, gets right behind the science and supports it, and now there is a whole new timeline in which Pope Galileo establishes the Great Scientific Church in 1603, and the creation of an orbital church in 1922…THIS IS WONDERFUL, seriously, and you can tweak all sorts of moments from the past in all sorts of ways and, basically, either take us to a glorious, post-scarcity alternafuture or, er, condemn us to semi-literate grubbing, and as both a game and just a fun counterfactuals toy it’s a an excellent way to spend 15 minutes. You even get a little ‘karma’ score based on how much you’ve ameliorated (or fcuked) the world, should you wish to keep track of your godly achievements. I don’t *think* that this is built on an LLM, although on reflection this is exactly the sort of thing which they would be perfectly capable at. By the way, I just fiddled with something else in my ‘Church of Science’ timeline, and now Adolf Hitler is President of East America by 1920, so, actually, perhaps the arc of the universe just bends towards Nazi and there’s nothing we can do about it, sorry lads.
  • DeepSeek: I’m including this here for completeness and because it’s not impossible that some of you might be interested in playing with the thing that sent markets insane on Monday – it feels a lot like using any of the other LLMs, except with none of the multimodality stuff, so it’s unlikely to excite you particularly, but it is a clear and obvious example of the fact that (as has been clear for a couple of years and, I think, largely admitted by both OpenAI and Google) that these companies have no moat. I think (and I will go a bit deeper in the longreads on this, but it’s worth repeating) that all the people on Monday getting all excited about how THIS WAS THE END OF THE AI BUBBLE and LOL SAM ALTMAN are, possibly, rather missing the point – what do you think happens when a profit-maximising system is granted access to something which enables ‘greater efficiency at scale’ (ie more profit), at a lower cost than was previously thought? Do you think it is going to use LESS of that thing? If you do then I would gently posit that you are a fcuking moron.
  • The Rest of World Photo Contest 2024: I think I mention on here regularly enough how wonderful I think Rest of World is as a media outlet – it consistently reports interesting stories from parts of the world that rarely get covered with any nuance or care by media (or at least the media I consume – I appreciate that, yes, this might be more of a ‘me’ problem), and it’s been really pleasing to see it continue to thrive over the past few years. This is what I think is its annual photo contest – there are only 10 images selected here, but there are some wonderful ones and in particular the image by Sandra Singh of the refugees in Lampedusa, just off the boat and clustered around a single phone as they videocall someone to tell they they’re alive, is a just astonishing image in terms of its combination of humanity, politics and very intense modernity, and has made me go ever so slightly wobbly here in my kitchen at 720am which very much suggests I didn’t get enough sleep last night. Anyway, lovely pictures.
  • The Wiener Holocaust Library: I happened to see a play on Wednesday evening all about Nazis – like, actual historical ones – and it turns out that it felt INCREDIBLY ODD and not wholly-comfortable in January 2025. Anyway, as you’re almost certainly aware, Monday was the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz and as such it feels appropriate to share the link to the Wiener Holocaust Library: “Based in London, The Wiener Holocaust Library is the world’s oldest and Britain’s largest collection of original archival material on pre-war Jewish life, the Nazi era and the Holocaust. The Wiener is home to hundreds of thousands of documents, letters, photographs, press cuttings, books, pamphlets, periodicals and unpublished manuscripts and memoirs, posters, artworks, and eyewitness testimonies.” There is a huge archive of imagery here, alongside documents and documentation and correspondence, German newspapers of the era, maps and logistical papers and…it’s all fcuking monstrous, honestly, and quite astonishingly unpleasant when you start going through it properly and start to slowly achieve a vague, and still inadequate, sense of the scale and horrific, grinding efficiency of the machine.
  • POTUS Tracker: Yes, I know, I know, THERE IS TOO MUCH OF HIM EVERYWHERE ALREADY. Honestly, the worst thing about all of this (to be clear: the worst thing FOR ME, someone who is no way (at least at present) materially affected by US politics) is that, if your job involves in any way having to DO NEWS then you simply can’t avoid him. Honestly, I need to keep up with what is going on to write the things people pay me to write, which means I am currently hearing his fcuking name approximately 17 times an hour and…that doesn’t feel healthy. Someone said to me the other day that they’re planning on just sort of noping-out of news for the next few years which, well, now that is a very particular type of modern, Western privilege. Anyway, this website tracks where the President of the US is and what they are doing, alongside official engagements and legislation enacted, so you can get a vague overview of what he is doing without needing to engage with either what he is saying or about what other people are saying about what he is saying, which, frankly, might make things *slightly* easier.
  • Bauhaus Bonk: Ok, this is a) a videogame that isn’t out til next week; and b) it’s one you’d actually have to pay a few quid for…BUT! There is a free demo! And, honestly, whether or not you care about games can I ask that you PLEASE take a minute and click the link and watch the trailer? If you have any interest in art or design or music or animation then I think you will find it UTTERLY CAPTIVATING. I don’t really want to spoil anything about the mechanic here or what happens, but it’s both delightfully-simple and SUCH a clever combination of visual and audio style with a really interesting kinetic gameplay mechanic, and I think it might quietly end up being rather beautiful.
  • The TI84 Online Calculator: If you were a different type of person to me – someone less scared of numbers, in the main – it’s entirely possible that the image you’ll see on loading up that url will give you a flashback of almost Proustian clarity. This website simulates – apparently in its entirety – the look and functionality of a specific type of scientific calculator which I think even I recognise as being pretty ubiquitous amongst more more maths-and-science-minded friends, which means that you can do all the, er, really ‘fun’ stuff that you used to do with these things back in the day ALL OVER AGAIN RIGHT NOW! I think you can use these things to run graphs and stuff, and, if you’re patient enough and so inclined, rudimentary animations and the like (and, almost certainly, some weirdo has got one to run DOOM at some point by now), but my main memory of what they can do comes from 1997 when my mate Javier worked out that, because you were allowed to take a calculator into all your exams and because this thing had a surprisingly-large memory, you could basically just transcribe all your notes into it and use them during the every single examination with pretty much total impunity.
  • Time Travel Television:  Websites that curate YouTube content by era and package said content into faux-retro viewing platforms are not a new thing and I have featured a fcuking multitude over the years, but I really enjoyed this particular variant, mainly because whoever’s done the curation seems to have done a really good job of both isolating some nice ‘channels’ to flip between and also of minimising the YouTube cruft inbetween episodes and, having only scratched the surface here, but OH MY GOD this goes deep. Obviously I went straight to the 90s because LIFE WAS NICE THEN, and in the course of a dozen or so channelhops I got, variously, Daria, MTV, Home Improvement, VH1, Dharma and Greg (I can’t imagine anyone cares about that, but just to give you an idea of the breadth of choice) – trying the 80s briefly there was another MTV analogue showing decade-appropriate vids, Dynasty and, wonderfully, The Wonder Years…basically if you feel CHILDHOOD/TEEN NOSTALGIA for the 60s/70s/80s/90s (or, alternatively, if you are young and want to experience how fundamentally limited and eventually-frustrating the domestic entertainment landscape was), then you will ADORE this.
  • Is My Twitter Feed Fcuked?: I am still maintaining a Twitter account, but for the past month or have only used it to post a link to this and then fcuk off because, well, 90% of the people who used to use it and make it fun for me have left. Still, if you’re still persisting with the increasingly-accurately-epitheted ‘hellsite’ then you might find this tool interesting (or, should you wish to get into a REALLY fun argument with any friends or family members who you think might not necessarily be benefiting from Elon’s Algorithmic Firehose of Fash) – all it’s doing is chucking an interface on top of an LLM, to be clear, but it’s an interesting use-case. To use it, you open Twitter, go to your For You page and scroll and scroll and scroll – take a screenrecording for 2m (that is a LOT of scrolling), feed it to this and it will, in time, spit out an analysis of the sort of content that you’re being exposed to, its political balance, key themes, etc (there’s also a lot of…slightly more esoteric bullsh1t like ‘mental health effect’, which is obviously rubbish, but). I presume that this is plugged in…what, Gemini? Anyway, it’s not only quite a fun way of getting OBJECTIVE PROOF that Twitter’s a cesspit these days, but it’s also a not-terrible usecase for multimodal AI should you be unimaginative enough to require one (sorry, but come on).
  • Encore: This is a smart idea which I am not convinced *quite* works yet, but it feels like something which people might find useful. Encore is, put simply, a natural language search layer which works across a whole bunch of different secondhand and vintage portals – you can limit the search to a bunch of different countries,  of which the UK is one, which means that you can type something like ‘baggy trousers that are a bit like carhartt but don’t specifically have to be that brand, and definitely not camouflage because I get incredibly confused if my legs blend into the urban background’ (I am a desperately-unimaginative dresser) and get some not-terrible results. It’s hit-and-miss (hence my ‘doesn’t work perfectly’ caveat uptop), but that’s I think in large part down to the occasionally-odd quirks of LLM interaction and interpretation, and as a quick way of browsing loads of different second-hand outlets online it feels potentially quite useful. It’s free, but it has paid tiers if you shop LOADS and want access to bells and whistles (like, using a marginally-better version of GPT, the ability to search by uploaded image, etc etc), and if you’re someone who’s less badly-dressed and averse to shopping than I am you might enjoy this.
  • Fathomverse: This is such a nice idea and I approve unreservedly – it also harks back to a long line of ‘using the crowd to solve dataset labelling problems’ solutions that go all the way back to donating their home computer’s processing power to SETI in the 2000s. I’m going to take the writeup from Bloomberg, so: “The game for phones and tablets populates a virtual ocean with images of marine critters in their deep-sea habitats stored in a sprawling database known as FathomNet. Some photos are of ocean animals whose identity has been verified by scientists. Others are organisms labeled by the AI or that have yet to be classified. Players first embark on training dives where they’re taught to distinguish the characteristics of 47 different types of marine animals.Once players are trained up as amateur marine biologists, they take on missions drifting along ocean currents looking for pulsating dots that indicate where marine life has been recorded. Players tap the screen to see the animal and identify if it’s familiar or tag it as unknown. The game then reveals whether their choices match the consensus of other players or if the creature remains undetermined. They win points for correct classifications as well as the number of organisms they spot. Players also score bonus points for correctly labeling a previously unidentified life form when consensus is reached.” Which, ok, makes it sound super-dry, but, well, Bloomberg, innit. I played with this for 15m earlier this week and it’s actually surprisingly fun and VERY zen, so if you’re the sort of person who enjoys pastimes that might reasonably self-describe as ‘cozy’ (have we talked about the extent to which that makes my teeth itch? It really does) then I think you might get something out of this AND you’ll be helping to explore the sea which feels like A Good Thing, karmically-speaking (to be clear, there is self-evidently no such thing as karma – I mean, look, does this look like a universe in which the concept of ‘karma’ is at play in any significant manner? I put it to you that it very much fcuking does not).
  • Fortune: This is silly, and ephemeral, and a *tiny* bit broken, but it is also small and frivolous and pleasingly-vapourwave and playful, and there’s about 90s of experience here and it will leave you, I hope, feeling…calmer. If you’re confused, just click around. NO I WILL NOT EXPLAIN IT MORE CAN WE NOT MAINTAIN AN AIR OF MYSTERY AROUND ANYTHING ANYMORE FFS?
  • Indieblog Page: Ok, this is just wonderful and HUGE credit to Andreas Gohr, whoever they may be, whose work it apparently is. As they put it, “This website lets you randomly explore the IndieWeb. Simply click the button below and you will be redirected to a random post from a personal blog…you can drag the button to your bookmarks and have it always available when you want to be inspired” – you can check out the full list of sites it’s drawing from (and I think even download it should you wish to for whatever reason) and it is fcuking VAST – honestly, there are THOUSANDS on there, many I had heard of and many I hadn’t, and if you’re the sort of person who vaguely enjoys the idea of hopping from site to site entirely at random and just seeing what you find and what you learn (which, given where you’re reading this, I’m going to assume you to to at least a small extent) – not everything I have found through this has been interesting, to be clear (and quite a lot quite the opposite) and a few things have made me feel…quite uncomfortable (the links are politically agnostic), but as a general ‘fcuk me the web is vast and we are legion and GOD PEOPLE ARE WEIRD AND OBSESSIONAL (BUT, MOSTLY, WEIRD’ source it’s almost unparalleled.
  • Homemade Meals: This is interesting – a Dutch company which I think is now launched in the UK as well, which offers an app service connecting people who want to cook food at home to sell with people who want to buy home-cooked food for delivery, muchlike the diasporic groups which exist on Whatsapp as informal networks for home cooks to sell to their community. Which, ok, now I type it feels like applying an exploitative commercial layer almost certainly backed by VC money to something which was already working quite happily without it thankyou very much, but, equally, it’s an interesting idea – although on reflection I have no fcuking clue what they do about hygiene standards and the enforcement thereof, which makes me *slightly* concerned that this might be a not-insignificant potential botulism vector. Caveat Emptor, I guess.
  • The Video Game History Library: Honestly, this is a frankly INSANE archive of old videogames magazines and the like, which I am only not being more vocal about because it inexplicably doesn’t feature the UK’s PC Zone or ZERO magazines (both were from the early-90s and both had, I now realise, a…probably-unhealthy effect on my writing style in later life). Still, it has LOADS OF OTHER ONES, and there are all sorts of other things too – promo materials from old launches and the like, and ALL sorts of behind-the-scenes details and documentation about the game development process from both individuals and studios, donated as part of the laudable desire to maybe try and not let all of this history fall into digital landfill. It is not…hugely user-friendly, but if you’re interested in the industry and its history then this is likely to appeal significantly.
  • The Dataviz Project: Ooh, this is good – a wonderful collection of different examples and techniques for data visualisation, compiled by Ferdio as what I presume is a marketing tool; it’s effectively a glossary/taxonomy of different dataviz mechanisms with examples of them in use, and if you’re someone who has to work in this area and who wants some sort of inspiration for how you can do something marginally more interesting than ANOTHER FCUKING BUBBLE CHART then, well, click the link.
  • Shapecatcher: Doodle in the box and The Machine will attempt to guess which Unicode character you’re trying to represent. Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT YOU JOYLESS GIT?
  • Personality Map: I feel I ought to warn you that this is potentially QUITE DANGEROUS depending on the sort of person you are – so, er, caveats apply. Basically (and this is speculative based on how I *think* this is working under the hood) you ask this natural language questions about yourself, of the ‘why am I like x?’ or ‘I think y, what does this say about me?’ variety, and in return you get a detailed analysis of WHAT IT MIGHT MEAN. Per the blurb, “PersonalityMap is a platform to help you understand the relationship between “everything and everything” with regard to human psychology. We provide access to over 1 million correlations spanning personality, demographics, behaviors, and beliefs. In addition, we provide a powerful and one-of-a-kind interface for exploring these relationships, allowing you to investigate questions of interest from a variety of angles. PersonalityMap can be used to generate new hypotheses, as well as to refine and confirm (or disconfirm) existing hypotheses. PersonalityMap is powered by an advanced, novel machine-learning algorithm of our own design. While its predictions are not always accurate, in a study testing its accuracy, it outperformed 100% of non-experts and 99% of academic psychologists in predicting correlations.” I feel I need to say upfront here that I do not think you should take ANYTHING this tells you with anything other than a skipload of salt; of course, this may be because I just asked it something (no of course I am not telling you what) and it responded by telling me that it’s likely because I am arrogant and desperate for approval so, well, this can basically fcuk right off as far as I’m concerned (I feel so so so seen).
  • Close Up Photographer of the Year: In part amazing, in part slightly-ruined by seeming-universal excessive HDR application across the board, there are still some lovely images here (but arachnophobes should exercise caution when scrolling, is all).
  • The Elevationists: I am slightly astonished that I’d not previously been aware of the fact that there is an actual, honest-to-goodness ‘Church of Marijuana’ in (of course) North America somewhere – but there is! They call themselves ‘elevationists’! They have an ACTUAL CHURCH, which I presume is permanently hotboxed and soundtracked by a few dozen people ripping bongs (but in really spiritual fashion), and in which you can get married! Despite my slight incredulity this seems…entirely benign, as far as I can tell, and just seems to be an excuse for a bunch of people in Denver who a) like smoking weed a LOT; and b) who identify as ‘spiritual’ in some sort of vague, nondenominational way, to hang out and get blitzed out of their gourds and, well more power to them frankly.

By Lola Gill

NEXT WE HAVE A WHOLE NEW ALBUM BY OLOFF WHO I APPRECIATE MIGHT NOT BE TO EVERYONE’S TASTE BUT WHO I REALLY ENJOY AND WHICH I RECOMMEND YOU CHECK OUT BECAUSE, WHATEVER ELSE IT MIGHT BE, IT IS VERY MUCH ITS OWN THING!

THE SECTION WHICH CANNOT GET THIS POST ABOUT THE NEW US ADMINISTRATION OUT OF ITS HEAD, PT.2:  

  • AI Smut Generator: As any of you who have a website with an associated email address will know, one of the quotidian joys of opening the associated inbox is to see what inventive spam you will have been gifted with (this week’s favourite was a lovely man in China asking if I might be interested in getting into aggregates and heavy machinery and, you know what, there was a brief moment when I was tempted ngl) – most of which tend to be of the ‘Wow! Your site is amaze! How much for mutually beneficial SEO-focused linkjuicing?’ variety. Which is why, when I got an email this week tersely asking me ‘how much for a shoutout on your site?’ I was inclined to ignore it. Until I checked the sender’s email, and realised that it was someone asking to pay me to talk about their AI erotic story generator – so obviously like a moron I replied and said that actually I would probably write about it anyway and there was no need to pay me, because I am a fcuking idiot who is so, so bad at ‘business’ that it actually hurts me. I did, though, warn my interlocutor that he might not like what I had to say. So, let’s see! This is *technically* free to use – although you only get one story credit, so if you want to do more than test it out I think it will start asking you for money – and so I had a play with it the other day, and…look, it’s marginally more sophisticated than a previous iteration of this sort of thing that I featured…what, a year or so ago?, in that you can specify to a quite astonishingly-granular degree the setting, the ‘type’ of encounter you want (nothing awful, that I was able to see at least), names and details of protagonists, etc etc, specify how filthy you want your filth, and BANG, in a few seconds you’ll have 1500 words or so of bespoke wordy bongo! Look, I can’t, obviously, tell you whether this will scratch whatever particular flavour of itch is your favourite, but, on the plus side, it is genuinely filthy, and seems to have a reasonably-coherent grasp of both physicality and in-scene coherence…but, also, honestly, *I* could write better, filthier filth than this and, to be clear, that is very much not the sort of thing I do. It’s just so obviously less good than getting an actual human being to do it for you, and while the pricing is actually…not that bad, I just can’t imagine anyone getting the, er, value out of this that would encourage persistent usage. Pleasingly, though, it does let you access all the OTHER filth people have generated, or at least some of it, so as long as you don’t mind spelunking through the weirdly-sticky and unpleasantly-mucal caverns of a stranger’s sexual imaginings then, well, GOOD ONE!  Also, there is one story on there about urolagnia which is so, so preposterous that it made me laugh out loud on several occasions, so this may not necessarily work for you as an erotic aid but it will almost certainly give you some bellylaughs if you’re reasonably-open-minded. So, er, Ryan, about that payment you mentioned…?
  • The Modern Literary Novel: This site is quite amazing, and I am not wholly certain as to whether it’s the work of a single person – but I *think*it is, which makes it all the more remarkable a body of work. This is an EXHAUSTIVE critical look at literary fiction worldwide – honestly, you cannot even begin to imagine the sheer number of authors and works that the author has read and opined on, from literally all over the globe. I obviously went to the English section because, well, small-island mentality, innit, and a) was delighted by the selection of authors, partly because it immediately irritated me slightly (Alain de fcuking Botton?) which is always a sign that you’re going to find the perspectives *interesting*; and b) then delved into it and was genuinely thrilled to find that this person has some SPICY OPINIONS and is not shy of sharing them. Witness this section on Martin Amis, a writer who I adore but who, equally, I appreciate is not everyone’s cup of tea – I honestly fell in love with the author a bit upon reading this WONDERFUL kicking: “So where does that leave us with Amis? I have covered Money: A Suicide Note and London Fields, despite the fact that both read like watered down early 1980s Norman Mailer (with, perhaps, a bit of Elmore Leonard thrown in) but I really do not think that these are anywhere near as great as some people make them out to be. No doubt we will have to put up with him and his antics for some time to come but there are many better writers to read. And if you want to know more about him, many of the sites below will help you. He was born in 1949, son of Kingsley Amis. He read English at Oxford and worked for the Times Literary Supplement and New Statesman as a literary critic. He had his teeth fixed (expensively, in the USA), trashed Katie Price aka Jordan, a woman of similar talent to his own, and argued with his father. He also wrote some books.” Seriously, this is amazing and if you like books and reading and writing then it’s entirely possible you could lose days to this.
  • Play Tetris inside a PDF: Do not ask why, just accept it and be happy. Is this a fun way of playing Tetris? No. Does it in anyway enhance or improve the base-level game experience? Also no.
  • The Drop: Ooh, it’s been a while since we’ve had a totally-fcuking-bullshit AI Kickstarter, but this one is a particular doozy. The Drop is a pendant which has 10xed its funding goal and so WILL APPARENTLY HAPPEN (there is no way in fcuking hell that this is ever happening), and which is designed to LEVERAGE THE POWER OF AI to, er, enable you to exert a frankly-psychologically-troubling degree of control over your calorific intake. The gimmick is that the pendant is equipped with a camera angled so that, in theory, it will be pointed at the point in your field of vision where a plate would sit while you eat; it recognises food, and will automatically take a picture of said food each time, send that image to The Machine for analysis, and IMMEDIATELY send you a calorie-and-nutrition breakdown of whatever you’re eating via (inevitably) an app. SHALL WE COUNT THE WAYS IN WHICH THIS IS FCUKING BULLSHIT? 1) The camera – do you realise how fcuking annoying it will be to ensure that your food is in-shot every time you eat? And how does it stop itself from just assuming that EVERY SINGLE PLATE OF FOOD that passes through its field of vision is finding its way into you?; 2) The ‘analysis’ – LOOK YOU CANNOT IN ANY WAY MEANINGFULLY ASSESS THE CALORIFIC LOAD OR NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF A PLATE OF FOOD WITH ANY DEGREE OF ACCURACY BASED ON A SINGLE 2D PHOTO FFS IT SIMPLY ISN’T POSSIBLE. Still, thanks to a LOT of idiot wellness fans, it has been willed into existence. Jesus. Also, again, I do not feel that this promotes a…healthy attitude to one’s diet.
  • Sephora Pinball: Would you like to take a small, interlink break to play a quick couple of games of branded pinball courtesy of makeup-peddlers Sephora? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! On the one hand, this is impressively-styled and the integration of the various makeup products into the table mechanics is nicely done from a design point of view; on the other, this is literally LESS GOOD as a game than the free pinball title that you got bundled as a freebie with Windows in the early-90s; like, ffs lads, you could literally just have reskinned that code and made something actually good with replayability potential and ACTUAL BRAND EXPRESSION and instead, well, you just phoned it in, didn’t you? Still, I bet the money was good and so I do, on balance, completely understand.
  • Emergence: Do you remember the height of the NFT/web3 boom and the associated oddity of the ideas floating around? Do you remember all the (inevitably vaporware) projects that were all about BUILDING AN ENTERTAINMENT FRANCHISE/IP ON THE BLOCKCHAIN? All of those DAO-based community projects about ‘collaborative, community storytelling’? That was fun, wasn’t it? And, obviously total fcuking bullshit because a) in the main creating stuff simply doesn’t work that way, and most people aren’t actually very good at building worlds or crafting stories; b) NONE OF IT REQUIRED FCUKING CRYPTO OR WEB3 IN THE FIRST PLACE. And yet despite all this we have seen the appearance of Emergence this week, backed by a BIG NAME HOLLYWOOD WRITER (the guy who wrote the Dark Knight trilogy, should that move you) and which ticks all of the 2021 boxes – look, here’s the summary from Variety because I find this sort of stuff exhausting to parse: “Centered around a white hole in a galaxy, the “Emergence” franchise will feature various storytelling mediums, including podcasts, comics and animations. Built using blockchain AI storytelling platform Story, Incention will launch Goyer’s project to “showcase the potential of this revolutionary model” and “capture mainstream attention while redefining how IP evolves.” “Emergence” will be created by Incention users as well as through its generative AI tool, Atlas, which is designed to serve as a “creative partner” to help with common tasks like aggregating ideas, crafting narratives and generating full videos.” Doesn’t…doesn’t that sound a) fcuking cursed; and b) like you will never, ever hear of this again following that Variety article? Maybe I’m wrong, of course, but the precedents aren’t good. I hope that Mr Goyer has been paid for his involvement in real money rather than forked Ethereum magic beans.
  • The Homosaurus: This is SO interesting – and I say this as a tedious cishet with no particular skin in the gay game – and a wonderful resource for anyone interested in queer culture and history. “The Homosaurus is an international linked data vocabulary of LGBTQ+ terms. Designed to enhance broad subject term vocabularies, the Homosaurus is a robust and cutting-edge thesaurus that advances the discoverability of LGBTQ+ resources and information. The Homosaurus was originally created in 1997 by IHLIA LGBT Heritage as a Dutch and English gay and lesbian thesaurus that was used as a standalone vocabulary to describe their collections. Over time, terms relating to bisexuality, trans, gender, and intersex concepts were added, but not methodically. This original version of the vocabulary (which we refer to as version 0) had an overly flat structure and, due to the lack of connections, terms were too isolated from one another and therefore easily missed. But, it became apparent that a vocabulary developed by an LGBTQ archives to describe LGBTQ resources could be a powerful tool.” Just click on the ‘vocabulary’ list and scroll down, and learn about such fascinating concepts as ‘intersex witches’. God people are fascinating.
  • The Spiralator: Are Spirographs still a thing for people growing up in modernity, or have they been consigned to the oubliette that also holds Spangles? Presuming you know what a spirograph is (and if you don’t, feast your eyes), this is a digital version of one – fiddle with all the parameters (plotter width, various options in terms of radius, colours, etc etc) and then see what wonderful geometric spirals emerge. Ok, fine, that’s literally all you can do with this – but, equally, take a look at the gallery because people have been making some rather beautiful designs, should you wish to potentially feel inspired.
  • Sequencer: Yes, I know, browser-based sequencer tools are OLD NEWS and you have seen millions of them (and me? How many do you think *I’ve* seen? I HAVE SEEN QUANTITIES OF WEBSITES YOU LITERALLY CANNOT BEGIN TO CONCEIVE OF), but this one is slightly different in that you can switch between two-dozen-ish different scales and see how each alters the tone of the sequence you’ve coded. Which might not be interesting to anyone who actually understands music, but if you’re like me and you genuinely have no idea what ‘pentatonic’ or ‘ionian’ means in terms of sound then it’s honestly eye-opening and really quite fascinating.
  • Exotic Animal Photo Repository: On the one hand, I like the fact that this exists very much indeed; on the other, the fact that the people who created it feel the need for its existence is incredibly fcuking troubling from the point of view of exactly what we’re doing to our increasingly-fragile-looking knowledge space – per the blurb, “This website exists to be a repository of image references for accurately identified animal species. In recent years, major image repositories like Arkive have gone offline, and generative AI has polluted the utility and accuracy of search engine results.  This site is the result of a decade of travel and photography at zoos, sanctuaries, and other facilities holding wild and exotic animal collections in North America. All animal identification to species and subspecies level is as accurate as possible and based on facility signage. As these images are presented for reference purposes, some are blurry or have distortions from glass/fencing visible. These were included intentionally: the reference material is still valuable even if the photography isn’t perfect.”  BONUS IMAGE LINK: this is a decent search engine for public domain images, should you require one.
  • Nested:Despite this being from 2011, I have never in fact featured it in Curios – which, frankly, is a travesty, as this is an absolute all-time piece of webwork by the mysterious Orteil (“some European dude who likes to make toys and games out of javascript”). I don’t really want to tell you too much, other than that literally everything in the universe is in here (I am sort-of not joking) and that you will feel a steadily-mounting sense of amazement as you work out what is going on and how deep this goes.
  • Design Your Own Lacoste: On the one hand, this site by Lacoste, which lets you customise one of its shirts in a frankly-astonishing number of different styles and with a truly impressive degree of granular control, is probably the best variant on the whole ‘brand lets you create your own bespoke tees/trainers/whatever’ thing I’ve ever seen – seriously, the power of the design tools here is genuinely surprising and the UX/UI is really very well done in deed; on the other, what’s the point of this if you can’t then order the designs, or vote on ones that you would like see put into production? It feels like it’s missing a step here, but perhaps I’m just being entitled. Check out the gallery to get a feeling of what you can achieve with this, there are some really rather nice designs here.
  • Subpixel Snake: Someone’s made a version of Snake that’s so small it requires a microscope to play. No, I don’t know either.
  • Order Up: A non-Wordle-like daily game! Each day you’re given a list of things and are asked to put them in order based on a specific instruction or clue within a set number of tries. This is *just* challenging enough to be interesting, although I have occasionally found its selfish insistence on being culturally North American an annoyance (this is not its fault, to be clear).
  • Collections: Our final game of the week is this one, a fun, moderately-involved daily word puzzle – each day there are three words for you to guess, and each day those three words will be linked by a category. Your job is to guess the category while attaining the highest points total you can – you lose points by ‘buying’ letters as you try and guess the three words, for wrong guesses at the connection, etc etc, and there’s a pleasing tension between needing more information and not wanting to spend your precious points determining whether that letter’s an ‘A’ or an ‘E’. I like this, but, full disclosure, I am annoyingly and embarrassingly sh1t at it which made me quit in slight disgust the other day. You, though, are probably significantly less stupid than I am.

By Javier Mayoral

SADEAGLE HAS BLESSED YOU WITH ANOTHER MIX ALL THE WAY FROM CORNWALL AND FULL OF EXCELLENT WEIRD RECORDS YOU ALMOST CERTAINLY DON’T KNOW BUT WHICH I AM FAIRLY CERTAIN YOU WILL ENJOY IMMODERATELY! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Look Caitlin: I have absolutely no clue what this is or where I found it this week, and in fact I have literally no recollection of seeing it before this morning which means that either a) it appeared magically in the Curios linkdump at some point, transported there by some sort of hopefully-benign force; or b) I was very drunk when I found it. Let’s all just hope it’s the former. Anyway, no idea what this is or why it exists but there is a STRONG AESTHETIC at play in the selection of images here which I appreciate.
  • A Few Things, Maybe Several Things: People tend to fall into three camps; people who have no fcuking clue who The Mountain Goats are, people who think they are the singularly-most-irritating musical act in the world, and people who would probably read John Darnielle’s shopping lists as artistic practice. I’m, obviously, in the third camp (can I take a moment to also recommend his superb novel Wolf In White Van from a few years back, which really is beautiful) (and which reminded me slightly of Gary Brecht’s ‘Pleasant Hell’, which seeing as I’m here I will also recommend to you). Anyway, this is a Tumblr featuring 300 words about every single Mountain Goats song ever, which, well, for some of you may well help you achieve apotheosis.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Why Northern England is Poor: Typically-fascinating writing and analysis by Tom Forth who lays out his (in-progress; I get the feeling he’s developing this over time) thesis as to the origins for the economic disparity that exists between the North and South of England, covering historical, social, economic and political factors (and giving you a nice explanation about Thatcher’s involvement that’s slightly-more-nuanced than ‘that milk-stealing b1tch’ (which, to be clear, we’re still entirely-entitled to call her). In a week in which significant, transformative development was again planned in the South (Heathrow, ‘the new Silicon Valley’ lol), this feels particularly germane. It’s quite hard to read this and not get quite…annoyed, not least at the utter facility and emptiness of the  ‘leveling up’ agenda bandied about by that last shower of cnuts, a pox on all their houses forever.
  • How Much Economic Growth Can We Expect From AI?: Ok, so this is, er, VERY LONG and VERY ECONOMICS-Y and not exactly a light read – BUT it is also hugely-interesting if you’re in any way curious about some of the actual projections behind all the assumptions being made around how AI is somehow magically going to ‘sort the economy’ (lol no), and if you’re either in a position where this sort of stuff matters to you professionally or simply someone who ‘likes talking about economics’ (weirdo) then this is worth a skim. I’m not going to try and offer you some sort of pat summary because, well, it’s more complicated than that, but I like how factual and analytical the piece is, and that it contains paragraphs like this which neatly sum up how I broadly feel about this sort of thing: “The fundamental thesis—that AI research output will be automated; that humanity will create ‘superintelligent’ systems; and that AI systems will do science that create greater and faster technological progress than humans could ever have done—will be borne out in the fullness of time. But this vision has to make contact with reality, and reality can act as a weird breaking mechanism: Meta wants to build AGI, but they couldn’t use a nuclear power plant for their datacentre, because of some rare bees.” NB – this was written pre-DeepSeek, but I don’t think that it materially changes the scope and direction of the points made, although would affect some of the ‘cost’ elements of the equation.
  • Deepseek Isn’t A Victory for AI Sceptics: I’m going to bundle all the DeepSeek stuff in here because, well, I can’t imagine that many of you give anything resembling a fcuk. First up is James O’Malley writing about how, as I mentioned uptop, all the people initially gleefully going “LOL THE BUBBLE IS OVER” were possibly not in fact correct (I have written before about the fact that a significant proportion of the ‘it’s all lies! The tech is useless! It’s all going to fail like NFTs!’ people are increasingly subject to audience capture by people who are increasingly paying them to keep saying stuff like that regardless of how accurate it is, because cope); I like this because it is clear, easy to read and understand, and makes exactly the same points that I would have done were I a more serious and cogent thinker who wrote proper essays rather than sh1t like whatever this is. ADDITIONAL LINK: Ben Thompson gives his take, which is drier and techier but basically ends up in roughly the same place. ONE MORE ADDITIONAL LINK: this is good, by Curios favourite Ethan Mollick, on use cases for the various models as of the now (DeepSeek’s not on there, but, honestly, we’re now at a point where they all do more or less the same stuff (multimodality excepted).
  • Capital Haves vs Capability Havers: I really like the framing here, but utterly disagree with the way it is then deployed. Still, it’s an interesting read – Lars Doucet effectively divides people in the future into ‘capability havers’ and ‘capital havers’, and suggests that the gradual insertion of AI into every aspect of our lives is likely to improve the lot of ‘capability havers’ (people good at working with The Machine) while slightly-diminishing the importance and impact of ‘capital havers’ (because simply having lots of cash is less of a lever in a world in which we all have access to The Machine). Which, to be clear, I think is interesting – and I like the capability/capital thing – but ends up in an entirely wrong place. I’d be inclined to think of it more in this way: 1) capital havers will continue to be in a position of extreme power because of entrenched wealth inequalities, networks and the freedom said capital grants you to live an occasionally-machine-free life; 2) capability havers of a certain type and quality will do well (say, the top decile of any given profession) will do well, because the capital havers will value a certain calibre of human expertise and as such will reward that with a share of said capital; 3) EVERYONE ELSE IS FCUKED IN HALF. I can plot that for you on a two-by-two matrix if you like.
  • Live With The AI Glasses: An interesting hands-on (on-face?) writeup of the current consumer-ready iteration of Meta’s A/XR glasses (the ones actually on sale now, not the scifi prototypes they showed off last year) – as with a lot of this tech, there’s a degree of ‘yes, but what is this for?’ coupled with ‘it’s not good enough yet to quite do the things you can tell it would be good at’, but I think there’s enough here to suggest that my personal thesis (should you inexplicably care what I think, that A/XR glasses are going to be mainstream by 2035 – and if I am stupid and ill enough to still be doing this in a decade’s time (lol like I am going to reach my mid-50s, like fcuk mate) then feel free to remind me of how wrong I was and also what a loser I am for still writing this fcuking thing) is still going to come true.
  • AI and Fake News: The Chinese View: You’ll have to write-click and get this in-browser translated (unless, obviously, you actually speak Chinese, which is of course entirely possible), but it’s a piece from China looking at the problem of AI misinformation, etc. It won’t tell you anything that won’t have occurred to you before, it it was interesting to me because a) in a country the size of China with such wildly-divergent levels of education and hence media literacy the potential effects of this stuff are…wild, potentially; and b) because it specifically calls out ‘old people who are sh1t at the internet’ as a specific at-risk class for this stuff, which is the sort of honesty I wish we saw more of in the UK because FCUK ME are there a lot of people out there right now of middle age and older (and also, astonishingly and depressingly, some younger people too) who may ‘use’ the web but who literally haven’t got the faintest fcuking idea how to evaluate a source (I think it’s fair to say we’ve seen…ample evidence of that since 2014ish).
  • Gen Z Life: Do YOU want a bunch of (actually pretty good, honest) research about GenZ and what they THINK AND FEEL AND LOVE AND HATE? Great! This is, I think, a US study, but I also think that there’s probably enough commonality in the lived experience of younger people in the anglophone west to make it applicable to UK kids as well, at least a bit. Anyway, I enjoyed this because it very clearly says ‘NO GENERATION IS A MONOLITH AND TALKING ABOUT THEM AS SUCH IS STUPID’ which, well, it is. Also it basically acknowledges the edges of GenZ latent space as basically being ‘sesh gremlin’, ‘hypercapitalist’, ‘bedrot’ and ‘woke’, which feels about right.
  • Being Mean Is Back: If you’re yet to read this superb longread by Brock Colyar, on their experience of hanging out at the election parties with the young MAGA crew, then you MUST – it’s…I mean, it’s fcuking horrible, to be clear, a sort of distillation of the sorts of attitudes and demeanours and behaviours that I remember incredibly clearly from a certain type of post-Neil Strauss forum culture in the early-00s and the ‘fratire’ boom, an inherent…frattishness (sorry, I appreciate that’s probably an annoying reference if you’ve not seen the Greek system close up at any point, but it fits), but it also made me once again think that I am totally right about the ‘80s at highspeed’ thing of the next 4 years because MAN some of the language used in this piece flashed me right back (in a bad way). The way in which Colyar is referred to by several interlocutors in this, by the way, is genuinely chilling, in a ‘hm, part of me wonders whether they viewed this person as entirely human’ way – “She also called me a “man in lipstick,” though I wasn’t wearing any. Later, when introducing me to Sinclair, she said, “He’s a queer. But a friendly one.””. I mean, fcuking hell though.
  • The Goon-To-Fash-Pipeline: This is slight, and I considered not including it, but I was so taken (read: bleakly intrigued to the point it started to sound weirdly-not-implausible) by this that I felt compelled to share it with you: “apps are working together to further push men to the right by rendering them porn-addled, socially awkward and isolated. This formula, his theory goes, will make men more misogynistic; embittered by their inability to form relationships with women yet still sexually objectifying them, they will then become conservative in order to gain more control over women. “There’s a direct pipeline from gooning, to conservative podcasts, to the Fourth Reich,”” NB – IF YOU ARE STILL PURE ENOUGH NOT TO KNOW WHAT GOONING MEANS THEN UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES UNDERTAKE ANY SEARCHES THAT MAY JEOPARDISE THAT PURITY.
  • Reactionary Decarbonisation: Part of me feels somewhat bad and doomer-ish (lol!) sharing links like this; on the other hand, though, I think it’s increasingly important that people be aware quite how much of large corporate talk (and indeed ‘action’) around the climate emergency and What They Are Doing About It is, put simply, fcuking bullsh1t. In particular this examines why the ‘carbon capture’ and ‘carbon management’ industries are, when examined closely, are basically environmental indulgences, reputational figleaves for big polluters to completely fail to change their business practices in favour of spending less money doing something they can pretend is making a difference. Don’t think too hard about what this means!
  • Who Is Sophie Cress?: This is a great story, and taps a whole ‘weird side-effects of AI’ thing that I hadn’t even begun to consider. Ashley Abram is a journalist who found herself one day approached by one Sophie Cress, putting themselves forward as a potential spokesperson for a story – except, when Abram investigated a bit more, there were a few things about Cress that didn’t quite seem to add up…and when she looked more closely, it became apparent that it Miss Cress was…unlikely to be a real person who actually exists. Did you have ‘AI-generated experts shilling for sextoy brands and polluting actual journalism’ on your AI apocalypse bingo card for 2025? No, me neither, but this is a properly fascinating development – oh, and as to the ‘why’, it’s an automated SEO/backlink play (SEO continues to demonstrate it’s one of the worst industries to have been created by the web, hands-down).
  • Cozy Games: This is SO nicely done and really ought to win all sorts of awards for the team at Reuters that put it all together – this is a piece all about the phenomenon of ‘cosy games’ (cf Animal Crossing, Stardew Valley, etc etc) which will tell you literally nothing new whatsoever if you know the first thing about videogames BUT which also is a sort-of interactive cosy game in and of itself, courtesy of some very impressive scrollytelling (yes, I know it’s a horrible word but it’s not my fcuking fault we have singularly failed to come up with a better term for this since Snowfall all those many years ago) and some equally-impressively-integrated little interactive dialogue and graphical elements. This is SO well-made, honestly, and utterly charming in its design.
  • The Strange and Resistant Appeal of Affluent Millennial Design: You will know the style that this piece is talking about pretty much within 3cm of scrolling – it’s about design and branding and that very particular flat aesthetic that took over in the era of the Airbnbisation of everything c.20..14ish? Anyway, this is a Blackbird Spyplane post which will either commend it to you entirely or make you skip over, your call.
  • How Private Equity Took Over Your Nursery: This is a London-focused piece, but I would be amazed if this sort of thing won’t be happening anywhere with a problematically-mercantile childcare provision setup. This is excellent journalism by Joshi Hermann at The Londoner, and yet another example of what I have been saying to anyone dumb enough to listen to me for about 15 years now, to whit that PRIVATE EQUITY IS FCUKING CANCER. I particularly liked the quote in there from the woman who WORKS in Private Equity who says something like ‘no, actually PE is a force for good in the world…but, er, I don’t actually want it anywhere near my kids’ education, thanks’ which I think is just a tiny bit telling.
  • Theme Song Earnings: The numbers in this Rolling Stone piece are absolutely insane – the Barenaked Ladies basically say that they earned somewhere in the region of $100m+ from doing the themesong to The Big Band Theory. I’d like, by comparison, to know how many rounds at the Dogstar Alabama 3 got for the Sopranos theme.
  • Amiga Hardcore: This is simultaneously some of the best and some of the worst music you will ever hear in your life, and I sort-of love it with all my heart. “Commodore International’s introduction of the Amiga in the mid-‘80s marked a shift towards home computers being seen as a vehicle for creativity and entertainment. Initially written off by the general public as “game machines,” due to developers’ emphasis on graphics and sound, Amigas gradually began gaining popularity among artists and enthusiasts in the demoscene, a subculture devoted to crafting short-form audiovisual pieces and entering them in competitions. By the early ‘90s, then-dated Amigas had become the catalyst for a new wave of transgressive hardcore techno and breakbeat that reveled in a lo-fi, homespun sound—a reaction to the explosion of more commercial hardcore that was being made with newer software.” This piece contains some interviews and some words, but more importantly a LOT of embedded songs which go quite unbelievably hard.
  • Innit Innit Boys: An absolutely wonderful piece in the Guardian about how British Nigerians growing up in the 80s and 90s fell in love with, and found identity through, Nigerian footballers coming into English football and showcased at world cups, and how football can be so vital to diaspora communities whether in the UK or elsewhere. “The children, born or raised here, have grown affectionate for the place we have learned to call home. In London as the years passed, we have celebrated births and birthdays and buried those lost. Some have started new families, bringing a second generation of British-Nigerians into the world. We worked our first jobs and found our first loves here, built a continued sense of kinship and connection, until eventually, if you are like me, arriving at a point where London feels more like home than anywhere else. The Nigerian population in London has continued to grow. The 2021 census counted 266,877 Nigerian-born residents in Britain, a number not accounting for their children and relatives born here. It is thought to be the largest Black population in Britain, with a presence in nearly every borough of the capital. The football leagues across London reflect this dynamic: British-Nigerians turning out for clubs across the city, chasing Premier League pipedreams.”
  • Day 1509 In The Big Brother House: A beautiful little essay in the Fence by Gary Grimes, talking about finding community and friends and himself in the threads of the Big Brother fan forums in the late-00s, logging on from his bedroom in Ireland and spinning fantasies of who he was and wanted to be to his fellow BB obsessives; if you’ve ever been part of any sort of online community (particularly if the messageboard/forum format is familiar to you) this will be hugely evocative; aside from anything else it’s just a lovely bit of coming-of-age writing (although, personally, I was slightly disappointed by the lack of specific BB callbacks).
  • The Future Is Too Easy: I am increasingly…bored, I think, of ‘TECH IS BAD AND THE PEOPLE WHO RUN IT ARE BAD’ articles – not because I disagree, but because, well, yes, and? What exactly is your 4,000 word treatise on ‘websites and apps are now rubbish and they used to be better’ going to add to the discourse that doesn’t already exist within it? This, though, while ploughing a similar furrow is significantly more entertaining, not least because the author is writing about their time at CES and I am always a sucker for some trade show reportage. Also, it is very funny in places, and this is an opening paragraph I like so much I am actively jealous of it: “There is something unstable at the most basic level about any space with too much capitalism happening in it. The air is all wrong, there’s simultaneously too much in it and not enough of it. Everyone I spoke to about the Consumer Electronics Show before I went to it earlier this month kept describing it in terms that involved wetness in some way. I took this as a warning, which I believe was the spirit in which it was intended, but I felt prepared for it. Your classically damp commercial experiences have a sort of terroir to them, a signature that marks a confluence of circumstances and time- and place-specific appetites; I have carried with me for decades the peculiar smell, less that of cigarette smoke than cigarette smoke in hair, that I remember from a baseball card show at a Ramada Inn that I attended as a kid. Only that particular strain of that particular kind of commerce, at that moment, gave off that specific distress signal. It was the smell of a living thing, and the dampness in the (again, quite damp) room was in part because that thing was breathing, heavily.”
  • Rich Stein: John Merrick writes in Vittles – I hope you can access this, because it really is great – about English celebrity chef Rick Stein and his weirdness, and his dad, and this is just beautiful, honestly, and made me cry a little at the end.
  • I Think People Are Perverts: Ok, this is NOT FOR EVERYONE, but should you be interested in reading an 11,000 word treatise on Ethel Cain’s latest album, David Lynch, the nature of art, the nature of the experience of art, the nature of criticism, architecture, structuralism and a whole bunch of other stuff too. I think you can probably work out based on that whether or not you want to read it, but I thought it was excellent and interesting throughout, fwiw.
  • Norman Foster: Our final longread of the week is this absolutely superb profile of Norman Foster in the New Yorker, which benefits from every single inch of the space it’s given. SO SO SO GOOD, honestly, I cannot tell you how excellent a piece of profile writing this is and how much I promise you will enjoy it. CLICK AND READ.

By PicPicZo

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 24/01/25

Reading Time: 36 minutes

Had you missed this? The feeling of being basically sandblasted in the face by a sort of fecal whirlwind? WE’RE SO BACK BABY! You know those photos they always release at the end of a storied leader’s tenure showing the ageing effect the weight of office has had on them? Well imagine what WE’RE going to look like after four years of this; perhaps it’s time for me to consider preventative botox and maybe having my tearducts sealed up.

Anyway, last week’s Curios apparently contained ONE LINK that Google didn’t like, meaning that I think it got spamghettoed and so literally three of you will have seen it. I know, you don’t care, but it was a good one and you can read it here should you so wish.

I have no idea whether that will have utterly-fcuked the deliverability of this sh1tshow in perpetuity, but, well, it’s not like I write this for you fcukers anyway so wevs.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are very much appreciated, whatever I may in fact say to the contrary.

  

No idea when this is from or who made it, but it’s via Feuilleton

THIS IS A BRILLIANT MIX OF APHEX TWIN TRACKS AND MIXES PUT TOGETHER BY THE FABULOUSLY-NAMED DJ SALIVA WHICH I RECOMMEND UNRESERVEDLY!

THE SECTION WHICH HAS BECOME SOMEWHAT UNCOMFORTABLE AT THE AMOUNT OF TIME IT SEEMS TO SPEND WISHING GENUINE, TRANSFORMATIVE HARM ON THE WORLD’S SUPER-RICH, PT.1:  

  • The Shardcore Inquisition: Generative models don’t have a personality, however much it might be tempting to project one onto them when they do such a convincing job of spitting out words in human-sounding chunks; they do, though, as a result of the weightings and training data and Weird Ineffable Maths Sh1t (this is the technical term) going on under the hood, have different ‘tendencies’ when it comes to the way in which they will respond to certain queries and the pre-prompting that’s going on under the hood to guardrail, shape and limit their outputs – but how do these tendencies express themselves? And how do the models differ in terms of their sense of ‘self’? If you ask them who they are, what do they tell you? You, of course, may never have given a flying fcuk about questions such as these, but Shardcore is weird and very much has – hence this, a new work from him in which he’s basically ‘interviewed’ a selection of the most popular LLMs (ChatGPT, Llama, Claude, Gemini and some other open source variant) to see how their responses to the same questions about ‘who they are’ and how they ‘see’ or ‘think of’ themselves (they don’t think and they don’t see, obvs, but you appreciate that describing this stuff quickly gets tricky if you try and stick to the strictly factual). Each LLM is posed a series of interview questions – the resulting answers have been matched to an AI-generated face, with an AI-generated voice, using some (occasionally-questionable) AI-lipsyncing software, so the resulting work is a series of short films in which you get to hear the machine tell you what it ‘thinks’ (doesn’t think) it is. This is FASCINATING – the differences in tone and ‘awareness’ between the models really are quite eye-opening, not least the variance between Claude’s stark, joyless insistence that it’s just code, whatever us silly meatsacks might want to project. and that frankly all these silly games are beneath it, compared with Llama’s frankly-unsettling self-image as…I don’t know, it’s either VERY MACHO or VERY TOM OF FINLAND, but it definitely likes to think of itself as ‘something of a bad boy’ (is this the masculine energy of which you spake, Mark?). As always with this stuff, if your knee-jerk reaction to anything involving The Machine is to recoil in horror from the slop then, well, maybe don’t – this is genuinely conceptually interesting and it’s a good example of the possibilities afforded to art and artists by AI beyond ‘machine make picture good!’ which seems to be about the extent of the ambition being deployed in this space at the moment. If nothing else then I look forward to this being revisited in a couple of years time to see how the machine’s sense of self (there is no sense, there is no ‘self’!) evolves.
  • Des & Beth: This should be in the video section to be honest, but I can’t find it as anything other than an embed on Reddit so, well, I’m putting it here instead. Every now and again I feel compelled to post the latest, best example of ‘machine-made video’ in here and ‘Des & Beth’ is by quite a long chalk the high-watermark of the medium so far. It’s a short film telling the story of two people meeting for a blind date in a cafe, and the highest compliment I can give it is to say that…I would probably watch the next one. Which, I know, doesn’t sound like much, but this has CHARACTERS and PLOT (and, I am pretty certain, is entirely human-written – this feels like the script and shot composition were written by someone with a passing knowledge of ‘how short films work’ and ‘how normal people speak’, things which tend not to be the case when you let The Machine take on the direction duties) and it made me…almost sort-of laugh on a couple of occasions, which, again, faint praise, but still. As for the quality of the video – yeah, ok, if you were to see this scrolling past on your phone you probably wouldn’t be able to immediately tell this is AI – there’s minimal weirdness, scenes are largely coherent, and it doesn’t even have the giveaway sheen of machine that characterises so much of the rest of this stuff. Obviously there’s minimal info on workflow and time taken to create, but…honestly, this is pretty fcuking good. Which, obviously, will make quite a few of you feel very ill indeed, and I completely understand why – I am choosing to see this as a wonderful opportunity to diminish the distance between ‘I have an idea but no technical chops’ and ‘oh look I have made something!’ rather than another nail being hammered into the coffin of the creative industries, but, equally, I appreciate that it does *sound* quite a lot like a nail. Sorry.
  • Better Without AI: As an antidote to the previous too links which I appreciate will have possibly left something of a sour taste in the mouths of the more anti-AI amongst you, Better Without AI is a WHOLE BOOK (in website form) all about how you, me and everyone we know can work to protect and guard against some of the potentially-negative impacts of the technology. Per the blurb, “This book is about overlooked risks—not malevolent robots, but “moderate apocalypses,” which could result from recent and near- future technologies. AI systems we cannot understand are already making major social and cultural decisions for us…Can we get the benefits of technological breakthroughs without succumbing to the risks? This book explains seven practical actions we can take to guard against disasters…The most important questions are not about technology but about us. What sort of future would you like? How might AI help get us there? What is its role in that world? What is your own role in helping that happen?”. You can read the full text of the book on the website, broken down by chapter, along with a bunch of supplementary materials and essays (you can also get it as a free ebook should you so desire) – I confess to only having skimmed it, but the bits I read were interesting and well-composed enough for me to recommend it to you here. That said (sorry sorry sorry) I also think there’s something a *bit* Cnut-like about things like this – I mean, lads, while I admire your endeavour I’m not entirely sure that some well-meaning ‘thinking about stuff’ is going to do much to deter the great mulching machine of global capitalism from deciding that the only way to solve the ‘growth problem’ is to maximise efficiencies everywhere as hard as possible using The Machine. Still, nice to dream! BONUS ANTI-AI LINK!: if you’re a Google user who’s not enjoyed seeing its own AI product being shoehorned into every single fcuking corner of the GSuite experience (I AM A FUNCTIONAL FCUKING ADULT AND I CAN READ MY OWN EMAILS STOP INFANTILISING ME FFS) then you can install this Chrome extension to neatly banish it from the interface.
  • Fcuk The Crawlers: OK, this is TECHNICAL and you will need to know what you’re doing if you want to fcuk with it, but, equally, if you’re a site owner and you would like to not just put guardrails up against AI scraping but also to DO SOME HARM to The Machine then you might find this interesting. The short explanation is ‘there’s some code here that if you deploy it to your site will basically trap any AI crawlers attempting to scrape it in some sort of infinite labyrinthine recursive loop of reloading webpages’ (this is, at best, an…incomplete attempt to tell you how it works, but I hope you’ll forgive me what with my being a pretty much total luddite) – you can read more on the homepage should you feel like sticking it to The Man and The Machine at the same time.
  • TrumpCoin: I’ve been slightly surprised at the lack of coverage of this – I mean, fine, there’s a LOT GOING ON, but I thought perhaps that the staggeringly overt corruption on display here might have merited more than a few headlines completely misunderstanding the play here. In case you’re not aware, ahead of his official inauguration Trump launched a new memecoin – $TRUMP, obvs! – which, while the website is VERY CLEAR is not an investment vehicle, was obviously immediately bought up and traded by all the usual parties, the grifters and the juicers and the inevitable mooks, flared in value before inevitably crashing…but that’s not the story here! The story is that THIS IS A MECHANISM THAT ALLOWS POTENTIALLY VAST SUMS OF MONEY TO BE DONATED IN LARGELY-UNTRACEABLE FASHION TO OSTENSIBLY THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD. Does this sound like democracy? It doesn’t, does it?
  • The Richard Mille Art Prize 2024: I confess to having been entirely ignorant of both Richard Mille and the art prize that bears its brandname – turns out (you may all already have been aware of this, so please excuse my ignorance) that it’s a company that makes VERY FANCY watches of the sort worn by people who (I have gone on quite an elaborate internal journey about the RM customer while I wait for the kettle to boil just now, so indulge me if you will) like to describe themselves as ‘work hard, play hard’, quite possibly own multiple sportscars (but possibly the electric versions because, you know, they care) and several gilets, and the art prize is awarded in conjunction with the Louvre (but the nouveau Middle Eastern outpost rather than the Parisian one) based on…oh, look, Christ knows, this isn’t really about the art is it? It’s about MONEY! Lovely shiny money! And the website very much reflects that – it’s SO SHINY, with lovely CG depictions of the works which you can explore and zoom around and learn about, and the interface really is lovely – it’s sort of a classic ‘scroll to explore’ walk through a virtual gallery space, but the animations and interstitial flourishes are very nicely done indeed. The work? The work is…the work is exactly the sort of work which I would imagine winning an art prize sponsored by a luxury timepiece manufacturer and hosted by a plutocrats’ culturewashing exercise, honestly, but it’s all VERY PRETTY.
  • Wikienigma: It’s unfortunate that, despite being in many respects a largely-terrible person who has been implicated in some of North America’s greatest foreign policy fcukups of the 20thC, Donald Rumsfeld was *also* responsible for the ‘known unknowns’ speech, which, honestly, remains my favourite and most-cogent explanation of different states of knowledge and uncertainty (I am not joking). So to Wikienignma, an EXCELLENT website which exists to document ‘known unknowns’ – things where we know the question but have no idea as to the answer. There are over 1100 entries here – as you might expect, they tend strongly towards the scientific/mathematical and so as a result I basically understand about 17% of the words on the website; that said, even if, like me, you’re crippled by scientific ignorance, it’s impossible not to find some of these things just FASCINATING – just now I have learned about Mustatils, 7,000 year-old structures which litter the ruins of ancient Saudi Arabia and Jordan in their thousands and which NOONE KNOWS WHY, and that noone can really do the maths that explains why things wrinkle in the way they do, and, seriously, my life is richer as a result (do not, please, speculate as to what thin gruel it must be to have been so improved).
  • SkinGPT: Ok, look, literally the only reason I’m including this link is because of the utter bodyhorror induced in me by the product name – SKINGPT FFS IT IS SO HORRIBLE SO UTTERLY WRONG. Ahem. Anyway, SkinGPT (ugh ugh ugh) is virtual tech which promises to let the cosmetics industry ‘demonstrate’ the effects of its products on people by taking a photo of them and then ‘AI-ing’ (technical term) the image to demonstrate how much better-looking your dermis will be if you spend several thousand pounds on squalene to rub into it. I confess to being hugely skeptical of both the tech here and of what the practical difference is between this and just applying a layer to a photo (THE DIFFERENCE IS AI! AI! MAGICAL AI!) and, in all honesty, I think it’s probably all total fcuking bollocks but, well, SKINGPT!
  • Wokeipedia: I believe this is created and maintained by Ian Betteridge – one of that small, storied group of people who will forever live on as a LAW OF THE INTERNET, which is something I confess to being pathetically-envious of – so, well, THANKS IAN! Wokeipedia, as you may be able to glean from the name, is an ongoing compendium of things that have been decried as ‘woke’ in the media – a selection of examples from recent days include dinosaurs, recycling plastic, films, sign language and trains. I enjoy this, and it made me chuckle in places, but, equally, it’s hard not to feel a bit dispirited by the sheer witless mundanity of the worldview here presented when you see it massed like this – more than anything it’s just astonishing that this bullsh1t has been happening for…Jesus, the best part of a fcuking decade, and these headlines are still running. WHY? WHO FOR? Actually we can answer those, can’t we? FFS.
  • Propagandopolis: Ok, so technically this is a shop that sells the posters it displays on the website – BUT! You don’t actually have to buy anything (although, obviously, should you wish to then I am sure the site’s owners would be grateful) and so I feel happy to recommend this as a general ‘interesting thing to explore’. Would YOU like to spelunk through an archive of some many hundreds, if not thousands, of old propaganda posters from all over the globe? I don’t know! I have no idea who you are or what you’re into, and your inner life is a constant source of mystery and confusion to me! But, if you do, then this site will make you very happy – I had quite a weird sensation looking through these that soon it’s going to be impossible to know when looking at materials such as these online whether or not they’re original or whether they’re AI-generated, which was such a horrible thought that I had to do and walk around my living room humming happy songs to clear my head. Hey ho!
  • Subways of Europe: Who doesn’t love an exploration of the underground transportation networks of some of Europe’s major cities? NO FCUKER, etc! Subways of Europe is, as the beautifully-staid ‘about’ copy puts it, a celebration of those cities which have ‘a picturesque as well as historically interesting underground transportation network to explore’. The photos are very much of the ‘architectural’ variety (or at least the ones I’ve looked at are) – denuded of people but beautifully-lit, and focusing on stonework and tiling and atria and all that sort of thing. I am, honestly, not generally interested in trains or anything like that, but there’s something fascinating about the different approaches to urban transit design employed by different cities. Also, man is Rome’s underground shoddy.
  • TrueFood: WEB CURIOS DISCLAIMER: I personally think that the current furore ovew ‘highly processed foods’ is a bit faddish and driven by one or two personally-motivated celebrity nutritionists who are doing very well out of this particular moral panic thankyouverymuchindeed. That said, I appreciate you may have DIFFERENT VIEWS (why? Just borrow mine, I barely use them, honestly) and as such might find this site interesting – TrueFood is a US site which basically takes in a LOT of information from various public sources about ingredients used in widely-available North American foodstuffs and offers them here for your perusal, so you can compare various products and brands to see how they stack up in terms of their use of polysyllabic chemical constituents. “TrueFood is a user-friendly interface designed to unveil the degree of processing of food products, powered by GroceryDB, a comprehensive database. GroceryDB is part of a research project that provides the data and methodologies necessary to quantify food processing and analyze ingredient structures within the U.S. food supply. By integrating large-scale data on food composition with machine learning, TrueFood offers valuable insights into the current state of food processing in the U.S. grocery landscape, highlighting distributions of food processing scores and the variability in product offerings across different grocery stores.” There’s something interesting about the way it presents ingredients and lays out the information which I think is worth looking at even if you couldn’t give half a fcuk about whether or not you’re more hydrogenated fats than man.
  • The Letterform Archive: OH MY GOD if you like print, type, layout design, fonts and any and all of that stuff then this is a fcuking GOLDMINE. SO MUCH TO BROWSE! SO MUCH INSPIRATION! Honestly, it’s quite tempting just to take 10 minutes out this morning and just have a gentle browse of these because there is some WONDERFUL work on there, and I say that as someone who, as a general rule, has all the design/aesthetic sensibility of Helen Keller.
  • FingerDama: A Kickstarter! A fully-funded Kickstarter that you can back with no fear of it failing! Kendama, apparently is an ancient Japanese toy/game thing that basically involves a cup, a ball, a string, and you attempting to introduce one to the other via your SKILL and DEXTERITY – this version is basically that, but rendered miniature so that it can be played with one hand wherever you go. The reason I’m including this, basically, is because it feels like fidget spinners rebranded for the age of horrors, and there’s a small chance that you could become PLUTOCRATICALLY RICH by bulk-buying these now and then selling them to a DESPERATE MARKET around Christmastime (NB this is obviously a stupid idea and I don’t mean it and will accept no responsibility should any of you be foolish enough to actually pursue it) (although if you do and make bank then, well, REMEMBER WHERE YOU HEARD IT FIRST YOU INGRATES).
  • Joan Ocean Dolphin Connection: Do you remember famously-difficult and almost-completely-obscure 90s videogame Ecco the Dolphin? Remember how it was basically a story about dolphins sort of protecting us from extraterrestrial threats via the medium of, er, messing about underwater? Well I feel Joan Ocean, whoever she may be, very much enjoyed the vibe of that game because MY GOD does this website channel some strong ‘new age crystal healing’ energy – I don’t really want to write too much here because this really does have to be experienced to be believed, but I would like to draw your attention to a couple of things: 1) there is a menu on the left whose navigation options include ‘whales’, ‘dolphins’ and, er, ‘sasquatch’; 2) there is a link somewhere on the page to Joan’s *other* web presence, called ET Friends, whose headline is ‘The Holographic Universe with the Dolphins’. This is AMAZING, and feels very much like a cousin of the wonderful world of The Aetherius Society, which has been delighting me ever since I first walked past its offices aged about seven.

By Katrien De Blauwer

NEXT WE RETURN TO THE TEUTONIC, TRANCEY BLEEPS AND BLOOPS AND BEATS FAVOURED BY FORMER EDITOR PAUL IN HIS LATEST EXCELLENT MIX WHICH MADE ME QUITE WANT TO TAKE SPEED AND STAY UP ALL NIGHT DANCING UNTIL I REMEMBERED WHAT THAT WOULD DO TO WEDNESDAY! 

THE SECTION WHICH HAS BECOME SOMEWHAT UNCOMFORTABLE AT THE AMOUNT OF TIME IT SEEMS TO SPEND WISHING GENUINE, TRANSFORMATIVE HARM ON THE WORLD’S SUPER-RICH, PT.2:  

  • The Pudding Cup 2024: Official holder of the Web Curios ‘best dataviz people in the world’ title (and STILL they won’t return my calls), the Pudding presents their annual list of their favourite dataviz projects from the past year – there are three main winners, none of which I’d seen before, and a selection of other commended projects, and if you’ve any interest in ‘how to best communicate stuff that can often be quite data-heavy and a bit dull in ways that are, well, less data-heavy and less dull’ then you should take some time to go through all of these because there’s some gorgeous work here – personally I thought this site, exploring the data, topics and associations, contained within GPT3.5 was particularly wonderful (and I was personally annoyed that I didn’t see if last year FFS what sort of a fcuking webmong am I?).
  • Fictional Videogame Stills: While videogames and gaming culture are now so utterly-embedded in the consciousnesses of anyone…what, under-35?, it’s fair to say that this very much wasn’t always the case; way back in the grey, malnourished days of the early-90s (so different from the, er, grey, malnourished days of modernity!) the idea of anyone drawing artistic inspiration from the world of videogames was frankly preposterous, let alone that this might be considered ‘fine’ art in any way shape or form. I had literally no idea that as far back as the late-80s Suzanne Treister was making work inspired by games, or that in the early-90s she produced this series of images directly inspired by the Commodore Amiga, at the time the most-cutting-edge home gamesplaying machine. “In the late 1980s I was making paintings about computer games. In January 1991 I bought an Amiga computer and made a series of fictional videogame stills using Deluxe Paint II. I photographed them straight from the screen as there was no other way to output them that I knew of apart from through a very primitive daisy wheel printer where they appeared as washed out dots. The effect of the photographs perfectly reproduced the highly pixellated, raised needlepoint effect of the Amiga screen image. Conceptually this means of presentation was also appropriate in that it made it seem like I had gone into a videogame arcade and photographed the games there, lending authenticity to the fiction. The first seven works on this page form a series titled, ‘Q. Would you recognise a Virtual Paradise?’” I sort-of love these from an aesthetic point of view, but more than anything I am thrilled to learn that this was A Thing. Also, each of these games looks fcuking fascinating and I would love to see a gamejam focused on bringing these screenshots to playable life.
  • Trains: Specifically, trains in North America! Via Andy over at Waxy, this is a live map of all the trains in North America RIGHT NOW, showing you where they are and where they’re going (sometimes – information’s incomplete for a lot of these, or so it seems). I am sure that North Americans will find their own reasons to find this interesting or useful, but my main takeaway from this is ‘how the fcuk is it that a country the size and wealth of the US doesn’t seemingly have a functional national passenger rail infrastructure?’ – seriously, click the map, there are FCUK-ALL trains on there, it’s insane. Anyone would think that’s the result of a fixation on (and billions and billions of dollars of lobbying by) the motor industry to the exclusion of pretty much all else.
  • The Infrared Photography Award 2024: PHOTOS OF THINGS THAT ALL LOOK SORT-OF PURPLE! Not just photos, though – there’s a short film category here as well as the stills, and, despite my tedious snarking, the images here are actually a lot more interesting than I might have imagined from the general ‘infrared’ thing; yes, ok, a lot of them *are* purple, but there’s also some quite wonderful black and white work there which, for reasons I don’t entirely comprehend, has a sort of vibrancy and contrast which is particularly pleasing to the eye (or at least mine), and the photos of space are, as you might expect, fcuking mental. I have a vague sense that this sort of stylistic effect might be something you see quite a lot of this year after Harmony Korine’s popularisation of it in filmmaking over the past year or so (but, as previously noted, you should never, ever listen to any of my predictions for anything because I am, in the main, a fcuking moron).
  • TabBOO!: Again via Andy, this is a very silly Chrome extension which basically adds jump-scares to the browsing experience of any website you tell it to – you can get a feel for it from the on-site explainer vid, but, basically, if you tell it to work on, say, bbc.co.uk, every time you then visit said URL you will, after browsing for a short while, get a scary pop-up image to shock you out of your digitally-induced torpor. I can’t for a second imagine that this will make an iota of difference to anyone’s browsing habits, but it did make me think that it would be VERY FUNNY to install this on a luddite colleague’s computer, assigned to (for example) the url for their timesheeting software. Except, of course, noone goes to the office any more and so you can’t really do that sort of thing these days – SEE WHAT WE HAVE LOST FFS!
  • Rutland Ramblings: NOT, contrary to what you might be thinking, the ceremonial county in the East Midlands of England (OBVIOUSLY that’s what you were thinking), but instead the Rutland in question here is the one in North Dakota (I now feel bad saying something the other week about how the US could effectively afford to lose the Dakotas and noone would really notice – sorry, Dakotas!), which, at the most recent census conducted in 2020, had a population of 163 but which, despite its diminutive size, somehow has an active and semi-regularly-updated local website detailing the comings and goings and EXCITING EVENTS going on in the community, and, look, I’m not going to pretend that this is anything other than a VERY NICHE CONCERN or that an entry from last October about how some people in Rutland had a nice time playing frisbee golf is…particularly-scintillating, but it makes me VERY HAPPY that it exists, and I can’t help but love a corner of the web so pure. Also, it made me think that there’s an interesting fictional project here – I do rather like the concept of a website like this which over the course of a year or so gradually reveals something sinister, glistening and possibly suppurating lurking at the village’s core, something whose unspeakable hungers can only be sated by The Old Rituals. That might just be me, though.
  • A Wibbly 3d CG Aubergine: I mean, look, I’m not sure how much more I can gild this particularly lily – it’s, er, a sort-of-3d model of the aubergine emoji which, if you drag it around the screen with your cursor will wobble with fleshy promise. It is significantly less-phallic than I possibly just made it sound, to be clear, but it is also completely, totally and utterly pointless and therefore perhaps perfect.
  • The Dropbox Brand Guidelines: No! Wait! Come back! IT IS INTERESTING I PROMISE YOU! Or, ok, fine, it’s interesting to *me* and might be to a few of you too, what with some of you being designertypepeople (or at least I *think* some of you are; as ever, you remain a mysterious enigma to me – so fascinating! So unknowable! So distant!) – this is, as you probably worked out from the link description, Dropbox’s brand guidelines, setting out the look and feel and tone of the company’s work and assets, and while I appreciate that’s not per se thrilling I think this is a really nice example of how to create documentation around this sort of thing that is user-friendly and clear and INTERESTING, and therefore has an outside chance of people actually looking at it and using it rather than sitting unloved and unlooked-at in the S: drive somewhere. In particular I really liked the part around ‘motion’, not least because it’s nice to see a company take all aspects of this seriously and think consistently about all aspects of how it’s expressed (oh, and the tone of voice stuff is good too – not necessarily because of the tone itself, but because of how clear and easy to understand it is, and how the examples work, and how user-friendly it is in a way these things so often aren’t).
  • Pepper: This link comes courtesy of Present & Correct, the world’s most personable stationery retailer, and is a website celebrating, and I feel I need to quote this in full, “The Peppermills of Jens Quistgaard…Over the course of his prolific and varied design career, Jens Quistgaard created a series of peppermills for Dansk Designs. Taking the dispersal of salt and pepper as the jumping off point, JHQ’s designs are a meditation on the possibilities of shape for a common household object. Intriguing and fantastical, the variety of forms expands the vocabulary of functional design, calling on an array of familiar references: chess pieces, tools, clocks, toys, as well as natural and botanical shapes. These peppermills, otherwise known as “table seasoners”, evoke tiny household sculptures, powerful individually, but most compelling when grouped and viewed in sets.” I know that the word ‘iconic’ should probably be retired for ever, so cruelly and wantonly has it been misdeployed and abused over the years, but seriously, just LOOK at these! You can literally imagine the feel of these in your hand, and the smell of the wood, and all of the corduroy and the sideburns and the appalling-retrograde attitudes to gender politics associated with the era! This feels like the sort of design work that someone with a retro-feeling apartment in the Barbican would flay the skin from your bones to get at.
  • Vivos: We’re, what, about 6-7% of the way through the year – how are you feeling about everything? LOL! In the spirit of the age, then, let me present to you ‘Vivos’, the ‘Global Shelter Network’ that also describes itself in the next breath as ‘the backup plan for humanity’. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.Humanity, you say? Is it…is it a backup plan for ALL of humanity? What’s that? “575 Private Bunkers With Space For Thousands In One Of North America’s Safest Locations” – so, er, no, then, it’s ‘a backup plan for a few thousand lucky, rich souls who might have an outside chance of saving themselves while the rest of us claw at the outside walls of their secure dwellings with radiation-blistered fingers and skin sloughing from our fragile, crumbling bodies! Great! Obviously this is fcuking vile and I wish ill on everyone involved in this preposterous grift (I think it’s fair to say that if you’re reduced to the point of needing one of these, things have probably gotten beyond the point where one of these will be sufficient to save you, is what I’m saying, and we all know that Peter and the real plute players have already bought half of New Zealand as contingency, so good luck on your own in the burning Cali desert!) – but I am also intrigued as to whether it gets any traction; the site claims that they are expanding into Germany and other countries, so, well, who knows? Maybe you’ll all be safe in your airlocked safety paradises while I continue spaffing out Curios til the very end – I mean, it would feel sort-of fitting tbh.
  • Your Digital Envirofootprint: To be clear – you watching or not watching Netflix is not going to make a blind bit of difference to anything, other than your own state of mind, and the concept of a ‘personal carbon footprint’, as we all know by now, was literally invented in the US by comms firms employed by the fossil fuel industry to deflect blame for environmental catastrophe away from them and towards the individual. So, well, this is SLIGHTLY bullsh1t. Equally, though, it’s quite interesting – tell it some of your lifestyle habits and it will tell YOU how much CO2 they contribute to emitting. What are you supposed to do about this? NO FCUKING CLUE! Still, if we all send 30 fewer emails next week that will make up for people worth £600m quid taking private jets everywhere, won’t it? Won’t it?
  • LED Scroller: Type whatever you want and it will scroll across the screen in big glowy LED-style letters. This reminds of a website whose url sadly no longer works which used to let you put a BIG FCUKING MESSAGE on your mobile screen, which during lockdown 1 I used to use to inform people who were being inconsiderate when walking around in terms of space, etc) that, and I quote ‘YOU ARE WALKING LIKE A CNUT’ (look, we all coped in our own way).
  • Loura’s Game: OH I LOVE THIS! Such a fun idea and such a cool thing to do with your personal website – this belongs to someone called Loura, who writes: “I’ve had a fascination with old-school rpg games since I played Final Fantasy VI as a kid and my blog theme reflects that. Recently I decided to take it up a notch and turn my blog itself into a game.” Such a lovely idea – there should be a pop-up-looking window in the bottom left of the site when you load it up that you can use to access the game part, which, while simple, is genuinely fun and I am slightly in love with the idea of just gamifying a site BECAUSE YOU CAN. If any of you can see fit to set something like this up on, I don’t know, PWC.com, I will love you forever.
  • Vox Regis: You are the king! The people are rebelling! But, with a bit of smart thinking and some very light maths you can crush the rebellion by causing various factions to fight amongst themselves – this is very simple but engaging enough to keep your attention for its full five-minute start-to-finish runtime, and there’s something really pleasing about the way the perspective is you, as the king, looking up from on high (the hands in particular are a nice touch). Oh, and the rebelling peons get smeared into pleasingly-jammy smudges when they die, which oughtn’t be satisfying but, worryingly, very much is.
  • Escape from Castle Matsumoto: A bumper week for games, this – here’s another one which is pretty fun and which you can play with a friend should you have such a thing. Are any of you old enough to remember Spy vs Spy? Not just the classic comic from Mad magazine, but the 80s videogame? Of course you do, you’re all fcuking ancient like me (but in case not, this is what it was). Anyway, this is a bit like that – except you’re not spies, your ninjas, and it’s set in ancient Japan. The general premise is the same, though – you play against either the computer or a human opponent, each trying to loot the titular castle, leaving traps and tricks to thwart the other player so you can emerge with more cash than them. It looks GREAT – by which I mean it looks legitimately like a C64 title – but it is QUITE FIDDLY and you will need to spend a bit of time familiarising yourself with the controls before you’re able to do anything other than wander about confusedly.
  • Dragonsweeper: Minesweeper, but with a fantasy-themed skin and some interesting tweaks to the rules (which you will have to work out as you play because the game seemingly has no interest whatsoever in telling you what is going on). Getting your head around the shape of the game is part of the fun, and if you can be bothered working it all out there’s something very satisfying indeed about finally beating the fcuking thing (I may have become…somewhat frustrated).
  • Asterism: The final link of the week is SOMETHING YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR. Sorry. That said, I think that this is worth every penny of the £10 or so that its creator is asking for it – Asterism is a truly GORGEOUS indie videogame, seemingly the work of a single person who has built a beautiful, superbly-animated, rich and heartfelt story through a combination of craft techniques and stop-motion animation, resulting in a game which is part-point-and-click adventure and part just sort of beautiful animated short film, and, honestly, it is inventive and beautiful and creative and I can’t stress enough what a truly incredible feat it is and how much it deserves people to take a look at it – oh, and the music is glorious too, which is just the cherry on the cake. It’s not super-long, but it’s just gorgeous and is one of the most impressive personal creative projects I think I’ve seen in years. If nothing else, please click the link and watch the trailer, I guarantee you will be utterly charmed.

By  Jesse Zuo

OUR LAST MIX THIS WEEK IS BY SUN SONE AND I CAN ONLY REALLY DESCRIBE IT AS SOUNDING LIKE WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO SIT IN ONE OF THOSE SCANDI OVERDESIGNED LOUNGE CHAIRS FROM THE MID-70s IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Movies: Specifically, films watched and reviewed by a Danish bloke who, as far as I can tell, has watched something like 4,000(!!!!) of the fcuking things over the past few years and so therefore you’d imagine probably knows a few things about what’s good and what isn’t. I have no idea what his taste is like, but based on the sheer volume it’s probable that he’s seen a bunch of stuff you haven’t and you might be able to pick up some interesting recommendations from here should you wish to.
  • Before The Clothes Come Off: Slightly astonished I’ve not featured this before, not least because it has SUCH strong ‘10 years ago’ vibes – ‘Before The Clothes Come Off’ shares stills from either bongo movies or mags in which the performers have not yet started, er, performing – everyone’s fully-clothed, therefore, if evidently about to get up to something INCREDIBLY FILTHY. There’s SO much to love about these – the outfits, the expressions that suggest that something DESPERATELY SALACIOUS is about to happen any second now (in fairness, they were probably right), the incredible captioning which results in such wonderful juxtapositions as a relatively-banal image of a man and a woman, fully-clothed, with the all-caps legend ‘JUICY VAGINA’…so much to love.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Kee Kunath: I discovered this photographer’s work through a selection of articles about her recent portrait series on India’s female bodybuilders – you can see some of those shots on her insta feed along with her wider body of work, and she is fcuking great.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Welcome To The Billionaire Era: Apologies in advance for the fact that there’s a reasonable amount of US politics stuff in here this week – but, well, we’re all downstream of it, painful as it is to admit, which means that whatever gets shat into the water table across the Atlantic will eventually bemerd our own in due course. So, how does it feel to live in a billionaire’s fantasy? Because that’s pretty much what the next four years seem to connote – we need to go faster to outrun the creeping horrors in the rearview mirror, so what better way to ensure that than by cutting the brake cables and buying some nitro off that nice, smiling man in the fancy suit? This first piece is by Don Moynihan, who does a good – if fundamentally FCUKING BLEAK – job of laying out the insane routemap that putting ‘no regulation, massive cost-cutting’ creates for the country and the world, focusing quite a lot on Marc Andreessen (a lesser-cited but incredibly-important part of the current inner circle whose terrifying, swivel-eyed accelerationist AI manifesto from a few years back is worth reading again in 2025, btw) and his recent NYT interview (which is also worth reading in full because FCUKING HELL), as well as on what the Musk effect is going to be. Honestly, this is very good – not least because it is increasingly clear that we are going to see a LOT of very rich people with very close ties to government saying many of the same sorts of things in the coming years in the UK and elsewhere.
  • The Aesthetic Rebirth of America: I know talking about ‘fascism’ feels like a bit of an overreaction. I understand that talking about ‘the end of democracy’ sounds, and probably is, hyperbolic. I get that all of that is frankly tedious and annoying and gets people to turn off, and so I am not going to do that. I would, though, like you to read this essay, by one Rachel Haywire, about ‘the new aesthetic’ that they would like to see adopted by the new administration in the US (and this should be read alongside the Executive Order requiring the building of more ‘monumental’ state architecture), and, as you read it, to think about where some of the themes it contains might be familiar from, and the sorts of regimes which, in the past, have espoused similar rhetoric about aesthetics and strength, and to think what it means when people feel absolutely fine harking back in misty-eyed terms to artistic movements which were closely associated with, and oftentimes started by, people who thought Hitler was actually right about a bunch of stuff. I suppose now we have an answer to ‘so, what sort of ideas can you trojan horse into people with a decade-long-drip-drip-drip campaign around the inherent superiority of classical western architecture and aesthetics?’.
  • Trump and the Spectacle: This, in the LRB, is fcuking superb from start to finish, honestly, just sustained, virtuosic writing and I just want you all to go and read it please. “It’s not news that Trump is a creature of the society of the spectacle. Creature and master, emanation and accelerant. He is the image. The mugshot. He’s the picture of himself on Fox he sits watching for hours each day – rightly understanding that doing so is doing politics, politics as our society now practises it. Governing? We leave that to our servants. (What a lovely bygone sound there is to Michel Foucault’s term of art ‘governmentality’. Only ascendant powers think the state is for governing. Leaders of empires in decline look across at Xi Jinping and wonder if he can be serious about infrastructure and censorship and party discipline and the size of the army. Wasn’t that yesterday?) Define the society of the spectacle. Oh, come on – you know what it is. What do you want, a Helen Levitt street scene opposite a drone shot of children looking at their iPhones? The question is not what the spectacle consists of – the spectacle goes on making a spectacle of its least change of apparatus, the least descent down its ladder of conformity – but what in the long term it does, above all to the other term in the portmanteau. ‘Society’ – what’s that?” Given that a bunch of you are the sort of cnuts who will quote Debord at a moment’s notice, this should appeal. BONUS GOOD TRUMP ARTICLE: this is by Edward Docx in the Guardian, who’s also a reliably-good writer and whose exploration of the idea of the ‘ogre’ in the context of Trump works far better than I expected it to.
  • Your Memecoin Is Your Slush Fund: I mentioned it in the main links section, but the whole Trumpcoin thing is just…fcuking ASTONISHING to me (I had forgotten this particularly unpleasant aspect of the idiocracy from the last time around, the sort of incredulous horror as you realise that…fuck, people really can just GET AWAY WITH THIS SH1T) – this piece does a really good job of explaining in mostly-comprehensible language how the grift works, and why it works, and what the purpose of it actually is (per my commentary above), TO SEND TRUMP CASH. Look, here’s the simple explanation – but honestly, read the whole thing, it’s important: “Suppose you wanted to buy a favor from Donald Trump, and he wanted to let you buy a favor from him. How could you do it? You can’t just pay him a giant bribe — that’s illegal. Maybe you could pledge him a bunch of cash for his presidential campaign. But there are campaign finance laws that will get in your way, and even if you succeed, he can only use the money for his campaign, not to buy yachts or whatever else he might like to use the money for. Instead, what you can do is to buy a bunch of TRUMP or MELANIA. When you buy one of those memecoins, you increase the demand for the memecoin. Its price then goes up. This makes Donald Trump richer, without any money actually having to change hands.”
  • What Ross Ullbricht Actually Did: Certain portions of the crypto-y, degen-y web have been celebrating this week as one of their poster children received a presidential pardon – Ross Ullbricht, better known as the guy behind the Silk Road who called himself ‘Dread Pirate Roberts’, was locked up for a whole bunch of reason which Henry Farell neatly lays out, but had become something of a symbol for the crypto crowd of The Man’s seemingly ceaseless attempts to STIFLE INNOVATION and IMPINGE UPON FREEDOMS. As such Ullbricht’s pardon is a clear signal to the cryptocrowd that they are IN FAVOUR – again, anyone might argued that acting in a manner clearly designed to appease a group of people whose activities and fortunes can materially impact the wealth of senior members of the Government feels…not ok, really? See also Elon standing on stage and saying ‘We’re going to take DOGE to  Mars’, which feels QUITE a lot like a ‘to the moon’ reference if you ask me…IT’S THE FCUKING KLEPT EVERYONE.
  • How Zuck Used Rogan: I know, I know, OLD NEWS – but I think it’s an interesting piece to read, because it neatly lays out the new podcast comms playbook, and why Rogan and people like him are wonderful opportunities for a well-trained executive because their ignorance and lack of anything resembling journalistic technique, combined with the associated coverage each episode provides, make it extremely easy to craft a narrative which suits you around whatever issue you like, which will then become disseminated worldwide with nary an interrogatory “…but, hang on”. In this instance Techdirt does a really good, step-by-step explainer of exactly how Zuckergberg manipulated Rogan and how, in turn, Rogan failed to ask any of the questions one might have expected a serious journalist to. Is it good that we’re entering an era in which the most powerful people in the world are increasingly likely to only ever communicate via these most softball of platforms because actual journalists have been largely removed from the food chain? IT DOES NOT FEEL GOOD.
  • The End of Social: Ok, that’s not technically the headline Ann-Helen Petersen chose to go with, but the point she makes in this rather good piece is that social media is not what it was and will never be that way again, however much you might want to sit on Bluesky and pretend it’s 2011. I can’t speak for you, but I have basically stopped using social media on my phone over the past year – I will check Bluesky if I am at a desk during working hours, but that’s it, which for someone as appallingly-online and previously-Twitter-addled as I am is quite the sea-change. As it happens I wrote something about this for a magazine last year – it’s paywalled sadly, but you can read the original unedited copy here if you’re interested.
  • Living Alongside the Computer People: An excellent essay by Jay Springett which looks at the backlash to the idea of Meta introducing AI avatars to its social media ecosystem at the beginning of the year – Springett writes about his experiences with Butterflies, a social network populated solely by AI agents which you may recall I featured in here last Summer. I bounced off it pretty quickly – I don’t care enough about the banality of real people’s lives ffs, let alone the banality of imaginary people’s imaginary lives – but he got rather into it, and there’s something interesting in his characterisation of his experience, seeing small stories happen without his input, characters developing and evolving relationships…I suppose there’s an extent to which social media has increasingly become a platform on which people interact with a small group of people they know irl and a far wider pool of people who they don’t know and will never meet and will never speak to…and, when you think of it like that, does it matter if they’re not real? I mean, yes, it does to me, very much, but I can see the points being made here and I appreciate that mine might not be the majority viewpoint. Anyway, whether or not you want this stuff, IT’S FCUKING COMING.
  • Neoliberalism’s Imagined Futures: Ok, this is long and a bit academic, but it’s properly-interesting, honest, on the way in which we imagine future cities and future spaces, and how the imagined architecture of these futures in many respects reflects and connotes a certain embedded ideology, specifically the neoliberal paradigm – which, yes, I know, that makes me sound like a cnut and makes this sound dull, but whilst the former assessment may be sadly accurate the latter is wrong. I promise, this is really really thought-provoking, not least because of the important reminder it contains that nothing is neutral and everything has meaning. The basic thesis is as follows – but it is worth at least skimming, I promise: ““eco-futurist” images symbolically communicate an association with sustainability through the visible use of “green” technologies and the adoption of highly contextual encounters with greenery, rhetorically prefaced on the ability of techno-science to mediate human–nature relationships, and visually bound within the design tropes of luxury tourist destinations. By intertwining the aspirational futures of sustainable design with the aesthetic sensibilities of the wealthy, I argue that eco-futurism primarily aligns itself with the interests of neoliberal property development and the spatial and social logics of colonialism.”
  • Podcast’s Pivot To Video: I mean, this feels like slightly old news – ‘video of podcast as social feed content’ has been a thing for what feels like a couple of years now, but I suppose there’s a critical mass of podcasters moving into video to warrant a ‘this is a big trend!’ piece. I understand the utility of video as an additional means of creating promo content, but also question the extent to which anyone ‘watches’ a podcast (though as someone who doesn’t even listen to them my opinion here is probably even less valuable than usual) – I do though think it’s a bit unfair that a medium previously perfect for all those of us with a face for radio is being coopted by the fcuking beautiful. FCUK OFF, BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE. Apart from those of you who feel a strong, inexplicable attraction to authors of preposterously-verbose internet newsletters, you can stay.
  • AI Potholes: In my semi-regular attempt to occasionally offer up a small alternative to the general ‘AI is evil’ narrative which seems to have taken hold amongst all right-thinking folk, here’s James O’Malley writing about why Keir Starmer’s example of ‘using AI to fix potholes’ wasn’t in fact as risible as lots of wags on the web enjoyed making it out to be. This is clear, simple and sensible, and a good reminder that AI IS NOT JUST FCUKING LLMS, and even when it IS an LLM, the really interesting and useful stuff it can do is, mostly, VERY far removed from writing terrible prose and creating soulless images.
  • The Future of Sports: When I was a little kid I remember going to a theme park – possibly Alton Towers – where one of the indoor attractions was literally a massive, floor-to-ceiling screen which showed first-person footage of a rollercoaster and which, when you stood in front of it as the film played, induced motion sickness to a frankly-terrifying degree (god the past was sh1t, wasn’t it?). I couldn’t help but think of that when reading this piece abouT THE FUTURE OF SPORTSBALL, which, per the article, seems to be ‘10xing revenue from live events by streaming them in a sort of ultra-HD ‘you’re in the best seats in the house’-style in venues that are basically like the Vegas Sphere but smaller. Aside from the aforementioned vertigo fear – honestly, it looks…horrid – I can actually imagine this being a lot of fun, like watching a big game in a packed pub but with everything turned up to eleven. I’ll be fascinated to see who brings this to the UK first, it can only be a matter of time before some warehouse in East London gets one.
  • Reading Too Many Debut Novels: A long-but-interesting and VERY generous post by Holly Gramazio, who last year as a newly-published debut novelist decided to read a bunch of OTHER debut novels published in 2024 to see if she could get a handle on whether there are any specific qualities or tropes which debut novels share. This is an exhaustive investigation into what she found out – which, should you be interested in writing, reading or publishing is just generally interesting – which also at the end segues into a huge list of the books she read, divided into categories to help you work out what you might be interested in reading. If you’re looking for a place to start building a reading list for the year, this feels like it could be an interesting place to start and to discover some potentially-great new writers.
  • Gorilla Tag VR: Everything I read about VR makes it sound like a busted flush – noone wanted the massive Apple headset, the MetaQuest, despite being apparently good kit, is still failing to breakthrough in any meaningful mainstream sense, and the progress being made with smartglasses and XR makes it seem reasonable to assume that that’s the next likely breakthrough post-phone tech. AND YET. I also keep reading stuff that suggests that there’s a whole generation of kids – reasonably-affluent kids, I presume – who are really, really enjoying VR and who spend a lot of time there, and it makes me wonder whether this is just a generational waiting game and that we’re going to have to wait for the Alphas to age into positions where they can influence the technology we encounter. Anway, this is all about Gorilla Tag, apparently an insanely popular game in the VR space, and the weird mythologies that kids are creating around it because, well, that’s what kids do.
  • Where Is Central London?: An important investigation by The Londoner, which obviously has no definitive answer and is entirely subjective but which here leads to several thousand pleasing words as various people offer their own interpretation of where ‘central’ starts and ends (fwiw my personal definition goes from, basically, Hyde Park Corner to St Paul’s W-E and King’s X to Waterloo N-S and it is the only correct one).
  • Chasing a Vibe Pic: I loved this, not least because it feels SO analogous to the way in which I experience the web and hence made me feel if only for a fleeting moment that I wasn’t entirely alone. Chris Erik Thomas writes about a found image on the web and the rabbitholes attempting to locate it took him down, and it’s a pretty perfect encapsulation of why I love the web (well, the web pre about 5-6 years ago, at least) – every bit of it exists because a person felt it ought to, and every part of it is an expression of an aspect of humanity, and it is in its totality a mad multidimensionalspeciespatchwork and it is meaningless and beautiful and poignant and weird and it is us, and this essay, I think, gets that.
  • My Summer Car: This is a review of a videogame, but I promise you it is of a videogame that will not sound like any videogame you have ever played before, or indeed that you can ever imagine anyone wanting to play. My Summer Car is about being in Finland over the Summer holidays, and trying to build a car from scratch – and it is even less fun to play than that description makes it sound, by design, and it’s the friction and the hostility that are the point. I have no personal interest in ever playing games like this, but I have an almost-insatiable appetite for reading about them, because I do firmly (and, obviously, extremely-w4nkily) believe that Games Can Be Art, and this is absolutely fcuking art. I mean, listen to this: “The broken vehicle in your driveway is the rusty chassis of a car called the “Satsuma”. Almost all the parts you need are arranged in shelves and scattered on the floor of your garage. A fully disassembled combustion engine lies in bits and must be painfully reconstructed. The steering column needs to be put back in. The suspension, brakes, gearbox, wheels – everything, every little bolt – has to be accounted for…Some of these parts you’ll need to order via mail. In another game this might simply be a menu. You’d click the part and – bloop – it would show up on your shelf. Here, ordering, say, a fuel mixture gauge means using a magazine in the garage to make an envelope appear, driving 20 minutes to the store, putting the envelope in the post box, driving back home, waiting two in-game days, getting a phone call from the store owner who says your package has arrived, driving back to the store to pick it up, then coming home again. It is comically laborious.” Doesn’t it sound terrible but also SUPERB? This is a great bit of games writing that I recommend to you all even if you couldn’t give two fcuks about the medium.
  • Amis: I knew I featured a bit of Amis writing when he died, but I came across this one this week and it’s SUCH a good piece about the man, his place in the English canon, the influence he had and the almost vulgar brilliance of his prose. I obviously fcuking loved Martin Amis’ books, and I appreciate not everyone will have felt the same way, but if you were a fan then this is a lovely reminder of why.
  • Davos: Finally this week, Caitlín Doherty writes for Harper’s from Davos. I can’t pretend I didn’t find myself grinding my teeth throughout a lot of this, but it’s SO brilliantly done, smart and informed and as frankly sick of the neverending merrygoround of monied power which determines the contours of our existence without really at any point doing a particularly good job of demonstrating why this state of affairs ought to persist as I, and presumably you, are. It is full of wonderful lines and vignettes, but the one about Al Gore having to look up ‘epistemology’ felt just too perfectly bleak for words.

By Sophie Sund

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 17/01/25

Reading Time: 35 minutes

I hope all of you who’ve sent me complaining messages about there being ‘too much AI stuff’ in Curios over the past few years are feeling suitably-chastened now that Sir Keir’s going to MAINLINE IT INTO THE NATION’S VEINS. Whether or not intravenous injection was necessarily the right analogy for the forced introduction of a potentially-nefarious technology that noone necessarily wants into the body public is…questionable, but, well, tough! You’re getting AI whether you like it or not! COMPLAIN TO YOUR ROBOT THERAPIST ABOUT IT, SOYBOY!

Sorry, not sure what came over me at the end there, it must be excitement at the coming of a new world order (suspiciously, just like the old one!) in which ‘owning the libs’ is once again the court sport of choice; rest assured that I am, remain and always will be 100% soy.

So, as we sit in the ROLLERCOASTER OF LIFE, feeling it crank up once more towards a the summit and knowing that we’re once again about to take a species-wide plunge at speed into a pit of unfettered capitalism, let me offer you up a Web Curios to take your mind off things. I hope it works it works for you, it doesn’t seem to be working for me.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you don’t have to watch on Monday afternoon if you don’t want to.

By Frances Waite

WHY NOT BEGIN THIS WEEK’S MUSICAL JOURNEY WITH THIS EXCELLENT AND WILDLY-ECLECTIC SELECTION OF OLD RECORDS FROM AROUND THE WORLD? NO, YOU ARE RIGHT, THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS GENUINELY SADDENED TO HEAR ABOUT PAUL DANAN YESTERDAY AND WHICH WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER THE ORIGINAL LOVE ISLAND, RIP YOU MAD-EYED SESH HOUND, PT.1:  

  • The Nokia Design Archive: Did you have a 3210? DO YOU REMEMBER SNAKE AND THE RINGTONE AND AND AND…look, I find retrophonenostalgia almost terminally-dull (the past was different! Technology has evolved! This is…not, in general, a hugely-interesting observation to my mind!), but it is also true that as the devices have become more technically-capable and feature complete they’ve also become more homogenous in terms of design…which is why this website is such a total joy, letting you explore the HISTORY OF NOKIA and, specifically, to do a load of digging around in their design archives so you can look through all the frankly insane scamps and draughts and vaguely-directional lookbooks that they were working through around the time they were also producing things that looked like this. There is SO MUCH STUFF in here, and if you’re someone who works in product design or branding, or who’s just generally interested in the process of ‘how people inform their design decisions’, then this will be catnip to you. The interface is simple but it works – you navigate between thematically-connected ‘nodes’, effectively, clicking into see individual elements or documents or videos, and there’s a nice interlinking of entries which creates a sort of taxonomy of Nokia design thinking, which I rather enjoy. Per the blurb, “The Nokia Design Archive is a graphic and interactive portal designed by researchers from Aalto University in Finland. It currently hosts over 700 entries, curated from thousands of items donated by Microsoft Mobile Oy and representing over 20 years of Nokia’s design history — both seen and unseen. You can freely explore the archive, learn about designers’ experiences working in Nokia and discover interesting topics surrounding design and mobile technologies.The Network view shows the archive’s contents, organised by thematic collections and displayed according to their relationships with each other. The visualisation displays the entries organised according to collection – click on them to explore and understand them and their context in the design process.” Basically it’s full of odd sketches and half-formed thoughts and notes and lookbooks and ‘inspiration libraries’, and for someone who, like me, is peculiarly un-gifted when it comes to the visual and the design-y and the like, it feels a bit like strange glyphs from an advanced alien civilisation (but also, SO Y2K).
  • I Feel So Much Shame: This is a website/poem type-thing by Jackie Liu, created as part of an initiative called ‘Welcome To My Homepage’ (running for 10 years and, shamefully, entirely-unknown to me until this week, the project is ‘an international online residency program hosted by The Museum of Human Achievement in Austin, TX that offers artists a low-stakes opportunity to experiment and expand their practice, explore the web as a site for creative production, and reach new audiences’, which I very much approve of as a thing and feel is something other institutions might want to usefully consider; I do think ‘web as canvas’ is underexplored by Big Art, which feels…retrograde in 2025) and it is made from scanned-in risograph prints, and, basically, you just click through it, but…look, this absolutely fcuked me in half when I read/experienced it the other day, to the point of having to take an actual break and have a word with myself, so caveat emptor and all that, but I thought it was BEAUTIFUL (NB – there’s nothing horrible or awful here, honest, I am just a bundle of exposed nerve endings right now it seems).
  • Free Our Feeds: This has had a reasonable amount of publicity and traction in certain corners of the web this week, and was an interesting (to me, at least) barometer of ‘how celebrity endorsements work in global media in 2025’ – turns out Mark Ruffalo gets you coverage in North America these days but not Europe, who knew? Anyway, Free Our Feeds is a campaign which is seeking to raise money to create a ‘warchest’ which will then be used to establish an independent foundation to make the AT Protocol, which Bluesky is built on and is basically one of the options for the fediverse alongside ActivityPub which Mastodon is built on, independent and globally-standardised OH DEAR GOD I FIND THIS STUFF SO DULL. Sorry, but I can’t bring myself to care about the technical side of this stuff – I know, I know, I should, but I simply can’t. Basically this is a nice-sounding idea, which, still, feels a bit pointless – like, I am not convinced there are enough normal people who care about any of this to a) raise all the money they want; or b) sustain any sort of campaign to recreate a FREE AND OPEN WEB in the face of the convenience, ubiquity and massive marketing budgets of Big Tech, and, in general, the whole Bluesky vs Mastodon ‘purity of the fediverse’ debate is just too neckbeardy for me to be able to engage with, and I imagine it’s the same for the vast majority of people. So, er, fcuk knows why I have just spaffed on about it for 200-odd words. Sorry about that.
  • Google, Voice and Culture: This page links you to four separate AI experiments by Google designed to explore how the tech can be used by cultural institutions to enhance the visitor experience, and these are FUN and frankly have potential applications beyond the museum and galleries sector. They’re all worth having a play with yourself, but there’s Talking Tours, which lets you wander round a venue (gallery, museum or, er, the Etihad) and get AI-generated commentary of whatever you’re ‘looking’ at in your browser; Mice in the Museum, where a pair of mice (no, me neither) give their opinions on an artwork of your choice from one of Google’s many digitised collections in, er, small rodent voices; Lip Sync, where a, er, pair of animated lips (no, again, no idea) have ‘live’ discussions on a series of prompt questions posed by artists; and Doodle Guide, which lets you draw anything you like and then get your sketch assessed by an AI voice which discusses your work, its style and execution. The last of these is by far the most fun – no, Google, that is NOT a ‘proud stetson’, try again! – but in general they’re all decent examples of how its voicemodels and multimodality are currently working, and, as with a lot of this stuff, you (or at least I) get the feeling that this is very nearly at the point of being very useful and very interesting indeed (use this phrase to beat me with in a year when this hasn’t progressed at all).
  • Google Euphonia: Seeing as we’re doing Google and AI and voice stuff, this is an interesting and laudable project to file under ‘see? Some of this AI stuff is good, honest! Not all of it is going to steal your job and entrench existing power structures! Although most of it, fine, probably will!’. Google Euphonia is its project to create speech recognition software which is capable of parsing a wider range of speech types, encompassing ‘non-traditional’ speaking patterns and so designed to help those with disabilities which affect the vocal cords be understood better by The Machine. The project is currently soliciting speech samples to help train and improve its models, so if you or anyone you know has non-standard vocal patterns then you might want to upload something to this as it feels, broadly, like A Good Thing.
  • Reddit Answers: THE LLMIFICATION OF EVERYTHING CONTINUES! Here we have Reddit taking the seemingly-sensible step of rendering its enormous UGC knowledge archive interrogable – so with Reddit Answers, currently in early-access (you won’t be able to use it now, but you can sign up for updates), you’ll be able to ask ANY QUESTION YOU LIKE of the Reddit corpus and, allegedly at least, get an answer back with references to where The Machine has sourced the info and links back to the original Reddit threads for investigation and future research. Which is HUGE, potentially, from an online shopping and recommendations point of view, and makes me feel that any brand that has invested time in building out a strong Reddit presence over the past few years, with a dedicated fanbase, is going to do quite well out of this (also, that ‘getting people to recommend your stuff on Reddit’ is quite an important pillar of any brand strategy, turns out). It is, of course, another HUGE warning klaxon for all those websites which have spent years amassing well-indexed articles on ‘the best handheld blenders for under £20’ which are going to see their traffic, and their income, tanked by this, after having seen their Google numbers kneecapped last year. It does rather feel like a lot of website-based stuff is going to be gurgling its last in the next year or so, much as it pains me to say so.
  • Chestfaces: Bluesky is not, in general, like Old Twitter – Old Twitter was younger and more vibrant and sillier and slightly-meaner, whereas Bluesky is more mannered and more po-faced and, generally, older, greyer and sadder (as, frankly, are we all) – but occasionally you’ll find things that SPARK JOY in the old way. So it is with Chestfaces, an account on Bluesky which exists solely to post images of famous men, topless, whose naked chests have been superimposed onto their faces, giving them (YES YOU GUESSED IT) chestfaces. There are only 12 of these, and they last posted a few months ago, but fcukit, I WANT MORE CHESTFACES FFS can whoever is running this please bring it back? Thanks.
  • Tony Slattery’s Funeral Fundraiser: This won’t mean anything to the non-Anglos here, I don’t think, so you can skip this one, but for anyone broadly-speaking of my generation (young GenX/VERY OLD millennial) then it might speak to you. Tony Slattery died this week, unexpectedly, of a heart attack, and it slightly floored me – I was genuinely in awe of the man as a kid, to the point where he made me doubt my sexuality…he was smart and funny and handsome and SO sharp, witty and dangerous and obviously a nervous wreck and I had never seen anyone like him on television before, obviously incredibly clever but so…smooth with it. His life ended up being sadder and smaller than anyone thought likely back then, as documented in this heartbreaking interview with him from a few years back, which is why his partner launched this crowdfunder to help cover his funeral expenses. It’s hit its target but in case any of you felt the same as I did about the man, you might want to contribute.
  • Steppin: Do YOU feel like your phone has a stranglehold on you? Do YOU feel like you need to TAKE BACK CONTROL from the device? Do YOU also feel that you could possibly do with getting some more exercise in this year?  Fcuk me, the January cliches! Combine all of your self-improvement goals (well, ok, two of them at most) into one simple app with this new download – Steppin is actually a pretty smart idea, the gimmick being that you ‘earn’ screentime based on your physical activity as tracked by your phone. Select which apps you want to limit, select your exchange rate (100 steps = 1 minute on TikTok, say) and off you go! I presume it’s no longer possible to fool your phone by throwing it in the air a few times and as such that this works as advertised, in which case I can imagine it working quite well for certain types of people – it integrates with a bunch of existing fitness and activity-tracking devices too, so if you’re one of those appalling self-quantifying fcuks then it will fit right into your disgustingly-optimised lifestyle.
  • Undermound: Got to be honest with you here, I haven’t really got the faintest idea of what’s going on here – I *think* this is a sort-of portfolio site collecting the Canva sketches of one Stevie Pimblott, but, frankly, I’m not really sure. Just scroll, click and see where you end up (I don’t get the feeling it goes anywhere bad, but, just so you know, I take no responsibility AT ALL if it does).
  • Colors: Another death this week which kicked me in the face slightly was that of former Benetton CD Oliviero Toscani, a man responsible for some of the most incredible, arresting, brave and, frankly, occasionally-borderline-not-ok ad campaigns of my early life (children, or those of you who for whatever reason don’t have an eidetic memory for this sort of stuff, let me remind you of the sort of sh1t that they used to put on billboards). What I really loved Toscani for, though, was Colors Magazine (I will forgive him the American spelling just this once) – Colors was basically the in-house magazine of Benetton’s in-house creative agency, Fabrica, and each issue was devoted to a different topic, and I first picked up a copy coming back from Italy on my own in…1993 and, muchlike Adbusters a few years later, it absolutely changed my conception of what a magazine could be, how you could be ‘political’ but also quite astonishingly stylish (to be clear – YOU could; I, as proven several decades hence, cannot), to to be informative and honest and INTERESTING, how to present information densely-but-beautifully, and the power of ugly/beautiful as an aesthetic…I am gutted that I lost the dozen or so editions of this I once owned, but enjoyed delving through this website which collates the covers of each of the issues (‘Fat’ is a particular favourite of mine) – I really, really hope that there’s going to be a proper exhibition of the archive of this, it would be ACE.
  • Lumon Industries: This website’s actually a few years old – I first came across it…whenever, a while ago, but didn’t understand it and didn’t feature it because it made no sense to me. And, look, I still don’t understand it and it still makes no sense to me, but I now know that that’s because it’s based on something from the TV show Severance, which I understand is very popular and is coming back on TV soon and which it’s likely that quite a few of you watch and enjoy. So! Er, this is for you! I don’t know what it is! Oh, ok, fine – it’s basically a slightly-mysterious busywork simulator (with a nicely-fleshed-out UI) which is clearly something to do with the MYSTERIOUS BUSYWORK that the characters perform in the show…look, can one of you who knows about this email me and offer me a short explainer? I will be really grateful and possibly send you a small reward.
  • Watch Duty: You will probably have heard of this app over the past week or so – it’s what’s mainly being used in LA to track the spread of the fires in near-realtime (you can see a browser-based map here should you wish). What I find interesting about it is that it’s nothing to do with the State of California – it’s an app developed by a very, very rich person who decided that he might as well do it because he had loads of money and some time on his hands. Which, to be clear, is nice of him – it’s not-for-profit, it doesn’t do anything bad with your data, and in general seems like A Good Thing! But also does feel sadly emblematic of A Lot Of Things – it does rather feel that infrastructural digital services like this ought to be the preserve of the state rather than relying on well-meaning plutes to step in and sort sh1t out.
  • Deep: I can’t speak for you, obviously, but it does rather feel to me like the shine has somewhat been removed from the 1950s dream of space exploration, tarnished by interstellar travel’s now-indelible association with That Fcuking Man and indeed now MechaBezos. So, as an alternative, why not let’s explore a future under the sea? Yes, ok, I know why (SO MUCH TOOTHY AND TENTACULAR FEAR, not to mention several thousands of lbs of psi), but ignore that for a moment and instead enjoy Deep, whose mission, apparently, is ‘Make Humans Aquatic’ (I can’t be the only one seeing Ariel frantically mugging ‘NO, NO!’ in the corner of my field of vision, surely?). This is a VERY shiny website promoting the company’s undersea exploration kit, including this thing, called ‘Sentinel’, which will apparently allow people to ‘live and work undersea’, opening up the theoretical possibility of modular dwelling bunkers on the edge of the Mariana Trench for when everything up-top gets…well, a bit burny. This is VERY scifi, only-partially-believable, and feels like a series of really unpleasant disaster films just waiting to happen.
  • Kudos Wiki: This is a nice idea – someone’s basically scraped Wikipedia for all the films that, per writeups on there, are the ‘best’ ever, which, turns out, gives you quite a wide-ranging and interesting new canon which diverges from a lot of ‘best films EVER’ lists you might previously have seen online. The list is available either to browse, or – and this is an interesting move which I don’t *quite* understand the licensing around – you can sign up for $1 a month and get a link to watch a different film from the list every four weeks (or indeed $12 for access to everything forever); if you’re a cinephile and want a new watching challenge/goal for 2025 this could be quite a cool way of doing it.
  • All Of The Cartoon Pitches: This is an INCREDIBLE resource for anyone interested in comics and cartoons and animation and illustration – this page collates DOZENS of links to documents which were used to pitch, or write episodes for, network animated TV shows – from He Man and She-Ra to Spongebob to Ren & Stimpy, this is basically a how-to manual of how to package and sell your work, and for a very specific type of person it will be GOLDEN.
  • Brand New iPhone Sexting App Just Dropped: I mean, I could have given it its full title – Exploding Messages – but frankly this does a clearer job of explaining what you’ll be using it for. Per the writeup on the app store, “Send texts and photos that disappear on iMessage. Your friends don’t need the app to view them. Screenshots are blocked too!” Which, obviously, is all fun and games, but some thoughts: 1) you have to be VERY CONFIDENT in that ‘no screenshots’ functionality; 2) if you think about it, this could equally be used to send people some pretty awful stuff, unsolicited, with complete deniability. Which, er, doesn’t sound great tbh. OH WELL NOODZ!

By Alfonso Duran

NEXT, ENJOY TWO HOURS OF REALLY RATHER LOVELY JAZZ COMPILED BY WINDRUSH RADIO! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS GENUINELY SADDENED TO HEAR ABOUT PAUL DANAN YESTERDAY AND WHICH WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER THE ORIGINAL LOVE ISLAND, RIP YOU MAD-EYED SESH HOUND, PT.2:  

  •  Loser Lane: Are YOU a cyclist? Are YOU annoyed by the provision of cycling lanes and other pro-bike amenities in your city? Are YOU so irritated by it that, er, you’ll go to the trouble of coding a small game about how bad cycling there is? I imagine the answer to that last one was ‘no’, but full kudos to Toronto resident Marie LeBlanc Flanagan who was so annoyed at the Mayor’s plan to close cycle lanes that she knocked up this little – to be clear, impossible – game to demonstrate what being on a bike in the city currently feels like. You can read a bit more about it here, but I am now IN LOVE with the idea of making a small videogame as protest at small acts of municipal idiocy. Can someone make a game about the bins please? Oh God, someone’s going to make one about grooming gangs aren’t they? Let me retract this idea immediately.
  • JourneyMaker: Another digital arts and culture toy, this one brought to me by Ben Templeton’s excellent newsletter; the Art Institute of Chicago has built this website which lets kids prepare their route through the museum ahead of their visit by picking a selection of works that interest them – it’s a lovely interface, which does a good job of giving the illusion of LIMITLESS CHOICE while actually being relatively-tightly-constrained, and there’s something really nice about the packaging of it and the way it creates a bespoke map JUST FOR YOU detailing your route and giving you little worksheets…it’s just a nice, light-touch bit of personalisation which has the benefit of being ACTUALLY CURATED rather than being chucked into The Machine and latent-space-sliced, which makes it feel like a more crafted experience than you might get otherwise. Lovely stuff.
  • The Smell of Data: ‘What if you could smell your computer?’ is a question that almost no actual consumer has ever wanted to know the answer to, but nonetheless is something which the tech industry seemingly seems hell-bent on making reality; I think it’s been 20-odd years since I first saw a ‘here’s a box that will spray relevant scents into the air as you play Call of Duty so you can actually SMELL the cordite and, er, blood as you perforate terrorists for FREEDOM!’ device – they had a bit of a resurgence during lockdown, and again during the brief metaversal spazzout of 2022, but noone’s ever REALLY wanted this to be a thing. This, though, this is ART and therefore a million times better: “The sense of smell helped early humans to survive. But now that our hunting and gathering has moved to the digital environment, our noses can no longer warn us of the lurking dangers in the online wilderness. The Smell of Data is a new scent created to instinctively alert internet users of data leaks on personal devices.” The Smell of Data is a device which you charge up with scent capsules and carry around with you, linked to your phone; when your phone connects to an unprotected website on an unsecured WiFi network or Hotspot, it will spray a puff of the scent into the air to alert you to the fact that you’re potentially being mined. This has now put me in mind of all sorts of builds on this – I quite like the idea of something like this embedded into the outsize collar of a coat or something and triggering at any point you’re in-shot of a digital camera, some sort of surveillance-watcher (impossible, obvs), but I am sure you can come up with your own.
  • Hyperkinetic Art: I like this a lot. The website of someone called Simon, who makes work with a plotter pen – per their description, “I make art with maths and programming, and I have a pen plotter robot called Stephen that brings it to life with a biro…The majority of the work I produce is inspired by nature, and the pursuit of generating organic shapes in the least organic medium I can think of – a bstard fcuking computer…All of the artwork is created with javascript, rendered on a HTML5 canvas for development and then exported to polylines and curves to be plotted onto paper. I’ve built up a considerable set of tools for creating generative art in the process, and have wandered down some unexpected paths, such as implementing Newton’s laws of gravitation to manipulate particle paths.” I think the work here is LOVELY, and far more interesting than a lot of machine-drawn imagery often is – it’s a commercial site and the prints are available to buy, but if you’re not in the market for new art then you might just want to have a browse and enjoy.
  • Emoticon Generator: Before the TYRANNY OF EMOJI there was the emoticon, and in the land of the emoticon the emoticon that used non-standard, non-English characters was king. This EXCELLENT little site lets you simply and easily create your very own bespoke emoticon, choosing from a selection of drop-downs to make a personalised little face JUST FOR YOU. Why not make this your kooky, whimsical digital callsign for 2025 (other than, you know, the appalling tweeness and self-regard involved in believing one needs a ‘kooky, whimsical digital callsign for 2025’)?
  • Alphabetical Order: Another newsletter! This is BRAND NEW,  only one issue in, and if you’re interested in music writing then you might enjoy the premise here: “Every other week, I’m going to pull a record off the shelf and write about how it affected my life in some way. Not my favorite records necessarily, or ones I even love for that matter, but albums that are tied to memories or important life moments.” This is a similar premise to Shelfies by Jared and Lavie, but for music, and I rather like this way of thinking of cultural items in relation to oneself. I can’t vouch for the quality of the resulting essays – there’s only one up there so far – but I think this is a fun idea which might be worth following.
  • Vintage Bowling: Would YOU like to immerse yourself in some classic Americana, the American of diners and T-Birds and large men demonstrating impossible grace and skill when wielding a 15lb mass? GREAT! This website collects photos of old-style bowling alleys in the US and is, basically, just a whole aesthetic in itself. These are actually really quite interesting from an historical perspective, as they trace the evolution of the game from the…19th?C to more modern iterations, but the real gold here is, imho, in the 1950s-era stuff, where you can practically smell the Brylcream, the tallow for the fries and the appalling quantity of cheap aftershave worn by Spike who just won’t leave that poor waitress Jeannie alone (look, that’s where I imagination just took me, what of it?).
  • Doom Running in a PDF: It’s monochromatic! It renders so painfully-slowly it’s unplayable! But! It is, definitively, the original DOOM running inside a PDF document! An achievement as stunningly-futile as it is technically-impressive, so WELL DONE to whoever is behind it, I can only applaud your endeavour.
  • Wandermap: On the one hand, I am impressed by how clever this is; on the other, I think that it is likely to lead to some genuinely unpleasant travel experiences. The premise, though, is really smart – Wandermap lets you plug in any video from Insta and then parses it to pull all the destinations from it and then map them for you, giving you an instant itinerary to mimic that of your favourite shiny-toothed and floppy-haired influencer moppet. Which, to be clear, is really smart! – I presume there’s a ‘feed video to GPT, extract destinations, map to OpenStreetMap’ pathway going on under the hood, though I am guessing here – but, also, means that what you’re doing is mimicking exactly the same route and destinations as the influencer in question, leading to a) you going to places that will inevitably be fcuking rammed by the time you get there, because, well, INFLUENCER!; b) you seeing stuff that you have already seen because, well, YOU WATCHED THE INITIAL VIDEO. Although given current travel habits practiced by The Young this doesn’t appear to be something that bothers them, so, basically, I should shut up and accept that I am old and don’t understand anything anymore.
  • Eyemead: Thanks to my friend Josh for sharing this with me – Eyemead is…Jesus, you know how I occasionally wang on about the fact that there are several million words of me on the web, blah blah blah? Well Eyemead is the home to ‘69 hand-coded websites by John Palmer’, started in 1998, which comprises “2,673 htm files and 6,206 images, totaling 12.92 million words and 268 Mb.” I MEAN, FCUKING HELL. This is, I think, no longer being updated – the last entries date from 2016 – but…this is SO MUCH WORK, on everything from oak trees to making haybales, Sherwood Forest to the Anapurna Circuit in Nepal…I love the fact that this exists, and I love the fact that John Palmer spent nearly 20 years building all of this stuff and that it is STILL THERE. I honestly believe – and, actually, as I type this, I realise I actually DO believe this, very firmly – that Governments ought to consider a certain personal hosting budget as a birthright, for anyone to create and host and maintain projects, and that this should extend to their posthumous preservation, because THIS IS CULTURE, however small and seemingly-marginal and frivolous it may seem, and the thought of all of this sort of thing one day vanishing into bits is…distressing to me, turns out.
  • Amazon Kitchen: This is a YouTube channel promoting some fancy brand of knife or another, but the reason I am including it here is because its promos are basically lavishly-produced, vaguely-ASMR-ish cooking videos which almost EXACTLY mimic the very specific aesthetic of a specific corner of the Meta algorithm which was stalking me a few years back – there was a period of about a year or so when on the rare occasions I opened Facebook I would be confronted with an endless stream of videos of LARGE MEN, mostly bearded and often topless, cooking in outdoor settings over open flames, mostly MEAT (obviously), using lavishly-oversharpened and outsize knives. Why? NO IDEA (I am 11 stone damp and have never, ever been able to grow adequate facial hair, just so’s you know). Anyway, these videos are basically like that and I’m linking them here mainly out of some sort of weird sort of algonostalgia, which now I come to think of it is…weird. Is this a thing? Has anyone else felt like they miss an algorithm they’re no longer exposed to? Am I having some sort of nervous breakdown?
  • The Missouri Marmite Museum: I don’t mean to be unfair to the state of Missouri, but I’ve never been presented with a compelling reason to visit it before (actually, speaking of being mean to States, it’s always interesting (to me at least) to ask Americans ‘if you could disappear ONE state – like, it would totally cease to exist immediately – which would you disappear?’; it’s astonishing how often the answer is ‘one of the Dakotas, maybe both’) – NOW though it’s all different. THEY HAVE A MARMITE MUSEUM! Ok, this is a terrible webpage – it’s literally just some information – but I was SO heartened to find this slightly-inexplicable piece of the UK in the US. “The Missouri Marmite Museum celebrates the world’s most famous love-it/hate-it item: a yeast extract made from the dregs found at the bottom of British beer barrels, and sold in adorable brown glass jars. The museum’s collection began with one metal-top jar purchased in 1974; today the collection is a broad spectrum of plastic-top jars, toy trucks, cookbooks, stuffed animals, thimbles, toast racks, advertisements, and wearing apparel: socks, t-shirts, aprons, and sweatshirts.   Parts of the collection come from India, New Zealand, South Africa, Australia, England, Sri Lanka, Canada, and Hong Kong – with the oldest item (1930’s) having been excavated from a rubbish dump in Wales. The Missouri Marmite Museum, located in Valley Park, Missouri, is open by appointment only.” I mean, that feels almost like it merits a roadtrip.
  • The Coney Island History Project: Sorry, there’s a lot of Americana this week, turns out – still, this is a really interesting website collating photos and information about the history of the Coney Island fairground in New York and, best of all, oral histories with locals about their memories of the place – I’ve only skimmed this, but there are some great stories in here which are worth exploring imho (via Blort).
  • The Puppets Co-Op: OH THIS IS FUN! Would YOU like to get into making puppets? Would you like a bunch of guides on how to do so, from small puppets to frankly-terrifyingly-large ones? Would you like an incredible trove of information about puppets and puppetry, all presented in an adorably-scratchy style that I genuinely adore? OH GOOD! Also there’s a section on the site about ‘puppet libraries’ where you can RENT OUT PUPPETS, which sounds like quite a fun thing to do on a rainy afternoon if you ask me.
  • Musiq Is: I *think* that this is another site that has basically been spun up by AI, like some of the ones I featured last week, but I can’t be wholly certain – either way, it’s a fun series of toys/games designed to test your musical ability – so you’re tasked to maintain a series of BPMs, for example, or identifying notes of a certain pitch. Fun, although possibly less so if, like me, you’re borderline tone-deaf.
  • Handcheck: Fun, pointless but also sort-of a cool proof-of-concept – the site just asks you to make and hold a series of hand gestures which it uses your webcam to track and verify…ok, so the payoff is a touch underwhelming, but there’s obviously quite a lot of uses for this; I quite like its potential as a non-traditional captcha for example, but there’s also a very childish part of me that quite wants to make a website to which access is locked until visitors make the ‘Loser’ sign on their foreheads.
  • The Current Time In Morse Code: I mean, that is literally what this is, I don’t really know what else I’m meant to say about it other than that part of me would really like one of these on a very big, railway station-style clacker board (yes, I know that that’s not the technical name for them but it escapes me right now).
  • Realbird Fakebird: A FUN NEW DAILY GAME! Which is nothing like, and doesn’t want to be anything like, Wordle! Actually I don’t think this is new at all, just new to me (so slow, so superannuated) – anyway, the premise is that each day you’re presented with seven things which you have to characterise as ‘X’ or ‘not-X’ – so today for example it’s ‘which of these were real, branded pinball machines?’. This takes literally 30s and is…light, frivolous, pointless fun! It still exists! Just!
  • The Visible Zorker: OK, this is…VERY, very geeky, but also quite wonderful in its own way. Zork, in case you don’t know (but if you’re reading this I have a creeping suspicion that you probably do), was one of (if not THE) original text adventures from the 80s; in this version, you can play the whole game but ALSO see the code as you play, so you can literally SEE how the sausage is making itself as you eat it (so to speak – wow, that was a really horrible analogy, sorry about that). Obviously if you’re a code person then this will speak to you far more than it did to me, but as someone resolutely non-technical it’s actually a really helpful and useful way to get my head around some of the ‘how does software actually work?’ questions that occasionally flit around my head in search of an answer (you can read more about the project here if you’re curious).
  • Sebastian’s Quest: A cute little Pico-8 browsergame in which you play a mouse. There is cheese. This is VERY ill-explained, but you basically have to make your way from screen-to-screen, pushing the blocks around to make a path for yourself…except you will quickly realise that there are wrinkles to the rules, and that you will have to work those wrinkles out for yourself. This is more fun than I expected it to be, though you will have to think a *little* bit.
  • St Blamensir: Finally this week, something a bit lovely which I don’t want to explain too much. From the creator’s blurb: “this is my personal interactive worldbuilding project hosted on neocities which incidentally also feeds my medieval hyperfixation. It is everchanging and I have a lot more stuff planned for it.” Do you like manuscripts and marginalia? Did you enjoy the visual stylings of Pentiment? I think you’ll enjoy this, then.

By Elif Özen

THIS WEEK’S FINAL MIX IS BY BOBBY MYSEH AND IT IS TWO HOURS OF GORGEOUS, VAGUELY-80s LOUNGECORE! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Dogs Divide by Zero: THANKYOU to reader Cameron McCormic who sent this to me along with the message “Everything starts with pen/brush marker/water colour on paper. Sometime I surprise myself.” This Tumblr collects his abstract sketches which are simultaneously VERY kaleidoscopic and also insanely-redolent of a particular 1970s visual style that I can’t for the life of me name or place. I like these a lot.
  • Gap Playlists: Via Simon from Unspun Heroes comes this sadly-defunct but still-great Tumblr featuring links to music that used to be played in Gap shops in the 90s and early-00s, alongside images from the period and links to playlists of the era-appropriate tracks. This is some EXCELLENT musical (and visual) nostalgia, although it did also remind me of the tedious stranglehold Gap had on mainstream daywear for a decade or more.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Aim Not Here: AI video (sorry) depicting a few nice corners of latent space – as with the more interesting projects of this sort, there’s a very clear aesthetic and vibe to these which, whilst obviously the product of The Machine, are stylistically-distinct enough to make them interesting to my mind; I rather like the ‘weird Hunterian Museum’ vibe of a lot of the stuff in here.
  • MD Foodie Boyz: I post this link with NO INTENDED SHADE WHATSOEVER, but with the following comments: 1) this is the Insta feed of a podcast (I know, I know) in which a bunch of ACTUAL, LITERAL CHILDREN (‘tweens’, if I’m being generous) talk about fast food and snacks; 2) the podcast has a LOGO. I appreciate the world is very different now to THE DISTANT PAST in which I was this age, but fcuk me the degree of media sophistication at play from the kids here is impressive (if you assume that this isn’t being adult-managed, which I am going to do); 3) I have tried listening to this. WHO IS LISTENING TO THIS? The inanity – no shade! I am sure they are nice kids! I am very much not the target audience! – is astounding. WHO WANTS TO LISTEN TO THREE NOT-HUGELY-ARTICULATE 12 YEAR OLDS TALK ABOUT CHIPS??? I don’t know man, I don’t see the ‘children as pillars of the creator economy’ thing as a necessarily Good Vibe, but I suppose this is what the Rizzler has wrought and so, well, here we are.
  • Marion Cumpa: An Insta feed posting what I might be tempted to call ‘erotica’ were that not such a fundamentally-awful word, there’s some photography on here but the reason I’m posting the link is because of the illustrations which I think are EXCELLENT and several of which I would pay actual cashmoneyfor should such an opportunity present itself.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Oldham: Another reminder of the importance of local journalism and why it’s vital to fund it wherever possible – this is an excellent piece of reporting by Joshi Hermann at the Manchester Mill, explaining clearly and methodically the background to the current resurrection of panics around ‘grooming gangs’ in Oldham, which does an excellent job at demonstrating that the issue is complex, multilayered and has been investigated multiply and at length, regardless of what specific, self-interested actors may currently wish people to believe. More than anything this shows that stories like this are complex, and often, at heart, slow and boring – investigations into procedures and processes and the past necessarily take time and do not necessarily provide conveniently-packaged answers or solutions, however much the nature of the crimes in question might induce one to wish they did. It’s also indicative of the degree to which people have been trying to make this story all about them for years, even before That Fcuking Man decided to opine, and how, even after years of being across the issue, it’s still hard for even the most-informed to have a clear picture of what happened, and how that is not for want of trying. Seriously, this is EXCELLENT journalism of the sort you see all too rarely these days.
  • The New Tech Right: I absolutely adored this essay by Jasmine Sun – ok, in part because it articulated lots of things I already think – about the current wave of right-wing thinking currently sweeping the Valley (although one might argue, as she does and others have done, that a better framing is accel/decel rather than left/right), what it stems from, and, per Doctorow’s point in The Well which I referenced last week, how coalitions are the spirit of the new age, and how people who don’t necessarily agree with the general vibe might consider working around it. In particular I adored the ‘In/Out’ list, which felt not only INSANELY on-point but also an excellent articulation of my current BIG THESIS, to whit ‘2025 is basically going to feel like the 1980s, but compressed into a single year’.
  • What The Fcuk Are We Doing Anymore?: One for the writers – LOL! IT WILL MAKE YOU SO DEPRESSED! – in which the reliably-excellent Kate Wagner goes long on the general sense of malaise felt amongst people who in an ideal world would like to exchange the writing of words for money, particularly people who find themselves (in NA, at least) on the political / social left. This is a long excerpt, but it’s worth reproducing as I think it gives a good overview of the central arguments: “Part of my ambient madness comes from what I see as an ever-emerging truth: there is increasingly nowhere to run to for stability or protection, especially political and legal protection, in the world of letters. This, coupled with the fact that social media has, in effect, become a kind of extrajudicial kangaroo court whose verdicts have dire consequences including for employment, does not bode well. While there remains a healthy culture of left-wing magazine writing, many of the old bulwarks (especially large newspapers) have either caved to power — such as the case with censorship or silence on Palestine — or have caved to the mob and seek only to frantically pander to a populism that isn’t even real because the internet has scattered us into algorithmic cesspits that are becoming more and more difficult to climb out of. (My own parents are on a completely different internet from me and nothing I produce would ever or has ever reached them “organically.”) And this is before we get into things like ensh1ttification, literary cultural decline writ large and what AI slop promises to do with the publishing industry. These developments, unfortunately, are a long time coming. For the last twenty or so years, the need to see internet number go up has destroyed countless literary lives, not to mention things like style and form, whether in terms of clickbaitiness in the Millennial mode or scandalous self-exploitative virality or through being made so afraid of backlash that one undermines one’s own argument, hands the keys over de facto to one’s enemies, writes oneself into a hole.”
  • Another ‘Where We Are Now With AI’ Piece: Ethan Mollick again, giving another ‘where we are RIGHT NOW’ update on the AI landscape, particularly in the context of the next AGI hypetrain slowly picking up speed (authorial opinion: AGI is bullsh1t and anyone promoting its imminent arrival is attempting to sell you something (or fleece investors)) – his point, once again, is one which I keep on making and which I found myself repeatedly returning to during the INJECT IT INTO OUR VEINS SIR KEIR!!!!! announcement on the UK’s AI strategy on Monday – to whit, it is astonishing how little anyone understands what you can CURRENTLY do with this stuff, and without that understanding I don’t think you can have sensible conversations about the future of it, and certainly not at the level of policy. Also, from a purely UK perspective, the habit of using political correspondents to ask questions on tech announcements really boils my p1ss and should stop ffs.
  • What Is Going To Happen To Search Very Very Soon: Look, I have written about this EXTENSIVELY over the past year so, presuming you actually read what I write and then don’t dismiss it out of hand as, well, b0llocks, you probably already know most of what’s in here – if not, though, this is a useful companion to that Reddit Answers link all the way back up there which explains, neatly, all the reasons why any businesses built on ‘search’ as a thing might be, well, fcuked beyond all recognition.
  • Trouble Transitioning: A superb essay by Adam Tooze in the LRB, ostensibly reviewing a history of energy written by one Jean-Baptiste Frezzos but at the same time offering a really well-crafted history of the concept of the ‘energy transition’, alongside a series of explanations as to why thinking of it as a phase transition is in and of itself potentially-unhelpful. This is a very good, inevitably-sobering piece which lays down an awful lot of rather…chilling (lol the irony!) facts about our current carbon emissions and what we might need to do about them, the answer to which is, basically, ‘completely change the way we behave and interrelate as a species’ so, er, GOOD ONE! I met someone this week who works for the Carbon Trust and who was…let’s say ‘less than bullish’ about things, in case you wanted An Update From The Coalface (again, lol!).
  • The Augmented City: OK, full disclosure, this is a 140-page document and I have at best skimmed it – that said, it’s a PROPER ACADEMIC THING from Cornell University and it is a really interesting central question, specifically ‘how might we think about AR/mixed reality data projects in the context of the urban environment, what benefits and disbenefits might the tech bring to public spaces, how might one consider regulating the use of this stuff, how can communities harness it for hyperlocal benefit…seriously, there looks to be some really interesting thinking in here and it’s a nice alternative to the ‘smart city’ bullsh1t that has siphoned up SO MUCH academic urbanist money in the past decade or so. I can think of a dozen brands off the top of my head who ought to be thinking at least a bit about this stuff.
  • The Neil Gaiman Stuff: So I didn’t link to any of the allegations previously because, well, it was a series of podcasts, but this longread by New York Magazine is…well, look, if you’re reasonably online and you have any interest in this stuff then you will almost certainly have read it, but I am aware that there are some…less-online people among the Curios readership (this strikes me as frankly mental – like, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE? – but obviously you’re very welcome) and as such they might not have seen it yet. This is a pretty unpleasant read, and it’s worth noting that it contains reasonably-explicit descriptions of what sounds very much like abuse, assault and a bunch of other things too – I’m linking to it because I think it’s quite important to share these things if people are brave enough to speak about them, and also because it’s wearily, weirdly familiar.
  • 69 Theses: Predictions and Lessons For Crypto in 2025: To be clear, I have no personal interest in crypto beyond the general ‘wtaf this is so weird’ stuff I put in here, but I found this list FASCINATING – this is very much from a different part of the web to the one I inhabit, the part where people still diamond hand and hodl like it’s 2020, and where sh1tcoins and memecoins and AI-juiced markets are real things rather than, well, just a collection of very silly-sounding phrases. I think I understood about…OK, being charitable I’d say about 65% of this, but it is DIZZYING, like a whole parallel futurenow being built somewhere over there. This might all be bullsh1t – and I have a fairly strong belief that 90-ish per cent of it is – but it is SUCH AND INCREDIBLY WEIRD SCIFI FUTURE! Your appetite for this will depend entirely on your tolerance for sentences like this one: “There are now two categories of memecoins: A) Legacy memecoins (ie $PEPE, $WIF, $BONK, $DOGE, etc.); and B) Sentient memecoins (ie $GOAT, $LUNA, $KWEEN). One group relies on humans to spread its gospel; the other relies on machines which do not eat, sleep or urinate from biological bladders. Legacy coins must morph into sentient memecoins or retreat from relevance entirely.” I TOLD YOU IT WAS ODD.
  • Hitachi and the Magic Wand: A bit of a slight story, this one, but I was, er, tickled by the revelation that Hitachi has basically franchised out the Magic Wand brand because it was too embarrassed to have a sex toy in its product portfolio.
  • At The Thistle: Dani Garavelli, again in the LRB, writes about the newly-opened Thistle Centre in Glasgow, where the city’s drug addicts are able to go and safely inject in a clean, secure environment – while I appreciate not everyone is comfortable with the idea of the state effectively going ‘yeah, go ahead, shoot up, no bother mate’, the piece does a good job of explaining the rationale behind the Centre’s existence and the hope that people using it will eventually develop relationships with the staff that will see them seek treatment over time. I find this a fascinating area of policy, particularly having moved back to South London last year and currently seeing a frankly-dispiriting number of skagheads doing the ‘need/beg/score/gouch’ circuit on the streets of Oval.
  • AI, The Old and Singapore: I found this almost-unbearably affecting, but in general it’s a pretty straight telling of how the elderly care sector in Singapore is increasingly integrating robotics and AI into its services – residents are apparently enthused by their new electronic companions, which is great, but it’s impossible to shake the feeling of their being something unutterably sad about hundreds, thousands, millions of people living out their last days alone but for a digital overseer emoting ‘care’ at them. Still, growth industry for anyone looking for a career pivot!
  • Britain’s Car Market Is Fcuked: I don’t drive, I have had a single driving lesson in my entire life (I was 20, I think, and realised that…I simply didn’t care, and so stopped – on reflection, this was to prove a troubling indicator of the future direction of significant portions of my life) and therefore cars and driving and the general concept of ‘the motorway’ are strange and wild to me, esoteric like the magic of the Wookey Hole Witch. Still, despite my near-total ignorance of motoring and associated issues, this is a really interesting essay explaining exactly how much more expensive buying a new car (any car, including electric) has become – which, you might argue, is not necessarily a bad thing but which is…quite inconvenient in a country still very much designed for the fcuking things. There’s an interesting point at the end of the piece about how strategies employed by previous governments have led to a position that has actively harmed our chances of meeting the targets set by the same governments which, well, WHODATHUNKIT?!
  • Century Scale Storage: This is VERY long, but I promise it is super-interesting – the Harvard Law Review goes DEEP on digital storage and the challenges of preserving information for the long-term, and, really, this kept me interested all the way through in a way I wasn’t expecting – also, if there is ANY part of your work or life that requires you to think about long-term storage or archiving of anything then this is probably hugely-useful.
  • Kofte, Two Ways: Typically-brilliant food writing in Vittles – here Melek Erdal writes about making İçli Köfte (as they explain in the piece, that’s what kibbe ended up as when they reached Turkey). This is an excellent essay up-top about modern diasporic living and the way food travels and ‘authenticity’, followed by two recipes for the kofte, one authentic and one very much not, and the writing throughout is joyful – the tone is both super-London and (for all I know of it) also super-diasporic and it sounds like my city.
  • My Machine and Me: ‘Glance Back’ is an art project by Maya Man which I featured here in…oh God, nearly five years ago, time travel back there should you wish, and which takes a photo of you from your webcam each day, with minimal warning, asking you to share what you are thinking about the moment it’s taken; these then become an archive of your thoughts and moods as you sit ENGAGING WITH THE MACHINE. This essay by Greta Rainbow is about her experience spending a year with the app and what it’s like looking back at twelve months of pictures of your face when each is tied to a written memory, and what that means (if anything) about our relationship with screens and the time we spend staring at them, and I like it very much.
  • Feeding The Machine: This is a profile of Trisha Paytas, who I think I have been aware of for about a decade now and who, I think, might be one of the most thoroughly modern human beings alive today (see also, depressingly: The Paul Brothers, Caroline Calloway, MrBeast, Jake Humphrey). WHAT an incredible human being (I mean that in the most literal of senses).
  • Bad Beef: A history of the rap beef, starting way back in the 80s with the ‘Roxane Wars’ and all the way through to the terminal Biggie-Tupac feud of the 90s – this is fascinating, and a nice piece of context to Drake continuing to embarrass himself all over the courts and media this week (it really is astonishing how some people, regardless of wealth and success and trappings, will simply never, ever be able to be cool – honestly, I feel we have enough very high-profile examples of this phenomenon for someone to do a proper study of it now, with Drake and That Fcuking Man as the two core case studies).
  • Five Star Ratings: Or, ‘how noone in Japan would ever give a five star review of anywhere, ever’. I love this so so much – “At a soba shop near my house, low stars are given for the colour of the tempura (black), the smell (ammonia) and the presence of ashtrays (one for each table). On Tabelog, a Japanese Yelp for restaurants, if I see 3.49 stars, it gives me a little thrill. A typical review might read something like, ‘Food was super delicious. Perfect night. The server had messy hair. 2 stars.’ It’s why Shake Shack has 4.5 stars on Google and the best udon you’ve ever had in your life has 3.8: tourists love grade inflation.”
  • The Ghost Coat: Our last longread of the week is by Catherine Lacey in Granta – this is superbly-written, and I was basically sucked in by this paragraph and I hope you will be too: “And while it is true that a person is always ignorant of the particular future moving toward her person, there will certainly be moments when this truth is truer than others, and such was the case as I spent several days calling all the friends who’d visited my home in the prior weeks and months to discern whether the coat was theirs; the precarity of my present was becoming truer and truer, darker and darker, yet entirely out of view. And though this story ends peacefully, I haven’t degraded that peace by entrapping it here. The moviegoer is best dropped some distance from a story’s true end, and told to walk the last mile alone.”

By Tim Barr

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 10/01/25

Reading Time: 35 minutes

New year, new worries, same old Web Curios! Even in the maelstrom of moderately-unsettling uncertainty that is Q2 of the 21st Century, rest assured that I am once again here to greet you with open arms, a tear-streaked face and a hug that you will initially find welcoming but will, as it continues without showing signs of stopping, begin to make you feel uncomfortably like I am holding onto you for dear life lest I otherwise slip away into nothingness.

You’ve missed this, I know you have, don’t make that face.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and it’s ok if you make ‘unsubscribing from this sh1t’ one of your new year’s resolutions, I will never, ever know.

By Noelia Towers

A GOOD START TO THE YEAR, MUSICALLY AT LEAST, AS SADEAGLE HAS ONCE AGAIN EMERGED FROM A CORNISH CAVE WITH A COUPLE OF HOURS OF CRACKING TUNES FROM HIS COLLECTION! 

THE SECTION WHICH  ODDLY ALREADY FEELS LIKE THIS YEAR HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR APPROXIMATELY THREE DECADES, PT.1:  

  • Simulation Clicker: Our first link of 2025 is one which, if you’re a certain type of online person, you will probably seen already – congratulations to Curios favourite Neal Agarwal who’s snagged the coveted (not in fact coveted, except maybe in some VERY niche circles) ‘first viral link of the year’ slot with this EXCELLENT clicker game. Ordinarily I chuck the games at the end of the main links, but I’m putting this one up front because a) it’s very good, and deserves to be looked at even at people who normally have better things to do than waste 30m on what, objectively, is an entirely-pointless exercise in ‘watching the number go up; and b) because it is SATIRE, and good satire at that, about THE FCUKING DIGITAL WORLD WE LIVE IN and what we are doing to ourselves with it and why. The premise is , as with all clicker games, simple – you need to accumulate clicks (do not ask why, for that way madness lies). The more clicks you accumulate, the more you can automate said click accumulation, until you have a veritable factory production line of systems all automatically clicking for you – but, in this instance, every new tier of automated clicking ALSO unlocks a new level of ‘digital stimulation’, drawn from an increasingly-ridiculous and pleasingly-imaginative selection of modern-day online junk trops, from slime ASMR videos to STONKS trading  to lofibeats radio…how much stimulation can YOU take before it all becomes too much? Will you flake out, or will the promise of MOAR CLICKS keep you glued to the screen til your dopamine receptors fry out entirely? Honestly, there was a certain point beyond which playing this was almost physically painful for me – and I know that that doesn’t make it SOUND like something you should experience, but, I promise, it’s exactly why you should (WARNING: this will make your laptop sound VERY emphysemic, but it’s probably fine. Probably). BONUS FUN LINKS: if you’d like to experience this but don’t want to spend the time, you can find some code in this Reddit thread which will set up autoclicking in the browser window so you can speedrun the whole thing. Oh, and Andy found a standalone version of the STONKS game which is weirdly addictive just to play on its own, should you fancy wasting some more time.
  • Subway Stories: A beautiful bit of urban storytelling, this site, found by Giuseppe Sollazzo – this is SO nicely-made, and a really clever way of using mass-scale passenger data to tell the story of the city in non-obtrusive and non-creepy-feeling fashion. Per the blurb, “Every year, New Yorkers take more than a billion trips on the subway. Using data from the MTA, we mapped out how riders flow between stations at every hour. Each story explores a slice of city life. Scroll down to keep reading, or click the horizontal lines on the left to jump between stories. The captions at the bottom explain what’s on the map for each page. Click the info (ℹ) icon at the top right for more details.” So as you scroll you’ll get a bunch of different little vignettes about different parts of the city, explaining why certain stations see specific traffic at certain times of day or the year, why it comes from specific places, where people are going and what they are doing…it paints pictures of the characters of neighbourhoods, from the differences between the Chinatowns to where the late-night party kids end up before getting the dawn subways back out to suburbia…all of city life is here and, as ever, I would LOVE to see a version of this doing a similar job for London. Does API data exist for station footfall over time per station? Because, if so, one of you could say thankyou to me for all these years of ceaseless, uncomplaining (well, ish) service in a very kind and specific way.
  • Build Websites With AI: I appreciate some of you will be displeased at the fact that we’re into a whole new year and I appear to still be banging on about AI stuff – but, well, tough, Cnut. And anyway, this is GOOD AI (sort-of), not ‘stealing artists work’ but instead ‘letting anyone make a website really, really easily, even if they can’t code for sh1t’. Obviously these aren’t exactly fancy websites – you’re not going to be building a business off this stuff, at least not yet – but there are some interesting examples on the homepage of the sorts of things that people have been spinning up and it feels like we’re on the cusp of this stuff getting…quite good? Here for example’s a little game someone’s build which asks you to identify one of four notes from a lineup – ok, fine, it’s hardly Balatro but, well, IT IS MADE USING THE MACHINE! THAT IS QUITE AMAZING! Or this one, which generates a bunny avatar for you on demand (and which would 100% have been an NFT scam 4 years ago, oh how times change!)! Basically I think that things like this are probably just about worth playing around with now in a way that they probably weren’t a year or so ago, and we’re getting increasingly close to some interestingly-creative options in development opening up to people with no specific technical skills whatsoever.
  • A Personal Portfolio in Minecraft: Ok, it’s not *technically* actually in Minecraft, it’s just designed to look that way, but this website, but one Andrew Woan, is LOVELY – it’s his small personal portfolio site which I think is intended more as a proof-of-concept than anything more fully fledged, and while it’s not hugely-interactive I found the interface and the animation as you scroll and the general look, feel and *vibe* of the whole thing is just gorgeous and I would generally like more sites to do this sort of thing please thankyou.
  • Meawio: This really is VERY silly, but, well, it’s January and it’s incredibly dark and cold, both literally and metaphorically, so I feel reasonably-OK about this edition of Curios being light on roughage. Have you ever wondered what it would be like to play Super Mario Brothers, or indeed a selection of other classic NES titles, in your browser, with all the sound effects replaced by the sound of cats? No, of course you wouldn’t, that sounds weird and pointless and a bit sh1t – AND YET IT EXISTS! You can also upload your own sound sample to trigger each time Mario kills a Koopa, say, which for those of you with a friend with an HILARIOUS CATCHPHRASE or similar could I am sure lead to some high comedy. But, er, keep it to yourselves, eh?
  • The Bruv Party: Oh, was that TOO silly for you? TOO frivolous? FINE, then, watch now as I apply the patented huge Curios thematic handbrake as we pivot hard to THE NEW FASCISM! Fascism that writes in crayon, true, but, well, fascism nonetheless. Amongst all the sound and fury of the *checks calendar* dear God FIRST FCUKING WEEK of the political chat of 2025 you’d be forgiven for not noticing a pronouncement from Andrew ‘Top G, Tiny Penis’ Tate that he had HAD ENOUGH of Britain being ruined by communists (or something; it’s hard to tell) and that he was so disgusted by the exploitation of young women and girls by criminal gangs that he was taking time out from, er, being investigated on counts of human trafficking and ‘sexual misconduct’ to throw his hat into the political ring. And lo! So it came to pass that the BRUV Party was apparently born (this is not a political party, to be clear, it is a thinly-disguised top-of-funnel marketing effort for Tate’s fraudulent ‘hustler’s university’ grift). BRUV obviously stands for ‘Britain Restoring Underlying Values’ (I know, I know, and it gets less coherent from this point onwards!), and the homepage links you to Tate’s ‘values’ (a page on the aforementioned ‘hustler’s university’) and to the party ‘manifesto’. Look, I know you don’t want to give this man the oxygen of publicity and, mostly, neither do I, but it really is worth downloading the document and having a read because FCUKING HELL. It looks and reads like it was LLM’d into existence in about an hour (and it quite possibly was), from the AI-generated images (there’s something almost poignant about the slide extolling the importance of education accompanied by a machine-created picture of a teacher at a board reading “ENTREPRENULSOIP”) to the…unsophisticated prose, but, equally, if you bother to actually read what the slides are saying then it’s…fcuk, it really is Fisher Price Fash in every single way possible. It’s a joke, but it’s not really a very funny one – I don’t think that this is going to go anywhere beyond doing a bit of work to swell the Tate empire’s mailing list, but it’s also not impossible that Elon will decide that THIS is the UK political force worthy of his cash at which point I am fcuking it all off and moving to Italy because even Meloni would be better than that.
  • The Plastic List: I can’t imagine that you need additional reasons to feel mildly uncertain and anxious about the future here in twentytwentyfive, but here’s one anyway! Both really interesting and deeply unsettling, this data is the culmination of a six month investigation in the US into the amount of chemicals found in everyday foods in the US. What was meant as a quick fortnight’s experiment expanded into a much wider project: “We formed a team of four people, learned how this kind of chemical testing is performed, called more than 100 labs to find one that had the experience, quality standards, and turnaround time that we needed, collected hundreds of samples, shipped them, had them tested, painstakingly validated the results, and prepared them to share with you. Over time our effort expanded to nearly 300 food products. It took half a year and cost about $500,000.” The result is this dataset, presented in admittedly-unattractive tabular website format but which lets you look at and sort the numbers in all sorts of ways. The upshot? “We detected plastic chemicals in 86% of the foods we tested.” HOW IS THERE SO MUCH PLASTIC IN US BABY FOOD???
  • Websites From Hell: There’s no record of this in the archive, although it looks suspiciously-familiar – I think this might have been featured MANY years ago, like 10+, which feels uncertain and long-ago enough for me to give it a pass. You want a collection of really horribly-designed websites collected in one place? You do? HUZZAH! I almost just got stuck on this one reminding myself of the sorts of things it features and becoming momentarily-fascinated by who or what the REBEKAHS OF MAINE are (seemingly some sort of women’s Masonic-adjacent WASP-ish community group, I think? But…are they all called Rebekah? AND IF NOT WHY THE NAME???), and if you’re a particular type of person (or if you are practising some very intense work-avoidance this afternoon) then you could lose yourself for quite some time in here.
  • Outdraw: Ok, fine, this is a link to a page about a game that isn’t technically out yet, BUT! I am linking to it because it’s SUCH a cool idea, and because I played a demo at London’s Now Play This festival last year and really enjoyed it, and would quite like the final version to find a wider audience. Outdraw is a clever, fun game making smart use of AI – it’s basically Pictionary, where the goal is to draw something that the human players can identify but which fools the machine – so your job is to draw something which communicates on a level which humans can comprehend but which doesn’t make ‘sense’ in a way LLMs can comprehend. Honestly, this is SUCH a smart idea, and exactly the sort of creative use of The Machine that I am disappointed we’ve not seen more of in the past year or so – this is your regular plea to remember that you can do SO MUCH MORE than ‘remix your brand assets with DALL-E’ ffs.
  • My Stupid Friend: A Chrome extension which does one thing and one thing only – in this instance, replacing every instance it find of the words ‘ChatGPT’ with ‘my stupid friend’ – so ‘I asked ChatGPT’ becomes the far more accurate and pleasing ‘I asked my stupid friend’. LAUGH AS THE MACHINES TAKE YOUR JOBS, HUMANS, LAUGH ALL THE WAY TO THE BENEFITS OFF…oh, no, hang on, they shut all those didn’t they.
  • The Virtual Tea Towel Museum: Yeah, I know, I know, TEA TOWELS ARE DULL. That said, everyone has them (weirdly, one of those things that in my experience even the most appallingly-studenty single men will own teatowels – why is that? Some sort of rock bottom below which even people who will occasionally sleep on an unmade bed won’t sink below?) and for some reason someone started this website celebrating the things during (I think) lockdown – it was abandoned in May 2021, suggesting it was the product of claustrophobia-induced insanity rather than because of its creator’s deep and abiding fascination with the subject matter. Still, I am glad it exists, and there are some genuinely LOVELY tea towels on there should you be in the market for such things (the best tea towel in the world, by the way, is this one).
  • The Public Domain Image Archive: Another tool in the slow, unwinnable fight against every online image one day becoming the product of AI, this is a great resource – “The Public Domain Image Archive (PDIA) — brought to you by The Public Domain Review (PDR) — is a curated collection of more than 10,000 out-of-copyright historical images, free for all to explore and reuse. Our aim is to offer a platform that will serve both as a practical resource and a place to simply wander — an ever-growing portal to discover more than 2000 years of visual culture. A valuable image archive in its own right, offering hand-picked highlights from hundreds of galleries, libraries, archives, and museums, the PDIA also functions as a database of images featured in the PDR, offering an image-first approach to exploring the project’s content.” Can one of you please find a way of using this in your corporate comms this year, please?
  • A Culture Finder for Rome: Fcuk, I can’t tell you how much I wish this had existed when I lived in the city – still, for the few of you who I know live there and read this, or for those of you intending to visit, this is a GREAT resource; a live-ish map of ALL the cultural stuff happening in the city, from interesting bars with attached galleries or music scenes to contemporary art popups, this is all the stuff that you never really see or hear about what with all the (admittedly insane) INCREDIBLY OLD CULTURE sucking the oxygen from anything new. Seriously, worth saving this for next time you visit the city so you can do something that isn’t redolent of several thousand years of death for a change.
  • Dailies by Matthew Carrozo: I have been Internet Friends with Matthew Carrozo for what feels like about 15 years, despite I don’t think ever having met the man – still, he seems nice! Anyway, last year he started forcing himself to make a short piece of video each day, and these have been slowly being uploaded to a YouTube channel; the link here takes you to a Page on his website which hosts some of the videos, and you can watch a year’s worth as a playlist and…look, I honestly have less than no time for video art as a rule, but there’s something REALLY lovely about these (I have now watched a couple of dozen on them) – they would benefit from being on a big screen, I think, just sort of looping, ambiently, but he’s got a real eye for a shot and there’s something pleasingly-retro about some of the angles and shots he employs across the various shorts. I really like these, you might too.
  • Time Wizards: Sort-of funny, sort-of made me want to cry! This is silly, but, equally, it is 100% something that imho you could lift wholesale for the right brand – as ever with stuff like this, KitKat springs to mind but you may have your own ideas. “Give the gift of time to a friend, colleague, loved one, or even yourself (we won’t tell). For just $5, we’ll send 3 very professional looking meeting invitations to their calendar. Then, in the early morning on the day of each call, poof! We cancel the meeting. By holding time on their calendar and (and later relinquishing it), you’ll grant the person who has everything (but time) a microdose of the good life.” On the one hand, a cute, funny little gag! On the other, the harsh reality that ‘just being left alone for a second’ is a genuine gift feels…sharp and unpleasant! I don’t know how to feel anymore!

By Kaoru Ueda (this and the rest of the pics this week from TIH)

I DID NOT EXPECT TO FIND MYSELF RECOMMENDING A FOLK CONCEPT ALBUM BASED ON THE PREMISE ‘WHAT IF ALIENS LANDED IN APPALACHIA AND BACKWOODSPEOPLE MADE MUSIC ABOUT SAID ALIEN LANDINGS?” BUT 2025 IS FULL OF SURPRISES ALREADY AND THIS ALBUM CALLED ‘WHERE THEY LANDED’ IS BY BE/HOLD AND REALLY RATHER GOOD! 

THE SECTION WHICH  ODDLY ALREADY FEELS LIKE THIS YEAR HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR APPROXIMATELY THREE DECADES, PT.2:  

  • Joys of Facebook Marketplace: NGL, linking to Twitter increasingly feels like I’m furtively passing you a wrap of something illicit, muttering something about ‘into the gums, you ain’t seen me, right mate?’ Still, given that people appear to have once again decided that they can’t quite be fcuked to start over again on Bluesky and the MASS EXODUS has slowed somewhat, Twitter continues to be at least somewhat worth looking at, and occasionally it will throw up a gem – like this! Collecting some of the unique and fantastic goods available for purchase on Facebook Marketplace, you know EXACTLY what you are getting here – it’s not big, it’s not funny, but if you attempt to tell me that you don’t find the idea of someone attempting to sell ‘The OG Testicuzzi’ (yes, it is what you think it is) to people in their local area USING THEIR REAL NAME funny then, well, I do not believe you.
  • Princess Etch: Are Etch-A-Sketches still a thing, or is it a relic of a bygone age which for anyone under a certain age will elicit shrugs, blank looks and a plea to STOP TALKING ABOUT THE PAST WE KNOW IT WAS BETTER WITHOUT THE INTERNET? Anway, presuming YOU know what an Etch-A-Sketch is, you may be impressed with the singular skill displayed with the instrument by one ‘Princess Etch’ (I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that that’s not her given name), whose website presents examples of her work and the opportunity to book original artworks made on a kid’s toy from the 80s and then fixed in place by MAGIC (actually chemistry) and mailed to you anywhere in the world. Do YOU want a monochromatic depiction of Van Gogh’s Sunflowers rendered in iron fillings and right-angles? GREAT! As ever with stuff like this, I am torn between thinking ‘I am genuinely thrilled that the web has enabled this person with a very singular and specific talent to make a living from it’ and ‘there is something about the woman’s eyes in all of the shots on that site that makes me think there’s an internal monologue screaming about being trapped in some sort of retro-art purgatory of her own making, as I often am with stuff like this.
  • Particles: A little visual code demo which, for reasons I can’t quite explain, I find pleasing to the point of near-ASMR. I could watch this ALL DAY, honestly, and it’s frankly miraculous that I’ve torn myself away to continue typing this (just think, you almost got away!).
  • DOOM Captcha: Because it’s the law that DOOM must be embedded into every single possible aspect of human life before the heat death of the universe (I just had a fleeting fever-dream of FPS-styled fertility treatments, which suggests last night’s lack of sleep is starting to catch up with me at 844am), here’s a version of the game’s first level which operates as a simple CAPTCHA system – prove you’re a human by shooting three enemies in a tiny on-page embedded version of DOOM. Made VERY difficult by the small window size, which would add a pleasing degree of friction and frustration to, say, logging onto the HMRC website (lol like it needs more). BONUS DOOM: this is a winning little bit of comedy-modding in which Filippo Meozzi has created a version of the game where, rather than shooting Cacodemons with a shotgun you’re instead sipping a glass of mediocre red wine as you stroll around a gallery opening, wandering the corridors and perusing the works (the works, by the way, drawn from th actual, digitised collection of the NY Met). I really enjoyed this, partly because it’s having a slightly-Proustian effect on me and I’m flashing back quite hard to all the bad wine I ‘enjoyed’ at Thursday night openings between 2005-10ish and partly because it’s just a nice use of the digitised collection.
  • Colourspace: Er, look, I don’t really understand what’s going on here – as far as I can tell its simply a way of displaying the colour spectrum, but it’s entirely possible I’m missing something deeply significant about why it’s clever. BUT! Who cares? It looks nice! You can move around it! It’s a CYLINDER OF ALL THE COLOURS! I think you can use it for a bunch of palette picking stuff and things but, honestly, I’m just here for the CYLINDER OF ALL THE COLOURS (although you can in fact read more about the theory behind this visualisation here, which might be of interest to designers or…colour theorists? Is that a thing?). I would quite like to see this as a large-scale projection, fwiw. What’s that? It’s worth ‘nothing’? Oh.
  • Surf: This is an interesting-sounding project which doesn’t *quite* exist yet but which points towards a future where the federated social web has taken off, and we’re all living in a future paradise with infinitely-customisable multi-platform feeds pulling content from a variety of independent-but-interconnected platforms existing as part of the fediverse – which, admittedly, is a bit of a stretch at the moment, but it’s not inconceivable and the ideas presented by Surf certainly seem like an attractive alternative to the feed-based status quo. It helps to click the link and read the blurb yourself, but BASICALLY the idea is that Surf will allow you to create custom feeds on whatever topic you choose, pulling from sources across the fediverse (so, for example, Bluesky and Mastodon and Threads and…YouTube? Sources are a bit unclear) and stipulating search terms and guardrails to keep it tightly-focused; these feeds can then be individually explored by content type (so, by video or images or audio or text) rather than by platform, immediately creating a more coherent sense of the informational ecosystem around a topic…I can 100% see the appeal here, and I think they’re being smart attempting to onboard social ‘curators’ to create initial feeds for them before a proper launch, but I still wonder whether there’s just too much of the stench of geek about the term ‘fediverse’ and we’re going to have to wait until it feels a bit less neckbeardy before any normal people give a fcuk.
  • L’Atelier de Musique: Via former editor Paul comes this YouTube channel which is relatively new, relatively sparsely-populated, but which I think looks GREAT – per the blurb, “Weekly mixes on vinyl that will transport you to different genres, countries, eras, and inspire new discoveries! Welcome to our YouTube channel where we post mixes and tracks on vinyl records! We collect music from different genres and eras, presenting rare compositions by little-known artists to broaden your musical horizons.  We explore rare grooves from around the world on vinyl. Each mix is a new journey into the world of music.” Which, fine, sounds pretty generic, but mix titles so far include “Soviet and Socialistic Grooves from the 60s & 70s” and “Mexican 70s Jazzy Vibes”, which puts this squarely in my area of interest. If you enjoy the Sadeagle mixes I post then you will enjoy this very much I think.
  • HyperEssays: Anyone still feeling that this week’s Curios is a bit lightweight will hopefully EAT THEIR FCUKING WORDS at this link. Do you want a project for 2025? HERE’S YOUR FCUKING PROJECT THEN. “HyperEssays is a project to create a modern and accessible online edition of the Essays of Michel de Montaigne…The Essays is not a single, cohesive book but a collection of short and long pieces on various subjects such as religion, horses, friendship, sleep, law, or suicide, which Montaigne wrote over more than twenty years. His goals for the book and the circumstances under which he worked on it changed over time. The first edition, published in 1580, comprised two books. Eight years later, an updated edition included hundreds of revisions and a new, third book. By the time of his death, in 1592, Montaigne had planned many more changes, which were in­cor­po­rat­ed in the first posthumous edition of 1595. So, while you can read the Essays from beginning to end, starting with Montaigne’s address To the Reader, you can also follow John Cage’s advice and “begin any­where.”” FULL CONFESSION – I have not read the Essays of Montaigne – or at least no more than a handful of them – but a) I think this is an interesting project, and I am slightly in awe at the fact that this is seemingly just one bloke who decided ‘yes, the world needs this and therefore I must create it’; and b) I figure there’s at least one of you who’s the sort of weirdo who likes to set themselves ‘improving challenges’ each year (how…how do you change? How do you get better? Asking for a friend) and, well, this feels like such a challenge.
  • Delics: A selection of caveats before we start here: a) I THINK THIS IS POSSIBLY VERY ILLEGAL; b) if it is not illegal I really, really don’t understand how; c) Web Curios IN NO WAY ENDORSES the sale or purchase of prohibited substances and would like to strongly advise its readers that they ought NOT attempt to purchase anything from this link. Ahem. Now, click the link and try and work out how it is that this website appears to be quite openly offering pharmaceutical-grade cocaine for sale to residents of Canada (and MDMA! And Ket!), in convenient little nasal spray bottles. They only ship to Canada, but, well, CANUCKS FILL YOUR BOOTS (noses) (NB once again Web Curios does not in any way endorse this website or want one of you in Canada to check if it actually works, no siree).
  • Explore a Mayan Temple: Basically this is Google Street View for the Mayan temple at Copan (because, honestly, looking at LA, it doesn’t really feel like we should really be doing frivolous transatlantic flights anymore, does it), which really is very, very cool indeed and quite incredible to wander round, even virtually.
  • The Mills of Britain: So seeing as we’re all agreed that it’s domestic or train-based holidays from hereon in (LOL!), you’re probably thinking ‘but Matt, what sort of travel within the UK could possibly compare to exploring the mysteries of an ancient Mayan temple in the tropics?’ and, well, do I have the link for you! VISIT THE MILLS OF BRITAIN! The link here takes you to a map of all the mills in the country, meaning that you can plan a FASCINATING journey around the country visiting, er, old mills. JUST AS GOOD AS THE MAYAN TEMPLES IN YOUR FACE MEXICO!
  • Tokyo’s Digital Twin: This is, I think, possibly quite interesting – but sadly I can’t speak Japanese at all and so I only really have a pretty rudimentary idea of what’s going on here, What I CAN tell is that this is a detailed 3d map of Tokyo, over which its possible to layer a LOT of different city data to be able to do all sorts of overview analyses of the city and how it works – what I sadly can’t tell you (re the aforementioned inability to read the Japanese alphabet) is what these datasets are, whether any of them are live vs static and all that sort of stuff. BUT I am interested in this sort of thing and the extent to which models like this, coupled with GenAI, might transform urban analysis and social planning and things. Does something similar exist for London?
  • I Have That On Vinyl: A new digital magazine project thing by Michele Catalano, where she’s collecting writing about music and why people love it – the focus is on physical recordings but really this is a home for any writing about the effect that music has on people and the feelings and memories it creates. “A mission statement for I Have That On Vinyl would be simple: a place for people to share their passion for vinyl records, music, and have discussions about both. But I don’t want a mission statement. I don’t have a mission. I have a vision. And that vision is to take my love of music, my respect for physical media, and my desire to spread good music around, and present all of that in one place. Mostly, it is going to be a collective love letter to vinyl and music in general…I want to connect you with people just like you; who love listening to whole albums, who love going to yard sales looking for holy grail records, who know every record store in a 25 mile radius.” This feels like something that some of you will love immoderately.
  • Mikroverlag: Ok, this is VERY niche, but I approve of the specificity and the passion behind it – and, also, it’s a new post-Imperica publishing project from Former Editor Paul! I will reproduce the ‘about’ here in full – if you’re interested in writing something or being involved, drop him a line: “Mikroverlag is an idea to publish new works that cover technology stories from the past few decades, particularly from Europe. Books on, from, and about Silicon Valley are plentiful. It’s easy to find a book covering business models, leaders, or company stories from that area. Silicon Valley’s place in the history of communications technology is assured. But, there are so many additional stories from Europe that are less well-known globally. The concept of Mikroverlag is to cover specific histories related to European technology: its innovations, its people, and also, its failures. Central and Eastern Europe is particularly ripe for untapping as there are many stories of government-led and people-led innovations that are in danger of being lost.That said, the point of Mikroverlag is to cover technology stories from the whole of Europe. We might cover, for example, the development of Minitel in France, or the story of the Sinclair ZX Spectrum clones in Communist-era Czechoslovakia. The first digital computer, the German Z3, might be a future topic, or perhaps a biography of Benoit Mandelbrot. I’m just making these up. This is where you come in.”
  • Riddling: Five clues a day to guess the one-word answer. Partly fun, partly INCREDIBLY IRRITATING due to the specificity of the word selections, your mileage will vary.
  • Catdle: Oh God, this REALLY makes my brain hurt – however, I am aware that there are some people (see my friend Mo, who ever since I first met her in her early-20s has carried around an actual physical book of logic puzzles, like a grandmother) who find stuff like this cracklike in its appeal. A daily puzzle which asks you to solve one of those ‘Alan has five nieces, Susan once went to Clacton, Angelina won’t get in the car with Tony unless Ann is in the back seat – WHO ATE THE LAST SLICE OF CAKE?’ conundra, except the characters involved are cats because it’s the internet. This is clever but sadly my brain doesn’t quite work in this way and so I slid off it pretty quickly – YOU, though, may be different (I hope you are, I wouldn’t wish being me on anyone, honestly).
  • Monopoly, Online, With Strangers: I presume that those of you with families would rather eat your own faces than ever play Monopoly again – does ANYONE enjoy it? Anyone? – but, judging by the fact that this website is seemingly ALWAYS teeming with players, there is a surprisingly-large number of people who like the game enough to play a 2d, minimalist version online with complete strangers. Ok, so it’s unofficial and so the game’s called ‘RichUp’ and the boards all have the wrong names on them, but, clearly, it’s Monopoly. Want to spent an hour or so getting bored and frustrated but with none of the familiar, familial warmth you might benefit from playing with loved ones? GREAT!
  • Dreiblade: This is…surprisingly full-featured for what feels like it started out as a punchline – this is basically ‘what if Beyblade battles but Dreidels?’, and tasks you with playing a selection of dreidel-vs-dreidel matchups against players of increasing skill, alongside a betting mechanic which, I confess, I have totally failed to understand across multiple attempts. Still, this is fun and feels weirdly like a lost NES-era title developed specially as a youth outreach tool by a very rich New York synagogue in the late-80s.
  • Gar Type: Another really, really well-made game for what is, at heart, a single-note gag – what if R-Type but, well, themed around Garfield? This is silly but actually really fun – if not exactly challenging – and the soundtrack in particular fcuking slaps (no, really, it does, it’s SO much better than it needs to be).
  • The Top 10 Webgames of 2024: Last up in this week’s miscellanea, this rundown of the ten best browser games of the past 12 months – a couple of these have been featured in here before, but these are all, generally, GREAT (and the final one, an escape the room number, is EXCELLENT) and, look, you’ve done a WHOLE WEEK of work this year already, sack off the rest of it and play some games, you’ve earned it you special little soldier.

By Zoë Waldman

OUR LAST MIX OF THE FIRST CURIOS OF THE YEAR IS THIS PLEASINGLY-FUNKY SELECTION OF INSTRUMENTALS AND CURIOSITIES COMPILED BY QUIROGA!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Glorious Trash: FINE IT’S NOT A TUMBLR. Fcuk, ok, I might have to kill this section at the end of the month, it does rather feel like the era of the single-serving Tumblog is sadly over (this is a genuine shame). As if to make my point for me, this week’s entry is, in fact, not a Tumblr at all – it’s an oldschool blog but, well, noone cares and frankly neither do I anymore. Glorious Trash collects reviews of old pulp novels – so if you want to learn more about classics such as ‘The Last Shaft’ (the final appearance of the titular detective in fiction) or, er, ‘Memoir of a Horny Hooker’, then, well, here you are.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • TrendyVideos AI: Do you ever experience someone else’s feed? It is an occasionally odd and unsettling experience to get a glimpse into the incredibly-intimate world of ‘what the algorithm thinks someone else wants’, as I discovered over Christmas when I was round at a mate’s and he pulled out his phone to show me something on Insta and I saw that his homepage feed was…just slop. Just AI slop video after AI slop video after AI slop video, fake sea creatures animated into being on beaches, fake animals in fake jungles, fake people eating fake cakes…what was even odder was that this didn’t seem to bother him at all (fwiw this friend is VERY offline and, I promise, less stupid than this exchange makes them sound). Anyway, that’s what this account is – all AI, all the time, and, seemingly, this is what a LOT of people are seeing all over their social feeds every day. We are, as the kids say, so so so cooked.
  • Voidstomper: More AI video! But this stuff is horrible and unsettling and so therefore interesting to me – again, though, it’s worth looking at this stuff and realising that there are a LOT of people in the world who simply aren’t going to pay attention to the fact that some of this stuff is faked. If you think the UFO panic at the tail-end of 2024 was something, I feel reasonably-convinced that we’re going to see some fcuking MENTAL crpytid-related chat in the coming year or so as people start to fall for increasingly-realistic videos of ‘ACTUAL CAMERAPHONE FOOTAGE OF SKINWALKERS CAPTURED’ sliding across their FYP.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The State of the World 2025: For the…God knows how many consecutive years, we kick off the new year longreads with the traditional ‘where we are now’ discussion thread over at venerable online community The Well, conducted by Bruce Sterling and Jon Lebkowsky, which, once again, brings together and interesting collection of minds to opine on the whole ‘where we are now and where we are going’ thing. As per previous years, the composition of the debate skews tech/futurist which means there’s a reasonable focus on those specific facets of the now, but it’s as-ever a wide-ranging discussion that covers geopolitics, history, AI, yesterday and tomorrow and features some really interesting thinking. Personally-speaking Cory Doctorow’s post in the debate about ‘coalitions’ being a significant unit of agency/progress in the coming now felt like an interesting one, but you can and will all find your own bits and pieces to glom onto amongst the chat.
  • We’re Getting The Social Media Crisis Wrong: I don’t know about you, but I have already read more information about social media platforms, their policies and their owners than I felt I needed or wanted to this year. Still, presuming you’re not burnt out by this particular discourse yet – and I’ll be honest with you, I have to confess to just feeling utterly exhausted by this latest bunch of bullsh1t, so tired of having the parameters of my existence determined by a bunch of spectacularly-rich men who have repeatedly-demonstrated that THEY ARE NO FCUKING GOOD AT THIS STUFF – then this is a really good essay by Henry Farrell about social media, misinformation and the effect both are having, which makes the point, correctly, that it’s not so much the promulgation of falsehoods that is the issue (although that’s bad too) so much as the following (forgive me for quoting in full, but it’s a strong argument he makes well and it’s worth reproducing): “Something like this explains the main consequences of social media for politics. The collective perspectives that emerge from social media – our understanding of what the public is and wants – are similarly shaped by algorithms that select on some aspects of the public, while sidelining others. And we tend to orient ourselves towards that understanding, through a mixture of reflective beliefs, conformity with shibboleths, and revised understandings of coalitional politics. This isn’t brainwashing – people don’t have to internalize this or that aspect of what social media presents to them, radically changing their beliefs and their sense of who they are. That sometimes happens, but likely far more rarely than we think. The more important change is to our beliefs about what other people think, which we perpetually update based on social observation. When what we observe is filtered through social media, our understandings of the coalitions we belong to, and the coalitions we oppose, what we have in common, and what we disagree on, shift too.”
  • The Creator Economy Doesn’t Work: Or, per its title, “It’s Time To End Our Subscription Addiction”, an essay by Nick Hilton which did numbers in media circles last week and which, if you don’t mind me saying, makes a point which I have been making for FCUKING YEARS, to whit ‘the creator economy as a concept is a fcukiong bust because the numbers simply DO NOT ADD UP’. Here Hilton uses Substack as his example, talking about the potential monthly burden of multiple subscriptions and how that’s a) not tenable for 99.9% of people; and how b) because of that, it’s not tenable for 99.9% of creators either. I mean, look, I HAVE LITERALLY BEEN SAYING THIS FOREVER, and I distinctly remember writing multiple times last year that I fully expected someone in their 20s to suddenly discover the concept of bundling up multiple writers in a single publication to benefit from economies of scale…LIKE A MAGAZINE! Anyway, this is overlong and basically only makes one point,  but it’s a point I agree with and so I will forgive it the prolixity (yes, I know).
  • The Best Newsletters: So obviously the next link I include is a collection of excellent newsletters you might want to try subscribing to – LOL LIKE YOU HAVE THE TIME TO READ ANYTHING ELSE AFTER THIS (you…you do read it all, don’t you? Even these bits?) – compiled by Caitlin at Links; this is a GREAT selection, arrived at by asking a bunch of people whose newsletters she likes whose newsletters THEY like, and so on, and so on. The resulting selection is long and SO BROAD, and I think almost all of these are free or have a free tier, so you can add to your regular reading list with some new blood for 2025 should you so desire (full disclosure: I was one of the people asked to recommend some links).
  • Frictionless Conformity: I really enjoyed this essay by Pascal Wicht exploring some of the potential reasons as to why everyone dresses the same these days. I really like the way Wich presents 15 or so different hypotheses to explain the phenomenon he describes as “Fast forward to now. Puff jackets, sneakers, oversized sweat pants. Style boiled down to algorithmic efficiency. The only message these outfits send is: “I fit in.” It’s not rebellion. It’s not self-expression. It’s passing the vibe check—the algorithmic kind, not the human one. Subculture has been stripped of its rough edges, sanded down into something smooth, market-ready and utterly frictionless.” Which you may not wholly agree with, fine – I think there are arguments one might make to suggest’s Wicht is slightly overstating this – but which then leads him to some really interesting (and, yes, slightly-w4nky) thinking about the why of it all, which I personally thought was worth a read from a cultural/social strategy point of view.
  • Capital Will Matter More: I think, as alluded to above, one of the reasons the first week or so of the year has felt so…psychologically abrasive is the sense that we are not in control, that agency has been stripped from us, that, effectively, it’s other people’s world, we just happen to be standing on it temporarily. If you feel vaguely-similar then can I strongly advise that you DO NOT READ this article, as, honestly, it will only make you feel worse. The central tenet, basically, is ‘the better AI gets the more likely it is that ‘being very rich’ will become the most important determinant of the degree to which one can be said to have meaningful agency’ – which, yes, fine, is sort-of true now, but JUST YOU WAIT! “The key economic effect of AI is that it makes capital a more and more general substitute for labour. There’s less need to pay humans for their time to perform work, because you can replace that with capital (e.g. data centres running software replaces a human doing mental labour). I will walk through consequences of this, and end up concluding that labour-replacing AI means: 1) The ability to buy results in the real world will dramatically go up; 2) Human ability to wield power in the real world will dramatically go down (at least without money); including because: a) there will be no more incentive for states, companies, or other institutions to care about humans; and b) it will be harder for humans to achieve outlier outcomes relative to their starting resources. Radical equalising measures are unlikely” HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!
  • No, Adrian Dittman Is Not Elon Musk: I don’t care about the story – for Professional Reasons I am sadly all-too-aware that there is a certain class of man (and it is always men, always) who are willing, ready and VERY KEEN to go into bat for Elon should you ever have the temerity to slag him off anywhere too public – but I found the account, of exactly how the researchers behind the investigation were able to prove that Adrian Dittman is not in fact a billionaire pretending to be someone else to defend himself but instead the far sadder spectacle of a seemingly-normal man going onto internet forums to defend Musk’s qualities as a parent, really interesting. Serious OSINT chops on display here.
  • Barry Malzberg: I’ve always been fascinated by the pulp novelists of the mid-20th-Century, the men and women who under various pen names would absolutely hammer out potboilers by the dozen to meet the voracious demand of the North American market for vaguely-salacious tales or galactic scifi adventures – this is a profile of one Marry Malzberg, who legend has it was the fastest and most-prolific of all, and who, per this piece, once managed to spaff out a smutty tome called ‘Diary of a Parisian Chambermaid’ in just over a day at a rate of just under 2,000 words per hour which, most remarkably of all, was apparently actually readable. Although, thinking about it, I do roughly 10k in 5 hours every Friday morning so…look, does anyone want to save me from the living hell that my life has become by paying me 1950s-equivalent rates to type the fcuk out of some low-quality bongo? Because, honestly, if so, I am ALL EARS.
  • The Idiots Year In Review: I know, I know, in week two of the new year one should really not be looking back – that said, this is one of those ‘a list of all the best dumb things people said on the internet last year’ things and FCUK ME is there some absolute gold in here. This is VERY LONG, but, and I say this even as someone who is far, far too online for their own good, there is some true gold in here. I promise you, there will be at least three things that will make you cry with laughter – also, the concept of a ‘coworker meme’ is incredibly powerful and will now stay with me until death.
  • The Case Against Gameplay Loops: Ok, this is very specifically about game design and so your interest in it will largely depend on your interest in thinking about why some ludic experiences are ‘fun’ and how that ‘fun’ actually works, and what we’re actually getting out of games when we play them – but presuming you are in some way interested in those sorts of questions then you’ll really enjoy this super-smart essay by Joey Schutz.
  • The Gentrification of Videogame History: SUCH an interesting article and a useful reminder of the fact that questions of perceived, relative cultural value are often firmly-linked to Western-centrism. When you think about the history of games, you think about Space Invaders and Pac-Man and Mario and Sonic and all that jazz – or at least you do in the West. You don’t, probably, think of all the games that you have never heard of but which are played by tens, hundreds of millions of people in South East Asia, or across South America, and which barely if ever show up in conversations about gaming culture and history because, well, we’re self-obsessed and have a tendency in the West to automatically dismiss stuff when it’s not from the Global North. This is so so so interesting, and also introduced me to the BRILLIANT Super Bomba Patch from Brazil, by all accounts the country’s best-selling and most-played football game, which is distributed exclusively through hooky copies and which itself is a heavily-patched and modded version of Winning 11 (the original Japanese version of Pro Evo – real heads know) from the early-00s (seriously, check out some footage here, the player models are genuinely amazing). This is fascinating, honestly.
  • What We Did To Our Penises: Not you and I, to be clear – or certainly not ‘I’, I can’t speak for what you may or may not have been doing with yours – but the wider world – this is Defector’s annual list of the terrible things that have been reported to medical departments in the US as having been done to the penises of various Americans; all of these are true, all of these are verifiable, and FCUKING HELL. As ever with this stuff, my main question is ‘how…how bored do you have to be of vanilla sex to think “Yeah, actually, you know what, I WILL try fitting this compact disc over my member”?’ – these are VERY FUNNY, unless of course they happened to you. BONUS LIST: here are all the things people got stuck inside themselves in 2024, should you want a cautionary tale to guide you into the second quarter of the 21stC.
  • Being A Viral Sensation: I know you’ve read a load of ‘I was a meme/I went viral for X’ pieces in which, say, success kid talks about what an amazing impact being, er, success kid has had on their life; this one, though, feels different. Christopher Spata at the Tampa Bay Times tracks down one ‘Lucky’ Luciano, who went viral back in the past as the slightly-Guido-ish kid in pink captioned “You know I had to do it to ‘em” (you will recognise it when you see it) – what I find fascinating here is the implication throughout that Luciano hasn’t had a very happy intervening few years, the failed attempts to cash in on his moment of fame, the vaguely-unmoored sense of a kid still vaguely hoping the fame lottery might find him again, this time better-prepared…I don’t know, this really touched me for some reason, can’t wholly explain why.
  • The Romantasy Beef: This is VERY LONG, but, honestly, it satisfied my internal; ‘messy b1tch who loves drama’ almost completely. There is NOTHING I don’t find fascinating about the romance fiction industrial complex, and this story – about a plagiarism accusation and the two authors at its heart – is GREAT, not least because it lifts the lid on a lot of ‘how the sausage is made’ type stuff about the industry (you may have seen the quote from the publisher in this piece doing the rounds this week, incredulous that some authors come to her without even having considered the hashtag for their work).
  • Satire Across Languages: In the week of the tenth anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo shootings in Paris, a look at how different nations across Europe approach the challenge of making ‘their own version of the Onion’ (the author argues, not unfairly, that ‘their own version of Private Eye’ simply doesn’t have the brand recognition as a phrase). This is great – very dry, very funny, and full of plenty of ammunition for any and all Europeans who want proof that NOONE ELSE on the continent is funny other than them (it is, for example, one of my strongest-held and most-troublingly-self-defeating opinions that, at heart, Italians simply are not funny. They can BE funny. They are charming, warm, amusing, passionate and often comid. But they are not funny. LOTTATEMI, STRONZI).
  • The Honourable Parts: One of my occasional links to Scope of Work, Spencer Wright’s wonderful newsletter about manufacturing which consistently amazes me by being so much more interesting than it ever has any right to be. This essay is gorgeous – Wright spends a day shadowing NYT photographer Christopher Payne, who specialises in shooting industrial processes or people at work, or factory settings, and explores what it is to record labour, what the photographs tell you, and what it is to celebrate the dignity and value of all sorts of work through art. Honestly, this made me feel…weirdly hopeful and sort-of happy, and that almost NEVER happens.
  • A Sex Memoir: Edmund White writes openly, explicitly and unflinchingly about his sex life, from the rearview mirror of his 80s – White is gay, and so the sex presented in the piece (drawn from a longer memoir) is all man-on-man, and there’s something so pleasingly-unsentimental and occasionally-visceral about his descriptions, along with a certain sad coldness and detachment, that speak both to the writer and the eras of which he’s writing, many of which predate the legality of the sort of assignations being described. So so so good (although to be clear it’s also very explicit, should that give you pause).
  • Doing The Work: Geoff Dyer is a cracking writer – Jeff in Venice, Death in Varanasi is still one of my favourite depictions of both Venice and the artworld found in a novel – and this piece in Granta, about his memories of doing no-future work in the 80s while getting his writing career off the ground, is not only typically-lovely writing but also feels like it hails from a distant world, one in which a young man could be paid the dole while scabbing a cash-in-hand gig and attempting to make a life in the arts. Fcuk me, there’s something terrifying about the immediate impulse I had then to couch Thatcherite Britain as ‘the good old days’ compared to the suppurating horror of The Now.
  • Child Catchers: A look back at the child abduction panic of 1980s America, a panic which will be familiar to any kid who grew up in the UK in the 80s and 90s when you were apparently never more than 300m away from a becorduroyed pervert in a sh1t-brown Ford Cortina who wanted to ‘show you his stamp collection’. I really enjoyed this – captures the fag-scented tinge of the era perfectly, along with the strange sensation familiar to the time of a world that worried loudly about children’s safety while simultaneously not really seeming to care about kids at all.
  • The New Age Bible: Sheila Heti is one of those writers where I would read pretty much anything she pens – this is a SUPERB essay in Harper’s in which she writes about discovering a tome called ‘A Course In Miracles’, apparently a hugely-popular ‘spiritual’ text which has been referred to as ‘the new age bible’ in some circles. Heti is initially intrigued, finding in its pages support and succour through a period of depression – and so digs into its history, which is where the story gets STRANGE. Featuring some top-notch 1950s batsh1ttery, the CIA, unrequited love, potential mind-control and the vague sensation of THINGS BEYOND OUR KEN, this is an absolutely superb piece which you will really enjoy, promise.
  • Devour The Flesh: On feeling rage, and leaning into it. Female rage, specifically – I am not an angry person (I’m just…disappointed), but the writing here by Steffi Cau is very, very good indeed.
  • Brigade De Cuisine: Our final longread of the week is from 1979 – I discovered this over the holidays and FCUK ME is it one of the most wonderful pieces of writing about food I have ever read. It is SO satisfying – rich and indulgent in subject and style – and just THE best portrait of a person, a time and a place that are long since gone. John McFee profiles a mysterious, anonymous chef, cooking Michelin-grade food for a small roomful of people out in the boonies of New York – honestly, this made me want to invent a time machine and go back 45 years so I could experience all this for myself. WONDERFUL, and a genuine pleasure to spend half an hour with (it goes long).

By Félicien Rops

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 20/12/24

Reading Time: 33 minutes

AND SO, WE CAME TO THE END.

44 editions of Web Curios, roughly 3,500 links, 400k-odd words (fcuking HELL though) and here we find ourselves, on the cusp of entering the second quarter of the first century of the third millennium of recorded time, with supposedly-educated residents of one of the world’s richest and most powerful nations shooting into the sky because they are scared of planes and no longer seem to understand technology.

Truly, the future is panning out gloriously.

So for the next few weeks, why not take a break from the future? Ignore it. Fcuk it. It will happen without you, whether you like it or not (and you probably won’t, let’s be realistic).

Briefly, before we crack on with the links and the words and all the usual Web Curios gubbins, I just want to say a small thankyou to all of you for reading this (or, more realistically, just opening it and clicking a few links and mostly ignoring the prose), for sending me interesting links and emails, for telling me each week which links I’ve managed to fcuk up (no really, I am grateful!)  and for occasionally sharing it with people – I really do appreciate it.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you will be FINE without me, I promise (but what will I do without you?).

By Tye Martinez (most images this week from TIH, to whom, again, thanks)

WE BEGIN WITH A CHRISTMAS GIFT TO YOU FROM SADEAGLE, BRINGING YOU A MIX FEATURING TRACKS FROM VIETNAM AND INDIA AND KOREA AND TURKEY AND LOADS OF OTHER PLACES BESIDES, WHICH SEGUES INTO SOME CRACKING HIPHOP IN THE FINAL HALF HOUR OR SO AND WHICH IS, GENERALLY, FCUKING SUPERB! 

THE SECTION WHICH WONDERS WHETHER PETERS MANDELSON AND THIEL HAVE EVER HUNG OUT, PT.1:  

  • The Shopify Winter Editions: No, I didn’t expect the prestigious ‘first link in the final Curios of the year’ slot (it IS prestigious! Shut up!) to go to the annual list of product updates shipped by an ecommerce company, but for the second time in recent months Shopify’s marketing people have done something genuinely fun and, well, credit where it’s due. Click the link and you’ll be taken to a dry-looking (and, frankly, dry-reading) list of product updates that have shipped this year – but, if you click on the top left of the Page, where you can toggle between the ‘boring’ and ‘not boring’ view, you can flip the experience to become…BORING TV! This is SO fun – basically they have taken the 150+ different updates and turned each into a tiny, silly TV commercial, made with AI, which you can watch on a little pop-up in-browser telly, complete with remote control to let you flip between them at will. I have no idea whether they fully committed to the bit and did all 150 (it’s a cute idea but, well, it’s still fundamentally about software updates to an ecommerce platform and I am not quite invested enough to do the full deep-dive), but everyone else, take note – THIS IS WHAT AI IS FOR. Well, not just this – you’d sort of hope for all the money spent and energy consumed we’d get a bit more out of it than ‘moderately-imaginative marketing for a massive corporate’, but let’s take what we can get shall we?
  • Rijksmuseum AI Art Explorer: One of the nice things about Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum – other than it’s superb collection and regularly-excellent digital work – is the way in which they facilitate others working with their archive; this is an excellent example, a hobby project cobbled together by one Sors Lockhorst which scrapes the museum’s API, uses OpenAI’s CLIP to map them in vector space and gives YOU, the end-user who frankly probably didn’t care about the preceding 20 words of semi-technical exposition, the opportunity to search the collection based on (their words) ‘vibes’. Want to ask the engine to show you works which demonstrate ‘the general sense of not knowing quite what you’re doing’? Or paintings which, more than any others, embody the very essence of ‘suspicious lust’? NOW YOU CAN! Your mileage will vary – not everything results in a satisfying selection of images but, broadly, there’s been something interesting in the way in which my (admittedly…somewhat oblique) queries have been interpreted each time – and because it’s not an official website you need to open the pictures in a new tab to get the full, hi-res view, but it’s another example of the interesting ways in which this sort of search can open up and recontextualise an archive.
  • The Taylor Swift Eras Website: I am sure that there are some of you who are already well aware of the launch of this website, whether as a result of your own personal Swiftian obsession or that of someone else in your household – I had no idea, though, that there was some NEW DIGITAL THING dropping from one of the world’s most famous people and was quite interested to see what one might make with all that money and all those resources and a reputation for engaging one’s fandom in deep, lore-driven explorations of MEANING and HIDDEN MESSAGES and LYRICAL COMPLEXITIES and…God, this is so fcuking miserable. Honestly, click the link – it feels HORRIBLY phoned-in (even the design is lacklustre and…cheap-feeling?) – fans get to choose which of the ERAS of the ERAS tour they want to vibe with, and clicking on the variously-coloured header images will take you to an embedded Spotify playlist of that specific album, and some shots of that bit of the stage show from various stages of the megatour, but there’s something really rather hollow about the fact that the sections on the homepage go ‘top nav / album embed / album shop / merch store’ – like, TayTay, you are VERY RICH and frankly haven’t you squeezed these kids (and their parents) enough now? Where’s the imagination and the sense of COMMUNITY and the opportunity to fans to come together and share their memories of the tour, and where are the additional easter eggs for all the devotees, and where, honestly, is the fun? Because this is not in any way a fun website. Once again it feels a little bit like being a fan of one of these people is a bit like enjoying a talented performer’s work, but also quite a lot like a strange findom relationship.
  • Connyct: I am including this not because I care about it in the slightest but because there’s a vanishingly-small likelihood that this is going to be TikTok2.0 – or at least it could be in the US, should the ban actually go through next year. Connyct is, as far as I can tell, ‘TikTok but doing rollout like Facebook in the mid-00s’, and so only opening up to college students at present so as to, I presume, allow them to scale at a reasonable pace and also build the sort of necessary young userbase that all social networks need to gain critical mass. Is this going to become the latest North American digital dopamine sink? I don’t know! I don’t, in all honesty, give a fcuk? And, come on, neither do you, let’s all stop pretending. Although, briefly removing the mask of weary cynicism, it does feel like, generationally-speaking, this might be a time for a platform reset for the young, and ‘social media as though it were invented for students today rather than 20 years ago’ isn’t a terrible pitch (even if that does, coincidentally, look pretty much exactly like TikTok).
  • Music Time Travel: Ok, full disclosure- I haven’t *actually* tried this, but the idea looks interesting and I am going to make a huge assumption that it’s not malware and it won’t brick your phone or anything. Rewind (that’s the app’s name, but ‘Music Time Travel’ is more helpfully-descriptive) basically lets you pick any year you like and pretend you’re listening to a sort of ‘greatest hits radio’ from said year – it links to your existing subscription music service so all the tracks are licensed, but adds a layer of curated ‘by year’ magic, meaning that if you want to spend the festive season harking back to a time in which your life was simpler and you didn’t yet know what a crushing fcuking *mess* you were going to make of everything then, well, you can! This feels like it might be fun for any of you whose children are going through a musical retrofetishism phase.
  • Cloudspotting: Pictures of clouds, which you can draw on so that you can share the shapes you see with the world. I love this – there are a load of images on there already, which you can either draw on yourself to find your own shapes, or hover over to see the shapes others have found in them; or, should you wish, you can upload your own photograph of some cumulonimbus (other cloud formations are available) so the wider cloud enthusiast community (nebulophiles?) can also enjoy seeing what they can scry in the wispy dampness. Why? WHY NOT, WHY DOES THERE HAVE TO BE A REASON FOR EVERYTHING FFS?
  • The Best Science Images of 2024: Nature picks their best shots of the year – honestly, these are great but to my mind there is nothing that can surpass the quite incredible close-up picture of a sand weevil which looks (I promise you am I right about this) like the best boss that FromSoft have ever designed, like something from an as-yet unexplored corner of Elden Ring’s map (seriously, if these references mean something to you then you have NO IDEA how right I am about this comparison). On the flipside, though, the swimming cheetahs felt a little like harbingers of some not-wholly-glad tidings. Still, overall these are all amazing pictures which will elicit some actual, proper ‘wow, isn’t the natural world a consistent incredible and beautiful place, regardless of our incessant attempts to fcuk it into the sun?’ feelings from all of you, so, well, enjoy those while you’re still capable of doing so. BONUS CRITTER PICTURE CONTENT: the annual comedy wildlife photography awards which, I’ll be honest, I’ve slightly fallen out of love with in recent years (it’s very much me, not them), but which this year redeem themselves with at least three top-quality images (the two separate penguin images – always great value, those lads – and the one of the seals, which I am AMAZED wasn’t titled ‘The Slap’ for reasons that should become immediately apparent when you see it).
  • The AI Art Critic: Upload an image and get a little video critique delivered to you by The Machine, in the guise of Danny Devito in a Warhol wig – the workflow here is presumably something like ‘image analysed by GPT, analysis fed as a script to a preset Runway text-to-video pipeline, for those interested; this is a classic example of what the limitations are of the text part of the pipeline, because the ‘opinions’ here are simply…nowhere near interesting enough to be worthwhile. The Machine won’t slag off the work, it will just spit some artw4nk-adjacent guff which, while corresponding to whatever it is you’ve uploaded, is neither interesting nor cruel nor funny, and therefore there’s no real incentive (to my mind) to try this more than once. Which is a shame, because I still maintain that there’s something magical and surprising about the tech here – the fact that The Machine can ‘see’ is fcuking insane!! – but it’s stymied by the off-the-shelf language model in use. Can someone make this again but with a jailbroken local copy of LLAMA or something? A little project for one of you to work on while I’m away!
  • Soot: Very much not my sort of thing, this, but I can imagine it being interesting and useful to people with significantly different brains than mine – Soot is, basically, a visual moodboard-type thing; you arrange images on a Page or series of Pages which you own and curate, images can be annotated and tagged and themselves link through to OTHER image boards, and you can make anything you post on there public so that other users can explore your aesthetic. I personally don’t *quite* see how this is different from the million-and-one similar type of platforms for this sort of thing that already exist, but I’m equally conscious that I am a bit like a dog staring at a car with this sort of stuff in that it is pretty much totally alien to my conception of the world and information and How Thinking Works, and your mileage might therefore vary a bit.
  • Google ImageFX: I have stopped bothering with AI update stuff in the main, partly because I was getting increasingly-irate emails from people complaining about it (on which, actually – if your default position is that ‘it is AI and therefore it is sh1t and you shouldn’t write about it or feature it or even look at or think about it lest you accelerate the badness!’ then, well, you haven’t really understood what Curios is about) and partly because there’s just SO FCUKING MUCH OF IT – I’ll make a brief exception for this, though, the latest iteration of Google’s text-to-image builder because it’s quite good (better than OpenAI’s, to my mind) and the interface is nice, and because, if you’re in the States or if you can be bothered to VPN your way there, then you can also experiment with this fun little style transfer-type toy called Whisk which lets you combine a bunch of elements into a scene which you can then remix using text prompts, giving a neat example of how this stuff is going to start working in the next year or so.
  • AI CEO: Satire! Except, well, it’s not so funny when it’s not the CEOs who are going to be replaced, it’s the rest of us!
  • The Old Robots: Via Pietro Minto, an OLD website featuring, er, a LOT of images of old robot toys from pretty much every point from the mid-20th-Century onwards. Do you have some sort of half-formed memories of a childhood toy in comforting beige, some sort of red-eyed lumbering hulk of 80s-imagined future, your very own plastic pal who was so much fun to be with? You will almost certainly find details of it in here, but fcuk me will you have to look hard because there are SO MANY OLD ROBOTS on here.
  • Spacefiller: I do like me some generative art, and I very much enjoy the idea here: “Each poster in the Living Prints series is algorithmically generated when you order it. The prints are sampled from an ecosystem of simulated organisms and no two posters are the same. You won’t know exactly what your poster looks like until it shows up at your door, but we think that is the fun part. The simulated organisms are grown from randomly placed seeds. A variety of predetermined species can appear in your poster, each with its own look and behavior.” OK, so the resulting outputs here aren’t to my personal taste, but I can very much get behind the idea at play – can, er, someone make one of these things that DOES conform exactly to my personal tastes, please? THANKS!
  • AImail: I think email gets too much of a hard time, personally. Email is discrete. It’s asynchronous. You can deal with it in your own time, at your own convenience, or indeed never. Noone has EVER sent you an email simply saying ‘hi’ with no further detail or information. I LIKE RECEIVING EMAILS. AND YET! It appears to have been saddled with the blame for a significant proportion of our modern ills, the corporate ones at least, and we’ve had a decade or more of people promising to KILL email or SAVE US from email or TRANSFORM email, and still it persists, unkillable. The latest attempt to free us all from the, er, not-particularly-tyrannical grip of email comes in the shape of Cora, an AI-enabled system which promises, as far as I can tell, to triage all of your mail and deliver you summaries twice a day of the things you need to know, responding automatically to the things you don’t need to be aware of, and deleting the things it deems to be spam. ARE WE ALL FCUKING MAD?!?!?! There is literally no way in hell that ANY AI software anywhere in the world can execute this sort of stuff autonomously, accurately, all the time, and putting your email life in the hands of this sort of system in 2024 is almost-certainly going to lead to some genuinely awkward – but, admittedly, potentially-very-funny mishaps as Cora decides that, actually, you didn’t need to see that reminder email from HMRC after all. Currently available via a waiting list, for any of you brave (stupid) enough to entrust your inbox to an LLM.
  • Cask Exchange: As we canter into the second quarter of the third millennium, it does rather feel like the ambient mood is ‘casino on the titanic about an hour before the iceberg hits’ – everyone feels a bit reckless, a bit emboldened, and a bit ‘fcukit, put it all on black, what’s the worst that could happen?’. In this spirit, and given you might want to divest some of the $Hawk you picked up on the crypto exchanges the other week, you may well be interested in Cask Exchange, a website which lets you invest in, er, whisky barrels? Is this a thing? Is this legit? Perhaps it is – per the blurb, “Cask Exchange is an online trading platform where qualified distilleries, wholesalers, and brands can buy and sell barreled spirits for bottling. It connects sellers looking to monetize their barrels with buyers seeking liquid for bottling.” – and, of course, there’s a market for everything, but, also, CAN MAYBE EVERYTHING NOT BE A FCUKING MARKET PLEASE? Apparently this has been going in some form or another since 1998, so once again it is I who am the rube and the idiot – Christ alive, I despise (and, mostly, completely fail to have any real understanding of,) money.
  • Snowflake Maker: You know those snowflakes you make with small children using folded paper and scissors? Well this is that, minus the paper and scissors (and hence minus finding bits of said paper all over your house for the following decade or so) – this is…fun! Genuine, simple, uncomplicated fun! Also, if you’re that way inclined, there’s an interesting minor patternmaking challenge involved in trying to create a snowflake with a pleasingly-phallic cutout pattern – give it a go!
  • The LAN Party House: I’ve never really been a proper geek – I appreciate that writing this as someone who writes, for free, a weekly newsletter about ‘stuff that I find interesting on the internet’ might possibly result in some muffled laughter at my expense from the seven of you reading this but, honestly, it’s true! I have never done D&D, I am not into boardgames or scifi or fantasy, or any of the standard tropes, and I have generally tended towards ‘drink and drugs’ as pastimes rather than ‘fandoms and communities’, and I am capable of doing my own washing without it smelling of mildew (sorry, but)! Which is why stuff like this absolutely fascinates me – just…imagine being so into something that you go to these insane lengths to facilitate it! For those of you too young or too…’normal’, frankly, to be aware of what a LAN party is/was, in the days before online gaming the only way to play serious multiplayer network games (FPS or strategy sims, mainly) would be to connect them to a Local Area Network – or LAN – which required the machines to all be cabled together, which required them to be in the same place, which meant people taking their computers to a central place and connecting them and then basically spending 24h+ doing nothing but eating fast food and playing games…you can see, can’t you, where some of the stereotypes about this community started? Anyway, this is what a house designed from the ground up to accommodate that sort of event might look like, if it were envisioned by someone VERY wealthy who had some pretty serious design chops – honestly, this is AMAZING (although what’s possibly more amazing is that the person in question is also married and has children) and will make one or two of you very, very covetous indeed.

By Jose Luis Cena

THIS IS AN ALBUM OF INSTRUMENTAL HIPHOP BITS BY DRUM TALK AND IT IS, HONESTLY, REALLY QUITE SOMETHING AND I RECOMMEND IT UNRESERVEDLY! 

THE SECTION WHICH WONDERS WHETHER PETERS MANDELSON AND THIEL HAVE EVER HUNG OUT, PT.2:  

  • WikiLocal: This isn’t a wholly-new idea – I have definitely featured something along similar lines before, possibly during Lockdown One – but I have a particular soft spot for projects which both leverage Wikipedia and which encourage local exploration and learning. This is a really simple website, mixing up maps with Wikipedia entires to let you quickly and easily find places that are notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry devoted to them in the immediate vicinity of any location you choose – so, for example, I can see the place where Van Gogh briefly lived round the corner from me, say, and I have literally JUST learned that I am located just by the site of the oldest adventure playground in London still to stand at its original site. I KNOW I AM SO PRIVILEGED! Honestly, this is SO interesting and I figured it might be particularly cool to give it a go over the holidays as an opportunity to get to know your neighbourhood a bit better. NB – Web Curios accepts no responsibility should this tool reveal that you live in an area with no interesting or notable history/landmarks whatsoever.
  • Meta Motivo: Ok, this is QUITE technical, but it’s really interesting from the point of view of attempting to create virtual agents which can move, act and to an extent even ‘learn’ autonomously in virtual space- this is a new experimental model/toy thing from Meta which explores how it’s getting along making models which can effectively perform “whole-body control tasks, including motion tracking, goal pose reaching, and reward optimization, without any additional training or planning.” There’s an explanatory blogpost here – which is, honestly, VERY TECHNICAL – but click the main link and enjoy playing with the AI stick figure man who, if you play around with it a bit, can be made to dance and caper in ways which give you a brief, tantalising glimpse as to how interesting and odd and fun it will be in a few years time when you have semi-autonomous in-world virtual actors who can act independently and who can display emergent physical behaviours. If, though, that doesn’t really grab you, then can I please encourage you to at the very least take a moment to right click on the figure and lob a beach ball at it? The ragdoll physics at play are VERY funny.
  • Disney Prime Video: A comedy Bluesky account! It’s not just people just humourlessly shrieking about platform etiquette, you know! These are imagined films – some funny, some not, but I did enjoy the recasting of a film about the nativity myth as one entitled ‘Cucked By God’.
  • Surf Social: This, theoretically, looks like it might be interesting and useful – Surf Social is effectively a wrapper service for a bunch of different feeds from different places, including the fediverse (Bluesky, Mastodon, Threads) and YouTube and Flipboard, and which will basically let you spin up a selection of interest-based feeds pulling in content from across each of these platforms into single, consolidated streams, Which, actually, sounds…potentially good? While the theoretically idea of ‘pulling all your feeds into one’ doesn’t tend to work in practice – different platforms are for different things! Context collapse is a problem! – keeping the main ones where they are but pulling shared results for interest-based searches seems…smart and not likely to mess with the way in which you use the platforms already. This could be worth a look, although the standard ‘it’s in Beta and so is likely to fall over’ caveats of course apply.
  • Keikku: To be honest, I am including this almost solely because I had no idea that stethoscopes had gotten so incredibly hi-tech or required such shiny and fundamentally-overengineered websites. LOOK AT THESE FCUKERS IT’S LIKE SCIFI MEDICINE OUT OF STAR TREK OR SOMETHING!!! Also…whilst obviously progress is good and stuff, and I can’t imagine anyone dying because of a stethoscope running out of batteries, I do wonder whether perhaps there are some things that possibly don’t need a wifi connection. Oh, and it taught me a new favourite word – auscultation! – which means that basically I love this website now.
  • Not My Name: This is quite dizzying, and does little to dispel my long-held internal belief that anyone learning Chinese as an adult is basically some sort of genius or magician. This is a website all about Chinese names and how they have been basically ‘flattened’ by the simplified version of the language – from the explanation, “You may come across Chinese names in various contexts, such as Cixin Liu, the author of the science fiction novel The Three-Body Problem, and Ai Weiwei, a contemporary Chinese artist. However, these names have been transliterated to Hanyu Pinyin, which represents Mandarin pronunciation, rather than their original characters. This can lead to name ambiguity, as even native Chinese speakers may find it challenging to decode the original names behind the Pinyin.” Scroll down the page, click on ‘explorer’, and you’re presented with a dizzying array of names (navigate using the arrow keys), each with an accompanying visualisation showing how many people share it, and the traditional characters it derives from, and the different tones that can be used when pronouncing it…the key to understanding it isn’t explained HUGELY clearly (which I’m going to attribute to difficulties in translation), but it’s worth clicking around and exploring – if nothing else the vocal samples illustrating pronunciation demonstrate the insane range of the language and the sounds and stresses and dear God it is SO HARD.
  • Social Justice Kittens 2025: Another year, another calendar full of kittens accompanied by some of the best Tumblr-esque sentiments expressed across the web in the past 12 months. Some absolute gems in this year’s selection – I think, on reflection, my personal favourite is May’s pair of Sphynx’s worriedly discussing the need to dismantle capitalism within a generation, but please do feel free to pick your own.
  • The World War II Film Supercut: OK, there is a certain section of the Curios readership here who on clicking this link are liable to become so powerfully tumescent with excited arousal that it might cause some sort of medical event – BE WARNED. Are you someone who would say they are ‘into history’? Did you contemplate buying a ticket to The Rest Is History live podcast recordings? Do you ACTUALLY think about the Roman Empire every day? Do you REALLY like old war films? OH MY GOD THIS IS ALL YOUR CHRISTMASES COME AT ONCE! I can’t stress enough what a fcuking BATSHIT project this is – per this explanatory blogpost, “For more than a year I’ve been working on the World War II Supercut, a video project that combines 143 World War II movies into one 12 hour series, with historically significant clips pulled from the movies and ordered chronologically.” The main link takes you to a Google Drive folder where you can find the entire 12-hour epic, arranged into a dozen hour-long episodes, taking you from the pre-war to the post-war in an astounding collage of clips from every war film you’ve ever heard of and a bunch more that you probably haven’t. To be clear, I could give not one iota of a fcuk about WWII or war films or history and so this is of less than no interest to me, but for those of you who are going to make a day of this then, well, MERRY FCUKING WARMAS!
  • Pop The Confetti: Click the button, pop the confetti cannon, watch the sprinkles, feel your laptop become worryingly hot as it tries to render the physics of thousands of bits of paper! Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT IT IS CHRISTMAS!
  • Midjourney Patchwork: This is an interesting idea – Midjourney have launched (in beta, I think) a tool which effectively works as a storyboarding/concepting workspace with integrated AI, so you can start to flesh out the look and feel of characters and scenes using the Midjourney image generation tool within your digital whiteboard, sort of like…I don’t know, like Miro but with the ability to spin up really very good AI images as part of the embedded functionality. You can read a guide to it here, which might give you an idea of whether or not it might be of use to you – generally though this looks like it could be superuseful from the point of view of initial storyboarding or concepting, particularly as a team-based tool.
  • Puppets: Via Lynn comes this lovely little puppet toy – it detects your hands, you select the puppets you want to embody and VWALLAH! In mere seconds you’ve got a passable Statler and Waldorf on your screen, moving along with your hands as you make them quip and caper. I actually found myself doing the voices while I played with this, which suggests both that this is pretty fun and that I am a very, very lonely man who probably needs to take steps to address this. BONUS HAND-TRACKING BROWSER TOYS! This lets you make rudimentary paintings using your handprints on a virtual cave wall, which when I used it resulted in what I can only describe as a scene looking a bit like a neanderthal dirty protest had taken place but which I am sure in your capable and artistic hands will help you create some truly stellar artworks (or, at the very least, a crudely-drawn c0ck, in the best tradition of wall-based art since time immemorial).
  • AI Mix Check: Are you a musician or a sound engineer? Would you like to have your sound mixing skills critiqued by an AI? No, I can’t imagine for a second that you would – and yet the future has seen fit to afford you the opportunity! I am not a musician and so have no demos to upload for assessment, but I would love it if one of you who is more musically-inclined can give me some sort of indication of quite how awful the advice it gives you is – although actually, on reflection, it’s not like it will be bad advice so much as ‘advice that will ensure that your record is mixed so it could be played in a supermarket at 917pm without anyone noticing’.
  • Short Trip: Oh WOW, this is a blast from the past. The main link is to the Steam download page for a short, small PC game called ‘Short Trip’, where all you do is drive a tram through some mountain villages, picking up and dropping off passengers – it’s designed as basically a small, soothing distraction, a 15m mind-cleanser, if you will. It came out earlier this month, and is the final evolution of THIS, which I featured possibly a decade ago and which I was delighted to rediscover all these many years later. Honestly, this is SUCH a lovely 5-10 minute distraction, beautifully drawn and made – there’s a *weight* to the controls that makes it feel…I don’t know, HOMEMADE in a way, and fits with the art style perfectly; I am really happy to see that the original is still online and that the creator, Alex Perrin, has persevered to make a fuller version available for download. Honestly, this is a classic of the small, interactive web and should be celebrated as such.
  • Scroll: Via B3ta comes this game, which challenges to see how far you can scroll, either in 30s or until you get bored or die or your finger develops some sort of intolerable RSI-type condition. If you can do more than 2.5 in 30s then either you have a far better mouse than I do or your fingers are AMAZING (or I am in some way digitally subnormal, which I concede is also a possibility).
  • Play Codex: Another daily puzzle to add to your now-probably-hours-long routine! This one’s a codebreaker – each day there’s a different quote which you have to work out; each day, the code changes. The codes are always simple letter substitution games – you know, today all ‘ys’ are ‘ls’, that sort of thing – but they’re always a decent, chewy five minutes of mental work which might be the sort of thing you enjoy (or will be the sort of thing that you hate-wrangle for a while before fcuking off back to Sudoku).
  • Travle: God, I am SO embarrassingly-bad at this. Travle is a simple game (which Gdocs seems REALLY disinclined to let me type – I KNOW HOW TO SPELL ‘TRAVEL’ YOU D1CKS I AM DOING THIS DELIBERATELY) which asks to to get from country A to country F simply by mapping out a country-to-country route to get from one to the other. This, honestly, has served as a humiliating reminder of how utterly appalling my geography is, but you may find it less shaming than I have.
  • Isle of Tune: Last up this week, something for you to play with over Christmas – come back to me in 2025 with your compositions, please (or, er, don’t! You owe me nothing! Spend Christmas however you choose!)! Isle of Tune’s a fun little music toy – make your composition by plotting a route for a train, placing various objects by the track, and seeing what sound they make; the various different elements are different sounds, you can change the pitch and tempo, and generally this is actually a far more in-depth and complex tool than in initially appears (but, also, it’s cute and whimsical and basically a tiny digital train set, and who doesn’t love that? NO FCUKER, etc etc!). ENJOY!

By Cody Bratt

OUR FINAL MIX OF 2024 IS THIS PERFECTLY-CURATED SELECTION OF VAGUELY-HOUSEY BUT GENERALLY-LOW-OCTANE TRACKS PICKED BY DJ SANZA! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Old Web Rulez: Just some incredibly powerful aesthetics really.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Trendy AI Videos: AI videos! Odd, slightly-unpleasant AI videos! The latest one, of the writhing mushrooms (no, really, writhing is 100% the right adjective) is spectacularly unsettling. This is slop, but…odd slop – and there are some of these, a few imagining a sort of ‘America’s Got Talent’ but with AI, which feel legitimately, horrifically near-real.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Gisele Pelicot, Again: We kick off this week with another piece about the Pelicot trial and the woman who has, rightly, become a cause celebre over the latter half of the year and who I really, really hope gets to just sort of be left alone for a while now. You all, I presume, know the details of the case by now, but this account by Sophie Smith in the LRB is excellent in particular because it doesn’t attempt to make this a ‘French’ case or a ‘French’ issue, taking it back to a scene in a beloved book by a beloved (female, fwiw) author which sheds some not-particularly-pleasant light on our general, cultural attitudes to sex and marriage and consent and ‘ownership’ – honestly, this whole article made me feel extremely, deeply uncomfortable, which is exactly as it should be I think – I’ve been particularly struck this week by the oddity of the two parallel cultures which exist in the UK, one where this is a significant and groundbreaking and horrific and illuminating case that should hold significant lessons for us all, and another which is cheerfully debating the whys and wherefores of a woman’s attempt to sleep with 1000 men in a day as part of her bongo career, and how we probably ought to maybe have more of a conversation about how and where these two worlds intersect.
  • The Pulitzer Year in Review: A link to the Pulitzer Centre’s picks of its journalism over the past year – “As we wrap up 2024, we are proud and excited to share a hand-picked selection of Pulitzer Center-supported stories that shaped our year. Every December, our team takes a moment to reflect on the journalism that moved us, surprised us, challenged us, or made an impact. These stories—reporting from more than 20 countries—include the big breakthroughs and the quieter moments that require sustained attention as public discourse shifts.” As you might expect, this is all SERIOUS REPORTAGE, but as a broad selection of stories about The State Of The World this is pretty hard-to-beat.
  • AI At The End of 2024: It’s slightly astonishing to think that it’s only been a couple of years since the introduction of the latest wave of generative AI – the past month or so has seen a flurry of different announcement and launches (and spats and disputes) which means it’s not always easy to get a sense for what the current state of the art is, but thankfully the ever-helpful Ethan Mollick has done a convenient roundup of ‘what is currently possible with the mainstream models from the main players’ and if you want a guide to ‘what can this stuff ACTUALLY do at the fag-end of 2024?’ then this is a decent overview. FWIW, my thoughts on this are, broadly: a) most people are still in the main thinking about this in very limited fashion when it comes to potential use-cases, and tend to be WAY too focused on the ‘creative’ outputs (pictures and video) which are the least-interesting (currently) expressions of the tech; b) 2025 should see people doing some interesting, creative and hugely-useful things with multimodality which will be very impressive; c) agents are going to be make a lot of things VERY messy in the next 12-18 months; d) the ‘oh fcuk, this stuff is…eating jobs!’ realisation is finally going to start to bite in the coming year.
  • Crypto is for Crime: Paul Krugman explains neatly why, in the main, yes, actually, crypto IS largely a nefarious thing! This neatly covers why it’s seemingly very likely that a significant portion of the world’s crypto stocks are being actively used for money laundering, and touches on the debanking thing which is getting lots of conservatives and cryptoenthusiasts frothy over in the US, and is generally a good overview of why one might want to use crypto for these purposes (and why, if you dig into it, there aren’t actually that many real, non-dodgy uses for the stuff anyway). Oh, and if you for some reason want to listen to me and some smarter, funnier people talk about this on a podcast you can do so here.
  • GoatseCoin: Ok, I know I have linked to this story before, but if you haven’t clicked on it in the past can I PLEASE exhort you to give it a try now – it basically links the ‘where are we in AI at the end of ‘24?’ stuff to the crypto stuff, and, even if I only take about 15% of it at face value (I am always skeptical of ‘autonomous machines’ and am inclined to presume Mechanical Turk-ing until proven otherwise), this is honestly batsh1t. To recap – there’s an AI agent that has been spun up, which exists on Twitter; people interact with it, those interactions get fed into the model, and so it ‘learns’ and grows…anyway, this ‘agent’ has in the past few months invented a memecoin based on Goatse (you don’t, I assume, need me to explain this to you by now – you’ve been here a while, you’ve received the horrible, fleshy induction), which now has a seven figure market cap…oh God, this is all so mad and deeply silly but also TERRIFYINGLY FUTURE and pretty much my favourite news story of the year.
  • That Massive Ed Zitron Essay: It’s been a good year for US-based UK PR man-turned-tech-industry-scourge Ed Zitron, who’s very much become A PERSONALITY off the back of his sustained critiques of the AI and wider tech industries – part of me wants to say something about preaching to the converted and audience capture here, but that same part of me realises quite how bitter that would sound and so, well, I won’t. This is Zitron’s last of the year, which is doing NUMBERS and lauded pretty much everywhere as an ESSENTIAL, EXCORIATING RANT – it’s neither of those things, though, it’s overlong (I know!) and overwrought (I know!) and slightly-too-hyperbolic (I KNOW!!!!), and could reasonably be summarised as ‘modern capitalism tends to make products and experiences worse over time, and the technology industry has effectively become our most ubiquitous and ever-present example of that, and it is bad and it is terrible for consumers and, more widely, society!’. Which, you know, is true! But probably didn’t require 10k words to say. God I am such a cnut – thank God Zitron doesn’t read this shit and won’t ever know that some fcuker who writes 10k words a week themselves has had the temerity to call them ‘verbose’.
  • What It’s Like Getting Your News From Rumble: Stuart Thompson in the NYT spends some time getting all of their news from Rumble, the right-wing social media platform that’s basically ‘YouTube, but for people who worry that Fox News is possibly leaning a bit woke these days’ – as you’d expect, it’s aimed at people who are angry, and scared, and want to be rendered more angry and scared by muscular men shouting at them from their computers. This is less interesting, to my mind at least, about Rumble than it is about this very, very hyperspecific media diet and what it does to you – because, honestly, it’s not hard to look at this and then look closer to home and the GBNewssphere and the TommySphere and the TRUTH TELLING ‘news’ accounts on X and YouTube and TikTok and realise that OH FCUK WE NO LONGER HAVE ANY SORT OF SHARED CENTRAL CONCEPT OF WHAT IS TRUE AND REAL AND ACTUALLY HAPPENING ANY MORE. I can’t stress enough how much it weirds me out that seemingly NOONE is talking about this, even after a year in which it because eminently clear that there are approximately 73 different versions of ‘reality’ which people might believe in at any given moment and that maybe 20% of those 73 versions intersect in any meaningful way with what is actually happening, and that this…might prove to be problematic from a civic point of view, maybe.
  • Fantasy: Ok, this is a link to an actual book to buy – BUT! I promise you, if you’re a ‘creative’ then you will absolutely fcuking adore this. Fantasy is a book by Bruno Munari, an Italian writer who in 1977 wrote this as a guide to his concepts of imagination, creativity and ideas – it has only just been translated into English, and is available from a small press in the US and, seriously, if you’re the sort of person whose job involves design or making or even if you’re just the sort of person who really does believe that Eno’s Oblique Strategies are TRANSFORMATIVE INTELLECTUAL TOOLS then, honestly, you will ADORE this – when I found it this week I dug out a public domain copy of the Italian version to remind myself of how good it is and, honestly, this really is superb (here’s the full Italian text – Italiani, godete, the rest of you take a look and get a feel for the sort of work it is).
  • The Harper’s Spotify Story: You might not have heard about this one yet what with it being quite new, but thanks to this piece dropping in the past day or so the PR team at Spotify is going to have a significantly-less-relaxed Christmas than they might have hoped. The main thrust of the piece – extensively-researched by Liz Pelly – is that Spotify has basically been commissioning huge quantities of faceless, semi-nameless, inoffensive music which it owns the rights to and then quietly working to ensure that said music displaces other tracks to which Spotify doesn’t own the rights across popular playlists, so as to ensure that Daniel Ek, his fellow partners, and the battery of shareholders he now has to deliver VALUE to on a quarterly basis can continue being richer than any human being ever needs to be, ever. Here’s the framing, just to set the scene – oh, and just in case you were wondering, this is 100% going to get worse with AI music which really is pretty-much good enough now to produce infinite ‘ambient chill’ and ‘lofi beats’ playlists to carry us through to the heat death of the universe. REJOICE! “Spotify, I discovered, not only has partnerships with a web of production companies, which, as one former employee put it, provide Spotify with “music we benefited from financially,” but also a team of employees working to seed these tracks on playlists across the platform. In doing so, they are effectively working to grow the percentage of total streams of music that is cheaper for the platform. The program’s name: Perfect Fit Content (PFC). The PFC program raises troubling prospects for working musicians. Some face the possibility of losing out on crucial income by having their tracks passed over for playlist placement or replaced in favor of PFC; others, who record PFC music themselves, must often give up control of certain royalty rights that, if a track becomes popular, could be highly lucrative. But it also raises worrying questions for all of us who listen to music. It puts forth an image of a future in which—as streaming services push music further into the background, and normalize anonymous, low-cost playlist filler—the relationship between listener and artist might be severed completely.”
  • Moon: I think that Bartosz Ciechanowski might be one of my favourite internet people in the world – he is SO GOOD at what he does, and there’s something so insanely generous about the work he puts into these explainers; honestly, his making these feels almost like a species-wide public service (ACTUALLY, there’s an idea – is there an award for the best use of the web for purposes that benefit humanity in small ways? There should be, I think). I’ve featured his explainer articles on here before, and this new one is another beautiful addition to the collection – here, Ciechanowski explains (in LONGFORM – this is detailed and involved, but justifiably so) everything you wanted to know about the moon, how it relates to the Earth, where it came from (perhaps disappointingly, here Ciechanowski sticks to the ‘official’ line rather than the true version which involves the moon actually being a fake version placed there by Archons c.1500 – I know this is true because David Icke once told me (this itself is true)), all accompanied by his brilliant interactive diagrams which help bring all the tricky concepts of mass and orbit and, well, PHYSICS, to life. SO GOOD.
  • The Eternal Bossman: I always find the fetishisation of bodegas by people from New York somewhat tiresome – yes, yes, you have SMALL INDEPENDENT LOCAL SHOPS, they are OPEN LATE, they sell IDIOSYNCRATIC THINGS, they are often run by COLOURFUL PERSONALITIES…GYAC mate this does not make your city in any way special ffs! Particularly when the london cornershop (not, to be clear, necessarily found on a street corner) is its very own perfectly-rendered urban curio with its very own vibe and personality – central to this is the proprietor, the bossman, written up here with genuine affection by the Economist; this is a lovely piece of writing both as a picture of modern London but also as a little vignette about the state of the country, socially and economically.
  • The Polski Sklep: I’m sure there are many parts of the UK in which the rise of Polish immigrant communities feels like a relatively-recent phenomenon, but 80s Swindon was weirdly dominated by Polish families which meant that I thought everyone in the UK was called things like ‘Niewiadomski’ and ‘Wolosczinski’, and that I learned Polish swear words in parallel with English ones (there are, honestly, few things more satisfying to snarl under one’s breath than ‘curwa’), and that loads of the local shops were owned by Polish shopkeepers, and which in turn meant that I felt weirdly nostalgic reading this piece in Vittles about how the Polish shop (polski sklep) has formed a key part of diasporic life, and the odd cultural collisions you find in the aisles of shops like these. Honestly, fcuk bodegas.
  • The Sam Smiths Pubs: This has been EVERYWHERE in the past 24h – a sign both of how much the English love reading about a proper eccentric and of how the Sam Smiths chain has a particular place in the hearts of many (specifically, I think, people who realised that they allowed you access to a magical world of sub-£3 pints  – as recently as about 2010ish) – but for those of you who’ve yet to read it this is a BRILLIANT piece about the pub chain, why it’s so odd, and the very, very peculiar individual who runs the business. Americans in particular will I think practically soil themselves at the layers of Englishness on display here, but everyone will enjoy it – although I was slightly disappointed that the article at no point managed to explain why Sam Smith’s beer gives significantly worse hangovers than ANY other brewer (is it because it was cheap and therefore I drank more of it? Impossible to say).
  • How Netflix Fcuked Everything: On Netflix, its model, and the rise of ‘slop content’ and the disengaged viewer, and how, as with so much, DATA HAS FCUKED EVERYTHING. Honestly, I really wish that someone would take away from Q1 of the 2000s that our obsession with quantification IS NOT MAKING THINGS BETTER. Anyway, this is very much ‘inside the TV industry’ but it’s a fascinating, well-written and well-researched piece that will help explain to you why there’s nothing worth watching anywhere despite there being basically infinite telly. Given the majority of material on streaming platforms appears to be designed to meet the needs of a theoretical, middle-of-the-bell-curve average consumer who’s probably ‘watching’ whilst also completing at least one other task, and given than on that basis quality simply doesn’t matter like it used to, what do we think that means when AI can churn out rubbish that is basically ‘film-shaped’ if you squint? HMMMMMMMM.
  • The Mad Wargame: Ok, this is…very odd, and I am still not entirely certain why I am recommending it, but for some reason this really stuck with me after reading and so I will chuck it in here on the offchance that it appeals to one of you. Some caveats: 1) this really is VERY long; 2) it’s about the narrator and his friend undertaking a mission to play an INCREDIBLY complicated and dry-sounding WWII strategy tabletop game; 3) the narrator is (and I am not trying to be mean here – it really is true, I promise) basically Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons (he is also not unaware of this fact), almost certainly owns a fedora and/or a collection of samurai swords and/or some of those velvet-effect paintings and is…not exactly sympathetic. And his friend is, honestly, a more extreme version of this persona. These are not heroes we’re dealing with here, let’s be clear. You can imagine this guy literally saying ‘milady’; 4) this is a post on a board game website, and therefore entirely unedited. AND YET. There is something…sort-of brilliant about this, a sort of morbid-self-awareness, as well as a sense of superiority, that reminded me INCREDIBLY of the narrator in A Confederacy of Dunces (a book which I never really understood the adulation for, if I’m honest) and which made the whole thing weirdly compelling to me in ways in which I appreciate that I am now really struggling to communicate. Look, this is WEIRD and VERY uncool, but also sort of cool because of it, if that makes sense. No? No, ok, fine.
  • The Best Links Of The Year: In case you’re interested, by the way, Caitlin over at links asked me to pick my favourites – so here they are. I’m putting them in the longreads section because 4-5 of them are basically longform writing and so it sort-of fits here, and if you missed them the first time around I really do recommend giving them another go.
  • Planet Puppet: I honestly wasn’t expecting a late contender for ‘best essay of the year’ to appear in December, but this is an all-time classic imho and you MUST read it. Mina Tavakoli visits the Vent Haven Ventriloquist ConVENTion, the annual convention for the ventriloquists of the world to come together, play puppets and generally hang out, and I am not exaggerating when I say that in terms of subject matter and style this really is one of the best things I have read all year.  Honestly, this should win SO MANY PRIZES, it really is utterly superb and funny and poignant and sad and and and oh God, seriously, it is so good that I want to stop writing about how good it is so that I can go and read it again.
  • The Point of Whales: Our final essay of 2024 is this, by Richard Smyth, published in September but which I only found this week. This is short and human and rather beautiful, I thought, and the final paragraph seems like a fitting one to leave you with.

By Zhiyong Jing

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 13/12/24

Reading Time: 35 minutes

So, kill the rich or don’t kill the rich – where do YOU stand?

Obviously MURDER IS BAD, but I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that I think I’ve come up with a solution to the general problem of plutocratic wealth accumulation which we can all get behind.

Let’s all agree that noone should be murdered – ok? OK! Let’s also accept that as part of our general social contract we all agree to abide by this and that everyone should be protected from murder by the law – ok? OK! Let’s ALSO agree that this applies to everyone alive…UNLESS you decide that you personally want to accumulate a personal fortune above a certain centrally-agreed threshold – let’s say, arbitrarily, $100m (I will leave it to you to decide where you think that line should fall) which will still let you enjoy the benefits of being RICHER THAN YOU COULD EVER POSSIBLY NEED TO BE whilst at the same time preventing you from achieving the sort of patrimony that allows you to, I don’t know, buy elections. If you DO decide that, actually, I still need more money than that, then, well you’re free to accumulate it – but, also, you forfeit your right to protection from murder. Want to be a billionaire? GREAT! As long as you’re willing to also therefore be an active participant in a global game of ‘Killer Manhunt’, like Hunted but with live ordnance and some STRONG MOTIVATIONS!

Honestly, I can see NO DOWNSIDES to this idea and look forward to it forming the central plank of a coming manifesto somewhere in the world.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are probably cursing the fact you’re not able to vote me into power RIGHT NOW.

By Elizabeth Zvonar

EASE INTO THIS WEEK’S CURIOS WITH A TWO-HOUR MIX OF UNSURPASSED BEATS, BURBLES, BLOOPS AND CLICKS (IN THE BEST POSSIBLE WAY!) MIXED BY THE SUPERB JON K! 

THE SECTION WHICH, WHILE IT HAS NO DESIRE TO BE SEEN TO BE IN ANY WAY AS SHARING AN OPINION WITH KEMI BADENOCH, WOULD LIKE TO GENTLY POINT OUT THAT THE ENGLISH OBSESSION WITH SANDWICHES IS FCUKING WEIRD, PT.1:  

  • The Bluesky Curiobot: If you will allow me a brief moment of authorial self-indulgence (LOL I KNOW!)…whilst obviously the terrible words are the price I demand for all the awesome links in Curios each week, I am conscious that this isn’t the…easiest format to cope with, or the most digestible, and that to be honest there are better and more efficient ways of getting your link fix than ‘wading through whatever stream of consciousness bullsh1t Matt happens to spew out when time comes to write up the link’. AND SO! For those of you who might prefer a lighter, easier way of getting ALL OF THE INTERNET, Shardcore kindly knocked up the CurioBot on Bluesky – all of the links from Curios (minus the the videos), extracted from the newsletterblogthing and posted to Bluesky at a rate of one every few hours during (roughly) UK working hours. You get the link, and a graphic of the copy that accompanied it – but you can ignore that and get to the good stuff without having to wade through my prose at all. BE GRATEFUL! Also, look, if this is still too much then be in some way mollified with the knowledge that you’re only a year or so away from AI agents being good enough that you’ll be able to tell one to just pull you the 5-10 links it knows you’ll like best from that week’s Curios without needing to interact with the copy whatsoever – AND THEN WHERE WILL I BE?
  • Americans: This is both a beautiful bit of digital exhibitionmaking, and a rare example of a brand campaign that I really like. WeTransfer has been effectivedoing the ‘brand as patron’ thing for ‘creatives’ for a few years now, but I think this is the most successful- and best-realise project to date; in it, Dutch artist and filmmaker Robin du Puy presents a selection of films and photographs and audio portraits of ‘America’ and its citizens, captured over the past two years (there’s a book being published now-ish, and an accompanying documentary film next year). There are 24 people here from across the country, spanning ages from 6 to 80+, across gender and race and economic boundaries, and some of the images captured here are wonderful, the portraits in particular. The whole site is just a pleasure to explore – it’s well-made but not overly fussy or fancy, the navigation works, and the UX/UI presents the work effectively – honestly, this is a GREAT exhibition which works perfectly as a website, well done everyone involved.
  • Cloud Data: Another week, another beautiful (if somewhat puzzling) website found via Kris at Naive. I need to be completely honest with you – I haven’t got the faintest idea what this is, why it exists, who made it or how it works or what, really, is going on, or why; that said, CLICK THE LINK IT IS LOVELY! Basically it’s a sort of loopy ambient music toy visualiser thing – the site shows a sort of particulate simulation of steam or smoke, and clicking around it will cause small audio samples to play (whose pitch and timbre I think depend on where on-screen you click), which sort of fade and loop into themselves over a simple piano loop – the effect is of a strange, slightly-mysterious musical instrument which you can use to create fragments of odd, Sigur Ros-adjacent ambient-type sound (fcuk, music journalism’s loss really is your gain, you lucky readers!)…oh, and the particulate thing responds (slowly and subtly) to your mouse movements…honestly , I really do adore this and have spent longer than you might expect fiddling around with it in slightly-confused wonder, give it a go (and, er, if any of you can come up with a better explanation of what this is and why it exists then please do tell me because).
  • The Tinder Year In Swipe: All of the platforms, as alluded to last week, are in their wrapup era (dear God I am SO SORRY I promise never to use that sort of appalling construction ever again – I am leaving that infelicity untouched so it shames me into remembering) and Tinder is no exception – I can’t personally say that I found this any more revealing or illuminating than any of the others, but I was struck by the frankly insane tone of it. Obviously I am very, very far away from being part of Tinder’s core userbase or target market – I presume that the dating apps are broadly stratified by age, and that Tinder is where young people go to swipe, cry and eventually go back to browsing the hentai subs – but the framing of the whole thing around the idea of a ‘vision board’ (for the manifesting, you see) is, to my eyes, somewhat batsh1t. All of the various ‘trends’ are buried behind icons with no textual overlay or preview – so you have to click on the pair of ‘so kooky!’ 50s-style flick-corner sunglasses to find out that, according to Tinder, ‘eyecontactships’ (cf ‘A connection built entirely on intense eye contact — an unspoken bond without words’) have been BIG in 2024, for example. It is very, very much Not Worth The Hassle in terms of the ‘insights’ available – but don’t worry, because you can then go and create your own MANIFESTATION BOARD for 2025 when you can pick a grab-bag of these trendy traits (or the icons that represent them) and create a sort of slightly-gaudy collage to represent how YOU want your dating life to be next year…oh, God, look, this feels like it’s aimed at 14 year old girls, honestly, which is why perhaps I don’t understand it – but, equally, why the fcuk is an app designed to help people find others against whom to consensually rub their mucous membranes employing design techniques that seem more suited to Just Seventeen magazine than something for over-18s? I DON’T UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ABOUT THIS (and dear God I am going to die so so so alone).
  • Once More With Feeling: A really lovely bit of data analysis and visualisation work by Naitian Zhou and David Bamman from the University of California (and brought to my eyes by Lynn), which basically asks the question ‘how do the emotions elicited in cinema tend to vary across the runtime of a film, and what commonalities can be seen in the way in which cinematic stories use emotion over the course of a narrative arc?’. Which, yes, fine, sounds dry as fcuk, but it’s great, I promise! Basically think of it as a riff on Vonnegut’s famous ‘shape of stories’ way of considering plot, but applied to emotion. There are, aside from anything else, some interesting inferences that you might draw from this in terms of the apparent decline in ‘emotionality’ evidenced in the study since the 1980s, not to mention a whole HOST of new ‘SCIENTIFIC’ reasons you can point to as to why it’s structurally VITAL for your 6-second preroll to hit specific narrative beats (there’s an academic paper linked to on the main page here for those of you who want to go deep on this – I can imagine, for scholars of filmmaking, there’s actually a lot of rather useful information in there if you can be bothered to dig it out).
  • Sitters or Standers: More excellent datawork! This is once again from the talented people at The Pudding, who have here chosen to investigate the crucial question of ‘how many people spend the majority of their working life sitting down vs those who spend the majority of it standing up’ (if you are reading this I have a reasonably-strong feeling about which of these camps you fall into, although I concede that it’s possible that some of you might be standing desk freaks). What this does brilliantly is takes that initial question and then, using MORE DATA, unpacks what that means, what that difference looks like, where YOU sit relative to the US population, and how the differences in income and outcomes for the two different groups maps onto – and you’ll be surprised about this! – all sorts of structural societal inequalities because, THAT’S HOW THINGS WORK! I know I say this with tedious regularity whenever I feature these people and their work, but they are SO good at this and I sort of think every single organisation dealing with public data and the communication thereof should look at The Pudding’s website and, basically, learn.
  • The Queue Game: Sadly not a link to the actual game, but to an Insta carousel post (sorry, I appreciate that this is a SH1T LINK but I promise it describes something interesting) which describes how Nike built a game in Roblox which simulates the process of queueing for a sneaker drop, which rewarded players who completed it with a Snap code allowing early access to a…real life sneaker drop, which is so horribly meta and ourobouros-like that I feel like I’m getting some sort of intensely-recursive digital labyrinthitis (and it’s sentences like that one which make me feel honour bound to point you once more at the Curiobot and say ‘you can spare yourself this, you know’). This is really clever, damn the sweatshop footwear peddlers.
  • Deta Surf: There really does seem to be a general sense of AI fatigue out there – so many ‘PLEASE STOP TRYING TO MAKE AI-GENERATED SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS HAPPEN’ complaints,  charming in their finger-in-dyke futility! – but, sadly, I don’t think 2025’s going to see less of it in your life. There may be occasional positive side-effects to its continued incursion into every aspect of human/digital interaction, though – witness Deta Surf, a prototypical new web browser whose gimmick is, basically, ‘full LLM functionality wherever you surf’. So, for example, you could be browsing some photos and see something that has the PERFECT colour palette for your A/W26 wardrobe – just tell the browser to extract the colours from the image as HEX values into a CSV! See an interesting diagram on a page but not quite sure what it’s telling you? Highlight the relevant area, ask the browser to explain it to you and VWALLAH! Or at least that’s the theory as-sold – whether this will be the advertised reality is of course uncertain (what IS certain is that all of this sort of functionality will be baked into Chrome eventually and you will never hear of these plucky, first-to-market innovators ever again), but it’s clear that this is the direction of travel for the browser experience one way or another. Come on, don’t make that face, it sounds useful! What? No, no, sorry, it won’t make it any more likely that your job will still exist in a decade. Sorry about that.
  • Sora: OPEN AI’S TEXT TO VIDEO MODEL IS FINALLY HERE! Except you can’t use it in the UK due to OpenAI being scared off, at least for the moment, by UK/EU regulation – but, honestly, based on what I’ve seen floating about the web you’re not missing anything particularly groundbreaking or significantly better than Kling, Runway and the rest of the other TTV tools. What you get by all accounts is the standard genAIvideo suite of skills – great at abstract images, great at stuff that looks like stock, really really bad at anything that involves object permanence or any sort of real-world physics whatsoever (the physics thing is really interesting to me from the point of view of the whole ‘so, is embodiment a vital component of getting this stuff right then?’ question) – and, per all the other stuff on the market at the moment, it can’t maintain coherence for longer than a few seconds at a time. To be honest, of all the stuff that OpenAI has shipped over the past week or so I think I’m less interested in Sora than I am in the realtime video update they just gave GPT – which means that you can now get it to analyse and interpret live video through your phone camera or screensharing, so you can literally point your phone at stuff and ask the ai to tell you what it makes of what you’re looking at…which potentially has huge implications for simultaneous translation and tourism and all sorts of other things, as long as you don’t mind the fact that there’s a better-than-even chance that your magical AI interlocutor will just make a bunch of stuff up. This stuff could potentially be REALLY useful – and, again, there’s a host of genuinely fun and SUPRISING and DELIGHTFUL (zzzzzzzzz) things that you could do with a live video feed, an LLM reading it and MAKING STUFF HAPPEN as a result. Come on, please, someone use this in a halfway creative way for once, I’m bored of agencies wasting AI on boring, rubbish stuff.
  • Mozi: It’s pronounced ‘Mosey’, don’t you know. This is BRAND NEW, by Ev Williams (one of the two founders of Twitter who *hasn’t* turned out to be a gigantic new age cryptowellness jackass) and is basically a small social network for (reading between the lines) the international plutocrat class (or, if I’m being less bitter for a second – for reasons I can’t really get into, I currently have…something of a personal beef with the super-rich – just people who travel a lot for business and have lots of friends who also travel lots for business). The idea here is that you sign up, you make your small network of REAL FRIENDS, and you simply use Mozi as a kind of basic location tracker/planner so you can better coordinate where in the world you and all your plutey mates will be so you can better arrange the concordance of private jets to your mutual social advantage (fcuk, dammit, still feeling quite chippy). “What’s that, Jans? You’re going to be in Gstaad for 9 hours on Friday? Oh great, I’ll just shift the booking on the Lear a couple of hours and we can have a light dinner at that gorgeous new Bosi place carved into the mountainside!”. I think I am going to be sick.
  • All The Albums of the Year: It is quite funny to me that the boom in ‘curation’ (up there with ‘gaslighting’ as one of the most traduced and abused words of the decade) has itself resulted in the need for metacurators – people doing the ‘roundup of all the trend docs’, say, or ‘the best of the gift guides’ or, as in this case, compiling EVERY SINGLE ALBUM OF THE YEAR LIST THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN BY ANYONE AT ALL ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. Or at least that what this feels like – there are a LOT of lists on this (including the wonderful, utterly obscure Quietus top-100 which, even by their standards this year – and I say this with love – is…niche), but they have also helpfully provided a bunch of ways in which you can check out the albums, including one view which shows you a sort of aggregate list which, as you might possibly have been able to predict, shows Brat at the top of the annual critics’ pile. Still, if you want a starting point to get REALLY INTO the year’s best music over the holiday season (if you’re wearing headphones they can’t talk to you!) then this is a perfect website.
  • StampFans: I LOVE THIS IDEA! Stampfans is a project for people who want to produce newsletters that are a bit more meaningful, and personal, and…weighty than this ephemeral digital rubbish – rather than your missive getting sent via Beehiiv or Substack or whatever platform you’ve chosen to hitch your email agon too, StampFans will PRINT IT AND MAIL IT OUT! Yes, that’s right, this is basically a service that lets you create a (small-run) physical mailing list, to which you can send actual, physical post in bulk for a really quite modest fee. The idea is that people will pay more for a monthly physical update in letter form, which means that you can absorb the fees for the printing, paper and postage which StampFans in turn charges you – honestly, I think if you’re a poet or somehow named writer, or if you’ve got a project in the epistolary romance vein, or…Jesus, there are SO many fun ways in which you could use the mechanic to create something beautiful and personal for a small community of readers, I am getting almost…excited thinking about it, which, honestly, is no mean feat here at the fag-end of 2024 when enthusiasm for anything much beyond ‘numbing it all with drugs’ is pretty much nil. SOMEONE PLEASE USE THIS FOR GOOD!
  • AP’s Photos of 2024: The Associated Press shares its pics for the best news photography of the past year. Stunning across the board, but my personal pic is the Romanian Orthodox nuns. As you’d imagine, this covers the FULL GAMUT OF HUMAN LIFE (and death), so caveat emptor for blood and death and tears and suffering (and sports!) and all the other fun things that make up the rich tapestry of existence.

By FeeBee

NEXT UP PUT SOME SUNSHINE INTO AN OTHERWISE STEEL=GREY DECEMBER WITH THIS SUPERB SELECTION OF AMAPIANO AND AFROBEAT COLLECTED OVER THE YEAR BY DANIEL HARRIS!

THE SECTION WHICH, WHILE IT HAS NO DESIRE TO BE SEEN TO BE IN ANY WAY AS SHARING AN OPINION WITH KEMI BADENOCH, WOULD LIKE TO GENTLY POINT OUT THAT THE ENGLISH OBSESSION WITH SANDWICHES IS FCUKING WEIRD, PT.2:  

  • Sanborn Fire Maps: Per the history books, “”D. A. Sanborn, a young surveyor from Somerville, Massachusetts, was engaged in 1866 by the Aetna Insurance Company to prepare insurance maps for several cities in Tennessee. [..] Before working for Aetna, Sanborn conducted surveys and compiled an atlas of the city of Boston titled ‘Insurance Map of Boston, Volume 1, 1867’” – “But Matt!”, I hear you ask, “why the fcuk should I care?”, which is, frankly, a not-unreasonable question. The answer is that Brandon Silverman loved the typography and design of the aforementioned maps so much that he’s taken the time to create this website dedicated to them – you can buy prints of some of the design work, but you can also browse the archive in high-definition and, honestly, the lettering and layout of the title pages alone is, I promise you, fcuking AMAZING – seriously, if you’re in any way visually inclined then I think you will slightly fall in love with the work on here. It’s astonishing when you go through the galleries how much stuff seems to riff off this particular style – it really does feel ICONIC, in an odd sort of way.
  • UnWrapped: Were you somewhat underwhelmed by your Wrapped last week? Do you not feel it quite captured the intricacies and nuance of your DEEPLY PERSONAL relationship to music, a relationship which is ENTIRELY UNIQUE and UNLIKE ANYONE ELSE’S (“you listened to 3,208 hours of Chappell Roan, CharliXCX and The 1975”)? Well why not create some alternative graphics to share amongst your friendship group and see if anyone gives a single iota more of a fcuk – this does a very good job of mimicking the vibe of this year’s Wrapped, down to the nonsensical AI-generated genre soup it created for everyone and some truly stellar made-up bandnames (I just fired it up again to remind myself of what it does, and it’s telling me that I listened to a LOT of Hedgerow Focaccia in 2024 which, honestly, I wish I had, maybe it would have made me feel better) – part of me wonders whether you could actually fool people with these, and the answer is, I think, ‘yes’ (making up fake bands and trying to get people to pretend to be sincerely into them even though they are entirely fictional is a MEAN thing to do, though, and I still feel guilty about getting a friend of mine’s little brother to swear blind that he was a massive fan of underground indie heroes ‘Chimney Factory’ c.1996).
  • David Whyte: David Whyte is a poet – I personally wasn’t familiar with his work, but this section of his website, which presents the text of one of his poems to music, has a genuinely BEAUTIFUL look at feel to it, all watercolour landscapes that get filled in as you scroll, both digital and, oddly painterly (which in my experience is a really hard balance to strike when trying to nail this sort of aesthetic on-screen), and despite the fact that this is possibly a *touch* on the twee side for my personal taste I can’t help but admire the gorgeous webwork on show here.
  • The Tiny Tools Directory: A handy collection of small webbuilding and creative tools, compiled by Curios favourite Everest Pipkin, designed for anyone who’s interested in building games or any sort of other lightly-interactive project online. Contains links to all sorts of useful things, from documentation about the ‘how’ to bits of software that will help with the ‘what’ – from game engines to graphics packs, mapmakers to sound generators, all helpfully=filterable in a variety of different ways. Such a generous collection of tools, rendered genuinely useful thanks to simple, helpful taxonomy and design – an object lesson in how to run this sort of thing.
  • Specific Suggestions: You will, of course, as diligent students of Stuff Online, be familiar with the 1944 CIA document which described in detail how best to sabotage an organisation or bureaucracy from within, with helpful tips like ‘talk as frequently as possible and at great length’ or ‘hold conferences when there is critical work to be done’ – all the sorts of things that, IRONICALLY, are often hallmarks of modern working culture. Anyway, some kind soul has now compiled all these helpfully-unhelpful ways of working into a single website where you can hit a button to get a new piece of sabotage advice each time, along with some accompanying text explaining a little more about the project. Why not make it a workplace ‘thing’ in 2025 to share a new one of these with your team at the start of each new week? Although, er, given the way everything’s going perhaps we shouldn’t accelerate the decline of the labour market any more than is already happening.
  • Fearleaders: Did you know that there is only ONE all-male (and non-binary) cheerleading team in the world, and that that team is in Vienna, Austria, and that they are call THE FEARLEADERS????? No, fcuk off, you did NOT know that, stop lying. Per the site, “As Fearleaders Vienna we support gender diversity and emancipation. We subvert gender stereotypes by turning them upside down and expose ridiculous and in the same way toxic masculine behaviour with overstatement and irony. We want to set a strong statement for equality and fundamental rights for every person in our society. We think that there is a need for men to not only choose a clear position when it comes to equality, but to also make a statement and fight side by side with the women* we support. Staying silent means accepting the status quo.” Also, and this is really important, they have some really sweet outfits in a popping orange/blue colourway. If you feel that this is YOUR SORT OF THING then you may be happy to know that there is a 2025 calendar currently onsale, featuring (based on the brief selection of sample images on display) some PG-rated queer lols in the Alps.
  • Do Professional Stuff on Bluesky: Look, I imagine any of you working for Big Agencies will have access to one of the big social media multiplatform management systems and as such will get this as standard at some point soon (if it’s not already baked into Hootsuite et al – thankfully this sort of thing is No Longer My Problem) – but if you don’t you might find this useful. TrackBlue’s a platform that lets you do a bunch of ‘pro’ stuff on the platform, like scheduling posts and managing your audience and getting analytics and that sort of jazz. Is it interesting? No, no it is not, but it might be USEFUL and sometimes I sacrifice my personal interest for your professional development, because that’s the sort of selfless misanthrope I am.
  • TimeyWimey: The name of this website/tool is so utterly abhorrent that I considered excluding it on grounds of crimes against language, but the design here is SO NICE that I couldn’t quite bring myself to. This is, fine, a very, very simple idea – a website which helps you calculate time differences – but the way it works is so simple and so elegant that I was left slightly agog (I appreciate that it’s entirely possible that none of you will be that amazed by this, but you have to bear in mind that, as I have mentioned, I am basically an anti-visual person and so possibly my threshold for this sort of thing is maybe…a touch lower than yours). Still, I thought this was super – it almost made me wish that I was the sort of international jetsetter who had cause to pay attention to different timezones (but I am very much not).
  • The Best Book Covers of 2024: Or at least ‘the 100 best book covers of 2024 according to Print Magazine’ – those slight caveats don’t make this any less of a great selection of designwork though. I think, based on the fact there are occasionally multiple editions of the same book, that this covers the wider world rather than just North America – there is such a wonderful breadth of work here and several of these which I would LOVE as prints (the cover to Napalm in the Heart by Pol Guasch, in particular, made me properly stop and gasp as I scrolled and I LOVE IT SO), and this is both just a lovely thing to scroll through and a wonderful source of high-quality visual inspiration should you be in the market for such a thing.
  • Photo Dharma: Do you like Buddhism? Do you like photographs? Do you like the concept of ‘photographs of Buddhism’ but have previously been unsure as to what the best place online to explore it might be? WELCOME TO YOUR HEAVEN! Photo Dharma contains “over 18,000 photographs of Buddhist archeological sites, pilgrimage centres, and temples in S & SE Asia, as well as Maps, Posters, etc.” for you to scroll through to your heart’s content. Web Curios – getting you one step closer to Nirvana with every link you click! Found via Jodi Ettenberg’s excellent monthly roundup of things.
  • Every Colour Imaginable: Now, I don’t know you, I don’t know what your mind is like and as such I simply have no idea what you can or can’t imagine. Are you capable of conceiving of colours of a depth and brilliance I can’t even guess at? Do your eyes perceive frequencies denied to me by my low-quality retinas? I HAVE NO FCUKING IDEA. As such I’m not able to gauge the veracity of the whole ‘every colour imaginable’ thing – but trust me when I say that there are a FCUKTONNE of colours on this page, although I am baffled as to exactly why.
  • SkullSite: An early Christmas present for the goths now (lol, like this hasn’t been on all your bookmarks lists for decades) – SkullSite is dedicated to photos and 3d scans of bird skulls – JUST BIRDS, FCUK OFF WITH YOUR MAMMALIAN CRANIA! – of which there are seemingly many, many hundreds collected here. The site is OLD and is seemingly in the process of being migrated elsewhere, and the 3d scans don’t currently work because of Flash being dead, and, well, what’s left is a collection of photos of the headbones of dead avians, but WOW are bird skulls cool looking and multivariantly weird-looking. Were it not *a bit weird* I would be sorely tempted to pick up a few of these as decorative objects (but I am quite acutely conscious at the moment of the fact that I probably can’t really afford to add any more ‘odd’ to my personality lest I become entirely incapable of relating to actual human beings).
  • Anti-Tag Clouds: Ooh, this is an interesting angle from which to look at a text which I’d honestly never thought of before – “An Anti-Tag Cloud shows you the most common English words that never appear in a text, visualizing the “negative space” of a literary work. Size indicates how frequent a word is across other texts.” Select classic books from the drop down and learn that ‘blood’ is never mentioned in Pride & Prejudice, that The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes apparently contains not a single mention of the word ‘religion’, and that, genuinely surprisingly, the word ‘horse’ does not occur even once in ‘Carry On, Jeeves’. Ooh, and the complete absence of the terms ‘father’ and ‘mother’ in Winnie The Pooh is REALLY interesting (to me at least). There’s an interesting reverse game in this where you’re presented with the missing words list and asked to guess which book the tag cloud applies to, in case anyone fancies engineering that.
  • Hotpipes: A reader writes! Thankyou so much to Caroline Crampton, who got in touch after last week’s Curios saying “I would like to recommend my favourite regular pipe organ broadcast: Hot Pipes. As far as I can tell, this radio show/podcast is made by a single British ex-pat living in Spain who just really, really loves documenting and explaining the sound of historical pipe organs. He often themes shows around particular composers or locations. For instance, this is one featuring organs that were built inside American pizza restaurants.” I obviously had no idea when writing last week that one of the six of you who read this thing would be a pipe organ enthusiast and would really appreciate my including an organ-related link, but THIS IS PERFECT AND WHY I LOVE WRITING CURIOS AND WHY I LOVE THE WEB (in the brief moments when I don’t resent it for making me the broken husk of a man I very much now am).
  • The London Community Laptop Orchestra: Based in Hackney, because some stereotypes are simply too powerful to overcome, the LCLO (I refuse to type the whole name more than once) is “a london based community laptop orchestra, open to anyone who’s interested in getting involved. no experience is required. only a laptop.” I know NOTHING about this and am working on the basis that these people are unlikely to be murderers, but if you’d like to find out for yourselves then there’s a meetup in FCUKING HACKNEY next week! Please do go along and reassure me that they are not in fact some sort of weird digital satanic cult or something.
  • Julianne Aguilar: I’m going to paste a small section of the ‘about’ bit of digital artist Julianne Aguilar’s website here, as I think it will help you understand why I love it: “Julianne Aguilar is an artist, writer, and narrative designer. Her work is inspired by HTML1, unfinished and abandoned 100k+ word fanfics, weed, hell.com circa 1999, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Net Chick: A Smart-Girl Guide To The Wired World by Carla Sinclair, the 1999 Nine Inch Nails masterpiece The Fragile, “Mother Earth, Mother Board” by Neal Stephenson, Elim Garak from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, dying MMORPGs, gail.com, the 1996 first person shooter Quake…” – the list of influences goes on, but it’s safe to say that this is all VERY MUCH MY SH1T. Aguilar’s website features a selection of small little digital artworks (along with a selection of articles and non-digital works), all linked from the homepage, some lightly-interactive and some which unfold over a short period as you watch them, and I have only explored a dozen or so but I honestly think there is some really, really lovely stuff in here that rewards both investigation and a bit of careful attention.
  • Into Time: Ok – click this link and and watch the beautiful colour gradient shift over the screen. Get a bit mesmerised. Then click the screen and realise that you can subdivide it into different sections and create a unique, vaguely-kaleidoscopic artwork composed of shifting windows of colour in a geometric grid and…LOOK IT IS GOOD OK IT IS NOT MY FAULT I AM TERRIBLE AT DESCRIBING THESE THINGS. Just click the link ffs.
  • Doctor Who Scarf: Is Doctor Who good or bad at the moment? Has the series been KILLED BY WOKE or has it NEVER BEEN BETTER? I can’t tell at what point in the seemingly-constant WHO QUALITY DISCOURSE the fandom finds itself (and, honestly, nor indeed do I particularly care – it is a children’s TV programme ffs), but hopefully one thing that EVERYONE can agree on is that a stripey scarf is, at heart, an excellent thing to be celebrated. And so it is with this site (SEAMLESS!) which exists specifically to chart the different scarves worn by Tom Baker, a past Doctor from…what, the 70s? 80s?…per their description, “Tom Baker wore several scarves during his seven series as the Doctor. Each one had its own unique characteristics. Select the links above for detailed information about each scarf including patterns, knitting specifications and yarn suggestions. There are also sections featuring the history of the design, tips for scarf construction, a gallery of scarves knitted by fans (and me) plus some fun ephemera.” FUN SCARF-RELATED EPHEMERA – WHAT MORE COULD YOU ASK FOR?!?! I jest, Whovians, I jest, enjoy your scarves.
  • Bird1000: A game! Promoting an album! Which has, honestly, one of the most utterly-batsh1t soundtracks I have heard in…dear God, in quite a while. This is a sidescrolling platformer – simple but quite shiny-looking – which is part of a wider multimedia arts project to promote a new record by Armenian artist Tigran Hamasyan. “The transmedia project The Bird of a Thousand Voices is the first of its kind to bring ancient Armenian folk tale Hazaran Blbul to life. Armenian composer & pianist Tigran Hamasyan and Dutch filmmaker & visual artist Ruben Van Leer are joining forces for a new live staged production that had its world premiere at the Holland Festival. The mythical bird – whose thousand different songs travel the world to spread harmony – comes to life in an intriguing new kind of music theater, an online game, a kinetic art installation and a series of films.” This is…this is quite overwhelming to be honest, and I am not joking when I say that the music really is like nothing I’ve ever heard before, sort of intensely melodic and a wonderful mix of Eastern and Western, but also…quite fcuking mental. I really really enjoyed this – three minutes of very weird, quite dazzling fun,
  • Skeal: Last up in this section is a game which I am slightly amazed I haven’t linked to in the past – this is PERFECT for December (and, honestly, any time of the year, but most of all December). It is short, it is silly, it will make you grin from ear-to-ear, and you need to turn your sound up. ENJOY!

By Zoe Hawk

OUR FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK IS AN HOUR OF TOP-NOTCH JAZZ SELECTED AND MIXED BY MAARTEN GOETHEER!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Tumblr Communities: This is a really interesting development by Tumblr. Yesterday it rolled out its ‘Communities’ feature to everyone, having previously been testing it in beta since earlier this year, which basically functions a bit like subReddits or forums – anyone can create a ‘community’ around anything they like (presumably within reason – no ‘recreational self-harming’ allowed, I would imagine), within which people post content on which others can comment…yes, it’s yet another reinvention of the base concept of ‘the forum’ (which I think after a few decades we can now all basically agree is the platonic idea of digital platforms, amirite? Eh? Please yourselves you fcuks)! But given the intensely-culturally-specific nature of Tumblr communities and the way fandoms congregate there seems to make perfect sense, and which makes this something that I am holding out hope is going to reinvigorate the platform a bit. It’s all a bit thin at the moment, the discovery functionality is, to be polite, dogsh1t, and there’s a general air of ‘featureset 1.0’ about the whole thing but, equally, it’s very early days and, who knows? If you’re really into, I don’t know, Taylor/Charli slashfic then perhaps this will be your new online foreverhome? Also – and this, I have to say, pleased me no end – THE OTHERKIN ARE THERE!!!!! No, I am not linking to their space, let them believe they are goblins in peace.
  • Flag Stories: Do you like flags? Would you like a LOT of information and data about flags and how their designs and design elements compare? Good, because FCUK ME does whoever runs this page share that enthusiasm and then some.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • UKSnack Attack: Imagined snack foods that don’t exist but which the creator of these mockups and several hundred thousand people who follow the account very much wish did. This doesn’t wholly do it for me, but it’s entirely possible that you will all be less pathetic food snobs than I am – either way, the photoshopping here is TP NOTCH, so well done to the kid behind it.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Gisele Pelicot: There’s no way to describe Janice Turner’s reporting of the conclusion of the trial of Gisele Pelicot other than ‘very distressing’, but, equally, it feels like it ought to be required reading – aside from the most obviously-horrific elements, there’s something particularly chilling, which Turner grapples with, about the self-image of the men involved, about how a sexual culture can be allowed to persist which allows men like the perpetrators to somehow doublethink their way into somehow not believe that they were committing rape…It’s impossible to read this without feeling quite sick, but it’s also quite important that we do, I think. One thing, though – I’ve found some of the commentary around ‘French culture’ and ‘French sexual / social mores’ in the reporting of this case somewhat blinkered and pathetic. GYAC everyone, this is not a country that is significantly more sexually-enlightened than anywhere else, regardless of what the English might want to believe of themselves, and to pretend otherwise is to ignore the fact that the vast majority of sexual crimes in the UK go unpunished.
  • Damascus: That…that happened quickly, didn’t it? I don’t mean to be wildly conspiratorial about events in Syria, but it does rather feel like there are some…COMPLICATED GEOPOLITICAL CURRENTS underpinning the events of the past week or so, and that there are about seven layers of proxy warfare happening in the region at any given second. Anyway, this is all by way of preamble to say that I am not even going to pretend to have anything other than a pretty cursory understanding of the complexities of the overthrow of the Assad regime., but that I found this piece in the LRB a helpful and clear overview of the situation as it stands (or stood a couple of days ago, at the very least). What does seem clear, though, is that Israel looks very much like a country which feels like it can act with impunity now – which, perhaps, is exactly what it is, for better or worse.
  • Parsing Luigi: I’ve been slightly disappointed at the lack of high-quality thinkpieces on the UnitedHealth CEO assassination – yes, ok, we’ve had the handwringing over the question of whether it’s ok to celebrate a death, even if the person who died ran a really horrible business in really horrible industry, but what I want to know is who’s currently running the book on ‘number of CEOs to get offed, globally, in 2025’? Because, honestly, I reckon there’s a market in that. Anyway, this piece looks at all the sleuthing that went on in the wake of his identity being uncovered – specifically his Goodreads, reading the tea leaves of his publicly-declared reads and his wishlists, scrying in the viscera of his reading history for clues as to what drove him to pursue a terminal solution to what he saw as the inherent injustice of the US healthcare system. The answer? There isn’t one, because you can tell very little about what someone is ACTUALLY like or what they actually think from the books they have performatively claimed to read on a socially-focused platform! Still, it’s interesting to speculate.
  • What Happened To The Glamour of Tomorrow: This is SUCH a good and interesting essay and one of the occasional ones which I feel honour bound to recommend if you’re someone with ‘planner’ or ‘strategist’ or (lol!) ‘futurist’ in your job title. Virginia Postrel asks ‘when did we stop thinking that progress was inevitable?’ and ‘when did the future stop feeling exciting and instead become either grim or dull or terrifying?’, and, honestly, this articulates something I felt so strongly wondering round the Electric Dreams show at the Tate recently – there’s a section showing some of the works displayed at the 1970 World’s Fair in Tokyo and literally EVERYTHING about that exhibition – the design of the pavilions, the language used, the ambition and the enthusiasm on display – spoke of a world in which tomorrow was, inevitably, going to be BETTER. Now? Hm.This is long but SO smart and dizzyingly polymathic, covering design and architecture and economic theory and philosophy and taking you through 20thC modernism towards a theory of how we might once again make progress seem exciting. This links to something I read, linked to from Sean Monahan’s typically-interesing newsletter, about how one of the main problems for the left is that it lacks a progress-based vision; at the moment what it seems to be offering is a future in which, ok, things might be more equal, but, also, you won’t have any holidays or new things, and you will have to eat root vegetables for six months of the year because seasonality, whereas the right is promising spaceships and rockets and getting rich on the memecoin lottery and, well, you can sort of see the problem can’t you?
  • The Creator Economy: Or, as Suw Charman-Anderson puts it in this essay, hares and lynx. This is one of the best explanations of why the economics behind the glorious ideal of THE CREATOR ECONOMY – in which everyone is selling the fruits of their creative labour to 1000 true fans and everyone’s happy and fulfilled – is a lovely concept which simply has no bearing in reality thanks to some fairly simple supply/demand logic; this is a really good, clear rundown of why it’s simply not possible for the vast majority of people to make a living ‘creating’ (at least not in the freeform way we like to think of it now), at least not in the present economic system – should anyone you know start talking about wanting to ‘pivot to becoming a full-time creator’ at any point over Christmas then I suggest that you a) share this link with them; b) maybe recommend some good plumbing courses or something.
  • The AI We Deserve: I’ve been recommending Evgeny Morosov’s writing in here for YEARS, and he’s once again written a banger – on AI and how perhaps we shouldn’t ‘settle’ for LLMs, and that perhaps it might be possible to conceive of a different form/function mix for AI if we think beyond narrow neoliberal conceptions of utility, and how the history of AI research since the mid-20thC has ended up where we are now. Which, now I’m typing it, is quite heavy for 1044am on a Friday morning, but if you have any interest at all in both the history of AI research but also the broader question of the ‘shape’ of technologies and how those ‘shapes’ get determined then you will really enjoy this a lot. There’s something in here about ‘pointy, directional’ systems vs ‘wandering’ systems that I think is really rich and rather fascinating, in particular.
  • The Management Singularity: I’m not linking to anything about the Casey Newton/Gary Marcus AI spat this week because I figure that if any of you care about it you’ll already be aware, and if you’re not then you don’t – that said, fwiw, my broad position is that Newton fcuked up by conflating a bunch of different AI-sceptic positions into one straw man (and an inelegantly-constructed one too) but that he is right about some things (specifically, that anyone saying ‘this stuff is useless’ doesn’t quite understand either AI or What Lots Of Companies Actually Do), and that Gary Marcus is a very smart man who REALLY loves Gary Marcus – but this piece feels vaguely-adjacent to it. Briefly, this is a decent little ‘where we are now’ article by Henry Farrell which points out that the real usecases for GenAI at the moment are to be found in boring, invisible bits of businesses rather than at the shiny margins, and that – basically the reason I like this is that it (SURPRISE!) agrees exactly with what I have been saying for 18m, to whit: “I have not seen any case studies of implementation of LLMs in big organizations. But I am prepared to bet significant amounts of money that this is going to be one of their most important uses. For much the same reason that they are excellent at spitting out ritual products, they are going to be very good at taking goals and procedures that are expressed in the language of Overall Management System A, and translating them into the terms and objectives of Sub-Management Systems B, C, an d D or for that matter, at giving Sub-Management System C a better idea of what those people in Sub-Management B are actually on about, when they use those weird words and keep on pushing incomprehensible goals.”
  • How Videogames Became Addiction Technology: A piece in the NYT looking at how the game industry’s model has shifted towards live service games – those, like Fortnite, which NEVER END, and which receive regular content updates over the course of their years-long lifespan, and which as a result can be profitable to a degree unimaginable to the old ‘sell a copy of a physical product’ concept of gaming pre-web – and how that shift has meant an equal shift in game design principles, where it is now vitally important to KEEP THE PLAYER COMING BACK, and how that in turn means that games have quite a lot more in common with slot machines than they did a decade or so ago. All of which is true, and all of which feels…desperately underregulated, if I’m honest (I can’t believe I am talking positively about the regulation of videogames – Young Matt would be APPALLED), especially when you take into account these smart additional observations on How This Works With Live Data offered by Adrian Hon.
  • The First AI Films Are Here: A warning – if you’re an actual, proper creative person, who makes stuff with love and care and craft and pours their heart and soul into whatever it is that you bring into the world, if you’re that sort of person then, well, this article will really upset you. 404 Media’s Jason Koebler went to a screening of AI-generated films by TV company TCL which is making them because…well, because this: “TCL said it expects to sell 43 million televisions this year. To augment the revenue from its TV sales, it has created a free TV service called TCL+, which is supported by targeted advertising. A few months ago, TCL announced the creation of the TCL Film Machine, which is a studio that is creating AI-generated films that will run on TCL+. TCL invited me to the TCL Chinese Theater, which it now owns, to watch the first five AI-generated films that will air on TCL+ starting this week.” So the endpoint is this – are you poor? Are you too poor to afford premium TV and streaming? NO PROBLEM! You can get a cheap TV and a bunch of free content! Yes, ok, fine, the free TV is cr4p, and the free content is 90% ads and 10% AI-slop, but, well, FREE MOVING IMAGES TO DISTRACT YOUR EYEPIECES! Obviously the ‘films’ are terrible, but it’s not that that’s the most upsetting part of this – it’s the clear understanding developing in my mind that, much as there’s a(n often predatory) ‘sub-prime market’ for lending to the financially at-risk, there will soon be a sub-prime market for culture, produced and marketed to people who can’t afford the ‘premium’ stuff, with all the best dataextractive ad-side services that modernity can muster. Fcuk ‘em, they’re only proles. Dear God.
  • Fish Eye: Ooh, I love this essay by Amelia Wattenburger – this is both a really interesting way of thinking about looking at problems, or concepts, or information, or a text, at different levels of ‘zoom’ to extract different layers of meaning from them/it, but it’s also a really charmingly-designed webpage which features possibly my favourite ever bit of pointless-but-lovely on-page animation (you will see what I mean).
  • The Pr0nhub Bongo Data Bonanza: Judging by the numbers in here it’s a wonder any of you can still see to read, you grubby things! The world’s premier tube site returns with its 2024 data drop – as ever, you can learn fascinating things about the particular proclivities of your nation, or the baffling extent to which certain national stereotypes really do maintain across all areas of life (although, briefly, I am going to push back slightly against people suggesting that Italians searching for Italians or French people searching for French people is nationalistic narcissism and suggest it’s far more likely to do with linguistics and the fact that not everyone wants to hear their fcuking in English), and this year’s selection of stats is no exception. I am slightly saddened to see that the global spike in trends for ‘giant pr0n’ which I think happened in 2021 appears to have been a blip, but am once again slightly amazed at how little as a species we talk about the seemingly-universal desire to crack one off to cartoons. Like, does noone else other than me think that, at the very least, there is something CULTURALLY CURIOUS about this? And how it might be linked to all sorts of interesting things such as the ubiquity of videogames over the past 30 years, and how that plays into a prevalence to a particular smooth, poreless aesthetic as classically seen in games and anime? And how that plays into real-world aesthetics and fashion, and how that spills into cosmetic procedures? Anyone? No? Ok, FINE.
  • How WhatsApp Changed The World: A typically-great bit of reporting by Rest of World which looks at how Whatsapp for Business has basically become international infrastructure for ecommerce businesses across the world, particularly outside of the Global North, and how the introduction of AI (INEVITABLY) is going to potentially impact the economies that have been established around the platform and its use for customer services, etc. So so so interesting.
  • Paper People: Another piece about gaming and gaming culture, this time about the growth in popularity of dating simulators aimed at women in Japan and Korea (and elsewhere, but particularly in those countries), and how this is leading to the young men who were traditionally served by the genre feeling somehow traduced or abandoned by a market that now wants to serve people who don’t have the same genitals or desires as they do. Do…do women do this if stuff they like gets popular with a new group? Because, honestly, this sort of behaviour is one of the more embarrassing aspects of my gender. Anyway, this is hugely-interesting about games and how they reflect shifting cultural attitudes and social mores, and how WEIRD fan culture is (THE EMPHASIS IS ON CULT).
  • Mike Myers: A lovely interview with Mike Myers, taken from a recent appearance in LA, in which he talks about his life, his career, his work, comedy in general…honestly, Wayne’s World is obviously ace but I have no love whatsoever for Austin Powers (I once saw Austin Powers 2 in the cinema with my Mexican friend Nick who was living with me at the time – I laughed a grand total of once, at a joke about Moon Unit Zappa at which not one other person made a sound, which story I tell you not to make me look somehow ‘cool’ (I am at least self-aware enough to know it very much does not do that) but to give you an idea how far away it and I are in terms of ‘comedy taste’), I am too old for Shrek to be an overwhelming cultural touchstone in my life and SNL is a) American; and b) never, ever funny, and so I am not any sort of Myers fan, but this is SO CHARMING and SO INTERESTING and, as with a lot of these interviews with people who are obviously VERY GOOD at what they do, you will end up learning a surprising amount about ‘the craft of comedy’ (sorry) as you read.
  • Rough Fish: This is very much one of those articles which I did not expect to enjoy, or even finish, and yet which I found oddly and completely fascinating – the ‘rough fish’ of the title are not, sad to say, tattooed, scarred and belligerent; instead it’s a descriptor for a class of fish generally considered not worth gutting fully when out fishing in Minnesota, and this article is how the State is slowly coming to the realisation that while they might be annoyingly-bony to eat they can still be useful and a vital part of the ecosystem. Seriously, I have never fished and am the very opposite of a nature or outdoorsy person, but this charmed me LOADS and it might do the same to you.
  • War Games: Not suggesting that there’s any reason why we might want to be thinking about this sort of thing right now, but, well, what do you reckon would happen if someone got a bit nuke happy? Well helpfully someone’s already simmed it all out. “The best available model of such an event is an ultrasecret 1983 Pentagon war game called Proud Prophet. That game was a nuclear test of sorts, and it provided critical lessons that remain crucial today. It was unique in that by design it was largely unscripted, involved the highest levels of the U.S. military and its global warfighting commands and used actual communication channels, doctrines and secret war plans. One of its great strengths was that unlike any other war game involving the possibility of small-yield nuclear weapons, it ran freely and was allowed to play out to its natural conclusion: global devastation.” Look, this won’t necessarily fill you with Christmas spirit but it’s SO interesting, both in terms of how the ‘game’ worked and also how it unfolded – come on, tell the truth, it would be quite fun do play this over the course of a few days, wouldn’t it, drunk on the power and safe in your imagined bunker.
  • Cleaning The Tube At Night: The second week in a row I’m featuring a piece by Miles Ellingham in the Londoner; honestly, though, this is another cracker, accompanying the night cleaning team of the London Underground as it goes through the tunnels as you and I sleep, cleaning the tracks and the walls and the tunnels of the detritus, human and animal and mineral, that accumulates over the hundreds of miles of track that comprise the network. Exactly the sort of storytelling you want from your city’s press, taking you into a part of the urban environment most of us don’t ever think of and will never see, this is the sort of writing the Standard *should* have been commissioning, fcuk you Evgeny and Gideon and Emily and Dylan you fcuking fcuks.
  • Cymbals, Anyone?: I though this was SUCH a charming story, told wonderfully, about the moment at which Patricia Wentzel possibly might have realised they were neurodivergent – but didn’t, yet.
  • Radicalised: Finally this week, a Cory Doctorow short from 2019 which, as you will realise as you read it, is not a little prescient.  There’s a bit of dialogue towards the end in which an adult and a child have a conversation about ethics which is so eerily on-the-nose that it’s a wonder their not raiding the author’s house for a rudimentary Tardis. Very good indeed.

By Cecil Touchon

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 06/12/24

Reading Time: 31 minutes

HELLO EVERYONE HELLO HAPPY FRIDAY!

I, er, went out for LUNCH yesterday, which, it turned out, was quite long, and quite liquid, and which almost certainly didn’t require the additional afterbooze, and which possibly was the reason as to why I woke up at 4am this morning…which is by way of small explanation as to why what follows is, even by my standards, a poorly-written and frankly barely-sensical mess of branespeek.  The links, though? The links are, as per, fcuking GREAT.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you should probably just click the links and ignore the words this week, sorry.

By Bobbi Essers

IT MAY NOT SURPRISE YOU TO LEARN THAT MY INTEREST IN CHRISTMAS IS PRETTY MUCH ZERO AND THAT I HAVE WHAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS A VISCERAL HATRED OF ‘FESTIVE’ MUSIC, BUT, BECAUSE I APPRECIATE THAT YOU MAY BE LESS FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN THAN I AM, I NONETHELESS PRESENT TO YOU THIS 3.5H SELECTION OF (NOT WHOLLY TRADITIONAL) CHRISTMAS TRACKS COMPILED BY MY FRIEND ED!

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY CURIOUS TO WATCH THE ‘GREGG WALLACE MAKES FRIENDS WITH LAURENCE FOX’ THING THAT NOW SEEMS GRIMLY INEVITABLE, PT.1:  

  • Advent 2024: Despite my personal distaste for the season, I am aware that, for many of you, this is THE MOST WONDERFUL TIME OF THE YEAR and that this might well be the week in which you turned on the fairy lights, purchased a violently-overpriced spruce and started calculating which of your secondary organs you’re going to have to sell to pay for everything. In the general spirit of ALMOST CHRISTMAS, then, we kick off the links this week with this, honestly, really really lovely project which presents a different, small digital toygamevignettething for each day of the advent calendar. Per their blurb, “Advent.js is a creative coding calendar of beautiful pieces of digital art (and one beautiful main menu) made by writers, poets, engineers, artists and other creative coders, with one new piece being revealed each day of December leading up to Christmas” – I can’t, to my shame, recall whether I’ve featured this in previous years, but there’s a link to the 2023 edition on the homepage should you want EVEN MORE CHRISTMAS. Obviously we’re only a few days into this, meaning there are only (at the time of writing) six of the windows currently open, but there are some really, really lovely pieces of work already in there – in particular, the little gamething from 3 December is, honestly, SO SO SO GOOD and really fun, and frankly worth the click all on its own. Bookmark this and enjoy a SMALL MOMENT OF DIGITAL FESTIVE JOY each morning between now and 25th December – or, alternatively, put yourself into some sort of medically-induced coma until approximately 3rd Jan when this will all be over. If anyone has any hookups on that front, by the way, I am very much all ears.
  • Our AI President: This is sort-of interesting and, weirdly, sort-of incredibly sad (or at least it was to me). It’s fair to say that Lebanon is…well, it’s a bit fcuked really, isn’t it, what with the 20+ years of no real Government and the whole Hezbollah thing, and the more recent ‘getting absolutely pounded by ordnance thanks to the munificence of the state of Israel’ thing, and, without wishing to be too pessimistic (lol), it’s not looking hugely likely that things will get significantly better anytime soon. Still, er, at least they now have a vaguely-inspirational chatbot! Our AI President is a project by Arabic newspaper AlNahar, which has used 90-odd years of its journalism on Lebanon and the wider region to train an LLM, which you can now interrogate about the country, its history, and how the fcuk it might be possible to sort it out a bit. “Lebanon has been enduring without a leader for over two years now, marred by decades of political deadlock and rampant sectarianism. But unlike transient human leaders driven by corruption, power, and greed, the AI President embodies transparency, integrity, and utilitarianism, and operates solely on logic and data-driven decision-making. By creating this AI leader, AnNahar aims to fill a critical gap in the political sphere while also exploring the potential for artificial intelligence to transcend the biases and political leanings that have long plagued traditional governance.” The bot is…actually not a terrible example of the genre, and it will deliver reasonably-cogent-sounding answers to questions like ‘so, how exactly might Lebanon extricate itself from the current clusterfcuk it finds itself embroiled in?’, but, honestly, there’s something almost-entirely awful about the hollowness of it all, and the idea that a fcuking LLM might have ‘answers’ to some of the issues facing the country – there are a bunch of suggested questions you might want to ask The Machine at the bottom of the page, including “how might we achieve accountability for the Beirut port explosion of 2020” which made me do an actual, bleak lol. Don’t worry, people of Lebanon! Your state is nonexistent and your national infrastructure is fcuked, but why not ask a chatbot how to make it better?
  • They See Your Photos: It seems strange that in the year 2024 we are still largely blind to the sheer quantity of information that’s collected about us every minute of every day by every single digital touchpoint we encounter – and yet the response to this tool/toy suggests that the vast majority of us still don’t have the faintest idea quite how real the digital panopticon is. They See Your Photos is a smart little bit of promo for some ‘secure’ photo storing app, which is designed to give you an idea of exactly how much information AN Other digital platform is able to get out of whatever photo you might upload to it – go to the site, give it a pic from your cameraroll, and GASP IN HORROR as you realise that not only can the metadata reveal where it was taken, on what device and at what time, but that, thanks to AI, your photo can now be ‘seen’ and interpreted and, by extension, that information can also be used to target you, sell to you and all of the other wonderful things demanded by 21stC capitalism. Which you might find creepy – or, quite possibly, might unlock a TROVE of interesting and creative ways you can leverage this sort of thing for FUN BRAND LOLS!
  • All Of The 2025 Trend Documents:  Along with the Christmas adverts and the spike in suicides, one of the other traditional, festive moments we all look forward to at this time of year is the absolute AVALANCHE of trends documents written by seemingly every digital platform, consultancy, agency and brand, all desperately scrabbling to find something interesting and worthwhile to say about the coming year. Should you be in the invidious position of having to have opinions on this sort of thing then, well, I am so, so sorry – but, equally, you will probably find this moderately-useful. I, thankfully, don’t really have to pretend to care about this stuff any more, but I have taken a cursory look and, honestly, even by the p1ss-poor standards of previous years this feels like a particularly-poor crop (or at least the agency/culture-type ones are – I confess to not quite having the emotional fortitude to open the Goldman Sachs-type documents) – I question who still needs to be told ‘when collaborating with digital creators, let them take the lead!’, for example (although I did very much enjoy the Pinterest one, if only for its confident assertion that ‘Sea Witchery’ is going to be big next year). For those of you who might need to use this to produce further trends documents – the TRENDS OF THE TRENDS, if you will – then you might find this little tool useful; it’s an LLM layer put on top of all of them, meaning you can ask questions of the corpus and it will spin up answers to, say, “if I’m attempting to sell pants to young men, what are the key visual signifiers I should be hitting in my marketing in 2025?”. This is a good idea, and useful, and a good example of ‘HOW TO USE GENERATIVE AI IN ACTUALLY-PRACTICAL WAYS’, and I am only SLIGHTLY annoyed that this is something that I have been suggesting to people for literally 18months now grumble grumble noone ever fcuking listens.
  • Another AI Advert: Following the peculiar horror of the Coca Cola Christmas spot – but to far less fanfare and DISCOURSE, because it wasn’t FIRST and therefore noone seems to care – is this effort, seemingly an official spot by Vodafone, which is, again, seemingly-entirely-AI-generated (your usual combination of Flux/Midjourney/Runway/Kling/etc seems to be in play here). The result is…well, it’s better and less-horrific than the Coke one, but, also, it’s not exactly *good* – oddly, though, that seems to matter less in this space, perhaps because mobile ads are already such a tedious grab-bag of lifestyle image cliches and that therefore there’s nothing noticeably worse about the versions presented here – nothing looks ‘real’, but then again nothing really looks ‘real’ in mobile ads anyway, so, I suppose, who cares? Which does rather feel like quite a sickly canary in this particular coalmine. Not to be outdone, Serbian football team Red Star Belgrade put this clip out on Wednesday (announcing their departure from X, I think) which is a similar sort of clip but far more effective – partly, I think, because there’s enough creativity in the images they use to sort-of warrant the use of the tech in a way that doesn’t quite feel true with the Vodafone clip. Oh, and just to reassure any of you in the ‘branded video content’ game that you’re not all out of a job JUST yet, there’s also this effort from Italy for Ferrero’s (amazing, addictive, heart-straining) Pocket Coffee sweets (seriously, they are fcuking INCREDIBLE – basically a shot of sweetened espresso in a chocolate shell, I recommend them unreservedly), which proves that, in the main, anything using genAI video still looks too uncanny and odd and unpleasant for mainstream consumption. I’m not, though, convinced that I will be able to say the same thing in 12 months’ time. BONUS AI VIDEO – this one did make me laugh, fair play.
  • The Colour Clock: Time! But, er, also colour! Briefly experience the wonder of synaesthesia with this nice little digital…thing (website, Matt, it’s a fcuking website – Jesus, this isn’t coming easily this morning) in which every time (hh:mm:ss) corresponds to a particular colour hex, meaning you get an imperceptible shift in tone every second. This is rather mesmerising, and I think it would look rather cool on a big screen (or as an actual, wall-mounted clock, should someone fancy making such a thing for me).
  • The National Gallery Mixtape: A properly fun use of AI, this, by the National Gallery and Google, which makes excellent use of one of generative AI’s main ‘skills’ – to whit, taking information of one shape and putting into into another shape. This is a tool that lets you both explore the National’s collection (via the digitised images already held by Google’s Arts & Culture project) and, er, hear what it sounds like – again, this is a vaguely-synaesthesiac experience which basically asks The Machine ‘if these paintings were to form the inspiration for a musical composition, what would such a composition sound like?’. The interface is pleasingly simple – you simply select paintings from the left-hand menu (from a reasonably-sized selection from the National’s archives, Rembrandt, Titian and all the lads), drop them onto the ‘musical score’ on the right in whichever order you choose, add notations from the ‘stickers’ menu (which let you affect the tempo of the composition and give pointers as to the sort of style of music you might want The Machine to mimic) and then HEY PRESTO you will have a personal bit of music which in some way represents the paintings you’ve selected. Which is, fine, almost entirely pointless…AND YET, I think there’s something rather interesting about the idea of seeing how the system decides to render the works in sonic form, and the stitching together of the various elements into a single composition is neat, and, in general, I find this sort of weirdness significantly more interesting and engaging than ‘imagine an AI landscape’ imagew4nkery, or the dreadful soullessness of LLM prose generation. This is fun, give it a play.
  • Explorable Images: We’re still a way away from ‘games, spun up by AI based on a prompt’ or ‘turn any picture you want into an explorable scene’ – but we’re a lot closer than we were a year ago. This link is to a series of (very early-stage) demos by a company called WorldLabAI, which, very basically, show you how its tech can create semi-explorable, navigable environments from a single 2d image – effectively letting you ‘step inside’ the picture and walk around ‘inside’ it, Except you can’t quite, not really – the ‘range’ of your exploration is very limited, and you can’t actually do anything within the scene other than move around a little bit and turn 360 degrees. That said, what’s slightly amazing is that it appears there’s persistence to what’s being imagined – if you look ‘behind’ you, you see the same thing each time, which has significant implications for the ability of this sort of thing to eventually enable proper in-image exploration. Which is fcuking MAD, to be clear. Then a couple of days later, Google announced a similar bit of tech but even more impressive – again, it’s entirely-prototypical and nowhere near product-ready, but there’s something intensely ‘oh, fcuk, that really is quite remarkable’ about this.
  • Clearsky: The Bluesky excitement seems to have quietened down slightly this week (thank God), but I continue to stumble across interesting things built using its API – Clearsky is a tool which, if you plug in your username, will tell you how many people you’re blocking, how many people are blocking you (and who they are), what starter packs you’re in…all useful information, as long as you’re not the sort of person to take being blocked personally. The ‘what starter packs am I in?’ thing really is useful, given the platform doesn’t seem to give you any other way of seeing this info – you can’t actually *do* anything with it, fine, but it does tell you who owns each Starter Pack so you can, should you desire, get in touch with them and ask to be removed. It’s also interesting to see the very, very weird blocklists people are building – who knew ‘following ex-Guardian journo Jim Waterson’ would be enough of a reason for people to want to block you?
  • Silent Poems: This is rather beautiful – type into the window and see your words rendered in a beautiful, vaguely-cursive, entirely-made-up alphabet. This is ‘real’ in the sense that it’s not random shapes; each corresponds to a particular letter, so you could in theory learn to read this if you put the effort in (and, well, what else are you going to do with the holidays?), and there’s something gorgeous about the way in which the letters all sort of flow into each other; even very mundane sentences have something gorgeous and organic about them when written down here. A project by one Lavinia Petrache, an animator from Zurich – THANKYOU LAVINIA THIS IS LOVELY.
  • Uncrop Your Profile Picture: It feels…weird linking to something on Twitter, like I’m offering you some really dirty drugs – meth or PCP or something. Except, unlike those two, Twitter barely even offers a vanishingly-small high these days before the crushing, ruinous comedown. Still, I was briefly amused by this – and slightly-astonished to find it, because I honestly didn’t think anyone was still making fun stuff over there. This is a simple tool that uses genAI to imagine what exists outside of the margins of whatever image you’re using as your profile pic on the platform – I’ve got a vague suspicion that it’s also doing some light scraping of your feed to inform what it’s imagining, but I haven’t tried to look under the hood to check. I don’t *think* it’s doing anything horrible with your data – I mean, anything more horrible than’s already being done to it by the platform – but, well, caveat emptor is probably advised. When I showed this to Shardcore the other day he pointed me at this project which he did two and a half years ago, just before the NEW WAVE of AI broke which proves that a) there are no new ideas under the sun; and b) this stuff really has come on leaps and bounds in 30 months.
  • PongClock: It’s a clock! But it’s also Pong! But, mainly, a clock. I really like this and, again, think it would be quite cool on a big screen somewhere.

By Katrien de Blauwer (this and all remaining images via TIH)

NEXT UP, OPPIDAN DOING A SET FOR DJ MAG FROM A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO WHICH IS A PRETTYMUCH PERFECT COLLECTION OF PARTY BANGERS! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY CURIOUS TO WATCH THE ‘GREGG WALLACE MAKES FRIENDS WITH LAURENCE FOX’ THING THAT NOW SEEMS GRIMLY INEVITABLE, PT.2:  

  • The Desert Island Discs Spreadsheet: An *incredibly* middle-aged, middle-class, anglocentric link, this one, but, well, I have a vague idea about the makeup of at least a proportion of my readership and I SEE YOU, Radio4 people. I have no idea who has compiled this but this spreadsheet contains not only links to every single episode of the show EVER – oh, hang on, ought I explain? Ok, fine – to the non-anglos amongst you, Desert Island Discs is a long-running BBC radio show on which notable people are interviewed about their lives, with the general conceit that they are being asked which records they would take with them if they were to be stranded alone on a desert island. So, this spreadsheet not only links to every single episode of the show, which is just interesting and useful in and of itself (there really are some incredible names on there) but also, for reasons known only to the person who compiled it, records every single artist whose music has been selected by someone, keeping a running tally of the most-popular (Mozart, in case you were wondering), books that people have chosen to take (you’re allowed to bring one – Shakespeare takes the top spot, but a surprising number of masochists would apparently choose the Encyclopaedia Britannica, which feels…joyless, frankly) and the sole luxury item that they would wish to bring with them (it’s worth scrolling down that particular tab because there are some truly esoteric picks in there – my personal favourite is whoever it was who chose ‘the law of the land’ as their luxury, for the sole stated purpose of then being able to break it). This is oddly-fascinating (or at least it is if you’re a middle-class, Radio4-listening brit of a certain age – I concede that for everyone else then, well, it’s a fcuking spreadsheet).
  • The Bluesky Roast Thing: So this was this week’s self-referential viral Bluesky thing – plug in your handle (or indeed anyone else’s), and this will do the whole ‘roast my profile’ thing (much the same as did the rounds for Twitter and Insta a month or so back), with an LLM offering an ‘hilarious’ analysis of your posts and posting style. I can’t stress enough how horrible I find this – the copy it comes out with hits a very specific register of perky-LLM-positivity that I find especially grating, and, overall, the tone of voice here is pretty much my least-favourite style of writing in the whole world; blandly-cheerful, ‘sassy’ and toe-curlingly insincere. Still, LOADS of people really enjoyed this, or at least enough to share The Machine’s ‘hilarious’ insights into their personality and ‘unique’ posting style, which I found interesting – turns out people can put up with horrible LLM-writing when it’s all about them!  BONUS BLUESKY THINGS!: for the techy amongst you, this is a decent primer on how to extract analytics from the platform so you can, should you so desire, cobble together information on post performance, etc etc.
  • The Neighbourhoods: This is a lovely project by one Rob Stephenson, exploring and documenting New York City – per the description, “This weekly newsletter is a not-so-deep dive into every neighborhood in NYC in an effort to create some sort of photographic document of modern-day New York, or at least a record of what I find interesting* on any particular day. I know I will be leaving out a ton of things that could be considered crucial to the understanding of a particular neighborhood and including stuff that will leave some scratching their heads, but this isn’t meant to be a complete or even accurate representation of a place, just my reaction to it. With a mix of old and new pictures and field recordings, I hope this project will add something to the substantial body of work that has already been made about the city.” This is SO interesting – I say this as someone who’s only ever visited New York and doesn’t have anything resembling DEEP KNOWLEDGE of the city, but who is fascinated by writing about hyperlocal urbanity, and for whom this sort of writing, discursive and personal and curious and interested and interesting, is basically personal catnip. If you like reading people like Jon Elledge writing about London then you might also enjoy this – and, obviously, if you’re a New Yorker, this feels like something of a must-read.
  • Y2K: There’s some new film coming out from ubiquitous indie-presenting collective A24 – I have literally fcuk all idea what it’s about, and nor do I care, but it does have a rather nice retropromosite accompanying it which I rather enjoyed; the gimmick is that it looks and feels like a desktop c.1999 (I may not know the first thing about the film, but I have a reasonable degree of certainty that it is set IN THE PAST), complete with Winamp-esque media player with a playlist of era-appropriate tracks, a bunch of files on the desktop for you to explore and an AOL-style chat window just waiting for you to talk to your friend through…except are they your friend? What’s going on? WHO ARE YOU REALLY SPEAKING TO? This is rather fun.
  • Billy Bass Cameo: Fine, it’s not *quite* Cameo, but, well, almost. Have YOU ever wanted the opportunity to have your own, bespoke video of a Big Mouth Billy Bass singing along to whatever song you fancy? No, I can’t imagine for a second that you have EVER wished for such a thing, and yet the universe has provided nonetheless. It’s all very homebrew, but all the better for it – you have to upload your own MP3, you can select specific movements for Billy to perform while it plays, and you can even select different lighting setups to best-frame your piscine performance (the best thing about the site, though, is that it includes a button which is simply labeled as ‘send to fish’. More websites need such a button). I am THRILLED that this exists, and I imagine there is at least one person in your life who would be equally thrilled to receive a video of a mechanical fish flailing arrhythmically to ‘Silent Night’.
  • YourSign LM: You may not think that the TikTok feed of a wholesale signmaker somewhere in China would be worth following, but you would be WRONG. I promise you, the guys fronting these – ‘Tony’ and ‘Leon’ and a couple of others – are some sort of hydrogen bomb of onscreen charisma, and while it’s increasingly apparent that there’s nothing remotely funny about what’s likely to happen to US politics over the next four years, there is something VERY funny about a young Chinese man doing an absolutely nailed-on Trump impersonation while attempting to convince you of the absolute importance of shipping a LOT of neon signage products from Shenzhen.
  • The Open Source Challenge: The OSINT enthusiasts at Bellingcat have put together this series of challenges to test your online sleuthing skills – they are unlocking at various points over the coming month, or you can unlock them early by completing previous puzzles in the sequence – the two that are currently open to view are both of the ‘where was this picture taken?’ variety, and as such not HUGELY complex, but it will be interesting to see what shape the rest of the selection takes.
  • Songs of Insects: What sort of lunatic wouldn’t want the opportunity to listen to the glorious sounds of cicadas, recorded and catalogued online alongside grasshoppers, crickets and 90-odd other species of noise-making insects? NO FCUKER, etc! This is a North American site and these are North American insects, just to stave off any disappointment in those of you who are exclusively interested in the sounds made by European or Asian insects instead.
  • Craftball: Pointless, shiny luxe brand browsergame corner! This time it’s the turn of Loewe, who, for reasons that I doubt even their head of brand could adequately explain, have chosen to spunk a bunch of money on a game which, even by the standards of these things, really is p1ss-poor. What exactly does ‘manouvering an orange (no, really, it’s a fcuking orange – WHY?) left and right along one of three straight courses in an attempt to avoid obstacles’ have to do with ‘flogging expensive bags and shoes and perfumes’? NO IDEA! Still, who cares? You can win PRIZES (I imagine the ‘prizes’ amount to ‘a tenner off a keyring’, but, still, PRIZES!)! This really is bafflingly-sh1t, but does at least have the requisite degree of shine and polish you expect from this sort of thing – seriously though, can anyone explain the orange to me?
  • Pipe Dreams: Oh this is great, PURE CURIO. Did you know that “Pipedreams, which recently celebrated the 40th anniversary of continuous broadcasts, began in 1982 and remains the only nationally distributed weekly radio program exploring the art of the pipe organ”? No you didn’t, fcuk off, stop lying. Anyway, this is the website accompanying the (presumably North American) show which features a quite astonishing array of pipe organ music – there are nearly 2,500(!!!!) recordings on here as far as I can tell, meaning if you ever wanted to get REALLY into, er, the sound of the pipe organ, you now have the perfect place to start. I can imagine that for some of you that this will feel pleasingly-festive (and quite possibly that for a few others it will cause potentially-traumatic flashbacks to being forced to spend a lot of time in church as a kid).
  • NPR’s Books We Love: Oh this is a great resource, well done NPR – this website is basically a pleasingly-explorable selection of books published this year which have been recommended by various NPR contributors, across a range of genres and categories, which is easy to browse and which contains over 350 titles, meaning that there’s something in there for pretty much every taste. Be aware that this is obviously a North American selection, meaning not everything on here will necessarily have been published yet where you are – but you can also browse previous selections going back to 2013, so if you’re in the market for a bunch of book recs for the holiday season this is an excellent place to start.
  • Infinite Baseball: Via Lynn Cherny’s reliably-fascinating newsletter (seriously, if you’re interested in AI and digital creativity in general you really ought to subscribe) comes this silly-but-also-interesting project, which basically produces AI-generated imaginary baseball games, delivered via ‘live’ commentary on the site – this is…sort-of incredible, partly because I don’t understand baseball in the slightest and as such I have no idea whether what it’s saying makes any sense at all. It *sounds* like it does, though, and there’s something oddly-soothing about having the commentary running in the background, wittering away about line-drives and batting averages. This is an art project by Dan Moore, who writes: “The Great American Pastime reimagines one of America’s most cherished rituals through the lens of artificial intelligence. This piece employs the Infinite Baseball Radio Network to broadcast an unending stream of AI-generated baseball games that captures the rhythm, tone, and drama of a live sports broadcast. By inviting listeners into a familiar yet subtly artificial version of America’s favorite pastime, the work provokes reflection on humanity’s increasingly tangled relationship with technology, nostalgia, and the narratives that shape the American cultural identity.” So, er, there!
  • Continue and Persist: This is a lovely idea, and I think you should all pick someone you know in the US to send one of these to. Per the blurb, “Every day, thousands of Cease and Desist letters are issued, telling people to stop what they’re doing (Looking at you, David Chang). What a bummer! That’s why we created: The Continue and Persist Letter. A official-looking legal letter that encourages and uplifts people, one that tells people to keep doing what they’re doing! Surprise someone you appreciate by sending them a Continue and Persist Letter.” WHAT A LOVELY THING! Also, they will post it for you for free, which seems like a good enough reason for you to bother – I can’t tell you how pleasing it would be to receive an official-looking bit of documentation telling me that, actually, I’m not wasting my life doing this and I should crack right on (but, perhaps, the opposite would be healthier).
  • Comball: Have you ever wondered to yourself ‘what would it be like if someone were to combine the twin ludic  pursuits of pool and popular mobile game 2048?’? No, I can’t imagine for a second that you have (you incurious fcuk, you), but thankfully Eray Zesen has which is why this fun little browsergame exists.
  • The Complete BBC Micro Games Archive: Growing up in the UK in the 80s, exposure to computing was in the main limited to occasional opportunities to use one of the school’s collection of yellowing, grubby BBC Micros, a system characterised by amazing, blocky graphics and some truly batsh1t games which for some reason were occasionally considered to be ‘educational’ enough to let us spend an hour or so messing around with them – I genuinely have no idea what exactly playing a text adventure game called ‘Granny’s Garden’ was meant to contribute to my intellectual formation, but GOD did I love those occasional moments when I got to play it rather than memorising times tables. Anyway, this site seemingly collects EVERY SINGLE GAME EVER MADE FOR THE BBC EVER, including the aforementioned Granny’s Garden, so if you want to experience exactly how poor electronic entertainments were in 1984 then this is basically all your Christmases come at once.
  • TicTactic: Noughts and crosses reimagined as a sort of roguelike card battler. This is a demo of the full thing, but it’s pretty full and the game is surprisingly deep and complex when you get into it a bit (ok, complex compared to actual noughts and crosses).
  • Fliphaus: Via the excellent Nag, this is a TERRIFYINGLY addictive game which someone really needs to rip off for the UK asap. The premise is simple – you’re shown two houses side by side, pulled from Zillow listings, and all you have to do is guess which one is priced higher. Given how insane Brits are about housing and property in general, and how insane we also area about money, a UK version of this would break traffic records for whichever estate agent or property-adjacent company nicks this idea first – GO!
  • The Confounding Calendar: This week’s last ludic link is this (growing) selection of puzzle games – a new one’s being released every day for advent, and, honestly, each of the ones so far is SO SO GOOD (in particular the fiendish and brilliant ‘Alphabet Soup for Picky Eaters’, which had me grinding my teeth at it for longer than I care to admit). These are fun, imaginative, quirky and interesting, and I think it’s very much worth checking back over the next couple of weeks to play them all.

By Kumi Oguro

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS A SUPERB SELECTION OF TRACKS CHOSEN BY NICK STROPKO WHICH IS REALLY MAKING ME WANT A COCKTAIL AS IT PLAYS IN THE BACKGROUND, UNFORTUNATE GIVEN IT IS CURRENTLY 10:01AM!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS IS ONCE AGAIN SADLY EMPTY!

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Arch Budzar: Art. Not normally my sort of thing, visually, but I find there’s something interesting about the juxtaposition of the sort of ‘naive’ style and the messaging and maybe you will too.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The Bloomberg Jealousy List 2024: Bloomberg’s once again published its now-traditional ‘jealousy list’ in which a selection of its writers pick the pieces from the past year that they wish they’d written themselves – as ever, it’s a wide-ranging set of picks (many of which you’ll have seen here in the past year, testament to my EXCELLENT taste or, alternatively, how closely my proclivities cleave to those of an EDITORIAL ELITE – either/or) which this year has been widened to include…stuff that isn’t actually writing, such as podcasts or, in one instance, that four-hour video explainer about why the Star Wars hotel failed. I am going to sound like something of a curmudgeon here – I know! – but I thought the picks this year lacked a certain something; personally-speaking I think this has been a great year for essaywriting and longform journalism, but I don’t particularly see that reflected here (outside of a few notable exceptions), and there are half-a-dozen pieces that I remember rejecting for Curios because, well, I didn’t think they were very good. Still, this is a MASSIVE collection of longreads which are very much worth picking through to find the best ones.
  • Scam America: Don’t worry, it’s not (really) about the election – except it is a bit. This dovetails neatly with a piece I included a couple of weeks back about how the Trumpian victory might usefully be seen through the lens of ‘everyone in the US is now a small business owner/creator/hustler’, and builds on it slightly – its particular thesis is that the dominant culture in the States right now is that of the huckster, the carnival barker and the man on the bridge playing that game with the chickpea and the tiny paper cups, and it’s quite hard not to a) agree; and b) think ‘hm, it’s not just the US, this is 100% a pan-Western phenomenon’. To quote, “When I hear about young men turning conservative, I see the idiots from the gym in their dollar-sign shirts. They are not enlightened—nowhere near it—but they are not explicitly hateful either. They think of themselves as open-minded, and to the extent that they believe the last thing they are told, they sort of are. They are aspiring scammers, though more likely than not they are being scammed. They’re willing to tolerate a lot of nasty shit—maybe they don’t believe Trump means it, maybe they don’t care, maybe they think he’s got a point—but it’s not clear that their hatred is what gets them out of bed. It’s not immutable, in other words. For these guys, the difference between the left and the right is that one side are winners and the other are losers. The right is here to keep the scam rolling. The left, to these young men, are the losers being lost in the dust because they’re in denial about the country they live in. To these young men, the left says: follow the rules! Watch your mouth! Wait your turn! Play nice! To the left, these young men say: can’t you fcuking idiots see that there are no more rules?” Sound familiar?
  • South Korea: As far as ‘poorly executed political manoeuvers’ go, it seems that Yoon Suk Yeol’s brief foray into martial law this week will go down in the annals – it will also be remembered (for some desperately unwell people, at least) as THE DAY BLUESKY CAME OF AGE, with Verge reporter Sarah Jeong posting (no I am not going to fcuking say ‘skeeting’, what’s wrong with you?) live on the platform about what was going on on the ground, and providing exactly the sort of realtime reportage that used to be Twitter’s stock in trade until That Fcuking Man decided to ruin it. The link uptop is to Jeong’s next-day writeup, which is a really excellent piece of writing that captures the ‘slightly p1ssed watching history unfold’ vibe of her original posts (an aside: it was…fascinating seeing Americans react to Jeong’s being lightly-drunk on a Monday night as though that was somehow strange or scandalous, your regular reminder that, when it comes to booze, yanks are generally fcuking amateurs (sorry, but you are)); it’s also worth reading Ryan over at Garbage day for a typically-sharp take on WHAT THIS MEANS for Bluesky, and how its demographic profile might actively work against it becoming a large-scale breakout network.
  • FOMO Is Not A Strategy: A smart, practical and sensible piece of writing by Rachel Coldicott on how you might want think about your approach to AI in 2025 from a professional/organisational standpoint, and the extent to which it is VITAL (or, actually, not vital at all) to get on the hypetrain. This is pleasantly-non-w4nky and antihyperbolic and worth a read if any part of your job involves ‘having people ask you annoying questions about AI’.
  • The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants: This is, embarrassingly, 8 months old and completely passed me by on publication – which is a shame, as it’s properly fascinating (if VERY long – seriously, this is 300-odd pages and QUITE DENSE). This is a paper published by Google looking at the ethical considerations which need to be undertaken when considering the development, deployment and governance of what they term ‘Advanced AI assistants’ (which description covers things like ‘LLMs’ and extends to the sorts of agentic behaviour we can expect to see more and more of in the next year or so); I know I’m possibly a little biased given its heavy philosophy/ethics bent, but I found this SO interesting and, to its credit, surprisingly-lightly-written considering the subject matter and the knottiness of the questions being discussed. In particular, the section about the need for a tetradic conception of AI alignment struck me as a simple-but-remarkably-useful way of thinking about base-level questions of ethics in this space and a helpful model to keep in the back of your head should that sort of thing be Your Problem, but, honestly, the whole paper really is super-interesting and worth at least skimming should this be your sort of field of interest.
  • Games and Strategy and Creative: I try not to feature stuff about advermarketingpr in here anymore because, well, I can’t even pretend to care, frankly, but I thought this thread by James Whatley was good and useful – it’s about videogame ads specifically, but the thinking he works through is generally helpful for any of you still struggling to educate people about the difference between ‘strategy’ and ‘tactics’ (if, like me, you are struggling to give a fcuk about that difference, I am afraid I cannot help you), or on what a ‘creative framework’ is for, or any of that sort of horrible, dispiriting b0llocks.
  • I Have No Mouth And I Must Stream: An excellent – and not a little disturbing, frankly – look at the insanity that some people succumb to in the content mines and the things that we think it’s ok to do to ourselves in search of views and, perhaps most-troublingly, the things that we are willing to passively watch other people do to themselves in the name of lols, and how this might end up going in a world in which how we think of employment is necessarily going to change a LOT. WARNING: contains at least one image of someone very, very eating disorder-y, should that sort of thing be something you’d rather not see.
  • Local Newspaper Dating: This is 100% a coming thing – first this piece, then yesterday’s news that UK magazine The Fence (which, whilst technically a national publication is very much a London-centric beast) is going start running personal ads in the new year, is CONCLUSIVE PROOF that hyperlocal, non-app-based dating is going to be everywhere next year. The link is to a piece about the local newspaper in Vermont whose ‘personals’ section has taken off in recent months as singles, burnt out from the relentless emotional battering they’ve taken from Hinge, Tinder and the like are instead turning to the more-traditional approach of ‘writing an advert for themselves in the local paper’ – honestly, I reckon we’ll see all The Mill’s stable of local outlets starting to run these as a small revenue stream (and as a community-building feature), mark my words (except, obviously, in the event that I am totally wrong about this).
  • The Future of Football Games: When I was a kid at international school there was a Spanish guy who introduced me to Spain’s answer to Football Manager, PC Futbol (real heads will know) and who was quietly obsessed with his vision of a future in which all football match footage would be able to be played, leading to situations in which you’d be able to literally ‘drop in’ to critical moments in famous games to see whether, for example, you could avoid skying the final penalty in the 1994 World Cup final (Hola Fermin! ¿Que Tal?). A mere 28 years on from that fanciful speculation and it looks as though…that might actually be possible? Honestly, I read this and I was ASTONISHED – obviously this is PR puff piece in WIRED and so should be taken with the requisite sodium chloride, but, honestly, what’s being described here sounds AMAZING. I mean, listen to this: “The real killer application here, though, is the ability to recreate actual Premier League plays yourself through the Moments feature. Rezzil has taken notable plays from EPL games (typically big goals for now, though the types of plays you can recreate will expand with time), then split them up pass-by-pass into what Rezzil calls “fractions” of the play. You first watch a video of the actual real-life goal, then view a digital rendering of which passes will lead up to the final shot. From here, you’re transported straight onto the pitch. All 20 Premier League stadiums are featured in the game, so your virtual playing field will change depending on where the actual play took place. You’re then prompted to complete each “fraction” of the play, taking control of that player and moving the ball onto the next phase. The fraction could be a short pass, a midrange lob, or even a long bomb to a streaking teammate, and then eventually a shot. Your passing target lights up orange just before becoming open, then green during the optimal delivery window.” I WANT THIS NOW.
  • All of the Chinese Cuisines: Ooh this is SO interesting – a post on the Chinese Cooking Demystified which goes into frankly insane detail on the hyperspecific regionality of Chinese food and the differences that can be found in dishes from area to area. This is really excellent – first explaining why the more-traditional conception of regionality in Chinese cuisine is not entirely accurate, and then going through 63 individual regions and detailing some typical dishes, ingredients and cooking techniques for each. This will, be warned, leave you absolutely ravenous.
  • Forensic Linguists Solve Crimes: I rather love this – the idea that one’s writing leaves as much of a fingerprint as one’s digits, and that through analysing a text’s vocabulary choices, syntax and grammar it is in theory possible to determine its author based on parallel analysis of their previous writings (I think it’s fair to say that you could make out the peculiar stench of my prose at 100m, for example), and how that’s used by forensic linguists to solve ACTUAL CRIMES. I was particularly amused by the fact that thanks to our collective addiction to posting we’ve all basically created a corpus of information that can be used to spot our writing with relative ease – maybe get ChatGPT to write the ransom note, just to be safe.
  • Tom Whitwell’s 52 Things: The 2024 iteration of Tom Whitwell’s annual, excellent collection of ‘interesting facts I learned this year’ is typically superb – as always with these things, I reckon there’s more inspirational creative fodder in here in terms of ‘interesting ways of looking at the world and thinking about things’ than in every single one of those fcuking trend docs all the way back in the first section. Pick your favourite – mine is, obviously, number 24, but I found 42 oddly fascinating and curious too.
  • My Shelfie: If you will excuse me a moment of brief self-indulgence (LOL I KNOW I KNOW IT WAS A JOKE!), I am going to link to something written by ME – this is part of Jared Shurin and Lavie Tidhar’s Shelfie project, which I featured in here when it launched and which they kindly asked me to contribute an entry to. So, in the unlikely event that you’ve ever wondered ‘what do the bookshelves in Matt’s house look like?’, ‘what’s on those bookshelves?’ and ‘what vaguely-amusing anecdotes was Matt able to scare up relating to a selection of said books on one of said bookshelves?’, this is your answer.
  • When New York Department Stores Were Great: I absolutely loved this piece, on the days before online shopping, in which the big New York department stores were were the city’s residents all descended to do their Christmas shopping, when the window displays were lavish and the trees extravagant and the demands of some of the more well-heeled clientele were predictably-batsh1t – this is SO much fun, full of great anecdotes, and will be catnip both to New Yorkers who remember the era and anyone who’s been raised on a media diet in which Christmas in NYC is always portrayed as the shiniest, glitziest version of Yule that you can imagine. I would LOVE to read a similar piece about Fortnum’s, Harrod’s and the London equivalents should any commissioning editors want to put such a piece on their slate for 2025.
  • A Portrait of the Artist as an Amazon Reviewer: You may have heard of Kevin Killian – his name occasionally crops up ‘curios of online culture’ conversations as ‘the most prolific and oddly-brilliant Amazon reviewer ever’ – but this profile of him is wonderful, and paints a picture of a genuinely-fascinating man who lived a genuinely-fascinating life (hung out with Ginsberg! Acted in bongo! A gay man who married a lesbian!) and who found an unexpected by very real artistic outlet through the unpromising medium of the Amazon review. I honestly love this – both as a profile and as a depiction of outsider-artist practice, and it’s sad to think that the inevitable deluge of AI slop polluting much of the easy-access textual web is going to make things like this harder to spot, and find, and remember.
  • Loving The Chatbots: Certainly not the first ‘people’s weird relationships with AI’ piece to feature in Curios this year, but this is one of the more comprehensive – Josh Dzieza spoke to a range of people for this article, exploring the different reasons why people choose to embark upon relationships of varying degrees of intimacy with AI companions, goes over the history of them, and explores the ethics of both the concept and where it might end up. If you’ve read a lot on this topic then some of the early bits of the piece will be familiar to you, but the case studies Dzieza has pulled in lend the piece broad human colour that’s often lacking, there was a lot of stuff in here from a platform/tech point of view that was new to me (and I say that as someone who, as you can imagine, reads quite a lot about this sory of thing), and the central human story at the heart of the piece is well-told and just weird enough to be compelling without being offputtingly-alien. Good luck not feeling a bit odd by the end of this – I know I always say this, but I don’t think we are quite prepared for how odd things are going to become in the next few years.
  • London’s Last Dog Track: Slightly sad, slightly elegiac portrait of Romford, the last dog racing track to be left operational in London. It doesn’t lean too hard into the ‘eels and geezers’ stereotypes, which is good, and it’s strong on the history of the sport and its relation to the city; it also, once again, provided me with a brief moment of pause at how utterly unbothered London is as a city by the rampant gak abuse that’s all over the fcuking place, specifically the throwaway line about punters popping to the toilets to celebrate a win. Can we maybe not make it normal, actually?
  • El Ultimo Vagon: Or, cruising the last tube carriage in Mexico City’ – honestly, I LOVE THIS SO MUCH, this is just a brilliant piece of journalism about the specific cultural phenomenon that is ‘El Ultimo Vagon’ on the Mexico City metro, where it’s basically accepted that the final car of a subway train is pretty much free cruising territory, how different lines attract different types of clientele, and how it’s not just about some casual boning but is also a place of meeting and coming together for the city’s various queer communities. Wonderful, interesting, informative and eye-opening (it did also prompt me to briefly imagine what this might look like in London, to which my mental answer was ‘significantly grubbier’).
  • In The Rocket’s Red Glare: Rachel Kushner goes LONG (really, this is chunky) for Harper’s, but every word here is wonderful – her account of accompanying her 16 year old son to a drag racing meet, and of the world of ‘funny cars’, and of working with your hands, and of what the ‘nitro’ in fast cars actually is, and about America and history and all sorts of other things. I appreciate that 10,000 words on drag racing may not immediately seem enticing, but I promise you that I absolutely devoured this and I can neither drive nor tell one end of a sparkplug from another.
  • The Invention of Fergus Henderson: No apologies whatsoever for including yet another piece about London restaurant St John – thankfully this is another cracking article about the place, this time in Vittles, looking at how it came to embody a certain *type* of Englishness, and English food, and how that fits into certain (semi-invented) concepts of national identity, and generally this is thoughtful, considered writing about eating and culture and a place where, in small ways, my life changed forever.
  • Goodbye, Bridge of the East: The last longread of the week is by Wang Zhanhei, translated by Dave Haysom, about the narrator’s relationship with a wannabe influencer somewhere near (I think) Shenzhen Shanghai (thanks to my friend Ged for correcting me here) – it is short and beautiful and cold and sad, all of which feel about right for this morning I think.

By Neko Sawatzki

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!: