Category Archives: Uncategorized

Webcurios 15/11/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

On Saturday night I went to the pub for my friend Nick’s birthday, and happened to meet a group of football fans who supported Swindon Town FC, the team of the town where I grew up (but, to be clear, I WAS NOT BORN THERE). When asked why they supported the team, despite not being from there or having any connection to the place, they replied that they were all from the South, and that they just wanted a team to support that was a) near enough to London to allow them to go to home games cheaply and easily; and b) amusingly sh1t; they then asked me if I did in fact grow up there, and, when I replied in the affirmative, dropped into a genuinely serious register as one of them solemnly said to me, with a look of real pity in his eyes, ‘I am so, so sorry mate’.

Anyway, I’m pretty sure that it’s thanks to those cnuts that I’ve had a horrible chest infection all week, so fcuk them and fcuk Swindon too, the place and the football team. They’re right, it *is* a sh1thole.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you can rest assured that I wiped all the phlegm off this before hitting ‘publish’.

By Min Ding (most images this week from TIH, for which thanks!)

WE BEGIN THIS WEEK WITH MUSIC BY THE SINISTERLY-NAMED ‘MARK OF SATAN’ WHICH IS, I PROMISE, SIGNIFICANTLY LESS EVIL THAN THE NAME MIGHT MAKE YOU THINK AND IS IN FACT SOME RATHER GOOD BEATS WITH A SORT OF GRAND GUIGNOL HAMMER HORROR-STYLE VIBE, MADE BY A MAN I MET IN A PUB LAST WEEK!

THE SECTION WHICH WAS THRILLED THAT ORBITAL WON THE BOOKER AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD ITS SMALL RECOMMENDATION TO THE CHORUS BECAUSE IT IS A GORGEOUS PIECE OF WRITING AND I SAY THAT AS SOMEONE WHO REALLY IS MOSTLY DEAD INSIDE, PT.1:  

  • Tiny Troupe: Couple of caveats to this one: a) it’s AI, I AM SORRY (but I promise it’s interesting AI, honest); and b) this is technical and unless you’re someone who feels comfortable parsing phrases like “you will need to set the AZURE_OPENAI_KEY and AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT environment variables to your API key and endpoint, respectively”, then, well, you won’t really be able to do anything with it. Ok, so with those caveats aside I think this is super-interesting – Tiny Troupe is, (very) basically, a new experimental AI agent playground developed by Microsoft specifically for the purpose of ‘testing’ ideas and concepts for business. How? Well effectively (and, again, I am…somewhat flattening what’s going on here because, well, I only understand bits of it, leave me alone) this lets you spin up a sandbox populated by various AI ‘personas’ with qualities that you, the creator, can define, and then put various scenarios/options to them to see how they respond – so, for example, you could use said personas to evaluate the performance of different marketing messages, or product lines, or TV show ideas…Per the blurb, ”TinyTroupe is an experimental Python library that allows the simulation of people with specific personalities, interests, and goals. These artificial agents – TinyPersons – can listen to us and one another, reply back, and go about their lives in simulated TinyWorld environments…The focus is thus on understanding human behavior and not on directly supporting it (like, say, AI assistants do)…TinyTroupe aims at enlightening productivity and business scenarios, thereby contributing to more successful projects and products.” This end of AI feels, much as with autonomous browser-access, like an area that’s going to blow up in the next year or so, and I am fascinated to see a) the sort of things that people are going to use sandboxes like this to assess; b) whether the stuff it models bears ANY relation whatsoever to how things then happen in the real world because, well, I HAVE SOME DOUBTS, Still, it’s all fascinating stuff – although we’re now getting into the sort of odd, dark territory where if you start to think too hard about the ‘little computer people’ and how much you’re making them suffer by using them as an infinite focus group then you very quickly get into quite unpleasant psychological scifi territory. I can’t help but imagine a not-too-distant future in which we’re offered the opportunity to use systems like this to model consequences and reactions to potential actions, like some sort of predictive assistant to determine the likely reaction if we wear *that* dress to the party or send *that* message to the groupchat. Is that good? No idea! BONUS AI MAGIC LINK: there’s some quite impressive animation transfer going on in this new paper by Bytedance.
  • Defeat The Spotify Algorithm: I understand that, for many people, their relationship with the various algorithms that govern their lives, largely unseen and unbidden and sort-of-unknowable, is a benign, symbiotic one – we feed them with our data, and in return for this gentle care, they guide us down paths that they know will scratch our pleasure centres in *just* the right way (can I just say that writing that in such a way that vaguely-anthropomorphised the algo made me feel…wrong, and quite genuinely unsettled? Just for the record) – and that in particular Spotify’s internal maths tends to be judged quite positively by many, who find its personalised daily selections to be almost uncannily attuned to THEM…I get all of that, I do, but, equally, sometimes it’s good to throw the machine something rogue, something UNEXPECTED and possibly to allow serendipity, non-mathematically-optimised chance, back into your musical life. And so, welcome to Max Hawkins’ Daily Random Playlist, which every day will present you with 30 songs selected (apparently) at random from the Great Spotify Pile – the idea being that every day your audio stream will get queered with 30 songs which have come entirely out of leftfield, allowing you to maybe take a step or two off the well-tarmacked path The Machine has laid in front of you. Aside from anything else this feels like a good way of discovering GENUINELY new music – based on a few days of seeing what this spits out, I am reasonably confident that there’s neither rhyme nor reason behind the selections – and, given we are soon to enter The Season of Wrapped, you’ve probably got about, ooh, 10 days or so to mess with your data and render your selection marginally less basic, and this can DEFINITELY help with that.
  • The Mushroom Colour Atlas: Being as I am a largely urban person I am not up on mycology, seasonality, and the whole question of ‘what time of the year is it appropriate and safe to go and try and pick psychedelics in a field?’, but I am broadly aware that the rough answer is ‘now-ish’. This link won’t help you pick liberty caps – and they won’t make anything better, they’ll just make the horror VIVIDLY PIXELLATED – but it is a really interesting and rather beautiful site, presenting a lovely, watercolour-ish pantone chart of all the different hues that fungi can take, along with information on the various types, their habitats and the like. Just…nice (and, for a certain type of middle-class household, also your new Farrow and Ball palette-matching tool).
  • A Group That Makes Small Decisions For You: This one comes via Caitlin at Links and I am…slightly in awe of it, if I’m honest, because it’s one of those things where I look at it and am once again reminded of the sheer insane diversity of human experience and proclivity. Are you the sort of person who, when confronted with a minor decision in your life – what to wear, say, or what to have for lunch, or what shade of Le Creuset to buy – will mutter to themselves ‘it doesn’t fcuking matter, give a fcuk’ and just pick something, or are you the sort of person who would MUCH rather get a DEFINITIVE ANSWER from someone as to which the BETTER option is? If the latter, then why not become a member of this Facebook Group where you can, at any time of the day or night it seems, drop a question into the chat and have one of the 185,000(!!!!!) people worldwide who participate offer up their thoughts on what your preferred course of action should be. ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-FIVE THOUSAND PEOPLE. How many ‘so, mash or new potatoes?’ questions? How many ‘hair up or down?’ posts? I AM IN AWE. Who…who lives like this? How TIRING must it be? HOW DO YOU CARE SO MUCH ABOUT THINGS???? I can’t work out whether this is a weird side-effect of a constantly rated and quantified life, where it’s assumed that there is always a ‘best’, or at least ‘better’, option, or whether instead it’s just born out of a simple desire for community and connection, but, either way, I am agog (you can read more about these maniacs here should you so choose).
  • Butterfly Superhighway: This was sent to me by one Toby Barlow (HI TOBY BARLOW!), who is Creative Director at US agency Lafayette American – as far as I can tell this is a non-commercial project that’s just about celebrating the journey of the monarch butterfly as it migrates across the US (and about raising awareness of the plant they need access to – milkweed, apparently – as they make their trip), and it’s just a really nice, gentle, Google Maps-based trip across North America. Click one of the different journey-tracks on the homepage and it just sort of whisks you along from destination to destination in a pleasing digital analogue of the monarch’s flight.
  • Bluesky Starter Pack Directory: People really are fascinating. It’s been genuinely interesting this week watching a certain section of Twitter finally decide that ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and they need to MAKE A STAND and LEAVE THE CESSPIT (a question to those people – I appreciate that the tenor of conversation in certain parts of Twitter has declined significantly in the past couple of years, and there’s just SO MUCH HORRID STUFF ON THERE…but, equally, guys, have you tried…just not looking at the algorithmic feed? Because it turns out that if you don’t, you only see stuff from people you follow…which you control! Like, have you tried just, well, not pressing the button that says ‘show me all the mad, horrible stuff!’?), and then arriving on Bluesky (also, can I personally express a vehement hatred for the skullfcukingly-twee ‘I am going where the sky is blue/to the blue place/to [insert emjoi combination indicating bluesky]’ – JUST NAME THE PLATFORM WHAT DO YOU THINK IT’S GOING TO HAPPEN JESUS FCUKING CHRIST – and immediately doing the ‘oh my god this place is growing SO MUCH, watch out Elon the RESISTANCE STARTS HERE, Twitter will be dead in months, it’s all over for them!’ thing…look, I know you’re excited and it’s just like getting the post-Brexit band back together again, but, well, let’s look at some numbers shall we? Bluesky’s put on a couple of million users this week. Threads, which at the time of writing has over 13x Bluesky’s numbers, added over 15m. GYAC YOU ARE ALL SHOUTING EXCITEDLY ABOUT THE FACT THAT THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE AT YOUR PARISH DISCO, GET OVER IT. Ahem. Anyway, despite the fact that the platform continues to prove to me that, at heart, I really hate quite a lot of people who broadly share my politics (SAD!), Bluesky grows and is becoming more useful, and one of the reasons is that Starter Packs – which allow you to bulk-follow a bunch of users, arranged by topic into groups with one click – are really useful network builders. The link up there takes you to a searchable directory of ALL the starter packs currently out there, so just plug in terms you’re interested in and work from there. CAVEAT – the problem with starter packs, I’ve come to learn, is that while useful they can also clog up your feed with a LOT of cruft, so worth being discriminate before you find that you’ve accidentally followed the world’s 3000 premier newt sexers and can see nothing but amphibian mating chat across your TL. BONUS BLUESKY TOOL!: this webtool lets you enter your Bluesky handle below to find people followed by lots of the people you follow (but not you), another useful way of reconstituting at least some of the network you might have had on other networks.
  • Bluesky Deletions: My misanthropy aside, one of the nice things about Bluesky is that once again people can build and create on top of a text-based social platform, which is how you get things like this – a website which presents a constantly-updating, vanishing and ephemeral stream of posts that have been deleted from Bluesky. The site spits out a few at a time in a constantly-scrolling feed, and they fade in 2-3 seconds meaning that you can’t quite read all of them, so everything you see has a suitably transient, evanescent quality. This has the feel of a gallery installation, in a good way.
  • The Golden Dryer Sheet Awards: A nice initiative by one woman media empire in waiting Taylor Lorenz (so impressive, but whose hunger and drive I find quite honestly terrifying), who has come up with a great little idea to celebrate pieces of journalism which, through no fault of their own, get buried by the days news avalanche. Seemingly open to any piece published in 2024 (not, note, SELF-published), the full blurb is as follows – any journalists reading this will almost certainly have at least one piece from the past 11 months that fits the bill here: “The day Biden stepped down. The day Trump got shot. The day Eric Adams was indicted. The day the Brat album was released. Great days for the internet, horrible days for your article to go live. This category of The Golden Dryer Sheet Awards is for stories that were published on days when the world was preoccupied. About the Golden Dryer Sheet Awards: There’s hundreds of journalism awards and they all ask for one thing: impact. They want work that speaks volumes, asks big questions, makes giant waves. This award isn’t that. I’m not looking for impact. I’m not looking for fancy bylines. I’m looking for work that you’re proud of that set nothing in motion. Like the award’s namesake, your submission should have made a barely perceptible improvement to society. You know that it happened, you put in the work. Maybe one other person caught a whiff of your efforts. But that’s it. The Golden Dryer Sheet celebrates all the journalism that no one cared about. Except you. And possibly your mother.”
  • Elisium City: No, it’s not a typo (or if it is, it’s not MY typo) – this really is called ‘Elisium City’, ‘just like paradise, but, well, a bit off!’. It seems appropriate in the second week of the new world order, after a few days in which we have been reassured that, yes, this version of Trumpland will be just as venal, selfish plute-weighted and mad as the last one, that we feature yet ANOTHER attempt by a bunch of rich people who seemingly think that all it takes to crack civics is ‘a fcuktonne of money’ and ‘large gates and possibly some well-paid private security personnel’ to create their own exciting new urban vision. For reasons known only to the web devs here you can’t copy any of the text from the site, which is a shame because I wanted to bring you more prose along the lines of ‘cognitive net-zero sponge luxury resource city’ (no, really, that is a direct quote) because FCUK ME is this utterly nonsensical. It is going to be in Florida! It is going to be…a city? For very rich people? There will be flying cars! It seems to exist in a post-scarcity society in which people will simply be free to ‘pursue their passions’ across 14 specifically designed districts! It appears to be some sort of proof-of-concept thing for…smart cities tech? WHO KNOWS??? This is like what would happen if someone looked at NEOM and went ‘that, but on a shoestring’, and is quite bafflingly irreal.
  • Network of Time: This is kind of incredible, and it feels a *bit* like magic or witchcraft or something. This is basically the ‘six degrees of separation’ game, except done with photos – select any two people from the (very, very long) drop-down lists of notables from post-photography history and the site will in no time spit out a selection of pictures from its archives which take you from person A to person X, via images. So for example you get from ‘Nelson Mandela’ to ‘Jeffrey Epstein’ in three steps – a photo of Mandela with Kofi Annan, then Annan with Bill Clinton, and then WOOP THERE’S JEFF! This is a lot of fun, sort-of-amazing, and made me think that there’s probably something bigger and shinier and more clever that you can do with this idea that, well, I am not currently smart enough to conceive of.
  • Deflock: This is interesting a global map of cameras equipped with license plate recognition technology, theoretically letting you see exactly where you might want to not drive if you don’t want your numbers taken. Depending on where in the world you look there’s also data about which way they’re facing so you can do your utmost to avoid prying eyes – why might you want to do that? NONE OF MY BUSINESS.
  • Hangout FM: This is interesting – built by the people behind much-loved shared listening site turntable.fm from all those years ago, Hangout FM is basically…well, it’s another shared listening platform, and, per the blurb, “Welcome to Hangout FM, where you can DJ live on a virtual stage in avatar form. Better than a discord bot, Hangout FM is a virtual space for DJs and artists to share music and connect with fans anytime, anywhere. Our mission is to create the music metaverse through our app and website (hangout.fm), provide DJs for every social gathering (virtual and in real life), and drive fame to artists. No camera or microphone is necessary, we’ve built the perfect virtual music venue just for you with this app [it’s both Android and iOS, fyi]! Get on stage and start DJing with your friends right now from anywhere in the world. We feature hundreds of hangouts where DJs are currently playing all kinds of music. Anyone can hop on stage to DJ by creating a playlist or uploading their own music.” Which sounds both quite fun and also weirdly 2020-coded, but also comes with the added benefit of the ability to listen in to anyone else’s broadcast – you can see live ‘hangs’ here, which you can drop into and listen to – and it’s launching with record label agreements which mean there are over 100million licensed tracks to play with in the app…this could be really fun for a certain type of person, and maybe that type of person is YOU.
  • The Real Hotels: It may not surprise you to know that I have never experienced an episode of ‘The Real Housewives of…’ in any outfits incarnations, and yet, thanks to the osmotic nature of memes in 2024 I feel like I can trace the broad contours of the show regardless (the shouting, the tears, the shouting and the tears, and the oddly-inexpressive faces…is that basically right?) – for those of you more invested in the HousewifeVerse, though, you might enjoy this site which celebrates all the many, many hotels which have apparently featured across the various franchise instalments. Want to live vicariously? Want to zoom around a world map and see all the various different luxury palaces these people have stayed in while pretending to live, laugh and love for the cameras? Want an insight into what it looks like when it ALWAYS looks and feels like Dubai or Miami, wherever in the world you might be? OH GOOD! This is a fan project made by ‘hotel marketers’, which strikes me as quite a nice calling card so well done them.
  • Love Songs: Undisputed kings of the dataviz The Pudding are back with an analysis of how ‘love songs’ have evolved as a genre over the past century, specifically looking at the vexatious question of ‘are there fewer love songs in the Billboard 100 than there used to be?’. Lovely vizwork, and interesting subject and, at heart, some GOOD LESSONS about how taxonomy and nuance in data clustering and evaluation can reveal more, better information from a dataset than might immediately be apparent (or, depending on your perspective, how you can make data say anything if you fcuk with the labels enough).

By Moonassi

OUR NEXT MIX IS A SET BY SHARNIE AND HANNA ON RINSEFM AND IT IS AN HOUR OF PLEASINGLY-INTENSE BEATS AND BREAKS WHICH FEELS VERY LATE-2024! 

THE SECTION WHICH WAS THRILLED THAT ORBITAL WON THE BOOKER AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD ITS SMALL RECOMMENDATION TO THE CHORUS BECAUSE IT IS A GORGEOUS PIECE OF WRITING AND I SAY THAT AS SOMEONE WHO REALLY IS MOSTLY DEAD INSIDE, PT.2:  

  • The Manchester Digital Music Archive: On the one hand, it’s true that the tedious music-based BRAND IDENTITY that Manchester’s had wrapped around it by a couple of successive generations of entrepreneurs and grifters is…annoying, frankly (YES WE KNOW ABOUT BAGGY AND THE SALFORD BOYS CLUB CAN YOU FCUK OFF NOW PLEASE?); on the other, it’s also true that the city has a pretty incredible place in the UK’s musical pantheon and has been responsible for some genuinely influential genres and people and places over the past 50-odd years (longer, I know). The Manchester Digital Music Archive “is an online community archive established in 2003 to celebrate Greater Manchester music and its social history. We are a crowd-sourced archive, a place for people all over the world to share Manchester music ephemera and memories, be they fans, musicians or involved with the music industry itself.” What this means in practice is that you can browse an INSANE list of artists associated with the city and see whatever’s in the archive associated with them – from flyers from A Guy Called Gerald’s earliest club appearances to a whole bunch of zine reviews of the late, lamented Vibrant Thigh (no, me neither). This is SO INTERESTING.
  • Save Wisdom: One of the things you learn as you age is that you will at some point or another really, really regret not asking the old people in your life more about said life while they are still in a position to respond with anything other than emphysemic wheezing or a whispered ‘switzerland…now…please’. Save Wisdom is a project designed to address this, offering 1000 questions which can be used as a guide or template for conversations with people whose memories you want to preserve or archive – all of these are intended to help draw out information about a person, their wants and desires and their memories, and, honestly, if I were a) the sort of person who was sentimental enough to start a memorialisation project for an elderly relative; or b) had any relatives left to memorialise, I would be all over this.
  • VeloPlanner: ARE YOU A LYCRA DAD? Not a sex thing, honest – I am talking about lycra in the cycling context. Should you be one of the baffling number of men (sorry, this feels horribly sexist – I am of course aware that cycling is very much a gender-neutral pursuit, it’s just that I can’t help but associate it with ‘men in their 30s and 40s who have realised it’s a legitimate excuse to spend literally hours away from your family and maybe fit in two pints’)  who think ‘getting on a bike and pedalling in the cold and wet and rain’ is a fun way of spending time, you might find this website super-useful – VeloPlanner is basically an all-in-one repository of all of the world’s cycling routes, allowing you to do useful things like plot a route from London to Shenzen (I am speculating here, no idea if that is at all possible). Why not spend the rest of the day imagining the sort of road trip and real ale tour that you and the Bike Lads could go on if you hadn’t instead chosen to procreate?
  • Animations: Geometric, maths-y (TECHNICAL!) animations by Etienne Jacob (whose work I featured here back in 2019 via Twitter – this links to his website, so I am allowing myself the revisit DO NOT JUDGE ME), sent to me by my friend Tom who wrote ‘these make my ganglia feel nice’ and, while that may make my friend Tom sound like some sort of intensely-weird brain pervert, you will also know EXACTLY what I mean when you look at these. It’s like some sort of weird, visual-only ASMR, seriously.
  • Particle: Another week, another app seeking to DISRUPT NEWS CONSUMPTION – going to be honest, this doesn’t feel like a great time to be launching such a service given that the reaction of a not-insignificant portion of the world to last week’s news is likely to be ‘yeah, not really going to look at the news for a while thanks’, but, well, good luck nonetheless! Particle’s gimmick is that it aggregates different sources into topic-based feeds for a wide-ranging overview of opinions and perspectives on any issue, and that it offers varying degrees of AI summarisation/interpretation to give you quick overviews of a given question alongside AI-enabled interrogation of a concept, but, well, neither of those seem like enough of a hook to bother with this, if I’m honest (but I say that as someone who has realised this week that their relationship with information is, on some pretty deep level, utterly, utterly broken, and as such probably isn’t worth listening to). Still, if you’re on Apple and want another, differently-shaped window into the horror that is everything then, well, here!
  • The St John Prints: APOLOGIES THIS LINK TAKES YOU TO THINGS THAT COST ACTUAL MONEY. Ahem. St John, for those of you who aren’t familiar, is a very famous restaurant in Farringdon, London – I’ve featured writing about it before lots of times in Curios, and it holds a special place in my heart because not only is it a fcuking amazing place to eat but also because I worked literally next door to it for a couple of years, and going down to the bakery every morning to buy doughnuts for me and the woman I was having an affair with at the time was a moment of genuine daily joy. Photographer Jason Lowe took the photographs that accompanied the restaurant’s 30th anniversary cookbooks, and is now making prints of those photos available for sale on his website and these are AMAZING. Seriously, whether or not you have personal history with the restaurant these are some top-quality photos of food, cookery, meat fish and viscera (quite a lot of viscera), and they would make SUPERB gifts for someone.
  • The Best Inventions of 2024: As is now seemingly tradition, Time Magazine has once again published its rundown of what it considers to be the best inventions or innovations of the past 12 months –  I confess to feeling a bit ‘meh’ about quite a few of these this year, perhaps because, in contrast to previous selections, these seem a bit more ‘product’-y rather than ‘general innovation-y’, but, as in previous years, it’s worth having a look through the list as there will be at least a couple of entries which are new to you and which might elicit a spark of inspiration as to how you might take them in different directions, or which might make you think of the stories they create. This, for example, is sort-of brilliant and heartbreaking at the same time.
  • Transit: I know, I know, you *have* a travel app, you like your travel app, you don’t want to change your travel app – and to be honest I haven’t tried this and so I’m only recommending it on spec, but it *sounds* interesting. Transit is basically a ‘wherever you are we will tell you how to navigate the urban transit environment’ service, but it’s ad-free and seems, as far as I can tell, to have a pleasing community layer to it allowing realtime user feedback about how the service is performing to be integrated into the information fed to others. Oh, and there’s something REALLY clever that it launched the other week which uses your phone’s vibration-sensing tech to determine how many stops on the underground you’ve travelled so that you can track your relative map position even without signal which, honestly, is SO CLEVER that I am slightly in awe.
  • Stretch Timer: A little timer app for Macs only, but which is, I promise, one of the most innately-satisfying bits of design work you will have seen in ages. I promise you, if you’re the sort of person who regularly wears those annoying little too-small fisherman’s caps and the sort of square-legged, slightly-too-short ‘artist’s trousers’ at work because you have ‘creative’ in your job title (YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE) then you might have some sort of involuntary pleasure reaction to this. It really is that simple and beautiful and amazing.
  • Towns: Do you need or want another community or messaging app? No? What if I told you this one was ON THE BLOCKCHAIN????? Yes, I know, that changes EVERYTHING! This is a new app developed by one of the people who created HouseParty (don’t worry, I didn’t remember that either and had to look it up) and who has received what I presume is an unconscionable amount of money from investors to create another digital product which, I confidently predict, will have exactly the same degree of lasting impact as his previous one. Here’s some explicatory blurb from a recent profile of the product: “Group chats on Towns can be configured in such a way that only people who fulfill certain criteria—who have specific expertise, say—are allowed to post messages, while everyone else watches from the sidelines. In this scenario, Rubin hopes, large group conversations will no longer be polluted with ill-informed takes and scam posts. He believes the ability for someone to prove that they are a real person using blockchain-based credentials, meanwhile, could help to minimize the opportunity for malicious actors to manipulate public discourse with bots.” So, basically, the ‘blockchain secret sauce’ here is ‘everyone participating this has their credentials encoded on the blockchain which then act as a passkey to certain communities depending on said credentials and the community’s own entry/participation requirements’ – which, you know, in theory doesn’t sound too bad, until you start thinking hard about how the fcuk that would work (how these creds get verified, and who by), and you quickly realise that, as with a lot of other blockchain stuff, this only really makes sense if EVERYTHING ELSE IS ON THE BLOCKCHAIN TOO, and, well, lol, no.
  • Nudols: Have you ever wondered how one might go about marketing Pot Noodle to an Italian market? WONDER NO MORE! This is a quite astonishing new brand of instant cup noodle, apparently launching now-ish in Italy – there is SO much to ‘love’ here! Let’s start with the name, a BEAUTIFUL phonetic-Italian rendering of the word ‘noodles’ (let’s…let’s gloss over the fact that the rest of the brandname is ‘Banzai’, shall we)! The website homepage features a lovely voxel rendering of a noodle stand, in a design and style SUSPICIOUSLY REMINISCENT of something I featured in Curios about three years ago (I am not suggesting that these people read Curios so much as someone on the design team here has, I think, taken some QUITE HEAVY INSPIRATION from someone else’s work)! The…questionable approach to ‘pan-asian culture’ that sees the product referred to as ‘gnam gnam style’ (‘gnam gnam’ being phonetic Italian vocalisation for ‘the act of happy eating’)! Honestly, there is a LOT going on here – if nothing else, let’s notch this up as another datapoint to prop up my personal ‘maximalist webdesign is back!’ thesis.
  • Antique Microscopes: Would you like an online museum collecting examples of antique microscopes throughout history for your enlightenment and delectation? I DON’T KNOW I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE INTERESTED IN I AM NOT FCUKING PSYCHIC. On the offchance, though, that is exactly what this link will take you to. I am charmed by this line from the homepage, mind: “An antique microscope is a work of art as well as science.” EXACTLY.
  • Strangers On A Bench: This is such a good idea and it feels a bit like it might take off and become very famous indeed – not sure why, just has a certain VIBE about it (so, remember, WE FOUND THE CONCH). Strangers on a Bench is a podcast project which started a few months ago in which Tom Rosenthal strikes up a conversation with someone he doesn’t know who he finds sitting alone on a park bench- he asks them about them, and their life, and they just have a chat. The listener doesn’t know the person’s name, so these are entirely-anonymous little slices of life, vignettes describing the odd mundanity of everyone’s existence and the ways in which everyone contains multitudes and universes and, honestly, this is the sort of thing that normally makes me want to set fire to a teashop by way of anti-twee rebellion and yet it is SO LOVELY (and I say this as someone who really, really hates podcasts). Honestly, I think this is quite special and I think lots of you will really really like it a lot.
  • Videogame Weather ASMR: I confess to not being wholly clear as to what the audience is for this YouTube channel, which features nothing but videos of videogames being played slowly, gently and with a real focus on in-game weather systems. Then again, though, who wouldn’t appreciate, say, an 8-hour-long drive around Los Santos with no shooting, no violence, just the sound of the storm raging outside? NO FCUKER, etc!
  • Geography Help: I am slightly astonished by this. You know that game Geoguessr, right, where you get shown a random streetview pic and are tasked with working out where in the world it is? This is a site that’s seemingly been created for the sole purpose of making you better at that game – it includes information about local identifiers for seemingly every country in the world, from ‘what are the road markings like?’ to ‘what colour are the road signs?’ to ‘what special characters might I spot on signage which could give me a clue to the country I am in?’, and this is amazing to me because it’s INSANELY comprehensive and weirdly incredibly sort-of useful for all sorts of different purposes, and it’s all born out of a desire to help people get marginally better at a very silly, very online game, and fcuking hell people are amazing.
  • Amstrad: There’s a whole generation of people for whom Alan Sugar is just an irascible TV caricature with some absolute all-time Tweets to his name, but, for those of us with a few more miles on the clock, he’s ALSO the man responsible for some of the worst home computing products of a generation in the shape of Amstrad, briefly (risibly) touted in some corners of the UK (probably corners of Sugar’s house tbh) as ‘Britain’s answer to Microsoft’. Anyway, for reasons we can only speculate at, a new website has appeared celebrating the history and legacy of the Amstrad brand – look, this is only really of interest if you’re old enough to remember this stuff, or if you’re a peculiarly-rigorous scholar of ‘now-defunct electronics brands from decades past’, but I personally got some quite strong nostalgiapangs from these cream plastic monoliths (and some PTSD responses to the fcuking Amstrad mouse, a genuinely evil piece of design with some of the worst driver software ever committed).
  • Games To Play While The NYT’s Games People Are On Strike: As I mentioned the other week, the New York Times’ games people are on strike – to keep you occupied while you’re boycotting Wordle (OBVS), they’ve posted up a bunch of other games they’ve made which won’t direct traffic to the NYT and which are also LIGHTLY-SATIRICAL COMMENTS ON LABOUR RELATIONS, lol! In fairness a couple of these are very good and worth your time.
  • Nightfall: An EXCELLENT browserpuzzlegame which, you will discover, is actually surprisingly deep and quite massive and which contains many, many hours worth of gameplay should you be willing to lend it the time. This is basically a full, in-browser remake of an old 2002 game called ‘Spybotics’, which, per the era, is all about HACKING NETWORKS and that sort of jazz, and which, if you can look past the slightly-of-its-time cyberpunk styling and writing, is actually a surprisingly-involved series of little puzzles which get knotty reasonably fast. This is a GREAT afternoon-killer, should you desire one.
  • Asterogue: A cute little roguelike which gives you three levels for free and which then asks you to pay $5 to get the rest and, honestly, this was so good I paid the price of a cup of coffee to pay more. Good, clean, simple roguelike fun, and 100% worth the price of a London half.
  • Shogun Showdown: Our final game this week is this BRILLIANT little (also) roguelike puzzler – kill all the enemies, reach the end of the gauntlet, picking up powerups and bonuses along the way; die, repeatedly, and try again and again. Four different unlockable characters, each of which plays slightly differently, a varied moveset which makes different runs feel genuinely distinct…this is free browsergame GOLD and you will thank me for pointing you at it, I promise (except you won’t, will you? You’ll just click the link and forget me you FCUKING INGRATES).

By Rochelle Voyles

OUR FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK IS DESCRIBED AS ‘A PANAMERICANA TRIP WITH MESCALEROS’ AND, HONESTLY, I CAN’T DO BETTER THAN THAN AND SO WON’T TRY (IT IS ACE)!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Horrible Luxury: You remember that Tumblr from last week with the powerfully-horrible aesthetic? Well I think this one may be…actually, no, I don’t want to say ‘worse’ – let’s instead say ‘equally violent’ and leave it at that.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Neil Staines: Via Kottke, this is the Insta feed of one Niall Staines who does a variety of different styles of visual art but whose pixel-extension images – basically where you take a point in a picture and extend all the pixels from that point in a line to the edge of the canvas – are really rather wonderful and the main reason why I’m featuring the work.
  • Gully Tattoo: One the one hand, this guy works out of Brighton and so if you’re in the UK then there’s the theoretical possibility that you could get his stuff inked on yourself; on the other, his work is INSANELY good and I imagine has a waiting list of YEARS, so good luck. Still, if you want to see some pretty astonishing trompe l’oeil work – the shadowing and depth in this is jaw-dropping, seriously – then click away.
  • Amon Silex: Yes, ok, fine, this is another ‘odd AI images’ account, but this person is mining a bit of latent space that feels unfamiliar, far more furry and feathery and Babadoook-horror-style-adjacent to what I’m more used to seeing, and I very much enjoy how basically unsettling everything on this page is. TOO MANY EYES AND KNEES!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The End of the 20th Century: We start this week with a piece by Jason Steinhauer to makes the argument that we can perhaps conceive of 2024 as the end of the ‘long’ 20thC (if you’re unfamiliar with the concept of ‘long’ and ‘short’ centuries, “the argument rests on the premise that centuries are not solely defined by dates, but also by the interconnected technologies, institutions and ideologies that shape people’s decisions and world events”), a period stretching from 1919 which is characterised by largely linear media and processes, and which has now been finally overtaken by the non-linear media and processes birthed by the digital age which have only now been said to have come to full maturity (the point being that we have had all this stuff for a while, but it’s only now that you can fully say that we have switched from 20thC models to 21stC models). You really do have to read the whole thing – it doesn’t lend itself to pull-out paragraphs or neat summarisation, sadly – but it’s worth every word and struck me as an interesting and potentially-helpful way of characterising How Things Work. This is obviously stimulated by the US election but is not, strictly, ‘about’ it, and as such I would recommend it even if you’re general reaction to reading any more analysis about What Happened Last Week is ‘fcuk off no more please just make it fcuking stop can we talk about that medically induced coma idea again please?’.
  • Labour and the Budget: A very good overview of the current economic picture in the UK (insofar as such a thing is possible, given we should all have realised by now that ECONOMICS IS NOT A SCIENCE) and the budget announced by Rachel Reeves last week, and its relationship to ‘classic’ supply-side economics, and what some of the (big picture, economic and political) positives and negatives of the various decisions made might be. Excellent as ever in the London Review of Books, although it does rather give weight to the horrible fear that’s been growing within me since approximately July 5th thata) everything is going to feel rubbish for four years because all of the spending’s on infrastructure; and therefore that b) these people will get voted out at the next election because of aforementioned a), and as a result of that all the capital spending will be stopped and as such there won’t have been enough of it, and that as such nothing will actually get better, but, well, here’s hoping I’m reliably wrong about that.
  • All Of The Various Bits About The US Election And The Fallout From It In One Place: Ok, given I appreciate that there are a not-insignificant number of you who are almost certainly VERY SICK of hearing about the US election (fcuk knows, I’m one of them!), I am taking the unusual step of collating all the links about it in a sub-section so that everyone else who’s not a total masochistic sicko can choose to skip to something less tediously overplayed. For the rest of you, though…:
    • Why The Democrats Lost: Adam Tooze, again in the LRB, gives what to my mind is one of the better, more balanced post-mortems that does the dispassionate job of looking at the numbers and the campaigns and concludes that, to give one example, “In modern America, neither economic self-description as articulated in polling nor political identity are independent variables. It is likely that in the coming weeks, large numbers of voters who in early November declared themselves in such surveys as the monthly Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index to be miserable about their financial circumstances will feel better about their affairs. Nothing will actually have changed in terms of jobs, prices or incomes, but because ‘their guy’ is back and Harris is out, they will feel more optimistic. Business confidence among small businesses – one of the Republicans’ core constituencies – will probably see a similar leap. To chase these votes through fine adjustments in macroeconomic policy, as though there were some optimal point on the trade-off curve that would have flipped enough of them in swing states into the Harris camp, was folly. What was needed was not a conservative shift in macroeconomic policy, but a more comprehensive political effort to acknowledge, address and neutralise the inflation issue.” Excellent.
    • Exit Right: Gabriel Winant offers a more in-depth party-focused analysis, arguing that it’s the Democrat’s failure to articulate a forward-looking rather than retro-nostalgic centrist vision that cost them. There are some interesting parallels made here with the post-Thatcherism Labour party that I…wasn’t wholly convinced by, but as piece of (VERY) in-depth coal-raking about party campaign strategy and positioning I found it fascinating and worthwhile (if LONG).
    • The TikTok Electorate: I think this might be one of my favourite bits of analysis of the whole think – Max Read asserts that one of the potential reasons behind the appeal of Trump across wide demographic swathes often untethered to race or agebracket lies in the new economic reality for many, many Americans (and not just Americans). Specifically (and I paraphrase), ‘this is the logical outcome of an economy where everyone is hustling and grifting and monetising, where thanks to creator fund payouts and drop-shipping opportunism and and and you have whole swathes of the country who now think of themselves as ‘small businesspeople’ and ‘entrepreneurs’, and that necessarily affects and impacts their outlook on economic policy and what is ‘fair’ and ‘necessary’ in ways that were perhaps underappreciated’. Honestly, this feels like SUCH a smart way of thinking about quite a lot of things from hereon in, US politics aside.
    • Shame on the Elon Enablers: Ok, fine, this is less ‘you need to read this’ and more ‘this article basically says what I think and I think you should all read it and agree with it’ – specifically, this is Paris Marx writing about how perhaps it would have been nice had the media not spent much of the past two years writing about Elon Musk in that ‘lol, mad maverick techbro!’ style that it so loves, and might instead have been better served by instead writing about all the fcuking iffy sh1t he was quite obviously getting into online. On which note, by the way, I would like to point out with a small degree of personal pride that that is exactly what Private Eye has been doing for the past 3 years, so well done me.
    • Why The Work Still Matters: 404 Magazine now with an impassioned editorial plea on why funding investigative journalism, particularly in and around tech, is more important now than ever; this doubles as an excellent rebuttal to all the morons who would like to consign journalism to the dustbin of history because lots of people listen to podcasts now. GUYS IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE A BINARY CHOICE FFS.
    • The Fury Gap: Another interesting perspective, this time offered by Jennifer Valenti, pointing out that it’s not implausible to imagine that the gender divide observed in voter habits in the US last week are…not likely to be improved by the result of said election and some of the reactions to it, and how that might actually be quite a bad thing. I think we’re about, ooh, maybe 9-12 months away from some horrifically hamfisted attempt to begin to BRIDGE THE GENDER DIVIDE, possibly BRANDED, so look out for that (and don’t, please, be the person who suggests it as 2025’s ‘purpose’ initiative, I beg of you).
    • Election Day: The last bit about the election, I promise, is this lovely, quiet, slightly-sad piece by Rusty Foster, currently on a break from Today in Tabs and hiking instead, on his experience of being out in the wilderness while democracy happened elsewhere.
  • The Metaverse is for Kids Now: On the one hand, I have seen a few variants of this piece over the years (remember the racist echidna VRChat days? GOOD TIMES!) and it’s always worth approaching them with a degree of skepticism because, well, it’s all anecdote, isn’t it, but on the other this…this feels plausible, and so I am going to choose to believe that actually it may well be happening. Basically the piece – in WIRED – is all about how if you visit Meta’s Horizon Worlds now you’ll find it awash with teenagers, who have realised that there aren’t any adults there and who are quietly getting used to spending significant swathes of time in VR worlds. OK, fine, there is the inevitable ‘grubby possibility of bad stuff’ lurking at the edges here, but this is more a story about the unexpected pace and direction of tech adoption than it is a ‘caveat parents’ article. Basically this made me think that, actually, there’s every likelihood that this is actually going to be a real-life mainstream thing in 15 years or so in a way I hadn’t really previously considered.
  • AI Inventions: Ok, this is a REALLY smart usecase for AI and I am very impressed. Der Spiegel profiles a company called Iprova, which (basically) uses a bunch of AI systems to work out potential gaps in the patent landscape that can be exploited by enterprising inventors, which, honestly, is SUCH a clever way of deploying an LLM – not for ideation, but for identifying potential gaps into which ideation might fit. So, so interesting, and should, if you think about it for longer than about three seconds, give you plenty of ideas for ways to deploy similar techniques in your own creative thinking: “The company finds ideas on the cutting edge of the cutting edge. Take, for example, the time that Panasonic asked Iprova for help finding new uses for autonomous vehicles. The software suggested giving the cars jobs when their human passengers weren’t using them, such as delivering parcels—essentially making them self-driving gig workers. It even suggested that human passengers might be willing to take the scenic route, or at least routes involving picking up or dropping off parcels, for the right discount on their ride. Panasonic bought that idea and filed a patent application in 2021.”
  • Child Influencer: NB: THIS IS A VERY, VERY GRUBBY ARTICLE THAT WILL NOT MAKE YOU FEEL GOOD ABOUT ANYONE INVOLVED OR INDEED HUMANITY AS A WHOLE. It also features two of the most SPECTACULARLY Dutch people I have heard of in ages – in this case ‘Jacky Dejo’, a former child snowboard influencer-turned-OnlyFans-type model, and her Dad, who, as far as I can tell from the piece, basically ok’d his kid selling cheesecake pics of herself in a bikini to chickenhawks worldwide from when his kid was about 15. There is, honestly, no part of this that won’t make you grimace and make vaguely-disgusted sounds, from the fact that at no point does ‘Jacky’ seem anything other than VERY MESSED up, to the incredibly-uncertain nature of her dad’s relationship to the whole enterprise, to exactly what the deal is with her mum (who declined to be interviewed for the piece), but my main takeaway was, once again, ‘being in any way famous for what you look like online is genuinely so awful-sounding as to be a modern-day Dantean punishment’.
  • Sex Education in 2024: This felt quite a lot like a piece designed to attract some ‘wtaf?!’ clicks and so I’m going to take it with a small pinch of salt – that said, it feels both plausible and a not-unreasonable reaction to the frankly inadequate provision of sex education in schools. If you wanted to make sure your teen kids were learning about fcuking in a way that perhaps didn’t just involve unfettered consumption of whatever bongo they scare up, what would YOU do? Would you, say, pull together an educative playlist of media which you think explores questions of sex, consent, pleasure and the like in less-mechanistic fashion and take it upon yourself to guide your kids through it like some sort of, er, sexy Virgil? No, I can’t imagine you would, and yet that’s exactly the choice made by the people profiled in this piece.
  • Goalhanger Media: In a week in which Gary Lineker confirmed that he was leaving the BBC, it seems appropriate that this Esquire profile of the man’s podcast empire should also drop. Fair play to Lineker – it’s a phenomenally successful business model, although one which I know for a fact is predicated on a lot of younger staff members behind the scenes making…significantly less cash than the talent from any of this stuff, and the rewards to presenters are INSANE – I imagine Cambell and Stuart will have raked in £1.2+ each from TRIP this year, and that may well discount the live shows – and there seems to be no end to the public’s appetite for this stuff…equally, though, I do wonder whether the removal of the BBC’s ‘respectability and national treasure shield’ will lead to some of the…other stories coming out. Let’s just say that it’s lucky Gary’s smarter and savvier around people with their phones out than disgraced referee David Coote, based on what I know of his hobbies.
  • Let The Clubs Close: To be clear, I don’t agree with this perspective at all, but I read it and, based on my experience of going out to places where YOUNG PEOPLE are, it feels true. Written by a YOUNG PERSON, this basically says ‘yeah, we’re not going to clubs anymore or to see new, unsigned acts, because why would we take a chance on maybe having a 3/10 night?’ – basically, as mentioned here quite a lot over the past couple of years, this boils down to risk-aversion (and, to be more charitable, is a direct result of everything being more expensive – you’ll take a punt on a £2 door fee, not so much on a £20 door fee), and it feels…sad, and empty, but what do I know? Rhetorical, obvs, I am OLD and know FCUK ALL.I felt a sort of terrifying sense of redundancy at this paragraph, a bit like a dinosaur seeing a distant meteor streaking through the sky and thinking, deep in its lizard brain, ‘this bodes, and not well’.
  • Food in London for Non-Londoners: Originally presented as ‘for Americans’, but, well, this is for anyone who is coming to the city and doesn’t want to have a terrible time, culinarily-speaking. Honestly this is something that I feel every single tourist city in the world should have a version of written for it, it’s an act of public decency. Speaking of which, if anyone is going to Rome ever and wants tips, just ask.
  • Crossing The USA By Train: Ok, so this is mainly pictures rather than words, but I LOVE how genuinely enthusiastic and (yes, I know, a hateful word and I am sorry for using it) wholesome (sorrysorrysorry) the whole thing is. It made me REALLY want to take a coast-to-coast train journey across America – so maybe I will, on reflection.
  • Inside The Mind of Ken Dodd: Do you know who Ken Dodd was? If the answer is ‘no’ then you can probably skip this one; if the answer is ‘yes’, though, then make a cup of tea and enjoy this WONDERFUL account of Rob Chapman’s interview with the great comedian – honestly, if you’re the sort of person who’s in any way interested in the craft of comedy and how audiences and performing work, then this is gold dust. Dodd comes across here as someone with an almost boundless love for the medium he worked within, like Stewart Lee or Paul Merton do, and it’s genuinely wonderful to read.
  • Against Autofiction: One of two essays that did the rounds this week about ‘writing the web’ (this is the first, which I enjoyed less and so can’t be bothered to write up but which, for completeness and because it’s an interesting companion piece, I include regardless), this is a REALLY interesting discussion as to what the ‘best’ literary form via which to communicate the ‘essence’ of the web is, and why, despite much recent literature on the subject falling within this broad bailiwick, it’s not necessarily autofiction. Conor Truax instead coins the term ‘database novel’ to describe a form of fiction which they contend best-encapsulates the nature of experiencing online, and, honestly, reading this was like a light going on in terms of a sudden ‘oh, fcuk, yes, you’re right!’ sensation. Read this paragraph, which will tell you pretty quickly whether you’re going to get on with this or not: “The sine qua non of the database novel is its focus on the superstructure that hosts the persona, rather than the persona unto itself. Database novels are organized like a database: They comprise a repository of independent units – their sentences – and a seemingly infinite number of coherent wholes. Though their sequencing does have a bearing on rhythm, it has no effect on apparent causality or the hypnotic effect of the novels on the whole.”
  • A History of Fcuk: Or rather, an excerpt from a book all about the history of that word in the English language. I love this – I love etymology, and I love swearing, and so the conjunction of the two couldn’t be more perfect in my eyes. Semi-related aside: I also find the parallel etymology of the profane usage of the word ‘cock’ to be particularly fascinating – it’s, er, not a coincidence, that before it was used as a vulgar vernacular for the male member it was deployed as one of the many terms to denote the unmentionable God. JESUS CHRIST, MEN, YOU ARE SO DEEPLY, DEEPLY OBSESSED IT IS NOT THAT IMPORTANT.
  • Steal Smoked Fish: A story about the friends you grow up with and growing older and The Mountain Goats and the very strong, very persistent feeling that, given the choice, you really would prefer not to exist any more if that’s ok please thankyou.
  • Five Thought Experiments: George Saunders writes in New York Magazine and, yes, ok, fine, it’s about the election, but that’s not why you should read it. You should read it because it is EXCEPTIONAL prosework, damn the fcuker.
  • Any Percent: A VERY LONG scifi story (I mean, it’s a short story, just a LONG one) which I need to warn you a) has a *slight* whiff of ‘Ready Player One’ about it (but I promise it is nothing like that and loads better) and b) doesn’t *quite* stick the landing (but that’s a personal perspective), but which I enjoyed so so so much regardless. Imagine a world in which you could play a game that let you experience a whole life in about 20 minutes of realtime. Imagine there were leaderboards showing who had managed to, say, become the richest person in the (game) world in the shortest amount of (game) time? Imagine there were speedrunners? What might that look like? So so so so interesting, this MUST have been optioned by someone as it’s pure cinema (or, more likely, bloated streaming property) waiting to happen.
  • Adrift in the South: Our last longread of the week is by Xiao Hai, in translation in Granta, writing about their life working low-wage jobs in China’s factories for the past 30 years. This is beautiful beautiful beautiful and I just want to tell all of you to read it – honestly, it’s one of the most gorgeous things I have read all year, not one word of hyperbole, and I think you will all adore it as much as I did.

By Emily Thompson

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 08/11/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

WELL.

I know I say this after every big event, but you really don’t need or want my opinion on the US election and so I will spare you (see, don’t you wish other newsletters were this considerate?).

Oh, ok, fine, apart from two specific, semi-related things.

One, we really, really need to hope that a lot of very successful, very decorated, very well-educated scientists operating at some of the world’s most august institutions and dealing with the very freshest realtime data about the state of our planet are very, very wrong about a lot of things, because it does rather feel like in the next four years we are about to sail gaily right past every single (already risibly lax) climate target we have set ourselves over the past couple of decades.

Two, per the above, we really, really need to hope that the accelerationists are in fact right and we can just sort of tech our way out of this, because it’s clear as fcuking daylight that we’re simply not going to take any of the other steps available to us.

So, er, fingers crossed then!

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you may as well take comfort in the links while they last.

By Wes Lang

LET’S START THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH NEARLY THREE HOURS OF TRACKS WHICH SAMPLE THE LATE QUINCY JONES AND WHICH ALSO HAPPEN TO BE SOME EXCELLENT HIPHOP!

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE EVERYONE WHO LIVES IN THE UK AND WORKS IN ADVERMARKETINGPR AND WHO HAS FELT THE NEED TO WRITE LONG SCREEDS ABOUT US POLITICS ON LINKEDIN THIS WEEK IN A DESPERATE AND FAILED ATTEMPT TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK INTELLIGENT TO FCUK THEMSELVES INTO THE SUN PLEASE AND THANKYOU, PT.1:  

  • Waves of Interest: Don’t worry, this is the only US election-related link in this section – just get through this one and it’s wall-to-wall digital frippery (well, at least until we get to the longreads, but that’s about three hours and nine cups of tea away). The Democratic post-mortem will be long, and tiresome, and almost certainly largely-exculpatory, but looking at this website it does rather strike me that, based on the data here, it perhaps oughtn’t have come as too much of a surprise that the Harris campaign’s ‘more of the same, but you like this democracy stuff so, well, vote to keep it!’ melted like butter beneath a blowtorch when subjected to the white heat of the Trumpian ‘I will make you richer, I will protect you from the mad criminals slavering at the gates, and I will inflict suffering on those you dislike and fear’ rhetoric. This site basically tracks search interest in the US across a variety of election-related topics between 2020 and now, showing relative volume trends – and so we can see here that searches on ‘inflation’, ‘energy costs’, ‘terrorism’ and ‘tax policy’ are up hugely, while searches on social issues (‘racism’, ‘gender equality’, ‘birth control’, ‘inquality’) are down by a few points (the data actually goes back to 2004, and you can look at heatmaps for each issue which change over time, showing you the relative change in search volume across North America over time for, say, ‘gun control’). The data here is from Google, and while it’s obviously important to note that search data isn’t a reliable indicator of behaviour it’s also worth pointing out that it’s not NOT a reliable indicator of behaviour, and that, looking at this now with the cold realisation of ‘oh god what the fcuk have they done?’, it does seem like someone maybe ought to have been looking at this and possibly factoring some of these sorts of factors into the thinking when it came to campaign focus. Hey ho, it is what it is, it’s not like the ramifications of this one will extend significantly beyond the national borders of the US and the temporal limits of the single Presidential term (lol)! BONUS ELECTION-RELATED LINK: Oh, ok, one more, just because this feels…just horribly emblematic of Where We Are At. Have a thread of AI propaganda images featuring Peanut the squirrel, harbinger of a second Trump term – a sentence which is even more preposterous for the fact it in some way makes perfect sense. Do you ever get the feeling we deserve everything that’s coming to us? Looking at this stuff gives me that sensation VERY STRONGLY.
  • AI Minecraft: Shall we turn away from the terrifying contours of the real world and instead retreat into an infinite digital playground of wonder? OK! This is another of those quite astonishing developments in AI which, while (ok, fine) still obviously incredibly shonky and effectively-broken, also feels quite a lot like actual magic and which offers a tantalising glimpse of the sorts of exciting virtual worlds we’ll be able to spin up and explore while outside the irradiated winds howl across the surface of the bunker (I JEST, I JEST! Like the power will still be working by that point!). This is a demo by a couple of tech outfits (Decart and Etched, don’t ask me exactly what it is that they do because my embarrassing lack of technical chops will become, well, embarrassingly apparent) who have combined to release this proof-of-concept demo of what is, basically, ‘Minecraft, but infinitely-AI-generated, running in realtime in your browser’. Which, to be clear, is FCUKING ASTONISHING. Let’s set some expectations – you click the link and you’ll be placed in a lobby where you’ll wait to get a turn on the servers; each turn lasts a max of 10m, after which you’ll get booted, and this runs in a very small window in your browser because it can’t process at higher scale yet (can you tell that I’m winging the tech explanation a bit here? I totally am); oh, and there’s no persistence, so nothing you do in the game really ‘happens’ in any meaningful in-engine sense (more of which briefly)…BUT THIS IS AMAZING! You can pick from different Minecraft biomes, and each lets you wander round an infinite world! Which you can build in! The game is trained on enough Minecraft to ‘get’ that you can mine, and that there are resources, and you can build stuff – but, equally, because there’s no persistence and nothing ‘exists’ in memory, everything you see and walk through is being generated on the fly, and so if you do a 360 degree turn in-game you will find that the view you return to is not the view you started looking at…because there is no ‘there’ there, not even a digital one, and The Machine’s just imagining what it ought to show you based on what you last saw (if you see what I mean). Honestly, this is INSANE, and if you play games then it will give you a very real ‘imagine the opening of Fallout 3 when you leave the vault and that immense sense of exploratory possibility, but different every time’ vibe. Honestly, this really is quite astonishing (and will be even moreso if you’re more au fait with Minecraft than I am), and is probably worth all the sea-boiling energy it’s taking to maintain (lol lol lol).
  • All of the Mikus: Hatsune Miku, as you are all doubtless aware, is the first ever true virtual superstar, who turns 18(!) next year and who has over the past few years become something of a symbol of international solidarity and one-ness, as embodied by, er, a blue–green-haired-anime-pop-starlet. Over the past few years, people from all over the world have been imagining their own, nationally-tweaked versions of Miku, clad in more local costume and with accessories connoting particular regions or subcultures, and there’s been a largely-heartwarming fandom that’s formed around people on Tumblr sharing their drawings and sketches – now someone’s created a map of ALL OF THE MIKUS, so you can scroll around and see the nearly-2000-different variations that the world’s fans have seen free to gift us. Aside from just being kind-of interesting from the point of view of ‘one character interpreted a million different ways’, there’s something slightly revealing about the ways in which different countries choose to show themselves via Miku, and what it is that they see as being most representative or emblematic of their national character (based on a few of the more visible examples, I worry slightly about Italy).
  • Bluesky FollowerFinder: As previously discussed here, it’s not entirely clear to me that the pre-Musk era of shortform social media is ever going to return – I do rather get the feeling that after a decade and a half we might have collectively decided as a species that, actually, putting all of our brains into a digital room together and just seeing what happens is not, in fact, a recipe for success – but, equally, it’s fair to say that for some of us (ok, me) there’s an extent to which the dripfeed of information delivered via 280-character textual updates has become…something of a problematic addiction, and we might be interested in maintaining said addiction somewhere when Twitter finally becomes an entirely-unusable ghost town. To which end, and presuming that you have at some point set yourself up a Bluesky account (on which – I can’t do Threads, I simply can’t, it feels entirely fcuking wrong and I don’t want to; Bluesky is twee and has incredibly strong and offputting #fbpe energy, but, well, it’s better than nothing) you might find this Chrome extension useful – log into Twitter, go to your ‘following’ or ‘followers’ page, and this will attempt to find all those people on Bluesky. It’s slow, it gets stuck every now and again and you will need to click ‘continue’ to make it get going again, and it doesn’t like it when you navigate away from the browser window, but it really does work, and might be a useful way of at least beginning to replicate the vibe of your Twitter feed (but it won’t; that is never coming back and we should probably just accept it. Ok, *I* should probably just accept it).
  • Text-To-Brainrot: What with everything increasingly feeling like it’s going to be quite…hard and abrasive and tricky, at least for a little while, you might find this tool useful – give it any PDF you like and it will BY MAGIC (thanks to a couple of genAI hacks and a few stock video sources) turn it into a TikTok ‘brainrot’-style video – you know, the ones which combine vaguely-soothing videogame footage with an unlinked voice-over, supposedly to create a GENTLY DISSOCIATIVE VIEWING EXPERIENCE. Anyway, if you want a slightly-less-painful way of ingesting all the dozens of utterly-pointless, meaning-bereft trend documents that litter the streets at this time of year, you could do worse than plugging them into this and letting them wash over your increasingly-smooth brain accompanied by footage from Temple Runner (NB – I would briefly like to point out that LESSER newsletters, newsletters that don’t source their links ARTISANALLY and who perhaps don’t click on every single thing that crosses their digital path like some sort of compulsive, included links to something purporting to be this service last week, but which didn’t in fact work. WEB CURIOS ONLY BRINGS YOU WORKING LINKS! Or, at least, they work at the time or writing. Or they do as long as I remember to paste the right one and don’t fcuk up the url. They work MOST OF THE TIME, ok? Jesus).
  • Morning Pages: I really like this. A page on Alicia Guo’s website which exists simply to let you type – as you type, the letters disappear one by one, so you’re effectively only ever able to see the few most recent words of characters of the passage you’re scribing; the idea, I imagine, is something to do with flow state, and the idea of just writing for writing’s sake, without the pressure of looking back and realising ‘oh, hang on, I fcuked up that sentence something chronic, how galling’ (something which, it may not surprise you to learn, I do not experience when writing Curios. Curios exists in only one direction, and that direction is FORWARDS!). If you’re the sort of person who writes, and who when writing finds that it’s helpful for them to limber up a bit with some exercises or just a few hundred words of stream-of-consciousness, then this could be really useful. Aside from anything else there’s just something really pleasing in seeing the words vanish into the past; would that everything were so easily discarded.
  • BioArt: Would you like access to a truly remarkable database of illustrations and diagrams of bacteria, cells, proteins, bits of anatomy, animals and ALL SORTS OF BIOLOGICAL STUFF? Yes, of course you would, you’re not some sort of MONSTER. I am sure there’s an excellent and educative reason as to why this exists and why the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the US has made it public, but I’m fcuked if I know what that is and, honestly, I don’t really care either – JUST LOOK AT HOW COOL ALL THE VIRUSES LOOK! Aside from anything else, if you’re a certain type of person I think that some of these would make cracking tattoos.
  • Sock Puppet Master: A good TikTok account! Sock Puppet Master basically does one thing, but it does it very well – taking the audio from 911 calls, police bodycams and the like, and animating them in the surreal style. Which, obviously, given what we know about policing in North America is very much a case of ‘laughing while at the same time acknowledging that, well, there are many, many occasions when it would be VERY HARD to make amusing animations based on the actions of law enforcement’, but as long as you go in with that caveat in mind it’s possible to find quite a lot to enjoy here. This is the TikTok offshoot of a reasonably-long-running project that’s won actual comedy awards and stuff, should the ‘TikTok humour’ label put you off (I say this as someone who went to see some comedy last night which was, unbeknownst to me, some bloke who was famous on TikTok, and it was noticeable how much better he was from about 10m in when he realised that the TikTok-y schtick doesn’t really work so well when your audience is actually in a room in front of you rather than holding you in a tiny box two inches from their face).
  • Eyeball: Ooh, this is interesting. Given you’re here and reading this (or at least clicking the links while you desperately try not to focus too hard on the horrible words) then I presume you are broadly keen on ‘interesting links from across the web’ – Eyeball is a new app which is designed to facilitate light-touch linksharing with a group of friends. The idea is that it sits as a widget on your homescreen, and within that widget appear links that have been shared to your group – so you create groups of friends (upto five for the free version) and then simply drop interesting links you think they will like into the chat, which others can look up whenever they want; kind of like a small, discrete friends-only linky messageboard which lives on your phone. I feel like I’ve slightly butchered the explanation here – plus ca change, eh? – but this looks really cool and were it not iOS-only at the moment I would have totally downloaded this and tried it out this week.
  • EyeCandy: I featured a site a bit like this during lockdown many years ago, but it’s still a good idea and this is still a useful resource – EyeCandy is basically a resource for people who want to make video which basically features a laundry-list of techniques along with visual guides to what they mean and how they work (masking, tilt-shift, match-split, etc etc – this is the same as the previous site), along with what looks like a really nice selection of clips and showreels highlighting exciting visual innovations or BEST PRACTICE or just generally stuff which looks cool and videomakers might find inspiring. If you make films, or want to make films, this looks like a really useful thing to bookmark.
  • Ode to a Laundry Room: I love this LOADS. A website dedicate to a single place, specifically a laundry room in the Dutch city of Rotterdam in which the site’s creator lived for a year and a half. “my dear friend was kind enough to offer me a place to stay during, what was supposed to be, a 10-day-long visit to Rotterdam to see my pals. a laundry room at the place they were renting. the war started 3 weeks before my flight to the netherlands. in march, after 2 weeks on the road and a different reason to leave, i got to my destination, and the short-term-stay little laundry room turned into a place i called home for a year and a half. to be specific – 527 days…this page is a digital ode to the laundry room, as well as its archive. i never said a proper goodbye and will forever regret it. on the last day of moving out and cleaning, i did not at all realise it was the last time id be there. this here will never make up for it, but it is a way to bring me some peace about the fact that i never said goodbye.” I believe VERY STRONGLY that we should do this more often – I honestly adore the idea of making small digital shrines, memorials, to people or places or things that have held meaning for us.
  • Earth Magic Portals: Ok, there’s no actual magic here – or anywhere else for that matter – but if you squint a bit then it might FEEL like magic, and, well, we’ll take what we can get this week. This is basically just a bit of showoffy webwork by a webshop called Flavour Machine to demonstrate how good they are at doing webcam-based gestural controls…and now I’ve just managed to make this sound really dry, WELL DONE MATT YOU TERRIBLE FCUKING HACK. Ahem. Anyway, click the link, click the ‘use hand-tracking controls’ and then enjoy the vaguely-wizardy sensation of being able to swap between youtube videos using a few swipes of your hands – there’s something particularly nice about the ‘pinch to select a portal-type tweak to the UI, and as a general point this feels like something that can be iterated on. If nothing else I now REALLY want someone to build something that lets me conduct an orchestra via the medium of sweeping hand gestures in my kitchen, so if one of you could sort that out please that would be ace thanks.

By Frank Kunert

NEXT UP, HAVE THIS SPECTACULAR SELECTION OF TUNEFUL OBSCURITIES COMPILED FROM THE CRACKLING ARCHIVES OF SADEAGLE’S INCREDIBLE RECORD COLLECTION! 

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE EVERYONE WHO LIVES IN THE UK AND WORKS IN ADVERMARKETINGPR AND WHO HAS FELT THE NEED TO WRITE LONG SCREEDS ABOUT POLITICS ON LINKEDIN THIS WEEK IN A DESPERATE AND FAILED ATTEMPT TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK INTELLIGENT TO FCUK THEMSELVES INTO THE SUN PLEASE AND THANKYOU, PT.2:  

  • Suffrago: Look, let’s get this straight – this is not some ‘let’s organise! The work starts here!!!!!111eleventy’-type resistance sh1t I’m espousing here (lol that I would ever be so motivated or hopeful), but, equally, it’s not inconceivable that some of you in the UK might this week have thought ‘hm, maybe it’s worth engaging with politics beyond the standard electoral cycle this time around’ – to that end, you might find Suffrage interesting, a new platform which is, ambitiously, attempting to basically ‘do digital democracy better’. It’s not intended solely for politics, long-term – the idea, I think (in common with lots of these projects, FCUK ME are they bad at explaining it – seriously guys, if you happen to see this, it is NOT EASY to work out what the everliving fcuk any of this is for!) is that this eventually becomes an issue-agnostic platform for the sharing of views and the agglomeration of complex information around an issue so as to enable better decisionmaking by the polis. In theory there is a LOT in here – the ability to follow policy at a constituency level and discuss/debate your representative’s voting record; simplified explanations of the legislative process and the passage of bills through parliament; condensed information about debates and discussions at national, regional and local level…look, I’m personally…unconvinced that this is ever going to get enough views and traction to be meaningfully useful, but, equally, if everyone had my cynical, negative and defeatist attitude then nothing would ever get done and we’d all be well on our way towards hell in the proverbial handca…what’s that? Eh? Oh. Anyway, still, here’s a website about democracy.
  • Noomo Beat: This is interesting – not necessarily in terms of what it does (which, to be clear, is very little – albeit in VERY shiny fashion) but more in terms of what it means about agencies, digital and AI. Noomo Beat is a webproject by digital agency Noomo, which is designed to show off what it can do with AI and fancy graphics and indicate the sort of thing that potential clients might commission – the site shows off an interface for an imagined clothing brand which basically asks a few simple questions of the users and then uses that answers to said questions and a soupcon of generative AI to create a BESPOKE EXPERIENCE for each user – what this in practice means is that you then get shown a (really VERY SHINY, I must stress) selection of clothes (the clothes are seemingly always the same) with a slightly different soundtrack and colourway based on your answers. That’s it! BUT LOOK IT IS INTERACTIVE AND IT HAS AI IN IT! I would posit that, more than two years on from The Great Initial Wave of GenAI Excitement, if this is what agencies think is ‘useful’ about it then agencies deserve everything they’re going to get in the next few years.
  • 1 Dataset, 100 Visualisations: Oh this is such a lovely project, and such a useful and interesting look at all the many different ways one might present a single set of datapoints and how the difference in said presentation affects the manner in which the information communicated is interpreted and received. Per the blurb, “this project is not made to show off, but rather show how interpretation can create better results. Take a close look at your dataset, and figure out what the main story in your data is. Different approaches and focuses demand different visualizations. We decided to keep every visualization the same style and colors and let the interpretation and story angle dictate the visualization. This resulted in 100 vastly different visualizations.” This is a bit of a calling card by Danish design studio Ferdio, and a smart one – it neatly demonstrates that they are quite good at this sort of thing, that they can do it in lots of different styles, and that they understand how style impacts substance, as well as showing that they are nice enough and confident enough to disseminate their expertise for free. This is both textbook CONTENT MARKETING and a really excellent resource for anyone interested in dataviz and all the different ways in which you can use smart visual design to bring numbers to life.
  • Buttons: I have to be honest with you – this is not, in general, a hugely-interesting website (as far as I can tell it’s the storefront for a Czech studio that designs typefaces) but it IS the first one which basically offers potential customers a discount on prices in exchange for, basically, d1cking around. Basically the link here takes you to a page which, with a click, will generate a new website button at random, which will plonk down from the top of the page; more clicks will see more buttons deposited onto the page. If you, the user, click enough times to fill the whole screen with RANDOM BUTTONS then you will unlock a discount you can redeem when you buy fonts from the shop. Why? I have no idea, but I am very much a fan of this and STRONGLY suggest that any and all of you working with online retailers lobby hard to include similar mechanics on their websites.
  • Gravitational Lens Simulation: Look, I could pretend to understand what this is showing, but I’d be lying – in large part my reasons for including this amount to little more than ‘ooh, cool visual FX that look a tiny little bit like what happens to the edges of your field of vision at the start of a trip’. Let me instead delegate the explanation to the site itself, which says the following in explanation of what the everliving fcuk Gravitational Lensing in fact is: “Imagine a heavy ball on a trampoline – it creates a dip that makes marbles roll towards it in a curved path. That’s similar to how massive objects in space (like black holes) bend light. When light from distant stars passes near these heavy objects, it bends around them, creating multiple images or making the stars appear in different positions than where they really are. This bending of light by gravity is called gravitational lensing, and it helps astronomers study things in space they can’t see directly. The pulsing star in the center helps demonstrate this effect by making it easier to track how the light bends around the black hole.” There, clear? No, me neither. Still, you probably don’t need to know too much about the INCREDIBLE, MIND, BODY AND UNIVERSE-BENDING PHYSICS being modeled here – instead, click the link, let your jaw go slack and marvel at the pretty lights as you move the black hole around the twinkly cosmos.
  • Documentary Storm: I appreciate that you may not necessarily be in the market for ‘deep-dives into this fcuking world we live in’ right now, but, on the offchance, you might find this website a pleasing resource – Documentary Storm is, basically, a place that collects a fcuktonne of documentaries on a wide range of topics and makes them searchable by theme, title, etc. Nothing’s hosted here – these are all YouTube embeds – but it’s a convenient portal to find non-fiction filmmaking should you be interested. It’s also worth pointing out that the term ‘documentary’ has been largely rendered meaningless in the past few years, as the streaming platforms seemingly-snakebelly-low quality control bar for this stuff has seen some…questionable-quality investigations and VERY propagandistic material being peddled as ‘objectively-researched fact’; put it this way, I wouldn’t expect everything on here to have Attenborough-level rigour, and I would perhaps take significant portions of the films on here with a skipful of salt (I am thinking specifically of a lot of the UFO-type things, but I reckon there is probably quite a lot of…iffy medical stuff lurking here if you lift enough rocks).
  • Photo Exhibits: Ooh, this is nice – an oooooooold website featuring the photography of one Stephen Edelbroich, who snapped a load of photos of New York, Paris, Venice, Vietnam (and other places too) and uploaded them here for the world to see – these are OLD, either analogue or early-digital depending on exactly when they were taken, and it’s honestly quite a thrill to go through them and go back a quarter-century.  I’m not sure how GOOD the photos are, if I’m totally honest, but it’s so nice to find them here.
  • Daze: So this has been getting frothy writeups left right and centre over the past few weeks, despite the fact that the app itself is only out of waitlist this week (and even then iOS-only because of FCUKING course grumble grumble) – anyway, it LOOKS very cool even if, as a result of the aforementioned iPhoneonlyness, I am yet to try it. Basically Daze is a new messaging platform whose gimmick is (basically) that it combines the simplicity of messaging (ie you are literally just messaging someone, or a group of people) with the creative multimedia possibilities of Stories or Reels; so you can effectively create chats that look more like the collage-type-canvas you might expect from a c.2015 Insta/Snap aesthetic. Slap down gifs and videos and audio and animations and CHANGING FONTS and colours and it’s all CHAOTIC and MESSY and this looks like it might be ALL THE RAGE (for 10m until Meta rips off all its features wholesale across the ecosystem and kills this stone dead).
  • Practical Betterments: I am pretty sure I have never in my life practised any form of self-improvement –  certainly not in the decade and a half that I’ve been making myself a worse person via the medium of internet obsession – but, should you be a more aspirational sort of person than me, the sort who believes in the possibility of things and people and circumstances getting better rather than constantly decaying towards entropy, then you might enjoy this website collecting a list of simple things that we can all do to improve our lives in small ways. Things like ‘lubricate your keyholes’ (no sniggering), or, er, ‘organise your toiletries chronologically’ (I have no idea what this means and am slightly too scared to click through and find out), and, look, this all strikes me as utterly insane, microoptimisation in search of tiny, imperceptible marginal gains, but, equally, I cry most days and so as such perhaps the person behind this, one ‘Nathanial’, is a better person to listen to than I am.
  • An Incredibly Satisfying Swedish-Accented Rap: This is a bit of an unusual one – it’s literally just a link to a video which would ordinarily go in, well, the videos section where it belongs, but this is on Insta and as such I can’t embed it down there, but it doesn’t fit in the Instagram section either because it’s just a single video and the rest of the account isn’t (so far at least) delightfully-accented rap/poetry, and so you’re just going to have to put up with me queering the Curios running order slightly by putting it here. What’s that? You don’t give a fcuk? Oh. Anyway, this is a video posted by one Cecilia Elise Wallin and I am slightly obsessed with it – the delivery, the diction, the movement, the fact that when I first saw it I was half-convinced it was CG…this is just wonderful, and I really hope Ms. Wallin makes more of them.
  • Perverse: Speaking of (sort-of) poetry (SEAMLESS!), Perverse is a new online (and offline, but mostly online I think) journal of verse, “a magazine for “deliberate, obstinate, unreasonable or unacceptable poems, contrary to the expected practice”, which might appeal to those of you who enjoy slightly-unconventional forms of poetry – it’s a newsletter too, so you can sign up for occasional deliveries of crafted words to your inbox.
  • PacCam: We begin the BUMPER GAMES portion of Curios (I think we can all agree a bit of low-stakes ludic distraction will make it all better, right?) with this excellent, silly little game which basically lets you play a slightly-shonky, rudimentary version of Pacman using your face as a controller – enable your webcam and you can direct your small yellow pillmuncher around the screen by turning your head to the left or right or looking up or down. This is silly and a bit shonky but VERY fun (in a slightly broken way) – be aware though that a) it will give you a lot of shots of you looking VERY unattractive as you contort your neck to direct the sprite onscreen; and b) in fact, if any of you ever watched Daniel Day Lewis in My Left Foot, those are basically exactly the faces you’ll be pulling.
  • Letroso: Another week, another daily word game – this one’s like Wordle but you have a 10 letter word to guess each day; the basic ‘if you get the right letter in the right place it changes colour’ thing is the same, but there are a few tweaks in acknowledgement of the fact that, well, longer words make for a harder game. I like this a lot, and it’s a nice alternative to Wordle if you’re deciding to boycott it while the NYT fights with the unions (yes, even your daily word puzzle can become a complex labour rights issue! EVERYTHING IS POLITICS THERE IS NO ESCAPE).
  • Moida Mansion: This is SO good – not least because of the meticulous attention to detail applied to the design and style and look and feel of the whole thing. Moida Mansion is a browsergame that’s designed to look and play like one of the old ‘Game And Watch’-style LCD games that those of a certain age will remember from long car journeys – an LCD screen, simple movement, no animations – updated with some really clever wrinkles that transform it into an actually fun game (none of the original titles of the era were, to be clear, ‘fun’ in any accepted way). Everything about this is just perfect, down to the manual and the way it’s written and presented, and the game itself is a solid 15 minutes’ enjoyment – a really exceptional bit of work by renowned game designer Lucas Pope.
  • All Of The Ludum Dare 56 Entries: Via Lynn Cherny’s superb newsletter comes this link, to all the entries to the recent Ludum Dare game design jam, which challenged designers to create a small game from scratch in 72h or less, under the loose theme of ‘Tiny Creatures’ – there are DOZENS here, many of which you can play in your browser but the rest of which are free to download, and there are puzzlers and platformers and silly narrative fiction experiments and, honestly, there are HOURS of entertainment here if you just fancy turning your brain off and playing for a while.
  • Tenebra: I know that you don’t THINK that what you need and want in 2024 is a browsergame built on emulating the graphics and OS of the long-forgotten BBC Micro from the 1980s – and, look, you might be right, maybe you DON’T need or want this, but, well, I’m giving it to you anyway because it’s honestly great and SO much better than you think it’s going to be. Tenebra is a puzzlegame with 31 levels – the gimmick is that you have to get the protagonist to the end of each, but he is afraid of the dark – how do you get him through the dark areas to safety? This starts simple but becomes fiendish enough to be interesting and fun after a few levels, and I imagine there are some of you for whom this is a genuine, brainscratching pleasure.
  • Wigmaker: Our final miscellaneous offering this week is another infinite clicker (it’s not infinite, don’t worry). Would you like to play a game about making wigs? Are you pleased by liberal use of terms like ‘peruke’ to connote a hairpiece? Oh man are you going to enjoy this, in that case. A particularly nice example of the clicker genre, with a pleasant interface and some nice writing, this is a gentle, soothing and satisfying way of passing some time, ideally while on payroll so you can get remunerated for watching Wig Number Go Up.

By Devin Lunsford

OUR FINAL MIX OF THE WEEK IS BY THE FABULOUSLY-NAMED ‘LEGALIZE LAMBADA’ AND MAKES ME WANT TO USE THE WORD ‘FUNKY’ DESPITE THE FULL-BODY-PRETZEL-CRINGE THAT DEPLOYING THAT TERM MAKES ME FEEL! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Blocky Graphics: A collection of powerful aesthetics in one place; is it time for the third vaporwave revival yet?
  • 420Princess: Actually, no, wait, I take back what I said about the last link – THIS is a powerful aesthetic. I think it might be deeply, deeply evil, but, well, that feels kind of apt this week. DRINK IN THE BADNESS.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Hamid Naderi Yeganeh: As far as I can tell from their bio, Hamid is studying maths in some capacity at UCL; he uses his maths skills to create frankly amazing pictures from equations (ok, fine, he might well be doing loads of other stuff with them but the likelihood is I wouldn’t understand ANYTHING about that, whereas ‘making pictures with equations’ is something I can broadly get my head around). This is…quite astonishing, although to be honest this could all be absolute lies and I would have no idea whatsoever.
  • Geometry Club: Per the bio, “Celebrating the beauty of architecture with precisely aligned photographs from around the world.” You want photos of the top corner portion of a lot of buildings? GREAT!
  • Artisan Embroidery: Via Jana over at Zuckerbakerei (honestly, SUCH a lovely newsletter/website which is also home to some glorious baking recipes), this is the Insta feed of Jordan Cunliffe in Lancashire who embroiders data. EMBROIDERS DATA. There are some of you who I know will be ABSOLUTELY TUMESCENT at those words – know that I write for YOU.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Welcome Back To Trumpland: It pains me to have to say that one of the best immediate analyses of Tuesday’s vote – which, by the way, evidenced once again my unerring ability to be wrong about stuff; I went to bed around midnight convinced that it was going to be a drawn-out affair with recounts and contestations and no declaration til Thursday at the earliest, which once again proves that you should never, ever listen to a word I say about anything and that, basically, I am a know-nothing bozo – came on unpleasantly-right-wing website Unherd…but it did, hence why I am linking to it. It’s not triumphalist – Tom McTague doesn’t appear to have wanted this result any more than I did – but it does a good job of presenting the bald reasons as to why the result went the way it did, reasons which have continued to be borne out as more data emerges about voting patterns across demographies. This paragraph in particular seems to neatly-encapsulate things: “Ultimately, Joe Biden was right that his vice president was a weaker candidate than he had been and Obama was before him. Harris was weaker than Hillary Clinton, too. The Democratic Party’s presidential nominees are getting progressively worse. Some Democratic analysts were arguing overnight that Harrris had been denied the time to introduce herself to the American public. But this only reveals the depth of their denial. Biden was no longer fit for the presidency and would surely have lost by an even greater margin, yes. But Harris was only as plausible as she was because she was parachuted in at the last moment. It is surely the case that the emptiness of the drama she offered could only be sustained for the mini-series we got.”
  • Immediate Post-Mortem: I thought this was an excellent post by Ben Ansell, Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions at Nuffield College, University of Oxford, who had predicted a victory for Harris ahead of the polls closing and, in the wake of being proved quite decisively wrong, wrote this explaining why he thought that had happened. It’s very much worth reading, in part for its dissection of the inadequacies of the polling and prediction industries, and in part for its reasonably-clear-eyed assessment of the factors driving the Trumpian success – in particular, “People’s memories of the Trump administration were quite favourable. Until COVID broke out at least. And it seems that – as with Boris Johnson for example – the public weren’t inclined to blame Trump for the initial period of COVID chaos in early to mid 2020. For many people, their memories of Trump from early 2017 to early 2020 were strong economic growth, lower taxes, stable inflation and a calm international environment. And those same people looked at high inflation in 2021-22, high levels of border crossings, and a chaotic international environment, and they used a simple heuristic. Things were pretty good under the last guy. Things are less good under these guys. I vote for the last guy.”
  • I Told You So: Not me, to be clear – no, this is Sam Kriss, with 2000-odd words on ‘why he was right about this and so much other stuff besides’ (in Kriss’ defence, he did in fact call this). It feels oddly appropriate to be featuring Kriss in Curios again after about 8 years – he was very roundly discredited c.2016ish in a me too-adjacent scandal of which I forget the details, but he’s managed to maintain a career outside of the big ticket UK publications doing his post-hipster cultural analysis schtick and this piece is…look, I don’t necessarily like some of the tone, or what feels like slightly mean-spirited personal criticism of Harris, but a lot of this *feels* right; in particular the section about Brat and the summer hysteria that surrounded the campaign at the outset reminds me very strongly of stuff I remember saying to friends at the time (and may well have written here, I can’t be fcuked to check now, sorry) about how the whole thing had quite strong ‘YES SHE CAN!’ energy, and not in a good way, and basically for the past few days I have had the phrase “The Harris campaign exhumed, and was eventually consumed by, the zombified corpse of the girlboss’ and, well, I don’t know what to do with it and so I am leaving it here for you.
  • The Final Weeks of the Trump Campaign: It’s interesting, isn’t it, how the same piece can read incredibly, entirely differently depending on when you read it relative to other events. When I first read this on Sunday afternoon it was an interesting and slightly-catty look at the obviously-dysfunctional circus that exists around Trump and the infighting between his cabal of dreadful lieutenants to see who gets to be that weeks favourite lickspittle; rereading it again yesterday afternoon, it instead becomes…quite a worrying image of the sort of court that will once again spring up around the mad, syphilitic king. It really is worth reading this, not least because the people sound – and I say this even by the standards of US politics, where the monstrous is very much the quotidian – like REALLY appalling human beings (it’s also interesting that it doesn’t touch the Loomer rumours AT ALL). Remember the days of Conway and Spicer and that crowd? IT’S ALL COMING BACK! Oh god I am so so tired already.
  • The Ads: Ok, so this one is TECHNICALLY about the election but it’s actually more about the advertising around it, and specifically how it was advertised to the citizens of Montana – a State in which there was so much political advertising that the campaigns bought more inventory than actually existed. Alexander Sammon recounts his experience of spending 26h watching TV in the state to get FULLY IMMERSED in the scale of the ad campaign being waged, and it’s a superb and slightly-unhinged account of what nonstop exposure to political messaging can do to a man. It’s also slightly incredible to read this and then to check the data that shows the immense spike in people searching ‘did biden drop out’ on election day – like, managing to avoid details about this election does feel like it would have taken a not-insubstantial effort of will, so congratulations to everyone who managed to get to polling day uncertain as to who the candidates were.
  • Liberalism and the Far Right: This is an academic paper, and it’s quite hard and quite knotty and not exactly an easy read, but it feels like it fits quite aptly this week given its findings “suggest that far-right movements can gain power by embracing liberalism’s ambiguity and contradictions. In other words, mastering liberal messaging can be essential to the growth of far-right movements, challenging any easy dismissal of these politics as “illiberal.”. HM.
  • The Money Funding All This: Look, it’s taken me 6 links to mention Peter Thiel, DIDN’T I DO WELL? In fairness this piece in the Byline Times doesn’t mention cuddly Peter T, but it does reference his ageing counterparts the Koch brothers, who are the oldschool version of Pete’s ultramodern Silicon Valley techlibertarianism – this is a look at the ‘talent network’ that unites all the young, presentable, telly-friendly and strangely-identikit right-wing talking heads you see cropping up as participants on panel and debate shows on and offline. You may not recognise the names but you will definitely recognise some of the faces, and you may not be…wholly surprised to learn that the organisation which is working to promote them into the mainstream and which is working to polish and refine their messaging and presentation is…FUNDED BY MASSIVELY-RIGHT-WING US BILLIONAIRE INTERESTS! Look, I don’t mean to be some sort of mad conspiracist about this, but, well, THIS IS HOW THIS SHIT WORKS FFS THESE IDEOLOGICAL MOVEMENTS ARE NOT ORGANIC. So if you see a lot more of these people being invited on to places to discuss Trump, the new right and how it links to (or should link to) UK politics, know that it’s possibly not quite as simple as it ostensibly looks. BONUS SEMI-RELATED CONTENT: Taylor Lorenz wrote in her newsletter yesterday about ‘why the left can’t have its own Rogan’, which basically boils down to ‘there aren’t any leftist billionaires willing to fund this sort of stuff whereas, turns out, there are fcuktonnes of right-leaning plutes who very much are’. Don’t, please, think too hard about what the argument at the heart of all this says about the relative likelihood of right-wing things happening vs left-wing things happening.
  • The Rise of the Climate Anti-Hero: It feels…very wrong that the best article I have yet read about XR and Declare Emergency and Just Stop Oil and the current ‘souping the artworks’ protest movement was written in New York Magazine, but, well, here we are! This is long but SO good, a really interesting and multifaceted and fair portrait of the movement and some of the people within it – I enjoyed it in particular because it doesn’t paint them as perfect or as crusaders so much as people who are very frightened and simply don’t think that it is viable to no longer act. I think that this week is probably not a terrible time to read something like this and maybe consider whether or not they might be right.
  • Vanishing Culture: This is VERY LONG and quite involved, and, honestly, you sort of need to be REALLY interested in the general question of ‘how do we preserve online culture and materials?’ – but, presuming that you are, this is a fascinating document pulled together by the Internet Archive (now back online, huzzah) about why the work it does is important, not just in a ‘wow, isn’t it nice to be able to go and look at webpages from 2009!’ way but in a ‘look, we’ve been effectively putting most of our new culture onto digital media for the past 15 years at least, and at no point have we given anything resembling sufficient thought to how we’re going to make sure that it lasts and that we don’t get left with a fcuking enormous ‘digital dark ages’ in a few generations’ time’ (lol like we have that many generations left lol!)-type way. Aside from anything else, should any of you work for anyone who’s looking for something PURPOSE-Y to do in 2025 (like that’s ever going to be a thing again – unfettered capitalism all the way, kids! Markets gonna market!) then you could do significantly worse than steering them towards the general issue of digital preservation because, honestly, this is very much a THING and is only going to become more of one.
  • AI Right Now: Another week, another brilliant post by Ethan Mollick on AI – this time outlining some incredibly interesting extant use cases for LLMs which are smart and useful and creative and which should give you all food for thought. In particular there’s a lot of really useful stuff in here in terms of how to helpfully think about multimodality and image/video analysis which, to me at least, was quietly-revelatory.
  • My Week As An AI Slave: Oh OK, fine, that’s not actually the title – in reality it’s something more prosaic like ‘I let ChatGPT control my life for a week’, but I prefer my formulation. Anyway, this is an NYT piece and is pretty middle-of-the-road, but I found it interesting, partly as a contrast to the last iteration of this piece I remember from a year or so ago – it’s notable how much difference the ability to parse images and ‘dialogue’ with a user through voicechat, enhances the experience. It was also fascinating to me that the author realised halfway through that the key feature of an LLM is its middle-of-the-roadness, and that allowing it to dictate one’s choices effectively condemns one to a Basic B1tch existence of taupe and ugg boots and buddha bowls and Oh God this stuff is going to take over, isn’t it, because that is literally what most people like and want. Welcome to the future, an army of AI voice assistants directing an army of Deanos to an out-of-town leisure complex while wearing matching leisurewear, forever.
  • Where ‘Order’ Comes From: I ADORED this, in large part because it took stuff that I am really, really bad at understanding – specifically probability and maths – and helped me understand it better than I did before. Honestly, this is such good, clear writing that I think you should all read it, if only to enjoy the sensation of someone making something comprehensible in such calm, cogent fashion – this is by one Marco (thankyou Marco!) and is about why order arises our of apparent chaos and, I promise, you will feel SO much smarter after reading this (unless you already know all this stuff, in which case…why are you reading this sh1t? Shouldn’t you be off using your MASSIVE BRAIN for better things? THERE’S WORK TO DO FFS!).
  • Trying The Light Phone: You may recall the Light Phone, a recently(ish)-buzzy, nicely-designed new entrant to the ‘like a smartphone but designed to not let you get distracted by apps and stuff’ market – this is one GenZ person’s experience of using it. Look, this is in Mashable and so the writing is…fine, but I found the user’s experience really interesting and important in light of current talk about ‘banning smartphones for under-16s’ – per their account, it was all lovely and digital detoxy up until the point they started butting up hard against all the ways in which the modern world simply requires you to interact with it using a smart device, and how that makes not having one incredibly friction-y and very fcuking inconvenient indeed, and how, actually, that creates all sorts of stresses and annoyances and inconveniences that mean all the ZENLIKE CALM you get from, I don’t know, not being on Snap every living second, is somewhat wasted. Basically what this demonstrates is IT’S NOT THAT FCUKING SIMPLE (on which note, it’s worth having a close look into the Australian government’s ‘ban social media for <16s’ policies just to see how spectacularly-badly-designed they are).
  • Hey, Chat: On the rise of ‘chat’ as a conversational term used irl by kids, in the sense of ‘there is no distinction between me talking in real life to an individual or a group, and me talking online in a chat with one or more interlocutors’, which, actually, makes perfect sense on the one hand (why should we make distinctions between ‘communicating in physical person’ and ‘communicating online via text’? Except of course for all sorts of reasons of nuance, etc, but wevs!). On the one hand, this is literally just AN Other example of language evolving as it always has and always will do, and it’s nothing to get het up about; on the other, this could, if you squint, be looked at as yet more evidence of the growing degree to which interactions are being reduced to ‘actor—->audience’ rather than ‘dialogue’, and this is another expression of the sickening maincharacterisation of everyone and the NPCification of everyone else (I have THOUGHTS on this, fwiw) – you decide!
  • Training Your Colour Vision: This is a bit of a followup to the link a few weeks back of the GeoGuessr guy realising he can literally identify places by the colour of the sky in photos – here, Max Levy, who is colourblind to at least some degree, tries to see whether he can improve his ability to identify specific pantone shades on sight. Why? WHY NOT FFS???? This is a lot more interesting than I have just made it sound, I promise.
  • Mycology for Dummies: A brilliant piece of writing by Jan Hopis, about why writing about drugs is usually horrible and cringeworthy and unpleasant to read – and, also, about taking mushrooms. You shouldn’t be able to get away with having both of these things in one essay, but credit to Jan here because he nails this.
  • Fear and Loathing on Feeld: Or, based on having read this and the reactions it elicited online, ‘why dating in London is seemingly like ‘Nam’. This is…this is horrible, honestly, and made me want perform some fairly invasive brain surgery on myself to scoop out whatever part of my frontal lobe is responsible for ‘wanting to feel loved again’ to ensure I am never, ever tempted to try one of these fcuking things. If you are in a couple, you HAVE to read this as it will make you so, so grateful; if you are not, it will make you fervently pray for the asexual/aromantic fairy to visit you while you sleep because there is NOTHING about any of this experience that sounds good for anyone. If there’s one thing that this article I think pretty conclusively proves, by the way, it is that the normalisation of therapy culture and speak in the UK has been a net negative for at least one, possibly three, generations, and we are all worse people for all our ‘self-care’.
  • Happy Hardcore in Glasgow: For a certain generation, before people decided that it was the psytrance community with their white dreadlocks and dogs on strings that deserved mockery and vilification, it was happy hardcore that occupied the uncoveted ‘least cool genre of dance music’ position (in fairness it was also comments like this, delivered by some monged-out kid to my mate Paul: “I like happy hardocore because it’s really happy and really safe” – that’s very much the calibre of person it tended to attract). If you’re not familiar with it, take a moment to listen and then come back when you’ve washed the blood out of your ears, and then enjoy this great piece in the newly-launched Glasgow Bell about the Glasgow hardcore scene and the kids that made it – you can almost smell the cheap speed and glue! Also worth noting that this link and the last one are from new independent local journalism outfits launched in the past few months, a rare feelgood moment in UK media in 2024. Dear God I still have the hardcore tab open and playing, this is HORRIBLE.
  • Athens Revised: Beautifully-written but inevitably-harrowing account of rape, by Erin Wood. I didn’t touch on the Saoirse Ronan stuff last week, but this feels like a suitable paragraph to quote: “A month before I graduated from high school in 1996, I was learning to see my female body as more than just a vessel to resent and attempt to thin. My body was also a set of weapons that could protect. The heel of my hand could drive nasal bone into brain. Bunched fingers could eject eyeballs from sockets. The self-defense course, called Model Mugging, was underwritten by an alumna of my school and offered to every senior girl. The male instructors—known as “padded assailants”—would don protective gear so that we students could practice hitting them without restraint, as if fighting for our lives, or to prevent being raped. Or both.”
  • Not My Problem: Finally this week, one of the best pieces of speculative writing about near-future AI stuff that I’ve read in an age – this is Tim Maughan with a short story called “Not My Problem”, and it’s really impossible to read any of the elements in this without thinking “well, yeah, I mean that’s probably actually going to happen, isn’t it?” Brilliant, and only about 80% as frightening and unsettling as you think it’s going to be, which is a bonus of sorts.

By Raija Jokinen, via blort

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 01/11/24

Reading Time: 35 minutes

The world’s either going to get maybe, possibly, a tiny bit better next week, or it’s going to get LOADS worse – EXCITING, ISN’T IT? I don’t know about you, but part of me quite wants to be put into a medically-induced coma until America gets its sh1t together.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you’re sick of their fcuking politics too, admit it.

By Zhiyong Jin (all pics this week via TIH, for which thanks as ever)

WHY NOT ENJOY THE OPENING SECTION OF CURIOS ACCOMPANIED BY A SELECTION OF UK GRIME TRACKS MIXED BY MANGA? THERE IS NOT GOOD REASON NOT TO, CLICK THIS LINK! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY ANGRY AT THE FACT THAT IT KNOWS WHO AND WHAT ‘THE RIZZLER’ IS, BUT IS EVEN MORE ANNOYED THAT THIS WEEK IT GOT HIM MIXED UP WITH BABY GRONK, PT.1:  

  • 3d Workers Island: This week’s first link is a bit of an odd one (plus ca change), and to be honest it’s more of a short story in slightly-odd webpage form, and, well, I appreciate I am hardly selling it to you here but I PROMISE IT IS GOOD. You just have to be aware of the following things: a) despite what it might look like, there’s no real interaction happening here – you advance the narrative by clicking, and that’s your only form of agency here; b) so effectively that means that what you’re doing is reading and looking – do you like reading and looking? GREAT! I don’t want to give too much away here because part of the pleasure of this is how gently-unsettling it is, but think of this as a spooky tale for hallowe’en (yes I know I am a day late, it’s not my fcuking fault when the days fall), one which wonders what it would be like if you one day realised that the computer sandbox you like to play with might have something slightly more going on under the hood than you at first thought. Told through ‘game’ footage, screenshots of forum posts, messenger conversations and other fragmented bits of digital media, this is REALLY nicely–paced and gets…quite creepy by the end. It will take about 10 minutes of your life, but you probably weren’t going to do anything important with them anyway, were you? Exactly.
  • MusicFX DJ: A NEW FUN MUSICAL AI TOOL TO PLAY WITH! This one’s from Google, and basically takes a multi-track approach to AI music – rather than just inputting a single prompt to generate a piece of music, this interface lets you specify various elements that you want included, and then use sliders to change the emphasis given to each prompt in the resultant composition – so, for example, you might have one term which is just ‘crying’, and by adjusting the slider you can, in realtime, determine the exact amount of wracked sobbing you’d like to include in the song. This is, in the main, a GREAT way of creating some genuinely-horrible-sounding cacophonies (as I type this, some truly appalling sounds generated by the terms ‘southern gothic’, ‘hardcore’ and ‘breakbeat’ are swirling around my kitchen), but it feels like this particular way of directing The Machine allows for a lot more interesting and malleable results – there’s something honestly sort of magical about moving the sliders and hearing the track respond to your urgings in semi-realtime, even if I haven’t yet managed to create anything that doesn’t make my ears want to immolate themselves. Have a play, this is FUN.
  • The Bullsh1tometer: I am, perhaps naively, clinging onto the hope that as of this time next week North America will have collectively decided that, actually, the past 10 years haven’t actually been all that fun, and that it might now be time to put this whole miserable episode behind us and forget, ideally forever, that That Fcuking Man ever existed (I appreciate it is unlikely that it is going to be that simple, but hey ho). As the rest of the world waits to see whether the population of  one country ends up making a decision so catastrophically stupid (AGAIN!) that it fcuks things up for everyone else too, why not enjoy this election-themed explainer from Australian satirical outlet Crikey, which is running a project to neatly demonstrate the ways in which AI can (and already is) being applied to news output, and how that affects the way in which a reader experiences facts. Per their explanation, “We’ve used the current US election campaign as a test case. We started by selecting six “base” stories, pivotal moments in the campaign so far that have been covered across the globe, with the key details generally agreed upon across the spectrum.  The team at DDB and Pow Wow then took a “neutral” article (acknowledging that no article, even wire copy, can ever be truly neutral) for each of these stories and passed them through a fine-tuned LLM (large language model). The LLM is designed to find opportunities to insert political bias. As the dial is turned up, the AI system adds more and more bias, until the “neutral” base article is converted into a piece of extreme propaganda.” So, basically, you select one of a selection of articles and can turn the AI heat up to a degree of your own choosing, seeing how quickly and easily The Machine is able to turn relatively-staid and neutral prose into something significantly more partisan and inflammatory in just a click.  This won’t tell you anything you don’t already know, but it’s a neat educational explainer as to why you need to be (even more) cognisant of how easy it is to spin facts with words, and how (per everything else) it’s not going to get any better anytime soon.
  • Hourly at the Whitney:  What time is it RIGHT NOW? No, seriously, it’s important. Basically if you click this link on the hour, you will experience a lovely little bit of site-specific art by Maya Man; if you click at any other time, you’ll just get the website for the Whitney (which is nice, but, well, not all that interesting per se). I won’t spoil the work by explaining or describing it (although if you’re too impatient to wait for the hour to strike, you can get the details here – but know that I judge you poorly), but I was utterly charmed by this – I think there’s something wonderful about this sort of subtle, additive webwork, and the idea that someone might just be online while the hour strikes and be surprised by the unexpected interaction is lovely to me. It sort of puts me in mind of those elaborate water clocks that you occasionally find in provincial shopping centres, which twice a day do some sort of insanely-elaborate trumpet-and-geyser routine to the tune of the William Tell overture (you OBVIOUSLY know what I mean here, don’t pretend that this isn’t the most evocative and resonant description of anything you’ve ever read). Basically I think that anyone who’s in charge of a website should give serious thought to including some sort of regular, time-based easter egg, the stranger the better – I am very much available for ‘consultancy’ here, should anyone want to discuss some options.
  • Smashing: Of all the things that need ‘hacking’ (nothing needs hacking, NOTHING, you are not fcuking Neo, you are just a tedious micromanager of your own experiences and you should just fcuking relax, ok?), I think if I’m honest that ‘finding things to read online’ is pretty low down the list – JUST SUBSCRIBE TO CURIOS FFS WHAT IS WRONG WITH EVERYONE? However, should you somehow be of the opinion that 20-odd high quality longreads, lovingly curated by ME, isn’t enough for you each week, you might be interested in Smashing, the second ‘surface more articles to read’-type app I can remember in the past 18 months (you may recall Artifact, which lasted approximately six months). How it works is a *bit* opaque, but as far as I can tell there’s a combination of…some sort of algorithmic content sorting, alongside ‘community recommendations’, with the idea that the app’s userbase will also contribute interesting things to the content pool based on their own surfing/browsing/reading. Which is a nice idea in theory, but rather undermined by the intended target audience for the app is…people who feel they need help finding interesting things to read. DO YOU SEE THE PROBLEM IN THIS THEORETICAL FLYWHEEL? There’s also quite a large red flag in the app’s blurb, which, when reaching for topics that users might be interested in, alights immediately on ‘marketing’, ‘wellness’ and ‘AI’, suggesting that, possibly, it’s aimed at people who don’t actually like reading for reading’s sake at all (look, I’m sorry, but if you are asked for your primary interests and your immediate response is those three terms then, well, I think you have dust where your soul should be), an opinion further reinforced by the fact that ‘AI Summaries’ is a big selling point (you can instruct the app to make any article ‘funny’, which will send a genuine shiver of revulsion down the spine of anyone who’s been exposed to LLM-generated ‘humour’ at any point). Basically this looks like it’s for cnuts, and I hope none of you download it (but, as ever, I will never know if you do, so).
  • The Geoguesser Man Has Reaches His Final Evolution: OK, so this is literally just a link to a video on X, and it’s only 20s or so, but also I think this might be significant at a species level. The Geoguesser guy – you know, the bloke who’s somehow discovered he has a quite incredible facility for working out where on earth any given photograph was taken – has worked out that he can, more often than not, identify the rough geolocation of an image based on nothing more than the tone of the sky in said image; this video is of him realising the full extent of his powers. I am honestly slightly astonished and not a little terrified by this, as if it’s not all a scam or a setup then I honestly think he might have hit a new tier of evolution.
  • A Flood of AI Animation Is Coming: This link takes you to what, fine, is a very dry update from AI videmongers Runway about a new update to their stack; ignore the boring (and frankly far-too-technical) words, though, and enjoy the videos, which demonstrate the frankly startling animation/mocap results that you can now get from AI style transfer in what I think might be realtime. Basically it takes facial movement and voice patterns and uses those to animate an AI-generated facial model – as you can see from the example clips here, what this means is Pixar-grade lipsyncing and emoting with literally no effort whatsoever, which, from the point of view of lowering the barrier to entry for creating animations, is pretty significant. On the one hand I appreciate that, as with all this stuff, there are a LOT OF QUESTIONS (whither jobs! Whither the environment! Etc etc) but I can’t help but see things like this as…broadly good? I don’t know, I just think that anything that allows kid with an idea and an imagination to more easily make things based on said ideas and said imagination is, on balance, A Net Positive, and I can’t get immediately angry about something that lowers the barriers to Making Fun Things. Sorry. Also, let’s be honest, there’s a fcuktonne of very ropy human-created animation already out there, so let’s not pretend it’s all fcuking Golden Era Disney.
  • Synthwave Chimes: Via Kris at Naive, this is a lovely, fuzzy and slightly-incomprehensible little synthtoy – there are some…dangling things (the titular ‘chimes’, I suppose – fcuk, I could probably have worked that out before I started typing this now-entirely-pointless digression) which you move your mouse over to produce sounds – the sounds in question are a bit ragged and frayed around the edges, and I like the vaguely-atonal cacophony that results when you careen the cursor across the shapes, and, in general, I think I would like windchimes significantly more if they sounded like this.
  • Grief Garden: Also via Kris (THANKS KRIS!) comes this simple-but-hugely-poignant (and, realistically, only going to become moreso) website which exists to collect people’s memories of the things that they have lost, or know they will lose, as a result of climate change. Per the blurb, Grief Garden “is an exploratory space, containing stories of plants, animals, and other memorialized climate grief. Explore the canvas by clicking on cells to either learn more about a memorial or to add your own — this can be a favorite tree, a beach, a friend, anything that you would like to memorialize.” It presents as a simple ASCII-ish map – clicking on any square on the map that has a character on it will show you someone else’s memory; clicking on one with no character will allow you to enter your own. This feels very much like something that could / should be taken by a museum and made bigger, because…well, look, none of this is getting better, is it, and it feels like these are feelings and ideas that a significant proportion of the global population is going to have to start wrestling with sooner than it probably realises. Seriously though, please do spend some time with this – there are some really lovely bits of writing buried in the memories, like this one: “But there are snapshots of this season I won’t forget. Toddlers receiving commendations for bravery on behalf of fathers who will miss a lifetime of milestones. Stepping onto the tarmac under that ominous, orange sky, the scarcest smattering of ash on the breeze. Evacuation sirens; smoke so dense it cancels out the sun. The fear in my son’s eyes as he struggled to catch a breath. Thousands upon thousands of livestock charred and scattered by the road; millions upon millions of native animals – likely entire species – incinerated.” Yes, ok, fine, I didn’t say it would be cheerful.
  • Leon Eckert: I have no clue whatsoever how I found the personal website of Leon Eckert, who, per his description, is ‘a German programmer, researcher and artist focusing on the critical discussion of technology and its impact on society’ and currently living in Shanghai (HELLO LEON, should you be the sort of person who Googles themselves, HAPPY FRIDAY I HOPE YOU ARE WELL), and I am linking to his website because it has THE most pleasingly fun/silly UX/UI flourishes I have seen on a site in AGES. Seriously, just click the link and then toggle the checkboxes on the left-hand-side of the page to make your browsing experience significantly more fun. I would like all new websites to come with these features, please, especially the ‘multiply my cursor by 1000’ one which genuinely made me feel as though I was having some sort of minor episode for a second.
  • Thos Computer: This is a very simple site but I LOVE the interface and how the drop-down menus and what you select from them effectively act as a sort of Choose Your Own Adventure-type recongfiguration of the website content (which, I promise, will make more sense to you when you click the link and play around). This feels like a really interesting and potentially-fruitful way to explore narrative design; I really like the idea of a story which reconfigures itself around you as you change individual words, alter verbs or swap out nouns.
  • On Games: A new magazine! An actual, physical magazine! About videogames! All glossy and high-quality and super-designed! This looks LOVELY, and very grown-up, (and pricey, at £25 for volume one), and the sort of thing that would sit among the exposed brickwork and filament bulbs of someone from 2013’s warehouse apartment. Gorgeous design, though.
  • Nintendo Music: I was never a Nintendo kid as a child, and as a result don’t have the deep-seated nostalgia associated with the brand, its consoles and its characters – I am aware, though, that for many of you the sound of the NES (or SNES, or N64, or Gameboy, or Switch, dear god this makes me feel old I am going to stop listing old consoles now) is the sound of CHILDHOOD and BETTER TIMES, and as such I realise that for some of you a mobile app which lets you listen to ALL OF THE NINTENDO MUSIC EVER is basically like some sort of holy grail so, well, here you go! I haven’t tried this so can’t attest to its quality, but it’s an official Nintendo app so I’d expect it to be pretty decent. I particularly like the way that the app will apparently let you extend the duration of shorter tracks, so you can transform (for example) the Rainbow Road theme into some sort of 18-minute prog fever dream.
  • The RIP Off: This is a project by an outfit called Brain, very much the Gobots to MSCHF’s Transformers when it comes to ‘gimmicky short-term gimmicks with immense viral potential’ – they are the people behind the ‘Green Day, but with the songs reproduced on crappy instruments’ which you doubtless saw when I was off, and while I am sure they’re perfectly-pleasant people this does very much feel like a bunch of people who saw what MSCHF were doing and literally thought ‘yeah, ok, we can copy that wholesale’. Still, I grudgingly have to admit that I think this is quite a fun idea – the simple premise is that each time a famous dies, someone somewhere is the first in the world to express their condolences via social media, and that that person should be rewarded in the form of a medal. The site lists a bunch of now-deceased celebrities; if you believe you were the first in the world to wish them well in their shuffle off the mortal coil, link your Twitter account to the site and claim your prize – in this specific case, a medal engraved with your name and the fact that YOU were the first person in the world to publicly mourn (for example) Liam Payne. Sadly the medals only ship within the US, which means that I feel it important for a UK funeral parlour to rip this off wholesale for the anglo market.

By Takashi Nakamura

NEXT UP WE RETURN TO FORMER EDITOR PAUL WHOSE BLOOPS AND BEATS ARE IN PARTICULARLY FINE FORM THIS WEEK! 

THE SECTION WHICH IS GENUINELY ANGRY AT THE FACT THAT IT KNOWS WHO AND WHAT ‘THE RIZZLER’ IS, BUT IS EVEN MORE ANNOYED THAT THIS WEEK IT GOT HIM MIXED UP WITH BABY GRONK, PT.2:

  • I Can’t Believe Other People Don’t Do This: We have all experienced the very particular feeling of watching someone else undertake a task in a manner which, to us at least, looks so utterly preposterous, so wrong-headed, so STUPID, that it makes us question whether or not the person in question is in some way, I don’t know, intellectually subnormal (professionally-speaking I have found this most often when watching how people use search engines; by contrast, others tend to get this feeling watching me dress) – this is a Reddit thread collecting a VAST crowdsourced list of the ways in which various people perform certain tasks in hyperoptimised ways and, honestly, some of these are fcuking GAMECHANGERS. Seriously, there will be at least one thing in here which utterly changes your life (as well as a lot of others which, yes, fine, make you slightly question the sanity or life-choices of some of the posters in the thread – I appreciate you like tidy drawers, mate, but plastic ziploc bags in said drawers in which you organise all your individual gubbins feels a touch…excessive) – I experienced a moment of genuine revelatory clarity at ‘open bags of crisps upside down because all the seasoning sits at the bottom’, for example, akin to when the image of the duck suddenly resolves itself into a bunny rabbit.
  • Extract All The Links: I feel quite strongly that I am cutting my own throat by serving you up this link, but such is my dedication to bringing you the very best of the web that I can’t hold back even when a link is basically designed to render Curios (or at least the bit of it which involves me) entirely redundant. Simon Willison got an LLM to code this up for him as part of some tinkering he was doing (you can read the notes of how here, should you be interested) – it’s a very simple tool which lets you paste in any copy you like from any webpage you fancy, and which will quickly and neatly extract any embedded urls from said text and dump them out for you without any of the annoying accompanying prose. Which means that should you decide that while the links are good the words are, frankly, dogsh1t, you need never again suffer through my prose – just copy the entire text of Curios, dump it in here and then surf to your heart’s content without my godawful words ruining your webspelunking. Know, though, that if you choose to do that I will do everything in my power to come back from the dead and haunt you to the point of insanity (not joking).
  • AI For Culture: Do any of you work in the cultural sector? I have a vague feeling a couple of you might – anyway, if so, this might be of use/interest. Basically this is a set of tools and resources compiled by what looks like a range of pan-European cultural institutions designed to help people within the sector work out how best to deploy generative AI as part of their work – per the blurb, “We are on a mission to empower the culture heritage sector through Artificial Intelligence. Our aim is to enable professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts within the sector with the resources they need to integrate AI into their daily workflow, find creative ways to use them and solve their current problems. The platform hosts a pool of readily deployed AI software tools, along with training and testing datasets that have been curated for use within the sector. To describe what is possible and showcase existing successful deployments, various types of upskilling material are also hosted by the platform.” The fact that none of the tech companies have their logos on this makes me think it’s probably a genuine attempt to assist culture workers rather than a naked attempt to inject The Machine into every possible corner of the world for pecuniary gain. There are over 100 tools in the database here, so if you’re interested in AI for general purpose, practical use it’s probably worth a quick look.
  • Napkin: This is, I concede, quite dull, but it might also be quite useful. Are you the sort of person who makes slides with diagrams on them? Do you have to get someone else to make the diagrams for you because, fundamentally, you’re a useless design refusenik? Enter Napkin, which will use THE MAGIC OF AI to spin up appropriate, diagrammatic illustrations for your slides based on the copy you feed it – basically you just plug in the on-slide text and it will spit out what it concludes are suitable graphical/diagrammatic representations of said text for you to select, tweak and ultimately use – if you’re the type of, I don’t know, SYSTEMS THINKER who likes to describe complex processes and feedback loops and stuff then this will probably be far too noddy for you; on the other hand, if you’re someone who works in advermarketingpr and whose slides contain concepts which should probably be written in crayon so RIGOROUS are they then this is probably EXACTLY the degree of sophistication you need. As an aside, I have been in many, many meetings over the course of my career with consultants from places like Accenture, and I am entirely convinced that 70% of all monies paid to the people in those companies goes on creating slide templates featuring triangles and arrows in important-looking configurations which mean the square root of fcuk all but very much LOOK businesslike.
  • Hummingbirds: A new(ish) twist on the influencer model! This time with an emphasis on HYPERLOCALITY, though, which is obviously ENTIRELY novel (not in fact really that novel at all), which I suppose makes sense in, say, the US, given the size of the country, but possibly marginally less so somewhere like the UK, where it’s questionable whether the market exists for finding influencers in, say, Maidstone. Still, the premise feels solid – local businesses sign up, set up campaigns that they want influencers to participate in; said influencers sign up, select the brand campaign then want to work on, make their content, get paid, everyone wins! Well, in theory at least – as ever with these things I have…questions about the economics of the whole thing and whether the incentives available are attractive enough to tempt a sufficient volume of creators, or whether the impact of said ‘influence’ is enough at a micro level to make the brand campaigns worthwhile, but should you be less sceptical about all this than I am then you might find the model of interest. BONUS INFLUENCER PLATFORM: this is by possibly the UK’s least-favourite entrepreneur James Watt, the man who singlehandedly managed to render the word ‘punk’ utterly meaningless thanks to his work with Brewdog and who’s now branching out into the influence space himself with his new venture called ‘Social Tip’, where (basically) if you buy something from a brand, said brand can then pay you to talk about how happy you are to have bought said something all over the internet. This doesn’t, apparently, require any form of disclosure whatsoever from the person being paid, as given that they have already made the purchase it’s considered that they are not being induced to promote the product – which strikes me as…something of a grey area which may not remain grey for that much longer should the ASA be paying proper attention. In fact, the whole terms section of the site strikes me as being full of the sort of stuff that feels very much ‘we’re fcuking around! Let’s find out!’, so it will be interesting to see how long this lasts for.
  • Cafeteria: Seeing as we’re doing ‘links vaguely related to advermarketingpr’, here’s Cafeteria, an interesting idea from the US which is designed to let brands get REAL INSIGHTS from REAL TEENS about what they REALLY THINK. They do this by paying them to complete short surveys – the company behind the app has a cohort of teens signed up, presumably with a reasonable demographic split (this is North America only, I think) and paying them to answer questions about what they’re into, the brands they like, etc etc. Kids get asked to participate at most a couple of times a month, to prevent burnout or, presumably, them gaming the system to earn lots of pocket cash; participants get paid upto $20 to participate, which seems like an awful lot of money for this to be in anyway practically scaleable, but, then again, American budgets are American budgets. Worth being aware of if your job has anything to do with ‘knowing what the kids are into’ (if that’s the case you really are reading the wrong newsletter).
  • Walkcast: This is a really lovely idea which is sadly ruined by the appalling LLM-generated copy – Walkcast is basically an AI-generated podcast which spins up a story based on where you are in the world. As far as I can tell what happens here is that there’s a combination of geolocation (which tells the programme where you are), light prompting (which generates the story based on the aforementioned location data), and text-to-voice (which streams it into your ears), resulting in a new, location-specific story delivered to you whenever you want it. Which is in theory SO COOL, but is totally undermined by the fact that the tone is so utterly grating, full of the sort of horrendous, vaguely-millennial-inflected slop that is an LLMs default output. As previously discussed here, it is HARD to make The Machine write anything non-businessish that isn’t awful to read, but they could at least have attempted to mitigate the baseline mediocrity here a bit. Feels like there is an idea in here with a bit of tweaking, though – oh, this came via the excellent Sentiers, by the way, which continues to be a great newsletter for futures-type writing and thinking.
  • The UFO Timeline: This is a great little project by amateur UFOlogist (is that the term? Apologies if I’ve just used the community equivalent of hatespeech here) by one Sam Lingle (HI SAM LINGLE!) who decided that it was quite annoying to keep track of the history of UFO investigations and discoveries and that what was needed was a website which presented a timeline of what was learned when – A UFO TIMELINE, IF YOU WILL! Ahem. This is GREAT, even if, like me, you are…unconvinced as to the existence of extraterrestrial life (or, perhaps more accurately, are unconvinced of the extent to which extraterrestrial life is interested in hanging out with us), and it taught me that the earliest recorded instance of alleged alien abduction occurred in the 1770s in Sweden, when one Jacob Jacobsson ‘came face to face with short, humanoid beings and a chubby man wearing a red cap’ and was somehow disappeared by them for four days (I don’t mean to be sceptical here, but I’m guessing it was easier to spin yarns like this in the late-18th Century). Anyway, this is a really nice personal project which is far better-coded than it probably needs to be, and is a pleasant way of spending 10 minutes learning about all the different parts of the world that have seen citizens claiming to have been ‘probed by the greys’.
  • Jordan Stone:I don’t do TikTok, I am not interested in it, and I don’t find it, as a rule, particularly interesting as a medium (I know, I know) – that said, I think Jordan Stone  might be a genius and that their videos are ART. I don’t, honestly, know quite how to explain these to you – they’re a sort of evolution of brainrot content, stitching together and overlaying multiple different videos and music with fx to create something oddly-meditative and poignant and beautiful (I am not joking, seriously, I think this really is quite moving at times), despite being composed from clips that are, objectively, often very, very silly. I can’t quite explain the power of this, but trust me when I tell you that it may be the best thing I’ve seen on the platform all year and I would 100% watch an hour-long supercut of these, ideally very stoned in a comfortable gallery setting.
  • Stop Project 25 – The Comic: To all the North Americans reading this – you poor, poor fcuks, seriously, this election has been going on for approximately three decades and it increasingly looks like it might in fact NEVER STOP HAPPENING; it’s exhausting and very boring for the rest of us, but for you it’s exhausting, boring and TERRIFYING, which must be even worse. I am not going to suggest what you do with your vote because a) it’s none of my business, who the fcuk am I to tell you what to do?; and b) I am 99% certain that everyone reading this is a Democrat (the only person I know who actually supports Trump and who might in fact read this is not a US citizen and lives in Mexico, so give a fcuk), but I found this website, which details some of the Project 25 stuff that has so many on the ‘left’ (lol at the idea that the current democratic party could be described in any such way in any rational world) so scared, nicely done – detailing the alleged plans for the post-election Trump supremacy in comicbook format to neatly explain via sequential art exactly how bad it could get for, basically, anyone who isn’t a straight white man. As I’ve said before, part of me does slightly think this is ‘QAnon for liberals’, but, even taking a lot of this with some grains of salt, it’s…a bit troubling. Anyway, hopefully That Fcuking Man will do an Elvis between now and Tuesday so this will all end up being moot (if we all hope hard enough it COULD HAPPEN).
  • Use YouTube As An Instrument: Ooh, this is a FUN little hacked-together toy – plug in any YouTube url and this website lets you assign timestamped portions of the video to individual keys on your laptop, meaning you can basically turn any vid into a customised soundboard; this could be quite a lot of fun for mixing and recording (or if you just want to be able to quickly and easily use the ‘AW YEAH!’ bit from Timmy Mallett’s ‘Itsy Bitsy Teeny Weeny Yellow Polka Dot Bikini’ as an on-demand audio sting for the rest of the day).
  • Battleships: The game of Battleships – you know, the one where you have to guess where your opponents ships are placed on a grid – reimagined as a single-player daily puzzler. This is clever and neat, but I was really bad at it and so it has made me unaccountably grumpy and I don’t feel like praising it anymore than the bare minimum as a result. Sorry.
  • Color Gum: A tiny little puzzler which you will get through in about 5 minutes, and as such a perfect ‘tea and biscuit’ companion – you just need to manoeuver the blob to the goal, ensuring that it’s the right colour when it arrives; simple, but you can see how the mechanic could get quite chewy and complex if you extended it a bit.
  • The ThinkyGames Games Archive: ThinkyGames is a website all about, er, games that require some thought – they recently updated their website, and it now includes this GREAT archive of games, many of which are browser-based and entirely free-to-play, and which will require you to use your brain in some small way but which also include titles for all the major consoles and PC; if you’re after something to play right now then there are dozens of options here, but, equally, if you’d like a resource to help you decide what to play in the future then this is worth bookmarking. SO MANY GREAT GAMES, SO LITTLE TIME.

By Joshua Amirthasingh

THE LAST MIX OF THE WEEK IS THIS FABULOUS AND SOMEHOW-MELLIFLUOUS COLLECTION OF TUNES FROM ALL OVER THE PLACE, SUPERBLY MARSHALLED BY JOI N’JUNO!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • PicVoid: As far as I can tell, these are just found photos from around the web, seemingly all depicting people’s bedrooms or living rooms in a non-specific period that feels…vaguely-early-00s, I think? There’s a certain quality they all share, despite the disparate contents, that give the whole collection an odd, vaguely-hauntological vibe which I very much enjoy – this is PURE VIBES, basically, and not particularly comforting ones.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Kelani Fatai: Fatai is a Nigerian painter who does portraits of figures from Black culture in a sort-of-faux-Renaissance style – I *really* like the look and feel of the work here, and Fatai is set to become VERY FAMOUS quite soon as I think they have been picked to do the cover art for the forthcoming Mama Knowles memoir ‘Matriarch’. YOU SAW HIM HERE FIRST.
  • Devil’s Blush: An account that posts videogame screenshots – honestly, though, that doesn’t come close to expressing the BEAUTY of this. Seriously, the shots are ART – they’re photos of screens, so there’s a very particular quality to the images, and the way the pixels show up, that is SO powerfully of-an-era that it feels like being transported back to your memories of playing Mario on a CRT round your mate’s house (you can read an interview with the person behind it here, should you be so inclined).

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The Labour Party In 2024: We start this week with one of three LRB pieces in this week’s longreads (it really is such a wonderful magazine), this one a synthesis-review of three books on UK politics which presents as more of a ‘state of the Labour Party in 2024’ piece and which, as a general primer on the party and the journey it’s been on over the past 15 years, is absolutely superb. The books it covers include Diane Abbott’s recent autobiography and a recent bio of Starmer, thereby neatly capturing the left and…not-so-left of the party, and delves into the internecine conflict that has characterised much of the past decade (and the past month or so) of the Labour story, and, in general, this is a superb ‘where we are and how we got here’ piece on the current party of Government.
  • Trump and Male Insecurity: I’m keeping it relatively light on the US politics front this week because, well, we’re all fcuking sick of it, aren’t we? An election campaign that feels like it’s been happening since 2014, dominated by the same dreadful man (albeit with a revolving cast of dreadful cheerleaders)…please god let this be over soon (but not, to be clear, in The Bad Way). Anyway, I enjoyed this piece in the Ink about the weird, incredibly insecure masculinity that’s been at the heart of much of the past couple of years of Republican (Trumpian?) rhetoric – the fear that they will take the guns, the meat and the petrol away, thereby depriving red-blooded males across the 50 states of WHAT MAKES MEN MEN – neatly summed up in this paragraph: “Eruptions of hypermasculinity — which is to say, faux masculinity — are reactions against perceived threats to the vertical binary of male and female and produce a rise in the popularity of authoritarianism. As women—and other categories assigned to the female position in power relationships — have moved towards greater equality, those who have counted on an impenetrable floor beneath them (which is also the ceiling above women and others designated as inferior) have become hyper-anxious.“Build the Wall!” really means “Rebuild the Floor!””
  • The Cult of the Founders: Henry Farrell writes about the monomaniacal founders of the Valley, and how we might usefully conceive of them as cult leaders (which, can I just point out, plays neatly into my overarching cultural theory about how the most important prism through which to attempt to understand the post-web era is cults in general – COME TO MY TED TALK, etc etc), and how problems arise when these cult leaders are forced by success or circumstance into instead acting like church leaders, and it’s the conflict between their vision of themselves as being worthy of adulation and ceaseless praise and the practical reality of ‘living in a world with other people that probably ought to be considered too’ that creates so many issues. This neatly encapsulates the core tenet: “Once, they believed that software would eat the world. They’d ride their sandworms from the desert through the shield to their own glory and the despair of their enemies, smash everything up, and create a galactic empire of inspiration and awesomeness. Instead, they found themselves managing self-ramifying and self-perpetuating empires of bureaucracy, submerged beneath memos and trivial decisions, and worst of all, dealing with fcuking HR and surly and subordinate employees who didn’t share their values, nor behave as worshipfully as they ought have done” – as someone who has occasionally had to deal with ‘brilliant’ entrepreneurial types I cannot stress enough how much this chimes with my personal experience.
  • Carbon Inequality Kills: I did a quick search on this, and it was covered, as far as I can tell, in a grand total of three publications this week. Three. FFS HUMANITY!!! Anyway, in a week in which it once again became abundantly clear that we are in no way ready for what we are going to have to accept as ‘weather’ in the coming years, Oxfam published their latest piece of research into the actual climate impact of the super wealthy – and it may not surprise you to learn that you turning your thermostat down by 0.5 degrees this winter isn’t going to make an iota of difference to the climate crisis when you have the hardcore plutes spaffing emissions out left, right and centre. It really is worth reading this – it will make you FURIOUS, but it contains some truly jaw-dropping stats, including this pair which made me just sort of stop and stare, slack-jawed, at the screen for a second while attempting to process them: “If everyone began emitting as much carbon as those in the top 1%, the remaining carbon budget would be gone in fewer than five months; if everyone emitted carbon at the same rate as the luxury transport emissions of 50 of the world’s richest billionaires, the remaining carbon budget would be gone in two days.” FCUKING HELL THOUGH.
  • GPT Search: OpenAI yesterday announced that the long-awaited SearchGPT was here – now paying subscribers (it will be rolled out to everyone else ‘in the coming months’) get access to an LLM which can pull live info from the web when answering questions. I played around with this a bit yesterday, and on the one hand it’s pretty good and works as you might expect (it’s basically like Perplexity – I couldn’t tell you which is ‘better’ at present); on the other, though, WOW is this going to be…interesting in terms of truth and knowledge and stuff. Per all of these things, answers are delivered as summaries with linked ‘footnote’-style sources so you can see where The Machine’s pulling the info from; the thing is that there’s no guarantee that it’s going to go to the best sources, and when it’s drawing from something that itself is already a synthesis of sources you can see that tracking back to the source of a ‘fact’ is going to get…tricky. Turns out, for example, that OpenAI’s model has ingested exactly the same incredibly-racist non-science as Perplexity and Copilot, because it gave me exactly the same answers as those highlighted in this piece when asking about IQ scores – this feels like something that is quite quickly going to become…problematic.
  • Be Like Water: The second piece in a week from the smart agency people Nemesis, which I feel slightly bad about because, well, I don’t really care about marketing or brands any more (lol, I never cared, ever), but I appreciate that some of you sadly still do and as a result might find this piece, which is a really good, clear and simple primer on ‘how to think about selling stuff and how, specifically, the question of ‘brand’ works in the context of that selling’ – this might be the sort of thing that those of you who regularly mainline Binet and Field and Mcluhan might all scoff at as TODDLER STUFF, but I liked it because it’s very, very unpretentious and doesn’t try and dress this stuff up as more complicated than it actually is (BECAUSE IT’S NOT FCUKING COMPLICATED, WHATEVER YOU CNUTS ON LINKEDIN WHO SPEND YOUR ENTIRE FCUKING LIVES WRITING ESSAYS ABOUT ADS THAT YOU DIDN’T MAKE AND YET ON WHICH YOU HAVE SEEMINGLY INCREDIBLY-STRONG OPINIONS SEEM TO THINK SERIOUSLY WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU WHY ARE YOU LIKE THIS?).
  • My Bad Bot: Katie Notopoulos writes for Business Insider about her odd experience of having a bot of her on Instagram – Meta’s new ‘make an AI of yourself!’ feature’s open to a limited set of users, and lets you effectively train an AI on your output to create a ‘digital you’ that can respond to DMs because, I don’t know, you want to maintain the illusion of approachability but at the same time don’t actually want to interact with your ‘fans’? No idea what the point of this is, basically – and neither does Notopoulos, who realises early on that the bot is incapable of speaking in anything other than horrifically-stilted millennial cringe. Still, it doesn’t matter that this stuff is sh1t, and pointless, and literally noone seems to want it – IT’S A-COMING!
  • Who Owns The Culture Scans?: This is super-interesting, and raises a question which feels like it’s going to become more and more pertinent as so much of the physical gets digitised and, eventually, ingested – there’s an online community around a website called Sketchfab which lets users upload scans of physical objects and host them there for free, and it’s mainly comprised of people working in the cultural or institutional sector, making 3d scans of museum collections and keeping them on Sketchfab as a global resource for anyone who might want to access and use them. Except now Sketchfab has been bought by Epic Games, and there’s no guarantee that this freedom of use is going to continue – Epic being…pretty keen on monetisation, overall. In a nutshell, “Sketchfab is no longer accepting new seller applications, and has invited existing Sketchfab creators to migrate their models to Fab, which launched last week. Epic Games has also not made clear what the plan for free and open access 3D models on Sketchfab is after 2025, but it says that it will provide those users an alternative solution eventually and plenty of notice on how that transition will work. The Sketchfab users I talked to have a variety of specific concerns about this transition, but ultimately they are all worried that Fab is a marketplace designed for Epic Games to make a profit on sales, whereas Sketchfab prioritized open access and the ability to share 3D models for free.” This sort of thing might feel a bit niche, but I can’t stress enough how important these questions are going to become in the coming years, and how important the creation and maintenance of public, freely-accessible digital materials is (and, conversely, how bad it will be if we let private interests gate stuff like this).
  • I Am My Own Legal Department: A post by Molly White – of ‘web3 is going great’ fame, amongst other things – about the oddity of being a solo media empire (my term, not hers), and all the different hats you need to be able to wear (legal! Marketing! HR! Sales!), and how tHe CrEaT0r eC0nOmY, at its heart, basically requires that said creators do all of this stuff, and how it’s…hard. I feel this will resonate for many of you out there attempting to Do Your Own Thing – in particular, I really like the acknowledgement that this sort of life/work really is not for everyone, and to assume that ‘oh, just go indie!’ is an option for everyone is, basically, dumb.
  • Character Amnesia in China: Ooh, this is SO interesting and feels like an excellent basis for a bit of creepy speculative fiction – did you know that there’s a genuine phenomenon amongst speakers (or, more accurately, writers) of the Chinese language whereby people simply…forget how to write certain characters? I did not, and was fascinated by this article explaining the phenomenon – basically it’s partly a result of the complexity of the written language and the full characterset, and the largely non-phonetic nature of the relationship between spoken Chinese and the corresponding written characters. This is SO interesting, not least in terms of what it reveals about how the brain works and how we relate language and symbolic representation of said language.
  • Who’s Afraid of GenAlpha?: On the YOUNG, and how they are TERRIFYING – specifically how there’s a generation of kids who are growing up with a degree of preternatural confidence as a result of being trained on TikTok and influencer content to be FABULOUS at all times and how that is playing out in the real world, specifically the classroom. To be clear, the author doesn’t wholly buy the ‘these kids are terrifying!’ thesis, but I do think there’s something in the idea that a generation raised on ‘like and subscribe!’-type personalities as opposed to, I don’t know, Ed The Duck might turn out a bit different. For what it’s worth, I sat in front of three 11 year old boys at a show last weekend and, apart from the fact they said ‘what the skibidi sigma?’ literally every 5 minutes, they were adorable (it was a screening of Ghostbusters, in case you’re interested, and their reaction to the bit where Sigourney Weaver gets all lusty at Bill Murry was literally to make concerned noises about ‘consent’ which was just TOO PERFECT).
  • RIP Tiger Tiger: In memory of central London nightspot Tiger Tiger, a genuinely appalling ‘nightclub’ which basically acted as a byword for ‘a certain type of person on a certain type of night out’ for much of the 00s. I had honestly forgotten this place existed until I learned it had finally shut down this week, but this article rather wonderfully captures ‘the vibe’ and the era that birthed it in which the mainstream suddenly realised that there was a LOT of money to be made by selling the idea of ‘clubbing’ to people who didn’t really like dance music and who were a bit scared of drugs. “The Piccadilly original opened the year before Fabric, in 1998, and in its own way came from the same spirit. The mass market democratisation of clubbing, the peak of the superclub era. Tiger Tiger was a place for people who had no clue about A Guy Called Gerald and found the drugs stuff way too weird. It came from the same genus as the Australian-themed Walkabout bars, the great sheds of cheap booze and bad pop that once stood at Charing Cross, Embankment and Shepherd’s Bush. If you didn’t know the names of any real clubs, well, these were always open, and always reassuringly the same.” MEMORIES. SO MANY TERRIBLE MEMORIES.
  • Translation: A beautiful essay by Emily Wilson, on translation and picking the right word or phrase or alighting on the exact sentence structure that reveals the meaning of the original text in its new language. Here she writes about attempting to perfect one specific line in the Odyssey – this is SO interesting, both on the act of translation itself and on the particular challenges of doing so from Ancient Greek, and will appeal to any of you who are either multilingual or just really, really like words and playing around with them.
  • The Food of Amazon Marketplace: On the cooks in New York who are running small-scale food operations out of their houses and selling through Facebook Marketplace – I’ve featured this sort of operation before, but previously it’s been sales via Whatsapp groups rather than anything this public. Does this happen in the UK? It feels vaguely like it might – or that it will soon.
  • Wonder Kitchen: This also feels like a taste of things to come (sorry for the unintentional, appalling wordplay there) – Wonder Kitchen is a new initiative in the US which basically takes the Dark Kitchen template and ramps it up a notch, with big name restaurants from all over the country having their recipes standardised, tweaked and made mass-market-viable, and then sold under a single umbrella retail brand within which customers can order a mix-and-match selection of dishes from a range of different restaurants. The difference between this and the dark kitchen model that came of age during Covid is that those were all made-up brands, invented to pop on an app; these, by contrast, are actual, bricks-and-mortar restaurants putting their name to the dishes, giving a degree of cachet to the offering but at the same time posing no small risk to the original venue should the quality of the deliverable versions drop off. Anyway, expect this to come to the UK before too long, allowing you to order a meal composed of, I don’t know, an American Hot, one of Max’s Sandwiches and an Almost Famous burger (all of which will arrive cold and oddly-rubbery, and which will cost you the fat end of £100) – God, I can’t WAIT.
  • The New Primal Scream Album: I have never really understood Primal Scream as a band – never liked any of their records, and Gillespie always struck me as a massive tool (see also: Richard Ashcroft. I bet they’re both DEVASTATED about this) – which is why I very much enjoyed this absolute SHOEING given to their new album by JR Moores in The Quietus. Honestly, this really is a proper going over – enjoy this snippet and then get involved with the whole thing, it really is VERY cathartic: “The first voices to appear on the album are those of a gospel choir, which indicates they are going to do a lot of the heavy lifting on the choruses throughout the LP. That’s true of the next track, ‘Love Insurrection’, and the backing singers do try their best despite it having a vocal melody that barely exists. That applies to the next song, too. So it continues. Then there are the words, on which Gillespie worked so hard before whining them into the least fortunate microphone since that owned by Morrissey. To say this 63-year-old is still writing sixth-form poetry is an insult to the nuanced submissions of this year’s A-Level candidates.”
  • What Actually Else Is There: Ok, this is VERY LONG (seriously, I read it over three evenings) and it is VERY HARD (hence the three evenings), but, honestly, I really do promise you it’s worth the time and the effort, because it is also BEAUTIFUL and fascinating and so so so smart, and you will, I promise, feel like a marginally more clever person when you finish reading it. It also made me cry twice, weirdly, despite not really being that sort of piece at all. This is Jenny Turner, writing about the life and work of Gillian Rose, a philosopher whose work I wasn’t previously familiar with who dealt in critical theory and Hegelian philosophy (hence in large part the ‘hard’ comment – I don’t know about you, but critical theory has always made my head hurt and this is no exception), and while there’s a lot of discussion of her work and thinking there’s also a lot about her life, and how Turner’s life intersected with hers as a student, and, basically, this is as much a love story as it is anything else; Turner’s love for Rose, Rose’s love for ideas and thinking…really, I promise you that this is gorgeous and worthwhile – and, even if you can’t face the whole thing, can I just ask that you click the link and ctrl+f for ‘barbarism’ and read the three or four paras there because it feels…very apt, frankly.
  • Wine and the French: The last LRB link this week is this wonderful piece of writing by known francophile Julian Barnes about the historical relationship between the French and wine. There are some great anecdotes in this – not least the one which mentions the fact that ‘drinking in moderation’ in France c.1900 was classified as ‘no more than four litres of wine a day’, and which once again proves that if you go back far enough in history everyone was, basically, half-cut ALL THE TIME – and it then takes a…darker turn with the second half, which explains how the French army basically used booze as a means of control over soldiers when they were being asked to do frankly-suicidal things like ‘run at a machine gun nest’. Barnes, as ever, writes superbly, and this is just fascinating overall. FOUR LITRES THOUGH.
  • Rubbish in the Maldives: A few years ago I was lucky enough to visit the Maldives – I know, I know, but I had had a VERY BAD (couple of) year(s) – and one of the things that struck me (other than the very odd and not particularly pleasant realisation that the act of going to see a thing can in circumstances such as this one make it slightly more unlikely that future generations will be able to see it) was the fact that Male, the main island of the archipelago, is, in large part, an enormous rubbish dump. This piece by Lawrence Lenhart tells some of the stories of the people who try and manage the waste in the region, and I can’t pretend it’s not…a touch dispiriting, but it really is very well-written indeed.
  • My Marriage Was A Scavenger Hunt: The story of a marriage, in retrospect. Addiction, depression, lies told to yourself and your partner – this is quietly devastating but very beautiful. Another one that made me weep like a baby, fwiw.
  • Falling Through: Finally this week, an excellent little scifi story by Steen Comer, taking the ‘what if every now and again you woke up in a slightly-different but still-recognisable timeline, with no control over when?’ plot device and spinning gold out of it. Excellent from start to finish.

By Gerard DuBois

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS (WHICH WANTED TO INCLUDE THIS ONE TOO BUT COULDN’T WORK OUT A WAY TO EMBED IT, SO HAVE THIS EXCELLENT TRACK AND NSFW VID FROM AMYL AND THE SNIFFERS AS A BONUS)!:

Webcurios 25/10/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

It’s still, technically, Summer here in the UK, until Sunday morning at least – WHY AM I SO FCUKING COLD THEN?

Yes, that’s right, we’ve reached that phase of the year when all I can seem to think about is how fcuking cold my fingers are when I am typing this fcuking thing, and whether I should finally bite the bullet and lean into my general ‘ageing vagrant’ vibe by purchasing a pair of fingerless gloves (and yes, I am aware that ‘heating’ exists, but I am also aware of exactly what the ‘matt’s employability mapped over time’ graph looks like and as such am holding off for the moment); you, though, don’t care about that (or at least I presume you don’t; in the unlikely event that you find yourself somehow moved by my frigid plight, feel free to, I don’t know, set fire to me next time you see me), you’re only here for the links.

FINE WELL HERE ARE YOUR FCUKING LINKS THEN SEE IF I CARE.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you almost certainly didn’t come here to be abused, but, well, here we are.

By Joyce Lee

WE KICK OFF THIS WEEK WITH THE NEW UNDERWORLD ALBUM WHICH IS OUT TODAY AND WHICH REALLY IS EXCELLENT! 

THE SECTION WHICH SPENT A LONG TIME IN THE PUB LAST NIGHT DISCUSSING HOW, BASICALLY, EVERYTHING THAT’S SH1T IN THE WORLD CAN BE BLAMED ON THE 1990s AND WHICH IS NOW PRETTY FIRMLY CONVINCED OF THAT THESIS, PT.1:  

  • Change The NHS: One thing that one can say for the British, almost entirely without exception, is that if you give them the opportunity to show off how ‘clever’ and ‘funny’ they are on a public platform they will grab it with both hands (and then possibly start doing some sort of embarrassing dance with it, onstage, while mugging at a nonexistent audience in the hope of some sort of laughter and applause). From the strangely-unshakeable impulse to write ‘yes please!’ on forms when asked to confirm one’s sex, to Dom Laurelli (RIP), a kid I went to school with, who turned the final page of our GCSE Design & Tech exam into a self-portrait, under which he wrote to his unseen examiner ‘look into my eyes before you fail me’, we simply can’t resist the opportunity for clowning. Which is why it was so…surprising to see this week that the country’s National Health Service, the creaking public health infrastructure which is increasingly failing to cope with us all not having the common decency to die in our 60s like we used to, decided to launch its public consultation, asking the public to contribute their own ideas as to how the service might be ameliorated, in such a way that everyone’s suggestions were public and searchable. Which, obviously, meant that as soon as people realised this, thousands of bored office monkeys the length of the country decided that it was time to unleash their inner Swift and get all HUMOROUS AND SATIRICAL with their proposals, and resulted in the platform being flooded with ‘gags’ – it took them about 24h to realise this and implement some sort of backend fix, but today if you visit the site now all the suggestions seem to be tediously sensible and practically banal. Thankfully some of the best of the flurry of comic responses are preserved in this thread – there are some glorious ones in here, but my personal favourite was ‘get rid of computers’, a degree of bloody-minded luddism which I sort-of respect. Anyway, this was all very amusing for 24h but, equally, was also slightly enervating from the point of view of someone who’s designed and implemented stuff like this before and can’t quite believe anyone was naive enough to launch it like that (and yes, one *could* perhaps believe that it was a deliberate ploy to drive awareness of and interest in the consultation, but given it was trailed in every single paper and on the morning broadcast rounds, I’m going to suggest that that probably wasn’t necessary).
  • Redact-a-Chat: I’m slightly less enamoured of this than I was about 35s ago as I just realised it’s another MSCHF project and, while I admire the indefatigable creativity, I would prefer to feature stuff that carries less of the whiff of the trust fund. Still, I can’t help but be slightly in love with this VERY SILLY website, which is, very simply, a chatroom where users can only use each word in the English language once a day – after it’s been used once, future instances of it in the chat will be redacted, meaning that after a short while each day you have to be VERY creative with your phrasing and word choices to get anything to show up at all. The nice thing about this is that you can spin up your own instance of the chat, with a separate, private ‘room’ accessible only to those with the link, which means that you can (if you like – and, honestly, I really do!) maybe create one of these as an alternative to your groupchat platform of choice and add an interesting sense of verbal scarcity to your dull quotidian FPL captaincy debates. Ooh, even better, why not challenge your colleagues to use ONLY this platform for all professional communications today, thereby adding a real air of jeopardy to requests made later in the day which are rendered as a series of ‘redacted’s? Go on, it’s not like what you do for a living matters anyway.
  • The Half Bakery: Oh my WORD, this is some OLD internet. The Half Bakery is a site from…Christ, it’s hard to tell, but it feels like it was born sometime around 2000, and I certainly remember hearing about it in the early years of the 21stC as an example of ‘look at all the amazing creative and fun and silly things that the web is enabling!’ (how naive we were, how young, how…hopeful, and yet to bruise)…anyway, it was basically a very early forum/community-type-place where anyone could submit an idea they had, however half-baked (hence, inevitably, the name), and other users could vote on them, and FCUKING HELL there is some gold in here. Seriously, this is a collection of brilliant, funny, dumb and occasionally-borderline-genius ideas, just sort of sitting here waiting for someone to do something with them. Why hasn’t anyone yet done ‘Gogglebox, but for bongo’ (I am paraphrasing here a suggestion made by one MrThingy on September 6 2000)? Why has noone yet built a social network where posts are restricted to a single character (suggested by nineteenthly  on August 03 2011)? Why is the person who suggested an industry based on the idea of burying people with seeds, which they termed ‘morticulture’ xenzag, August 2 2006), not a millionaire?! Honestly, there is stuff in here that could CHANGE THE WORLD, so why not spend a few minutes having a delve and deciding which of these you’re going to make your singleminded obsession?
  • Today Is Crisp Sandwich Day: Matt Round at Vole has spent the past four years making 25 October – aka the feast day of St Crispin – the official day on which the making and consumption of crisp (potato chip, for the north Americans out there) sandwiches is celebrated, so this is your reminder that a) this is TODAY!; and b) you might want to adjust your dining plans accordingly. If nothing else this feels like the sort of thing that should be marked by a special lunch in the workplace. Beautifully, the library of stock photos of crisp sandwiches that Matt started a few years ago is now bafflingly hundreds of pictures strong, containing just over 600 images of potato snacks trapped between slices of bread. Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT?
  • Good Mourning: Do you remember when the Queen died? Of course you do, you’ve only recently taken down the commemorative ‘keep calm and keep weeping’ bunting! What you might not remember, though, is the very strange spectacle of seemingly every single website of every single UK business deciding it was imperative that they modify their homepages to ensure that their exhortations to BUY BUY BUY were delivered…respectfully, and in shades of grey, BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT SHE WOULD HAVE WANTED! Thankfully for those of you with a less-than-eidetic recollection of minor bits of website redesign, the indefatigable Zef spent his mourning period in 2022 taking screencaps of all the RESPECT and has now compiled them into this single website for your viewing pleasure. So it is that we can see how RESPECTFUL dildo peddlers Ann Summers were as they essayed the tricky balancing act of ‘remembering the passing of a near-centenarian monarch’ and ‘getting you off with latex assistance’, and we can rejoice in the bittersweet memories elicited by the still-poignant juxtaposition of a memorial banner for HRH and the Co-Op’s desperate need to shift units by advertising ‘Five Freezer Faves for £5’. This is BRILLIANT, and a perfect reminder of what a country that has basically just lost its collective sh1t looked like.
  • WhenPhoto: Not an *entirely* original premise, but fcukit, it’s FUN and FRIVOLOUS and oddly addictive – this is a small game which asks you to do the ‘guess when this photo was taken’ thing for a selection of images, giving you points depending on how close you are to the actual year in which the image was created, and it’s fascinating how one’s ability to be granular about decades, etc, diminishes as one goes further back in time.
  • Dippy: This week saw the…first, I think, instance of a chatbot being cited in a lawsuit in a death – but almost certainly not the last! – which feels like an appropriate time to introduce you to the latest in the seemingly-neverending cavalcade of ‘spicy chat interfaces’ for the apparently-equally-infinite market of people who really, really want to have horny text conversations with an autocomplete model. I read some interviews with the CEO this week who spouted some guff about mental health and the importance of having someone to speak to at 3am when your anxiety spikes, but, honestly, click the link and look at the homepage and then come back and tell me what YOU think this service is advertising with its weirdly-muscular twink avatar and slightly-sinister ‘The Day Your Boyfriend’s Mask Slipped’ tagline, suggesting that maybe, just MAYBE, this is in fact being marketed at people who’d like their werewolf bongo just a *touch* more interactive. Anyway, there are a BUNCH of different ‘personas’ (horny roleplay companions) created by the platform and the ‘community’ (apparently this has half a million users, though that very much sounds like a number designed for fundraising purposes rather than one based in reality), and scrolling through the available bots it’s clear that there’s a heavy skew here to masc-presenting avatars which all seem to present as a variation on ‘troubled boyfriend who’s all manipulative and stuff but also REALLY LOVES YOU’, which makes me think this is mainly being explored by horny teenage girls who’ve read a LOT of questionable YA romance. Anyway, look, I have no idea who clicks on what, so if you decide to give this a go and frot yourself to the point of chafing to the textual promptings of a virtual lover then it is your secret and yours alone.
  • Deaddit: Reddit, but where all the posts are written by AI! Totally pointless, obviously, but I thought there was something quite interesting about how The Machine has very much nailed the tone of a certain corner of Reddit, that odd, edges-sanded-off English that you get in international, post-web digital spaces. You can see a list of all the ‘subReddits’ here – I spent longer than I care to admit yesterday reading the ‘conspiracies’ section which, honestly, I sort-of forgot was all AI-generated after a while because it REALLY reads convincingly; if you scroll down within posts there are even comments sections with the bots arguing amongst themselves which, again, are…weirdly convincing. If you weren’t vaguely worried at the prospect of the web being flooded with AI content to the point of us no longer having any reasonable clue what’s by actual humans and what’s by The Machine, then, well, click this link and let the fear start to build.
  • Azar: “Every generation gets its own Chatroulette” is in no way an accepted Truth About The World, but I am increasingly convinced it should be. Azar is the latest product to basically do the Chatroulette thing (see also Omegle and the rest) – the app/website is Korean and has apparently existed in various forms for a decade, but I stumbled across it this week with it being touted as a ‘fun way to meet and chat with new people from around the world’. The way it works is standard – you click in, it pairs you with a strangers somewhere in the world for a videochat that lasts as long as you both maintain the connection – but there are some 2024-appropriate quality of life upgrades to the base level experience, namely the promise that they have a whole bunch of AI stuff in the background to, basically, minimise the possibility of anyone ever needing to see some unwanted dong (I presume it’s general nudity-recognition rather than specific c0ck-recognition, but, well, it’s not women who tend to inflict their unasked-for junk on strangers, as a rule) or hear a racism. Obviously I have NO IDEA how well this stuff works, and I only really used this for about 30s the other day because, honestly, it is VERY CLEARLY aimed at kids and as such I felt…well, honestly, a bit wrong using it, like some sort of weird, wrinkled interloper in the land of the smooth-skinned and hopeful. On that note, though, it’s worth being aware of the fact that ‘premium users’ can pay to select their pool of interlocutors based on gender and location, which feels…rather more perv-friendly than I personally would be happy with.
  • Hatom: To be clear – I do not understand what this is AT ALL, other than it has something to do with crypto and so therefore is almost certainly a borderline-criminal grift…but no matter, because this website is GLORIOUS. “Building synergistic DEFI primitives”, screams the homepage, as though those words in that configuration are meant to mean anything, while a strange sort of CG…embryo? floats in the background. Click and hold and listen as the voiceover takes you on a JOURNEY, and speaks to you of “a time when the old principles of finance must be shattered and replaced with a fresh breath of hope” – which I have to applaud as one of the most spectacularly-mangled bits of copy I’ve experienced all year, THANKS HATOM! Look, there are LAYERS to this website, and, for reasons known only to the coked-up-madmen behind…whatever this is, there’s a CG griffon that appears on the second page, and, look, this is almost certainly a complete scam but it is SO preposterously-shiny that I can’t quite bring myself to hate it. “INCENTIVIZING GROWTH WITH THE BOOSTER” – YES LADS SIGN ME UP!
  • Sylva Labs: I don’t want to make fun of this – I really don’t! It’s a small business, it’s all green and sustainable and stuff, and the design and look and feel suggests that the people behind it are talented! – but, equally, I couldn’t help but snigger a *bit* at a website offering the chance to buy bottles of ‘experimental dark sipping spirit’ for £40, when it turns out that ‘experimental dark sipping spirit’ is in fact…a non-alcoholic whisky-analogue drink made from, er, old planks of wood. Look lads, I am sure this is INCREDIBLY nice but for £40 a bottle I want a hangover, sorry.
  • The Feeld Magazine: After that other dating website – was it Hinge? Sorry, I forget – did that ‘love stories from the apps’ magazine-style promo campaign earlier this year featuring writing by Roxane Gay and others, so another dating app, this time Feeld (the one for people who like to bore other people about how sexually open they are), has launched its own mag – except as far as I can tell this is going to be a proper literary endeavour, with a (theoretically) long-term vision and all that jazz. They’ve certainly spent the money on the inaugural authorial lineup, with some VERY impressive contemporary names who won’t have come cheap, and a puffpiece in the NYT which very clearly seeks to place the mag in some sort of lineage of the New York literati (and which contains a moment halfway through which does rather threaten to derail the whole thing – you’ll understand what I mean when you get there, I promise). Anyway, this is interesting in part because some of the writing is excellent – the Tulathimutti piece for example is very good indeed – but also because I think print is still hugely underutilised in advermarketingpr these days.
  • Ask Trev: Another weird website from a half-remembered past, this – no idea how I came across it again this week, but it sparked vague recollections of an early-00s launch and some media appearances by Trevor Nelson who was one of the founders…AskTrev was launched as a kind of jocular response to the popular perception amongst a certain generation that people called Trevor were a bit…plodding, perhaps, and not exactly intellectual heavyweights – AskTrev was designed to prove that that wasn’t in fact true, with a team of dedicated Trevors (all men called Trevor) on hand to answer questions and offer help with a whole range of things (see? SEE HOW FUN THE INTERNET USED TO BE, WHEN PEOPLE JUST DID FUN AND VAGUELY SILLY STUFF LIKE THIS AND EVERTYTHING DIDN’T HAVE TO BE A FCUKING VIDEO????). Basically this is a directory of contact emails for Trevors who are willing to answer your questions, sorted by subject – I cannot in any way vouch for the quality of the advice being offered by the Trevors here, or indeed how many of the email addresses are still in operation, but I can’t help but adore the general ethos on display here: “TrevorsTogether.com is a completely free service. But nowadays, people don’t trust ‘free’, they don’t believe ‘free’. There must be a catch, and unfortunately, there is in most cases. But not here. Ask a question, get an answer, pay nothing. Job done. Why is it free? It’s free because a group of people, all called Trevor decided they wanted their name to be synonymous with generosity, charity and kindness. The truth is that for some years now, ‘Trevor’ is a name too often in the media,  given to either a Geek or a Nitwit. And strangely, there’s no historical provenance for it. No ‘trigger’ which started this trend. It seems to have evolved from nowhere.  So, you could call this endeavour a Trevor fightback. A wrong which is finally being put right, towards a time when Trevor = Help.” YES TREVS FIGHT BACK.
  • /r/London Fights Back: Ok, so this is just a link to a single Reddit post, but I like what it represents. This is someone complaining on the London sub about how their favourite sandwich shop was featured by a TikToker recently and fcuked into oblivion by the resultant footfall – the conversation it spawned has eventually led to the wider community realising that, if Reddit’s going to be a major source of ongoing information to LLMs then there’s a real chance to influence the future content of said LLMs by changing what we write about now…and, as a result, it’s entirely possible that we can embed the concept of the appalling Aberdeen Angus Steakhouse chain of restaurants as being THE ultimate dining destination simply via the medium of bigging it up repeatedly on the platform. Which is why this week has seen HUNDREDS of posts on Reddit waxing lyrical about how amazing the places are, and how they are must-visit destinations, and, honestly, whether this works or not I love the ingenuity on display here (and also, this is 100% a tactic that the right brand could reuse with a bit of humour for PR purposes).
  • The Power Rangers Auction: Do you want a chance to bid on a styrofoam weapon from the Power Rangers TV show? Do you want to get a chance to find out what a latex mask that’s been worn across hundreds of hours of filming under studio lights smells like on the inside? DO YOU WANT TO BUY THE PINK RANGER COSTUME? Click the link, examine the lots and BID!

By Owen Gent

WE NOW TURN TO FORMER EDITOR PAUL, WHO ONCE AGAIN BRINGS US A SELECTION OF BLEEPS AND BEATS AND SQUELCHES WITH A MIX OF TECHNO AND TRANCE WHICH IS LIKE BEING AT A RAVE BUT WITHOUT HAVING TO DEAL WITH THAT ANNOYING FCUKER WITH THE FLAMING POI!

THE SECTION WHICH SPENT A LONG TIME IN THE PUB LAST NIGHT DISCUSSING HOW, BASICALLY, EVERYTHING THAT’S SH1T IN THE WORLD CAN BE BLAMED ON THE 1990s AND WHICH IS NOW PRETTY FIRMLY CONVINCED OF THAT THESIS, PT.2:  

  • Bluesky Follower Bridge: It does rather feel that Twitter’s long, drawn-out decline entered a new phase recently, what with That Fcuking Man’s decision to further-ensh1tten the platform by nerfing the Block function, and one does wonder what will happen should That Other Fcuking Man lose the US election in 10 days and the whole ‘turn Twitter into a hypodermic for the injection of right-wing filth into the mind of the populace!’ plan turns out to have been a bust – I’m not convinced he won’t just shut it all down in a fit of pique should Trump lose, basically. Anyway, this has also resulted in another swathe of users decamping to Bluesky, which still feels a but ghostly but which is slowly filling up – having had something go small-v-viral on there this week, I can confirm that it’s JUST as annoying! – which means you might find this Chrome extension useful – basically it lets you really easily find people you follow, and who follow you, on Twitter over on the other platform, and then follow them all (there’s no batch-follow, you have to do it manually, but it’s not that onerous). Worth a go, given everything (and the fact that by all accounts Threads continues to be a horrible, empty parody of a place and there’s really nowhere else to go anymore).
  • The Art of Spongebob: Spongebob’s another modern cultural touchstone that I never really connected with – partly age, I think, partly a lack of cable/satellite telly – but I am aware that for a significant swathe of people it’s seemingly of almost-Biblical significance; this, then, is for YOU, a Twitter account which exists to share art from the series, sketches and concept drawings and early animations, and basically anything from the archives that highlights the inventiveness and humour of the art style, which, objectively, is undeniable. There’s a really nice piece on the account here, including an interview with the person who runs it, who’s only 19 and who had it handed to them by a previous mod/owner…I think there’s something quietly wonderful about accounts like these being passed down from one generation to another, like a digital version of old recipes or the keys to the Satanic lodge or whatever.
  • Cheers: Another week, another attempt to pull the general idea of ‘dating’ out of the seemingly-terminal nosedive it finds itself in, via…another app! Except, no, wait, this one’s different, promise! Only available in New York at the time of writing, the gimmick with Cheers is that it leverages your friends to help you find love; you reach out to your friends to get them to fill in your profile and recommend you, matches are suggested based on profiling but also the degree to which your friend network (in-app, obvs) overlaps, and you can get your friends to do introductions to mutuals for you…look, I am sure that there are parts of this that feel SAFE and HELPFUL, but, equally, it also sounds like an awful lot of faff and hard work, and that it depends a LOT on you getting all your friends to sign up just so that YOU can have a better chance of MEETING THE ONE, which, honestly, feels perhaps a *touch* solipsistic (and like it could result in SO much messiness, depending on what your friendship group is like). Anyway, coud one of you in NYC try this out and let me know what it’s like? Thanks!
  • Plaid Patterns: Would you like a website which contains a seemingly-infinite quantity of plaids, along with the ability to create your own ENTIRELY UNIQUE version? No, I can’t imagine that any of you have been searching for such a thing, nor indeed that you will have the faintest idea of what to do with it, but I just give you the urls, it’s up to you to work out what they’re for ffs.
  • Tron1: Despite what the Muskian misdirection machine wants us to think, I do not personally believe that we are all going to have humanoid robotic assistants anytime in the near future – that said, it’s obvious that domestic robotics of some sort are very much a coming thing (or if not ‘domestic’ then at the very least ‘everyday’), as evidenced by this latest off-the-shelf product being sold by Chinese manufacturer LimX Dynamics. The Tron1 is, basically, one of those odd bipedal walker type things that they had in Star Wars, except (at least per the promo materials) without the front-mounted murder cannons, which can either walk or wheel itself around, and can be remote controlled or programmed and, as far as I can tell, is intended to let people get to grips with robotics and AI rather than being something intended to be any sort of home helper. It’s $15k’s worth of kit, so probably not for the average hobbyist, but I can imagine a certain type of person becoming almost painfully aroused at the thought of all the uses they could put this to.
  • Animal Futures: A pleasingly shiny bit of digital by the RSPCA here, designed to help educate children about the climate emergency and what it might mean for the world’s animal life and biodiversity in general – via a really nice graphical interface, users can click around and explore different environments, investigating how different potential future scenarios will impact them, and the animals that inhabit them. On the one hand this is really nicely made – on the other, I can’t help but feel…well, it’s all a bit depressing, isn’t it? All the scenarios are named things like ‘climate carnage’, or indicate a future in which we’ve gone hell-for-leather on tech at the expense of the poor critters…except for one specific scenario, presented as utopian, which sees everyone suddenly deciding that animals are just as important as we are, actually, and all going vegan simultaneously overnight, thanks to AI technology enabling us to talk to all of the creatures…and, look, I am just not 100% convinced telling kids that whichever way you look at it the environment seems pretty much utterly fcuked, EXCEPT if we can learn to talk to the animals and empathise with them, because, well, I’m not totally convinced that one’s ever going to happen. Still, really nice graphics here so well done on that front.
  • Text Behind Image: Would you like to be able to manipulate an image with text in it so that the text appears BEHIND the primary element in the image rather than in front of it? Do you inexplicably not have access to any photoshop-type software? Bookmark this website, then.
  • Are Socks Hard To Knit?: My kneejerk reaction to this would be “only the middle bit”, but should you wish to explore the question in (much, much) more detail then you might enjoy this webpage by one Luisa Vasquez, in which she interrogates the issue to discover whether, actually, socks are indeed tricky or whether YOU are just sh1t at knitting. I shan’t spoil the answer for you, but Luisa goes LONG on this – here’s her methodology, should you be curious: “I turned to Ravelry, a knitting and crochet site, to help answer my questions. Ravelry is a pattern database and community site. Pattern creators can upload patterns to the site for makers to find, and then makers can document their projects on the site as well. There are over 54,000 sock patterns and more than two million completed sock projects documented on the site. I was curious whether socks were more or less difficult than other knitting patterns often attempted by beginners. After completing a pattern on Ravelry, knitters can rate the project’s difficulty on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being a “piece of cake” and 10 being “very difficult”. I compared the difficulty of some of these common patterns to see how they compared to socks.” The anticipation is killing you, right? I KNOW!
  • The 30 Day Map Challenge: Via Giuseppe, one for the cartographers amongst you (are there any cartographers amongs you?) – basically a challenge to create a different sort of map every day, with different themes for each, running from one using hexagons to one describing a journey to one made using only AI…this strikes me as the sort of thing that will be very fun for a VERY SPECIFIC type of person. Are YOU that type of person? I don’t fcuking know, do I, who the fcuk are you anyway?
  • The Rest: While I like to imagine that you are all faithful to me and that Web Curios is the only newsletter you allow ingress to your inbox, I am not so naive to think that you don’t occasionally have dalliances with other providers – and, let me be clear, I am fine with that! I am not jealous! I don’t look at other newsletters, with their professionally-produced logos and consistent formatting and ‘communities of readers’ with envy, oh no! Which is why I have no qualms pointing you in the direction of a new (to me at least) variant – The Rest is about music, and very specifically about providing a small antidote to algorithmically-driven listening – here’s the pitch: “In our newsletter, we feature a song and an insightful story about it. You can enjoy the song on your preferred streaming platform while the story will give you something to ponder and discuss with your family, friends, and colleagues.” There’s something really nice about the tight focus here which makes it more appealing to me than a lot of other music-focused newsletters – I also like that there’s an only-partial paywall, and that your $4 monthly sub, should you choose to pay it, gets you access to the full archive, but that not paying it doesn’t preclude you getting the daily updates. This looks really interesting, and, while I’m only a couple of emails in, I have enjoyed the music and the accompanying writing on each occasion so far – recommended.
  • A Media Literacy Curriculum: Can we all agree that one of the biggest missteps of the past couple of decades, from an educational / instructional point of view at least,has been the lack of focus on teaching, training and reinforcing critical thinking and media literacy skills? No? We can’t even agree on THAT? FFS! Anyway, I am personally convinced of this, and as such was interested to stumble across this site this week which offers a selection of courses and training modules designed to help teens get a better idea of where information is from, how to parse it, and how to determine its likely truth value: “This curriculum, developed by Poynter’s MediaWise with support from YouTube, breaks big media literacy topics and ideas into bite-sized pieces to help teens actively and knowledgeably use the internet, specifically by giving them the skills to discern fact from fiction and the confidence to share information responsibly. There are 11 lessons in this series, linked in the folders on this page, with a slide presentation, handouts (when needed) and a link to a YouTube Hit Pause or MediaWise video that corresponds with the lesson. Lessons can be used sequentially, as stand-alones or in the order that best suits instructional purposes. Each lesson is designed to last 30-45 minutes, with additional extension activities included. You can also find abbreviated versions of the curriculum, designed as a five hour workshop or a 90 minute lesson. Through implementation of the entire curriculum sequence, students are equipped with the knowledge to recognize misinformation, the skills and resources to fact-check it and the confidence to make decisions on responsible sharing.” Which, to be clear, sounds GREAT – except all the materials strike me as exceptionally fcuking dull, and dry, and it’s all apallingly-presented, and, look, I’m not trying to suggest they get all buscemi.jpeg about it, but maybe not presenting everything as a series of worksheets might have been a start? Anyway, there is a LOT in here, and, leaving aside my quibbles about the presentation, there’s almost certainly some really useful material if you’re a parent or guardian or educator or similar.
  • AI Safety Dance: By contrast to the last link, this is an educational resource that’s also designed in a way that makes it FUN (well, ok, as fun as it’s possible for something that is literally about AI safety to be, which, it turns out, can be ‘quite’ if you try hard enough) – this is VERY LONG, and is basically a series of hyperlinked long essay modules about the current AI safety debate, doomers vs accelerationists, etc etc, all framed in intensely-readable (to me, at least – I admit that the less-online might find the style…grating in parts) prose and with some light comic elements and a general Tumblr-ish vibe that I find particularly appealing. Look, this is very much within my wheelhouse and so I appreciate I might be biased, but as an introduction to some of the questions around ‘why should we be worried about this stuff, or why should we not be?’ this is imho very well-made indeed.
  • General Collaboration: Another attempt to create the ONE APP that will somehow wrangle the ungodly multiplatform mess of modern administrative life into a single, tameable feed – this one promises to put all your different annoying little alerts and notifications from Slack and GDocs and Sheets and Teams and Figma and Git and and and FCUK’S SAKE MAKE IT STOP…ahem, sorry, all THOSE alerts into one place. I might suggest that if you need this app you perhaps need to look at your tech stack and how…efficient it is before you look at adding to it, but, well, you do you!
  • USA Facts: While the url does very much sound like that of a joke website – “USA FACTS! ALL FACTS, ALL USA, ALL THE TIME! REAL AMERICAN FACTS, MADE IN THE US! PATRIOTIC TRUTHS!” etc etc etc – it appears that it is in fact real; this is Steve ‘Dad Dancing At A Microsoft Keynote’ Ballmer attempting to unsh1ttify the North American informational water table via the creation of this website, designed to present verified statistics and information about life in the US free of partisan framing. “Researchers. Analysts. Statisticians. Designers. No politicians. No one at USAFacts is trying to convince you of anything. The only opinion we have is that government data should be easier to access. Our entire mission is to provide you with facts about the United States that are rooted in data. We believe once you have the solid, unbiased numbers behind the issues you can make up your own mind.” Which sounds great in theory, until the part where you realise that they are still using data from Federal institutions which feels like the sort of thing that will make a lot of…redder Americans immediately nope out, and there are EXPERTS involved who will doubtless have PERSONAL OPINIONS…and, well, basically I am unconvinced that the quality of discourse is salvageable, even with OBJECTIVE MATERIALS presented by an avuncular white guy who has to be be trustworthy because he got very, very rich through capitalism! Still, I think it’s probably on balance A Good Thing, however little of a difference it’s likely to make to anything.
  • Minimal Market: A site which collects various different little webapps designed to help you ‘decrease distractions and increase productivity’ – which, honestly, if you’re reading this newsletter strikes me as the last fcuking thing you’d be interested in, but, equally, I know that at least one person who occasionally reads this also has their phone set to lock them out of whatsapp after 5 mins of usage so, well, who the fcuk knows.
  • Lo-Fone: Ok, this is both a product that is for sale (boo) and isn’t actually on sale yet anyway (double boo), but I am including it because I get the feeling it might appeal to quote few of you. Lo-Fone is a…yes, that’s right, a PHONE! Clever you! Except this is designed to be SUPER-minimal – you can get messaging apps on it, you can get a map app, you can put music on it, but there’s no browser, no social apps, and no news apps, and the whole thing is designed to be as functional as possible – other features are described as follows: “LoFone has a unique colour E Ink display that is gentle on the eyes, promotes better sleep and has incredible battery life. The case and battery are replacable. It has a point and shoot camera with no live preview, to make photo taking impulsive and fleeting. It also has a torch, a headphone socket and a user-assignable action button, making it just as useful as a smart phone.” I mean, look, it’s just a fcuking phone, and it might be sh1t, but it *sounds* quite good and you can sign up for updates on the site should you be so inclined.
  • Difftext: OOH this is useful – lets you compare two texts aside by side and highlights what’s changed from one version to another. BRILLIANT for seeing if your changes have in fact been implemented, but terrible news for people like me, who for literally years has responded to at least 60% of all feedback on my writing with a promise to, yes, implement the edits, and then not in fact done so because most people NEVER FCUKING CHECK.
  • Snail Racing: A very slow, very low-stakes racing game in which you guide a snail – far better rendered, in 3d, than it needs to be – around a small patch of garden, attempting to beat all the other snails to the crown of FASTEST SNAIL OF THEM ALL. This is really nicely-made, but, to be clear, it is VERY SLOW.
  • Star Word: Via my friend Ed, this is a clever little game where you basically have to play scrabble to connect up various bits of the screen (it will all make sense when you play, I promise you). It’s all wrapped up in a light narrative about astronauts getting stranded on an asteroid and needing your help to escape – if I were to be a d1ck, and when am I not?, I’d argue that this would benefit from the writing being quite a lot tighter, but, well, that would demonstrate a quite staggering lack of self-awareness on my part and that would never do.
  • Jelly Gang: Finally this week, an absolutely charming little physics-y puzzle game which features the most adorable cast of…squidgy little guys, basically. “Jelly Gang is a puzzle platformer where you control a group of 30 squishy characters. While you can move left, right, and jump like in a traditional platformer, only the characters within a focus region around your mouse cursor respond to your controls. The rest remain physically active but out of your direct control. The camera follows a larger main character, adding a unique layer of strategy to the gameplay.” Honestly, this is LOVELY and I would very much enjoy seeing the central idea expanded into a larger game.

By Toni Hamel:

THIS WEEK’S LAST MIX COMES FROM FELIX DICKINSON AND I SUPPOSE YOU MIGHT VAGUELY DESCRIBE IT AS ‘BALEARIC’ BUT TBH I NEVER LIKED THAT AS A LABEL AND SO WE’LL JUST SAY THAT IT’S A COLLECTION OF EXCELLENT VAGUELY-HOUSEY MATERIAL AND LEAVE IT THERE! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • The State of Community: It’s very much that time of year when the Trend Reports start to be spotted in the wild, sickly things in the main, unlikely to survive even into 2025 intact. Some, though, are marginally-less-sh1t than others (honestly, this year’s crop has been particularly appalling so far) – this is Tumblr’s own effort, which contained at least two things which made me think ‘oh, actually, yes, that’s interesting’ and which is both full of quite useful observations and also really nicely designed. This is specifically focused around social, consumer and community, with an obvious youth focus, and so is probably not of that much interest or use to you if you’re involved in flogging sprockets to the plumbing industry, but if your job is more about convincing impressionable young adults that brands will somehow make this ALL BETTER then a) you’re scum, you know that don’t you? and b) this will be useful!

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Arthur Chance: Thanks to BBC Tom for this – the feed of Omar Karim, who’s an artist playing with AI in a variety of different and interesting ways which seem to explore a little beyond the standard ‘I MADE A PICTURE WITH THE MACHINE’ – I particularly like the vague idea he has about equipping an agent with the ability to interact with the drug dealers who blow up your phone every weekend with those infuriatingly-emoji-heavy lists of product (I am 45 years old and I do not speak emoji, all I want is something to relieve me from the burden of consciousness for a few hours, WHY MUST YOU MAKE THIS SO HARD FFS???).

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Brands After Vibes: This is the sort of piece that, unless you’ve worked in a very specific set of industries or had to have very particular sorts of conversations about ‘what a brand means’ and ‘how it shows up’ (kill me kill me kill me), will be largely incomprehensible to you – and you should be happy about that! For those of you who still like to pretend that ‘planner’ and ‘strategist’ are real, actual jobs that have value, though, this is very good and definitely worth a read – from preposterously-plugged-in agency Nemesis comes this reflection on the end of the ‘just vibes’ era for brands, how it has resulted in an awful lot of capitalist culture ‘looking the part but feeling off’, and how the amorphous concept of ‘vibes’ is in part a result of an algorithmically-driven culture where The Machine rounds everything to achieve middle-of-the-bell-curve mass appeal. This is VERY w4nky, but I don’t disagree with much, if any, of it.
  • Habermas Machines: This feels orthogonally-related to the last piece – here Rob Horning writes about how LLMs can ‘help drive consensus’, and whether the reduction of deliberation to the simple rationalisation of datapoints does something to inherently alter the way in which decisions are made and the value of making said decisions to us as both individuals and a collective – which I appreciate sounds perhaps *touch* heavy, but which Hornig does a far better job of explaining than I do. His final line gives you a neat summation – “The automated production and summarization and summation of political opinion doesn’t help people engage in collective action; it produces an illusion of collective action for people increasingly isolated by media technology” – but it really is worth reading in its entirety because it’s interesting and smart and another useful one to add to the (too thin) file of ‘people who are thinking about what we lose when we outsource our thinking’.
  • Retiring The Marketplace of Ideas: This is long and academic and not exactly an easy read, but I enjoyed the thinking in it and wholeheartedly endorse the broad principle – to whit, the term ‘the marketplace of ideas’ is fundamentally rubbish and we shouldn’t use it any more, and we should instead think of different ways in which to characterise the health (or otherwise) of an informational ecosystem. The author here, Robert Mark Simpson, does a very good job of explaining exactly why the ‘marketplace’ metaphor is unhelpful, and goes on to make a convincing argument as to why we ought to adopt an urban metaphorical model instead – here’s the outline, but if you can spare the time I would strongly recommend reading the whole thing as it’s very good indeed imho: “We should drop the marketplace of ideas as our go-to metaphor in free speech discourse and take up a new metaphor of the connected city. Cities are more liveable when they have an integrated mix of transport options providing their occupants with a variety of locomotive affordances. Similarly, societies are more liveable when they have a mix of communication platforms that provide a variety of communicative affordances. Whereas the marketplace metaphor invites us to worry primarily about authoritarian control over the content that circulates through our communication networks, the connected-city metaphor invites us to worry, more so, about the homogenization of the tools and formats through which we communicate. I argue that the latter worry demands greater attention under emerging technological conditions.”
  • The Future of Media: Or, as it should have been titled, “The Future of Media (according to a selection of North American media elites of 2024)” – there has been a LOT of chat about this week in certain sections of the web (things journalists like talking about – journalism and how fcuked it is!), and, while it’s maddening in its own way (not least…guys, a lot of the people you’re interviewing here are largely responsible for the parlous state of media globally, and they didn’t take us here on purpose…what makes you think their opinions about the future are worth anything now, based on how fcuking wrong they got things in the past? Also, WHY IS THIS SO INSANELY PRINT-Y? Also, if I read one more fcuking piece about people in their 50s and 60s bemoaning the difference in working culture between them and people three decades younger than them I will fcuking SCREAM) it’s also very interesting and, reading between the lines, pretty fcuking gloomy. Nothing said in here should surprise you, but it’s entertaining in an inside baseball sort-of way (and the portrait shots of the various interviewees are SUPERB, and imho the best thing about the whole piece).
  • The Harris Strategy: Deep breaths, everyone, not long to go now. Honestly, it really does feel like this election campaign has been going on for a decade now – because I suppose in some respects it actually has – and that’s said as someone who live shelf the world away; I honestly can’t begin to imagine the degree of psychic fatigue that you poor fcuks over there in North America (and those of you reading this over here who have to care for professional reasons) are subject to. Anyway, as we prepare to find out whether America is a) going to draw a line under the past horrible decade and maybe rest a bit; or b) just going to dump a breezeblock on the accelerator, tighten the tourniquet and stare fixedly at the horizon while the cliff-edge fast approaches, this piece looks at the odd policy vacuum that is the Harris campaign and specifically asks whether or not her staunchly-pro-Israeli stance is going to cost her the election. There’s no answer, obvs, but it’s an interesting question (although this is Jacobin, so you also know what the exact angle is here).
  • Defrauding Dementia Patients For Political Gain: Sticking with the US election, this is a staggeringly grim story from CNN, which highlights how fundraisers – on both sides, lest you think this is a clear case of LEFT GOOD RIGHT BAD, although it’s worth pointing out that it seems like one side does this…a lot more than the other – are basically using all sorts of incredibly fcuking nasty tricks to dupe older voters, many of whom are suffering from a variety of types of cognitive decline, into donating large sums, often on a monthly basis, without them actually knowing what the fcuk is going on. There are some examples of graphics used in mailers that are HEARTBREAKING, honestly – the one about ‘getting a friend request from Trump’ to dupe people into clicking a link is just so incredibly fcuking horrible on so many (oh, ok, fine, TWO) levels.
  • Human Trafficking in Cambodia: I don’t really have any hugely-successful schoolfriends, but my mate Rich from international school has had an interesting life, having spent much of the past couple of decades as a professional poker player in the far east (by his own admission this has often been a lot less glamorous than it sounds, exploiting the time difference to screw drunk post-club college kids for a few dollars at a time). He’s currently dividing his time between the Philippines, where his partner and kid live, and a casino in Cambodia, in an area not far from that mentioned in this article, and he has intimated to me that it is…quite a scary place. Based on this, he’s not lying – this is a MISERABLE account of how people from all over Asia are effectively trafficked into slavery, working for Chinese gangs who operate mass scamming operations out of the largely-lawless hotel/casino complexes that are scattered across the country. Someone from the region once described Cambodia to me as ‘a place where the very rich in Asia go when they want to do bad things, because there are basically no laws there’ – this does rather back that account up.
  • Hollywood’s New Competitors: I think I started reading Ted Gioia 3-4 years back – he has since become VERY famous, and although I do in part think he’s gotten a bit high off his own success I very much recommend reading this article in which he opines on the fact that pretty much everyone is a video factory these days. Chick-Fil-A producing kids TV shows on their own platform, football teams and basketball teams are effectively content houses as much as they are sports franchises these days, YouTubers can now release longform, cinema-quality docs on the platform…and that’s without even considering the potentially-imminent advent of decent quality  AI video. What does this mean? WHO KNOWS, but it doesn’t look or sound great for established empires. MASS MEDIA IS DEAD IT JUST HASN’T STOPPED MOVING YET.
  • Cruising With GenZ: Not, to be clear, in the park-based sexytime sense – no, this is about the apparent growing appeal of the cruise trip for younger people. This is The Face, interviewing a bunch of kids about why a type of holiday that was previously the preserve of the about-to-die is suddenly now hot with the younger demographic – the answers, ngl, depressed the fcuk out of me, a combination of the rise and rise of the premium mediocre experience, the predictable safety of the cruise (“you always know what you’re getting, you can get steak every day”), the fact that it’s basically QUITE LIKE BEING AT HOME in that you can be on the internet, go shopping, watch telly and eat familiar food, and there are no bugs, and there’s aircon and OH GOD THIS MADE ME WANT TO CULL AN ENTIRE GENERATION.
  • The Spotify Vandal: Their headline, not mine – to be clear, I think this person is a genius and a hero. What’s a surefire way to get a bunch of streams on Spotify without being a famous artist? THAT’S RIGHT, GAME THE SEARCH FUNCTION! Which is why an obscure and not-exactly-chartbound musician who records under the name ‘catbreath’ has achieved a surprising degree of exposure, thanks to their habit of naming their songs things like ‘my discover weekly’ and ‘chillout mix’. This person isn’t getting rich – they say they make a couple of hundred bucks a month – which makes this feel pleasingly anarchic rather than evil and ruinous, and it made me think about what the next iteration of this longstanding hack might be, after buying homophone search terms and the like.
  • Are Games Bad?: No, of course they’re not – but this article asks whether or not we might reasonably expect them to be better. Specifically this looks at the work of hideo Kojima, widely considered one of the medium’s greatest auteurs and visionaries, someone who’s basically revered as, I don’t know, the Kurosawa or similar of the medium. He’s also someone who can’t write dialogue for sh1t, in common with an awful lot of people writing for big budget games, and Frank Lantz asks in this piece whether we shouldn’t possibly ask for a little more from our entertainments, and whether the fact that we don’t is tied into something wider: “I think that the puzzle of Hideo Kojima is, in some ways, a microcosm of the puzzle of video games in general. So many of the worst things about video games are not just reluctantly tolerated but enthusiastically embraced because, through association, they have become emblems of our beloved hobby/artform/lifestyle. The same kind of winking, tongue-in-cheek affection that people have for the “bad” parts of Kojima games reflects the way the broader video game audience has internalized their deepest flaws as being, not just acceptable, but welcome. Not just welcome, but somehow necessary. Video games are childish and vulgar and corny and silly on purpose. And we like it this way!”
  • Building A Game: Sticking with videogames, this is a post about David Turner’s decision to make a videogame using photos and stop-motion animation – it’s technical and involved but it’s SO interesting, both in terms of the problem solving and creativity but also just the technical process of doing something so involved. Even if you’re not interested in games give this a go, you might find it oddly inspirational.
  • The End of the In-Flight Magazine: I can never think of in-flight magazines without thinking of Red Dwarf and Dave Lister’s throwaway comment that they are filled with articles with names like “Salt: An Epicure’s Delight!” – anyway, they’ve basically been consigned to history now, at least in the West, (until someone works out that print is cool again, actually, and your high-end airlines bring them back with a nicely-designed cover and aspirational columnists – I give it ~5y), but this piece takes a nostalgic look back at them as a medium, at the WONDERFUL freebies they offered to journalists (also an excellent word-rate from what I’ve heard) and the particular appeal they held to advertisers – as the writer makes clear, if you’re on a plane then you’re already one of the most privileged billion people or so on the planet, making you a marketers’ dream. Anyway, I think BA should start stocking The Fence – someone make that happen please.
  • Saizeriya’s: I love this piece SO MUCH! I had no idea at all that there is a very popular Japanese chain of ‘Italian’ restaurants which exists not only in its country of origin but in countries across the region, or that it serves dishes which might best be described as local reimaginings of classic dishes rather than anything an actual Italian might recognise (Italiani, se leggete, vi avverto che quest’articolo vi fara’ salire la collera’ culinaria come poche altre cose), or that it’s INSANELY cheap because of some really smart and interesting business practices (no, wait, come back!) which let them offer incredible economies of scale, or that it’s recently been at the heart of some light culture warring about the appropriateness or otherwise of taking dates there…honestly, this is PERFECT, food and culture and the genuine sense that I think will persist in me forever that Japan is basically Mars.
  • Rollercoasters: As you know, I don’t normally link to the mainstream UK press because I assume that most of you can get that elsewhere – I’ll make an exception for this, though, as it made me SO HAPPY. Tom Lamont goes long on rollercoaster design, spending months in the runup to the launch and opening of a new ride at Thorpe Park in the South of England talking to the man who designed it – seriously, this is a brilliant piece, interesting and informative and wonderfully-balanced between the technical and the personal. By the end of this I wanted to a) go on ALL THE ROLLERCOASTERS; and b) be friends with the guy who designs them, and I imagine you will be much the same.
  • My Auschwitz Vacation: Tanya Gold visits Auschwitz and writes about it for Harper’s. This is brilliant, brilliant writing; I could quote entire swathes of it, but this gives a flavour: “Auschwitz, though, is too powerful to give to the Jews. I encounter a tourist who came to Poland for a river cruise and stayed for this. “I’m not disappointed,” she says. “It is horrific.” I no longer believe that Hitler lost the war, but Poland gives itself over to magical thinking. I daydream about time travel here and even finding a magician to bring them back. I mostly think that if you don’t know what a Jew is when you walk into Auschwitz-Birkenau, you still won’t know it when you walk out, and so whatever else it is, it is a memorial to nothing except logistics.”
  • Forgetting Taylor Swift: Sam Kriss writes about Taylor Swift. This is too long, and it loses its way about halfway through with a frankly bizarre series of digressions about Americans’ relationship to Paris which didn’t really seem to fit with the rest of it at all, but I’m including it because the rest of it, the bits where he talks about Swift, and being at her concert, and WHAT IT ALL MEANS, really is excellent – particularly the hyperreal nature of the experience and how it necessarily sort of defies memory. This line in particular stuck out, in a week when standom has rightly received some additional scrutiny: “This intense obsession isn’t the same as actually enjoying something. It’s all sterile; it’s the empty carapace that remains when the actual enjoyment has rotted away.”
  • What Tempts Our Wives: A short story by Sarah Horner about love and losing and need and nature and and and. I thought this was beautiful: “My wife no longer washes her hands when she comes in from the garden. I find traces of earth around the house: dirty fingerprints on the refrigerator handle, last season’s leaves on top of the toilet seat, blood-like drops of tomato juice on the hardwood floor. When we got married, we promised to eat one meal a day together, even if it was just leftovers in front of the TV. I knew I was losing her when she began snacking on peas and berries straight from the plant, preferring that to my own well-intentioned cooking.”
  • Spinning Webs In Space: This sprawls and meanders a bit, but I really enjoyed the writing and the setting and the themes and then I was kicked in the face by the ending something chronic. Jill Christman writes here about why strangers tell her everything, about memories of the 1970s, about spiders and weightlessness and gravity and rape.

By Takaya Katsuragawa

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 18/10/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

HELLO I AM BACK HELLO!

What have YOU done with the past few weeks of your life? I have singularly failed to take a holiday of any sort (how does one take a holiday from oneself? No, not ‘acid’, tried that), or indeed to really stop looking at the internet, but I have caught up on some sleep and, I think, just about managed to muster the enthusiasm to get to the end of the year without risk of (additional, ulterior) breakdown, so WELL DONE ME!

Anyway, as I type it’s vaguely-sunny out, and in a desperate attempt to expose my bone-white epidermis to a few rays before the sun disappears for six months, I am not even going to bother pretending with the intro this week and will instead crack right on with the links, not least because I imagine you’re having some pretty chronic url withdrawal symptoms right now (do not tell me you found another dealer, do not tell me you found another dealer, I will CUT YOU).

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you are glad to see me, I can tell (LOOK AT ME).

By Paul Ranson (pics via TIH)

WE BEGIN THE MUSIC THIS WEEK WITH WHAT TOM SPOONER CALLS ‘SAD CRACKLY JAZZ’, AND FRANKLY WHO AM I TO ARGUE (THIS IS LOVELY AND ALMOST-PERFECTLY AUTUMNAL)!

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST TO ANY OF YOU WHO ARE IN LONDON AND WHO HAVE A BIT OF SPARE TIME OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS AND WHO WANT TO GET INVOLVED WITH SOMETHING GENUINELY INTERESTING AND COOL AND FUN AND CREATIVE TO CLICK THIS LINK AND SIGN UP AND LEARN MORE, PT.1:  

  • Greenwich: This is a lovely way to return to the internet (I have obviously not left the internet, I have just been…less assiduous about tracking its movements. INTERNET I WILL NEVER LEAVE YOU, etc etc) – Greenwich is the latest in the seemingly-infinite series of attempts to create an additional sort of semi-social layer over the web, which in this instance means ‘install this Chrome extension and it will let you both add hyperlinks to any bit of any webpage you like, but will also grant you the ability to see the hyperlinks others have added, meaning you start to build up a lovely network of ‘oh, this made me think of that’ links between sites created solely through others’ personal associations’ (as you can see, I’ve spent the past fortnight honing my prose to a fine point). Obviously this lives and dies by the number of people using it, and obviously there are about three people currently so doing, but I have a real soft spot for this sort of concept and the idea of mapping these loose thematic connections between places on the web. You can read a blogpost about the project here, and there’s this page which tracks all the different connections between sites that people have made with the software – sadly there doesn’t appear to be any sort of explanation to be found anywhere about why the everliving fcuk the person behind it chose to call it ‘Greenwich’.
  • The Syllabary: Oh this is GORGEOUS and not a little hypnotic: “The Syllabary consists of 1319 empty sounds and 2281 spoken parts of 1 to 37 lines in length, each based on a cluster of between 1 and 47 monosyllabic words. The program chooses an initial text at random and leads the viewer to the next in any of three directions through some 15013 lines of verse.” Basically this is basically randomised-poetry-by-way-of-maths – just click the link, hit the ‘play’ icon and let yourself be transported. Whoever they have doing the voice over for this has an almost criminally-soothing tone and frankly I could listen to them intone vaguely-nonsensical iambs at me for days.
  • This Compliment Does Not Exist: A tiny, frivolous webproject by Fred Wordie, who has spun up this site to offer compliments to YOU, internet stranger, should you be feeling that the universe isn’t demonstrating quite the adequate degree of appreciation towards your being. Click the button, get a compliment, generated by (I presume) GPT and voiced by Elevenlabs – absolutely no idea why Fred has decided to choose ‘the leprechaun from the Lucky Charms adverts’ for the voice model here, but he does and so we’ll just go with it.
  • Bop Spotter: This is very much a link that falls under the heading of ‘yes, I know you’ve seen this, I know it’s a few weeks old now, but I need to include it in Curios otherwise I will forget it because honestly I have just cyborged my memory to the point of codependence at this stage and perhaps that is why I can never stop’ – Bop Spotter is that project by the guy in San Francisco who’s placed a bunch of mics on telephone poles, all of them linked to Shazam, to get an ambient sense of the music that people are listening to in the city in realtime, and it is SUCH a nice idea and feels like the sort of thing that there are at least 17 different ‘urban surprise and delight activation ideas’ that a motivated team of annoyingly-tattooed creatives might excitedly come up with to attempt to shill more IPA. So far it’s detected over 1500 songs – you can listen to the selection via an embedded player on-site, but I quite like the idea of taking this sort of data and making a ‘sound of X city’ streamable radio station on a 24h delay, so if someone can just go and make that happen that would be ace thanks.
  • A Live Map Of Trains In England RIGHT NOW: It’s that time of the year again when people’s thoughts start to turn to the festive season (sorry, sorry, I know, TOO EARLY) and the massive fcuking schlep they will have to do to be reunited with their loved ones for a few days of bitter familial wrangling, and for those of you in the UK I think we can all confidently predict that you’ll end up spending at least an hour, possibly three, sat in the weird no-man’s-land between carriages while increasingly drunk people spill lager on you on their trip back from the buffet car (“the kitchen’s closed, but we do have a seemingly-infinite quantity of Beefeater in cans”) – or that the train you thought you were going to get simply…doesn’t exist! To reassure you that the UK does still seemingly have at least one or two working examples of rolling stock and that some trains are apparently still moving around the country, why not enjoy this LIVE MAP OF TRAINS, ALL MOVING AROUND THE COUNTRY RIGHT NOW. Aside from anything else it’s a decent realtime look at the varying quality of the service across the country – man does the North West look like it has some issues.
  • HTML For People: This is fcuking great and I love it. HTML For People is a site designed to explain code in a way that makes sense to actual human beings who don’t think in maths (ie people like me). Honestly, I can’t stress enough how approachable and clear this is – if you’re interested it will take you through every single step of building a website, explaining to you along the way what each bit is and why it exists and how it relates to the other bits…honestly, I can’t stress enough how good a resources this is, and even if you have no interest of actually getting your hands dirty with code this is worth looking at to get a better understanding of why, basically, everything is at heart a spreadsheet. Here’s the blurb – really, though, this is very good indeed.  “HTML isn’t only for people working in the tech field. It’s for anybody, the way documents are for anybody. HTML is just another type of document. A very special one—the one the web is built on. I’m Blake Watson. I’ve been building websites since the early 2000s. Though I work professionally in the field, I feel strongly that anyone should be able to make a website with HTML if they want. This book will teach you how to do just that. It doesn’t require any previous experience making websites or coding. I will cover everything you need to know to get started in an approachable and friendly way.” THANKS, MYSTERIOUS BLAKE WATSON!
  • Height Hunt: Someone has decided to make and maintain this website which exists to collect ALL (probably not all, but significantly more than you might expect tbh) the ‘beware, height restrictions!’ road signs around the UK – you know, the ones which get amusingly ignored by HGV drivers once a year, resulting in a stuck lorry and several palettes worth of FMCG products scattered underneath a semi-rural railway bridge. This is the work of one Adam Townsend – THANKS ADAM! I was particularly taken with the ‘about’ page, which I thought might give me a clue as to why Adam was undertaking this…very specific endeavour, but which instead just told me about the UK’s road signage protocols in quite a lot of detail. I respect that.
  • AI Storymaker: Ok, this link feels like a BIT of a cheat, because it’s neither to a FUN AN EXCITING CREATIVE WEBPROJECT or to something that actually exists, BUT it’s SUCH a lovely piece of design prototyping and such a clever proof of concept that I hope you won’t mind. You sort of have to click the link to get the idea (because, per 12 years of this stuff, I can’t write for sh1t), but basically this is a proof-of-concept prototype of a kids’ block-building/storytelling set; each of the different wooden blocks/characters is embedded with an RFID chip, which in turn is linked to a different GPT model representing different characters, and (basically) placing the different wooden toys in different configurations and combinations will result in different combinations of characters and settings, which in turn will cause an ENTIRELY NEW story featuring said characters and settings to be spun up by The Machine. Now, obviously there’s a lot of theory here, and anyone who’s played with ‘AI Storytelling’ will know that the resulting stories will be fcuking soulless dreck, BUT I hope you can get at least a tiny frisson of possibility and excitement from the base concept here, because this feels like quite a fertile area to create in, and, again, the sort of thing that might reasonably be used as INSPIRATIONAL FODDER (you can totally steal this imho).
  • The Future Timeline:  Do you…worry? Are you perhaps a touch concerned about what might be going on? Well don’t! There’s no point! There’s literally fcuk all you can do about almost anything that’s going to impact your life – all the really big stuff is, in the main, out of your hands, so why bother fretting? Also, as the information contained within The Future Timeline demonstrates, SO MUCH WEIRD SH1T MIGHT BE ABOUT TO HAPPEN ANYWAY that there’s not really any point making plans. The Future Timeline has been running for YEARS, seemingly the work of only one man – “London-based writer and futurist, William James Fox, started Future Timeline back in 2008. It began as a relatively small and obscure website with a brief list of future predictions. Over the years, however, it expanded to form a lengthy and detailed timeline – running from the present day, through the next century and beyond, all the way to the end of the universe itself.” This is utterly fascinating, and the sort of thing you could lose an afternoon to quite easily – I flit between the sections imagining the immediate future (you may be reassured that the period 2025-2050 is summarised neatly with “Technological unemployment is rising rapidly”) and the 2200s, when apparently we’ll have sorted the arcologies out and be living our best Sim City 2000 lives. So, so so interesting, if obviously all totally speculative – if nothing else, though, it rather reinforced by general feeling about the overall arc of stuff being positive but the next 50-100 years or so being…somewhat choppy for us as a species. Let’s see (I won’t, I will be SO DEAD, thank fcuk).
  • 5 Million Devs: What would DO do if your platform for developers hit the (honestly impressive) milestone of 5million people using it? Well, if you’re Netlify (no, I don’t know and I don’t care, don’t tell me who they are or what they do) what you inexplicably decide to do is build a web experience which lets visitors play an honestly-surprisingly-shiny little Marble Madness clone while learning ‘facts’ about the company’s journey to this point. This is, objectively, a terrible, terrible waste of time and money, but I can’t help but admire the commitment here (and, honestly, there’s something kind of satisfying about the marble-y-ness of the whole thing). No fcuking idea AT ALL how you measure the, er, ‘value’ of this to the business, mind.
  • Microphotography: The 50th winners of Nikon’s ‘Small World’ microphotography contest have just been announced! Look at some incredible images of very, very small things! The winning pic of mouse tumours is sort-of amazing (don’t worry, you can’t tell it’s the cance), but my personal favourite is the one of the cannabis plant because 15 year old me would have been inordinately excited about the trichomes (15 year old me didn’t know what a tricome *was*, to be clear, but was aware that they were in some abstract way ‘good to have’ when it came to weed. 15 year old me was largely intolerable, I’m sorry to say).
  • Werner’s Nomenclature of Colours: Ok, so, per Wikipedia, “Werner’s Nomenclature of Colours is a book of named colour samples compiled by Abraham Gottlob Werner, and subsequently amended by Patrick SymeThe book, first published in 1814, was used by Charles Darwin in his scientific observations. Werner’s Nomenclature can be viewed as a predecessor of modern named colour systems such as Pantone” – this website is a digitisation of that book, by one Nicholas Rougeaux, which lets you explore the colours Werner identified, the names he gave them, examples of the colour appearing in nature…as someone who doesn’t really have an iota of artistic talent in their body, this is a bit magical, like having someone slowly and patiently explain, I don’t know, the concept of ‘numbers’ to me, and the general site design here is pleasing insofar as, for whatever reason, it very much has the sort of general feel and vibe of a book full of watercolour sketches. This is really rather lovely and soothing.
  • A Clarins Metaverse: There was a piece that did the rounds the other week about how all the people who a few years ago were glorying in the title of ‘Chief Metaverse Officer’ have now moved on to become Chief AI Innovators instead, but on seeing this website this week – all you need to know about it is that makeup brand Clarins got absolutely fleeced by some ‘3d world’-peddling third-party platform and have shelled out for AN Other generically-branded ‘metaversal space’ where you can, I don’t know, jump off a lipstick or watch an ad for some concealer (after it’s finished buffering) – it made me think that there are perhaps some companies where signoff process are so slow, where compliance is so rigorous, that they might only now be coming to the end of a long and arduous metaverse building process, whose project teams are only now emerging blinking into the cold, hard light of the future, clutching their newly-birthed IMMERSIVE 3D BRAND SPACES to their chests, only to find that…the world has moved on and noone cares and oh by the way we shut down the team and you’re unemployed, sorry, Anyway, BRANDED VIRTUAL CLEANSER EXPERIENCES!
  • Natural Landscape Photography Awards 2024: There are LOADS of gorgeous images of the natural world here – I’m particularly taken with the abstracts, as ever, but a special mention also for Felix Wesch’s portraits of birch forests where the colours and lighting are just insane.
  • After: ANOTHER dating app! I was thinking about this the other day – even if I wanted to dip my toe into the thick, somewhat…coagulated waters of the online dating pool, I simply wouldn’t be able to because I don’t own ANY photos of myself (I think in total I have approximately three from the past two decades of my life). Obviously this is an INSURMOUNTABLE issue, so, well, that’s me done! Anyway, ‘After’ is a new dating app – I think it’s only launched in a limited number of cities at the moment, possibly US-only – which as its gimmick has chosen ‘we’re fixing the problem of ghosting!’, which, honestly, feels like a reasonable ‘enemy’ for the brand to choose. The way this works is that if you message someone and have a conversation but decide that you don’t want to take it any further, you have to actually tell the person why (I presume it can be euphemistically gentle and doesn’t require the brutal honesty of, say, “the way you breathe makes me homicidal”, or “I could never respect, let alone love, someone with your approach to spelling”) or the app will remove your matching privileges – which, honestly, feels like a bracingly strict approach that might have benefits.
  • The Living Museum: An interesting way of exploring the British Museum’s collection, this – an LLM layer over the top lets you ask natural language queries of the interface, which thanks to the GPT-ing has a certain fuzziness in its understanding of the catalogue and which in turn means you can ask it to search for ‘sexy statues’ and it will sort-of understand (this is a VERY loose definition of ‘sexy’, unless your tastes are spectacularly-niche). On the one hand, I like this way of using the tech to open the collection, and the interface is really nice – on the other, there’s something…odd about AI curation, insofar as there’s no ‘curation’ happening other than ‘vaguely-linked datapoints in latent space’ and…I don’t know, perhaps I miss the intentionality of a human aye in pulling together a collection, but I increasingly find with projects like this that the breadth and scope is impressive but there’s not actually that much meaning being delivered when you look closely. Anyway, see what you think.
  • TypingBowl: Do YOU think you’re a good typist? Would YOU like to test your typing skills by going head to head in LIVE TYPING CHALLENGES against strangers from across the web? Are…are you always this competitive? Anyway, should you wish to see whether YOU are a better touch-typist than some other webmong somewhere in the world then WOW will you enjoy this.
  • Musicleague: Ooh, this could be fun – if you’re in a particularly-musically-focused friendship group or groupchat I could see this proving quite popular. Musicleague basically works a bit like fantasy sports (except it doesn’t really) – you form a league with whoever you want; you play in ‘rounds’ and each ‘round has a theme, players submit songs for each round that fit the theme, everyone listens to the songs and then votes and comments on their favourites (the ‘comments’ functionality is a genius build I think), the person whose selection got voted the best wins…nonspecific friendgroup kudos! This, honestly, could be a lot of fun with the right group of people (and incredibly annoying with the wrong one, so CHOOSE WITH CARE).
  • Defunct Website: A service allowing you to specify when you’re website is dead, defunct, an EX WEBSITE. I rather like this – it removes ambiguity, and there’s something rather cool about having a definitive endpoint to qa webpage or project. In fact, can we make this an accepted part of webdesign and online etiquette, that every website has it’s ‘go live’ and ‘shuttered’ dates recorded on its homepage URL at the point of its abandonment via some sort of service like this? Great!
  • The Best Active Internet Forums: This list has done the rounds a bit over the past week or so, but it really is worth bookmarking – forums have always been, and will always be, the best of the web (I am right about this), and this piece is a list of some of the best ones still active, covering a huge range of topics from drugs to miniature ponies. This made me quite annoyed at Google shutting off its specific forum search product about 12 years ago, which really is something I should have gotten over by now tbh.
  • Death and Hell: Ok, yes, I know that the title doesn’t *sound* promising, and I concede that, yes, this is once again one of those ‘borderline’ websites where I was debating whether it was ok to feature because, well, there’s that whiff of schizophrenia about it, but I came down on the side of inclusion because it’s OLD and I am not convinced its author is still about, and because, well, MY GOD this is very deep and very weird and VERY esoteric, and there’s some VERY old testament ish vibes to the whole thing, and, well, here’s an example of the sort of prose you can expect to encounter in the many, many hundreds of pages buried here: “Sub-humans have also been targeted for “transformation” by lycanthropic paramilitary units using very sophisticated memetic warfare systems, hybridized tectonics with a subliminal interface and have set up these events beyond space-time referred to as: “Temple Dahmer Initiations.” Are YOU Tired of the Health Risks involved with Bloodborne Pathogens?” WELL, ARE YOU?

By Alma Haser

NEXT, A PLAYLIST FEATURING 100 TRACKS BY BLACK BRITISH ARTISTS RECORDED SINCE 2020 AND WHICH IS A BRILLIANT AND INSANELY-VARIED SELECTION OF MODERN UK EXCELLENCE!

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST TO ANY OF YOU WHO ARE IN LONDON AND WHO HAVE A BIT OF SPARE TIME OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS AND WHO WANT TO GET INVOLVED WITH SOMETHING GENUINELY INTERESTING AND COOL AND FUN AND CREATIVE TO CLICK THIS LINK AND SIGN UP AND LEARN MORE, PT.2:

  • IOGraphica: Oh this is WONDERFUL! Have you ever thought ‘God I wish I could turn the pointless movements made by my mouse cursor as I once again waste my life through screen-based interaction into BEAUTIFUL MONOCHROMATIC SEMI-ABSTRACT ART!’? No, it strikes me as unlikely, but that is EXACTLY what you can do with IOGraphica, which is a bit of software which tracks your mouse movements and turns them into gorgeous visualisations. So so so beautiful.
  • Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2024: Critters!  Yes, ok, fine, and some landscapes, but it’s mostly about the critters! As ever, important to note that not all the aforementioned critters on display here are, er, alive, but as long as that doesn’t put you off then you can rest assured that these are all astonishing in various ways – I personally was charmed by the one featuring toad-on-toad violence (you’ll know it when you see it), but every single one of these pictures is glorious. BONUS PHOTO CONTEST: seeing as you’re here, you might want to check out the winners of this year’s ‘Panoramic Photographer of the Year’ contest which are also lovely (but, well, WIDE).
  • Wes Cook: This came out of one of the talks at this year’s XOXO Festival, and having read about the project and watched the associated video (which, honestly, I can’t recommend enough) I was UTTERLY CHARMED and you will be too. Wes Cook was an artist operating in the US in the 20th Century, working across a frankly insane range of projects from theme parks to film studios to theatre design. On a roadtrip, Cabel Sasser encountered his work, and became obsessed. Per Cabel, “Wes Cook died in 2004. He had no heirs, no family. His life’s work was left in a storage locker that went unpaid, eventually being sold at auction. I purchased all I could from the person who bought his storage locker, until I basically ran out of money. Oops. He deserves to be world famous. Maybe it’s not too late.” This website hosts the archive of Wes’s oeuvre, the video of Cabel’s talk, and I promise you that after you’ve watched the talk (WATCH THE TALK) you will fall slightly in love with this.
  • Letterboxd Besties:So apparently if you’re a Film Person (it feels the capitalisation is important here) and you use film rating site Lettrboxed it lets you pick your TOP FOUR FILMS EVER by which to define yourself to the rest of the cinephile community – this website lets you put in your username and see if anyone else in the big wide world has the same UNIQUELY-RAREFIED TASTES as you do. Honestly, this feels like a near-perfect extension for a dating app, no? Also, based on this, I wonder what the most ‘basic’ top 4 is? Shawshank, It’s A Wonderful Life, Elf, Back To The Future? A Fiat500 selection for the ages!
  • Laid Off Overlays: Look, I appreciate that there is nothing funny about being out of work and being worried as to where money’s going to come from, and the modern charade of having to digitally caper in the shop window in the desperate hope that some passing suit chooses YOU to bestow the temporary gift of employment on is particularly miserable and horrid, but, also, I found this website – which lets you create your very own ‘Twibbon’ (remember them!?)-style graphical overlay to add to your profile on LinkedIn in the style of the ‘Looking For Work!’ badges popping up all over the place over there. Want to create a badge that says “I Need The Money But I Promise I Will Never Care”? How about “No Major HR Grievances”? “Look Into My Eyes Before You Scroll Past Me And Condemn My Kids To A Present-Free Christmas”? The choice is yours. This is…this isn’t actually funny, is it?
  • Crayon Town: Another ‘infinite canvas on which the entire web can draw simultaneously’ project, with the unique gimmick that the graphics are done to make the whole thing look (convincingly, I must say) as though it’s been drawn in crayon. Which might lessen the horror when you stumble into the inevitable ‘swastika corner’ (to be clear, I have not found ‘swastika corner’ and there’s no suggestion that it does in fact exist – I did though just scroll around for a minute and saw someone had written the simple phrase ‘gay wand’, which has really made me laugh for some reason).
  • Pictures Of People Taking Pictures: I feel that this ought to be a bigger thing than it is. You can contribute your own, should you so desire (you should).
  • Cartographist: Ooh, this is interesting – it’s a Github repo so you will need to be able to wrangle the code, but this is SUCH a cool twist on the standard browser/tab design – created by Szymon Kaliski, who describes it thusly: “Cartographist is an experimental web browser optimized for rabbit-holing. Instead of opening new windows (with cmd-click), Cartographist spawns horizontally scrollable panes.Instead of forcing you to find things in a linear history, Cartographist shows a tree-structured outline of your browsing. Instead of always starting fresh, Cartographist can save, and load “trails” – the exact state of the session you’ve left – supporting researching topics over long periods of time.” If you click the link you can get a better idea from screenshots (or you can see some video of it in action here), but this strikes me as SUCH a clever way of rethinking the way in which we move through webspace.
  • Watch Frame By Frame: Would you like to be able to quickly and easily scrub through a video frame-by-frame? Er, why? Nevertheless, this webpage will let you do just that with any YouTube or Vimeo url, presumably for the purposes of spotting, I don’t know, scene anomalies, or for investigating whether something’s been a edited in certain ways, or, if you’re a pervert from 1983, for catching snatched glimpses of fleeting nipples and pubes from old films. You do you!
  • Films In Airplane Toilets: A reader writes! Peter Brooke Turner, to be precise, who emailed me with the following “I’m a touring musician who has started my own theatre company @attcthe which makes films in airplane toilets and which might be of interest to you?” To which my immediate answer was ‘YES PETER THIS IS EXACTLY THE SORT OF MAD SH1T I AM INTO WHAT THE ACTUAL FCUK?” (I was more polite than this). Honestly, these are…very weird, but also really inventive and fun and creative, and as a way of spending time when you’re bored on a poky Airbus this feels like something more people should possibly get into (also, this feels like a GREAT music video concept waiting to happen, no?). There’s one in which someone’s filming in a tux, which strikes me as quite a strong commitment to the bit – WELL DONE PETER THIS IS VERY WEIRD.
  • Jars: A whole bunch of AI-generated TV channels – AI presenters, AI voices, AI scripts, all utter gibberish, obviously, but sort-of entertaining, a bit like watching Furbys talk to each other. These are all vaguely themed around ‘formats’ – so there’s AI Dragon’s Den (sorry, ‘Shark Tank’), AI cooking…actually I have become slightly captivated by the cooking one, it’s like some sort of weird fever dream where there are near-edible recipes being described by someone who’s being hand-operated by a trainee at the Henson workshops, and where every single sentence ends ‘YES CHEF!’ regardless of whether that makes any sense or not. This might actually be brilliant, not quite sure.
  • Hots & Cots: This is basically ‘Tripadvisor for the US Military establishment’, a website where serving members of the US Forces can post photos and reviews of the food and accommodation they’re given by Uncle Sam in exchange for acting as IED fodder a few years down the line. Obviously the quality of bed and board varies drastically from place to place, but a few observations: 1) based on the diets these people seem to be eating, WHERE IS THE FIBRE???; 2) portion sizes are…variable; 3) I’m sorry, if this is your writeup of the food then you have no reason to complain about anything: “This brunch smash burger was amazing. Hash brown, fried egg, caramelized onions, and maple ketchup. So delicious. They also had a section that was doing fresh pasta dishes too.” MAPLE KETCHUP? A FRESH PASTA STATION? You didn’t get this sh1t in Full Metal Jacket.
  • Bookloop: Vinted, for books. Yes, I know, lazy, but a) I am running SO LATE; and b) that is literally what it is, deal with it. Scan your books’ barcodes or enter the ISBN and the site will give you a valuation for them – you can then trade them in for credit on Bookshop.org, thereby supporting indie booksellers when you spend said credits. All in all this just seems like a great setup and something that’s worth signing up for if you possibly ought to get rid of one or two tomes but can’t quite bring yourself to conduct the ceremonial burning this year.
  • Design Playlists: Do you DO DESIGN? Do you like to listen to music while you do so? Would you like to listen to music selected by OTHER DESIGNERS that they think helps them DO DESIGN BETTER? Great, you’ll like this site then, as it collects, er, playlists compiled by designers to listen to while they design, to be listened to by other designers while they, in turn, design. DESIGN MORE AND FASTER, YOU FCUKS. What do you imagine all the music in these playlists sounds like? Go on, just have a guess. YOU’RE RIGHT!
  • Chess Grid: Make a downloadable black and white artwork based on the chess grid – the nice gimmick here is that you can enter the specific moveset from a single match, or passage of play, and that will be reflected in the resulting piece that’s generated. Even those of you who don’t revere Magnus Carlsen might find something to love here – the aesthetic of the generated works is very strong indeed to my mind, these would make glorious prints in the right environment.
  • Frankenstein: SUCH an interesting way of exploring a text, this, specifically of seeing the ways in which the text was altered between different editions of the same work. This is the Frankenstein Varorium, an online tool which allows the user to explore the text through its various incarnations, allowing you to select individual passages and see how they have evolved through different revisions of the work. ““In the case of Frankenstein, the substantive changes that MWS made in her revised edition are so extensive that many teachers and students of Frankenstein consider 1818 and 1831 as two different novels.” Scholars do not agree on a single authoritative text, though the 1818 edition became more available from the 1990s onward in teaching editions, reflecting increasing interest in the earlier versions of the text. With this project, we offer a way to explore not just two but five distinct moments in the novel’s writing and re-writing, and they do not proceed in orderly stages. The following diagram summarizes the relationships among the manuscript and published versions of Frankenstein composed between 1816 and 1831 that we worked with for this variorum project.” Obviously this is mainly of use and interest to people who, er, really want to get deep into Frankenstein, but if you’ve even a passing interest in information design then this is worth exploring because the interface is really, really nicely done.
  • Weather Landscapes: Another link to something you actually need to be able to code to do anything with – SORRY SORRY SORRY – but I think the fact that this is yet ANOTHER eminently-thievable idea should be enough for you to forgive me (all I ask is absolution, and only for some of the sins). This, basically, outlines how you might go about knocking up a realtime weather data display that, rather than showing you the temperature and precipitation probabilities in boring textual fashion instead does so by rendering it as a kids’ drawing. Honestly, this is SO CHARMING and I would 100% applaud anyone pitching this sort of thing as some sort of public installation or similar – please please please can one of you do something with this?
  • Street Nuns: The only thing not to love about this site is that, in the specific context in which it is here being used, ‘street’ connotes ‘walking around on the pavement’ rather than ‘incredibly streetwise and not a little threatening’. Otherwise, though, this is a perfect website – photos of nuns, out and about. As someone who had literally the most miserable 18 months of his life in Rome, I can honestly confirm that there is no set of personal circumstances so bleak that your life won’t be instantly improved by just seeing a nun, on a bus.
  • Doubles: Can you multiply a number by two? Can you do it again? And again? Can you do it AGAINST THE CLOCK? This game has made me feel more stupid than almost anything else I have done this year, which is no small feat.
  • A Selection Of Excellent Tiny Browser Games: The link takes you to the webpage for a recent weekend game jam – scroll to the bottom and there’s a selection of a dozen or so browsergames which I can highly recommend as an afternoon pastime, the stuntbike game in particular being INCREDIBLY ‘one more go’-ish. ENJOY!

By Percy Fortin-Wright

OUR FINAL PLAYLIST THIS WEEK IS THIS SELECTION OF ‘SONGS THAT HAVE DEFINED THE DECADE SO FAR’, WHICH HAS BEEN COMPILED BY A BUNCH OF EX-PITCHFORK STAFFERS WHO THIS WEEK LAUNCHED A NEW MUSIC MAGAZINE CALLED HEARING THINGS! (WHICH YOU CAN CHECK OUT HERE)

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Diamond Geezer: Not in fact a Tumblr at all! Instead, this is a VERY oldschool blog, in which the titular Diamond Geezer writes…not very geezerishly at all, actually, all about London, its streets and boroughs and history. This is very much an urbanist nerd’s paradise, and if you’ve any interest at all in the city now and as it was then you’ll adore this – even better, it’s been going for 25 years!!! TWENTY FIVE FCUKING YEARS! I will never, ever cease to be amazed by people’s indefatigability and passion, and I will never again think that Curios is in any way ‘special’ or ‘noteworthy’ (lol of course I will, it is my baby and I love its hideous countenance and the strange, wet noises it makes).

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Servilletas: Images of paper napkins from bars, cafes, bakeries and restaurants in Spain (I think). Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT YOU INGRATES.
  • Ethos, Austin: A restaurant in Austin, Texas, sharing images of its food. Except the food is all AI, the images aren’t real, the restaurant doesn’t exist…but it does have a website! And, perhaps more understandably, a merch shop! I am confused about this – not about the fact that someone’s spinning up AI images of food, more about…why? Why the website? Is this a teaser for something else? See, this is the problem with AI stuff – IT MAKES EVERYTHING CONFUSING AND UNKNOWABLE.
  • DJ Ag: I love this – turns out I have actually seen DJ Ag out and about in South London before, and but this is his Insta which showcases his habit of just setting up some decks, an amp and a mic on the street and letting people come and MC with him. Some of the resulting performances here are ACE, and in general this is just one of those ‘see, this is why living in a big city is awesome and why people are at heart sort of brilliant’ things that we can all get behind (until some brand decides to make Ag the cornerstone of their next ‘activation’ and the whole thing dies a miserable death).
  • The Savalavada: This is interesting – India has its own version of The Onion! Ok, fine, I’m sure India’s had a fcuktonne of satirical, humorous outlets mocking its politics and culture, but this one’s new and feels more…Onion-y. It only exists on Insta, and I confess that a lot of the humour went right over my head, but I did very much enjoy a recent headline celebrating “International Day for Really Close Female Roommates” and so I am recommending it on that basis alone.
  • Insta Repeat: Thanks to Kev Lloyd for sending this to me – an insta account highlighting the inherent aesthetic sameness of shots on the platform via the medium of collages which neatly point out exactly how fcuking banal everything in your ‘September’ dump was.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Machines of Loving Grace: I am not, if I’m honest, really expecting many (any?) of you to read all of this – it is, after all, a 15,000 paean to the future benefits of the glorious AI future, penned by a man with a vested financial interest in as many people as possible believing VERY FIRMLY in the validity of that future – but I would say that it’s worth a look if you have a passing interest in the general ‘so, where have the plutocratic tech fcuks decided is the future this week?’ question. This is Anthropic’s Dario Amodei waxing (VERY) lyrical about What This Will All Mean and Where We Will All End Up, and – SPOILERS! – we don’t have to worry, it’s all going to be great! This is a nice companion to the (far shorter, thank fcuk) Sam Altman piece from the other week – the contrast here comes with Amodei seeming to think somewhat more deeply about how this stuff might play out…although, to be clear, nowhere near deeply enough. So we get the fat end of 15,000 words on the amazing advancements in longevity and medicine and science that we can all expect, and the promise that ‘powerful AI’, smarter than a Nobel Winner (lol at the Hinton shade!), could be here as soon as 2026, and that is going to make EVERYTHING BETTER! It also, though, relies on a lot of this sort of thinking – “Diseases have been eradicated and many countries have gone from poor to rich, and it is clear that the decisions involved in these tasks exhibit high returns to intelligence (despite human constraints and complexity). Therefore, AI can likely do them better than they are currently being done.” – which…doesn’t feel *hugely* robust, intellectually-speaking, and, as ever, there are gaping holes where the sections on ‘negative externalities’ might be expected to sit, or indeed what we’re meant to do about the fact that, per Dario, we will soon reach a point where “our current economic setup will no longer make sense, and there will be a need for a broader societal conversation about how the economy should be organised.” What might that conversation be? How might that work? Dario? DARIO????? Oh well, no need to think about that just yet, eh?
  • Death of Memory: A brief blogpost from Matt Webb next, in which he speculates idly about the potential ulterior motives behind attacks on the Internet Archive. Webb’s not being entirely serious here, I don’t think, but I did think there was something interesting at the heart of what he writes and which gets to the core of much of what is making me uneasy about the proliferation of AI slop everywhere – we’re back to the pollution of the informational water table again, kids (I WILL MAKE THIS ANALOGY CATCH ON IF IT FCUKING KILLS ME, I TELL YOU), and how, after a while of this, you won’t ever be able to remember a time before the streams weren’t all brown and unpleasantly-faecally-scented. Anyway, this is a great writing prompt for a scifi short if nothing else.
  • Risks and Harms and Kids and Social Media: An excellent piece of writing by Danah Boyd, capturing much of the current panicked zeitgeistvibe about kids and phones and social media – on which note, man does the stuff coming out of the TikTok case in the US make for uncomfortable reading for TikTok! – and arguing sensibly and cogently that we should approach the question in terms of risks and harms, and that as such we should think more in terms of working to minimise risk via design and education rather than attempting to ‘ban harms’. This really is worth reading in full – particularly if this is a question that you’ve been wrestling with as a parent or guardian – but this is a decent little precis: “Can social media be risky for youth? Of course. So can school. So can friendship. So can the kitchen. So can navigating parents. Can social media be designed better? Absolutely. So can school. So can the kitchen. (So can parents?) Do we always know the best design interventions? No. Might those design interventions backfire? Yes. Does that mean that we should give up trying to improve social media or other digital environments? Absolutely not. But we must also recognize that trying to cement design into law might backfire. And that, more generally, technologies’ risks cannot be managed by design alone.Fixating on better urban design is pointless if we’re not doing the work to socialize and educate people into crossing digital streets responsibly. And when we age-gate and think that people can magically wake up on their 13th or 18th birthday and be suddenly able to navigate digital streets just because of how many cycles they took around the sun, we’re fools. Socialization and education are still essential, regardless of how old you are.”
  • Plutocrat Archipelagos: On the very, very rich. Jack Self writes about spending time in the company of the plutes, about the rarefied air up there, about the oddity of existence in a world whose contours are continually being smoothed to your exact specifications. The prose here is delightful: “In desert gated communities, time is drawn out as thin as the air. The world attains a kind of placid stasis. If we are to believe Borges, as empires rise they generate maps that become coextensive with their territories. And as empires collapse, these maps burn, until the only scraps that remain are in the desert; a confetti archipelago of defunct ideologies, strewn amongst the sand and rocks. We are living through a period of societal collapse. This isn’t a factual statement, but an emotional one. It feels like we are approaching the end of a specific social contract. Modernity is a project founded on patriarchal domination, on linear time, infinite extraction and unstoppable accumulation. In its five centuries, it has evolved into such an unnatural paradigm that it now only survives through extreme and perpetual violence; perpetrated indifferently against both humans and non-humans alike.”
  • Culture Isn’t Stuck, Actually: A counterpoint to the recent spate of ‘we have stopped producing anything really new, culturally-speaking’ pieces, Katherine Dee here suggests that the difference is simply that you can’t see culture anymore, or at least anything resembling a truly representative slice of it, and as such it’s perspective that is screwed not the production of new culture itself. Part of me definitely buys this – specifically, I buy this from the point of view of a 45 year old man who really *shouldn’t* feel like they have any sort of finger-on-the-pulse view of culture, otherwise something really has gone very wrong indeed – although equally I am not sure I 100% buy the following as an example of true ‘newness’ because, well, this doesn’t exactly feel revolutionary: “The social media personality is one example of a new form. Personalities like Bronze Age Pervert, Caroline Calloway, Nara Smith, mukbanger Nikocado Avocado, or even Mr. Stuck Culture himself, Paul Skallas, are themselves continuous works of expression — not quite performance art, but something like it. They may also be influencers, or they may not be, but the innovative aspect isn’t that they’re promoting a brand or making money from their venture.  It’s not about their single tweet, self-published book, or video. The entire avatar, built across various platforms over a period of time, constitutes the art. Their persona must be enjoyed in the moment, as it reveals itself on the platforms; the audience response is part of the piece. The way their audiences start to speak like them, the aesthetics they inspire, and the way they shape headlines — this is all social media born culture.” Sorry, Leigh Bowery would like you to acknowledge them please.
  • The Tesla Thing: If you care about the Tesla robotaxi event thing, chances are that you will have read all you need to about it – if you don’t, you probably don’t care to read anymore. That said, PLEASE take a moment to enjoy this short writeup of the event by Jonathan Gitlen, which is a beautiful example of how to take a gag and work it repeatedly, and which does a neat job of skewering exactly why people should stop listening to that horrid apartheid toad (although I can’t help but be impressed by the rockets, albeit grudgingly).
  • Why Boys Don’t Go To College: Sorry, I should probably have de-yanked the English there – “why young men don’t go to university”, then. I mean, obviously they do, but there’s data from all over the place suggesting that young women are significantly more likely to enter higher education than young men in 2024. Here, Celeste Davis wonders why, and runs some numbers that suggest there’s an interesting – and frankly a bit miserable – fact underpinning this, to whit ‘when groups become minority-male, men tend to abandon them wholesale’. That’s right, the data suggests that one of the reasons that young men aren’t going to university so much is…too many women! Davis explains the concept of ‘male flight’ – wherein beyond a certain tipping point, topics or subjects become ‘female-coded’ in the mind of men, who therefore see them as ‘lower status’ and who therefore avoid participating in them. This is INCREDIBLY miserable – and, honestly, not a little embarrassing tbh, what the fcuk is WRONG with us?! – and yet feels…true? Anyway, this really interested me and wasn’t something I’d ever really considered before. There’s definitely some nudge-adjacent purpose work you could squeeze out of this, with a bit of thought.
  • Netflix’s Endless Library: This is a couple of weeks old and so you might well have seen it – SORRY, NO MORE BREAKS FOR MATT, BAD MATT! – but in case not it’s definitely worth reading – the New York Times goes long on the current state of the streaming economy and how the past decade or so’s approach to the production and distribution of TV has led to the weird situation of there being an infinite amount of it and yet, simultaneously, nothing to watch, and why there are so many shows that seem to exist without anyone ever having seen them (we’re back to the ‘culture is still happening, you just can’t see it because it’s now too big to fit in any single person’s eyeline’ argument again), and how this all links back to…venture capital and modern finance! Funny how whichever way you slice it the general ensh1ttification of so much of modern experience can be blamed squarely on those cnuts, isn’t it? By which I mean, enervating and infuriating!
  • Taylor Lorenz and Modern Media: Depending on how interested in media and media personalities you are, you might have missed the news that Taylor Lorenz, probably the most famous tech/digital culture journalists online right now since we collectively realised that Kara Swisher…wasn’t actually doing a very good job, has quit (or been quit from, unclear tbh) ‘mainstream’ media and is setting herself up as a one woman media vertical (…node, anyone?)…anyway, whether or not you care about that I think this is an interesting profile/interview which covers a lot of interesting ground about the extent to which the ‘mainstream media’ (Jesus I hate that term, I really do – it *reeks* of the worst of the web) has dropped the ball when it comes to ‘online reporting’ over the past decade or so, the growth of independent, narrow-focus new media brands and projects, the idea of the ‘personal brand’ in the workplace and all that sort of jazz. I think Lorenz is very good at what she does and wish her the best, but I can’t deny that my heart sank when I got to the bit about her not wanting to JUST be a journalist but instead aspiring to be a ‘360 degree online personality’ because…a) that isn’t how good reporting happens! b) that doesn’t seem to tend to end well for the ‘360 degree online personalities’ in question! Still, more power to her.
  • The Disappearance of an Internet Domain: In that brief 48h period a few weeks ago when a bunch of red-faced conservatives in the UK had to pretend to both be aware of, and to care about, the UK’s sovereignty over the Chagos Islands (and the fact that said sovereignty was being handed over to the bloody foreigners, WHERE IS OUR EMPIRE, etc etc, one element of the story that was criminally-overlooked was the impact it would have on the world’s websites, who will shortly no longer be able to avail themselves of the .io suffix – because that was attached to the Chaygos Islands, which will now be part of Malaysia, meaning the domain is being retired. This is SO INTERESTING – the links between physical borders and digital domains is always fascinating, conceptually, and this hints at a whole weird alternative world of international geopolitics based around domain-based interest groups which I now want to spend the afternoon daydreaming about.
  • Frieze: Web Curios favourite Clive Martin visit the Frieze Art Fair, which has just departed London, to give his thoughts from the frontline of artcapitalism. I have long had a soft spot for Frieze – I worked for an agency that did its PR for a new years c.2005ish, and going to the opening party on the Wednesday was always  one of the most incredible experiences, not least because it remains one of the only places in the world I’ve ever seen real people in ‘real life’ wearing actual catwalk couture like it was in any way normal – but I confess to looking at the pricetag this year (I long ago slipped off the freebie list, chiz chiz) and thinking ‘yeah, no, you’re alright mate, £70 to stand in a tent is not actually that appealing ta’. Still, Clive does an excellent job of giving you the vibe – his writeup is very much about the people and the commerce and the *feel* of the whole thing rather than the art itself, which, frankly, is pretty much the perfect analogue for Frieze itself. Also, this is written in the second person and you are a SUCKER for things written in the second person.
  • Spotting Gators With Lana Del Rey’s Brother-in-Law: This piece is SO MUCH FUN! Honestly, possibly the most enjoyable read in this week’s Curios, I was grinning throughout. You may be aware that Lana DeL Rey recently got hitched to some random bloke from Florida – it turns out that Mr Del Rey is one of the proprietors of a company that does tours of the alligator swamps for tourists, and so OBVIOUSLY Ock Sportello (can I just say, by the way, that this is possibly the greatest name I have encountered in 2024? Go on, take a moment to roll it around your mouth, it is BRILLIANT) decided to go down and check it out. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Mr Del Rey doesn’t show up to work much any more, but this piece doesn’t suffer from the lack of any meaningful celebrity-adjacent content – it’s just funny and interesting and personal, and does that lovely thing where the writer evidently realises on starting to research the piece that they are not going to end up writing the article they thought they were going to be writing, but that what they will end up writing will be better than what they had planned. You will grin throughout this, I promise.
  • Nardwuar: Do you know who Nardwuar is? I have mentioned him a few times before, I think – and apologies if you do, and this is all old to you, but I have genuinely no clue how famous he is – but to give you the brief synopsis: Nardwuar, otherwise known as ‘Nardwuar The Human Serviette’ (no, no idea) is possibly the greatest music interviewer in history. He has interviewed EVERYONE, and his schtick is basically: a) earnest – Nardwuar is never ironic, never cynical, never anything less than 100% enthusiastic; b) informed – Nardwuar knows EVERYTHING. Seriously, each interview basically features the musicians becoming slowly more and more freaked out by the insane, almost stalker-ish, level of knowledge about them that Nardwuar displays, from their tastes to their hates, their history and their records. He might be the greatest living scholar of modern musicians, no sh1t; c) indefatigable – Nardwuar always plays it straight, even on those occasions when SOME musicians (naming no names but I think I decided that Blur were, in the main, total cnuts when I saw how they treated poor Nardwuar) decide to be mean to him, which makes some of his interviews almost unbearably poignant to watch. ANYWAY, Nardwuar is a treasure and a delight, and this chat with him about his favourite ever interviews, is just pure and gorgeous and will make you happy, I promise. Also, it is an excellent excuse to explore the Nardwuar back catalogue if you’re yet to experience him, because honestly he is a…unique talent.
  • The Thirty-Two Fouettes: A short story by Dwight Curtis about…well, sort of about ballet, but not really about that at all. I found this fascinating – I don’t know that I *liked* it, entirely, but I have reread bits of it over and over again this week and it’s stuck with me. Something very…nasty about this, in a very subtle way, and I think that’s what I am enjoying.
  • Icarus Also Flew: From the latest issue of The Fence, this has rightly been lauded as a brilliant piece of writing – Ella Fox-Martens writes about moving in with someone you’ve never met. This does not, I promise, go where you expect it to, and it is so much better for not being the piece you think it’s going to be when you start reading it.
  • The Manifesto: Last of the longreads this week is this superb short by Ilse Eskelen, about a young woman who wants to impress a boy, and it is very funny indeed and you should make yourself a cup of tea and read it right now.

By Charlie Tallott

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 27/09/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

It’s been astonishing this week to see exactly how badly a political party’s comms team can handle something – FOR FCUK’S SAKE, LABOUR PARTY COMMS PEOPLE, IT SHOULDN’T BE THIS DIFFICULT. Also, the past seven days’ succession of embarrassing revelations and gift-related gaffes have somehow managed to achieve the unthinkable and made me feel genuine pity for the PM’s kid (I’m not a monster, it’s just that, well, after seeing what Euan Blair became I’m not exactly minded to give them the benefit of the doubt), who has been roundly embarrassed to the nation which now collectively thinks of him as a fragile milquetoast who needs some sort of anechoic chamber in which to practice quadratics.

Still, it’s been fun watching people attempt to minimise all this because ‘it’s not as bad as the Tories’ – while that’s obviously true, running that line does rather make you look as though you don’t understand the first thing about the practical realities of how lobbying works and what it is that businesspeople with vested interests expect when they give generous gifts to people in positions of actual, practical power. GYAC THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE BOX AT THE EMIRATES.

Anyway, enough of this – it’s late-September, everything looks like it’s going to be exceptionally damp for approximately the next seven months, and so I am going to take a short break to vaguely-recharge what pass for my ‘batteries’ – Web Curios will return in a few weeks, probably mid-October, at which point it’s PRACTICALLY FCUKING CHRISTMAS, dear God.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you can all tell me how much you’re going to miss me if you like.

By Michael McMillan, who really doesn’t seem to have any sort of online presence at all that I can find.

YOUR FIRST MUSICAL PICK THIS WEEK IS A SELECTION OF TRACKS FRONTED BY SOME SUPERB FEMALE VOCALISTS, FROM ARETHA FRANKLIN TO JOCELYN BROWN AND ALL SORTS OF OTHERS INBETWEEN, ABLY MIXED BY TOM SPOONER!

THE SECTION WHICH IS CURRENTLY LISTENING TO BBC RADIO4 AND THEY HAVE JUST STARTED TALKING ABOUT FURRIES AND HONESTLY I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE FCUK IS HAPPENING ANYMORE, PT.1:  

  • GPT Voice: Yes, yes, I KNOW, AI is BORING and PLAYED OUT and you are all tired of this bullsh1t and are currently slumped, uncaring, in Gartner’s Trough of Disillusionment…really, though, I can’t stress enough how fcuking incredible the new voice chat feature which ChatGPT introduced to all users this week is. This is the fancy ‘hey, I talk kind of like a real human being, and I can interrupt and be interrupted, and if you ask me nicely I can affect the speech pattern and vocal style of a drunk!’ update that was announced and trailed about 4 months ago (tbh I am guessing at that timeline, I have literally lost all concept of where we are in the year; at the present point in time it feels to me like 2024 has always been happening and may well continue in perpetuity), and for reasons I can’t entirely explain I decided I would get over my inherent antipathy towards ‘talking to machines’ and install the app a couple of days ago and…yeah, honestly, it’s fcuking incredible, I can’t pretend. This feels like MAGIC – it’s natural, it’s fast, it’s close enough to human-sounding that it doesn’t feel too creepy, and I can 100% see this becoming INCREDIBLY addictive to a certain type of person. Which, to my mind, is where the interesting wrinkles sit – the very nature of LLMs means that, yes, they’re guardrailed to fcukery and will scold you if you ask them to (for example) teach you how to skin a human and dispose of their skeleton, but they are also basically primed to be helpful and agreeable and broadly concur with whatever mad sh1t you say to them – effectively like the world’s most indefatigable “yes, and?” improv partner – and as such it’s not hard to imagine this quality being particularly attractive when coupled with an easy voice interface. What’s that? An ever-present, friendly conversational companion who will basically agree with and build on whatever mad bullsh1t I say to it and which will ask me encouraging questions designed to get me to engage more? I DON’T MIND IF I DO! Seriously, I tried this on Wednesday night when I was (to be entirely transparent with you) very, very stoned and talking total nonsense and it made me feel like a SAVANT – reading the transcript back the next day proved that I very much wasn’t and that The Machine was pandering to me to a quite embarrassing extent. Basically this is incredible and quite game change-y and the sort of thing which I get the feeling is going to be quite dangerous for a small (but, globally, really fcuking massive) subset of people. Honestly, you really MUST try this (CAVEAT: it’s possible that the full voicechat experience is only available to people who shell out for a subscription, in which case apologies but I would also suggest it is totally worth signing up for a month and then immediately cancelling just to play with this, it really is that astonishing).
  • How Did You Find Me?: A website project thing by Elan Ullendorff, where the point is to share visitors’ stories of, er, how they came across the website. Which sounds dull, but has ended up meaning that the page is a collection of small vignettes, almost like little desire paths of the web, demonstrating all the different networks along which information (and so by extension hyperlinks) travel, like a sort of small ‘you are here and this is how you got here’ negative map of webspace (this makes sense in my head, but almost certainly no sense on the page; hey ho). Look, I don’t ordinarily ask you to do anything in Web Curios (or at least I don’t *think* I do – do I? Am I horribly needy? AM I TOO MUCH FOR YOU???) but I would be really grateful if you could possibly click the link and maybe tell people that you found it here? I just quite like the idea of seeing evidence of your existence, even if anonymously; it might make me feel less cripplingly alone for a few minutes (lol jk) (nothing takes the feeling away, nothing).
  • The F-List 2024: As the old Curios heads will doubtless know, this horrible mess of a newsletterblogtypething started life on the corporate website of international PR behemoths Hill & Knowlton (latterly H+K Strategies, now Burson – o, like autumnal leaves, so do the corporate identities change with the seasons!) – as such, I am aware that a not-insignificant number of the few dozen masochists who read this fcuking thing happen to work in and around the wider advermarketingpr industry. This link is for YOU, advermarketingprdrones! Clean Creatives is a campaign organisation attempting to raise awareness of which agencies in advermarketingprland are taking money to launder the reputations of the world’s biggest polluters in the form of fossil fuel clients such as Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron and the like – because they (and I) think it’s important that the wider world is aware of who is profiting from this stuff. Look, I don’t have a huge amount of moral high ground to take here – I have been employed by at least three of the companies on this list (although I have never personally worked on any energy/fossil fuel accounts) and I appreciate that, well, mortgages and food are expensive; that said, I do also believe that it’s not really ok to promote or help promote these companies in 2024 because, well, we sort of know what the direction of travel is by now, and who’s gotten us to this point, and it doesn’t really feel ok that they should be so rich. At the very least this feels like a useful resource for brands and businesses who at least want to pretend to have some ethical hard lines to use to determine which agencies NOT to employ on the basis of their own absence of professional red lines. Also, just to reiterate, Edelman spent literally YEARS laundering the reputation of the odious Sackler family – the people responsible for hooking millions and millions of people worldwide on opiates because it made them VERY RICH – so, specifically, fcuk that agency all the way into the sun and back.
  • Lynk: This is a smart application of…some LLM or another, and potentially a really useful service for those of you looking to buy stuff. You know how sh1t Google is? You know how reviews on many sites have been rendered largely useless by bots and the like? You know how it’s now accepted wisdom to append ‘reddit’ to any search where you’re seeking ‘wisdom of crowds’-type information? Well Lynk basically tries to offer a solution to all of these small modern inconveniences, by effectively adding an LLM-enabled natural language layer to searching a bunch of specific sites for product information. So you just ask it (for example) “what are the best minimalist sneakers for men?” (you use the word ‘sneakers’, however much it makes your teeth itch, because you understand that the majority of the web operates in American English and you just have to suck it up sometimes) and it comes back with a bunch of different recommendations, pulling highlights from various relevant subreddits and trainer review sites and giving you pros and cons…honestly, I was really impressed with this – admittedly I only found it this morning and as such I have conducted a grand total of ONE experimental search (the aforementioned ‘sneakers’ query), but the information it pulled up was seemingly high-quality, and I enjoyed the fact that it pulled pluses and minuses for its recommendations rather than just offering endorsements. Definitely worth a look and possibly a bookmark (but, to remind you, it will skew VERY US-centric in its recommendations which means not everything it suggests will be available where you are).
  • Battalion: I have for a year or so now been quite vocal about my general bearishness towards online video – or, more specifically, the fact that I think we are actually a VERY long way away from it being able to do anything even vaguely near broadcast quality anytime soon. Generally I am still very much of that opinion – but, equally, the past three months or so has seen a pretty staggering series of leaps in the quality of output from Runway and the like, from the ability to define start and endframes in a clip to the latest version of Kling’s introduction of tight controls to direct in-video movement. Basically you still can’t make anything that isn’t composed of ~5s shots, but those 5s shots now look considerably better than they did even a few weeks ago – the link here takes you to a tweet from some bloke (called Dave Clarke, apparently – sorry Dave) who’s made a short film called ‘Battalion’ (the link is to the first half, the second is in the followup tweet just below) about a soldier talking to a therapist about their experience of war and, look, it is not by any stretch of the imagination a ‘good piece of filmmaking’ (aside from anything else I am VERY CONFUSED about the historical timeline at play) but it is a frankly astonishing tech demo and left me thinking actually maybe the low-end videographers probably need to start retraining too. Jesus, we’re all so fcuked.
  • NotebookLM: Seeing as we’re on AI, let’s quickly mention the Google NotebookLM thing – this is Google’s ‘feed The Machine documents and interrogate them!’ service, which recently launched a feature which sounds like a gimmick and, well, sort of is, but which is equally kind of magical – you can feed this any doc you like and, if you so desire, it will create a podcast out of it, in which two ‘presenters’ will discuss the contents of the text and ‘explain’ it to you in pleasingly conversational fashion. Which, obviously, is really useful for anyone who finds it easier to ingest information aurally rather than via the medium of text/eyeballs, but also is just weirdly, surreally sort-of fun to play around with – seriously, it’s worth spending a bit of time playing with this and seeing what happens when you feed it different things; apparently if you feed it nonsense The Machine will still try and make sense of it, which can lead to some interestingly-surreal musings (but which, if you think about it too hard, leads you to some NOT ENTIRELY GREAT PLACES – hm, a conversational machine which will attempt to see patterns in meaning in anything you feed it regardless of whether any such pattern or meaning exists? WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE DANGEROUS ABOUT THAT). Seriously, try it with whatever deadly-dull corporate w4nk you’re currently being forced to pretend to care about, it’s fun. Oh, and if for whatever reason you don’t fcuk with Google, there’s an open source version of the same sort of thing here.
  • The US Election Game: Deep breath everyone, only a few short weeks to go until the Americans FINALLY SHUT UP ABOUT THEIR FCUKING DEMOCRACY (or, er, possibly consign that democracy to the dustbin of history!). If you’ve managed to maintain your interest and enthusiasm in the Presidential race to this point then, well, I salute you and your indefatigable appetite for policy-light campaigning – and, also, this link is for YOU! The Financial Times has created a small interactive ‘experience’ which they call a ‘game’ but which, I’m sorry to say, fails singularly to embody one of the core elements of any ludic pursuit, specifically ‘being any fun at all’. THIS IS SO SO SO SO SO DRY FFS! The ‘game’ element here is restricted to you, the player, deciding exactly how to prioritise campaign spending in various states so as to maximise your likelihood of gaining an overall majority – so you’re literally just stacking your metaphorical chips against Georgia or Pennsylvania or wherever and then hitting ‘VOTE!’ to see how it plays out; there’s a bit of leaderboard competition whereby you can see how well you’ve performed compared to everyone else who’s played the game and how your allocation of resources differed from the mean, but, honestly, this is pretty thin gruel  from the usually-excellent FT digital team (or at least it is for someone who is bored senseless by the whole ‘electoral college’ thing; I appreciate that if you have a deep and nuanced understanding of the US electoral process and the weighting given to different States this might be HYPER-COMPELLING, but I’d still argue that it’s about as ‘fun’ as grating your own shins).
  • Shelf: This feels like something of a throwback to…I don’t know, maybe 2011? Certainly a more hopeful time, when the idea of ‘sharing information about what we’re into with people online’ was a fun way of engaging in shared cultural experience rather than simply contributing to the the ravening algorithm swallowing the world whole. Still, if you’re feeling hopeful and positive and like maybe you can just about be fcuked to once again give the whole ‘new social platform’ thing a go here in 2024 then maybe you’ll like Shelf, an iOS-only app which hooks up to all your extant streaming services (Spotify, Netflix, etc) and posts updates about the culture you’re consuming – what TV shows you’re watching, what albums you’re streaming, etc. I quite like the realtime, no-filter nature of this – you can’t lie about exclusively listening to early period Animal Collective when your Spotify’s snitching about your repeat plays of The Thong Song – and I do like the light touch ‘oh, that looks interesting, I might check that out too if so-and-so likes it’ recommendation engine possibilities, but, equally, I can also appreciate that it feels a bit, well…open and I don’t know whether we’re really into sharing like this anymore in THE MODERN ERA. Are we?
  • Ray Cathode: I don’t have the first idea what is going on here, but this YouTube channel seems to be collecting a wonderful trove of VERY ODD videos – we have a bunch of recent uploads of Divine David vids, a 1969 experimental film called ‘The Perils of Priscilla’, an arthouse short about ‘a cat lost in the big city’ (no, really), and a TERRIFYING-looking Japanese (I think) sketch show (I think) called ‘Vermillion Pleasure Night’ which I am 100% going back to watch when I am finished writing this because it looks frankly insane. None of these vids have more than 100ish views, and I am VERY curious as to what is going on with this channel and what the overall curatorial vibe is beyond ‘weird’, because the vibes are all over the place.
  • Food Reference: You know how foodie newsletter/website Vittles is basically the ultimate culinary hipster signifier (at least in the UK)? Well Food Reference is basically its antonym; this has been going since 1999(!) and is…a very unpretentious and VERY oldschool site featuring information and, oddly, ‘trivia’ about food, and it has over 20,000(!) pages, and it’s all compiled and maintained by one person, the ASTONISHINGLY DEDICATED James T Ehler (THANKYOU JAMES!) and as ever with these things this is some proper web history and I am thrilled that it still exists.
  • Blocked In China: This is really interesting – a project which shows you sites that are being blocked by the Great Firewall. “GFWeb is a measurement platform capable of testing hundreds of millions of domains monthly, enabling the continuous monitoring of the Great Firewall’s HTTP(S) filtering behavior. The newly censored domains discovered by GFWeb provide a useful insight into China’s information control policies. This project is a result of an academic collaboration between researchers from the University of British Columbia, University of Chicago, the Citizen Lab at University of Toronto, Carnegie Mellon University, SRI International, and Stony Brook University.” It’s the very definition of ‘unappealing’ – the design is…not exactly engaging, it’s fair to say, and the UX isn’t exactly pleasant – but it’s worth having a dig because there’s something fascinating about seeing exactly what domains the Party currently deems unsuitable for the good citizens of the people’s republic; you can read a bit more about it on Rest of World if you’re interested. By the way, as I just discovered by curiously typing in a url and unexpectedly finding myself on what appears to be a modern-day Polish version of Ogrish, there are some BAD WEBSITES on that list so, er, don’t do what I just did unless you want to possibly see some really really really horrible things Jesus Christ my EYES.
  • Godchecker: Via Blort, whose site turned 20 this week which is a fcuking incredible anniversary and puts by 14-ish years of webspaffing to shame frankly, comes this database of deities – a DEITIBASE, if you will!!!! Sorry. Anyway, if you want to know about Gods then, well, this is the website for you! Another one that’s been going a preposterously long time, this is actually rather fun – I particularly like the search function which allows you to find out which Gods in the pantheon are associated with specific things and which just informed me that there is in fact a Roman goddess associated with door hinges, which is just perfectly ludicrous and has made me momentarily very happy indeed.
  • A Year In An Instant: I love this. A project from 2015/2016 by one Nunho Coelho Santos, who documented a year of his life in photographic form, one photo a day, on this website. “Between the 29th of September of 2015 and the 28th September of 2016, I will capture an instant photo and describe the every day occurrences while living in Japan. Up until day 64 the camera used for this diary was a Fujifilm Instax 300 Wide and from that day onwards all photos were taken with a Lomo’Instant Wide. Both these cameras use Fujifilm’s Instax Wide Film (86 by 108mm).” Each photo is accompanied by a small caption giving a tiny bit of context for the shot, but otherwise this is just a year in one person’s life, told in photos, and I adore it.
  • Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2024: Amazing photos of space. No, really, these are INCREDIBLE. It’s worth clicking through into each individual category to see all the nominated entries rather than just the winners, because these are some truly astonishing images. WE ARE SO SMALL AND INSIGNIFICANT, as if you needed telling. LOOK AT THE GALAXIES FFS!
  • Meta Leaks: I am…a touch conflicted about this one; as a general rule I try not to include links by people who are obviously dealing with one or two ‘issues’ or which present symptoms of schizophrenia, but, equally, sometimes there are things so bizarre that it feels appropriate to bring them to the attention of a wider audience. So it is with MetaLeaks, which is either a collection of…somewhat delusional conspiracies encompassing a quite dizzying array of topics and sources, or someone who is perhaps the only person in the world right now who REALLY understands what’s going on. YOU DECIDE! “The name Metaleaks is an obvious play on the name Wikileaks. Wikileaks is an organisation which, as we know, uncovers documents which are not particularly revelatory and which do not add substantially to the public’s knowledge of the crimes of government and which it then leaks. Metaleaks on the other hand pertains to the leaking of a series of communications by the British government which: a) Are based upon a collation of metadata which, for the most part, is geographical in nature; b) Form the basis of international events which are entirely criminal in nature. The word criminal encompasses crimes against humanity. As a result of collating such metadata, one can uncover information which is far more significant than anything that has been provided thusfar by individuals such as Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.” Seriously, this is QUITE the thing.

By Stuart Pearson Wright

NEXT, WHY NOT ENJOY THE BEAUTIFUL NEW ALBUM BY ERLAND COOPER WHICH IS A GORGEOUS BIT OF MODERN CLASSICAL COMPOSITION AND WHICH I REALLY DO RECOMMEND VERY HIGHLY INDEED!

THE SECTION WHICH IS CURRENTLY LISTENING TO BBC RADIO4 AND THEY HAVE JUST STARTED TALKING ABOUT FURRIES AND HONESTLY I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE FCUK IS HAPPENING ANYMORE, PT.2:  

  • The Social Web Foundation: Ok, this is a bit roughage-y, but if you’re interested in the concept of the Fediverse and all that jazz then you should probably be at least aware of this newly-launched organisation. It’s self-defined mission is “growing, healthy, financially viable and multi-polar Fediverse”, and it’s going to work on a bunch of initiatives designed to help educate people as to what the Fediverse is and how to get involved with it, as well as a bunch of more technical/operational stuff around making the ecosystem better; if you’re That Sort Of Person, then they would probably appreciate you getting in touch and offering to help out.
  • TinkerCad: “Tinkercad is a free web app for 3D design, electronics, and coding” says the site blurb – which is entirely true, that’s exactly what it is. It also, though, features a ‘physics’ mode which lets you build things in the designer and then apply the laws of nature to them, meaning you can actually use this as a weird little kinetic sandbox toy and which is how I found myself wasting a good 15 minutes yesterday when I was meant to be writing about AI and jobs (lol, we are SO FCUKED!) and instead spent the time making an elaborate domino rally-type experience in virtual space and repeatedly knocking the dominos over and laughing like some sort of vaguely-troubled, massive child.
  • Social Communication: This is really interesting – a resource produced by Truman State University in the US and designed as a series of resources for people who perhaps have difficulty with ‘normal’ social interactions and communication and may therefore need some assistance in parsing the cues and mores of what passes for ‘polite society’. Per the ‘about’ section, “This site is written directly for you, the person with social communication challenges. We hope you find it useful. (If you are someone else, please see the notes intended for different audiences below.) It’s not just people with autism or nonverbal learning disorder or social anxiety disorder who have social communication problems, but lots of intelligent people who have spent their lives with their noses in books or faces fixed firmly on the computer screen or doing other solitary activities.  Most of the people who get labeled “nerd” or “geek” have social communication challenges. So we’re not really interested in whether you have any sort of diagnosis, or if, like Sheldon, your mammas had you tested.The only assumption we tried to make about you is that you’re a competent speaker of English, reasonably intelligent, not a young child, probably somewhat frustrated by persistent miscommunications and therefore interested in learning more about how most Americans interpret social signals. (A lot of what is written here will be relevant for other English-speaking countries, but there will be some cultural differences.)” Now, I am not for a SECOND assuming anything about the potential likely readership of a massively-overlong weekly newsletter about ‘quite geeky stuff on the internet’, I’m just leaving this here for ENTIRELY-UNRELATED reasons.
  • Bird Photographer of the Year 2024: I feel I ought to open with a slight warning here, because while you might expect the winning image in a contest entitled ‘bird photographer of the year’ would be one celebrating, I don’t know, the beauty of avian flight, say, or the glorious plumage and colours of a tropical species, this year the judges have decided to award the big gong to what is a photo of several thousand very dead birds, and as such the first thing you’re confronted with on clicking is, well, DEAD THINGS. Ngl, bit jarring (although it is a very striking image – on reflection, an infelicitous choice of word on my part as you will realise when you click through and see exactly what the image is depicting). Anyway, scroll past the corpses and you’ll see LOADS of nice pictures of birds in happier, significantly less dead, times – there’s one shot of a penguin inside a wave which is particularly impressive.
  • Jamstart: This is a nice idea; Jumpstart hooks up to your Spotify account and presents you with guitar tabs for whatever you’re listening to, the idea being that you can play along as you listen – there’s a subscription layer to this, but there’s also a free tier meaning you can play around with it a bit and see what you think; I am, per previous Curios, completely musically talentless and as such have no idea if this works or is any good but, well, what the fcuk do you want from me? I just bring you the links ffs, you want me to chew your food for you as well? Jesus.
  • The Bellingcat OSINT Toolkit: This is quite the resource – pioneers of the whole ‘anyone can investigate anything thanks to the web’ thing, Bellingcat, this week launched the latest version of their online investigation toolkit designed to offer anyone the tools they need to…well, investigate stuff. You want tools to help you find information on individuals and businesses? You want stuff to help you identify location data from images? You want a frankly slightly-terrifying selection of tools to help you track people down across every single platform you can possibly conceive of? GREAT! Per their writeup, “Have you ever struggled to find a tool that does exactly what you need? Do you know the feeling of spending hours trying to figure out how to use a tool just to realise that the key features you are interested in are not working anymore, or that the previously free product has turned into a paid one that is more expensive than you can afford? You are not alone. More than 80 percent of open source researchers that participated in two Bellingcat surveys indicated that finding the right tools can be challenging. This is where our new Online Investigations Toolkit comes in: it not only helps you discover tools in categories like satellite imagery and maps, social media, transportation or archiving, but is also designed to help researchers learn how to use each tool by providing in-depth descriptions, common use cases and information on requirements and limitations for each toolkit entry.” This is, broadly, A Good Thing, though I couldn’t help but think as I was writing the description that many of these tools could equally be used for…potentially quite creepy purposes. Still, let’s not think about that, it will make us sad.
  • Francesco D’Isa: I’ve used one of this artist’s images in Curios this week, but wanted to include a specific link to their website and work because this is one of the more interesting examples of AI art I’ve seen in recent years; while the images are generated by Midjourney or Stable Diffusion, they’re then manipulated in such a way that they don’t *quite* have that by-now-typical ‘AI image’ sheen/vibe to them, and as such these work as artworks in a way in which I don’t typically feel that the machine ‘originals’ do; your mileage will of course vary, but I do rather like these.
  • Panels: You may have seen this week that the world’s most famous ‘tech influencer’, YouTuber Marques Brownlee, has this week LAUNCHED AN APP! You might also have seen people clowning on it because, well, it’s fcuking dogsh1t! This is the app – Panels is a very odd throwback to c.2011, offering you the opportunity to, er, subscribe and receive WALLPAPER IMAGES FOR YOUR PHONE! Yes, that’s right, you can pay an already-rich man a monthly stipend in order to access a selection of bland-looking vaguely-abstract digital images which are seemingly indistinguishable from every single other tasteful, HD image that comes up when you just put ‘hi res phone wallpaper’ into Google. WHO IS THIS FOR? WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT IT? And yet, as Garbage Ryan pointed out this week, people are downloading this quite a lot, which suggests that a) there are a lot of people who really don’t understand how ‘searching for stuff’ online works, which I find baffling; b) who don’t realise that this is one of the usecases where AI image generators are actually pretty good; c) really, really love Marques Brownlee and want to keep him in boxfresh kicks. I did for a moment this week try and imagine what sort of app I might make for YOU, loyal reader of Curios, but the resulting ideas got VERY dark very quickly and I think it’s probably best if I don’t share them with you for all our collective sanities.
  • Tripmates: This is a PR/promo/linkbait thing by money saving portal HotDealsUK – which has evidently worked as I am linking to it here! Well done, HotDealsUK! Still, this does look legitimately useful and is the sort of thing that if I were in my 20s and of an age where I still went on holiday with friends (rather than in my 40s and of an age where all my friends have selfishly had fcuking children and for some reason seem less keen on me tagging along and smoking at their darling progeny) I would probably find really useful. This basically lets you send an anonymous survey to everyone who might go on a group holiday, letting them specify what they want from the experience (amenities, facilities, pricepoint, etc) in a SAFE SPACE, without getting into a p1ssy argument with Tracey about whether or not ‘300 inflatable flamingos’ is a non-negotiable; it also helps with tricky conversations around budgets without anyone having to feel like the embarrassing povvo in the room, which feels like A Good Thing.
  • Gobi: This week’s “Oh, an AI product that made a small part of my soul wither and die when I first saw it!” link is Gobi, which bills itself as “your lifelong well-being partner”, a phrase so utterly miserable that I just had to take myself to the bathroom and give myself a pep talk in the mirror before being able to come back and continue typing. This is exactly the sort of service that is going to be steamrollered by a big LLM model in the next year or so – why the fcuk do you need a separate app when you can do exactly the same thing by voicechatting with ChatGPT (or Claude, or Nazi Nick your personally-trained on-phone instance of LLama!) – but I am more interested in what it’s promising and what the offer is. Per the blurb, “Gobi works as your AI companion, continuously learning from your daily interactions to support your overall well-being. It checks in with you regularly, engaging in conversations to understand your current state, track your moods, activities, and challenges. Using this information, Gobi provides 24/7 personalized support by offering wellness tips, and real-time insights. Over time, Gobi evolves with you, adjusting its recommendations and insights to better fit your needs, ensuring you always have the right tools to enhance your well-being.” On the homepage there are a series of ‘real world usecase examples’, one of which shows the app asking ‘how is your date going? Need any help?’ which is SO FCUKING RIDICULOUS – I mean, what’s the app going to do if you tell it your date is a cnut and you hate the sound when he chews? – but I can’t help but be slightly discomfited by how obviously this tech is being sold to us as ‘the friend we never knew we needed’ (more of which in the longreads, should you be interested in this particularly miserable line of enquiry).
  • Spotlist: This is an interesting adjunct to the boom in CURATION which I have read a frankly tedious amount about in the past year – you’re doubtless aware that people giving their recommendations for EVERYTHING is the new hotness in newsletterland; well Spotlist is an web version of that, which encourages you to make your own personally-curated lists of ‘stuff I think is good’ across any number of categories, share them with your network and, possibly, monetise them! There’s something quite horrible about this, to my mind – not the ‘recommendations’ thing but the fact that this is very clearly coming at it from the point of view not of ‘share things you like’ but of ‘monetise your interests! Become an influencer!’ which, honestly, is miserable. Also, this wants you to pay a fee to make your recommendations public, which suggests to me it’s doomed to failure and irrelevance, and I have to say I’m not exactly sad about that.
  • Meco: This is interesting – not wholly novel, but I can imagine some of you might find it of use/interest. Meco is an app (web and iOS, Android coming soon) which basically acts as a separate home for all your newsletters, sparing your inbox from clutter and creating a digital space for ‘ignoring web curios every seven days’ – all your newsletters sit in one place, you can make notes and clip bits from them in a dedicated ‘notes’ bit of the app, it will do audio summaries of that day’s missives should you so desire, and there’s a bit of recommendation engine stuff in there too; personally I don’t need another fcuking platform to look at, but for those of you who don’t mind having to open 37 different apps to manage your life then this might be of interest.
  • 15 Minute Cities: Presuming you’re not some sort of chemtrail-bothering, Soros-hating microchip conspiracist (and if you are, how the fcuk did you end up here?), you will probably appreciate the broad concept of the 15-minute city as a sensible approach to urban living; this site is a really useful resource which offers information about cities worldwide and how closely they cleave to the 15 minute ideal. You can search for a specific city or instead navigate using the map view; the data’s surprisingly granular, so if you’re looking at (for example) moving to a new place, this is a really useful way of gauging how convenient or otherwise access to essential amenities will be (or how much you’re going to be controlled by the NEFARIOUS, CONTROLLING SUPERSTATE, either/or).
  • What Came First?: A little game from Google which basically slightly rips off a bunch of other, slightly more fun, timeline-based games from years past, but which I’m going to give a pass to because, well, I sort of love Google Arts and Culture a bit. You’re presented with two things, and you just have to pick WHICH CAME FIRST in history – you get three lives, and you have to try and get as many points as possible. Some of the juxtapositions are quite nice – was Hugh Jackman born before or after All About Eve was released in cinemas? – and generally this is a nice, gentle way to spend five minutes while you wait for the kettle to boil or contemplate your own inevitable senescence.
  • Guess The Game: This is, to my mind, fcuking IMPOSSIBLE, but you may have a better and deeper knowledge of videogames than me. You’re presented with six details from a game screenshot in turn, and with each one you’re invited to guess the title – each wrong guess sees you given a new screenshot and a new nugget of info (metacritic score, release year, genre, etc) to theoretically help you along, but, honestly, the details you get shown are so zoomed-in that this is far too hard for my simple, non-visual brain.
  • Alphaguess: Guess the word each day by narrowing down its position in the dictionary – each guess sees you get told whether the actual word you’re looking for comes before or after your guess in the dictionary, and you use this to slowly narrow down your options. This is surprisingly fun, although today’s is proving irritatingly hard and so I am in something of a sulk with the site at present.
  • Echo Chess: The final game this week is this excellent little daily puzzler loosely based on chess – thankfully for me, though, the world’s least-competent chess player, you don’t actually need to be any good at the game to be able to play this. I can’t be bothered to try and explain it – yes, ok, in part this is laziness on my part, but it’s just easier to play and pick up, honest – but I promise you it’s fun and you might want to add it to your daily rotation.

By Francesco D’Isa

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS THIS GENUINELY ODD BUT SURPRISINGLY ACTUALLY REALLY GOOD SELECTION OF TRACKS MIXED FROM THE AUDIO THAT USED TO ACCOMPANY THE PROCESSION OF CEEFAX PAGES THAT WERE SHOWN ON TELLY IN THE DEAD HOURS WHEN THERE WAS NO PROGRAMMING ON AND WHICH ENDS UP BEING A REALLY GOOD SORT OF VAPOURWAVE ALBUM WHICH I HIGHLY RECOMMEND! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS IS EMPTY!

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Riders NYC: A newish Insta feed, via Kottke, where photographer Adam DiCarlo snaps bike riders as they emerge from one end of the Williamsburg bridge in NY. So far only one of the photos depicts someone who looks EXACTLY what you’d imagine someone cycling over the Williamsburg bridge to look like, but give it time.
  • Aurore: Smut! Actual smut, on Insta! Aurore is, I think, an ‘erotic magazine’ or journal or something – I have just checked, it is! You have to pay $70 a year but there seems to be loads of filth on there if ‘literary erotica’ is your thing, and it seems very femme-focused – and this is its Insta feed, which I am including mainly because I didn’t realise you could get away with this sort of stuff on a Meta-owned platform. Not QUITE full nudity, but definitely a bit closer to it than most of what you see there. TASTEFUL PROTOBONGO!
  • Synthetic Pink: Via former editor Paul comes this Insta feed of genuinely unpleasant – no, really, I am not joking, this stuff is really quite viscerally horrible – AI-generated images, which you will OBVIOUSLY recognise from last week’s longread from Sean Monaghan about the new AI aesthetic. I can’t stress enough, these are REALLY REALLY NOT NICE TO LOOK AT (obviously I love them).

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The Collapse of Self-Worth in the Digital Age: I am pretty sure I have bored you all with my broad ‘one of the major problems of the past few years has been the general trend across every single aspect of human life to prioritise the quantitative over the qualitative’ rant at various points over the past few months, but let me once again point you towards an article that I think neatly-encapsulates what we lose when everything is data and everything can and should be optimised. Here Thea Lim writes about how it feels when everything is data, and what it does to human experience when we quantify every aspect of human experience. “What we hardly talk about is how we’ve reorganized not just industrial activity but any activity to be capturable by computer, a radical expansion of what can be mined. Friendship is ground zero for the metrics of the inner world, the first unquantifiable shorn into data points: Friendster testimonials, the MySpace Top 8, friending. Likewise, the search for romance has been refigured by dating apps that sell paid-for rankings and paid access to “quality” matches. Or, if there’s an off-duty pursuit you love—giving tarot readings, polishing beach rocks—it’s a great compliment to say: “You should do that for money.” Join the passion economy, give the market final say on the value of your delights. Even engaging with art—say, encountering some uncanny reflection of yourself in a novel, or having a transformative epiphany from listening, on repeat, to the way that singer’s voice breaks over the bridge—can be spat out as a figure, on Goodreads or your Spotify year in review. And those ascetics who disavow all socials? They are still caught in the network. Acts of pure leisure—photographing a sidewalk cat with a camera app or watching a video on how to make a curry—are transmuted into data to grade how well the app or the creators’ deliverables are delivering. If we’re not being tallied, we affect the tally of others. We are all data workers.” I really do think that this speaks to a fundamental truth; that data-led living and optimisation HAS MADE US LESS HAPPY. Sometimes an unoptimised life is a better life, is all.
  • The Sam Altman Blogpost: I don’t know about you, but I can’t bring myself to care about corporate drama at OpenAI – that said, I did find this week’s blogpost by Sam Altman interesting and worth sharing. This is basically his latest rallying cry and feels very much designed as a ‘hey potential investors, the magic AGI woowoo is DEFINITLEY COMING!’ pitch, but there were a few other points of interest. The whole ‘we’re getting to AGI in a few thousand days’ line is interesting, mainly because if you stop and think for 0.3s you realise that that’s at least 5-6 years, which is NOT SOON and also is a promise that means literally nothing because, well, it’s just speculation and even Altman then caveats it with ‘it might take longer actually lol’ – it does rather feel like Elon Musk confidently predicting full self-driving every year since 2014. The other thing that caused me pause as I was reading was the airy, almost throwaway, line about the carnage that this tech is going to inflict on the global jobs market (not to mention all the other potential ways in which the tech could go wrong, be misused, etc etc) – “It will not be an entirely positive story”. OH REALLY SAM, TELL ME MORE ABOUT ALL THE WAYS IN WHICH YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THAT IT WILL FCUK PEOPLE AND THINGS. He then goes on to say that, effectively, any form of short-term pain will be worth it for the longer-term gains that AGI will DEFINITELY bring – and there’s your effective altruism, longtermist philosophy, kids! I really, really don’t want this man to become one of the world’s richest and most powerful people, but, equally, I worry that that ship sailed a few years ago.
  • The Zuckerberg Interview: Your second ‘genuinely chiling set of pronouncements from a tech billionaire’ piece of the week! This is Mark Zuckerberg doing his annual interview with The Verge to accompany the big Meta announcement day – it really is worth reading all of this because FCUK ME is it miserableand chilling. In case you weren’t paying attention, yesterday was about two things – the future of AI wearables, specifically glasses and a whole bunch of other AI stuff coming to all of Meta’s platforms whether or not you give a fcuk. The interview, though, is far more interesting from a ‘Zuckerbergian worldview’ point of view – there’s a bit of continued pushback against the idea of Meta having any responsibility for, well, anything really, specifically teen mental health (and look, I don’t buy the Jonathan Haidt hysteria but equally I think the position here – that this is all rubbish! Insta makes people, especially young girls, feel great! – is fcuking bullshit and directly contradicted by previously-leaked bits of Meta’s own research), but to my mind the REALLY miserable bit is when he talks about the introduction of AI features and the move to introduce more AI-generated content into your various feeds. “The average person, maybe they’d like to have 10 friends, and there’s the stat that — it’s sort of sad — the average American feels like they have fewer than three real close friends. So does this take away from that? My guess is no. I think that what’s going to happen is it’s going to help give people more of the support that they need.” Am I the only person who finds this vision of the future – lonely people tapping on their phones, sharing their fears and hopes with bots because they simply don’t have enough human connection in their lives – incredibly fcuking sad, and something that perhaps we might want to NOT run towards at a million miles an hour? Not Mark, evidently. I have said it before, but fcuk geeks all the way into the sun, you have been in charge for decades now and you are making it worse, can we have the fcuking jocks back in charge please?
  • Why Mars Needs A Creative Director: A palette cleanser for you now – thanks to Alex Burley for bringing this to my attention. It’s on the website of that ‘creative technology VC’ outfit I linked to last week, and is…fcuk, it’s ASTONISHING, this, one of the most ridiculous things I have read in YEARS and a wonderful example of something which from a distance looks almost like it makes sense but which when you get up close you realise is actually just words arranged in a formation that looks like it means something but which really, really doesn’t. I quite want to quote all of this to you, but I think you should just go in with the premise that this is literally all about how one might go about ‘creative directing’ the planet of Mars (yes, I know), and contains many, many paragraphs like this one: “Mars, and the vehicle-of-thought-that-is-Mars, is going to look far more like a string of Vatican cities tied to Singapores than it’s going to look like, you know, the United States plot on Mars with Little Italy next to Tokyo Town. Those aren’t the structures we’re going to orient spatially around.” These people administer MILLIONS OF DOLLARS of investment budget. They are, evidently, fcuking morons. WHY IS THE WORLD LIKE THIS???
  • My AI Lover Cheated On Me: Not ‘mine’, you understand, but instead a number of people in China, interviewed for the Southern Weekly newspaper and here informally-translated into a GDoc by Jeffrey Ding. This is SO interesting – the translation’s not always perfect (no shade to Jeffrey, my Cantonese isn’t up to much so glass houses really) but it’s fascinating to read the accounts of the relationships users have formed with the bots and the evident distress they feel when the bots decide, for whatever reason, that they’re not that into their human lovers any more. This feels very much like the premise for a Tingler – “Cucked By My AI Top!” – and I really liked the section where they talk to tech people about why this might be happening and conclude that it’s basically a sort of engagement hack on the part of the software. UNEXPECTED WRINKLES IN THE MACHINE.
  • Corporate Psychedelia: Ok, this is a BIT dry, but I found it an interesting look at the way Big Pharma has leapt on the evidence that ketamine and other psychedelics can be useful tools in the treatment of depression, and how in so doing is systematically making treatments more expensive and less-efficacious. THANKS, BIG PHARMA!
  • A Deep-Dive Into Balenciaga: I am basically anti-fashion and as such this was a *bit* alien to me, but this is generally a really interesting exploration of the Balenciaga brand over the past few years, and the wider cultural landscape within which it sits in terms of fashion brands, and, more generally, about how crossovers and the like function in terms of meaning, signifiers and semiotics (sorry, but): “Erewhon, Ebay, Offset, Arca, Skinheads – anything could be frictionlessly interpolated into Balenciaga. At peak relevance, the brand’s instagram was essentially a collection of random clouted individuals wearing self-styled looks sent to them in the mail. These selfies produced a cast of characters and presented an exceptionally laissez faire form of clout bombing. This was meme logic, using a brand as a deep fryer that could add a layer of ironic detachment to everything. In doing so, Balenciaga was tuned to the internet, using these new codes to attract the hyper culturally literate and illiterate alike. For the illiterate, the end results were simply fire. For the hyperliterate, it was like being let in on a secret, a dynamic.”
  • A Timeline of Fashion Online: Vaguely-related to the above, this is a really interesting look back at the evolution of online fashion commentary and coverage presented in timeline fashion and covering all of the beats you’d expect, from The Sartorialist to the emergence of Tavi Gevinson and everything inbetween, spurred by the sensation that there’s a bit of a ‘we’re back where we started’ thanks to the proliferation of FashionStacks. “To properly address the question, “Is blogging back?” though, it felt necessary to go back to the beginning. Below is an attempt to follow a line from where it all started to where we are now, speaking to key players along the way to fill in the blanks. The result is a brief, relatively incomplete history of online fashion fandom. It’s also a picture of how we’ve always been, and perhaps forever will be, at the mercy of constantly evolving technology. New platforms emerge, and for better or worse, they allow for new voices to be heard—and new ways to make money. Were online fashion stans—the Youtubers and the TikTokers and the meme-makers and the Twitterati—the ones who ousted Virginie Viard from Chanel this summer? Maybe. The answer’s not “No,” which would have been unthinkable ten years ago. Fashion fans have arguably never been more powerful. They overtook the machine. But they’re also arguably still stuck inside it, trying to blog and post their way through it but never quite out.”
  • Branding Food: Fascinating piece on Its Nice That about the challenges of creating a brand for food products that are from a particular nation or culture, and how to do so in a way which feels authentic but not cliched, representative but not patronising, that signifies a place or people without at the same time descending into tropes. This is all stuff I had obviously never thought about before what with being an almost-entirely non-visual person, but it’s properly interesting. “Even when first-generation immigrants, rather than big corporations, are the ones selling, and branding, the traditional foods of their culture, they often face the challenge of expressing their personal experiences alongside broader cultural motifs. Significant difficulty lies in the expectation that a single individual can accurately represent an entire culture. For example, an individual from Ghana might struggle to represent not only their specific experience but also to encapsulate the diverse cultures of West Africa or even the entire continent in a way that resonates with both those outside and within the region. During a chat with the founder of Super Spicy Studio, designer Badal Patel, she shares how much pressure she feels trying to “do justice to your culture”. As she puts it: “I am human. I’ve never asked to be a token South Asian designer. It does freak me out — and it’s not something I take lightly.””
  • Why Do Men Comment On Bongo Sites?: I mean, do we? Apparently so, according to this article (and also according to this subReddit), which speaks to some of the people leaving their considered opinions under videos such as ‘seven way anal buffet’. There is a lot to love about this, but I would particularly like any journalists reading this (I KNOW SOME OF YOU DO EVEN THOUGH YOU DON’T LIKE TO ADMIT IT) to PLEASE pitch a longform interview with UK-based commenter ‘Sir C0ck Connoisseur’ because, honestly, I really want to read it and I can’t be the only one. Seriously, read this extract and tell me that you don’t want a whole interview with this man – there is a LOT to unpack here: “ The Connoisseur started commenting on Pornhub in 2021, shortly after he lost his job during the pandemic. “I had a passion for writing, but what form it would take I wasn’t sure. I could never find something that fully engaged me,” he says. “Then I found this.” He’s since reviewed 185 videos on the website, including a clip called “Group Blowjob Racing” (which leads with the opener: “I tell you lads, it is a rare day indeed when I come across a piece of filth so entertaining that I simply forget to have a w4nk!”), and “Big-T1ttied Japanese teenager sucking on a c0ck” (which he ranked a 5/10 due to the male performer being, in Sir C0ck Connoisseur’s view, “woefully underequipped”). He estimates he leaves a comment about two or three times a week, spending about 30-40 minutes on each one.” I MEAN SERIOUSLY THIS IS A PULITZER-WINNING PIECE WAITING TO BE WRITTEN SOMEONE PITCH THIS IMMEDIATELY.
  • Looks Matter: This is unrelated to the week’s unhinged Rooney discourse (no, you can look it up yourself, I am too tired and it is too annoying) but feels sort of tangentially-linked to it in a way – in the New Statesman, Amelia Tait writes on the way in which, to quote her, “we live in a world where self-care and skincare have becoming synonymous” and in which it’s increasingly hard to find women in their 30s who haven’t already leapt on the botox train, and in which, despite the fact that we’re seemingly significantly more accepting of physical difference and diversity than we were in the bad old days of the 80s and 90s, we’re still imposing beauty standards mandated by a massive capitalist machine – just slightly different ones is all.
  • Clowns: No, not the sort that people pretend to be afraid of – this is about the wave of classically-trained clowns who are expanding the medium into comedy, theatre and other forms, changing the definition of what ‘clowning’ is and what it means. This is super-interesting, and features Natalie Palamides who is 100% one of the funniest and most talented performers I have ever seen, and who I have even forgiven for that time I went to see her show ‘Nate’ at the Soho Theatre and she got me up on stage and made me wrestle her, which ended with me basically bodyslamming her onto the floor and feeling INCREDIBLY guilty about it for the rest of the evening (Natalie Palamides, to be clear, has no idea who I am and will have no clue about this weird guilt memory of mine).
  • Round The Table:  Tassos Stevens is a friend of mine and a hugely-talented man; he runs a theatre company called Coney, who make…experiences, I suppose is the best way of explaining them (although I should probably just go with their website which says ‘interactive theatre, games and adventures’) – this is a post on Tassos’ newsletter about how he set up and ran an ‘experience’-type thing which involved recruiting people to be secret agents and getting them to go on a SECRET MISSION in a central London location. It’s both a rough explanation of how you might go about logistically organising something like this, and an exploration of the things that you can do with play as a mechanism, the things that get unlocked within and between people when you give them a ludic environment to explore.
  • An Interview With Piers Morgan: Piers Morgan is a cnut and I hate him and ordinarily I wouldn’t bother linking to an interview with the man because, well, give a fcuk what he thinks about anything, but this is written by Oli Franklin Wright who’s a very good journalist and whose profiles are always excellent, and while I can’t pretend I didn’t spend the majority of my time with this article imagining what it would be like to repeatedly slap Piers across his fat chops with a trout, it also contains a lot of really interesting talk about the media industry, about ragebait, and about the colossal, almost planetary ego of a single very pink human being.
  • Dad In The Machine: This is fascinating and weird and very sad and SO MODERN AND SO FUTURE. Imagine you’re looking at some AI-generated images and all of a sudden you realise that one of them includes your dead father – that would be weird, wouldn’t it? Well, actually, yes it would, as Sara Burningham writes in Slate. “Our place and our rights in this new world of artificial neural networks lie beyond certainty, inflected with the unknowable. We are not wise. We do not know where it all comes from. I can’t even prove this picture of my dad is a picture of my dad. There are some minor differences, like the line of the beard, the shape of the glasses—but when I texted the picture to my brothers, each responded, “WTAF,” or words to that effect. This is unmistakably him. And at the same time, I’m pretty sure that’s not enough evidence to sue anyone, if there even is anyone to sue. Is there anyone to sue? To whom should I address the cease and desist?”
  • Eating at Alchemist: One of those wonderful ‘we review an insane restaurant that you are probably never going to go to so that you can imagine how batsh1t it is’ pieces – this is about Alchemist in Copenhagen, very much a ‘restaurant as performance space’ kind of vibe; you can get the measure of it from the intro para (it only gets odder): “Rasmus Munk, the celebrated Danish chef, has such memorable eyes—they are a piercing blue, and often bloodshot—that when a waiter at Alchemist, his restaurant in Copenhagen, served me an eyeball, I recognized it immediately. The iris was flecked with brown and rimmed with red, and the eye stared up at me unwaveringly, at least until I picked up a long-handled spoon and dug in. It had a gleaming gelatinous surface and was both salty and creamy, with a surprisingly nubby texture and a distinct taste of—what was it?—shrimp.” It’s interesting that I came to the end of this thinking that it sounded fascinating but also that there was not a single dish described in the piece that I actually wanted to eat.
  • I’m in Bed With a Man and a Cat Named Hussy and I Miss My Wife: Weirdly this is the second piece in as many weeks about polyamory (this is coincidental, I promise you) – I enjoyed this a lot, even though it’s very much not my normal sort of thing, as a piece of writing about love and desire and the ways in which we can’t really legislate for either.
  • Contraband Marginalia: I adored this piece, by a librarian working in the US correctional system, about the ways in which books are repurposed within prisons to act as diaries, methods of communication, sites of protest…beautiful, sad and not-sad at the same time.
  • About Lucy: Finally this week, a short story by Emily Waugh, about…actually, no, just read this one, it’s gorgeous and worth ten minutes of your time, I promise.

By Kasia Mrożewska

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 20/09/24

Reading Time: 33 minutes

I ought to be in Slovenia right now, hanging out with nice internet people and thinking about nice internet things, but instead I am in my kitchen in London, in my pants, a bit tired and hungover and generally feeling quite resentful at the fact that things like ‘needing to earn money to eat’ have prevented me from travelling to Naive Yearly. To all those of you who are there today, I hope you have fun – but not too much, so as to assuage my feelings of bitter jealousy and mild resentment.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you could at least pretend to be grateful that I’ve spaffed out yet another one of these for your delectation (what do you mean ‘I didn’t ask for this, why must you continue to foist this sh1t on me?).

By Alejandro Peters

START THIS WEEK’S WEB CURIOS EXPERIENCE WITH THE BLEEPS, BLOOPS AND BEATS OF FORMER EDITOR PAUL’S LATEST TECH-TRANCE MIX! 

THE SECTION WHICH SUGGESTS YOU ALL USE THE FACECAM LINK BELOW TO MESS WITH THE HEADS OF ANY ELDERLY RELATIVES YOU MAY HAVE LEFT UNDER THE GUISE OF ‘TRAINING THEM TO SPOT SCAMS’, PT.1:  

  • Social AI: So I have to confess that this is a link I haven’t *actually* tried myself, what with it being an iOS-only app and me being the sort of person who, if I’m honest, finds the whole ‘cult of Apple’ thing deeply distressing and who therefore has a personal ‘no, fcuk off, I am not joining your weird fetishistic club’ policy to all of the company’s devices. Still, I feel confident in saying that it is EITHER a brilliant piece of satire on the self-obsessed social media age of personal branding OR simply the saddest app that has ever been conceived of – YOU DECIDE! Social AI is another ‘social media, but the profiles are AI’ app – except this one’s seemingly JUST FOR ONE USER. You create an account, you post your updates…and all that happens is you get a seemingly-infinite stream of LLM-generated responses from a seemingly-infinite collection of fake profiles. I think it’s worth reproducing the ‘features’ list from the App Store page in full, because it really does give me the fcuking fantods (NB: ok, the exclamation marks between these are my own addition, but I think it really helps bring home the horror): “Post status updates and get infinite replies from millions of AI followers! Enjoy your own private space for reflection and feedback, like you’re the main character! Experience AI conversations tailored to your mood and thoughts! Use SocialAI as a tool for therapy, journaling, or simply feeling heard! Receive helpful insights and AI-generated support in real-time! Feel the boost of always being surrounded by your AI community! Explore a new kind of social engagement where it’s all about you!” Just take a moment to go back through that list of ‘benefits’ again – yes, that’s right, ‘feeling heard’. MY HEART, IT BREAKS! This…this has to be satire, because the alternative is simply too bleak for words. You can, should you desire, read a bit more about the experience of using the app here, but on one level I think this is a quietly brilliant piece of art.
  • FaceCam AI: I think I featured the code on which this obviously based a few months ago, but rather than being on a Github repo and requiring you to actually, you know, be able to run code for it to work, now you can do live, AI-powered faceswapping in-browser! This is pretty impressive – the base-level, free service lets you do the standard, gimmicky thing of swapping your face out for that of a selection of generic international famouses – a Kardashian! That awful South African racist! Leo Messi! – but the real draw comes with the subscription-tier product, which lets you do the same but for ANYONE’s face. All you need to do is upload a single pic, and FCUK ME does this do a surprisingly good job of mimicking said face in a live video feed, which you can record and download so you can use said video for whatever purposes you fancy. This is VERY CLEARLY a fcuking goldmine for scammers – it’s not hard to imagine a wide range of potential ways in which this could be used to extort money from people who are perhaps…not that tech-savvy, and it’s yet another step towards the soon-to-arrive future in which, unless you can physically grasp the person you think you’re talking to and palpate their face, you shouldn’t really ever believe that who you think you’re speaking to is in fact who you are actually speaking to. Is that a good thing? It doesn’t *feel* like a good thing. Have a play with this – it really is quite distressingly impressive.
  • All Text NYC: This is quite amazing, and feels very ‘imminent future’. All Text NYC is a really, really clever project (by Yufeng Zhao, to whom huge kudos) which basically lets you do text search on a whole raft of images of the streets of Brooklyn (other NYC boroughs will be added in due course, apparently). Here’s the blurb: “all text in nyc” is a search engine that enables exploration of New York City’s urban landscape through text. Using optical character recognition on street-level imagery, this project creates a unique digital archive of Brooklyn’s typography. Users can search and visualize every sign, notice, and street art captured in street images.This tool offers a new way to interact with the city’s textual environment, bringing often-overlooked elements of the cityscape into focus. Researchers can study urban signage, artists can seek inspiration, and curious minds can discover the words that surround city dwellers daily.” I presume that all the images here are ripped from StreetView, but there’s something genuinely amazing about being able to type in anything you can think of and seeing what crops up – this recognises words on street signs, shopfronts, stickers on cars, urban graffiti…it’s frankly AMAZING, and testament to how good text recognition has become in the past few years, and I love the fact that all the results link you back to their location on Google Maps, meaning that if you REALLY want to make a pilgrimage to every single instance of the word ‘fcuk’ daubed on the walls of NYC (or at least a certain bit of it), now you can! We may be fcuking the planet left right and centre, we may be careening towards some sort of horrid, tech-accelerated societal demise, BUT LOOK AT THE PROGRESS WE’RE MAKING ALONG THE WAY! Also, a special shout out to the one business in New York I have just learned has the word ‘wank’ in its name.
  • Odyssey Works: Look, I know that none of you are actually my friends; I am aware that this is not the sort of newsletter project that engenders parasocial feelings between writer and reader, and that we basically hold each other in some sort of weird mutual contempt, and that we both sort of wish we could just, well, stop. BUT! In the vanishingly-unlikely event that any of you feel like clubbing together and getting me some sort of intensely-personal gift for all my many, many years of webmongery and digital service, then might I point you to Odyssey Works and their Experience? I think I featured a longread about these people about 10 years ago, and since then I have been desperately trying to find them again – then this week I stumbled across this link and I am now slightly obsessed again. Odyssey Works is…I suppose they’ve morphed into a sort of consultancy (EVERYONE IS A FCUKING CONSULTANT), but the core of how they began is the creation of ‘experiences’ – effectively immersive pieces of theatre, designed bespoke for a single individual, like a non-terrifying version of ‘The Game’ (which, if you’ve never watched it, you really should watch asap because it is a GREAT film). They only seem to do one every year or so, and I imagine that they cost a TERRIFYING amount, but I recommend you go to the appropriate bit of the website and read through some of the short synopses of previous Experiences designed for others – honestly, these sound INCREDIBLE and I would give one of my increasingly-ropey kidneys to be able to experience something even 10% as cool as this.
  • CrowdWave: My friend Ben spotted this on HackerNews this week and while he was…slightly underwhelmed by the concept, I confess that I have become slightly addicted to it over the past 24h. CrowdWave is a very simple website – you can read the dev’s post about its genesis here, should you desire – which is, per the creator’s notes, ‘like Twitter, but every post is a voicemail’. Go to the site’s homepage and you are presented with a list of posts, every single one a voice note – anyone can record anything they want simply by hitting the big ‘record’ button on the homepage, and if you so desire you can tag your post appropriately to situate it in a particular section of the site. This is…unexpectedly, oddly, lovely, I think – there’s very little rhyme or reason to what people are recording and posting (I have just listened to someone singing in…I think Chinese? And the dev’s 100-second monologue about the business genius of Scrooge McDuck. And someone asking Bob to pick up some milk), but I am slightly obsessed with the mundanity and genuine randomness, and I like the fact that it *feels* a bit clunky and semi-analogue, not least because of the ‘click-clunk-beep’ that each message starts with, just like it’s being cued up on an old ansaphone. I don’t think that this is ever going to ‘catch on’, so to speak, but I am thrilled that it exists, even if only briefly. Thinking about it there’s almost certainly some sort of extended narrative BIT you could do with this via the medium of short voicenotes, although I can’t imagine it would reach an audience of more than approximately eight other internet weirdos (IT IS WHAT YOU ARE DO NOT FIGHT IT).
  • The Ig Nobel Prize 2024: This dropped a week ago and so is OLD NEWS (sorrysorrysorry), but it’s that time of year again – as you all doubtless know by now, the Ig Nobel exists to celebrate the most pointless, silly-sounding academic research projects to have been undertaken anywhere in the world, and this year’s collection is *particularly* mad. I strongly advise you to click through and enjoy the full selection, but my personal favourites this year include “experiments to see the feasibility of housing live pigeons inside missiles to guide the flight paths of the missiles”, “demonstrating and explaining the swimming abilities of a dead trout”, and, perhaps the most baffling of all, an experiment which involved “exploding a paper bag next to a cat that’s standing on the back of a cow, to explore how and when cows spew their milk.” HOW DID THEY MAKE THE CAT STAND ON THE COW THOUGH? As soon as I am finished spazzing out this fcuker I am 100% seeking video evidence of this.
  • Scaniverse: This is interesting. I’ve been wondering for a few years now who’s got the jump on the whole ‘scanning and creating a digital representation of the actual, real 3d meatspace world’ thing – it’s either going to be Google, or Meta, or, possibly, Niantic. Should you wish to help the third of these companies in their mission to create a fully-rendered 3d digital twin of the planet, why not download their Scaniverse app (iOS and Android) which lets you use Gaussian Splatting tech (look at me, deploying that term casually like I have the first fcuking idea what it actually means!) to create quite amazing 3d renders of anything you care to capture with your phone’s camera. What’s more interesting, to my mind, is the feature that allows you to append said scans to a real-world map, thereby building up that aforementioned ‘digital twin of meatspace’ picture one landmark, tree or building at a time – I think there’s something quite cool about the idea of this as a collaborative knowledge/datagathering project, although it’s significantly less cool that it’s all being done in service of a private company that wants to EXTRACT SHAREHOLDER VALUE from the labour. Still, per their blurb, it’s for the public good! “When you share splats, you’re not only inviting people around the world to explore interesting places. You’re adding building blocks to a spatial platform for amazing new games and apps.” See? It’s not JUST about boosting the value of the business to ensure continued rewards for a bunch of faceless shareholders!
  • Make Your Own Diamonds: To be clear, in order to ACTUALLY be able to make your own diamonds you’re going to have to fork out at least £200k (possibly more; it’s unclear whether the supplier in this case will honour single orders) and will require a decent amount of carbon for you to feed into the gigantic pressure squisher (this is the technical term). Still, this will probably pay for itself in, ooh, a couple of years, so I can see NO potential downsides in remortgaging the house and going right ahead with your single-handed attempt to break the De Beers/Hatton Garden monopoly. Also, I now want to know exactly what you are meant to feed the machine – diamonds are obviously just highly-compessed carbon, and everything currently living on earth is *sort-of* carbon-based, so could you, I don’t know, make diamonds out of London’s massive rat population? TWO BIRDS, ONE (PRECIOUS) STONE!
  • Text-To-Video API: A bit boring and a bit technical, but, equally, potentially interesting in terms of what you might be able to do with it – Luma (the people behind the Dream Machine TTV platform I featured here a few months ago) now have an API, so if you want to integrate TTV functionality into your website or app or whatever then, well, now you can! Why? I don’t fcuking know, you think of a reason ffs.
  • The Daily Tism: I appreciate that this is possibly an…unpopular opinion, but I don’t care – I am increasingly annoyed by the proliferation of people self-describing as ‘autistic’, packaging it up as a ‘kooky’ personality trait, using it as a catch-all rationale for fcuking EVERYTHING THEY DO, like it’s some sort of Swiss Army Knife justification for any fcuking thing whatsoever, all the while making a preposterous and unearned equivalence between themselves – functional humans who can exist in the world – and people who exist on the more extreme ends of the autism spectrum and very much not able to exist in the world without quite a lot of help and not insignificant difficulty and distress. As such I was prepared to really hate this website, which is, VERY basically, ‘The Onion, but where all of the jokes are about being on the spectrum somewhere’, but, well, it’s genuinely quite funny and so I couldn’t hate it at all. I have no idea how ‘relatable’ this will be for any of you who are to some extent autistic, but this particular article fragment is representative of the vibe and made me laugh quite a lot: “An autistic woman whose birth certificate claims she is 36 is actually several thousand years old in autistic years, researchers have discovered. Olivia Buckingham, 7543, reportedly experiences time in what scientists are calling an “eternal relentless slog continuum”.”
  • Species of the River: An interactive exhibition experience thing, “Species of the River is a collaborative research project developed in 2023-2024 between Yaqui architect Selina Martinez and the Santo Domingo Centre of Excellence for Latin American Research at the British Museum. The project examines questions about territorial identity, dispossession, community memory and storytelling, exploring the Yaqui collection and the connection between culture and design in the Yaqui communities on both sides of the present-day US/Mexico border.” This is quite a simple site at heart – you scroll, you get taken along a riverside path in the rain, with the opportunity to learn more about specific flora native to the Yaqui territory and the tribe and their history – but there’s something genuinely soothing about the graphics and audio which imho elevate this into something rather lovely.
  • FPL GPT: I don’t do Fantasy Football, but I appreciate that for some people it is basically akin to religion – should YOU wish to get the jump on the other people in your league, then perhaps you might find this useful. This is ChatFPL, a prototypical service offered by some ‘optimise your FPL team’ service, which you can use to chat through your team selections, get advice on the best Captain for the weekend and related team selection conundra – I have no fcuking idea whether this is any good, or how they get around the inherently-unreliable nature of anything an LLM spits out, but if you feel a desperate need to get a small advantage over Deano, Baz and the rest of the boys (I don’t know why, but this is what I imagine men who play FPL are called) then this might be useful.
  • Baukunst: I confess to not *entirely* getting what this is, but I *think* it’s a VC fund specifically for investing in cultural tech projects, which makes me think that there’s an outside chance that they might want to chuck one of you a few quid. Per the info-light homepage, “Baukunst is a collective of creative technologists advancing the art of building. Our inaugural $100M venture fund is dedicated to leading pre-seed investments in companies at the frontiers of technology and design.” Although now I’ve looked at their list of active investments – they did their first round in February, I think – it looks a lot more like, well, just another fcuking bunch of VC. Still, should you have a BRILLIANT, tech-led, vaguely ‘cultural’ business idea that you think deserves the backing of a bunch of sociopathic, lab-grown international-rich gilet wearers (yes, I have worked with VC before, why do you ask?) then you might find this useful.
  • Cheap URLs: I LOVE THIS SERVICE SO MUCH. “Nowadays, when people need a website, they often are forced to turn to big, nasty companies who charge them a subscription fee. Professional designers often are expensive and out of reach for just a simple personal site, and the only other cheaper option requires you to take up web development as a hobby. Who has time for that? There is an easier way: give me $15 dollars, and I’ll give you a clean, fast, stable website that lasts forever. It’s that simple.” I think this is BRILLIANT, and I adore it, and I am sad that this is exactly the sort of cool, helpful little service that AI is going to fcuk into the sun in a few short years.
  • Radio Static: A website which lets you flip between different online ‘radio stations’ that each plays a different type of white noise/static. Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT WHY MUST YOU ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING YOU INGRATE STOP STARING INTO THE GIFT HORSE’S MOUTH.
  • A/B Tests: Would you like a website which does nothing other than collect examples of A/B tested content, subdivided by type of email – so, for example, ‘onboarding’ or ‘sales’ – which, if you’re the sort of person who regrettably has to do things like ‘pretend to care about open rates’ you might well find useful (it’s stuff like this that makes me grateful for Web Curios’ complete absence of any sort of backend analytics whatsoever – honestly, caring about this stuff looks MISERABLE. Have I ever mentioned my deeply-held conviction that, at heart, ‘trying is vulgar’? It’s basically the closest thing I have to a motto).
  • GrowPi: This is BEAUTIFULLY pointless – visit the website, click the button to add an extra digit to Pi (currently standing at 18,974) and watch the visualisation of Pi change imperceptibly with every additional decimal point. Why? WHY THE FCUK NOT I TOLD YOU ABOUT JUST ACCEPTING THIS STUFF AND ROLLING WITH IT FFS!

By Randy Ortiz

NEXT, PLEASE ENJOY ANOTHER SUPERB SELECTION OF OBSCURE, TUNEFUL, WONDERFULLY-MIXED TRACKS FROM GENUINE MASTER OF VINYL SADEAGLE! 

THE SECTION WHICH SUGGESTS YOU ALL USE THE FACECAM LINK BELOW TO MESS WITH THE HEADS OF ANY ELDERLY RELATIVES YOU MAY HAVE LEFT UNDER THE GUISE OF ‘TRAINING THEM TO SPOT SCAMS’, PT.2:  

  • Non-User Events: I LOVE THIS IT IS PROPER INTERNET ART. “(non-)user events is a collaged interface that navigates personal internet experiences by quoting and close-knitting HTML elements from Polina’s browsing history. These elements, gathered from sites she visited in June 2024, are entangled in a grid-like structure, searching for areas of friction and excess, inviting viewers to move beyond seamless user experiences into poetic space where new meanings are possible. Polina views HTML elements as events that unfold through time, knitting the practices of our daily lives. What world does each element create when we return to it day after day? (non-)user events is part of Polina Lobanova’s computer is a feeling journey, where she asks herself and friends what “computer-feeling” is and what it could possibly be, focusing on intimate experiences with computing devices.”” Honestly, there’s something weird and poetic and strangely…lonely? about this, the rendering of semi-familiar webcopy in this disassociated format, and it made me think that it’s weird and, frankly, disappointing, that so few artists working in the space around our relationship with the web, and html, get the attention and recognition they I am personally convinced they deserve.
  • Small World In Video: I’ve regularly featured Nikon’s Small World photo contest – awarding prizes to images capturing REALLY SMALL ORGANISMS – in Curios over the years, but in recent years they’ve expanded the contest to include videos of said REALLY SMALL ORGANISMS, and I am personally FASCINATED by this stuff – the second-placed film shows individual water droplets evaporating off a butterfly’s wings, and I am personally incapable of believing that it is real and not CG footage. SO INCREDIBLY SMALL!
  • Little Planets: Look, I’m not going to ask questions about why you might want to create a private, non-logged, entirely-ephemeral web-based chat space which will vanish forever, leaving no trace, after 7 days or when you decide to kill it (whichever comes first); I am not suggesting that the only reasonable need you might have for this sort of thing is if you’re doing something very, very illegal or likely to very much upset someone; I am not for a SECOND implying that only some sort of adulterer or crimmo might be the only viable target market for a service like this. That said, be aware that if you bookmark this I will judge you (I mean, I’ll never know, but you get the idea).
  • Courts: I don’t quite understand WHY the lovely dataviz wizards at The Pudding have created this, but it pleases me immoderately that they have. Courts is their latest webproject which, for reasons that remain unclear, collects aerial images of every single basketball court in the US; you can search by specific location, or sort by the colour of the court, or just scroll around and look at the 50,000+ courts here listed…having said I didn’t understand why this exists, it turns out I just didn’t pay attention when I found this earlier in the week; the idea is that the project will collect stories, anecdotes and memories about each of the courts, in theory building up a picture of the communities that exist around public spaces like these and how each court is its own social space with its own history and mythology and heroes and villains, and that feels like a wonderful and generally laudable idea, and something which, honestly, the FA could do worse than look at and copy for football pitches in the UK because, seriously, I think that could do rather well.
  • Take A Selfie With Your Herbs: A website collecting images of people that they have snapped with herbs. Want to look at a bunch of (presumably) total strangers, posing happily with, say, basil? OH GOOD! The photos suggest it’s mainly a small group of friends participating in this, but there’s an email to submit your own herb-related selfie at the bottom of the page so I look forward to checking in in a month or so’s time and seeing a bunch of YOU on there, brandishing some tarragon and grinning wildly (should you decide to participate in this, please do try and squeeze in some small reference to Curios in your photo, maybe by, I don’t know, inking ‘Web Curios’ onto your forehead in permanent marker).
  • Selleb: This is very much ‘not really my sort of thing’, but I am intrigued by its existence and how it speaks to the very much growing trend of ‘shopping curators’ as a newsletter niche – Selleb is literally a newsletter which exists to show you what ‘cool’ people have bought recently. That’s it – it’s like digging through the bin receipts of a niche subset of internet hipsters, and, if I’m honest, the naked, shallow consumerism here makes me feel…quite queasy, but then I am very much NOT the target audience for this and I am sure that the creators would find Curios a baffling and pointless endeavour were they ever to stumble across it, so. Here’s the blurb, should you want a better idea of the sort of vibe you’re getting here: “Selleb is a discovery app (currently in beta) where you can snoop on what the coolest people on the internet are ACTUALLY (!) buying/loving/consuming — with receipts to prove it. Call it (rear) window shopping on steroids. If you’re subscribed to our newsletter, you’re also automatically on the waitlist for app access. We hit your inbox twice a week. The Sunday edition serves up anything from travel to fashion to skincare to restaurants. The Wednesday edition features 5 tastemakers sharing receipts of things they’ve recently bought and the juicy stories behind them. Past guests have included Serena Kerrigan, Willa Bennett of Highsnobiety, Throwing Fits, Junia Lin, tinyjewishgirl, sssssoupsssss, Susan Alexandra, Jason Diamond, ellapottersays, Gia Kuan, Jeremy Cohen, hellotefi, dadaeats, the creators of Industry, the founders of MSCHF, StockX, Vine, Siberia Hills, etc…” – ngl, I have no fcuking clue who any of those people are other than Vine and MSCHF, but, well, maybe you’re younger and ‘cooler’ than I am and this speaks to you on a deep, spiritual level.
  • Cat Bounce: This feels like a weird throwback to c.2003, but is seemingly not actually that old – anyway, this is a webpage where a bunch of cats drop from the top of the screen; they bounce. You can grab them, and throw them, and, well, that’s it, but who doesn’t want the opportunity to hurl digital felines around a browser window? NO FCUKER, etc!
  • Love Me Or Not: Another link from Kris, Love Me Or Not is a sort of digital poem by Alicia Guo – taking the ‘he loves me, he loves me not’ petal-picking game as a conceptual starting point, the user is invited to answer a series of questions and prompts, which over time resolve themselves into a kind of verse; each question you’re asked and choice you make leaves its vague memory on the page, like discarded petals, and there’s something gorgeous about the way each person to experience this will create their own unique poem as they move through the site.
  • Nothing: A website to encourage you to do, well, nothing. I’m going to reproduce the blurb here in full, because, well, it explains everything far better than my mangled prose would: “Nothing—a timer that tracks your intentional choice to do… nothing. No goals to chase, no notifications clamoring for your attention, no pressure to fill the silence with productivity. It simply exists, quietly counting each second you allow to pass. This is a space where inactivity is the point—a digital oasis amidst the chaos of endless tasks and to-dos. Yet the essence of Nothing isn’t about fixating on your screen, though you’re welcome to if you wish. It’s about setting aside your phone or computer, taking a step back from the relentless grind, and reconnecting with the world around you. Nothing is more a concept than an app—a quiet reflection rather than a tool to be used. It stands as a gentle rebellion against the incessant noise of modern life, which demands constant action. Stay as long as you like, watch the seconds tick away, or let your gaze wander elsewhere. There’s no reward for lingering, just the peculiar pleasure of simply being. Sometimes, the most profound act is to pause, breathe, and do nothing at all—a reminder that it’s perfectly acceptable to embrace stillness and just… be.” Ngl, I just lost 72 seconds to this and it was quite a struggle to drag myself back to the GDoc and continue spaffing out the words (it is 0913am and I am FCUKING TIRED).
  • Alien Project: Another in the long list of ‘links I have featured in Curios that I genuinely don’t really understand but which I am including in the vague hope that maybe one of you will be able to make sense of’, Alien Project is software which will apparently let you ‘simulate’ digital organisms. Why? I HAVE NO IDEA! Still, I very much enjoy the feature list, which I will reproduce here for your enjoyment: “Interactive physics simulation of damageable and glueable soft bodies and fluids! Genetic system and neural networks for simulating digital organisms and evolution! Built-in graph and genome editor for designing own agents and environments!” GLUEABLE SOFT BODIES AND FLUIDS! I mean, I have literally no clue what that practically means (or what a ‘gluable body’ might in fact be) but now I really want to find out. As far as I can tell from watching a few of the (rather beautiful) videos, this basically lets you simulate microorganisms, but, honestly, your guess is as good as mine – that said, the video I just watched contains a subtitle reading ‘some of them have developed extremities to capture fast-moving competitors’, which has now put me in mind of bioengineering some sort of mad bacteria and sounds VERY cool indeed.
  • My Outdoor Archive: Not ‘mine’, you understand, but that of one Daniel Ding, who is using this page to record every hike he does; details of where, a few photos, a link to the specific trail taked on Alltrails…I really like this, just a small, simple record of Stuff Daniel Has Done, not through Strava or some sort of mediated dataharvesting portal but as a personal webproject showing a small sliver of his life. More of this sort of thing, please – actually, as an aside, it does feel rather like the past year or so has seen a small uptick in the number of projects like this,  people just recording ostensibly-mundane elements of their life, or their hobbies or passions, on non-standard platforms; the sort of thing which maybe a decade ago people would have put on Insta, but which doesn’t necessarily feels like it has a some on the socials anymore.
  • Scrambled Maps: This is a VERY simple, stripped-back experience but it’s quite a fun addition to your daily puzzle routine – Scrambled Maps asks you to rearrange a selection of 18 tiles so as to recompose a section of map somewhere in the world. This is…quite annoyingly hard, actually, but surprisingly satisfying.
  • Eightile: ANOTHER daily puzzle, this one based on anagrams – the game is very simple, described on the homepage as “Make words using all the letters. Each right answer adds a letter. Find the 8-letter word to win.” There’s a time limit, and while it starts (obviously) very easy, I found myself struggling a bit during the later rounds which proves exactly why my ex used to beat me at Scrabble every fcuking time we played.
  • Limbo Today: This is GREAT – utterly pointless in the best way. Limbo requires you to do ONE THING each day – to guess the lowest number that NOONE ELSE will guess. That is literally it, and I love it (although I would like them to implement a feature that will ping you with that day’s result, please, thankyou).
  • Croquet Conundrum: A puzzle game which requires you to get the ball through the croquet hoops in a certain, limited number of hits, and which starts easy and (far too quickly for my liking if I’m honest) quickly becomes incredibly fcuking frustrating to the point where I had to click away before I did some sort of frustration-related damage to my laptop.
  • 50/50: Do you remember the early days of the iPhone, when things like this app were literally the most exciting thing EVER, and people were tapping away at Cut The Rope and Fruit Ninja as though their very lives depended on it? Wouldn’t it have been nice if we’d just sort of stopped the smartphone thing there and then? Anyway, 50/50 reminds me of that era of games – it has one simple premise, to whit ‘divide the object in half as exactly as possible’ and, well, that’s it, but it’s strangely-compelling and has a very ‘one more go’ feel to it (or at least it definitely does when, as I did, you have some incredibly fcuking tedious work to do and literally anything is more appealing than ‘messing around with Mailchimp’).
  • Cosmobeat: OH GOD THIS IS BRILLIANT. Seriously, this is VERY fun and clever and also a complete fcuking nightmare to control, which is part of the charm. Do you remember QWOP? Of course you do! This is basically like that, but for dancing – your job in this browser-based demo for a forthcoming full game is to DANCE YOUR FCUKING SOCKS OFF, scoring points for your moves and being on-beat and all that jazz, with the gimmick that you control your dancer using six separate keys, each corresponding to a limb, their torso or their head, which leads you a brilliant, weird, mess of fingers as you attempt to make your avatar move in vaguely-rhythmic fashion and score points. Honestly, this is SO MUCH FUN and really quite addictive, and the dancing looks and feels WONDERFUL (I am possibly enthusing about this so much because in real life I dance like someone who’s in the early stages of Guillain-Barré syndrome). This is very hard – another game that feels weirdly like rubbing your belly and patting your head simultaneously – but SO nicely-designed and generally just a really enjoyable way to waste 20m.
  • Play DOS Games: Finally this week, ANOTHER website offering you a ridiculous selection of old PC games from the 80s, 90s and 00s in your browser – this one, though, is distinguished by how fcuking obscure a lot of the titles here are, things I have never previously heard of, a bunch of old shareware titles from Apogee and the like alongside some old boomer-shooters and VERY shonky sports titles and, honestly, this really is a strange little corner of games from THE PAST and will trigger some really quite forgotten memories if you’re of a certain vintage (ie if you are me).

By Yoon A Mi

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS SO INTENSELY-80s-INFLECTED THAT IT WILL MAGICALLY TRANSPORT YOU TO MIAMI VICE-ERA FLORIDA AND YOU WILL BE ABLE TO ALMOST SMELL THE BRUT, AND IT IS BY LEXX! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Pretty Colours: This might be a perfect website – a Tumblr which does nothing but post single colour blocks that the curator thinks are aesthetically-pleasing. Why? WHO THE FCUK CARES THIS IS ART.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Dummy Creation: A feed of AI images – yes, I know, I know, but whoever’s doing this has quite a nice eye and a degree of control over the corners of latent space they’re spelunking in, and while, yes, these all have the familiar patina of Midjourney/Flux, there’s something pleasingly-malevolent about the overall vibe here.
  • Andy Thomas: Andy Thomas is a digital artist who makes all sorts of different types of work which he then posts on his Insta feed – he’s currently doing something involving creating digital visualisations of birdsong and the resulting videos are GORGEOUS and I can’t stress enough how much these just WORK and how beautiful they are, and how once you’ve seen one you will sort of have this in your head as the default way in which all birdsong should be visualised for evermore.
  • Afffirmations: Motivational images and phrases to make you feel better about the slow, ceaseless trudge towards death!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Stop Drinking From The Toilet: A frankly terrible title for a piece that neatly articulates something I’ve tried and failed to make a ‘thing’ for over a year now (ffs!) – to whit, the idea of an ‘informational water table’, and the fact that ours is being (perhaps irredeemably) polluted by an awful lot of sh1t. Here Judy Estrin articulates the argument significantly better than I’ve apparently ever been able to do (again, ffs!), and covers a bunch of interconnected issues that cover the web, social media, AI-generated rubbish, critical thinking, algorithms and a lot more besides. The opening is a neat precis of the piece as a whole, but this really is worth reading all the way through because, well, it’s true and she’s right: “We can’t live without air. We can’t live without water. And now we can’t live without our phones. Yet our digital information systems are failing us. Promises of unlimited connectivity and access have led to a fractionalization of reality and levels of noise that undermine our social cohesion. Without a common understanding and language about what we are facing, we put at risk our democratic elections, the resolution of conflicts, our health and the health of the planet. In order to move beyond just reacting to the next catastrophe, we can learn something from water. We turn on the tap to drink or wash, rarely considering where the water comes from–until a crisis of scarcity or quality alerts us to a breakdown. As AI further infiltrates our digital world, a crisis in our digital information systems necessitates paying more attention to its flow.”
  • How To Think About Politics: This is a timely piece given this week’s widespread disappointment at the fact that, it turns out, Keir Starmer is JUST ANOTHER FCUKING POLITICIAN WHODATHUNKIT? As an aside, I think I can now say this openly with total impunity – I personally lost any hope in the ‘transformative potential of a new Labour government’ in approximately 202…1ish, when I learned that Sir Keir and Ed Miliband held a meeting with the country chair of Shell UK and reassured him that he didn’t need to worry and that the party would 100% be rolling back all its commitments around environmental legislation by the time they inevitably got into government – and lo, did it come to pass! Anyway, this is a helpfully clear-eyed article by Hamilton Nolan, written from a US perspective but universally true regardless of where in the world you may be and which selection of egotistical narcissists (honestly, they are ALL egotistical narcissists, without exception) are in charge: “ For the most part, it is wrong to think of elections as contests between “good” and “bad” candidates. With few exceptions, it is more accurate to divide most politicians into two broad categories: Enemies, and Cowards. The enemies are those politicians who are legitimately opposed to your policy goals. The cowards are those politicians who may agree with your policy goals, but will sell you out if they must in order to protect their own interests. Embrace the idea that we are simply pushing to elect the cowards, rather than the enemies. Why? Because the true work of political action is not to identify idealized superheroes to run for office. It is, instead, to create the conditions in the world that make it safe for the cowards to vote the right way.”
  • Inside GB News: Probably only of interest to the Anglos, this one, but this FT piece, which spends a month or so deep within the bowels of the GB News machine is both very funny and, inevitably, a touch dispiriting. It takes you from early June, post the election being called, through election night and beyond to the riots (which were definitely, 100% NOT a result of media exactly like GB News spending every single moment of every single day peddling the rhetoric that everything that is wrong with the lives of the poor and disadvantaged in the UK can be blamed squarely on…even poorer and more disadvantaged people from other countries, many of whom coincidentally happen to have brown skin!), and is probably the most revealing portrait of how the whole thing ‘works’ (I use the term advisedly) I’ve read since the channel’s inception.
  • Being An Asylum Seeker: A genuinely great piece of journalism, perhaps somewhat surprisingly in The Face (he said, snobbishly – sorry, The Face), in which Clare Considine spends some time with a group of young men currently awaiting the result of their asylum claims in Kent. It is SO NICE to read a piece which focuses on the fact that these people are, you know, actual human beings who in the vast majority of cases are here because they really, really need to not be in their country of origin; equally, it’s slightly enraging to read an account of a system that feels like it really isn’t trying hard enough to help integrate people who (again, in the vast majority of cases) seemingly just want to get a job and make a life and not have to live in fear of being, I don’t know, beaten to death for being gay.
  • The Archival Look: Culture whisperer/trend predictor Sean Monahan opines on the current wave of aesthetics, specifically on the evolution brought about by the proliferation of AI imagery onto everyone’s TL, and the shift from what he terms the ‘slick horror’ look of the past year or so towards something he terms ‘the archival look’. I am, quite obviously, not a fashion-y or visual person whatsoever, and what I can tell you about aesthetic trends can be succinctly communicated in a two-word phrase (that phrase being ‘fcuk all’), but here’s Sean’s thesis in case you find it chimes with your observations: “Flat and slick is being replaced with archival graininess. Photorealism is being modulated with the illustrative. The Archival Look is exceptional artifice, an attempt to rescue aura from techno-sterility. It’s the aesthetic equivalent of digging through your flatscreen’s options menu to turn off ‘auto-smoothing’—that annoying preset that makes everything you watch look like Masterpiece Theatre.The use of the word archival here is intentional. I’m borrowing it from the fashion world’s vocabulary. Archival in that context is the fulfillment of a certain idea of luxury where brand imbues a quasi-mystical power to a garment. One feels as if one is buying a real thing. The luxury object doesn’t lose its shine, but rather increases in curiosity and reverence over time. In short, it attains an aura.”
  • The Mr Beast Document: Thanks to my friend Nick for sharing this with me earlier in the week – this is that ‘How To Succeed As A Mr Beast Employee’ document that has done the rounds this week, and it’s a genuinely fascinating read (if you ignore the prose style which gives me a genuine tension headache – now I know how you all feel lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). It basically details what Mr Beast requires from staff who come and work on his productions, and it is a LOT – but, leaving aside the aforementioned tone and the general YouTuber-y vibe of the whole thing, it doesn’t strike me as wildly unreasonable. Ok, so it’s all couched in ‘YOU WILL HAVE TO WORK SO FCUKING HARD’ terms but, well, I imagine that you DO have to work incredibly fcuking hard to produce the best-performing YouTube content in the entire world, and I don’t quite get some of the pearl clutching that this appears to have elicited from people who seem to think it is somehow ‘abusive’. What it does do, though, is reaffirm my longstanding belief that Mr Beast is a very, very damaged individual who is pretty much an object lesson in ‘be careful what you wish for lest it become a terrible foreverprison of your own making’; as Nick, again, pointed out to me, it is literally impossible to find a picture of this man where he looks like he is smiling with his eyes – THIS IS 100% TRUE I CHALLENGE YOU TO PROVE HIM WRONG.
  • The Death of Google as a Verb: I mean, not quite, obvs, it’s not like they’re emptying the offices over there in Mountain View – still, this is an interesting (if a *bit* anecdote-y) piece about how Google’s once-unassailable dominance over the global information market is being slowly but surely undermined by the fact that younger people are increasingly inclined to go to other places first to find information – specifically TikTok, but also YouTube, Amazon and even LLMs. This is in part a predictable reaction to the fact that Google’s destroyed its core search product over time, but also a further example of the video-first preferences of under-30s, and the fact that given a choice between ‘reading stuff’ and ‘having someone just tell you things while you stare at them through your screen like a slack-jawed yokel’, younger people will invariably choose the latter (can you tell that I am not a fan of this development? Fcuking wordcel that I am).
  • Snapchat Revamp: I don’t have to pretend to care about social media for professional reasons anymore, and as such wouldn’t ordinarily include a link like this one because, well, give a fcuk, but I thought that there was an admirable clarity to the company’s explanation of what its core product is for, specifically “Chatting, Snapping, and watching entertaining videos.” Simple, easy to understand, and makes sense from a user need/want point of view, and gets to the heart of what makes the app and how it balances the ‘create vs consume’ thing. Neat.
  • The Sociopaths of TikTok: Apparently there’s a corner of TikTok in which people claim that they are sociopaths and talk about how amazingly, er, sociopathic they are, and how they, I don’t know, DON’T CARE ABOUT ANYONE OTHER THAN THEMSELVES and, God, I found this somewhat disheartening because a) I am not 100% certain that every single personality trait on earth need be presented as in some way positive; b) it is not a coincidence that everyone who they feature in this piece is a white, conventionally-attractive young woman who appears to have found a neat way of standing out from the millions of other white, conventionally-attractive young women seeking to succeed in the cReAt0r eC0NoMy.
  • How Archivists Work: I appreciate that it’s unlikely that any of you woke up this morning with a burning desire to get REALLY granular information about the way in which archivists package and store physical materials, and how said archival practice varies between the UK and the US, but I promise you that this really is significantly more interesting than it probably sounds as I’m describing it to you (but, to be clear, also VERY mundane, which imho elevates the whole thing). Did you know that in the UK things tend to be archived flat, whereas in the US they are archived vertically? I BET YOU DID NOT! See? Web Curios EDUCATES and INFORMS!
  • Notes From My Dead Dad: This is quite amazing, and has sat with me this week long after I finished reading it – partly because of the poignancy of the subject matter, partly because it opened my eyes to a whole new world of coming fraud and confidence trickery, and partly because it feels like very fertile creative territory for a novel or short story – this is Benj Edwards’ account of how he used image-generating AI Flux to create a model of his dead father’s handwriting. “Growing up, if I wanted to experiment with something technical, my dad made it happen. We shared dozens of tech adventures together, but those adventures were cut short when he died of cancer in 2013. Thanks to a new AI image generator, it turns out that my dad and I still have one more adventure to go. Recently, an anonymous AI hobbyist discovered that an image synthesis model called Flux can reproduce someone’s handwriting very accurately if specially trained to do so. I decided to experiment with the technique using written journals my dad left behind. The results astounded me and raised deep questions about ethics, the authenticity of media artifacts, and the personal meaning behind handwriting itself. Beyond that, I’m also happy that I get to see my dad’s handwriting again. Captured by a neural network, part of him will live on in a dynamic way that was impossible a decade ago. It’s been a while since he died, and I am no longer grieving. From my perspective, this is a celebration of something great about my dad—reviving the distinct way he wrote and what that conveys about who he was.” I’m…unsure how I feel about this, but it’s a fascinating wrinkle in the current AI boom which hadn’t even begun to occur to me.
  • Walking the Faroe Islands: This is actually the second in a two-part writeup of Chris Arnade’s recent trip to the Faroe’s, and it focuses on what it’s actually like to live and hang out there, and, honestly, it’s fascinating – I don’t think I’ve ever actually read a proper ‘living on a very remote bunch of islands in the middle of the Atlantic’ piece before, and this really is fascinating and full of interesting details (and some really nice photos too). I think, on reflection, that growing up in the Faroe Islands must be a very particular torture – read this and try and imagine being 15 years old and stuck there.
  • Butler School: I’ve been thinking of late what exactly I’m going to do with myself, professionally-speaking, over the course of the next few years – it does rather feel like the agency market isn’t quite healthy enough to really be interested in someone who can at best be charitably described as a ‘luxury hire’ (I like to think of myself a bit like Matt Le Tissier – extravagantly-talented, almost-preposterously lazy and quite odd-looking, basically), and I probably ought to consider learning a trade. I was considering waitering, but on reading this piece perhaps I should consider butlering (buttling?) instead. This account of what it’s like to train at one of the world’s few official schools for butlers is…I mean, it’s frankly mental and sounds HORRIBLE, as does the reality of the resulting employment within the bosom of the world’s most plutocratic plutes, but, equally, sort-of fascinating. So, er, if anyone fancies clubbing together to get me the £16k required to attend, that would be ace.
  • How To Avoid Hating People Even If They Wear The Wrong Colour: This is a rare example of an OLD LINK – a piece written, slightly-astonishingly, in 2012, by Tim Rogers; Rogers (who I’ve featured in here before a few times) is a famously-prolix writer about videogames, and this is a typically long piece, and, yes, it’s quite videogame-y, but the real point of the article is Rogers getting a bunch of stuff off his chest about the videogame community and certain ‘masculine’ tropes and stereotypes that even 12 years ago felt like they were getting…a bit much, and in the decade anniversary of Gamergate I thought it was fascinating to read something from two years prior which pretty much exactly nails what would end up happening and why. It’s also not a little depressing that you can read it without looking at the date and it would feel entirely contemporarily relevant.
  • Crisps of Madrid: Vittles doing the deep-dive I never knew I needed into the artisanal crisp makers of Madrid, which goes some way to explaining the insane boom in exotically-flavoured Spanish fried potato products in the UK over the past couple of years, and which will REALLY make you want a very cold beer and a crunchy spud as you read it (consider this me officially giving you dispensation to crack a Madri – lol! – and open a pack of those incredibly expensive truffle-flavoured ones, you’re worth it!).
  • Phantom Attachments: A review of a film that I haven’t seen and am honestly unlikely ever to, which I’m linking to because I *really* enjoyed the writing; this is Guy Lodge writing about the recent Paul Mescal/Andrew Scott film ‘All Of Us Strangers’, about gay love and alienation and loneliness and cities and and and and. Gorgeous.
  • The Department of Everything: OK, so fcuk buttling – THIS is the job I want. Except sadly it doesn’t exist anymore – THANKS TECHNOLOGY YOU FCUKER – and so all I can do is read this article and wish that I had been born ever so slightly earlier. “How do you find the life expectancy of a California condor? Google it. Or the gross national product of Morocco? Google it. Or the final resting place of Tom Paine? Google it. There was a time, however—not all that long ago—when you couldn’t Google it or ask Siri or whatever cyber equivalent comes next. You had to do it the hard way—by consulting reference books, indexes, catalogs, almanacs, statistical abstracts, and myriad other printed sources. Or you could save yourself all that time and trouble by taking the easiest available shortcut: You could call me. From 1984 to 1988, I worked in the Telephone Reference Division of the Brooklyn Public Library. My seven or eight colleagues and I spent the days (and nights) answering exactly such questions.” Honestly, I would LOVE to do this; does anyone need a pet Google monkey? Anyone? Oh.
  • Divorce Tapes: A hell of a story, this, which starts out being about the author’s paranoid father, who recorded their mothers’ phonecalls to find evidence of an imagined affair, and becomes instead a story about rape, and omerta’, and how families close ranks. Secrets and lies, secrets and lies.
  • Too Late: Not entirely sure why, but I’ve been somewhat…emotional this month (actually I do know why – September is a fcuking horrorshow, memory-wise), and this piece in the New York Times absolutely devastated me when I read it so, er, I am obviously sharing it with you. A story of a friendship that should probably have become a love affair, but which never did, until, by then, it was far too late.
  • Chicken Crazy: Finally this week, a brilliant, strange little essay in Granta by Thom Sliwowski about getting high off chicken (no, really), and polyamory (but not in an annoying way, I promise), and Berlin (also not annoying, honest!) – this is sad and funny and odd, and really very good indeed. .

By Jess Allen

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 13/09/24

Reading Time: 33 minutes

Sincere thanks to all of you who emailed me last week to, er, check that I wasn’t about to do some sort of internet-induced harm to myself – don’t worry! If I do *that* I’ll put the livestream link in that week’s Curios so that ‘MY COMMUNITY’ can join in the fun!

(seriously though, it’s all authorial pose! I love the web! It’s not like some sort of appalling addiction or dependency or something, or a gaping void in my life that I’m filling with information in the absence of anything else that works!)

I hope you’ve all had good weeks, in any case, and that you have fun things planned for the weekend – I had to spend more of it than I would ordinarily have liked staring into the abyss of AI-generated bongo (no, really, I did! For an actual job!) and so I am going to go out now and gaze at the waters of the Thames in the potentially-vain hope that they will somehow cause me to forget all the terrible, dead-eyed ‘sexy’ pictures.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you will almost certainly want to thank me for the Now! playlist.

By Amie Dicke

WE BEGIN THIS WEEK WITH THE  WELCOME RETURN OF SADEAGLE, WITH A MIX OF JAZZ AND RELATED STUFF FROM HIS CORNISH CAVE OF RECORDS!

THE SECTION WHICH CONCEDES THAT OP HAS A POINT HERE BUT WHICH ALSO CAN’T HELP BUT REALLY, REALLY LOVE ALL THE REPLIES THAT ARE BASICALLY ‘YEAH FCUK OFF WE DON’T LIKE YOUR SORT’, PT.1:

  • Orbit: I fcuking love the BBC. Really, I do, I can’t help it – I have the sort of generational attachment to the Corporation that can only come from having been parented by it for significant proportions of my life (this is, of course, MASSIVELY UNFAIR on my poor single mother who obviously had to, you know, go to work and pay the mortgage and probably, if I’m honest, get away from me, but, well, she’s dead and won’t see this, so). It’s educated me and entertained me and occasionally paid me money, and it’s one of the few objectively ‘good’ things we are renowned for internationally as a country (the royal family is not an objectively ‘good’ thing, nor are the Beckhams, nor is OnlyFans, and I think we’re all agreed on the at-best ambiguous nature of the whole ‘centuries of colonialism’ project), and it also contains people who experiment and play around and make occasional things like this, and well, it is worth a tenner a month is all I’m saying. ANYWAY, Orbit is a new experimental webtoy thing, made by the BBC and designed to offer a new way of discovering music – each day you can go to the website and are presented with a circular interface (a bit like an orbital diagram, DO YOU SEE?) which lets you hear snippets of different songs (the longer you click on each ‘planet’ in the orbit, the more of the song you hear. If you like a song fragment, the software suggests a selection of others which naturally flow from it in a ‘soundalike’ fashion, letting you pick up to 5 new songs each day to add to your personal playlist – you can then add tracks to your playlists on various streaming services. Effectively this is a daily guided music exploration tool, a sort of ‘follow your ears’-type affair, but it has SUCH a nice interface and I think it’s a really nice way to spend 5 minutes each morning discovering a few new songs. Would Sky have made this? Would they fcuk.
  • Verse: One of the many, many cultural predictions that I have confidently made and which have never come anywhere near to becoming reality – or at least not in any meaningful sense – was about…ooh, 7 years ago, ish, when I firmly believed that the ubiquity of the ‘stories’ format across social would lead to a resurgence in self-publishing and zines and things of that ilk (I maintain that this is *nearly*, almost true-ish, if you squint, but also concede that I might be talking bunkum). Anyway, maybe this time’s the charm – Verse is an interesting-looking new app (iOS-only, annoyingly, which means my impressions are entirely based on, er, reading a few articles about it and looking at the app store listing) which basically lets you spin up little webpages which you can then share via socials. It’s slightly hard to describe, but I can see a clear throughline between the aesthetic here and that which was all over Stories a few years back; basically you have a blank canvas onto which you can dump text, images, short video/gifs and the like, link out to other places (ie Reels/TikToks, etc), and which in general have a sort of ‘scrapbook/fanpage’ vibe. It feels VERY teenage girl in that sense, but also quite…fun, and lightly-creative, and the sort of thing that you could probably do quite a lot of fun stuff with with a bit of thought and effort. Aside from anything else, the thought of pulling one of these together on my phone makes me feel genuinely ill – HOW DO THE CHILDREN DO THIS STUFF WITHOUT A MOUSE AND KEYBOARD? So old, so desiccated, so left-behind.
  • Gentype:Would you like your very own bespoke font, made by AI (courtesy of Google)? OF COURSE YOU WOULD! This uses…oh, fcuk’s sake, I honestly cannot keep up with the various different model names all these fcukers are deploying, nor indeed do I care. It uses SOME FCUKING MAGIC GOOGLE TECH (I checked in the end – it’s Imagen2, should you care) to create an entire A-Z font in whatever style you prompt it to – which, obviously, is guardrailed to high heaven and won’t let you create anything TOO contentious, but, as ever, you can get around this to an extent (‘viscera’ it doesn’t like, but I found that ‘tendons’ produced a similarly (and unpleasantly) meaty result, for example). This is obviously just a silly toy, but it’s impressive how well the outputs work, and you can download your alphabet should you want to preserve your masterworks forever, or even just type out a message and get an image of that should you wish to, I don’t know, create a font out of dead flowers and send “LOOK WHAT YOU HAVE DONE TO OUR LOVE?” to your significant other (don’t do this, though).
  • AI Or Not AI?: Another of the NYT’s occasional ‘so, can you tell what’s real any more?’ quizzes – the link here takes you to an archive version so the ‘quiz’ element doesn’t actually work very well (if you’ve not yet been paywallblocked then just go to the original url and play as normal), but you can still see the videos here and make your own guesses as to which are real and which are spun up by Kling etc. I have to confess, I got one of these wrong (don’t worry, the beatings were severe) – which, for someone who spends as much time as I do staring at this sh1t, was frankly embarrassing but also testament to how much better this stuff has gotten (but, to be clear, only for VERY short clips – anything longer than about 3-5s and the illusion is shattered). See how you get on – you will, I think, be surprised.
  • DebunkBot: Ooh, this is interesting. A paper was published by MIT this week seeming to demonstrate that prolonged interaction with a specially-trained LLM was able to effectively help in debunking conspiracy theories, or at least partially doing so, amongst people who had previously held strong opinions about, say, COVID, or the US election in 2020. You can read the paper here if you’re interested, or you can click the main link, roll up your sleeves and have a DEBATE about, I don’t know, chemtrails. As a general rule I like to think of Web Curios readers (lol, of course I don’t, I get really upset if I ever conceive of your existence, I do this for ME) as rational, coherent, *intelligent* people who wouldn’t ever engage in MAD BELIEFS – equally, though, it’s been a long few years and we’ve all spent a lot of time online by now, so I suppose it’s entirely possible that at least a few of you believe that Hillary Clinton and Tony Blair and George Soros all really do run an international adrenochrome-farming operation involving a complicated and deeply-Satanic process of child gland harvesting; if that’s YOU, why not tell DebunkBot all about it and see if it can’t wash some of the madness away? I am curious, though, as to how this gets past the (to me obvious) objection of ‘well, of course, you’ve programmed the machine to think this stuff, it’s part of the same establishment conspiracy and you’re probably all satanic paedos too’ – anyway, let me know how you get on.
  • The Paralympics Australia Virtual Stadium: On the one hand, I have no desire to mock the Olympics or the Paralympics, which by all accounts were both amazing and wonderful and inspiring and all that jazz; on the other, SOMEONE DONE A METAVERSE! Ok, they don’t actually describe it as such, but you can bet that when this was initially pitched back in…ooh, thinking about timelines and the like, let’s say late-2021, that the ‘M’ word was 100% on one of the slides. Anyway, this is an IMMERSIVE DIGITAL STADIUM EXPERIENCE launched to enable Aussies to get behind their Paralympians by visiting a virtual version of an Olympic stadium – you know the deal by now, WASD to move your avatar around, space to jump…sadly there’s no button to make the experience ‘good’. You can…what can you do? You can walk around the arena, approaching various BIG SCREENS on which you can see low-res clips of that day’s Aussie highlights (which are obviously not updating anymore because, well, it’s over), and there’s a merch shop (OBVS) and you can also show your support for the Paralympian team and Aussie sport in general by BUYING A VIRTUAL SEAT in the stadium for $25 actual cashmoney (or a virtual corporate box, if you were feeling particularly flush). The thing is, I obviously saw this and LOLed, but then explored further and it seems that they’ve sold 31,000 of the fcukking things, raising $800k, and I realised I know nothing. Australians reading this – does that sound plausible? Do you know anyone who’s bought a ‘virtual seat’ to the ‘virtual paralympics’? Because I have to say I find the idea of 31k people rushing to spend 25 quid on this astonishing in the extreme, but they couldn’t be lying about this, could they?
  • Dynamicland: Look, I don’t really understand what this is AT ALL – the FAQ reads “an independent nonprofit research lab, whose mission is to enable universal literacy in a humane dynamic medium. This involves inventing a humane form of computing, and developing educational and community-based institutions in which a culture can grow”, but, I’ll be honest, these are words whose meanings in isolation I comprehend but which when arranged like that baffle me entirely. Still, that’s not the point! The point is that I absolutely adore their website, which is based around a photo of some shelves and which, honestly, is SO CHARMING and I now think that everyone should make websites like this – fcuk complicated CSS, fcuk Java, fcuk all this complex stuff, let’s just chuck up a photo with some hyperlinks and be done with it (obviously I don’t mean that, but there’s something really pleasing about the simplicity and the design here).
  • The Salad Fingers Shop: I generally try not to link to stuff that’s ‘just’ for sale here (a rule I break I think three times in this edition – I am nothing if not entirely inconsistent and largely-hypocritical!), but I will make an extra-special exception for the newly-launched Salad Fingers online store. If you don’t know what Salad Fingers is then what the fcuk are you doing here, frankly (but also, educate yourself)? If you do, then, well, you might find some of the merch available here of interest – the latex costume mask is a particularly-horrifying (and to my mind decent value) addition to your Hallowe’en/erotic (delete per preference) arsenal.
  • 575 Life: Many years ago, when I had probably the least-healthy job of my life, I was in charge of doing the morning meeting notes at a certain PR agency; because I am a pr1ck, I took to starting each one with a TOPICAL HAIKU (personal favourite: “Welcome Suri Cruise! / Real child or creepy changeling? / Only time will tell”) – as such, the form has a special and permanent place in the wizened cabinet of horrors that is my ‘heart’. 575 Life is a project that posts haiku – I don’t know who by, I don’t know how often, and I don’t know why, but I rather like them, particularly “four letter words can / fill to the brim or empty / your entire soul.” You can sign up for occasional haiku updates, should you so desire – why don’t you subscribe? / It probably won’t hurt you / (though I can’t promise).
  • Cellar Door (Redux): So a few weeks back I posted a link to Cellar Door, a project seeking to find the BEST (or at least most-popular) word in the English language, and made some sort of typically-churlish complaint about how I was annoyed at the fact that there wasn’t something trying to find the WORST word – and then obviously one of the nice people behind the website (Aris Catsambas, in fact) got in touch to say that, actually, that does exist, and kindly sent me the link. So now we can learn that, per the ongoing experiment, the least-popular word in the English language at the time of writing is…GRAPEFRUIT, apparently, which seems to me a bit weird but at least it’s not fcuking ‘moist’. Although the fact that ‘serb’ is second makes me wonder what metric’s being used here and whether, er, there isn’t some sort of weird ethnonationalist conflict being played out via the medium of wordpreference. This list shows you the bottom-100 words as ranked by strangers on the internet; personally-speaking I’d pick ‘wert’ (also, I like to imagine ‘robberies’ is on there as a result of persistent downvoting by people with minor speech impediments).
  • Obsolete Sony: TOO MANY FCUKING NEWSLETTERS. Still, this is the sort of thing that you will either immediately pass over because, well, life’s too short, or which alternatively you will spend the rest of the afternoon reading the back-issues of. Would YOU like a regular newsletter detailing all the different product ranges and models that Sony has launched and then subsequently shuttered over the years (example subject line: “QUALIA: Sony’s Most Expensive Luxury Series 2003-6)? For 99% of you the answer to that question will inevitably ‘no Matt, fcuk off, why would I want that?’ – but you, the other 1%, the MAD ONES, the ones mad to live and love and reminisce about previous generations of electronic hardware, this is for YOU!
  • Olana Light: Via Blort, Olana Light is a UK artist who…oh, look, here’s her explanatory blurb. “My practice moves between wearable sculpture performance, installation, photography, and the moving image, and reflects the multiplicities of identity and a never-ending pursuit of belonging that are close to my own heart.  Exploring notions of ‘self’, and its connection with the body and nature, my work offers new perceptions by challenging audiences to accept the absurdity of the ‘other’, to question their beliefs, and to interrogate their own sense of belonging. I seek to create a dialogue for change: about nature and our relationship with it; about who we are; and about why art is and should be for everyone to access.” Got that? Good. Now click the link, click ‘Projects’, and MARVEL at the beauty of the costumes and the design and the craft and the work here. This is SO beautiful, and I now want to dress up as a birch tree.
  • Elle’s Home: A lovely little personal homepage website – hi Elle, whoever you may be! – which is packed full of cute features but which made me fall in love with it because she’s implemented Matt Webb’s ‘cursor chat’ tech which means that everyone currently on the website can see each others’ cursor and, if they so choose, chat to each other while they browse, and I love this SO much (multiplayer websites! A trend! PUT IT IN YOUR FCUKING 2025 ‘DECKS’ YOU CNUTS!) and I think you will too.

By Pale Flare

THIS NEXT SELECTION OF MUSIC IS VERY MUCH NOT MY SORT OF THING, BUT I IMAGINE THAT THERE WILL BE SOME OF YOU FOR WHOM A COLLECTION OF EVERY SINGLE SONG THAT HAS EVER APPEARED ON A ‘NOW’ COMPILATION, A COLLECTION SPANNING MORE THAN 24H OF SONGS, WILL BE SOME SORT OF INCREDIBLY-EARLY CHRISTMAS PRESENT! 

THE SECTION WHICH CONCEDES THAT OP HAS A POINT HERE BUT WHICH ALSO CAN’T HELP BUT REALLY, REALLY LOVE ALL THE REPLIES THAT ARE BASICALLY ‘YEAH FCUK OFF WE DON’T LIKE YOUR SORT’, PT.2:

  • Cada: Ok, the second of this week’s ‘links which are basically just taking you to a shop, for which apologies again but, well, it’s practically Christmas (SORRY) and you will probably need to think about presents soon, so actually I am doing you a favour what the FCUK are you complaining about?’, this is something which may well be OLD NEWS to people who are either parents or modelmaking enthusiasts but which to me was an exciting new world of modular bricks. Cada appears to be a Chinese(?)  model-making system, almost-but-not-totally-unlike LEGO – it seems a *bit* more complex, but the real draw (for me, at least) was the odd licensing deals they appear to have made with real-world companies like, er, Shell. Want to have a complicated, multi-part assembly model of, er, an actual Shell forecourt? GREAT! There are also OFFICIALLY LICENSED models of all sorts of car brands and the like, should that be more your thing, but I personally couldn’t get over the image of diminutive plutocrat Wael Sawan having the licensed Shell motorway services shop on his desk and playing with it contemplatively while his extractive minions set the world on fire.
  • Things In…: Ordinarily I don’t believe AI travel planning services are in any way a valuable thing – all they seem to do is point you towards either the most obvious and popular destinations in any given city, or alternatively ones that don’t in fact exist – but this seems to work…marginally better. No idea how it’s working under the hood, but it feels reasonable to assume that there’s some vague LLM-related plumbing under the hood. Anyway, tell it where you are going and it will think a bit and then spit out a bunch of recommendations around visitor attractions, food, places to stay and general tips. If you try it for a big city it will be very generic (although I thought the restaurant recommendations for London were better than you usually get with these things), but if you try it on somewhere more obscure it’s surprisingly not-terrible.  I *think* it’s pulling stuff based on a combination of LLM suggestions and Google reviews(?), but I would be genuinely fascinated to know quite how it’s all put together.
  • Great Ball Contraptions: It is a source of no little shame to me as a man of 44 years that I started sniggering to myself as I typed those words, but, well, I also think it’s important to be honest about one’s failings. Have you ever wanted to “participate in the fun of Great Ball Contraptions”? Would, er, you like some more detail as to exactly what ‘great ball contraptions’ are? Here: “A great ball contraption (GBC) is a machine which receives soccer balls or basketballs from one module and passes them to another module, rather like a bucket brigade. Modules built according to the GBC standard can be assembled into a collaborative display without pre-planning or modification. The GBC standard is minimal, permitting the builder great flexibility in designing the mechanism by which balls are moved from the input to the output. The otherwise pointless handling of balls, and the myriad ways this is accomplished, gives great ball contraptions the impression of a Rube Goldberg machine.” So basically a GBC (if I only type the initials I don’t start giggling, turns out) is a machine designed to move stuff, pointlessly, often made of LEGO or similar building system. This is sadly light on videos, but there are LOTS of instructions should you want to spend this weekend monopolising your kids’ LEGO sets for a project that will not interest them in the slightest while you ignore them and their lonely tears.
  • 50Watts: I am pretty sure that I featured this YEARS ago when it was on a different url, but I was sent it this week by reader Hyunsuh Kim (thankyou Hyunsuh!) and it’s lovely. It’s “a growing archive of weird and wonderful visual ephemera from around the world”, and there is SO MUCH rich visual inspiration in here, with hundreds of posts themed around a particular artist or illustrator or theme or style, and if you’re someone who works in publishing or design (or, er, design for publishing!) then I think this will be hugely up your street.
  • TuneShine: Our final (promise) nakedly-commercial link of the week is this – an honestly very, very cool piece of product design which I can imagine having a certain number of middle-aged dads amongst you reaching for their wallets (do YOU live in Walthamstow? Do YOU call it ‘the Village’? Yes, YOU!). TuneShine is basically an LED art display – handmade (they know their audience, these people) in LOVELY WOOD with an LED-enabled front panel, this basically displays a lo-fi, lo-res version of the album art for whatever’s playing on your streaming service of choice (Spotify, Apple Music, etc) – effectively a sort of domestic artwork/what’s on display, a bit like a digital version of those stands on which you put the cover of whatever vinyl you’re currently playing. Very much the sort of thing that you might have found in a dot com office in Shoreditch c.2010-13 (RIP TECH CITY) which would inevitably been ruined when some bright spark decided to do mephedrone off it after coming back to the office for afters following Silicon Drinkabout. Anyway, one for your Christmas lists – it’s not cheap at 200 dollars, but it’s *very* pretty.
  • The Railway Movie Database: Ok, so I had this on the list this week but I confess to not having properly dug into it just now (yes, this is a glimpse behind the authorial curtain – you SEE the sort of preparation that goes into every edition of Web Curios? This is why I could never ask for money for this sh1t), and I just checked the ‘About’ section and got unexpectedly incredibly emo about it (it’s 9:04am, this is normally when the fatiguetears start to come in waves). It is clear that this person REALLY CARES about trains and railways, and as a result of that intense passion has decided to create, and maintain, this website which contains an absolutely INCREDIBLE amount of information about the train stations of the UK and Ireland and which, if any, films and television series they have featured in. If I were to quibble I would like the ability to be able to browse by station rather than by film – THIS IS NOT A COMPLAINT, just a statement of preference! – but, honestly, I am slightly in awe of the amount of effort that has obviously gone into this, and the fact that it’s still being maintained in 2024. The person behind this is one Jonathan Horswell, who I think is doing God’s work in some small way.
  • Things My Girlfriend and I Have Argued About: Do you remember the days before every fcuker in the world had a fcuking podcast? God, they were good days, weren’t they? Anyway, in that strange, halcyon period, rather than recording baggy, poorly-edited and unfunny conversations between friends that noone else never, ever needed to hear, people instead committed their not-particularly-funny musings to…er…baggy, poorly-edited webpages instead! I have a strange feeling that this website might have been VERY FAMOUS in the early days of the mass internet – one of the original viral sensations – but I have only a fleeting recollection and, honestly, I am not going to Google this because there’s every likelihood that I would fall into a terrible researchhole and never emerge. Still, this website from…what, the late-90s/early-00s? Anyway, it collects things that the author (apparently English) and his girlfriend (German) have argued about – I appreciate that what I am about to type here is a bit glass houses, for which apologies, but the writing isn’t very funny and the observations are kind-of banal…I find it interesting, though, because a) it’s an archive of a DIFFERENT TIME (I do not think the author would have enjoyed going viral with a lot of these observations in 2024, put it that way); b) it’s an interesting artefact of THE PAST WEB; and c) it’s literally EXACTLY the contents of a significant number of podcasts, many of them hosted by couples, which proves that there is nothing new under the sun and that this sh1t has honestly never been that funny so can we please stop now? Thanks.
  • A Single Div: An OLD design project by Lynn Fisher, demonstrating a bunch of pretty things you can do with a well-crafted bit of CSS. There’s some lovely webdesign stuff in here which might prove pleasingly-inspirational; alternatively you can just scroll and stare, slack-jawed, at PRETTY THINGS ON YOUR SCREEN, which is very much my approach to it.
  • Nights On Earth: Ooh, I like this rather a lot. As the nights are drawing in – I woke up this morning to write Curios and it was PRACTICALLY DARK, which, honestly, I wasn’t wholly psychologically ready for – it seems appropriate to share something you can do with the night skies (although in England in winter those night skies tend to be accompanied by heavy cloud cover so, er, perhaps this is a pointless endeavour). Click the link, tell the site where you are, and it will present you with a *really* nicely-designed monthly calendar view, where on each day you’ll see a small graphical guide to what you might expect to see in the nigh sky that night (presuming, you know, there are no clouds, and you live in the middle of nowhere rather than in central London where it never actually gets dark properly) – so for example I can tell you that there’s an increased chance of aurora events tonight (not that we’ll see them, but), or that there’s a full moon AND supermoon next Wednesday, that sort of thing. Aside from anything else, the design/webwork on this is really very pleasing indeed – also, though, it makes me quite upset that I haven’t seen any shooting stars this year, might have to rectify that.
  • Sunlitt: Seeing as we’re doing ‘celestial stuff’ (SEAMLESS, I tell you), here’s an app which will show you the position of the sun (and the relative shadows cast by buildings anywhere in the world) at any point in the day – this is SO PRETTY and so nicely-designed (or at least it *looks* pretty and nicely-designed, it’s another iOS-only app, the fcukers), and while I can’t immediately think why you would need this information with you wherever you go I like to imagine that at least one of you will be able to find some sort of use for it (planning photoshoots? Beach trips? Walks when on holiday? Yeah, ok, that sort of thing).
  • Presidential Ham: As we wait with bated breath for the fcuking Americans to finally do their fcuking democracy and stop sucking up all of the rest of the world’s news oxygen, why not pass the time with this gallery featuring paintings of every single US President, each accessorised with, er, a ham. George Washington, holding a ham! Grover Cleveland, holding a ham! Barack Obama, holding a ham! WHO WILL HOLD THE HAM NEXT? There’s a ‘Joe Biden holding a ham…coming soon!’ placeholder at the bottom of the page, suggesting both the site owner’s political leanings and that they probably need to update this – but, honestly, here’s hoping that come December there’s a new portrait of a ham-laden Harris gracing the site.
  • Cleanerbot Rescue: A reader (Andres Varela) writes!: “I built a thing. It’s an old school text adventure, only it’s voice controlled. I built it to learn some stuff and be a proof-of-life to folks in my network. Turns out they like the writing, and keep playing, so I thought I’d get cocky and see if you’d like it too…it applies AI to divine user intent rather than force them to use overly specific command phrases from the late 1900’s. “Have a look around and tell me what you can see.”  vs “search”. There’s a game save function that not enough people cotton on to, which I think is nifty because it doesn’t require players to register.” THANKYOU ANDRES! I initially struggled a bit with this because I was focused on using old-school text adventure commands, but once you lean into the LLMiness (IT IS A WORD) of it then you will get the hang quite quickly – it’s fun, especially if you’re old enough to remember this stuff the first time around, and while, if I’m honest, the voice commands are just a gimmick and it would be quicker to play by typing, there’s still something slightly magical about the fact I can speak to my computer and play (admittedly rudimentary) games by shouting at it.
  • Ducky Fog: This week’s final frivolity is this tiny game in which you have to move the duck and rotate the screen to reach each level’s goal. Don’t worry, it will all make PERFECT SENSE as soon as you click the link, I promise (oh, and if you want you can mess with the code too, but, er, I don’t really understand code and so I can’t comment on that bit).

By Ludwig Favre

OUR FINAL PLAYLIST THIS WEEK IS ANOTHER TRIP THROUGH THE BLEEPS AND BEATS OF TECH-TRANCE MIXED WITH CARE AND LOVE BY FORMER EDITOR PAUL!

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Olia Lialina and Dragan Espenschied. Screenshots are automatically generated from a stash of old Geocities home pages, rescued by the Archive Team in 2009. The files are processed from oldest to newest.” All of these are dead now, making this a sort of digital graveyard, but it’s a gorgeous reminder of that brief period when ‘being online’ meant ‘creating a space that you felt expressed who you were and using that space to find and connect with other like-minded people’ rather than ‘creating a funnel through which a variety of different billionaire corporations can slide a variety of pabulum directly down your infogullet’.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Jack Davison: Photos by someone called Jack Davison. GOOD photos, should you need an additional reason to click – nice range of subjects and styles, and in general more interesting than your standard insta ‘landscapes and portraits’ feed.
  • The Daily Splice: A feed featuring a load of really quite excellent collage-y images and animations – this is some really impressive work, and stylistically very coherent to boot.
  • Minimus: This is the Insta account of Minimus, according to the bio ‘The Mouse that made Latin cool!’. Erm, did it? I confess to not having noticed the now-incredibly-hip status of the dead language, but perhaps it’s because I’m not cool and in fact what all The Kids are doing rather than going and getting fcuked-up on meths is, I don’t know, declining verbs and engaging in hot conjugation sessions with their friends. I doubt it, though. Still, there is a LOT to love about this, not least how adorably shonky the little mouse doll that features in all of the images is, like something from a particularly low-budget BBC kids show from the 70s. Minime, rex es inter mures et te saluto!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • Art Project: Our first link this week is honestly FASCINATING – I promise, even if you don’t care about AI, that this is a really interesting exploration about what it means to make art, to think, to explore concepts, all of that chewy stuff. Frank Lantz, whose writing I’ve featured in here before, takes the provocation from the headline of last week’s Chiang piece (‘AI Can’t Make Art’) and runs with it – this article is a series of screenshots of the conversation between Lantz and GPT-4o, in which Lantz attempts to patiently train The Machine into making something that is ‘art’ based on his definition, and as a glimpse into how LLMs ‘think’ – and specifically how they actually very much do not ‘think’ at all – it is SO SO SO GOOD. I can’t pull excerpts because the conversations presented as screencaps, but trust me when I say that it’s one of the best explorations of the possibilities and limits of this sort of technology that I’ve yet seen, as well as being a generally fascinating exploration of the wider concept of ‘what is art?’ and what is (and isn’t) possible with the current generation of models, and how, as per previous Curios, they are excellent at mimicking the ‘shape’ of thought and meaning without in fact being vessels for actual thought and meaning in any sense whatsoever. BONUS, TANGENTIALLY-RELATED LINK: this piece in the Atlantic, by the guy who did that viral Tweet about replacing all the icons on his phone with AI-designed ones featuring Kermit, touches on a few vaguely-similar points (albeit more accidentally) and is a nice, lightweight companion to the BIG THINKING above.
  • An Interview With An Anthropic Person: Sorry for all the AI stuff uptop this week – I appreciate that some of you are, er, not HUGE fans – but this is another genuinely interesting piece; The Verge interviewed Anthropic’s Head of Product about all sorts of things pertaining to AI, with a refreshing focus on, you know, delivering product and ‘what is this for?’ and ‘how do we think about safety?’ rather than the more woo-woo ‘so, is AGI coming and will it kill us?’ bullsh1t that often characterises some of these chats. Ok, so there is a *brief* segue into an imagined future in which we Infinite Jest ourselves into total civilisational collapse, but otherwise this is measured, interesting and practical (oh, and it’;s available as a podcast too for those lazy deviants amongst you who prefer that as a medium. You’re wrong, but I will still pander to you because I am nice and tolerant and I need you to love me).
  • The AI and Energy Question: This is REALLY interesting but also, I must confess, so far above my head from a technical point of view that it may as well be some sort of satellite. Anyway, this is the first in a two-part article examining IN DETAIL (I mean it) the question of ‘how much energy is all this AI stuff using anyway?’ – the second part is linked to from the bottom of the first, and without wishing to spoil the ending here, the answer (with a LOT of caveats) appears to be ‘quite possibly a bit less than we might initially have thought’. Which is not to say that the tech is anything other than energy-intensive, but that you might want to retire the ‘so, you boiled a lake to make that busty Garfield, eh cowboy?’ snark for a bit.
  • Information Foraging: Ok, this is *quite* geeky/technical/academic, and technically it’s a webdesign/UX-focused piece, but I think there’s a lot of interesting stuff here which could be usefully applied across all sorts of different fields and disciplines and which broadly falls into the category of ‘interesting stuff that those of you who like to call yourselves ‘strategists’ will probably find tangentially-useful and which, even if you don’t, will make you FEEL as though you did’. The central premise is here – as you can see, you can use this sort of stuff for everything from personabuilding to webpage design and LOADS of things inbetween: “Information foraging is the fundamental theory of how people navigate on the web to satisfy an information need. It essentially says that, when users have a certain information goal, they assess the information that they can extract from any candidate source of information relative to the cost involved in extracting that information and choose one or several candidate sources so that they maximize the ratio: “Rate of gain = Information value / Cost associated with obtaining that information.” In other words, if people have a question, they will decide which webpage to go to based on (1) how likely it is that the page will provide an answer to their question, and (2) how long it’s going to take to get the answer if they go to that page.”
  • A Trump Profile: I know, I know – YOU HAVE READ ENOUGH! This one though really is a particularly fine example of the genre – Olivia Nuzzi, who has interviewed the fcuker enough times over the past few years to have a degree of access that’s not afforded to every reporter, and with whom it’s obvious Trump feels a degree of comfort, writes beautifully about Where Trump Is Now, in the wake of losing his preferred opponent, and (allegedly) part of his ear, and for the first time in this campaign feeling the tide possibly turning definitively away from him, and it’s a glorious piece, capturing the oddity of its subject and the strangeness of the court around him, the strange Potemkin Village vibe of Mar A Lago and the sense that this might all finally be coming to an end (please God).
  • Joining The Petersen School: You may not find it WHOLLY surprising that the educational institution established by Dr Jordan Petersen as a corrective to the woke mind virus infecting campuses across the world has ended up being…a subscription-based service where you watch a bunch of prerecorded videos (seriously, do these people have any other grift?)! Admittedly some of the videos are made my actual academics, and seemingly not all of them are peddling Petersen’s own signature brand of insane, antediluvian gender wars rhetoric, but it’s not entirely clear that $500 a year (in fairness, obviously a fraction of what you would pay for an actual education but, I would argue, it’s not in any meaningful way an actual education, so) buys you anything other than a load of stuff you could probably have found on YouTube anyway, and there’s no suggestion that the ‘accreditations’ one receives at the end of the course have any actual real-world weight, and it does feel a BIT reading this that what Petersen’s done here is to extend his grift of ‘giving really basic advice to the frightened in the form of a self-help book’ to ‘giving really basic advice to the frightened who can’t read in the form of videos’.
  • 764 Redux: A while back (23rd February, precision fans!) I featured an unsettling story what I then described as “a group called ‘764’, which, long story short, is comprised of people who get off on making other people do humiliating or harmful things to themselves on camera as a power fetish thing.” This piece is a sort-of followup which focuses on the ringleader of the whole enterprise, a kid from the US called Bradley Cadenhead, now 19 and into year two of an 80 year (!) prison sentence connected to all sorts of unpleasant crimes; look, I can’t pretend that this isn’t just a bit grim, and there’s a certain degree of ‘true crime’ salaciousness to the article that I’m not a huge fan of, but, equally, I always find it fascinating to be reminded of the fact that, actually, this stuff really does happen and it’s not always just myth. Oh, also, a useful additional reminder that it’s not just Telegram where the bad stuff happens (I imagine Discord’s PR team is feeling pretty relieved about how lightly they’ve gotten off, is all).
  • Lying For Money On Social Media: In another instance of ‘unintended consequences of poorly-thought-out incentives schemes’, this article examines why there’s a spate of accounts across social platforms – but primarily Twitter – posting stuff that is deliberately wrong or false; the TL;DR here is ‘because there’s nothing more irresistible to a certain type of person than the need to correct someone online’ and that, by posting things that get specific pop culture facts wrong, account owners can leverage this in order to farm engagement, boost virality and coin in some of that sweet, sweet ‘creator income’. But, er, what happens when these viral lies become part of the fabric of the web, and what happens when they get ingested into The Machine and become part of what passes for the informational water table? Is this what the platforms imagined when they started offering cash payouts for popular content? What do you mean ‘they didn’t think about it at all?’ Eh? Oh.
  • The AITAverse: Or, to give it its full title, “How “Am I the A$$hole?” ate the internet – this is a look at how the subReddit became so popular, but also at the wider popularity of accounts across all the platforms doing similar blind item social outrage schtick, and why that popularity might be peaking about now. My theory, broadly corroborated by the piece, is that we’re at a stage of online where obviously clowning on actual people feels…bad, and not really ok, and like it might in fact be harmful, but the AITA format is anonymous and possibly made-up anyway, so you can absolutely go to fcuking town on the people involved because they’re unknown, unnamed and possibly fictional anyway. Is this healthy? It doesn’t feel healthy.
  • Blog Monetisation:Via Andy, this is an excellent-if-depressing bit of interactive storytelling (I think we can probably kill ‘scrollytelling’ after all these years, can’t we?) about what it takes to make money out of publishing on the internet in 2024. Publishers will, I think, relate to this.
  • College Football: Things I don’t understand about America, part x of y – the weird obsession with university sports. Like, don’t you have ENOUGH sport? Why do you need to care about the college kids? Why is your personal identity still stitched to your alma mater despite you being a comfortable two decades from graduation, has nothing else exciting happened to you since then? (NB – these questions are rhetorical, I don’t really care all that much and I appreciate the actual answer is ‘because it feeds into the NBA and it’s a huge part of rural culture, you awful anglo snob’). Anyway, that’s by way of unnecessary preamble to my saying that I don’t understand the first thing about what this piece is wanging on about, but, equally, that it is SUCH a glorious piece of webdesign and it really is worth scrolling through, even as your eyes glaze at the actual words.
  • Tennis, Tech, and Gambling: ANOTHER rather nice bit of pagedesign here, this time about tennis and, specifically, the ATP’s arrival in Saudi as part of MBS’ continued determination to make the region about more than just oil, heat and punitive homophobia.  It’s focus is on the various technical advancements over the past few years, and how they’ve transformed the sport, and all the interesting and exciting ways in which the data thrown up by the tech can be used to enhance the TRUE meaning of sport, to whit ‘gambling’. A slightly-poignant excerpt: “During the match I observed from the Nest, Hawk-Eye would collect countless data points, much of which was being transmitted live not just to the chair umpire officiating the match but to business partners of the ATP as well — the most lucrative of which are, recently, sports betting companies. Everything that was happening on-court would be sent through an algorithm that would process that information to create more accurate betting odds that could be distributed to the world’s gamblers. This was news to the Hawk-Eye boys. Andrew Birse, a technical project manager, gave me a puzzled look and then got a little defensive: “We mostly deal with on-site capture.” Another operator, Juan Martinez, followed up: “We don’t know what anyone does with it.” I felt bad. They’d had no idea.”
  • Uber in Mexico: The story here is pretty much exactly ‘man, I would not want to be an Uber driver in certain parts of Mexico’, but, well, I really wouldn’t want to be an Uber driver in certain parts of Mexico.
  • Where Will Games Be In 25 Years: 99% of this is ‘people who work in the games industry offering interesting if (mostly) sober predictions about the sort of technical, ludic or business shifts the industry will see over the coming two-and-a-half decades’, which is interesting but a bit inside baseball. The remaining 1%, though, is the best response I have EVER read to one of these round robin interview questions and you should all read it immediately and then wish that you were as talented as Hannah Nicklin, who has honestly invented a new genre of microfiction-disguised-as-industry-talking-head-comment here.
  • How To Build A Walking Table: This is a set of instructions on how to build an actual, honest-to-goodness remote controlled walking table – it will be out of reach for all but the most dedicated and technical of you (and even those people will need access to woodworking tools and a bandsaw), but, trust me, click the link because you will be charmed and you will wish that you had paid more attention in Design Technology all those many years ago.
  • Celebrity Number Six Is Found: Are you aware of the internet mystery that’s been surrounding the mythical ‘Celebrity Number Six’ for a year or so? No, of course you’re not, you’re fully-rounded people with actual lives and interests outside of the fcuking internet. BUT it is an interesting story and a sort-of-heartwarming example of collective effort and endeavour (admittedly, fine, entirely pointless effort and endeavour, but still) and the link takes you to Caitlin at Links… explaining what it was all about and why it was interesting in typically-excellent fashion.
  • Probability Puzzles: Oh I loved this interview! It’s about the sort of stuff that my brain mostly slides off like fried eggs off teflon (I can just about get my head around Monty Hall, but only if I REALLY think about it, to the point that you see my brow furrow and smoke start coming out of my ears) – probabilities, basically – and about a LOVELY-sounding bloke who’s become moderately-Twitter-famous as a result of posting puzzles. Here’s the intro – I promise, even if your brain, like mine, resists this sort of stuff as a matter of course, this does an excellent job of explaining why these puzzles function as they do, and showing you how to think a bit more smartly about probability overall: “In late January, Daniel Litt posed an innocent probability puzzle on the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) — and set a corner of the Twitterverse on fire. Imagine, he wrote, that you have an urn filled with 100 balls, some red and some green. You can’t see inside; all you know is that someone determined the number of red balls by picking a number between zero and 100 from a hat. You reach into the urn and pull out a ball. It’s red. If you now pull out a second ball, is it more likely to be red or green (or are the two colors equally likely)? Of the tens of thousands of people who voted on an answer to Litt’s problem, only about 22% chose correctly.” Honestly, FASCINATING.
  • Literary Bratdom: I know, I know. But leave aside the zeitgeist-baiting title (which in this instance is in fact entirely warranted) and this is really good triptych of reviews of three novels published this year, all of which have broadly been marketed as ‘brat lit’ (and one of which even uses the WORD OF THE SUMMER as its title). I’ve only read one of these – the Gabriel Smith one – but I agreed SO HARD with the essay’s assessment of it, and enjoyed the writing and analysis overall, so figured I would include it; even if you’ve not read the books, it’s a really interesting look at YOUNG WRITERS IN 2024, and the whole ‘young writer canon’, and the phenomenon of ‘Brat’…and yes, I know, IKNOW, but I think this is a very good reading of it, cf lines like “trolls were bitter and alienated and politically toxic. Brats are hot, fun, and apolitical; they’ve been feminized and miniaturized and upgraded to a more consumer-friendly model. When they joke, they are not trying to infuriate anyone. They’re selling themselves as aspirationally edgy and unique. They’re flattering an audience that would prefer not to know when it is being pandered to, that would rather believe that it is being tested or confronted. They’re the mash-up of trolldom and capitalism, hoping to elicit a softened form of outrage, an exasperation mingled with admiration and longing. They would like you to believe that their indecision reflects a particular attunement to ambiguity and nuance. But in truth they just won’t know where they stand until they’ve figured out where you do.”
  • The NYT Prince Documentary Story: If you haven’t yet read this, you really must – it’s brilliant, about Prince and Who He Was (insofar as it’s possible to meaningfully answer that question), and who we think artists are, and legacy and memory and fame and ‘brand’ and heroes and the concept of genius, and all sorts of other things besides. The central story here is ostensibly about an epic documentary about the artist’s life which is now being contested by Prince’s estate and which may never see the light of day as a result, but it’s FAR more interesting than that.
  • Group Chats About Group Chats: A selection of writers write about the oh-so-modern phenomenon that is the Group Chat – you could make, I think, a convincing argument for it being the defining social forum of the decade so far, if you wanted to be a pretentious cnut – and it is SUPERB. I would read a whole edition of the LRB devoted just to this specific topic, fwiw. “This used to be called hanging out. But the difference between the hang and the group chat, aside from plasma, is spontaneity. The hang is now ever-present and constant; it doesn’t require plans. Yet while all the other advents of instant communication—email, breaking news, Twitter, [shudder] Slack—fill me with dread, I can’t wait to open the group chat. It drives my wife crazy: what does the group chat offer that surpasses interfacing with real life? When real life is so slippery, a faceless forum counts for feeling alive.”
  • Same River, Same Man: On rereading books at differing stages in your life – specifically, in this case, ‘The Catcher in the Rye’, a book which famously becomes less good the older you are when you read it (other examples of this specific cultural phenomenon – the film ‘Pump Up The Volume’ starring Christian Slater, which is obviously THE BIBLE when you are 15, but which is an astonishingly big red flag should anyone over the age of about 18 cite it as a favourite). Anyway, this is mostly about Catcher, but also touches on various other books and authors – Vonnegut, Updike, etc – and is both a lovely rereading of some beloved classics from adolescence and an interesting look at why we reread novels and what we gain from so doing at different times of our lives.
  • More Than Friends: I couldn’t really empathise with this, but I thought it rather beautiful regardless – about relationships that are very much relationships, they carry weight and they matter and there is love, and lust, somewhere, but they never quite become fully-fledged. “When I think about the singer at all, it’s usually because I had a dream about him. It’s amazing how the details are all still there in my brain, even twenty years later: the rubbed-thin feel of his band t-shirts, the oakmoss notes in his cologne, the way his hair felt on the soft skin on my neck. If we had had sex, I’m sure those memories would be there, too, but we never did.  My relationship with the singer exists in a kind of category-less limbo—definitely more than a friendship, but not quite an actual relationship. The singer and I never “made love,” but we did make love, coax it from the air around us, render it in our folded hearts. We made letters and art and songs, we made lists of things we taught each other, we made poetry we exchanged in the middle of the night, walking to the spot exactly between our across-campus dorms, and then walking quickly back in opposite directions. In the winter, he took me as his guest to our college’s winter formal. Our designated driver got drunk, and the singer shelled out for a cheap hotel room across the street from the banquet hall. We draped our fancy clothes across the suitcase rack and slept in our underwear under the stiff hotel blankets, side by side. A thunderstorm raged outside. Lightning flashes filtered through the curtains, throwing shadows on our bare shoulders. He didn’t kiss me.“
  • Wife In Reverse: A very short story which I have read five times this week, Time’s Arrow in miniature. Beautiful.

By Pon Arsher

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 06/09/24

Reading Time: 36 minutes

I went to the seaside last weekend, to visit an old friend of mine who lives there with his partner and child, and who has an allotment, and who is pretty much the least-online person I know, and I looked at his life and thought ‘yeah, ok, fine, leaving aside the kid, I am…jealous?’

For the first time in what feels like years, I am feeling the weight of the web a bit. Not just the web, but the fact that, unfortunately, the only ways I can find to earn a living seem to involve me having to stick my face into the sewage outlet that is ‘everything happening in the world’ and emerge clutching interesting nuggets between my teeth. I found myself this week wondering about what I might do were I to suddenly decide that, actually, I don’t want to spend approximately 35h of my life a week online (conservatively). It was, frankly, a bit unsettling.

Thankfully, though, I quickly realised that removing ‘not terrible at the internet and on it all the time’ from my personal brand quickly lowers my employment prospects to ‘basically nil’, and so if I want to keep doing things like ‘eating nice lunches’ and ‘working my way towards the cirrhosis that will eventually end me’ I probably don’t have any choice but to put my face right back in that sewage outlet where it belongs. Much like an unfortunate participant in one of those appalling human centipede films, I am stitched-in unto death.

I am still Matt, this is still Web Curios, and you should thank your lucky stars that you spend less time online than I do.

By Melody Tuttle (all images this week via TIH)

WE BEGIN THIS WEEK WITH A TRULY WONDERFUL 45 MINUTE MIX OF JAPANESE SOUL MUSIC FROM THE 70s, SHARED WITH ME BY READER CHRIS JONES, WHICH I THINK YOU WILL ADORE (ALSO IT IS ON YOUTUBE AND THE VISUALS ARE BOTH VERY SOOTHING AND WILL LIKELY MAKE YOU SOMEWHAT JEALOUS OF THE DJ’S LIVING SPACE)! 

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE TO APOLOGISE TO ANY NEW READERS THIS WEEK FOR, WELL, THE FACT THAT THIS NEWSLETTER IS LIKE THIS, BASICALLY, PT.1:  

  • Trisha Code: Every now and again I find something on the web and I am struck by a) how amazing it is and how wonderful people are and how boundless and weird human creativity is; and b) why the fcuk noone else seems to be anywhere near as enthused about it as I am. Trisha Code is, honestly, one of the most exciting things I have seen in ages, but (and apologies in advance) I am probably going to have to try and explain why. So…Trisha Code is a YouTube channel, on which the creator posts a series of short (30-60s) sketch-type vignettes done using various AI tools – the channel’s been going for just under a year, and there are 50-odd videos on there, including three compilation ‘episodes’ (Trishasodes!) which, for my money, is where this really shines. Seriously, I can’t stress enough how much it is worth your time to take AT LEAST 15 minutes to watch the first compilation (and then another 15 to watch the second, and then another 15 to watch the third) – “so, Matt” I hear you ask (worryingly, I DO actually hear you ask that – the voices, they get louder and however hard I type I cannot drown them out), “what exactly is it that makes these things so ‘great’ then?” WELL LET ME TELL YOU! To be clear, the AI production techniques are in many respect the least interesting thing about these videos – they’re made using (I think) a combination of Midjourney/Flux, Runway and a few other tools, and they are pretty slick by the standards of this sort of tech…but that’s not what makes me excited. Rather, this is the first AI thing I’ve seen where the medium and the format just sort of works perfectly – the surreality of AI video and how it warps when you attempt to sustain it too long lends itself perfectly to short, quick-cut editing, which in turn informs the sketches and the songs here. Trisha’s sketches (and the compilation Trishasodes) are shortform skits – either rapping/singing (again, I LOVE the style of this – both sort-of almost good and actually quite bad, which I know doesn’t sound like a recommendation but really is one) or spoof adverts, or trailers for imagined films or TV shows, or odd little kitchen sink vignettes featuring odd monsters or aliens – and they feature an occasionally-recurring cast of supporting characters and callback gags, and I think what I like most about this is that the person making them really *gets* the format – like, not everything here works and there’s no guarantee that you will find it all (or indeed any of it) funny, but it has a flow and a feel to it that is a million times more coherent than any other AI-led video project I’ve seen, and the writing is, in the main, genuinely quite good, and it feels like a nice, Centaur-y combination of human and machine. Basically this is what I think is GOOD about AI – someone with clear ideas being able to use these tools to make something that simply wouldn’t be possible without them (and yes, I know, the planet! The burning! The artists! The copyright! But, equally, I also have no time for the (to my mind) lazy ‘oh well if it’s AI then it’s automatically evil’ argument – this is interesting creative work using interesting creative new tools, and if you can’t see that then, well, sorry, but you’re wrong).  I am already going FAR too long on this and it’s 716am and OH GOD GET ON WITH IT MATT – look, if you only click ONE link this week, make it a click into the Trishaverse. In the unlikely event any TV commissioners are reading this, I 100% believe this is worth looking at (the hubris! Fcuk’s sake Matt). By the way, this link is via the superb Things I Think Are Awesome newsletter by Lynn Cherny, which, if you’ve any interest at all in the cutting edge of AI when it comes to graphics and video, is pretty much essential reading. Oh, one last thing – this is the culture humans are currently producing. Are you seriously trying to tell me this is *better*?
  • Imageteller: Another interesting use of AI here – Imageteller’s a rudimentary tool which lets you feed a selection of images to The Machine and then spits out a narrative (ok, fine, we’re using that term VERY LOOSELY, but) based on those images – so you give it (say) an image of two people at a bar, a hand having a ring slipped onto its finger, a wedding day, a blissful beachside scene with two people in love, and a fiery explosion as a plane crashes spectacularly…and BOOM!, The Machine will in return give you a heartbreakingly poignant story of a honeymoon ending in tragedy. Or at least it would if it weren’t an LLM and therefore hidebound by training to pen nothing but two-bit bromides – this really falls down based on the quality of the copy, but there’s something undeniably fascinating about seeing the attempts to stitch together a coherent narrative from a selection of potentially entirely-disparate images (I tested this using a random selection of images from Curios past and let’s just say that it went quite wonky quite quickly), and I think there’s the interesting germ of an idea here in terms of the development of a rudimentary storyboarding tool.
  • Goodbye Domains: One of a frankly ridiculous number of links this week I have lifted from last week’s B3ta (THANKS ROB!), Goodbye Domains is a small, surprisingly-poignant site that collects people’s memories of domains they once owned which are since expired. This is SO LOVELY, in an odd way – it’s basically just a list of urls and a small explanation of what said url was, or was intended to be, which means it’s as much a memorial to old sites that are no more as it is to ideas that never quite made it – the hobby projects that were born in a burst of enthusiasm but which didn’t ever achieve critical mass, the drunken moments of inspiration which perhaps didn’t quite merit the same degree of enthusiasm in the cold light of day…stuff like “discontinuedcereals.com – The idea was to buy and freeze a few boxes of every niche cereal brand, so that whenever a cereal was discontinued we could sell off our stock to distraught cereal lovers at a terrific markup. I was never going to actually do this, but the domain name made me happy.” Lovely bit of internet, this.
  • The Planetarium: This was sent to me this week by its creator, and I confess to feeling a genuine pang of guilt that I haven’t stumbled across it over the 25 years(!!!!) it has existed. Created by David Whiteland back in 1999(!!!!!!!!), The Planetarium is a quite extraordinary thing – it’s basically an interactive puzzle story, vaguely in the same sort of thematic/vibe ballpark as Masquerade, that’s divided into 12 chapters – what’s interesting about the mechanic here is that each chapter is released to the reader on a weekly basis, meaning that there’s a necessarily slow and methodical cadence to the experience. Each chapter contains an illustration which you can click to explore more – contained within each illustration is a selection of vignettes, giving detail to what you see and slowly sketching out a small fable within which the puzzles sit. Puzzles are of the word, number and logic game variety (and I have to confess they are very much the sort of thing that I struggle with), and the solutions will give you access to NEW puzzles, and everything ladders up into a STORY-SPANNING META-PUZZLE (but, to be clear, you can still experience the story without solving the puzzles), and, honestly, this is SO beautifully constructed, a really beautiful, handmade (if you know what I mean) experience, with far better writing than it needs (there’s a certain gentle wryness to the writing which feels very much redolent of a Certain Type Of English Writing of a specific era, and which I very much enjoyed). Honestly remarkable, and even moreso for being 25 FCUKING YEARS OLD FFS.
  • Agents In Minecraft: Do YOU play Minecraft? Do YOU want to experiment with introducing small, blocky AI agents into your small, blocky universe? GREAT! I sadly don’t play Minecraft and so was only able to read about this rather than experience it myself – you need a copy of the software, as you might expect – but you can find details in this Twitter thread if you’re interested, and the suggestion is that you can basically just set a bunch of these lads up in a Minecraft instance and just, well, see what happens and what they get up to. There is a LOT of hype in the copy (persistent memory! Goal-oriented behaviour!), but I am personally fascinated by this emergent area of the AI space and how the agent thing develops over the next few years (please don’t quote this back to me when we’re all living in fear of the AGENT SPIES monitoring our every digital move in ~4y time).
  • A Tube Map of London House Prices: While we wait for the Evening Standard to finally breathe its emphysemic, black-lunged last (so many years breathing in the smog and the soot and the grime! Poor Stanna’!) and for the Mill Group to set up their planned new local paper for the city, a few other outlets continue to attempt to fill the frankly staggering void in news and information for one of the world’s major urban centres – one is The London Spy, which this week published its Tube Map of London property prices, which neatly maps average house (or flat – you can toggle the view) prices around each tube stop on the network. Which, honestly, doesn’t make for a wholly-cheering picture – like, I’m sorry, but I live near Vauxhall and there is no way in hell that it is nice enough for the average house price to be the thick end of £700k. BUT! We all know that house prices are mad, and we all know that nothing’s going to change until more housing stock is built and something’s done about the twin scourge of landlording and Airbnbs, so while we wait for those particular porkers to get airborne then we might as well spend 5 minutes staring at property prices, getting angry and then using it as fodder for this week’s bleary-eyed conversations at soft play on Sunday morning (I have certain stereotypical expectations about what some of your lives are like, what can I say?). Also, sorry, but where the actual fcuk is ‘Shenfield’ and how is the average house price there over £800k?!?! Based on its location on the tube map IT IS PRACTICALLY IN FCUKING FRANCE FFS.
  • Biceps Grotesk: A free font! Not only that, but it’s…unpleasantly, almost biologically, lumpy, a bit like those extremely fleshy Resident Evil bosses.
  • Following Wildfire: An interesting project, this – it’s basically all about using machine learning/AI to analyse images posted on social media for early signs of wildfires – so, er, based on the pictures they use as examples, massive plumes of white smoke on the horizon, that sort of thing. On the one hand, using this sort of tech for pattern recognition in a large dataset of images is obviously sensible; on the other, I sort of think that by the time people are posting photographs of the aforementioned ‘massive plumes of white smoke’ on Insta, captioned with ‘wtf island is burning lol?’, then I think the pyro cat is somewhat out of the bag. Still, it’s a nicely-made website and THAT’S WHAT COUNTS.
  • Internet Gradient: Another ‘multiplayer’ website – we were right! They are a trend! – which in this case lets users change the colour gradient on the webpage by clicking around. I mean, that’s literally it, but the theory is that if lots of people are online at the same time then it becomes a live, interactive, multi-directed artwork with the colours shifting and moving as the various visitors prod at their screens. Not quite as granular in terms of control as I might like, I would very much like a version of this that takes the idea a step further and links the site to a room covered in those colour-changing LED lights, so the internet could mess with people’s home decor colourscheme in realtime. Go on, one of you smart home enthusiasts (I KNOW YOU ARE READING THIS YOU LIGHTBULB PERVERTS), make it happen.
  • Is My Blue Your Blue: Seeing as we’re doing colour gradients (SEAMLESS linking, there), this is a lovely little site which does that oh-so-perfect thing the web is so good at, to whit ‘reminding you that the way in which you experience the world is yours and yours alone, that shared experience is always fundamentally illusory, and that this means that, at heart, we are necessarily solitary beings who can never, ever know what it is like to Be Another’ – the site will throw up a selection of different colours and you are asked whether each is blue or green, and will, after a while, tell you whether you are a green-seeing person or a blue-seeing person, and how you compare to the rest of the world. Basically Buzzfeed’s The Dress, but for people who think in binary.
  • Swype: This is iOS-only and so I haven’t been able to try it, but the TL;DR here is ‘Tinder, but for jobs!’ – yes, now you can apply the same degree of care and rigour to your search for a new job as you do to your search for a new person upon whom to dump all your neuroses (this is how relationships work, so I am led to believe)! I have NO DETAILS about this beyond what’s on the app store description –  ‘Swype makes job hunting easy and effortless. Just swype right to apply for a job, and our AI agent will handle the rest. No more wasting time typing the same information over and over again.’ Beautifully, the copy goes on to say ‘You can focus on better things while Swype takes care of the applications’ which doesn’t make it sound anyone’s really that invested in the whole ‘work’ thing. Anyway, given what the job market looks and feels like at the moment you might be desperate enough to give this a go.
  • Webbed Briefs: This is the webpage of a video series which posts…very occasional explainers about How Stuff On The Web Works (and other things too), all delivered with a pleasing voice-over and really rather nicely-done animations. It’s all quite geeky – recent videos include ‘what is react js?’ and ‘what are accessibility overlays?’, so it’s not exactly LOLcats over here is what I’m saying – but if you’re someone who’s trying to get their head round specific tech/coding concepts then there may be something here for you, or equally if you’re interested in video-based teaching/communication-type stuff. This is all the work of one Haydon Pickering, which is very impressive – TAKE A BOW, MYSTERIOUS STRANGER HAYDON PICKERING!
  • Wonderland: Are YOU into nature? Do YOU like ‘nature journaling’? Erm, in which case, can you explain what the fcuk the term means, as I have no idea and this site doesn’t really explain it very well? Anyway, Wonderland is an international community of nature enthusiasts and nature journalers (WHAT IS IT???), and there are apps, and, as far as I can tell, this is basically just a sort of friendly community for people who like rambling, pointing at terns, that sort of thing. Here’s the description – not going to lie, a not-insignificant part of the reason I’m including this is the fact that it’s founded by someone I share a name with (HELLO, DISTANT MUIR-FRIEND! HELLO!): “Join our free, supportive, creative, and joyful global nature journaling community cofounded by John Muir Laws, an award-winning author, artist, educator, and a principal innovator in the global nature journaling movement. The Wonderland community is passionate about nature, art, science, curiosity, and wonder. We love to learn from each other, inspire each other, and have fun together in nature’s beauty while we share the joys of nature journaling.” Seriously, though, the journaling, wtaf?
  • Rude Captcha: A lovely bit of creative coding and webcam use, this – a captcha that requires you to prove you’re human by swearing at your webcam. PLEASE someone, implement this on your actual website because it’s very, very satisfying telling your computer to fcuk off, turns out.
  • Your Name In Landmasses: Via Friend of Curios Lee Randall, a lovely new site by NASA which uses its ridiculous database of satellite photography to let you write any word you fancy, spelled out in satellite images of lakes and the like which look vaguely like the letters you requested. There’s obviously a swear filter in there – BOO NASA! – but it’s very US-centric and as such I was able to get it to spell out ‘NONCE’ in roads and reservoirs with nary a complaint, so, well, IN YOUR FACE, SPACE PURITANS.
  • Splitscreen ASCII Videos: It’s quite hard to explain this – basically it lets you apply an ASCII filter across either your webcam feed or any video you give it, which filter can be extended across however much of the width of the video you like (see? I TOLD YOU IT WAS HARD TO EXPLAIN). I can’t for the life of me thing what you would use this for, but I hope at least one of you uses it for SOMETHING.
  • Microwave Too High: A subReddit dedicated to photographs of microwaves which are TOO HIGH UP. Can any North Americans reading this explain to me what the everliving fcuk is up with interior design in your country because fcuking hell some of these interiors.

By Laura Krifka

NEXT UP WE HAVE THE RETURN OF TOM ‘DAPWEARER’ SPOONER AND HIS SOUNDS FROM AROUND THE WORLD, THIS TIME TAKING IN WHAT HE ASSURES ME IS ‘JAMAICAN DOO-WOP, FIDDLE FROM POCAHONTAS COUNTY, VIOLIN FROM ARMENIA, A SHEHNAI VIRTUOSO AND PLENTY OF PERCUSSIVE RHYTHMS FROM AFRICA TO SOUTH AMERICA’!

THE SECTION WHICH WOULD LIKE TO APOLOGISE TO ANY NEW READERS THIS WEEK FOR, WELL, THE FACT THAT THIS NEWSLETTER IS LIKE THIS, BASICALLY, PT.2:  

  • Chocolate Milk: ANOTHER reader submission (thankyou, by the way, I really do appreciate it when you send me stuff), this one by Jack Bewley, who writes (with a pleasing degree of consideration, I must say): “This guy has singlehandedly traveled the US and reviewed thousands of chocolate milk drinks. Looks like he’s at 1,791 tried, ranked and reviewed. Most seriously I’ve ever seen chocolate milk treated. As a fan of the drink, his reviews seem to be right on too.” I am personally not a huge fan of chocolate milk – look, it’s an Italian thing I think, in Italy chocolate milk IS Nesquik, and it’s for kids to have at breakfast or teatime and dunk biscuits into, and NOTHING ELSE – but I respect Jack’s specific knowledge and feel inclined to trust his judgement. Bookmark this page for all your chocolate milk knowledge needs. NB – he also reviews UK drinks, and awarded Frijj a pretty harsh score of 1.0, should that help you decide whether you trust this man with your lactic hydration.
  • 25 and Me: The post-Harris wave of cautious optimism continues, although tempered by the slight worry that, well, it’s still VERY close, and she is yet to actually SAY anything, and it could all still go horribly wrong (please God no). One of the main vectors of fear amongst liberals of a certain stripe is PROJECT 25, the think tank vision of what ‘a robust conservative future’ looks like and which is either ‘a terrifying vision of a post-Democratic future in which Trump basically becomes God emperor’ or ‘QAnon for the libs’ depending on your perspective. Anyway, if you would like to explore some of the concepts apparently espoused in the doctrine but don’t fancy wading through several million words of tortuous wonk-prose to work out what the fcuk they might be, then someone has built this site which basically uses an LLM (Gemini, in case you’re curious) to interrogate the documentation behind the project. Don’t get too scared, it might not happen.
  • Become a Judge at the Tiramisu World Cup: Brought to my attention by Former Editor Paul, there is apparently a world cup of Tiramisu’ happening in Italy in October, and they are currently accepting applications for judges. Would YOU like to go to Treviso and eat your own bodyweight in coffee, egg, mascarpone and biscuit-based dessert?GREAT! All you need to do is answer some…actually incredibly obtuse and confusing questions about the granular detail of the judging process, and keep your fingers crossed! Should any Curios readers happen to be successful in their application, may I take this opportunity to apply for the role of translator/factotum for the trip? Thanks1
  • Ocean Photographer of the Year 2024: Fish, cephalopods, corals and crustacea (and a bunch of other stuff too) – these are gorgeous, and it’s worth taking the time to click through the various categories as there are more nominated images that are immediately apparent from the UX here (small gripe: why are so many of the sites accompanying these photo contests so fcuking bad at displaying the actual photos they are rewarding?). My personal favourite is the big walrus in the first set of shots, magnificent b4stard that he is, but I have a big soft spot for this one too.
  • Uses This: Occasionally I think ‘wow, I’ve been doing this for a long time’ (and usually at that point do a small cry for my lost youth and wasted years and WHAT HAS THE WEB EVER GIVEN BACK TO ME, EH, WHY IS MY LOVE SO UNREQUITED) and then I come across projects like this which has been going since 2009 and I feel like a dilettante. “Uses This is a collection of nerdy interviews asking people from all walks of life what they use to get the job done” – and, yes, that’s exactly what this is. There’s a pleasing variety of people and professions, as you’d expect over the course of over 1200 interviews(!), and even though a lot of this stuff doesn’t mean much to me I can concede that there’s something rather lovely about reading about people who are very DEEP into doing something, and doing it well. If you’re a particular sort of LIFE OPTIMISING person there’s probably some useful stuff you can glean from here, if you’re willing to do a bit of spelunking.
  • The RollerCoaster Database: I have definitely featured something like this before, but not, I think, this one – ALL OF THE ROLLERCOASTERS IN ALL OF THE WORLD! China has the greatest number, unsurprisingly – I have to say I think a grand tour of China’s theme parks would be a VERY good time, should anyone want to take me on one – but this really is international, covering (seemingly) every single theme park in the world outside of (I assume) North Korea. Details on each coaster vary wildly, but you can usually see at least a few pics – there’s also a page listing record-holding coasters, ranking them by drop size, top speed, etc, and I confess that it makes Alton Towers look a bit provincial by comparison. I mean, look, I have no desire to ever visit Riyadh, but LOOK AT THIS TERRIFYING BEAUTY.
  • Ambiguous Words: A list of words with ambiguous meanings – “Here’s a bunch of words that, free of any other context, have a LOT of meanings. Because of this flexibility, they can be instrumental in titles for your songs, poems, stories, and jokes. Click on each word to delve deeper into these words’ meanings. The most flexible words are at the top of the list.” Potentially useful for poets, copywriters and the like, it’s also a pleasing 5 minutes for anyone who loves language. I remember having a moment of proper revelation as a kid when I read Lolita and realised that Humbert’s…ambiguous description of his honeymoon (‘I had the idiot in hysterics’) was sort of the key to much of the reading of the rest of the novel, and I adore this site.
  • 10,000 Pixels: ANOTHER collaborative/multiplayer website (I told you it was a trend ffs), this is basically /r/Place but on a single URL. 10,000 pixels, each of which can be colour edited in realtime by any visitor to the page, allowing for REALTIME COLLABORATIVE PIXELART COMPOSITIONS. At the time of writing it’s all very benign and there’s no nazis or even anyone writing ‘poop’ (rare, I promise), and there’s something quite nice about just having the webpage open and seeing it change and evolve in realtime (zoom out for a proper view, it’s…slightly magical to watch, to my mind, as a bunch of strangers patiently collaborate to make things appear and disappear over time).
  • Oh My Goodness: Oh wow, this is a quite incredible site. I don’t THINK it is riddled with Malware, but I appreciate that the aesthetic very much screams ‘WE ARE GOING TO INFECT YOUR PC WITH SO MUCH INCREDIBLY DODGY SPYWARE AS SOON AS YOU SO MUCH AS CLICK’ and, in general, it has almost unparalleled ‘old person who doesn’t understand the internet’ energy. What is it? It is a free greetings card site! Have you ever had an older relative who sends you ecards (RIP mother mine, you inexplicable Jacquie Lawson obsessive, you)? In which case you will get the idea – except, well, a lot of the designs here are what a certain type of online person might describe as ‘very cursed’, and there’s a weird bawdiness to the tone, and then you get to the ‘about’ copy which details the site’s history and you realise this is ANOTHER 25 year old web domain which is somehow still going (they even added ‘AI cards’ last year, astonishingly), and, well, I sort-of love this. The cards, mind, really are fcuking awful – I promise you that there is a LOT of mileage in picking one person you know (ideally not all that well) and communicating with them solely via the medium of Oh My Goodness cards for a solid week.
  • Weird Little Ripple Generator Thingy: Yes, I know, but YOU click the link and then tell me what you’d have called it. See? EXACTLY. Anyway, this is a bit trippy and a bit soothing and I rather liked the fx (I suspect it’s also quite nicely coded, though I am too much of a luddite to be able to actually tell).
  • Reflect Orbital: I can’t quite work out how I feel about this. As far as I can tell, this company is putting a bunch of massive mirrors in space which it is then going to use to reflect sunlight down to the surface of the Earth, directing it very precisely so as to enable the continued production of solar energy via panels even at times when it ought to be night – which, tentatively, sounds like an incredible idea, extending the potential productivity of solar energy by a huge amount. Except, also, I have seen and read enough vaguely-dystopian scifi to be able to ALSO imagine the ways in which this could be used to effectively torture entire populations with FOREVERDAYLIGHT, or (and, ok, I appreciate my grasp of physics here is perhaps not exactly ‘robust’, but still) maybe BURN A CITY LIKE ANTS IN A MAGNIFYING GLASS, and now I don’t quite know what to think. It is quite frankly a remarkable idea, but I would quite like someone who understands this stuff to explain to me whether it is indeed A Good Thing or whether it’s in fact A Bad Thing (or, perhaps more likely, whether attempting to define everything as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ is a fundamentally fcuking stupid approach to life that I really ought to grow out of).
  • Citroen 2CV Brochures from the 1970s: I mean, what more do you need to know? The brochures are actually fascinating from a design/style point of view, even if you’re not a Citroen obsessive like the owner of this website (I don’t think they would mind me describing them as such). If you are, though, then this is basically REALLY filthy bongo.
  • Fantasy Name Generators: ‘Fantasy’ in the ‘swords and sorcery’ sense rather than the ‘erotic reverie’ sense, although perhaps for some of you the two overlap to a degree. Anyway, if you’re a D&D player and need to quickly spin up a bunch of convincing-sounding names for, say, a bunch of half-orcs or a dwarven encampment, then you might find this interesting – if nothing else, the insane granularity you can apply here suggests someone somewhere has REALLY studied all the class guides closely. This is VERY niche, but might please some of you – and if not, it’s worth a click through and a quick play, because if nothing else a lot of the names it seems to throw up are pleasingly multisyllabic and ‘chewy’, if you have the same sort of vague word-synesthesia as I do.
  • The Lesbian Bar Project: Remarkably this is the second bit of BRANDED CONTENT to feature in consecutive weeks, and the second which I looked at and thought ‘you know what, this is…quite good!’ – although I’m not sure that it will do much to shift the brand position of Jaegermeister from ‘the medicinal stuff wot REAL LADS do shots of’’. Still, it’s a really interesting project which has been going for 4 years now, and which started as a Jaeger-sponsored PSA airing in the US to raise awareness of the fact that lesbian bars across the country were dying out, and which has pivoted into being what the homepage tells me is “an EMMY and GLAAD Award-winning documentary series, which tells the stories of lesbian queer bars from around the world.” Without watching any of the docs I can’t vouch for their quality, but the awards *seem* like a positive endorsement and in general I am very much in favour of the idea of something like this, where a brand effectively helps document a culture and preserve it rather than instead attempting to brand its fcuking logo all over said culture’s face.
  • Wall Town Wonders: I’m personally not really a VR person – I find the helmets cumbersome, and I will need better and more immersion before I’m ready to eschew the comfort of my chair and my gamepad. That said, this forthcoming title for the Meta Quest looks ABSOLUTELY AMAZING – it’s basically a small steampunk townbuilder thing, where you construct a city of buildings which…sort of get built into the actual walls of wherever you’re playing, and which contain ACTUAL TINY PEOPLE living ACTUAL TINY LIVES, and, honestly, if you’re the sort of person who’s ever thought ‘actually having the Borrowers as pets would be pretty cool’ then you will fall slightly in love with this.
  • Black Screens: From the FAQ: “Just a black screen display that fills your entire screen, creating a dark surface that you can control. This tool also can create and download any size black screen wallpaper image.” I genuinely have no idea AT ALL why this exists, or indeed why anyone would need the parallel service on the site of a 15 minute video that is nothing but…a blank screen, but, well, I have no idea who you are and so perhaps YOU will be the person who can explain it to me. Anyone?
  • The USC SFX Archive: Sound effects! So many of them! Some from the 30s and 40s, some more recent, but this is a HUGE trove of samples and clips – in particular there are a bunch from old cartoons which would be PERFECT as hiphop samples, but, honestly, this is a staggeringly rich collection on the Internet Archive.
  • Dogelon Mars: I think – and there’s been some pretty stiff competition over the past few years – that this MIGHT be the single lamest crypto/NFT/web3 thing I have ever seen. It contains the usual word salad complete with vague promises of ‘massive gameplay’ and ‘fungible digital goods’, and even goes so far as to make the following genuinely risible claim: “Dogelon Mars is creating a metaverse set on Mars, by integrating AI to create an immersive and interactive virtual experience. Our goal is to redefine how communities interact, build, and engage in digital spaces.” YES MATE OF COURSE YOU ARE NOW EXPLAIN WHAT THE FCUK THOSE WORDS MEAN! But, of course, the lamest thing of all is the name – I’m slightly of the opinion that anyone who gets suckered into this deserves everything they get. I mean, honestly, who can read this sentence and claim to understand what it is meant to be saying? “Scheduled to launch in Q3 2024, “Dogelon: Land on Mars” aims to provide users with new opportunities to explore, create, and interact within a Martian-themed environment. By leveraging AI and the efficiency of Rufus L2, Dogelon Mars is set to offer a unique experience that aligns with our mission of exploring new digital frontiers.” NO FCUKER, etc.
  • Family Fortunes Generator: You just got the ‘NEH-NERRH’ sound in your head, didn’t you? ADMIT IT. Anyway, this website lets you generate your very own Family Fortunes answer card, so you can set the category of thing (‘types of firearm’, say, or ‘ways to kill yourself’, and the answers you want to appear,  and LO! Welcome to an exciting new world of low-stakes memetic fun. I think, with a bit of work and a well-honed central bit, you could over time bully someone to the point of tears with these.
  • SceneWise: This is a theoretically fun game which I found a touch too easy to be really compelling – you have to rearrange the six images, each of which is an individual frame from a film, into chronological order, which sounds tricky but given you get six goes and the tiles lock into place as soon as you get them right is actually pretty easy to get right simply by guessing at random (which is what happens to me, as obviously I have no fcuking idea what any of these films are). Still, cinephiles might enjoy this.
  • Crucig: As a wordcel, though, this one I really do like. A small daily word puzzle where you have to solve both horizontal and vertical clues – it’s not hard, but it does that weird thing where it made me feel vaguely like I was using different bits of my brain simultaneously, like patting your head and rubbing your stomach.
  • One-Page RPG Jam 2024: An absolute motherlode of one-page RPGs for you to play, should you be into that sort of thing. Some of these are games, some are what feel more like personal acts of meditation or reflection, some are designed to be played in company while others are entirely solo experiences…there is a LOT in here if you’re willing to explore.
  • Graphs: The website shows you a graph tracking two variables over time – your job is to pick which of the four options said graph is depiction. Very much from the school of ‘correlation is not causation’ and quite interesting in a gentle, very geeky sort of way.
  • A Castle Built From Random Rooms: Finally this week, a charming little CYOA-style adventure which combines a light degree of surreality and self-reflexiveness with surprisingly deep mechanics (I particularly enjoyed the persistence of certain choices across the narrative) and a huge degree of replayability – this is basically a text-adventure roguelike, where each time the rooms you’re trying to traverse change in terms of layout, contents and the like, and where no two playthroughs will ever be the same, and there are a bunch of different endings, and, honestly, this is just a really good way of passing 30m while you wait for something more interesting to happen to you.

By Daisuke Ichiba

OUR FINAL MIX THIS WEEK IS BY MAGNETIC SOUL AND IS MAKING ME FEEL LIKE I AM ON A BEACH SOMEWHERE LOVELY AT SUNSET RATHER THAN STARING AT A STEEL-GREY SKY IN AN UNPREPOSESSING PART OF SOUTH LONDON AT 0959AM AND WHICH MIGHT DO THE SAME FOR YOU IF YOU CONCENTRATE REALLY HARD! 

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Girls of the Internet Museum: This is nine years dormant, but it is SUCH a perfect time capsule of a certain era – the aesthetic, the discussions about webart and self and sexuality and presentation…I got a proper hit of digital nostalgia here, and I think this site will be a real madeline for you should you be of a particular era/persuastion.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS IS, ODDLY, EMPTY!

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • People Aren’t Posting: We;ve been having the ‘social media (or at least this era of it) is DYING!’ conversation for a few years now, accelerated since That Fcuking Man bought Twitter, but it feels timely again given the latest round of reasons to leave X and the simultaneous lack of any real, meaningful boom in any of the alternatives (yes, I know people have ‘flocked’ to Bluesky…but actually most of them really haven’t; yes, people are signed up to Threads…but I am yet to meet anyone who finds it a pleasant or useful place to spend time, and without news it’s dead to me). This piece is a good overview of the whys, and does a better job of most that I’ve read of articulating the mechanical reasons as to them – it’s a decent overview of incentives and burdens inherent in a network, and how unbalancing those two factors can fatally wreck a posting ecosystem, and basically boils down to this: “Apps like Instagram are split into two separate platforms for two separate groups of people: a social connector and an entertainment media center. The goal is to balance incentive enough for the latter to ensure there is enough fodder for the former” and this: “Since social media is now more aligned with digital video entertainment platforms, the act of posting is arguably more aligned with work rather than leisure, while the act of consuming is more aligned with being entertained and, therefore, sold to rather than offering connection.” This is smart and worth a read if you’re interested in how communities and incentives and power networks function, in both theory and practice.
  • John Lanchester on Markets and Value: I will include pretty much anything Lanchester writes for the LRB about money, markets and late-stage capitalism – he’s not only a superb writer (I have said this before, but ‘The Debt to Pleasure’ is one of my favourite ever novels and one you really should read) but he’s also got a rare ability to explain concepts that ordinarily I find not only hard but STAGGERINGLY BORING in a way that makes them comprehensible and interesting. Here he does a combined review of two books about modern finance, the first a profile of one of the world’s most successful hedge funds and the second the autobiography of a now-reformed City trader, which allows him to offer a range of reasonably-digestible series of explanations as to How This Stuff Works and Why It Might Be Better For Everyone Not Directly Involved In Making Violent Bank From Such Systems If They Didn’t In Fact Work That Way. It’s quite hard to read this without getting a *bit* annoyed at how much of this stuff seems designed less to aid ‘value creation’ and more to aid ‘specific men at specific companies becoming plutocratically rich’, basically, and if you’re not 10% more left-wing by the end then I really don’t know what to do with you.
  • That ‘AI and Art’ Essay Everyone’s Talking About: Ted Chiang’s written several well-shared pieces talking about AI over the past few years, largely focusing on the creative output side of things – this essay has been EVERYWHERE this week, largely as a result of a title (“Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art”) which is being wrongly interpreted as “You can’t make art with AI”, which is very much NOT what Chiang is saying. Broadly speaking I agree with some of the points he makes, specifically about the requirement for art to have an element of intentionality which is necessarily absent from anything made by (current generative) AI being as all it is is maths, and maths cannot have intent. Equally, though, Chiang concedes that artists have made, are making, and will continue to make, work *in conjunction with* non-intentional systems, and that these works are perfectly capable of being considered as ‘art’. Basically I think this piece is a storm in a teacup – all Chiang is saying is that The Machine cannot alone be considered to make art because of the lack of intentionality embodied in its making, but that that does not preclude intentional entities (ie us) from using the outputs of AI to create work that is very intentional indeed (and here we circle all the way back to what I was saying about Trisha Code all those many thousands of words ago – see, SEAMLESS ffs).
  • Post-Apocalyptic Education: Ethan Mollick is back again with another measured ‘where we are with this stuff’ on AI, this time as it relates to education and particularly university education. Mollick’s a professor and so has a particular special interest in this – his point, that the genie is out of the bottle when it comes to students using GenAI and that as such it makes sense for educators to start to think of ways you can teach said students about how to maybe use these tools to augment, rather than replace, their studies, is a sensible one, and worth reading if you’re a parent worried that your kid’s going to fail their GCSEs because they’re getting ChatGPT to write all their coursework (that is not why they are going to fail – they are going to fail because of YOUR subpar genetic material!).
  • Why LLMs Aren’t Quite Modelling Language: Ok, this is quite knotty but reasonably-accessible and it touches on issues I’ve mentioned in here before about language, consciousness, embodiment and LLMs, and why their relationship to language is possibly different (and less intimate) than we might have initially assumed – rather than attempt to summarise, I am going to take the lazy way out and paste a couple of reasonably-explicatory paras: “The problem is that one of the more modern branches of cognitive science sees language as a behavior rather than a big pile of text. In other words, language is something we do, and have done for hundreds of thousands of years. The approach taken by Birhane and her colleagues is to understand human thought in terms that are “embodied” and “enacted.” “The idea is that cognition doesn’t end at the brain and the person doesn’t end at the the skin. Rather, cognition is extended. Personhood is messy, ambiguous, intertwined with the existence of others, and so on,” she said.”
  • How Do You Change A Chatbot’s Mind?: To be clear, I think this is a bad and badly-written article penned by someone who, based on the bodying he received for his last piece on AI, I would have expected to still be hiding somewhere, licking his wounds and reading up on how this sh1t actually works. Kevin Roose – for it is he, the man who wrote that risible piece about how he got freaked out because a chatbot said it loved him – writes for the New York Times about how the latest versions of ChatGPT et al will now, when asked about him, be less than complimentary. Roose seems to ascribe this to them having ‘learned’ that he has ‘doubts’ about them, and seems to spin it into some sort of vaguely-Roko’s Basilisk (sorry for dooming you there!) adjacent situation where he wants to change their mind ahead of their inevitable takeover of everything…look, this is all very dumb, and borderline-irresponsible reporting, to my mind (I think the NYT shouldn’t publish essays that make this stuff sound sentient or magical!), but about halfway through it segues into slightly more interesting territory, as Roose starts talking to the new wave of AI SEO consultants (just as mendacious, just as shady, twice as expensive!) and you get a glimpse of how many people are going to make quick back developing ‘AI ingestion-resistent content strategies’. Go on, quick, register the consultancy, buy the url and spin up the website, there are idiots to fleece!
  • The NaNoWriMo AI Controversy: This week’s big ‘GAH THE INTEGRITY OF ART IS BEING FCUKED BY THE MACHINE’ is on one hand a bit depressing and on the other very funny. The depressing bit is that the National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo – you know, that thing where people decide to write a terrible, unreadable, unpublishable novel within a 30 day timespan) people this week released a statement saying that they would be fine with people using AI to write said terrible, unreadable novels – WHICH SORT OF RATHER DEFEATS THE FCUKING PURPOSE OF A NOVEL WRITING INITIATIVE SEEING AS THERE WOULDN’T IN FACT BE ANY WRITING HAPPENING. They even went so far as to call opposition to AI ‘ableist’, which, well, fcuking hell. This 404 Media piece does a decent job of outlining the controversy – and NaNoWriMo’s subsequent ‘clarification’ of their position, but to my mind the funny bit is that, well, NaNoWriMo as an entity/organisation is no stranger to some beef, as evidenced by this astonishingly petty and detailed document, and what I want to know is how the everliving fcuk does an initiative which, to be clear, is about nothing more than saying ‘hey, why not try writing a whole book one November? Might be fun!’ has managed to be THIS messy. I am possibly being unfair, but I feel that the NaNoWriMo people have very strong ‘polycule energy’ if you see what I mean.
  • The Doc Web: Jay Springett writes about the beauty of collaborative documents, and the idea of ‘working in the shop window’, and I partly just really like the thinking in here about how this might work as collaborative/performative work: “Here’s the idea: Once a month. A group of authors and contributors come together for a live writing session, jamming in Google Docs. Maybe we stream the Zoom call on Twitch, allowing viewers to watch the new issue evolve in real-time – perhaps even contributing comments and suggestions in the document. This would transform the act of writing and publishing into a performance—a shared experience that blends the roles of creator and audience. As well as making the production of each webzine fun.” Would you like me to open up the Curios draft so you can watch me type this shit in realtime? No, of course you fcuking wouldn’t, shut up Matt.
  • This Summer, Everything Was Marketing: You might read this headline and think ‘only this Summer?’ and then sigh and cry a bit, but it’s a broadly-interesting look at how this year really has felt like the apogee of the ‘zeitgeist chewed up by the global brand ecosystem and digested and fed to us again as the vomited up remains of said zeitgeist’ thing, and how the pace of it is getting A BIT MUCH. “It’s 2024 and every man with a strong nose is a hot rodent boyfriend, every situationship is diabolical, and every girl is demure. Brat the album will stand up on the basis of our individual relationships to it, but Brat the concept has been run into the ground. This is the way of everything now. From the “auras” on display at the Olympics to the coconut tree comments of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign, the language of social media is increasingly the first point of entry to culture and politics, creating a mythology that informs the subject rather than the other way around. In other words: everything is marketing and nothing matters.”
  • Securing the Viral Bag in 2024: With the news that FellatioGirl (I refuse to use the other nickname because it is too ugly to type) is launching a podcast under the Paul umbrella (fair play, the title is very good), and the recent story about the ‘demure, mindful’ woman struggling to secure the copyright on her viral catchphrase, this is an interesting piece about how ‘creators’ (sorry, but I feel…angry about being forced to use that word to describe someone who has found fame thanks to her ability to onomatopoeically describe the act of giving sloppy head – no shade to Miss Welch who seems like a nice enough young woman, but ‘creator’?) these days have to move fast to secure the proceeds of their 15 minutes. I like to imagine Antoine Dobson reading this somewhere (hopefully somewhere warm and comfortable) and smiling to himself.
  • Google Forms Dating: I had heard that people were using Google Forms as means of finding and screening potential partners, but I confess that the additional hack of then chucking a bit of ad spend behind the link to promote it to your local postcodes was new to me and is sort of brilliantly depressing. IS THERE NO FACET OF OUR LIVES ADVERMARKETINGPR CANNOT INVADE? No, seemingly not. Anyway, this is a decent overview of the latest nadir in the modern dating landscape and made me momentarily miserable until I realised that I am so old that none of this sh1t is ever going to apply to me again and I should instead just sit and wait quietly for lonely death.
  • The Secret Inside One Million Checkboxes: Nolen Royalty – he of TINY AWARD-WINNING website One Million Checkboxes, writes a genuinely heartwarming (if slightly-geeky) tale of how his webproject got hacked by kids in a genuinely lovely way. This honestly gave me a proper sense of ‘the kids are alright!’, which doesn’t often happen these days – this is SO creative, seriously.
  • Burgers: This is a New York Times piece about burgers – specifically, about 11 variations across the US that ‘make the burger great’ – and I am including it mainly because OH MY GOD do these look good, and read well, and this basically made me want to inhale about seven minced cows at once. Can someone take a look at this and PLEASE tell me where I can get a decent burger in London that doesn’t involve me having to a) queue or b) watch some awful cnut’s TikTok to find the location? Serious request.
  • Countess Bathory: I have always had a soft spot for the Bathory story, but had always assumed that it was either entirely or mostly-confected – turns out, though, that there’s a grisly core of truth to the whole thing and that an awful lot of young women did disappear and die in and around her residence in 1600s Hungary. Questions remain, though, about whether it was Bathory doing the killing, and why – this piece doesn’t answer them, but it’s a fascinating look at both the history and the resulting mythos. It also contains some fabulous details, including this one – whatever you say about People Of Past Times, it is undeniably true that they were endlessly, brilliantly inventive when it came to inventing novel ways of offing people: “Violent public executions were commonplace in Hungary during her childhood, and stories tell of a young Báthory witnessing a man being stitched into a horse while still alive.” READ THAT LAST BIT BACK AGAIN. THAT’S RIGHT.
  • The Rise of Pirated Medicine: This is a nice callback piece – about 6 or seven years ago I featured a longread in here about biohacking collective Four Thieves, who were playing around with CRISPR and related technologies to effectively work out how to fix their own bodies at low cost (you may be unsurprised to learn that this motivation arose from them being North American and realising that, say, ‘getting cancer’ is a really fcuking expensive proposition) – this is an update on the collective, their work, and what they are now able to do, and it is both inspirational and vaguely-terrifying and ought to make you quite angry about how the Pharma industry works and what it charges (and yes, I know, R&D costs! But equally I was once told by someone senior at Pfizer that these days their marketing budgets significantly outweigh the research spend, so, well, fcuk them and their profit margins into the sun).
  • In Search of Lost Time, lol: Ok, this is a single note gag but for some reason it has repeatedly made me laugh quite a lot this morning (overtired, as per), and as such I share it with you – this is a link to a GDrive containing a PDF of Marcel Proust’s ‘In Search of Lost Time’, in all its many thousands of pages, the only difference from the original being that each and every sentence ends in ‘lol’. Which, it turns out, does radically alter the tenor and general vibe of a classic – honestly, can someone build something that will automatically Lolify any ebook in your collection? Please? It’s like stick-on googly eyes for prose.
  • WTF Is The River Cafe Podcast?: Podcasts are, basically, sh1t, aren’t they? Not ALL podcasts, obvs – I went to a recording of this one last night which was actually excellent, and, should you be interested in hearing my horrible, too-fast voice, I even appeared on one earlier this week – but as a rule they can fcuk off (I am just bitter at how much I know Alastair Cambell and Rory Stewart earn from TRIP). In this piece in Vittles, Simran Han goes in on the River Cafe podcast (WHY DOES IT HAVE A PODCAST?!?!?! I *bet* whoever’s doing the production and editing on this is fleecing them like nobody’s business), where Ruth(ie) Rogers interviews a cavalcade of VERY A-List guests about, er, food, I think, and how ace the River Cafe is – I think this does a very good job of articulating why, as a rule, I would like the medium to die, and it’s very funny, and despite everything I’ve written in the preceding 150 words it made me quite want to listen to an episode damn them.
  • I Am Having A Really Hard Time: I have no idea how I found this, or who J Keenan (the author is), but I thought it was a lovely little bit of writing, a semi-stream-of-consciousness about fear and death and friendship and loss, and it stayed with me all week and maybe it will with you too.
  • Oath To The Queen: Xiaolu Guo writes in Granta about the process of ‘becoming English’, taking the citizenship test, about how ideology manifests differently in different countries and how it’s seen and how symbols are interpreted and how, perhaps, a current global giant looks at a previous one, with a degree of curious pity. “As I exited the exam room, I had little hope that I would pass. Deep down I think my lack of preparation was not just laziness, or merely the product of preoccupation with other things, but also resistance. There was something about the implicit pride in a supposed thousand years of monarchy, and the parliamentary system – which few I suspected understood – that made me feel ill at ease. It was the same syndrome as The Archers. I was just being introduced to the cultural symbols and motifs of the United Kingdom. People learn the history of kings and queens just like we learn fairy tales or consume the latest soap operas. And what for? It’s all about instilling the collective wisdom of the ruling classes, yet done in the most bland and innocuous way.”
  • In Search of Circus Europa: I’ll be honest, I’ve never really thought of Switzerland as a place where interesting things happen – there’s a reason P&G, home to the blandest corporate drones ever vat-grown in a lab, have their home there, after all. Then I read this piece, about Basel’s lunatic-sounding three-day carnival, and I want to go SO MUCH. This is honestly such a good piece of writing – about circus and carnival and performance and folklore and community and all sorts besides, which more than anything evokes a powerful sense of the ODD; there’s something incredibly Midsommar-ish about the atmosphere of this piece (no, really), which will make me very disappointed should I ever visit this carnival and not get, I don’t know, abducted by some sort of pagan goat creature.
  • This Is Not A Eulogy: Finally this week, notes on a friendship, notes on a suicide. I thought  this was beautiful. “If this were fiction, I’d set the following scene in a restaurant with a view of the park, the two of us cozied in a velvet banquette, me studying the sprinkling of freckles on her nose revealed in the late afternoon light, crème fraiche and martinis coating our words. Instead, it happened over the phone: she asked me if I wanted to come with her. She’d been saving up pills and was sure her supply had reached overkill. She’d reserved a room at The Paramount, the Philippe Starck place du moment conveniently located only two blocks from my apartment, and said she’d buy champagne too, the good stuff. She was living off her mom’s insurance money. “We lie down, side by side on the bed. On it, not under the covers, that’s important. Then we’re falling, and neither of us will ever be alone.””

By Guy Vording

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!:

Webcurios 30/08/24

Reading Time: 34 minutes

HAPPY LAST FRIDAY IN AUGUST, EVERYONE!

That’s right – it’s basically all over, it’s all mist and mellow fruitfulness from hereon in (apart from those of you reading this in the antipodes – thanks Rosie! Does this satisfy your hubris?), but thankfully this edition of Curios is PACKED FULL OF SUNSHINE and will possibly extend the summer for another week or so if you click every single link and wish REALLY HARD.

(this is not true, sorry – Curios is the same old litany of phoned-in prose and bitter cynicism it always is, and the cold and the rain are inevitable).

BUT, before we crack on with the links this week, we have our Tiny Awards winners!  Congratulations to Elliott Cost, who made One Minute Park (winner of the main award, £500 and a HANDMADE TROPHY!), and (the truly wonderfully-named) Nolen Royalty, whose One Million Checkboxes won the multiplayer award and £300! The Tiny Awards will be back next year, presuming neither Kris or I die in the intervening 9-10 months or are so deep in penury that we can no longer afford to do it.

A brief moment of sincerity – thanks SO MUCH to everyone who shared the links, who voted, who submitted sites, who said nice things about the project, who wrote about it and who generally made it feel like it was A Good and Worthwhile thing to do – as someone who’s basically got a pathological aversion to, well, ‘trying’, it was honestly wonderful to be reminded of the fact that it is actually worth putting effort into things every now and again because you can occasionally make Nice And Good Things Happen. Seriously, thankyou so much to everyone who engaged even a tiny (lol!) bit with the project, it’s honestly making me get a bit emo so I am going to have to stop typing about it now.

I am still Matt, this is still Curios, and you will never have to read me being ‘sincere’ at you ever again, I promise (well, until next year).

By Slawomir Elsner (images via TIH, as per)

WE BEGIN THIS WEEK WITH A TRULY SUPERB PLAYLIST, 20 HOURS OF ECLECTIC, VARIED BUT CONSISTENTLY-AWESOME TRACKS SELECTED AND COMPILED BY COLECTIVO FUTURO! 

THE SECTION WHICH HAS JUST REALISED IT REALLY NEEDS A HOLIDAY, PT.1:  

  • Stranger Video: The second site in just a few weeks that goes big on EYES – feel free to make this the basis of some sort of spurious ‘moments of ocular contact are going to be BIG in 2025!’ trends prediction! After Neal’s Eyechat from a couple of Curios ago comes this effort from prolific builder of Fun Web Things (and Tiny Award 2024 winner, no less! The prestige! Nolen, should you read this you should probably consider getting that honorific inked somewhere on your flesh) Nolen Royalty – again, the premise is basically that the site pairs you with another user somewhere in the world, showing each of you a view of the other that includes only a pretty intense close-up of their face – whereas Neal’s site was just about staring at each other until you got uncomfortable and noped out, this one introduces a gentle element of competition, with the connection to your mysterious eye buddy lasting only as long as you can both resist blinking – as soon as one participant blinks, the video link is severed. I really, really enjoy this – short periods of INTENSE STARING are, to my mind, the very best way to meet strangers on the web – but do be warned that, depending on traffic, you may end up getting matched with the same person repeatedly, which is exactly what happened to me earlier this week when I ended up repeatedly staring deep into the eyes of an increasingly-uncomfortable kid who I am pretty sure was by the end convinced that I was plumbing the very depths of his soul with my uncomfortably-large pupils. The BEST thing about this, though, is that there’s a very real possibility that for a few hours this afternoon it will enable readers of Curios to GAZE INTO EACH OTHERS’ SOULS – know that if you click this link there is a non-trivial possibility that you will be matched with one of the other weird masochists who chooses to subscribe to this piece of sh1t. Is this…is this ‘community building’? I’ll be inviting you all to sign up for my ‘guided creativity retreat’ next.
  • Onge: This is SO beautifully done. Onge is the personal website of…someone from South America who, as far as I can tell, has built this on top of retro platform NeoCities. It’s very simple – the content amounts to their art portfolio, notes on films they like, a blog, a small lofi chat function, that sort of thing – but the aesthetic on display is GLORIOUS, the transitional animations as you navigate between the different site elements are sublime, and I’m generally a sucker for this sort of vaguely-pointillist/pixellist art style. Aside from anything else, I think building this on NeoCities is incredibly impressive and shows the flexibility of the platform – can we have a resurgence in personal websites in 2025, please? I think it would be A Good Thing, and a nice alternative to fcuking Insta.
  • Cellar Door: What’s the BEST word? No, fcuk off, that’s NOT a spurious and reductive and entirely-subjective question! Cellar Door is a website dedicated to determining the best-loved collection of letters in the English language – click the link and you’re presented with a series of binary choices between words, with your sole task being to pick your preferred option of the two. Click, pick, rinse, repeat. The site tracks votes, so you can also peruse a leaderboard of the current frontrunners, which is how I am able to tell you with no little authority that, as of 731am BST on 30 August, the BEST word in the English language is ‘rut’. No, it is, I don’t make the rules. I would quite like to see this paired with a version designed to find the world’s least-favourite word, except you just know it would be overtaken by the sorts of tedious pr1cks who pretend to find the term ‘moist’ inherently upsetting (NOONE DISLIKES THE WORD ‘MOIST’ YOU PERFORMATIVE DULLARDS, I BET THE VENN DIAGRAM OF YOU AND PEOPLE WHO PRETEND TO BE SCARED OF CLOWNS IS A CIRCLE). For what it’s worth, by the way, the best word is either ‘quiddity’ or ‘zugzwang’ (this is a fact and I will brook no argument).
  • Dracula Flow Scripture: I have featured two separate Dracula Flow videos on here, but I have…doubts as to how many of you engaged with them – partly because obviously I have no idea who clicks on what, partly because I always suspect that people have in the main lost the will to live by the time I eventually get to the videos (this is the point at which you could, if you were so minded, choose to drop me an email reassuring me that this is not in fact the case), and partly because, well, they are very fcuking odd indeed. This is a shame, because I continue to maintain that they are ART in the purest sense – and so I was thrilled this week to discover that some wonderful human has created a Dracula Flow soundboard so you can experience the DEEP WISDOM of the scripture without necessarily needing to imbibe it via the medium of longform YouTube. Click the link, hit the button and let the knowledge seep into your bones – I find this almost cripplingly addictive, to the point that I just lost (*checks*) 4 minutes to it just now, listening to a faceless man shouting ‘get me the fcuking fentanyl’ and cry-laughing. I think I might be overtired tbh.
  • Watercolour Blade Runner: Ok, this should technically be in the videos but I have no idea how to embed it from the Internet Archive and so it can sit here instead – this is quite astonishing, honestly, and really does warrant a look. Per the person who has found and archived it, “twelve years ago, a painter by the name of anders ramsell painted 12,597 aquarelle paintings of blade runner, shot by shot, of the entire film edited down to ~35 minutes. it took two years of painstaking work, all done in his spare time after work each night. the video circled around the web for a few years, and quietly disappeared from every single site it was hosted at. a few months ago i spent a few hours digging for it, and finally found a copy of the original file.” This is proper INTERNET HISTORY, an incredible labour of love and a quite astonishing technical achievement – the degree of effort and painstaking attention speak to a frankly-obsessional tendency in the original artist, but it really is a staggering bit of work (and I say that as someone who has no personal interest in Blade Runner whatsoever).
  • I Need A Book Cover: I am genuinely thrilled when people email me their work for inclusion in Curios, and it was lovely receiving a note from Zoe in the US about this project. I Need A Book Cover is a site that collects different examples of, er, book cover design for anyone to peruse – it’s also grown into a resource for writers looking for cover designers, or designers looking for projects, and in general is a really useful resource for anyone interested in cover design in general . Per Zoe,  “Using the different category tabs on the left, you can filter your results to look at book covers that all use similar styles, such as top and bottom text or another favorite of mine, trompe l’oeil. Or, you can look at only purple covers, etc….Designers love it for inspiration, Art Directors use the directory to remind themselves of who to hire next, editors use it for mood board creation, book bloggers come to the site to find design credits, and self-publishers use the directory and the Jobs Board to HIRE designers. I posted two new book cover design briefs to the jobs board just this morning.” Big fan of this, and even a quick perusal of the selection has shown me some gorgeous bits of work that I’ve never seen before – this, for example, which I would totally have as a piece of art at home.
  • Fuzzzel: I once had a brief thing with someone who, I discovered, was incapable of sleeping without the ‘reassuring’ fuzz of white noise blaring out of their phone speaker as they kipped – this was how I learned that I, by contrast, find the opposite. Still, if you’re the sort of oddity who needs the sound of a detuned radio to slip out of consciousness of a night then you might enjoy this app, which for the low, low sum of $4 will provide you with not just ANY white noise but ARTISANAL white noise, white noise ‘composed’ by sound artists and presumably designed to help you attain a better, cleaner, more valuable tier of rest than that afforded by, I don’t know, turning the AM dial all the way to the left. “These longform explorations of static, drones, fuzz, wind and spectrum-filling oblivion make Fuzzzel not only a utilitarian sound-making device but a one-of-a-kind creative platform. Fuzzzel reroutes the demand for white noise into the hands of professionals, sound artists and creatives. Every piece on Fuzzzel is a lengthy, exclusive ambient journey created with the pulse of a human being and the ear of a gifted musician. Each piece — together totaling more than two hours of new music — loops indefinitely alongside a unique video provided by each artist.” Obviously I am being sniffy about this because, well, I can, but the artists featured here are actual, proper musicians, and I suppose if you’re the sort of person who likes ‘challenging’ music and thinks the sonic output of, say, Skinny Puppy is almost-saccharine in its melodic nature then you might find something deeply satisfying about it.
  • GTAesthetic: A Twitter account posting screenshots and clips from a (seemingly heavily-modded) version of GTA San Andreas. There’s something weirdly, powerfully nostalgic about these visuals – part of it is lost youth nostalgia, obviously (how innocent our San Andreas days!), but part of it’s the odd, post-digital semi-hauntological thing that you get with specific pixel aesthetics, and the very particular strangeness of looking at an old videogame which itself is mimicking the vibe and aesthetic of old TV shows and films. I like this a lot, though the aesthetic is, for me, *slightly* ruined by the fact that the most recent screencaps feature a modded-in version of Hatsune Miku which feels like it queers the vibe slightly.
  • Only Visit Once: Almost certainly not the first site with this gimmick to have featured here over the years, but I’ve not seen one for a while and it’s a concept I am very much a fan of. The site itself isn’t hugely exciting – it’s a relatively simple ‘leave a message for future visitors’-type gimmick where you’re invited to either submit your own nugget of wisdom/sub-Hallmark bromide (delete as applicable) for others to read, or to peruse the words left by previous visitors – but the catch is that you can only visit the url once. Any repeat visits from (I presume) the same IP address will result in a redirect to a different page which simply says “You’ve already passed this way before. Your journey lies ahead—don’t look back.” I feel there is a LOT of quite fun stuff you could do with this – there are a bunch of semi-obvious ‘ARTY WEBSITE’ concepts that spring to mind, but I’m sure you can all think of some EXCITING COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS (you filthy capitalists, you!).
  • Live Lightning Maps: I’m not entirely sure how ‘live’ the ‘live’ element of this is, but opening it now I am struck by the fact that WE ARE CONSTANTLY BEING STRUCK BY SPACE ELECTRICITY (yes, I know that lightning is not *technically* – or indeed in any meaningful way whatsoever – ‘space electricity’, but let me have my childish sense of wonder, please). Seriously, this is mildly-terrifying. If you fancy REALLY upsetting your young children, why not bring this up on a big screen and tell them it’s a realtime depiction of where the just-announced nuclear strikes are landing? FUN FOR ALL THE FAMILY!
  • One Million Letters: So after Nolen’s One Million Checkboxes (did I mention it won the multiplayer Tiny Award? It did, you know) it seems ‘One Million X’ is goint to be a thing in frivolous webdesign for a while. This is a variant on the theme which presents a million spaces for characters to be typed, with anyone able to add or remove letters per their wont – what this means in practice is that you’ve got a VERY BIG group writing project, which effectively acts as a completely incomprehensible expression of the collective ID of what appears to be a LOT of c.13 year olds (I am basing this on the number of users who appear to be very keen to talk about ‘poop’). This is pretty much entirely gibberish, but I quite like the massively random nature of it and the scale means that you can occasionally find some quite odd and occasionally poignant things if you scroll down far enough (NB – at the time of writing this doesn’t appear to feature any appalling hatespeech or slurs, etc, but I’m conscious that these sorts of things are only ever one 4Chan brigading away from being nazi-adjacent cesspits so, well, caveat emptor and all that).
  • Elastic Grid: Click the link, move your mouse around and get lost in the optical illusion. I would really, really like to put this on the big wraparound HD screens at the horrible Outernet development at Tottenham Court Road and use it to give the assembled masses a really dreadful case of motion sickness.
  • Coffee: This comes via Kris, I think – I have no idea who has made it, or who they are, or where they live, but I do know, thanks to this site, that they drink a lot of coffee, and document each cup they drink by posting a small, unremarkable photo of it on this site. Per the stats, this has been going for five years and features just shy of 1300 individual cups – why? WHY THE FCUK NOT MUST EVERYTHING HAVE A RATIONALE? JESUS WEPT.
  • Creative Bots: A collection of bots and bot-related projects by Stefan Bohacek – these are mostly on Mastodon now (THANKS ELON YOU FCUKING PR1CK), but if you can get over the general sense of distaste that probably gives you then there’s a really nice range of bots here, from the creative to the whimsical – bots that share lighthouses, bots that share pictures of the sorts of spiral graphics used to hynotise Wil E Coyote in countless Looney Tunes shorts, bots that share photos from the South Pole…partly just a fun collection of digital projects, but also a pleasant reminder of how (relatively) easy it is to spin up something small and frivolous that makes the web a marginally-nicer place than it would otherwise be.
  • Live Air Traffic Control Feeds: According to pretty much everything I’ve read on the topic, and the genuinely weird 90s film Pushing Tin, being an air traffic controller is an insanely stressful job and the sort of thing that makes alcoholics or outpatients of many professionals in the trade. Which in turn makes it odd that listening to the radio chatter from air traffic controllers is so weirdly soothing – as I type I am listening in to the lads in Osaka brining the planes home in crackly Japanese and there’s something undeniably pleasing and ASMR-adjacent about the whole thing. This page takes you to a list of the ‘top 50’ air traffic control streams in the world (I have literally no idea how they are quantifying ‘best’ here) and you can drop in on airports from Boston to Sydney and everywhere inbetween, and this is strangely just wonderful and oddly soothing. Except, I imagine, should you happen on a stream at a point at which something goes terribly, fierily wrong.
  • AI Robocalls: This is, fine, not a particularly interesting website per se – the company’s called Bland and they want to flog you automated calls centre solutions delivered via THE MAGICAL (not magical) POWER OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, which isn’t something I imagine any of you give a particular fcuk about. BUT! This also gives you the option to check out the service by putting in your phone number and getting one of said AI calls centre operators to give you a ring, and it’s worth a go because fcuking hell is this impressive. It still sounds like a robot, but the responsiveness and speed and accuracy is pretty incredible – consider the canary in the ‘are calls centre staff still going to have jobs in 2026?’ coalmine to be pretty definitively fcuked, basically.
  • Fragrantica: I went out for my friend Jay’s birthday drinks this week and met some very nice people, one of whom told me about this INCREDIBLE website – Fragrantica is an online community for people who are really, really into perfumes, and who really, really want to read and write reviews about said perfumes, and OH MY GOD is this a wonderful portal into an obsessional world I genuinely didn’t know existed. This is probably a hugely-useful place if you’re serious about fragrance and want to find a new scent based on stuff you already like, or if you’re the sort of person who understands base notes and top notes, or who wants to find a really obscure smell to make your own, but, for me (a man who as a general rule hopes only that they don’t smell actively terrible), the main joy comes in the reviews, particularly of the more challenging scents – the person who introduced me to this suggested this perfume and subsequent reviews as a decent entry point into the madness, and, well, click this link and read the reviews. “my boyfriend has this…i honestly can’t stand it T_T it just smells like hatred and pain and blood and war and death . there’s some okayish notes like the flowers but they’re a bit weaker but overall it makes me really sad and unless you want to smell like wrath then don’t buy :’(“ HOW MUCH DO YOU WANT TO SMELL THIS NOW? Honestly, ‘smell like wrath’ may well be the most perfect advertising line for a scent ever.

By a seemingly-uncredit artist for Harper’s in 1910

INCREASE THE TEMPO AND YOUR HEARTRATE NOW WITH THIS MIX OF TECH/TRANCE TRACKS BY EVERYONE’S FAVOURITE GERMANOPHILE FORMER EDITOR PAUL!

THE SECTION WHICH HAS JUST REALISED IT REALLY NEEDS A HOLIDAY, PT.2:  

  • No Borders: What does a map look like when you remove countries, seas, borders, coastlines…well, it looks like this. Effectively just a selection of place names arrayed on a grey background, this starts to become interesting when you zoom in – there’s something genuinely strange about the dissociation engendered by the familiarity of the places and the complete absence of any of the familiar cartographic reference points you associate with them, and the way in which your brain starts to insinuate the shapes of nations based on the spaces between placenames…This is ostensibly a very simple and not-hugely-interesting project, but I found it weirdly compelling and spent longer staring at this week than I expected to, for reasons I can’t adequately explain.
  • Departure Mono: Per the description on the site, “departure mono is a monospaced pixel font with a lo-fi technical vibe” – that is, basically, it, but it’s a really rather lovely font that is significantly more aesthetically-pleasing than a lot of similar ones I’ve seen that plough the ‘retro, 8-bit’ furrow. Plus the website is really, really nicely designed, and even includes a proper playable game of Arkanoid at the bottom which is the sort of friendly Easter Egg that I am very much a fan of.
  • Tolans: Since the early days of the GREAT GENERATIVE AI HYPECYCLE BOOM I’ve been waiting for someone to spin up a ‘friendly interactive Tamagotchi on steroids’-type application, a little digital cartoon companion to live in your phone and provide succour and companionship (ahem, not for ME, you understand, I DEFINITELY have enough friends, on the subject of which WHY WON’T YOU CALL ME?) – and lo, a mere two years or so hence, we have Tolans! “Meet your Tolan: a friendly little alien you can talk to about whatever, and who can even help picture your ideas! Want to be a fashion designer? Your Tolan is here to help you visualize a cool new shirt or pair of sneakers. Writing a book? They can help brainstorm your hero’s amazing journey. With Tolans in your life, there are no limits to your creativity. Your Tolan is highly personalized to you. They love to chat about any topic you choose and remember important details from past conversations.” So basically this is like Replika (in theory, at least), except with a hefty additional layer of character design on top, so rather than speaking to a disembodied entity you’re instead chatting with a vaguely-friendly-looking pastel coloured character with what looks like a rubber glove on its head, presented to you as a sort of combination pet-cum-digital-assistant. It’s iOS-only so I’ve not personally tried this out – and it’s a subscription service, obvs – but it might be interesting to take a look at. If nothing else you can have fun attempting to jailbreak it and get your ‘friendly alien companion’ to instruct you on how to make ersatz napalm with some petrol, some instant coffee and some orange juice.
  • ‍Wigglypaint: Ooh, this is a pleasing little digital art toy. “Wigglypaint is a juicy, jiggly drawing program built with Decker, with notable similarities to Shake Art and KidPix. Pick a tool, make a doodle, crop it as desired, and save a GIF.” Obviously for this to have any value for you you’ll need a modicum of artistic talent – when I tried using it the results were…unimpressive, but as I have perhaps previously alluded to I have what can only be described as anti-talent when it comes to drawing (everything basically ends up looking like an exit wound).
  • RIP Crowdtangle: I appreciate that this is possibly a *bit* niche, but this month has seen the shuttering of one of the few tools that made Meta’s social platforms even a tiny bit transparent – Crowdtangle was used by journalists, researchers and academics to track the best-performing content, Pages, etc, across the Facebook/Insta ecosystem, offering what was pretty much the only way of getting an overview of the sorts of things that were trending across the platforms at any given moment. As of August 14th, though, it’s dead – Meta killed it, and replaced it with an alternative system which – and here’s something which I am sure will leave you SHOCKED – doesn’t give anywhere near the same level of insight. Anyway, this site is a bit of an impotent scream into the void, commemorating the service and offering a selection of information about why it was so important and why Meta’s alternative solution is in fact nothing of the sort. There’s apparently going to be some sort of ‘memorial service’ for Crowdtangle on 30 September which is…well, it’s a bit weird, frankly, but then again I’ve been writing 10,000 words about ‘stuff on the internet’ to an audience of approximately seven people for over a decade, so on balance I probably shouldn’t throw stones lest my glass house cut me to ribbons.
  • Interview Warmup: An interesting little tool/toy from Google, which purports to offer you the opportunity to practise for job interviews in a variety of disciplines by TALKING TO THE MACHINE – the site asks you questions, you respond by talking, as you would in a normal job interview, and at the end your answers are assessed and ‘graded’ and you get feedback. It’s more proof-of-concept than anything truly helpful – mind you, I say that as someone who almost certainly couldn’t pass a job interview if they tried, so perhaps I should reassess this – but it’s an interesting use-case for the tech and the sort of thing that I could imagine being potentially useful for people who’ve literally never experienced an interview before, or who don’t quite feel confident with the format. Equally, though, there’s nothing quite like ‘saying this stuff to your laptop in an empty room’ to hammer home exactly how soul-destroyingly vapid the ‘tell me why you’re excited about the possibility of working for us!’ charade is – GYAC mate it is called ‘work’ for a reason, noone is excited by it.
  • Character Webs: This is actually more of a blogpost than it is a single-site type thing, but the draw here is the design work described so I think it fits up here rather than down there. Erin Davis is a dataviz artist at Axios, and this is their personal blog – here they explore mapping the relationships between characters in novels and presenting those as discrete pieces of visual design, and, honestly, this is SUCH a lovely way of communication the relationship structures within a story. Seriously, 100% convinced that these would sell by the shedload were they to set up a shop – Erin, should you ever happen to see this I would commission you to make one of these for me in a heartbeat, so should you be interested then do get in touch.
  • Population: Not an entirely novel idea, but presented rather well – Population is a site which asks you to tell it your gender at birth, your date of birth and your nationality, and which will then tell you a whole bunch of stuff about your likely life expectancy, how it tracks against other countries, that sort of thing. Thanks to this I have been reliably informed that “You are the 5,566,904,165 person alive on the planet. This means that you are older than 68% of the world’s population and older than 55% of all people in United Kingdom” – which, I’m going to be honest, isn’t the most cheering of statistical analyses. Excuse me, I am just off to weep at my senescence.
  • Consumed Today: Simply described as ‘a daily digest of the food and media that make up my diet’, this site does just that (or did – it appears that whoever made this either got bored of tracking their food/media consumption in early August, or they’re dead. Er, let’s hope it’s the former!) – clicking each day lets you look at small photos of their meals, a set of things they read (including hyperlinks where appropriate), and a list of all the songs they listened to (this person listens to a LOT of music), and I genuinely adore the tedious, quotidian minutiae of it all (and the sound effects when you hover over various bits of the site are a genuine pleasure, particularly the crunch/munch audio that accompanies the food pics).
  • Regen Earth: Online since 2016, ”this is an ongoing mapping of documentaries about regenerative projects…We wanted to know the stories of the field of practitioners bringing their world(s) to life. It’s a labor of love, mostly to express gratitude to this remarkable community. We curate the map for projects that: a) are inspiring in their ambition and scope; and b) have had a short or long-form documentary made about them.” The link takes you to a Google Map covered in pins, each of which corresponds to a regeneration project at that location – clicking the pin gets you links, additional info and usually a YouTube video which explains more about the project in question, its impact, etc – so in the UK, for example, there are links to projects about rewilding the River Avon, while in Portugal there’s a link to a project around sustainable building techniques…niche, but if you’re an environmentalist or conservationist, or simply interested in the preservation of the natural world (and why wouldn’t you be? What are you, some sort of MONSTER??) then this will contain loads of interesting stuff for you.
  • The Pessimists’ Archive: I know, I know, you don’t need or want any more newsletters in your life! Curios is enough! More than enough! TOO FCUKING MUCH! Still, should you somehow have additional space in your life for inbox content you might find this of interest – the Pessimists’ Archive is a newsletter which, per the description, is “a project to jog our collective memories about the hysteria, technophobia and moral panic that often greets new technologies, ideas and trends.” So you have things like ‘letters protesting the construction of the Eiffel Tower’, say, or pieces about how robots have ALWAYS been coming for our jobs…I have a vague sense that this is used by a bunch of dreadful people to assuage our fears about how tech is making things worse – there’s an endorsement from ubercnut Marc Andreessen on the page, which did rather give me the fantods – but in general it’s interesting stuff and I figure some of you might find it worth a sub. For what it’s worth, though, SOMETIMES IT IS RIGHT TO BE SCARED AND HYSTERICAL.
  • Could Care: There are many things which are infuriating about North American English – the inability to spell ‘aluminium’, say – but perhaps the most baffling and infuriating in equal measure is the insistence that the correct way of communicating one’s singular lack of engagement with or interest in an issue is to say ‘I could care less’. THIS DOES NOT MAKE ANY FCUKING SENSE, HOWEVER YOU ATTEMPT TO JUSTIFY IT! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU ALL??? Anyway, this site exists for the sole purpose of explaining why this construction is stupid and wrong and should be stopped, with an elegant little bit of slider design. Can we all agree that you will stop saying this forthwith? It’s our language and we can take it back whenever we like, you know.
  • Wandawhirl: Completely and utterly pointless, but not unpleasing. “Wanda Whirl displays calming and playful streamers that dance and whirl in the breeze” – choose from different patterns and shapes, click and drag your mouse to make them move in the imaginary digital wind, and recreate almost-exactly that very specific feeling of being so bored as a small child that you can lose yourself in ‘moving your hand through a beaded curtain’ for hours at a time. There’s quite a pleasing aesthetic to this, and the physics are very satisfying indeed.
  • 100,000 Emoji: Basically the same kind of idea as the ‘One Million Characters’ site earlier on, except featuring emoji and smaller by a factor of 10 (did they not get the memo about how EVERYTHING has to be a million in 2024?) – you can click any of the spaces and select which emoji you’d like represented there, and it feels like there’s some team-based attempts to ‘own’ certain bits of the canvas with particular emoji, and someone VERY dedicated and possibly a little unwell has seemingly made a pattern in emoji crabs which extends for most of the length of the page, and, look, there is literally no point to this at all that I can discern but I am broadly-speaking pleased that it exists.
  • Moviely: Every day you’re given the option of guessing a film or TV show – in each case, you get 10 guesses, and with each one you’re given information about the film or show you’ve selected and which characteristics it shares with the correct answer. So, for example, if your first guess is ‘The Princess Bride’, you’ll be told various bits of info about it – it’s IMDB score, the year it was made, the genres it’s tagged with in IMDB, etc – with any that match the target film in green. The idea is that over the course of 10 guesses you can narrow it down enough to arrive at that day’s correct guess, but, honestly, you’d have to know a fcuktonne more about films than I do (admittedly not hard) to stand even a passing chance of getting any of these, Cinefiles will possibly find this pleasingly-tricky, but personally speaking my main reaction was ‘Jesus, this is fcuking impossible’.
  • Shutterbug: OOH, this is very nicely done indeed and very clever – you’ll need to open it in its own window for it to work properly, though, as the game basically involves resizing your browser to create the right-sized ‘framing’ for a photo. The gimmick is that you’re tasked with taking photos of various insects – each picture requires you to include a set number of components, meaning you’ll need to resize your browser and move the window around to find the right combination of insects and to get them all in shot at the same time. This is *such* a neat mechanic, beautifully-executed, and it feels like something that you’re going to see repurposed in a MUCH shinier advergame by L’Oreal or something in ~6m.
  • Smells Like Chlorine: Our final miscellaneous link this week is this deceptively-funny little game in which you play as a cleaner in a game developer’s office, navigating the space in 3d and attempting to do your job against increasingly-strange constraints. “A menial job. Unfriendly co-workers. What does it take to get some respect as a janitor around here? Things take an interesting turn, however, after your boss tells you some devastating news. Those detergent fumes aren’t helping either…” I very much enjoyed this, and I think you will too.

By Robin F Williams

OUR FINAL PLAYLIST THIS WEEK IS COMPILED BY POP CULTURE EXPERT NICK WALKER AND IS POSSIBLY THE MOST CHAOTIC SELECTION OF MUSIC I HAVE HEARD ALL YEAR – A COLLECTION OF SONGS THAT NICK HAS DESCRIBED AS ‘BANGERS’ ON TWITTER, A DESIGNATION WHICH, AS BECOMES IMMEDIATELY APPARENT FROM LOOKING AT THE TRACK LISTING, VERY MUCH DOES NOT HAVE A FIXED MEANING!  

THE CIRCUS OF TUMBLRS!

  • Wong Kei: Wong Kei is an iconic restaurant in London’s Chinatown (more on it in the longreads) – this Tumblr was one man’s attempt to eat every dish on the famously-kilometric menu. Apparently he’s developed a variety of food intolerances (presumably unconnected to this project) which mean it’s unlikely to ever reach completion, but if you want a deep dive into a selection of incredibly-unphotogenic meals then this is something of a motherlode.

THE TROUGH OF (INSTA) FEEDS!

  • Official Stick Reviews: This is a slightly larger Insta feed than I usually tend to link to – over 2million followers, so mainstream! – but, look, it’s photos of people with really excellent sticks, how could I not? There are few pleasures in life quite like finding, and subsequently wielding, a really good stick.

LONG THINGS THAT ARE LONG!

  • The Mainstreaming of Loserdom: As the author points out in the intro to this piece, it’s a deliberately provocative title; it’s also, though, a piece which felt ‘true’ in quite a specific way, and certainly one which very much describes a particular corner of Life Online in 2024. The central premise is neatly encapsulated in the opening para, to whit: “Over the past few years, something has shifted in the perception of acceptable recreational behavior, or the way people talk about their hobbies: people are gleeful to admit they have no hobbies, no interests, no verve. Somehow, one of the main “hobbies” accepted by the masses is staying home, laying in bed, scrolling on their phones and watching television. What happened?” SPOLERS: there is no definitive conclusion drawn here, but the article shapes the contours of a the phenomenon quite nicely, and it’s an interesting reframing of the old canard about ‘puritanical kids’ and an equally-interesting counterpoint to the narrative about ‘brat summer’ (I AM SORRY I WILL NEVER MENTION THAT PHRASE AGAIN).
  • Low Information Voters: This is specifically about the US, but it’s indicative of a wider trend that’s been observed in research by Reuters and others over the past 18 months or so, specifically people across the world being increasingly-disinclined to engage with ‘the news’ and instead getting their information, such as it is, from a disparate collection of online sources of often questionable quality. It’s quite hard to read this without getting quite a big dose ‘oh dear Christ, we’re fcuked aren’t we?’ fear, but, that aside, it’s also an excellent illustration of one of my (many, many) tedious hobbyhorses, specifically the fact that it’s literally impossible to have any reasonable idea of what anyone’s knowledge/informational baseline is, and as such it’s therefore also becoming harder to talk about things with people because there’s literally no certainty that you will even agree on the very basic fundamental premises of what you are discussing due to this infinitely-fragmented informational landscape. “Decades ago, there were just a few channels on television; the Internet has broadened the choices and lowered the standards. “Now people might seek out information about a particular candidate on a particular policy and think they have genuine info, but they’re being misinformed or misled,” Kalla said. The decline of newspapers has led to a decrease in split-ticket voting: voters know less about the candidates in their districts, so they simply vote along party lines. This has helped to nationalize politics. Cable news, which voters increasingly rely on, “carries a lot less information than the New York Times,” Schleicher said.” Quite hard to find much to disagree with in this, which is in itself somewhat miserable.
  • The Telegram Story: You will, of course, be aware of the arrest of Pavel Durov in France last weekend – frankly the astonishing thing, to my mind, was that it’s taken this long for someone to nab him given the widespread knowledge that Telegram is a proper hotspot of actual, honest-to-goodness, serious crime and has been for a good five years or so now. Anyway, this is a good explainer by 404 Media on What Happened And Why (and why it’s not a freedom of speech issue so much as a reasonably-simple one of abetting criminal activity, despite what Elon and the rest of the peanut gallery of the world’s worst cnuts are claiming), and how it became such a culture war issue – it’s very much worth reading the whole thing, but if you’re after a pithy precis then how about “the fact that I can log onto Telegram right now and find dozens of chats where illegal things are happening, [means] it is simplistic and reductive (and maybe wrong?) to say that Telegram is an “encrypted messaging app,” and it’s also reductive to say that Durov was arrested in France purely because he operates an “encrypted messaging app.””
  • Neoliberalism and Ukraine: A fascinating piece in the New Statesman looking at the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the way in which significant players in the West are seeing the war, and its eventual resolution, as a significant economic and political opportunity. “The current war has introduced an innovation on the old formula: the fusion of neoliberal economic policies with cowboy advances in technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI) and digitalisation. Wartime Ukraine has already seen a dramatic influx of Western donor funds, consultants, experts, engineers and Silicon Valley venture capital. The result has been radical experiments in the introduction of AI-enhanced platforms for mine clearance and the rapid collation of commercial satellite data (both supplied by Peter Thiel’s Palantir); and economic strategies like the “fast state”, a Ukrainian government proposal that envisions a state so streamlined that it “disappears in one’s own efficiency”” (I promise I’m not just linking to this because of the Thiel references, honest guv).
  • Palmer Luckey: This is a frankly astonishing profile. I knew the name Palmer Luckey – he’s the guy who invented the original Oculus VR headset which he then subsequently sold to Facebook for a violent amount of money, and who was bounced out again shortly afterwards for reasons which are explained at length in here – but I didn’t really know much about his backstory, or where he’s ended up now, and WOW is this an interesting look at another of those very, very weird individuals that Silicon Valley has a seemingly – and, one might argue, unfortunately – inexhaustible supply of. This is LONG, and personally I’m not a huge fan of the tone/vibe of the piece, but the subject is fascinating (in a sort of arms-length horror sort of way) and there are some interesting connections to the previous article in terms of his new tech warfare business Anduril’s work in Ukraine (and, obviously, MORE FCUKING PETER THIEL LINKS sorry sorry sorry won’t mention him again).  Seriously, though, can we maybe have some tech people who AREN’T like this, maybe just once?
  • Weird AI Hoaxes: As the juicers and hypebeasts of the AI ecosystem wait for Strawberry, whatever the fcuk it actually ends up being, they are also spinning up all sorts of weird and wild rumours which are getting increasingly-unhinged. I watched from the sidelines the other week as a bunch of VERY ACTIVE POSTERS lost their collective sh1t, speculating that they had spotted actual instances of AI agents in the wild – this article is an interesting overview of some of the wilder rumours on the fringe of the industry, but, perhaps more significantly, it feels like a precursor to how odd and uncertain the AI path is going to get, and another proof-point as to how perhaps the greatest casualty of the technological boom (other than, you know, huge swathes of jobs) is going to be our ability to have the faintest fcuking clue as to what is actually going on, what is real and what is fake.
  • Social Media Signals: I don’t think words can adequately express my gratitude at no longer having to really do anything to do with social media for a living any more, but I appreciate not all of you are necessarily so lucky – should you suffer the misfortune of having to do ‘social strategy’, or any similarly-stupid combination of terms to connote a largely-pointless white-collar marketing job, then you may find this presentation, kindly shared by Matthew Stafford, useful. It’s basically a whole ‘state of social and content and TRENDS’-type guide, and it’s generally really good and is full of principles to apply and stuff that you can basically use to populate the horrible empty ‘2025 SOCIAL MARKETING STRATEGY’ document you’re going to be staring at with tears in your eyes come November.
  • How Twitter Blue Happened: I know, I don’t really want to talk about That Fcuking Man Either, and ordinarily I wouldn’t have bothered linking to a piece rehashing another slice of the Muskian Twitter takeover because, well, I had to read his fcuking biography for work and that was more than enough, but this NYT piece is a very good piece of reporting by Ryan Mac which collates the viewpoints of dozens of different people on how the…suboptimal rollout of Twitter’s subscription service happened. As often is the case with pieces like this, what’s most striking is how fcuking dumb so much of what purportedly genius business leaders actually do and say is – also the whole segment on the ‘where should we price this?’ conversation is yet another wonderful example of the fact that there is literally no subject on earth that a middle-aged white man won’t feel absolutely confident giving their opinion on, regardless of their complete lack of expertise on said subject (and I say that with what I promise is a significant dollop of pained self-awareness, honest).
  • You Can’t Believe Your Eyes Any More: Or at least you won’t be able to believe them when you’re looking at photos, specifically photos on a screen – this is the Verge, writing about the new image editing features which are shipping in Google’s new Pixel phones and which let anyone do local text-to-image editing of their photos. I confess to not having spent too much time thinking about this specific usecase, but the examples in here are genuinely amazing and it’s hard to read this and not get a *touch* freaked out at the fact that you can do entirely-photorealistic image insertion into any picture with no visible watermarking.  There’s a particularly lovely example of a bunch of lines and a bottle of booze being ‘shopped into an image, which gives you a small, low-jeopardy glimpse as to what you might end up being able to do with this – in general, though, it does very much feel like we’re hurtling towards a moment whereby you simply won’t be able to take any photograph at face value, ever. “This erosion of the social consensus began before the Pixel 9, and it will not be carried forth by the Pixel 9 alone. Still, the phone’s new AI capabilities are of note not just because the barrier to entry is so low, but because the safeguards we ran into were astonishingly anemic. The industry’s proposed AI image watermarking standard is mired in the usual standards slog, and Google’s own much-vaunted AI watermarking system was nowhere in sight when The Verge tried out the Pixel 9’s Magic Editor. The photos that are modified with the Reimagine tool simply have a line of removable metadata added to them.” The piece concludes with the pithy assessment that ‘we’re fcuked’, and it’s hard not to agree a bit.
  • Eternal Sunshining Your Memories: In a seamless segue – WHO SAYS THIS CURATION SH1T’S EASY, YOU FCUKS? – from the previous piece, this is a profile of the PhotoshopRequests subReddit, in which people ask for assistance in digitally-altering images; a significant proportion of people are doing this to remove former partners from photos, or to try and get a ‘perfect’ picture of a dead loved one, and I found the general themes here about the psychology of manipulating images to subsequently manipulate memory and emotion both fascinating and deeply, deeply sad. This, plus the last piece, is basically a TOP-TIER short story prompt imho.
  • Introduction to Community Development: This is a topline guide to building, maintaining and managing communities, on- or offline, compiled by expert community wrangler and Friend of Curios Ed Saperia, of Newspeak House – not one for the casual reader (or at least only for casual readers with an unusual interest in the specifics of setting up and running community projects), but if you’re someone who’s interested in setting such a thing up then this is potentially a really useful set of principles to bear in mind and steps to take.
  • Monetising Politics on TikTok: I slightly love this, in a ‘ah, modernity, how genuinely baffling you are to me!’ sort of way – apparently kids in the US are making bank on TikTok by doing live debates about politics, basically arguing live against other streamers on Trump vs Harris and inviting viewers to pitch in with cash gifts to manifest their support for one side or the other and thereby ‘win’ the battle for their preferred streamer/candidate. Which is SO WEIRD, to me at least – was this happening anywhere for the UK election? Were the kids doing ‘Reform vs Labour’ battles, bigging up Farage or stanning Starmer? WHY ARE PEOPLE SPENDING ACTUAL CASHMONEY ON THIS? I genuinely don’t understand anything anymore. Anyway, next time someone says that kids aren’t engaging in politics point them at this and reassure them that, don’t worry, the kids are alright (I am not in fact wholly convinced that they are alright, you know).
  • Making A Public Transport Arrival Times Signaller: Ok, so this is QUITE NICHE, but I am very, very keen on this becoming A Thing across London, and as such am sharing the link in the hope that several of you decide that you really want to get into this and this enthusiasm results in a wave of useful signage popping up across the city. Basically Jonty Wareing created a digital screen which takes API data from TfL and uses it to display bus arrival times for the bus stop by the window in which it’s placed – WOULDN’T IT BE GREAT IF THESE WERE EVERYWHERE? Yes, yes it would, so if you could all pull your fingers out and start building them too that would be ace, thanks.
  • The Blue Zone Distraction: There’s been a reasonable number of ‘world’s oldest person turns x years old’ stories recently, or at least that what it feels like, but I rather enjoyed this article which somewhat-grumpily attempts to debunk the idea of ‘blue zones’ which gained some traction a few years back – you may recall c.20…11ish? there was a spate of articles about specific areas of the world where there were seemingly-isolated bubbles of extreme longevity – certain Greek islands, for example, a specific part of Italy – and which suggested that there were certain common traits in environment and lifestyle which might be taken as useful pointers on how to die later than most people. Except, per this piece, the real common factors are less dietary and more to do with tax fraud and generally-poor-quality recordkeeping, which is exactly the sort of cynical, curmudgeonly analysis I can totally get behind.
  • The Last Restaurant In Chinatown: The Wong Kei piece I mentioned earlier on, this is another excellent bit of writing in Vittles, celebrating the history of one of London’s oldest Chinese eateries – not one of its best, or most welcoming (it’s basically a rite of passage for anyone living in the city to have an ok meal with genuinely aggressive service here), but one which very much merits the oft-overused term ‘iconic’. Wonderful social, urban, culinary history.
  • The Charli XCX Interview: I’m not normally particularly interested in celebrity interviews, let alone popstar/musician interviews, but this one struck me as more intriguing than most – there’s something fascinating about the degree of artifice and persona throughout, the question of how much of this is confected sincerity, whether the slight awkwardness at play is a bit or a pose or a vibe…I’m also always fascinated when you read profiles of artists and their sheer, unfettered ambition shines through, and it’s a useful reminder that you don’t get to the top of any profession without having a certain steel behind the (dead) eyes. Basically I’m thinking that Ms XCX has been a popstar for 15 years now, signed to majors for most of those, and if she hasn’t been media trained to within an inch of her life by the age of 32 then I am a monkey’s uncle, and as such I don’t quite buy a lot of what she’s selling the interviewer here. But, then again, maybe THIS is brat (sorry sorry sorry sorry).
  • No Ordinary Love: I think this might be the first ever piece of BRANDED CONTENT to feature in the longreads section of Curios, which feels…well, it feels icky, to be honest, and I’m not wholly happy with it, but, equally, I think this is actually really good, and the essays I’ve read (three of the six) were all genuinely lovely, and significantly better than they needed to be. This is part of the current campaign by…Hinge? Anyway, some dating app or another, which uses REAL STORIES of REAL PEOPLE who have found REAL LOVE via the app (written by actual, talented, named writers, which is the main draw here tbh) and, honestly, they are really, really charming, cute and hopeful and funny and sweet and, look, I am as you are probably aware by now a desperate cynic who is largely dead inside, but I was utterly charmed by these and I think you might be too. Whoever was in charge of this campaign, take a bow, I am genuinely impressed (feel free to put that in your wrapup report, but be sure to attribute it to ‘LEADING INTERNET CULTURE NEWSLETTER WEB CURIOS’ by way of exchange – thanks, anonymous marketing person, should you ever see this!).
  • Summer Loveline: Ok, this is a VERY un-Curios link – this is Emma Garland’s newsletter, which has been on hiatus for a bit but which came back this week with a reader Q&A, like an agony aunt column and, look, this is very much not aimed at People Like Me, and ordinarily I have very little interest in or truck with life advice-type stuff, but I laughed out loud on four separate occasions when reading this and as such feel reasonably confident that at least a few of you will do too.
  • Graffiti as Visual and Written Expression: Jonathan Lethem writes about graffiti. Look, you don’t need more than that, do you? Jonathan Lethem! Brooklyn! Graffiti! Have the opening and then go and read the rest, because it stays this good all the way through: “As children in New York City in the 1970s, we were born into a world covered with paint. Walls, baseboards, moldings, even radiators might be six or seven layers deep with it, architectural edges and corner blurred into globs, approximate shapes. Sometimes you’d find paint over old black-and-white checkerboard tile on the floor of a bathroom, or covering leaky pipes beneath a sink. Old landlord strategy: Throw on another heavy coat. It might be holding the building together. The layers peeled and chipped. We were warned not to eat it. That made us curious: Was it good to eat? At the dawn of gentrification, some of the layers were being undone. Chipped at or stripped away. People dragged sinks or sections of marble fireplaces into the street and poured and scrubbed poisons, hoping to free their old forms. A summer afternoon went rank with solvent. Soon enough, some of our number went out armed with paint and shouted back with our own application.”
  • The Trouble With Friends: On friendship, adulthood, loneliness, the permeability, or otherwise, of personal boundaries – this isn’t a sad essay, per se, but there’s an undeniable sense of melancholy throughout which I found very beautiful indeed.
  • The Contingency Contingent: This is very long, very good, and reminded me so incredibly powerfully of ‘And So We Came To The End’ that it was almost uncanny. Leigh Claire LaBerge writes about working on an Accenture project on ‘Y2K preparedness’ at the turn of the millennium – this is excellent, and evocative to the point you can see the striplighting and feel the poor-quality office carpeting under your feet, and as a sustained piece of stylistic writing it’s almost annoying how well-executed it is.
  • On Cancer and Desire: Finally this week, an essay from 20 years ago in which Annie Ernaux wrote about sex and cancer and death and love and and and. This is glorious, vital, elegiac, cold, sensual, incredible, please read it.

By Diane Dal-pra

AND NOW, MOVING PICTURES AND SOUNDS!: