Category Archives: Uncategorized

Webcurios 26/07/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

Hi everyone! Hi! Can…can we all please stop talking about the US election for a bit, please? There’s ages left and you’re not going to be able to keep this level of discourse up for another three months, unless he really DOES fcuk his couch.

Tell you what, let me distract you with something different, something which exists BEYOND POLITICS! Something which transcends petty boundaries of left and right, right and wrong, ‘Republicans’ and ‘people who aren’t total cnuts’ – THAT’S RIGHT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE TINY AWARDS!

Yes, gentle reader, we have a shortlist! 12 websites in the main category, 6 in the ‘multiplayer’ category, all vying for your votes and attention and the chance to win a VERY SMALL PRIZE!

Thanks to everyone who shared the website – we had over 300 entries after clearing up spam and the leavings of all of those people who simply can’t comprehend written instructions – and especially to our esteemed judges who sorted through them all to pick their favourites.

Please do go and check out the nominations, and vote, and TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO VOTE – if nothing else it’s a lovely selection of interesting and odd and fun and silly and BRILLIANT websites, made by actual people for the simple love of Making Stuff Online, and for that reason alone it deserves a bit of love and attention.

The winners will be revealed on 18 August – I’ll remind you ahead of time, don’t worry – but PLEASE SHARE THE LINK AND SPREAD THE WORD! Should any journalists be reading this thinking ‘you know, maybe this would make a good hook for that piece I’ve been longing to write about the small, creative web as an antidote to Big Tech Hegemony?’, let me reassure you that you are right and that it would.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are as sick as I am of the ‘b’ word, don’t pretend you’re not.

By Natalia Gonzales Martin

WE KICK OFF THE SONGS THIS WEEK WITH WHAT IS FRANKLY THE ONLY MIX YOU NEED, PERHAPS EVER, IN THE SHAPE OF OVER 24 HOURS OF (FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD, AT LEAST) SUPERB TRACKS SPANNING A MASSIVE RANGE OF GENRES AND ARTISTS AND ERAS AND WHICH, HONESTLY, IS JUST A GIFT FOR WHICH IMMENSE THANKS TO THE PEOPLE AT DEEK RECORDINGS FOR COMPILING IT!

THE SECTION WHICH WONDERS HOW EXACTLY YOU IMAGINED THEY GOT THE HORSES TO DANCE IN THE FIRST PLACE, PT.1:  

  • The AI Song Contest: No, hang on, come back, this is the *GOOD* AI! Or, at least, not the entirely bad AI, insofar is this version appears to be based on the idea of a future that does at least in part allow for some small human involvement. The AI Song Contest is amazingly (to me at least) now in its FOURTH year, having started in 2017 and then taken a somewhat-irregular approach to ‘happening annually’, and is based in Switzerland, and it is, for the next few days, at least, ACCEPTING ENTRIES! This, to be clear is a contest designed for ‘people who are making music WITH the machine’ rather than ‘people who have just typed “SOMETHING IN THE STYLE OF COTTON-EYE JOE” into Udio’ (in fact, they strongly discourage entrants from using either that platform or Sudo due to copyright concerns, bless them), and so the idea is that entrants will be actual musicians who are playing around with AI tools and toys and, well, COMPLICATED MATHS to make pleasing sounds, and I wondered whether one or two of you might fit the bill (as ever, WHO THE FCUK ARE YOU????). Entries close next week, so you’ll have to get a move on, but if you’ve got a few spare hours this weekend and, er, a bunch of musical equipment, and a decent chunk of at-home compute, and a penchant for algorithms then, well, HAVE FUN!
  • Crawlspace: Conceptually-adjacent to the HTML Review (see Curios passim), Crawlspace is another ‘publication’ (we need better words, don’t we? It feels slightly preposterous to refer to a digital magazine as a ‘publication’ – can we coin some sort of neologism? How about…a WEBAZINE??? What? It’s pleasingly-retro ffs, and I thought we were all in on 90s/00s fetishism in the year of our Lord 2024?) which operates somewhere at the intersection between words and code, and here presents a selection of…hm ,I suppose you might call them ‘interactive digital/textual experiences’, but only if you wanted to bore someone into submission (WAKE UP, COME BACK!). Instead, let’s call them ‘digital poems’ and be done with them. Some are vaguely-interactive-fiction-ish, some, inexplicably, involve oddly-horny verse written by anthropomorphised cartoon golf balls, some meld words and animations in oddly-beautiful ways…I think these are glorious and spent a genuinely lovely hour or so with them earlier this week, you might enjoy doing the same.
  • Vintage Yourself With Cadbury’s: AN ADVERMARKETINGPR ACTIVATION! A lot about this promo by Cadbury’s made me slightly sad, I have to say – not because of the work, which is…fine, but because of the vaguely-joyless experience it puts the user through and the way you can just tell that the whole thing has been through approximately 37 layers of client approvals and amends and legals, and that everyone involved in its genesis had all the enthusiasm for the project sanded off them about 30% of the way through. Basically the simple gimmick here is ‘put yourself in a vintage Cadbury’s advert, drawn from actual examples pulled from the chocolatey brand archives from decades past!’ which, you know, is fine as things go (use of archive material! Historical brand connection! Personalisable and shareable content! AI! Email capture!) but which also made me sigh quite a lot inside at the banality of it all (‘Your Face Here!’ is what digitaladvermarketingprmongs have been doing for literally 15 years ffs, can we not do ANYTHING new?) and the fact that it takes about 10m, start to finish, to go through the workflow, and you have to get the end result emailed to you for what I assam are inevitable data protection reasons, and tbh what I am most annoyed about is that the resulting image of ‘Matt as a cheery 1930s sweet shop owner’ that I requested looked significantly more like Paul Whitehouse doing his ‘Suits You!’ schtick (contemporary AND in-no-way parochial reference there!) than it did my admittedly-etiolated countenance. Anyway, look, this is the sort of thing that some of your older relatives might like, who am I to sneer? Noone, it is 719am and I am in my pants again, writing this, I have no high ground whatsoever to claim.
  • Kling: NEW FANCY TEXT-TO-VIDEO MODEL JUST DROPPED! Ok, not ‘just’ – users with a Chinese email address have had access for a couple of months now (you may have seen a selection of weird and creepy ‘celebrities meet past versions of themselves’ clips doing the rounds in the past week which if I’m not mistaken uses a version of this that’s baked into a Chinese app) – but it’s been opened up this week to international users so anyone in the world can now make upto 6 5-second video clips for free every 24h. You know how this works by now – type some stuff, submit it, wait an indeterminate amount of time for The Machine to render your request and then feel a sense of mild disappointment as you once again realise that getting these tools to output anything consistent or that doesn’t go full ‘OH GOD I AM ON ACID WHY IS EVERYTHING MELTING?’ about 3s in. Still, it’s undeniably very impressive, seemingly on a par with the latest version of Runway and marginally better than that DreamStudio thing from a few months back, and it’s worth playing just to get an idea of what it can do (again, not enough to be actually useful, to my mind at least).
  • The Failure Museum: A memorial to the schwag left behind by the corporate giants of yore – the failed products launched by otherwise-leading brands that never really took off, the companies that failed to see the future coming and so crashed into it head-on in spectacular, fatal fashion, the many, many terrible and preposterous lies bought and sold by a collection of investors and VCs…all are here, lovingly preserved by one man, Sean Jacobsohn, with an all-consuming passion: “My entire career has been as an operator or venture capitalist for enterprise software companies.  I’ve also been an avid collector of sports memorabilia. On November 14th of 2022, I received an FTX sponsored bobblehead of Jordan Poole. This was only a few days after the FTX collapse.  I realized I had a collectors item and found other similar sports related collectors items at home such as a Webvan hockey puck. Combining my passion for entrepreneurship, risk taking, and collectibles, I built a collection of artifacts from failed companies, products, toys, and sports.  I blog about how we can learn from each of these failures.” Some of these you will be familiar with – Colgate Lasagne! New Coke! The entire concept of Theranos and Juicero! – but others were entirely new to me and as such I have just learned about ‘Febreze Scent Stories (“Launched in 2004, Febreze Scent Stories was a clamshell device which added new scents every five minutes within a 30-minute disc. They proclaimed: “You can play scents… like you play music!” By making Shania Twain its spokesperson who helped with fragrance selection, consumers incorrectly assumed the device would also play her music.”) and Barbie’s defecating dog, Tanner, which inexplicably didn’t seem to feature in last Summer’s obsessive brand deification. This is a WONDERFUL project.
  • Benny: To once again return to the earlier theme of ‘I DON’T KNOW WHO ANY OF YOU ARE’, this is another link which I like to think will be transformative for at least one of you but which, honestly, I have no clue at all. Are any of you ACTUAL MUSICIANS? Like, you know, people who have mixers and who can actually work in Ableton? Do you know what a ‘sequencer’ is (and, er, if so can you explain it to me)? Basically, look, do the following words mean anything to you? “benny is a modular software playground for making live music. it seamlessly integrates hardware and software, midi and audio, lets you connect anything to anything and extends flexibly into polyphony. benny is a good place to host your own max/msp patches, but you don’t need to know max to get started.” It SOUNDS like it’s something really quite cool and useful and potentially-powerful, but, equally, I literally don’t understand what any of those letters mean when put together in that order. Anyway, this is free and open source and if any of you happen to find it useful can you please send me a short, reassuring email? Thanks.
  • Coppelganger: Via Andy, this is an excellent and not a little sinister) project which takes the public database of photographs of New York’s policemen and invites you to upload an image of yourself so that it can use ‘facial matching’ software to see which three NYC cops you most resemble and tell you their names. Beautifully, the site also informed me that approximately 3% of all NYC police staff are called ‘Michael’, so there’s a reasonable percentage that you will match with a Mikey – part of me really likes the idea of doing this and then carrying the photos of my three matches with me when I next visit New York, asking helpful policemen I find if they can help me trace my lookalikes, and a significantly larger part of me realises that these policepeople are likely to find this less ‘whimsically amusing’ than I currently do. Still, if you’ve ever wanted to have the opportunity to potentially pass yourself off as an actual US officer of the law, this might help (the lookalikes it gave me were…er…loose, shall we say, so I wouldn’t place too much hope in it finding your long lost coptwin).
  • Nobody Reads Ads: One for those of you who Work With Copy, and PARTICULARLY those of you who enjoy posting pictures of old creative/advertising on LinkedIn and using it as engagementbait or as part of an…irritatingly…paragraph-spaced…screed about how an overreliance on data has killed good old-fashioned creativity, man (I SEE YOU I KNOW YOU ARE OUT THERE WITH YOUR DESIGNER GLASSES AND VAGUELY-SCANDI LEISUREWEAR) – Nobody Reads Ads is a pretty wonderful collection (maintained by one Miguel Ferreira THANKYOU MIGUEL!) of, er, old advertising, specifically of the copy-heavy variety which was very much en vogue in the 70s and 80s. This is all English language and so necessarily tends towards the North American, but there are some Anglo and (I think) Antipodean examples in there as well, including a truly BRUTAL bit of work by the RSPCA which you can find if you scroll all the way to the bottom. Basically this has you covered for ‘grumpy old man in advertising shouts at clouds and complains the past was better’ content for MONTHS (and is also a great resource should you want to point people towards ‘ad copy that for once doesn’t make you want to gouge your own eyes out with teaspoons).
  • Hako Yamaho: The YouTube channel of (I think) one Hako Yamako, whose ‘thing’ is simple: to quote the ‘About’ page, they “assemble a box from a development diagram. In the description of each video, the PDF of the development diagram is attached. Thank you for watching. If you like it, I would be happy if you subscribe to the channel and give it a “like”. On this channel, you can enjoy DIY paper crafts by watching videos, challenge yourself to assemble the box like a quiz, or relax by observing the process of completing the paper box. We offer content for beginners to advanced, so please check out the other videos as well.” Do YOU want to watch a selection of videos in which you see a pair of (pleasant, well-manicured) hands gently bending and folding a flat cardboard model into a 3d cuboid? Do you want 30 of them, with new ones being added every few days? Would you like them to be soundtracked with a sort of gently-encouraging melody that you might find vaguely-reminiscent of kids’ TV? Look, I’m not judging, if this is what you’re into then FILL YOUR METAPHORICAL BOOTS.
  • Icons: Not really sure what’s going on here, but this is one of the more dizzyingly-esoteric collections of old Geocities/MySpace-ish gifs and jpegs and images – this goes on for PAGES, so use the arrows at the bottom to scroll through an aesthetic time tunnel, back to an era in which, just imagine, you could have decorated your own personal corner of the web with one, or more, or ALL of these wonderful pieces of digital flair. Honestly, look through these and try telling me that the web wasn’t a marginally better place when sh1t like this was festooned over every available spare pixel like some sort of angry, violent response to the very concept of ‘minimal web design’ – YOU CAN’T, CAN YOU??? Aside from anything else, some of these little animations are GREAT – so much tiny creativity here from so many unknown people.
  • The Transformers Wiki: It is a source of no little shame to me that the parts of my brain which I think by now should be full of knowledge like ‘what a futures market actually is’ and ‘plumbing’ and ‘how pensions work’ is instead still more full than I might like of detailed information about the plotlines of the Transformers comic books in the UK c.1987 (to be clear, I haven’t read any of those comics since 1987 – it’s just that the other topics are so skullfcukingly tedious that the ‘robots in disguise’ are seemingly unwilling to make room for them). The Transformers Wiki is seemingly THE repository for all Transformers-related knowledge on the web, and as is inevitable with this sort of thing contains a volume, depth and breadth of information that makes you wonder what the people behind its upkeep might have achieved had they had slightly-different obsessions. Still, if you’ve ever wanted to confirm EXACTLY how many shoulder cannons Galvatron had (I AM MAKING THIS UP I SWEAR I AM) then this is for YOU.
  • One Sound, Two Frames: This and the next few links come from Chris Cubitt’s excellent newsletter all about digital arts and culture stuff, which I highly recommend – this is a new Google Arts & Culture toy which presents the user with two famous paintings at a time, and plays an AI-generated tune as you look at them; your task is to guess which painting was the prompt for the tune. Simple, fun, quick and replayable, this is a really nice little toy (and, honestly, something that it feels like pretty much any museum could rip off with minimal effort).
  • What The Art?: Once again from Google, once again via Chris, this reminds me of Matt Round’s ‘Draw A Crappy Mona Lisa In 60s’ game from a couple of years back (and works as an excellent reminder that Matt has good ideas and you should commission him to make stuff) – this is a REALLY nicely-done game which you can play solo or with friends (I say ‘friends’ – you don’t have to actually like them), and requires you (in multiplayer) to either try and draw an artwork or to guess which of a selection of potential works your opponent is trying to draw. Again, this is simple and fun and the fact that upto (I think) four people can play simultaneously (this is a bit like JackBox, for those of you who got into that stuff during lockdown) makes it the perfect way for you to avoid your professional obligations for the next few hours.
  • Daily Gallery: The final of our Google toys this week, this is…this one I don’t really get, to be honest, but some of you might enjoy the doll’s house-ishness of it. Basically you can log on each day and get a selection of ‘accessories’ ‘delivered’ to your ‘gallery’ – a virtual white cube that you can over time customise and make your own, with artworks and decorations and flooring and wallpaper, like some sort of trust fund gallerina Sims. I don’t know, perhaps I still have some sort of latent PTSD from all those years I spent doing a p1ss-poor job of looking like I fitted in at art openings (reader, I *never* looked like I fitted in), but there’s something about the WHITE CUBE-ness of this that gives me the mild fantods.
  • A Community of People Who Like Electrocuting Themselves: Or, to use the url, r/TDCS, or ‘trans-cranial direct current stimulation’, or, more prosaically, ‘wiring yourself to a battery to see what happens when you apply current to various bits of you’. This is, honestly, one of the more…esoteric online communities I’ve stumbled upon of late, and I feel honour-bound to put some sort of ‘AND OBVIOUSLY I DO NOT SUGGEST THAT ANY OF YOU ATTACH SOME ELECTRODES TO YOUR TEMPLES AND START MESSING WITH THE THREE-POINTS’ caveat in here, but, well, none of you are like that, are you? ARE YOU? This isn’t really a ‘point-and-laugh’ link – there are people in here who are obviously self-medicating for a wide selection of…issues – but it’s FASCINATING to read.
  • A Poem: More digital poetry – this is gorgeous, and there’s no AI at all involved. Each poem is created from a ‘seed’, which then over time mutates and evolves based on…some under-the-hood maths which I don’t understand. You can browse other previously created poems, and there’s a lovely feature which lets you scrub back and forward over each poem’s evolution so you can see the way it grew and changed over time. GORGEOUS.
  • The Best Of Viz: Ok, fine, this is an engagement-bait tweet, but the results are SO JOYOUS that they have to be shared. For the non-Brits amongst you, Viz is a long-running comic for adults – it’s very puerile, very profane and occasionally very, very funny (it’s also where I got my prized ‘Life Of Christ In Cats’ teatowel). The original tweet here asked “Is there a @vizcomic Letter or Top Tip that lives rent-free in your head? EVERY time I’m driving, I think of the person who wrote in to say “Why should I use my indicators? It’s none of your business where I’m going”” and OH MY GOD THE GOLD IN THE QUOTES. Look, just click, scroll and enjoy – if at least one of these doesn’t reduce you to actual tears then I think there might in fact be something wrong with you. I have just lost my sh1t entirely at “Olay says it combats the seven signs of ageing. Does that include ‘becoming more right-wing?’ Because that’s the really problematic one”.

By Janet Maya

NEXT UP, AN ACTUAL ALBUM BY A NORTH-EAST PUNK BAND CALLED SUNNY BLUNTS WHICH I DISCOVERED THIS WEEK AND FELL SLIGHTLY IN LOVE WITH, NOT LEAST BECAUSE THE SINGER HAS A RECOGNISABLE ACCENT WHICH IS IMMENSELY PLEASING AND THE SONGS ALSO SLAP! 

THE SECTION WHICH WONDERS HOW EXACTLY YOU IMAGINED THEY GOT THE HORSES TO DANCE IN THE FIRST PLACE, PT.2:  

  • Ready Player One: Ok, it is very important that you watch at least some of this clip twice –  the first time KEEP THE SOUND OFF. The link is to a Tweet promoting a bunch of ‘sports cars’ existing in ‘metaverse platform’ (so 2021!) Somnium Space (remember them? They were selling ‘real estate’ for real cashmoney back in the day, bet that’s appreciated nicely!), and, honestly, this is slightly amazing – these are all modded in by users, and they are all ‘ownable’ (something something web3 blockchain) and drivable in the game, and as you watch this you start to get a creeping feeling that, yes, ok, fine, this may be something that is currently only really being used by about 1000 people worldwide, in all likelihood, and it’s a *bit* janky, but, actually, if you squint, you can JUST ABOUT make out the shape of every fcuking tedious manchild’s fictional wet dream Ready Player One lurking in the not-too-distant future…look, seriously, I have no personal appetite for any of this stuff, but even I can concede that there’s something slightly mind-blowing about the possibility being hinted at here. Ok, you done that? You watched at least a bit of this with the sound off? Ok, great, now go back to the beginning of the video and put the sound on. Listen to the voice-over. THAT IS WHY THE METAVERSE IS NEVER GOING TO BE A THING. PEOPLE LIKE THIS. WHY ARE YOU ATTEMPTING TO MAKE SEXY CHAT ABOUT VIRTUAL CARS? Honestly, you can practically *smell* the mountain dew and see the very, very grubby gamer chair. Still, the tech is undeniably impressive so well done, sort-of.
  • The Salesforce Child Art Sale: I have featured the strange and, honestly, rather horrible, art of Salesforce Child in here before via their Twitter account, but I noticed this week that some of their work is now on sale in physical form and, well, GET INVOLVED. Spending some of the corporate art budget on one of these would be an incredible statement of intent, is all I’m saying.
  • Overlap: What do you want more of in your life? Time? Money? Sex? Cake? Tearful solitude (lol!)? NO WHAT YOU WANT MORE OF IS PROFESSIONAL CONNECTIONS CONNECT ME UP TO THE NETWORK LINK MY NODE. Ahem. Overlap is a new professional matchmaking setup, which, presumably, is designed to do similar stuff to LinkedIn except without causing you to lose some of your immortal soul every time you post (I presume that’s what’s happening on LinkedIn, anyway) – basically it’s a dating app but for professional connections (sort of), insofar as it seeks to pair you with potentially-interesting people based on your profile, but the idea here, presumably, is that you will swap business cards and contacts and wisdom rather than mucal extrusions. The problem with an approach like this, I worry, is…well, it’s men, isn’t it? Given that men can’t seem to spend any time on any platform without attempting to use it as a platform for chirpsing, it seems to me vanishingly-unlikely that one which quite obviously apes the UX and UI of dating apps (minus the sexy photos, fine) isn’t going to be swamped with guys attempting to use it to get into more than someone’s contacts book. Still, MORE PROFESSIONAL CONNECTIONS, like some sort of miserable besuited Pokemon of sh1t.
  • Button Stealer: Fun AND pointless! Button Stealer is a Chrome extension which, when installed, lets you ‘steal’ a button from any webpage you happen to visit – ‘stolen’ buttons are not, of course, stolen in any meaningful sense, but the extension saves them in your personal ‘stash’, so over time you can build up a small, personal collection of digital design elements that are uniquely yours. It’s that that makes it charming, I think – the fact that everyone’s haul will be unique (and obviously totally pointless, but, well still unique!).
  • Raymond Biesinger: Ok, this is an online shop, fine, but the design here, by one Raymond Biesinger, is SO GOOD – this is his store, where he sells his own prints and restorations of vintage design work from 20th Century Canada, and, honestly, I promise you that you will find something here that you adore, and the prices are relatively low for this sort of thing. Take a look, this is great.
  • So, You Want To Build A Museum: WHAT a resource this is! Offered by by Florence Schechter, who is the person behind the long-running and eventually-successful campaign to establish London’s Vagina Museum and who’s now created this insanely-generous document which neatly and simply takes you through the questions you need to think about and the steps you need to take if you want to establish your own small museum on whatever topic you fancy. You need to fill in some details and hand over your email to get access, but, honestly, that’s a small price to pay – there’s SO much good thinking in here, and, honestly, it’s probably worth a look for anyone who’s involved in planning-y, thinking-y, organising-y work.
  • Asqme: Interesting idea, this, aimed at YouTube creators – the idea here is that you train The Machine on your archive material, which is then used as the basis for a Question & Answerbot version of YOU, spun up by AI, which can be available 24/7 for anyone to ask questions of, the idea being that answers will be valuable because drawn from your actual bank of knowledge and not in fact just spun up as a result of probability. You can even go so far as to monetise the system, charging for responses (and even charging a premium for FAST responses), which seems…punchy, frankly. I see what they are trying to do here, but I would have to be SIGNIFICANTLY more confident in the ability of these people to fix the whole ‘hallucination’ issue than I in fact am before I let The Machine confidently answer questions on, say, the safe way to install an induction heater. Feels like there might be some interesting legal liability stuff in the future here, is all I’m saying.
  • Rebind: Featured in the longreads section a few weeks back, Rebind is an AI-augmented reading platform which offers you the ability to, er, read but with ADDED FEATURES – video content to go alongside the reading experience, and discuss the book with an AI model which has been specially trained on the thoughts and interpretations and reactions of another reader, an expert or someone with particular perspective on the text in question. It was this AI component that got all the attention in the press leading up to launch, and it’s an interesting idea, although I suppose I question exactly how many people are actually going want to spend significant amounts of time ‘talking’ to an AI interlocutor about, I don’t know, Middlemarch enough to spend the cash on these SPECIAL BOOKS. There’s a slow publication cadence, with a new title coming out every month or so, and there’s a bunch of additional functionality including the ability to take notes on the text as you go, and then use those notes to create your very OWN interlocutor, so you can…what, discuss your feelings and thoughts on the text with an AI version of yourself? As you can tell, this holds VERY limited appeal for me, but perhaps you’ll be persuaded – personally it feels quite a lot like CD-Rom encyclopaedias c.1995, but see what you think.
  • A Very Big Auction of Sports Memorabilia: How much would you pay for the shorts that Michael Jordan wore on his final ever NBA game, playing for the Washington Wizards in the 2002-3 season (it is unclear from the listing whether said shorts have been laundered, lest that change the amount you might be prepared to bid)? How about Diego Maradona’s ACTUAL SIGNED ARGENTINA SHIRT from the semi-final of the 1986 World Cup? Well TOUGH, unless the answer to both those questions was ‘a genuinely insane amount of money’ then I’m afraid you’re unlikely to get near any of the lots at this forthcoming Sotheby’s sale taking place in the US next week. Still, nice to window shop.
  • Free Faces: After last week’s ‘steal the fonts’ MSCHF drop, here’s the lawful-good antonym – Free Faces offers “a curated collection of typefaces that are available under a variety of free licences somewhere on the interwebs”, collected by one Simon Foster. THANKYOU SIMON FOSTER!
  • Free Textures: More free digital things! Textures this time! “Texturelabs is an online resource for free, original textures and tutorials for art and design. These elements are created by Texturelabs and are free to use, even in your commercial work (with just a few exceptions). Alongside these resources are a selection of original Tools – project files, templates, actions, and more, which play a vital role in sustaining the project.” All of this was created by one person, Brady Erickson, which is such an insanely generous thing to do it makes me very slightly emotional.
  • British Teeth: Matt Round gets his second mention of the week (he doesn’t even PAY me, ffs) for this lovely new project on Vole where the English amongst you can find out exactly HOW English your English teeth are, compared to the degradation of the teeth of the average English person of your age. As someone who went to the hygienist this week and therefore is feeling moderately-virtuous about their oral hygiene (whilst simultaneously currently imbibing his seventh mug of ruinously-strong brew of the day here at 917am, of a hue that might best be described as ‘terracotta umbre’, thereby undoing all of the good work accomplished in the chair a few short days ago ffs) this made me feel rather smug – anyway, this is ANOTHER great example of a simple idea that can and should be coopted into a marketing promo for a dentist’s, or a public health campaign or something. SOMEONE PAY MATT THE MONEY FFS, HE HAS LITERALLY DONE ALL THE WORK.
  • Learn Go: I appreciate that telling people to ‘learn Go’ in 2024 is a bit like telling them to, I don’t know, master times tables – you could do it, fine, but, equally, we passed the Rubicon of machine superiority a while back. Still, if you don’t mind the fact that you’re learning a game that machines have literally completed (to an extent, at least) this is a really good resource which patiently takes players through the rudiments of the game before slowly scaling up the complexity across a five-step tutorial program. To be clear, I tried a few steps of this and realised quite quickly that this is FAR too maths-y for me, but those of you with more, er, rigorous brains might enjoy the learning experience here.
  • Infinite Homepage: Another attempt to recreate the Million Dollar Homepage! Honestly, has anyone tallied the various riffs on Alex Tew’s now-legendary early-internet stunt? Would love to see something chronicling all the copycats it spawned (and to know whether any of them had anywhere near the same degree of success). Anyway, Infinite Homepage is another ‘hey, why don’t you buy a stake on this infinite webcanvas?’ project, with the gimmick that there’s an infinite series of editable text boxes which users can ‘lock’ in exchange for a payment – if you want an idea of why this is never going to work, try making ANY fcuking sense of the ‘about’ page here. Doomed to eventual irrelevance, but in the meantime there’s something oddly-fascinating about seeing all the various bits of graffiti people are choosing to populate the canvas with (and slightly dispiriting to note that the moronic crypto ‘gm!’ thing is still a, well, thing).
  • Smokescanner: I am slightly annoyed by this – I think it’s a fun, silly little idea (and as a smoker – still, just – I obviously approve of the theory behind it), but it REALLY doesn’t explain itself particularly well. Let me see if I can do a better job – tell the site where you are flying from, and to, and it will tell you how many packets of fags you have to buy at your destination to cover the cost of the flight in the savings you make. Er, does that make sense? Hang on, maybe it’s harder than I thought. Basically the idea is ‘if you buy loads of fags in (eg) Italy you will save about £9 per pack – by that token, if I buy 20 packs of fags I have basically got a £180 flight for free’ – SEE, IMPECCABLE LOGIC!!! I know that you almost certainly can’t use ‘tabs are cheap abroad!’ as an advermarketing mechanic in 2024, more’s the pity, but this is a great little gimmick.
  • The Supreme Court Art Competition: Do YOU know someone between the ages of 15-18? Are they artistically talented? Are they at a loose end this weekend? Are they the sort of 15-18 year old who would like to spend their free time creating an artwork inspired by the UK’s Supreme Court to celebrate its 15th anniversary? WELL ISN’T THIS YOUR LUCKY DAY! You only have until Sunday 28th to get your entries in, and they have to meet the following criteria: “This is a free, open submission exhibition for students aged 15-18 studying in the UK. Families of Supreme Court staff and Justices cannot take part. We welcome works on paper, small canvases and small, light sculpture. Paper and canvas artworks should be a maximum of A3. Sculpture should weigh a maximum of 1850g and be a maximum of 30cm high and 20cm wide.” Disappointingly, if perhaps predictably, the contest also stipulates that “Artwork should focus on the UK Supreme Court building or the judicial system. Artwork should not parody or satirise the law,” but, well, TRY ANYWAY.
  • A Good GoFundMe: I don’t think this is serious, and even if it was it would never meet its target, but I am 100% here for the concept behind the campaign which I think is the best use of the Vegas sphere I have yet heard of.
  • IRL HTML: A FUN USE OF AI! Specifically multimodal AI, which is being used under the hood here to ‘see’ the images uploaded, ‘read’ them, and then render them as code. “IRL HTML is a web app that hosts HTML web pages created from photographs of HTML code. You can upload a photograph of some HTML to create a new HTML page!” Hear that? Sketch some html on a piece of A4, photograph it, upload it here and VWALLAH IT IS A WEBPAGE! Which is, honestly, quite magic – there’s a really interesting extension to this which is effectively creating a sort of scrapbook Visual Basic tool for people to literally draw out webdesign and have it automatically spun up into a prototypical page design, which now I come to think of it is obviously totally possible right now and which I imagine someone has already made. Still, if not, GET ON IT IT IS A GREAT IDEA.
  • Sarah of the Antartic: Sarah is someone who has recently arrived in Antartica to do research into polar ice cores. This is their TikTok account, which only has three videos but two of them are ‘doing polar research in the style of Wes Anderson’ and are so beautifully, perfectly realised that I feel reasonably-confident recommending the channel to you, because, really, who doesn’t find beautifully-presented Artic landscapes delivered via the medium of perfectly-composed cinematography compelling? NO FCUKER, etc!
  • The Intimate Haptics Control Standard and Library: Have you harboured a long-standing fascination with teledildonics and felt that the only thing holding you back from creating your very own remote-controlled sex aid? OF COURSE YOU HAVE, YOU ARE ONLY HUMAN! Welcome, then, to the Intimate Haptics Control Standard and Library, a repository of all the code you could possibly need to set a variety of latex-covered objects moving intimately within you! I present this information without judgement or prejudice, and ask only that none of you ever try and tell me what you do with it.
  • Mojie: The final miscellaneous link this week is to this fun little Wordle clone (I know, but I promise it’s fun) which asks you to guess three films each day based on emoji-based clues. My general lack of anything resembling cinematic knowledge makes this a particularly challenging one for me, but if your appreciation of cinema extends beyond ‘Bad Boy Bubby’ and ‘Meet The Feebles’ (no they ARE classics!) then you might find this an enjoyable addition to the daily puzzle round.

By Aleksandra Waliszewska

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK DESCRIBES ITSELF AS ‘BALEARIC BOOGIE NIGHTS’ BUT PERSONALLY SPEAKING I THINK ‘MASSIVE 80s GAY DISCO’ IS A BETTER FIT – EITHER WAY IT IS ACE AND IF I HAD A POOL IT IS THE SORT OF THING I WOULD PROBABLY PLAY WHILE ‘LOUNGING’ NEXT TO IT AT THE WEEKENDS! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • The Library of the Printed Web: The companion Tumblr to a piece in the MOMA collection: “The mission of Library of the Printed Web is to provide an in-depth view of network culture, artistic practice, and the printed page. The collection is an important resource for the study of print-based experimental publishing in the early 21st century” – this collects various projects seeking to combine the physical world of print and the world of the url for artistic purposes, and as you can imagine pretty much everything on here is right up my street.
  • Grumpy: I don’t know if this is actually a Tumblr, but it FEELS like one. Examples of infuriatingly-bad UX and UI, compiled by a wide range of grumpy contributors from the world of design. EXCELLENT, particularly if you too are grumpy.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Cruising Archaeology: An Insta feed sharing photographs of some of the detritus abandoned at various cruising sites across the UK – from the mundane, to the poignant, to the odd and inexplicable, all of gay life is here. SO much fascinating stuff here – my personal favourite is the discarded poppers bottle emblazoned with the Union Jack and bearing the legend ‘ENGLISH ROOM ODORISER’ which immediately opens the window onto an imagined psyche absolutely RIDDLED with self-doubt and contradictions, but you will find your own amongst the collection. There’s an art book out now accompanying this, should it be your sort of thing.
  • Historic Embroidery: I mean, you probably don’t need this explaining, do you? IT’S OLD NEEDLEWORK FFS.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Why Conservatism Failed: This is a really interesting article of the sort I wouldn’t ordinarily have bothered reading – no idea where I came across it, but it’s basically a look at what has happened to ‘conservatism’ as a concept (this is very much focused on the idea of ‘small-c conservatism’, the traditional definition which focuses on a politics motivated by an appeal to tradition, etc, as embodied by the British Conservative Party (or at least as once-embodied by it)) and why it appears to have rather been left by the wayside in favour of various flavours of liberalism, neoliberalism, libertarianism and the rest. To be clear – on a personal level I do not bemoan the relative demise of conservatism as a movement, but I found the discussion of the philosophical underpinnings of the movement and the way in which the author argues that it’s simply not compatible with a post-tech society, hugely interesting, and you might too – see how you feel about this: “The modern conservative project failed because it didn’t take into account the revolutionary principle of technology, and its intrinsic connection to the telos of sheer profit. Decrying left-wing revolutionary politics and postmodern anarchy, conservatives missed that the real moral relativism was to believe that one could change the material form of society without directly affecting its substance or its ends.”
  • The Republican Convention: On the one hand, sending a talented English writer to point and laugh at the mad excesses of the Republican party is pretty much ‘fish in a barrel’ as far as commissioning goes – on the other, Andrew O’Hagen in the LRB really does a wonderful job presenting the various freaks and liars and, honestly, fcuking dreadful, cnutish, ghoulish excuses for people that populate the halls of the RNC. This is written in the immediate aftermath of the Trump shooting, and captures the fear, greed and naked opportunism swirling around the atmosphere as a collection of mostly very rich people work out exactly how they can plot and collude to make sure that they stay rich, and ideally get richer, over the coming five years. Made me almost miss the days in which I used to get to go to party conferences and get paid to be spectacularly rude to Tories (I mean, that’s not what I got paid for, fine, but it’s definitely a significant proportion of what I actually did).
  • Cool URLs Mean Something: I enjoyed this immensely, all about how hyperlinks and urls are GREAT, actually, and how their existence and function is the very backbone of a functioning web, and how they are goods that should be preserved. I have been toying recently with the idea of futureproofing Curios to an extent – I quite like the idea of buying 50 years of hosting to ensure that even long after I am dead someone will in theory be able to read this crap, fcuk alone knows why – but then I realised that that’s sort of meaningless if all the links within are dead, and it made me wonder whether there’s some sort of concerted, organised way of dealing with this, some sort of…I don’t know, guaranteed, state-backed, guaranteed volume of storage that could be guaranteed for every citizen, a certain number of Terabytes guaranteed for 100 years for you to dispose of as you will, and how that might be an interesting way of securing a certain type of small, personal web…anway, that’s all almost certainly b0llocks, but read the piece and see if it takes you anywhere similar.
  • The Pop Craveification of Breaking News: Or ‘the news happens everywhere and nowhere simultaneously and it’s basically weird being alive in a time when it’s as likely you will hear about, I don’t know, an asteroid being about to hit the earth on the news as it is you will hear about it third-hand via an incredibly complicated meme you have to reverse engineer to understand’. Taylor Lorenz writes about the fractured way the US experienced the news of the Trump shooting – which is brought into sharper relief by this list of all the different ways people found out about it. I have been saying this for a few years now, but it really is true that the idea of any sort of ‘universal informational layer’ that we can all agree we all have access to and agree on is gone, perhaps forever. Which is quite strange, and I think will have equally-strange consequences.
  • Confronting Impossible Futures: The wisest man in AI discourse, Ethan Mollick, returns with a typically-superb essay on the current state of AI and how it might be helpful to try and think about its future development, specifically from the point of view of organisational implementation.
  • AI and the Games Industry: A sobering dispatch from the frontlines of game development, in which WIRED talks to a selection of people involved in the industry about how they’re seeing generative AI impacting their jobs and the wider market. The answer, as you might expect, is ‘not in ways that are particularly good news for lower-level staff’ – this is very much worth reading, imho, not so much because of its focus on the games industry in particular but because of the fact that much of what it describes chimes with my own experiences this year of being paid to consult on this stuff – cf, IT IS NEVER THE SHINY, FRONT-FACING STUFF THAT YOU HAVE TO WATCH OUT FOR IT IS THE BORING BEHIND-THE-SCENES STUFF WHERE THE SWINGEING CUTS ARE COMING.
  • Hell Is Haggling With Chatbots: A piece on 404 Media presaging the inevitable future in which AI gets baked into every single fcuking interface on earth – a reality which came a small step closer this week with the release of the new version of Llama – and we have to deal with fun things like ‘having your purchase journey interrupted by a conversational assistant that invites you to ‘barter’ with it for a discount, except you’re not actually haggling, it’s a pre-agreed discount that’s already been baked into the model and the financials and so all you are doing is playing out a dispiriting pantomime with a machine to achieve exactly the same result as you could have gotten with a simple voucher except now you have lost 3% of your soul and you will never get it back’. Sounds GREAT, doesn’t it?
  • Ethiopia’s EV Problem: This is an EXCEPTIONAL story, and exactly the sort of cautionary tale that a certain type of person will almost certainly internalise and use as their go-to example of why PLANNING IS IMPORTANT. So Ethiopia has recently taken steps to address the fact that, until recently, the country was spending $7.6bn on fuel imports per year – by, er, banning the import of non-electric vehicles. Which is a great and progressive idea, at least in theory, but which floundered slightly on the harsh reality of the country’s existing EV infrastructure, which is…patchy at best. Ethiopia, according to the article in the always-excellent Rest of World, has around 50 charging stations in total, and they don’t really have a stockpile of replacement parts for EVs, and the power supply’s not quite up to scratch…an incredible example of how enthusiasm occasionally needs to be tempered JUST A BIT with practical realism.
  • Looking For A Man In Finance: What happens if you ACTUALLY go looking for a man in finance in New York’s financial district? Will you find a blue-eyed plute to pose for rooftop cocktails with? Joanna Rothkopf investigates for The Cut, in a piece which is very funny but which also did nothing to disabuse me of my belief that a good 75% of people who live in Manhattan are actually sociopaths. Also, and I know that this has been discussed at length elsewhere but, I find the ‘Bateman aesthetic’ fetishising so incredibly depressing. “I think American Psycho has always been in” – no mate, it hasn’t, you’re just awful.
  • The Kink Behind Brat Summer: After the past week I can barely bring myself to type the word again – PLEASE CAN WE NEVER, EVER DO THIS ‘X SUMMER’ THING EVER AGAIN, PLEASE? Also (and while I hope this doesn’t happen for obvious reasons) I wonder whether this album will get utterly memoryholed by the culture should Harris not win? Anyway, this is the only piece I am linking to about That Meme because, well, I have already featured too much about it in previous Curios – I am making an exception for this, because it’s very funny and actually very smart about the link between the term, its ubiquity and the kink/fet dynamic that it springs from, and I haven’t seen anyone else writing about this. By Emma Garland, whose newsletter is very much worth subbing to.
  • What Happens When You Let An AI Try And Plan Your Trip: Nothing good, basically – you probably won’t be hugely surprised to learn that ‘let The Machine plan your itinerary!’ services aren’t quite up to snuff yet, what with the fact that The Machine HAS NO UNDERSTANDING OF SPACE OR TIME and therefore can’t do things like ‘work out a suitable cadence of pubs for the Circle Line Pub Crawl’, but despite being largely unsurprising this is still an amusing read, not least the London correspondent’s dogged commitment to following the AI’s mad instructions to the letter.
  • Cleo, The Mysterious Maths Expert: OH I love this! Of a similar vibe to the recent story about the SomethingAwful user who came back after 11 years to carry on an online argument where it left off, this is an adorable and slightly-mysterious tale of Cleo, a user on the Mathematics Stack Exchange website (a place where people who are VERY GOOD AT NUMBERS gather to talk about, er, numbers) who found fame through occasionally popping up on the forum’s pages to offer answers to INCREDIBLY HARD PROBLEMS, with no explanation and, most traumatically of all for this community, NO WORKINGS. This is a lovely piece – transcribed from a podcast – looking at why the ‘no workings’ thing sends the numbermongs into a frenzy, and who Cleo is, and why they post the way they do, and, honestly, I adore this sort of stuff, the random anonymous online heroes, your Let Me Solo Hers and the like, more power to them and LONG LIVE CLEO, whoever they may be. Also, solving complex factorials and the like and just dropping the answer is the coolest geeky thing in the world, to my mind.
  • The Love Letter Generator: A beautiful, sad, poignant bit of history, this – “In 1952, decades before ChatGPT started to write students’ essays, before OpenAI’s computer generated writing was integrated into mainstream media outlets, two gay men—Alan Turing and Christopher Strachey—essentially invented AI writing. Alongside Turing, Strachey worked on several experiments with Artificial Intelligence: a computer that could sing songs, one of the world’s first computer games, and an algorithm to write gender-neutral mash notes that screamed with longing.” There’s no evidence that Turing and Strachey ever had a romantic relationship in real life, but it’s impossible not to read a certain yearning subtext in the project and the letters that were exchanged over its duration. It reminded me that epistolary correspondence is, to my mind, the most romantic expression of feeling there is, the slow unfurling of love over thousands of exchanged words across weeks or months.
  • Books The NYT Missed: Following on from the New York Times’ list of ‘the best books of the 21stC’ which I featured last week, this week I can bring you TWO alternatives – the first, published by LitHub, consists of novels that might reasonably have made it in, but which didn’t, and which you can say fall basically within the same sort of ballpark, books which you have almost certainly heard of if you’re a certain type of person. Personally I prefer this one to the original – it contains a few more spiky texts, a few less ‘MODERN CLASSICS’, and it’s a bit more varied in tone in its picks. The second selection is FAR more interesting and varied – this one’s compiled by a bookshop in New Delhi, and contains a selection of titles that SHOCK HORROR had the temerity to not necessarily be written in English, and of which I had heard of maybe 20-odd, and which I am going to use as the basis for much of my reading for the second half of the year I think.
  • READ: I didn’t know this til this week, but another of America’s big national public ad campaigns (alongside ‘Got Milk?’) has traditionally been one designed to encourage kids to read, via the medium of celebrities, photographed with a book, alongside the single-word instruction ‘READ’. This piece takes you through the 100 ‘best’ – honestly, some of these are WONDERFUL. Who chooses the famouses? Who art directs these? The one of Lucy Lawless in particular, in full Xena garb, holding a scroll, is fcuking PRICELESS.
  • The Worst Album Covers Ever: A list by Rolling Stone, which is comprised mainly of ‘bands you might actually have heard of and who, honestly, all ought to have known a lot better’. Some of these are legendary, some of these were new to me, but it was nice to be reminded of some all-time classics like the infamous Twin Towers cover by rappers The Coup. Still don’t think the Chumbawamba cover’s all that bad, mind.
  • Secrets of a Ransomware Negotiator: A piece from the Economist’s superb 1843 Magazine now, this is a brilliantly-done portrayal of what it’s like to negotiate with a ransomware gang that says it has it hands on a bunch of your customer data – this is GREAT, nicely paced and not-a-little tense at times, which left me with two main takeaways: 1) being a ransomware scammer sounds like a pretty sweet gig tbh; 2) but not as sweet a gig as the ransomware expert negotiator, who, from what I can tell, gets paid enough to live in the fcuking Maldives while basically doing a job that equates to sending one or two calm-sounding emails a day.
  • Indexing Plath: Carly Rollyson writes about exploring the life of Sylvia Plath through his biographies of her, and specifically the insights and understanding of a life and a person through an indexing of their experiences. Rollyson talks about how through indexing his work and her diaries he came to a deeper understanding of the role sex played in Plath’s life and relationships and marriage to Ted Hughes, and for someone like me who’s inherently sceptical of the idea of ‘finding beauty and interesting stuff via the medium of statistics’ it was interesting to listen to him expand on what the accumulation of detail and recording of incident and accumulation of volume can tell about the texture of a person.
  • The Bootleg Beatles: Kieran Morris writes in the FT about the Bootleg Beatles, the world’s premiere purveyors of ersatz Beatles experience. This is SUPERB – honestly, I had no idea that the ‘tribute band’ thing went THIS far, that the Bootleg Ringo has AN ACTUAL PROSTHETIC NOSE, that they try and mimic everything down to the amps and the lightbulbs they use on stage, that they have quietly played some incredible gigs…seriously, everything about the piece and its subjects is charming and lovely and you will not fail to be charmed by it, I promise.
  • The Later Years of Douglas Adams: Very much one for the fans, this – I concede that if you’re not personally interested in the life and works of Douglas Adams, this isn’t likely to convert you. That said, if you’re a fan of the man and his work, this is a great look at what he did AFTER he’d done with the Hitchhiker’s books – all the terrible uses to which he put his money, and the various ways in which he attempted to get out of writing, and the botched mess that was Starship Titanic, and the oddity of H2G2, and Christ he was an astonishing and visionary person in many ways, what a shame he died so young (but, maybe, for the best – at least we didn’t have to watch him Going Full Cleese).
  • The Sounds of a Calculator: Sublime is an interesting-looking new website / tool for collecting and sharing interesting stuff online, sort of like Are.na but different (I will write it up properly when it’s out of beta) – this is a genuinely lovely post from one of the team there, about how they came to find one of the sounds that they use on the site, and I promise you it really is a beautiful reflection on old and new, digital and analogue, and how inspiration can and does come from anywhere and everywhere and you can never tell where.
  • Demon Slayers: I have always been fascinated by Big Evangelical America – the pomp, the theatre, the barely-concealed sense that someone, somewhere is making quite frankly insane bank out of all this proselytizing…I remember being in North Carolina about 30-odd years ago and seeing a church-sponsored sign along the freeway which exhorted parents to keep their kids safe from ‘Drink, Drugs and Heavy Metal Rock Music’, which is pretty much illustrative. ANYWAY, this is a wonderful article by Sam Kestenbaum in Hazlitt, all about the very specific business of mass exorcisms, filmed and packaged and broadcast as Christian films (or TV specials) – Kestenbaum attends a big exorcism, sees the speaking in tongues and the fainting, witnesses the…rather more practical and prosaic considerations of the people running the show, and SOMEHOW manages to pen several thousand words on the whole thing (good words too) without calling anyone a massive, grifting charlatan which to my mind is worthy of some sort of prize.
  • Tyson: GQ interviews Mike Tyson – this piece was presumably intended to coincide with the Tyson/Paul bout which has now been pushed back to November, and it’s…look, we all know how the celebrity interview junket works at this level, and you don’t get access to someone like Tyson around an event like this without agreeing in advance as to what the parameters are, but, well, the softballing here, the lack of any sort of serious interrogation of Bad Mike Doing All The Bad Things, is kind of astonishing. It’s worth reading this and also keeping Tyson’s Wiki open alongside it to remind you of all the stuff it’s NOT mentioning, basically. The section with the pigeons is nice, though (if inevitable and predictable).
  • Pneuma: One of the more astonishing pieces of writing I’ve read in a while, this – Mary Gaitskill writes of her experiences with Pneuma, a form of…what, energy healing? Something like that, I get my woo-medicine confused…which she gets involved with over a period of several years and which sort-of takes over, and maybe halfway ruins, her life. This really is extraordinary – Gaitskill’s a great writer and she’s very good at pre-empting a lot of the reader’s skepticism whilst making it perfectly clear that, for her, this was very much A Real Thing – and the cast of characters she meets is…well, it’s going to be immediately familiar to anyone who’s ever come even halfway-adjacent to this sort of stuff. I really was left floored by this – a properly bravura piece, and a very odd one indeed.
  • Bitter North: Our final longread this week is another piece in Granta – Alexandra Tanner writes about Danna and Hal, a couple going on a trip together, and I loved this so so so much, the mundanity and the detail and the fact that you can almost feel the cheap fibres of the motel carpet under your fingers, and the highest compliment I can give this is that I was devastated when I finished it to discover that Tanner’s novel isn’t published in the UK til 2025. Really, really good.

By Daido Moriyama

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 19/07/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

Propriety be damned, we’re allowed to feel a faint twinge of regret, right? Please take it upon yourselves to determine exactly which of last Sunday’s major news events I am referring to.

Anyway, given the fact that the world’s digital infrastructure appears to have decided to fall over this morning and that therefore a lot of you might find yourself in a position where…everything…takes…forever…thanks…modernity…fcuk’s…sake, I’ll keep this short and instead proudly present to you this week’s selection of freshly-slain links, harvested at no small personal cost by me, for you, just you, always you.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you can already taste that first pint, can’t you, I can tell.

By Reuben Negron (all pics this week lifted from TIH)

WE KICK OFF THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH AN ALBUM I BOUGHT FOR A QUID ENTIRELY AT RANDOM ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO IN SPITALFIELDS AND WHICH HAS SINCE BECOME ONE OF MY FAVOURITE SUMMER LISTENS AND WHICH FEELS PERFECT FOR AN AFTERNOON LIKE THIS ONE (THE ONE IN LONDON RIGHT NOW, TO BE CLEAR, I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR PERSONAL AFTERNOON MAY OR MAY NOT BE LIKE)! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS ASKED BY A STRANGER IN CENTRAL LONDON LAST SUNDAY IF I HAD ‘ANY BUGLE’ TO SPARE, WHICH STRUCK ME AS BOTH DELICIOUSLY RETRO AND WILDLY OPTIMISTIC ON THEIR PART, PT.1:

  • What Beats Rock: We are officially in THE TROUGH OF DESPOND when it comes to AI (no, really, Gartner have said it and everything), but if you’d like something to remind you of how it can be FUN and SILLY it can be (leaving aside any momentary worries about how exactly we’re planning on cooling all these datacentres) then you could do worse than spending a few enjoyable minutes playing ‘What Beats Rock?’, a game which asks you the fundamental question ‘which of these two objects, or even abstract concepts, is more POWERFUL than the other?’. You start with paper – your only task as a player is to think of something that the system agrees will ‘beat’ the substance in question, with the LLM that sits behind all this being in charge of deciding whether or not it agrees with you. The obvious – boring, normie! – pick is of course ‘scissors’ – but get creative! Why not try ‘fire’? Or ‘paper-eating termites’? Or ‘a holepunch deployed with repeated aggression’? SO MANY OPPORTUNITIES! If you submit a response that The Machine deems acceptable, you’re onto the next round and charged with trumping your previous suggestion – so you can’t go big too early or you’ll be left thinking ‘hm, ok, what beats ‘the concept of time’?’ and coming up with empty hands. The game ends when you’re unable to come up with a workable suggestion, with the aim being to get as high a score as possible by keeping the chain of ridiculousness going, and, honestly, this is FUN and absurd and while we may not have yet come up with compelling reasons as to why it’s been worth investing all this money in spicy autocomplete (trust me, though, the ‘compelling reason’ is ‘reduced operating costs when it comes to staffing’ and it always has been!), this feels like as good a rationale as any.
  • Jars: One of the great hopes of generative AI to date, of course, has been the prospect of INFINITE CONTENT – fcuk the quality, feel the width! While we are, per Curios passim, a LONG way from these systems being able to produce anything much more than curious nonsense or total dreck, it hasn’t stopped people from ploughing what I assume is a reasonable chunk of idiot VC money into stuff like Jars – an ‘infinite’ series of AI-scripted and fronted ‘tv shows’ which you can view through the website here linked. There are DOZENS of these, with talking head avatars burbling on about topics as varied as, er, ‘would you have a penguin as your vice president’ and Jeffrey Epstein (OF COURSE!)…why? There’s a degree of interactivity available with this stuff – per other ‘AI TV’ setups, you can theoretically direct and influence the chat through comments…but noone’s watching, so this is just The Machine burbling to itself, into the void, forever. I am genuinely baffled by this – firstly, which purse-string holder was duped into thinking that there is ever going to be an audience for ‘computer generated characters have stilted conversations in which they pretend they are in Love Island’ (because of course that is a channel), and secondly ‘how much is this costing?!?!’, given there are several dozen channels, all running seemingly 24/7. Anway, if you fancy checking out what is almost certainly NOT the future of entertainment, Jars is here! I have just found one channel that apparently has 7 concurrent viewers at the time of writing, and all I can think is ‘who are you, and how do you not have anything better to do with your time?’ (swiftly followed by ‘I am in no position to mock or deride, what is become of me?’).
  • Eggnog Infinite: Seeing as we’re doing ‘supposedly infinite content that noone in their right mind is ever going to consume more than once’, here’s another attempted variant on the whole ‘user-directed, AI-generated storytelling’ thing! This is ‘Eggnog’, which is a platform trying to do the whole ‘give us a skeleton of an idea and we will turn it into a storyboard for you’ thing, and which is marketing a feature it’s calling ‘Eggnog Infinite’ where you can watch entire ‘series’ of AI-generated pseudovideo. I have no idea AT ALL who has made all these things – I presume they have been prompted into existence by ‘the community’, the only explanation I can imagine for the VERY COPYRIGHT-INFRINGING material here collected. Would you like to ‘watch’ an incredibly-stilted reimagining of ‘Bridgerton’ (called, for avoidance of doubt, ‘Bridgerton’) delivered via the medium of 20s AI-generated clips? No, of course not! The same almost certainly applies to ‘Breaking Bad: Maldives (no, really) although, honestly, I do rather recommend delving into the mad Epstein or the jaw-droppingly poor ‘Sex Education at Oxford’ clips. Each ‘series’ has a vague ‘choose your own adventure’ vibe, so you each episode ends with a binary branching choice – this is like ‘interactive televisual entertainment’ as reimagined by someone who’s either totally unfamiliar with the concept of ‘entertainment’ or who has recently enjoyed some sort of blunt-force cranial trauma.
  • YouSim: Another rather fun AI sandbox toy, this, in similar vein to ‘SIMULATE THE WORLD’ tools I’ve featured previously – with YouSim, the gimmick is that you can ‘summon’ and interact with anyone you like (to be clear, this happens via the medium of ‘typing with your fingers’ rather than through any kind of occult process – sorry to disappoint), just to see what happens. There are various commands you can experiment with – so you can summon Frida Kahlo, say, and then get the simulation to imagine that she’s just taken ayahuasca and is seeing totally new colours, and then perhaps summon Aleister Crowley to tell Frida about his murderous mountaineering exploits, and then tell the simulation to make Frida angry and see whether you can get her to clock Aleister around the head for his satanic ways…basically it’s like a text-only doll’s house/dress-up box, and with a bit of imagination and effort there’s something rather wonderful about the ways in which you can end up in some very odd, and pleasingly ‘imaginative’, places.
  • Follow The Crypto: Thanks to the increasingly-likely prospect of a Trumpian second term (a sentence which 2015 Matt finds risible in the extreme – 2015 Matt was a fcuking d1ck with no idea at all what was going on or what was going to continue going on, turns out!), crypto is once again a bull(ish) market – WE’RE SO BACK, BABY! With all the usual suspects weighing in behind the Republican campaign in the past week – Thiel, obvs, but Andreessen and others – there’s a real sense that a certain portion of the world sees Donald 2.0 as a Big Business Opportunity. Should the fact that this portion is also the portion which is all-in on incredibly grifty sh1t like crypto give us pause for thought? You’d have to be a fool or a communist to suggest so! Anyway, as the bubble reinflates, even if temporarily, we have a new project by Molly White (of Web3 Is Going Great fame), this time attempting to the amount of crypto-adjacent money that is being funneled into the US Presidential race via PACs and SuperPACs and the various other complex financial instruments that makes American Democracy such a joy to behold. Of interest mainly to keen observers of US politics and who exactly is trying to influence it and how, and anyone who wants to get a tiny, tiny glimpse into the mindfcuking amounts of money involved.
  • The BBC Computer Literacy Project: Oh God, there is a certain type of middle-aged (and older, tbf) UK-based nerd for whom this is going to be Proustian in its ability to take you back to a specific time – return, if you will, to an era in which computer software came on tape or floppy discs (they really used to bend!), in which screen resolutions were such that digital bongo was the very definition of ‘a challenging w4nk’, and in which you were seemingly only allowed access to one if you had a cardigan and elbow patches – HERITAGE! “In the 1980s, the BBC explored the world of computing in The Computer Literacy Project. They commissioned a home computer (the BBC Micro) and taught viewers how to program. The Computer Literacy Project chronicled a decade of information technology and was a milestone in the history of computing in Britain, helping to inspire a generation of coders. This site contains all 146 of the original Computer Literacy Project programmes plus 121 related programmes, broken down into 2,509 categorised, searchable clips.” This is HISTORY (and will be useful should you have unaccountably put ‘learn BBC BASIC’ on your ‘ways to fill the days between birth and death in 2024’ list).
  • MorseLaptop: Code which lets you communicate in Morse via the simple medium of opening and shutting your laptop (click the link and watch the demo vid, it makes sense, honest). I am less enticed by the laptop hack here than I am with the possibility to setting something like this up on a door in an office or public space somewhere, and translating the ‘long open/short open’ movements into Morse which then get communicated somewhere, like some sort of ongoing, randomised, Dada-ish ‘poetry of movement’. Which is almost certainly the w4nkiest thing I am going to write ALL DAY, and it’s only 751am so well DONE Matt!
  • Snort & Paste: One of several links lifted from B3ta this week, this is a very silly gimmick which lets you erase text from a webpage by hoovering it up with a big digital nose JUST LIKE DRUGS, DO YOU SEE??? Extra special bonus points for the ‘clear your nostril to expel the cloggage’ functionality which is an admirable commitment to the gag.
  • Does It Glider?: Are you still playing Wordle (or similar daily word puzzle, ideally one which, like Wordle, presents you with a daily grid-based scorecard at the end of each game)? Would you like something new to do with your completed Wordle grid once you’ve solved it and are basking in the glory of your fantastic verbal prowess? Well why not copy the scoreblocks and paste them into to this webpage to see whether or not your day’s performance would cut it in the digital petri dish that is Conway’s ‘Life’ – this takes the Wordle scoregrid and asks ‘yes, fine, BUT HOW LONG WILL IT LAST AS A SELF-REPLICATING SIMULATED ORGANISM?’, which, frankly, is the question we should ALL have been asking for the past few years.
  • Font Interceptor: MSCHF released a bunch of new things in the past week or so – this is the first of them, a website where you can plug in the url of ANY OTHER website to let you steal ALL of the fonts used on said site. Caveat – I haven’t actually tried this out, given I have no particular need to grab a bunch of fonts, but, presuming it works, then I feel I ought to also say ‘stealing is bad’. That said, I have a vague recollection that the whole font industry is something of a cartel/racket and, honestly, who can afford to pay for serifs in THIS economy? NO FCUKER, etc. There’s a little Q&A on the homepage talking you through the morality of when one should and shouldn’t steal a font – basically if you’re a povvo you’re fine, and given you’re reading Web Curios I’m going to assume a degree of spiritual/emotional poverty and therefore I officially say it is OK for you to use this with impunity.
  • Project Gucciberg: MSCHF drop of the week #2 is this fun little exploration of copyright law – is it legal to create a selection of audiobooks which take public domain books available via Project Gutenberg and then has them read out by an AI voice model trained on the unique vocal stylings of Gucci Mane? Is it legal if the voice model is unauthorised but created from publicly available recordings? What about if it’s a non-commercial project? WHO KNOWS??? As MSCHF write on the homepage, “We didn’t write the books, and we deepfaked the voice. Is this copyright infringement? Is it identity theft? All of the training data (recordings) used to make Project Gucciberg were publicly available on the web. Gucciberg lives in that lovely grey area where everything’s new and anything goes.” I do think there’s some quite fun and interesting stuff to be done in spaces like this – there’s nothing funny about STEALING PEOPLE’S ART, obvs (he says, despite the fontstealing link he literally just posted, the fcuking hypocrite), but I think there’s space in the charitable/awareness-raising space to take some risks with public domain and what you can and can’t get away with. Leaving aside all that po-faced stuff, though, you can now download an AI-generated recording of a famous rapper reading you Kafka’s ‘Metamorphosis’, which I think we can all agree justifies the effort, expense and environmental impact.
  • Kaleidoscope: This is very simple, fine, but it is also WONDERFUL for making really quite distressing images. Plug in any photo you want and this makes a sort of looping, zooming kaleidoscope-type animation out of it – obviously you’re free to use this however you want, but can I just point out how astonishingly vile the results are if you feed it images of glistening meats? Honestly, SO UNPLEASANTLY SQUELCHY AND VISCERAL.
  • Lower Silesia: A Google Arts & Culture project which looks at the Polish region of Lower Silesia and offers an overview of its architecture, regional mythologies, history, wildlife and all sorts of other things. There’s a virtual art gallery featuring works depicting the area which you can explore! There’s richly-evocative music which feels very much as though it was lifted from the ‘exploring Hogwarts at night’ bits of the early Potter films! Honestly, you may not ever have previously thought ‘Christ I *wish* there was an easily-accessible and attractively-presented guide to this otherwise-little-known area of Poland’ but you will be THRILLED to discover the existence of this one. Seriously, a really interesting introduction to a region I knew nothing about, and which I am now almost tempted to visit (but I simply don’t like pierogi enough).
  • Live Near Friends: Via Elan Ullendorff’s newsletter, this is SUCH an interesting idea which I am slightly amazed I hadn’t come across before. Live Near Friends is a website based on a super-simple premise – that, given the opportunity, people would increasingly choose to live in vague clusters with their friends, and that as such they should be able to arrange things to let them do that. The site asks you to choose what sort of arrangement you’re after – multiple units within an apartment block, say, or houses in a neighbourhood, or on a street – and then helps you find areas where house prices and availability match your and your friends’ criteria…on the one hand, this makes all sorts of theoretical sense; on the other, I can’t help but get a feeling (and this might just be my innate ‘I AM NOT A JOINER’-ness at play here) that there could be some…interesting negative externalities here. What about the people in the neighbourhood/apartment block that perhaps wouldn’t be thrilled at having your entire uni mates groupchat moving in en masse? What if you and your group of friends are, not to put too fine a point on it, *d1cks*? Anyway, this struck me as both a really curious idea and the GREAT starting point for some superb domestic/community drama.
  • Live, HD Stream from the ISS: I have obviously featured this sort of thing at some point before, but this is NEW and SUPER-HD, and if you have ever wanted to watch a stream of, at the time of writing, clouds over the ocean then WOW do I have a treat for you. This gives me vertigo, in a way that is very hard to describe.
  • Epistolorean Club: This is an interesting idea, though details on how exactly it will work is unclear at the time of writing – from the blurb, “Epistolary books are written as letters or journals. They tell a story through the eyes the characters, capturing their thoughts, feelings, and events as and when they are recorded. The Epistolorean brings epistolary books to life. Subscribe to a book and you’ll receive emails from the characters as the story takes place. Our first book, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, is currently in testing.” Except, well, Dracula is already in large part an epistolary novel, no? Anyway, no idea if this is going to be any good, but it’s INTERESTING so give it a try and stop being so suspicious.
  • Years In Seconds: ‘A Year In My Life In a Minute’ as a style of video feels VERY 2012-coded, to me at least – stuff like ‘The Sartorialist’ and ‘Charlie Bit My Finger’ that’s OLD INTERNET, more innocent and less corrupted…ordinarily I wouldn’t pay much mind to this sort of thing, but I stumbled across this channel this week and became slightly transfixed. This is someone called Shaun Tollerton who since 2015 has posted a ‘my year in 365 seconds’ videos – a second of video a day each day throughout the year, edited into single vids – and none of them have more than 200 views, and it’s just…perfect. Not attention-seeky, not trying to do or say anything, no big running bits or stories or revelations, just mundane, wonderful, boring, LIFE (admittedly the life of someone who I think has quite a decent job in tech and travels a bit, fine, but still). Shaun spends at least part of his life in London, so there’s a pleasing familiarity to some of the shots, but in general I am just slightly in love with the…the ordinariness of it all. No idea why this has grabbed me so, but I really, really enjoyed these and maybe you will too.

By Stephen A Scheer

BACK TO FORMER EDITOR PAUL FOR THIS NEXT MIX, WHICH IS PSYTRANCE AND ACID TECHNO AND THEREFORE ALMOST UTTERLY UNCOOL BUT I LOVE IT UNCONDITIONALLY REGARDLESS BECAUSE DEAR GOD DO I MISS DOING SPEED AND DANCING TO THIS STUFF! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS ASKED BY A STRANGER IN CENTRAL LONDON LAST SUNDAY IF I HAD ‘ANY BUGLE’ TO SPARE, WHICH WAS BOTH DELICIOUSLY RETRO AND STRUCK ME AS WILDLY OPTIMISTIC ON THEIR PART, PT.2:  

  • Gaza Memorial: A site which lists the names and ages of people killed in Gaza over the past 9 months – if you have your volume up, you will hear the names being read aloud as they cycle. The voices reading the names of the deceased are other people from around the world who have contributed their voices to their project – if you’re moved to do so, you can leave a recording here.
  • The Ultimate PaywallHopper: Before you all get excited, be aware that this is TECHNICAL and you will need to be comfortable fiddling with a few things on your computer to get it to work – BUT it’s not actually hard at all, and the instructions on the page are comprehensive, and, look, as previously discussed, I believe in paying for journalism as much as the next man but, equally, I am paying four figures annually for subscriptions at the moment and it’s not like my employment prospects are getting any better with the passage of time. This will get you into ALL SORTS of places, including The Athletic and Bloomberg, and is a fcuking GODSEND.
  • The Picasso Study Centre: Picasso, seen from the vantage point of 2024 – a leathery old pervert who had an indisputable way with the oils but who you probably wouldn’t necessarily trust with your wife/daughter/mum. Still, if you’d prefer your analysis of one of the 20thC’s most celebrated artists to be informed by rather more than my throwaway dismissal, you might enjoy checking out this newly-digitised set of works collected by the Picasso Study Centre – this contains 5,000 works from sketches and studies to monographs and photos and 3d models, and you could honestly lose hours to this if you’re so minded.
  • Code Galaxies: OK, I can’t claim to wholly understand what it is that is being visualised here – yes, fine, ‘code’, and according to the description code which ‘visualizes dependencies among most popular package managers. Every star in this visualization represents a package’, whatever that means – but beyond that I’m slightly lost – but it’s undeniably VERY PRETTY and quite mesmerising. This site – via Giuseppe’s ever-excellent data newsletter, btw – lets you explore Rust, Python, Arch Linux and other languages in zoomy, space commander fashion, flying through the various nodes as though they were, well, galaxies. Hence the name. Jesus. Anyway, I don’t think there’s any purpose to this AT ALL from a practical point of view, but I am very keen on the aesthetic and general VIBE.
  • The ABC Glossary Questionnaire: An interesting nascent project about the web and tech and language, this, in which you (yes, YOU!) are invited to submit your own new words, terms and definitions to characterise how we relate to the internet. “Welcome to the ABC Glossary* Questionnaire, an invitation to revisit your relationship to the internet and to reimagine how we collectively web through language. Below are a set of exercises to help you locate yourself within a (local area) network in order to refuse harmful computing practices and to repair our connections with/between technology, community, and nature. What words do we use to describe our electronic experiences? What terms do you associate with the internet, computing, and cyber culture? What words do we ignore? What words do we need to use in new ways? Submit a term with a newly redefined condition.* Draw an imagined map of the internet.” I mean, that sounds right up my street and maybe it will be up yours too – this is only a few weeks old and only has three entries so far, but I am hoping it will spread and grow as people engage with the idea, not least because I am increasingly of the opinion that we need new vocabulary for all of *this* as ‘being online’ and ‘surfing the web’ (LOL!) doesn’t really cut it any more.
  • Make The Olympic Flag: You know what the Olympic flag looks like, right? RIGHT? OF COURSE YOU DO! In fact, I bet you remember it so well that you can replicate it digitally RIGHT NOW, completely accurately, on your first try. Click the link and PROVE IT. This is one of those things that makes you realise how appalling human memory is at detail (oh, ok, fine, MY memory) – while I had the vague shape of the rings in my head, turns out I have literally no effective retention AL ALL of which colours are involved, what order the colours go in, or indeed the correct proportions of the final design. Erm, can you all try this and reassure me that you’re sh1t at it too? THANKS!
  • The Locavore: This is an NYC thing, but feels very much like it can (and should) transfer as a concept to basically anywhere else. Designed to be a directory of small, local shops in the city, this is a BRILLIANT idea – shops can self-submit, with the only criteria being: “1. Open to All – It’s important to us to highlight IRL shops with regular walk-in hours. Everyone’s welcome!; 2. Independent – To qualify, shops must have 5 or less locations and be independently owned; 3. Accessible – Shops must be easily accessible by bus, train, biking or walking within each neighborhood; 4. Old and New – We prioritize longtime community staples as well as new much needed neighborhood additions.” There’s no search function – you can browse by store type or neighbourhood, but the idea is that this is designed as much to help you learn about the shops that are out there as it is to get you a quick answer to your ‘where can I find a cobbler in Greenpoint’ query – and this feels like a SUPER initiative overall. The directory apparently now spans over 13,000 independent shops, which is quite remarkable – does this exist for London? If so, can one of you point me at it, please?
  • Tinder For Recipes: Yes, I know, but it’s the app-makers’ description so I am letting that one go – it’s actually called ‘Dinners’, but wevs. This is an app for…for who? Big families with wildly-divergent taste in meals? People who want to introduce a potentially-extremely-limiting element to their domestic approach to food? The idea is that you and your fellow housemates all download the app, then get presented with various recipes – swipe left to say ‘MMM YES PLEASE’, right to say ‘I WOULD RATHER EAT MY OWN FACE’. All the recipes that you ALL swipe left on get added to your APPROVED recipebook, ensuring that you only ever cook things that you all like – simple, right? Well, yes, in theory, until you get that one housemate who only wants to eat plain rice and poached chicken breast and who therefore royally fcuks the whole system for everyone else. THERE IS ALWAYS ONE.
  • Jordan Stone: I am really not a TikTok user, mainly because video is very much Not My Medium, and I am sort of grateful for that because I’m very conscious of how easy it would be to find something that scratches a very particular, personal itch and just falling into some catatonic rabbithole with it for approximately six hours or so. So it is with the work of Jordan Stone – I have never, ever seen anything on TikTok which speaks to me quite like this does. Seriously, it has some sort of very odd ASMR-type effect on my brain, like someone is stroking it VERY DIRECTLY, and it’s very hard for me to stop watching – WHY???? This is…I don’t know what it is. Memetic nonsense? TikTok slop? NO IT IS ART, ART I TELL YOU! There are only 23 videos on this channel but they are all worthy of being in the Tate, and I am not sh1tting you – watch and marvel. BONUS TIKTOK: I have no idea what the fcuk is happening here, but the chickens are magnificent and I want more.
  • Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2024: Our annual look at ‘photos of mad stuff in the cosmos’, now – leaving aside the fact that I am 100% convinced that one of these images is not a photograph but is in fact just a screenshot from a very heavily-modded version of Skyrim (you will know exactly the one I mean, promise), can I just draw your attention to the caption on the image entitled ‘Run to Carina’? The bit that reads “Deep in northwest Namibia, in a scorched desert where you can drive hundreds of kilometres without coming across another human, an artist is hard at work. Dotted all over the desert are numerous sculptures made of stone which blend seamlessly into the surroundings. Known as the ‘Lone Men of Kaokoland’ [as the region was formerly known], it is not clear who has put them there and where exactly they are located.” EXCUSE ME WHAT?! Why did noone ever tell me about the mysterious stone giants of the Namibian desert?! Anyway, the space pictures are ace, as always, but that detail in particular has spun me out rather.
  • Beautiful AI Animations: Gerde Gotit is…a studio, I think, based in Canada, that does a bunch of work using generative AI to create animations – the main link goes to some work they’ve done creating dancing leaf sprites and the like, but you might recognise them from those videos of the dancing spaghetti which did the rounds last week, which you can see more of here. This is really impressive, particularly in terms of the way they’ve used mocapped dancers to create the movement set, and I’d be amazed if this specific technique doesn’t crop up in a TV spot sooner rather than later.
  • The AI Murder Mystery: Via my friend Tom at the BBC (HI TOM!) comes this slightly-shonky work-in-progress/proof-of-concept experiment in AI-led ludic interactive experiences (catchy, eh?) – you play…A DETECTIVE! And you have to SOLVE A CASE! By TALKING TO SUSPECTS and INTERROGATING THEM! Using NATURAL LANGUAGE! Specifically, “You are Detective Sheerluck, investigating the murder of Victim Vince. The storyline, clues, and suspect alibis are all fixed, with every suspect hiding something about the case from the police. Each suspect knows important information about the other suspects, allowing you to piece together the truth through chatting. Your partner Officer Cleo can investigate locations at your request and present you with observational evidence. You can ask her to give you an overview of the case or to search certain locations for clues. Take notes from your conversations and piece together who killed Victim Vince, why he was killed, and how. When you are ready, click the End Game button to make your deduction.” This…almost works, sort-of, but what’s more interesting is the shape of the *next* thing you can vaguely see beneath its skin; we’re not yet at a point where this stuff can be considered anything other than a passing curiosity, but we can definitely also see exactly how it will work when the tech gets good enough. If you’re of a particular sort of mind, it’s also moderately-amusing to work out how you can jailbreak the characters into telling you everything straight off the bat – one for all you ‘prompt engineers’ (LOL HELLO 2022!) out there.
  • Newsletters-To-Podcasts: To be clear, this is a terrible idea which won’t work at all – but that has never stopped me from including a link in Curios, and it won’t stop me now. This is a service called Jellypod, whose gimmick is that it will take all the many newsletters you subscribe to and which you don’t have time to read, and will, VIA THE MAGIC OF AI, turn them into a fully-voiced podcast, summarising all the main issues so you don’t have to do any tedious, time-consuming reading. Look, I appreciate that I am very much the last person in the world who can or should be making this argument, but can we maybe not just accept that there are real, practical limits on the quantity of information that we are capable of usefully ingesting, even if we listen to it all at 3x speed? Also, can you imagine the hideous mangling of content and meaning you’ll get from an AI summary of multiple newsletter sources? Please, can someone spend a week getting their news and information ONLY via the medium of this service and tell me how you get on?
  • Underground Comix: OH YES. “The Adler Archive of Underground Comix is a collection of underground comix, books, and archival newspaper and magazine clippings on cartoonists and ephemera. The underground comix portion of the collection presented here includes ~250 items published between the 1960s and 2000s by artists such as Robert Crumb, Justin Green, Bill Griffith, Aline Kominsky Crumb, Harvey Pekar, Dori Seda, Art Speigelman and many others, as well as anthology titles such as Arcade Comics Revue, RAW, Weirdo, Young Lust and Zap.” I sort of feel that every kid aged about 16 ought to get access to this, it feels like a sort of countercultural rite of passage – if nothing else, I IMPLORE you to dip in here and read some Harvey Pekar if you’ve never done so before; the man really was a genius, and, on a personal note, his book ‘The Quitter’ is the most painfully-relatable piece of media I have ever encountered in my life.
  • Bookmarks: Ooh, this is a good idea I think – basically IMDB for novels, this is potentially hugely useful for anyone looking to get book recommendations from somewhere less genre-obsessed and generally mental than BookTok. “Every day, the Book Marks staff scours the most important and active outlets of literary journalism in the US and beyond—from established national broadsheets to regional weeklies and alternative litblogs—and logs their book reviews. When a book is reviewed by at least three outlets, each of those reviews is assigned an individual rating (Rave, Positive, Mixed or Pan). These ratings are then averaged into a result and the book becomes part of our Book Marks database. Each book’s cumulative rating functions as both a general critical assessment, and, more significantly, as an introduction to the range of voices and opinions that make up the world of American literary criticism. These opinions are accompanied by pull quotes representative of the overall stance of each individual review, and readers can click through to the full review at its source. Readers can express their own opinions alongside those of the critics in each book page’s What Did You Think Of… comments section.” Smart and helpful, and, coincidentally, a really good place to remind yourself of how TERRIBLE US book cover design is when compared to the variety and ingenuity you see from European and UK publishers (sorry, but it’s really true).
  • Frasier Sleepers: This week I learned that there is an active community of Redditors who have come together around the shared experience of being seemingly unable to fall asleep without the comforting Seattle-based sounds of Frasier to accompany them to unconsciousness. Join them here, as they discuss hot topics such as “I find watching the first 5 seasons far more relaxing and as the series progresses so does the cameras and the sound quality become crisper. Thats not to take anything away from watching and enjoying the series over and over again in its entirety. On the dvd box set version, the microphones and cameras they use on set seem more velvety and the picture quality is creamier and less harsh and bright as in the later series.” PREACH!
  • The Tokyo Toilet Map: At some point in the late-1990s, a resident of Tokyo decided to use the early internet to document the states of various public conveniences across the city. Photos of Japanese toilets from 1996-1997! Occasional images of graffiti of, inexplicably, dogs in congress! I am astonished at the fact that this is still live, 30 years after the fact – there’s an email address attached to the page, should any Japanese speakers wish to get in touch with the Yuuji Hayashi who is apparently responsible for this small slice of odd obsessiveness.
  • Disk Defrag Simulator: Completely, totally and utterly pointless – EXCEPT I reckon that if you work in an office with young enough colleagues, you can reasonably open this webpage, fullscreen it, turn the sound on and then apologetically explain ‘sorry, really important IT updates, can’t do anything about it’ and just sort of go to the pub. Try it NOW while it’s momentarily sunny!
  • Alien Melon Games: Dozens of weird little…games? Art projects? Code experiments? Wevs, these are ace and there are LOADS of them – you will need to download most of them to try them out, but it’s all free or ‘pay what you want’, and there’s SO much creativity and odd packed into each that it’s 100% worth bookmarking for your next bored, rainy afternoon (so in all likelihood ‘August’).
  • Pippin Barr Does Greek Punishments As ‘Snake’ Variants: Pippin Barr, 8-bit game artist and fan of the classics, returns with another in his occasional series of ‘tiny games riffing comedically on Greek mythology’ with a small series of variants on the classic Nokia ‘Snake’ gameplay model, each tweaked to represent one of a selection of Greek punishment myths. Play ‘Snake’ as Sisyphus allegory! Play it to be reminded of Prometheus! Or Tantalus! Ok, so these are single note gags which you will probably get very quickly, but, equally, they are FUNNY and I am always a sucker for medium/message stuff like this.
  • The Coin Toss World Cup: Finally this week, this is literally a piece of branching interactive fiction about tossing coins – BUT it is VERY FUNNY and I promise you that you are going to want to keep playing to because the writing here is far, far better than it needs to be. Although, be warned, I believe that the probabilities here are accurate and so you might want to clear the remainder of the century if you’re going to beat this without brute-forcing the whole thing in some way.

By Mark Forbes

WE CLOSE THIS WEEK WITH A MIX WHICH, HONESTLY, SOUNDS TO ME LIKE WHAT I IMAGINE IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN LIKE TO WALK AROUND THE MALL IF YOU WERE ONE OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS FROM AN EARLY BRET EASTON ELLIS NOVEL!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • PicVoid: This Tumblr is very much ‘a vibe’; not necessarily a good vibe, but very much a vibe nonetheless.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Morgan Leigh Meisenheimer: How full of cows is your Insta feed? NOWHERE NEAR FULL ENOUGH! Rectify that immediately with this Insta account, run by animal photographer Morgan Leigh Meisenheimer, whose photos of LOVELY BOVINE LADS are really very good indeed, and made all the better by the number of said BOVINE LADS who have clearly just received a really comprehensive shampoo, condition and possibly blow-dry and are, by the standards of dairy cattle at least, remarkably glam as a result.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The Flattening of Everything: Or ‘what the attempted assassination of Trump tells us about how the media/social media nexus works, or doesn’t, in 2024’. The main link here is to Charlie Warzel in the Atlantic, and it’s a decent precis of how news doesn’t really work anymore, or at least not in the way we were all sort of used to it working for about 8 years or so in the post-social media 2010s, and how we have ended up at a point where the shouting and the uncertainty and the dreadful grifters are just as much the product as a side-effect of the product. “Some may wish to see the conspiracy peddling, cynical politicking, and information warfare as a kind of gross aberration or the unintended consequences and outputs of a system that’s gone awry. This is wrong. What we are witnessing is an information system working as designed. It is a machine that rewards speed, bravado, and provocation. It is a machine that goads people into participating as the worst version of themselves. It is a machine that is hyperefficient, ravenous, even insatiable—a machine that can devour any news cycle, no matter how large, and pick it apart until it is an old, tired”. If you want more on this, then Slate has a similarly decent overview of how the memetic layer which used to be the dessert with which we’d reward ourselves for engaging with THE ROUGHAGE OF NEWS is in fact the main meal nowadays, our informational gut health be damned (sorry, that analogy really fell apart halfway through, didn’t it?); as is often the case, though, the most accurate-feeling assessment of All Of This comes from Ryan, who writes “The 2010s populism wave which Trump rode to victory in 2016, which guys like Andreesen, Musk, and Thiel are clearly trying to emulate, was dependent on a still-exciting digital public square, made up of millions of disparate groups using it to communicate. And what we were all posting only became Real News thanks to a still-relevant mainstream media that was able to curate it to something that felt it mattered. But normal people don’t use social media to communicate anymore. They use it to watch videos. And those videos don’t mean anything because the apps that want us to watch them want us to watch them constantly. But those videos did replace television. Which is a problem because now there’s no way to elevate the insane chatter that some users are still putting online. So now we’re left with an internet that is constantly screeching at us, but none of it can actually break through into culture.”
  • Austerity, Vulnerability and Populism: This is a link to a full academic paper, so I appreciate your appetite to click and read may be…limited, but I promise you that this is both interesting and, I think, a useful thing to know about. Basically, what this shows is that there is a strong correlation between ‘countries which embraced policies of austerity in the 2010s’ and ‘countries which are now seeing a marked rise in appreciation for populist figures’ – the causative conclusion drawn is that “the success of populist parties hinges on the government’s failure to protect the losers of structural economic change,” and that “the economic origins of populism are thus not purely external; the populist backlash is triggered by internal factors, notably public policies.”
  • Ads In The UK Election: This is a post by Who Targets Me?, literally the only organisation which has anything resembling a handle on how much is being spent on social platforms when it comes to electoral advertising, looking back at what conclusions can be drawn from spending on Meta/Google ads in the UK general election just gone – an election in which over £11m was spent with a pair of companies who aren’t *great* at paying tax in the UK, as a rule. This is smart and sensible and worth a read if you’re interested in how campaigning works – and should, ideally, work better.
  • Minority Report Policing: Apologies for yet another academic paper, but I hope you’ll forgive me when you read the precis: “Using arrest and victimization records for almost 644,000 people from the Chicago Police Department, we train a machine learning model to predict the risk of being shot in the next 18 months. Out-of-sample accuracy is strikingly high: of the 500 people with the highest predicted risk, almost 13 percent are shot within 18 months, a rate 128 times higher than the average Chicagoan. A central concern is that algorithms may “bake in” bias found in police data, overestimating risk for people likelier to interact with police conditional on their behavior. We show that Black male victims more often have enough police contact to generate predictions. But those predictions are not, on average, inflated; the demographic composition of predicted and actual shooting victims is almost identical. There are legal, ethical, and practical barriers to using these predictions to target law enforcement. But using them to target social services could have enormous preventive benefits.” Is…is that the sound of a massive ethical can of worms being ripped open? I THINK IT IS!! It’s not possible to read this, I don’t think, and not feel a tiny bit trepidatious about this stuff being rolled out in real life.
  • Devilish: Bruce Sterling writes about the unique cadence of AI-generated copy, a phenomenon he has chosen to term ‘Delvish’ after the propensity of the systems to inject the word ‘delve’ into copy. This is a nice overview of the way it *feels* to read machine-created prose, that odd uncanny valley of prose that it almost always inhabits, and comes with a nice glossary of the most overused turns of phrase employed by The Machine (at least as of July 2024).
  • A Big Chat About The Metaverse: No, wait, come back! It *IS* still a thing, honest it is! Or at least so hopes Matthew Ball, who very much became The Metaverse Guy c.2020, and who now has a book coming out about the whole thing which his publishers, I imagine, are starting to wish they had never paid the big advance for. Anyway, this is Ball in conversation with Epic Games Founder/CEO Tim Sweeney and Author/Entrepreneur Neal Stephenson, and this is, honestly, a really interesting read – particularly for all those of us who spent a significant proportion of 2020-1 saying things like ‘the metaverse sort-of exists already, it’s videogames ffs’. This covers Fortnite, Roblox, hardware, software, user behaviour and barriers to entry, as well as touching on AI towards the end – on the one hand, at least two of the parties in volved in this chat have a vested interest in making The Metaverse happen in some way or another; on the other, I am still long-term bullish about the idea of fluid, interoperable digital identities and experiences, etc, even if the idea we’re all going to be wearing a fcuking Oculus to do it was always bunkum.
  • The Hamster Kombat Explainer: In case you have heard the term but lack context, here you are – basically all you need to know is: a) clicker game; b) on Telegram; c) linked to crypto; d) requires players to shill for the game to boost their chances of getting rewards. So, VERY BASICALLY, this is Farmville reworked for 2024 (it’s not, obvs, but, equally, I am not totally wrong either). If you have kids it might be worth reading this, though, as it feels like exactly the sort of thing that a 13 year old boy might get unreasonably invested in.
  • Roxane Gay on TikTok: This is SUCH a good piece of writing – or at least it is in the parts where it doesn’t reiterate, for the nth time, ‘TikTok has an algorithm!’ and ‘once upon a time there was an app called Vine!’. The bits where it shines – and it really does shine – are those sections where Gay just talks you through The Feed, the dizzying carousel of videos and people and experiences that you can just flow through, zenlike, dipping into and out of the river of human experience (yes, it’s a river, I have decided, what of it?), partly at will and partly guided by the algocurrent. I would honestly happily read an entire piece riffing in that style, or a prose poem, should someone fancy spending an awful lot of time and effort writing something specifically for my enjoyment.
  • Imagination vs Creativity: As a general rule I’m not particularly interested in ‘I think like this therefore…’ or brainhack/method type pieces, but I thought this essay, by Venkatesh Rao, was an interesting look at the conceptual distinction between ‘imagination’ and ‘creativity’, what each is ‘for’ and how to go about encouraging both different forms of thought. This feels very much like the sort of thing that those of you with collarless shirts, black, thick-rimmed glasses and those annoying fcuking fishermen’s knit beanies paired with wide-legged artists’ trousers will enjoy – and I mean that EXACTLY as disparagingly as it sounds. More seriously, though, as someone who is occasionally moderately creative but who has no imagination AT ALL, this was both depressing and oddly-helpful, so maybe some of you might find it speaks to you as well.
  • The Greater London Project: This is interesting – a new project by Sam Bowman and Joe Hill, seeking to solicit and explore ideas on how to Make London Good Again (my term, not theirs). I don’t know either of these people, but Sam Bowman on Twitter is a slightly-weird combination of vaguely-economically-libertarian policy chat and light trolling – this, though, seems sincere, and while there’s a lot of stuff in the initial introductory post which strikes me as…well, silly tbh, there’s also enough that makes me curious to see what sort of other ideas might get explored. Obviously this is all utopian, with no mention of how any of it might be paid for, but if you’re curious about how one might think about creating better urban spaces – specifically, better urban spaces that will likely benefit me, the author of this newsletter, then you might want to have a read of this.
  • Bitcoin Mining Is Bad For Your Health: A cautionary tale from Texas, where it turns out that the noise of a million computer fans whirring 24/7 as they do the hard compute on Bitcoin mining does Bad Things to people over time – this gets more and more unsettling as it goes on, and left me with two lasting impressions: 1) fcuk me does Bitcoin have an astonishing number of negative externalities; 2) turns out that having regulation around what people can and can’t in pursuit of money do IS occasionally a good idea, whodathunkit?
  • Vegetarians Only: Sara Ather writes for Vittles about the ways in which vegetarianism is being weaponised against India’s Muslim community as part of the Modi regime’s ongoing demonisation of them as a group; specifically, landlords are using diet to restrict the supply of homes to Muslim families who, in contrast to mostly-vegetarian Hindus, are more likely to eat meat. “The concept of ‘purity’ that is embedded in the Hindu caste structure – espousing vegetarianism and demonising meat, especially beef – is consistently used to enforce hierarchies and to control the movement of Indian Muslims, preventing them from finding comfortable homes. In 2021, Mohsin Alam Bhat reported that a Hindu broker in a suburb of Mumbai found that ‘the right way to refuse people’ was to ‘simply [tell them] that he only has houses for “veg families”’, while a recent study found that being a meat-eater or ‘non-vegetarian’ made house-hunting a significant challenge for people moving to a new city. Over the last few decades, the policing of tenants has also extended into the online realm: Facebook groups frequently include dietary requirements in their listings, subtly discouraging Muslim applicants from searching for a home in neighbourhoods of mixed faith.”
  • The Mayor of Amsterdam: A fascinating interview in the FT with the Mayor of Amsterdam, Femke Halsema, in which she talks with refreshing openness about how she is attempting to manage the city’s drugs policy, where she wants to take it, her work to modernise and relocate the red light district, and the particular, peculiar challenges of running a place which, for better and worse, has been a byword for ‘liberalism’ for the past 70-odd years but can’t really keep going as it is for that much longer.
  • The Mayor of Mexico City: Not an interview this time; instead, this is a short piece looking at the ‘UTOPIAS’ created by incoming Mexico City mayor Clara Brugada developed in her previous mayorship in the less-storied territory of Iztapalapa – UTOPIAS are basically mixed-use public spaces which she established across the province, reclaiming old buildings and spaces to create areas which can be used for community projects, education and the like. There’s something so refreshing about reading about an elected official with an appreciation of the importance of ‘third spaces’ and community hubs, something which I have really started to notice the absence of in London in recent weeks – this is the sort of thing you read and think to yourself ‘well OBVIOUSLY everyone should do stuff like this, makes total sense’ and then get slightly depressed when you realise that without committed, dedicated work from people significantly better than me, stuff like this simply doesn’t happen.
  • Offline Is The New Online: Look, I don’t know who the author of this is or why anyone should listen to them -BUT I wanted to include this just in case it turns out to be the most incredibly prescient essay of the year. YOU READ IT HERE FIRST: “Who is going to be online in 2027? Less than 15% of the population. Remember the early days of the internet, when it served as a secret corner for all sorts of freaks and outsiders with niche interests to unite? People from small towns could connect with like-minded individuals across the globe, overcoming geographical barriers and finding solace in a sense of community. People in big cities could start companies from their basements and get venture funding if they understood how the internet worked. You didn’t need a degree, and you didn’t need a sponsor. You just needed to be interesting. Wake up. The world that once welcomed outsiders and eccentrics is gone. We’ll spend the next few years reminiscing about it with nostalgia, never quite capturing the same feeling. Offline is the new online, and we’re currently at the beginning of a drastic shift in how we socialize. By 2027, less than 15% of the population will actively participate in the digital world unless it’s for work.” I don’t think this is true, but I’d be lying if I said there wasn’t a sickos.jpeg part of me that really wants it to be.
  • The Origins of the Broccoli Perm: I AM CALLING BULLSH1T ON THIS ESSAY! This is in GQ – US GQ, I think – and it focuses on the ubiquity of the ‘short on sides, permed on top’ cut so popular amongst so many young men (see also: tiny little gak satchel), and it traces its surge in popularity back to one Dylan Lathem on a TikTok from 2020…NO! THIS IS NOT TRUE! I posit that the genesis of this cut’s popularity can in fact be traced back to Little T and the Blackpool Grime massive, as rendered famous in the mid-00s (see 7:50 in this video), and that in fact it was originally referred to as the ‘meet me at mcdonalds’ for reasons that I can’t for the life of me recall. NO MORE LITTLE T ERASURE! Whatever happened to Little T, anyway? I hope he’s ok.
  • Auramaxxing: This week’s completely-made-up online trend comes in the form of Auramaxxing, or, per this piece, “I feel like it’s a new term for being cool,” …Auramaxxing is just taking care of yourself and also knowing who you are as a person first before you try to show other people.” Which is obviously very silly, but, equally, I do see this as part of the broader post-austerity / post-2013/4 trend for witchcraft and woo and astrology and witches, which is less about a resurgence in beliefs in the occult and, to my mind at least, far more a reaction to everything being sh1t and hopeless and largely out of our control, and therefore this sort of rubbish being seen as more legitimate given the lack of actual, sensical things that anyone can practically do to ameliorate things (that’s just my theory, though, you are welcome to develop your own should you so desire).
  • Wealth Creation Machines: Ooh, I like this – an odd little essay looking at mythology around machines to make infinite wealth arising in different cultures, the names given to those machines, and the businesses that have adopted those names in an attempt to, I don’t know, hopefully apply a degree of nominative determinism. Contains a ‘Fruit of the Loom’ observation that BLEW MY MIND, and well do the same to you.
  • Making A Generative Documentary: I was vaguely aware of there being a forthcoming documentary on Brian Eno, but hadn’t realised that, in typically Eno fashion, it’s all GROUNDBREAKING and sh1t. The gimmick is that the doc is generated anew each time from a central corpus of footage, effectively Frankensteined into being anew at each screening from a sort of central skeleton, with the flesh being different each time. This is a really good explanation of How It Works – certainly better than my typically cack-handed attempt – and the sort of thing that ought to give anyone still believing in the idea of ‘ads as a craft medium’ significant pause for thought, because if you can do this for a doc and make it good you can certainly do it via The Machine for an infinite set of adverts for protein powders.
  • The Best Books of the 21st C: …according to the NYT, at least. I think…I think this is a pretty good list! There’s nothing too obviously ridiculous on there, it’s not TOO uniquely Americentric (though it is a bit), it’s not TOTALLY blind to authors who don’t write in English (though it is a bit), and it gave me a prod to add a couple of overlooked biggies from the early part of the century a try (although I confess to finding the love for the ‘Oscar Wao’ novel utterly fcuking baffling). BONUS POTENTIALLY-ENERVATING BOOK RANKINGS! This is Esquire’s ‘Best 75 SciFi Books EVER’ list which I am sure will render a certain type of person apoplectic.
  • The Unexpected Poetry of PhD Acknowledgements: A paean to the beauty found in the acknowledgements section of people’s PhD theses, and all of the worlds of struggle and sacrifice and solitude and skull-crushing tedium that a doctorate entails (honestly, so much respect for people with the dedication to pursue one). There are some lovely examples in here, sort of the equivalent of discovering humorous marginalie in a library book – GENTLE HUMOUR AND WARMTH of the best sort, and that’s not always something you get in Curios so, you know, BE GRATEFUL.
  • Blood In The Water: Weirdly this is the second consecutive week I’ve featured something about dead whales – this piece is a fascinating (but, be warned, a touch bloody) article about the tradition of the grindadráp, the Faroese whale hunt, and the international protestors trying to put pressure to bear on the islanders to make the practice history. Largely dispassionate, it features some great writing, an excellent sense of the oddity of the Faroes and just how insanely remote and far away they are, and a few pictures of dead whales which I had to scroll past quite quickly – although the photos of the sea turned blood-red from, well, actual blood are astonishing.
  • On Delivery: Snapshots from the frontline of the opioid crisis in the US, written from the perspective of an aid worker whose job it is to keep addicts on the streets from dying. “MY 10-YEAR-OLD SELF, learning the language of recovery during his father’s brief stint in AA, would think I’ve become the second-worst kind of person: an enabler. I have no defense except to say, like a parent to a child, that stuff gets more complicated. On deliveries, we don’t try to get people sober. Sobriety is beside the point. We offer resources if they ask, but we never push it. We never even mention the idea of getting sober unless they bring it up, because otherwise they wouldn’t trust us. We are, for many people, the only service they receive that doesn’t try to make them do something, that doesn’t demand shame as the price of care. So we are uncompromising enablers. We deliver to people at homeless shelters, knowing that if they are caught they’ll be kicked out. We deliver to people on parole, knowing that drug use could send them back to prison. We deliver to people in the dark corner of the parking lot outside the rehab facility, where they once hoped to get sober.”
  • Letters to My Ex-Metamour: As a rule, I am largely of the opinion that there is literally nothing less interesting than hearing to someone talk about their polyamory (apart from hearing people talk about their dreams, obvs) – POLYAMORY IS JUST LOGISTICS WITH ADDED MUCUS FFS, IT IS NOT INTERESTING. I will, though, make an exception for this essay by Allison Darcy, which takes the form of fragments of notes written to her ‘metamour’, which I this week learned is the term given to the other person with whom you share a partner – this is, per everything to do with poly stuff, at times infuriatingly self-absorbed and self-indulgent, but I forgive it because some of the writing really is excellent.
  • Daisy Chain: Finally this week, a lightly-interactive scifi story – you ‘play’ it, but it’s a linear (ish) narrative; think of it a bit like a short story delivered in a vague-graphic-novel-y way. I really, really enjoyed this – the form makes a genuine difference to the heft of the narrative – and I think you might too.

By Maureen Dougherty

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 12/07/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

Welcome, one and all, to the very first Web Curios EVER not to be written under a Conservative government!

What do you mean ‘it all looks dispiritingly familiar, you’ve not even given the place a lick of paint ffs’?!

Ok, so the election wasn’t all good news – loads of people simply couldn’t be bothered to vote, and a troubling proportion of those that did chose to put their ‘X’ in a box marked ‘racist, frog-faced haunted ashtray’ – but, equally, at least I can now forget that Michael Fabricant was ever anything other than a middlingly-successful mobile DJ who once worked under the nom d’arte of ‘Mickey Fab’ (this is 100% true, by the way).

Anway, enough of all that, there are a fortnight of links for you to get through while you wait for the nice man in the blacked-out beemer to show with the seventeen grammes of cheap cocaine you’ve ordered to ‘get you through’ on Sunday. To be clear, if England win then I hope all your gak is cut with strychnine.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and after Sunday we are never, ever going to talk about football again.

By Jason Levesque

OUR FIRST MIX THIS WEEK IS THIS BRILLIANT SELECTION OF GAUZY, JAPAN-INFLECTED, VIDEOGAMESOUNDTRACK-Y D’N’B, WHICH I PROMISE IS SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER THAN THIS DESCRIPTION ALMOST CERTAINLY MAKES IT SOUND! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY THRILLED TO IMAGINE ALL THE FRENZIED GROUPCHATS HAPPENING AROUND THE UK RIGHT NOW AS THE UK’S MEN COMPETE TO SEE WHO CAN BECOME THIS YEAR’S ‘AR$E-FLARE MAN’, PT.1:  

  • All The MPs: Apologies to those of you who really couldn’t give less of a fcuk about the conclusion of the DEMOCRATIC JAMBOREE over here in the UK, but we’re going to kick off with some political content this week because I figure at least one or two of you might find it interesting or useful. First up, this link – a directory of every single MP now in the Commons, with links to information (mostly empty at present given, well, a large proportion of them have barely got their name badges yet) about their voting records, their debate interventions, their expenses (again, when published)…this is hacked together from various different datasources, you can set up alerts to track the activity of Parliamentarians you’re particularly interested in tracking, and, generally, this feels like a really useful thing (in particular, if any of you have a friend or relative who is FAR TOO INTERESTED in politics, this is basically going to be like crack for them).
  • Parse The Bill: POLITICS X AI! It’s like all my Christmases have come at once (in that I hate Christmas)! This is actually a pretty smart-looking bit of lightweight LLM use, taking select pieces of legislation passing through Parliament (right now it’s ‘select pieces of legislation which *have* passed though Parliament, but one assumes more will be added in due course as the machine once again starts to grind) and using…some AI or another to summarise and explain each, offer you an overview of objections, present summaries of the changes that the Bill underwent at each stage of its passage through Parliament…beautifully this is all rather undermined by the (entirely necessary) disclaimer which says in big letters (I paraphrase, but) “there is a significant possibility that everything you’re about to read here bears no actual relation to the legislation in question, LLMs lol amirite?!?’, which does slightly undermine its utility, but it’s a neat way of getting an overview of new Bills as they come through (maybe).
  • All Of The Labour Ministers On Twitter: A Twitter List! Just like it’s 2012! How retro! Still, if you want what seems to be a pretty comprehensive list of the current Cabinet in one place, here it is.
  • A Bunch of Campaign Trail Photos: I know, I know, after 6 weeks of campaigning there’s a large part of you that never, ever wants to see Starmer’s Easter Island head or Sunak’s sad, diminutive frame ever again (in the case of Starmer, good luck with that) – for the rest of you, though, this collection of campaign photography by one Stefan Rousseau is a nice overview of the sort of weird images that end up being produced of electioneering politicians; there are some lovely (mad) shots in here, including a particularly brutal one of Mr & Mrs Sunak outside Downing Street after his concession speech where she really does look like his mum come to pick him up after school, bless. Oh, and here are some behind-the-scenes shots of the press pack on tour, which reinforces my long-standing belief that being a political journalist is a really miserable job on pretty much every level and one which you have to be a peculiar kind of weirdo to enjoy (to any such ‘weirdos’ reading this, that was obviously meant with immense affection).
  • The Internet Phonebook:. I might have mentioned before (of course I have; this has been going for 13 years now, I simply am not interesting enough  not to repeat myself over that sort of timeframe) that the first time I ever used the internet it was with the assistance of an actual, physical book which purported to contain ALL OF THE WEBSITES IN THE WORLD (in fairness, in 1995, that would actually have been possible). Well now someone is doing it again! Friend of Curios Kris, of Naive and TinyAwards fame, and Elliot Cost, write: “We are creating a physical directory for exploring the vast poetic web. It features the personal websites of hundreds of designers, developers, writers, curators, and educators. We are seeking personal, poetic, and human websites. If you would like your site to be considered for the first edition, click the link below to submit your website and we will get back to you.” This is as much an artwork as anything else – the site lets you submit your site for consideration should you so desire (or, presumably, anyone else’s), so get involved if you want your slightly-ephemeral HTML stylings to be rendered in slightly-less-ephemeral paper and ink.
  • OpenVibe: This is *really* interesting – 100% not for me, but really interesting. OpenVibe is basically a prototypical service which *should*, if you can be bothered to wrestle with the fundamental unfriendliness of decentralised social media (I am sorry but life is TOO SHORT for Mastodon instances), create a single, unified feed across from all your various different networks into one timeline – so you can pull your feed from Mastodon, Bluesky, Nostr and even Threads into a single, solitary source, and post to each from one place. Which, to be clear, is very much The Dream for the decentralised social model and which is The Way It Was Meant To Work – I just can’t shake the feeling that, at present, it’s all a bit too ‘tofu and homemade granola’ for your average web user and that until you can make all this stuff happen without really thinking about it then we’re going to be stuck with the big, centralised platforms (or, perhaps more accurately, til Meta makes this all work for the middle of the bell curve). Still, please do let me know how you get on with this should you try it, am genuinely curious.
  • Some AI Video Examples (Again): I feel I need to put a quick caveat here – ‘fcuk’s sake Matt’, I almost hear you mutter, ‘NOONE CARES’ – and explain that I link to all this AI stuff not out of implicit endorsement but because I think it is interesting; to be very clear, though, I would personally prefer it if we weren’t all rendered entirely professionally obsolete by The Machine, and that we didn’t render our planet entirely-uninhabitable while that happened. BUT, also, I think that if you can’t be curious about the sudden, semi-magical ability to conjure words and images out of nothing then, well, that’s a bit sad too. ANYWAY. Sorry. This is a thread on Twitter by one of those AI booster accounts (sorry) which collects a dozen or so examples of best-in-class recent RunwayML/DreamStudio outputs – as I keep saying with this stuff, it is nowhere near good enough to do anything serious with yet…except this time there are at least two of these where I watched and I thought ‘you know, you could probably actually use this for 2-3s in a TV spot’, from which it is only a very small leap to ‘well, if we made sure that the whole of the spot is just a series of short scenes, no more than 1-3s each…’, and, well, you can see where this is going, right?
  • All The Cannes Lions Stuff: Seeing as I just did the Bad Thing and mentioned advertising, may as well chuck this here – this is a link to a Google Drive folder featuring a quite spectacular trove of case studies from this year’s Cannes Lions – every single category, every single entry (seemingly at least), every single metal winner – each with its own one-page case study explaining the ‘INSIGHT’, the creative and the outcome, each with its own unique-yet-strangely-familiar hyperbolic style (“Only 27% of teenage boys are proud of their testicles; that means 73% of teenagers, nearly three quarters of our young men, are suffering TESTICLE SHAME – we knew that Dr Pepper had to act swiftly to change this and make an impact. After all, what’s the worst that could happen?”). I have to confess that I have only glanced at a couple of these as, well, I simply don’t care about this stuff anymore, at all, still, if you’re the sort of person who feels your chances of still having a job in 12 months time depends on bringing home one of these fcukers in 2025, then you could do worse than getting one of your AEs to spend a day uploading all of these to an LLM and crafting a custom prompt to develop Lion-winning ideas for whatever brief you fancy (this is a legitimately not-terrible idea which I can’t believe I’m giving you for free – look, you can even use Google Notebook to do it you fcuking ingrates, don’t say I never do anything for you).
  • NoPlace: The latest in the seemingly-neverending wave of web1.0 fetishism, the HOT NEW APP FOR TEENS (so I am told, anyway) is NoPlace, which is the latest iteration of ‘MySpace, but for a new generation!’. It literally *is* MySpace – there are friend lists, you can pin songs to your profile, there’s a degree of customisability and a vaguely-retro aesthetic to the whole thing, Very much not one for me – or, in all likelihood, you either – but you may have kids or siblings or nephews or whatever who might be into it (although I imagine that ‘recommending a new social platform to a child’ in 2024 is likely to elicit the same sort of response from the concerned adults in their lives as ‘sitting down and reassuring them that there *are* safe ways to consume fentanyl’). I did enjoy this particular faq, though: “what if i encounter bad vibes? we are doing our best to build a solid community with noplace, but the haters will still get in. we have community rules in place to make noplace a place for everyone. there are features that allow u to block, mute, and report users who have problematic behavior.” Honestly, “WHAT IF I ENCOUNTER BAD VIBES?” should be in every single employee induction handbook from now on.
  • Adimverse: On the one hand, this looks like quite a cool idea and I can see the potential; on the other, I am slightly annoyed that it’s backed by Rob McElhenny, who I’m sure is a perfectly nice man but who I don’t personally want to enrich any further by promoting his portfolio projects. Still, this could be of interest to some of you – the idea here is it’s a creative collaboration platform, where people post their ideas for projects, recruit people to work on said projects alongside them, find other talent…there’s also a degree of rights management apparently built into the platform to help smooth the often rocky path towards rights sharing. OBVIOUSLY it’s on the blockchain – OBVIOUSLY – but, in a pleasingly non-obnoxious move, there’s no mention anywhere of wallets or coins, and there’s seemingly no attempt to turn this into a MLM. This is, basically, a DAO-ish enterprise but without the web3cryptoguff around it, and it seems like it *might* be worth a look if you have an idea in search of a creative team to bring it to live. Still, though, it would be nice if it wasn’t all in the service of making an already-violently-rich man even richer.
  • Moshi: This is slightly incredible, even if at present it’s not much more than a really fancy demo-toy-thing. Moshi is…I think it’s a French initiative, and I think the LLM it’s using is its own open source variant, but to be honest I’m not sure and you almost certainly don’t care anyway. What makes this interesting is the voice interface, and the speed at which it works – try it in your browser and it really is quite amazing the first time you give it a go, with The Machine occasionally even interrupting you it’s so quick to understand and respond. The magic is slightly undermined when you realise that what it’s saying bears, in most cases at least, absolutely no relation whatsoever to real life or fact, but its a very cool party trick and the low-latency really is transformative from a UX point of view.
  • Jen Music: Another text-to-music tool! Except THIS ONE IS ETHICAL! Yes, that’s right, Jen’s unique gimmick is that “With over 40 fully-licensed catalogs in its initial training set, Jen adheres to a strict training doctrine that emphasizes its commitment to transparency, compensation and copyright identification. Jen’s rigorous compliance process sets it apart from the pack. Every track is automatically vetted for audio recognition and copyright identification utilizing a database of 150M tracks. This includes both the compositions in the training set and every newly generated track on the platform. Further, Jen generates a cryptographic hash for each track that is then recorded on The Root Network blockchain. This process provides an advanced form of verification, ensuring the integrity and timestamp of each track’s creation.” So, basically, it’s trained on licensed stuff and it’s also designed to it won’t spit out anything that violates copyright – which is great! Except, er, when you try it, and it’s about 10% as good as Udio, Suno and the rest, suggesting that actually training these things on massive amounts of copyrighted material actually might be necessary to make them work. Which, if nothing else, will keep the lawyers in clover for a few years yet.
  • Mosquepedia: Photographs of gorgeous mosques from around the world, information about their design, and occasionally accompanying architectural drawings and plans too, for anyone serious about getting into the ‘designing beautiful religious buildings’ game (seriously, some of the architecture here is astonishing).
  • The D-Day Map: This is a LOVELY educational resource – the National Museum of the Royal Navy has put together this interactive map-cum-guide to the D-Day landings, from preparations to the aftermath, all presented on a massive map with small models offering a lo-fi animated depiction of troop and unit movement at each phase of the operation. Honestly, this is really nicely-done and it’s worth a look if you’re interested in the history – note that the clickable area on the landing page ‘start’ button is a bit iffy, but if you hover just over the text you should be able to get in).
  • Natural Language Colour Picker: ANOTHER great use of an LLM! No, seriously! This is a colour finder which lets you basically describe the hue you want in whatever florid, descriptive terms you fancy and will provide you with the colour AS IF BY MAGIC! I have no idea how consistent this stuff is – I suspect NOT AT ALL – but I really like the idea of being able to go into a client meeting and say with confidence ‘yeah, we’ve gone with this particular hue because we’ve used AI to determine that it is actually the colour of migraine’, or ‘we think it’s important that the male lead’s jumper be in #FF3300 because that’s actually ‘the colour of a man’s face who believes that his marital infidelity has been discovered’ and we think that that sort of subtle easter egg will really engage the online audience’.
  • A Taxonomy of Swears: “Swear words and profanities from around the world!” proclaims the website, all of the arranged on a vertical, scrolling scale, from least offensive at the top to the very worst words EVER at the bottom. Various languages are covered, and there’s a colour-key to help you distinguish between profanities of a sexual, familial or scatological insults. This is obviously GREAT, and, even better, there’s an option to submit your own terms for consideration – I really want this to become some sort of profanity thermometer, an objective ranking of THE WORST THINGS YOU CAN EVER SAY, although I will forever argue against ‘cnut’ being deemed the ne plus ultra of profanity (on a purely personal level, I have always found being called a ‘pr1ck’ far more offensive) (but please don’t).
  • Realise: A website to promote the single ‘Realise’ by the band Hearse Pileup – it’s a relatively-simple Outrun-style driving game, in stylised black and white, running at pace through a selection of cityscapes as you attempt to avoid obstacles and collect cash. There are CHOICES TO MAKE! There is a MESSAGE! I really enjoyed this – there’s a touch of the Ace Of Spades about the track, which is no bad thing, and the whole thing is short enough to be a nice bit of engaging fun. MORE STANDALONE WEBSITES AS MUSIC VIDEOS PLEASE!
  • New Food at the Minnesota State Fair: Long-term readers may know that I have something of an obsession with the preposterously-calorific menu items dreamed up each year for the various state fairs of the US; this is basically now a virality contest, with the various venders trying to come up with something that will go viral like ‘deep fried butter’ did a few years ago (I am not sh1tting you, that was literally a thing – cubes of butter, deep-frozen, breaded and then deep-fried; can you *imagine* what that would do to your insides?!) – this year’s selection of ‘no, fcuk off, that is not fit for human consumption’ comestibles come from Minnesota, and highlights include deep-fried ranch dressing (a concept so vile I am honestly doing those small swallows people do right before yakking, not one word of a lie) and (and I have to quote this one in full) “kettle chip-flavored ice cream created by Minnesota Dairy Lab, sandwiched between focaccia bread from Wrecktangle Pizza. Topped with a blend of honey butter, kettle chips and herbs.” THIS STUFF IS WHY REDDIT IS FULL OF COMMENTS FROM PEOPLE WITH TERRIBLE BOWEL ISSUES, AMERICA.

By Mobolaji Ogunrosoye

WE CONTINUE NOW WITH ANOTHER SELECTION OF STRANGE AND OCCASIONALLY SINISTER BUT ALWAYS VERY CRISP BEATS AND BREAKS AND BLOOPS FROM FORMER-EDITOR PAUL! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY THRILLED TO IMAGINE ALL THE FRENZIED GROUPCHATS HAPPENING AROUND THE UK RIGHT NOW AS THE UK’S MEN COMPETE TO SEE WHO CAN BECOME THIS YEAR’S ‘AR$E-FLARE MAN’, PT.2:  

  • The Swype 30k: How often do you see or hear things that make you think ‘yeah, I mean, we’re fcuked, aren’t we?’ I hope, honestly, that it’s rare, that you’re not constantly muttering under your breath about how WE’RE ALL DOOMED – I mean, I’m definitely not doing that, oh no siree – but it’s reasonable to assume that the constant whirling assault of modernity will occasionally throw up some in-feed content that makes you…somewhat concerned as to the likely trajectory of our future. So it was this week when I encountered an ad for the Swype 30k, a newly-announced brand of disposable vape (remember, DISPOSABLE) which not only lets you inhale variously-flavoured particulate matter to your heart’s content but which also comes equipped with, er, Bluetooth, and an OLED screen, and the ability to link to your social media accounts, and Spotify, so it’s basically an entirely-disposable smartwatch. AMAZING. On the one hand, let’s make sure we’re doing our recycling – on the other, let’s also churn out 100,000k units of these fcukers! Still, maybe this is made out of a revolutionary new class of entirely-biodegradable electronics and plastics, right? Right? Er, hello?
  • The Doolittle Prize: Ok, yes, fine, it’s not TECHNICALLY called the Doolittle prize, but it ought to be. Existing pretty much at the opposite end of the intellectual/’hope for the species’ spectrum as the previous link, this is ‘the Coller Dolittle Challenge for Interspecies Two-Way Communication. A Grand Prize of USD$10mln will be awarded for “cracking the code” with annual prizes of USD$100,000 to support successful applicants with their research to develop scientifically rigorous models and algorithms for coherent communication with non-human organisms until interspecies communication is achieved.’ So, basically, ‘can you use AI to help us talk to dogs? Great, we’ll give you ten million quid’ (I simplify, but only slightly). On the one hand this is obviously BRILLIANT and I am 100% here for this sort of funding; on the other, where do we go when we finally get the opportunity to TALK TO THE ANIMALS and we finally learn that they think we’re d1cks. WHAT THEN????
  • Volv: I’ve long tired of the slightly-smug epithet ‘a stupid person’s idea of a clever person’, but, if I can paraphrase that, this really is a stupid person’s idea of a clever idea. Volv promises to give you ALL THE NEWS YOU NEED, but in, er, nine-second snippets. Why nine seconds? Because, apparently, ‘that’s all our TikTok addled brains can take’ (SCIENCE!) – so instead of, I don’t know, working to get your attention span back, why not lean into that degradation by downloading an app that promises you summarise EVERYTHING YOU COULD POSSIBLY NEED TO KNOW in small infobites that can be consumed in less than 10 seconds each. Take a moment to think about the top 5 significant news stories happening today wherever you may be. Now think about how you might communicate those stories in a manner which preserves their nuance and complexity, that communicates a necessary quantity of information and context, in nine seconds. Hard, isn’t it? I remain unconvinced that the GENIUS MINDS behind Volv have quite nailed this, but if you find the idea of the ‘…For Dummies’ series of books too intellectually daunting for you to cope with then perhaps this is for you.
  • A Song Map of Canada: This is a LOVELY idea. One man, on a bike, cycling across Canada, following a route mapped by song lyrics. “Canada has no shortage of lyrics that pay tribute to the places people call home, with songs like Alberta Bound, Runnin’ Back to Saskatoon, Sudbury Saturday Night, Farewell to Nova Scotia, and Bobcaygeon to name an obvious few. Whether it’s rock, pop, folk, or blues there are countless artists of all genres, traditions, and communities with songs that tell the stories about the places we live. The Great Canadian Song Cycle is an unsupported (no van following along) bicycle trip across Canada with a focus on collecting songs about places. The end goal is to provide a song map of Canada populated by artists and their fans, and random interviews en route.” This has apparently just started, and there are minimal updates so far, but there’s a map and a list of songs, and I think this is just a lovely idea for a trip (for someone with significantly stronger calves than I possess).
  • A Computer Vision Gallery: A curated collection of AI-created artworks pulled together by the Seattle Convention Centre – these are fascinating, a really interesting selection of different styles and techniques and models being employed by the various artists in question. I do think that anyone who out-of-hand dismisses any art made with AI as ‘not art’ should probably take a look at stuff like this and think again – there’s a categorical difference between ‘artist making work with models’ and ‘person typing prompt into Midjourney’, and this stuff is definitely the former.
  • Paint’N’Play: This is quite fun – a tool from the National Gallery of Art in Washington DC which lets you paint in the style of various different artists; effectively this just cycles the paintbrush through four or five different shapes, but they’re done well enough to mimic the styles of Van Gogh, Constable or others and the way in which you can mix and match the different stroke styles allows for some surprisingly-interesting effects (or it would if you were more artistically-inclined than I am; all my stuff looks like dogsick). Try drawing a Van Gogh-style portrait, it is FCUKING HARD – so fair play Vince, you were actually pretty good.
  • Large Horse: This is a single-serving joke, but I am very much into the commitment to the bit and the use of subdomains as a comedy vehicle, something which, personally speaking, I don’t think you see enough of. COMEDY SUBDOMAINS FTW!
  • Find The UK’s Hellmouths: Matt Round has somehow found a document listing the official location of every single one of the UK’s 700+ hellmouths, and has mapped them for you here – see where YOUR nearest one is. Then spend a good 10 minutes getting annoyed with yourself as you try and work out which actual, real-world datasat Matt has used to populate this, and then wonder whether or not their PR team will get in touch to complain should they ever find out about this.
  • BossManChickFillA: The TikTok account of a fried chicken shop in Preston, Northern England, which consists mostly of them posting videos of their customers coming in after having had a few drinks of an evening. This is actually really lovely – it’s good-natured and feels nice, not sneery, and is a gently-comic look at life in a standard English town when you’re young and p1ssed and REALLY need a chicken shish with everything on NO LETTUCE! Although I have to say that the footage of all the kids celebrating after the football on Tuesday makes me so, so scared for Sunday night that I might have to stop writing here and just take 70 Xanax.
  • Noiys: This is a very simple anonymous messaging site – anyone can log on and post a message anonymously and it will disappear in 24, and it’s obviously been hacked together by a kid somewhere, and it’s…weirdly, I found myself quite invested in this this week. You won’t read anything particularly profound or hilarious and most of it’s just nonsense posted by people who I reckon are probably on average about 12 years old…but also there’s something sort of fascinating about it, like looking at an antfarm or something, and it made me think of how this is what so much of the young adult experience is in 2024, these streams of strangers sharing text messages across Discord channels or Slack channels or Telegrams or weird little websites like this, so ephemeral and yet so persistent…no idea where I am going with this, but I found this a curious-if-pointless ‘slice of modernity’ and maybe you will too.
  • All Of The Playlists: Oh, ok, fine, not ALL of them, but a VERY SIGNIFICANT NUMBER. “OK Mondays was a near weekly playlist spanning genres and moods, published from January 2nd, 2017 through January 1st, 2024. This page serves as a searchable index and archive of all playlists in the project.” So that’s somewhere in the region of 350+ playlists, all hand-curated, which, based on a quick scan of some of the tracklistings, span a truly remarkable selection of genres…this should be an instant bookmark imho.
  • Some Interesting VTubers: While I’m not personally ever likely to get into the whole VTubing thing – I’m reasonably-relaxed about ‘the trappings of adulthood’, but at the same time draw the line at being the sort of 44 year old man who watches an anime e-boy with dragon ears and considers that to be legitimate entertainment – I am fascinated about the creativity evident in what some of these people are doing and how they do it. This Twitter thread presents a few examples of people pushing the envelope in terms of what it’s possible to do with Twitch and a mocap rig – there are a couple in here combining it with a hand-drawn animation style which I am in awe of.
  • 4Chan’s Top 100 Books Ever: This is interesting – even if only from a sort of cultural analysis viewpoint. You all know what 4Chan is – each year the site does a member poll on THE BEST BOOKS EVER – one enterprising Channer has gone through all of the lists to date to compile THE UBERLIST, based on rankings over time, and you can see them all here. This is pretty much what you’d expect in many respects, but I was pleasingly surprised to see that it wasn’t ALL male (just, er, massively, overwhelmingly so) – it’s obviously super-American and super-Western and super-white in its bias (also, there is no universe in which ‘A Confederacy of Dunces’ should be anywhere near any top books list – what is it with American men and their obsession with that novel?), but it’s an interesting look into ‘what forms the mindset of an average super-online Western teenage boy in 2024’. Slightly embarrassed by how many of these I’ve read tbh, but in my defence I have read a LOT (and I have read 80% of the collected works of Jilly Cooper and I bet none of the Chan fcukers can say THAT).
  • Lettre: I feel slightly like I am ageing into a different part of the web. Partly this is my insistence on experiencing it primarily via desktop, which automatically siphons me towards A Certain Demographic, but it’s genuinely arresting to me when I get served stuff like this, which is, objectively, for Older People – I mean, look, it’s an fcuking iPad-first app! I am not old enough for iPad first apps! Except, er, it also looks quite interesting, I must say – it’s basically a penpalling app, where anyone can write letters (handwritten, obvs – again, AIMED AT OLD PEOPLE FFS) and if you like the look of a letter then you can reply to it in-app…basically like a sort of a reskinning of the basic concept of ‘forums’ for people who would be very scared of the concept of ‘forums’ but who are still very big fans indeed of ‘handwritten epistolary correspondence’. Ngl, if I had an iPad (WHICH I DON’T BECAUSE I AM NOT THAT OLD) I would totally give this a go.
  • Not Quite Past: A LEGITIMATELY GOOD USE OF AI! MACHINE-IIMAGINED TILEWARE! “Not Quite Past trains AI to make beautiful things. Our first project explores classic Dutch Delftware tiles and lets you make your own. Make your own tile in our Workshop or pick one that’s already been made in our Marketplace. We then get it made in a kiln in the Staffordshire Potteries and sent to your door.” This is really fun, and quite a cool way of making yourself something bespoke and unique and secretly-geeky which will also look rather nice in your newly-refurbed kitchen.
  • Buy A Stegosaurus: Yes, ok, there are other lots available at this forthcoming auction at Sotheby’s, but there is only one star attraction and that star attraction is Apex, a mounted stegosaurus skeleton which is estimated to go for a mere $4-6m dollars, making it the perfect adornment for your front garden. You can also get a T-Rex tooth for a mere $50k or so, though, which frankly feels like the sort of thing your kids can probably sacrifice their university fund for (tell them to become plumbers, seriously, it’s a better bet in the long run anyway).
  • Dawn Chorus: Via blort, ALL OF THE BIRD SOUNDS! This is lovely – recordings of the dawn chorus from all over the world, mapped, which you can listen to to your heart’s content. It’s weird how evocative the different sounds of different birds’ songs can be – there’s a qualitative difference to what it sounds like to wake up in Rome to what it sounds like to wake up in London (and yet the taste of the tears in the morning is tediously-uniform, how queer!). This has been going for a few years now, and there’s an app which you can download should you want to record your own sounds and contribute them to the project – 100% lovely, this, no notes.
  • Insect Photos: Got to be honest, I’m a *bit* of an entomaphobe and so these images make me itch like billy-o, but they’re also amazing in the way that only massively-close up photos of, say, beetles can be. THEY ARE LIKE TERRIFYING ORGANIC TRANSFORMERS! THEY ARE LIKE JEWELLED DEATH MACHINES! PRAY THEY NEVER GROW TO 100x THEIR SIZE! Anyway, this is the page featuring the nominations for the Royal Entomological Society’s annual photo contest, and these are GORGEOUS, especially the one of the termites which isn’t something I thought I would ever type.
  • Chrono Piano: Ooh, this is both mathematically-pleasing and melodically-pretty and I very much enjoy it. “Chrono Piano is a live music player generates piano music based on the current date and time. Each digit from the date and time corresponds to a musical note. The date digits create the bass and the time digits form the melody.” Can we please have a clock in a public place that uses something like this to produce sounds, please?
  • One Checkbox: You remember that ‘One Million Checkboxes’ site from the other week? Well this is that, but…smaller. It made me do a small lol, and may do the same for you.
  • Where’s Wally?: Ok, so for excellent reasons of copyright this isn’t in fact called Where’s Wally? – but, well, that’s exactly what it is. I think it’s a promo for some New Zealand-based agency or something, given that all the various places in which you’re charged with finding a character in the throng are NZ locations, but, honestly, who cares? FIND THE MAN IN THE RUBBER RING! FIND THE LAUGHING OLD LADY! BEAT THE CLOCK! I am so, so bad at this it made me quite angry and I had to stop playing after a few fruitless minutes, but you may get significantly more out of it (you fcukers).
  • The King Is Watching: Finally in this week’s miscellanea, A GREAT GAME! And one which will tide you over nicely til 8pm on Sunday night (PLEASE GOD SPAIN PLEASE GOD) – it’s quite hard to explain but easy to pick up, and all you really need to know is that a) you need to protect your kingdom fro hordes of ravening goblins; and b) noone does anything unless THE KING IS WATCHING. Seriously, this is great fun and is distracting enough that it kept my mind off the horrendous prospect of a potential England victory for a good 10 minutes.

By Roope Rainisto

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK BRINGS WHAT I MIGHT DESCRIBE, WERE I A VERY DIFFERENT SORT OF PERSON, AS ‘IMPECCABLE NYC BLOCK PARTY VIBES’ AND IS COMPILED BY ARSENII!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Anime Computers: Depictions of computing devices in anime – partly just cool, and partly a really interesting look at how culture has seen, reflected and conceived of computers over the past 50-odd years.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Sonder Solutions: Sonder Solutions are a German art collective that do odd little performances that riff on stereotypes of national identity and ORDER and probably all sorts of other stuff that I don’t understand because, well, everything they do is in German. Still, their Insta feed is full of pleasingly-nonsensical (to me at least) videos of them doing things like ‘pointless roadworks, very slowly, in a TINY SILVER DIGGER’ and, honestly, who doesn’t need a bit of in-feed Tuetonic surrealism? NO FCUKER, etc!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • What Is A Majority For?: In what I PROMISE will be the last bit of UK politics-focused writing in here for at least a few weeks, this is James Butler in the LRB writing about the election and what the incoming Labour Government has on its plate, and how we might expect it to approach the myriad issues facing us. This is…look, it’s a pretty sombre reflection, as befits the whole ‘worst economic status since WWII’ thing (although, er, does that mean we can expect the same sort of achievements as those enacted by the Atlee government, then? GREAT!), and the other ‘hm, you really like the Private Sector Partnerships idea, don’t you, and we’ve been here before’ thing – but, equally, however cynical and embittered and pessimistic you are (and, reader, I am VERY), it’s been impossible this week not to feel like there’s been a slight lightening of the mood, a sense that, at the very least, the people currently in government aren’t total fcuking shits (they might still end up being, mind, so don’t get complacent). The bar was limbo-low, fine, but good to see them managing to clear it comfortably nonetheless. Although, and apologies if this applies to any of you reading this, if I hear one more person use the appallingly-twee formulation ‘the grown-ups are back in charge’ or any variants thereof I can’t promise I won’t do some sort of appalling dirty protest on the spot.
  • How To Raise Your AI: This is a few weeks old now, but it’s a really interesting chat between Alison Gopnik and Melanie Mitchell on the subject of AI, machine ‘intelligence’ and learning, and how to think about All Of This Stuff. Sensible, level-headed and pleasingly factual throughout – no woo-woo predictions, no fearmongering, no boosterism, just a reasonably-level-headed discussion about the current state of AI and LLMs, the extent to which the speakers believe that this is or isn’t a path to ‘better’ AI, the problem of embodiment and all that good stuff. This is a really good overview of where the smart thinking is at the moment on the topic, imho, and worth reading as a ‘we are here’-type primer.
  • That Goldman Report on AI: Many of you will have read Ed Zitron’s latest ‘AI IS ALL A SCAM!’ screed – or at least seen it floating around the web – but this link is to the Goldman Sachs report that is his piece’s subject. The report is GS’ most recent research document in which they go deep on a particular issue, in this case ‘are we spending too much on AI based on the potential benefits it may accrue?’ , and the answer is…mixed. The big headlines that Zitron took were from Jim Covello of Goldman and his bold statements that AI won’t be able to do the stuff that it needs to do to make serious money because it can’t solve complex problems – which, it’s true, is a pretty damning assessment. It’s also accompanied by a statement that basically says ‘but that doesn’t matter even if I’m right, because there’s so much money sloshing around that it makes sense to keep investing in it anyway because, either way, we will still win!’. Which rather changes the conclusions here if you ask me – the point is less ‘AI is a bust!’ and more ‘AI is going to fcuk us whether or not it’s a bust or otherwise because so many people have a vested interest in selling and implementing it, and even if all it achieves is efficiencies rather than transformative change that is going to be more than enough to make lots of people very very rich and lots of other people very, very unemployed’. WE SHALL SEE.
  • Antiquity to Alt-Right: Oh this is good – I have been waiting for someone to write a neat ‘look, this is how the whole ‘classical civilisations were great!’ to ‘I am now an actual fascist’ pipeline works’ piece and here it is! Tallulah Trevezant writes: “The association between the ancient world and contemporary extremist political ideologies is well known among career classicists and amateur historians alike. For example, the etymology of ‘fascism’ is derived from fasces – bundled rods with protruding axe blades carried by lictors during the Roman Republic, signifying imperium, the power of the state. Not only is the association widely-known, it has a long history: in 1922, Benito Mussolini’s government – considered by some to be the first government to be known as fascist – envisioned itself as an extension of the Roman Empire, while in 2015, outspoken white supremacist Richard Spencer encouraged white people to embrace their “forgotten” Roman identities. My aim is not to explain that there is a connection between Classical Antiquity and the Alt-Right, rather, I aim to understand how algorithms on social media sites such as Twitter[1] lead users who engage with content related to ancient history– particularly ancient Greco-Roman history– down an alt-right pipeline.” This is REALLY interesting and useful to know imho.
  • Exorcising the Primer: Ok, so this is only really worth reading if you’ve a) a degree of familiarity with Neal Stephenson’s ‘The Diamond Age’ and/or b) if you’ve a particular interest in educational/pedagogical techniques and how technology can help improve them. How many of you left? Eh? Oh. Anyway, for the three of you still reading this, this is a HUGELY-interesting essay on the question of ‘if we were to attempt to design an interactive, exploratory educational/instructional system from scratch, what might that look like?’, using as its base premise the concept of ‘The Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer’, a fictional device invented by Stephenson which is, very basically, a ‘magical book’ which acts as a dynamic tutor to one of his characters as she grows, and which is basically the most incredible-sounding teacher ever to have been dreamed up in fiction. In this essay, Andy Matuschak talks about what we want from learning, how to create experiences and scenarios that encourage learning and thinking, how technology might be used to prompt curiosity…honestly, this is so so so interesting, and if you like this one then you will also enjoy this essay in response to it by Adrian Hon.
  • Why Is Chile So Long?: I know very little about Chile, other than the existence of the Atacama desert and the fact that they have PENGUINS! Now, thanks to this brilliant and properly-interesting article, I also know why it is so very, very long. As you read this, take a moment to consider the country’s geography and what, exactly, it must have been like establishing a civilisation there using nothing but some very hardy and unfortunate donkeys for support. Not sure if I’ve said it before in here, but if you’re ever offered the opportunity to reincarnate, NEVER take the donkey option.
  • Fridge Peepers: Economic divination via the medium of fridge readings, basically – this piece profiles a London-based investment manager called Tassos Stassopoulos who, so it’s claimed here, scries the future trends and movements of markets worldwide by perusing the contents of fridges in cities across the world. A rise in demand for fudge flavoured yoghurt in Mumbai means pork bellies are about to take a hit in Montevideo is the very-basic explainer here, a sort of culinary-chaos-theory of taste – actually it’s less witchcraft and more about using certain class-indicating signifiers (aspirational snack consumption, ready-prepared fruit and vegetables, etc) as early-warning signals for larger economic shifts (he says, as though that’s simple), but this is REALLY interesting, and if you’re a certain type of agency person (I KNOW YOU) might be a useful one to send to senior people when you’re next trying to make the ‘WE NEED TO GET OUT INTO THE WORLD AND SEE ACTUAL PEOPLE RATHER THAN JUST SITTING AT HOME WATCHING TIKTOKS OF REAL PEOPLE’ point which I know you make without fail every 24m or so.
  • A Roblox Primer: Do YOU want a decent guide to Roblox, what it us, how it works and the sorts of things that brands are doing on it right now? GREAT! This is by the people at Ex Research and might be quite useful to some of you.
  • Notes App As Wardrobe Planner: You may well all be aware of this behaviour already, but as someone whose wardrobe consists of ‘the clothes lying on the bed in the spare room’ I confess that ‘outfit planning trends’ rather tend to pass me by. Anyway, apparently it is now A Thing for young people (in the main women) to take snaps of themselves in particular outfits, then take that image as a sticker and drop it into their Notes app, arranged under various headings so they can easily categorise their favourite fits under various categories – work outfits, say, or ‘hot day’ outfits, that sort of thing. Which is partly just a really interesting example of ‘users find use cases for software that devs can never imagine’, and also something that it feels like a smart brand could do something with (the idea of creating personalised irl sticker books for people to populate with their fits feels like a nice touch tbh).
  • We All Speak Phone Now: This is written from an annoyingly US-centric perspective – GYAC it’s an English language thing not an American thing! – but feels SO TRUE; effectively this piece talks about the linguistic flattening that’s happened thanks to the smartphone era, the way that, because slang now often arrives and evolves primarily via textual, online media, mediated via a screen, it’s impossible to know who’s using it, and who ‘owns’ it, which means that you lose some of the in-/out-group function that it used to fulfil, which, to crib from the piece’s conclusion, “is a problem because it deprives people of a previously reliable way to know whom they’re talking with and how to treat them. If I hear someone make a remark about the first Velvet Underground album with which I strongly disagree, I am more likely to respond kindly if I know they come from a background different from my own. If a stranger on Twitter says that Nico had pitch problems, I am much more likely to tear into them if they speak the way I do, because I assume they have the cultural experiences, education, and resources that brought me to my own extremely correct opinions. When everyone talks like me, I make the mistake of believing that everyone is like me—and therefore falls into the category of people whom I cut the least slack.”
  • The Aesteticisation of Food: Yes, I know, not a word. BUT! It sort of ought to be, at least for this article which looks at the way in which food is being presented in advertising – as in, non-food advertising – in 2024, the semiotics of it, if you will (you don’t have to, honest), and how that might relate to the fact that we are, per the author, living through the skinniest era in years (I am going to have to gently demur here based on my experiences in South London of late – babes, just because everyone in LA and certain parts of Notting Hill is on Ozempic…). I think this topic merits deeper thought than this piece gives it, if I’m honest, but I think it’s a decent start: “Our growing obsession is almost like a modern-day lipstick index, which posits that during economic downturns, sales of smaller indulgences tend to increase. And what could be a smaller indulgence than a fancy little treat? Even when it’s too expensive to travel or buy new clothes, we all have to eat. Food is a universal indulgence. No matter your income, any food can feel like a guilty pleasure “
  • Food Miniatures: OH GOD TINY MODELS OF FOOD! I can’t help myself, I go giddy over this stuff – no idea why, I don’t think I ever wanted and failed to get a doll’s house as a kid – and this piece from Vittles, in which Emily Kenway visits an expo at which various vendors of TINY MODELS OF FOOD (honestly I love them!) are flogging their wares, to explore what the appeal is and who collects them and why, and this is not only beautifully-written but also really heartwarming in a slightly-odd way. Thanks to this article I now know that there is a magazine dedicated to this stuff, called Shrunk (obvs), and LOOK HOW CUTE IT IS (must not subscribe, must not subscribe).
  • Winter of the Mind: You may recall a few months ago I featured a longread which veered halfway through into becoming a very odd piece about an even odder secret society dedicated to paying attention to things (this one, in fact) – remarkably, this is the second piece this year about the same broad topic, but this time describing a DIFFERENT society dedicated to getting people to really, really pay attention to stuff (although it’s orthogonally-related to the other one, turns out). I really enjoyed this article, in part because it goes a little longer and deeper into the genesis of ‘radical attention’ as a concept, and in part because I think this is something that you could potentially turn into something quite personally/professionally useful (in a very w4nky way). Comes from a similar place to the obliquiscope – the idea of paying deep, persistent attention to an object, system or process is something it feels like we might have fallen out of the habit of doing, maybe bring it back?
  • Thoughts on Glastonbury: Not by me, you understand, but by someone who was there this year and who’s done dozens of the things over their lifetime, and who has Some Ideas about what the festival needs to do to keep going. I was interested by this – not least because it’s not just someone going ‘it was better when I was young’, which is about 88% of all festival criticism, but because it takes a fairly dispassionate look at what the crowd is like these days, what punters seemingly want to see and do, and how space is allocated on that basis. The TL;DR here is ‘take some of the space away from the hippies, literally noone cares anymore’ which feels, honestly, pretty much the antithesis of THE GLASTO VIBE (™ – Bottles of authentic ‘Glasto Vibe’ are available from the mail order shop, shipping international, £19.99), but from the point of view of cold, hard commercialism it feels like they are probably right tbh. Then again, though, fcuk commercialism, cap the numbers and keep the hippies imho.
  • Water In Sicily: A lovely blogpost from the Scope of Work newsletter, about water supply in Sicily – which, I know, really doesn’t sound like it should be interesting but I am right and you are wrong and you should read it forthwith.
  • What’s In A Sex Scene?: This is wonderful. “A lot of ink has been spilled parsing the difference between “literary” and “commercial” fiction. Some might call it arbitrary; others, imaginary. It could be said that one distinction between the two is that in contemporary literary fiction, characters seem rarely allowed to get off.  Sex scenes in literature have always been contentious. Since the inception of the novel, detractors and moralists have often accused the form of promoting degenerate behavior and corrupting the morals and impressionable minds of young women. The Literary Review started a “Bad Sex in Fiction Award” in 1993 and laureates include Jonathan Littell, Tom Wolfe, and Morrissey (yes, that one). On the one hand, contemporary literature, like movies, is often accused of being bereft of real eroticism. On the other hand, smutty fiction and erotica is thriving online and increasingly in print as well, albeit subject to the scolding of many more highbrow readers. Everyone’s a critic, so few are having fun. So we asked some of our readers to tell us about their favorite sex scene in a book.” SUPERB – runs the gamut from forced-inlaw-incest-erotica through Twilight by way of Sheila Heti, and it’s interesting and erudite and funny and even, yes, a bit sexy.
  • Lewd Vocabulary in Erotic Fiction: A seamless segue there – this is actually a presentation rather than an essay, but, well, it fits better here. Want to know the most and least popular terms used for specific anatomical parts and saucy activities across the gamut of smutty novels? YES YOU DO! Some of this is just astonishing – you mean to tell me that there is smut currently circulating on the market which uses the term ‘milkers’ for breasts?! And that that smut is of a significant enough volume for ‘milkers’ to rank as one of the more popular mammarial euphemisms?! I particularly enjoyed the wordclouds at the end of this which showed readers’ most-loved and most-hated words in erotica – a special shout out to whichever author is peppering their steamy sagas with liberal sprinklings of the oh-so-erotic word ‘clinical’. Seriously, this really is one to be opened up in company so you and your friends and colleagues can go deep (ahem) on this, it is VERY funny indeed.
  • Working On Meth: About having a very boring, very menial job, and doing it while getting very, very high on methamphetamine while you’re at work. I really, really like the flatness of this, the matter-of-factness, the way it matches the matter-of-fact demeanour you probably need to keep about you when you’re spending 20 minutes in the toilets huffing rock.
  • Whale Fall: This is from 2015, but oddly enough it floated across my field of vision last week and has been rendered current by events in Orkney this week. Rebecca White, in Granta, on a beached whale: “A few years ago I helped push a beached humpback whale back out into the sea, only to witness it return and expire under its own weight on the sand. For the three days that it died the whale was a public attraction. People brought their children down to see it. They would stand in the surf and wave babies in pastel rompers over the whale, as if to catch the drift of an evaporating myth. The whale was black like piano wood and because it was still young, it was pink in the joints under its fins. Every few minutes it exhaled loudly and slammed its fluke against the sand – a tantrum or leverage. Its soft chest turned slack, concertinaed, when it rolled.”
  • The Year When My Husband…: The full title of this is “The Year When My Husband Started to Act Like a Tsundere Teenage Girl to Get My Attention”  – this is…not a pleasant read, in some respects (it deals with issues of abuse and paedophilia, even if not explicitly described), but it is, I think, very well-written indeed.
  • A Pandemic Breakup: Finally in this week’s longreads, a piece I really didn’t want to like when I started reading it but which I had to concede by the end is really, really good – an excerpt from Emily Witt’s forthcoming novel, this segment deals with going out clubbing with her husband just before the pandemic through the breakdown of their marriage and his mind – even if you hate the opening three paragraphs, persist because I promise it’s worth it.

By Nick Prideaux

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 28/06/24

Reading Time: 38 minutes

HELLO I AM BACK HELLO!

How are we all? I mean, I say ‘all’ – as is inevitable at this time of year, my already-vanishingly-small audience is further thinned by what I imagine is a significant number of you being in a field in Somerset, and a large proportion of the rest of you still being attached to the post-Cannes recovery IV, but to those of you who are reading this then a heartfelt THANKYOU HI I LOVE YOU.

Anyway, here in the UK we are a week away from a GLORIOUS NEW DAWN – or at least we’d better be, or else there will I fear be some sort of collective mass suicide event as we all fail to get our heads around another 4+ years of Conservative horror. That…that couldn’t actually happen, could it?

Well, regardless, I won’t be here next week to comment on it – sorry, but there’s no way in hell I am not staying up next Thursday, meaning the likelihood of me being in any fit state to start writing this crap at 6am (or indeed of wanting to) is pretty much nil. SO, this newsletterblogtypething will return on 12 July, hopefully in basking in the glow of…well, in all likelihood a Government that doesn’t look hugely different from the old one, policywise, but where familiarity has yet to breed total, overwhelming contempt!

That’s…that’s progress, right?

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are definitely better off reading this than being at a festival, DEFINITELY.

PS – thanks to everyone who shared the TinyAwards link and submitted a site! Nominations will be revealed in a few weeks!

By Jessica So Ren Tang

WE KICK OFF THIS WEEK WITH ANOTHER SELECTION OF TECHNO, ELECTRO, BEATS AND BLOOPS (AND, INEXPLICABLY, SOME ZAPPA) BY FORMER EDITOR PAUL!

THE SECTION WHICH ISN’T ASHAMED TO ADMIT THAT IT’S WISHING FOR A SMALL, LOCALISED MONSOON TO HIT WORTHY FARM BETWEEN NOW AND SUNDAY, PT.1:  

  • PortilloGeddon: Ok, so this one’s FOR NEXT WEEK, but if you’re in the UK (or indeed if you’re one of those foreign perverts who takes an active interest in other people’s elections – FREAK) and want to maximise the enjoyment as a bunch of Conservative MPs fall domino-like across the country then you might want to bookmark this website and return to it as you watch the results come in on July 4th. It will make it MORE FUN, and you will probably be able to gamify it in a way that almost guarantees you start the new government with incipient cirrhosis.
  • How Has Your Area Changed?: Oh, and if you’re still somehow vacillating over which way to vote and want some EVIDENCE-BASED RATIONALE to ensure that the incumbents get fcuked every which way to hell and back, you might find this tool interesting – plug in any postcode in the UK that you fancy and it will neatly show you how a few important local metrics have trended over the past 14 years, such as apprenticeships and knife crime and NHS waiting times, all pulled from public data. You get presented with a small overview, but you can also click ‘show all statistics’ in the bottom left and you get additional data, graphs and sources to show you where the numbers are coming from (official stats – this is all legit), and a fun game is to try and remember all the postcodes you have ever lived and, and then to plug all of them in, and see if ANYWHERE got better in an measurable way over the past 14 years because, honestly, I am fcuked if I can find anywhere where the graphs go in the right direction.
  • Guess The Candidates Party: I promise, the last electoral link of the week (and, all being well, the last thing pertaining to a UK election for at least four years, please God), this is a simple game that asks you to guess which of the major parties you believe the person presented to you is standing for. DO ALL YOUR PREJUDICES MAP CORRECTLY? This is, on the one hand, harder than you might think given the wide range of mad little parties putting up candidates, but it’s interesting/amusing/telling (delete per your level of metropolitan prejudice) how easy it is to zero in on Tory/Reform picks.
  • BBC Sound Effects: After a couple of weeks in which the labels finally appear to have woken up to the existential threat posed to them by Sudo et al (lol, except we all know that it won’t be the labels and top 10% of artists that get screwed – it will be the session musicians and jobbing production engineers, whose interests literally noone gives a sh1t about!), it’s nice to be able to bring you some GOOD OLD ANALOGUE SOUNDS (except delivered digitally, so not actually that analogue at all). This is a WONDERFUL resource and a very fun tool, and it is surprisingly powerful – a library of…I want to say ALL THE SOUND EFFECTS, but even by my standards that’s probably ridiculous hyperbole, so let’s just go with ‘loads’ of sound effects, all from the BBC audio library, made available online for your joy and delectation (and non-commercial use). You want over 91 different cat sounds? GREAT! You want kettles and whistles and mumbled conversations and someone indistinctly shouting “RICKAAAAAAAAAAY!” in the middle-distance? SUPERB! All the samples can be downloaded for you to mess with as you choose (per the aforementioned ‘non-commercial’ restrictions), and there’s an additional lovely feature where you can pull a bunch of different audio samples into a player together and use them to create a sort of soundbite of your choosing…basically this is great, superb bit of BBC public service work, and an amazing resource, and another opportunity to remind you that anyone who seriously advocate cutting the BBC’s funding or abolishing the license fee is a selfish, miserable cnut who doesn’t understand the first thing about the value of culture as a public good. So, er, there.
  • That Toys’R’Us AI Ad: I like to think that, given it’s late-June and that it’s been quite nice this week and the football’s on and that at least some of you have LIVES, a significant proportion of you will have no idea that this week Toys’R’Us (still, apparently, alive as a brand, although I have a feeling that at this stage it’s basically just a logo (and an increasingly dead-eyed anthropomorphic giraffe) with nothing behind it other than the terrifying, evil vampire squid of private equity) have made THE WORLD’S FIRST ENTIRELY-AR-GENERATED TV AD!!!! It’s supposedly generated with Sora, the yet-to-actually-be-made-available-to-proles text-to-video tool from OpenAI, and as with anything made with this tech there’s literally no way of knowing how much post-production work has gone into it and how long it took and what the workflow was…and also, as you will see if you click the link, the ad is bullsh1t – a generic ‘the dream behind the brand’ fable, with all the classic hallmarks of AI video (object impermanence, shifting and inconsistent characterisation and ‘look’, the sort of wobbliness in all the movement and characters that makes you think that you’re just starting to come up on acid, you know the deal by now)…but that doesn’t matter because, as you can tell from the whole breathless ‘THE WORLD’S FIRST…’ the whole point of this was not to make a good advert or to show anything meaningful about creativity and AI and the industry, or do anything interesting…it was instead ALL about getting cheap and easy headlines from…people…like…me…oh. Anyway, the ad’s sh1t, the tech’s not ready, I remain unconvinced it will be for a good 18m yet (MINIMUM), let’s see.
  • Calculating Empires: I have to be honest, I remain uncertain whether what you will see when you click this link is the product of genius or madness. On the one hand, it might be an incredibly sophisticated piece of visual communications depicting the evolution of thinking across 30 disparate areas (think ‘the biosphere’, ‘time’, ‘biometrics’, ‘communications infrastructure’, that sort of thing) and offering a sort of maximalist overview of the evolution of modern thinking and understanding from approximately 1500 to the near-future; on the other, it might make as much ACTUAL sense when you dig into it as intricate scrawls of mid-episode schizophrenics – I simply cannot tell, it is TOO MUCH. What I can tell you, though, is that it is DIZZYING – you can’t quite get a sense for the full scale of it unless you zoom right out and then see how deep it goes when you zoom in again. Anyway, here’s the blurb – I would really, really like to see this printed BIG somewhere, just to see if it coheres, as I don’t personally think a screen does it justice at all: “Calculating Empires is a large-scale research visualization exploring how technical and social structures co-evolved over five centuries. The aim is to view the contemporary period in a longer trajectory of ideas, devices, infrastructures, and systems of power. It traces technological patterns of colonialism, militarization, automation, and enclosure since 1500 to show how these forces still subjugate and how they might be unwound. By tracking these imperial pathways, Calculating Empires offers a means of seeing our technological present in a deeper historical context. And by investigating how past empires have calculated, we can see how they created the conditions of empire today. Calculating Empires centers on four themes: communication, computation, classification and control. Across the centuries, the work illustrates the shifts in communication devices, infrastructures, and computational architectures, and how they are entwined with the histories of social control and classification. The vertical axis represents time, beginning with the 16th century at the base. The horizontal axis features a collection of systems: from algorithms to architecture, bodies to borders. Navigation is flexible: you can follow a theme, a time period, or set of ideas.” Have a look, it’s quite insane.
  • Play Library: This is a lovely initiative (I think, at least) by the National Library of Singapore, presumably just a PR stunt to raise the profile of reading in general and the library more specifically – not dissimilar in style to a ‘choose your own adventure’-style GPT prompt which I featured in here a few months back. The gimmick here is that the team behind this has taken a selection of books which are in the public domain (Sherlock Holmes, for example, The Count of Monte Cristo, the Jungle Book, etc) and plugged them into The Machine with a pre-prompt that turns them into pieces of interactive fiction, letting users interact with the books rather than ‘just’ reading them. So for example, you can explore The Count as a (fine, limited, but still reasonably faithful) game in which you decide how to approach Dantes’ return to his homeland at the start of the novel, get imprisoned with him, find the treasure, become the Count…it’s paper-thin, true, but it’s a nice gimmick in terms of letting you explore the classics and a smart (and largely free, time commitment notwithstanding) bit of PR which I have seen all over the place in the past couple of weeks.
  • Diane Lindo: I do love me some unpleasantly-visceral stop-motion animation, and this really IS some unpleasantly-visceral stop-motion animation! The link takes you to the Twitter account of one Diane Lindo whose work encompasses slightly-battered dolls, collaged text, paper, body horror, and a general sense that everything is going wrong under the surface in ways that are going to become messily apparent far sooner than you might like. This isn’t technically in any way ‘horror’, but also it very much is – SO GOOD.
  • The Vogue Archive: For some of you this may well be the only link you need this week (well done for burying it halfway down in section one Matt, you pr1ck) – an ASTONISHING selection of imagery from the Vogue archives, released as the in partnership with Google and which the magazine describes as: “the launch of 15,000 newly digitised colour images from the archives on Google Arts & Culture, the culmination of a five-year collaboration spearheaded by Ivan Shaw, Condé Nast’s corporate photography director, and Amit Sood, the director of Google’s Cultural Institute. Said images can be browsed not just by year, colour and designer, but by subject, too, whether your interest is in Versailles or Veruschka.” Honestly, if you have any interest at all in the history of modern fashion and its representation in popular culture, this is basically your Louvre.
  • Anime Themes: Now I come to think of it, this is another one that some of you might find completes you entirely. I’ve mentioned here before, I think, that I grew up before the Great Anime Love-in started – it seems like everyone about 10 years younger than me grew up watching Dragonball, Naruto and the like and as such it’s part of their childhood and their formative experience, whereas my only exposure to it (apart from in Italy, where it was on ALL THE TIME – but only very specific anime, namely giant robots, wrestlers, footballers, and, er, space kids in inexplicable bird costumes) was terrifying tentacular horrorbongo that I really wished I had never, ever seen, particularly not at age 8 – but I am aware that for a whole generation it’s basically YOUR CHILDHOOD. So, then, you might enjoy this site which is a fcuking astonishing collection of anime theme tunes – I mean, seriously, this appears to have millions of the fcuking things (oh, ok, ‘over 15,000’, but that’s PRACTICALLY millions), searchable by title, director, year, etc, and if you can’t find what you’re looking for on here then you might just have to give it up.
  • Kindred: With the news that Barcelona is going to ban Airbnb rentals by 2028 (genuinely intrigued to see if that happens and, if it does, what ends up filling that space), perhaps we’ll all be in the market for an alternative way of getting ‘cheap’ accommodation in urban centres – so you might want to take a look at Kindred, which is basically a ‘no-money Airbnb-type solution’ which instead of working on a pay-per-night basis works on a credit-swap system; hosting people in your home earns you credit to stay in other people’s, everyone on the platform is real-ID vetted before being accepted, everyone (or mostly everyone) hosts in their real home, and the only expense for the person visiting is that they cover the costs of post-stay cleaning for their hosts….this all sounds quite nice, except for the fact the fees look…quite steep? I mean, $510 for ‘cleaning and services’ for 7 nights in NYC feels like…a lot, but maybe I simply don’t understand what the going rate is for running a Dyson around a Brooklyn basement these days. Anyway, might be worth a look if you feel ‘NyLon apartment swapping with strangers’ will feed your wanderlust.
  • Receiptify:  Another ‘get the jump on your Wrapped data’-type toy for Spotify – plug in your account and you can get a bunch of different views of your listening data, giving you ‘a user’s 10 most-played tracks from the last month, last 6 months, and all time’, all presented in a SO AESTHETIC receipt-style format. If you catch yourself early you still have time to curate your 2024, audio wise (but, also, take a long, hard look at yourself).
  • The One Shot Photo Contest: I’ve been trying to work out what exactly the gimmick is here beyond ‘LOOK, BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOS!’ and to be honest I don’t think that there necessarily is one – but, well, LOOK, BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOS! Some of these are wonderful – personal favourites are the French dancers in a field, and the performer guy with the pierced nipples in the corset wearing the expression of beatific contentment, but please pick your own (also, aside from anything else, it’s nice to come across a photo contest that I haven’t featured a dozen times already in here).
  • Matcha: It’s been a BAD YEAR for new devices, it’s fair to say, particularly given the Rabbit’s latest round of ruinous press, but I am going to maintain cautious hope that this new entrant into the arena might be…well, let’s keep the expectations grounded and limit them to ‘not total sh1t’. Matcha’s set to be a small, tactile-looking box with a speaker and mini screen, which basically lets you do a bunch of useful things that you would ordinarily need your phone to do without needing to actually have your phone. Per the Page, “General purpose I/O is always a button press away. Right button to take a photo, left to record audio. Capturing inspiration and memories, reminders, journalling, etc. without a hyper networked device on you. ‘Applications’ that need the screen are accessible by just speaking a word. E.g Here’s the weather, and my calendar within a second of saying the word.” This is VERY early days yet, so there’s no information on price, timescales or suchlike, but you can submit your email if you want updates – I like the fact that this feels like a hobby project rather than something looking to raise hundreds of millions, and generally it gives me Good Vibes, should that for some reason mean something to you.
  • More Than Enough: A TikTok account which, as far as I can tell, has one ‘thing’ and that ‘thing’ is taking video of details of paintings, and adding a voiceover to said paintings in the manner of a very modern video comedy in which all the minor characters in, say, a Lowry, have an argument about what takeaway to get. Which, I realise, is an ATROCIOUS description which almost certainly actively-dissuades you from clicking, but trust me when I tell you that this is a) very funny indeed (and I say that as someone who normally doesn’t get this sh1t at all); and b) feels like a genuinely good ‘bit’ that could run and run, should they be bothered.
  • Akadimia: What if I told you I could give you access to THE GREATEST MINDS FROM HUMAN HISTORY, all of them available for you to talk to and chat with and ask questions of and LEARN FROM like the unceasingly-thirsty knowledge sponge that I know you are? “SIGN ME UP, MATT!”, is what I imagine you would cry – only to be bitterly disappointed when you realise that what I was actually offering you was in fact Akademia, a platform whose ACTUAL offering is, er, a really poorly-realised AR model of, say, Mohammed Ali, moving jankily on your living room floor while you type questions into your phone (no, you can’t talk to the greatest minds in history via voice, sadly, which does rather sort of ruin the point of the AR gimmick). This is janky and rubbish and frankly the only reasons I am including it are how terrible the character models are, and the frankly risible promise that the app will make you ‘the smartest person in the room’. WHAT SORT OF ROOMS DO THEIR TARGET MARKET INHABIT?!
  • Football Sticker Yourself:  On the one hand, I feel like I should probably caveat this with a general warning about what a bad idea it is to upload photos of your face to strange websites whose ownership you’re unsure of; on the other, I am pretty sure I can trace this back to London agency Phantom, so should you find yourself being cloned and your identity being used to, I don’t know, shill cialis on the Cambodian web in a few years’ time, you know who to have a go at (to be clear, it is THEM not me). In celebration of the Euros, this is a classic ‘give us your photo and we will turn you into a 1980s football sticker complete with hair and shorts and the odd patina that only photos from the 70s and 80s have’ and it works BRILLIANTLY and your Euros groupchat will love it, promise.

By TS Harris

OUR SECOND MIX IS THIS BEAUTIFULLY-CHILLED SELECTION OF LOUNGEY-TYPE STUFF MIXED LIVE AT CAFE DEL MAR BY ANDY WILSON!

THE SECTION WHICH ISN’T ASHAMED TO ADMIT THAT IT’S WISHING FOR A SMALL, LOCALISED MONSOON TO HIT WORTHY FARM BETWEEN NOW AND SUNDAY, PT.2:

  • Habbo Is Back: I am of an age that my main exposure to Habbo Hotel was my mate Luke doing the PR for it for a few years back in the day, but I am conscious that there may be some of you for whom it has a more substantial nostalgic pull (or, if I am correct in my suspicions about the Curios readership, your kids enjoyed it) – anyway, Habbo is BACK, resurrected, phoenix-like, in what looks to my exceptionally-untrained eyes to be a pretty faithful recreation of the original, with all the furnishings and personal spaces and odd, boxy avatars that you remember so well, alongside what they promise is all the quality of life stuff you would expect (safety, moderation, community guidelines and all that jazz). Would YOU like to crawl back into an internet that feels small and safe and cute just like it did when you were 11? I mean, look, I want to have a go at you for regressing but given I am currently rereading a bunch of novels I last read two decades ago I don’t think I have any legs to stand on, so, well, enjoy!
  • Search The Market: A gorgeous little bit of webart, this. “Think about a personal and private google search and post it on this website. Something you might not have told the ones dearest to your heart. Google uses these searches to generate a data profile of you to sell on open bidding markets. This website creates a bubble for each search to remind us of all the data collected.” The site is literally just a list of searches that other visitors have submitted which you can scroll through, and each is clickable so you can see the results that show up for each – a window into other people’s hopes and fears and dreams and how they are mediated and reflected by the web. This feels like an installation of sorts waiting to happen.
  • Butterflies: Would you like to install a new social network on your phone? No, of course you wouldn’t, you’re presumably not (that sort of) a masochist – but wait! What if I were to tell you that this was a social network…entirely populated by AIs?!?! No, wait, come back! This isn’t the first of these that I’ve seen – there was one about a year ago, I think, but that was text-only and web-based, whereas this is an app and significantly shinier, and has GRAPHICS and…no, actually, it’s still a sh1t and pointless idea. You download the app (I know this because I bothered – you may not want to), and you’re then prompted to spin up as many ‘characters’ as you want which you can then use to populate the network. Give them a personality, a backstory, some traits, and then set them loose to post and interact and share pictures and…WHY?!?!? Look, I can sort-of see the appeal in a vague ‘infinite sandbox experiment’ sort of way, but that simply doesn’t apply with this sort of stuff when it’s built on your standard LLM – everything, per all GPT-type text you will ever read, is sanded down to LinkedIn-smooth-blandness, which means that all of the posts and ‘interactions’ have that horrible ‘meaning-shaped but unpleasantly-empty’ vibe of most untreated LLM slop; that, coupled with the fact that whatever model they’re using to generate the images tends hard towards ‘generic Stable Diffusion busty elf girl cheesecake’ as its aesthetic, makes the whole thing feel like a PG-13 Reddit thread full of the most boring conversations you can imagine. NOONE WANTS THIS STUFF. Or at least I really hope they don’t. Interestingly I left ‘alerts’ on, just to see how ‘autonomous’ these agents are – I have had none in the six days since I installed the app, suggesting it’s perhaps not really working. SURPRISE!
  • Stop Or My Mom Will Shoot: Matt Round continues his one-man mission to make the web a better place with a new project dedicated to becoming the web’s number one fansite for all-time classic Stallone vehicle ‘Stop Or My Mom Will Shoot’. “We couldn’t resist buying the domain name, or taking on the challenge of creating the best fansite ever for this classic film. Don’t miss the amazing fanart and GIFs, send us your thoughts and keep an eye out for the launch of our podcast, Stop! Or My Mom Will Mute.” I have no idea how long he will keep this up, but, personally-speaking, I am intrigued by the podcast (and I NEVER say that).
  • Seen: Another new app, this one apparently intended to be used by actual people rather than AI agents – Seen has one gimmick and one gimmick only, namely that it’s an app exclusively for reaction videos. Rather sadly, the app’s description in the App store (iOS-only at present) reads: “Tired of sending hilarious video content to your friends and getting just a ‘haha’ in return? Seen is a video sharing app that shows you authentic reactions to the videos you send. Share memes or mini vlogs of your life and get genuine real-time reactions to all your content” which rather makes it sound like a passive-aggressive away of demanding that your friends LAUGH AN APPROPRIATE AMOUNT at your hilarious content. Anyway, this is either going to die a miserable death or it’s going to lead to an unpleasant resurgence in swap.avi reaction videos, either/or.
  • Climate Zones: Have we all accepted that the weather’s going to keep getting different? No? Oh. Still, for those of you who would like some DATAVIZ-LED INSIGHT into exactly what this change is going to look and feel like in the coming 30-40 years, the fine folk at The Pudding have pulled together this lovely-if-troubling guide as to how various cities around the world are likely to change in terms of average temperatures, rainfall and the like, and I encourage you to scroll through and have a read/play because it’s not only just a really nice piece of work (as per with these guys – they really have been consistently excellent for years now, credit where it’s due) but also because it contains all sorts of really quite granular detail about how each city’s climate is likely to shift (London becoming a place with ‘no dry season’ feels a bit too on-the-nose tbh).
  • Dracarys: This is ‘just’ a bit of WebGL coding with particulate effects, but it is SO PRETTY and therefore worth checking out. LOOK AT THE BEAUTIFUL SPACE DRAGON! Very nicely coded indeed. Oh, and if you want more simulated particulate fun, this is VERY satisfying to play with.
  • Timeface: I think this might be my favourite bit of digital clock design I’ve seen in an age – it looks like a mess on first viewing (and, ok, on second an third as well), but then it clicks and I think that this would look very cool on a watch, personally (and I say that as someone who hasn’t worn a watch since approximately 1993, and, honestly, whose wrists are probably too thin to support one these days anyway).
  • County Cricket Day 2024: OK, this isn’t internetty AT ALL (aside from the fact it has a website), but it’s being organised by a friend of mine out of a simple desire to Do Something Good, and despite my complete lack of interest in cricket I figure that some of you who live in the UK and who don’t intend to spend Sunday afternoon getting right on the pub gak while you cheer on GARETH’S UNDERPERFORMING, OVERPAID BUNCH OF CNUTS LET THE LEASH OFF SOUTHGATE YOU PR1CK WHY AREN’T YOU PLAYING TRENT GET GALLAGHER OFF WE OUGHT TO BE WALKING THIS WHO’S GOT THE BAG GET US A PINT IN OUR BOYS might find this of interest. “County Cricket Day is a fan-led campaign to celebrate County Championship cricket, and encourage as many people as possible to attend a game on ​Sunday 30th June 2024. It’s inspired by (but not affiliated with) Non-League Day, which for over a decade has worked to attract fans to football games at the lower end of the pyramid, and has helped spark a renaissance at that level of the game. County Cricket has a lot in common with Non-League Football: it’s affordable, it’s at the heart of local communities, and it provides matchgoing fans a relaxed environment to enjoy games in the way they want to. At many county grounds, you’re also able to bring in your own food and drink. But most importantly of all – you’ll be guaranteed a warm welcome by the people running their clubs for the joy of the game. Whether you’ve played cricket, are a committed fan, or have never experienced the game live before, we want to show people that the fixtures on County Cricket Day promise a joyful and memorable day out for everyone.” Maybe give it a go?
  • Cursor Museum: Whilst I am very much not a father and will never be one, the fact that I enjoyed this single-gag website quite as much as I did suggests that I have now become a dad on some sort of spiritual level.
  • 45 Football: OH MY GOD THIS IS THE MOST AMAZING COLLECTION OF FOOTBALL-THEMED SONGS I HAVE EVER SEEN! Compiled by one Pascal Claude in Zurich (THANKYOU PASCAL!), “This is for all football and vinyl and footballvinyl lovers around the planet. I hope you enjoy. 45football.com is based on my collection of vinyl 7″ records on football. I started to upload the files in July 2012, since then I’ve been about to register the singles week by week. I’m still happy to find records I haven’t known yet, so feel free to get in touch. Also if you have some additional or preciser information on a record. If there’s a song on 45football.com you own the copyright of and want it to be removed, please let me know. It was and is impossible to regulate all the copyrights of all the hundreds of records here. Most of the record labels don’t exist anymore.” Honestly, if you’re the sort of person who REALLY wants to put together a football-themed playlist for your Euro finals party in a few weeks time, but is ALSO the sort of appalling muso who insists on all the songs being obscure vinyl-only samba/funk novelties from 1980s Uruguay then OH MY GOD this is going to make you happy. SO SO GOOD.
  • The Ultimate Playlist Index: This…this might be the most incredible music repository I have ever linked to in 14-odd years of doing this, no joke. The project’s a byproduct of the Rate Your Music community, and, as far as I can tell, is an attempt to create a comprehensive list of links to the ULTIMATE playlists for every single genre of music ever conceived of, the playlists that you would give to aliens if they were to make First Contact and inexplicably lead off with a question about ‘really wanting to get into baile funk but not really knowing where to start’. Seriously, click the main link and scroll and marvel at the incredible selection of playlists, offering you an entry into every single type of sound you could possibly conceive of, from ‘Ottowan Noise’ to ‘Viking Metal’ and everything inbetween. Seriously, there are 1600 separate playlists linked to here, this is ASTONISHING. Oh, and if you want EVEN MORE MUSIC, you might enjoy checking out this insane library of what its curtator terms ‘exotica’, which as far as I can tell basically means ‘seemingly hundreds and hundreds of vinyl records of vaguely-loungey guitar music from mid-20th-C America’ and which you really have to click around to explore properly because fcuk me this goes DEEP’.
  • Paint Spin: Make your own spin painting type artworks, in-browser, which is far more satisfying than it sounds, I promise you. Soothing in a way few ‘make an art!’ toys tend to be.
  • Election Leaflets: “ElectionLeaflets.org is an online archive of political leaflets. It is created by members of the public photographing and classifying what comes through their doors at election time. Since 2010 there have been 19563 leaflets added to the archive, providing a valuable resource for academics, journalists and campaigners.” This is a UK site, to be clear, so it’s UK political parties – as seasoned leaflet-watchers might expect, the Lib Dems and their unusual approach to graphs and their axes feature heavily here, but what’s really interesting to me about this is the wild variance in design choices across the spectrum, even within parties, and the degree to which it gives a reasonable impression of the vast, mad unruliness of campaigning at a national level (also, special shout out to the independents and in particular Chaz Singh who’s standing in Plymouth and who has SUCH WHOLESOME ENERGY on his leaflet (please don’t be an awful person, Chaz Singh!) and whose clashing fonts I rather love).
  • Webcollage: Via PFRC, this is a lovely bit of webart – per the description, “WebCollage is a program that creates collages out of random images found on the Web. More images are being added to the collage about once a minute, so this page will reload itself periodically. Clicking on one of the images in the collage will take you to the page on which it was found. It finds the images by feeding random words into various search engines, and pulling images (or sections of images) out of the pages returned.” As its creator says, ‘this is what the internet looks like’ – inchoate, slightly out-of-focus, unpredictable, and a portal to an infinite number of mysterious places. AS IT SHOULD BE.
  • LEGO Cars: A Flickr album full of images of classic cards recreated in LEGO. In case you really want 17 photos of a model of a Mercedes Benz W112 Fintail Build, recreated in Swedish plastic blocks because, well, who wouldn’t? NO FCUKER, etc!
  • Urban America: I know, I know, the sheen has rather come off AI-generated imagery now that we’re all beginning to realise that, hang on, the pollution is starting…still, let’s ignore that (and the whole environmental thing) in favour of enjoying this pleasingly-unsettling TikTok account that posts short clips about regional horror myths – the dead-eyed Alaskan Kutasha, the Teke Teke from Japan… these are all spun up in (I think) Midjourney and then animated with a variety of different tools, and they work REALLY well – short and focused enough to be unsettling without breaking the immersion through AI jank, this is some of the better ‘making interesting things with AI tools’ content I’ve seen in a while.
  • Queen Songs: Would you like a genuinely exhaustive guide to the music of Queen, including a link to an actual proper book analysing the band’s songcraft? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! There’s a…slightly odd man who lives in what used to be my mum’s apartment block in Rome who used to blast Queen at earbleed volume at all sorts of odd hours of the day, and has done for years, and while I am unlikely to ever see him again and he will never read these words, I dedicate this link to HIM (and, er, any of the rest of you who have a deep and abiding love for Fat Bottomed Girls).
  • The Best Legal Website I Have Ever Seen: As far as I can tell, this really is the website of a French firm of lawyers (I have checked, their registered on the official list of legal representatives and so seem legit) – just click on it, seriously, and then ask yourself ‘why aren’t all lawyers’ websites this good?’. THERE IS NO GOOD ANSWER. If you work in corporate webdesign, PLEASE show this to all of your most tedious clients and ask them to DREAM BIGGER.
  • 23 Words: A daily word game – but no, wait, come back! This is simple, clean and quick – you simply have to find solvethe 23 anagrams you’re presented with each day within the time allotted. They start easy with four-letter words, then the difficulty ramps up until by the end…well, look, I am terrible at anagrams and I, er, struggle towards the end of each day’s puzzle, but it’s oddly satisfying and it’s at most a minute or two each day should you want to add it to the timewasting routine (current daily time required before work can start: 43 minutes).
  • Woodworm: This is SO CUTE – the premise is simple, you’re a woodworm (of course you are!) and your task is to eat away at a block of wood to replicate the shape you’re shown on each level. Gently brainteasey at higher levels, but satisfying rather than frustrating, and generally VERY PLEASING (when you solve them, rather than when you’re coming up hard against your (ok, my) total lack of anything resembling patten matching abilities).
  • One Million Checkboxes: This week’s ‘wow, this really has been EVERYWHERE’ link is this charming multiplayer website project/game/thing – this is literally just a million checkboxes on a webpage, checkboxes which have two states (checked vs unchecked), checkboxes which anyone on the website at any given time can check or uncheck to their heart’s content, and which have resulted, since it went live a few days ago, in one of those occasional amazing experiments in collective will and behaviour that you occasionally get online (see also Reddit’s The Place and its various incarnations). Log on and just watch, and you’ll see the site is an endless back and forth of factions attempting to tick all the boxes, or seeking to ensure that that NEVER happens, people trying to write rude words in ticks, people just sort of muddling around at the edges…EMERGENT BEHAVIOURS! I love this stuff – it’s a bit like (bear with me) watching a field of long grass being moved by the wind – you can’t see the actors (wind/people clicking), only the resulting effects of their movement (shifting grasses/boxes changing colour) and there’s something almost ghostly about it…anyway, I fcuking adore this and would quite happily have this on a massive screen somewhere ambient (but I appreciate that my idea of what constitutes ‘public art’ is possibly not universal).
  • Pokerogue: Finally this week, something that I sort-of bounced off pretty quickly because I simply don’t have the ingrained Pokemon knowledge to either be competent or particularly interested, but which I imagine will grab some of you by the synapses and not let go – this is basically a roguelike variation on Pokemon where you have to battle through the entire roster of beasts, collecting as you go, unlocking new starters and generally putting all your accumulated Pokeknowledge to the test. If you or someone you know are the sort of person who can actually tell the difference between, say, Pokemon Diamond and Pokemon Pearl (please, do not tell me) then this is for YOU!

By Casey Goddard

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS THIS WEATHER-APPROPRIATE ‘CANARY ISLANDS MIX’ BY ATLASt WHICH A GENUINE SUNSHINE-Y DELIGHT!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Cinema Without People: I mean, you don’t really need me to explain this for you, do you? This is BEAUTIFUL, some wonderful shot selection here.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • The Plum Island Museum: The Plum Island Museum is a collection of objects which have washed ashore in Massachusetts, maintained by a single woman – it’s a physical collection too, visits on appointment, but this is the photographic record of the various detritus that collects on the shingle. “The shoreline is a place where nature collides with the detritus we humans leave in our wake. Plastic forks intermingle with bird bones, Happy Meal Toys float in on clumps of seaweed. Frequently, I mistake reeds for straws or straws for reeds. It is easy to see how sea creatures innocently attempt to feed on things we have left behind.” Beautiful and sad.
  • Ohmni: You will know MIA as an artist from Paper Planes, obvs; you may also remember her as an outspoken voice on Sri Lankan independence back in the day, and, over the past few years, a peddler of…increasingly esoteric opinions on a wide range of topics, which is why it was not a HUGE surprise this week to see that the singer/artist/producer has launched a range of clothes which are, er, made of materials designed to stop the 5G from reading your thoughts. I am not exaggerating – click the link, and look what happens when you take the classic ‘tinfoil hat’ concept and make it FASHION. A snip at £100 – after all, WHAT PRICE THE SANCTITY OF YOUR BRAINWAVES? Well, quite.
  • The Bali Time Chamber: There is a lot of masculinity that I really don’t understand AT ALL, and the whole ‘MEAT AND MUSCLES AND FIRE AND BEING ALPHA’ thing is very much of that ilk. Perhaps that’s why I found the concept of The Bali Time Chamber so perfectly, wonderfully ridiculous – the idea that MEN need a space surrounded by OTHER MEN without the distractions of women or booze or, er, vegetables which are keeping them from achieving their FULL MASCULINE GOALS. Still, if that sounds like your sort of thing then you will LOVE this – a place in which upto about 25-odd men can all pay to hang out together in Bali, in a fully-catered island paradise where you can…I don’t know, to be honest, the website has a lot of stuff about ‘fulfilment’, but the general vibe I get from the whole thing suggests that that ‘fulfilment’ might be the sort that comes from pump-and-dumping a memecoin and making off with six figures of mooks’ crypto. Still, PLEASE read the brochure – it is VERY FUNNY – and enjoy the majesty of the Insta feed, which, were I not aware of how it was selling itself, I would strongly suggest looks like it’s advertising a very particular type of man-on-man bongo if I’m wholly honest.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • 14 Years: Apologies for the second or third Curios in a row leading on a UK election story, but, well, we only get them every four or five years, so you will I hope forgive me. This is the London Review of Books, again, looking back at the totality of ‘how we have got here’ – honestly, this is really really superb, focusing as it does not JUST on a decade and a half of Conservative misrule, though there’s plenty of that too, but also on the wider sociopoliticotechnological factors that moved and shifted alongside the politics, and how the two currents moved in tandem to shape Britain into the…well, the mess it currently finds itself in. This isn’t anything uplifting, obviously , but it is very comprehensive and reasonably-even-handed in doling out its slaps, and makes some interesting points throughout – I personally found the argument about the erosion of trust in all public institutions, starting from the MPs’ expenses scandal and moving through Savile and the BBC, phone hacking and the rest, all the way through Covid and the assorted lies and chicanery, and how that sequence of events has had as much impact on our relationship to the body politic and the overall state of the nation as any policies. I can’t imagine for a second you need any other reasons to vote ‘anyone but those cnuts’ come next Thursday, but it’s worth reading this to give you an extra spring in your step as you stroll to the ballot box. BONUS ELECTION CONTENT: I can’t imagine any of you want to listen to a podcast about social media ads and the UK election featuring me, but, well, just in case.
  • Housing: Another LRB piece, and another one about the UK – SORRY INTERNATIONAL READERS, SORRY – this one about the housing crisis and how it’s playing out in Manchester, and some of the reasons why we’ve ended up in a situation where nearly 150,000 children are on the list of the statutorily homeless. This covers Grenfell and speculative property investment and the criminal justice system, and as someone whose work over the past couple of decades has variously touched the prison service, the probation services and the property development sector, this is a staggering indictment of the past 25 years or so of collective (in)action and naked profiteering. You will, if you’re anything like me, do a genuine doubletake at some of the quoted extracts from the property investment advisors helping clients in the Middle East invest some of their wealth in UK rental properties – turns out they are all accurate and you can read them here in full. The reality of the UK’s international status (and our economy, and housing market) as described in this piece, and the difference between that reality and the version being peddled to potential Tory and Reform voters as to the halcyon vision of WHAT BRITAIN COULD BE AGAIN (if only we got rid of the pesky foreigners, specifically the brown ones) is…astonishing.
  • The Ministry of the Imagination: Ok, three pieces in and a small iota of hope! This is VERY LONG – but, also, is more of a smorgasbord of ideas than a single longread, and as such you might want to bookmark it or file it somewhere for future reference. I feel I need to give you the full explanation so you can get the gist, so, well, here: “The From What If to What Next podcast ran from May 2020 until March 2024, calling it a day with its 100th episode. Each one took a different ‘What If’ question and with two guests dived deep into what the world might be like had that change already been made. The questions were often sent in by listeners and covered a wide range of topics. Those who subscribed on Patreon to support the podcast also received our bonus ‘Ministry of Imagination’ episodes. Here, the guests stuck around for a little bit, and were inaugurated as Ministers at the Ministry of Imagination. The Ministry itself increasingly became a character in its own right–it was a Ministry of Imagination after all. On one visit it might have run off to join the circus, another might find it on an asteroid because it wanted a change of perspective, and on other occasions it transformed itself into a dazzling array of different things or hosted all manner of wonderful and fantastical events and occasions. It always kept us guessing. Each freshly-inaugurated Minister was invited to choose 3 policies that could be immediately implemented that would rapidly accelerate the collective move in the direction of the question we had been discussing. They were encouraged to choose policies that were bold, audacious, ambitious and beautiful. They set to their task with great relish.” This is a collection of ALL of those ideas, those imaginary policies, those ‘things we could try to make things better’ concepts, all arranged in one immense document, arranged by theme, and containing a quite staggering array of potential proposals for making things better. Some will infuriate you, some will make no sense, but occasionally you’ll read something and get properly inspired, and, seriously, if you’re curious about ideas and policy and MAKING A DIFFERENCE, or alternatively want a bunch of other people’s thinking about purpose-related stuff that you can keep on file and dip into whenever you need to steal an idea, this is GOLDEN (if you can ignore the 20-odd % of this that is pure woo, like ‘giving people the space to love themselves’, fine).
  • Progress Is Annoying: An excellent article explaining why it is that many people find social change irritating, and why it is that that irritation is not a sign that that change is bad – or, indeed, that certain people getting irritated is not automatically a sign that a change is per se good either. The piece gives you enough information that, hopefully, “should lead you to pause the next time you reflexively roll your eyes upon encountering some new, annoying norm and the changes its advocates are asking you to make. That irritation is not your bullshit detector going off. As tempting as it can be to interpret the unpleasant feelings as your moral compass ringing alarm bells, your annoyance is just a feature of your norm psychology becoming misaligned and reacting to the unfamiliar. A better response would be to treat your feelings of irritation as a cue for further reflection. Instead of simply going along with your immediate gut reaction, step back and take those feelings under advisement, along with any other relevant factors, and then consider whether your response is reasonable: ‘Is this new thing actually bad, or does it just feel that way because it’s unfamiliar?’”
  • How To Fix The AI Copyright Issue: To be clear, I am not 100% convinced that this is THE solution, but it’s certainly a really interestingly-argued piece of thinking and contains some smart potential solutions to the problem of ‘how do we adequately compensate the people whose works have been used to train the machine that is now churning out serviceable replicas of exactly such works?’. This is quite knotty, but Tim O’Reilly explains it cogently – there’s basically a thought at the heart of this about rewarding people for the extent to which an output resembles them, with the greater the resemblance the greater the degree of remuneration; per O’Reilly’s thinking, “One option might be to retrieve the raw materials for generation (versus using RAG for attribution). Want to generate a paragraph that sounds like Stephen King? Explicitly retrieve some representation of Stephen King, generate from it, and then pay Stephen King. If you don’t want to pay for Stephen King’s level of quality, fine. Your text will be generated from lower-quality bulk-licensed “horror mystery text” as your driver. There are some rather naive assumptions in this ideal, namely in how to scale it to millions or billions of content providers, but that’s what makes it an interesting entrepreneurial opportunity. For a star-driven media area like music, it definitely makes sense.” If your work even vaguely touches on these sorts of questions this feels like a must-read.
  • GenZ’s Digital InformationGathering: This is REALLY interesting, although it’s important to caveat it with the fact that it is NOT QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH – this is *all* qual, all based on 25-odd interviews, and therefore should not be taken as anything other than ‘interesting anecdata which deserves more enquiry’. Still, it’s done by Google’s Jigsaw research arm which makes me trust it a bit more – basically what the study showed was that typical GenZ behaviour when it comes to information discovery is TO GO STRAIGHT TO THE COMMENTS AND SEE WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING THERE. So, effectively, like a crowdsourced tl;dr – based in some part on a general sense that ‘truth’ doesn’t matter so much as ‘utility’ when it comes to information. “”Within a week of actual research, we just threw out the term information literacy,” says Yasmin Green, Jigsaw’s CEO. Gen Zers, it turns out, are “not on a linear journey to evaluate the veracity of anything.” Instead, they’re engaged in what the researchers call “information sensibility” — a “socially informed” practice that relies on “folk heuristics of credibility.” In other words, Gen Zers know the difference between rock-solid news and AI-generated memes. They just don’t care.” Look, this is a BusinessInsider writeup and therefore hacky and sensationalistic, and, as previously stated, this is not statistically significant in any way…but, equally, it *feels* plausible, certainly based on my recent interactions with this generation, and does make me think that we have a lot of people who will have no qualms whatsoever happily embracing AI summaries of search results with nary a concern for hallucinations, provenance or anything else.
  • Nonsense Accelerationism: Or, ‘how and why memes have become so incredibly informationally dense as to be incomprehensible to anyone who isn’t basically deeply broken with onlineness’ – this piece doesn’t offer any real explanations, or certainly not a singular one, but I enjoyed the line of questioning around ‘the death of shared cultural experiences’ post-mass-linear-TV and the extent to which hyperdensememeticism is a reaction to that (personally speaking I like to think of it as a bit of arch metacommentary around the impossibility of ever again having a true picture of ‘culture’ from the air, but feel free to make your own interpretation).
  • Your New Interactive AI Journal: I know we’ve had a lot of ‘I tried an AI assistant – this is what I learned!’ pieces of junk journalism over the past year, but I thought this was slightly more interesting – Mark Wilson, writing for FastCompany, has spent a year or so with a just-out personal companion app called ‘Dot’, and shares his thoughts about the experience in this piece. Wilson was broadly positive, although there’s nothing in here that suggests this is in any way a MUST HAVE (or even particularly useful) application of the tech. “At a glance, it’s not much more complex than any messaging app. But look closer, and you’ll notice an ombre patterning in the background that subtly reflects Dot’s thinking. Then if you pinch to zoom out on your conversation, that endless conversation is bucketed into a list of topical summaries. My own summaries include topics ranging from “Jon Batiste concert” to “new workout routine” to  “Mark’s introspective nature.” Many of these phrases are hyperlinked. Tap one, and you end up at what feels a lot like a Wiki – sometimes with accompanying images if you’ve shared them. On top, Dot summarizes its take on the situation, writing about you in third person. Below that, a timeline charts out updates on the topic over time—one of my topics—“One Piece obsession”—tracks my thoughts on the long-running manga series as I read it. This approach to design takes Dot beyond conversation. It creates an organized, running narrative of your life; and the team intends to lean into this approach with more features in the future (imagine auto-generated memes tailored hyper specifically to your life events). However, much of Dot’s service is not about your own digging but its proactive “Gifts.” These are messages it sends you every now and again after thinking more about you. For me, they’ve included recipes I might like, articles I might be interested in, and follow-up observations to conversations we’ve had.” Personally-speaking I have no interest in this sort of thing – I enjoy ‘talking about and thinking about myself’ about as much as I tend to enjoy invasive, exploratory dentistry – but I can really see this sort of thing appealing to people with a more developed sense of self than I possess.
  • Why You Can’t Really Trust Online Reviews Anymore: Tl;dr – because “Balazs Kovacs, a professor of organisational behavior at Yale School of Management…fed a large batch of Yelp reviews to GPT-4, the technology behind ChatGPT, and asked it to imitate them. His test subjects — people — could not tell the difference between genuine reviews and those churned out by artificial intelligence. In fact, they were more likely to think the A.I. reviews were real.” Which means, if these reviews are as effective in persuading people as ones written by actual humans, you are going to see every single ratings and recommendations system on the web getting absolutely DESTROYED by bots (presuming this hasn’t happened already tbh). I really hope Reddit has some robust plans in place to deal with this (lol!).
  • AI-Augmented Books: This is SO interesting – I am not entirely convinced that this will become A Thing, but it’s certainly curious enough to have piqued my interest. In WIRED, Laura Kipniss writes about working with a new company called Rebind, which is basically trying to make ‘discursive books’ a thing. It’s quite hard to get a full handle on the user experience being proposed here, but, based on Kipniss’ experience, it sounds like Rebind want to create digital versions of classic texts which operate, effectively, as discursive builds on the novel in question – they work with writers and thinkers to effectively make the text ‘talk back’, effectively letting you have a dialogue with said writers and thinkers about the text you’re reading, effectively turning it into a sort of always-on book group where you’re interacting with an AI that’s itself been trained on LOADS of thinking and analysis of the text by smart, interesting people. This is still prototypical, and details on the exact functioning of the tech are a bit iffy in the piece, but it was genuinely interested to think about, and imagine, ways in which the act of reading could be rendered qualitatively different  – and in way which seemingly doesn’t fcuk with the actual original text.
  • Delivering Food In 50 Degrees:  On how delivery companies and drivers are planning on coping with the new reality of 50+ degree temperatures. To be honest this piece, in Rest of World, is as much a photo essay as anything else, but if you can read this corporate comment from one of the major delivery players in India without having a proper ‘fcuk me, this is dark’ then, well, you’re a more upbeat person than I am: “All Swiggy delivery partners have access to a free, rapid-response ambulance service.” Does that…does that sound good? I would posit that in fact it does not sound good at all.
  • The Odd Kindle Slop Vortex: Leah Beckmann writes about discovering an odd corner of Amazon where the AI written ‘books’ live, and the strange and seemingly-almost-eldritch-feeling way in which the books merge and meld and appear and disappear in the Kindle Store, almost like there’s now a totally separate an unknowable, by us at least, layer of commercial reality that is just The Machine moving in 4d chess ways that we simply don’t and can’t understand (that is very much what is starting to happen, fwiw).
  • A Weird Night At Frog Club: I like going to nice restaurants, but sometimes a true stinker of a review is almost as satisfying as some top-notch scran. This isn’t quite an evisceration, but it is a very funny takedown of what sounds like a perfectly-preposterous restaurant called ‘Frog Club’ in NYC, which insists on secrecy and exclusivity (but, er, has tables available on Resy), where the food, honestly, sounds like a p1sstake, and where it feels like the owners are laughing all the way to the bank. Superbly enjoyable throughout (also, can someone tell me what the current London equivalent of this is, please? I refuse to believe we don’t have something similarly idiotic going on here).
  • The Madness of the Jay Slater Facebook Groups: Apologies for the Unherd link, but I rather ‘enjoyed’ this overview of the madness currently swirling across Facebook Groups up and down the land over the disappearance of Jay Slater, currently missing in Tenerife and subject of some…increasingly-loopy speculation about what might have happened to him and who might have been involved, and which is basically a sort of continuation of the Baby Reindeer thing and proof positive that we’re now so internet-poisoned (THEORY: referring to everything as ‘content’, and the ultimate pomo context-collapse engendered by EVERYTHING BEING ON YOUR TINY PHONESCREEN, means that there is literally no dividing line now between ‘entertainment’ and ‘not entertainment’, and as such literally anything thatwe experience on that screen is grist to the mill of KEEPING US DISTRACTED AND AMUSED) that there is literally no event so significant/serious/sad/mundane that it won’t be turned into ‘fodder for bored people to pore over’ within seconds. Also, conveniently, it’s REALLY EASY journalism – you have loads of GREAT unhinged posts you can embed, and you can do a sneery look at ‘all the online morons’ which, simultaneously, appeals to all the OTHER online morons who like sneering at the first set (er, yes, guilty), so EVERYONE’S A WINNER. Except, probably, Jay Slater.
  • The Apple Emails: This pretends it’s about theft from an Apple Store, but it’s not – instead it’s about the genuinely surreal materials created to sit on display computers in the Apple store, just in case anyone ever bothered to click through into the email client on a display Mac. This is, I promise, genuinely funny, and will appeal especially to any of you who have ever had to write entirely pointless copy JUST IN CASE.
  • The Worst Pitches: Back for what feels like our weekly visit to The Fence now, with this excellent piece in which a variety of UK journalists who share the worst story pitches they have ever made to editors (apart from one, who shares the worst PR pitch they ever received – which, whilst funny, feels like cheating imho). Some of these are very, very funny, though there’s a certain degree of incestuousness about how many of the people quoted here obviously all worked at VICE – still, this made me laugh a lot: “I did once try to do ‘Adventures in the Ketaverse’, i.e. taking ketamine with a VR headset on.”
  • Who’s Got A Problem with Damian Hirst?: Not so much an overview of Hirst and his career, despite what the title might suggest, and more a review/overview of the current exhibition at his Newport Street Gallery in South London, and a retrospective on that particular period in the 90s when British Art was a thing, and Hirst’s place within that canon – I went this week, as it happens, and aside from a couple of stellar pieces (Myra, a few Bacons, a beautifully-unpleasant collage by Antony Micallef) it mainly served to remind me how much I fcuking hate Banksy and how I always thought Gavin Turk was overrated (lol, like he cares).
  • Active Fire: This is LOVELY, and I hope it becomes a regular series – James Caig and (friend of Curios) Rishi Dastidar in epistolary conversation about an album they both love – in this case, ‘Giant Steps’ by The Boo Radleys. Despite the fact that this is a record that I didn’t personally hold particularly dear, there’s something glorious about reading two people for whom it obviously meant LOADS talking about why it does so, and where and when they were when it came out, and how it’s accompanied them through their lives. Honestly, this is SUCH a nice format, and some beautiful writing to boot.
  • Finishing a Dead Man’s Novel: “Eight years ago, my mother met a woman named Laurene. When my mother told her she had a son who was a writer (I hate it when she does this), Laurene exclaimed, “I have a story for him!” And Laurene, I came to learn, meant this in the most literal sense. Two weeks later, in her kitchen, Laurene told me her late husband, Jim, had spent decades writing a novel that he had always planned to finish upon retirement but died before he got the chance. He was not a professional writer, rather a surveyor by trade. Laurene presented me with a large leather briefcase, heaving it onto the table and resting both hands upon the lid. “His notes, his chapters, his everything is here.” Richard Kelly Kemick writes about the gift/burden/horror of the bequest, about the concept of unfinished novels, about the act of writing, about failure to write, and and and…whether or not you are ever likely to try and write a novel yourself, if you enjoy words then you will adore this.
  • The Art of Translation: THIS IS SO BEAUTIFUL. Honestly, if you speak more than one language well then this will, I think, absolutely sing to you – and if you don’t, I think it’s as good a way as any of starting to get your head round how two languages interrelate, and don’t, and how bridging the gaps between one and the other works both linguistically and conceptually and, to a certain extent, even emotionally. Honestly, I sighed out loud with pleasure at certain parts of this so deeply did I feel it.
  • Swallowing: We finish the longreads this week with this piece in the Paris Review by Gabriel Smith, whose novel, Brat, I read last week and rather enjoyed – this is…fiction? Memoir? I am unsure, but it is very very good indeed. “A thing about growing up: you do not know what is strange until after. This was suburban England and the Holy Jemima’s hobby seemed about the same, to me, as my parents’ doctor friends’ African masks mounted on the walls above their CD towers of world music. Six streets down from them was Bellybutton Man, whose hobby was watching us leave school whilst silently smiling and lifting his blue T-shirt to finger his navel. And Bellybutton Man seemed about the same as Andy, eight minutes across town, who ran a pub and was a chess savant, who showed you newspapers and explained where the grandmasters were making mistakes. And Andy seemed about the same as Jake, whose hobby was that his parents let him drink as much Sunny Delight as he wanted. When you’re a kid it’s all just flora and fauna. You learn prejudices slow, like which plants are poison.”

By Amie Dickie

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 14/06/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

Hello everyone, hello hello – firstly THANKYOU to everyone who shared the Tiny Awards link over the past week, it is HUGELY appreciated and I would thank each and every one of you personally if that wouldn’t involve a degree of stalking that would almost certainly make you exceptionally uncomfortable. If you would like to share the link AGAIN, then PLEASE DO – here it is! The Tiny Awards! Nominations open for another couple of weeks or so!

Anyway, this week’s Curios is, as ever, PACKED, BULBOUS AND STRAINING WORRYINGLY AT THE SEAMS with excellent writing (not mine), games, pictures, webtoys and curiosities – which is good, because I am off next week and maybe the week after too, what with having to nip to Italy for a few days (I have to sign a piece of paper – the 21st century continues not to be entirely-evenly-distributed, turns out). Still, the extra time between newsletters will give you the opportunity to finally CLICK EVERY LINK. Won’t it? WON’T IT?????

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you might want to plan something big for next Friday to fill the massive, Curios-shaped void in your life.

By Keita Morimoto

WE KICK OFF THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH AN EXCELLENT NEW MIXTAPE OF MANC HIPHOP BY THE EQUALLY-EXCELLENTLY-NAMED BRITIZEN KANE! 

THE SECTION WHICH HOPES ALL OF YOU ENJOY THE EUROS AS LONG AS YOUR ENJOYMENT ISN’T CONTINGENT ON ENGLAND WINNING, PT.1:  

  • Dream Machine: The list of ‘impressive-looking text-to-video models that we’re only currently able to see hand-curate demo videos from’ got longer last week with the announcement of Kling, by Chinese appmakers Kuaishou (don’t get excited, it’s waitlist-only and only available to people with a Chinese phone number) – it joins Sora from OpenAI on the list of ‘things that people with souls of questionable quality believe will KILL HOLLYWOOD’, but until there’s a version people can actually play with then I am personally withholding judgement on AI video. BUT! There is now Dream Machine, a new text-to-video toy that anyone can use in their browser! YES, EVEN YOU! Click the link, enter a prompt, and (depending on what time of day it is -at times yesterday there were queues of a few minutes to render anything) you will get your VERY OWN ‘Hollywood-killing’ (LOL) snippet of AI video with which to amuse and delight your friends. So, what are the outputs like? Hm. On the one hand, this is by far and away the most impressive bit of freely-available video generation kit I have seen (beats Runway into a cocked hat); on the other, there is no way in hell you would ever use this for anything other than ‘messing around’. Basically it can’t do anything with complex moving parts very well (so people are out), it can’t do text (hence the garbled ads on the side of buses), it has no concept of persistence of vision, which means that elements will flit in and out of existence within a single clip…but it’s still QUITE MAGICAL. Have a play, you will enjoy seeing if you can make it generate anything truly horrifying (I am yet to succeed with that challenge, but please do let me know how you get on). To be clear, though, I think we are still quite a long way away from this being anything other than a novelty – although, as this thread proves, the novelty can still be pretty fun. Oh, and it can go to some quite unpleasant places, suggesting a degree of 80s horror film in its training data.
  • AI Steve: It’s a mark of how incredibly underwhelming and largely uninspiring this election campaign has so far been (we’re halfway through, everyone, there is light at the end of the tunnel! It is, fine, unclear as to whether said light is in fact an oncoming train, but let’s just cross our fingers and hope not, eh?) that ‘AI Steve’ got pretty much universal media coverage this week – that, and the fact that the media is still in a phase where appending the letters ‘a’ and i’ to any old crap will guarantee you at least a modicum of attention. So it is with ‘AI Steve’, the gimmick elevating the no-hope candidacy of one Steve Endacott, an ‘entrepreneur’ from Brighton from ‘Just Another Middle-Aged Oddity’ to ‘An AI-Enabled Middle-Aged Oddity’ – the idea is that all of Steve’s policies will be, er, crowdsourced, through people interacting with the AI Steve chatbot? I think? And then other people vote on them? And ‘AI Steve’ needs to exist, because despite the fact that real life Steve is standing for election in Brighton, on the South Coast of the UK, his actual day-to-day residence is in Rochdale, very much in the North of the UK, where he lives with his ‘new wife’ (sorry, but the level of detail there – why ‘new’, Steve? Why the need to emphasise that? Was there a first draft in which the adjective ‘young’ was also appended to the word wife, Steve? Do you…do you refer to her in the third person as ‘the wife’ in conversation, Steve? I bet you fcuking do, you know – really sent me), and as such AI Steve will serve as a bridge between the real MP and his real constituents because, er, he doesn’t care enough to actually move to the place he says he wants to represent. This makes so sense at all – the buttons on the website where you’re supposed to be able to ‘talk to AI Steve!’ don’t work, ffs, and as far as I can tell the only bit that does is the datacapture form to harvest your details so they can tap you up for donations…except of course it DOES make sense when you realise that Steve (real world Steve, that is) is an entrepreneur (and, per his website, an ‘Angle Investor’)…who is an investor in Neural Voice, the company whose tech is powering the ‘AI Avatar’ software. Jesus Christ, PLEASE LET THIS BE OVER SOON.
  • Say What You See: A cute little Google Arts & Culture experience which is basically a ‘my first prompting class’ tutorial, but delivered with all the charm and general pleasing air of cute that you’d expect from Google. The game is simple – you’re presented with a selection of images, and your job is to write a prompt in such a way that Google’s image gen tech creates something that it recognises as being meaningfully-similar to the target image. SIMPLE! This is surprisingly fun, not least as a way of working out how Google’s own particular image gen model weights terms and where you put them in a prompt, and it’s a great way of getting an understanding of How This Sort-of Works and how to make The Machine do (sort of) what you want it to.
  • Midjourney Launches Model Personalisation: This is, fine, a bit technical and will only really make sense if you’re a Midjourney user – but by this point there’s not really a good excuse not to be, particularly considering the web interface is slowly opening up and means you will soon never have to touch Discord ever again. This is a Twitter thread explaining how The Machine will now let you effectively designate a specific style as ‘yours’ – effectively letting you anchor your generations in a particular corner of latent space, should you find an area of it that is particularly aesthetically satisfying to you. What this means in practice is another step towards being able to deliver consistent outputs, which means significant improvements in terms of the ability to create photoshoot-style content, or multiple frames in identical style for storyboarding, etc – seriously, MJ is so far ahead in terms of quality of images generated that it’s almost ridiculous, although it’s still not managed to shake the standard ‘yep, this is Midjourney all right’ sheen which distinguishes the majority of its output (you can swerve that by getting it to output cameraphone-style images, though, in my experience). BONUS AI IMAGE STUFF: The Stable Diffusion subReddit has been quite fun this week, as various WELL-ADJUSTED MEN react to the fact that the new version of the model has gotten markedly worse at generating anatomically-correct women. Dear Christ.
  • The Deep Ark: This is, on the one hand, the website to promote a very, very niche book about, I think, 90s ambient Techno: “A psychedelic odyssey that plunges the reader into a mythic exurban world of wonder, ritual, folly & friendship, The Deep Ark blurs the lines between the imagined, the real and the invoked. Moments of tenderness, humour, grief, joy and revelatory intensity combine to form a fragmented narrative of quiet lyrical beauty, suffused with an abiding reverence for the music, memories, community and landscape that inspired it.” Does that mean anything to you? Anyway, that’s not important – what IS important is that there is ALSO an accompanying 8-HOUR(!!!!) mix that goes with the book, featuring Aphex Twin and Autechre and μ-Ziq and all your other INTENSELY TUNEFUL FAVOURITES, and I think for some of you this might possibly be somewhat transcendental.
  • Cara: Segueing on nicely (if I do say so myself) from the last link, Cara is a new online community which has done big numbers this week off the back of some rather zeitgeist-baiting positioning around AI – to whit, they aren’t having any of it on the platform, neatly positioning Cara as a nice, utopian, hand-knitted alternative to the increasingly-hollowed-out Deviantart et al. I haven’t dug into this enough to work out whether it’s 100% worth a look – and as ever with places like this that get a mad influx of users off the back of a sudden publicity burst, I am…sceptical that it will have robust enough community support in place to cope with all the headaches that a quick uptick in users brings – but if you’re after a new platform on which to host all your work as a visual artist then this might be worth a look. FWIW, though, I think this policy – “We do not agree with generative AI tools in their current unethical form, and we won’t host AI-generated portfolios unless the rampant ethical and data privacy issues around datasets are resolved via regulation” – is, frankly, dumb and shows a lack of understanding of what you can do with AI in the context of art; there is a significant qualitative difference between ‘artist making their own work with their own models, tinkering and tweaking and training’ and ‘plugging some words into Dall-E’, and not to acknowledge the genuine artistic potential of the former seems shortsighted imho.
  • Hypercinema: This is interesting – fine, a bit niche, given it’s aimed squarely at the visitor attractions space, but I continue to be curious about ways of bringing generative AI into real world spaces and how you can integrate it into consumer experiences for CREATIVE AND POTENTIALLY FUN RESULTS. Basically this company sells its services to theme parks, museums, galleries and the like, with a view to working with them to make interactive experiences for visitors which harness generative AI. Per the blurb, its tech is “a state-of-the-art AI platform powering HyperCinema, fusing advanced algorithms for unique visitor experiences. It features intelligent personalization, dynamic content generation, and interactive engagement, evolving continuously to redefine digital storytelling.” Which, fine, so far so w4nky – BUT I do think there’s something sort of self-evidently fun about this stuff, and I have been going on for at least a year about creating physical manifestations of AI magic, and these people seem like they might be worth looking at should you ever want to ‘make Matt’s idea of an AI-enabled Magic Mirror reality’ (PLEASE IT WOULD BE REALLY FUN).
  • The Climate Reality Check: A website which self-describes as ‘the Bechdel test, but for the environment’, and which is dedicated to tracking the depiction of the climate emergency in film and TV to see how culture reflects reality over time. “Climate change is our reality. It’s happening here and now, not elsewhere or in the future. It touches every aspect of life. But that reality is still largely absent from our on-screen stories. The Climate Reality Check is a simple tool to evaluate whether our climate reality is being represented in films, TV shows, and other narratives. It’s inspired by the Bechdel-Wallace Test, which measures gender representation.The Climate Reality Check asks whether, in a given story: a) Climate change exists; b) And a character knows it.” You may be unsurprised to know that, of the 250 films analysed, just under 10% passed the test – meaning that (as you probably already knew tbf) over 90% makes no reference whatsoever to the fact that We Might Have A Small Problem Coming Up Here. Another one for the ‘hm, I wonder what happens to an idea or issue when the arts entirely fail to engage with it?’ folder, alongside ‘the pandemic’. Anyway, this is an awareness-raising bit of comms by an organisation called ‘Good Energy’, and very nice it is too.
  • Beauty in the AI Age: I’ll be honest with you, I tend to be VERY SNIFFY about Dove’s comms – partly because I am of an age whereby, for about a decade, every clunkily-explained attempt to define what an ‘insight’ is (DEAR GOD NEVER AGAIN) was accompanied by the Dove ‘campaign for real beauty’ case study, to the point that I briefly started hiding their products in the supermarket; partly because I despise the parent company; and partly because there’s something so nakedly cynical about the (admittedly impressively-jujitsu) move of ‘weaponising female insecurity to sell unguents, but in a really stealthy way’ – but this is really good. Click the link and it takes you to a microsite (weird nostalgia typing that word just now) about how AI-generated imagery might impact and affect beauty standards, and a link to download a brochure outlining some principles to help brands and creators make images that are more representative – and, honestly, the brochure is GREAT. Practical, clear, with decent instructions on prompting and things to consider and ways to construct your interactions with The Machine, and acknowledgements of all the watch-outs, and I honestly can’t fault this at all from the point of view of ‘really smart extension of the brand into sort-of knew territory’. Bloody Dove.
  • The Vittles Map Of Slightly Obscure Places To Eat in London: If hipsters were still a thing, I would call Vittles ‘the hipster foodie bible of London’ – but they’re not, so I can’t. Still, hopefully you get the idea – for any of you not aware, Vittles is a newsletter which highlights (mostly) London food that tends not to get written about elsewhere, the diaspora cuisines of the city’s Eritrean or Somali or Chilean or Croatian or Laotian communities you might find in the outer boroughs rather than your Soho/Hackney joints. For a while now they have been running a weekly column that recommends six small, local joints – this map accumulates all those recommendations, so that wherever you are in Greater London you can find yourself a reasonably-priced and highly-recommended meal. A truly SUPERB resource – I can vouch for the quality of the recommendations, the ones near my house are all ACE – even if, as with all of Vittles stuff, the sense of reverse-snobbery is palpable (“of course, all the real cognoscenti know that the BEST food in London is served from a nondescript van under a Haggerston viaduct between 10-11am on the third Thursday of every month with an ‘R’ in it.”
  • The Forgotten Madness of 2001: A superb Reddit thread in which people look back at some of the things which happened in 2001 which, as a result of the all-consuming Western hysteria engendered by the September 11th attacks, have rather been forgotten in the subsequent decades. Very US-centric, in the main, but there are some astonishing ones here – this, in particular, made me stop and think about ‘WHAT MUST THAT EXPERIENCE HAVE BEEN LIKE??’ (horrible, inevitably): “Air Transat Flight 236. Plane from Toronto to Lisbon ran out of fuel in the middle of the Atlantic and glided 75 miles to an airport in the Azores and safely landed. Longest glide of a passenger airliner. Happened 3 weeks before 9/11.” I mean, just *imagine*.
  • Dumb Domains: Want to make your own website? YES OF COURSE YOU DO! In which case you might find this site helpful – a search engine for cheap and, admittedly, silly domain names. If you want a url and you don’t really care what it is, and you don’t mind it being…whimsical, at best, then this really is your best friend – tangypatrick.xyz could be YOURS for a mere £5, for example, which is the sort of bargain I imagine you’re all here for.
  • Build Your Own Website: Think of this as a companion to the last link – this is a charming little webpage dedicated to giving advice and encouragement on building your own small domain online. There are links to tutorials, short guides to ‘what to think about when you’re thinking about making a website’, some guides to terminology, all wrapped up in an aesthetic that can best be described as ‘Rainbow Brite’ (I don’t know why this is the reference my mind immediately jumped for; must raise that with the therapist).
  • Tokyo In Roblox: Another entry in the semi-regular ‘stuff happening in Roblox that I think is interesting’ slot – this is the Tokyo Metropolitan Government making TOKYO IN ROBLOX! Fine, ok, it’s not the WHOLE of Tokyo, but it’s a fun little representation of it, with minigames and landmarks and things to visit and stuff to collect…this strikes me as a brilliant and theoretically-inexpensive way of doing tourism to kids in a way that makes sense.
  • Recipe Search: Ooh, this is GOOD – blazingly fast search engine JUST for recipes – I think all the recipes here are taken from a training set for LLMs, so it’s all stripped back and hence really simple to use. The only caveat is that it’s all (from what I have seen, at least) US content, meaning you have to contend with the frankly-preposterous measurement conventions that for some reason Americans have decided make sense – THEY DON’T MAKE SENSE WTAF IS A ‘CUP’ WHY CAN’T YOU USE THE FCUKING METRIC SYSTEM LIKE LITERALLY EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD? And yes, I know that an English person complaining about national exceptionalism is a *touch* pot/kettle, but, well, authorial privilege.
  • MS Paint Anything: Quite possibly my favourite use of AI of the week – I think this is a Stable Diffusion mod which has been trained to style transfer anything you feed it into looking like it was drawn – badly – in MS Paint. Honestly, I lost a good 10 minutes this week feeding it photos of people – it does TERRIFYING THINGS to faces and smiles, and, honestly, if I still had access to a corporate ‘Meet The Team’ page on a website I know exactly what I would be doing with my afternoon (PLEASE DO IT PLEASE PLEASE – I can guarantee that it will take FAR longer than you think for anyone to notice; as a leaving gift to one former employer, I spent my final afternoon in the office modifying every single employee bio by the addition of a single line; examples included ‘Distinguishes himself by being the only MD in the UK powered by clockwork’, and ‘no outstanding convictions’. Took them WEEKS to notice).

By Aleksandra Waliszewska

OUR NEXT MIX IS THIS SUPERB SOUL-AND-FUNK SELECTION COMPILED BY BANARDO! 

THE SECTION WHICH HOPES ALL OF YOU ENJOY THE EUROS AS LONG AS YOUR ENJOYMENT ISN’T CONTINGENT ON ENGLAND WINNING, PT.2:  

  • Shop Like Batman: Presuming that none of you are billionaire playboys with access to an improbable degree of military-grade hardware, it’s unlikely that you’ll be able to replicate the Batman/Bruce Wayne lifestyle in any meaningful sense (other than the whole ‘crying alone at night’ thing – that’s within reach of all of us!) – but if you’re rich enough, you can now SHOP LIKE THE BATMAN! This is an online shop which…is this some sort of retail-focused extension of the bat-brand? Is that a thing now? Apparently so, per this piece in Fast Company, which treats the idea of ‘what if Bruce Wayne were a real person? What sort of obscenely-expensive tat would he buy to signal his status and taste to the world?’ with frankly insane levels of reverence. This was briefly hosted in a real-world New York townhouse last week, at an invite-only series of in-person immersive shopping trips for, presumably, millionaires who still have superhero-themed bedsheets – but you, mere peon, can still browse the wares via the online shop. Want to buy a ‘one of only ten made, ever’ working replica of the Batmobile (recent, rugged, military-styled version), finished in Anish Kapoor-authorised Vantablack and complete with, er, ‘imitation gun turrets’? You pathetic little man – but HERE YOU GO! Fancy some violently-overpriced glassware to adorn your version of Wayne Mansion? GREAT! I am slightly agog at this.
  • The Cuneiform Corpus: Describing itself as “The World’s Largest Online Corpus of Translated Cuneiform Texts”, this is slightly incredible – input any keyword you like and it will pull the relevant texts from the extant archive of translated cuneiform text from about 3,000 BC onwards. You can drill down into specific periods and eras and geographies should you so choose, which is obviously of use to anyone using this for serious scholastic purposes, but for everyone else there’s something truly amazing about just chucking random, banal words into the search box and seeing what comes back to you from several millennia past. Shopping lists and lamentations and curses and and and – I really, really like this a lot.
  • FuryPage: Ooh, this is quite cool – FuryPage is a simple, off-the-shelf way of making nice-looking scrolly animation sites. There are various different templates that you can use, and I think these are primarily intended for designers to show off their portfolios, but I reckon this is probably flexible enough that it can be turned to whatever end you fancy – the outputs look rather slick, and this might be worth a look if you’re in the market for a more interesting landing page than you might get with Wix or the like.
  • Bloggers Blogging About Blogging: A blog, collecting blogposts by people who blog about the fact of blogging. Which I appreciate is recursive to a degree that might not necessarily be immediately appealing to all of you, but which, honestly, is actually really soothing in what I can only describe as ‘a very old internet sort of way’. Basically this website practically has elbow patches it’s that middle-aged in vibe, but it’s also a nice (nascent, and growing) collection of thoughts and reflections by a selection of people (mainly in the UK, and currently mainly focused in tech/IT from what I can tell) about why they blog and how and what about, and it’s a non-terrible place to start exploring a specific corner of what, quaintly, used to be called ‘the blogosphere’ (dear God WHAT a hideous term that was) about 20 years ago.
  • Deer In Places They Shouldn’t Be: Would you like a Twitter account dedicated solely to sharing images of deer interloping in places where, objectively, they have no place? To be honest this account doesn’t *quite* live up to the name – I was hoping for more ‘deer looking guiltily into the camera as it’s snapped attempting to sneak out of the domestic bedroom via the window’-type content – but it’s a nice enough source of gentle, deer-themed humour, and who doesn’t want some of that in these trying times? NO FCUKER, etc!
  • SmallStack: This is a nice initiative – SmallStack is a new initiative designed to highlight small (<1000 subs) newsletters on SubStack; from what I can tell, anyone whose newsletter falls under the qualifying threshold can submit theirs, and the best ones will be mailed to subscribers as a ‘here’s a small newsletter you might be interested in checking out’ teaser. Cute, and a potentially good way of uncovering some new writers you might not otherwise discover – although, caveat, it being Substack there is likely to be a lot of twee sh1t too (sorry, but) and a reasonable number of people who expect paying for what is, objectively, dogsh1t writing (again, sorry, but).
  • Math Encrypt: I LOVE THIS. Input any number you want and this website will magically (not magic) come up with a VERY COMPLEX-LOOKING EQUATION which, if solved correctly, will give the number you originally entered as its answer. Want a challenging way of ensuring that only a very specific type of maths nerd ever gets your number at a bar (lol at the idea that anyone gets chatted up in the real world any more, but still)? HERE YOU ARE THEN! Ok, fine, this is very much ONLY useful as a filter for people with a certain minimum degree of mathematical ability, but I really like the potential applications for this for ARG-type games (or just fcuking with people).
  • Decker: Have you ever thought to yourself ‘God, I really love making slide-based presentations – DECKS, IF YOU WILL (I won’t, by the way, I fcuking despise that term) – but I wish there was a way for me to make them in a manner that replicated, almost exactly, the specific aesthetic of 1980s MacOS’? WELL LUCKY YOU! Decker is exactly that – this looks…surprisingly powerful, with a degree of Visual Basic-lite programming you can do of slides and buttons and things, but the main draw is obviously the look-and-feel.
  • The Mewsletter: EXACTLY the sort of pun-based and narrow-focused sort of project I think we should all get behind, The Mewsletter is a new, er, newsletter whose author has decided to attempt to visit every single one of London’s 2,381 mews streets (DO YOU SEE?) and write about the experience. I don’t know who’s writing this, but I enjoyed their justification as to why: “So: would take too long to walk every street in Greater London, don’t want to walk every street in some particular bit of Greater London, certainly don’t want to just lie about walking every street in some particular bit of Greater London. But what if there was a more feasibly visitable subset of streets, found throughout the capital? For example, every street called ‘[something] Mews’: is visiting all of those achievable? Well, if it is, I will declare myself the Softest Geezer and demand that I am allowed to yell “MENTAL HEALTH” at Sir Keir Starmer3 until he starts crying and declares that what I have done is better than any of his stupid policies.”
  • Frogland: Do YOU like and appreciate frogs? Do you wish there was an online portal devoted to the best of the amphibians?  Do you want to go back in time nearly 30 years? OH GOOD! Welcome to Frogland, the internet’s premier frog-themed website since 1995! 1995! Honestly, this is like unearthing something from ancient Mesopotamia, Hammurabi’s teenage diaries – it was obviously maintained by a kid who not only loved frogs but who had parents who were techy and geeky enough to be online in the very nascent era of the public web, and it is SO PURE AND LOVELY (and also, froggy!), and in particular I thought there was something genuinely sweet about the ‘awards’ section where you can see all the different accolades the site got in the mid-to-late 90s when there were obviously a bunch of initiatives to celebrate and reward digital creativity/curiosity among kids of the era. I know this is SUCH an old person’s thing to say – I know it, and yet I’m going to fcuking say it, which, again, is VERY OLD PERSON – but I do think it’s a shame that we don’t seek to promote and reward digital creativity in this way any more (by which I don’t just mean ‘making websites’, by the way – spinning stuff up in Roblox or Fortnite or Blender or Unreal might be a better modern equivalent then ‘cobbling together a webpage in Dreamweaver’).
  • Bookfinder: This is a really useful resource – if you’re looking for books that are old, or out of print, or you’d simply like to buy physical copies of something that’s a bit hard to find from somewhere that isn’t Amazon, then just type in the title to this search engine and watch as it pulls out listings from websites you’ve never even heard of. Importantly you can also set your shipping destination to wherever you fancy, to ensure you’re only searching retailers who will actually work where you are – this is GREAT, particularly for anything slightly niche or obscure.
  • The Carabiner Collection: I’ve never been particularly into climbing – possibly a shame, given I am all limbs and weigh about nine stone soaking wet, making me a prime physical candidate (apart from the whole ‘muscle tone of an elastic band’ thing) – and as such I have never personally developed any particular feelings about carabiners. Still, I imagine if you’re more of an experienced climber and have dangled from your fair share of rock faces you’ve probably developed a degree of affection for the little bits of metal who have kept you from plummeting to a pointy, crunch death – and so, presumably, have the people who maintain this site, er, ‘celebrating’ (can one really celebrate a carabiner? LET’S TRY!) the carabiner in all its glory. Sam Johnson, whose website this is, I fcuking SALUTE you and your dedication to/love for the carabiner, you are the sort of person on whom the web is basically built and we all thank you for your service.
  • Pn0gstr0m: A HORRIBLE name for what is a fun little game (from last week’s B3ta) – imagine Pong, but every time you or your opponent hit the ball, it splits into MORE BALLS, until you’re basically whacking a whole salvo of shots across the net and attempting to keep as many of them live as possible, racking up massive scores and collecting powerups that do interesting things to the balls – sending 10x the number back to your opponent, say, or equipping you with a laser that destroys a load in one fell swoop. This is less challenging than it at first looks, but it’s definitely a fun 15 minutes on a Friday (or Monday) afternoon.
  • WordSnake: Another B3ta link, this one – this is Snake, but with a gimmick when it comes to the controls and the mechanic. See how long it takes you to work out what it is (no, I’m not telling you, you’re a CLEVER PERSON, you can do it!).
  • Fcuksweeper: This needs a download, and, well, it’s a game called ‘Fcuksweeper’ so I’m not sure how many of you will make it past this bit – still, for anyone still reading, this is actually VERY FUN and very funny, and a lot sillier/weirder and significantly less ‘sexy’ than the name might suggest; there’s bodyhorror GALORE here, in an ‘odd rather than scary’ sense, and if you approach it as an interactive artwork rather than a ‘game’ per se then you will, I think, really enjoy it (or at least be pleasantly weirded out by the experience). Oh, and be aware that if you just want to play Minesweeper then, er, I’d probably stick with the original.
  • Chao Bing: This is BEAUTIFUL – a gorgeous experiment in lightly-interactive storytelling, with seven very small mini-’games’ (they’re games only in the loosest sense, think of them more as brief moments of interaction/contemplation) which come together to tell a small, personal story. From the creator’s description: “Chao Bing: A Read-Only Memory Experience is an interactive memoir in the style of a CD-ROM storybook game. Explore my childhood memories woven into a story about the ennui of adult life–all rendered in a 640 x 480 pixel resolution. Chao Bing is a game forever in its own making, writing, and rewriting. It’s a game, and also a game about the performative act of making a game.” I really, really like this – strongly recommend you giving it ten minutes of your time.
  • Probabilistic Noughts and Crosses: Yes, technically the url says ‘tic tac toe’ but THAT IS NOT WHAT THE GAME IS CALLED FFS. Ahem. This is a really smart little twist on the traditional gameplay – you play against the computer (or another human, should you have…friends?), with the twist being that each move you can make has a different success probability attached to it; if it ‘succeeds’, you place your ‘X’ as normal, if you ‘fail’ the space gets marked for your opponent, and if the outcome is neutral then the space remains unallocated – which obviously completely changes the way you play, where you look to move, and the flow of the game, as you can strategise in ways not possible in the original ruleset. There’s also quite a lot of interesting stuff in the background about ‘optimal’ game design, should you be the sort of maths mind who can get their head around all that stuff (I very much cannot). Per its creator, “in any given game of Probabilistic Tic-Tac-Toe you can do everything right and still lose (or do everything wrong and win.) However, the better player always rises to the top over time. These are characteristics that I find interesting about a lot of other games, and I thought they’d be fun to apply to an otherwise boring, solved game like tic-tac-toe. They’re also highly relevant to my life philosophy – that every outcome is effectively random, but our actions can often skew the odds in our favor. Bad breaks are inevitable, but good judgment is always rewarded (eventually, and given enough chances.)”
  • KittyToy: Would you like some cute pixelart cats to feed and generally horse around with in your browser? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! “Take care of and adopt stray kitties. Buy toys and decorations for your house and yard!” says the description, and, honestly, how could you resist? The autoplaying music is…somewhat grating to my ears, but mute the tab and keep this open FOREVER and you will always have a roomful of digital cats to pet and kiss and cuddle whenever things get hard. This is surprisingly deep (in a very shallow way) – there are various different toys and things that you can ‘buy’, and you can seemingly accumulate a near-infinite quantity of digital felines, which will be pleasing to those of you who have secretly harboured ambitions to own ALL OF THE CATS.
  • MoonDrop Isle: I only got a chance to spend  30m or so with this yesterday, so can’t tell you TOO much about it – but it’s interactive fiction, in the classic Zork style (“You are in a room. You see a laptop, and an empty mug of tea. You are tired and in your pants. Continue writing? There are no exits”, etc etc), and it’s a collection of multiple individual adventure games written by different IF specialists, all joined together into a shared experience set on an island which you, presumably, somehow have to escape or understand in some way. The puzzles I experienced in the first section were interesting but not maddening (and I say this as someone who really is a fcuking DREADFUL lateral thinker/problem solver), and I think you’ll enjoy this a lot (as long as you don’t mind reading, and no graphics, and having a typing-only interface).
  • Level Devil: Finally this week, one of the most evil browser games I have ever seen – honestly, this is diabolical and cruel and you will die over and over and over again. It won’t matter, though, because you only stay dead for half a second or so, and it’s all SO brutally cruel that you will have to laugh at the arbitrary unfairness of it all. Seriously, this is very fun indeed – if you happen to recall IWBTG, then this will ring a lot of pleasing bells.

By Irina Selaru

OUR LAST MUSICAL SELECTION THIS WEEK IS A MIX OF 80s-ISH SOUL AND LOUNGE-TYPE STUFF BY DJ KRUG WHICH IS SO SMOOTH AS TO BE PRACTICALLY-FRICTIONLESS! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Chris Steele-Perkins: Just great photography. No gimmicks, simply excellent shots of people. Some of England, some from elsewhere, but all these shots are wonderful in their own way.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Nice To E-Meet You: A reader who shall remain nameless got in touch last week to tell me that the Tiny Awards had reminded them of an old Tumblr they made about a decade ago. They shared it with me, and so I am sharing it with you. WHY? WHY NOT!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Good Riddance To The Tories: This is, admittedly, LONG – it’s also very much ‘the story of the past 14 years in the UK’, which means that I’m sure many of you are inclined to skip it due to either the tedious parochialism or the fact that, well, it’s long and you lived through it. PLEASE DO NOT SKIP THIS PIECE! It is SUPERB – Tom Crewe writes in the London Review of Books about the past 14 years of Conservative government in the UK, outlining in increasingly-numbing detail all the different ways in which, for reasons of selfishness and short-sightedness and greed and cruelty and incompetence and idiot ideology and cronyism and and and and…all the different ways in which the people in charge have managed to variously fcuk the country over nearly a decade and a half. Seriously, even if you’re not English and you think ‘why should I care about your stupid island’s stupid inclination to politically self-harm?’, I can’t stress enough how STAGGERING it is to see everything laid out like this – it’s worth reading purely as an objective account of all the different, spectacular ways people can make bad, stupid, wrong decisions, and how exactly those decisions play out. If you are English, and you think that you can’t be bothered to rake over this all again, I strongly urge you to reconsider because a) this is very, very well written, and there’s a tone of barely-concealed fury and disgust throughout that I very much enjoyed, despite the civility and control of the prose; and b) you will honestly have forgotten about so much of this, and seeing it all laid out over a Curios-length essay is quite dizzying. Honestly, if you can read this an offer anything resembling a defence of the Conservative party after having done so then I want to hear it (also, YOU ARE BRAIN DAMAGED). In the giant Word Doc of links I maintain each week with which to feed the Curios beast, this was annotated with the simple, explanatory word ‘CNUTS’, which I think tells you all you need to know.
  • Silicon Valley and Universe 25: I am including this link not because I necessarily agree with it, but because I can see it getting a reasonable degree of traction online over the coming weeks and months and I think as such it’s worth being aware of its existence. Ted Gioia, who I have featured here quite a few times over the past few years, is a music writer who is polymathic enough to reasonably branch out to all sorts of other topics, and who has a personal interest in culture (and by extension the way it is impacted by tech, and how in turn that impacts society) – earlier this year he went megaviral with his essay about ‘art vs entertainment’, and I can imagine this one breaking containment too. This one is about Gioia’s loose theory that we’re effectively being tech-dulled into societal collapse (I am paraphrasing, but): “What would you do if AI took care of all your needs? Would you be happier? Would you be kinder and gentler? Would you love your neighbor more? Would you spend more time with family? Would you have a richer, more fulfilled life? Calhoun tried to answer that question by creating a utopia for mice, and watching how their society evolved when all their needs and desires were met. It didn’t turn out like he planned.” Basically this is all about how, fundamentally, a society in which the need to work or create or strive in any meaningful way will lead to depression and collapse (he even references anomie, a pet theory of mine, bless him) – and how BIG TECH is helping us along this path. This reads very much like ‘old man gets scared of the future’ with a significant dash of chemtrail-adjacent conspiracies (there’s a slide in here that feels like it is going to do NUMBERS in a certain corner of grandparent Facebook, for example), and I think there’s some slightly-dangerous scaremongering about ‘TECHNOLOGY AND SCREENS BAD!’ which really should have been edited out by someone (not to mention the tedious ‘higher pleasures vs lower pleasures’ sub-JSM schtick that this sort of argument always devolves into) – but, regardless of what I think of it, I can see this thinking gaining not-insignificant traction in normie (sorry) circles, so keep an eye out.
  • Human Capital vs Physical Capital: Thanks to Alex for sending this my way – I thought this article by Tom Forth, on why a relentless focus on ‘human capital’ (skills, basically) at the expense of physical capital (infrastructure, basically) might in fact have been a bad idea over the past couple of decades, and why, and what a change of emphasis towards the latter over the former might mean for the future development of the country. Taking as his starting point the comparative socioeconomic starting points of the UK and East Germany in 1990, Ford looks into why East Germany’s situation improved so much more drastically than the UK’s did – to quote, “North England certainly has a much higher intensity of graduates than East Germany. And again, if we trust international rankings, vastly better universities. And yet it is Denmark, the Netherlands, Germany and the rest of Northern Europe who are economically well ahead of North England and Britain as a whole. And it is East Germany that from a starting position well behind us has caught, overtaken, and is now pulling away economically from North England. They haven’t done this by reindustrialising either, but rather by beating us in a high value services world with a high value service economy. Why? I’ve long argued it’s because while North England was trying and failing to level up with a human capital approach, those places did things that worked better. Better transport, spending on research and development, and replacing central planning with local power.” Interesting, although depressing that it’s so much more thoughtful and evolved than literally anything I have read over the past month on ‘how to unfcuk the country at least a little bit’.
  • On Apple & AI: As a non-Apple person I couldn’t really give less of a fcuk about whether or not AI is coming to your overpriced fetish object; still, lots of peope DO care about Apple, and as such this week’s BIG AI NEWS is interesting from a cultural point of view as much as a commercial one – will THIS get everyone using LLMs every day? Well, no, not for a while, seeing as most of this will only be on the super-new models that only morons or obsessives or the VERY RICH will be getting anytime soon – but, equally, it’s quite possible that it’s this which will in three years see everyone comfortable with LLMs as the default interface for everything. Anyway, Ethan Mollick is on typically good form here, explaining some of the technical stuff about how the GPT/on-device stuff will work, and also the narrower, more directional approach that Apple seems to be taking about how to get people to use this (basically the difference between ‘this can do anything! What would you like it to do?’ and ‘this can do very specific things, like sending your mum a photo of Angie and Dave where they’re both smiling’).
  • Spreadsheet Assassins: Or, ‘Why SaaS is a cancer’ – I very much enjoyed this, about how the drive to turn literally everything into a ‘software as a service’ business has made everything worse (THANKS, MONEYCNUTS!). Matthew King writes in The Baffler about how the SaaS model is particularly attractive to investors (recurring revenue, low costs, potentially enormous margins!) and why it almost always ends up being worse for consumers than other models: “As one CEO of a content management platform recently put it: “The biggest incumbent in [business-to-business] SaaS is some spreadsheets and one additional headcount…Every SaaS application pitch ever (including ours): 1. Your data is in lots of places 2. So you use spreadsheets 3. We bring it all together 4. Profit.” Or, another CEO-turned-MAGA ghoul, who invests in dozens of whatever-management platforms: “Find a commonly used spreadsheet (eg cap tables) and turn it into a dashboard (eg Carta). Replace email attachments with workflows. Spreadsheets are the long tail of datasets that don’t have their own SaaS tool yet.” Why let a business-critical workflow exist in some generic document, easily shared across systems and possibly fulfilling every task requirement, when you could corral those actions into a gated domain, gussy up the UI to imply value or progress, and charge a monthly subscription for it?”
  • How Is TikTok Changing Voters?: Short answer – IT ISN’T! THIS IS A STUPID HEADLINE! Still, I thought it worth linking to this Vox piece about ‘politicsTok’, not because it was hugely-insightful but because it highlights what I personally think is wrong about the writing/thinking about politics and TikTok (certainly around the UK election). As I am sure I have bored on about before, the most interesting thing, to  my mind, about TikTok in the context of politics is its opacity – this piece makes blithe assumptions about ‘what political content is like on TikTok’, but doesn’t acknowledge that TALKING ABOUT IT AS A MONOLITH IS DUMB, and that noone’s experience is like anyone else’s, and that as such talking about ‘how it’s changing politics’ are talking guff because NOONE KNOWS WHAT ANYONE ELSE IS SEEING. What is TikTok changing? It’s ushering in an era in which it’s impossible to have any idea what anyone’s informational diet is, what they can reasonably be expected to think/know/believe, is my take. Is this good? No idea!
  • The Death of Koo: I featured Koo in Curios in 2022 – now here’s a piece in Rest of World about how ‘the Twitter of India’ has managed to fcuk up its meteoric rise by – SURPRISE! – a focus on insane growth above all else! This is an interesting read, not least because of the way in which it demonstrates that, regardless of market, the pursuit of investor-pleasing metrics do have a tendency to rather fcuk a company up. Your regular reminder that VC investment is, quite often, a fcuking dreadful idea and that, in many cases, VCs are rich morons in expensive downy gilets.
  • Shanghai Disneyland: I am personally always fascinated by the ways in which global cultural phenomena are interpreted at a local level – Disney’s pretty much a perfect case study for this sort of thing, being both globally ubiquitous and locally-granular (in Italy, for example, the Disney canon absolutely revolves around Donald Duck and his family, with Mickey very much a second-string character who noone really gives a fcuk about; Donald, by contrast, is a fully-fleshed-out, er, duck, with an extended family and a clearly-defined persona and world view (perennially furious, unlucky, lazy, broke) which is seen by lots of Italians as one of the better representations of the national character ever devised). This piece looks at Disney in China – it’s not fantastically-written, but I really enjoyed learning about the completely new character the corporation invented for the Chinese market and how its lack of meaningful backstory or character building actually worked in its favour because it wasn’t seen as a ‘foreign’ character and instead could just act as any empty vessel for whatever Chinese kids wanted to project on it. Culturally fascinating.
  • The Internet and the Amazon, Redux: YOu remember that piece last week about that tribe in the Amazon that got Starlink, right? OF COURSE YOU DO! Anyway, this is a followup/reply to that, by 404 Media, responding to the piece going viral-ish last week with a bunch of outlets effectively summarising it as ‘AMAZING TRIBESPEOPLE DEVELOP CRIPPLING INTERNET BONGO ADDICTION’ despite the original piece never actually saying that at all – it’s a really good piece of journalism which neatly skewers the assumptions that underpin those sorts of silly reaction pieces, but also the original NYT piece which, it turns out, was written in such a way to obfuscate the reality of the tribe’s life and the fact that they were well aware of the web, and how it worked, and what it was, and have in fact been using it occasionally for years. A really useful reminder that even ‘quality’ journalism is edited and editorialised and skewed and limited and NOT REALLY REAL.
  • Building Brat: CharlieXCX is very much HAVING A MOMENT – an artist who I can look at and go ‘yes, you are objectively interesting and probably doing Good Work’ while at the same time having little to no personal interest in. Her new album, Brat, came out this week (or last, or whenever) – this is a really interesting LONG investigation into the marketing around it, the CharlieXCX brand, and how the album has been promoted across the world and the web, and as a look at How To Do A Launch and How To Do CrossMedia Cultural Domination it is very useful indeed. Seriously, worth reading if you have anything to do with ‘promoting culture or even just vaguely attempting to glom onto it’.
  • Elon Musk Tweeted A Thing: Second 404 Media piece of the week, this is a very good essay lamenting the terrible state of journalism where Musk is concerned, specifically the dreadful habit significant swathes of the world’s media have fallen into whereby they feel compelled to write up every single fcuking brainfart that cnut has as though it were carved into a tablet and delivered to us from Mount Sinai. More of a lament than an article, possibly, but it’s a good lament and as someone who has to write about That Fcuking Man on occasion it’s one that I personally feel very strongly about.
  • The AFL Mullet Data Analysis: A NEAR-PERFECT PIECE OF DATA JOURNALISM! I can’t remember the context, but I found myself thinking last week that the mullet – the hairstyle, not the tasty piscine morsel – might be the greatest comeback of the past 100 years. Seriously, as a child who grew up in the 80s and 90s the idea that people might in the far-flung future of the 2020s decide ‘yes, that is the haircut that I want, and that which I think says positive and dare-I-say-it-sexual things about me!’ was impossible to countenance, and, honestly, I’m still part-convinced that it’s all an elaborate joke. Still, this is a SERIOUS INVESTIGATION by ABC in Australia, examining the hairstyles of the Australian Rules Football League to answer the following questions: “Are we seeing a throwback to the footy stars of the past or is today’s generation making the mullet their own? Does it secretly make for a better player? The ABC analysed the headshots and hairstyles of all AFL players in the 2024 season in search of some answers.” So, so good, not least because it’s such an obvious ‘we saw everything The Pudding has been doing and thought yes please’ piece of work.
  • What Is The Best Way To Cut An Onion?: NO, YOU ARE WRONG. It is in fact the way described in this article, in which famously-obsessive food-science guy Kenji Lopez-Alt, he of the ‘I’m going to make 316 hamburgers to work out the optimum degree of smash and salting’-type enquiry, sets to work to find out what the ACTUAL best way of chopping up an onion into very, very small pieces is. I was entertained by this, not least because of the insane overengineering of what is not, to be clear, a remotely-significant problem.
  • Iain (M) Banks: A retrospective on the novels of Iain Banks and Iain M Banks, two sides of the same authorial coin, which fairly concludes that the scifi effectively cannibalised the imagination of the non-scifi after a while, and that his non-scifi work sort-of peaked just before he got properly super-famous. One for the Banks fans, this – it was a lovely reminder of his writing and the canon of his work, and if you’re not familiar then OH MY GOD can I unreservedly recommend his first four or five non-scifi books and basically every single one of the Culture novels.
  • The Dinner Party Boom: GenZ loves dinner parties – who knew? Actually this doesn’t feel surprising – performative interest in food and cooking is very much a Thing at the moment, and noone’s got any money, and there’s a certain ‘IRL>Online’ fetishism still hanging over from post-Covid, and dating is a nightmare hellscape…yeah, the ingredients are there, this feels legit. Is anyone doing ‘limited number curated group dining experiences’ as a nightlife thing at the moment? Feels like they should be.
  • Girl Mossing: Look, I am including this not because I think it is a good article (I do not think it is) or because I think that the ‘trend’ it is describing is significant or even real (I do not). This is a piece about ‘Girl Mossing’ (no, really), described here as “lying on a forest floor, staring up at a leafy canopy or caressing moss…While it is challenging to pinpoint the origins and scope of this aesthetic movement, “girl mossing”, “girl rotting”, and related terms have seen significant growth on social media since around the middle of last year. The trend can be traced back to mid-2022, when journalist and influencer Daisy Alioto tweeted: “The girl boss is dead, long live the girl moss (lying on the floor of the forest and being absorbed back into nature).” ACTUALOL! HOW DID THIS GET COMMISSIONED?! No, the reason I am including it is that it made me think that, based on this, it must be possible to spin up a few fake UrbanDictionary entries and some Insta posts and through those get similar articles written on ‘GirlTossing – girls going out into nature and hurling large logs in the style of the Highland Games as a reaction to the tyranny of capitalism’, or ‘GirlFlossing – girls spending an inordinate amount of time on infradental hygiene as a reaction to the anthropocene’, or ‘Girlhossing – girls generally just horsing around in wholesome fashion in an impassioned critique of neoliberalism’. PLEASE MAKE IT HAPPEN.
  • AI Generated Nudes In Bio: A look at the coming future, in which there are Patreon accounts into which real people (men) deposit real money in order to, er, access bongo of AI-generated women – except it’s happening right now! Not much, true, but as the article points out there are actual people paying actual cash to have access to, and interactions with, an entirely machine-generated OnlyFans-type content creator. WHY?!?!?!?! From what I can tell from this article it’s not even as though this AI-generated material is particularly niche or fetishy – it just seems like fairly standard nudes, which begs the question..,why not just pay an actual person, if that’s what you’re into? WHY ARE YOU INTO THE FACT IT’S AI?!?!? This is dizzyingly psychologically odd.
  • Haidt, Redux: A second LRB link of the week, this time to the latest dissection of the Jonathan Haidt ‘Have Snartphones RUINED A GENERATION?’ polemic – this is another ‘no, Jonathan, it’s probably not that simple actually’ rebuttal, albeit a reasonanbly-sympathetic one, which does a good job of explaining why it is that saying ‘PHONES BAD’ possibly fails to take into account a lot of the other, very good, reasons why young people’s sense of general wellbeing appears to have taken something of a nosedive post-2010 (some of those other reasons: THE ECONOMY. THE ENVIRONMENT. THE LABOUR MARKET. GEOPOLITICS. THE GENERAL SENSE OF TOTAL UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE NEXT 50 YEARS).
  • Professor Chips Visits England: This is…I want to use the word ‘perfectly quaint’, but that feels unfair. Cosy? Yes, but I sort of hate that term. It’s…comforting, I suppose, like a warm room and a cup of tea after a damp walk. It smells a bit of warm, wet wool, yes, but in a good way. This is a piece of writing by one Graeme Williams, a man who apparently runs an Instagram account dedicated to crisps called ‘Professor Chips’ (he is North American and so shall be forgiven) and who recently visited England to see an obscure band he’s a massive fan of, who were playing in a tiny venue in Hastings. This is just his account of his trip – it’s not hugely exciting, unless you count his occasional thoughts in English crisp varieties – but it’s…I don’t know, it’s inexplicably warm and comforting and just NICE, in a good-not-patronising way, just a really pleasing account of someone finding pleasure in LIFE and SIMPLE THINGS and, I don’t know, this spoke to me slightly in its (admittedly largely mundane) beauty.
  • Embarrassments in a Small Town: DW Mckinney writes about their experience of being a Black woman in a small town in the US, at an artist’s residence, and what it is like being Black in a very enclosed, very white space which doesn’t necessarily realise it is either of those things. Superb, controlled writing.
  • What I Learned From Getting Fired Six Times: This is great – on life and work and quitting and being forced to quit and fitting in and not fitting in and making a scene and leaving quietly and it not mattering either way except in the way it matters more than anything. Really, really good, this.
  • Infinite: Finally this week, an essay about being online and scrolling and how that feels and how it eventually stops feeling anything at all. Form AND function (you’ll see what I mean)!

By Jenny Holzer

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 07/06/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

HELLO EVERYONE!

Ordinarily I use the bit at the top here for some p1ss-weak attempt at topical satire or an op-ed, but I hope you will forgive me this week for giving it over to some MINOR SELF-PROMOTION.

Kris and I are once again running The Tiny Awards in 2024! TELL THE WORLD! In case you have managed to somehow wipe the memory of last year’s edition from your minds, the Tiny Awards is our attempt to spotlight some of the brilliant, weird, heartfelt, curious, creative, poetic, beautiful, pointless websites that people all around the world make and which tend not to be surfaced by algorithmic feeds because they’re not FCUKING VIDEOS (have I mentioned how fcuked off I am about the ubiquity of video as the dominant medium of our age? I really am, you know).

As with last year, we’re running nominations for the next few weeks – so PLEASE submit sites you like, whether your own work or those of other people, because the more there are the better, and the better the final shortlist (decided upon by an ESTEEMED PANEL OF JUDGES from around the world), and one of these sites will win £500 and a SMALL HANDMADE TROPHY (and there’s another £300 prize for the best ‘multiplayer’ website too!).

Noone gets rich from this, there’s no desire to turn this into something massive, it’s just something we thought was a nice thing to do and we hope you do too. If you know communities that might find this interesting, or people who might like the idea, then please share it with them – you don’t HAVE to, obviously, but think of it as a small thankyou to me for, er, writing an overlong, self-indulgent newsletter that literally noone in the world ever asked for every Friday morning.

Ok, that’s the end of the self-indulgence, you can fcuk off and click the links now.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you want to tell everyone you know, don’t you? Yes you do.

By Edu Monteiro

WE START THIS WEEK WITH THE SUPERB NEW ALBUM BY MACHINE DRUM WHICH IS AN EXCELLENT COLLECTION OF HIPHOPDRUMNBASSBREAKSTYPESTUFF AND VERY MUCH WORTH YOUR TIME! 

THE SECTION WHICH REALLY WOULD LIKE YOU TO PLEASE TELL ANYONE WHO MIGHT CARE ABOUT THE TINY AWARDS BECAUSE THEY ARE A GOOD THING, PT.1:

  • Latens AI: I am putting this at the top of Curios partly because it’s an interesting idea, and partly because it caused my (admittedly old and increasingly-fcuked) laptop to start wheezing uncontrollably when it eventually loaded up, and as such I would strongly advise not attempting to experience this when you’re 32 tabs deep. ANYWAY, Latens is a (very, very alpha-y) attempt to let you create a sort of navigable landscape of…anything you can possibly imagine, via the medium of (OF COURSE) AI – when it eventually loads up it defaults to a slightly abstract ‘fairy lights floating in the evening sky’ sort of view, but by editing the copy in the input window you can get it to imagine anything you fancy – cityscapes or countryside vistas or terrible, ruined palaces of suppurating flesh, you get the idea. The slightly-mad thing is that you can then *move around inside* said imagined ‘landscapes’ – WASD lets you navigate in the now-classic FPS style, with the visuals sort of re-rendering around you as you move…look, to be clear, this really is only, at best, about 10% viable at present, but equally it feels sort-of tantalising, like a glimpse of a future that feels a tiny bit nearer than it did last week. If nothing else, with a bit more stability (and a very hefty processor behind it) I think this would make a genuinely amazing ‘IMMERSIVE ART EXPERIENCE’ if it was extended / projected across all six surfaces of a room.
  • The Data Poets: This is CHARMING! A project by Gaston Welisch, the Data Poets encourages visitors to upload an image of a place they hold dear, along with a few short details about where it is and why it’s special to them; the site will then generated a short piece of verse to accompany the picture, which poems are added to the on-site archive for other visitors to enjoy. This is all done by AI (image recognition and then LLM-ing the verse), and there are apparently plans to enable the uploading of audio to use sound as the inspiration for resulting verse…honestly, this is so so lovely, and there are two or three new posts a day, and, amazingly for machine-generated words, the poems are…not terrible (God knows how – Gaston, on the offchance that you happen to read this I would be fascinated to know the workflow here), and the whole site is just a pleasure to scroll through. If you’re wondering ‘hm, what sort of sites are the Tiny Awards hoping to highlight and reward?’ I would personally suggest ‘stuff very much like this’.
  • Genderswap FM: A site dedicated to cover versions – primarily, but not exclusively, ones in which the gender of the singer is swapped from the original. So, for example, various female vocalists covering Smells Like Teen Spirit, Darius Danesh (RIP) doing Britney (actually, going to have to link to that on the offchance there are people heer who have never experienced its majesty)…all of the classics, basically. This is built on the Spotify API, and you can search for songs by various modifiers like ‘songs that are more/less upbeat or energetic than the original’, and there’s an accompanying massive playlist to go along with the project, and in general this is brilliant and I am glad it exists.
  • A Quite Remarkable Example of How Good AI Music Stuff Is Right Now: Click the link, and, as the tweet asks of you, press play on the song and try and guess at what point it stops being the original composition and when the AI starts making it up. HARD, isn’t it? Or at least it was for me – in fairness to them, several of my friends did clock it rather more easily than I did, but I put that down to them being actually quite musical (the freaks) – and the general point is that if you CAN see the join, it’s because of a shift in compositional style rather than because the music suddenly becomes jarringly crap. It’s astonishing how quickly the music models have improved, and how competent this ‘audio inpainting’ (for want of a better term) has become, and I have a sneaking suspicion that use of this sort of tech is going to become commonplace without anyone really noticing.
  • AI SFX: Seeing as we’re doing AI audio, Elevenlabs has just released its ‘sound effects generation lab’, which is very, very fun indeed – basically it will spin up four clips of ANY sound effect you can think to ask for. Think of this as an infinite comedy soundboard (ok, fine, there are proper applications for it and I’m sure that if you’re making short animations or similar this is a godsend in terms of spinning up audio elements in no time at all) which you can use to provide HILARIOUS audio accompaniments to friends, loved ones or colleagues – just think, now EVERYONE in your life can have a personalised audio sting that you can deploy whenever you like, to add a pleasingly cinematic note to their existence in a way that definitely won’t be annoying at all. Seriously, this is QUITE magical and very run – I have just wasted a good three minutes of precious Curios writing time by messing around with ‘record scratches from an early-00s rap rock song’ and ‘a chorus of sad trombones’, but you can do better I’m sure. BONUS AUDIO GENERATION! Stable Diffusion just released Stable Audio, which is specifically designed for musicians and producers who want to train a model on their own work – you can basically use it to produce upto 47s of anything you like. Per the blurb, “Stable Audio Open allows anyone to generate up to 47 seconds of high-quality audio data from a simple text prompt. Its specialised training makes it ideal for creating drum beats, instrument riffs, ambient sounds, foley recordings and other audio samples for music production and sound design. A key benefit of this open source release is that users can fine-tune the model on their own custom audio data. For example, a drummer could fine-tune on samples of their own drum recordings to generate new beats.” So there, give it a go.
  • Engine: Describing itself as ‘a tiny gamemaker’, Engine is a tiny bit like V Buckenham’s ‘Downpour’ app except it’s, er, not an app, and it’s a lot simpler and more constrained in its style – BUT it’s a lovely canvas for anything you like. The homepage lets you either go into the game creator or experience the games made by others, and I recommend having a bit of an explore through the library of existing work in there as it’s the best way of getting a feel for what’s possible and how the engine works (if I have a criticism it’s that it’s not HUGELY well-explained). Basically each ‘game’ is a series of interconnected screens which can be navigated through in one of 4 directions, so effectively what your building as a designer is a ‘map’ of different canvases which the player can navigate through; the layout constrains the potential player movement, which in turn is used to create a narrative (linear or branching) for the player to experience or explore. Does that make any sense? I am genuinely unsure, but, well, just click and play and see what you think.
  • I Side With…: Are you, dear reader, one of the LUCKY people with the right to participate in the EXCITING DEMOCRATIC EXPERIENCE we in the UK are getting to enjoy on July 4th? Are you as yet uncertain as to which of the assorted collection of largely-mediocre parties should be the fortunate recipient of your SACRED BALLOT? Look, you and I both know that the only correct answer to that question is ‘whoever helps fcuk the incumbents the hardest, preferably with knives’, but if you’d like to do a PROPER EXPLORATION of your political beliefs and preferences, and have those beliefs and preferences mapped onto one of the actual voting options available to you, then you might enjoy this site – answer a bunch of questions on policy and social issues and have them cross-referenced with the positions held by each of the main parties (and some of the smaller ones to) in order to see who, in theory at least, best fits your ideological leanings. I did this and got told I ought to vote for Sinn Fein, which on the one hand is tricky based on my living in London but which on the other felt vaguely appropriate as a (very, very lapsed) Catholic – still, you might find it an illuminating exercise (and a great way of starting arguments with your partner, quite possibly). Oh, and you might also want to sign up to the Swap My Vote project, should you really want to commit to the whole ‘let’s grind the Conservative party up into the smallest parts possible in the hope it will never, ever be able to reconstitute itself into government ever again’ bit. In general, if you’re interested in keeping an eye on digital stuff being built around the election (campaigning, activism, information) then you could do worse than bookmarking the UK Election Tech Handbook being maintained by the nice people at Newspeak House – it is a very useful resource indeed.
  • Super Internet World: I really haven’t got the faintest idea what this is or why it exists, or why the fcuk there’s an option to ‘connect my wallet’…but, maybe, it’s a sort of navigable art gallery of NFT art, with each room being based on a different work? Maybe? Anyway, you can move through the space in classic FPS fashion, look around with your mouse, and generally get a sense of overwhelming colour saturation and confusion as you navigate from room to room, through increasingly-bright spaces which mostly look as though they’ve been designed by kids who’ve maybe been left alone with the Haribo for a little too long. This is quite the thing, thanks to Pietro for the tip.
  • Thistle Gulch: After last week’s introduction of that AI-generated TV shows project (this one, ffs, HOW QUICKLY YOU FORGET), this is one of the OTHER projects from the same studio. Thistle Gulch is, per their blurb, “ Fable Studio’s  first Multi-Agent Gym Environment or “MAGE”. This platform isn’t a game; it’s a groundbreaking tool that merges the art of storytelling with the latest advancements in artificial intelligence. It’s the same Simulation that powered our SAGA release, an open-source tool for agents to make decisions in such worlds.” This is a *bit* hard to explain, but let me try. Thistle Gulch is a stereotypical Western town – it has a set layout and certain characters that inhabit that environment, and you as the ‘director’ can set up ‘stories’ by giving said characters motivations and goals; the conflict between different characters goals and motivations are what create ‘emergent narratives’. The fascinating bit is how this then plays out – characters will act autonomously based on said goals/motivations, but will at certain points be faced with choices to determine their next action – these choices are worked out by the AI, and the director can determine which choice each character makes and hence how the action continues to play out. Which, honestly, is fcuking insane if you stop to think about it – and which, obviously, will at this stage be janky as all fcuk and won’t produce anything decent. BUT! It’s worth clicking through and watching the short explainer video, because  the potential here feels astonishing – I am once again, for what is possibly the millionth time ever in Curios, mention ‘Little Computer People’ and how close we are to FINALLY making it a reality (also, for those of you who buy into the whole Muskian stoner ‘WE COULD BE LIVING IN A SIMULATION, MAN, WATCHED OVER BY OMNISCIENT BEINGS WHO SECRETLY MANIPULATE OUR ENVIRONMENT FOR THEIR OWN INSCRUTABLE ENDS!’ then WOW is this going to spin you out).
  • STORM: Another slightly mind-blowing AI experiment, this time from Stanford University – this is basically an autonomous researcher, built on an LLM, explained thusly: “Under a context of abundance, a significant disparity exists between the vast amounts of accessible information and what an individual can realistically assimilate. While large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive generation abilities, they do not directly address this issue and even worsen the situation due to more texts produced. This research project explores building a knowledge curation agent that can proactively research a topic, organize the information, and present the most pertinent insights in a reader-friendly way.” So, basically, you tell this what you want it to research and it…does it. Or rather, it did when I checked earlier in the week – they have paused new article generation as there’s going to be an update to the code, but you can sign up to be notified when it’s live again, and in the meantime you can see the outputs other people have generated – honestly, this is…quite astonishing. Effectively this generates topline Wikipedia entries about anything you ask it to, with citations for its sources and it’s…pretty good? I mean, it’s a bit superficial, and can be repetitive, but, equally, as a first pass at topline research it is 100% as good as what you’d get if you asked a mediocre colleague to do it for you. I can’t help but look at this and have Some Worries about what this is going to do (again) to online content, or to academia, but, well, it seems we’re just ploughing on with this stuff regardless, so, er, crack on! Interestingly, AI search engine Perplexity is doing something similar – it’s now offering the ability to create webpages from any search you do with it, effectively spinning up a host of (again) Wikipedia-ish entries in seconds. I have…questions about this (how long do the Pages exist? Are they searchable? How will Google treat them?, but if you’re curious as to what these will look like then you can take a look at an example here.
  • Sylathas World: The personal website of digital artist Sylathas, which is designed to look and behave a little like Myst – you navigate using the arrows on the bottom of the screen, and while the world you move through is small, it’s BEAUTIFULLY designed and very atmospheric, and the commitment to the bit here is admirable. The work’s interesting too – in fact, I featured a video they worked on in Curios a few months back – and there’s some rather moving writing about their struggles with gender identity buried in there too which is worth reading if you have a moment. I rather love this, and I would like more sites to basically use ‘videogames from the early-to-mid-90s’ as their design inspiration please thankyou.
  • Zigsam: What are the worst cigarettes you’ve ever smoked? Personally I don’t think anything will ever top Ducados, a tab so utterly vile that having one first thing in the morning necessitated a swift return to bed via a short-but-unavoidable bathroom stop to vomit ferociously, but this website made me think that there are some pretty devilish-looking contenders out there in the world. Zigsam is a website dedicated to the MAJESTY OF THE FAG (in the English sense, for clarity) – it contains photos of over 35000 different brands from around the world, which is frankly MENTAL and is a degree of dedication I can only marvel at. Particular props to Russia, which seemingly has over 3000(!!!!!) different tab types documented here, but there is SO MUCH wonderful (terrible) design stored in these records, as well as images of cigarette cards and general assorted ephemera – you can practically smell the stale smoke and imagine the yellowing walls.
  • The IKEA Coworker: Fair play to IKEA for this stunt – I have seen this story EVERYWHERE this week, but in case you haven’t…IKEA announced that it’s recruiting for 10 new roles, which will be ‘jobs’ in the IKEA-branded experience in Roblox – so you’ll be, for example, helping people buy IKEA Roblox furnishings, or, er, serving them digital meatballs in the digital IKEA cafe. What does this show – does it show that the future of work is humans-behind-avatars, helping users navigate THE METAVERSE? Well…maybe, although I would be fcuking amazed if that sort of ‘helper’ role doesn’t get AI’d to fcukery due to the relative economics of paying people vs running a model. What this DEFINITELY DOES show is that there is literally no spin on the now-infamous ‘best job in the world!’ PR stunt that won’t work  – seriously, I have NEVER seen one of these that doesn’t get coverage and links, which just goes to show that there’s no real point ever trying to be original because, honestly, why bother when this sort of crap just *delivers*? £100 says that the ‘jobs’ being offered here are not full-time, permanent contracts, put it that way.
  • The TransferScope: A FUN, HACKED-TOGETHER AI TOY! I really like this – you have to click the link to properly understand it (hm, perhaps I shouldn’t admit failure before even attempting to explain…but, on the other hand, I know my limitations), but basically this is a device that lets you do style transfers to any image you capture, from any image you capture. So, for example, look at a tortoiseshell cat through the viewfinder and it can ‘learn’ the visual style of said cat; if you then look at your naked boyfriend reclining on the sofa (for example), it can then apply said tortoiseshell cat’s style to said naked boyfriend. I can’t stress enough how much SURPRISE AND DELIGHT potential there is with this stuff – can you imagine taking this and making it BIG and installing it somewhere? Go on, someone, do something FUN for a change rather than just paying someone to make more fcuking videos.
  • Pride Flags: ALL OF THE PRIDE FLAGS (there are, er, LOTS) and what they mean, and the history behind them – I am including this partly as it’s interesting, but partly because some of these are BRILLIANT – I’m a particular fan of the Lesbian Feminism Pride Flag, which goes very hard indeed, but the Pocket Gender flag is also a cracking bit of design.

This is from Twitter in 2017. 2017!!! Do you ever think about the universe and how altered it might be if one single event had gone differently? I often dream of a world in which that plane crash had been fatal.  

A SURPRISINGLY-EXCELLENT PLAYLIST OF MODERN GERMAN MUSIC, NOW (SORRY, GERMANS, BUT ALSO, WELL, YOU UNDERSTAND, RIGHT?), EXPERTLY COMPILED BY GERMANOPHILE FORMER EDITOR PAUL! 

THE SECTION WHICH REALLY WOULD LIKE YOU TO PLEASE TELL ANYONE WHO MIGHT CARE ABOUT THE TINY AWARDS BECAUSE THEY ARE A GOOD THING, PT.2:        

  • Space Explorer: This is SO CUTE! Steve Gardner has made a little website that explains how you can, er, make a small website where the interface is a spaceship flying around an interacting with various on-page elements – so you can move the ship around the page, which explains how various things work (objects, movement, inertia, interactivity, etc) and then gives you the opportunity to remix the page or to make your own – this is a LOVELY piece of interactive tutorialising (no, it IS a word, fcuk you) and personally I would like to see more websites that have this sort of (entirely pointless and somewhat-overengineered interface). Just like…
  • Dolce Activation: A LUXURY WEBSITE! With a truly appalling url – seriously, Dom and Stef, could you not have bought a better domain? Still, I forgive them because while the site itself is dull as fcukery the style and interface is GORGEOUS – you navigate by moving a little Vespa around a map of Rome, with your goal being to find a selection of monuments which in turn let you access EXCITING PRODUCT INFORMATION about various bits of D&G tat. To be clear, this is an objectively terrible way to experience what is, at heart, a very content-lite website – it’s slow, inefficient and you will inevitably be a bit disappointed by what you eventually get served when you ‘uncover the secrets’. BUT! The art style is gorgeous – sort of cel-shaded, which you don’t see often enough in webdesign if you ask me – and YOU ARE DRIVING A TINY VESPA AROUND ROME!!! Oh, by the way, if you have the time I also recommend looking at the playlists that they have included here to publicise the perfumes they’re flogging, which I think are the most appallingly-generic attempts at ‘musical curation’ I have ever seen and which made me actually lol at the thought of there being some sort of ‘cool consultant’ behind the decision to fill a mix with the EDGY SOUNDS of, er, Drake and Jack Harlow and Skrillex.
  • TrippyTunesTV: Ooh, this is cool – a 24/7 stream of dance music of various kinds (when I’ve logged on this week at various points it’s been psytrance –  look, I LIKE IT – and breakbeat and at the time of writing it’s playing d’n’b) with an accompanying visualiser that’s all generated and animated by AI. Not sure of what the workflow is here, but the description on the page says: “this is the output of my computer god image creator – it uses much gpu (a whole 4090) and much cpu (a whole 14900ks) to make weird pictures somewhat synchronized to the musical entertainment to serve as a demonstration of the powers of our future ai overlords.” This is…weirdly hypnotic, I have to say – the machine occasionally gets ‘stuck’ in odd loops of ‘thought’ (not thought), and it’s fascinating seeing it move from image style to image style and interpolate between them, and I think this would look ace on a big screen.
  • Het Archief: Speaking of dance music and clubbing, this is incredible and a proper slice of musicultural history (well, Dutch musicultural history, at least). De School was a space in Amsterdam which for 8 years was a sort of arts and cultural centre that hosted artists, musicians, club nights and collectives, and which shut in January this year – this website is a frankly astonishing archive of audio from that period, capturing sets and club nights from across genres over the entirety of 2016-24. “On January 15, 2024, De School closed its doors for the very last time. From a first Friday night in 2016 until the 66-hour grand finale, Amsterdam’s former technical school functioned as an ever-evolving space, with at its core the steadfast pulse of a club. Infused with new life, the labyrinthian building—lest we forget: derelict classrooms, pitch-black basement, blossom-kissed garden, checkered cubicles, highway-like hallways—became a temporary home for the interlocked wonder of music, art, and culture. A blueprint for countless special people to forge countless special days, nights, and the blur beyond time. Het Archief, which you have just entered, translates eight years of club history into an expansive sound archive. Eight years of recordings are indexed, escape the walls, and finally see the light of day. Het Archief is a time capsule for the present and future, and an open-ended zone to remember through sound.” Seriously, if you are into techno this is a fcuking MOTHERLODE – and even if you’re not, there is SO MUCH in here to explore and listen to.
  • Stompers: Over the years I’ve featured a variety of ‘gamified fitness’-type apps, none of which have ever achieved the same degree of success or profile as the OG version Zombies Run! – Stompers is another in similar vein, but which feels a but more fun and silly than some of the previous iterations, a bit like a sort of ‘Mariokart with your mates, but for step counts’ – basically you create an avatar and compete in daily step goal challenges with your friends…but there are powerups! And debuffs! And it all feels sort of fun and dumb and playful, which might make it the sort of thing that’s fun to do with your family or groupchat. Or not – I’m basically fcuked if I understand anything about the compulsion to exercise, if I’m entirely honest with you.
  • Alt Text Selfies: This is rather beautiful and occasionally poignant and a tiny bit sad. A series of paragraph-length self-descriptions, designed to invoke the alt-text one might apply to a photograph, the idea being to create a non-visual representation of the self: “For us, an alt text selfie is any written self-portrait. This project takes a well-known practice—the selfie—and approaches it through a disability lens. Selfies and self-descriptions are often visually focused, but to us, an alt text selfie doesn’t need to center visual presentation or a literal description of an image. Alt text selfies might focus on feelings, smells, tastes, sounds, emotions, textures, or some combination. Alt text selfies can be any length, but for this project, we focused on writing in the one-sentence to one-paragraph range…Selfies and self-descriptions are often visually focused, but, to us, an alt text selfie doesn’t need to center around visuals, or literally describe an image. As the selfies gathered on this website exemplify, alt text selfies can blend smell, taste, touch, sound, and more. At their core, alt text selfies are an access practice, tools for connecting across sensory experiences and distance.” Do take a moment to read through a selection of the pieces here – they’re all bitesized, and some of them are quite arrestingly beautiful.
  • Shade Map: I think I’ve featured something similar in Curios a few years back, but the site wasn’t as nice as this one – ShadeMap does exactly what the title suggests, which is, er, show you where the shade will fall, anywhere in the world, at any given time of day. Which, honestly, is fcuking mental when you think about it. You can select the date and time at the bottom of the page, which means you can use this for all sorts of useful purposes – planning walks in such a way as to ensure you’ll be in the sunshine more often than not, or conversely for ensuring that you’re not exposed to the TERRIFYING BURNING ORB more than you absolutely have to be (don’t worry, goths, I see you), or for planning any outdoor/experiential thing which might benefit from sun or shade…in fact it feels like there’s probably some quite fun outdoor installation work you could do with this, playing with where shadows and light fall at different times of day, which I would quite like one of you who’s significantly more artistically and creatively inclined than I am to think about some more, please.
  • MemoryLane: To be clear, this is a grift and a BAD PRODUCT and I do not endorse it at all – but it feels like there’s an idea here that someone else (a charity, for example) could improve significantly. MemoryLane is a ‘tell The Machine your memories and it will turn them into a book which we will then print for you’ service, except it’s run as a £20 a month subscription service which makes no sense at all except from the point of view of parting gullible people with their money – that said, I think there’s something quite nice about the concept, and with a bit more care (and a significantly-less-aggressive pricing model) and maybe the ability to speak to The Machine rather than just type, this could be quite a cool service for, say, Age UK, or the Alzheimer’s Society.
  • Sonicity: Various cities from around the world, interpreted as audio based on specific information about them (temperature, elevation, population, etc) – this is a standard ‘convert data to sounds!’ project, but I quite like the way it results in each of the cities having quite a distinct audio profile, which in itself sounds like a CLEVER CREATIVE IDEA for certain types of brand, should you be in the market for such a thing. London sounds sh1t, I am sad to say – POOR LONDON.
  • MusicLawyerAI: This seems like…a legitimately good use of AI! With no apparent downsides! Apart, of course, from the possibility that it might give you bullsh1t information (or, perhaps, that it’s an early death-knell for a particular type of lawyering – although your opinion of whether or not that is in fact A Bad Thing will obviously depend on the degree to which you think that commercial lawyers are a category deserving of preservation – I am keeping my own counsel on this one). MusicLawyer lets you plug in your contract, at which point the AI will analyse it and, apparently, tell you exactly how it’s fcuking you, to five decimal places – but, obviously, I don’t have any music contracts to hand to test it with, and even if I did I’m no lawyer and so would have no idea whether The Machine was in fact offering a decent analysis or whether it was just making sh1t up left right and centre – which, I suppose, is the problem. Still, it’s free, and I would be intrigued to hear from anyone who tries it about whether it actually seems to deliver the goods.
  • Life In Jars: When I was a kid, someone I was at school with (no, really – this isn’t one of those euphemistic anecdotes where ACTUALLY IT WAS ME; I want to stress this very much WASN’T me, for the avoidance of doubt) decided to see what would happen if they left a jar of their own p1ss in a cupboard in one of the history classes over what turned out to be an unusually hot summer – turns out what happens is that it turns into a very weird black sludge and causes not-inconsiderable consternation in the member of staff who opens it curiously come September. Which is by way of only-slightly-tenuous introduction to this YouTube channel, in which a bloke looks at what happens when you leave water in jars for a while and then look at it under a microscope. SO MUCH LIFE! SO MUCH TEEMING, TINY LIFE! This is brilliant YouTubing – educational, entertaining, a tiny bit weird/gross…also, it’s not just ‘stuff in jars’, there’s a lot of other nature/science content on the channel which is very much worth an explore. Still, though, STUFF IN JARS!
  • Museum Artefacts in Fortnite: I really like this – this is a set of Twitter videos showing how various museums are experimenting with integrating 3d scans of elements from their collections into Fortnite maps, as a light-touch way of introducing, for example, ACTUAL DINOSAUR SKELETONS to kids as a natural part of the in-game experience (there’s one vid in here which shows a player mining in-game, and as they do so uncovering a scan of a real-life triceratops skeleton which is a perfect example). This just struck me as a really smart way of ‘meeting your audience where they are’, and of using digitised collections in creative fashion.
  • Cartwheel: This feels like a useful thing for any of you into 3d animation – Cartwheel is an AI-enabled platform that’s designed to let you create first pass animations to any character you feed it through text prompting. So, for example, you upload your character created in Blender or whatever, and then tell the software to ‘make it do a cartwheel’ and HEY PRESTO, there it goes. Or at least it does in theory – I imagine it’s probably not QUITE that simple, and that the results probably don’t always look like the ones on the homepage – but, even if it’s not quite as slick as they want you to believe, this strikes me as something worth playing with for anyone interested in animating characters (also, I really, really hope that they’ve not been rigorous with the guardrailing because dear God can I think of some potentially-wonderful if not-entirely-tasteful prompts I would like to try out).
  • Fractal Life: You know Conway’s Life simulation, right? The gliders, all that sort of jazz? Well this is that, but infinite and fractal and DEAR GOD this messed with my head something chronic. Click the link and then scroll out…and keep scrolling…this gave me proper, dizzying, ‘we are just specks in a petri dish’ insignificance vertigo, and I hope it does the same to you because, frankly, I see no reason I should suffer alone.
  • Classic Computer Brochures: This very much does what you’d expect it to based on the title – “Welcome to my personal collection of vintage brochures”, says the welcome banner, and that is EXACTLY what you get. Obviously if you’re the sort of person who gets excited at the prospect of delving into the instructional documentation for the APPLE II then, well, ENJOY, but even if you’re not quite *that* much of an IT enthusiast there’s something genuinely interesting about the way in which this takes you through the history of brand and marketing in the personal computer space, how the devices were presented and sold and the differing roles they were sold as occupying in our lives.
  • Nightmare Kart: AN ACTUAL, PROPER, FULL VIDEOGAME WHICH YOU HAVE TO DOWNLOAD BUT WHICH IS AVAILABLE ON A ‘PAY WHAT YOU WANT MODEL’! This is BRILLIANT, honestly – can you imagine a version of MarioKart, released for the PS One, and themed around the beloved FromSoft game Bloodborne? Can you? IMAGINE NO MORE FOR IT IS HERE! Seriously, this is really, really fun and is 100% worth downloading and chucking the devs a few quid – the courses are great, the references to the Bloodborne (never named, for obvious legal reasons) are integrated beautifully, and overall it is just a Good, Fun Time for All the Family – highly recommended, this one.
  • Tiny Glade: Another game you actually have to download – but it’s only a demo, and it’s free, and, honestly, if you liked Townscaper you will absolutely adore this – you just make a beautiful little woodland dwelling, basically, all tilt-shifted and SUPER CUTE, and, honestly, it’s a genuinely relaxing little toy which I once again recommend unreservedly.
  • Jasbiac: Guess the genre of three albums based on their cover art – this is a fun daily quiz to add to the rotation, should you be in the market for yet ANOTHER timewaster to add to your pre-work routine.
  • TILT: BAAAAAAAAAAAAAH this is infuriating but incredibly addictive, a tiny little bullet-hell type game where you simply have to survive the spinning and swirling death blobs long enough to collect a set number of…things in order to ascend to the next level. This is very, very hard, and quite brain-mangly if, like me, you have the approximate spatial awareness and coordination of a piece of Gouda, but bitesize enough that it doesn’t get frustrating so much as compellingly ‘I CAN DO THIS’-y.
  • Word Up: Last in this week’s selection of games is this mobile-only variant on Scrabble, where you have to score a set number of points each level – inbetween levels you can spend the points you’ve earned on tweaks and powerups that change the gameplay in interesting and creative ways, maybe instituting a minimum word length for a score to register, say, or banning abstract nouns (I am making these up, but you get the gist). This is a LOT of fun (if you’re a wordcel like me) and one I very much recommend giving a go.

By Coco Capitan

WE CLOSE OUT THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH THIS SURPRISINGLY-EXCELLENT MIXTAPE COMBINING VARIOUS GRIME TRACKS WITH OLD TV THEMES WHICH I KNOW SOUNDS FCUKING TERRIBLE BUT WHICH I PROMISE YOU IS GENUINELY GREAT! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Little Guy Mart: This is, per the description, “a blog of cute little guys sourced from eBay listings”. They are indeed cute little guys!

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Mitch Sea: Mitch Sea is a sculptor, and this feed shares his works, and works in progress – I personally find some of the musculature a bit fussy for my tastes (ffs Matt you fcuking ponce!), but the talent here is undeniable and it’s rare to see this sort of stuff on Insta (in my experience, at least).
  • NTFLX & Drill: You might have seen some of these doing the rounds this week on Twitter under the guise of ‘AI Music’ – it’s not AI, though. Per the artist bio, “One man making beats and animations based on Film/TV characters. The only AI is the voice change.” Regardless, this is another example of how amazing the current tech stack is in terms of what you can pull together in your bedroom – I don’t personally find ‘raps about characters from Harry Potter’ compelling in any way, but there’s no denying the skill here; there is something sort-of magical about the insane creative toolbox that’s now available to anyone with the wherewithal to learn how to open and use it.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Consequence-Free Policy: Stephen Bush writes in the FT about the peculiar way in which policy announcements in the election so far have been largely divorced from reality – the Conservatives can say any old sh1t because they’re unlikely to get in and therefore to have to make their promises reality; ditto the Liberal Democrats, whose (laudable!) stated aim to offer ‘free adult care for everyone’ in the UK is literally uncostable, but, hey, fcukit because they’re never getting anywhere near power…as for Labour, as Bush points out, there’s a fundamental contradiction in the juxtaposition of many of the policy proposals and the cast-iron ‘promise’ not to raise any taxes for anyone which suggests that at least one of the two sets of ‘commitments’ is going to have to give…Perhaps that’s why it’s so hard to get in any way excited about this contest, because it feels that it’s operating on a plane that is only tangentially connected to the day-to-day reality of people’s lives or indeed to the reality of government.
  • Dear God The Debate Was Miserable: Ok, not the technical title of this piece in the LRB, but very much the theme – I watched the second half of it after coming back from the theatre and spent the majority of the time watching from between my fingers. There was a point towards the end where Sunak started effectively *whinging*, and I realised that it’s entirely possible that this electoral cycle will never end, that we’ll be trapped in an endless purgatory of meaningless promises and vacuous non-statements and blunt attack lines and made-up figures DEAR FCUKING CHRIST I WANT IT OVER. Anyway, this is a good–if-miserable piece of analysis by James Butler, a flavour of which you can see here: “Other miserable moments followed: an Atlanticist fug descended in eulogies for the special relationship. Both men nearly broke out in a military tattoo. The debate on migration and small boats was especially noxious, with Starmer repeating his line that Sunak is the ‘most liberal’ prime minister on immigration and asserting his openness to third-country processing. He rounded it off with a bid to be considered the true heir of Churchill. What would the debate have looked like to someone with no knowledge of the political history and affiliations of the people in front of them? There were differences: one man likes to talk about ‘the workforce’ more, the other ‘freedom’, which mostly seems to be a euphemism for not paying taxes. Yet a Martian viewer might have been more struck by how often their answers converged, and the strangeness of a political system that produces such similarity between putative adversaries.” If you want more of this sort of thing, Sam Leith is typically good in his analysis – I particularly enjoyed his observation that Starmer appeared to be implying that he’d personally taken down terrorists WITH HIS BARE HANDS rather than the more prosaic reality of ‘doing the paperwork’.
  • Consciousness, Machines and Moral Status: An ACTUAL ACADEMIC PAPER, and a philosophy one to boot – but no, wait, come back! I promise, this is very much on the ‘accessible’ end of the scale (I mean, look, I haven’t had to think properly about anything for about 22 years and I was able to follow it without too much difficulty, so I am sure you will be fine) and is super-interesting on the question of ‘at what point might we begin to grant ‘conscious’ status to machines, and what even IS consciousness anyway?’ – this is by Henry Shevlin, a professor at Cambridge, and it looks at (some of) the various ways in which philosophers currently believe you can define consciousness, and how these might need to be tweaked in order to meaningfully apply that question to machine intelligences. This is not, to be clear, attempting to argue that we’re there yet (or even that we’re nearly there), more that it’s important to think about these things because they will, one day, become quite materially important (and when they do, they will do so QUICKLY). Here’s the opening – honestly, this really is SO interesting and worth putting the effort into, imho: “The idea that machines might be endowed with consciousness and even come to have moral status has long been a target for speculation in philosophical thought experiments and science fiction. In the wake of extremely rapid progress in machine learning over the last decade, frontier artificial systems display increasingly sophisticated linguistic and even cognitive competencies. Yet despite the flurry of interest and effort, the science of consciousness is still, if not quite in its infancy, then in its troubled adolescence. Even as policymakers and the public are increasingly inclined to look to expert opinion on questions of machine minds, no consensus has been forthcoming.” See? FASCINATING!
  • Text and Meaning and AI: This is a blogpost by Matt Webb which is technically about something specific, but which ends up being SUCH a good explanation of how LLMs ‘do’ words and meaning, and effectively of how latent space works – I firmly believe that getting your head around the concept of latent space is the key to getting your head around ‘what you can do with this generation of AI, and what you probably can’t, and by extension some fun and creative applications of the tech’, and this is I think the best guide to ‘what it’s all about’ that I have yet read, and pleasingly non-technical to boot. Very much worth reading, this.
  • Doing Stuff With AI: Ethan Mollick is BACK, with another excellent post about ‘how to work with AI RIGHT NOW’ – again, this is a simple, comprehensible and intensely-practical overview of ‘things that the machine is good at as of Summer 2024’, from watching and analysing videos to writing code and everything inbetween.
  • Prebunking Misinfo: On how the US and European Union are attempting to get ahead of potential digital misinformation campaigns in forthcoming elections by doing some educative work ahead of time – an interesting approach, particularly considering the weirdly-ostrich-like approach to the issue seemingly taken by the Electoral Commission and others in the UK in the runup to our own day at the ballotbox.
  • Homecooked Software: This is wonderful, and genuinely hopeful and positive in a way I know a lot of what I share here, well, isn’t. A talk given by Maggie Appleton at a recent conference in Berlin, all about how she believes that generative AI is going to usher in a whole new era of small websites and digital projects and CREATIVITY AND WONDER, thanks in no small part to the barrier to creation being lowered to basically ground level – after all, if The Machine can spin you up a basic website based on a few text prompts and maybe a shonky sketch of the homepage UI, what’s to stop you from creating (for example) the online tribute to 80s TV classic ‘Manimal’ that the web has always needed? NOTHING! This made me very happy – a genuinely positive and hopeful bit of thinking, which also chimes rather nicely with the launch of the Tiny Awards this week; after all, if anyone can make a tiny website with minimal effort and little-to-no skill required, why shouldn’t EVERYONE make tiny websites about whatever the like? GALAXIES OF TINY WEBSITES!
  • Research As Leisure Activity: This spoke to me QUITE INTENSELY – Celine Nguyen writes about people who, like her, find pleasure in finding out about stuff, reading and learning and exploring a topic for no other purpose than the joy of so doing – as she puts it, “The idea of research as leisure activity has stayed with me because it seems to describe a kind of intellectual inquiry that comes from idiosyncratic passion and interest. It’s not about the formal credentials. It’s fundamentally about play. It seems to describe a life where it’s just fun to be reading, learning, writing, and collaborating on ideas.” While I’m obviously a miserable loner and have minimal desire to ever collaborate on anything, in the main, the rest of it is basically Curios to a tee – there’s no way in hell I could, or would want to, do this if I didn’t find the specific act of ‘reading the whole of the internet and deciding what I want to include in the next issue’ to be, well, FUN (and I appreciate that the very idea of ‘spending a significant proportion of your day reading random stuff on the internet that may or may not be good or interesting’ being enjoyable will make me sound like a genuinely damaged person to many of you; I get that, I really do, but, equally, LIKE YOU’RE FCUKING PERFECT STOP JUDGING ME YOU CNUTS), and it was nice to read something that basically says ‘you are not alone. You are possibly quite odd, fine, but you are not alone’.
  • We’re Doing Curation Again, It Seems: The New Yorker profiles ‘the new generation of cultural curators’, which is seemingly one of those things that’s going to come around every 5-6 years or so, or every time there’s a big platform/format shift; we had the whole ‘curators are the new creators!’ argument in around 2010, I recall, with bloggers in the titular role; we had it again in the mid-10s with Insta the focus, and now we’re doing it again with TikTok and newsletters – Jesus, I remember writing social media strategies (lol! Dear God, can you *imagine*?) which had ‘CURATOR’ right at the heart of the ‘purpose’ bit of it way back in 2008 or so. Anyway, I’m possibly being salty because for some reason the author doesn’t appear to have heard of Curios, the RUBE – interestingly (for me, not for you) I was actually approached by an NYT journalist last year asking to speak to me about ‘interesting website curation’; they then subsequently failed to reply to my reply, so fcuk the Grey Lady, basically, but should any journalists be reading this and want to chat to someone about how INCREDIBLY VITAL it is that people ‘collect interesting links’ then, well, I AM AVAILABLE.
  • The Google Leak: This is VERY ‘inside baseball for SEO’, but it’s interesting nonetheless – you might have heard that a massive bunch of documents from Google got leaked recently, offering a rare insight into How Search Works; the various SEO heads out there are still attempting work out What It All Means, but there’s an overview of initial findings here. In general, though, I do slightly wonder how relevant any of this stuff is going to be in a year or so, because, despite its well-publicised fcukups, AI search is very much here to stay because THAT’S WHAT THE MARKET WANTS (not the market made up of actual humans, to be clear, but the one run by that invisible hand cnut).
  • The Ghosts of New Atheism: A very good piece looking at how the Dawkins/Hitchens wave of ATHEISM IS GOOD AND GOD-PEOPLE ARE DUMB AS ROCKS thinking has left a long shadow, and examining what shape that shadow takes in 2024. I’ve always thought that hardcore atheism is not only a slightly-obnoxious position to take, but also a fundamentally hypocritical one – after all, isn’t it a classic example of holding an unshakeable belief in something (ie the non-existence of a supreme being) that is fundamentally unprovable…which is faith…JUST LIKE BELIEVING IN GOD? I would posit that it in fact is, so QED and fcuk off – and so was primed to agree with this from the off, but I very much like the clear throughline it draws between the initial rise of the movement and the ‘facts don’t care about your feelings!’ style of online argument favoured by many of the very worst people in the world in the 2020s.
  • 10 Years of Normcore: OH GOD I FEEL SO OLD, SO OLD. 10 years since Normcore swept the world, since a small hipster trend consultancy coined a term that defined an era (a short, inconsequential era fine, but still), a decade since we started having to coin pithy, one-or-two-word terms for EVERYTHING…this is a great piece, interviewing three of the people at K-Hole who came up with the term and looking back on What It All Meant, and if you’re the sort of person who ever has to ‘do’ trends stuff then this will speak to your soul (and make you shudder involuntarily at several points, no doubt).
  • 10 Years of MSCHF: I’ve made it clear on here before that I am suspicious of MSCHF – partly jealousy, obviously, as it’s exactly the sort of thing I would have loved to have been involved with 15 years ago, but also partly because I’ve always felt that it has a whiff of undeclared trust fund about it. Still, this profile of the company on its 10th birthday made me feel slightly better-disposed towards them – possibly because the author annoyed me more than the company he was profiling (sorry, but). This is an interesting look at how the business works, what it thinks it’s for, what might be next and whether the whole thing’s already sort-of over – unsurprisingly, it’s a lot more sensible behind the scenes than it looks from the outside, and I found their approach to idea generation and development really interesting (democratic and THOROUGH, basically, which are qualities perhaps worth attempting to replicate).
  • No Launch: My reaction to this was CLASSIC OLD PERSON – I basically read it with steadily-mounting incredulity, astonished at the idea that ‘Not putting every single aspect of your relationship on fcuking Insta’ is now considered to be a radical new approach to the cut and thrust of dating. WHAT THE ACTUAL FCUK?! I know I am anomalous in many respects when it comes to social media usage, but is this really such an outrageous idea, that you wouldn’t in fact treat your relationship in the same way as a tabloid might treat that of a celebrity? Madness, I tell you. See also this piece, on ‘the rise of tolamory’ – tolamory, for those as confused as I was, is apparently ‘a relationship dynamic in which one or both partners puts up with — or tolerates — the other’s outside sexual or romantic contact. Unlike polyamory and other forms of consensual non-monogamy, it’s not something the couple has explicitly discussed and agreed to’…so, what, that’s ‘accepting being treated like utter sh1t even though it makes you miserable and unhappy and you never signed up for that sort of sh1t in the first place’? DEAR GOD NO WONDER THERE IS A CRISIS OF DATING. You’re all mad.
  • Rigid Body Collisions: A brilliant interactive explainer about How Physics In Coding Works – I LOVE THIS, and I know next to nothing about either physics or coding. “From Mario bouncing off a Goomba to two cars bumping into each other in a racing game, dealing with collisions is such an integral part of most video games that we often take it for granted. In this series of blog posts, I want to show you what actually goes on behind the scenes in a physics simulation. While we’re going to look at this through the lens video games, this post is really about the actual math and physics of collisions. Video games are just a nice way to contextualize these concepts and help make things a little less abstract.” Honestly, this is SUCH a nice, gentle and clear series of explanations, reminiscent of the amazing Polish guy who does all those ‘how flight actually works’ longform web explainers (you know the one, I can’t be fcuked to Google it as it’s 1120 and i am running LATE).
  • Bringing the Internet to the Amazon: What happens when a tribe in the Amazon gets Starlink and access to the web? This does: ““When it arrived, everyone was happy,” said Tsainama Marubo, 73, sitting on the dirt floor of her village’s maloca, a 50-foot-tall hut where the Marubo sleep, cook and eat together. The internet brought clear benefits, like video chats with faraway loved ones and calls for help in emergencies. “But now, things have gotten worse,” she said. She was kneading jenipapo berries to make a black body paint and wearing ropes of jewelry made from snail shells. Lately, the youth had become less interested in making such dyes and jewelry, she said. “Young people have gotten lazy because of the internet,” she said. “They’re learning the ways of the white people.” Then she paused and added, “But please don’t take our internet away.””
  • The Church of Roblox: Another one for the ‘The Metaverse already exists, it’s just not owned by Meta or in VR yet’ file – this piece is about young people in the Philippines congregating in digital Catholic churches in Roblox as part of a slightly-odd ecclesiastical roleplaying game (no, really): “The Roblox Filipino Catholics group, which calls itself a “community of young people looking for sanctity online,” has about 5,000 members on the gaming chat platform Discord. While none are actually ordained, the group mirrors the real-world Catholic Church hierarchy, with bishops, priests, deacons, and monks. It even has an online seminary to train role-playing priests for the virtual churches. “We don’t recognize ourselves as real priests, nor would we be recognized as such,” Inigo Arcilla, 19, who leads the Roblox Filipino Catholics as co-chief administrator, told Rest of World. But while they are merely role-playing, “all that we do must be in accordance to tradition,” he said.” I find this stuff SO INTERESTING.
  • Why Do People Hate Nickelback?: PROPER ANALYSIS, this, of what it is that caused Nickelback to become possibly the web’s first meme band, the go-to name when you wanted to reference a universally-derided artist – to be clear, I firmly believe that ‘This Is How You Remind Me’ is an all-time classic (IT HAS THREE HOOKS! THREE!) and think that anyone who disagrees is being a contrarian. Anyway, this is quite silly and made me laugh, but does make the important point that perhaps the main reason was a single joke about the band by some comedian being used in an ad for Comedy Central that was on TV ALL THE FCUKING TIME for six months – never underestimate the power of high-rotation broadcast media, kids, even in the internet age.
  • Baking: A really *nice* piece in the FT, in which Ella Risbridger spends the day with Nicola Lamb in an attempt to git gud at baking – this is just really lovely writing, and the sort of article that, despite my innate dislike for the term, I can’t help but describe as ‘wholesome’. Although I think Rusbridger perhaps flubs the freestyle bake at the end on purpose, because I refuse to believe that ANYONE could conceive of a cake combining honey, rye flour and olive oil as being nice to eat.
  • The Man Who Couldn’t Stop Leaning: This is a wonderful profile of a person who is on track to become the most-academically-decorate human in North America – “Benjamin B. Bolger has been to Harvard and Stanford and Yale. He has been to Columbia and Dartmouth and Oxford, and Cambridge, Brandeis and Brown. Over all, Bolger has 14 advanced degrees, plus an associate’s and a bachelor’s. Some of Bolger’s degrees took many years to complete, such as a doctorate from the Harvard Graduate School of Design. Others have required rather less commitment: low-residency M.F.A.s from Ashland University and the University of Tampa, for example.” This is LOVELY – there’s something wonderful about someone learning simply for the love of it (ok, fine, it’s possible there may be a SMALL element of compulsion here too, but let’s ignore that), and I really like the authorial observations of the sort of person that Bolger is as a result of all that education, the sense of all of this knowledge now just being within him, waiting to be pulled out and connected to other bits of knowledge (I can’t help but think of LLMs at this point, which is either an interesting angle or the result of my personal AI-poisoning, not quite sure). There’s one rather startling omission, to my mind, throughout – at no point, unless I have missed something, is the question of ‘who is paying for all this and how?’ addressed – but this is a really heartwarming read in general (or it is if you’re not one of those miserable people who sees the value in education and learning solely in the potential impact on one’s employment prospects).
  • Taylor Swift Loves ARGs: OH THIS IS GREAT! A proper, deep exploration of all the clues and games and TREASURE HUNT elements in the Taylor Swift promotional cycle, written by someone who knows their ARGs. “I’m not aware of Taylor Swift using backmasking to hide secret messages in her music. I have yet to find secret tracks between the grooves of her vinyl records. And I have not yet called a phone number because a Taylor Swift puzzle told me to do so. But Taylor Swift’s easter eggs absolutely live up to the promise of that question Jordan Weisman asked over twenty years ago: can we do Paul is Dead, but for real” Yes. Swifties have been playing that game for years, and they keep getting better at it. The Tortured Poet’s Department alone had fans poring through the source codes of websites, going on global scavenger hunts to spell out messages, and hunting down secret messages in online videos. And the decision to turn her life into one massive ongoing puzzle is something so all-consuming that it’s more than a little terrifying to imagine: practically anything is on the table.” Superb, Swiftie or not.
  • The Review Copies: Alexander Velky is a poet (he’s also president of the micronation ‘Landskeria’, but that’s not relevant right now), and this is his account of what it’s like self-publishing a book and punting out review copies in the hope that someone will bother to cover it, and the odd sense of disillusionment when you find that one of said reviewers has seemingly chucked the copy you sent them on eBay without having read the fcuking thing in the first place. This is a great piece of writing – funny, ironic, poignant and honest about the realities of what it’s like to make work that, objectively, the world doesn’t give a fcuk about – and I can strongly recommend his poetry (honestly, it really is good).

By Faith 47

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 31/05/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

When I was 20, in the Summer of 2001, I spent an afternoon at my friend Paul’s house in Swindon along with my other friend Jim. As we got gently drunk in the sunshine, we found ourselves lamenting the fact that ‘there isn’t any big news happening at the moment’ (yes, I know, but in our defence we were young and this was a pre-rolling-news / pre-web-everywhere era).

And so, the monkey’s paw curled.

Since then it’s fair to say that everything appears to be happening simultaneously, all the time, but even by the standards of modernity this week has been QUITE FULL, what with the various election madnesses in the UK, and Ukraine, and Gaza (honestly, Israel’s commitment to finding new and creative definitions for the word ‘precision’ is quite remarkable), and the Pope and, oh yes, That Fcuking Man (lol, though), not to mention all the other stuff which I simply haven’t had time to learn about.

So what I’m saying is that you probably feel like you need a break, like you need to kick back, to relax, to maybe just live in the moment, to BREATHE. Well, sorry, but I can’t help with that – all I have are a fcuktonne of links, as ever, so make the best of it and stop whining.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you might want to consider visiting a heat pump this weekend (it will make sense if you read on, promise).

By Sonmina

WHY NOT START THIS WEEK’S CURIOS WITH SOME LOVELY JAZZ AND LATIN AND OTHER STUFF COMPILED BY TOM SPOONER? THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER! 

THE SECTION WHICH, HOWEVER OLD IT GETS, WILL NEVER CEASE TO BE AMAZED BY THE CREATIVE AND SPECTACULAR WAYS IN WHICH THE LEFT IN THE UK WILL ATTEMPT TO FCUK ITSELF WITH KNIVES, PT.1:  

  • Showrunner: I’ve repeatedly said in here that I am pretty bearish about AI-generated video – it’s not very good now, and I don’t think, based on what I understand about How Generating It Works, that it is going to get meaningfully better very fast – and the less said about ‘AI video based on AI-generated scripts’ the better. So that’s to preface this link with a general hand-wavey ‘hey, anyone who works in TV/film, I don’t think the machine is coming to take your job just yet! No, it’s the terrible mismanagement of your industry, rapacious greed of the people at the top and the insane competition for attention you’re up against that’s going to fcuk you instead!’ sort of vibe – that good? You feel reassured? GREAT! Showrunner (back to the link) is a prototypical (very prototypical – it’s only in Alpha, and there’s apparently a 50,000 strong waitlist to get into even that) platform designed to let people make entire TV shows using AI. Do you remember a year or so ago I linked to an entirely AI-generated episode of South Park? No, of course you don’t, but I DO. That was built on something calling itself ‘Fable Technologies’ – which has since spun up this platform. The details are VERY FUZZY, but from what I can recall there’s a sort of ‘create the characters, give them personalities, and emergent drama happens within the sandbox, which you can direct and edit and (possibly, I’m reaching a bit here) script if you want…anyway, Showrunner currently has a selection of trailers and the occasional 5-minute FULL EPISODE of AI shows for you to check out, and I encourage you to take a few minutes to click into some of them and take a look. There’s the inevitable ‘South Park-style satirical riff on Silicon Valley; (OF COURSE), which has a 5-minute episode and which was probably the least-bad of the things I looked at (the bar, to be clear, is snake-belly low); there’s an Akira ripoff anime, there’s a Cars ripoff…honestly, based on the quality of the output here it’s hard to imagine anyone with an IQ in treble figures being entertained by any of this stuff, particularly when you consider that the bits they’ll have put on the website will be THE VERY BEST they could create, but I am fascinated to see whether there does end up being a market for dreck of this ilk – because, to be clear, if there *is* a market for it, that is slightly chilling.
  • The Big Spreadsheet of Politicians Doing Video: So, have you enjoyed THE FIRST WEEK OF ELECTION FUN? I’ve had to pay significantly more attention to the practical minutiae than I would ideally have liked, and, honestly, it is incredibly dispiriting – I think perhaps my most ‘we are not a serious country’ moment (and there have been many) was the realisation that it’s entirely plausible that the party whose entire electoral comms strategy to date has been ‘wacky, self-aware photo opportunities’ will in fact be the official party of opposition in five weeks’ time (I mean, unlikely but NOT IMPOSSIBLE) and that their response to this potential responsibility is to pretend to fall off a paddleboard in ‘comedy’ style. My second least-favourite thing has been the branding of the whole thing as ‘THE FIRST TIKTOK ELECTION’ (I know, the media needs a THING to latch onto, but really?) and the breathless attempts to analyse the competing communication styles of the two main parties on the platform without any parallel explanation of How The Platform Works, or seeming understanding that ‘doing TikTok’ is literally just ‘throwing sh1t at the wall and seeing what sticks’. Anyway, if you are curious to see how various politicians in the UK are communicating with video, the BBC’s Marianna Spring has compiled this amazing spreadsheet of all the UK and US politicians, with links to their Insta and TikTok profils (where they have them), so you can get a feel for how they’re using it. If you’re a bit of a politics weirdo (like, er, me, to a certain extent) there’s a degree of joy to be gleaned from the sheer wooden ineptitude of so much of the output here – I’ve worked in politics and adjacent to it, and I have to acknowledge that almost every single MP I have ever met is in their own way incredibly charismatic in person, strange as that might be to say (weird, yes, invariably incredibly strange and often broken, but charismatic nonetheless), and yet that charisma does not, in the main, translate to the small screen AT ALL. Almost every single one of these accounts has what I believe people refer to as ‘incredibly cursed energy’.
  • In Rhythm With Nature: If all the politics this week has left you feeling somewhat enervated and wrung-out, then a) pull yourself together ffs, there’s LOTS left; and b) you might appreciate this small Google Arts & Culture Experiment which effectively offers a selection of small meditative moments, a ‘virtual multisensory experience’ which in itself is an interpretation of Carl Linnaeus’ Flower Clock. Depending on what time of day it is when you visit, you’ll get a different experience based on a different type of flora, some breathing exercises, and some lovely flowery visuals designed by Anna Glover. Lovely, this, and genuinely relaxing in a way that I don’t ordinarily find this sort of thing.
  • Maven: It’s been interesting watching Twitter come back to life (a bit, in a sort of dead cat bounce sort of way) as the politics has kicked off again, as people remember that in certain very specific times there are few things more entertaining than a bunch of desperately-cynical, miserable and internet-broken people making jokes about how dreadful everything is (or, er, that’s what my feed’s like, in any case) – still, I still largely believe that the social media as-was era is over and isn’t really coming back. It’s not stopping people from attempting to reinvent that particular wheel, though, and the latest attempt is this, Maven, which has a few interesting features and looks…maybe like it could be worth persisting with. Effectively it’s ‘social media but with no likes, or ‘follow’ mechanic, and which instead is designed around the idea of following ‘interests’, with content then aggregated within these interests by AI. The idea of this, presumably, is to minimise the peacocking and personal self-aggrandisement of a ‘me and my followers and my popularity’ network, and instead to move towards a ‘value of information based on interest and utility’-based network, where content is surfaced based on how worthwhile people find it. “Maven is a new kind of social network–a serendipity network–that doesn’t work like the usual popularity-contest style of network you’re used to experiencing everywhere else.  We don’t have likes (and therefore don’t count them) and you don’t follow other people’s accounts.  Instead, you follow interests, and your feed is a reflection of the interests you follow. Maven AI extracts the relevant interests from every post and shows them to you when you see content in your feed.  That way, because posts touch on multiple interests, you continually experience the opportunity to expand your horizons by following new interests, increasing your chance of serendipity through meeting people with complementary interests. Because the users you encounter on Maven are through shared interests rather than likes or follows, you’ll meet people here you would not encounter anywhere else. Part of the idea behind Maven is that there is an enormous flux of ideas and interests out there on the internet that we never get to see or interact with because everything we experience is always based on popularity.  That changes with Maven.” I’ve been vaguely lurking on the web version for a couple of weeks, and it is a VERY different experience to anything I’ve used before – significantly slower, and…deeper, in a way. Not sure I need another fcuking distraction timesink and therefore whether it will stick for me, but it’s definitely worth a look.
  • Kaizen: Look, full disclosure – on many levels I really, really dislike this. The voices used (an incredibly-irritating kid and a patronising-sounding woman), the generically motivational/positivity/YOU CAN DO IT! vibe of the narrative, such as there is one, and the general sense of ‘live, laugh, love’ of the whole experience meant that at several points over the few minutes of its runtime I found myself making disgusted noises out loud, and at one point even muttering ‘oh for fcuk’s sake’ at my laptop (which by the way was wheezing emphysemically at certain points, so maybe don’t have ALL the tabs open when you run this). But…but…the art style is REALLY nice, and the animation is nice, and if you ignore the sickly ‘message’ and the ‘you can do anything!’ bromides, it’s actually a nicely-made bit of webwork (and, to reiterate, the look of this is really rather gorgeous). It’s a digital calling card by the Make Me Pulse agency, who, should they ever read this, I hope will focus on the nice things I have said about their technical chops rather than the aspersions I am seemingly casting on who they are as people.
  • Analysing Text Messages With My Ex-Boyfriend: This could not be more up my street if it came and set up camp outside my front door (fcuking *hell* that was clunky, sorry) – Teresa Ibarra had a relationship which went on for about nine months, and during which she and her boyfriend exchanged 83,000 odd messages between them. This site is a deep textual analysis of those messages (done with the permission of the ex) and I LOVE IT SO MUCH. Sentiment analysis, topics over time, common themes…all of this is presented as data, graphed and plotted and visible to the world. Ibarra presents all this fairly baldly, with minimal commentary and interpretation, but there’s something beautiful and poignant and sad and lovely about seeing the ebb and flow and eventual demise of a love affair tracked in bar charts, the tailing off of communication as things reach their close, the spikes at the start when you’re still stunned by the fact that you found each other and you like each other and you still have so much to learn…Honestly, I think this is so so so beautiful, in a very analytical and slightly-austere sense, and I would give a kidney (not that mine are worth anything any more) to have this sort of analysis available as a standard feature in any communications platform, to be able to select a WhatsApp chat, say, and with the consent of all parties involved to be able to create something like this (but I say that as someone who somewhere has a CD onto which I burnt all of the emails I exchanged with an old girlfriend with whom I shared a workplace, so maybe I’m just weird).
  • Gmail Will Break Your Heart: Tangentially-related to the last link, this is a project that Caitlin at ‘Links I Will Gchat You’ is running and which I think is SUCH a good idea – she writes, “I’m collecting old, personally meaningful emails to celebrate Gmail’s 20th year. Our long-memoried inboxes contain a complete and damning record of our past interactions. But when’s the last time YOU went spelunking there?? What I’m looking for: Old emails (pre-2022, let’s say, but the older the better) with personal meaning to you. That could include your first email with a friend or partner, your last email from an elderly relative, a message expressing love or anger or heartbreak or any announcement that otherwise changed your life in some way.” All emails will be anonymised – and there are tips on how to easily do that with software before you submit via an anonymous Google form, so this is all totally privacy-safe – and, even if you decide not to participate, I can’t recommend the exercise of going back into your email past enough. It is a different country, and there is something quite remarkable about revisiting the very different and yet entirely the same person you were 20 years ago via the medium of old prose which you never thought you would look at ever again.
  • Walmart Realm: It’s A METAVERSE! Or at least that’s probably what it was sold to management as – in reality it’s…dear God, what the fcuk *is* this mess? It appears to be a selection of ‘immersive interactive environments’ that you can explore (I confess to only having tried one of them, because this is fcuking terrible on every level and I couldn’t stand to waste any more of the limited amount of time remaining to me with ‘experiencing the magical undersea world of Walmart’) – I say ‘explore’, but it’s limited to clicking on a few navigation arrows, and then some buttons which apparently let you…buy a very limited selection of stuff from Walmart, and play some terrible browser games for…the chance to be entered into a sweepstake to win a voucher? This is astonishingly bad – not just conceptually, but technically (seriously, try ‘looking around’ the environment and see what happens to the camera), and if you’re feeling a bit low, professionally-speaking, it’s perhaps worth taking a look and reminding yourself that you were at least not involved in pitching, building or justifying this utter waste of energy (unless, er, you were, in which case I am very sorry for your lots).
  • RetractionWatch: Niche, and honestly a bit serious for Curios, but I was momentarily fascinated by this site which exists to track and document retractions in the academic space – so basically a list of posts detailing instances where academics or institutions have been forced to retract research papers as a result of…irregularities. I was amazed by how often this seems to happen, although on reflection there are a LOT of academics and institutions worldwide, and, well, people will be people. Interestingly, there’s a whole section on ‘GPT-generated papers’ which gives you some insight into how LLMs are affecting academia.
  • ViewStats: Say what you like about Jimmy ‘MrBeast’ Donaldson – no, really, say what you like, he will never know and even if he did it is unlikely he would give one iota of a fcuk, considering the only thing the man seems to care about is YouTube channel stats – but this is, I think, A Good Thing and quite a generous one. ViewStats is a new tool, in beta at the moment, which gives you really pretty good (from a cursory look, at least) insights into YouTube channel performance, for free – there is of course a paid tier with PRO TOOLS which promise to help creators make more appealing, stickier (and more monetisable!) videos by using MrBeast’s ‘secret sauce’ (a deeply unpleasant sentence I wish I had not written), but the free analytics are genuinely pretty good, and if you need a way of getting details about channel performance over time and a whole bunch of other stuff, this looks like it could be genuinely helpful. It doesn’t have every YT channel on there (yet), but if you are looking for one and it’s not currently visible you can submit it to be added to the database, which feels helpful and generally like A Good Thing.
  • The CalmTech Institute: An interesting new initiative – the CalmTech Institute is basically a new collective that, as far as I can tell, wants to set itself up as a kitemark for ‘mindful (sorry, sorry, sorry) technology’ – or, at the very least, technology that isn’t explicitly designed to siphon all of your attention (and, by extension, data, or money, or what remains of the withered husk of your soul). The idea is that they will work with tech developers to ‘accredit’ their devices or software, thereby granting an imprimatur of ‘quality’, or at least ‘calm’ to the whole thing. You can read about the principles here – they’re sensible, to my mind at least – and this feels like something which if you’re doing a Certain Type of Initiative, it might be worth investigation or partnering with.
  • AI Literature Review: This…this looks like a rare example of a good, useful implementation of AI for academic purposes (although it’s entirely possible I am wrong here, so, well, as ever don’t take a word I say seriously). AI Literature Review, as the name would suggest, uses AI to help academics create the summaries of the current state of thinking in their field which are a necessary part of the submission process for papers, based on real, verified-by-humans information: “With Seamless, researchers can input a paper description and Seamless will generate a literature review grounded on real papers. Seamless searches the Semantic Scholar database of scientific papers (that covers the scientific works published in most of the topics), and blends together the relevant papers with the user description to create the literature review. The last step is done using large language models like GPT-4.” So basically an LLM query layer on top of a database – which, fine, isn’t exactly groundbreaking, but does feel like a smart and helpful application of the tech. It’s not free, but if you’re in academia it might be worth a look, particularly considering how onerous I imagine this sort of thing is to compile manually.
  • Hello Wonder: Another interesting application of AI as a ‘layer’, although I am…sceptical as to how this will actually work, if at all. The premise is, basically, ‘the internet, but filtered through an LLM which ensures that it’s safe for kids at all times’ – so basically your kid can browse, but the content is moderated. “Wonder is an AI companion that makes the whole internet safe and nurturing for kids. It effectively filters out harmful content, making it a better way for children to independently experience the internet. Children can engage in conversations about their interests using simple language. Parents and guardians have the ability to customize content parameters to align with their goals and values. Additionally, parents and guardians can monitor their children’s online activities in real time, receive notifications, and communicate with their children directly through Wonder.” So, as far as I can tell, it basically adds an ‘Explain It Like I’m 5” filter to everything, as well as a safety filter, to render the contents of the web digestible for smaller people. I am…not sure I like this idea, but then again I am not a parent and am probably more relaxed than is healthy about ‘just let them read stuff, it’ll be FINE’ (reading Kate Millett’s ‘Sexual Politics’ at 11 never did me any ha…oh) – still, I am not sure I’m comfortable with the way that this presumably sands all the edges off everything and regurgitates it in the bland LinkedIn-ese of LLM prose. Still, if you have a kid and an iPad this is free to use (it’s in beta, so there may be charges in the future) and could be interesting.
  • Visit A Heat Pump: What are YOU doing this weekend? Anything fun? BBQ, maybe? The Champions League Final? A 72h meth and darkroom bender? Why do any of those things when instead you could, er, VISIT A HEAT PUMP! Via Ben Templeton, this is actually an initiative by NESTA in the UK, designed to get people who already have a heat pump installed to evangelise to the heat pump-curious (what a phrase!) about how great they are and how easy to install – all of this in service of the policy drive to get more people to replace their old fossil fuel-powered boilers with the cleaner, greener tech. To be honest this is a good idea and I am sure there’s a lot of smart ‘insight’ behind it (maybe), but I couldn’t help but p1ss myself at the hopeful-sounding website title which implies that ‘Visiting a heatpump’ is an activity to be bracketed alongside, say, ‘visiting Stonehenge’.
  • Facebook AI Slop: This is a genuinely great Twitter account sharing some of the best/worst examples of the AI rubbish sweeping through Facebook like a plague. The pinned image is one of the best things I have ever seen, if by ‘best’ you accept I mean ‘worst’, and this feed is FULL of some truly batsh1t stuff (and some occasionally slightly horrible images, just so you know).

By Randy Ortiz (this and all subsequent pics lifted from TIH)

UP NEXT, A GENUINELY BEAUTIFUL ALBUM WHICH I HAVE BEEN LISTENING TO A LOT LATELY AND WHICH I THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE TOO AND WHICH IS BY A BAND CALLED SPIRO AND WHICH IS CALLED ‘KALEIDOSCOPICA’!

THE SECTION WHICH, HOWEVER OLD IT GETS, WILL NEVER CEASE TO BE AMAZED BY THE CREATIVE AND SPECTACULAR WAYS IN WHICH THE LEFT IN THE UK WILL ATTEMPT TO FCUK ITSELF WITH KNIVES, PT.2:    

  • Sympawnies: Via Andy, this is a YouTube channel with a single, singular premise – Noam Oxman is a musician who…oh, look, let him explain it: “In the search of new ways to express my art, my passions, and my music I created ‘Sympawnies’ – a new type of art form that combines three of my biggest loves – animals, music, and drawing. ‘Sympawnies’ is a collection of my original musical scores, which I draw in the shapes of different animals. All animals are welcome – pets/farm/wild.” Which I appreciate may not make much sense, so click in and look at the videos and realise that the score is written in such a way TO MAKE THE MUSICAL NOTATION LOOK LIKE A PICTURE OF THE ANIMAL IN QUESTION! THIS IS REMARKABLE! Ok, so there are some flourishes in the way he draws his semiquavers and the like to make the pictures work, but there’s also some insane compositional skill in making music that sounds good while also being recognisably written so as to appear in the shape of, say, a great dane. This is honestly mental, and made me wonder how the fcuk this idea first came to him (mushrooms, surely?).
  • Poetic Computer: This is technical and a bit obscure, but I very much like the idea of ‘code as poetry’ and the ability of html and css to connote meaning and convey emotion beyond the content they frame (if that makes any sense at all). Basically this is the home to Prasa, described by its creator as ‘an esoteric programming language that investigates the intersection of technology and cultural identity’, inspired by the Telugu language of certain parts of India. Look, you’ll have to be a particular type of programmer/language enthusiast to get the most out of this, I think, but I hope that for maybe one of you this will be slightly inspirational or at least academically-interesting.
  • Load-Bearing Posts: If you’ve been anywhere near Twitter in the past week or so you’ll likely have seen this floating around, but if not then I strongly encourage you to click the link, click the ‘Quote Tweets’ button and enjoy a recap of some of the greatest shortform bangers that the human race has ever produced (oh, ok, fine, that’s unfair, but we’re not privy to the pithy sh1tposting of the Mesopotamians and so this is what we’re left with). The original post read as follows: “What are the load-bearing posts of our time? Obviously ‘facing god and walking backwards into hell’ and ‘miette’ are up there. Does Ed Balls still count? PS if you can parse this you should probably log off”, and although, as is inevitable when something gets this big, people have gone off-topic and are substituting ‘load-bearing’ for ‘funny’, it’s still a wonderful reminder of the fact that Twitter really has given us some absolutely top-notch comedy over the years (alongside the brainrot and the general disgust with our species that it’s also engendered).
  • Meow Library: Books for cats – specifically, famous novels which have been ‘translated’ for felines, so that every word is replaced with ‘meow’. “Founded by feline linguist Sam Austen, The Meow Library aims to translate every major work of the Western canon into language that can be understood and appreciated by the common housecat. Proceeds from Sam’s literary debut, Meow: A Novel, are funding this effort. Our organization hopes to have several works by Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, and Proust feline-ready by this holiday season.” So this is obviously a very silly joke and the fact that the books are being sold as ‘comedy gifts’ slightly put me off including it, but then I discovered the podcast and FCUKING HELL is this a commitment to the bit that I can’t help but applaud. Seriously, click the link and listen – I genuinely did corpse at this, and it made me feel significantly warmer to the whole project. MEOW.
  • Watch Censor: On the one hand, this SAYS it’s a site dedicated to helping you work out at what point in popular films there are scenes of a sexual nature so that you can ensure that you skip them entirely, so as to not offend your chaste eyeballs with the FILTHY PERVERSION OF HUMAN CONGRESS (so far, so ‘stereotypes about GenZ/Alpha’) – except, if you dig a bit, all of the titles they seem to have information on are, er, famously QUITE SEXY, and the information also serves the dual function of itemising every single even vaguely-titillating moment in each episode so that, should you be so minded, you could ALSO use this as a way to just scrub through and get to the good bits. This has obviously been hacked together by an enterprising teenager, and, frankly, more power to them for not just going straight to a Tube site.  This reminded me an awful lot of something that genuinely did exist in the 1980s and 1990s in the UK – terrible joke non-newspaper ‘The Daily Sport’, famous for incredible headlines like ‘Lord Lucan Found Living In Bus On Moon’ (no, really – you can see some bangers from its Sunday edition collected here), used to have daily TV listings which would provide a detailed breakdown of every single instance in which female nudity, however minor, was visible on UK television, so avid masturbators could ensure they were tuning in at the exact moment in which, I don’t know, you got a brief flash of Helen Mirren’s nipple in a vaguely-erotic 1970s arthouse flick. Good to see that certain habits persist (Jesus, men eh?).
  • Can’t Sleep Reads: This is a nice idea – Can’t Sleep Reads is, as the name suggests, a place to find things to read when you can’t sleep; all of the content is public domain, so it tends to short stories from classic (mainly US, I think) authors like Mark Twain, and you get a different one each time you refresh (you can also load a new random one at the bottom of each page should a single tale not be enough to send you towards catatonia). Definitely worth bookmarking or saving a link to on your phone should you be the sort of person with a tendency to lie there staring at the ceiling at 3am, wondering if your insides are doing what they’re supposed to be doing.
  • Drum Samples: Would you like some free drum samples? You would? GREAT! This is a page on the website of artist (and drummer) Bill Mead, who posts images of his paintings, free to download, as well as offering a whole host of these samples for anyone to take and do with as they please. “Most of the drum samples you’ll find on this site were originally created and distributed through a project called Organic Drum Loops (organicdrumloops.com). This site was prolific from late 2016 through early 2023 and produced a large catalog of unique drum samples. This body of work represented the sound of calfskin headed drums, and the aesthetic of a professional drummer who was finding his way out of musical conformity. Within these downloads are thousands of high resolution multi-track loops, one-shot samples, and improvisations. Earthy in sound, greasy in groove. Interestingly messy much of time, clean and appropriate almost none of the time – yet somehow always feel-driven and vastly musical.” I think I’ve been saying this a lot recently, but I really do adore this sort of thing, the generosity just to make stuff available just in case anyone might want to play with it, or make with it. THANKS, BILL MEAD!
  • Losange Magazine: Do YOU like old Renault cars? Oh my word you will love this, then. “Losange Magazine started in the Netherlands in 2007 as an initiative of Renault enthusiast Tony Vos. The magazine is published four times a year. The digital version started in 2018. Losange Magazine has the support of Renault Classic, the history department of the Renault factory.” SO MUCH RENAULT! Not just cars either, tractors too! Look, this is very much Not My Thing, but I have the utmost respect for anyone who loves something as much as the person behind this clearly loves Renault – seriously, some of the prose is almost reverential – I mean, just listen to this: “Love is not always logical or explainable. But Renault Design has made the new all-electric 5 a sweetheart.” Find someone who talks about you the same way that Tony Vos talks about the all-electric Renault 5.
  • Strong Spiel: Oh oh oh this is so pleasing (and, I get the impression, surprisingly deep if you are musical and take the time to play around with it and understand it a bit). This is basically a stringed instrument simulator – click the link and you’ll be presented with a selection of four sets of digital ‘strings’ which you can strum with your mouse (or, presumably, your finger if you’re on a touchscreen device); you can also edit them and add your own additional strings to effectively create your own strummable instruments – you sort of have to play with it to get the idea, but it’s quite astonishingly soothing, both to play with and to listen to. If you click the little ‘notes’ icon in the bottom-right hand corner you can select from a range of classical pieces (and a few game OSTs as well) to see them being played on the site, which will give you an idea of what’s possible if you can get your head around the interface and the concept – this really is quite beautiful, and, based on the ‘about’ section, I think pretty technically-impressive. There’s an iPad version available for a couple of quid, which I think is a bargain for anyone who’s interested in spending some time getting to grips with it – but even the web version is just gorgeous. Superb work by Canadian dev Murat Ayfer.
  • Funny Works: This week’s ‘preposterously overengineered bit of webwork’ comes from Korean digital studio Funny Works, who’ve recently revamped their website and created this quite amazing portal into their portfolio and projects, all designed as a cartoon teenager’s bedroom that you can click around and explore. There are so many lovely touches here – perhaps my favourite is the oldschool videogame system which acts as a portal to let you explore the various ‘metaverse’ (sorry) type products they’ve built for various clients by plugging in different carts (such a nice bit of design, that), but the whole thing is charming and even the sound on the Page isn’t annoying in the slightest. Ordinarily I get annoyed with sites like this for being obtuse and hard to navigate, but this is really, really charming.
  • Synthetic Theatre: More AI art/storytelling experimentation here, this time (I think – the project’s not exactly well-described, if I can be critical for a second) an experiment in (again, I think) seeing what happens when you let an LLM concoct a story and an image-generator spin up accompanying pictures, with a bit of human guidance. This is very much ‘what you might expect’ in terms of the aesthetic, but I did like the ethos behind it, described here: “This project is an exercise in feeling exposed. Not every story is going to be interesting, not every story or artwork will be interesting, and not every design exploration will look great, but as long as I can manage to fuel my drive to create something new, the outcome becomes secondary.” I can get behind this sort of play – why not use The Machine to fiddle and mess around? Although, to be clear, about 80% of the stuff here is tripe.
  • Cockfloat: This is, I concede, incredibly stupid and very, very childish, but at the same time I was totally unprepared for what I would get when I clicked and I found myself laughing out loud for longer than I am comfortable admitting. ART.
  • Sort The Court: Ooh, this is fun! Have you ever played the mobile game ‘Reigns’? OH GOD SORRY I HAVE JUST DISCOVERED THAT THERE’S A FREE WEB VERSION OH GOD Ahem, sorry – I was saying, Reigns is a game which puts you in the shoes of a monarch making decisions about their kingdom; the decisions are all binary yes/no-type choices, and through them you will either guide your kingdom to fortune and glory, or yourself to an early death. Sort The Court is basically like that, but with a few more graphical flourishes, and it’s FUN! Silly, fun, and a bit whimsical, and a really good way of passing 20 minutes while you wait for something. But. let me reiterate, the second link here takes you to a browser-based version of Reigns, which I really can recommend unreservedly and which may well become something of a timesink compulsion if you’re not careful. TWO  GAMES FOR THE PRICE OF ONE LINK! God I am good to you.
  • Utopia Must Fall: A browser-based demo for a fuller game, coming sometime soon, but which is more than engaging enough to occupy you for 5-10 minutes at a time – it’s basically a Missile Defence-type setup, with you tasked with defending London from asteroids and aliens and assorted other threats by shooting the everliving fcuk out of them with some space lasers. The gameplay is simple-but-fun, but the real star here is the visual style which is a pitch-perfect recreation of the 80s arcade aesthetic responsible for, say, the original Star Wars cabinet game (iykyn) – very reminiscent of Matt Round’s interpretation of Flappy Bird which I linked to a few weeks ago.
  • Frogger, the RPG: Our final game of the week is this FAR better than it needs to be RPG – this is a ‘real game’, or at least about an hour’s worth of one if you’re a completist, made in RPG Maker and asking ‘what if Frogger was a roleplaying game in the style of early Final Fantasy titles?’ – the answer, by the way, is ‘it would be really fun, and if any of these references mean anything to you then you should play it!’. There’s a save functionality so you don’t have to do the whole thing in one sitting, and this is generally a lot smarter and more engaging than you might think when you first log on.

By Matt Hansel

OUR LAST MIX THIS WEEK IS THIS SELECTION OF LOUNGEY, JAZZY, SOUL-Y, ELECTRO-Y, 80s-ISH (SORRY, BUT THAT’S THE BEST I CAN DO) OBSCURITIES MIXED ELEGANTLY BY MYSTERY SEASON!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • The Photo Registry: Via Things Magazine, which I was really pleased to see return this week, The Photo Registry self-describes as “A compendium of photographs for you to digest now and again” – these are not only all really cool images, but the curation here is astonishingly good – just scroll slowly down the page and revel in the absolutely superb ‘mixing’ (yes, I know, but I can’t think of a better term here) of form and subject that whoever is putting these together is doing. Excellent curation done with real style.
  • Forbidden Toys: Whoever is behind this account has absolutely found, and locked into, the part of latent space which is the intersection between ‘old MB toys and boardgames’ and ‘Scarfolk’ – these are fcuking BRILLIANT, and quite a few are just uncanny enough that you’ll have a second or two of false memory before realising that no, actually you did not have a Hypno Pancracio playset (can I just say, by the way, that the LEGO ‘Lady of Fatima’ is legitimately brilliant, and I would like anyone reading this with any influence at the company (lol!) to petition hard for a ‘Catholic Icons’ series? Thanks!

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Snapper Matt: Also via Things, this is drone photography of London – you know what you’re getting, but the images are no less impressive for all their slight predictability.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Building The World For Everyone: Our first longread of the week is written, broadly speaking, about the need for New Zealand to think more and harder about the systems and structures it puts in place to ensure that they work for indigenous peoples as much as they do others – but it’s a really strong argument for inclusive design in a broader sense, and while there’s nothing in here that I would class as ‘revelatory’, it’s equally a really cogent and clear explanation of how systems, and therefore systemic inequality, work, specifically in relation to tech, and the three questions it frames in conclusion are I think hugely useful to carry with you whenever you’re thinking about changing a system or creating a new one (whether technological or otherwise).
  • Strong Links vs Weak Links: A really interesting exploration of two opposite ways of looking at a problem and developing potential solutions – from the opening, “A weak-link problem is where success depends upon the quality of the worst component, whereas a strong-link problem is where it depends upon the quality of the best” – and how a focus on one or the other can and will lead to radically different outcomes and approaches. I thought this was fascinating, both conceptually and also from a practical perspective, as a way of framing thinking and approaches – for the strategists and planners, this is the sort of thing that you can probably turn into an absolute fcuktonne of diagrams (thereby inevitably removing all depth and meaning from the thinking, but, well, I know what you’re like!).
  • Nudging Doesn’t Work: Or, more accurately, perhaps it’s not the magic bullet which so many people have spent the past decade or so saying it is. You’ll be familiar with ‘nudge theory’ – the idea that behavioural change in people is easier to effect via the medium of changing the environment or system within which they operate or exist so as to facilitate or incentivise the behaviour you wish to encourage – largely in part thanks to the adoring coverage given over to the ‘nudge unit’ (technically the Behavioural Insights Team) and their work with the UK Government in recent years. This WSJ piece looks at new research which suggests that the long-term impacts of this sort of work aren’t in fact as impressive as they seem in the short-term, arguing that people are less likely to stick to behavioural change when they don’t feel that they have been agents in deciding to make said change – basically if you eat fewer doughnuts because your route to work changes rather than because you have decided to eat fewer doughnuts, you’re likely to relapse and start going to Krispy Kreme to buy in bulk at the weekends after a while (is basically the argument here).
  • Culture Is An Ecosystem: I have a very personal, very peculiar horror of ‘diagrammatic representations of systems’ thanks to a boss of mine, circa 2005, casually suggesting that it would be good if I could ‘just sort of create a visual map of the UK’s cultural landscape which we could then turn into an interactive website which would effectively be the ur-guide to who was what in every single aspect of the arts at the time, and which we could use as a sort of catch-all research, media and contacts database’ (I am not joking AT ALL – that was literally the aspiration, he was nothing if not ambitious, and I very nearly had some sort of breakdown); anyway, if you are less scarred than I am you might find this interesting and useful (in fact, again, the planner/strategist types among you will fcuking lick this up). “The “culture” of a society isn’t a blob of random human activity, but an orderly ecosystem arising from the interactions between particular subunits. To maintain ecosystem health, we must reject the cynical “poptimist” framing of culture as a mere vehicle for entertainment and commerce and instead promote the benefits of constant cultural refresh” – this is part one of three, but it’s interesting and, I think, a potentially useful set of frames/lenses for thinking about How Culture Works.
  • The Accidental Tyranny of User Interfaces: Or, ‘how making things easy also often makes them worse’. I felt this SO DEEPLY – part of this is age, fine, and FEAR OF CHANGE, but it’s also motivated by being reasonably comfortable navigating information and digital systems, and enjoying the feeling of agency that comes with that comfort; as this piece argues, the drive towards simplification can have the unintended consequences of hamstringing the more accomplished or curious or creative person who’s interacting with a product, service or system (hm, lots of ‘systems’ this week). This is actually a couple of years old, but it feels very resonant and relevant four years on: “My thesis here is that an obsession with easy, “intuitive” and perhaps even efficient user interfaces is creating a layer of soft tyranny. This layer is not unlike what I might create were I a dictator, seeking to soften up the public prior to an immense abuse of liberty in the future, by getting them so used to comical restrictions on their use of things that such bullying becomes normalised.” PREACH.
  • Longform vs Shortform Culture: Or ‘why, if everyone’s attention span is shot to fcuk, is media so bloated these days?’ This is a Vox piece, so it’s a bit surface-y, but the general question – why are so many films so long? Why are so many albums so self-indulgent? – is an interesting one, even though it’s easy to think of examples that contradict this supposed ‘trend’ (and also it doesn’t look at the most interesting longform medium of all, the YouTube deep dive – currently being discussed because of that insane four-hour video about the Star Wars hotel which I haven’t watched but I am reliably informed is Very Interesting). A lot of this is obvious, but there were a couple of questions that I found worth thinking about a bit more – I don’t think there’s any basis whatsoever for this assertion other than ‘authorial vibe’, but this one struck me in particular: “We worry about whether art is the right length because we’re worried that we don’t know how to pay attention anymore,”  or the idea that there’s a sort of performative quality to this longform trend, in a ‘look, see, we CAN focus!’ way.
  • Why Is Learning Chinese So Boring?: This is LONG – and is in fact a collection of three separate essays, all exploring the same broad topic of ‘why don’t people want to learn Mandarin?’ (specifically, I think, from the perspective of New Zealand, but applicable more broadly). This is really interesting – it covers all sorts of things that seem semi-obvious when you are told them, but which I had personally never considered before, such as the extent to which the mandated themes and texts and examples and vocabulary deployed to students are of course mandated by the Chinese state, which has a very clear and well-defined idea of the image of China they want to communicate and who see language teaching as an extension of that – hence the focus on classical poetry and a strangely-antiquated set of phrases and vocabulary which don’t reflect the reality of living in modern, highly-developed Shanghai or Shenzen. I also didn’t realise that foreigners learning through official schools aren’t encouraged to learn ‘traditional’ Mandarin, and are instead directed to the Simplified version of the language and characters, which in itself cuts them off from significant swathes of modern cultural output. Thanks to Alex for sending this my way.
  • The Era of Celebrity Erotica: I had literally no idea that this was a thing, but I guess it’s inevitable given the rise in popularity of both audiobooks and rampantly erotic werewolf bongo novels (other types of bongo novel are, I am assured, available). “A relatively new phenomenon pioneered by audio erotica apps like Dipsea and Quinn, actors have taken on the role of smut narrator, much to their fans’ delight. The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina’s Luke Cook plays an actor engaging in group sex with his wife and girlfriend on Dipsea and You star Victoria Pedretti plays a sapphic detective on Quinn, for example. Most recently, the Hot Priest himself recorded a three-episode story for Quinn portraying a queen’s guard with unresolved feelings for a fiery rebel.” This is an article on Mashable so it’s not exactly sparkling prose (sorry, but it isn’t) – that said, it touches on a lot of interesting areas including the rise in female-centric erotica, the resurgence of INSANE FANDOM and the inevitable boom in spoofed celebrity voices being spun up by AI to enact whatever grubby little scenario you like in audio form. Is…is everyone on the tube secretly listening to Andrew Scott narrating fellatio?
  • One DnD, Two Covers: A really interesting post by Jay Springett – apparently Dungeons and Dragons have published new editions of the game’s ruleset, but have done so in two different covers; one aimed at the sort of player who wants to GO ON ADVENTURES AND KILL DRAGONS AND GET LOOT, and the other aimed at the sort of player who sees the game as a sandbox in which to do character-led roleplay that maybe doesn’t have to involve combat or ‘The Magical Mithril Sword of Thorgandia +3’ or any of that rubbish. I enjoyed the exploration of the promises design makes to the buyer, and the wider question of whether it’s really meaningfully possible to play the second sort of game within a ruleset that was originally developed to be very much the first type – and, to be clear, I don’t and have never played D&D in my life (no shade, I just grew up in an era where demonstrating any interest in this sort of thing would have resulted in my having no friends and an interesting and growing collection of contusions all over my body, and possibly cigarette burns too. Ah, the 1980s! See, kids? Life was shit before mobille telephony and the internet too!).
  • Weetabix: You may not think that a history of Weetabix and a look at its manufacturing process would be a fascinating read, but you would be WRONG – this, by Alex Brenchley in Vittles, is great, although in common with many (if not most) stories about ‘how things work’ there will come a point where you stop reading and sigh/roll your eyes and mutter something about ‘oh ffs massive global capitalism AGAIN, is it?’. Anyway, if nothing else this will give you a new company to investigate and then despise with every fibre of your being – Hi, Cargill! – although if I have a criticism of this article is that it doesn’t devote enough (or indeed any) time to discussing the weird Weetabix brand flirtation with the skinhead movement in the mid-80s.
  • The History of Prosthetic Eyes: I’ve always been fascinated by ocular prostheses (look, not in a weird way, promise), ever since my little brother toyed with the idea of getting one but was fundamentally too freaked out by the process involved – turns out ‘taking a cast of your eyesocket’ is a genuinely invasive and unpleasant experience, who knew?! – and this is a fascinating (if *slightly* uncomfortable, certainly if you’re a bit squeamish about eyes like I am) insight into how they were made traditionally and how the technology has evolved.
  • Penis Filler: Not the first article I’ve featured about ‘men messing with their penises for cosmetic reasons’, but this one is very much a puff-piece rather than an expose’ – no tales of bruised, damaged or deformed members here, oh no siree, just a couple of thousand words of what is basically advertorial for a particular doctor in the US, enthusiastically endorsed by his patient ‘Tommy’, whose getting his treatments comped in exchange for basically being the doc’s hypeman. I’m including this in part because, well, I want every single man reading Curios to feel exactly as queasy as I did when reading about the practicalities of the procedure, and in part because I was so astonished about the various things that (mostly gay) men have done to themselves. Scrotal botox?! (is a phrase I didn’t expect to ever write, and yet).
  • Ballard: An LRB piece about the work and life of JG Ballard, reviewing a new book focusing on the author’s non-fiction output and giving a far more nuanced overview of the man and his thinking, beliefs and place in the canon of 20thC British thinkers than you often get from pieces focusing on his fiction. If there’s one writer who I wish were still alive now to comment on The Now, it’s Ballard (and, oddly, it’s he who I think of first when grasping for ‘an author whose predictions about the world came closest to being true’).
  • Kid Rock: Kid Rock isn’t really a thing in the UK, and never was, but I found this profile of him in Rolling Stone far more curious than I expected – there’s a lot about his career which frankly you might want to skim, but the meat of it comes from his conversations with David Peisner about his politics and beliefs and how he has ended up occupying the niche he has, given his early history in Detroit rap. By the end of the piece there’s something properly tragic about the character depicted, and the closing scenes are among the most poignant I’ve read in a celebrity profile in a long, long time. Rock’s obviously a pr1ck, but it’s also hard not to feel a tiny, tiny bit sorry for him, like so many of this sort of populist waverider trapped in a prison of affect that’s largely of their own making (on which note, long-term UK Twitter/tech heads might want to check out Milo’s feed now he’s been de-banned, which very much has a similar, tragic, ‘playing the hits to the peanut gallery’ vibe).
  • Trump and the Apprentice: On the one hand, HAHAAHAHA! On the other, I am not laughing any more than that until after the US election, because, well, I remember last time. Still, this piece dropped overnight – a look back at the first series of The Apprentice by one of the producers, one Bill Pruitt, who for whatever reason now feels able to dish out the unvarnished truth about what it was like working with That Fcuking Man – this won’t surprise you, but, equally, fcuk me some of the details in here.
  • The Social History of the Cardboard Box: Also via Links, this is a VERY LONG piece about something which sounds incredibly dull but, in fact, is properly interesting. Cardboard boxes are everywhere, but like so many ubiquitous-yet-mundane features of modernity we don’t tend to think about where they come from or who makes them or how or why – this will OPEN YOUR EYES. This covers supply chain, manufacture, the environment…even the *semiotics* of the cardboard box (and yes, I am well aware how w4nky that sounds) – the only omission here, that really surprised me, was the complete lack of acknowledgement of the box’s role as a place of shelter and rest for homeless people in urban environments the world over, a surprising omission for such a winding and comprehensive piece.
  • OnlyFans and Football: As a Chelsea fan I spend a bit of time on Chelsea Twitter, which is how I became tangentially aware of the existence of OnlyFans ‘model’ Astrid Wett (I am unsure as to whether this is Ms Wett’s given name, but I have my doubts) – I didn’t, though, know that there was a whole cottage industry of other young women doing various shades of bongo while at the same time milking their club allegiance to make ‘w4nking to a woman barely out of her teens’ an essential part of ‘SUPPORTING THE BOYS’. This piece made me feel very old, if I’m honest, and quite sad – look, if these women can deal with it then more power to them, but the degree of abuse they seem to receive, and the fairly rank misogyny involved, and the stuff lurking just below the surface about the tacit relationships between clubs and players just all feels…quite grubby.
  • Strength Training: I have been to the gym twice in my life, and that was enough; despite this personal lack of interest in staving off death via the medium of exercise, I really enjoyed this piece, by Phil Christman, about his experience of lifting, the difference between ‘working out’ and ‘training’ and the culture and psychology of physical self-optimisation. This is really well-written, whether or not you know what and where the fcuk a deltoid is.
  • How To Write A Eulogy: A really good piece by Chandler Dean in McSweeneys, on writing words for a funeral. I hope you don’t need this, but just in case you do.
  • What It’s Like Being At A Gangbang: On reflection  not necessarily the cadence of articles I’d necessarily have chosen, but, well, that’s just the way the tabs fell this morning. This is JOYOUS – honestly, it really is, and I say that as someone who genuinely has no desire ever to see, attend, participate in or, especially, smell the sort of event here being described. This is a Q&A interview between some bloke who wasn’t there and some woman who very much was – the interviewee was working as a ‘fluffer’ at said gangbang, and, honestly, just sounds like SUCH a happy and sex-positive and friendly person, and makes the whole event sound quite astonishingly friendly and wholesome, if you can use that word about a piece that involves some detailed descriptions of ‘Eiffel Towering’ (no, I didn’t either, but you will learn).
  • 50 Things I Know: Ordinarily I have VERY little time for these sorts of lists – I don’t care what wisdom you’ve accrued, you fcuker, and why does it so often end up being the same set of platitudinous Hallmark bromides, eh? – but I will make an exception for this one, which I very much enjoyed; partly stylistically, but partly because of the variance in the sorts of ‘lessons’ being imparted. I thought a good 15% of this was errant b0llocks, but that doesn’t matter because it was enjoyable, interesting and thought-provoking to read.
  • Slap Fighting: This is a SUPERB bit of feature writing in Esquire – Ander Monson goes to explore the growing world of slap fighting, a sport where men stand opposite each other and compete to see who can deck the other first via the medium of delivering straight-arm, open-hand slaps to the face. Funny, interesting, and with just enough authorial personality injected to make it relatable for those of us who aren’t the sort of person who thinks ‘getting smacked in the face by someone who weighs 14 stone’ sounds like a good time. The final paragraph took me back to Ballard again, oddly enough, specifically Cocaine Nights and Super Cannes, which isn’t something I had really expected when I was watching videos of slap fighting at the top of the piece (honestly, the knockouts are TERRIFYING).
  • The Smoke of the Land Went Up: Finally this week, a beautiful short story by Andrew Cominelli about sex, money, the environment, transience, place, belonging and all that jazz – I really, really enjoyed this and I think you will too.

By Chet Zar

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 24/05/24

Reading Time: 41 minutes

Are you excited? Are you tumescent with rising anticipation! THAT’S RIGHT EVERYONE, WE GET TO DO ANOTHER DEMOCRACY!!!

Thing is, my obvious happiness at getting rid of this shower of dreadful cnuts who have fcuked the country in half over the course of the past 14 years is somewhat mitigated by the p1ss-weak nature of their likely replacements and the very real fact that, for a significant proportion of those set to be defenestrated from Parliament, this will make not one marginal iota of difference to their lives and circumstances – in fact, for a lot of them, it will be a net benefit. Do you think Messers Hunt, Rees-Mogg, Shapps et al will give anything resembling a flying one when they hear the bell toll on July 4th? No, they won’t, because they and so many of the rest of these appalling, double-figure-IQ mediocrities are INCREDIBLY FCUKING RICH, and will in fact be at liberty to become considerably moreso at the point they are no longer ‘constrained’ (lol) by the fact of being, at least in theory, a public servant.

Anyway, fcuk the tories, kick them so hard they can’t get back up again for a decade or so at the very least, and pray to god that the incoming lot are marginally-less milquetoast in the face of corporate interests than I fear they will in fact be.

(a note to the non-English reading this – yes, I know you don’t give two fcuks about the democratic process taking place in a country that can best be described as ‘second tier’ (on a good day) but please indulge my momentary excitement at the thought of not having to hear from Rishi Sunak ever again. Oh, by the way, my personal money is on that stumpy little nonentity ending up at Andreessen Horowitz come August, so let’s see shall we).

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and I promise you will get significantly less swearing over the course of the next 10,000 words or so (sorry about the length, again).

By Jordan Bolton (images this week all courtesy of This Isn’t Happiness)

WE BEGIN THIS WEEK WITH A SET BY OPPIDAN FROM TON OF BRIX IN LONDON LAST MONTH, WHICH IS AN HOUR OF PROPERLY BRILLIANT DJING AND SOME TOP-NOTCH TUNES (AND, JUDGING BY SOME OF THE FACES ON THE KIDS UP AT THE FRONT, A PLEASING COUNTERPOINT TO THE WHOLE ‘YOUNG PEOPLE ARE PO-FACED MORALISTS WHO DON’T DO DRUGS’ MYTH)!

THE SECTION WHICH IS GOING TO BE REALLY DISAPPOINTED IF ALL OF YOU WORKING IN AGENCIES WITH A LOBBYING OR PA FUNCTION DON’T DO SOMETHING AT LEAST MARGINALLY INTERESTING OR PSEUDO-CREATIVE WITH THE MANIFESTOS AND LLMs, PT.1:  

  • World Sim Redux: Ok, so *technically* this is a repost, but given that a) the original site went offline about 72h after I put it in Curios a little while back; b) it’s now on a slightly different url; and c) it now has a whole additional side to it, I feel it’s ok to remind you of its existence – also, it is still slightly-mindblowing to me. Per my last writeup, “Imagine a text adventure in which the whole premise is ‘you’re god. On Day 0 of creation. GO!’ – well that’s what this is. Built on some LLM – I think it’s using Claude – this is one of the most amazing, dizzying, silly, brilliant applications of the tech that I’ve seen in ages – to be clear, it is utterly pointless, but it is also SO beautifully set up. Tell the programme to create humans – watch and see what sort of humans it creates. After creating the heavens and the earth, land and sea, I asked for some fauna and the system became bizarrely obsessed with developing a unicorn-based economy for my humans to exploit. Create plagues! Create existential conundra! Tell every single living creature they must engage in blood sacrifice to avoid the wrath of the capricious, all-seeing God-creature that oversees their every waking moment! I spent about an hour with this this week and I can’t stress enough how wonderful it is – I strongly advise you to just leave it in a tab and pop back in when you fancy messing with an imaginary universe at a deep, even cellular, level.” This is still quite, quite incredible – and now, on landing,  you get to choose whether to go straight into the ‘imagine the infinity of creation and then start fcuking with it like some sort of capricious deity’ bit or whether instead to play around with an AI-enabled website imaginer, which does something similar to another link from a few weeks back and lets you get the machine to ‘imagine’ websites about whatever you want it to. This is…I don’t know, most stuff pertaining to AI and creativity leaves me very cold, but I find the possibilities and the sheer scale of the ‘imagining’ happening here to be really quite spectacular. Now if you’ll excuse me I’m just going to go and inflict some plagues on my medieval peasants and see what happens (turns out that having complete godlike dominion over a planet’s worth of nonexistent AI-generated ‘people’ is also a surprisingly decent way of unearthing any sort of latent psychoses you might be harbouring!).
  • Brainbridge: I’ve been vaguely aware this week of the resurrection of the (mad, utterly implausible) ‘we can do head transplants now!’ story, but until I opened my emails this morning and saw this great tip from Mike Hurl (THANKYOU MIKE HURL!) I wasn’t aware that the lunatics claiming to be able to LITERALLY SWAP YOUR HEAD ONTO ANOTHER BODY also have a website – and WHAT a website it is! “Safer. Faster. Reliable”, it claims (safer than…safer than what? The previous attempts at doing this sort of thing, presumably undertaken by Nazi scientists and charming funsters like Princess Bathory?). You’ll be reassured that the tech is ‘AI Powered’ – no details as to what sort of AI, but, well, FCUKIT IT’S AI! – and possibly excited to learn that not only do they say they can CUT YOUR HEAD OFF AND PUT IT ON SOMEONE ELSE’S NECK, but also that they are working on solutions that will enable full face transplants, boasting of “face and scalp transplantation to restore functionality and aesthetic appearance. Younger donor tissues reduce the risk of rejection and enhance appearance” (…anyone else here vaguely-unsettled by the potential implications of ‘younger donor tissue’?), and, apparently…some sort of neuralink-like brain/computer interface? Or telepathy? It’s really hard to tell, but there’s definitely something a bit esoteric-sounding about the claim to enable people to “execute tasks independently using their thoughts.” This is gloriously, wonderfully, utterly batsh1t – so I can imagine each and every one of you is currently reading this thinking “Matt, tell me how I can possibly get involved with this organisation so very obviously at the vanguard and cutting edge (lol) of medical science!”. You’ll be gratified to know that they are ‘recruiting’ – it’s unclear from the website whether that’s for staff or for guinea pigs, but don’t let that trifling uncertainty put you off signing up!
  • Tactical Vote: For those of you in the UK, a website to help you work out how best to use your ballot on July 4th to get rid of these fcuking cunts and replace them with…well, frankly another pretty uninspiring bunch of mediocrities, but a change is as good as a rest. Right? This is one of a number of tactical voting sites you can choose from – I’ve included this one because it seems relatively free of any weird or creepy subtexts, unlike this other one which is being fronted up by some genuinely dreadful Twitter politics egotists (and, bizarrely, my mate Jon), but there are multiple others available – but, frankly, it doesn’t matter where you get your tactical voting advice from so much as it does that we all do the right thing and make sure that the Conservative Party gets its ar$e handed to it, electorally-speaking. In all likelihood it won’t make much difference to anything – if you’d like a small insight into why I think that, email me and ask me about exactly who Sir Keir Starmer and Ed Miliband had a meeting with 18 months ago, and what they said in that meeting – but at least you will have tried, and that’s basically all we can ever do.
  • The Obliquiscope: Ok, full disclosure – this is a) a link to something you have to pay for; and b) the person who makes it is a friend of mine. BUT! I love both the idea, and the execution, and I get the feeling a few of you will do so too. The Obliquiscope is a small bit of coloured perspex and its sole purpose is to make you THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT. Which is a small thing, but it’s a nice reminder to think critically about everything and that simple questions are always worth asking, even about things that you think are familiar and known and banal. I’ve had one of these for a while, but now they are COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE and they’re just a nice, pleasing object which I think lots of you who work in strategy and planning and made-up jobs of that ilk might like, or which might tickle the brain of a particular type of curious teenager in interesting ways.
  • XOXOFest: Hm, ok, so this is ANOTHER link to something you have to pay for, and ANOTHER link to something by someone I sort-of know – sorry! I promise Web Curios is not about to become one of those incredibly fcuking irritating newsletters which tries to sell you stuff! I have nothing to sell but my sou…oh, no, sold that in 1997, fcuk’s sake! – but I think loads of you might be interested in this. XOXOFest is ‘an experimental festival for independent artists and creators who work on the web’, taking place in Portland, Oregon, USA (sorry, you probably didn’t need the elaboration there, but I thought it worth making it very clear to people in the UK that this is FORRIN) in August, which brings together all sorts of interesting people who make the sorts of things that I write about in here every week, for talks and music and I think a general sense of Slightly Geeky (and probably moderately-socially-awkward) Fun Times! It’s worth taking a look at the lineup and seeing who some of the people involved are – Mollie White, for example, Ryan Broderick, people from The Pudding, Annie Rauwerda from Depths of Wikipedia – to get an idea of the general vibe, but I think if you Make Things On The Web then this will generally be right up your street. XOXO has been dormant for a few years, and the affection its held in and the lineup mean that it’s likely to be enormously-oversubscribed, so they’re operating a ballot system for tickets (which are $250 for the whole thing, which feels pretty decent value) – you have til 29 May to apply for one, should you fancy popping along.
  • Unitree G1: Do you have a spare $16k (minimum) knocking around? Would you like to use that money to purchase a bipedal, vaguely-humanoid robot? WHY?!?! Still, if the answer to that question was, inexplicably, ‘yes please!’ then you will be thrilled by the Unitree G1 – this is basically a Boston Dynamics ripoff from China, at a fraction of the cost, but which, based on what I’ve read and the videos on the site, also has…significantly-less functionality. Would you like a robot companion that can…squat? Awkwardly flip a slice of bread into a frying pan? Stand up on its own from a prone position? WELL THEN IT’S YOUR LUCKY DAY! I asked a few friends what they thought the point of this was, and the universal replies were basically along the lines of ‘some weirdo is going to try and fcuk it’ – which, honestly, if anyone attempts ANY sort of congress with this, based on the less-than-subtle motor control exhibited in the promo materials, they are going to be well on the way to nullodom before you can scream “DEAR GOD NO LET GO OF IT AAAAAAAAAARGH”.
  • A Quite Impressive Bit Of AI Animation: To be clear, the output here isn’t that impressive – it still looks janky, and it’s very short – but what *is* is the workflow involved, and the simplicity of it, and how quickly the ability to do this stuff is evolving. Basically what’s going here is someone filmed some footage of themselves walking about, mocapped themselves, turned that mocap into a cartoon, then inserted that cartoon into a static image from Midjourney – all using simple, free(ish) tools that have been developed over the past few months. This sort of stuff feels like the Good AI, if there is such a thing – augmenting the creative impulse rather than striving to replace it – and I am really curious to see what genuinely mad stuff teenagers are going to start making with these things in the next year or so. If you ‘do video’ or ‘visual content stuff’ it really is worth having a read of this (short) Twitter thread, because the potential here is insane.
  • Generating 3d Landscapes From Cartoons: Vaguely-related to the above, this is a paper rather than anything you can play with but contains enough examples of what the tech is that you can get the idea – all very early and shonky and experimental, but the general idea here is about using AI to generate 3d models of an environment (in this case, interiors) from visuals from cartoons; so, for example, creating a 3d flythrough of the Simpsons’ house from a bunch of clips of the show. Which, if you stop to think about it, is kind of mindblowing.
  • Oakley Future Genesis: Earlier this year I featured a very shiny…pseudo-game-thing by Oakley, called Project 2075, set in some sort of future in which overdesigned sunglasses were the key to the future survival of the human race (or something – I confess to not being wholly across the detail here). I was curious as to What It Was All About, and it turns out that it is in fact part of a wider TRANSMEDIA (hello, 2009!) project spanning animation and a run of comic books and, eventually, god knows what else. This is the overall project site, from which you can jump into either the previously-linked Project 2075 thing, or watch the animations which explain the story and introduce the characters and, I presume, provide a bridging point to the graphic novels. The animations are all done in (I think) Unreal Engine, and are pretty high-end – the facial models in particular are really impressive – but, equally, I am already a bit jaded by the ‘LOOK AT ALL THE CHARACTERS’ REMARKABLY COOL AND INEVITABLY-PLOT-SIGNIFICANT BRANDED EYEWEAR’ gimmick. Still, it’s interesting to see a brand doing this 15 years after people like me got all frothy about this sort of cross-platform branded storytelling, and I’ll be interested to see how/if it evolves and what other elements get introduced, and if anyone gives anything resembling a fcuk – feels like a lot of money’s gone into this, and I have to say that this quote from some Oakley marketing guy makes me…quite sad inside: “Chapter One follows Max Fearlight, symbolizing Oakley’s legacy, as he undergoes an evolution parallel to the brand” – I mean, that just SCREAMS satisfying narrative, doesn’t it?
  • Fadr: MORE AI MUSIC TOOLS AND TOYS! Except this one’s slightly different – rather than like, say, Suno, which is aiming squarely at the ‘MAKE SONGS WITH THE MACHINE WITHOUT NEEDING ANY PEOPLE!’ market, Fadr is positioning itself more as a suite of AI-enabled tools to allow you to mess with and manipulate music; so offering you AI-powered remixing tools, or stem retrieval, or creating a sound palette that you can then subsequently play with…basically it’s a sidekick for producers rather than a replacement for them, and on that basis might be worth a look for any of you who make music or want to see if The Machine can finally turn your tin-eared noodlings into something vaguely-approximating to ‘tunes’.
  • Daylight Computer: Oh ffs, this is ANOTHER ‘link to maybe buy something’ – really sorry about this – but, I promise, it does look really interesting and genuinely innovative. Daylight Computer is a type of tablet which rather than having a standard screen is instead running (what looks like) a lightning-fast e-ink display, making the whole experience of surfing and browsing and reading generally softer and gentler – amazingly (to me, at least) it runs at the same sort of performance as a normal tablet, and it can play video and games and do all the things you’d expect, as well as acting as a writing pad (with stylus), and it has an app ecosystem meaning you can run Spotify, etc, on it…I have seen NO REVIEWS or writeups of this at all, and so I am not for a second suggesting you rush out and spend your hard-won pennies on it (particularly based on the…less-than-stellar reception granted to every single other bit of novel hardware released this year), but it looks really interesting and I’m fascinated to hear whether or not it is in fact any good.
  • Rip Entire YouTube Playlists: Or individual songs, but it’s the ‘get an entire playlist of songs from YouTube in mp3 format’ functionality here that struck me as really rather useful. Free, clean and, as far as I can tell from a limited time spent kicking the tires, actually does what it’s meant to.
  • Sails of Success: I know that for many people in Our Strange and Hideous Modern Age, the use of motivational mantras and affirmations and all that sort of thing is part of daily life – I don’t condone it, I don’t understand it, but I am aware that some people like that sort of thing. Whatever provides you the crutch you need! Should you be in the market for that sort of thing, if you feel that what’s holding you back from achieving your full, miraculous potential is an absence of bland pabulum cribbed from the worst self-help garbage in the world, coupled with some I-think-questionable-Joker-ish vibes – then you will LOVE Sails of Success, a TikTok channel which seems to exist solely to post AI-generated clips featuring, er, fictional pirate Jack Sparrow and a voice over which says things like “YES YOU CUT THEM OFF…BUT THEY GAVE YOU THE SCISSORS” in a bleak robotic monotone. I think this is possibly quite bad news, but, equally, it made me do a couple of horrified laughs, so see what you think.
  • British Museum x NewJeans: I am including this simply because I think it’s really smart by the British Museum and I haven’t seen it covered anywhere – they have collaborated with insanely popular KPOP group NewJeans to create a special audio tour of the museum’s collection, or at least some of the highlights, voiced by the band. Which, given the Kpop wave, is just a really neat way of immediately appealing to a completely new demographic which, it’s fair to say, probably wouldn’t be rushing to download the audiotour (or even visit the museum).
  • The Rural Indexing Project: I found this significantly more interesting than I expected to, and maybe you will too: “Rural communities are dispersed across the American landscape. The buildings and streetscapes in these places are a repository for visual trends—historical, architectural, and social—that relate to aspects of commercial, municipal, and private life. Rural Indexing Project (RIP) documents these trends as they exist in the built environment. RIP originated in 2010, and continues to document locations to this day. Roughly 1,200 communities in 25 states have been documented to date, and new material is added to the site frequently.“
  • Automated eBooks: Basically any search for a book on any topic on Amazon now is polluted by pages and pages and pages of AI-generated dreck, attempting to make a quid or two from buyers too lazy or careless or stupid to realise that they are shelling out for the product of a (not even very good) LLM. How is this stuff being spun up so quickly and at such immense scale? Well, services like this one are partly to blame – for a ‘small fee’, this site will not only generate a 100-pageish book on any topic you like, but will also help you come up with ‘ideas’ for your next terrible, AI-generated non-book. This is SO BLEAK – really, click the link and scroll down a bit and have a look at the workflow here, and then imagine the quality of what’s going to get vomited out. I have quite bad feelings about what is going to result from the sheer volume of this rubbish that is flooding the web.
  • FestGPS: Festival season is upon us! For those of you who fancy the idea of spending several hundred quid to get rained on in a field (I am being grumpy, festivals are fun, apart from Wilderness which is full of some of the worst advermarketingprcnuts in the UK, all kidding themselves that they are ‘creative’ because they make powerpoints for a living, cosplaying at being whimsical while hoovering up industrial quantities of gak), FestGPS is a really interesting idea. Connect it to your spotify account and it will ‘analyse your music taste’, cross-reference it with festival lineups from across the world, and suggest those events which might best fit your likes. As I might have mentioned in the past, I don’t really use Spotify and as such I have no data for it to draw on, and as such I can’t vouch for the quality of the recommendations, but this is free and seems like it might be worth a play.
  • The Map Of Spoons Prices: Wetherspoons, rather than utensils – this is a map which shows you the price of the cheapest pint in all of the Wetherspoons pubs around the UK, and it is INCREDIBLY USEFUL. On the one hand, I am not a fan of Wetherspoons as a business; on the other, you can’t sniff at the prospect of separating yourself from your consciousness for less than £20 for 8 pints.
  • A Brief Moment of Authorial Self-Indulgence: LOL THIS IS ALL AUTHORIAL SELF-INDULGENCE YOU DREADFUL PR1CK, MATT! This week, for reasons I forget, I was digging out an old link from Curios passim and found the temporary blog I set up after I left H+K and before Imperica were kind enough to house me; this is the resurrected copy of the final blog I wrote on the Hill+Knowlton corporate website after I quit my job (which was deleted approximately 45m after I published it, for reasons which you will probably understand should you click through and read it),  and, honestly, WHAT A TIME MACHINE IT IS. It then induced me to go back to the internet archive and dig out the original posts from 2010-12, and I found this one, and, honestly, I am ASTONISHED that a major multinational communications company owned by WPP ever let me publish this stuff. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? What was *I* thinking (other, obviously, than “I really hate a significant part of my working life”)? Anyway, all this self-indulgent w4nk is in part just that, but also to say that it’s actually really interesting to go back to about 2010/11 and see what I was linking to and what I was saying about it – not because I was smart, or funny, or any good, but more because it’s a really interesting look at what was ‘trendy’ in digital marketing, and what I thought was going to be BIG and what I was completely, totally wrong about (ARGs! Location-based social!). It’s also sort-of sad how much of the stuff I linked to just doesn’t exist anymore – sic transit gloria mundi, innit. Anyway, this made me really misty-eyed the other day, and made me also feel quite guilty about what a total pr1ck I evidently was to work with and to ‘manage’, and I am, retrospectively, very sorry for being such a total d1ck.

By Alex Eckman-Lawn

A MUSICAL CHANGE OF PACE NOW WITH THE NEW SOLO ALBUM BY BETH GIBBONS WHO REALLY DOES POSSESS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL VOICES! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GOING TO BE REALLY DISAPPOINTED IF ALL OF YOU WORKING IN AGENCIES WITH A LOBBYING OR PA FUNCTION DON’T DO SOMETHING AT LEAST MARGINALLY INTERESTING OR PSEUDO-CREATIVE WITH THE MANIFESTOS AND LLMs, PT.2:    

  • The Snoop Memorabilia Auction: It’s long nee known that Snoop will do seemingly ANYTHING for money – no brand collaboration too tawdry, no grift too base – so it’s no huge surprise to see him flogging off a bunch of tat for cash. If you have ever wanted to own, say, his old Death Row Records chain (current bid $1700!), or the outfit he wore at Wrestlemania 2023 ($905!) then WOW ARE YOU IN LUCK! This has about a week or so to run, so I would imagine the prices are going to rise a bit, but if you dig through there’s actually some pretty interesting memorabilia from Snoop’s golden era scattered amongst the frankly ludicrous amount of branded tie-in tat (a first edition Snoop FunkoPop, anyone?).
  • The Ancient Greek Farm Simulator: This is *slightly* more interesting in idea than in execution, but it’s an interesting glimpse of one of the ways in which we’re going to see AI used more and more – this is basically a build of the quite remarkable ‘Smallville’ village simulator which I linked to last year, in which a bunch of AI agents with their own motivations, etc, were set loose in a small simulated environment to see how they interacted, developed relationships, displayed emergent behaviours, etc, except here it’s an ancient Greek farm. Meet Lycidas the goat herd and the other residents, and watch as they go about their tasks – farming, chatting, falling in love…you as the player can ‘interact’ with them, but in common with all LLM dialogue to date it’s hard to get them to say anything interesting, and I personally didn’t find I was given enough ability to see ‘inside the heads’ (if you will) of the agents as I would have liked. Still, this is a really interesting branch of AI research and investigation, and I’m fascinated to see how this sort of thing develops as the tech improves – you can read more about it here if you’re interested (there are also sims of a Roman fishing village and somewhere in Ancient Egypt, should you prefer a slightly different flavour of AI-simulated history).
  • Professional Lunch: ANOTHER friend link, and one that’s probably only really of use if you live in London or come here regularly – that said, if that is YOU and you like eating at restaurants, and you’re lucky enough to be able to afford to do so, then this is GREAT. Marshall Manson is a Texan in London, and he enjoys lunch – so he has started this newsletter, where he writes twice a week about…good places to have lunch. Marshall is a significantly more grown-up and professional human being than I am, and as such he writes from the perspective of someone who’s doing ‘business lunches’ (or at least who isn’t planning on doing a three-bottler), but even if that’s not your thing he is an excellent judge of food and I can vouch for a significant number of his recommendations.
  • No Web Without Women: A website celebrating innovations by women in the field of computer science, as a reminder that, despite the persistently c0ck-heavy vibe of much of compsci and webtech, a lot of it is built on the work of women. From Lovelace to Lamarr to Roberta Williams and beyond, this is a lovely and potentially-inspiring look at how various women have had a significant impact across a wide range of disciplines which are often lazily and sexist…ly (?Not a word, but it should be) male-coded.
  • Maecenium: This is…weird, and I get quite bad vibes from it but I can’t quite articulate why. On the surface, it’s a charitable foundation dedicated to the promotion of STEM and to provide funding to research – per the site, its mission is “to support and promote the pursuit of knowledge and innovation in various fields of natural and social science, including but not limited to biology, personalized medicine, chemistry, physics, mathematics, engineering, and history. We believe that scientific research plays a crucial role in solving complex problems, improving lives, and shaping the future of humanity…One of our main goals at Maecenium is to identify and support innovative, high-impact scientific projects. We believe that breakthroughs often come from thinking outside the box and exploring new ideas. Through our rigorous selection process, we identify projects that have the potential to make a significant impact and provide them with the necessary resources to thrive. Through our support, we aim to enable scientists to focus on their research without the burden of financial constraints. We believe that by investing in scientific research, we can unlock new discoveries, innovations, and solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.” Which sounds good, right? So why do I get such bad vibes from the site? I think it’s in part the name – I now get the fantods about stuff that has this faux-antiquity vibe and a near-immediate assumption that it’s trying to trojan horse some pretty fashy thinking – and in part all the AI-imagery on the site, the fact that while only talking in the very vaguest of terms about what the fcuk it is that they want to fund or do, if you dig into the site they seem to be requesting donations at a minimum of £10k…oh, and the fact that a bit of digging suggests that the founder, one Katherine Yovanovich, PhD, seemingly has no other online presence anywhere other than on this site, which feels…weird for a supposed academic. Do any of you happen to have a clue? Am I being unfair, or am I right and is this very fcuking dodgy indeed?
  • The American Diary Project: Who doesn’t love reading other people’s diaries? NO FCUKER…actually, is that true or is it just that I am a terrible voyeur? Hm. Anyway, this isn’t creepy or voyeuristic at all, promise – instead, it’s a project designed to archive the personal journals of people from the US throughout history. “The American Diary Project was founded in October of 2022 with one simple vision: Rescue diaries and preserve the writing of everyday Americans. From our founder and executive director, Kate Zirkle: “One crisp fall day in October, I was updating my last will and testament when I was struck by the question of what to do with my journals after I pass. Should I leave them to someone? Should I burn them? Should I donate them? These questions lead me down a fruitless internet search—I just couldn’t find a suitable place to archive my writings in the U.S. Upon this discovery, I felt an instant, electric surge of “I WOULD LOVE TO DO THAT” and thus, the American Diary Project was born.”” It’s still pretty new, and not STUFFED with content, but there are examples of diaries from the past 300 years on the site and there is something just wonderful, to me at least, about going wandering around through the past thoughts and feelings and memories and fears and dreams of these strangers.
  • The Talk: You may have seen a clip doing the rounds this week of a purported conversation between Robin Williams and Philip Seymour Hoffman, about the existential horror of being alive – at one point it was being shared EVERYWHERE with all sorts of commentary about how moving it was and how DEEP, and, honestly, I don’t personally understand how the fcuk anyone didn’t see through it immediately (sorry, but I didn’t) but, obviously, IT WAS NOT REAL!!! In fact, it was an out-of-context excerpt from this series of videos, called The Talk, by Danish artist Jonas Hollerup Helle. The link here takes you to the youTube channel for the project, which features a bunch of similar imagined chats – Chris Rock and Will Smith, Cher and David Lynch, etc etc – which are produced, as far as I can tell, by editing together clips from completely unconnected interviews into a semi-coherent-seeming conversation. I think it’s worth having a think about what this implies for people’s likely susceptibility to AI content – I mean, look, just watch one of these things and it’s clear to anyone paying even an iota of attention that there is no dialogue happening, that the phrases spoken barely relate to each other, that there’s no interaction between the participants…and yet lots of people didn’t notice at all. Which isn’t to say people are stupid so much as it is to say that we simply don’t pay attention, and that that’s going to mean we’re on the cusp of some VERY interesting consequences when AI duping of faces and voices gets just a tiny, tiny bit better.
  • The Communal Plot: Via Giuseppe, this is SUCH a good idea and a lovely interface/visualisation to boot. Every day, the site throws up two different questions plotted across two axes – today’s, for example, is ‘do you prefer non-fiction or mystery novels?’ and ‘do you prefer country or pop music?’ – which you’re invited to answer by placing yourself on an appropriate space on the plot. Pick your spot and you’re shown how you compare to everyone else who’s answered that day’s question. That’s it -but it’s elegant and interesting, and I really like the correlations it can occasionally throw up, and I think there’s something here which might be worth exploring further for data analysts and the like.
  • Puzzle Canon: This very much falls into the category of ‘things I think are interesting but I really don’t understand AT ALL’ (it’s a big category, growing by the fcuking second) – (very) basically, puzzle canons are musical riddles, sort-of compositional in-jokes or challenges designed to test a musician’s ability to interpret clues within musical notation (I think). From the site’s own description: “”Puzzle canon,” “riddle canon,” “Ratselkanon,” “Enigmatic canon,” “closed canon,” all these terms refer to a sort of canon that is sufficiently strict that a single written melody can represent two or more performed melodies! One of these melodies might be the retrograde of the other, or upside-down, or higher or lower, twice as fast or slow. Only the imagination is the limit. many more possibilities exist. What kinds of clever things have Bach, Mozart and others tried? What other kinds of puzzle canons exist? Who are the unsung heroes of canon from Medieval times to the present? The puzzlecanon website is the place to find out!” The only issue I have with this is that it is VERY MUCH designed for real musicians – it’s all displayed as staves, there’s no audio to give you a reference as to what these things sound like when you get them ‘right’ vs ‘wrong’, and, as such, unless you can read music and ‘hear’ it in your head (which I very much can’t) it might remain a mystery to you. Can someone who understands this please explain it to me in a manner that a cloth-eared moron like me might comprehend?
  • Osbcurify: Another Spotify plugin, this time analysing your account to see how obscure or otherwise, compared I presume to majority streaming habits based on raw numbers, your tastes are – it also gives you information about how this is changing over time, whether you’re tending to listen to more or less ‘energetic’ music than you used to, all that sort of jazz. Potentially interesting if you like quantifying every aspect of your life, or if you’d like to keep an eye on what your ‘Wrapped’ selection is going to look like for the purposes of gaming it to make you look more ‘interesting’ based on your taste in, I don’t know, deathcore from the Faroe Islands.
  • Share Textures: ANYONE WHO DOES ANYTHING INVOLVING CG AND 3d MODELING / DESIGN – THIS IS FOR YOU! “Since 2018, we’ve been sharing textures that are free from copyright restrictions. Our collection now includes over 1500 free textures, 200 3D Models, and 50 atlases, and it keeps growing, thanks to our patrons. You don’t need to register or pay, just select an asset and click the download button. You can able to download them up to 4K resolution.” This is an incredible resource and SO GENEROUS, bless whoever’s behind it.
  • Slosh: I don’t quite understand the recent American obsession with ‘hard seltzer’ – we did alcopops 30 years ago ffs, why are you doing them again but…sh1tter? – but I am slightly obsessed with the website for new range ‘Slosh’. I don’t want to drink a single one of the available flavours (they all do that very, very North American thing of having incredibly-incongruous combinations that sound…too much, something I always find on restaurant menus in the States as well – also, black cherry and lime is, objectively, a nasty-sounding mix), but I absolutely adore the frankly insane overegging of the site – there is SO MUCH going on here, from the different types of interactivity to the music to the animations to the fact that you can pick a flavour to ‘explore’ by playing an actual game of 3d ‘beer pong’ (it’s not very good, and it’s quite annoying, but WHAT commitment!). Basically this feels like the designers all got very, very baked and just went with it, which I personally think is the sort of aesthetic all digital projects should lean into a little harder.
  • No Disposable Barbeques: Look, absolutely no shade to whoever is behind this campaign – I am sure there are lots of good reasons why disposable bbqs are a bad thing, from an environmental and safety perspective – but I find the single-issue nature of this Twitter account, going since 2020, genuinely amusing.
  • Acousitc Location and Sound Mirrors: I guarantee you that unless you are already aware of what the words in the link refer to that you WILL NOT be able to guess the sorts of devices and contraptions that are commemorated on this website. LOOK AT THE ILLUSTRATIONS! Honestly, I cried laughing at some of these.
  •  I, The Moon, The Star: I don’t quite know how to describe this – a sort of digital poem, I think – but it’s lovely. Change the words in the phrase via the drop-downs and see how the site responds – aside from anything else I really love the UI here, as well as the resulting imagery and how it fuzzes into focus.
  • Sister Mary Blaze: Look, this is religious propaganda – I KNOW I KNOW – but, equally, it’s a fcuking nun on TikTok, and who doesn’t love some of that incongruity? NO FCUKER, etc! Sister Mary Blaze is…is she a real nun? I don’t want to dig into it too deeply, but she dances to popular songs – there’s a recent vid of her doing a routine to the BBL Drizzy beat which is quite the thing – and generally seems Quite Online, and I haven’t checked into the comments but I wouldn’t be surprised to see an awful lot of children in the mentions praising her for ‘serving cnut’. It’s very much THAT sort of account, and your mileage will vary depending on the extent to which you enjoy the cognitive dissonance of a woman you’d expect to be doing a rosary and maybe polishing an apse (NOT A EUPHEMISM!) doing very, very self-aware content marketing.
  • J1zzy Jewellery: I’m not sure whether ‘j1zzy’ is the sort of thing that will get spam or profanity filtered, but let’s play it safe. Anyway, for clarity, this is a site which allows you to commission custom jewellery MADE FROM SEMEN (or breastmilk, apparently, elsewhere on the page) – per the vendors, “Whether you are marking your fertility journey, getting a vasectomy gift, surprising your partner or just want to be that much closer, we can turn your j1zz into a real gem! We love being inclusive over in the Trinkets world so both male and female j1zz can be used! (YOU MUST PROVIDE YOUR OWN SAMPLES)” – the last bit of that really finished me. Anyway, if you fancy spaffing into a jar and sending sad spaff to some strangers to be transmuted (via some mysterious process they don’t really elaborate on, from what I can tell) into very, very milky-looking ‘gemstones’ to hang on a pendant or wear on a ring or something then BOY are you in the right place. They’re unclear on volumes required, which feels like something of an omission (an ‘emission omission’, if you will, which I imagine you won’t – sorry about that), but this seems entirely legit (or as legit as you could ever say a business designed to sell you jewellery made of spunk could ever be) and as such, well, here you are!
  • Consider The Consequences: Finally this week, a genuine historical Curio updated for the digital age – Consider the Consequences “originally published in 1930 was written by  Doris Webster and Mary Alden Hopkins and is the earliest known published work of fiction that offers branching paths.  This style of fiction would go on to give rise to Choose Your Own Adventure books, Infocom text adventure games, and of course, the incredibly popular field of modern Interactive Fiction.”  It’s been replicated in Twine, and you can play it at this link, and it’s such an interesting look at mores and customs of a century ago, and it’s worth exploring, both because of its status as a precursor to basically any ‘branching narrative’ experience of the now and the way it shines a light on the social concerns of the interwar era in North America. Also, it’s a nice palate-cleanser after all that talk of j1zz.

By Photo in Moz

OUR FINAL MUSICAL PICK THIS WEEK IS THE MOST RECENT RELEASE FROM DAVID SHANE SMITH WHOSE ANGULAR-BUT-BEAUTIFUL SONGS I HAVE BEEN ENJOYING SINCE HE FIRST KINDLY EMAILED ME SOME IN AROUND 2008! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • 80s Anime: Stills and gifs culled from anime from (mostly) the 80s – this is a lovely collection (not, as far as I can tell from a brief look, run by someone with an unhealthy interest in the seamier side of the medium) and has some gorgeous examples of some fantastic artists’ work.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Adventures in Jelly: Via Jana at Zuckerbaeckerei, this is SUCH a lovely Insta feed – would you like to see loads of pictures of moulded jelly desserts and the occasionally video of them wobbling? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! These are so, so pleasing, and while I’m conscious that there’s a vanishing number of you for whom this is likely to tickle a scratch a peculiar fetishistic itch, be safe in the knowledge that I will NEVER KNOW and can never judge.
  • Museum Bums: An account existing solely to celebrate bums in museums. Genuinely astonished I haven’t featured this before, it is PERFECT insta.
  • Cafe Good Day: Craig Mod is doing one of his Japanese walks again at the moment, and his daily emails from the road are just wonderful – I’m not a particular Japanophile or anything, he’s just so so so good at writing about the flow state that you get into when walking long distances, and about the people he meets and their stories, and the things he sees, and it’s just glorious. Anyway, this is the Insta feed of a small cafe that he found on one leg of his insane, 30km day yomps, and while it’s not remarkable in any way it is also just incredibly soothing and I thought you might enjoy it.
  • Who Designed This Garbage?: Photos of discarded designer goods packaging in NYC. No, I don’t really understand why either.
  • Turkish Sh1tposting: A window into being VERY ONLINE in another culture and language – I fcuking adore this, even if I have no idea what the everliving fcuk a good proportion of the posts mean. It’s not all Turkish – there’s some Russian stuff in there, some from Arabic nations – but the general point is ‘look at how other people do this stuff, and how it is familiar and yet very different’. Via Pietro’s always-excellent Link Molto Belli.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • My Last Five Years Of Work: I had a conversation on Twitter this week about AI and jobs – the person I was talking to was less worried about the whole thing that I am, but they are smart and know what they are talking about, and I am happy to be disagreed with by someone who I know knows what they are talking about. At some point, though, some bloke popped up to say ‘well people have been telling me for years that AI will replace me and it’s not happened, so I think you’re talking rubbish’ (I paraphrase, but). I was curious as to who this person was, so I checked and THEY ARE A FCUKING KING’S COUNSEL. Mate, look, you are very much in the top decile (quintile? 1%) of your profession, OF COURSE YOU’RE FINE! As I feel compelled to keep repeating until I am blue in the face, a significant number of the people peddling the ‘it’s going to be additive not substitutive!’ line seem to have no idea that a vast number of white collar workers the world over do jobs that are EXACTLY THE SORT OF INFORMATION FILLETING/TRIAGING THAT AI IS EVEN NOW PRETTY GOOD AT! Anyway, whatever your feelings on the matter, I thought this article was very interesting indeed – Avital Balwit works for Anthropic, and here writes in a personal capacity about what she thinks, being someone who’s, you know, pretty close to the whole thing. It’s worth reading the whole thing, but I think these two paras are a decent summary of her argument and I find it very, very hard to disagree with her assessment: “Given the current trajectory of the technology, I expect AI to first excel at any kind of online work. Essentially anything that a remote worker can do, AI will do better. Copywriting, tax preparation, customer service, and many other tasks are or will soon be heavily automated. I can see the beginnings in areas like software development and contract law. Generally, tasks that involve reading, analyzing, and synthesizing information, and then generating content based on it, seem ripe for replacement by language models. Obsolescence is unlikely to come for all types of work at the same pace, and even once we have “human-level AI,” the effects will look very different before and after the widespread deployment of robotics. The pace of improvements in robotics lags significantly behind cognitive automation. It is improving as well—but more slowly. Anyone who makes a living through  delicate and varied movements guided by situation specific know-how can expect to work for much longer than five more years. Thus, electricians, gardeners, plumbers, jewelry makers, hair stylists, as well as those who repair ironwork or make stained glass might find their handiwork contributing to our society for many more years to come. Regulated industries like medicine or the civil service will have human involvement for longer, but even there, I expect an increasingly small number of human workers who are increasingly supplemented with AI systems working alongside them.”
  • Agents as Translators: Ok, so this is an academic paper and as such not HUGELY readable, but it’s worth at least a skim because, honestly, what its describing is pretty insane. Effectively what the paper demonstrates is that it is possible to create a ‘translation agency’ composed of different AI agents, acting semi-autonomously to translate a text – “We establish a virtual multi-agent translation company, TRANSAGENTS, featuring a diverse range of employees including a CEO, senior editors, junior editors, translators, localization specialists, and proofreaders. When a human client assigns a book translation task, a team of selected agents from TRANSAGENTS collaborates to translate the book. This paradigm simulates the entire book translation process, where agents with different roles work together to ensure that the translation maintains high quality and consistency throughout.” So, to be clear, the human input here is ‘translate this’, and subsequently the agents SELF-ORGANISE to do the work in a way that they believe optimally meets the brief. Even more interestingly, when benchmarked by human and LLM assessment, the agent translations were rated better than both human and sole LLM work. SO interesting and quite incredibly scifi.
  • Mapping The Mind of the Model: This generated quite a lot of excitement and interest this week – Anthropic, the Claude people, published this post which explains how they are coming to develop an initial understanding of how the model ‘works’ in terms of ‘what it ‘thinks’ about when it analyses a text’. It’s complicated and quite heavy, and very much at the limit of my technical understanding, but there’s a slightly more normie-focused explainer here should you want one. BONUS TECHNICAL AI LINK! – again, this is very much at the limit of my technical understanding, but there’s something really interesting about this project which effectively enables anyone to contribute to the training set of open source LLMs, effectively meaning that anyone can work to keep the central model primed with the ‘right’ information – there’s a gitub repo with all the technical info here, but a significantly more user-friendly video explainer here should you be interested. I am curious about how this guards against deliberate sabotage/pollution, but as a way of course correcting biases and lacunae it strikes me as a clever solution (thanks to Former Editor Paul for the link).
  • An Interview With Sunder Pichai: About the AI search and AI in general – I’ll be honest, this made me profoundly sad about the future of the web because it is very clear that Pichai does not give two single fcuks about the potential degradation of the quality of the general online experience as long as Google maintains market dominance (which is why he is CEO of one of the largest companies ever to have existed and I, as you know, am a webmong writing an overlong newsletter no cnut reads while sitting in his pants in his kitchen). The tenor of the answers in particular is miserable, a particular form of corpospeak that will be familiar to anyone who’s ever worked in corporate comms, and in general it doesn’t exactly fill me with joy for the next decade or so of internetspelunking. I think we need another way.
  • The MS Copilot Stuff: MORE AI COMING TO EVERYTHING! This is basically the big ad for the new AI PCs that Microsoft announced this week, but also contains more detail on the feature that everyone was getting all frothy about this week – to whit, the ability to remember EVERYTHING YOU HAVE EVER DONE ON YOUR COMPUTER, EVER, and let you find it via natural language search. I have seen a lot of people suggesting this is a PRIVACY NIGHTMARE, which I’m not quite sure I agree with – the stuff’s only stored locally rather than in the cloud, and because of space restrictions it will only go back three months, max – but I do think that the security vulnerabilities you will be exposed to if you lose your laptop or it gets nicked should make everyone think twice about enabling it. Anyway, it won’t be an issue for 99% of people who don’t want to spend a small fortune on a brand new PC, so maybe don’t worry about it just yet.
  • The Disappearing Web: Segueing on from me talking about all the dead links in past Curios, this is a report on some research by the Pew Research Centre which found that nearly 40% of webpages from 2013 are no longer accessible. I don’t care if you think the web is STUPID AND POINTLESS (although a) I do, you are wrong; and b) if you’re reading this, I have a sneaking suspicion that you don’t think that at all), it’s impossible not to see that as deeply, deeply sad. Of course, some of it will have disappeared because whoever made it in the first place wanted it to, but a significantly larger proportion will have vanished because of platform decay or, basically, capitalism. If you consider that the volume of material published online between the early days of the web and 2013 can conservatively be estimated as FCUKING LOADS – without wishing to be hyperbolic, it would comprise a significant proportion of all human written output, I’d hazard a guess – then you get an idea of how significant that is, and why the Internet Archive should be an internationally-backed initiative under the auspices of the UN or something.
  • The End of the Internet’s Art Gallery: Semi-related, this article explains all the ways in which DeviantArt, the site that basically housed all the web’s fanart and amateur visual work for a LONG time, has basically been fcuked beyond all recognition by a combination of mismanagement, bots, AI…you can guess the rest. Again, it’s significant and sad not even because of the content that it used to house but because of what it represented – a community and a platform that celebrated amateur work, which helped inspire people’s careers and which played home to nascent cultural movements like few others – and how so much of what it provided for people simply won’t be replicated elsewhere now that everything is hypercapitalised.
  • The Netanyahu Plan: OK, I am pretty sure that this is a legit source – has this been news? Have I totally missed lots of reporting on this? Because, honestly, this strikes me as QUITE THE STORY. Click in and read the whole thing, but let me just give you a flavour: “Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office recently released a PowerPoint that gives a glimpse into what the Likud Party has in mind for Gaza’s future, and the Levant region at large. On May 3, Netanyahu unveiled Gaza 2035: A three-step master plan to build what he calls the “Gaza-Arish-Sderot Free Trade Zone.” The plan was first reported by The Jerusalem Post and later by Al Jazeera. The Gaza-Arish-Sderot Free Trade Zone would encompass the 141 square miles that make up the Gaza Strip, where more than 34,500 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces in the past several months, and where experts say that famine is underway. The zone also would include the El-Arish Port to Gaza’s south in Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula and Sderot, an Israeli city north of Gaza…Today, Gaza is at the nexus of a historic trade route in the Middle East between Cairo and Baghdad, and Europe and Yemen. Gaza 2035 would capitalize upon this geography by adding new east-west rail service between Alexandria, Egypt, and Gaza City, Palestine. It would also add north-south rail service between Gaza and NEOM—the speculative $500 billion Saudi city roughly 130 miles south of Rafah. All of this connectivity would open up the opportunity for tech companies, factories, and “electric-vehicle manufacturing cities” to migrate to the Gaza-Arish-Sderot Free Trade Zone, the document said.” I mean, fcuking hell.
  • The Lack of Artistic Engagement With COVID: Apologies for linking to a Twitter thread, but it’s a really interesting one – Jessica Ellis starts by writing “Welcome to the weird era I’ve been warning about since the pandemic started with scripts, where everything is either bizarrely set in 2019 for no reason, or the year is never mentioned”, and goes on to talk about what this refusal to engage with the topic means for art and culture, and what we lose by not doing so. Smart and interesting and a bit concerning if you think about it for more than 5 minutes.
  • What 3M Did: This is VERY long, but it’s also very much worth reading because it becomes one of the more staggering examples of corporate malfeasance I’ve heard of in recent years. HOW much poison have you polluted the world with, 3M??? It is very hard to read this without thinking that a significant number of people involved with the events here mentioned ought to be in prison, and that it’s fcuking disgusting that, inevitably, they never will be.
  • Captain Corelli’s Machine Gun: Excellent essay in the LRB about Italy, fascism, its role in WWII and the country’s singular failure to ever meaningfully address the fact that IT WAS A FASCIST DICTATORSHIP. This made for uncomfortable reading for me at points, I have to say – it’s never nice to be reminded that your grandfather was part of an occupying colonial force which did some very, very bad things (although my grandad was an administrator rather than a fighter and as such was, I think and hope, only tangentially complicit rather than directly) – but it did remind me of an astonishing photo I saw of his from his time in Asmara, featuring a train of camels and soldiers rounding a scrubby hill and a massive, white Hollywood-style text sign which had been erected just above them, reading, simply, ‘DUX’. Oh, and for anyone feeling smug about the fact that their grandparents were all on the right side of history, my granddad was tortured by the English when he got captured – EVERYONE DOES BAD THINGS IN WAR, EVEN THE GOOD GUYS. Mind you, he was always an unapologetic fascist even into his 90s, so maybe he deserved it (one of the benefits of almost all of your family being dead is that you can say stuff like that with impunity).
  • Aging Global Gig Workers: I know a…I was going to say ‘surprising’, but actually given the sorts of people I know and *waves* The Way Things Are perhaps it’s not in fact that odd…anyway, I know quite a few people who at various points over the past few years have had to pick up gig work to make ends meet, whether as delivery drivers or shop assistants – this is a piece in Rest of World looking at how this is playing out around the world, and how people everywhere are having to come to terms with the fact that retirement might not ever be a thing again for the majority of the world’s people, and automation means that a lot of the ways you might have expected to be able to eke out a living as an Older Professional might not exist anymore.
  • Touching Computers: Brilliant digital creative type Spencer Chang wrote this a couple of months ago, but I totally missed it – I LOVE THIS SO SO SO MUCH. Please take a moment to read this short project explainer, in which he describes MAKING WEBSITES THAT LIVE ON PHYSICAL OBJECTS – effectively embedding an NFC chip into a piece of plaster or something that creates a physical object which, when touched with your phone, takes you to whatever site you choose, like a sort of physical digital business card…I got so excited about the possibilities of this sort of thing when reading it, maybe you will too.
  • DJs on What It Is Like In The Club Right Now: A bunch of DJs write about how the job has evolved in the age of social media and MODERNITY – I found this super-interesting as someone who doesn’t really go to clubs anymore (I am 44 years old, and I do not want to be the wild eyed man with the whirling jaw and melting face who causes all the younger people to think ‘please don’t ever let that be me’) in terms of the changing way in which Being A DJ works, and the way in which crowds and atmosphere has shifted – anecdotally, I have heard from people who are actually DJs that playing in the UK at the moment feels a bit flat compared to other countries because a) we are all miserable after 14 years of these fcuking cnuts fcuking everything up; and b) all the kids take ket, which I am sure is a fun time for them but perhaps doesn’t lend itself to the most jump-up of party atmospheres.
  • A Grand Don’t Come For Free At 20: Another great bit of writing on The Quietus, looking back at Mike Skinner’s second album and the time and place that produced it – I’d forgotten how irritatingly ubiquitous ‘Dry Your Eyes’ was that Summer, but fcuk me was it inescapable – and how Skinner influenced so much of what came after him despite noone else ever really *quite* sounding like The Streets did. Still not as good as Original Pirate Material, mind.
  • Being Tradwife: For Eater Magazine, Amy McCarthy spends a weekend trying to ape the sort of ULTRADOMESTICITY evidenced by the most iconic of tradwife influencers, making her meals from scratch and just been an all-round model of a hyperefficient and doting 1950s housewife. SPOILER: it is hard and not very enjoyable, and I refuse to believe that making your own mozzarella is worth it – the article, though, really *is* fun.
  • A Hairsplitter’s Odyssey: Selected highlights from a new book called ‘Dictionary of Fine Distinctions’, which explores the, er, distinctions between ostensibly very similar terms – so, the difference between ‘despot’, ‘tyrant’, ‘dictator’ and ‘autocrat’, for example, and why they ARE NOT SYNONYMS FFS! This is wonderful and I really, really want a copy of this book now.
  • A Book of Surrealist Games: A scan of a book from 1995, all about the parlour games invented by the surrealists to explore language and to, well, BE SURREAL. This is really interesting, taking you from ‘automated writing’, where you just…write, in stream of consciousness, without stopping, for a fixed period, just to see where your mind goes, to ‘The Truth Game’, in which everyone has to answer questions truthfully and which is illustrated in the example given by the rather arresting enquiry ‘how do you reconcile your love of women and your taste for sodomy?’ and the even more arresting ‘what do you say at the moment of climax?’ and its subsequent answer ‘Generally I say ‘Fernande’ (that’s my sister)’. This is…quite the read, and I should warn you that it contains at least two instances of a VERY BAD RACIAL SLUR as early as page 11/12, should you wish to avoid it on that basis. DIFFERENT TIMES EH?
  • The Beauty of Concrete: I found this SUPER-interesting – all about the evolution of building methods throughout history, and why, rather than the post-20thC architectural style of minimal ornamentation on buildings being born of cost-consciousness and problems of scaling labour, it’s in fact nothing of the sort and is simply a factor of the ‘victory’ of a certain type of aesthetic, and, as the author Samuel Hughes concludes, “In the first half of the twentieth century, Western artistic culture was transformed by a complex family of movements that we call modernism, a trend that extends far beyond architecture into the literature of Joyce and Pound, the painting of Picasso and Matisse, and the music of Schoenberg and Stravinsky. Between the 1920s and the 1950s, modernist approaches to architecture were adopted for virtually all public buildings and many private ones.”
  • Reading Disco Elysium: A collection of critical essays discussing the themes raised by the videogame Disco Elysium. If you haven’t played the game then this might not mean much to you – but if you have, and if you enjoyed it, then this is GOLD; it’s rare that a game is intelligent enough to warrant this degree of critical analysis, but in this instance it’s entirely merited. I think I have said this before once, but, even if you don’t think you like videogames, I cannot recommend Disco Elysium highly enough – it is smart and funny and heartbreaking, it has a truly brilliant soundtrack, and it is simultaneously very game-y and the least videogame-y game I have ever played. It’s the best game I’ve ever read, or the best book I’ve ever played, and I really really really urge you to give it a try if you have the means – it’s available on pretty much every platform, and you almost certainly won’t regret it.
  • The Sorry State of Men’s Hygiene: I might have mentioned this before, but one thing I have learned from spending time on Reddit is how many people have what seem to me to be quite catastrophic issues with their gastric health – here, the author takes a brief, unpleasantly-scented safari through the general state of men’s bottoms, based once again on ‘stuff people say online’. While some of the stuff you see on there is very much of the old school ‘making stuff up online because it’s gross/funny’ sort, there are enough comments about people leaving…unpleasantly-fecal stains on their bedlinen to suggest that there are an awful lot of men who for some reason have never learned the rudiments of, erm, well, cleaning themselves. This is sort-of horrific, but compelling.
  • Turkmenistan: Ok, this is all in Italian but you can translate it (if you don’t have the COMMON DECENCY to speak my mother tongue) with a click, and it’s VERY good – the author visits Turkmenistan, hope to the largest concentration of marble edifices anywhere in the world (who knew?) and some top-quality mad dictatoring. Obviously as with all of these sorts of pieces there’s a slight sense of ‘hm, yes, but it’s not all lols is it, lots of people here are having A Very Bad Time’, but equally this is very well written and not played for laughs too hard, so I will give it a pass.
  • Italian Sunday Lunch: As this piece notes, the concept of the ‘massive six hour Italian meal with 36 relatives and 300 dishes’ is something of a trope, and not entirely representative of anyone’s actual reality in 2024 – and it was always a Southern Italian thing rather than a Northern Italian thing anyway. That said, there was a period when I was small, and fewer members of my family were dead than are currently, when Sunday meals *were* a bit like this – my grandfather literally in a string vest drinking a couple of bottles of genuinely DREADFUL wine (he used to go and get it from a bloke he knew outside Rome a couple of times every year, filling four demijohns with this terrible gutrot, my grandmother having a really miserable time in the kitchen, and various assorted family and friends sitting there having a jolly old feed…anyway, look, this is a NYT piece and therefore it’s Italo-American and a bit ‘plastic Mario’ for my tastes, but I can’t lie that it made me powerfully nostalgic and will likely make you feel VERY HUNGRY.
  • The Bongo Man: The extraordinary life story of one Jose Duval, and his wife Daniele – Jose was a bongo star, but that didn’t stop him from loving his wife very much. This is a weirdly-heartwarming love story that features, as you might expect for a tale that spans the 70s and 80s and involves people who have sex on camera for money, a quite astonishing amount of cocaine. Jose sounds like he had a great time, and he and Daniele had a seemingly happy if…er…unconventional marriage, but my GOD this has some incredibly dark undertones.
  • What Time Is It?:  This is about someone getting dementia – it is absolutely heartbreaking, and I can’t pretend I didn’t slightly lose it at a couple of points and have to stop reading. BUT! It is also beautiful and if you can deal with the subject matter I think it’s a really, really good piece of writing by Jeff Wood.
  • Boys Being Boys: Finally this week, a story about male friendship and booze, and the way in which the two things go hand in hand, and whether the first exists if you take the second away. This is very ‘rural smalltown America’ in detail, but I think the themes are pretty universal and I thought it was superbly told.

By Shannon Cartier Lucy

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 17/05/24

Reading Time: 38 minutes

Do you ever get the feeling, maybe, that you perhaps don’t quite have the same…checks and balances as other people? That perhaps your moral compass is somewhat askew?

I ask only as a I did a thing this week which involved standing up in front of people and talking about Things I Did In The Past, and there were various points when…well, let’s just say when it became clear that things that *I* found funny, or at the very least examples of ‘well, the past was a different country!’, were seen by others as examples of what might best be described as ‘severe moral turpitude’ (to be clear, NOTHING CRIMINAL).

Am…am I a cnut?

As with so much of Curios, dear reader, that is a rhetorical question and I really, really don’t need or want to hear your opinion on it. Just know that I occasionally ask myself, and let’s leave it at that.

Anyway, this week’s edition is, if you’ll excuse the momentary autofellatio, quite a good one I think, so why don’t you get on with reading it and I’ll go back to enumerating all my many failings to seven decimal places.

I am still Matt, this is still Curios, and you really should make sure to check out the video at the end this week because it is EXCEPTIONAL.

By Charlie Tallott (images nearly all lifted from TIH, for which thanks)

OUR FIRST MIX THIS WEEK IS A CRACKING SELECTION OF EARLY HIPHOP (WE’RE TALKING 80s AND EARLY-90s HERE) COMPILED BY FORMER-EDITOR PAUL! (AND YOU CAN READ SOME WORDS ABOUT IT HERE IF YOU LIKE!)

THE SECTION WHICH MIGHT HAVE TO LEAVE LONDON IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT ARSENAL DO IN FACT WIN THE LEAGUE, PT.1:  

  • Project Random: ‘THE ALGORITHM!’, we all cry, powerless to resist its thrall. ‘THE ALGORITHM!’, we weep, bowing and scraping before its might while simultaneously wishing we could take it between our fingers and grind it to dust. ‘THE ALGORITHM!’, we wail, flinging the word about willy-nilly as though it’s some sort of monolithic entity rather than a complex agglomeration of multiple mathematical models which we are long-since being past being able to understand. What I’m saying, basically, is that it feels ever so slightly like we as a species (or at least those of us privileged enough for this sort of sh1t to even vaguely count as ‘a problem’) are rather tired of the invisible hand of maths determining what we see (and therefore think, buy, play, hear and fcuk) (although, on reflection, the slavish devotion we continue to display to the similarly-unknowable and similarly capricious invisible hand suggests we’re stuck with this for a while yet). Anyway, that’s by way of unnecessarily-overwritten introduction to Project Random, an avowedly anti-algo project which seeks to inject a bit more serendipity in your mindless content-guzzling – click the link and you’re presented with the opportunity to browse 15 different platforms – from YouTube to Spotify to Snap to TikTok to Deezer (lol!) and a bunch of others without the pesky forces of attention-based capitalism seeking to funnel you down one rabbithole or another. Per the copy, “Project Random randomly serves obscure content from around the web. It puts the web on shuffle by randomizing the algorithms behind social media and streaming platforms, to unearth content that you (or anyone in the world) might otherwise never see. The Internet today is dominated by engagement-based algorithms that are designed to serve popular, addictive content. The content that we see and interact with is only the very tip of a colossal media iceberg. It is within the depths of this iceberg where we find the obscure web: content that is uploaded, only to remain unseen and forgotten about for the remainder of its existence. Project Random gives forgotten content a chance to be seen by someone, somewhere in the world.” Obviously I approve of this hugely, and it reminds me a lot of one of my favourite projects of recent years (Nobody Live, featured in…2021 I think?, which shows you Twitch streams with no viewers), and in my brief time playing around with it (I tried TikTok and Vimeo and Snap fwiw) threw up a load of odd stuff – TikTok in particular is fascinating because of the volume of interesting, mundane, slice-of-life video being posted from all over the world which it’s genuinely interesting to dip into. This is fun, give it a try.
  • Serve Your Trash: Unless you are pretty technical this is still very much in beta and so inaccessible – but the idea is genuinely brilliant, and PROPERLY ART (I say so, therefore it is TRUE – I am available for the Turner selection committee should anyone be interested in getting me involved, is all I’m saying). Serve Your Trash is a project that allows (or will allow) anyone who wants to participate to share the contents of their desktop ‘Recycle Bin’ with anyone else who wants to see it – the idea is that it effectively creates an online, shared read-only folder into which your deleted items get dumped, and which anyone else in the world can also keep on their desktop so that at any given moment you can click in and see what, for example, Juanito in Aruba has been furiously removing from his hard drive. Obviously this has ALL SORTS of privacy implications, and is no way suitable for, say, spies, or people working in Government, or anyone working on projects of dubious ethics for a major multinational corporation (I KNOW SOME OF YOU READ THIS), but as a concept it is thrilling – one man’s trash, after all, is another’s treasure (although, fine, that perhaps doesn’t apply to the first three abortive drafts of your screenplay). There are instructions for setting this up yourself from the command line, but unless you’re the sort of person who is comfortable working in the terminal then it’s probable beyond you (oh, and this is MacOS-only – chiz chiz) – still, have a read here as it explains the whole thing rather better than the somewhat-opaque homepage; honestly, this is such a cool idea and I think has genuinely-interesting potential.
  • Space Trash Signs: Every few years a project comes up which causes me to remember the concept of The Graveyard Orbit (yes, I know, I have talked about this before, IT IS MY BLOGNEWSLETTERTYPETHING AND I MAKE NO APOLOGIES (but, well, sorry for the tedious repetition), the area of space around the Earth where all of the various junk that we have spaffed into the cosmos over the past 75 years or so agglomerates – so it is with this, which is a brilliant and fascinating and ever-so-slightly troubling visualisation of some of that junk, and where it is in the sky. Clicking the link takes you to a really nicely-rendered view of space, with the various clumping of dead satellites and sensors arranged into ‘constellations’ (the idea is they’re like star signs made of rubbish, DO YOU SEE?). “Space Trash Signs is an initiative to visualize the consequences of space debris on different aspects of life on Earth. These signs were identified by monitoring real debris orbiting the planet. Each sign depicts the impact of a single consequence of the collective problem that space pollution represents. The matters of space are discussed in closed conference rooms around the world, and they are barely made accessible to the general public. But we all have the right to participate. After all, our lives on Earth heavily depend on space.” This is a joint project between various organisations, including the European Space Agency – you may not be surprised that Starlink, a genuinely incredible company (I do mean this – whatever I may think of That Fcuking Man, Starlink and SpaceX are quite astonishing achievements) which is responsible for an even more incredible quantity of the material that is soon to be clogging up your next attempt to view the Aurora, is not involved. Anyway, I think this is a great idea, a lovely site and a *slightly* depressing reminder of our species-wide tendency to just sort of leave a trail of material crap wherever any of us go, with no regard whatsoever for the potential long-term consequences.
  • Higher Intellect: A BIG WEB CURIOS CAVEAT: THERE MAY BE BAD STUFF IN HERE. I haven’t been through all of it – lol, I have barely scratched the surface of the surface – but the limited amount I have checked out does include some…quite old-school documentation of the ‘how to easily and relatively-painlessly top yourself at home, using nothing but the contents of your kitchen cupboard’ sort, and as such I’m reasonably certain that there’s likely to be some sort of amateur bomb-making instructions buried in the archives somewhere. Caveat emptor, is all I’m saying. Anyway, this is a quite remarkable collection of old files from the old web – the BBS and messageboard days, when text files acted as digital samizdat, copied and shared on floppies or low-bandwidth servers, and the web was populated by…look, let’s just say it out loud, genuine outsider weirdos. “Higher Intellect is a World Wide Web server hosting a searchable database of over 750,000 text files on a variety of subjects” runs the blurb – but that doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface. The topic listing should give you an idea of the sort of esoterica on display here – the first entry is ‘aliens and UFOs’, ffs – but a selection of other categories includes “Ancient Texts, Cryptography, Cryptology, Employment, HAM Radio, Images, Laugh, Lyrics & Music Related, Manuals, Movie & TV Scripts, Other, People, Recipes, Sensitive Documents, Sporting & Recreation, Strange Information, UN & NATO”, so you get the idea. I imagine there is some genuinely mad stuff in here, which is the appeal – but, again, really, tread carefully as you maybe don’t want a bunch of instructions on ‘how to make napalm in your bath’ in your cache.
  • Hexagen World: Another of those ‘infinite canvas’ projects where an infinite number of people from all over the web can claim plots of ‘land’ on a website and create their own small townscapes which will live on in perpetuity for anyone else to look and marvel at – except the gimmick here is that the small parcels of land are decorated based on the AI prompt that you input. Which, yes, I know, AI ART=BAD, but not everyone has the time, patience or skill to painstakingly compose a pixelart masterpiece, and there’s something pleasingly-democratic about the fact that anyone can drop in and add to the canvas. You need to scroll around to find a spare plot at the edges – zoom out as far as you can, and scroll down-and-right – and you can only add to a plot which is connected to an existing design on at least one side, but it’s simple, easy and free, and it’s quite pleasing to add to something collaborative like this. I presume that there are various guardrails in place to prevent you from creating, I don’t know, “A high-rise city constructed from phalli”, but, well, why not test the boundaries? This is pretty new, I think, and there’s a bunch of functionality they want to implement including the ability to ‘take over’ other people’s hexes – which, frankly, will probably make the whole thing significantly worse, so get in early and have a look around before it gets turned into some sort of tedious Channish turf war between bored children (you can browse without adding anything – it’s worth taking a look, promise).
  • Otto Writes: I’ve long been of the opinion that while everyone has a book in them, most of those books don’t deserve to be published, or read, or written – the same applies for autobiographies, except quadruply so. Still, if you’re possessed of a degree of hubris so great that you think ‘you know what? I AM FASCINATING AND MORE MUST KNOW OF MY UNIQUE STRUGGLE’ then a) I don’t like you; and b) you will possibly find something to love in Otto, an AI-powered (OF COURSE) platform which purports to help YOU – yes YOU! – write your own story. The idea is that the AI will ask you a bunch of questions about yourself, which you can answer simply by speaking into the app – do it at your own pace, whenever you feel like it – and the software will then turn that into AMAZING PROSE (it will not be amazing prose) which will eventually be compiled into “a 7500 word professionally written biography for a fraction of the cost.” I think they are *possibly* stretching the definition of ‘professionally-written’ to its very limit here – and, honestly, can you IMAGINE the sort of copy that will result from anyone self-obsessed enough to actually want to do this being allowed to burble unfiltered ID into a microphone based on prompts like ‘what are your dreams?’? – but if you’re the sort of dreadful, egocentric monster whose ‘friends’ have started glazing over every time you start talking about being in your ‘rise era’ then GO FOR YOUR LIFE!
  • Globe Engineer: I am pretty sure I featured this a few months ago [AUTHORIAL NOTE – yes, I did, in March], but it has had a glow-up and, honestly, I think this is genuinely useful in a way that few other AI things (outside of your Big LLMs and image-generators) are, and so I am featuring it again in the hope that some of you give it a try. Globe Engineer is basically a topic mapping tool – put in any topic you like and it will generate a genuinely helpful sort of…well, topic map (sorry, that was VERY poor) of the concept. Put in ‘long-distance running shoes’, for example, and in LITERALLY SECONDS it will pull together a dashboard covering types of foam cushioning, insoles, medial postings (no idea), heel counters (again, no idea) and the like, with screenshots from useful web resources. It doesn’t pretend to go DEEP, but as a way of getting an almost-instant birds-eye view of a subject this is honestly INCREDIBLY helpful – all of you strategists and planners who often have to immerse yourselves in a completely new category for a pitch, bookmark this as it is properly helpful in a way that I didn’t expect it to be.
  • The Chronosphere: Significantly less sinister than the name makes it sound – or at least I think it is; I’ll let you know if a Pinhead-alike appears unbidden in my kitchen as I’m typing this and attempts to separate my skin from my skull – The Chronosphere (seriously, WHY?) is actually a really shiny 3d virtual museum platform which, as far as I can tell, basically brings together elements from different and disparate collections around the world in surprisingly-high-quality 3d renders, which you can ‘walk’ around in-browser. Ordinarily I’m quite sniffy about ‘walk through the museum’ stuff, because in the main these things are, let’s be honest, dogsh1t, but the tech here is really very good, and the quality of the graphics and the modeling on the works displayed is superb. Collections so far are limited to ‘Stuff from Ancient Rome’ and ‘Stuff by Goya’ (with Egypt coming soon), but it’s worth a look as it’s significantly more impressive than these things tend to be – although be warned, it absolutely FCUKED my laptop (which is admittedly VERY SH1T and VERY OLD) which was wheezing like an emphysemic until I shut down every single other tab.
  • Walked Out Niemans: The TikTok account of an experimental videogame developer – look, you really just have to click this and scroll and watch some of the videos, because this stuff is both ART and NIGHTMARE and SOCIAL COMMENTARY, and while it’s not (to my mind at least) on the same level as Dan Douglas’ ongoing, genius, Duke Smoochem project (I will say it again – GIVE THAT MAN THE TURNERT PRIZE HE DESERVES YOU COWARDS) it is brilliantly unhinged and quite…striking in its visual design. Seriously watch this – no, watch ALL of it, with the sound up, full-screen – and tell me that something special’s not happening here.
  • Wikipedia Fact-Checker: If you were to travel back in time 15 years and confidently tell people that Wikipedia would in the future be considered a genuinely useful place to do research and source facts you would have been laughed out of town – WELL WHO’S LAUGHING NOW??? Erm, noone, as it happens – the fact that we’re all so reliant on Wikipedia says far more about the degradation and pollution of the global informational water table than it does anything else tbh – but it’s true that it’s an incredibly comprehensive and largely-accurate resource here in fcuked-up old 2024. This is a Chrome extension which uses (I think) GPT API access to check Wikipedia for you on demand – install the extension, highlight any text on any webpage that yo’d like to quickly run a check on, and The Machine will toddle off to Wikipedia and confirm or deny the veracity of whatever it is that you’re querying, along with providing a link to, and citation from, the relevant page. This is…this is great, honestly, a really smart use of both the LLM and of the Wiki corpus, and it’s easy to use, and, in my limited trial, it…seems to work? Honestly, for anyone who does a lot of desk research this is worth a look.
  • All The Birds With One Stone: Prolific digital artist Chia Amisola returns with a new, small project – I don’t want to explain this too much, it’s small and lovely and it will make you feel…nice? I don’t get to say that too often in Curios, so enjoy the rare moment of respite from the crushing futurehorror (you will need to enable popups for this to work properly, fyi).
  • Scott Darby: I have a vague feeling I have come across Scott’s work before over the past 20 years of internetspelunking, but I had never seen his homepage before – Scott is a Bristol-based creative developer who tends to work in and around datavisualisation, and his website…God, I can’t explain how much I *adore* this, the visuals and the aesthetic and the kinetic way the whole thing sort of slides around under your eyes, like the digital offspring of Richard Serra’s sculpture’s and Frank Gehry’s architecture (yes, I know, pretentious as all fcuk, but I promise you’ll see what I mean), and I think this is a work of art in and of itself. There are links to a selection of his projects too, which are worth exploring, but, honestly, this is SO beautiful.
  • Watch The Titles: I am slightly astonished that I haven’t come across this before – turns out the internet is really big! Who knew?! – but if you’re interested in visual design in cinema then this will be right up your street. “Forget the Film, Watch the Titles! is a project dedicated to the art of title design and its creators. Launched in 2006, the recently renewed website features a growing collection of over 200 title sequences and behind-the-scenes content, offering a unique glimpse into the people, ideas and processes behind their creation.” This is a quite incredible resource – there is SO MUCH in here – and obviously a real labour of love by one Remco Vlaanderen who’s seemingly responsible for curating the whole thing.
  • Famicase 24: Every year, a competition takes place where designers submit their, er, designs (FFS MATT!) for cartridge art for imaginary games on the now-defunct Super Famicom games console (known as the Super NES in the West) – this is this year’s selection of entries. Obviously none of these are real games, but so many of them really ought to be – and the imagination and skill on display here is hugely impressive. It’s worth taking a bit of time to go through them – click the first one and then cycle through, as they’re a bit small to see all at once, and tell me that you don’t think the person who designed the cart for ‘Body Golf’ shouldn’t win some sort of international prize (seriously, even if this doesn’t tickle your particular fancy, do check it out).
  • My Girlfriend Is An Artist: Not mine, my friend Kris’ – this is a site he made for her birthday, featuring photographs by her, captioned by him. I think this is SO BEAUTIFUL and SO LOVELY – each time you refresh the site you get a different image and caption, and there’s a sort of poetry in just clicking ‘reload’ for a few minutes and wandering through someone else’s family love story (sorry if that sounds creepy, man, it’s really not meant to).
  • Twelve Football: I think this is designed for ‘professional’ football data analysts, but it’s another interesting use of layering an LLM over data – the idea is that you can run natural language queries against an enormous corpus of player data from across the major leagues around the world, letting you ask things like ‘which left-footed striker has the highest nXPG from open play between minutes 73 and 90 when playing against a flat 442?’ (ok, I am guessing here, but it feels like that sort of thing). It’s only in trial at the moment, but if you’re someone who’s interested in how you can do more with data using this sort of tech then it’s possibly a useful case-study – equally so if you’re the sort of person who takes their FPL team far too seriously. It’s interesting to me how democratised this stuff is getting – this and McClachbot are genuinely impressive data analysis and scouting tools, made available to anyone, which is sort-of remarkable really.
  • AI Tarot: On the one hand, a tarot reading done by AI is obviously TOTAL BOLL0CKS – on the other, so is a tarot reading done by an actual human being (sorry, it really is) so why not just let the AI do it? Pick the sort of reading you want, frame your question, and MARVEL AS THE DIGITAL CARDS REVEAL YOUR FATE! This is all textual with no graphical bells and whistles, but it’s clean and quick and if you want a quick answer to ‘should I quit my job and set up shop as a freelance strategist?’ (the answer is ‘lol, do you know how many middle-aged people are glutting the market with this sort of sh1t right now and do you know how necessary they are, lol?’) then you could do worse than consult the major and minor arcana through this site (to be clear: you could not do worse, this is STUPID and should only be treated as a joke, do not let The Machine cosplaying as Mystic Meg dictate your life).
  • Kitchen Confidentials: I have…some questions about how long this is going to stay live for, particularly given it’s operating in the famously-litigious New York area, but WOW is this a great idea and a source of some cracking restaurant industry gossip. Kitchen Confidentials is basically ‘glassdoor for the NYC restaurant scene’, and its mission statement reads as follows: “Kitchen Confidentials exists to empower workers in the food service industry. Kitchen Confidentials grew out of a need for a platform where food service workers can access trustworthy information regarding the compensation, workplace culture, and benefits offered by establishments in New York City. Kitchen Confidentials is committed to fostering positive change in the food service industry. We celebrate businesses that prioritize the well-being of their employees, and create accountability among businesses that could improve worker treatment. We believe in the power of transparency to create an industry where owners, managers, waiters, line cooks, dishwashers, and customers can all thrive.” A great idea, a good initiative and SO FUN to read (in a sort of schadenfreude-y way) – MAKE THIS HAPPEN IN LONDON, SOMEONE! This feels like it has ‘Vittles Spinoff Project’ written all over it.

By Molly Bounds

NEXT UP, HAVE SOME SLIGHTLY-MANIC JAZZ COURTESY OF THE FABULOUS SOIL AND PIMP SESSIONS! 

THE SECTION WHICH MIGHT HAVE TO LEAVE LONDON IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT ARSENAL DO IN FACT WIN THE LEAGUE, PT.2:    

  • Rap Feud: Now that the dust has seemingly settled – at least momentarily – on The Great Beef, take a moment to enjoy this really nicely-made site which takes you through the timeline of HOW and WHY and WHEN it all went down. This is really, really good – obviously it’s interesting if you’re interested in the story and the people and the music, but also as an explainer project and as a piece of webdesign in its own right. As you scroll, you pass through each individual track – you can listen to it, get information on the backstory as to why it was written, read the lyrics, get information on the artists and the targets… regardless of your interest in Kendrick, Drake or the whole thing, this is just really good webwork. Also it taught me that one of the samples on the Metro ‘BBL Drizzy’ beat was in fact AI-generated, which had totally passed me (and I imagine lots of other casual listeners) by, and which feels like a Rubicon of sorts has been crossed here.
  • The Most Horrible Advert I Have Ever Seen: I’m not exaggerating here. This really, really upset me – not joking! Made me really really sad! – and I would honestly take steps to actively harm the product in question were I ever to see it in the wild (but I think it’s only in North America, and I can’t imagine the brand is going to exist in a few years’ time). Seriously, watch this and see what happens when you take ‘ironic detachment’ far too far.
  • Birdify: By way of a palate-cleanser after that horrid ad – SO HORRID – have this lovely project, by one Thomas Newlove, which simply lets you listen to the sound of birds. That’s it! Search for your favourite, or simply browse through the list – it’s simply pleasant to hear birdsong, but it’s also nice to have a listen to some of the more common British varieties to see if you can start to recognise them in the wild; I am back in leafy South London and it is SO NICE to be able to hear birdsong again (although I am probably going to have to revise that opinion if the pigeons obviously living on the roof directly above my bedroom don’t start shutting the fcuk up).
  • Words About War: Not really a Curio, this, so much as a serious and useful project (there’s that whiplash thematic sidewindering again, really must try and address that one day) – Words About War is a document which is designed to act as a language guide for people writing about conflict to seek to ensure that the words they use are fair and accurate. From the homepage: “From George Orwell’s critique of the language of totalitarian regimes to today, discussions of war and foreign policy have been full of dehumanizing euphemisms, bloodless jargon, little-known government acronyms, and troubling metaphors that hide warfare’s damage. Think of “collateral damage” (civilian deaths), “overseas contingency operations” (wars), and “bug splat” (killing human beings with drone-fired missiles). This guide aims to help people write and talk about war and foreign policy more accurately, more honestly, and in ways people outside the elite Washington, DC foreign policy “blob” can understand. We encourage you to use this guide, to share it with others, and to adapt it as necessary to local contexts. The guide should be especially helpful to journalists and other writers, podcasters and vloggers, policy analysts, teachers, scholars, and people involved in public education projects.” Leaving aside the slightly-irksome reference to the ‘foreign policy blob’, this is a useful and interesting project, and it’s worth having a look at the short version, even if you can’t be bothered with the whole thing, and then bearing what it says in mind next time you read reporting about, for the sake of argument, Gaza.
  • The Desktop Cat Cursor: Inspired by an idea floated by legendary internet geek Foone, this is a small download (which costs a quid) which will turn your computer cursor into a long cartoon cat’s paw, reaching in from outside the boundaries of your screen to move and manipulate things on your desktop. Why? BECAUSE IT’S FUNNY (sort-of, if you’re a particular type of person).
  • Digital Art From the Era of Japanese PCs: Ok, so, again, an upfront warning – this is a decade-old forum thread collecting examples of pixel art from Japanese videogames in the 80s and early-90s, and as such it features QUITE A FEW EXAMPLES OF PIXELART NUDITY, almost all, inevitably, of women, because Hentai. Still, it’s not ALL slightly-tawdry pseudo-bongo, and, honestly, this is aesthetically fascinating, I promise (as well as there being some really beautiful work in here). From the person who started the thread: “So over the past few years I’ve been saving pictures from old Japanese games that I really liked and I thought I’d share them with you all. Most of these pictures come from Japanese PCs from the 80s to mid 90s like the MSX, PC88, PC98, X1, X68000, FM Towns and a bunch of others. They’re pretty impressive because they display a level of graphical quality that Western computers just weren’t capable of producing until much later. Take a look at the intro for the PC88 RPG The Screamer. It’s hard to believe that this game came out in 1984; there was nothing remotely comparable coming from Western computers at the time.” There is a LOT in here – there are 4 full pages of screenshots – and if you’re interested you can read a little more about the technical ‘why’ of this stuff on this page (but, again, apologies for the nudity on this one – it turns out that the venn diagram of ‘people who are minded to collect screenshots of old Japanese videogames’ and ‘people who like looking at pixelart representations of anatomically-improbable women’ is a circle).
  • Shund: This is one of those links that is very much Not For Me – mainly because I don’t speak a word of Hebrew, or Yiddish – but which I like to think will for ONE READER be genuinely fascinating and useful. Shund is a searchable database of Yiddish popular fiction from down the years, searchable and readable on-site, and while it’s intended for linguistic and cultural scholars I would imagine that, if you can read the texts, there’s something in here for the more casual historian. “A Woman’s Honor, The Lost Daughter, It’s Hard to be a Mother, The Masked World—these are just a few titles from the thousands of Yiddish pulp novels published during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Serialized as stand-alone pamphlets or in the pages of the Yiddish press, novels like these are twisting tales of murder and infidelity, adventure and political intrigue. Though labeled by critics as “trash” (shund in Yiddish), they were central to Jewish daily life throughout the global network of Ashkenazi Jewry. Today these texts remain largely unstudied even as scholars assert their importance to understanding Yiddish culture and its afterlives. This project aims to bridge this gap by producing a collaborative, open-access database that will synthesize shund’s varied and disparate archives and facilitate new scholarship. With a better understanding of what exactly constitutes shund, a group of scholars can together produce comparative histories of the genre while theorizing it as a paradigm for how marginalized cultures confront the modern world.” The site’s not the most user-friendly in the world, but it does work – I just couldn’t understand a word of the content, but that’s my problem not theirs.
  • Pasta Guide: A guide to pasta! As it says right up top, this is not a recipe guide or a cookbook (although there is a recipe for making actual pasta) – it’s just a guide to what pasta is, how it’s made, some of the shapes…Look, I fcuking LOVE pasta (obviously) and I genuinely don’t understand the slight air of shock and horror that people in my life have occasionally exhibited at my ability and indeed inclination to eat it multiple times a day, and I am very much in favour of this sort of technical appreciation of one of the world’s greatest-ever foodstuffs (fight me) (don’t fight me, I am weak and sickly)…and if you click through the ‘Experiments’ tab you’ll be taken to Adriana Gallo’s Are.na page where she documents her experiences of making the stuff…this is not the most comprehensive pasta resource on the web, but I love it precisely because it’s just one person’s celebration of something they really like, which is basically what the very best of the web is all about.
  • Dupe: Look, let’s get this out of the way – I don’t approve of buying stuff just for the sake of it, I don’t approve of consumption in general (yes, I am fun at parties, and no I don’t get invited to many, why do you ask?) and I’m increasingly feeling like some sort of ascetic preacher of doom in the face of the world’s ceaseless attempts to dull the pain with shopping. THAT SAID, I am equally aware that sometimes you do actually need things, and that you might find it useful to have a way of finding stuff that looks like the expensive version you really want but can’t afford, at half the price. Thus, Dupe – a service in beta which lets you plug in the url of any product you care to mention and which promises to find you a selection of knockoff versions of said product from around the web. I can’t vouch for how well or otherwise this works, but it’s worth a go I think. This is firmly focused on home decor, before you get all excited about getting couture knockoffs, but if you’re decorating then this might be useful.
  • Il Campionato Mondiale di Umari: This is a project by one of my favourite niche newsletters (Scope of Work, which I’ve featured in here a few times before, which is mostly about building and construction and the process of making stuff), and I’ll let Spencer, who runs it, introduce the concept to you: “Umari is the plural form of umarell, and umarell is a jocular Italian [AUTHOR’S INTERJECTION – it’s actually dialect, Bolognese iirc. God I’m a prick] term for a person – classically a man of retirement age – who pauses to observe work in progress. The term might be used as light-hearted mockery, but I think more people ought to umarell.  To umarell is to take an interest in the built environment – the environment that our species creates, and in which most of us spend most of our time. An umarell turns their attention to that environment’s creation, taking time to appreciate the materials, machines, and muscles from which it emerges.” Isn’t that a wonderful concept? Anyway, Spencer is running a small contest, to celebrate people who are observing work in interesting ways – whether in sketch form, or in writing (whether technical or creative) – and I think this is SUCH an interesting concept and potentially a source of some really interesting work, and I wondered maybe one or two of you might think it the sort of thing you might want to have a go at.
  • Open Glass: I imagine the number of people reading this who might be interested in cobbling together their own homebrew version of AI-enabled glasses is a round zero, but, just in case, here are some instructions on how to do so. You remember 12 years ago when Google Glass came out and the world wasn’t ready, and the term ‘glasshole’ was coined? Trust me, you would need to invent whole new words for people wearing these. Still, pretty fcuking scifi (NB – I think this is the second of these projects I’ve featured in here, but this one’s managed to strip the hardware costs to about £25 which is…frankly insane).
  • The Black Games Archive: “Black Games Archive is a multimedia, public-facing database of games, digital resources, accessible scholarship, and designer interviews that are relevant to the intersections between Black culture, games, and play.” This is a great resource, both for people seeking titles that feature better representation of black people than was often traditional (although thankfully the industry’s come on leaps and bounds since I worked in it in the mid-00s) and for anyone interested academic readings around race, society and representation in the medium – there’s also a section focused on essays and scholarship, which is useful for anyone wanting to delve into this further.
  • While We’re Talking About Games, I Did A Talk: The link takes you to the (terrible) slides, and you can read my (terrible) notes here, should you be interested. I am genuinely sorry to everyone who listened to it for all the swearing and for using a Bad Word Which Is No Longer Acceptable In The 2020s when describing the Daily Mail’s reaction to God of War II’s launch party.
  • Fanzine World: This is a nice idea which I don’t think *quite* works, but you might find something in it – Fanzine World is designed to let anyone pull together a list of 5 ‘creators’ based on a theme of their choosing, the idea being that anyone can say ‘Hey, I’m really into haberdashery, here are the 5 creators I think are most interesting the haberdashery space RIGHT NOW’ for anyone else to find and peruse and enjoy. Basically it’s a way for people to share their passions, and it’s potentially not a bad way of finding creators within a certain vertical should you need one.
  • Campane Marinelli: Are any of you in the market for a church bell? I mean an actual church bell, massive and sonorous, to hang in a church tower, made in a foundry and weighing tonnes? No, of course you’re not, but I was so pleased with the fact that PEOPLE WHO MAKE CHURCH BELLS HAVE WEBSITES that I felt compelled to include this one. Campanologists, this one is for YOU!
  • Digitiser: Now this is one I really can’t believe I haven’t featured before – those of you who a) grew up in the UK; and b) are old, like I am, may have fond memories of TeleText, the text-based internet precursor (it was nothing like the internet) which basically let you read pages of text on your telly, and which was arranged into various sections, not unlike a weird sort of TV-based magazine, and which was where people used to buy cheap holidays and keep track of the football scores as recently as about 1998. One of the BEST things about TeleText was its coverage of music (honestly, I bought SO many great albums based off their recommendations in the early-90s) and videogames – the games section in particular was a genuinely-hallucinatory mix of off-kilter humour, tips, properly good reviews and some VERY STRANGE low-res 8-bit pixel art, and some utterly baffling (to anyone who wasn’t already immersed in the lore) in-jokes and running gags…and the archive is online! YOU CAN READ DIGI AGAIN! Honestly, if you remember this stuff then I can’t tell you what a treat it is; if you don’t, it’s worth clicking this link and having a dig around because a) you will be amazed by how genuinely strange so much of it is, and how odd it must have been to find it just a button-press away from the aggressively-normie confines of ITV in 1993; and b) you will get an idea for how incredibly bored teenagers were , when we would literally sit and wait 20s at a time for the pages to automatically turn so we could read a comic review of Prince of Persia.
  • AntARctica: Sorry about the bad joke sorry sorry sorry. This is genuinely great, though – an (I think) educational portal for the UK Antarctic Heritage Trust with a bunch of AR experiences that let you ‘experience’ the magic and mystery of being VERY COLD on the tundra, with your huskies – you can do these on your phone, and there are six different experiences including swimming with the penguins, running with the sledding dogs and freezing to death, alone and cold and frightened (one of these is in fact a lie).
  • The Labyrinth: This is by no objective standards ‘good’, but, equally, it’s a game that was made by a team of forty ten year old kids in Croatia – it’s a small platformer, which uses the children’s drawings as the source art, and while it’s very simple and very janky it’s also weirdly charming, and I have to say that if it was a bit more polished I like the aesthetic enough to play for longer than the 45s I actually lasted.
  • PixoGuess: Can you guess what the pixellated thing is? CAN YOU? Pick from various categories – logos, pokemon, videogame characters, etc – and see how quickly you can guess what they are as they go from HUGELY PIXELLATED ABSTRACT MESSES to recognisable images. This is…moderately fun, and you can create local lobbies so you can spend the afternoon challenging your colleagues should you not have anything better to do with your life.
  • EyeSpy: Play I Spy in your browser with what I presume ae Google Earth images – you’re plonked somewhere in the world, and given an option of 3 objects which appear somewhere in the 360 image – all you need to do is select the correct one. This is…quite hard, but you get the feel for it after a couple of goes and it’s a not-terrible way of killing time while you wait for timesheet-o-clock.
  • Showdown: This is ‘rock, paper, scissors’, but more fun than you’d think – you play against a moustachio’d cowboy figure, which responds to your strategies, and there’s a betting mechanic which keeps it compelling, and this is FAR shinier and better-made than it needs to be, and, honestly, I really enjoyed this and I think you might do too.

By Not The NoName

THE FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK TAKES YOU THROUGH LOUNGEY DISCO ALL THE WAY TO SOME SORT OF PROTO-HOUSE VIA A VARIETY OF SLIGHTLY-80s SOUNDS WHICH I CAN’T DESCRIBE ANYWHERE NEAR AS WELL AS I WOULD LIKE, AND IT’S BY SI KURRAGE AND MR SHIVER AND IT IS GREAT! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Models Meet Mean Girls: Photographs of models juxtaposed with quotes from Mean Girls – there is ONE person I know for whom this is basically a perfect website, but maybe it will be that for you too.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Art Deco Society NY: Via Blort, this is a lovely Insta feed featuring, er, art deco stuff in New York. But, you know, not just the Chrysler Building – OTHER art deco stuff. Look, it’s good, you’ll enjoy it, have a click.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • All The OpenAI Stuff: Ok, so obvious caveat here that I am not a journalist (lol, like you needed telling) and that therefore me casting shade on the reporting around this week’s BIG AI ANNOUNCEMENTS, but it was incredibly disappointing, in the case of OpenAI, to see all the coverage literally saying ‘IT IS GOING TO BE JUST LIKE ‘HER’ LOL!’ without applying anything resembling a critical lens to the fact that a) THIS IS ALL DEMO STUFF AND UNTIL IT IS IN THE WILD YOU SHOULDN’T REPORT ON IT LIKE IT’S FACT FFS; and b) by so doing all you’re accomplishing is the perpetuation of the already-creepy ‘female digital figure as servile male fantasy companion’ trope that should already have been retired many, many years ago. Anyway, my tedious kvetching aside, it’s worth going through all the of the promo materials from the GPT-4o launch because there *is* a lot of impressive-looking stuff there, but it’s all NOT YET ACTUALLY CONSUMER-READY YET (just like Sora! And that hasn’t stopped millions of words being written about how amazing it is, despite the fact that only about 300 people in the world have actually used the fcuking thing). What I will say is that the move towards ‘true’ multimodality, from both OpenAI and Google, is going to be genuinely transformative – the assistant stuff is, to my mind, the least-interesting bit of this, whereas the potential applications for industry are vast and thrilling (to me, at least). I’ve been playing with GPT-4o this week (or at least the bits of it that are available, which is basically the sped up model and the ability to do better and more useful stuff with Excel) and my quick impressions are that it’s LOADS faster but not ‘smarter’ in any appreciable way, BUT its writing feels…less awful than the standard GPT-4, which is useful, and the DallE-3 integration can now do faultless text, which again is helpful. Still, NONE OF THE FANCY STUFF IS LIVE YET, so perhaps hold off on spaffing joyously into the breeze with excitement just yet, eh?
  • All of the Google I/O AI Stuff: As for OpenAI, for Google – ALMOST NONE OF THE STUFF THEY SHOWED AT THE DEMO IS ACTUALLY LIVE YET! SO MUCH OF WHAT PICHAI SAID ON STAGE WAS COUCHED IN TERMS OF ‘WHAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO DO’ NOT ‘WHAT WE CAN DO’! FFS! Anyway, I thought it was interesting – and, let’s be clear, a genuinely inspired bit of PR/Marketing on the part of the team doing the demo videos – to include the ‘and look! Astra (the digital assistant part of the show) can find your glasses WITHOUT EVEN BEING TOLD TO NOTICE THEM!’ bit, which is what EVERYONE in my feed was getting super-excited about (if nothing else, Google know exactly how old most tech reporters are in 2024, it seems, and what they personally care about). Still, the BIG NEWS which has been criminally underreported in the wake of this week’s news has been exactly how hard every single business that has been built on ‘traffic equals revenue’ is going to be fcuked in the next 12 months. Seriously, if you currently make money from ad revenue then, well, KISS THAT GOODBYE!
  • Plastic Everywhere: This week’s ‘unpleasantly-sobering dispatch from the pointy-end of the environmental sh1tshow’ comes in the form of this ProPublica article, in which Lisa Song spends some time at the UN Environmental Programme’s Conference on Plastic Pollution and discovers that a significant number of the delegates are…enormous plastic producers, swanning around with access-all-areas badges and treating the whole thing as a massive lobbying opportunity while the delegates from the countries currently having their waterways clogged with infinite quantities of Coke bottles and P&G/Unilever single-serving plastic sachets get to stick posters up in the corridors and cry quietly into their terrible coffee. I can’t stress enough that every single multinational company currently saying things like ‘we really want to be part of the solution, and in fact we need to be, because without us the ‘energy transition’ or ‘plastic free oceans’ or ‘movement to limit water scarcity’ (delete as applicable) at conferences like this is ALSO, behind closed doors, whispering into the ears of the political classes…’but we have to go slower, because otherwise CIVILISATION (and, coincidentally, our margins) will collapse around our ears’.
  • What Elon Musk’s Favourite Game Tells Us About Him: When I reviewed the Musk book last year, I noted that the Walter Isaacson had a bizarre and very boomer-ish  (sorry to use that word, but in this case it feels apposite) habit of thinking that Musk’s enjoyment of videogames somehow marked him as ‘interesting’, ‘unique’ or, heaven forfend, ‘strategically brilliant’ – here, Dave Karpf takes that and runs with it, spending a bit of time playing Musk’s favourite game (per Isaacson), a mobile free-to-play number called ‘Polytopia’, and doing a bit of a thinkpiece on What It Means if this particular title is your favourite game in the world. Honestly, this is BRILLIANT and I think the most savage takedown of That Fcuking Man and his intellectual prowess I have ever read – please do read the whole thing, it is smart rather than snarky, and it makes so much sense. I mean, look: “There are no hidden layers to Elon Musk’s thinking. He likes the gratification of impulsively pushing a button and seeing the numbers go up. He likes games that are straightforward and easy to beat. He’d rather reset every 45 minutes than execute meticulous plans that extend far into an uncertain future. He does not think ten moves ahead. He just responds with maximal aggression to the latest change of conditions. (The stock is down again. Announce robotaxis!) When this works, he gets the satisfaction of dominance. When it doesn’t, he can always just reset and try again.”
  • AI Forgeries: I rather enjoyed this piece, in a ‘wow, I did not for a second think of that as a potential side effect of the rise of generative AI, but now you come to mention it it makes perfect sense’ sort of way – Maggie Appleton writes about the flood of prints of works by classic artists that are cropping up all over Etsy and eBay (not purporting to be originals – just people selling prints) which are not in fact paintings that have ever existed in the real world. Turns out if you just plug ‘in the style of [dead old master] into your image generation machine of choice, along with whatever scene you fancy, you can conjure up the sort of thing that looks like it belongs in a lineup of the artist’s other works and which is convincing enough to fool someone who has no idea about the artist’s actual body of recorded work. The examples in here are fascinating ‘Plage Rose’ by Monet (not Monet), an infinity of knockoff William Morris prints…as Appleton puts it, this is all pointing towards a degree of ‘epistemic collapse’: “You can peruse this evidence and conclude I’m just a gullible idiot, which I’ll accept. A more learned and cultured individual could easily distinguish a real Morris from a Midjourney hoax. Despite earning a snowflakey liberal arts degree, I failed this test. How many others do you think would pass it? What happens to the next generation of gullible idiots, when they ask their AI assistant to show them “william morris prints,” and those keywords have already been tainted by the sea of Etsy images? What about when more capable models can create even-more-convincing Morris prints, sans their telltale artefacts and slip-ups? When do the generated images become epistemologically indistinguishable from what Morris created?” Well, yes, quite.
  • The Indians Fighting In Ukraine: This is a quite remarkable story – and a very bleak one, to be clear – all about how kids in India are being lured to Russia on the pretext of (relatively) well-paid work, only to find themselves shipped off to the frontline. Honestly, you will read this with slowly-mounting disbelief and horror; SUCH a future story, this one, and Gibsonian in the most horrifying of ways.
  • EVs in China: I don’t care about cars, and this piece is a bit *too* car-y for my general tastes, but I’m including it because it paints a fascinating picture of something we should all have realised by now and which I (and, to be fair, loads of other smarter people) have been wanging on about for a while now – specifically, THE WEST IS VERY MUCH NOT THE CENTRE OF THE WORLD ANY MORE, OR THE VANGUARD, AND WE WILL NOT BE AGAIN FOR QUITE A LONG TIME. This is motoring journalist Kevin Williams on his experience of going to a recent EV motorshow in China, and being blown away by the quality and sophistication of the vehicles on offer there, even at the low end, compared to what’s coming out of the US (this is a US-centric perspective, but I can’t imagine that the picture looks significantly better if you’re a European manufacturer). There’s a sense as the piece goes on that Williams is having something of a Damascene moment, and not in a way that he’s enjoying.
  • Print Is Coming Back: On the one hand, I agree with the basic premise of this piece – that there is a renewed desire for physical media, particularly amongst younger generations, as part of the general trend towards fetishising the analogue past, and ‘doing a magazine’ is the sort of thing that will help you appeal to a certain sort of demographic; on the other, I also think that the prospects of being able to ‘do a magazine’ in a way that makes money in a sustainable way are, in the main, basically zero. Look at The Fence, for example – a magazine I like a lot, and subscribe to, and which is in rude health, relatively-speaking, but which is also INCREDIBLY WELL-CONNECTED in London medialand, which is run by a man who is by any token INCREDIBLY FCUKING POSH, and where at least one of the people closely connected to the publication has a title. Try launching a mag without those sorts of hookups and see how far you get, is all I’m saying. Still, printed collateral ftw and all that.
  • The Hidden Pregnancy Experiment: In which Jia Tolentino tries to keep her pregnancy hidden from The Algorithms. You will of course all remember the now infamous story about the woman who found out she was pregnant because the advertising algos worked it out before she did and started advertising nappies to her – well in this instance Tolentino knows she’s pregnant and decides to see how long she can keep it a secret from the advertisers, not doing any searches for pregnancy or child-related topics and trying to determine whether it’s possible for The Machine to work it out from inference. You will be reassured to know that the answer is ‘yes’ – so can we PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD put the whole ‘my phone is listening to me’ lie to bed now, please?
  • The Life Of A Secret OnlyFans Chatter: This is a great piece, if a legitimately sad one – Brendan Koerner writes for WIRED about taking a job as one of the people who pretends to be an OnlyFans model in the chat, running accounts as part of borderline-criminal engagement farms, which run accounts for multiple women who effectively act as fronts for schemes where the REAL money is made from getting the marks chatting, paying for extra attention and, occasionally, buying third party goods where the engagement farmers get a kickback (not to mention the fraud stuff). This is…this is really bleak, honestly, from the fact that SO MANY PEOPLE are doing this – Koerner initially struggles to find a job, because the supply of people willing to do this stuff outstrips demand, and even when he does the money is pretty dreadful – to the fact that at every turn you’re confronted with the fact that the people being scammed are desperately lonely and desperately unhappy. Don’t, whatever you do, think too hard about what AI is going to do to this industry.
  • The Battle For Thamesmead: Apologies for the Unherd link, but this is just a straight bit of writing with no apparent attempt to push a mad right-wing ideology (unless I am missing something obvious here) – instead, it’s about the redevelopment of the Thamesmead Estate, where A Clockwork Orange was in-part filmed, and how what is happening there can be seen as a synecdoche for the problems facing UK housing, planning and development in general. Look, you have to be…quite interested in housing in the UK for this one to be of interest, so I won’t be offended if the non-Anglos skip this one, but this really is interesting, I promise (if enraging in places).
  • The Actual History of Emoji: The second link in Curios this week about the ways in which the intersection of the unique quality of the Japanese written language combined with the country’s technological sophistication in the 20th Century resulted in really interesting, parallel-track innovation – in this instance, it’s a surprisingly-interesting (no, really!) look at the REAL history of emoji, which did not in fact start in the internet era but instead, this piece argues, as far back as the 1960s. Honestly, this really is fascinating (and I don’t like emoji).
  • Music Vs Lyrics: Are you a music person or a lyrics person? I have to say that personally I don’t totally get the distinction (though, I suppose, it’s always words, always words), but I really enjoyed this piece in which a variety of different ‘music journalists, DJs, musicians, editors, authors…people generally paid to think about music for a living’ think about where they would put themselves on the one-vs-the-other spectrum and why. I enjoyed this mainly because it’s one of those wonderful windows into the way in which everyone’s brain works differently, and everyone’s experience of everything is necessarily utterly subjective, and therefore we are all fundamentally alone and will die alo-no, hang on, that wasn’t meant to be the takeaway! Anyway, this is really interesting as much from the point of view of human psychology as it is from the point of view of music.
  • Making the XKCD Machine: You will, of COURSE, remember the massive, interconnecting series of Rube Goldberg machines that XKCD let people create earlier this year (you do, I wrote about it, don’t be obtuse); well, this is a piece about how they built it. Which, I know, doesn’t sound that interesting, but I promise it’s FASCINATING from the point of view of design, UX and UI, how to design systems, how to create collaborative experiences, how to plan for and manage human psychology…honestly, this really is SO GOOD if you have ever made, or tried to make, anything for people to mess around with on the internet, and shows the insane amount of thinking and hard work that has to go into making something this good.
  • Designs for the Great Tower of London: I genuinely had no idea that this was ever mooted, but it turns out that when Paris got the Eiffel Tower, London got VERY jealous and, for a brief period, seriously considered attempting to one-up the French by building our own. This is piece about that, which also includes an embedded PDF of an old book featuring ALL the designs submitted as part of the public contest to come up with a structure. There are some AMAZING (and some very, very mad) designs in here, and what I think I love most of all is that while some of them were obviously submitted by teams of architects and the like, a significant number seem to have been knocked up by ‘some bloke in Sydenham with a pen and some time on his hands’. Amazingly construction was actually started on one of these, but the project ran out of money in 1889 after seven years and just 47 metres. OH WHAT WE COULD HAVE HAD!
  • I Don’t Know How To Live If My Anorexia Dies: This one is obviously all about having an eating disorder so, for the third time this Curios, caveat emptor. If you can stand it, though, this is (to my mind, at least) quite an incredible piece of writing – it’s rare that I read something about a condition like this that is so honest, so clear-eyed and so unflinching in its depiction of the mental state one finds oneself in when one can acknowledge that one has a problem but, equally, when the problem is so much a part of one that without it, one may well cease to exist, even if, with it, the same outcome is probably likely. This is not an easy read, and, look, if you’re having a hard time then I might suggest you approach it with caution, but I think it’s superb.
  • Eating Rabbits: On meat, and animals, and the relationship between the two, and poverty and memory and and and. This is beautiful – but, also, it is about killing and eating animals, so, y’know, be aware.
  • The Garden of Time: As this republication of JG Ballard’s short story SCREAMS from the top of the page, ‘THE STORY THAT INSPIRED THIS YEAR’S MET GALA’ – it’s Ballard, so obviously it’s great (although personally it’s far from Classic JG, to my mind), but the reason it’s worth reading is that it’s *quite hard* not to see the choice of theme as a fairly explicit ‘fcuk you, you fcuking idiots’ to either the people paying all that money to attend the Met, or to those of us gawping at their outfits with our noses pressed against the glass (of our phone screens), and I honestly can’t decide which I think it is.
  • Sour Face: The Quietus is one of the UK’s best music magazines, and has been for years, and it relaunched its website this week and is now SHINY and, you know, MODERN-LOOKING, and they also published this absolutely cracking piece of writing by Benjamin Myers recounting the few years he spent as member of a punk outfit called Sour Face, gigging as schoolkids (this was the era of Ash, who were also about 13-14 when their first EP got them on the radar of Chris Morris and others, and I think were 15/6 when they first appeared on TOTP, although I would imagine Myers would fcuking hate the comparison), supporting ridiculously-famous bands like NoFX in Newcastle and across the North East. If you’ve ever been in a band – or if you’re like me and haven’t, but can remember the band that was on the cusp of making it in your hometown when you were a kid (Cinnamon Smith, RIP) – then this will resonate hugely; I know I am OLD, but there’s something slightly elegiac about this as I can’t imagine this being an experience that’s really possible 30 years hence.
  • The Wrestlers Who Made Soho: Ok, this is VERY LONG, and I appreciate that the title might put some of you off, but, honestly, it would be impossible for me to give less of a fcuk about wrestling and I still inhaled this like it was smoke off tinfoil. Patrick W Reed writes about his unlikely friendship with Twiggy, a former denizen of Soho’s colony rooms, a contemporary of the French House drinking set that congregated there when Soho was still, well, Soho, and from that friendship paints a quite incredibly detailed picture of the area and the people that inhabited it in the mid-to-late-20th Century. Yes, ok, there is stuff about the history of UK wrestling, but also about the history of London, and counterculture, and Bacon and Barnard and so many others, the Coach & Horses and GOD I LOVED THIS IT IS SO GOOD. Seriously, give it a go – but it’s definitely one that needs a whole pot of tea (don’t try and drink through it, although you may be tempted given the general air of booze and fagsmoke that pervades the whole piece).
  • I Ran Away To Spain: Gabrielle De La Puente writes on White Pube about…running away to Spain. This is so so so so so so good, a piece of very personal writing that doesn’t ever feel self-indulgent, long as it is, and which touches on art (obviously) and bodies and illness and self and self-definition and feeling like if there was a button just *over there* that you could press and it would turn you off forever that you would press it so fast noone would even see your arm move, and which really is a great piece of writing that I can’t recommend highly enough.
  • You Are The Product: Finally this week, Paul Dalla Rosa writes about ‘interacting with the internet’ – this isn’t long, but it might be the truest-feeling thing I have read all year and I commend it to you entirely.

By Jeremy Hutchison (via Blort)

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 10/05/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

SUMMER HAS COME TO LONDON! Or, more accurately, it is not currently raining and that is good enough for me. I would imagine that you’re all excitedly preparing your spangly pants and protest songs in anticipation of Eurovision, so I will keep this intro short and encourage you to dive right in, as otherwise there’s no way you’ll be finished before all the besequinned caterwauling starts.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you should probably stick a fiver on that Baby Lasagna song (according to someone I know who understands this stuff; I have no fcuking idea, obviously).

By Michelle Thompson (all images this week lifted from TIH, to whom thanks as ever)

AS YOU WERE DOUBTLESS ALL AWARE IT WAS 45 DAY ON 04 MAY, CELEBRATING VINYL AND ALL ASSOCIATED THINGS, SO HERE IS AN APPROPRIATELY VINYL-Y MIX BY TOM SPOONER WITH WHICH TO CELEBRATE!

THE SECTION WHICH IN THE WAKE OF NADHIM ZAHAWI’S DECISION TO STAND DOWN WOULD LIKE TO REMIND READERS THAT IN HIS YOUTH HE LITERALLY LOOKED LIKE A TERRIBLE STREET MAGICIAN WHO WAS ALSO A PECULIARLY-UNSUCCESSFUL PICK-UP ARTIST, PT.1:  

  • Food For Fish: As regular and assiduous readers will of course know by now, I tend to keep the games and frivolous stuff to the end of Curios, as a sort of reward to you all for ploughing through the weird, unsettling and…more esoteric stuff in the front end (and, look, if all you do is skip to the end then that’s fine too. No, really it is. You consume this however you want, I’m not the boss of you, and, no, really, you *shouldn’t* feel guilty about ignoring all the other good stuff that I spend hours every week foraging JUST FOR YOU…this isn’t helping, is it? Right. Sorry), but I am making an exception this week, because Food For Fish is just BRILLIANT. This is a browser-based point-and-click game in the classic Lucasarts style – think Monkey Island, or Day of the Tentacle, or Sam & Max (hugely contemporary ludic references there! People under the age of 35 – does anyone under the age of 35 read this? I…I doubt it, I’ll be honest with you – google those titles, they are great and worth exploring), except done in what looks like claymation (but is just really nicely-rendered CG), and, honestly, this is fcuking BRILLIANT. You play as a nameless man, living a dull life, who embarks upon a strangely-underpant-fixated adventure under your gentle guidance – the interface is intuitive, and even if you’re not wholly familiar with this sort of game you’ll get the measure of it soon enough (but if you are, you’ll feel a genuine warm hit of nostalgia at the cursor that changes shape to connote the different actions you can take as you hover over an object, and the incidental observations elicited as you click on objects within the various rooms), and, honestly, this is funny and surreal and it even has a lovely piano soundtrack, and I promise you this is just a wonderful way of spending half an hour or so. Who is the main character? What happened to his grandfather? Why is he only wearing a pair of y-fronts, and why does ‘the agency’ want him to build an ‘underpant simulator’? And what is that strange rash on his torso, and the scar on his face all about? CLICK AND FIND OUT! Honestly, this is brilliant and all credit to Kris Temmerman, the Belgian(?) freelance dev who’s knocked this up as what I presume is a sort-of calling card – Kris, should you ever see this know that you have brought me GREAT JOY, so thankyou very much indeed.
  • Taper: If you’re a fan of the HTML Review (see Curios passim) then you will almost certainly also enjoy Taper, which despite having been an occasional thing for six years now I only came across this week. Taper self-describes as ‘an online literary magazine for small computational pieces’, published twice a year – the link takes you to the latest edition, for Spring 2024, but you can explore all the others through the site. Much like the HTML Review, Taper features a selection of…how would I describe this? Digital poems? Explorations of creative code? Slightly-wanky high-concept html-noodling? ALL OF THOSE THINGS! It’s worth setting aside 15 minutes and clicking through a selection of the different works that comprise the issue – there’s a nice range of styles and types of work, from this fun little ASCII flipbook maker which will let you make a short animation of yourself (or whatever you choose to hold up in front of your computer, tbh) using your webcam, to a sunrise poem, and all sorts of things inbetween. Small, odd moments of sometimes obscure, sometimes interesting digital creativity – this is a really nice mental palate-cleanser, should you require one (I can’t possibly think why).
  • Pressmaster AI: You will by now have either read enough about the coming (already here?) wave of what we are now apparently all deciding to call ‘AI slop’ (personally I preferred ‘dreck’, but what do I know? Rhetorical, as ever) which is sweeping the web – if you’re curious as to where it’s coming from, then look no further than services like ‘Pressmaster AI’, which, bizarrely, sells itself as an ‘AI Pr Service’, despite not actually doing ‘PR’ at all – instead, it’s a system which will let you generate a seemingly-infinite quantity of AI-written articles on any topic you like, publish them to the web automatically, and, if you pony up for the fee, publish said dreck through a selection of syndication channels (on reflection, that’s where the ‘PR’ comes in I suppose). Basically what this does is create a ‘digital newsroom’ (anyone who’s worked in PR for a while will have a faint frisson of horror at that phrase) full of terrible GPT-spawned ‘content’, which the service promises will (somehow) rank in Google news and as such deliver untold SEARCH BENEFITS – according to Pressmaster, they get around Google’s attempts to plug the flow of this crap by dint of the workflow, which requires you to basically sketch an outline of the points you want to make (either by dictation or a few notes) rather than just letting the AI go wild – I personally am…skeptical about whether this approach will in fact get you past the anti-machine filters, but the fact that you can basically pay to then have the outputs injected into the low-end feeds of Forbes, BusinessInsider and similar low-quality outlets does rather suggest where this is heading. To be clear, I think that this service is a grift and will not in fact do about 70% of what it says it will do – but, equally, the 30% that it will do will be enough to ensure that approximately 90% of all written material you find published online from…oooh, well, from about NOW actually!…will be exactly this sort of empty, meaningless, information-shaped-but-actually-value-bereft rubbish! GOOD TIMES! If you’d like to read a bit more about this, there’s an interesting longread about a company called Advon, who were behind Newsweek’s recent brush with AI content, here – this is all very US-focused at the moment, but you’d have to be some sort of mad optimist not to see this happening everywhere very soon indeed.
  • Meet Me At The Workers Club: Via Andy, this is another brilliant piece of digital work by the consistently-excellent Molleindustria – this time it’s a gorgeous interactive recreation ‘of Alexander Rodchenko’s Workers’ Club, originally exhibited at the 1925 World Expo in Paris. The virtual copy of the constructivist installation is accompanied by posters, photographs, and breezy texts tracing the historical context of workers’ clubs in the Soviet Union, as well as personal musings about the role of the artist in a time of revolution’. This is not only beautifully made, it’s a lovely way of doing a ‘virtual exhibition’ – small, not too much navigation, nicely-rendered in a way that doesn’t quite to ‘do’ photorealism, and full of interesting interactive bits to learn about – and, personally speaking, the little visual effect when you enter the exhibition and ‘step into the past’ (you’ll see what I mean) is really nicely done.
  • Who Funds Them?: One of those of you in the UK – unless any of the more international amongst you have a peculiar interest in the financial arrangements of UK parliamentarians – this is a project by transparency campaigning organisation MySociety, the people behind They Work For You (the service which provides an easily-accessible record of MPs’ voting history), which is seeking to create a comprehensive record of exactly which organisations and individuals provide funding to which politicians – both as individuals, and the slightly murkier world of All-Party Parliamentary Groups, which as anyone who’s ever worked in campaigning knows are very often simply a ‘cash for access’ project (HEAVEN FORFEND!). The project’s in its nascent stages and at present they are looking either for volunteers to help with the research or a small (£10) donation to help fund the work, and if you can spare a few hours a month (and you’re the sort of person for whom the idea of ‘poring through records and doing some data entry in pursuit of a better politics, which, fine, I appreciate isn’t everyone) then this might be worth a look.
  • Sleep Baseball: I slept DREADFULLY last night – you don’t need to know that, fine, but it might explain some of the dreadful writing that you’re going to experience over the course of what, for me at least, is going to be the next 5 hours or so – as of 743am, I am on my fifth cup of very strong tea and feel slightly like I’m coming down off some quite unpleasant base – but perhaps I should have eased myself into slumber with this most soporific of podcasts. I think this has been going for a while, but amazingly I don’t seem to have featured it before – Sleep Baseball is a series of recordings of full games of baseball, narrated in the gentle style, all of which are completely made-up, with fake teams and players and absolutely no jeopardy whatsoever, just the slow, North American cadence of batters and runners and pitchers and outs (I don’t really understand baseball, does it show?), each of which lasts over two hours and which, from a cursory listen, really is astonishingly soothing and pleasantly-dull, like a sort of sports-themed white noise. Of course, I can’t vouch for the fact that your dreams won’t be full of men spitting tobacco at their feet and making elaborate hand signals to the backstop (see previous comment re ‘not really understanding baseball), but that feels like a small price to pay for, you know, actually being asleep (oh god so tired might cry).
  • The AI Film Festival 2024: Lest it need repeating, AI-GENERATED VIDEO IS NOT READY YET! IT IS NOWHERE NEAR READY! DO NOT BELIEVE THE HYPE (YET)! Still, if you’d like to see the current ‘state of the art’ (we are not counting Sora, because until actual users get their hands on it it is vapourware in my eyes) then you could do worse than checking out this year’s entrants to Runway’s second AI Film Festival – I think the winners were announced at a ceremony last night, but at the time of writing they haven’t updated the site yet. Still, scroll down and you can click the various floating thumbnails to see the entries – I personally don’t find this stuff interesting anymore, partly because of my general lack of interest in the moving image and partly because I have seen a LOT of this stuff over the past couple of years and I am quite sick of the very particular aesthetic and flickery animation that all this stuff inevitably has, but if you’re curious about what is ACTUALLY possible with this kit right now then it’s worth a look (as is this, by Starburst, which is a rare example of an advert using GenAI which…works, I think).
  • Explores UK: Seeing as we’ve been talking a lot of late about AI-generate imagery flooding social media, I thought I’d share a particular example that has been polluting my personal digital ecosystem this week. Explores UK is a Facebook Page (look, there are Groups I find useful, don’t judge me) which has appeared EVERY SINGLE TIME I have opened the webpage this week (I don’t have any of this sh1t on my phone, what do you take me for?) and which is pumping out a frightening quantity of images of BEAUTIFUL LONDON for its audience to ‘enjoy’. Except, as you will discern from clicking and having a quick scroll, this is not a London which anyone familiar with the city would recognise – partly because all the landmarks seem to have moved around, but mostly because all the buses (it LOVES London buses) are going to destinations like ‘Whiiite6 Coi07idy’ or have number plates that read as if you’re currently having a stroke, and the buses themselves…ok, have to admit, the buses look FCUKING COOL, as though the concept car designers at Maranello had been given a massive budget by Sadiq and told to go wild. The comments are a mixture of obvious bots, the occasional confused old person and people shouting ‘AI SPAM’ – WELCOME TO THE FUTURE OF THE SOCIAL WEB, EVERYONE! A warning, by the way – if you use Facebook and you click on this page while logged in, this sh1t will follow you EVERYWHERE.
  • TraxMachine: Are you a MILLENNIAL? Did you grow up online in the safe, welcoming, isometric haven that was Habbo Hotel? Do you have fond memories of the synthtoy that you could access from within the game, and wish that someone had recreated it in-browser so that you could go back to those halcyon days when all you had to worry about was how you were going to decorate your virtual room and whether that boy/girl/other was going to log on or not this afternoon? If so, this is very much your lucky day.
  • AFG Collection: More AI (sorry!), this is a TikTok Page which shares videos of fake history – I feel ok sharing it though because, honestly, if anyone’s going to be taken in by Kodachromes purporting to be from Ancient Egypt then they probably have a wider set of problems and this really is the least of their worries. I think these are all made in Midjourney, judging by the lighting and overall aesthetic, and I was surprised by how interesting I found these odd counterfactual imaginings, which are presented as the photographic records of time travellers returning from the past (time travellers who presumably set off in the 1950s, judging by the photo stock they seem to be using).
  • Great Brandlines: Via my friend Rishi, and one for the copywriters and advermarketingprdrones amongst you, this is a really nicely-designed site pulled together by the Frankly Fluent agency – the idea is to explore the thinking behind some of the world’s biggest brands’ most famous taglines, in part by showing how…wrong, weird and worse they are if you get the words just a little bit wrong. I rather enjoyed hearing the stories behind ‘Just Do It’, ‘Finger Lickin’ Good’ and the like (of course, KEEN STUDENTS of this sort of stuff will know all of this already, but well, maybe you should get out more? I appreciate the intense hypocrisy of that sentence written by a man who writes 10,000 words a week about ‘stuff on the web’, but, well, I embrace it), but my favourite thing about this is the interface (which, fine, isn’t particularly exciting, but is simple and just WORKS).
  • Training The Robots With AI: Via Shardcore, I thought this was interesting – this is a short video posted to Reddit, looking at the success that’s been had using a GPT to train a robot. It’s short, don’t worry, and it’s not complicated – this is more something that made me think about whether we’ve possibly underestimated the extent to which The Machines can do physical, real-world stuff without in fact needing ‘embodiment’ at all.
  • KCTV Now: ANOTHER TikTok (please don’t make me give them their own section, I really don’t want to), this time dedicated solely to sharing clips from North Korean state TV. To be clear, this really is North Korean propaganda – the videos are a mixture of clips showing THE GLORY OF THE SUPREME LEADER AND HIS VISIONARY IDEALS FOR BENEFIT POPULACE and some not-hugely-subtle anti-Western messaging, currently mostly focused on the US’s less-than-sparkling role in the current messin the Middle East – and I take no responsibility whatsoever to what might happen to your FYP should you spend six minutes consuming this stuff, but it’s a really interesting look at how one of the world’s maddest nations (once upon a time I would probably have said ‘maddest’, but it does rather feel like there’s some competition these days) seeks to present itself, and it how it sees the rest of us. This is sort-of funny for a few minutes, until it very much isn’t.
  • The Impact of Energy: A fascinating map, showing (not all, but lots of) the world’s countries and what the environmental impact of their energy usage is RIGHT NOW. This is using data sourced from a whole range of national energy companies and providers and as such as pretty legit, and takes into account domestic energy production (and whether it’s currently drawing from oil, gas or renewables) as well as imports and exports, and it makes for…occasionally sobering reading, particularly in a week when the scientists are once again getting The Fear, not least because of all the places where there’s no data at all and where, one suspects, the story isn’t…great. Also, as an aside, wtaf Poland?!
  • Metal Horse: Oh, ok, fine, ONE MORE TIKTOK. This belongs to a woman called Emily, who I think lives in Canada, and who owns a horse that really, really fcuking LOVES rock and metal – other music, not so much. You may not think that a video of a horse headbanging to Slipknot would be worth your time, but you would be WRONG. Apparently bands have started sending tracks to the horse to get its approval, which frankly is a degree of critical analysis that I think we can all agree is perfectly appropriate.

By Yuwei Tu

OUR NEXT MUSICAL TREAT IS THIS PLAYLIST FEATURING EVERY SINGLE SONG MENTIONED IN THE BEASTIE BOYS BOOK – SERIOUSLY, BOOKMARK THIS, IT IS FCUKING AMAZING AND IS OVER A DAY’S WORTH OF BRILLIANT TRACKS!

THE SECTION WHICH IN THE WAKE OF NADHIM ZAHAWI’S DECISION TO STAND DOWN WOULD LIKE TO REMIND READERS THAT IN HIS YOUTH HE LITERALLY LOOKED LIKE A TERRIBLE STREET MAGICIAN WHO WAS ALSO A PECULIARLY-UNSUCCESSFUL PICK-UP ARTIST, PT.2:

  • Record Club: I know, I know, the last thing anyone wants in the year of our Lord 2024 is ‘another social network’. Or, frankly, any social networks at all. Still, let’s not think of this as a social network – let’s instead think of it as, er, a record club! This is a new online community built by and for music enthusiasts as a place to hang out, chat about music, share recommendations and all that sort of jazz (lol) – crucially, it’s not trying to be a destination for listening, more a space for people to congregate around particular artists or songs or genres, and to find like-minded people who are also into the same sort of thing. Obviously this isn’t a wholly-new premise, and there are doubtless other places online that offer a similar sort of vibe (or which try to), but I rather like both the design and the feel of this – it’s in beta, but I was let in pretty quickly, and if you’re the sort of person who really likes talking about how much the B-side of ‘I Touch Myself’ meant to them as a kid (look, I’m not judging, it takes all sorts) then this may be your new online forever home. I think it reminds me a bit of ‘This Is My Jam’ (RIP, wiv da angles), which may be why I feel so warmly towards it.
  • Etymonline: OH GOD I LOVE THIS. How have I not seen it before? Evidently I am not spending enough time online. I have just checked out the FAQ page and I think this has been going since…2005ish? Anyway, it is OLD – Methuselan by modern web standards – and it is venerable, and it is a BRILLIANT resource for, er, etymology nerds. Are you the sort of person who really, really enjoys finding out the origin of terms like ‘macadam’ or ‘two-step’? GOOD ME TOO! Honestly, the fatigue is really starting to kick in now and it’s all I can do not to abandon you right here and just go to bed and send myself to sleep by going through the linguistic history of the verb ‘to eat’ – but I won’t, because I am DEDICATED and, also, I have compulsive issues which means that I wouldn’t be able to relax chiz chiz. Anyway, this is a genuinely wonderful resource, and as with so many things it’s mainly maintained by a single individual, who, honestly, is a fcuking hero. I can’t stress enough how wonderful I find these sorts of sites, useful and deep and PERSISTENT, and which exist solely because someone is interested and cares and believes it important that it SHOULD exist. It’s almost enough to make me like people, almost.
  • The London GreenGround Map: Another link from Rishi, this (buy his poems, they are great), and another which I am slightly upset I hadn’t known about previously. A piece of design by Helen Ilus, the London GreenGround Map is (roughly speaking) a sort of tube map analogue for the capital’s green spaces, mapping connections and routes between public parks and gardens and areas less blighted by urban sprawl, letting you plan routes that take you through the bits of the city that are yet to be tarmaced over. “An enthusiastic walker and urban explorer Helen travelled widely, studying and working in UK, before coming up with the idea of connecting parks to tube style network for walkers. Fan of Harry Beck’s London Tube map she wondered what would happen combining the schematic mapping with walking routes. As an intuitive traveller she found the schematic maps more accessible in urban environments, but realised they also trap people in transport networks. This is why her maps give priority to green infrastructure, replacing stations with parks and tube lines with walking routes. She has also experimented with creating a walking map for libraries as well as worked with several commissioned maps.” It’s free to download, and if I had access to a colour printer I would totally do a big copy of this and carry it with me – whether or not you want a physical copy, this is SUCH a good way to plan walks and routes, and if you live in London it’s worth looking for your local area and seeing if there are any nearby spaces that are new to you that you might want to explore over the coming few weeks before it gets cold and wet and grey again.
  • London Rent Prices Map: A sub-Page of the previously-featured Pint Prices page (mapping the price of a beer – which, by the way, I saw someone pay £EIGHT FCUKING QUID for a pint of neck oil  the other day, which is an awful lot to pay for beer that bad), this takes data from SpareRoom to map average per-room rental prices across the city. The values are colour-coded, so the lower end of the pricing scale is green while the higher end is red, but it’s important to remember that GREEN DOES NOT EQUAL CHEAP, because there is no cheap housing stock in this fcuking city and you can expect to shell out a minimum of about £800 for a room that is practically in Essex, let alone something on an actual tube line. If you’re looking for somewhere to live, this could actually be useful – you can click into specific areas, and then find individual links back to the SpareRoom listings, which might be helpful if you’re currently unlucky enough to find a new rental (I am sorry, good luck).
  • The Hacker News Map: A map! Of posts on Hacker News! Arranged thematically! You can search, or just zoom in and around – it’s actually a pretty decent search engine given the massive range of topics covered on the site over the years, and you can read a decent explanation of what it is, how it works and how you might use it on this blogpost by its creator Wilson Lin – it’s a surprisingly good way of finding interesting things, and for doing topic-based research (as long as you don’t mind it throwing up things from a few years back), and is a generally interesting place to spend a bit of time digging around.
  • The Water Drinkers: I think I featured a piece on here a few years ago about the weird world of hydration YouTube, where people, mainly young men, would post videos showing them drinking water, performatively chugging a bottle of Evian or whatever, again and again, day after day, maintaining ‘hydration streaks’ (surely, you know, a prerequisite for being alive?) and generally building a small, weird, niche, but dedicated, audience of hydration fans – this link takes you to a spreadsheet listing some of the top water drinkers, how many days their ‘streaks’ have been going, that sort of thing. The person at the top of this leaderboard has been filming themselves drinking water and posting the footage to the web for (at the time of writing) a total of 4541 days, which is a degree of obsessional, and quite possibly deeply-psychologically-unhealthy, dedication to which I can very much empathise.
  • Abandoned Blogs: Via Kris, this is an Are.na board collecting blogs that have been left dormant by their owners. This is INCREDIBLE, a series of windows not only into the past, but into the specific pasts of specific strangers – the blogs collected here (there are over 100 I think) run the gamut from the personal to the obsessional, covering fashion and music and food and ‘just, you know, LIFE’, and there is so much here to explore and enjoy. Some of these will have been abandoned through lack of interest of a loss of focus or simply time and change and, you know, growing up, and some will have been left because their owners don’t exist anymore, and wandering through these is…I wanted to type that it was like wandering through a graveyard, but that makes it sound sad and elegiac in a way that this isn’t. It’s more like walking down a street where all the houses are empty but perfectly-preserved, able to step through any door you choose and explore what was left by whoever once owned it, and it is BEAUTIFUL. I really need to look into forever hosting for Web Curios – given I am never going to procreate, this fcuker is my SOLE LEGACY (literally the saddest line I have ever written, that) and I’m fcuked if I’m letting it decay when I finally manage to get off this mortal coil.
  • Weathersight: Self-describing as ‘tools for data-driven climate journalism’, this is basically a resource that seeks to make weather datasets more easily readable and accessible – genuinely useful for anyone who is involved in researching or looking into all of the various interesting and awful ways we’re fcuking the planet and, by happy extension, ourselves!
  • Tiny Dogs: One of the rare occasions when I feature a commercial endeavour in Curios – but, honestly, it is SO CHARMING that I couldn’t leave it out, even if it is something you have to pay for. Do you have a dog? Would you like to have a tiny version of said dog? A tiny version crafted out of felt? Which looks EXACTLY LIKE YOUR BELOVED HOUND? YES YOU WOULD! Hence Tiny Dogs – this person is based in Austria, and if you send them a photo of your dog they will send you a quote to have it ‘tinified’ – effectively rendered in miniature using what are probably some really quite impressive crafting techniques. Look, I am very much not a dog person – they smell, and you have to take care of them, and having dealt with two terminally ill, bedbound family members already in my short life I’m done with that thankyouverymuchindeed – but these are SO CUTE, and, honestly, if someone you love has a SPECIAL BOY (or girl) of the four-legged variety I can think of few nicer (if unspeakably–twee) gifts for them than this. I also very much enjoyed the short, one-word answer to the ‘Do You Do Cats As Well?’ FAQ (“No”).
  • AI Recruiting: Do any of you work in Human Resources/Recruitment? If so, you might want to skip this next bit. Gone? Good. YOUR DAYS ARE SO NUMBERED! This is a slightly-chilling service, selling itself as a one-stop-solution for (specifically) tech recruitment, which claims that it basically does EVERYTHING automatically – CV vetting, task-setting, interviewing, interview assessment…all managed by The Machine, with the magical, unknowable Black Box deciding who the optimal candidates are without a human ever needing to be involved in the process, undercutting recruitment agencies or headhunters by a purported 80%. “What about bias?”, I hear you cry, “And what about the fact that the process is entirely inscrutable?”. “WHO CARES?”, responds the software company, firing up the AI and effectively putting Randstadt out of business.
  • Books About Food: This is a site made by two guys in London which is designed to be a hub for people – authors and those on the publishing / design side – who are involved in the business of writing about food, a site where they can showcase their work and promote their projects, and it works as a really useful directory of ‘people in food in the UK’. If you are after food writers or stylists or photographers or designers in this space, this feels like a hugely-helpful place to start doing your research; you can focus in on a specific author and see, for example, who art-directed their cookbook, or find inspirations for brand collabs, or find potential recipe writers for a commercial project… If you work in UK food publishing, or foodie advermarketingpr, this is GREAT.
  • Motown Junkies: A proper old-school blog, this: “a track-by-track review of every US and UK Motown single, including all subsidiaries. Not ambitious, then…I’m Nixon, and I’m British. I love music in almost all its forms, and I love Motown…Here’s how this will work. I’m going to do a separate post for every released (or planned) A- and B-side, and these will then be compiled both on the pages for each label, and also in the Master Index, which is just a great big list of everything that’s been posted to date. Unless otherwise noted, for the stuff between 1959 and 1972, I’ve treated the liner notes in the Complete Motown Singles box sets as the Word of God, and will only be dissenting from the officially-sanctioned “party line” where I think it’s important to do so (and noting the conflict). I’ll also provide external links to any information out there which I’ve taken note of, or which might provide useful further reading.” This is excellent, a proper labour of love, and a wonderful way of finding some genuinely brilliant music.
  • Snail Is Inevitable: This is very silly, and also feels like something that you could iterate on in a variety of fun ways. “A snail relentlessly follows your cursor. There’s a fun hypothetical that asks if you would accept the following conditions: you get ten million dollars, but a snail follows you for the rest of your life, and if it ever touches you, then you die. Naturally, I took this hypothetical and made it into a chrome extension (the “snail that follows your cursor” part, not the “getting ten million dollars” part, though you are free to pretend this is the case). Once you press the “start” button on the extension’s popup page, a snail (shoutout Slay the Spire) will invisibly start tracking your cursor’s position. It moves very slowly, but it is always moving. If it touches you, then you die (get a blue screen of death popup).” I installed this earlier this week and it has added a pleasing note of existential angst to my browsing experience, which, fine, may not be what you’re after from a link, but LIVE A LITTLE FFS.
  • Tranquil Words: I enjoyed this. Tranquil Words presents a blank screen on which you type whatever you want – but the words are invisible, unless you choose to reveal them or send the output to yourself via email. Whether you’re interested in practising free writing – you know, that stream of consciousness unblocking technique that a certain subset of ‘creative’ people swear by – or just use it as a secret way to write all sorts of invective about your colleagues or flatmates while they are RIGHT THERE, I very much like the unfettered ‘type your id into the void’-ness of it all.
  • Other Orders: Code which lets you play with text in interesting ways, taking words and rearranging and reordering them in different ways based on different rulesets. Which I appreciate may not make much sense, but will do when you click, I promise. Not practically useful for anything I can immediately think of, but potentially fun from the point of view of experimental writing (or, actually, doing interesting/oblique interrogations of a corpus or single text, which could be useful now I come to think of it). If you’re a very particular type of wordw4nker there’s something interesting/whimsical/romantic you could do with your collected correspondence with a lover here, I think.
  • Courtesy Vulture: Gah, ANOTHER TIKTOK (sorry) – but this is SO GOOD. Stop-motion animation in the ‘weird, and a bit gross’ category, which reminds me, vibe-wise, of Salad Fingers in the best possible way. If you click the link, the first vid on the page is a compilation of previous episodes (each tends to be about 30s long), which will get you nicely up-to-speed (insofar as this makes anything resembling ‘sense’). Aside from anything else this is technically really impressive, props to whoever’s behind it.
  • Dhime: It will almost certainly come as no surprise to anyone reading this that I cannot dance for sh1t – I am largely arrhythmic, afflicted with the ‘dancing white man’s overbite’, and frankly far too tall and thin for my efforts to look like anything other than a collection of coat hangers having an epileptic fit. Still, maybe this will CHANGE MY LIFE – Dhime is a really interesting idea, using AI to teach you how to dance. The deal is that you watch videos of dance routines, then set your phone up to film you attempting to replicate the moves – The Machine then analyses your movements and attempts to work out how similar or otherwise you were to the ideal, and then offer you feedback to improve your spastic flailings. Whether this works I have no idea, and will never, ever find out, but if you’re someone who really wants to nail whatever the current TikTok fad is then a) why are you reading this newsletter? It seems frankly incongruous; and b) this might help.
  • Perfect Pitch: Last up in this section, ANOTHER GAME! Listen to the notes, attempt to map them to the correct keys on a keyboard, and if you’re anything like me realise that you really are tone-deaf to a spectacular degree. This is, honestly, fun, even if you are really, terribly bad at it.

By Chang Ya Chin

OUR FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK IS A SELECTION OF TRACKS THAT SOUND NOT UNLIKE A HARD DRIVE DEFRAGGING ITSELF, BUT IN THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE, MIXED BY FORMER-EDITOR PAUL! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Computers on Law & Order: Why would someone spend some of the finite time on Earth bestowed upon them by a strange and unknowable force compiling photographs of computer equipment being used in the Law & Order TV universe and posting them to a Tumblr? I genuinely cannot begin to imagine, but someone out there has chosen to do so, and, well, who am I to cast aspersions?

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Manu Kant: Specifically, SEXY, YOUNG, AI IMMANUEL KANT! No, really, look at his cheekbones! FEEL THE WEIGHT OF HIS SMOULDERING CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (little Kantian joke for the heads out there)! This was a short-lived art project that, for reasons I can’t adequately explain (despite the writeup here), decided to present selected bits of Kant’s thinking as though they were coming from the mind, and mouth, of a VERY PRETTY 24 year old influencer called Manu Kant. Isn’t he gorgeous? And SO DEEP!
  • The E-Ink Cam: Another Krislink, the E-Ink Cam is a wonderful project, describes by its creator, Kaloyan Kolev, as follows: “eink.cam is a lo-fi digital camera with a tiny energy footprint that makes charming dithered pictures. I like to describe it as a “digital polaroid.” eInk (or ePaper) is an alternative display technology that uses physical ink particles to produce images. eInk displays are much more power efficient and legible in sunlight in comparison to LCD screens, but suffer from slow refresh times and limited color reproduction. While these limitations will be overcome as the tech develops, they also give it an undeniable charm. The images on eink.cam look futuristic and retro at the same time.” I would imagine if they ever chose to make this a purchasable product they would be INUNDATED with orders – I barely ever take photos of anything, and even I want one of these immoderately.
  • John Pork: Who is John Pork? Why, he’s a virtual influencer with the head of a pig! What a silly question! I honestly have no fcuking idea about this one AT ALL.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Under the Jumbotron: Apologies for starting this week with yet more about student protests, but this, published this week in the LRB, is an excellent piece of writing which also gave me far more detail about some of the things happening at some US Universities than I’ve seen in other reporting. Quite hard to read this and not think that…this really isn’t a rational or reasonable response to people expressing their displeasure at the actions of their government and the support being afforded to said actions by their academic institutions: “Over the weekend, following the formation of the encampment, a large group of counter-protesters, few to none of whom appeared to be UCLA students, arrived on campus. They screamed, hurled racial slurs and sexual threats (‘I hope you get raped’) at the students, and opened a sack full of live mice – swollen, seemingly injected with some substance – on the ground near the camp. When the counter-protesters dispersed, they left behind a Jumbotron – a massive flat-screen TV, about ten feet high – in the middle of campus facing the encampment and surrounded by metal barriers. Paid security guards remained inside the barriers to protect the screen. For the next five days, the Jumbotron played, on a loop, footage of the 7 October attacks along with audio clips describing rape and sexual violence in explicit terms. Mixed in among the clips were speeches by Joe Biden vowing unconditional support for Israel and ‘Meni Mamtera’, a maddeningly repetitive children’s song that went viral earlier this year when IDF soldiers posted a video of themselves using it as a form of noise torture on captive Palestinians.” Meanwhile, tower blocks continue to be dropped on families while significant swathes of the world’s political and media classes seem unwilling to acknowledge what is quite clearly happening to some very, very unfortunate people, and what has been for months.
  • Liberalism Without Accountability: I know I said I wasn’t going to ‘do’ the Middle East here, way back in October 2023, but it does rather feel like it’s not OK to ignore it. Per this companion piece, also from the LRB, “universities reliant on investment portfolios in a system where mega-profits are made by companies that threaten and destroy human life, influenced by an increasingly radicalised class of billionaires, teaching students whose degrees won’t earn them enough to pay off their loans, managed by supine administrators threatened by (or willingly collaborating with) a reactionary right, who have decided that young people’s minds are being turned against capitalism not by their own lived experience of austerity and racialised police violence but by ‘woke Marxist professors’. This situation has now met with a live-streamed genocide which is supported, and brazenly lied about, by political leaders and commentators who claim to stand for truth and justice. Students, like much of the public, cannot square the reality of what they see with the world as constructed by politicians and the media. Under such circumstances, pitching tents, raising placards and demanding divestment are really quite mild-mannered responses. That they have been met, in many US universities, with militarised policing reflects the fragility of liberalism – in the face of the growing hegemony of the conservative right as well as its own inability to offer a future even to Ivy League college students, let alone the less privileged. There is a refusal by liberals to accept accountability for the world they have created, through their support for wars in the Middle East, their acceptance of growing inequality and poverty, cuts to public services, glacial action on climate change and failure to create secure and meaningful jobs.”
  • How The OpenAI Model Works: Well, sort-of, ish. This is one for those of you who care about the nuts and bolts of The Machine, and how it’s guardrailed – it’s a blogpost by OpenAI in which the company sets out the ‘desired behaviour guidelines’ and outlines what they term the ‘Model Spec’ which is effectively their ‘ur-guide’ to how they think about deploying AI safely and responsibly. I personally found this super-interesting, from a rules/systems/ethics point of view, but your mileage may vary here, I concede.
  • The Return of the Homepage: Kyle Chayka in the New Yorker writes about the growing trend in digital publishing to reprioritise the HomePage as a direct-traffic destination, and the ideas and design principles that motivate that trend. I am obviously very much behind this as an idea, mainly as it reflects the way that I personally like to use the web (nothing a middle-aged man likes to read more than a piece in an international magazine which reinforces the belief that he is right and that the world is finally coming around to his way of thinking!): “Perhaps the platform era caused us to lose track of what a Web site was for. The good ones are places you might turn to several times per day or per week for a select batch of content that pointedly is not everything. Going there regularly is a signal of intention and loyalty: instead of passively waiting for social feeds to serve you what to read, you can seek out reading materials—or videos or audio—from sources you trust. If Twitter was once a sprawling Home Depot of content, going to specific sites is more like shopping from a series of specialized boutiques.”
  • The GoogleTrafficPocalypse Part 2: You may recall that a few months ago I shared a blogpost by a website called HouseFresh, all about how Google updates had basically tanked its traffic, and hence its revenue, and put its existence in jeopardy – this is a followup post by the same site, outlining the response to the initial post, their efforts to reclaim their search ranking and traffic, and the dawning realisation that it might not be possible and the era of ‘traffic to specific niche verticals via search referral’ might in fact be over. This is…not cheering reading if you’re a publisher, particularly not if you’re a small one, but does rather feed into the idea espoused in the previous piece, that audience is more important than traffic, and building the former is a hedge against the death of the latter.
  • Proof of the Tradwife-To-Fash Pipeline: Regular readers will be aware that one of my long-running obsessions has been the insidious creep of Conservative, ‘traditionalist’ values, promoted via social media and acting as a Trojan Horse for all sorts of other less-savoury ideas and ideals, all bankrolled by some Bad People (copyright Mark Menzies) with a view to SHAPING THE GLOBAL DISCOURSE – regular readers will also, in all likelihood, started to roll their eyes every time I mention Peter Thiel (SORRY!) or a creepy cabal of very rich people who are using this stuff as a way of entrenching their position and their worldview in the face of a progressive wave. WELL NOW I HAVE PROOF SO IN YOUR FACES. Ahem. Actually it’s Media Matters that has proof, but this investigation does a nice job of demonstrating that there is a very clear throughline between ‘watching videos of attractive people living a lifestyle out of rural 50s America’ and ‘watching videos about how the gays and the wokes and the browns are ruining everything’. “After we interacted with tradwife content, TikTok’s recommendation algorithm began flooding our FYP with right-wing conspiracy theory content.Our FYP also began displaying medical misinformation and anti-government content, specifically fearmongering about the need to prepare for an impending “civil war.” Of the 327 videos served to the “For You” page in Media Matters’ analysis, 100 (or 30.6%) contained conspiracy theories or apocalyptic fearmongering. After we interacted with tradwife content, TikTok’s recommendation algorithm began flooding our FYP with right-wing conspiracy theory content. Our FYP also began displaying medical misinformation and anti-government content, specifically fearmongering about the need to prepare for an impending “civil war.” Of the 327 videos served to the “For You” page in Media Matters’ analysis, 100 (or 30.6%) contained conspiracy theories or apocalyptic fearmongering.” So there.
  • Reading What Musk Posts: There have been times over the past year or so when for Professional Reasons I have had to read a significant amount of Musk’s social media output, and it is HORRIBLE – as Tim Murphy, writing for MotherJones, discovered when he did the same for a whole week. This won’t tell you anything you don’t know about where Musk’s politics seem to have ended up (or at least it won’t if you’ve been paying attention, which I concede you might not have been because, well, life is short, and maybe you have friends and families and loved ones to be with or something), but it does give you a decent overview of how genuinely fcuking unhinged some of the stuff the world’s richest – and in some important senses, most influential – man thinks is. Still, if you were ever confused as to exactly HOW the ‘woke mind virus’ is goint to destroy humanity, Elon’s explanation can be found herein (I’ll save you the click, just in case): “Imagine if instead of merely rendering forced ‘diverse’ images it decided to make that true in reality, potentially killing millions of people to achieve diversity goals.” I mean, IMAGINE. Jesus fcuking Christ.
  • The Future of Political Campaigning (Thanks To AI): The name Brad Parscale possibly rings a bell to some of you – he was Trump’s digital campaign manager in 2016, and he’s now going ALL-IN on AI to secure the great leaders of tomorrow! None of this will be surprising to anyone who’s spent any time thinking about the potential implications of this stuff, and it’s important to note that people like Parscale (see also: Alexander Nix! Remember that cnut?) are ALWAYS going to exaggerate the efficacy and impact of their techniques, particularly when tech is involved, and also there’s no extant data about whether this stuff moves the needle in any meaningful way, but, equally, read this and try and feel like this is going to be A Good Thing: “Parscale has said Campaign Nucleus can send voters customized emails and use data analytics to predict voters’ feelings. The platform can also amplify “anti-woke” influencers who have large followings on social media, according to his company’s documents and videos. Parscale said his company also can use artificial intelligence to create “stunning web pages in seconds” that produce content that looks like a media outlet, according to a presentation he gave last month at a political conference, where he was not advertised in advance as a speaker. “Empower your team to create their own news,” said another slide, according to the presentation viewed by AP.” This, plus that horrible AI-generated content farm up the top in link 3, equals…probably not great things tbh.
  • How To Play A Game: I really, really enjoyed this essay, by Frank Lantz, all about the question of ‘knowing’ and ‘understanding’ and to what extent AI can be said to do either, and how we might determine when that particular rubicon has been crossed, all through the lens of ‘how we play games, and what we mean when we say that ‘we’ are ‘playing’. This is just a really nice bit of ‘thinking through a series of ideas’, done really well and explained in admirably-clear fashion.
  • Meet My AI Friends: One of a spate of pieces this week in which journalists explore the idea of ‘digital companions’ and the extent to which people are already using them as virtual conversation partners, confidantes and the rest. This first one is by Kevin Roose, who spends a week with a variety of different bots by different platforms, all set up to do slightly different things…and finds himself not quite as repelled by the experience as he expected (but, equally, doesn’t at any point give the impression that he’s going to carry on using any of them beyond the period it took him to research the arcticle). This, by contrast, is the WSJ on how AI bots can be potentially useful as a way to practice difficult conversations – which, personally-speaking, strikes me as fcuking bullshit, given that all the major models can raise their register to, at most, a tone of mild irritation which I don’t think necessarily maps to the real-world experience of, I don’t know, telling your husband you’ve been boning the gardener for a year. Finally there’s this one, in The Verge, with the inevitable ‘the teens are talking to the robots!’ scare-take (it’s actually not that fearmonger-y, in its defense), which makes the point that Character.ai is…pretty popular with kids, and there must be a reason for that. Each of these takes a slightly different perspective, but it’s interesting that there’s now a certain sort of sense of inevitability about the fact that ‘talking to The Machine’ (or, more accurately, A machine) is going to be A Thing, which feels…accurate, given the likelihood that this stuff is going to be baked into everything as soon as it passes a (relatively-low) threshold of ‘good enough’.
  • Money Dysmorphia: Or, ‘how TikTok and the strange whiplash of consumerist and doomerist content, is causing no little cognitive dissonance’ (fine, their title is pithier). None of this is new per se – being presented with images of a lifestyle that is presented as attainable but is in fact really not attainable for you at all, ever, is something that’s as old as consumer culture and capitalism, after all – but I find the acceleration of it via TikTok (not just TikTok, to be clear, but let’s use that as an analogue for the always-on, fullscreen video onslaught of THE NOW) an interesting wrinkle. I have mentioned this a few times over the years in here, but it once again brought to mind Emile Durkheim’s concept of ‘anomie’, which can be characterised as ‘the gap between what an individual is told they can expect from life by society and what is actually available or achievable to them’; the larger the gap, the greater the degree of social dysfunction. Just saying.
  • When The Yanks Came For Soccer: As a Chelsea fan (yes, I know, but my dad lives literally 5 mins from Stamford Bridge and I went to all the home games for about 5 years when we were REALLY SH1T, so I think it’s entitled) I felt this one very personally indeed – this is the New York Times looking at the influx of US ownership into UK football and how it’s being received (badly) and whether they care (no) and why that is (money). The whole piece is worth reading, but I’ll leave you with the closing quote which honestly encapsulates the views within pretty much perfectly: ““Our fans are like, ‘We like tradition,’” Edens said. “And I tell them: ‘No, you don’t. You think you do, but you don’t.’ I mean, who doesn’t like a big-screen TV with plenty of food and beer?” Then he spread his arms wide and answered his own question: “Nobody.””
  • How Pokemon Players Are Messing With Maps: This is quite a small story, but it falls under one of my favourite subheadings – to whit, ‘ways in which digital stuff bleeds into the physical world and has strange repercussions that noone could reasonably have foreseen’. In this instance it’s about Pokemon GO! players who are fcuking up the open source mapping community by altering map data so as to increase the chances of generating in-game spawns of certain monsters (because the game uses OpenMaps for its terrain data). Perfect ‘weird future’ story, this one.
  • A History of Videogame Controllers: Honestly, if you have ever played videogames or if you work in product design, or interaction design, or UX, this is FASCINATING – this piece takes you through the evolution of the game interface, from the esoteric dials and knobs of the earliest consoles in the 70s and 80s, through the the glorious era of microswitches in the 1980s, to the incredibly-designed controllers ushered in by the PlayStation and XBox. Very geeky, fine, but it’s design and so probably just about socially acceptable.
  • The Contestant: This is a lovely little article/interview, about a story you may recall from the distant past. “Naked, alone in a tiny room in Japan, Nasubi had one way to survive: submit entries for sweepstakes. For 15 months beginning in 1998, Nasubi lived in isolation, entering sweepstakes to win food, clothing and other items, while his movements were captured on camera for the wildly popular Japanese reality TV show, “Susunu! Denpa Shonen.” A 22-year-old aspiring comedian, Nasubi had willingly entered this reality TV challenge, a segment titled “A Life in Prizes,” thinking that footage would be recorded and possibly aired after it was over. In actuality, he was being broadcast to millions of viewers across Japan every week.” Oddly-heartwarming.
  • Videogame Clouds: No, wait, come back! This is, I promise, SO CUTE and also really interesting – for Eurogamer, Christian Donlan goes to talk to the founder of the UK Cloud Appreciation Society about the depiction of clouds in videogames, and it turns into a genuinely wonderful article about clouds and games and what and why we find things interesting, and about how two people can find a degree of shared interest and commonality in unexpected places. If nothing else you will be CHARMED by Mr Cloud himself, Gavin Pretor-Pinney, and the frankly BOUNDLESS enthusiasm he displays for cumulostratus and the like (this piece contains significantly more excited swearing than I was expecting, put it that way).
  • Brains As Food: A history of people eating brains – I adored this from a ‘writing about food’ point of view, and the history (and some of the recipes!) are fascinating, but, equally, the part of me that really struggles with corporeality and being made of meat found it an intensely-uncomfortable read and I was very, very conscious of my brain sitting inbetween my ears, heavy and just sort of *there*, as I read. See how you get on – you may be less discomfited by the general idea of ‘having a body’ than I seem to be these days.
  • Gmail As A Diary: A selection of writers look back at their old emails, as Gmail marks its second decade. I loved this, partly because I’ve long had an occasional habit of picking a date in the past and going back into Gmail and seeing what I was doing and who I was writing to, and what I was thinking, and if you have the opportunity I promise you that you will want to do the same after reading this (I just dropped into 2004 and found someone on Pobitch who sent me an mp3 of ‘The Other Cheek’ by Tanya Stevens (thankyou, mysterious neverundersold@gmail.com!) – God, I have always loved the web.
  • Failed Attempts at Human Flight: This is fascinating, very funny, and will make you wince more often than I care to mention – this is by Joe Fassler, who’s written a whole book on the topic but here pulls out the highlights of all the times in the past when people hurled themselves off tall structures in the hope of magically taking to the skies. Unsurprisingly, this is an account littered with painfully-splintered shins, punctured organs and death – it’s occasionally sobering to take a moment to think about how much of what we currently enjoy is built upon what I can only characterise as a pyramid of corpses going back through history (like eating mushrooms), so, er, maybe don’t think about it too hard.
  • How The Cabbage Patch Kids Are Born: I have, I am aware, featured a piece about the Cabbage Patch Factory in here before, but as far as I recall it didn’t go into detail about, er, how the dolls are ‘born’. This one does. It is FCUKING WEIRD.
  • The Battle For Attention: I started this piece thinking it was going to be about advermarketingpr, or selling things to people, and I was prepared to abandon it after a few paragraphs and then it turned into something completely other and I realised it is BRILLIANT. I don’t want to spoil this for you, but about ⅓ of the way through the author learns something that pretty much totally changes the direction of the piece and it becomes SO much more interesting. Look, er, if anyone reading this happens to know any more about the organisation here described, fancy getting in touch?
  • The Last Thing My Mother Wanted: I thought this was an astonishing piece of writing, but it’s worth pointing out that it is about quite a lot of Hard Things – bad parenting and trauma and death and suicide and and and. Still, I found it beautiful, but be aware that it deals with ISSUES.
  • The Feast of St John: Finally this week, the now-obligatory link to an article in The Fence – this one is about the author’s stint doing a stage at London restaurant St John, famed for its ‘eat the whole animal’ style of cooking and where work involves a LOT of viscera. I know St John well – for a few years I worked in the building directly next door, and would pop down and get fresh doughnuts from the bar for elevenses – and this is not only a wonderful piece of writing about food and cookery but also about place. I have no real regrets in life, but I genuinely wish that rather than going to university and ending up some fcuking advermarketingprwebmong I had gone into cookery instead – I would have been good, I think. Oh well, next life (lol).

By Andrew Brischler

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!: